Attention. You're listening to the top Huff Radio show, America's home for conservative not bitter talk radio. Be advised. The content of this program has been documented to prevent and even cure liberalism, and listening may cause you to lean to the right. Here's your conservative but not bitter host, Tod Huff. Well, that is right, my friends, you have tuned into America's home
for conservative not bitter talk. It's a pleasure to be here today. I want to talk with you a little bit about the lefts continued feigning outrage over the war on our democracy. They want you, they want me, to believe that the war on democracy is being waged by none other than President Donald J. Trump and his henchmen in the Republican Party, conservatives all across the fruited plane. This is what they want you to believe. They want you
to believe that the danger is in electing Trump. We've got some couple of things to talk about regarding that today, including the real problem, the real problem which is on display for anybody who wants to see. And we'll talk about former CIA director John Brennan. We'll talk about the January sixth show committee. We'll talk about Trump and his call with Raffinsberger from Georgia, and other
things of course in the news as well. But before we do that, my friends, I want to tell you about one of our newer advertisers and tell you that it's time to crush your vice. Nick Knack Naturals, one of the newest advertisers on this program, is on a mission to help move nicotine consumers away from combustion, away from all forms of tobacco, all forms of vaping, and toward a less harmful alternative. Nicknack Naturals is one hundred
percent all natural and it's a non tobacco nicotine. There's no smoke, there's no spit, there's no slimy pouch, no bad breath, no teeth stains. It's discrete, it's odorless. My friend, is time to crush your vice with nick Nack Naturals. You can visit their website today nicknack dot com. That's n I c n AC kind of like that, Nick Knack, nicknack dot com. Nickknack dot com. It's time to crush, crush,
my friends, your vice. So let us start today by well beginning here with our looking at what John Brennan, what John Brennan is out there saying, now, John Brennan, is when you think, well, when I think deep state, when I think corruption at its finest, when I think of people who are the poster child for what is wrong with our government, when I think of people who epitomize what I refer to as the seven pillars of propaganda, when I think about that, and of course, the seven
seven pillars of propaganda include seven general areas of I'll just say, our society, our system at large here in this great nation. But one of those pillars of propaganda is the government. That's right, my friends. The government is engaged in actively gaslighting you. We have an administration that's I mean, they have full time gas lighters, one hundred percent full time gas lighters. And it didn't start with this administration, but it certainly continues with this administration.
So we've got the ex CIA head John Brennan, who is one of those folks, one of those folks. Here's the headline. This is from a story that published here a couple of days ago. I guess it would have been boy Saturday. Xc This is RedState dot Com. XCIA head says intel community might withhold sensitive information from Trump if he wins the nomination. Now
think about this. Think about this. Now you have someone who, of course, Trump is on the brink of winning the nomination to president for president of the United States, for the Republican nomination for president of the United States. There are established processes and procedures as to what is supposed to be done with candidates who may potentially be the next commander in chief. And one of
those things is giving them access to information. So now the narrative, of course, the narrative, of course is that Trump is a danger to democracy. Trump is trying to overthrow our government. Trump wants to establish himself as king, and all this nonsense, and that it I say, all this nonsense. But to a group of people, a subgroup of people in this
country, this is like it's red meat. There are people who eat this stuff up, who consume this with absolute disregard towards truth, reality, anything remotely close to anything remotely close to reality. They will reject it in favor of this. And I don't know if it comes out of fear. I don't know if it comes out of a desire to You know, there's a saying that you'll often hear me reference on this program if you've listen for any
length of time. I didn't come up with it, but I think it's brilliant, And it goes like this, the heart will ascume me, the mind will justify with the heart desires. The mind will justify with the heart desires. So the heart doesn't want Trump as president for whatever reason. Because people, I mean, you could pick any number of things, but a lot of these leftists hate this country as founded. They don't like concepts or discussions like America first, what is that. They just don't like it.
