Attention. You're listening to the Todd Huff radio show, America's home for Conservative not bitter Talk radio. Be advised the content of this program has been documented to prevents and even cure liberalism, and listening may cause you to lean to the right. Here's your conservative but not bitter host, Todd Huff. Well, welcome, my friends. You have tuned in to America's home for conservative not bitter talk. Friends. This is like the GPS for truth, recalculating
proper perspectives, one logical argument at a time. It's a pleasure to be here. Email should you want to be part of the day's discussion Todd Toddufshow dot com, or you can text. The text number is three one seven two one zero twenty eight thirty. Be sure to include the appropriate amount of adoration and praise when contacting yours truly, and message and data rates could apply. So it's good to be here today, my friends. Thank you for
for joining us. I want to start today. There's a couple of things that grabbed that grabbed my attention, and I think I want to start with what's some of the latest news on this scandal legitimate scandal Hunter Biden scandal. This is unbelievable. What we're learning now predictable? Yes, should we have been suspecting these things? Absolutely? Is it completely surprising? No? But what it is it is a lot to just comprehend when you realize a couple
of things. Number one, what looks to have been or at least, let's say, let's say it this way, there is evidence to suggest these things actually happened, and just wrap your head around that these things are quite possibly based upon the evidence, allegedly happening within our government, your government, my friend, my government. This stuff is happening. In number two, there were many people that knew about this, and yet they kept it out
of the headlines. They kept it hidden, and you have to wonder were they simply turning a blind eye because of political affiliations. Were they in on the gig as well? I don't know, but this is a massive, massive problem. Let me give you just a couple of a little sayling of
I guess, a couple of the stories that I'm referencing here. Number one, Number one, Hunter Biden and his associates made ten million, ten million dollars more from sources from these foreign sources than was previously known ten million. They found another ten million dollars that came from foreign sources. You know something I want to know that I haven't really seen written about. Maybe you have, I have not. What is the what are they saying Hunter was providing?
What made Hunter get such legit? If this is legitimate? What was he giving in exchange for the money that's legitimate? I mean, what on earth was he selling art back in these days as well? What is the explanation given here for why Hunter Biden? Why Hunter Biden had so much money being funneled his direction, That's one of the questions. So they found ten million dollars more, and of course that begs the question how much more money?
How much more money actually is being funneled has been funneled to Hunter Biden and his associates and the big guy allegedly. How much more is there? Then there's a story here. I say, follow the money. Foreign oligarchs, foreign olagarks. These are leaders. These are leaders of foreign countries or people within the political class of foreign foreign countries, oligarchies, if you will, rule of the small elite class. They moved millions of dollars to Biden
tied firms before meeting with Joe Biden to investigators. So this one, this story basically says, and I think this came from maybe Representative Comber, this shows that prior to hunt, excuse me, Joe Biden having him meeting when he was vice president with a particular individual or group of individuals, that that group of individuals would first move millions of our well in total, it was I think it was twenty million, so I don't know the number of times,
but it was lots of money. So it was almost almost as though they were paying for a meeting or access to the vice president of the United States. Why were they doing that? How coincidental is that? I mean, how much of this are we supposed to buy before we begin, before we begin to wonder? It's almost like those stories, I think you can still find them online. The number of people that the Clintons knew that had mysterious death or who committed suicide and so forth. The number of people.
I mean, at some point you think, how many times am I supposed to believe some of these some of these bizarre explanations. How unfortunate can this be? How coincidental can this be? We have millions of dollars popping up in firms that are tied to Biden right before these individuals that sent the money met with Biden. And that's based upon claims from investigators. And then we've got, of course money popping up and Hunter Biden's accounts that we didn't know
about. So then on top of that, this is all on the stack of stuff. On top of that, there's another story. This story says that there is evidence to show that there were results, let's put it that way, results or things happened in the vice president Vice President Bribery's office back when he was vice president. I'm not misspeaking. There a lot of these things happened in the Obama administration in that timeline. So Joe Bribery was vice
president then. So there's no evidence to show that when Hunter Biden, at the request of foreign countries, oligarchs, people within their political leadership of these foreign countries, when Hunter Biden was requested to call DC, we have evidence that things began to happen. So you start to piece this stuff together, which of course we've done on here, you've done on your own common sense determines that we I mean, we all end up at this I mean,
we end up at this same place. We end up at the place that says, what on earth is going on here that is legitimate? Because there are red flags galore. This is, as I've said before, what a true scandal would look like. This, my friends, is what an actual corruption case would look like if these things hold to be true. And I'm
not definitively stating that they will be. All I'm saying is the idea that this does not have evidence that Republicans are targeting Hunter because he has drug problems, or because he's got embarrassing and compromising pictures and videos of himself on his laptops with hookers or whatever else. That is not what this is about. Do not buy the lie, do not buy the narrative. Do not buy the argument that says this and what is happening to Trump are the same thing.
