Attention. You're listening to the Tod Huff radio show, America's home for conservative not bitter talk radio. Be advised. The content of this program has been documented to prevents and even cure liberalism, and listening may cause you to lean to the right. Here's your conservative but not bitter host, Todd Huff.
That is right, my friends, and thank you Glenn for that absolutely stellar introduction. As usual, you have tuned in to America's home for conservative not bitter talk. I am your host, the one, the only, the benevolent dictator behind the microphone. Here, Todd Huff. You know the routine. If you've listened to this program for any length of time. Thoughts, questions, feedback, adoration and praise can be sent to Todd at toddhuffshow dot com, or if you prefer, you can text those questions.
But again, always be sure to include the appropriate amount of adoration and praise and it's more than you think is necessary. Three one seven, two, one zero, twenty eight to thirty is where you can send those text messages as well. I read these, my friends, so I welcome you to to send them. Just make it count. Most of you do a couple of you don't. I just ough it's so disappointing when that happens. So let's get into it today. Well, let me set the stage for
what we want to get into. I want to talk about what I'm I guess I'm going to refer to as a political realignment. Is what's happening here in our country today. A political realignment. In fact, that's what today's Todd Talk is about, which you'll be able to find those on our website. Those are sixty second features, little clips, snippets of if you will, they're not snippets of this show. They're just short daily features talking sometimes about it just depends.
Sometimes it's about things that are maybe front and center on the program, which is kind of what today's was. Sometimes it's anecdotes and experiences and things that I have well that I want to share with people. And sometimes it is some stories that don't have time to get to or that I find humorous or whatever. But those are Todd Talks, and those will be as we build those out on the website. But there's a political realignment happening here in this country, and I want to talk
about that here in this hour of the program. Will do that my friends as the program it gets a roll in here. Before I do that, they'll let me remind you. If you are a smoker, if you are a vapor if you are a chewer of tobacco products, nick Knack Naturals is here to help you crush your vice. They have created a nicotine mint. These mints come in a variety of flavors. I don't often say that because I'm telling you more about what it does, but there's
a variety of flavors. You can go and you can actually get a variety pack which includes a well, as you might suspect, a variety of flavors, or you can find the flavor that you like and get a series of cans of Nickknacks that have the flavor that you prefer. Either way, these mints are designed to help you crush your vice. Again, this product is not for you if you're not currently using a nicotine product. But if you are, and if you're looking to crush that vice, you can
go to nicknack dot com. That's in ic nac nicknack dot com again one of my all time favorite website addresses to say and my friends, if you use Knickknack naturals. If you use these mints, you can avoid the messiness that comes along with using tobacco products. There's no smoke, there's no spitting, there's no slimy pouches or spit cans or bad breath or you know, just a cigarette smoke smell on your clothes. There's no need to excuse yourself from the office or from your home to go outside
or wherever you are. If you're at a basketball game, you don't have to leave and go smoke and then come back or go vape. You can do all these things just like normal, just like you would be having a stick of gum or a regular mint. So nicknack dot com is where you can go. Promo code Todd will save you fifteen percent. Nick knack dot com Promo code Todd crush yourvice my friends with nick Nack Natural. So let's talk about this political realignment that we have.
This political realignment. So just in the past couple of days alone, since the end of last week, we have had Robert F. Kennedy Junior, who and by all measures, is a liberal Democrat. Now, notice the term that I I used to describe Robert F. Kennedy Junior RFK Junior. I did not use the term radical leftist. He's not a radical leftist. And you know, this might require a little bit of explanation because some people use these terms I think interchangeably. Now you can say someone is on
the left and they are a liberal. That would be fair. You could say someone is left leaning and they not be a radical leftist. So the way that I talk about this, and the way that I think people should think about this is if you can envision a political spectrum a continuum. A line right is a flat line, an x axis. On one end, I have the furthest left that we can go right at the beginning of
that line. On the other end, I've got the furthest right that we can go And you know a lot of people want to put fascism at one end and communism at the other, and communism on the left, fascism on the right, and then the idea is, hey, we've got to be somewhere in the middle here. That is not how I think about this. Now you're free to think about it the other way. I just don't think that it's best. I know that that's the traditional political paradigm,
the traditional political spectrum I don't. I choose not to look at it that way because I don't think it's accurate. I don't think that that's the way to explain it. Well, the way I look at it is on the left end of the spectrum, we have total government control. Now, whatever form of government that the well that's instituted to use that totalitarian absolute control is largely irrelevant to me.
