Attention. You're listening to the Todd Huff radio show, America's home for conservative not Bitter talk radio. Be advised. The content of this program has been documented to prevents and even cure liberalism, and listening may cause you to lean to the right. Here's your Conservative but not Bitter host, Todd Hoff books. Do you remember a couple of years ago when Trump It was actually right after Trump was elected. I've referenced this in recent days, weeks, months.
This may have come up over the course of time many times in our conversations about what's happening in well, American culture, American politics, American worldview, and so forth. But as I'm queuing this up Chuck Schumer, he was on with Rachel mad Out, and I think, you know, I've thought, I've actually considered playing this SoundBite almost daily, even daily, because I think if you have this in mind as you interpret the day's events,
it explains a heck of a lot. Actually, you could make the case that it explains everything. And this is when, Chuck Schumer, Now you got to remember what the at the moment, what the kind of the narrative was, where we were as a country. This was right before right during I don't know Trump's actual inauguration. Remember Trump never had a honeymoon. When he was elected president to this great nation. There was no honeymoon, as
is normally the case. Usually you get about ninety one hundred days or so of just getting acclimated, getting the questions about what's your favorite ice cream? Now they still ask Biden that because of course he's a leftist. Well, I don't know. Biden's an opportunist. I think I don't know that he's
a principal leftists. He's whatever's good for him and his party's agenda. Potentially, allegedly, if you follow the money here, you could say certainly the case that you could make the argument that what's good for his pocketbook or his family's pocketbook. Anyway, the point is is that the time that we were in when this SoundBite took place, was we were trying or they were trying to really discredit Trump. Trump had positioned themselves as this businessman with sense and
just you know, doing the obvious things. And so Chuck Schumer comes on to Rachel Maddow. And remember this was in the wake of Russian collusion and all the very beginning of it. Russian collusion, and so he had to set the expectation, or I guess established the counterpoint that says, if Trump was really that smart, if Trump was really that insightful, if Trump really
had common sense, he would know. And this is the point that the intelligence community, as Chuck Schumer says, has six ways to Sunday for getting back at you. That's what he said to Rachel Maddow. And so here we are fast forwarded into two twenty three, six and a half years roughly later, and now we're looking at the fulfillment of that. I would you could say a type of prophecy in the sense now it's a self fulfilling prophecy.
It's not like there's some divine intervention on behalf of these scoundrels. What there is is there is an intentionality behind the scenes. It was a telling of what was to come. They were telling us what was going to be going on behind the curtain. And many Americans, I guess at the time it just sounded to them, to the left, to the folks who are the low information voter or whatever, this sounded like a criticism of Trump's intelligence.
Why would you mess with the intelligence agency? Why would you why would you cross them, Why would you do anything to upset them, because they could get back at you. They could just think about it. Chuck Schumer was admitting on television, admittedly not a station that many people watch, thankfully, Rachel Maddow MSNBC, but enough people watch it, enough people watch it to be concerned learning. But this is he was admitting that intelligence agencies could
get back at the president of the United States. Why would we ever even accept that as a reasonable thing. I don't want the intelligence agencies getting back at Joe Biden. I don't want the intelligence agencies being used to get back at Barack Obama or Bill Clinton or Hillary Clinton or anyone for that matter. Now, I do want justice to be served as someone is guilty of crimes, legitimate crimes, if they're not the subject of political witch hunts and so
forth. That's look I mean to me, this is obvious. This is just common sense, although I wonder how common it is anymore when I listen, Actually I got a sound bite. I don't I probably won't have time to get to it today, but it is in the stack of stuff.