This is not the same thing as we went through yesterday in great detail. Mitch McConnell. Mitch McConnell is reluctant to impeach Biden. He doesn't want to see the house now, you know this. But for those we have people that again tune in at all different stages. Some people are new to politics, some are seasoned professionals and everything in between. So I'm speaking to folks that may not know. And it's okay if you don't know, you've
tuned into the right place. But Mitch McConnell is the minority leader in the US Senate, and Mitch McConnell is the Republican leader of the Senate, and he's been that for a long time, quite a long time, what's it twenty years or some such thing, and so or at least in the leadership group. And so the Senate does not impeach the President of the United States.
The Senate. If the president is impeached, and he or she would be impeached in the House of Representatives, the House of Representatives would actually go through the process of impeachment. If they voted to impeach the president, then it goes to the Senate, and the Senate would actually put the president on
trial to decide if they are going to remove him from office. There are two distinct parts of the process, and McConnell doesn't want anything to do with any of it because he says we should not be engaging in this sort of politics. That says, if we have control of, say the chamber the House, for example, and the president is of the other party, you
should not target the other the president because he's in the opposition party. I agree with that, but as I said yesterday, and I won't go through it and hash it out, but if you want to hear, go to yesterday show. We hashed it out in a lot of detail. Context matters. Context matters, and just because somebody was given a ticket or arrested and was not convicted for the charges that they were charged with and so forth,
or if they were wrongly in prison, that's a terrible thing. But just because there were errors in one case or something was misrepresented to a jury, or in the case of Trump, just because we have phony impeachments given or that were that he was put through, that does not mean that that means all impeachments fall into that category. There are legitimate times to impeach a president.
Mitch McConnell said that this is not good for the country if we do this, and I maintain that what's not good for the country is having the country being run by people that are financially benefiting from their position of authority and political power here in this country. That is not good for the American people
that should go without saying, that's what's truly bad. And if you follow the line of thinking, and if you follow where this could potentially lead, you realize nations like Ukraine are in the center of some of this scandal. That's where Beresma, the energy company that Hunter Biden sat on their board of directors, that's where it is. It's in Ukraine. And you realize, wait a minute, I've heard of Ukraine. I've heard a lot about Ukraine.
