Attention. You're listening to the top Huff radio show, America's home for conservative not bitter talk radio. The advised that the content of this program has been documented to prevents and even cure liberalism, and listening may cause you to lean to the right. Here's your conservative but not Bitter host, Todd Huff. All right, my friends, here we go back at it here on this busy Monday emails. Should you want to be part of the conversation Todd at
toddhofshow dot com. You can also text three one seven two one zero twenty eight thirty. Yes, the voice is on a wild ride. I thought I was better. It's arguably harder for me to talk right now than it was last week. It could have been could have had something to do with this weekend. I will tell you since I shared a little bit about this
last I think it was last week. I kind of filled you in as to why my voice was struggling last Monday, which was because we had a basketball game and I was yelling, not not mad, but yelling at the at the team, and we had games. We actually had three games over the weekend, so I am probably three times worse. I guess I don't know how to say it. The girls actually won the championship. Of course, it was one hundred percent due to coaching. The girls did a great
job in all seriousness. So anyway, that's the voice is hopefully going to hang in there with us this week. But again, anything can happen, as we found out in prior times with this voice situation. But let's let's get after it. Hit or day. You know, as I was thinking about how to frame what I want to talk about today, when I thought about just how I wanted to set it up, I guess, you know, we don't do themes on here, but as I think, I try
to, you know, figure out what's going on. And there's times, by the way I shut down, I shut down. I don't you know. When this program concludes on Friday, I pretty much turn it off. I mean, this is what I do every day, right, and I love it, don't get me wrong, but sometimes you just need a mental
break unless something, of course major happens and I'll look into it. Someone will indefinitely tell me usually OZ. But anyway, the as I was preparing and as I read the news and was just thinking and looking at what was going on, and I see Trump now is up in the Wall Street Journal poll, which is the first time. Again we're still a ways out. I don't want to put too much into these polls, but just when you look at a series of things that are happening, and one of the things
that are that's happening is what we're going to talk about today. And there's a couple of things I want to get to, time permitting, of course, But as we as we look at it and I try to take a step back, especially on a Monday, you know how, I don't know, I just come off of that break, kind of take a deep breath.
We're heading into the holidays. Christmas is what two weeks from today, so you know, you take a step back and you look at the scheme, the grand scheme of how things are going, and I have what I think is good news for you. You know. Let me before I say that. Before I say that, let me say this. There are four stages when you start something new. And this is relevant to the point I
want to make here. When there are four stages that happened when you say you start a new job, or you take up a new hobby or whatever, just something new. The first phase is, and this is how I say it. There's actually other people that say it. They have kind of names for the categories, but I kind of describe the category. And the first phase is you don't know what you don't know, right, So you start something. It may seem like, oh, this should be easy,
and you don't realize really what you've gotten yourself into. Whatever it is, a new job, a new hobby. Typically this is the case, and it's something that looks it looks interesting, it looks fun. Maybe you've messed around with it in the past, and you say, hey, I'm going to do this, whether as a as a job, whether I'm going to volunteer at my church or whatever. Right, I'm going to take a bigger step to really embrace this and to kind of sink my roots here and really
become good at this and do this as a hobby. Well, then you quickly realize there's always more to it than you first kind of suspected. And then there's that terrifying phase, which is you know what you don't know, and it's a bit of an overwhelming situation because you think, oh my goodness, I started this, what did I bite off? I don't understand. You know, you're just starting to kind of get your feet wet in different parts of the hobby or the job, and you realize, oh, my
goodness, I don't know much about that. I didn't know it entailed that there's math involved. What's going on. One of my daughters she crochetes. She crochetes animals. She's twelve. She's twelve, And I'll tell you I wasn't her oz. What's the name of the she's on Instagram? What is it? Yarn Buddies by Evie? Right, Yarn Buddies by Evie. And she's gotten I'm telling I know she's my daughter. I'm biased, but I mean she's gotten very, very good at this and no time at all.
