Attention. You're listening to the Todd Huff Radio show, America's home for conservative not bitter Talk radio. Be advised. The content of this program has been documented to prevents and even cure liberalism, and listening may cause you to lean to the right. Here's your conservative but not bitter host, Todd Huff. Well, thank you, Glenn for that absolutely wonderful introduction. As usual, Conservative not bitter. Indeed, my friends, you have tuned in to America's
home in fact for conservative not bitter talk. I am your host, the beloved, the one and only Todd Huff Email. You can reach us by emailing Todd at toddhufshow dot com. You can also go well, let's see text us hey. You can text us three one seven two one zero twenty eight thirty one on social media as well. The last time I checked, it's a constant battle there, and that's fine. We prefer to come straight to you through this program versus trusting the jokers at social media platforms. Anyway,
it's good to be here. Thank you for for joining us today. A couple of things I want to get into today, Well, actually there was something and I'll do it later in the program. But there was something that actually came up on social media yesterday. The good Bad Guy, for those of you that maybe knew that, is our He helps with our marketing and social media stuff. He pulls clips. He pulled a clip of a
show. I don't know if it was yesterday's show the day before, I can't remember, but he posted it on social media, something that I thought was pretty straightforward that I was saying that I got a bizarre response to. I don't really often mention the social media responses that we get on here,
but I do want to talk about that today because it interests me. It illustrated demonstrated something that I find very very easy to understand, the lack of understanding that's out there, or the lack of concern for trying to truly understand. So that's out there. But I want to start today. I want to start today by talking about Speaker McCarthy and his announcement that the impeachment inquiry of President Bribery is set to begin. That that is going to be a
thing now, and let me be abundantly clear, it should. And at the same time, let me say this because I have said this on this program before. I think it is necessary to illustrate, to articulate this, to communicate this, explain this, because this is going to be the immediate pushback that we get from people who are going to be either misinformed, uninformed, or people who are in the Team Biden camp. And we know there's
not many of those folks. There's a lot of well there's there's a larger number of people who are in the hate Trump camp and actually pro bide. I don't think there's a single pro Biden camper out there. I'm not even sure if doctor Jill is in the pro Biden camp. But be that as it may. The so the in peacement inquiry is a necessary step. It's
a necessary step, and there is going to be resistance. There's already been this, It's already been discussed Mitch McConnell, for example, By the way, Mitch McConnell, Senate's minority leader for the Republican Party, I saw a pole. I saw a pole that I had in the stack of stuff yesterday, maybe the day before. Seventy four percent of Republicans think Mitch McConnell should retire. Seventy four percent think Mitch McConnell should resign retire whatever and be done
with it. I would be in that seventy four percent. Now, I don't know if they were talking position of leadership or just overall as a senator. That wasn't clear to me when I read the article. Either way, Mitch McConnell is of that establishment elitist wing of the Republican Party that I'm not a fan of. In fact, I actually think that many times, and this was not one hundred percent true of Mitch. When Trump was president.
There were a few times that Mitch McConnell, actually I don't know, was probably motivated by Trump to actually do the right thing, and I've pointed those things out. I'm not a big Mitch McConnell fan, but I do want to give credit where credit is due. I was a big fan of what he did when he withstood the pressures to take Merrick Garland as the nominee Obama's
nominee in the final months of his term. Think about this, Merrick Garland, who is overseeing the weaponization of the Department of Justice, could be sitting today on the US Supreme Court, and instead of that because of what Mitch
mc look, credit is due where credit is due. My friends, Mitch McConnell stood firm and prevented that individual who's cool with weaponizing the DOJ Merrick Garland, who we were told back in the end of the day, we were told, this guy is the most fair minded you can't possibly be against Merrick
Garland. That was the position, that was the argument. In fact, that was supposed to be viewed as almost a type of an olive branch from the Obama administration to the Senate, which was controlled by the Republicans at the time, almost a sort of just a it's an isle of brands. So look, we're just I know that I could have someone more radical on the court, but I'm going to give you Merrick Garlands, someone that we should
all be able to agree fits the bill as a Supreme Court justice. And McConnell said no. McConnell said, we're gonna let the American people decide. It was one of the factors that determined the winner of the twenty sixteen election, which, of course the left still mains maintains is stolen by Trump because he collaborated, excuse me, colluded with Putin using Facebook ads and Pokemon go
ads, the trick Hillary voters into voting for Trump. Stupidest stuff. I just with the with the background in marketing that i've that I've got, it's just the stupidest thing. I don't understand why single critical thinking person would have ever fallen for the stupid lie of Trump Russian collusion to begin with. But here we are, so I'm not I mean, i'm generally again McConnell in the sense that I think he's part of the problem. But he's done some
good things. That was one of them. He did some other good things in the Trump administration, in the Trump administration, but alongside of or with the Trump administration as well. But Mitch McConnell's on the side. He's already come to the pulpit, or the pulpit, the podium, and he said, you know, to the left it is the pulpit, by the way, And I know McConnell's not a leftist, but to the left, those
