An Assault On Reason - podcast episode cover

An Assault On Reason

Aug 29, 202339 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

The Radical Left & the media wield a lot of power over the psyche of the American public by constantly keeping their narrative in the news.

Hawaii Fire Relief:
https://mcusa.org/hawaii

Sign up for our newsletter:
https://www.toddhuffshow.com

Stack of Stuff:
https://www.toddhuffshow.com/stack-of-stuff

Email: todd@toddhuffshow.com
Phone: 317.210.2830

Follow us on…
nstagram: @toddhuffshow
Facebook: The Todd Huff Show
Twitter: @toddhuffshow
LinkedIn: The Todd Huff Show
TikTok: @toddhuffshow

Support Our Partners:
https://www.toddhuffshow.com/partners

Links:
https://www.mypillow.com/todd Promo Code: TODD
https://mystore.com/todd
https://4patriots.com Promo Code: HUFF for 10% off
https://www.modere.com/?referralCode=5895745
https://faith-lit.com Promo Code: TODD for 15% off
https://americaschristiancu.com/radio/
https://getthetea.com Promo Code: HUFF for 10%
https://www.patriotshave.com Promo Code: TODD for 10%
https://icreateartbox.com Promo Code: TODD for 10%

Transcript

Attention. You're listening to the Todd Huff radio show, America's home for conservative not bitter talk radio. Be advised. The content of this program has been documented to prevents and even cure liberalism, and listening may cause you to lean to the right. Here's your conservative but not bitter host, Todd Huff. My friends, did you see? I did not see this, honestly, I don't think if I did, I'd forgotten it. Didn't see this until

yesterday that the radical left on social media spread a fit. It is so priceless to me. They were spreading a fake mug shot of Trump on social media. My mistake. It wasn't even that it is an intentional well, somebody made it intentional. But these leftists, and there's a lot of them that shared it on Twitter. What is it? X? Now? I can't. I can't. I like Elon and not every way but in many

ways, but I can't. Keith Olberman's out there sharing it. Oh, you can see some edited tweets and they were commenting on how bad the first mug shot looked. And it did look bad, but it wasn't the real one. It wasn't the real one. So these jokers and clowns had to eat their own words because the second mug shot. In fact, if you haven't seen this, it's in the stack of stuff todd enough Show dot com. I encourage you or google it. I think this is a bright bart

story from maybe a couple of days ago. But just look at the reactions that they have to the mug shot. In fact, Olberman tweeted out, if Trump practiced this, he didn't practice hard enough, thinking that the first mug shot was real and it wasn't. And of course, what are they out there telling us every day that the social media social media needs to be clamped down on because it's misleading conservatives and people that they think are stupid because

they don't agree with their idiotic, baseless, morally bankrupt worldview. They're the very ones who fall for this junk every time it's tried. Greetings. By the way, my friends, you've tuned into America's home for conservative not bitter talk. A great decision you have made today. If you want to be part of the discussion, you can email Todd at Toddhefshow dot com. I do check those. You can go to our fate or excuse me, are

well. You can put it on Facebook two, I'm less likely to check it there as efficiently as I would if you went to the website or emailed it. A lot of folks messages through the website, that's totally fine as well. The good bad guy makes sure that I see those and text us three one seven two on Row twenty eight thirty. You can do that also, my friends. In fact, I got a message that I just wanted

to it's in the stack. Well, it's not in the stack, it's in my list of things that I want to talk about today, time permitting. So I mentioned yesterday on yesterday's program, as we've gotten through the weekend now and into this so it's we're at the end of August, right, We're at the end of August. Election day is November fifth, two thou twenty four, so we are within what is that fourteen months just a little

bit over fourteen months away. I know there's been many times during the first term of the hopefully first and last term of President Bribery's time in office, that we didn't think we would even see today. August twenty nine, the month of August, I wasn't sure we were going to see February of twenty one, to be quite honest, but we somehow have gotten through, gotten through all the mess I mean, in some cases limping along here by the

way, inflation, just the mismanagement, and virtually everything. We gotta talk of nuclear weapons being used by the Russians, since the Ukrainians attacked airports with drones. Now Russia's talking about nuclear weapons. Of course, this all happens on Biden's watch, but the left and the media want you to believe. And sorry for being redundant there. The left is of course the media as well, but they want you to believe that this all would have happened on