But it was kind of like that with her, And as she was doing the crocheg I don't think she knew that there was math involved. She shared this with me a couple of times. Dad, there's math involved. I gotta do math to figure out how many stitches. And I don't even understand what she's telling me, but I know that she's learning, and she didn't know that it involved that. So there's that phase when you first realize I've there's a lot to this right, and gradually you become more adept, you
become more capable of doing the job. And you slowly but kind of methodically, if you keep working at it, if you have a talent for it and knack forward, if you just have a work ethic, if you're focused or whatever, you just keep chipping away and you eventually become you become competent, and you then reach the phase that you don't know what you've learned.
You don't know what you currently know. It's like in your mind, you're still in that phase where it seems so overwhelming, but you've gotten better at it, and you just haven't completely realized that yet. Now you're still not a master of the skill, but you've gotten a lot better. What's what's the I've heard people say if you do just I forget how many minutes a day. It's not many, it's like fifteen minutes a day. Say, if you do something for fifteen minutes a day in the course of X amount
of time, X number of months or maybe it's a year. I don't even think it's that long. You become you're going to become like in the top I forget a few percent five to ten percent of people doing that in
the world, just because you've invested the time and the energy. But sometimes it doesn't feel like that right, So sometimes we don't know that we become competent, that we've kind of gotten good at it, and then finally we all reach that phase if we stick with it long enough, if it's a good fit, if we love what we do, if we keep plugging away, we finally get to that point where we are competent and we know it.
And what's interesting and I find fascinating is that when you get back to that level, when you've mastered something, it is so interesting to me at least, this is how it works in my head. Things become as easy as you thought it was at the beginning, except instead of just being naive and thinking that it's just that you've understood it well enough to be able to break it down into its most simple components, into its simplest pieces and steps
and components. Now you can teach it. Now, you can explain it. Now you can help people troubleshoot who's trying to learn what you've learned. You can become I'm kind of a master at it. And so it's with that in mind. It's with that in mind that sometimes I take a step back, right, I take a step back, and having done this for eight years, and having followed politics for g whiz probably thirty thirty years roughly
to some degree, I always had an interest. Again I've mentioned before, even as a kid watching watching Reagan, but I mean really had an interest in politics and discussing these cultural and political issues in worldview and all that sort of stuff. Faith having a really sincere interest in this for the past thirty years or so. And I can take that step back, and I can say there's something I've observed that I want to share with you, and I'm
going to tell you something. It's going to be interesting. Some of you may resist this, some of you may already think the same thing. Some of you may realize with a little bit of discussion, this is really where we are. But I'm going to tell you this, and I believe that this is accurate. Now, there's there's layers to this, and we got to unpack them. And I want to get to this. I want to
get to the SoundBite. I actually want to get as the example or the story that's kind of I think teaching us this that I want to talk about today is what's happening with these university presidents who acted like anti Semitism calling for the genocide of Jewish students was no big deal, didn't put anybody at risk
at their campus, on their campuses, which is preposterous and acidine. But nonetheless, nonetheless I want to talk about that because I'm telling you my friends, and I even hesitate to say this because it is it is just something I've observed. It's you know, I just mentioned that we are team the girls. They won the championship this week. In so envision this what I'm about to tell you. Like, we're in the first quarter of a game. You know, anything can happen in the next quarters. We might be
ahead, we might be behind. In fact, I think we got behind in the championship game six to zero. It was a shootout. I think we won nineteen to fourteen, but we got down. I think we were down six to zero. But the point is we're at the beginning of this game, and I just want to keep it in mind. I'm not saying that this this could change today. This could be one hundred percent different, one one hundred and eighty degrees flipped from what it is right now. But
I'm telling you, my friends, we are winning. We are winning. I mentioned a few months ago, or maybe I think it was a month and a half, two months ago, in one of my columns, I made the observation that we have won, we have won the argument on illegal immigration. In fact, there's stories in the stack of stuff. Today.