podiums are pulpits. So it was a fautball. See when I say that we all make mistakes, there you go, right, there's one that I made. But anyway, McConnell, when he came to the podium a few times recently, he's frozen up. I mean, there's clearly something going on with his health or something. You can see it. He literally locks up mid sentence, has no idea, It appears where he is, what he's
saying, and he just freezes up. So for those who say I only want to jump on Biden because of his health, cancerns and things that come to some folks with older age, I mean the same is true of Mitch
McConnell. But Mitch McConnell's on the wrong side of this. The elitist Republicans, the establishment Republicans, and of course the radical left, they're all on the wrong side of the issue as it pertains to the impeachment of Biden, the impeachment inquiry, And there is a reason that we need to do this. It is imperative that this needs to be done. Let me say that up front, and let me add this. I am one hundred percent against
the politics of retribution. Anyone who wants to impeach Biden president bribery because Trump was impeached illogically, indefensibly, however you wanted to frame that he should never have been impeached to begin with Trump. I am one hundred percent in the camp that says we should not say, now that we are in power, it is time to go after Biden. If someone believes that, I think you should rethink that. Sincerely, that is not the solution. You know,
we want to obviously regain sanity and decency in this country. We want to eradicate the deep state, the bloated bureaucracy, the lifetime professionals in Washington, DC. We want to eradicate corruption and all these bad things. But my friends, we cannot we cannot expect to achieve those ends by using the same means that the radical left is prepared to use. The Democrat Party has prepared that, They've proven that they've been willing to use it. And I
get it, Todd. What's good for the goose is good for the gander, right, I do not agree with that. I think, first of all, you have to win these battles. You have to win the battle that I just laid out, get control of the government, reduce spend, which I know are mammoth things, right, They're not just gonna happen overnight. These things we have to play the not even the long game, the
long, long, long game. This is far out into the future before we could even begin to think of moving the needle significantly in any of these areas. And I don't know candidly that we I'm hopeful that we can, but I'm not predicting it that we're going to. I'm just saying that we have to take the steps necessary. And on the other side of that, once we win these victories or as we win these those ads, it could
be simultaneous sort of stuff. But as we begin to regain control of our government, see a resurgence of literal liberty, actual liberty that we can, you know, the opposite of what's happening in the state of New Mexico. Although I'm encouraged to see now the Attorney general there, who's also a Democrat, said that she's not gonna defend that as well. She's not going to defend the unconstitutional order that's being pushed down the throats of the New Mexican people
by this leftist, opportunist governor. So I'm encouraged, and there's things that we should be encouraged about locally or in different parts of the country, but also nationally. But we have to do it the right way. We have to be able to find a way as we have our victories, and as we see the growth of government, god willingly decrease and our liberty increase. We want to be able to make amends with those that are on the other
side of the political spectrum. Now I know that the radical left is never going to do that, but there are some folks that are going to do that, and we have to be able to look at ourselves in the mirror as well. So I'm a one hundred percent against this politics of payback, politics retribution. We should not the rationale for impeaching Biden, and I don't think it is. I'm just making this point because this is the first defense
that they're going to throw up against this impeachment inquiry. It's going to be why are you coming after Biden to impeach him? It looks like there's not any evidence. And if there's not any evidence, as the narrative goes, then there's also that that implies or that seems to suggest that this is about payback. In fact, I remember I remember when Biden took office and what January. On January twentieth, I guess of twenty twenty one, I made
an announcement on this program, the era of payback. Politics has begun. Get ready, it's about payback. And I think that actually I may have made that announcement when the Democrats won one control of the House and said anyway, but when the Democrats getting control, because their leaders are not principled, they start doing things that are unjustifiable, and they believe they don't care. They don't care. They're never questioned on these things. The media doesn't care,
because that's the media is the pr firm of the Democrat Party. The media doesn't ask them tough questions. In fact, if you can compare and contrast in your mind, they're not going to take a break here. But if you can compare and contrast in your mind the differences between how the media has already spoken about these Biden impeachment inquiries in that whole process, and compare
it to how Trump that impeachment was discussed. I mean, the media started from the position of, well, they have to do this, they have to impeach this guy. This guy's a menacing threat to society. This guy has broken every sort of social norm. He's a danger to the constitution, he's a dictator, he's a whatever. Right. I mean, the list on and on and on he colluded with Russia, right they which again is
the stupidest thing in the world to me, But here we are. And so that was the way that that was covered in the media, and just compare and contrast, this one is immediately attacked. And by the way, I don't care that the media questions that the media should question it. You
know one else they should do that they should report. I got a SoundBite from an encounter that the chair of the Freedom Caucus, he was at a press conference talking about this earlier in the week, talking about the impeachment inquiry, and someone in the media was basically saying there's no evidence. He got a little fired up, and as he well should, but there is evidence.