And you start looking at all the money and stuff that we're sending to Ukraine and you begin to wonder. I mean, it's a fair question. I'm not casting the allegation. I'm not saying that, you know, people people sometimes want to I don't know, misrepresent people who like me or many of you have been misrepresented as well. I'm not saying that we should root
for Putin or anything like that. But the idea that Ukraine is a put together country that's corruption free and that is in favor of liberty is not a fair assessment. Doesn't mean they should have been attacked by by Putin, That's not what I'm saying. But to claim that they are somehow just a perfect country and that they have no flaws of their own is silly to suggest and to think about. But you look at this, and you look at the corruption, and you have to ask the question, at some point, are
these things all related? Is this part of the payback? I'm not suggesting it is. There's not evidence I would say to come to that complete conclusion. But I think that as you look at the grand scheme of things, it's at least a question. That's my point. It's at least a question. And again I compare and contrast this to the lie, the deception we
were subjected to. For I would say, we're still objected to the Trump Russian collusion delusion, and they wanted us to believe that that's what a corrupt scandal look like, And of course that's not what a scandal looks like. The last step of a scandal, of a corrupt scandal, where the government is trying to assert authority, is not an ad campaign. It's just it's ridiculous. Corruption looks like this. It's step by step. You can connect
the dots. You can see people's you can follow money, you can see relationships, you can see meetings that follow when sums of money were transferred. Look go back to the Clinton found This is the same It looks very similar to the Clinton foundation. Clinton Foundation was that this is the same thing, and you begin to ask yourself, how many people are doing this? Is it just allegedly I'm not I'm not making the claim that Biden is doing it,
but this is damning evidence. Give a an explanation because they are not trying to explain any of this. All they're trying to say is Joe Biden
doesn't know anything about Hunter's Biden's business. They didn't talk about it. Now we know that they did because of testimony from Devin Archer, which we talked about earlier this week, or maybe it was I think it was earlier this week, maybe maybe last week, but we talked about that where he said that twenty times, a couple dozen times President Biden at the time Vice President Biden jumped on the phone to talk to these people that Hunter Biden had business
dealings with. And then, of course now the narrative changes. Well, they were talking about the weather, they were just chit chatting. Joe Biden didn't know any of this. We'll wait a minute, five seconds ago you told us he didn't even have any conversation. Now we're supposed to accept that he has had conversations, but that they were meaningless. You can see how this how this process begins to go. But there is evidence of legitimate fraud.
There is evidence that goes all the way up to vice president bribery at the time he was vice president under Biden, potentially selling access and who knows what else. I mean, it begins to to the naturally curious and the people who really want to get to truth. When you begin to ask those questions, well, what was what was he getting? Well or excusely, what was what were we giving up in return for this? Was it just a meeting? I mean, people don't just want to meet you for the
sake of shaking your hand and taking your picture. They want to benefit from it. What was the benefit? Where does this go? Where does this lead? How long does this go on? And then you've got the aspect of what if they have evidence that they can release themselves showing impropriety, then you've got the cover up aspect. How far are they going to go to cover this up? To pretend like this is not a problem is beyond naive. Again, it's not about Hunter's laptop. It's not about hookers and drugs
embarrassing him. As I've said before and I'll say again, I hope he gets help. I hope he finds Jesus to be quite candid with you. But I also know that the way that this looks should concern every freedom loving American. Timeouts in order, my friends, you are listening here to conservative not better talk. I am your host, Todd Huff. Back in a minute. Come back, my friends. By the way, this program is brought to you in part by our friends at four Patriots for patriots dot com.
That's the number four followed by the word patriots with ans dot com. I use my last name, Huff. You can save fifteen or excuse me, ten percent during checkout. During checkout that you can go and you can shop their products that include things like survival food, another gear in case there are shortages, in case there are blackouts, or who knows what else we've
endured. We've endured some of this stuff already with with COVID. It's wise to plan and to prepare, and so we want to help you do that. If you have an interest in doing so, go to four Patriots dot com. Use discount code huff to save ten percent on your order. So I want to now shift gears a tiny bit here. I want to shift gears a tiny bit here and go to something that we touched on briefly,
and then I want to move on. There's a couple of other things I want to get to today, but I mentioned and passing or very quickly maybe at the beginning of yesterday's program, that the j sixth Committee, the January sixth Committee, the committee that was there to get to the bottom of what happened on January sixth, to hold Trump accountable. This was the committee where Kinzinger was crying at the podium. This was the committee where there were two
quote unquote Republicans, both Rhinos, on a committee. No other Republicans allowed on this committee. It was a committee versus full of Democrats and to make believe Republicans, Liz Cheney and Adam Kinsinger. And of course it was a show trial that was a kangaroo court, if you will. It was just political theater, that's what it was. And it was bad political theater. It was really really bad. This is Adam Schiff was on this committee.
You know what I'm talking about. And so of course, the way that they presented this committee was they just wanted to get to answers, and you know, as they did with the impeachment, they acted as though, I don't want to come to this conclusion. I don't want to say it, but I just think Trump's the problem. I think Trump caused this problem and that problem. I think Trump, this committee would say, is responsible for
these things happening and these individuals losing their lives and so forth. And there were terrible things that you know, people who talk about January sixth. I am not here to defend all the things that happened on January sixth. I'm also here to I am here to make sure that we don't inappropriately malign everybody that was there on January sixth. I mean, there were certainly people who were doing things that were against the law, and they should face the consequences.