So you can say that it's fascist, you can say that it's communist, you can say that it's you know, in the case of the Islamic Republic of Iran, you can say that it's an extreme theocratic government that is totalitarian as well. It doesn't so much matter to me. The those are those are the details to me. What is to me important is whether or not there is liberty or there is power in the government, ultimate power
to total control and power. And so at the far end of the left spectrum, I say, absolute government control, not much liberty, not any liberty. And in the furthest left example, the government makes all decisions. You sit down, you shut up, I sit down, I shut up. We are all cogs in the wheel and we need to be doing what we're told. High HOHI ho it's off to work. We go whatever they tell us. We don't question. That's the furthest uh. Again in this in this spectrum,
on the other end is anarchy. On the other end is this idea that says, you know what we're we're free, and we are so free that we literally reject any sort of governance whatsoever. This is the wild West. There are no rules. It is simply just you know, live your life, and you know, there's there's no laws, there's no order. It's just anarchy. And I guess survival of the fittest. So now those are extreme right. This is
a long, long line. But again, what I like to do and I kind of learned I don't know if I learned this from Rush or if he helped bring this out in me. Is something that I was already doing. But he used to say, we illustrate the absurd with the absurd. But I think you also illustrate just just to to kind of sandwich down and kind of create a sandwich and squeeze down until you get to the point where you think, okay, this is this is where I think the balance point should be. This is actually
where we should land on this spectrum. So we're starting super wide, and I would think I would think that in America today most people would say I reject both of those extremes. There would be some people that would accept or even call for some of those extremes to be the case. But I think that they're on the fringe still, And so we start walking our way towards the middle. We don't have to land at the middle. The idea isn't that the middle is the right place.
Every time we start with these extremes, and then we begin to walk them back. And so as we begin to walk from the right end of the spectrum from anarchy, you get to a point somewhere where it's you know, you're moving left, but you're still you know, right of center significantly, and you get to the point where I think our founders landed, and they landed at this concept that said, we want we want law and or in a society, we want to we understand, we understand that
we are created with these rights. These rights come from God, our creator, and so the government has to have some teeth and ability to protect those and you know, there's some other things that government has to do as well.
The government has to provide national defense. I mean, you know, if there's no order, no structure or anything, and you've got an enemy, you've got another nation that's deciding to invade your country, you're going to have a heck of a hard time repelling that attack if you don't have any organization or any military or any ability to defend yourself. Now, some people would say, well, you know, individual people would
defend themselves, but again then it's like minor skirmishes. You got a major army coming through and fighting a few people here, fighting a few people there, and those people that they're encountering may or may not even really be supporting one another anyway. So there has to be a mechanism whereby we can address things that we know we're going to have to run into. And national defense is well one of them. Another one would be defending the
rights of people. So the Founders really spent some time here and they wrote about this. Jefferson wrote about this
in the Declaration. I mean, you know that this idea that we're all created with these rights by our creator, and so it's the role of government to say, look, we're going to we acknowledge that these exist, and we are going to defend and protect those and if people infringe upon your life, liberty, property, pursuit of happiness, the government is going to take actions whereby there are consequences
for infringing upon someone's God given rights. And you can't have a government that's completely feckless, that's completely completely worthless,
or doesn't have enough power to function. In fact, you could make the case, you can make the case that the founders kind of experimented with this and understood when they established the Articles of Confederation in the early stages of this country, and so they realized that they did not there was not enough teeth in the well, there wasn't enough power in the government to deal with some of these some of these threats, some of these rebellions and so forth, and so they kind of move maybe
a little bit more towards some centralized power, but of course still well on the side that says, look, we're doing this not to centralize power and become a far
