Episode 48: Fighting for Freedom with Sen. Ron Johnson

to try to control me. They have censored very similar to what we see in communist countries like China, because what China understands is if you control the flow of information, if you control what people read, see and hear, you control the population. And they've tried to silence anyone who dares to ask questions in America, people like me. They've smeared us as anti vaxers just because we have questions about a vaccine that was produced in record time. Think

about that. These are people who have denied Americans early treatment. Say things like I ever met in even mono cloni antibodies. The FDAY recently pulled emergency youth authorization for some monoclono antibodies in the country. Their policies have caused devastation, which they don't seem to care about. People have lost their jobs, they've lost their livelihoods, and and and a lot of instances they've lost their lives through overdoses, delayed care, and suicide.

This man, who I'm going to have on the show this week, he has been a fighter this entire time, a fighter for truth and liberty in America. He has stood up to the group think. He has stood up to this s mere merchants on the left. And what he's done is he's advocated for early treatment. He's been doing it from the beginning. He's highlighted vaccine injuries, which you know, you know, no one wants to talk about that. And he's given a voice to world renowned doctors and

medical experts who dare question the group think. This man is Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and he joins me this week on The Truth with Lisa Booth. I promised you, guys, you don't want to miss this, stay tuned. So the last time I had this guest on, he was trying to decide if he was going to run for re election. Fortunately he is and we are all lucky for it. Senator Ron Johnson, thank you so much for for taking

time for the show. I really appreciate the opportunity. You know, so, sir, as I mentioned, you know last time you were on you're sort of trying to figure out, you know, what does the future look like? Am I gonna run for re election? You have decided to which we are all thankful for and grateful for. You know what what went into that decision, Well, many factors. I think most people recognized. I really would have preferred, you know, serving out the

second term and and going home. But when you take a look at the current landscape, you know, we're not around and I told people I intended to serve a second term and go home. America. I didn't feel like this. We weren't anywhere near this divided, and it really does seem like this nation's coming apart. And you know, I

realized I'm in a position to help improve things. I've never walked away from problems in the past, and in the end, when you when you saw the Democrats, for example, just the week before we went on recess, pushing to change the Senate um, I don't think people realize how significant that was what they were attempting to do. This.

The Senate was uniquely designed by our founders. Two require if you're going to make big changes, you know, if you're gonna try and transform this nation, you need the public behind you. You need it to be done on a bipartisan basis, not a partisan basis. And of course what Demick strit Crafts tried to do with with not even a real majority, I mean they got fifty, we

have fifty. Did they break the tie with? Uh? The Vice President that they were trying to fundamentally transform the Senate so that they could fundamentally transform this nation, that they have no mandate to do this, and so that that was also part of is Even though thirty two Democrats five years ago, when Republicans were in total control, they were concerned about us destroying the silibusters so we could ram through our partisan bills. Okay, that they were

a letter imploring us not to do that. Now we we weren't going to do that. I don't think one Republican sentator back then was favoring getting rid of the filibuster. I know President Trump tried to put pressure on us, but we understood the vital role of the Senate plays that kind of slowing things down. Okay, Uh, twenty seven of those same Democratic senators are still in the in the Senate. One is the Vice president and they completely

I mean talk about gro teste hypocrisy. And now all of a sudden, them, all of them except probably Joe Manchin. I don't think Cinema signed that. I think Joe Manson probably did so the rest of them all we're happy to limitate filibuster when it was advantageous for them for their short, short term power. But of course they wanted to do it to change to nationalize our election law, hoping that they could turn America into one party state. That that was their goal. That's why this was so

important to them. And again I just say, God bless Joe Manson Careson Cinema for holding strong it's it's it's it's vile the way Democrats are treating members of their own party. Well, and what's scary about it, sir? As you mentioned, like feeling like this country is coming apart, and I share that sentiment. And so you've got Democrats, as you pointed out, trying to nationalize elections to make it eat, to basically just keep Democrats in power and perpetuity.

At the same time where we are seeing just like agregious abuse from the government in denying people liberty denying people. You can't even go into a restaurant in New York City if you're unvaccinated. So these two things are aligning at the exact same time, and it paints a really scary picture of the kind of vision that Democrats have for America. I'm hoping Americans recognized that we're all frauds in a pot of water, and it's nearing boiling right now.

