Attention. You're listening to the Tod Huff Radio show, America's home for conservative not bitter Talk radio. Be advised. The content of this program has been documented to prevents, ed even cure liberalism, and listening may cause you to lean to the right. Here's your conservative but not bitter host, Todd Huff. Greetings, my friends, and thank you for tuning in to America's home for conservative not bitter talk. I am your host, the one and only
Tod Huff, the benevolent dictator here in the studio behind the microphone. It is indeed my pleasure to be here today. Todd Huffshow dot com is where you can go, by the way, any of the things that we talk about on this show. Maybe with some rare exceptions, you will find links to articles or background information that I have used in preparation for the show on the stack of Stuff page at totofshow dot com. That, by the way,
is a hat tip to the late great Rush Limbaugh. A coin or a shot me, I should say, a term he coined his stack of stuff. Of course he had papers. I got some papers here. Rush used to do that, ruffle the papers to tell you that he was holding in his formerly nicotine stained fame fingers some stories from the day. We have most of these things digitally now on our website if you want to check him out at totofshow dot com. But I want to start today. You know,
I was thinking about this as the music was playing. I was thinking because in a previous hour we were talking about Trump suggesting that Biden's going to get a shot in the arm, actually a shot in the as he put at the backside the ables, in order to get through the debate on Thursday night, which we've we've talked a lot about on this program. Because we're now in the I mean really the beginning of the final stretch towards well through
the campaign. I mean we're down to a couple of months. Votes will be cast, not that far well, for all we know, votes have already been cast. I'm kidding. I'm kidding. I do love the bumper sticker that says, when I die, make sure that I don't vote Democrat. I think that that's fantastic. By the way, whoever came up with
that, very well done, Very well done, my friends. But you know, you think about the narratives and the storylines today, Trump is out there saying that Biden gets a shot of a drug in order to get through shot of something in order to get through the debates. We have fact checkers coming together to let you know with certainty that Biden was not out there soiling his breeches when he was in when he was in Paris for the G seven.
I mean, these have become real narratives and issues in politics here in twenty twenty four, it's absolutely crazy times. We've got a narrative. We've got a storyline that talks about a president who has been charged, well now convicted, charged in other cases, having charges brought against him in other cases, but also already been convicted in one case setting sentencing will be here in
just a couple of weeks. So we've got that to talk about. I mean, you start listening or listing all of the things that's going on in this particular campaign. I mean, it's crazy. I never dreamt when I was studying political science at Butler University nearly gee heck over over twenty five years ago. Well, I graduated in twenty so twenty four years ago, twenty
four to twenty seven years ago. Let's say that there's no way I don't think anybody in my class would have believed that there would be actual conversations political discourse about whether a candidate for president of the United States messed is paying in the political discourse, or that the one candidate was saying the other candidate was getting a shot of something in the arm or in the backside in order to
get through a debate or the State of the Union address. But that, my friends, is where we find ourselves it certainly, you know, depending upon your perspective, that can be disappointing. You can think, man, what happened to the statesmanship? It could be entertaining. I don't know,
depending upon your viewpoint. And there's some days I shift back and forth as to how I look at it. But the bottom line is we have to use whatever's going on, whatever's going on out there in this campaign, in the current narrative of the moment, we have to find ways to persuade people to choose liberty, the constitution, freedom, and not the ideology, the morally bankrupt ideology of the radical left. So lost to get to here today
in this hour of the program. But before we get started, I want to remind you that if you're currently smoking or vaping or chewing to back the Nicknack Naturals is here to help you crush your vice. They've created a mint,
a mint that is a nicotine mint. So this is not for you if you are not currently using nicotine products, but if you are and if you're looking for ways to crush your vice, Nicknack Naturals has found a naturally better alternative to smoking, to vaping, to chewing things that don't involve the mess. Don't involve the mess of smoke, of spit, of slimy pouches, bad breath, cigarette brakes, maybe yellow teeth. Who knows all these
other side effects. Nicknack Naturals doesn't have those. It's a discreete mint. It can it's not messy, it's odorless. You don't have to go outside out in the hot weather or the cold weather or the pouring rain to have a smoke. You can sit at your desk or stay in your house and use the product. So you can go to nicknack dot com you can shop the variety of labors they have there in ic innac nick neck dot com. By the way, fifteen percent discount if you use my name Todd during checkout.