It's a doctor's it's a where'd I get this off? Of social media, but it was from libs of TikTok and it was a basically a social media clip where a young lady gets on you know, her camera, post to social media something about only women can have babies, which to anyone with the brain, that's true to anyone who follows the science, that's true to anyone who cares about truth and reality and objectivity, who lives in as Rush used
to say, Realville, then these things are not offensive to you. But we now have doctors or someone who's purporting to be a doctor responding upset and saying not all people who have babies or women. So I wonder, you know, my dad had a term over educated idiots. And look, I'm not against education. If it's legitimate education, it's a good thing. It's
legitimate education. If it's the seeking of truth and understanding things as they are trying to make sense of the universe or master your career path, or you know, just follow it where it actually leads in reality, that's a great thing. And it doesn't have to take, by the way, the form
of formal education. It can help, sometimes it can hinder in the case of these over educated idiots, and that's the term my Dad had to describe these people who have been through so much schooling, so much of the wrong type of schooling. Let me say it that way, so much of the wrong type of formal schooling, that the ability to think for themselves and use sense and logic and reason had been beaten out of them and replaced by mumbo
jumbo, replaced by complete stupidity. Reminds me of a line from the movie JFK. I was a big fan of that movie back when I was in what junior hire whenever it came out, and maybe high school, and the Kevin Costner, who was the main character of the movie, said, theoretical physics can prove that if we tie the tail of an elephant to a daisy, it can hang off the side of a cliff. But we've got something different. We've got common sense, and we know that's not how that works.
I think he was referencing the magic bullets which paused in the air and went through multiple victims and made ninety three turns and all that sort of stuff. Anyway, I don't know that I can get to that, but it's in the stack of stuff. But so what I what I say to you when Chuck Schumer is admitting on live television this was years ago, that the
CIA or the whoever whoever's in the intelligence agent the community. I don't even know that we know everybody in the intelligence community, you know, CIA, DNI. Do we throw FBI in there? I mean, just what are all these these agencies and why are they going after the president? Why are
they going after anybody? Why is that something that we accept If Chuck Schumer, who was a high ranking senator at the time, and of course now is the majority majority leader in the sentence, I think he was the back in those days, I think he was the minority leader because I think the dinner the Republicans were in control. But the point is, why is he
bragging? Why is he saying this and almost using it as in a threatening way to say to Trump, Hey, you're not as smart as you think you are, because these intelligence agencies are gonna come and take you out. Man. Why why are we bragging about this in the era in the era of when the JFK, A lot of what we you know, there's been some some more information released from that, uh you know, government rees or whatever, papers and information and so forth, but not all of it's been
been released. Why in lin of those times, in lined of what happened in the nineteen sixties, nineteen sixty three, the assassination of Kennedy and all the stuff that we're learning about corruption at the highest levels of government, things were before our eyes. Why are we bragging about this? Why are we using it as a way to say, you're so stupid you don't even know how they can get back at you. Why are we accepting that? I know you're not, but why is that okay to say it on TV?
Why would Rachel Maddow say whoa, whoa? Whoa? Or why wouldn't she say why is an agency that's supposed to be under supposed to be under the authority, control, purview of the President of the United States? Why is that organization allowed to go after the president? Does that seem right to you? Does that seem just to you? Meanwhile, these jokers and clowns want to tell us and I got another sound bite. I do hope to get
to this one. Got another SoundBite that shows some MSNBC lunatic saying that Trump wanting to cut the bureaucratic state to reduce the size of government is the textbook definition of fascism. So to be clear, they're okay with the government that has an intelligence community that can go after the sitting president of the United States, and of course if they can do that, they can go after any citizen, any person in the United States. So they're cool with that.
But if you try to cut the bureaucratic state, you're considered a fascist. Tell me you know nothing about fascism. Without telling me you know nothing about fascism. Thank you MSNBC for doing this. So all that being said, what do I want to do here today? I want to play this sound by it from Chuck Schumer. I want to play this just to remind you that this explains this was said I think seven six and a half a years
ago. I guess this is what he said, and this is what is coming to fruition now, intelligence community, just insert maybe deep state, bureaucratic state, the swamp. That's what this that's what's coming to fruition here. Chuck Schumer was actually in a way prophetic, not pathetic. He is often pathetic, but he was also prophetic in this instance. Here's what he has
to say. Listen carefully because this will explain so much of what we're experiencing now and what we will experience in the days, weeks, months, and years to come. He's taking these shots, this antagonist, and it's taunting to the intelligence. To you, in a day, you take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you. So even for a practical, supposedly hard nosed businessman, he's being really dumb
to do this. What do you think the intelligence community would do if they were mad? I don't know, but I from what I am told, they are very upset with how he has treated them and talked about them. Oh where where they're very upset? They're feelings are hurt. Oh so it's okay now, Rachel Maddow, who's supposed to be this arbiter of truth.