Trump's watch. In fact, it would have been so much worse if Trump would have been there. There already would have been nuclear holocaust or whatever, nuclear end of the world. And that's how they get away with this is beyond me. Obama bragged about the depression that he saved us from back in two thousand and eight, two thousand and nine. I guess, and people fall for it. People fall for this, and I you know, it's a subtle thing, but I do have something in the stack here that I

just it makes me think of this. This is actually in the bottom of the stack here, but it is relevant in talking about how they get away with this headline here foxnews dot Com, Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister says Canada is preparing a game plan in case of a far right shift in the US. And of course, if you listen to the media, we've already had this far right shift. America is being led by Trump to try to overthrow the

government. That's what they want you to believe. I would maintain that the American people have been awakened to the fact that their government is being used to well as a weapon against them, as a boot upon their necks, and they we are tired of this. But the way that the media, the way that the government often does this is they don't try to convince you that America. They don't try to convince the American people that the government is moving

far right, which is a completely laughable concept to me. If anything, the government has gone ultra ultra leftist. But anyhow, at least there's people in that government that I can point to and say, look at what they're arguing for, look at what their positions are. It's definitely gone anti American. The American government is anti American today. Which let that let that sink in under this leadership of President Bribery. But we have this headline, or

it's not just the headline here. Fox is just reporting And I'm not a Fox fan or anything, but Fox is just reporting this. But it's what the Canadian government is doing. So instead of going to the podium and trying to explain why America is going far right or why it might, they don't do that. What they do is they have someone what they title that sounds

very serious. We got the Canadian Foreign Affairs minister. In fact, I believe she may be what is her name, Melanie Jolie j o l Y. She maybe some thinks somethink that she might be eventually the replacement for Trudeau, which she was. I can't even talk about a messed up dude. But anyhow, so you've got instead of trying to convince you in me that America is moving in that direction, what they do is they use a position of power and authority to say, oh, we've got to we've got to

prepare for the possibility. What does this mean in practical terms, the possibility of a Republican president being elected in America. We've got to redo everything that we're doing in Canada, says that that's the position here in order to try to figure out how to work along side of a government that's under the radical control of Trump in the worst case scenario, or de Santists or vvak Ramaswami or anybody that's up there on the Republican stage. That's what they want you

to think. They're wringing their hands and this is effective to people. It's I've often used this analogy. I remember this is this is twenty some years ago. I remember, I think I was in college and I saw this and I was I was at the time. I was floored because I remember it was footage in a Palestinian school and they were basically showing how these Palestinian students were being taught language and so forth. You know, like just like

we would be taught here, but it's not how we're taught here. Oh, I would say, it wasn't how we used to be taught here. And so they would be diagramming sentences on the board or whatever the exercise was, and their sample sentences were things like the evil Jewish pigs and stuff like. That's what they were saying on the board. And so they were diagramming

the sentence, so they weren't. It's it's a more powerful form of of just trying to convince people, in this case, students young people of something without directly putting them on defense and trying to make them. You know, it's it's how do I say this? When it's when it's subtle, you don't necessarily have your defenses up, right, So instead of saying, hey, I'm here's what I'm trying to convince you. Ever you're ready for me to make my argument, and someone says, okay, go for it.

Now they're in the mode of filtering the argument. But if you're trying to persuade, not to persuade them, if you're trying to manipulate them, if you're trying to trick them, if you're trying to almost hypnotize or dare I say, brainwash people, this is how you do it. It's it's an assault on reason because what it does is it bypasses that because it's subtly, subconsciously hammers in these points. And that's what the media does in large scale.

Now that's just one example. Here is what I just read you. But this applies to everything It's why they want to indict Trump four times, and if they can indict him forty four times, they will be content with that as well. Because they want people just to subtly in the background, consistent, consistently drip drip drip, here Trump indictment, Trump indictment. And they want people to get to the point where they say, well, all

these indictments can't be wrong. The guy had to do something wrong. I don't know what it is, but he can't have had all these charges brought against him for nothing, because again, I can't question these people. Fanny willis who Ah says gives a bad name to Fanny packs. You can't have these people, all from different parts of the country, different states, different jurisdictions, all coming to the same conclusion that Trump has to be indicted.