leftist country on the spectrum that I've laid out. Instead, we're doing this to protect the rights of the people and also to respec to defend this society and this structure that we're building so that people can live their lives without constant threats of uh, you know, just attacks on their whether it be their into their their rights, or upon the very civilization itself. There has to be enough teeth to push back. And so you begin to
find where that is on the spectrum. You know, we have a government, but we want it to be as limited as possible. It's not anarchy. There has to be some, as I've explained, some ability to have some teeth into this government. There has to be a mechanism whereby we can actually accomplish things and actually defend both our country and the rights of people. And so you can kind of envision where this is in your mind. It's still right of center, but it's not on the far end
because there's some structure in order. But the Founder's basically said, and that's what the Constitution was. The Constitution was basically a document that said, Okay, we are going to give the government these specific powers. And they went through the articles and they laid that out. They laid out all
those things. They laid out the idea that you have a Congress that has these responsibilities, and you have a bicameral Congress that has the House of Representatives in the Senate and these This is how the senators made up. This is how they are elected. This is how often they have to go through an election process. You've got the House of Representatives. This is how the districts are apportioned amongst the amongst the colonies or states at the time.
And you know, this is how we're going to calculate how many states get, how many representatives and all these sorts of things. And oh, by the way, this is this is the legislative process. This is how something becomes law. This is you know, how the president can veto that law. Oh, but Congress can override that veto all those rules, right, And there's very specific roles or very specific responsibilities that
each branch of government has. The Founders also were brilliant when they said, look, you know, we're not going to just give all the power to say a chief executive who's now our president. Some folks wanted a king type figure. The Founders said, let's let's not go that direction. We've kind of seen where that that's ended up. Let's have a president. I mean, it's okay, we need to we need a commander in chief. We need someone who is presiding over kind of the head of government, so to speak.
But we don't want to give this person too much power. We see what that can do. That's a danger. So we'll have this legislature and again we divide the legislature. And originally you've heard me mention this before. Originally the founder said, hey, the Senate, the Senate is going to be elected by the rep excuse me, the the legislatures in each in each state. So then senators would be held accountable by the state legislatures, and then the people
would hold the representatives accountable. We've done away with that, so now there's direct election of senators by the people as well. I think that's a terrible idea, I know, I do. I think that it was brilliant in how they set that up. Of course, there's room for obviously corruption there, and that's kind of what changed, you know, the the amendment to the Constitution that changed that. But there's corruption today as well with the way that these
these folks operate in the deep state. And that's really again at the heart of what we're going to get into here when we talk about this, you know, the new realignment and what the new battle is about. It's no longer just about tax rates and you know, social programs. We're talking about fundamentally changing our country. You've got a group of people that want to fundamentally change what I'm talking about here, and you have a group of people that want to defend it. That's me, that's the vast
majority of you as well. And so they wrote this constitution and they said this is what you can do. Anything else, anything that's not specified in this document, you are not permitted to do. That's read the Tenth Amendment. Basically, it says, whatever is not specified in this document is reserved by this to the States and to the individual,
to the actual individual American citizen. Meaning if it doesn't say Congress or the President or the Supreme Court can do X, Y or z, and that's up to the states and the people, right, they are the ones who retain the rights to manage that particular thing. Friends, we have blown through that. It is though, it is as though we have looked at the Tenth Amendment and said, let's burn that baby to the ground. Let's totally disregard that because the exact opposite has happened. The exact opposite
has happened. That's how you find things in the Constitution that says that there's a right for a woman to terminate the life of her unborn child. That's exactly how you end up with that, because now you have these games of semantics and make believe Supreme Court decisions and so forth, meaning make believe, make believe meaning, they just they come up with their desired endpoint and then they use sully logic and reasoning to get to that point. Right,
the ends justifies the means. Right. We want to protect a woman's right to kill her unborn child, so let's just make up a bunch of rules to get there.