Sorry, I can't even stay with this ray face, an arbiter of truth, someone who wants you to believe she can explain the way that you know things are working in the country, ways that the things should work in this country, instead of saying whoa, whoa, whoa. Senator Schumer, why would we ever be okay with the FBI or the intelligence community or any of these organizations going after people, including the current president of the President elect of
the United States. Why is that? Okay? She's like, wells. Instead of that, her response was, well, how would they How are they going to go after him if they were motivated to do so? What would that look like? Tell me more? You know what it looks like, Rachel Maddow. It looks precisely like what we're dealing with today. Indictment number three, which we talked about in great detail yesterday. It looks like Trump Russian collusion, delusion. It looks like impeachment one. It looks like
impeachment two. It looks like January sixth. It looks like again indictment one, Indictment two, and now soon to be Indictment number three. Folks, we are in the midst of a cold civil war. You had best or no many of you have. I hope everybody listening to my voice realizes just
how serious this is. These are you know, when history looks back at this and well, assuming the leftists don't get to write the history books, so the woke people that are actually rooted in reality and have concern for ration, a rationale and logic, when they hopefully write the history books, they will point to these events. They will point to these events as history making
events. What are we doing about it today? Are we just idly on cruise or do we realize this how intense and serious things are that's going on anyway time out. I know most of you are well aware of this, but the alarm bell should be sounding. Rush used to say, I will tell you when it's time to pining. And it's not time to penic, but it is well passed time to be sitting on cruise control. Things are
personally comfortable, and life is easy and so forth. It's it's sometimes that prevents us from maybe doing or engaging in the things that we should do. Being aware it can lull us to sleep, it can lead to apathy, it can lead to just a comfort level that's such that you know that's not today's problem, but it is today's problem. This is two day's problem,
one hundred percent. It is being waged right before our very eyes. And the reality is, even though many people don't still believe this, this is within. This is absolutely within the power of the American people to do something about The question is are we going to have enough manpower and woman power for
that matter. I just mean that in general terms like supposed to use that word, the woke tells me. But will we have enough people pushing in the right direction against this insanity, against this corruption, against this evil. I've got to take a break, my friend, Sit tight. You're listening to conservative not better talk. I am your host, the one, the only Tod Huff back in a minute. All right, my friends, welcome
back. I did not I normally do this at the beginning of the program, but if you want to be a part of today's conversation, I welcome you to do that. You can email Todd at Todd huff Show dot com. Look, we're growing. I know we've got new listeners and just we're looking at even expanding hopefully in the near future. You're into some some other markets, and that's m we continue to get new People's the point. So it's huffed, by the way, with FS the letter f HU Frank Frank.
That's how you spell that. I occasionally see Google searches that end up on our page. H O U g H. I like to tell people we spell it the right way. HU. I'm kidding, of course. So tap show dot com is the email, or you can text us three one seven two one zero twenty eight thirty. I'll say that again slower three one seven two one zero two eight three zero messaging data rates may apply. So I mentioned here in the last segments that the left, of course,
they are okay with the FB think about this. They're okay, They're okay with the FBI being used to target the president of the United States or the sitting president of the United States. Totally cool with that, not concerned whatsoever. Instead of asking why is that okay, Rachel Maddow says, well, what are they going to do? How can the FBI be used to stop Trump? That's really what she wants to know. Man, what can they do? Can they take this guy out as president? Tell me more,
Senator Schumer, tell me tell me more. Can they put him in jail? Can they you know, can they create an audio file that sounds like his voice or a video, a deep fake and convince people that Trump is mentally unstable? Can they do that? Tell me more. I'm open to anything whatever it takes to stop this guy, Senator Schumer, I'm okay with. And the whole time, we're supposed to believe that these jokers and clowns care about democracy, care about the integrity of this country, its elections,
the will of the people. They care about their agenda. Any normal person, when Chuck Schumer would have said that stupid thing that the intelligence agency can get back at you as president of the United States, any normal person would said, beat beat back it up, dude. Why in the world are we having a discussion about this. This is not something that is even remotely acceptable in a free society. This is not the way our government's supposed to
work. This is a totalitarian state. What is going on? Who's running the show? You know that there's so many things that should have been said to this besides tell me more, Tell me more, Senator Schumer, tell me more. Bs So I can come back on here the next several months and give my viewers, Rachel Maddow would say, give my viewers a false sense of hope that some of these things are going to happen, that the CIA is going to come and do a night raid like the Osama bin Laden