Nick knack dot com. That's in ic nac nicknack dot com. Promo code todd saves you fifteen percent. So lots of crazy narratives out there today. I want to start here by well, actually where I want to start today. Something I find a little bit ironic. This is at the Federalist dot com. Here's the headline, Sean Fleetwood writing this article. Democrats love democracy so much they're trying to keep RFK Junior off the twenty twenty four ballot.
So in addition to the debate, and in addition to what's happening between Trump and Biden, we cannot overlook if there's another candidate. Now, this candidate's not going well, there's actually a couple of other candidates, but there's another candidate who's in double digits as it pertained to polling or potential votes in the twenty twenty four election. And that candidate is RFK Junior, Robert F.
Kennedy Junior. And the Democrats who are out there telling us that they are fighting to save our democracy, that Republicans and Trump and MAGA supporters are out there to try to undermine our democracy, which of course we have a constitutional republic that matters. By the way, that absolutely matters. I'm not saying, look, there's certainly this concept of self governance that matters tremendously the consent of the government. In fact, our entire system is predicated upon the
idea that we the people and our founders were brilliant for doing this. We the people said, look, instead of you know, we just won this revolution. Normally, what happens is the people that won the revolution will establish themselves as the people who then become the ruling class over the new nation. That's not what happened in this particular instance. Our founders said, look, fellow Americans, we are not subject to anyone. You're not subject to some
person who calls him self king. You are made in the image of God. Your liberties, your freedoms come from your creator. And instead of having a government come in and tell you what you can do, we do this a little bit differently. In fact, we do it exactly opposite. We say that the government that is established is going to have the consent of the governed, and so we start from the position that we're the ones that rule
ourselves, and that we are going to grant the government. The federal government certain powers, powers, by the way that we reserve the right to oversee powers, by the way that we don't want to become centralized and used against us. And so with everything that we do in the creation of this new government, we're going to make sure that we have separate branches that hold one another accountable. We want it to be We want it to be tedious,
we want it to be difficult. We want it to be we want governing. We want legislating to be painful. We don't want to see radical changes that can happen quickly simply because fifty percent plus one say that they want it. We want there to be some tension here in the system. But we also understand that we have the consent of the government. We are a people that governs itself. Although we don't have a pure democracy. We're not all
voting on everything. Everybody doesn't vote on every single issue as an individual and then the majority wins. It's not the way that this that this works. We want a representative constitutional republic where we elect people who represent us our interests. We send them, in the case of the federal government, to the national capital in Washington, d C. And those individuals will will make decisions, engage in debate, will serve on committees, will cast votes for and
against certain things. And in the constituents, the people that he or she is representing back in their home district can say we like what you did, we didn't like what you did, whatever the case may be, and we can vote you in for another term, or we can vote for your political opponent next time. That's the way that this is supposed to work. So, but the left wants you to believe that we live in democracy, democracy, democracy, democracy. Now again, I'm not denying that there are democratic
aspects in the constitutional republic. Of course, this whole concept again of the consent of the governed is critically important. It's we the people how the Constitution of the United States starts out. But it is not a pure democracy.
And that matters tremendously because, my friends, because my friends, at its core, a constitutional republic says we are going to define the role of the government on paper, this is what the government should be doing, right, Section Article one, Section whatever, Article two, sex you know, it lays out the role of each branch of government. And then at the end of that document and what we call the Bill of Rights, we write down a series of kind of examples. This is not meant to be viewed as
an exhaustive list. This is a series of examples of rights that we have as individual people, and the ones that we enumerated include things like freedom of speech, freedom of religion, the right to keep in bear arms, the right to be secure in your houses and papers and property, and so forth against the warrantless you know, searches and seizures of property and so forth.