They tried, they try to avoid this every way possible. That's what they want you to think. They just they're out of options. They got to take this guy out because he's a danger to our democracy. That's the narrative, that's the argument. But they don't want to make it directly because it's stupid, it's patently absurd to try to make this on its face. Instead, not sure what that was. But instead what they want to do is put that into the psyche of the American voter, and they want to terrify

the American voter. They want to terrify the American voter into thinking what might happen if Trump is elected. They want you to be terrified and on edge about that constantly. Meanwhile, those very things can happen when Biden is actually

president and no mention of it is even made. The power, the power they hold in drawing attention to something, the power they hold, and being able to magnify it and amplify it, or to be able to make it sound insignificant in order to make it appear to be less than what it really is. They hold, They still wield a lot of power. And I gotta be honest. I think I've said this before on here. When I was when I started listening to talk radio, which would have been nineteen ninety

nine, when I was first introduced to Rush. I remember, you know, back in those days, the Internet really wasn't you know, people weren't going there. There wasn't social and people were using the Internet, but not like they do today. Right, It wasn't a place where there was a ton of information, a ton of different places to get news and so forth.

It was pretty much the big three CBS, ABC and NBC, and it was some big media out There would be big media outlets like New York Times, Washington Post, right, places like USA Today, all those places, and they kept singing this name tune. And I think I thought for a time that when the Internet is able to draw people and people can access information and alternative viewpoints, people are going to be awakened. But I'm not

sure that's happened for some. But I'm not sure that's happened in mass In fact, when you factor in the power of censorship, when you factor in just the again the number, the multitude of voices online through the help of big tech, right, social media is not a friend of conservative policies of

limited government and so forth. When you factor in how they amplify and promote certain things, and then d platform silence, sensor all the other things, the ideas that are in line with what I think and what the vast majority of you think. It's it's almost like people have you know, back in the day, I think that they didn't have access to the information now they do. But they have it over abundance of information right. Cutting through the

clutter and the noise is complicated and difficult when there's so many choices. And of course you have alternative, well I shouldn't say alternative, you have you have social media platforms and big tech platforms that try to silence im. If the things that happen even to this program would boggle some of your minds, it's boggled my mind. Even though I knew it. It's still something altogether

different to see it and to experience. And that's why we like to go straight to That's why we have our email column, That's why we have talk radio stations, that's why we have the podcast. Although I'll tell you, even with the podcast, it makes you a little bit uncomfortable because you have to go through these third part platforms and you don't have to, but in

order for people to find you, that's where they go to listen. And so it becomes a concern that at any moment they can flip, they can flip a switch on it, turn it off, demonetize it, or whatever the case may be. And so in a wild way, by having access to more information, some Americans have shut down and said, just tell me what to think. Just tell me what to think. Jim Acosta, just tell me what to think. Evening news host, just tell me what to

think. MSNBC, CNN, or whoever else is out there. Just help me, help me navigate this. Tell me what to be afraid of, Tell me who to vote for, Tell me why I should support Biden. Tell me what's politically and socially acceptable today. I will comply, I will follow the rules. Just give me the cues. Just tell me what to do. And there's a lot of people like that, a whole lot of people like that, and that isn't play. There's a big part of that

at play in these Trump indictments. So I mentioned yesterday Trump and his campaign raised over seven million dollars. I see seven point one million dollars raised since the bugshot was released, which again is just so rich, so rich. CNN is seemingly catching on to this and they're upset that maybe this is actually helping Trump. So we got a lot to still go through with this. In fact, Alan Dershowitz and Jonathan Turley, both who are Democrats, by

the way, Democrats who are not happy their attorneys. They're they're legal scholars. They're not happy with what's going on with Trump. They've got some words of wisdom and some advice regarding his trials. And we've got some other things, lots of other things to get to as well, some stuff with the Biden crime family, which never ceases to amaze me, President bribery and so forth. But timeout is in order, Oz is correct. The time out

is in order, my friends. So we're gonna take a break, come back and get to those things and a lot of other things in today's news. You're listening here to conservative not better talk. I am your host to Hugh Back in a minute. Welcome back, my friends. So this was from last week when Trump actually turned himself into authorities in Fulton County, Georgia. CNNs Caitlin Collins and Sarah Murray. Now keep in mind, there's a

helicopter. There's a helicopter flying over a news helicopter where Trump is pulling in, his team is pulling in. And remember he's a former president who's folks, he is under continual threat. People. I condemn violence against anybody, even if I politically agree or disagree. Right, this should go without saying in a free logical decent society. But I think objectively, there's no doubt that President Trump, I mean, the amount of people that would like to

inflict harm upon him is massive. It's massive. And dare I say that these jokers and clowns at CNN and other news outlets have helped to feed this actual narrative. Now some of course are bigger culprits than others, but they have stirred the American people into a frenzy over this guy. And of course the American people have to take responsibility as well and say, hey, why are what? Why is what we're being told so out of line with reality?