Right.
And so, the government has been stepping outside the constitution for a long long time. I'm talking decades and decades and decades. And so you have people that have been in the government and they are on both parties. They are in both parties, i should say, and they are they are intent on growing the size and scope of government. See, they are on the inside. They are in the ruling class. They think that they know better. They are condescending, they
are arrogant, they are self righteous. These folks, in my opinion, you go back and you look at the Bible. These folks remind me an awful lot about the religious leaders of the day coming up for rules for the people to follow, onerous, heavy rules for people to follow that are a burden to them, that are a burden to the people. But yet usually Congress and the people inside
the government have one or two things. Sometimes they're exempt completely from having to follow the rules at other times, at other times they may have to follow the rules. But of course they always have the ability to be the exception to the rule. But they also since they make more money than their counterparts in the private sector, research has shown us that the people who are doing a job in the federal government make more than someone who does it in the private sector, which makes literally
zero sense. Right. It's not public service if you're going there for a pay raise. It's not public service if you are using it as a career path and to enrich yourself and to have lots of yachts and houses, which I'm not against, but don't tell me that it's public service. And it also makes no mathematical sense that the people who create the wealth that then goes to government.
It doesn't make any sense that to pay for the same job in the government, you have to pay more than you would pay for it in the private sector when the private sector is the one that's funding the public sector. None of this makes any sense. But this is the trajectory we've been on for a long time. And I'm gonna say both parties are responsible. I'm gonna say, but I'm gonna say it like this. I'm going to say that it's virtually all of the Democrats, with maybe
maybe somebody out there who's an exception. I don't even know if that's the case. And it's some of the Republicans, maybe even many of the Republicans, Republicans that I would call rhinos, Republicans in name only, not the conservatives, not the folks who are libertarian, folks who are in the government, who you know, they they're kind of in the middle. They're not radical, but they're also not principled conservatives who would well adhere to the Constitution and believe in truly
limited government. They they think that they should be in charge of the government and the rest of us adults should follow along, but they also want to limit a little bit what they should get into, but they still want it to be more than the Constitution says. That's how I view it. So the battle lines are being drawn from this point because you're going to have people who like me, are on the side of the Constitution of liberty, and you're going to have people who are
on the side of growing big government. That's where the new battle lines have been drawn. That's why there's a political realignment, so to speak. We'll talk about that as the program unfolds. But my friends, do you know I know you know because I've mentioned this on here before, but seven hundred thousand Americans, seven hundred thousand Americans have lost their lives to heart disease in each of the last two years. That's why I've introduced you to Salty.
Sulty is an all natural, clinically proven way to lower your bad cholesterol. It's ideal for overall heart health. So if you hear me say this, if you have high cholesterol and you're wanting to do something about it, Todd, I, here's something that you can do. Solty dot com. Sol tea salty dot com. You jump on that website, you can read the testimonials, read about the product. I can't talk about all the details here, but I can tell you that you go there, do your research. Maybe you
just want to give the product a try. Check it out. You can get a three month supply for twenty nine dollars and ninety five cents. You get free shipping. It's a good deal. Test it. Maybe some of you can have your lipid levels tested before trying the product and then take it afterwards, because research has shown that this
has lowered cholesterol as lowers people's cholesterol. So if that is something that is a priority for you heart health and lowering your cholesterol, go to salty dot com and you got to use my name Todd at checkout to get that discount. So salty dot com promo code Todd. That's so sol tea Salty dot com quick time out. You're
listening here to Conservative not Better Talk. I am your host, the one and only benevolent dictator that's right behind the microphone here back in just a minute, my friends, just talking here about how there is a political realignment. In the first segment we went through and we kind of outlined, kind of outlined the I guess reasons or the the background. We kind of the lines have been there all along. The battle lines have been drawn all along between those
who love liberty and those who love big government. And so there was a time in our nation's history where the politics seemed to be about policy, you know, foreign policy, tax policy, spending. Let's talk about the budget, you know, do we want to have a program for this, How much funding does that need? What about the military? All these things? Right, that's that's traditionally what politics was. At
least that's what we were told that it was. I'm not sure how much it really ever was that, because behind the scenes there's been a fight brewing for a long long time, I honestly since the founding of the country. Because again, once we acknowledge, once we understand that government does, the government grows. I've said this before. I'm going to say it again. I know, I know, I'm repeating myself from I don't say this often, but I've said this before.