You can't just be walking down the street and have some government law enforcement officer come up to you and demand that you prove that you're innocent effectively, or come knocking on your door at two am, unless, of course you're Trump and live at mar A Lago and you know they're coming to suppose the get papers that they may have just sent you palettes of a few months prior. But anyway, all that those are just and that's not meant to be an
exhaustive list. That's meant to just kind of give a flavor to take to take the time to enumerate certain rights, rights that the founders may have seen that were infringed upon by the monarch of the King of England. Right they wanted to take steps and measures to do that, but we don't have a pure democracy because a pure democracy can theoretically say that we take away rich people's rights, which the Left does this the rich that they want to target rich
people and say rich people have to pay certain taxes. The Founders didn't like this sort of stuff. In fact, my friends, did you know, in order for us to even have a federal income tax, the Constitution had to be amended. We had to change what the Founders originally wrote further to be a direct tax from the federal government to you. The Founders would have
found this absolutely appalling, my friends. But yet we've changed that, and we've changed a lot of things, a lot of things that we should never have messed with, including I would maintain the way that senators are elected used to state legislatures voted for senators, which was an ingenious way again of having representation in our federal government for the people through the House of Representatives, but also for the states, which you could say the state is the collection of
people, but it is a different when you're being held accountable by state representatives of state legislature. There's a different series of things that you have to keep in mind. And it's more along the interest of the state itself, the state government, which is important, which is important. There's no representative representation for that today. And I think we would avoid a lot of the pitfalls that we found ourselves in in this country if we had not changed some of
these things. Some of the things absolutely needed to be changed. Don't misunderstand, but these particular examples I'm laying out they were not with the founders envisioned how they're not how they viewed the federal government, your liberty and so forth.
But we don't have a pure democracy. The left talks about this in such a way that they've now convinced large swaths of the American people that we are a democracy, which a democracy could say that if you vote to take away Bill's rights, that Bill no longer has them, because the democracy has
spoken, and that's a terrible proposition. And so a representative republic, a constitutional republic, has established that in order well that the government will respect the rights of the smallest minority, which the smallest minority you can possibly have is the minority of the individual. The individual and his or her personal rights constitutionally
protected, but rights that come not from the government but by God. But nonetheless, this has not stopped the left, the Democrat Party from I guess, taking advantage of monopoly or capitalizing on the opportunity to say we're in favor of democracy and the peace pull in the course of the Republican Party and Trump and Maga Republicans are not. Trump wants to be a dictator. The Democrats want to save democracy. That's what they want you to believe. The narrative
is. But wouldn't you say that if you love democracy so much, if you love the rule of the people so much, and you wanted to give people choices, wouldn't you say that you would not try to keep a candidate off of the ballot. Remember RFK tried to run as a Democrat. My friend, he tried to run as a Democrat. They opposed him there. They didn't want a primary for Sleepy Joe. They didn't want to primary, as I say, for President Bribery. They wanted it to be easy sailing.
So they were able to kick RFK Junior to the curb. And I would tell you, if you're a Democrat, if you're a Democrat and you like RFK, do not forget that do not forget that you're party much like it did in twenty sixteen to Bernie Sanders, although a little bit differently, but it's the same basic thing. They prevented the opposition, right, They
didn't let they didn't really let the people vote. By the way, if you go back to twenty sixteen and you look at the way that candidates were selected by the Democrat Party, look into what the term super delegate meant.
If you believe in democracy, and you believe that your party is in favor of democracy, then I ask you to please reconcile, for me and for the American people people who study this stuff, the concept of a super delegate when selecting your party's nominee for president, That, my friend, that is an incompatible notion where one person's vote has dramatically more value in the process of
selecting the presidential nominee for your party than the average person's vote does. That is not democratic, And the Democrat Party, of course, is not for that. They are for power. They are for using whatever they can to manipulate people to believe that Republicans are dangerous, Democrats are good, and that we should be well electing Democrats and empowering these jokers and clowns. That's the real narrative. So I'm gonna get to this article here in just a moment.