And of course that's not always. That's not always what happens when you have a situation like I was explaining last segment, where you've got people who are on autopilot. They just want to exist and live their life and follow the latest government or media led just series of recommendations or whatever. Just said the same thing with the masks, right, just tell us what to do.

We'll comply. We'll be morally superior to those who don't. Will criticize people who don't comply, and if they don't comply, and if they die, we'll cheer in the case of COVID, which is unequivocally what happened in certain circles during COVID, led by in some cases by comedians like Jimmy Jimmy Kimmel when he basically said that, well he said that on his program anyway.

So the motorcade's rolling up to the jail, which again, why are they rolling up to the j because they've been ordered to by Fanny Willis and the leftist there in Fulton County, Georgia. They thought this was a good idea. They wanted to be able to capitalize on this. They should have known better than to do this. I mean, we talked about this. This is obvious as the noonday sun that Trump is going to be able to put this to his advantage. But it seems like the media is clueless on

this. Caitlyn Collins and Sarah Murray as Trump is pulling up, pulling up in the motorcade to report to jail as he was told to do, and as they have news camera. The media is the one that has news choppers flying over filming this, but they're just seeming to understand that possibly Trump is going to put this to his own advantage. So listen to this back and forth between these two individuals, Caitlyn Collins and Sarah Murray at CNN. From

himself has been not downplaying this. I mean, he has certainly seen how he uses these exact moments to his political advantage. Sarah. I mean you covered him when he was in the white else as well, and he was posting today, you know what time he expected to be here, seven thirty year to seven thirty four, as he is arriving here where timely? I love some timely guidance, I guess, yeah. But he does use these. I mean he uses these for fundraising, He uses these to rally space.

I mean, that's one of the questions about the sort of value of a mug shot in this case. Right, It's sure it's treating Donald Trump if he does get one, the same as any other defendant. But you're also giving him a photo that there's no doubt that he's going to use on promotional material. He's going to use on fundraising material. I believe he made a fake mug shot in the past they used for fundraising purposes, and I think that you know, that's one of the things that's gone into consideration in

his previous three arrests where he has not had a mug shots. Do we really need to do this when we're talking about a form of resident of the United States. We know what he looks like, right, and that's courtesy of NewsBusters. They put that that they pulled that clip, but that they're just catching on to this. It's almost though the only piece of that puzzle they did not admit was, Hey, we want to be the ones to

put this to our political advantage. We can't have Trump manipulating this situation. Trump's supposed to be the victim here. Trump's supposed to look beat down. Trump's supposed to be down in the polls. Americans are not supposed to be rallying around this guy. And this is swollen and expanded well beyond what they ever well, definitely what they hoped for, and I would dare say what they even have expected. This is bigger than they had anticipated. If they're

out of options. To me, that's just what we keep coming back to. They are out of options. So they're gonna see this thing through. And there may be other indictments, there may be other charges, there may be other strategies. The idea that Trump needs as much protection as he has, is absolutely exactly. I mean, he needs that, he probably needs more than what he's getting. I mean, the amount of anger and rage

as directed against this guy is unlike anything we've ever seen. And the media narrative is that's because he's so dangerous to our democracy and everything's about to crumble, and this guy is like Hitler. But for the American people that are waking up, the American people see no, no, no. The real threat here are the people that will do anything, and I mean anything to

stop him from being president of the United States. The real threat are people who are using the government, using the Department of Justice, using the judicial branch of government as a weapon to go against their political enemies. The real culprit's, the real dangers in this scenario are the people who are cheering for the deaths of people who did not get the COVID vaccine, yet they died of COVID or something else. They cheer that because again, you've not complied.