Uh now. Fortunately, I think more and more Americans are realizing that water is almost coming up to the boil and they're they're starting to hop out of the pot um. But our freemes are being relentlessly taken away from us. That's what democratic governance does. I mean, when you grow the federal government, you naturally start taking away freedoms. It's it's a direct proportion. The more government grows, the more demands of your hard earned labors, you know, the higher

taxes are. Taxes are absolutely direct correlation with freedom. But when when the government can take your money, they take your freedom. And so hopefully Americans are recognizing how during the pandemic, one of the one of the results, in addition the tragedy of all the deaths, um has been a loss of for example, free speech, a loss of many other freedoms. And but again just like that, you know frog and in the in the pot of water. Uh, you know, we we we were concerned about COVID so

early on we knew no nothing about it. It was very scary. But as we learned, uh, we should have adapted. But people in power utilize the pandemic to entrench their power. I I guess they enjoyed controlling people's lives and they don't want to let go of it, so they created the state of fear to maintain that control over our lives. And I think a lot of people just didn't really recognize that they were looking for any court in a storm.

They were afraid of COVID, and they would listen to the siren song of for example, the faucis the world thing I hear, I've got the miracle vaccine. It'll, it'll, it'll relieve us of all this fear. You can all rest easy. Well, that didn't happen, did it? Well? And I think too, I mean Americans. I don't know if the differences between the two parties have ever been clear.

Because you can just look at the states, right, you can look at for instance, everyone's looking at the same data during COVID, right that all the governors are seeing the same thing. They're they're all looking at the same data. And yet you had states like Florida with Governor Ronda Santa's reopen, open for business, not masking kids, allowing kids to go back to school, you know, so not not abusing children like we're seeing in states like New York.

And then you have New York and what in New York do to continue to crush businesses, continue to control people's lives, continue to abuse emergency orders. And so I don't know if there's ever been a time, at least in my lifetime where the difference between the two parties has just been so stark and so on display. Yeah. What's interesting about that too, is you know the fallocies the world claimed, you know, Folly claims he's science and

the Democrats and well, we're following science. These other heretics are spreading this information. I think probably the most egregious, the most unforgivable piece of information that that the Democrats that I call them the COVID gods, the fuscis of the world, the legacy media, the big tech giants has

suppressed all this information. The biggest piece of information that they refused to acknowledge is the AIGE stratification of the risk from of of severe consequences from COVID plus core morbidities. But the CDC his own data in terms of infection cartality rates shows that if you were under seventeen, twenty out of a million, of you, of of the population

would die from COVID twenty out of a million. Uh, if you're over I think sixty five is how they break it down, ninety thousand out of a million would die from COVID. So you know, to me, that's pretty obvious that there's a real difference between the ages, and so our approach should have changed. Remember how Sweden was vilified. That's not caring enough. All their school children went to school, they didn't wear masks. One million school children, not one

of them died from COVID. The teachers who were deemed essential they had to work. They actually experienced a lower infectivity rate than the rest of the Sweden society. And the children just weren't a vector for spreading this disease. We knew that very early on. We knew this age stratification very early on from reports on Italy and the Princess Cruz. Yet we didn't factor and and it was

a one size fits all destructive response to COVID. And I guess my final point here is you can't take a look at eight hundred thousand American deaths, the human told, the economic devastation, the harm to our children, the loss of a year at least of learning that, the social implications of having to wear a masks that you know, you can't look at our response and call it successful. You have to say it was a miserable failure. Well,

and it's monstrous what's happening to children? I mean, I saw a picture the other day on Twitter of Governor hokel in New York and she's not wearing a mask, and children in front of her are wearing a mask. And it's to your point. You know, children are at extremely little risk from COVID, right, like the flu is

a bigger risk to them than COVID. Yet in places like l A there, you know, in California they're trying to dictate where kids have to be vaccinated from COVID to be able to go to schools, they're still being forced to wear masks and parts of the country. It's we've seen I think it's among girls, increase in attempted suicide rates. I mean, like what we are doing to children. I don't know how to describe it any other way. Besides saying it's abuse, I would call it monstrous. Um,

it's it's indefensible. Uh. It's again denying reality, it's denying the science. It's forcing a one size fits all response to COVID on everybody. And you have to ask, there's so much that it doesn't make sense about a response to COVID. Almost all of it makes no sense. You have to ask, you your yourself, why why is this here? Why? Why haven't we robustly explored and recommended early treatment every