raid on the White House or something. What on earth is going on here? Anyway? So but I mentioned in addition to that, I said, they're okay with that. They the radical left, they're totally cool with the president being targeted by the CIA, the intelligence community, whatever. But in addition to that, so that's on the one end of the spectrum. On the other end of the spectrum, they want to tell you. They want to tell you that Trump's the fascist. They want to tell you that Trump's
the one that's trying to abuse his power and authority. They want to tell you that Trump's the one that's trying to subvert elections, that's trying to overthrow our democracy. And again, we have a constitutional republic, certainly with this concept of self governance, but we are in no way shape man or reform a pure democracy. We need to stop saying that, actually it's a constitutional republic. And the reason that matters I hit on this recently, but I
want to repeat it. The reason that matters is because the constitutional republic protects the rights of the one, of the individual. You want to care about protecting the rights of the minority, then you should absolutely be a constitutional You know, someone who's in favor of a constitutional republic, because what that says is it doesn't matter. It doesn't matter if the majority say that you can't say something. It doesn't matter if the majority says that you can't keep and
bear arms. It doesn't matter if the majority says you don't have the right to worship as you choose or to live your life according to your conscience. It doesn't matter what the majority says. That's why the constitutional republic is built to say, we respect the right of the one, and the majority cannot impact those things. They cannot. Pure democracy, on the other hand, does not have that safeguard anyway. So these jokers and clowns at MSNBC.
I didn't intend for this to be a show about MSNBC, though. It turning into that. There's a guy there. It's name's Eugene Robinson. I found this clip, you know what. I think this came from bos Nerdley's daily email, but I'm not. I can't swear to that. If this is a tweet from Tom Elliott, you might have to Tom s Elliott is his Twitter handle. And so this is a SoundBite of somebody at MSNBC explaining
something He clearly doesn't know what he's talking about. But he's explaining on MSNBC to people that have no idea who are watching this, what fascism is. And so again Rachel Maddow cool with the FBI being used to take Trump out totally fine intelligence community, whatever it takes. She just wants to know how. She doesn't want to know why we're allowing this same network. Eugene Robinson now wants to tell us what fascism really is, and according to him,
I just I can't even believe this. These are the people that think that they're smarter than you. These are the people who think they are worthy of making decisions to run your life. These are people who think they are superior and the rest of us Hayseed Hicks in fly Over Country like I am, like many of you are in any town, USA. As Cosmo Kramer would say, they want to tell you that Trump cutting, this guy, Eugene Robinson wants to tell you that Trump cutting the size of the bureaucratic state is
actually textbook fascism. What in the world is this joker talking about. Here's the club that gathered around Donald Trump and that will enable this move toward fascism. I mean, this is textbook fascism, and it's outrageous. It's incredibly
dangerous, not just to our system of democracy and our democratic values. It's just it's just dangerous because he's talking about wanting to essentially fire the people in the federal bureaucracy who who know how to run things, who makes the country work, who keep our air clean and our water safe, and who who keep up safe in the intelligence agencies and in the Defense Department and everywhere he sees somebody who who doesn't tell the line, who doesn't go along with every
crazy anti democratic idea he has, he wants the ability to fire that person and replace him or her with a lackey. Um, that's what he wants. That's what he intends. We should believe him when he says says it and this is a great danger to the country that we know the country. I cut that off. I don't even know that. I just wanted to hear that part. But he says a couple of things that I want to talk about that just lit my fire a little bit. I'm gonna have to
do it on the other side of the break though. He says that the government, oh, the bureaucratic state, the bureaucrats, they're the ones that make this country work. Oh, my friends, he's got it completely backward. And look, I if I'm talking to someone who is a person who's doing your job in government, I'm not criticizing that, but I want to point something out on the other side of this break, the way that this country is set up to work, the reason there are federal jobs, state
jobs, local government jobs. There's such a massive misunderstanding, a massive misunderstanding. And I don't know, this is so stupid what he said. I don't know if he just doesn't know. I don't know if these programmed to say the talking points in sequential order and just you know, pieces those together. And it sounds like it means something to the radical left, the mindless people who don't think for themselves and aren't critical. I don't know if it
means something to them. But none of that meant anything of substance. It meant zero. It was talking point stitched to talking point, stitched to talking point. And if you drill even a millimeter deep beneath the surface of these superficial, stupid and idiotic talking points, there's nothing there. There's nothing to this. This is asinine, is what this is. And it's considered in liberal circles and journalistic circles run by leftists to be profound thinking and analysis.