The real dangers are the people who are cheering and hooting and hollering and clapping and applauding when our legal system completely has no concern whatsoever for due process of January sixth, defendants. I could go on and on the real danger are the people who want to target individuals and say that because they are not paying their fair share and taxes, that's the reason why you Why an average

person, why me? Why some other mayor Erican is suffering because some billionaires not paying his quote unquote fair share in taxes when they are breaking no laws. When they're breaking no laws, change the tax code if you don't like the tax code. By the way, no one understands the tax code. It's brazillion pages. There's all sorts of legal court decisions that you also have to know. I mean, it's the amount of information one has to understand

understand. The tax code is absolutely incomprehensibly large. And we're talking I think, I read. I think it's over a million pages. If I'm not mistaken. When you factor in court cases, in tax code and everything else, it may even be more than that. It's incomprehensibly large. But yet they want to blame the people who put the law to work in their favor as the problem. And then they tell us they're going to target them for taxes, They're going to pay more in taxes, and the reason that you're

unhappy, average American is because someone else hasn't paid their fair share. And who's going to make sure that they pay their fair share? None other than President Bribery, who's out there getting more than his fair share, allegedly for helping his son get some sweet business deals in order or in exchange for some potential political favors. At least that's what former Prosecutors Shoken is out there saying. What happened in Ukraine anyway, lots more to get to, my friends,

but I'm up against a break. Sit tight back here in just a minute. Welcome back, my friends. As we are quickly and I mean quickly, approaching the fourth quarter. We've just got one more month September, in case we've got any Bernie fans in here. The year can be broken up into four quarters, and the fourth quarter begins October first, which is a little over a month away, so we're quickly getting to that point.

This is the time of year that a lot of folks look into their well lots of things, especially as they move into the beginning of the next year, and some of those some individuals is a good time to review things like

health insurance. If you are thinking of doing that, whether as an individual, whether as an employer, whether as someone in HR, whatever your role, whether again personally or with your business or the place that you work, I can I ask that you consider reaching out to my friend Eric Wilson and I sell HEALTHI sellhealth dot com. They've been serving clients throughout this great nation since two thousand and four. Specialize in individual health, group health medicare.

Some folks may need navigating Medicare. Eric is skilled and adept at doing that as well, and also helping plan tax free retirements. He's a expert in the Affordable Care Act, which doesn't mean he's a fan of it, but he's an expert in knowing how to navigate it. He's a good resource on helping find out which plan, which options make the most sense for you. I encourage you to reach out to Eric. He's been a friend of mine, a supporter of this program for a couple of years. Maybe I'm three

or so, maybe even a little bit longer than that. You can reach out to them for a no cost consultation is absolutely free. Eight one five three seven, two thirteen sixty three eight one five three seven two thirteen sixty three, or just visit him on the website I sell health dot com. That's I sell health dot com. I'm Eric Wilson and his team. There. Be sure to tell him that you heard about him here on the Todd

Huff Show. So I mentioned earlier. Alan Dershowitz, Jonathan Turley. These are two folks that are they vote Democrats, and they are legal scholars, their attorneys. They are I think, very fair minded legal scholars. They're out there saying both of them are saying that there is no way that Trump's trials that any of them. Right, there's four indictments, there's no way. They're saying that they're even going to begin before election day in twenty twenty

four, which is about, as I've said, fourteen months away. So they're saying they're dreaming if they believe that these that these trials are going to start before that day. Now, I would say, look, I've long wondered this. I mean, I've I'm not an attorney, nor do I play one on this radio show, but I have paid attention, and I feel like, you know, it seems to me that it takes a little bit longer for trials to begin than what most of these folks, especially Fannie

Pack over there. I think she's wanting it to begin, and I mean, who there's there's different days. One of them wants it to start before Super Right, the day before Super Tuesday, which is in March of next year. I think on Jack Smith wants one of his cases to begin January second. Trump's teams, of course, is pushing for this to be delayed. I mean, we're still in the discovery phase. I mean, this

is there's a lot of stuff left to unfold here. I mean, if you ask the average leftist, they would prefer Trump just be escorted out to the public square and charged and I mean maybe hanged. Who knows what they would be prepared to to condone at this particular point in time. Metaphorically, of course, my friends, Although there's some crazy, wicked people out there,

there are people that think he's guilty of something. Just get rid of him, just put him in the clink for the rest of his life, at least make him drop out of the race for Republican nominee for president. Anything, just he's guilty of something. They don't care, they don't care about evidence. They hear the name Trump and they're ready they're ready to start foaming at the mouth, and that's effectively what's what's going on here. Now.