They don't like this country as it was created to exist. And if they had their choice, they would completely eradicate that and establish it as something much more ironically authoritarian, much less concerned with your liberty, with your freedom, with your choices. They would be much more content and having a leftist style of government, whether that be socialists, whether that be all out stalinistic and communist. It's that's that's again. The continuous is quite simple. You know,
the political continuum. You've got the right side of the continuum, and in my mind, the complete white right side would be absolute anarchy and no rule, no order, no no government. And then you begin to move from the fringe, and you reach the point where there's, okay, we want a government, but we want it to be as small and as manageable as possible, not one ounce larger than that. And then you continue to
move left and you'll hit other political ideologies. But as you move left, as you move left, what it is is a more there's more focus and more power given to a centralized government and less power given to the individual, less choice. And these folks like John Brennan, these folks that are part of the deep state, these folks that are embedded in Washington, d C.
They are to the left. There's just no denying this. And so it comes as no surprise the people that are in charge of the government apparatus what I call this pillar, this governmental pillar, and I say that they are a pillar of propaganda. There's no doubt why. Because they're trying to deceive people to move from our natural state of desiring to be free, to
be in control of our own choices, our own destiny. And they want to deceive us into believing if we just take little steps to the left, little steps to the left, they will take care of things for us.
They will make sure that we're safe. They will make sure that if we trade a little bit of our liberty, that they're going to give us ultimate security, or in this case, they're gonna protect us from the dangers of Donald J. Trump knowing allegedly about as the Republican nominee knowing about some sensitive information. Now, this could extend long past, long past the nomination process, and this is something Trump battled to some extent when he was President of
the United States. I mean, there are forces that there are individuals and forces working within our government that are that don't want any oversight whatsoever. You know, it's it's ironic, really, they want to take away your freedom, your autonomy. But yet even though they are employed by you, the taxpayer, they are empowered to exist through well supposedly through the constitution, through our representative form of government, through our through our constitutional republic. That's where
they derive their power from the consent of the governor. At least that's way it's supposed to be. But now, ironically, they don't want you having oversight of them. They want to have oversight of you. They want to
have control and a power and authority over you. But yet they want no oversight in return, and that's where this bureaucratic state that they build, that's where this is very effective, because it creates all these nooks and crannies where they can hide, where they can exist outside of the spotlight, outside of being in the public the public eye. And so now Brennan's out there telling folks, here's what he says. This is let's see if I read down
in this article again at RedState dot com. This is in today's stack of stuff. By the way, here is what Brennan. Brennan told Nicole Wallace, which of course she is. She's on MSNBC for Starters, so by virtue of being there, you know that she is an absolute She's hysterical about the possibility of Trump being president once again. So he's on there talking with
her. They're talking about this Politico article that talked about how intelligence officials are allegedly planning to brief Trump but have reservations according to the article here due to quote his handling a classified information. No word on whether or not they have concerns about Biden's handling of classified information. Sitting there next to his classic Corvette in a garage somewhere in Delaware, but this is what he said to Nicole
Wallace. Now, I'm pretty certain that my former intelligence colleagues will provide briefings that are not going to do any type of damage to sources and methods in terms of providing information to Donald Trump that he can misuse. But they will provide analytic overviews and briefings about some of the world's hotspots, letting Donald Trump know what the assessments are at this point. So they got to keep a
hush hushed, They got to keep it from Trump. Now, if they're going to do this during this particular part of the process, which admittedly, I guess you could say is a little bit of a gray area because you know, a nominee is not the president yet they've got to win the election and so forth, is it not fair to ask the questions that they're doing or thinking these same things when hopefully he's president of the United States Again.