Give me a break. I gotta take a break. You're listening here to conservative not bitter talk. I am your host, Todd Huff, the home of sanity. By the way, back into the minute, Welcome back, my friends. OZ is trying to carry on a conversation about something totally unrelated. I don't know what she thinks as going on in my head, but I can't. I am the world's worst. I'm telling you, I am the world's worst multitasker. If there's what's the population of the planet, is
it eight billion? If there are eight billion people, I think I am eight billion in terms of multitasking. OZ knows this too. Anyway, Welcome back. So the before the break or last segment, I should say, we were talking, well, we played this stupid SoundBite from MSNBC, which that's redundant to say stupid SoundBite and then to say MSNBC, of course it's stupid. Of course it's stupid coming from MSNBC. It's it's it's lunacy over
there. It's absolute lunacy. It'd be great entertainments if they were not representative or the things that they say on that station did not translate into the way that some of these Democratic congress people, senators, presidents think so it's it's actually dangerous, but it's it's still comical to think how ridiculous this is. Look, folks, you can have we can have different opinions, but we
can't. We just can't have different universes of reality. And they live in a totally different universe, or they've better stated, more correctly stated, they have convinced themselves or they've convinced the people that are in their audience that they live in a different universe because it is not reality at all. What they are talking about has no basis, no bearing in reality at all. It's dangerous stuff. To say that Trump firing people in the bureaucratic state is an
act of overt textbook fascism is insane. It's absolutely ridiculous to say that, so the founders were fascists by wanting a limited government. Is that what this clown saying. I just I cannot It makes no sense. It doesn't stand up to any scrutiny at all. It's not what fascism is. He also said bureaucrats and people in the government are the ones who make this country work. That's demonstrably false and that is not meant. Please, I don't want
to be misunderstood. I know I had people that work state jobs federal jobs. That is not an insult on what you do. I'm saying the only reason that there are there even is a government in this country is because there was a prosperous private sector. The government takes money out of the private sector by force, by the way, and then takes it to run what they're
supposed to be running. Of course, they add to that massively over time to where we're doing things in the federal government, in our state governments, and our local governments in many cases, and our schools in many cases that are completely one hundred percent not what we were supposed to be doing. It's not what these things were designed to do. So we just continue to pour more and more money into it. We take more and more money out of
the private sector. Then we put people in positions of government, we pay them more than the private counterparts, meaning if you're an accountant in the private sector, you get paid less on average than if you're an accountant in the federal government. Not to mention the federal benefits, folks, when you look at the federal unfunded liabilities, that's not even included that part of the number that's not even included in the number of our current federal debt. So we
say it's thirty one or thirty two trillion now or whatever it is. But the truth is it's much more than that, because there are unfunded liabilities, meaning there are retirement funds that don't you know, when people retire, they are going to continue to get a paycheck that doesn't show up as debt. But that is of a liability that the government has taken on. And I'm not saying people shouldn't have retirement. I'm just saying the whole thing should be
scaled back. There shouldn't be as many people. Federal budgets should be much less, Federal departments should be fewer. The role and scope of our federal government should be massively cut. How in the world is cutting the bureaucrats, eliminating jobs in bureaucracy, reducing departments, eliminating departments. How is that fascism? What is this guy talking about? See, it doesn't have to make sense to the people that don't need sense to make decisions. They just need
to hear a narrative. They don't question a narrative. They trust the MSNBC logo or they trust Rachel Mattau, or they trust whatever this guy Eugene was at Eugene Robinson. I think, whoever it is, it doesn't matter in certain new name, in certain new face. It's just another leftist. They just believe it. Why do they believe it because of the authority that they you know. It's just like there's a there's a fallacy and logic called an appeal to authority. An appeal to authority. So, for example, I
can say that, let's just take this issue of transgenderism. I can say, well, someone is biologically male or female, which is a fact, by the way. But you can have some doctor come along and some doctors say, well, men can have babies, which is what I've referenced this earlier too. It's in the stack of stuff. I'm probably not gonna play it. Maybe I will. I looked at the clock. If I got time, i will. But so someone will say, well, the doctor