Governor Eric Adams, excuse me, Mayor Eric Adams from the city of New York headed to DC over the weekend or whatever, came back to his city and he told them, he told his he had a press conference or he made an announcement where he said, nobody is going to fix this problem. No one's coming to help us from the federal government as it pertains to how illegal immigration is really bankrupting our city. He made that announcement. This is
from a sanctuary city, my friends. We have sanctuary cities and states who have suddenly realized just how much of a burden an open border is to this nation, to cities. Now, they still don't say it quite the right way. They still have some hurdles they got to get passed. They're never gonna they're always gonna try to demonize Republicans about immigration and all this. But my friends, we've won the we've won the argument. Now there's a whole
other thing that has to happen. We've got to win the political fight, which is a whole, like I said, a whole other thing. So that is that is where we find ourselves. And we found ourselves in this predicament again. And we found ourselves specifically in the predicament of having a victory, having a cultural victory here because this university president, a couple of them, three of them went Mit Harvard and University of Pennsylvania, you pinned.
They went and testified before Congress will play a little bit of this after the break. I know it's time to take that break. But they went and testified last week, I think a week ago tomorrow. I think it was last Tuesday. It was last week sometime. They testified. Representative at least Stephonic asked them questions about whether or not calls for genocide violated universities, the
university's policies, and none of these folks would say that it did. They all acted like it was some sort of a you know, like a what am I trying to hypothetical hypothetical sort of question, some sort of imaginative question. She's saying, Look, you're having people literally threatened to say they want to wipe out all Jewish people from the face of the planet, unlive them,
as we have to say for social media purposes now. But you want to unlive them, and you act as though that's not a threat or a danger to students on campus. And these professors are excuse me, will they're professors too, But these university left as presidents were like, no, you know, it depends on the context and whether or not they can put it
into practice and all this kind of stuff. They do something with their words, then it might be I've got the SoundBite, but they they all hell broke loose on these professors, these university presidents, this particular university president, you pen she and I'll get into it, like I said before or in
the next segment. Her name, by the way, Liz McGill. She did what it amounts to a Michael Scott apology video for those of you that have watched The Office, where she basically well, I'll play a bit of that as well, but it still didn't do the job. People called for her, for her to be removed from office. She resigned. I think she resigned. She's not. She's gonna be the interim president as they choose a new president. She's a We're going to keep her cushy job somewhere on
the faculty. But the point, my friends, is that we're winning these arguments. Now. We've got to be smacked across the face sometimes because simply seeing one of these radicals removed from office doesn't mean anything, because they're just probably gonna plug someone else in. So we have to think two or three or twenty steps ahead. And I've got another story about that that I'm reminded
of as I say that anyway, But we are winning. We have real traction, and we are winning in the cultural war, in the worldview battle, in this battle for truth and decency. I'm not saying we got a lot of things wrong in this country, but we have victories that are mounting now. Whether or not that translates politically remains to be seen. Republican Party somehow always finds a way to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. But
nonetheless that's where we find ourselves here. I need to think a time out doing Okay, I don't think I sound that great, but I still feel like I've got a little bit of power here. As we go to the break, timeouts in order will pick up on the other side of the break. Wouldn't we get back my friends. You're listening here to conservative not bitter talk. It's a pleasure to be here this Monday. Be back here in
just a minute. Welcome back, my friends. So, as I mentioned last segment, I'm going to play a bit of the sound bite, a bit of the SoundBite that we heard being shared from the president, the former president of the University of Pennsylvania. She was asked, well, she was testifying before Congress, and she was speaking with well answering questions from in this
particular example, at least staphonics. She is a representative from She's a Republican from the state of New York, and I just want you to listen to this exchange. I want you to listen to this exchange because she is being asked for the whole purpose of this hearing was to talk about anti Semitism,
hate on campuses, talking about threats and dangers. Of course, in the wake of what we've seen between Israel and Hamas by the way, did you see all of the Hamas terrorists that are surrendering net and Yahoo says that they are close to ending this war? Do you end by the way in the United States? To the credit to the credit of the United States even under this administration. I don't want to get into motives or any of that at the moment. I just want to give credit where credit is due. The
United States vetoed a UN resolution that called for a cease fire. In Gods, folks, I am not in favor of innocent people getting caught up in the hell that has been created by Hamas. One by Hamas. The only way to have a lasting ceasefire is to allow Israel to go in there and eradicate the problem. Now, there still could be problems, I fully recognize that, but not allowing them, not allowing them to take care of the
enemy as they should and eliminate the threat. If they're not going to unconditionally surrender and release all the hostages, then Israel must do whatever it takes to create that end result, which is the people involved no longer have the capability ever again of doing what they did so but that's the United States vetoed that
resolution calling for a ceasefire. I'm in favor of a ceasefire, my friends, but I'm in favor of a real ceasefire, which will happen when the side that is calling for the death and destruction of Israel, when those jokers and clowns and evildoers and terrorists are annihilated and not have they don't have the capability of waging those wars anymore anyway, So this is all tied together.