other disease we we try and deal with. It's always about early detection allows for early treatment produce a better result. Let me take over at cancer. You want to detect for early so you can cure it. You don't want to You don't want to get a cancer diagnosis when you're already stage four, and yet that that in effect is any age guideline to deal with COVID. You know, we spent tens of millions dollars on testing. And you know once once the horses out of the barn, once

contact tracing was useless. Why because our guideline says, if you test pause for COVID, do nothing, go home, isolate yourself, be afraid. We added Monoculta antibodies, which you know the variants are are making less effective. Try and get Monoquona antibodies. I know some people have been saved by them, you know, recommend their use where you can find them. But that's really about that entail and all. And then certainly what we found in our panel on Monday, uh, hospital care

hasn't advanced in two years. Um, it's no. This has been a travesty. What has happened to our medical establishment, medical journals, the corruption of our health care agents these I would say, the capture by them by big pharma. It's becoming glaringly obvious. COVID the pandemic has exposed so much corruption, so many problems in a healthcare system that caught. Honestly,

the people in charge are ignoring well. And you had mentioned you held a roundtable discussion called the COVID nineteen a second opinion panel or a second opinion, and you had a panel with a lot of esteemed medical and uh, you know, individuals in the science community as well. I think it has over you know, almost eight hundred thousand views already. Uh, everyone can go find it on Rumble. I mean, you've really been out there and pushing for

things like early treatment. And I can't, for the life of me understand why we would not be pushing early treatment. Because the thing is, even if you look at I ever met, then like it's safe, right, Like, as long as you're taking like you know, dosages that are meant for your body way and you know you as an individual, it's safe. And so it's like why why why do they care? If if people want to try iver mected and they're not going to have a negative adverse reaction,

why not let them? I just I don't. I can't for the life of me. It is to your point, it really raises much deeper questions about what's actually going on here, because I cannot think of why we would be denying people potentially life saving care. But yet it's forcing everyone, Oh, but just go get the vaccine. It's it's just it really does raise the question. It really does make it seem like it's all about the money, right, like it's all about Visor, it's all about Maderna, and

it's all about lighting their pockets. Yeah, they made me more cute as well. But let me just give you a listeners. The data that I get censored for when I when I put my little chart together, twenty years experience for I met on the fires, the FDA adverse events, the system for drugs on average fifteen gas reportage in association with ivermecting fifteen. I drop your clarkin about sixty nine. The season of food vaccine on average, about seventy seven

deaths per year. We have already exceeded twenty two thousand deaths of the COVID vaccine. And I realized theyres does not prove causation. But thirty of those deaths occurred on day zero one or two following vaccination. It certainly should raise concerns. You know, I'm concerned about it. I raised this issue with Frances Collins. When I think death around three thousand back in uh you know, February March two thousand, twenty one. And you know what is responsible to me?

That's Santor. We've we've linked about six deaths. You know, these were young women of childbearing age. You know, with clotting the Johnson Johnson vaccine, we've linked six deaths, but otherwise, you know, SANDERD people die. Yeah, I got that, Dr Collins, but you know, I'm a little concerned about this. But they've they've been collectively unconcerned because they've got the single

minded approach vaccine, vaccine, vaccine. So did they deny early treatment because it is true that it's hard to get an emergenc use authorization for an experimental vaccine when you have effected there these is that what this is about. But one of one of the charts that the Dr Corey's group, a percentage shows, uh, you know all the studies by all these drugs that have been looked at, and there's there's literally a cornucopia of drugs, uh cheap

generic repurpose drugs to show us that efficacy. But but they also put the the the expensive ones that are recommended in the circle. The only drugs that the helping seas are recommending are the expensive patent of drugs. And we started about five hundred bucks to pop going up to our industrious over three thousand um. Is that what's going on here? It's It's kind of hard to come up with another explanation, but but it to me, it shows corruption. It shows something that's really wrong. It shows

something that has to be fixed. But as long as the people in charge um can deny the reality and get away with it, that that's part of the problem here, Lisa. Uh. The people that have been what I consider wrong, we'll never admit the wrong. They can't afford to be proven wrong. The body count is so high, and they have the power because we're talking about federal health caage agencies, we're talking about the legacy medium media. We're talking about the

detect giants to social media. These are all people that is suppressed in censored early treatment. If it's proven that these drugs work and save lives, the consequences for those individuals will be severe. So they have the power that they can't be proven wrong. They have the power to make it very difficult to prove them wrong, So they

will continue to censor people like me. They will continue to vilify and ridicule people like me and these eminently qualified doctors who have paid such a huge price professionally, reputationally. What one of the doctors, Dr Paul Merrick, He has the fl c c C group. The doctor is associated with no Emily Qualified. He told the story of how he his right to treat patients with off label prescription off label drugs. You know doctors had that right. Um it was taken away from him and he from him.