Brennan continues here, he said, I think it's going to be analysis that will be devoid of the sources and methods, the sensitive things that we are most concerned about, the types of things that were in all those documents that he had in the bathroom. Remember, Hillary had the email server in her bathroom, Clauset. She thought putting four walls in a door around that thing
would keep it secure, if you remember that back in twenty sixteen. But anyway, and he talks about just what Trump was, the materials that Trump had at at Mar a Lago, and of course we know what's happened, the FBI raid, the charges and so forth that stemmed from that. But they're out there saying we had to keep you safe. We can't tell Trump, we can't tell him specific information because he's not to be trusted. This
is such hogwash. These these people, these people are just it is chasing a narrative at all costs, and it is indicative of what Trump faces if and when, hopefully he rewins wins again reelection here to the presidency. It's it's part and partial of what he's dealing with. He's going to have to fight these battles day one. There are going to be embedded opponents completely antithetical to the cause and leadership of Trump, embedded in our federal government. And
that's not the way it's supposed to be. You know that these organizations, these these you know, these the acronym soup here they are supposed to report
to the President of the United States. Now again, I know we're talking about his uh the time before he would be re elected, but none less, it is very fair to ask, especially in light of what we saw his previous term as president, how much of this nonsense going to be happening again, I mean, this is why the calls to eradicate complete departments of
the federal government. Then one of the reasons one of the reasons why, because this sort of nonsense is going on so anyway, there's that there's other things as well. The j sixth Committee is allegedly suppressing testimony, which I'll get to in a minute, But before I do that, I want to tell you a little bit about four patriots. My friends. I know, as a conservative, you are someone who wants to be prepared. You want
to be prepared to take care of your family financially. You want to raise your children, raise help raise your grandchildren, provide leadership, provide an example that can help them the next generation start off on a better foot. Everything you do, you think about what is my responsibility a my covering that responsibility? And do I have some something set aside that would allow me to navigate some difficulties should those difficulties arise, And so the question is have you thought
about a possible food shortage in the same way. Right, So, there's natural disasters. We've seen natural disasters of all types hit this country. Power outages. We had a power outage this weekend. Wasn't a long one, but we've had some long ones in the past as well. And of course food shortages that could be caused by any number of things, including a federal government that mismanages everything that it touches. And so it's wise to be prepared.
It's wise to be prepared in the event of a natural disaster or a power outage, some sort of a supply chain problem, food shortage. Why not take a look at four patriots dot com slash huff. You can check out their most popular item, which is a three month food supply includes breakfast, lunch, dinner options stackable toads. Twenty five years is how long this food supply can be stored. Go to four patriots dot com slash huff that
will give you access to their latest deals and discounts. They've also got things like generators, solar phone chargers, freeze dryers, water filtration systems and RB and camping gear four patriots dot com slash huff. That's my last name for Patriots dot com slash huff. So let's talk a little bit about about what's happening here with this testimony, this testimony that has been allegedly suppressed hidden regarding
the j sixth Committee. This is Foxnews dot Com. You may have seen Liz Cheney go to Liz Cheney go at it with I think Mark Levin on Twitter because he caught her out on this, and rightfully so. J sixth Committee allegedly suppressed testimony showing the Trump administration pushed Ford National Guard presence on January sixth. This seems pretty relevant, right. It seems like something that you would want to make sure that you if you were really conducting an investigation focused
on digging up and finding the truth. It seems relatively obvious to me that if someone was testifying that Trump was trying to get his administration was trying to get a presence of the National Guard on January sixth in our nation's capital, it seems like something pretty relevant. Now. That's, of course, assuming that the j sixth Committee was interested in truth and not just in a political
narrative. Remember, this is the same committee that had nothing but Democrats, well democrats plus Liz Cheney and Adam Kinsinger, both by the way, are no longer in Congress, Thank goodness. These are make believe Republicans. Remember Kensinger up there, Fox crying on the stand or at the when he was sitting on the committee, asking questions, listening to the testimony. This was
all designed for consumption. This all is designed for what we've been talking about, even the last talking about John Brennan saying the intelligence community is going to keep things away from Trump. This is all designed to fuel that narrative. Trump is terrible. It's bad enough to make a former well former congressman at the time, current congressman cry, couldn't even take it. Someone who was a veteran of the Air Force, someone who served in the military up there
crying, this must be bad. Adam Kinsinger's in tears over this. It's all supposed to fuel the concept, this idea that says, hey, Trump is a menace to society. Trump is absolutely unqualified to be president. Trump can't be allowed to step back into the oval office because bad, bad things happen. Now, how many troops did Trump want if this testimony is true.