To pretend that there's no evidence is patently absurd. There is evidence to suggest that Biden was personally benefiting financially from I'm not again, notice how I say this. I'm saying there's evidence. If you remember when Trump was impeached, it was they had already declared these things. Is factually true, he colluded with Russia. He's a danger to society. This guy's got to be
stopped. They reluctantly want to impeach him, that's when Adam Schiff and those other clowns in the House of Representatives act like they were pallbearers carrying a casket when they carried over the articles of impeachment from the House to the US Senate. You remember this. I talked about this. You remember this they put on. They wanted you to believe that they were mourning, that they were
in just despair. They had no choice. It was sad, it was against their will, but it was strategic from day one, to the degree that this could be strategic from the Republicans in the sense that they didn't care
about the content. If that is the if that is the belief, if anyone believes that, if anyone's okay with that, I want to go on record is saying I one hundred percent vehemently opposed that there is legitimate evidence pertaining to Hunter Biden that directly implicates his father president bribery, and that needs to be pursued because it is a major problem. If Joe Biden is in fact
the big guy. We know he's the big guy. If it if he's getting money because of using his position of power while sitting in office, if he's using that position to personally enrich himself, potentially giving away favors to foreign countries that may or may not be in the best interests of this country which he's supposed to he's supposed to be representing right as the vice president back in those days, today's president. That's a legitimate problem that is worthy of impeachable
that's an impeachable offense. High crimes and missed and meaners. I think the founders would all be totally fine if you said, Hey, we think there's a guy in the wine house today who has been using his authority to personally allegedly stay, you know, stash money in his pockets and potentially giving out foreign favors and you know this pay to play sort of situation. Would you be okay with impeaching him? I think they would be offended that we asked
the question. Anyway, my friends, timeouts in or a little bit loong the segment. Sit tight back in a minute. Welcome back, my friends, just going through this impeachment inquiry again. For those of you that may now just be joining us, missed the first segment, let me scold you for a moment. I'm kidding. You can always catch anything you missed on our podcast or by visiting tadashow dot com. The show is there for you to listen to. But I was trying to compare and contrast a couple of
things that were going on. Number One, McCarthy has announced that impeachment inquiry. The impeachment inquiry will begin. Number two, I pointed out that this should not be about revenge. This should be about justice. This should be about the search for truth. This should be about accountability. This should be about preserving, preserving this nation as the founders created it to exist. But also, I gain it's probably less about preserving it and more about reclaiming it
because it's become corrupt in so many ways. Not the system, but the people that are plugged into the system. Right, It's kind of like if you have I'm a fan of football, played football my whole well, not my whole life. I've up until through college, and you know, the sport is a I mean, to someone who's a fan, it's a beautiful thing, right, it's a it's a beautiful thing. I love it.
I don't like what Goodell is done to it, what the NFL has done to it, what the modern dare I say, feminization of everything is done to it. But I love the sport, and so the sport is to me great. But you can plug in. The people you plug into your team make of course all the difference, and it can be everything, and
not just on the field. I mean you've got the general manager. I mean it starts with the owner here Indianapolis, I mean we got Jim Ersa, so who russellum Ball used to call Jim Heresay, which I thought was fantastic anyway, But Ersea owns the Colts. And then there's the GM, the coaches, the players and all of that. But the players and the coaches, the people that comprise that team, they make or break the team.