But friends, let me tell you. Let me tell you that I a couple of a couple of months ago now, when I was thinking about losing weight. I was and I was beginning this conversation with myphdeweight loss dot com. I was asked the question about why why do you want to lose weight? I packed on some pounds. I'm not proud of that, but it's the truth down by the way, about thirteen pounds. But at the time before I started this program, I was asked, what is you know,
what's the reason you want to do this? And that's important to understand, right because there's tough days when you do something like start a weight loss program or any any sort of you know, improvement program or something that causes you to change a behavior, change a habit, to just to do things and to be a little bit more conscious and maybe even strict on yourself, whatever the case may be. You have to know your why to get through those tough times. And I just remember, you know, as as a
guy, that was when I was younger. I was a college athlete. I was always very physically fit, and I'm a family guy, and I thought, you know, I don't ever want I don't ever want personally my physical condition to prevent me from being able to do things with my children or god willing, one day, my grandchildren. I don't want that. And I know, look, we're all fighting a battle against time, and ultimately we can't beat can't beat father time. I'm not suggesting we can, but
we can certainly be in a better position from a health perspective. And that was the reason that I ultimately decided to do this and to work with my phdeweightloss dot com. And so I started a program of well six or so weeks ago, and I feel better. Inflammation and my knees are down. I've had two I've had two ACL surgeries and arthroscopic surgery over the past. It's been a while, it's been thirty years. But nonetheless I've I've had
knee problems and inflammation in my knees. That stuff's down. I didn't I don't think I was expecting that, to be quite candidate, The inflammation's down. I feel I feel better. I'm not hungry with this program. If you're looking to start your weight loss journey, if you have a good why, you know, there's some things that are important to you, something like being there for family, being healthy, taking care of yourself so that you
can stay active and do things and see things and go places. Maybe that if you didn't take care of yourself, maybe you couldn't do as easily or in some cases at all. My PhD Weight Loss can help you with that website again, My the Word by m Why PhD, phdweightloss dot com, My phdweightloss dot Com. Just be sure to telling me you heard about him here on the Todd Half Show. So I'm gonna start this, but I'm gonna have to pause for the break headline here at the Federalist dot com.
Democrats love democracy so much they're trying to keep RFK Junior off the ballot off the twenty twenty four ballot. Worried his campaign may hurt Joe Biden's reelection chances. Democrat are working overtime to prevent independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Junior from appearing on the twenty twenty four ballot On Saturday, This would have been last weekend, left wing mouthpiece CNN reported Democrats have accelerated efforts to deny Kennedy
ballot access in key battleground states ahead of the November contest. Does this sound like democracy at work to you, my friends? According to the report, the Democratic National Committee, the DNC, and Clear Choice Pack, a pro Biden super pac focused on countering third party candidates, have filed legal bids contesting
Kennedy's ballot access in four states in the last month. These include battleground states such as shocking right battleground states such as North Carolina and Nevada which Trump taught me to say correctly I used to say Nevada, as well as quote Democratic strongholds. Each of the filings, the report says, claims de violated state laws that stipulate how independent candidates as symbol of the paperwork needed to qualify for
a state's ballot. Democrats are alleging Kennedy's campaign misled voters to sign their petitions and properly formed a minor party to ease ballot qualification, and committed procedural errors in its petition across five states. According to The New York Times, Kennedy has officially gained ballot access in seven states, including Michigan. The independent candidate's campaign has claimed it's acquired enough signatures to appear on the ballot in thirteen other
states, although official certification is still pending. Among those states are North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Nevada. So bottom line here, this is not very democratic from the party that tells us they're fighting to save democracy number one. Number two, Look, I'm all for if something is questionable, certainly there can be legal challenges, and RFK juniors should not be out there. None of the candidates should be doing things that are or the political parties or anything
that are breaking the law. Of course. Of course, usually what happens is that people are targeted for things that maybe everybody else is doing. That's not a good thing either. This legal system has been used to justify political prosecution and persecution here. I don't know if I want to call it persecution, but basically they don't want him on the ballot because they're afraid. They're afraid that that can hurt their chances. Make no mistake about it. All
this talk about who Kennedy hurts and helps. In the twenty twenty four general election. This is all you need to know. Democrats are not pro democracy, and they know that a strong RFK junior candidacy in states, especially battleground states, can hurt them in a massive, massive way. That being said, it's time to take a quick time out. My friends, Sit tight. You're listening here to conservative not better talking on your host Todd huff back
here in mere moments, my friends. So lots of things here in today's stack of stuff, but I want to shift gears a little bit to something that we've you know, we've hit on in the past. In fact, I need to compile let's put a note down. Let's compile a list of people who say that Trump's coming after them if he's elected in twenty twenty four. And I think we need to who do we add to that immediately? Rachel Maddow, I think right. I think we need to add Robert de
Niro AOC. I think those are three that I can think of off the top of my head. I'm sorry, Oh, Chrissy Tagan, that's right. We talked about Christy Tagan recently. So there's four of confirm all of it. But we'll we'll start a list. And by the way, listener, if you have someone that I need to add to that list, we'll make sure we'll keep an eye on it. Here's my vow to those people. I will personally keep an eye on you. I mean, look, I'm here in central Indiana. We do travel, we have it for a
bit, but we travel on the Truth Tour around the country. We will keep an eye on you. I'll make sure that people know about your whereabouts. If there's concerns, legitimate concerns of brown Shirts showing up like they did at mar A Lago to do a raid down there, I will make sure that the people know. I don't want you going to prison just because you
opposed President Donald Trump. Even if I think your movie sock Robert de Niro, or even if I think you're a lunatic politically AOC will, I certainly don't want you to face legal consequences because of your political affiliation, your opposition to Trump. That's something I actually oppose. I actually oppose, and the people in this audience oppose as well. It's of course used as a weapon by your side, but nonetheless we're not going to sync to that level.