So of course anti Semitism comes from the amount of hatred that exists on these radical, woke leftist organizations, these college campuses, and so it's created a bunch of antisemitism because apparently in the minds of these little radical leftists, they think that some Jewish kid on campus is responsible for whatever the crap they think is going on in Gaza in Israel today, and so they get bullied and
threatened and violence perpetrated against them. So they have this hearing and they want to talk to college university presidents and say, hey, what are you guys doing about this? This is a problem, whatever the case. Here's a least dephonic speaking here. In this particular clip, she's speaking with the former president of university of Pennsylvania, Liz McGill, I want you to listen to this exchange because this is kind of the starting point of all the things that
have happened since well the past week or so. Here it is Penn. Does calling for the genocide of Jews violate Penn's rules or code of conduct? Yes? Or no? If the speech turns into conduct, it can be harassment. I am asking specifically, calling for the genocide of Jews? Does that constitute bullying harassment? If it is directed and severer pervasive, it is harassment. So the answer is yes. It is a context dependent decision.
It's a context dependent decision. That's your testimony today. Calling for the genocide of Jews is, depending upon the context, that is not bullying or harassment. This is the easiest question to answer, yes, miss McGill. So is your testimony that you will not answer yes if it is or if the speech becomes conduct, it can be harassment. Yes, conduct means committing the act of genocide. The speech is not harassment. This is unacceptable. Mismcgil.
I'm going to give you one more opportunity for the world to see your answer. Does calling for the genocide of Jews violate pens Code of Conduct when it comes to bullying and harassment, yes or no, it can be harassment. The answer is yes. She's right. The answer is the answer is yes. By the way, it's absolutely astonishing. I mean it's not we
know who these people are. We know who these people are. Now, keep in mind, She's probably pays a lot of respect and attention to some of these radicals who There is a radical fringe, of course group of Democrats, and often they have a lot of power in the Democrat Party. But the Democrats have kept them away, have kept the pro Palestine, anti Israel, the pro those who chant from the river to the sea Palestine will be free. These people, these were Shida to Leeb types, AOC types,
the squad, if you will, truly anti Israel, anti Semites. They are truly the minority fringe in the Democrat Party and in this country on this issue. Now, there are certainly reasons to be concerned about the amount of junk being pumped into the minds of college kids around America today. I get all that, But we've won on this issue because since that point in time, and by the way, when Miss stephonic Congress willmus the phonic said I'm
gonna give you one more chance. I try my best not to interrupt their interject I wanted you to hear it. I might have said a couple of words here and there. But when she said I'm gonna give you one more chance to answer this question, that moment that miss McGill president, former president I guess now interim president, outgoing president of University of Pennsylvania, Lisa McGill, she had an opportunity to save her career there and she didn't. Now,
I don't know if she didn't get the memo. I don't know if she thought that the Democrat position was truly the position of anti Semitism or what. But she lost her career over this. And I let me say,
and rightfully so, my friends. She could not say. She could not say that calling for genocide on the college campus at the University of Pennsylvania constituted, constituted bullying and harassment of Jewish students, genocide, calling for the complete and utter wiping off the face of the planet of the people of Jewish faith. She could not say that that was intimidating and behavior that was against policies of the University of Pennsylvania. I want to talk about this because I'm a
free speech guy. In fact, I want to get to the old analogy of yelling fire in a crowded theater, and I want to break that down. What does that mean? Why does that matter? And this is the easiest, this is the easiest question that the president of the University of Pennsylvania
should have ever been asked. If someone on your school campus is calling for the group that another one of your students belongs to, ethnically, religiously, racially, for the annihilation, the actual destruction of their entire race, of their entire ethnic group, of their entire religion. If they're calling for that, does that constitute a threat? Does that constitute bullying and harassment of that
student? Absolutely, and unequivocally, how this only doesn't make sense to a accmmedition someone who is an intellectual who has no bearing, no footing, no existence in reality. Is absolutely absurd and outright stupid. And it's candidly why my father, my father coined the phrase over educated idiots. I think that's exactly what we've got going here, over educated idiocy running our college campuses around this country. Timeouts in one of my friends sits back in just a minute.