So the founders understood. The founders understood that it is the nature of government to grow. And it's not just the nature of government to grow, it's the nature of all things to grow that humanity is involved with. I've referenced this before we were created. Fact, I just asked my son this yesterday. Just asked my son this yesterday. I said, when did God biblically from the Bible. When did God create work? Because a lot of people think that work was kind of a consequence of the fall,
that's not true. Work was created. Work was created back when God saw that everything was good. Work was not a result of the fall. Work was something we were actually created to do. We are God's workmanship, were to be kind of a partner with God, not an equal, but one who works alongside of God biblically to do the things that He's called us to do. That's saying, I think, putting it simply, And I know some of you don't believe that. That's okay. I mean, I'm not
here to criticize it. I just think that that's clearly why we're here. I say, clearly, it's clear to me because again I believe the Bible to be true, and I got reasons for that. But anyway, the point is is that work is not a bad thing. Work is not a bad thing, and so we were put here to do things to I think accomplishing. In fact, the first word that's used to describe God in the Bible, the first way that God has described in the Bible,
is that he's a creator. In the beginning. God created, right, he created, that's the first thing we know about him. And so humans are creators too. Now we're not on the level of God, but we're made in his image. So we have kind of a sprinkling of his abilities, so to speak, a tiny, tiny, just a little bit of you know, dab of his abilities within us. And we have those abilities in a variety of different talents.
And so, but all those things, when we seek to pursue them, you know, if you seek to, you know, just you get married and you want to grow a family, and you want to grow a family. You want to you want your children to learn. You want your children to develop skills, skills to live life, skills to be content or happy. You want them to deal with some adversity so that they can deal with adversity when life hits them up the side of the head like a two by four. So these things are all necessary, and
so we're but but we like to build. We build cities, we build businesses, we build families, we build homes, we build churches, we build schools. And what do we we measure some type of growth That doesn't necessarily mean that we measure just how many students but we're measuring improvement. We're measuring Sometimes we're saying, let's add on, let's make it bigger because we need to accommodate more people, or we got a new program, or whatever the case may be.
But we're builders, and that's a good thing. But it's not a good thing if you go back to that continuum I talked about in the very beginning, that political continuum where we have the far left in the far right. It's not a good thing if you believe as the Founders believed, as the Constitution and Declaration kind of paint this picture that we need a limited government, right, we need a government that's big enough to do the basic
things it needs to do, but not any bigger. And so if that's the case, and if philosophically the government the Founders said, this is the size of the government period, right, not doesn't mean that you can't ever hire more people, because you know, when you have more people to serve as a country grows, of course you need more people to I mean fill in the blank, to be police officers,
to be administrators in the state, or whatever it is. Right, that's understandable, but not to the levels that we've we've reached. And so the Founders understood the inherent risks of growing that government, and there is a well, there's a counterbalance. The more the government grows, the more your liberty shrinks. That's the way that it works. Government is force, and so there's an inherent danger and intrinsic danger to a growing government because government is forced and force is a
direct threat upon your liberty. And so the Founders understood this, but they needed this is why. Look, I will go along with folks who really are in favor of term limits. I'm not against the idea we have term limits. I'm not against the idea of term limits at all, I am. But my issue is is that the idea that we can put that out there as though that's going to solve the problem and we can go about our business of not not exercising oversight on our government. That is
where I say that's completely wrong. The real solution is being so involved and aware of what's happening in our government that we can hold these jokers and clowns accountable. And so some people when they say, okay, we got term limits, so now they can't be lifers. Now we can, you know, let our attentions drift elsewhere. I say, big fat an to that, because that is how bad things happen. We lull ourselves to sleep. That's how we got into
this mess, right, I mean I know that. I think my father in law, he and I had conversation once when he got into politics, more after he had retired, and you know, he would say to me, you know, when I was working, you know, that's what I was doing. I was working, I was living my life. I was, you know, providing for my children. He was a single father, and you know, did a great job, but he was occupied and so you know, he didn't follow the government
very closely. And then when he was retired and he started seeing what the government had become, he thought, what the world did we do? And that's because we were complacent. And I'm saying, look, I understand, I'm understanding about this. You know, we we have a lot to manage, and that's another thing on our plate. And then when you factor in that, the government makes it harder for you to hold them accountable because they do things like create inflation.