In fact, here's what it says. The former J six Committee apparently withheld mister or Nato, mister Ornato's testimony critical witness testimony from the American people because it contradicted their predetermined narrative. The testimony proves what mister Meadows has said all along. President Trump did in fact offer ten thousand, ten thousand National
Guard troops to secure the US capital, which was turned down. Now that's what Representative Very louder Milk of Georgia said in a statement on on Friday. Liz Cheney's out there saying it's false, This is not accurate, that witnesses weren't to be believed in all this sort of sort of stuff. But the bottom line is you didn't know. I mean, well, you know it
because you followed. The American people don't know this. The American people, the American people were told by the J sixth Committee that Trump wanted to overthrow the government and stop a completely justified process from happening. When Biden was being confirmed or I guess formally elected by the Electoral College and the vice president would accept those electors. Trump was trying to overthrow that throwart our democracy. That's
what we were told. Who knows about all this other stuff. Why would Trump want ten thousand National Guards members there? If in fact, if in fact everything was what the media tells us, what Liz Cheney told us, what Adam Kinsinger told us, that was a show trial, my friends, from the very very beginning. The deep state is a problem. The Seven Pillars of Propaganda is a real thing, and the government is actively working against
us, my friends. They're not there to any longer to protect our liberties. There apparently ostensibly there to infringe upon those liberties. It's a sad, sad day, and they're at war with us in lots of different ways. Talk more about that after the break. I'm going to tell you here as we're wrapping up this segment leading into the next, that I sell health. Eric Wilson, my friend there. He's been a supporter of this program for
several years now. He is here to help provide individual and group health plans to you, to our listeners. He's been serving clients throughout the Fruited Plan across the Fruited Plain since two thousand and four, so that's twenty years. In case We've got a Bernie Sanders supporter out there tuned in who isn't good with math. That's twenty years now, twenty years. He's an expert in the Affordable Care Act. He knows how to navigate the complexities provide people with
options that make the most sense for their wallets and for their needs. You can call Eric today for a free, no cost consultation eight one five three seven two thirteen sixty three eight one five three seven two thirteen sixty three, or visit I sell health dot com. So I'm gonna take a break here. When we get back, I'm going to continue a little bit in this discussion on the real problem here facing well, the real war being waged against
what folks call our democracy. I say it's our constitutional republic. And we're going to continue with some of the things happening out there today, including this phone call between Trump and Raffinsburger. But I've got to take a break, my friends. So you are listening here to the home of can Conservative not Bitter Talk? Be back here in just a minute. Welcome back, my
friends. So we're continuing this conversation on the ways that the government is the real threat to our quote unquote democracy, which of course is more accurately stated our constitutional republic. But I'll let it slide for the sake of just just highlighting that, just making sure that we blame the right individuals here. So before the break, we talked about Brennan, We talked about the January sixth
Committee allegedly suppressing testimony. By the way, that testimony has, as I understand it been released, I have not read it yet in its entirety, but so this information is out there. You know that, remember this committee, the Jason Committee, had the opportunity, They had the opportunity to be transparent with the American people from the beginning. They chose not to be They
absolutely, positively, unequivocally chose not to be transparent. They didn't release all of the video footage that we have since had released thanks to Speaker of the House Mike Johnson. They did not release that there's video that shows Capitol police taking actions against people that weren't doing anything, I mean, shooting tear gas into the crowd, things like that, things that could clearly be viewed as
acts of unnecessary provocation that was withheld from the American people. Why why were these things with help, because the answer is of course obvious. They had a narrative to sell, they had a midterm election to win. They weren't interested in the truth, my friends. They were trying to damage Trump in every conceivable way, through every against the Seinfeld Newman strategy, whatever it takes, as long as it takes them, so long as it takes Trump away
from the White House. That was the plan, the strategy. That's what they were, That's what they're continually doing. So we got that constantly going on in different ways. But but but but the other thing I want to
talk about here is this phone call. This phone call between Donald Trump when he was president of the United States, and you'll remember hearing I'm not going to play the call here that you'll remember when he spoke with Georgia's Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger, and Trump said, I just want to find eleven thousand, seven hundred and eighty votes. Now, this phone call, this recorded phone call, was one of the key pieces of evidence that was used by
none other than Fanny Pack herself. Fanny willis who you talk about a train wreck in every conceivable way. I haven't even really discussed that, and I don't have time to do it right now. But you talk about an embarrassing, corrupt mess, the way that Fulton County District Attorney Fanny Willis has conducted herself allegedly. I mean you've if you've watched the trial, if you've watched the just the things that, well, she had this love. I don't
want to get into it. She had this lover, She had money that was going to this guy that was helping with the investigation. She wore her dress backwards. I mean you've probably followed that a little bit. We just I haven't talked about it much. I mean, it's right up my alley, the sorts of things and the sorts of things that entertained me. But it's what's interesting to me is that is that these are the folks that like
to stand on the moral high ground. They come in, they want you to think that they're here to take care of the real culprits, the real threats, the folks who are really the danger and menace to society. But yet they often turn out to be those very things themselves, in fact, even in much to a much greater degree than those that they're trying to go
after. So Fanny Willis. Fanny Willis, she one of the key pieces of evidence is she's basing this her charges against Trump on these rico prosecution charges, where she's prosecuting Trump on these rico allegations. The big piece of evidence was this phone call. Well, it turns out that this phone call and this is in the stack of stuff. I'm looking at it here, bombshell, this is the headline RedState dot com infamous Trump Raffensberger call at heart of
Fanny Willis prosecution was illegally recorded. It was illegally recorded. Now now there's questions as the weather or not, can this can this be used? Well, look, I'm not an attorney by any stretch of the imagination. I think I've told you that I went to a pre law program at American University in d C. I loved the program that decided the world had one too many attorneys as it is, so I didn't I decided I didn't want to
pursue it. It's actually the beginning of my interest in pursuing this a back twenty some years ago now. But I remember, even in that early stage of you know, kind of a pre law program, there is a concept what's it called I is it the fruit of the poisonous tree? Right, So you don't want if something has been illegally obtained from by law enforcement.