Welcome back, my friends. By the way, Christmas time is a coming two weeks from today. Jolly old Satan Nick is going to make well, I don't know, hopefully to all of your houses. Hopefully no one here is going to get a lump of coal on the stocking, although Oz has told me I better be on the lookout. But it's Christmas time. Maybe you're thinking about gifts for some body in the family, mom or dad, grandma, grandpa, husband, wife slippers are a great gift MyPillow dot
com slash todd you'll save on those slippers. We love our slippers. It's one of my wife's favorite products that we have. She actually had them last Christmas or Christmas before, she got them as a Christmas gift from her dad. They've got styles for men and women, of course. They've got multiple sizes and colors, and they're designed to be used all day indoor outdoor. Finished with high quality leather suede made from good old US cowhides. The inner
linings of the My slipper is very comfortable and cozy. As Oz would say, again, they're designed for indoor outdoor use. They've got a durable rubber outsoul that's designed to be worn both in the house or outside as well sixty day money back guarantee. Go to my pillow dot com slash Todd use promo code Todd to save on those slippers. MyPillow dot com slash Todd promo code
Todd. So getting back to what we've been discussing Hill here, which is Liz McGill former I guess you could say, still current, but now interim outgoing president of UPenn. She has well, I played you the testimony a moment ago, but from the time of the testimony there's been a lot of I mean a lot of people upset for obvious reasons. I mean, she's
literally she can't say. She couldn't say for whatever reason, whether she didn't get the memo that you know, the Democrats had decided to not be antisemites for the moment, I don't know, but for whatever reason, she couldn't bring herself to coming to the conclusion that she needed to be concerned about the well being of all students in her care at her university. What is so hard about this? I mean, there's nothing remotely hard about this. If
one group calls for the annihilation of the other group. That's no longer speech. And I mentioned that's no longer the type of speak. That's just free speech. There's no idea that's being described or explained there, there's no it's just pure hatred. In fact, I want to take you to the where are we here? Let me find where is it here? It is? Okay, So let's talk about really quickly here Free speech, right, free
speech. So the constitution, most importantly Almighty God has given us the opportunity, the ability to have the right to our own opinions and viewpoints and beliefs, and we can say those things. We can say those things, and we can express those things, and we absolutely should have free speech. But we've heard everybody's heard the metaphor the analogy that says we don't have the right to yell fire in a crowded movie theater when they're is no fire. That's
true, But why is it true? That's important If you want to apply the lesson the analogy of the metaphor whatever, you've got to make sure that you understand why. I learned years ago. The person who knows how will always have a job. The person who knows why will always be the boss. You can be influential. You can if you understand the whys. That's a critical piece of the puzzle here. And so the reason that we can't yell fire in a crowded theater, really, I think that there's two components.