And he describes how he still has seven COVID patients that now he couldn't treat, and all you could do is sit by and watch those seven patients die. Could could intervene, could couldn't use things that he believed worked that they were probably begging him to use, as I've heard countless times families begging hospitals just try it. What do you come on? Come on, twenty two thousand deaths of vaccines, You recommend those, but I remect him fifteen You won't at least try it. You're telling me my

loved ones there's no hope they're gonna die. And Mr Last rites and you won't let me use I remect her hydroxy corkland or vitahim and senor vit him and you won't let me. Why not? Why not? It's outrageous? And I really hope your listeners will will listen to the whole five hour event. We also have a thirty eight minute edited condensed version, but you'll get a sense of the frustration of these doctors who have had the

courage and compassion to treat patients. They know it works, so they sit back and they know that hundreds of thousands of people had needlessly died, and they for all their efforts, it's still happening. It's still occurring. So you'll see the frustration come out. But you'll also see how eminently qualified they are, how unbelievably reasonable they are. And for me, you know, I've always been told serious illness

get a second, maybe even a third opinion. I'm gonna go and get a second opinion, not from somebody I re tower who doesn't treat patients that don't have the courage to expose themselves disease. I'm gonna go to those doctors, those nurses that have the courage and compassion to actually treat illness and ask who I put on that handle on Monday. And yeah, Americans are interested in this because you know we have what I checked this morning, almost

a million people have viewed the five hour video. Almost a million people in a couple of days. Eight million people viewed Dr Corey's testimony back in December of two thousand twenty on I re met in early treatment eight million people before YouTube pulled it, censored it. They weren't allowed You're not allowed to see that. Um this, this is this is outrageous. This is a travesty. What's happened? And one thing that really disturbs me, and everyone should

go watch this. I saw it on Rumble, but I think I saw this shorter version was on YouTube as well. But Rumble is probably your safest pet because you know

who knows what YouTube is gonna do. But the one thing that has really disturbed me about the past couple of years is the silencing of anyone who has questions right to your point, that you're labeled misinformation, you're smeared with labels like anti vax or all these different things, and it's it's really no different than what communists in places like China do, because what China understands is if you control what people read, see and here, you control

the population, right, if you control the narrative, you control the population. And that's what we've seen from our leaders on the left here in America as well as the media as well as big tech of shutting down anyone who asks questions because they don't want an informed public,

they want a compliant public. And so what they do is, you know, if you if you questioned about the origins of the coronavirus, which you basically have to be an idiot to not think it came from the lab, but you know, so if you raise that question, you're smeared. If you if you have questions about a vaccine that is the fastest vaccine ever created, you're labeled as an anti vax or if you don't want to get a

vaccine that you did not need your late. But point bang is that the effort to try to control the narrative is scary to me. What we have seen over the past two years concern every American just after the tragic death that didn't have to occur. I think the greatest casualty of the pandemic this freedom of speech. And you know, and I think your listeners realized that the reason our founders put freedom of speeches the first guaranteed

right is every other freedom flows from that. If you can control speech, you can control people, you can take away their freedom. And so that is then a real casualty of the pandemic, and Americans need to be concerned. We need to fight back. I first ran for the United States Senate, you know, basically to fight for one thing, freedom And I've said this has been a rallying cry for eleven years and still is. No. This is a

fight for freedom. It's it's not somebody else's fight, It's our fight, and it's a fight we we must win. We have to win. People have to understand the stakes. We are at a hinge point in history. People need to understand, is Mark Livian writing his book, We need to awaken to the urgency of this moment. We're in the fight of our lifetime. I really believe this with every five fiber of my body. It's why I've been

so vocal throughout COVID. It's why I put myself out there by saying I wasn't going to get the vaccine, even though though I knew, I took take bullets doing it. But we're in the fight of our lifetime for freedom and liberty, which is why it's so important to have senators like you standing up and you know, unafraid about the smearing that takes place, the you know, being called names the attacks because we do have to get this information out there. We should. It's America. We're allowed to

have questions and I'm sorry. We're allowed to have questions about a vaccine that is the fastest ever created. I'm sorry. Like, yeah, if something is developed that quickly, there might be potential like issues with it. Right, and if they previously told us you're not gonna get COVID, you're not going to spread COVID if you get it, that didn't turn out to be true. So we're allowed to have questions about it.