I don't care if I agree with them politically or not. They should be given due process. They should not be treated the way in that they're being treated allegedly in jail as they're awaiting trial and so forth. They should be given a fair trial, a speedy trial. They should be granted the rights of due process. This is sad that I'm having to say this in two twenty three, but that does not implicate every person that was there on
January sixth. What they want you to believe about January sixth is that Trump was trying to stage a coup and overthrow the government. I mean, how silly is this. That is not at all what was happening. It was a protest because of the actions or lack of action. Better stated that Vice President Pence, who, by the way, I'm just want to touch on this. It's in the stack of stuff. He's got an ad out, folks. It is just I don't take pleasure in this. I don't.
I'm a hoosier. I had initially a lot of respect for Pence years ago, and it pains me to say this. I know really good people who are close to Pence. I know really good people that have been involved with him politically and you know, in in other ways over the course of time, and I've heard some really good things. But this. He's got no business entering the selection. And now he's got a campaign ad that's out where he's pretending to pump gas and whoever put this thing together, I can't play
it. It just it wouldn't work. You have to see the whole thing to you visually see it. But it's in the stack of stuff, and he's got the He pulls the gas pump out, you know, the nozzle out, puts it in his truck at the pump, and he's talking about energy, but he doesn't hit the button, you know, to select which type of fuel he wants, whether it's gasoline, which octane and all that sort of thing, or whether it's diesel. Fortunately didn't that diesel because it's
a gas pickup truck. But it's beeping in the background as he's talking. You know how when you go to the pump, for those of us that pump the gas, you go to the pump and you have to put your card in or whatever you gotta do there, and you gotta pick the pick the gas that you want, the fuel that you need, and then it stops beeping. It might go beep, and then you hit the nozzle and
you fuel up. But instead of doing that, instead of doing that, he just puts the nozzle in and is talking like he's pumping gas but he's not. And they didn't even edit out the background noise. It is ran it as is. I mean, I'm telling you, it's just it's embarrassing. Well it's not to me embarrassing, but in today's world of superficial have
superficialities, it's just it's just embarrassing. And so again, as I said before, with him, the whole idea was for him to be there in case Trump is unable to run this election, right, if he's if he's going to jail, which I put nothing past him, if he's unable to raise money. We've gone through this. So that's that's their bet. And but the thing is they're not They're not even positioned for that. There's several candidates that are in a stronger position, a much stronger position than Pences.
And now he adds this as well, and that's in the stack of stuff on the website todd Up showed dot com if you want to see it. But let's getting back to the January sixth Committee Commission, whatever they call this dumb thing. It's now been reported that they allegedly destroyed evidence. They destroyed evidence, and not only that, and this should come as no surprise, but the media has ignored this. The media has ignored this. I've got
a story in the stack of stuff about that as well. This one's from NewsBusters, But the media ignores it, the possibility that the committee destroyed evidence, at least the oversight the current House committe. He doesn't have it. The committee the previous committee under was shift the one that ran this one or received us on it. I can't keep it. There were so many show trials. I can't remember. I don't think he I think he was just
on the committee. But nonetheless, that committee failed to preserve the documents, preserve the video, preserve anything else, depositions and so forth that were related to the so called investigations. It wasn't for that. That's not the intent of that. The intent of that was to get some face time on the camera, to get kinsing or tearing up, to get whatever else was happening
to hurt Trump politically, to try to help during the mid terms. And I mean, Republicans didn't win by as much as they should have won, so maybe it worked for some people. I have no idea, but that was the purpose of that committee. And of course the media is ignoring that evidence was destroyed. It doesn't exist. Where is it. Nobody seems to care. All they want to talk about is Trump's indictments. No one wants to talk about hunter By, neither the things that we talked about last segments.