And again it's often or typically or I don't want to use the word always, because there's a myriad of factors and arguments that can be made I suppose as to why something should be admissible and not be admissible. But I mean, this was illegally recorded. So why was it illegally recorded? Well, it was recorded Florida. Florida is a two. Both parties have to know if a phone call is being recorded in Florida. Now that's not the case in a lot of places. That's not the place or the case in a
lot of places. In fact, it's not the case where I am in Indiana. Only one party has to know if a phone call is being recorded, and of course, if you're the one doing it, then you can be the one making the recording. This is not the case across across the country, and it's not the case in Florida where Trump was when he was on the phone call, So that should be a pretty big problem. So again, but they don't care. That's the point. They don't care.
If I mean, remember, just remember all the things that they've done to Trump his campaign, people who were with Trump. I mean, we can't even cover them, We can't even cover them here today. But remember when they spied on his campaign, Remember when they alleged that he was engaged in some sort of a disinformation campaign with Vladimir Putin and the Russian government. Remember this, I mean, this goes back to before the time he was even
president, before the time he was even elected as president. Back to the time where they were at the well openly at least in front of the cameras, mocking the idea that Trump could ever be president. Back when they were doing that, they were actually doing a lot of things behind the scenes because
they were terrified of the guy. Terrified of the guy I've referenced. Well, John Brennan's out there telling us that the intelligence community may withhold sensitive information from Trump if he wins the nomination, which of course leads us to ask, what else are they going to be withholding from him if he's president of the United States. I mean, we've seen so many things happening against Trump, the weaponization of the Department of Justice, how they've gone after him.
This Fanny Willis cases is an example of that. The mar A Lago case, I mean, the situation that the civil case in New York, the real estate thing. I mean, it's remarkable what has been done to stop this guy. That's the real problem. That's the real problem that we have. It's not the danger that Trump poses to the American people or the United States of America. It's the danger that the people running our government post, not just the Trump but to all of us. And that, my friends,
is is the bottom line here. So need to wrap up this segment. But before we do that, I don't know if you've seen this. I just saw this in since today's stack of stuff. Gold is at a near all time high as investors are preparing for a potential cut in the interest rate. So there's you know, when you when you look at gold, there's a lot of factors. And I'm not here to predict or time, time, the gold pricing or anything like that. That's not at all what
I do. But there's factors that influence the price of gold, including interest rates, including inflation, and we've got a lot of those sorts of things going on in our world right now, and so and so with gold moving possibly here to an all time high. Possibly not making predictions, but that's what There's articles out there that are saying these things. I'm wondering, my friends, if that would make you interested in having a conversation with our friends
at Harvard Gold Group. Harvard Goldgroup is here to help you, help you with your gold and precious metals investing purchasing. You can find out more by visiting them online Harvard Gooldgroup dot com. That's Harvardgoldgroup dot com. Use my name Todd, and you'll get a two hundred and fifty dollars credit on your purchase. Harvard Gooldgroup dot com promo code Todd two hundred and fifty dollars credit
on your next purchase. So time is running out here. But next segment, I want to talk about what a CNN punit recommends to be Biden's quote unquot new campaign strategy. Fantastic stuff. Talk about it here and just a minute, my friends sit tight back here in mere moments. Welcome back, my friends. So I want to this is fantastic. Remember when we've talked about this a lot. We've talked about the fact that this is going to be an intense campaign it's something that, in fact, we talked about it
even yesterday. This is something that is going to be is going to make twenty twenty look like a walk in the park if you ask me. So, there's there's a and and right on time, right on time. There's a CNN pundit named Kara Swisher. This is I'm looking here, MRC NewsBusters so NewsBusters dot org. She's on CNN, good Old CNN, giving advice to Biden and to his campaign what she thinks the campaign should be doing,