Is healthy to raise questions and ask questions about m R and A is newly available to the public, that's what's on the CDC's website and talking about it um or day. We are allowed to have questions about it. It is insane to me that we are in a place in society in America we're asking questions. Is dangerous. So insane is the right word. You know, we should all admit there's so much we still don't know about

the coronavirus, about COVID disease, about code the vaccine. So with that reality, you would certainly recommend exercising cautions as you proceed, right, um, certainly when when you're looking at an experimental vaccine, and and the truth is and and by the way, nobody's challenged me on this statement, nobody, nobody can tell you about the long term safety implications of the vaccine. Nobody can because we don't know the

long term We haven't let it play out. We unblinded the Cebo group, so so we really don't even have a good idea based on the actual trials because the Cebol group no longer exists. Okay, so we should have exercised caution. We should have based the administration of the vaccine. By the way, I'm the champion Right to Try, which allows people the freedom to choose whether they want to take an experimental drug before it's fully up to approved. I'm a champion of that bill, so I support this.

But we should have made it available only based on medical necessity. And that's where you go to that aid stratification. Certainly the elderly not you know, I'm elderly. I'm over sixty six, but I had COVID, so I chose not to get the vaccine. My wife hasn't got COVID. She's also chosen not to get that The vaccine, that's her choice. But she's doing all the other things, zinc, vitamin C.

You know, she's prepared. She's gargling. You know, I was to two hours of national ridicue for basic of telling the truth. Gargling with these you know anti You know, these these compounds that can kill the virus, that can reduce by replication before he gets into your lungs, has proven effective, It works. Why not try? What's what's the worst that can happen? You have fresher breath. But we

haven't been allowed to explore these things. Um, just just thinking how many deaths might have been prevented if we would have actually been telling people, you know that there there are nasal sprays, there are gargles that can help prevent further spreads. It doesn't cure it, it's not gonna cure it, but it can it can help prevent more serious disease. Why haven't we talked about that? You know Dr Fauci to vitamin D himself. Why haven't Why haven't

our health agencies promoted vitamin D? Uh? The most people of serious cases of vitamin D with COVID are vitamin D efficient, So why haven't we talked about that it hasn't been allowed because there's been one approach has been a vaccine. And again the insanity of that, uh certainly gives gives me scratching my head, going what's what's going on here? Also, fresh breath is just a public service

to your neighbor, you know, sir. One thing I've I've been recently, you know, thinking about, is like, so m erna has obviously been studied. You know, we've been looking at m RNA and potentially using it in vaccines. But did big Pharma use the fog of a war and a time of crisis to get m r and A vaccines to the market on this scale? Yeah? Again, I I don't know. I don't have all the answers here.

I just have suspicions and you know, I just know, you know, things that we should have done that we did. And again I keep going back to early treatment because I really the reason I was so in favor of that, so promoting it again, totally agnostic in terms of the drugs can be used. That's up to doctors, um. But the reason it was I thought we I knew the

vaccine was gonna take time to develop. I mean It was a big supporter of Operation Warp speed Um, and I'm a big support of people having the choice to avail themselves other vaccine. But I thought we might have if they were effect enough therapies, we could have nipped this pandemic in the bud right off the you know, before it really devastated so many people. But that wasn't allowed.

I mean the censorship started almost immediately. I was listening to these doctors out of New York, you know, in the the belly of the Beast, I mean, the people that had the courage, and they were posting videos and talking about their theory the case. Now I'm not saying all those videos were right, but it was spreading information, not misinformation, not information. These are people treating patients. They were observing things that this wasn't standard, you know, problems

with with lues. This was something different, and they're talking about it. But those those videos are being pulled. Remember a couple of doctors in California can't remember their names. They were talking about how they were successfully treating patients. That video was pulled. Why, I mean, what we should have done in the midst of a pandemic where there's

so much we didn't know. We should have allowed doctors who had the courage to practice medicine, let them use are awfully with prescription rights, and then share the information what's working what's not working out. I've then privileged to be part of these email groups of doctors, global doctors, and I don't chime in very often, but I'm just looking at all the studies they're sharing. I'm I'm listening to them discuss what's happening. I'm watching them reach out