So anyway, got that out there as well, my friends. But never fear more, Americans are waking up to the reality of what we are facing, what forces, what evil, what deceptive forces we are up against. So a little bit along the segment, have to take a time out, and my friends sit plenty of other things to get tough. Here today you're listening and conservative not better talk. It's my pleasure to have you here
today, my friends. No matter what your background, I used to say, no matter what you believe, it doesn't matter, it doesn't matter, You're welcome here, no matter what you believe. I'm going to tell you up front, the ninety eight percent of scientists, that's one percent more of scientists agree that listening to this program will cause you to lean to the right. Then the ninety seven percent of scientists that tell you man is causing climate
change and that climate change will be catastrophic on planet Earth. I actually have one percent more of scientists agreeing to the power of this program. It's remarkable, my friends. But timeouts in order sit tight back in just a minute. Welcome back to my friends. Do you think that Trump should go to the first Republican debate that, by the way, is a little less than two weeks away August twenty three? Trump at the first Republican debate? Should
he attend? You know, I've been kind of back and forth about this in my head, and I will tell you that I want him to go for the personal reasons. I want to see him on that debate stage, because that is just something to behold. I've told Oz before, I've told you before, this is something I don't think we're ever again in our lives
going to be. Nothing is going to be like this again. Now, We're going to have this intense political fight on our hands for the remainder of time, however long that is. And I don't I don't pretend to know. I don't pretend to know how long time will continue to tick along.
Here. At times I wonder how near it really is because of all the stuff that we're starting to see in all the corruption, and I mean there's a lot of stuff out there if you follow, if you follow some of those those things pertaining to biblical prophecies or whatever, there's at least some interesting things to be aware of keep your eyes on. But anyway, I don't I know that the battle is never going to end. It is never and we need to get that through our heads. The battle is never going to
end, and we need to be okay with that. We need to be okay with that. In fact, we need to relish that every day when we wake up, my friends, we have an opportunity. We have an opportunity to continue to keep this American experiment alive. And if we don't, if we don't get involved, this American experiment is going to die on the vine rather quickly. I mean we've seen think about how quickly we've seen things
expand here into craziness. I mean, from the transagenda in schools. I mean we're literally talking about whether or not we should be talking having the public schools talked to seven year olds about their private parts, about their sexual orientations, about their gender identity, things that folks, I don't even understand all
the stuff that they're trying to tell us about gender identity. And to be honest, I think if someone does understand, I think that there's a problem because that stuff shouldn't make sense, because it's completely messed up, and that stuff has happened in the blink of an eye, the metaphorical blink of an eye. One day it was completely fine and not talk, you know, for it to not even to be a discussion point. And now now it's shaping curriculum in some schools. Now, in some schools, if your kids
go there, they will be taught it or else. I mean, it is crazy what has happened and how quickly it has been because they have infiltrated public education. They haven't completely taken it over, but in some places they've taken majority share, or at least they're the what's the squeaky wheel gets the oil. At least they're the squeakiest wheel that people want to placate and accommodate and give the reins of power to. And so that is never going away.
So that is always here with us, whether there's a Trump, whether there's a descantist, whether there's a vvek Ramaswamy rather, whether there's a Todd huff Show, which there will be so long as God leads me to do this, So that is never ending, that's never changing. What is potentially going there, Well, which what will change is that we're not going to see another Trump. We are not going to see another Trump. And so, for selfish reasons, I want to see him on the debate stage.
I want to I want to get the popcorn out, and I want to watch this. I want to watch it unfold. I want to watch this performance. And this, by the way, is good political theater, and it's necessary, and it's about things that are pertinent and relevant. It's not about made up stuff and living in a reality that isn't reality. This is about getting us back to reality. And so I watched these things and I look forward to seeing Trump on the stage. However, strategically, I just
find myself asking what does he have to gain by being up there? He actually draws more attention to the other people by being up there, He actually makes in a weird way. If his position is, Hey, this is my nomination to have right, we all know this. I should just be the nominee. Let's quit fighting amongst ourselves. Let's understand that the real problem is what we're seeing from President Bribery, what we're seeing from the radical left,
what we're seeing from globalization and all these things. Let's unite let's not go through this process one of those you know people's people that are up there in the remaining group. It'll be there day one day, but right now it's mine. Let's let's get to this. I'm not even gonna bother going and give it legitimacy because everybody knows this my nomination. That's one particular path that he could take, and I kind of think that it might make the
most sense now. On the other hand, on the other hand, you think Trump has been living relatively speaking, Trump never lives in the shadows, but relatively speaking, he's not been in the limelight right He's not had the bully pulpit. He's not had constant, NonStop coverage like he had from twenty fifteen up until what January of twenty twenty one or whatever that that has changed.