So I'm going to personally keep an eye on you. But I need to have a list, and so that's why we're going to start that. But it's even beyond that. It's even beyond Trump coming out out for me headline here the Daily Fetch. Maxine Waters, the congresswoman from the People's Republic of California, says that there will be more killings, more killings if Trump becomes president. I'm concerned for my safety, she says, if Trump becomes If
Trump becomes president. So she's on an MSNBC. I'm just gonna start playing some of this. I wasn't sure how I wanted to do this, but I'm gonna play some of this. She's on an MSNBC, And so again, what are they doing here? The idea is to say, look, we have to against the Seinfeld Newman strategy is doing whatever they whatever it takes, as long as it takes them, so long as it takes Trump away from sixteen hundred Pennsylvania Avenue. This is their strategy. This is what they
want to do. If you've got to plan claim that you're going to go to prison if Trump is elected, then that's fine if you've got to claim. But see, it's gonna get ratcheted up from this point in time.
So it went from someone's gonna be thrown in prison, Trump's gonna come after them politically, to now Trump, There's gonna be more killings, according to max And she's a sitting congresswoman, sitting congresswoman from the People's Republic of California, saying that there will be more killings if Trump becomes president, and that she is concerned for her safety. I don't want Maxine Waters to be concerned
for her safety. I don't want anybody to be concerned for their safety because of their political beliefs and so forth, because there's lunatics out there that would hurt people really of all different ideologies and political beliefs and so forth. There's crazy people out there. I don't want that. But I also think that this is a little bit of a stretch, or maybe a lot of a stretch of the imagination here, faux outrage is designed again to get people to
think that, I mean, think about where we've come. The narrative now, they don't have a lot of places to take us from here, my friends. The narrative now is your country will collapse if Trump is president.
That's the narrative, and it's the narrative that's in the wake of political prosecution, of law fare, of political warfare against the current Republican nominee, the presumptive nominee from the Republican Party, Donald J. Trump, who is going to be announcing, hopefully here soon, his VP choice, which he's hinted at a couple times. The VP will be at Thursday's debate, although I don't know if they'll announce them there. I think they're gonna wait a little
bit on that, but we'll see. Anyway. All this is to say Maxine Waters, she's the one that's kind of doing the test. She's kind of you know, there were canaries in the coal mines right back in the day, and when you take the canary down there, and when the canary was having trouble, ultimately, if the canary passed away, that the miners knew we better get out of here. The gases are such that this is a dangerous place to be. Let's get out of here before it hurts us.
And so Maxine Waters, she the entire Democrat Party has become crazy, but she's on the fringe of that. She's actually there's another fringe that kind of starts with the squad, and I would say Maxine Waters, and their job is to even step outside the crazy of the Democrat Party took fringe, and to see how far that they can. But they can take these crazy ideas and make them appear to seem reasonable or you know, how far they
can advance the political narrative with them. And then you've got the core Democrats. Of course, the the folks who are less from less radical districts have to distance themselves as far as possible from that. That's why you actually have some Democrats who are calling for border security. Now they're from districts that are
not radically insane leftist districts. But meanwhile, the radical leftists can go out there and do all sorts of ridiculous things and make ridiculous claims because of course they're guaranteed to win anyway, because crazy wins in those places. So that being said, Maxine Waters on MSNBC telling people that she's concerned about the safety
of so many people in this country, particularly people of color. Okay, here we go seen Waters talking about what happens if Trump is elected and how she's going to be concerned and afraid for the threats against lawmakers are on the rise again after hitting an all time high in twenty twenty one when Donald Trump's followers stormed the Capitol on January sixth. Last year, the Capitol Police investigated more than eight thousand threats against members of Congress, an increase from twenty twenty
two. A spokesman for the department paused eight thousand threats against lawmakers and twenty twenty three, is that what he said? An increase over the previous year, But so eight thousand, folks, In case it needs to be said, threats against lawmakers is unacceptable. It doesn't matter if they're made to Republicans or Democrats. It doesn't matter if it's made against men or women, white candidates, black candidates, Hispanic whatever. This is unacceptable. It's unacceptable.