to each other. Here, here's a patient I have. You know, this is this is a different situation. What would you recommend in this case? That's what should have been allowed, but it wasn't allowed. I mean, classic example, the vaccine injured that I gave a for him to in June, and of course I was just attacked in you know front page bub the fold my picture, the headlines so

fund really dangerous. But that group, they had Facebook groups two thousand people, but when they presented on the Monday morning, within days their group reached five thousand. When people heard I'm not the only one suffering this way, you know what Facebook did with those groups. By the way, we're used to council people that were suicidal. Some of these adverasy events, these inner vibrations and neurological problems so severe people are committing suicide. So these groups are being used

to counsel and support those suicide and suicidal individuals. So what Facebook did you know? Uh, compassionless Facebook. They dismantled those Facebook groups and suicide suicidal individuals lost contact with the people that are providing them emotional support banks Facebook.

And the reason I asked the m R and A question was just because now there's all these articles about oh, m R and A could solve this, could do this, and it seems to have opened additional revenue streams that they didn't have prior to COVID to be able to get the mr Anda vaccines to market and then open up, you know, all the different doors to make additional money. But to your point, they deserve a voice, right it.

We know that there are adverse reactions with any vaccine, and then you have again something that was very rapidly produced that we we should be giving them a voice. This is we should be able to have conversations about all of these things. And it's just the desire to

control the narrative is so disturbing to me. And then even beyond that, I didn't really understand this as clearly, but I've learned through my conversations with people about just how much control someone like Dr Fauci in the n I n I H has on the science community, right the fact that basically he controls the funding, he controls the grants, and so people are really afraid to sort of take him on and challenge him because of that, And so I find that to be disturbing as well.

When it comes to the treatment of disease, doctors and trains spent years obtaining their train They should be at the top of the the decision making process. I mean they put their patients rights first, Okay, um, our federal

health agencies should just operating the supportive role. You know, FDA should be concerned about drug safety, you know, the CDC should be talking about you know, they should be gathering data, which of course they haven't done, but they should be providing data, you know, looking at safety signals, looking at the outbreaks, providing advice, you know, and and age kind of uh is over much of that, UM, but their supportive role. They shouldn't be dictated doctors, but

you're exactly right. You know, Fauci has gotten himself in that position. He's been their way too long. I don't know. I've heard a hundred billion dollars worth of grants. So hospitals are research institutions. They're they're not going to buck what Faucci tells them to do, and that is corrupted I think the practice of medicine. You also have fewer

independent doctors are all part of hospital associations, hospitals. You know, they probably make a fair amount of money offer ram destin here versus a course of ira emectin or hydroxic Clarkland or budesinine. You know, there's probably a fair amount of profit in remdestin here. Uh, there's there. Actually, I saw a pretty interesting video of somebody's kind of researching how much doctors are getting from pastons to die off of ventilators, and it's in the hundreds of thousands of dollars.

I mean, you know how those hospital bills can wrap up here. Um So again, there are financial incentives for treating people the way we're treating there. There's there's no financial incentive for early treatment using cheap cannered drugs that literally cost you pennies per per dose to produce, and so we've completely completely corrupted. You know that everything is in the favor of the big farming. We've killed the playing field. So you know, when Fauci demands random control trials, well,

who can afford that? I mean, generic drug companies can't afford to run randomized control trials on a generic drug that they bare they just meet Kenny's a tablet on But certainly drug companies can when then they turn around and sell a molded pier are for seven hundred bucks of dolls, which by the way, moment period it's one. It's one of and I hope it works. Okay, I hope Paxtel did works. Moldent Pere though barely got by the safety advisory or the advisory paddle on to vote

of thirteen to ten. There were serious concerns raised on molden peer beer, but whoop ran that one through and got that approved right away. It's a big farmer drugs seven hard bunch of dolls, whereas you know, and I just still kind of studying iver met and which by the way, I would say on the record, I do not whatever whatever n I comes up with their study I don't trust. I won't trust the results on ibra metal unless it's positive, you know that'll then I'll seriously

take a look at it. But if it comes back negative, I'll be looking very carefully hopefully a lot of other researchers were very carefully how that trial was done. And we've seen what Dr fout does to people who try to push back or counter the narratives that he's driving. And when we saw Dr Fauci and doctor Francis Collins clued against people like the Great Barrington signers like Dr j Baticharia trying to smear his name because he dared to oppose the failed lockdowns that has caused so much