And if you have a bunch of people, you have a bunch of people who are well put aside the skill set for a moment, whether they're good or not. But if you have a bunch of people who are uh you know, have that are not making good judgments off the field, if they're abusing kind of their power, if they're just arrogant and unlikable, it has an effect right on the team. If there's fighting within and things like that. So it's that's the problem. It's the pieces of the puzzle,
not what the puzzle, how the puzzle was put together. It's the individual pieces, the people that are in there that is the problem. And so we have to eradicate that corruption. And if it includes the President of the United States, then he needs to be held accountable. There's no question about this. I don't care his party, I don't care any of the things is how how old he is, how young he is, his raised, gender, ethnicity, any of those things, political party, none of those
things matter. They shouldn't matter. And so it cannot be about revenge. It has to be about about justice. And so we are but we're going to have to We are going to have to explain this. Republicans are going to have to articulate why this is not about revenge. They're already out there.
They're claiming they the media, they the Democrats. I don't know if you saw John Fetterman, excuse me, excuse me, the fashion icon John Fetterman out there when he was asked about by journalists about the impeachment inquiry. This this guy. There is something wrong with this guy. There's something wrong with a lot of these people in DC. But I this guy, I wish I could show you the video, because you know, most of you are listening on the radio or the podcast or whatever, and there is a
video stream of this, But it's just showing my lovely face. It's not showing the things that I'm I'm playing. Although I'm sure the good bad guy could probably arrange that, we're not going to do that right, just just yet. That's not how we're set up to operate. But Fetterman's reaction to this, the fashion icon himself, it is. It's embarrassing. It's embarrassing. I'm gonna I'm cuing this thing up to play it because even without seeing
it, it's remarkable. And yes, if you're wondering, if you are wondering, he has shorts on. He's not he's at he's in the Senate, not on the floor, but he's in the halls of the Senate. He's approached by journalists. He's well, let's just play it. Let's play this. Let's just play this thing, and you can hear it, hear it for yourself. About this news that Speaker McCarthy has formally launched an impeachment and said he's going to go oh my gosh, you know, oh,
it's devastating don't do it, Please, don't do it. This is crazy. What is wrong with this guy? Again? He's got his shorts on, got his bright white legs. For as much as the guy wears shorts, I would think I would think he would have more of a tan. He doesn't. And this is coming from a guy that never tans. But I just I he If you can see his reaction, he puts his hand over his chest at first, both his hands, and he takes steps back and he says, oh, oh no, oh, my goodness, what
are we gonna do? And he I think, at one point puts his hands along the side of his head as though he's just you know, beside himself. And then at some point he goes, whoo, I just can't. This is a US senator in shorts. He's this guy has problems. But he does the fingers like he's, uh, you know, the Emperor star Wars. That's not even true, because the fingers are going up and down like it's the doo doo doo doo doo doo doo doo sort of thing.
Right, So that's the encounter with the US senator, right, So they're gonna mock it. They're gonna take the position that this is about retribution. Republicans are in power, this is how they abuse their power. This is why we needed to impeach Trump, because we needed to make them pay so that they wouldn't use their positions of power to come after us when they're in power, in political power, right, and so they're gonna dismiss it,
they're gonna laugh at it, they're gonna mock it. But the people that do that are one or two groups of people. They either don't know what's going on, they will they don't know. That's one group. They don't care. That's another group, although that could be the same group. Maybe you don't know because you don't care. But then they're the people who are tasked with the responsibility of creating the messaging. They are the people like
Federman, the journalists, yes, I said, the journalists. By the way, Biden, the Biden administration has already sent out messages or excuse me, it's been announced that they are going to send out messages to the media about how to cover this, about how I got it in the stack of stuff, how to cover this. You know, we want to make sure that you're covering this correctly. Which again should not come as a shock.
But now I guess people are so fine with the idea that the Democrat Party is working hand in hand with the media that it doesn't even impact people when they hear this stuff. Hu's assumed. I assumed that they were getting messages every day from the White House on how to cover things. And I'm fine with the White House making their position. That's fine. They can make. They can make their defense, they can ignore it, they can talk about
it. They can have Federman doing embarrassing things. They can have journalists diminishing what's actually in the evidence, which I've got a sound by it about that as well that I'll play in the next segment. But we have to we have to understand there is evidence. Number one, it's not about retribution, or it should not be about retribution. If there's actual evidence, it can't be about retribution if the charges, of course, if the evidence supports charges
that are that warrant an impeachment, then it cannot be about retribution. Right, So it's there has to be evidence, and there is. It can't be motivated by retribution or politics. I know, I know the temptation. I know that those things are discussed. And I'm not saying that there shouldn't be any discussion about how how things might be politically perceived by the public.