which ironically is what they've been doing all the time. But I just want you to listen to how she frames and phrases this, because this is We're gonna get more of this. We are going to get more of this. It is going to get more angry. It is going to get more divisive. They are again, they're out of options. They can see the writing on the wall, Trump versus Biden. They can see the polls, they can see Biden's absolute deplorable economy, wide open borders, you know, terrible
State of the Union address. As much as they want to gaslight us about that, telling us it was fire, telling us it was now going to replace the narrative about Biden's cognitive abilities and so forth. Anyway, so now they've moved on to this latest well, I guess new campaign here it is. This is what's her name again, Kara Kara Swisher at CNN Here it
is enjoy this. He's going to be shameless, which is his greatest ass at the shamelessness of him is then Biden has to get in there very hard and go rapist, racist, fascist, over and over and over again, and then the trials are happening at the same time. He's just had to pay he's just ninety three million dollars for right now, and just hammer it in with those three things. Rapist, racist, fascist, here's the thing, thank you, that's truth. That was it. So the strategy here,
she says, which is the strategy along? She said, Look, he's going to be out there. Biden needs to say rapist, racist, fascist. That should be Biden's campaign now in one degree or in one sense, I agree with her because well, not with these particular words, but make the campaign about anything other than Biden, because there's nothing about Biden that is going to attract voters to vote for him. There is nothing about Biden that he has done. There is nothing about Biden that kind of inspires and
motivates. There's nothing about Biden that just makes you want to go out and vote for him. Unluss, you can destroy your opponent and cause so much fear by calling him a rapist, a racist, and a fascist. That's the strategy. And I mean, in a way, she's letting the cat out of the bag, But this has been the strategy from the beginning. They want to do these things and then hide Biden in the base room, basement closet. That's what they want to do. Hide him, get him
out of the public view. In fact, I don't know if you saw this. It's in the stack of stuff. I was going to talk about it a little bit more, but I kind of decided to change course a little bit on today's program. But there's there's a I think it's a someone who's a psychologist or a psychiatrist who's out there saying who's out there saying that Biden was basically pumped full of some sort of a stimulant in order to go out there and give his State of the Union address. This is at townhall
dot com. Psychiatrists suggest that Biden was given a stimulant to make it through his ninety minute State of the Union speech. Now you can make from that whatever you will. I've never been a big fan of people diagnosing others remotely or just by watching him on TV or whatever. But bottom line is, bottom line is there's reason to think that something like that may be going on
because we've all seen Biden in his regular day to day appearances. And while he was anything but articulate and just you know, he didn't have that speech that they told us he was going to have that was going to change the trajectory of this campaign, he also was able to get through it without some of I mean, he had his moments. There's no doubt. He froze up and couldn't speak a couple times, and of course they'll blame that on a stuttering problem, and if you make fun of that, you're making fun
of people with stutters and all this sort of thing. But he was definitely different than we've seen him just in his day to day activities, which is why they hide him in his day to day activities. And again this is the strategy hide him. Call Trump a rapist, a racist, and a fascist, and that should get should get the job done. So they think so they think so I don't, my friends. I mean, it's it's deception at its finest. This campaign is not going to be about anything Biden
brings to the metaphorical table here. This is not That's not what this is about. This is about terrorizing people. It's about making them think, if you vote for Trump, you're voting for the end of our democracy, the end of our constitutional republic, the end of civilization as we know it. That's what they have to do. That's the only way that they can get
through this. And I don't think they're going to be successful. But that's why they're out there calling Biden, excuse me, having Biden instructing Biden, telling Biden to call Trump a racist, a rapist, and a fascist. It's all they've got, my friends, and this is all that I've got. Time wine as well, time wise as well. Got to wrap up here. Have a great day. SDG.