But they want you to think that Republicans and Trump's they want you to think that Trump's out there condoning this stuff. Predicted twenty twenty four will be quote a very busy year for our special agents. This week, a Texas man who vowed to kill Congresswoman Maxine Waters was sentenced to thirty three months in prison and a ten thousand dollars fine. The man left good by the way, well, I mean, look, assuming that this is a legitimate case,
I'm not following it. But if this is what happened, if he's threatening to kill a sitting congresswoman, again, it makes no difference to me, your political affiliation, background, whatever, there should be consequences for that. And it sounds like there worth thirty three months in prison for this. Water's voicemails with violent and racist threats in twenty twenty two and doubled down when police
warned him to stop. Congressman Waters attendant demand sentencing hearing. She told the court the threats gave her nightmares, it made her and her family fear for their lives. The Los Angeles Times reported that the congresswoman described herself as quote haunted. Joining me now is Democratic Congressman Maxine Waters of California. She's the ranking member. Okay, so he's introducing her. She's going to say something.
So the background there is troubling. It's one case, for starters, it's one case, and it's one unacceptable and it sounds like it was handled properly from what I know, which again I never know what I'm being told from these jokers and clowns in the media. But shouldn't happen. They should She shouldn't be treated like this, even though, by the way, remember this is the same woman. I'm not saying this, this is does not
justify this whatsoever. Do you not misunderstand? But remember when Trump was was president, she told people to follow around and harass Trump's cabinet people that were on Trump's team. Remember this. I remember this. I can see the clip in my mind as she's She's telling her people, telling her people, the people in the audience to basically harassed these Don't let him eat in peace. Remember that if you see him at a restaurant, don't let him eat
in peace. Now does that mean that she should be treated like she was? Absolutely not. But to act like she's not contributing to this sort of environment, not to that same degree. Don't misunderstand in would be an erroneous thing to say or to believe. Here she is of the House Financial Services Committee. Congreso Waters, as always, thank you for coming to the Saturday Show. You've been in the public eye for decades. Why were these threats
particularly painful? Well, you know it was sinister. Here was a man who continued to call four times and he made ratio comments. He basically said, not only was he going to put a bullet between my eyes, he was going to cut my throat. And I want to tell you it did get to me. I'm not someone who walked around, you know, just fearful all the time. But this was more sinister. Again, it was deadly. And so I wanted by those kinds of comments coming from him.
Congresman, what made you want to face your harassmer in court? I wanted to see who this human being was and when he saw me, what was it about me that made him want to kill me? What had I said? What did I that made him want to slip my throat or to put a bullet between my eyes? And so I listened to him, and I hope he listened to me. I had my children in court with me. My daughter was there and my son was there, and they're always fearful that
I'm going to be killed. And of course my staff has to endure these kinds of threats. This isn't the first one we've had. We've had some others sentence and put in jail, but this one seems more consistent and seems more serious. Again, it seems as if this man was intent on not only threatening me, but he said he had people in the Los Angeles area, some of his friends or groups of people that he works with, that we're going to get me. That they had a contract out on my life.