I'm not saying that there shouldn't at least be discussions, But to use this to fabricate some sort of an advantage should not be the point of this. It should be about what's what's justified. And if Biden has done what the evidence suggests may very well have been the case, then he should be impeached. He should be removed from office, not just impeached. That's what the House does. It should go to the Senate, and he should be removed
from office. If the evidence bears out the things that I'm telling you, if the evidence supports that as vice president of the United States, and even before that, maybe his whole career for all we know, if it suggests, if it bears out, if it indicates that he was using his position of power as an elected official to enrich himself and his family personally, these aren't look I have a problem when someone is in office and then they leave
and then they use those relationships to have other lucrative deals. That's a problem too, But that is different than using your position and saying, hey, I'm going to use my current authority to help you get whatever you want foreign country or whatever in return. You know, wink wink, I'm gonna need I'm gonna need something, and that might be funneled through one of the twenty LLC's that reformed or whatever. If the evidence doesn't suggest that he should not
be impeached, he should not be removed from office. I know that that paints people to say I don't want him in office, but that has nothing to do with this. And it's sad to me that that's the starting point for people. Just because it's my guy, it doesn't mean he's innocent. Just because it's not my guy doesn't mean he's guilty. Evidence determines that I'm stating things that you've known since you were five, right, I know that
you know this. I'm just saying it because this is how we're going to have to defend this, because this is going to be attacked as a you know, an active revenge. This is going to be portrayed as a political stunt. And we have to make sure that we renounce political revenge and we focus on evidence and then we give it and we give it so timeouts in
order take a break. Here, come back. I want to play another SoundBite related to the chair of the Republican Party being asked about this by a journalist who claims that there was no evidence of any wrongdoing by President Bribery. So quick time outs in order, my friends, sit tight. You're listening to conservative not bitter talk. I am your host to back in a minute. Welcome back, my friends. So I mentioned before the break, and
I mentioned this earlier as well, mentioned this earlier as well. Here it is Rick or excuse me, not Rick Perry, not Rick Perry, Scott Perry, representative from the state of Pennsylvania. He is the Freedom Caucus Chair, and he, of course was talking recently about this impeachment inquiry, which
we've been talking about today. So he's talking about the impeachment inquiry, and he's making a statement about that, and he's then asked, he's answering questions from journalists and he is basically a journalist, says there's no evidence of any of any wrongdoing. So here he is. I just want you to hear this exchange. He gets a little bit fired up, and as well he should. But here is what Scott Perry his response is kind of back and
forth with this journalist. So it might be a little hard to hear the journalists because, of course the journalist is not at the podium. It's a podium when conservatives are at it. It's a pulpit when the leftists are at the podium in government, because it of course is the religion of the radical left. But nonetheless, here he is, this is about a minute or so kind of back and forth here trying to lay out the case to a point. But here it is Scott Perry, chair of the House Freedom Caucus.