knows. The doctor knows because she's a doctor, men can have babies. Because that doctor said men can have babies. Forget what Forget what the laws of nature are, forget what science can actually prove. I've got someone in a white coat with a MD beside their name that says women, excuse me, men can have babies, and suddenly that's supposed to matter because they're a doctor. We'll forget about their position of authority for a moment. And this
is used, by the way, on any any number of levels. Like you could say, in religious circles, you could say the church said, and my pastor said. You could say, in business circles, the boss said. Now, I mean to a certain degree. I mean like the boss at a company can say this is how things are going to be run. But a boss of the company that says that the sun isn't going to, you know, rise tomorrow, you don't have to. He's he's either
right or wrong. And he's not just right because he's the boss. He's gonna If he's saying it's not gonna rise, he's wrong. And I guess the point is is that too many people just get sucked into that. I
don't care what MSNBC says. I don't care honestly what anybody says. I care about whether they can articulate it and make it make sense, whether how does that claim match up against truth and claiming that Trump is a textbook fascist for wanting to reduce the size of government or get rid of bureaucrats in our system that are candidly the problem, people that are abusing their power, they are the problem. To call him a fascist is absolutely Maybe you don't have
to like it, but it's not fascism. What on earth is this guy talking about? Because he's got a appearance on MSNBC or a show. I don't know if he's I don't even know who the guy is. He's just on MSNBC. I saw the stupid clip. I wanted to share it with you. I read about it. But you know, the point is, there is no reason just to believe someone because they say, listen to me, I'm the authority figure. Same thing happened in COVID. Follow the science,
but don't ask us about the science. What about the science has been established for many, many years. Why why should we be vaccinated against something that we've already contracted and had at one point in time. Our body has antibodies that they've created. They go back into the bone marrow over time, they're not just actively floating around the bloodstream until they detect in the future that
virus in the bloodstream again. Then the body says, go get it, antibodies anyway, But none of that matters because there's no context, there's no room for debate, there's no room for discussion. People just listen to their tribe. People listen to the authority figure at the moment, which for some people, somehow, some way as MSNBC anyway, I gotta get a break. Long in the segment sits out of my friends back in a minute. Welcome back, my friends. By the way, this program is brought to
you in part by our good friends that I sell health. As we get into the latter half of the year, and my friends, we are in the latter half of the year. Now, it's crazy to think that, but we're in the latter half of twenty twenty three. We're about to enter into debate season. Who knows if Trump will be there, who knows if Pence will qualify. Who knows what's going to happen next? How many more
Trump indictments, all of this sort of stuff on the radar screen. But as we move toward the end of twenty twenty three, a lot of folks consider the possibility of changing or amending or adding insurance and so forth. If you're in the market for that. Encourage you to consider reaching out to Eric Wilson of I Sell Health. I sell health dot com is the website for more information. He helps folks all over the country. If your business in
particular, or the business you work at is looking to add coverage. UM now might be the good a good time to to think about reaching out. But I selehealth dot com. Eric Wilson, good friend of the program m most states he can help I sihealth dot com. He's sure to tell him you heard about him here on the Todd huff Show. So, like I said earlier, I don't have the time to play another SoundBite that I wanted to play. You can see it in the stack of stuff at Todd huff
Show dot com. What you'll want to do, I'll move it up towards the top. I think I currently have it down low, but anyway we will UM it's it's doctors a doctor. It says doctor attacks woman who says only women can have babies. And I've referenced it twice. I just want you to hear it, and it's it's crazy and some of the things the American Medical Association is now saying is crazy is anti science. Especially as it comes into relation with the LGBTQ, in particular the trans agenda. We are
losing truth, my friend. That's why it's so important that we proclaim it, because the second we quit proclaiming at the liars and deceivers step in with their version of well reality. But of course it's not that at all. Time outs in order, though, I gotta take a break, so back, sit tight, back in a minute. Welcome back, my friends. Cut this way too short today, My apologies for that, but we live in a messed up world. As I said at the end of last segment,
truth is something that we've learned, that's been revealed to us. It's our job to proclaim that. The second we stop proclaiming it, someone's going to step in and try to redefine it. And if people are not constant, we don't have it all figured out. But the things we have figured out, we better learn how to communicate and understand the importance of continuing to communicate it. Otherwise we've got jokers and clowns want to step in with lies. I've got to go SDGC tomorrow. Take care