Thank you to President Joseph R. Bribery and Kamala Harris and other lovers of big government who want to spend money we don't have without raising taxes, which I'm not endorsing we shouldn't spend the money, but it's somehow got to be covered. And so what happens is instead of raising taxes that pay for it, they actually they actually
create inflation. They create an additional money supply to cover the bills of the things that they spent money on, and in so doing that, by creating an excess money supply, they drive down. They put too many dollars into the economy, making your dollars that you currently have, that you currently that you worked for previously, or that you save previously, they make them worth less. And so when prices go up,
that means you have to work more. And if you work more, you're not able to do things like I mean, take your pick. You're definitely not able to hold your government accountable because they're out there doing whatever they want to do, and then they come and they tell you something else, something different altogether that they're out there doing, and so it's hard to hold these jokers at clowns accountable.
They know this. It's also harder for if you're a if you're a mother and you want to stay home with your children. I'm not implying that you have to, but I know a lot of mothers that that's the desire of their heart, and they can't because of financial pressures. A lot of these financial certainly, we got to look to ourselves first and say, what am I doing That is a burden financially? Can I cut doing this? Can I cut the Netflix? Can I cut that? Okay? Did
we really need a house that's this big? Whatever? But it's also true to say that the government has made it harder to live our lives financially and to make these decisions, and so then we become we become overburdened by our government. And that's where we are, and that's where the battle line is drawn. R FK and Donald Trump and Todd Huff and the vast majority of you are on the side of the line at least in certain key issues that say, enough, you guys have ruined
everything you've touched. You're a disaster, You're a mess. Knock it off. I got more to say about this, but I've got to take a break before I do that. My friends, let me remind you, if you are looking looking in this economic disaster in this high inflation economy. It's come down, but just this unstable economy, they're still higher than average inflation. It's still about twice what it was now under Trump in general. So there's just economic problems,
political tensions. Maybe a good time to look at investing in gold, silver and precious metals. And even if things go well, even if things are back to normal, if Trump wins, I hope and pray that that does happen, that doesn't mean that it's still not a good time to look at doing an investment in gold, simply because of diversification purposes. So Harvard Goldgroup is who we partner with on this program. Harvard Gooldgroup dot com slash Todd.
You can get their free investor's guide by visiting there, and if you decide to move forward with an investment, you can use my name Todd at checkout well during the investment process to get a two hundred and fifty dollars credit. So Harvard Goldgroup dot com slash Todd promo code Todd quick timeout is in order, my friends, sit tight. Back here in a minute, my friend. So the battle lines have been drawn in this new political realignment. Cholsey Gabber Robert F. Kennedy Jr. RFK Jr. They are on
the side that says enough with Donald Trump enough. Now. They may not be, especially RFK Jr. They may not be in unison with Trump on every issue. In fact, RFK made it a point to say he's not again, he's against Trump on some of these issues, but Trump is right on some of these core issues. Government, stop infringing upon the rights of your citizens to speak freely, to talk about concerns about election integrity, election fraud. Don't police what can be said. Don't talk to us about
hate speech as though hate that. Look, I'm not defending hate speech, but surely people can understand that the people who can identify and the people who can define what is hate speech have a lot of power. And if you say it's hate speech to say that a politician is a joker in clown, as I do, then that certainly inhibits our ability to engage in political discourse and to fight about these issues. And suddenly the side that's determining what is quote unquote hate speech has a major advantage.