harm in this country. What really infuriates me is now you have like the CDC, public health officials, the media or like CNN or whatever, just casually dropping these truth bombs like, oh yeah, cloth masks don't work. There's a difference between with COVID from COVID. Maybe lockdowns don't work, the vaccines don't stop to the spread all things that

you got smeared for saying previously. But there's just such a callous nature to it, because all of these things, all of these policies have caused people so much harm. Oh yeah, again, they'll never admit theyre wrong, so they're just gonna change their narratives. I you know, and they maybe didn't say the exact of these words, but certainly the vaccine came out effects efficacy. Everybody took that to mean that, well, if I get vaccinated, I've got a

chance of not getting the disease. Well, once they found out, well that's not happening. You know, the eck of efficacy is waning. And you know, now with omicron um there's actually evidence of negative efficacy with the vaccination and boosters that type of thing. Not now, the narratives switched to or reduces the severity the disease. Um, okay, when you consider that with younger people people survived covid. Uh, I

had COVID, I have the anabtes for it. I was asymptomatic, So my own natural immune system reduced the severity disease the point where I didn't even know I had the disease out then I was taking precautionary tests and found out I got COVID. Right now. Um, so again again, show me the data on that. But my point is they will just switch their narrative. And because the media is complicit in this, the big tech is complicit in it,

they'll buy it. So they'll make sure that the public buys the change narrative, the corrected narrative, the bias looklient and sinker. So there's all we never really you know, like touch when I call him out for what he did with AIDS, where he did pretty much the same thing, he denied the use of back term for two years um and he also denied the fact that he literally scared that you know, a lot out of the American public saying that you might be able to catch this

through close casual contact. Two months later you say, well, it's preposterous that anybody would say as could be spread with close personal contact as opposed to you know, uh, the way we know it's it's spread. He just denied reality just two months later, bold faced, and the press doesn't call him on it. And that's what's gonna happen here with the with COVID. All as wrong as these people have been in so many issues, they'll never admit it then ever get called on it, then it would

be held accountable. Is there any way to hold out you accountable well with the truth. Um, you know we we you know, four thousand of his emails were provided under foy Uh, heavily redacted. Congress is not it's not such at those same redactions. So we immediately, by the way, we were asking for this information and we just couldn't get it. The courts enforced it. So we've asked for those emails now that we will exist and they were

quite honestly incriminating enough even with redactions. We've asked those emails unredacted. Um, we're getting them in dribs and drafts. We can go in in camera to review these things fifty pages at a time. We're uncovering things that there's a fuller story to tell you. Before we tell that story, I want to have the full story. But yeah, well, we're gonna continue to investigate this. But these agencies are so opaque. Uh. They realized that Condress doesn't really have

enforcement power, so they pretty well blow us off. So cirass oversight capability has been dramatically reduced and the only the only thing that forces disclosure nowadays is public pressure, which is why I'm very transparent in my oversight. We we make all my letters public. You know, sometimes you know, people like you and conservative news outlets will will pick up the questions we're asking, but really requires almost a

public level of outrage before these agencies come clean. How much control has big Pharma and companies like fightser have had on our policies that we've made. I think my eyes are pretty well there have been wide opened wide. I think they exert enormous control. I mean, you've probably seen the video clips. You know, they run about sixty

minutes or sixty seconds. You know this newscast, this newscast, this newscast, you know, this sportscast brought to you by fightser um the revolving door between the agencies and the big armor companies. You know Scott Gottliebs, he's a director at the at fightser. Now he's been very open about,

you know, pushing pushing the vaccine, pushing the vaccine. You and now he's you know, pushing the a year and a half and I actually wrote a letter to the editor in response to his column in The Wall Street Journal, basically declaring, hey wouldn't be a good idea to have a pill that could reduce viral replication, reduced severity of symptoms. Would that be a great idea? You know, hey, fighter has got one. Um so hey, welcome to the party.