Okay, so you get the idea of reprehensible stuff, no doubt. But also they want to use this, of course, to say that voting for Trump's going to lead to more this. Voting for Trump is going to lead to more of this. That's the narrative. I got to take a break here, my friend, Sit tight, you're listening to conservative not being to talk. I am your host, the one and only time to back in just a minute. Welcome back, my friends. This is the third
and final segment of this hour of the program. We've been talking about Representative Maxine Waters, who had been threatened, who had been threatened to be killed by an individual. This individual was charged, has been convicted, has been sentenced to thirty three months, which is terrible stuff. Again, it's terrible no matter who it happens to. I find it ridiculous. I have to say this part because in today's world. In today's world, of course,
everything stems from narratives. Those narratives often stem from, well, this idea that one group of people is of course responsible for all the rage and just the condition, the overall climate, political climate. Now I'm not talking about the climate as far as temperatures go. That, of course we know is for people who are driving SUVs. I'm kidding. I'm kidding, But that's
the narrative that they've established for that. But I played that part of the interview last segment that leads to what I want to get to this segment, This is really what I wanted to get to, where she's asked by the host of the show, Maxine Waters, representative from the People's Republic of California. She's asked how she feels about these sorts of threats continuing if Trump is reelected. Remember, we've gotten to the point where they've already threatened that if
Trump wins, he's going to establish himself as king. He's hitler, they've told us. Now we are being told that individuals are just going to I guess, be killed more frequently because Trump's in office. That's I mean, that's where they've gotten. This is the only way just think about it. This way, the only way that they can I guess win. The support of some people is to take the conversation this far. None of this is rooted in reality, none of this has any sort of basis in logic and
so forth. But this is of course what is being proclaimed out there. Before I play that SoundBite, my friends, let me remind you about our partnership with the good folks at z Stack. Z Stack is a trusted brand that has been formulated by doctor Zolinko, and they create natural health supplements that
allow you to take better care of your health. They got a series of products, a series of formulations that you can find on their website zstacklife dot com slash todd and you can see how these products can help you help you with everything from just general immunity to sleep to dealing with flu like symptoms. They've got some most of the formulations are for adults, but they've also got
formulations for kids as well. Folks, we are responsible ultimately for our overall health, and yes, diet and exercise are important, but it also is important to supplement ourselves with things depending upon our personal needs, that maybe we aren't able to get enough of through our regular diets and so forth. So zstaklife dot com is where you can go zstack life slash excuse me, zstacklife dot com slash Todd, use my name Todd check out. You're gonna save
fifteen off of your fifteen percent off your purchase. Z stack empowering you to stay prepared, stay safe, and stay strong. So here's Maxine Waters. I'm not going to get to all of this, but I want you to hear this back and forth about how much more of a threat people like Maxine Waters and other Americans will face. According again to the narrative here, if Trump is elected president here in November. Here it is concern are you,
congresswoman, about your safety if Donald Trump is re elected. Well, I'm very concerned, not only about my safety and not only about the safety of members of Congress. I'm concerned about the safety of so many people in this country, particularly people of color. Donald threat. Donald Trump has said that
if he does not win, it's going to be fraud. And because I thought we were more afraid if he were to win, now you're saying you're more afraid if he doesn't win, because that's when he's going to tell people it was fraud. It's going to be fraud, there's going to be blood in the streets. He threatens about a civil war, and he threatens there
it's going to be violence. So I say all of this it's motivational with many of those who are racist, who are sending it home, listening to him, and they're taking him up on his threats even before the elections take place. And so it's about thousands, maybe millions of people, you know, being threatened and being risk because of Donald Trump and his desire to wreak revenge on anything and everybody. And this is quickly. I don't have a
lot of time left. But so it sounds like she's making the case if you don't, I'm just I'm just using her own thinking, her own logic. Here she says he asked her you worried about there being more violence if Trump wins. It sounds like the way she answered the question, she was afraid of more violence if Trump loses or if Biden wins. So I guess if you flip this on its head and actually follow what she's logically saying, I think she's saying that you better vote for Trump if you don't want there
to be violence in the streets. That's how I take this. I mean, this is just incoherent gibberish. This just I don't know the details the dates of when these You know, the gentleman that's been convicted and spending thirty three months in jail in prison for his threats against her, I don't know when that took place, but I don't believe it. I don't believe it was during Trump's presidency. Maybe it was, so then it sounds like there's more of a risk, more of a danger if you don't vote for Trump.
So I guess Maxine Waters is out there endorsing Trump. That's what I'm starting to piece together from that incoherent answer. She just scaveed there. But anyway, music's telling me it's time to wrap up. My friends, Thank you so much for listening, Have a wonderful day. We'll talk soon. SDG