But he would do that. I don't think it'd be appropriate. All right. Last question, yes, question, what actual evidence do you have as opposed to allegations to show to the American public that would merit an actual impeachment inquiry of Joe Biden? Improve it today. Isn't just about some of you, Oh, I don't know, McCarthy, for the sake of enacting political revenge. This isn't about political revenge. We have the bank accounts. We can see, ma'am. You can see that the homes that the Bidens
own can't be afforded on a and a congressional or Senate salary. You also understand that it's not normal for family members to receive millions of dollars from overseas interests. Those things aren't normal. That's not normal. Have twenty silk shell country companies. These things are not normal. And it alludes to not only just widespread corruption, but money laundering, if not influence peddling itself. And we also have the president on the vice president at the time, on record
saying that the prosecutor was fired. Well, son of a bitch, the prosecutor was fired, right because the prosecutor was going after the company that his son was working on. That's what we have. If you can't see that, if you are, if you are that blunt, look, I'll turn it over. The attorney said, the people because you don't report on it. I'm not sure you know. Okay, So he steps aside, lets the attorney take the podium, and he says the reason people, well,
she says people think it's political revenge. And he says, it's not political revenge because you know, people think that because you're not reporting on it. He's exactly right on that. By the way, isn't it remarkable how the journalists don't tell people things, or they tell them things that aren't accurate. They tell people that this is about, you know, the private contents of this Hunter Biden. This this poor guy who's had a battle with porn addiction
or whatever, the prostitutes, drugs. He's just he's he's a victim, and the Republicans get the contents and they're embarrassing this guy, even though Hunter says that was another thing I saw. Hunter recently said it embarrassed him when they release the contents, which is at least peculiar for someone who said that the laptop wasn't his. I just a whole series of things. But anyway,
I still understand. But I mean there's some there's some personally very embarrassing things on there for Hunter Biden. I understand all that, and I understand that of course this could be used for political purposes. Sure it could be, but that doesn't mean that doesn't mean it's just like it's just like when they when the left talks about say illegal immigration, right, remember it was parents being separated from their children. Well, what happens is if you get
stopped for coming into this country illegally and you have to be detained. Back when we did those things. I don't even know if we do those things anymore, but we're welldon gates open along the southern border. I do know that. But when when when someone was detained and children were with them, they had adults go to one facility, children go to another. And so
instead you can frame it as any way that you want. You can say this is the separation of parents and children, when what it actually is is, Okay, someone's breaking the law. Now do we want to put those who are breaking the law all together, children and adults in one place,
or do we want to separate them out. It's not a permanent situation, shouldn't be a permanent situation, But you know what's what's safer, what makes more sense, just like if you are doing something you shouldn't do, or if I am and we get arrested and our kids are with us, their cops aren't going to take them to jail. So you can portray it in a lot of different ways. And you know, as someone who's focused on truth and reality and at least a fair minded approach, I understand there's different
opinions. But when you frame things that way, in the case of children being separated from their parents, for example, or I would dare say, my body, my choice. No one has any problem what a woman's doing with her body. It's the body that they're trying to terminate, terminate the life of in the mother's womb. That's the question. That's what's always been
the question. But they want to misrepresent it because obviously people should be able to do with their bodies as they please, so long as it does not directly infringe upon someone else's life, liberty, property, whatever, right. I mean, this is a clear stuff. It's clear stuff for those that want to understand, but they deliberately misrepresent these things. There is evidence it should make Americans pause. And it's not about Hunter having hookers and snorting lines
or whatever he's doing on his whatever's on those videos allegedly or whatever. It's about a deeper, potential problem that there's evidence to suggest. Why does Hunter reference the big guy getting his cut when it's clear who the big guy is referencing. In fact, we know there's been announcements to that fact that the big guy is Biden President bribery. Anyway, that's just a just a snippet. It's the small example of what we're going to be dealing with here as
impeachment moves forward. Quick break by friends back in a minute. I'm back, my friends, so so so, so what us wrap up with the time that we have remaining here today? I want to share something from a sponsor. I want to start to get to We have two dogs in the studio and one of them has come to make himself known to be right now. So I'm a little districted. But the one of our advertisers is for
Patriots dot com. I want to make sure, my friends that you have the tools that you need to be have prepared in the event of a natural disaster, a power outage, food shortage. These food supplies offered by four Patriots can help you prepare for that issue, to prepare for that problem, and you can tang it. This is a tango in the off in the studio here tango go light down. So this food supply lasts twenty five years. Stackable totes breakfast, lunch, dinner menus and it's the most popular product
that they have. Go to their website for Patriots dot com. The number four the word Patriots with ans dot com. Use promo code todd to save up to ten percent. My friends, but quick time out as in order. Here Tango is not cooperating with me. Here, quick time out, my friends back in just a minute. Welcome back, my friends. I made an error in the bumping I was getting from Tango Snouts at the end of last segment. I'm sorry about that. You know, normally it is
lay over here in sleep. But in the nudging I got with the snout, I overlooked I made. I told you the wrong. Promo code for four Patriots dot com, the promo code to save you ten percent is Huff. Discount code Huff. It's my last name. All the others are our first name, but this one is Huff. Promo code Huff for Patriots dot com. That's the number four Patriots with ans dot com. For Patriots dot
com, shop their food supply. There's other products that might help you in the case of a national emergency, disaster, shortages, those sorts of things that we know that leftist policies can bring upon us, so and just life in general. So discount code is Huff, my friends. That's all the time that we have today. As always, it is my absolute pleasure to be here. Didn't get to all the things that I wanted to but this impeachment thing is a big deal and it's going to dominate the news here for
the months ahead. Have a great day of my friends. STG.