Dr Gottlieb. I've been pushing this and I think, you know, I think there's proof that we've had these pills available since the start of the pandemic, but people like you have denied their existence, together with the rest of the big farmers. A matter of Facturk, I mean Murk is the one that patented this miracle drug called iver Mecton. It is a miracle. Is prevented river blindness, you know, tired parasitic illnesses throughout the less developed world. It's a

miracle drug, incredibly incredible safety profile. Patented that drug. You know, the people the people have velve but got Nobel prize. But then Mark trashed get for uston covid. They trashed it. They undermined it because guess what, Mark had its own version of a pill per We just talked about that, you know, barely passed the Advisory committee to ten, mainly because moment pier actually caused the virus to mutate. Gee, what could go wrong there? Now? It's it's it's all

very sickening. And then when you start connecting the dots. It's just, you know, to your point about the media with visor like it sort of tells you why nobody in the media asks questions about the vaccines. It just raised. It's it's all pretty disturbing, you know, sort of looking ahead at the mid term elections. There's already been twenty nine House Democrats that have now retired or announced or have it either retired or announced that they are not

going to seek office. Uh. That is the most retirements for Democrats in twenty eight year, or more than the twenty ten wave and tied for the record set in the Republican Revolution. Uh. You know, Republicans hold a double digit lead and enthusiasm. You know, they're leading in the generic ball and the real clear politics point bing is the picture looks dire for Democrats. What do you think's ahead in the mid terms. Well, first of all, take nothing for granted. What we were up against, what I'm

up against, Sharon, Wisconsin is swinging state. Uh. I've been attacked relentlessly for the last year. Um. The Democrats, I've just found themself spent nine million dollars on attack ads against me before I had even decided to run and least I think talk to me. You realized my inclination was not too okay. It would have actually been fun to say, now I'm not running. He guys just wasted

nine million bucks. Uh. They spent two million dollars. You know when I announced, I mean the immediately announced a million dollars I had buy and then a week later another million dollar add by. Uh. So it's not just the massive amounts of the Democrats are dedicated to spending. I mean, they'll I mean, they'll why, they'll destroy it.

I mean, and they'll never get called on it. But their allies, Let's let's face it, the communication apparatus of the Democrat Party is the legacy media and big tech social media. So we're up against Democrats, but the majority in the media, we have significant challenges. They've got they are, they are a powerful voice, so we can't take anything for granted. You know, you know the way I framed this contest in Wisconsin, literally it's the truth versus lies

and distortion. It's me against Democrats, legacy media, mainstream media, social media, and big tech giants. That you understand why, you know, I think the first an you say he's in it for himself. One of the radio talk show hosts here in Wisconsin said, I think Johnson kind of understands he just threw himself in front of a fast moving freight train. Yeah, I do, I understand, right him up again. So if I can, um, appeal for help, if you want to save this Senate seat, if you

want to see me, you know, serve another term. If if you want the truth, I'm gonna need help, um Ron Johnson for Senate dot Com. I'm gonna need a lot of help. But one thing you can be assured of, I'm not gonna be deterred from speaking the truth, from talking about important issues that affect people's lives. Um, That's who I am. I'm I'm gonna continue to fight for freedom because that's in the end, that's what this is about. This is about freedom. We had all kinds of other issues,

and you know, the issues that divide Republicans conservatives. Don't let those issues divide us. We anybody who loves liberty, anybody who loves this country understands how precious it is, understands our solemn duty to preserve it, to make sure now we've survives that thrives for future generations. Anybody who agrees with that must remain united. Don't let slight differences of opinion divide us. We must remain united against their

relentless quest for power. There, relentless quest for control over our lives. They're relentless destruction of our liberty and freedom. Well, and everyone listening, we've got to help. Senator Ron Johnson, Sir. I have so much respect for you and so thankful you are a relentless fighter for both the truth and liberty and freedom in America, and we are so lucky you're seeking another term. I just want to thank you for continuing to bring the truth on COVID. You've been

so brave. I know it's hard to take the hits, but I deeply admire your courage and what you're doing, sir, And I'm so thankful for you for taking the time to come on the show, Sir, So thank you so much. It's well. I appreciate the security and I appreciate any support if people can provide. Everybody, Stay healthy, God bless y'all. Yeah. Yeah, I want to thank creator Ron Johnson again for such a great interview and for being a fighter for truth in liberty in America, and I want to thank you

guys at home for listening. If you enjoyed today's show, leave us a review and rate us five stars, and Apple podcasts. You can find me on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram and at least and read booth. I want to thank our team, Producer John Cassio and our executive producers Debbie Myers and speaker new Kingkridge, all part of the Ginger three sixty network and team.