But this is actually in a Supreme Court case called the Shank case hs ch E NK. Shank case. Two reasons. From the way I look at this one, it doesn't add any value to the discourse. It adds no idea, there's no there's nothing of value being added, even a even an idea that I don't agree with. It's just serving to cause panic and chaos. And it doesn't prevent anything to the discourse but actual harm. And this is the important thing, and the very thing that the existence of law
is designed to prevent. In fact, if you read a excerpt from the Shank case, which I've got in our stack of stuff, it says this the most true this was the justice for it was a blackman who wrote this opinion. I can't remember the most stringent protection of free speech would not protect
a man falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing a panic. The question in every case rites this is in the decision, the Supreme Court decision, the question in every case is whether the words are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they
will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. So, if you're calling for the evil that says we want to kill un alive a group of people because of their religion, their ethnicity, their favorite football team, their race, whatever, if that's your position, which is what is happening on college campuses, the Supreme courtas says that that is not something
that is not protected speech because it's calling for substantive evils. I think we surely, to goodness, in twenty twenty three, we can still agree that calling for genocide is a substantive evil in anybody's eyes. And Congress, that's exactly the sort of thing that Congress is designed to prevent. Create law and order so as to prevent the very things that this speech is calling for. That is important. These jokers and clowns could not articulate that in front of
Congress. And one of them has had her job taken away, right well, she's resigned it, but she's under immense pressure, and rightfully so. There's also now there's billboard trucks driving around Harvard Harvard University calling for the resignation of the president there who did who had similar confusion in her testimony before Congress
as well. Time out, my friends, is in order to sit tight back here in merror moments, I'm probably not going to have time to play the video she did from the time of the testimony last week until the time of her announcement of her resignation the u University of Pennsylvania president who's now outgoing interim soon to be former Liz McGill, she did a what I'm comparing to
a Michael Scott video. Do you remember the the Michael Scott episode or the Office episode, I should say, where they somebody was mad and in production and they printed a watermark in the back in the background, of course, on some uh standard paper, and it had some inappropriate things going on in the watermark, involving cartoon characters. And this went out and you know, to customers, and they used it for I think one of the high schools
used it as a invitation to a prom. I can't remember exactly, but there were upset customers. Michael Scott's for those of you who aren't office fans, you know, I encourage it. That's it's a great, great show. I know it's it's older, but it's one of the one of the greats. But anyway, Michael Scott holds a press conference that he of course calls Michael Scott's Steve Carell arguably, I think possibly the best television character of all time. Kramer would give him a run for his money, but Michael
Scott is great. Anyway. Bottom line is the he invites a customer in the customer to demands his resignation. He says, dream on, that's not happening, and there's a little bit of an argument that happens between him and the customer. So he goes. He wants to proactively cut this off, and so he goes and creates a video. He creates a video where he says, I'm not going to retire. You're gonna have to carry my dead body out of here. I'm not going anywhere. I will burn this place
to the ground if I'm removed from here. And then he ends ends the video by saying, you have one hour. It's some sort of a video where he is holding someone hostage and expecting some sort of a payout to you know, to do business. I guess anyway, that's what this video felt like. It's in the stack of stuff if you want to see it tiedefshow dot com right there on the homepage stack of stuff. You'll see it.
Click on that timeouts in order that my friends sit tight just out of time here back in a minute, Welcome back my friends, winning moments of the program. I said this off the top, but I want to say it at the end as well, because some of you don't hear the beginning. Shame on you, of course, I'm kidding. But you can always, of course download the podcast to titofshow dot com, slash listen or wherever you listen to podcasts. But I want to say this at the end too.
I think that there are many issues, many that we are winning, or maybe even have one. At least we've won the argument. Now that's where the interesting part to me begins to fall into place, just because we've won it culturally, we've won it societally open borders for one of those. As an example, this radical wokeness on college campuses, anti semitism, this issue is another example. What happens politically. Maybe a different thing altogether. I
hope not. We're winning these fights, my friends. Gotta go, SDG