He still can get coverage of his events. People still care about what he says, but he's not He's not the guy right now because he's not
in the oval office right now. And so in that respect, I can see where where his campaign or where Trump himself would say, I think we need to be there because so many eyes will be watching, and we need to go in there and just in this first debate, obliterate metaphorically speaking right, just abliterate the competition, right, and make make it clear we do one debate, and then maybe I say we don't do anymore, because there's
no point. I've already proven I'm the guy. I don't know, I don't know where it goes, but I feel like that's some of the conversation that's going on. As he's considering what to do. He's asking should I go? Should I not go? But I honestly I lean right now. I lean right now that it's probably better strategically not to go. I want him to go, I do, but I also think I kind of think
he will as well. I'm not predicting that out right, but I kind of think that he will because I think, I mean, he's been dying to do this, get back out there, get back into the limelight, which again he's not completely out of it. I'm not saying that, but now it's we're a presidential debate, right, this is a different, different sort of scenario, and he can go after he can go after some of
these folks. Maybe he's chomping at the bid as I say, to go after Pence and he should be by the way, and Pence, oh my goodness, it's gonna be a if he does, It's going to be a political blood bath. It is it is. I see no way outside of the grace of God that Pence survives this thing. I mean to the point again I've shared before people acted like in two thousand and fifteen or sixteen, I guess it would have been when Pence took the nomination decided to run be
the running mate with Trump. They said that was his the death knell in the future of political ambitions of Mike Pence. I said at the time that was wrong. The death knell in his campaign or his future political ambitions will be this again, short of short of divine intervention, which anyway, timeouts in order. Just curious what you think though, should he be should Trump go to that first debate, should he not give it any credibility whatsoever?
Should he jump in and go right after him? I can see it both ways, So anyway, you can share your thoughts with me on that, But I can take a time about my friends. Sit tight back in just a minute. Welcome back, my friends. Not a lot of time left, but I do want to I saved this to the end, and I've got this again on our website tahefshow dot com. It's in the stack of stuff. I would encourage you to take a look at this, or you can google it. I don't know, I don't know. It's the Gateway
Pundit. It's the Gateway Pundit dot com. I was gonna say google it, but it's got such a long headline, and I don't know what to tell you to google. But this is relevant. This is important. Headline is it's a lengthy one, so as here it goes. Now we have proof TGP that's the Gateway Pundit exclusive massive twenty twenty voter fraud uncovered in Michigan, including estimated eight hundred thousand balant applications sent to non qualified voters, bags
of prepaid gift cards, guns with silencers. I didn't catch that when I read this at first. Burner phones and a Democrat funded organization with multiple temporary facilities in several states. Now I obviously can't go through this. I want you, if you can, to read it, and it's on our Stack of Stuff page, or you can go to the Gateway Pundit dot com. This thing has a date of August eight, which would have been what is that Tuesday? I guess if you haven't seen this, encourage you to check
it out. So timeouts in order. I just wanted to share that quick time out my friends, very very important stuff by the way back in just a minute. Welcome back to my friends again. I would encourage you strongly just to read this the Gateway Pundit dot com. It's from August eighth, talking about proof that well evidence evidence that exists that there were serious voter fraud
in the state of Michigan. I just think that we need to be very aware of this and it's important stuff, especially as we head into the twenty twenty four campaigns. So again, you can go to our website, tod huff show dot com, go to the Today's stack of Stuff and you'll see the link. Or you can simply go to the Gateway Pundit, whatever's easier, but I would encourage you to take a look at that. Also have some things I'm very excited about announcing to you next week involving what we call
the Inner Circle. Can't wait to share that with you, my friends. Have a great weekend. STG.