Surely we could agree on that reality and that truth, and so people like RFK Junior Tulsa Gabbard. They've said, enough, enough enough of using the CDC to do all kinds of crazy stuff, inexcusable behaviors, inexcusable infringe infringements upon your liberty during COVID. Enough of that. No more of that, No more of telling us that the government is using its legitimate oversight to, you know, make sure that the things that Americans are being sold to eat are actually healthy.
Enough of that stuff, enough of abusing and paying off or just manipulating the system to be used against the interests of American American citizens. Enough of it. Enough of it. Then on the other side, you've now got what two hundred and thirty eight Republicans who used to work either for Mitt Romney, John McCain or George W. Bush, people who I would maintain are the very problem. You know,
These are the rhinos. Like I know, Bush tried to position himself as what was it, the compassionate Conservative, and there were things that I liked about Bush. I don't want to now Mitt Romney, I don't know. I mean, politically speaking, I can't. There's very little about Mitt Romney that I like. I think Mitt Romney is the epitome of what's wrong with Republicans. I think John McCain also had a lot of problems, and these guys were rhinos.
They often crossed the aisle. I'm not against cooperating with people, but I am against I am against compromising principles and values, and that's what they've done. Bush was not as bad as that, but I mean, there's a lot of problems on Bush's on Bush's watch, you know, I'm one, Look, the war on Terror was justifiable and understandable, but you start getting into things like the war in Iraq, and
there's questions there and just war. Right, It's one of the things that Kennedy and Trump voters agree upon, or Kennedy and Trump agree upon, which is enough of these endless wars. By the way, we just got through yesterday was the marked the three year mark of when we when Biden had the botched withdrawal from Afghanistan leading to the deaths of thirteen American service members. Didn't even bother showing up at the memorial service. Trump did, Kamala didn't,
nor did Biden. Biden's on another vacation. Biden, it's actually a good place for Biden. I mean, just just stay in the vacation home through the end of this term. Let's just not have any more policies or any more things that happened, and let's let's pray that we have no more conflicts or anything between now and then. Let's just get out of this administration. But this is this
is where the battle lines are drawn, my friends. It's for people who believe the government should grow, people that believe the government should have more authority, which includes I'm telling you, it includes the Rhinos, it includes those Republicans. They they're not as bad as the as the lovers of big government on the left, but they still think you're stupid. They still think they know better. They're embarrassed by Trump. This is not the way that it's supposed
to be. The media attaxus whatever else. And so they sign over their souls to Kamala Harris. Anyone who's signed over an endorsement to Kamala Harris has revoked their ability to say with the straight face that they're a conservative. That is absolutely absurd and ridiculous. She is truly comrade, Kamala. She is the daughter of a Marxist, She is a arguably has Marxist tendencies as it is so the battle lines have been drawn. Which side are we going to?
Which side is America gonna choose? That's the question that we're going to find out, my friends here as I wrap up the program, if you're looking for ways to take care of your body beyond diet and exercise, you can look to natural supplements. Now, natural supplements that are created produced by z Stack, formulated by doctor Zelinko. These things have clinically proven ingredients. They're manufactured here in the United States. Patriotic company stands in favor of medical freedom.
They fight against medical corruption. Go to z stacklife dot com, slash Todd, zstacklife dot com slash Todd to shop youse code Todd. During checkout, you'll save fifteen percent off your purchase. Zesteklife dot com slash Todd, z Stack empowering you to stay prepared, to stay safe, and to stay strong. My friends, that is all the time that I have here in this hour. I appreciate you so much for joining us. Have a wonderful day. We'll talk again soon. SDG