I will say this that Derschawitz and Tly, of course, are two legal scholars that I do have respect for those guys, even though they vote differently than me in many instances. I will say this, I don't know if they are accounting for the political aspect of this. And what do I mean by that. I mean, if there is any conceivable way possible for

them to stick at the Trump yet again, they will do it. So for example, if if Turley and I have no reason to doubt that they're wrong on this, but if Turley and dersha would say, Hey, in a normal world, there's no way in there's no conceivable way for these trials to even begin, for any of them to begin even before election day of twenty twenty four, and I would say, okay, but is that the world that we're living in. In a normal world, President Trump, these

these indictments would never even have been brought before a grand jury. As I played yesterday on the show, So I played yesterday, there's a long an ad campaign that was released in twenty sixteen after the election after Trump had won, but before the electors had got you know, gone to Washington, DC

to cast their votes for President Trump. And there was a whole campaign that was led by well, the spokespeople, one of them was Martin I always want to say short Martin Sheen, Martin Sheen, Deborah Messing and some other C list or D list or enlists, celebrities, so called celebrities, begging these electors to not vote for Trump. Now, I postulated the question yesterday

when were these folks indicted? When were these folks charged? When was a grand jury and paneled to bring you to have a decision as to whether or not they would be facing charges for trying to undermine our nation's elections by thwarting democracy and overthrowing our government. I mean, that's the way it's talked about with Trump. And of course, of course it's not what happened, because

that's not what the narrative of the day. That's not what the power brokers the radical left wanted to talk about back then, what they wanted to talk about. In fact, if you listen to that ad campaign, it sounds like they have reverence for the Constitution that was in twenty sixteen they're ready to set that baby on fire today, and in many ways they have, of course metaphorically is of course, but we'll see what happens. I mean,

this is designed. They pick this time frame to inflict the maximum I'm out of damage to Trump. That is why there are four indictments that all fall within this very tightly defined window. They have determined that this has the potential for the greatest impact. And I would not put it past them to move heaven and earth, or trying to move heaven and earth to make sure that these trials, if they think it's going to help them, make sure that

these trials begin before election day. And I don't doubt Dersha what's internally who say that this is not normally the case. There's no reason to believe that this will happen here except for the reality that this is President Trump, and except that nothing applies regarding the traditional conventional wisdom when you look at how President Trump is. These lawsuits have been handled from the beginning, the entire you could say, the entire handling of Trump by the media, by the bureaucratic

state, by the judicial branch, by the deep state. It's never been according to any sort of standard operating procedure. It has stopped the guy at all costs. So I would not put it past them to break all protocol, to break all records, and getting this to trial quicker than ever before. I would not put it past them at all. Again, this is we're in the fight for the survival of this republic. The radical left sense is blood in the water. They since that we are against the ropes.

They believe this is their moment to pounce and they know that if they give Trump another chance, but the odds of him moving the needle back in our favor, which is against the favor of these radical leftists, these globalists, they're going to be in a much worse position. So this is the moment that they have to win. All the chips are down. That's why we got to fight harder than ever before. My friends, This is not going to be easy, but it's absolutely going to be worth it. Timeouts in

order, my friends back in just a minute. Welcome back, my friends. Not a ton of time left, but I want to hit on some other headlines here really quickly in the time we do. We do have remaining. So I mentioned that Victor shoken the prosecutor that was fired after Biden abused his powers allegedly as Vice president of the United States. He says that Hunter Biden was recruited specifically by Berezma to quote provide protection while the company engaged in

quote illegal activities. Seems relevant to me. That's out there. Devin Archer, who's the friend of Hunter Biden, who was on the Beresma board with Hunter Biden, reportedly met with Secretary of State at the time, John Kerry, who had tipped to the Great Rushlan Ball served in Vietnam. He met with Devin Archer, met with John Kerry weeks just weeks before Shokin was fired. And that now infamous incident where Biden is on stage talking about threatening the

Ukrainians to fire prosecutor. We've got Biden, Biden Stafford that met with a member of Jack Smith's team, Jack Smith, of course, who's been prosecuted Trump on a couple of these indictments before, before the Trump indictment. So we have Biden who wants to act like there's no reason to think he's doing anything with this is the Department of Justice, not him, But he's out there. They're they're connected, Their fingerprints are all over these things, my

friends. But I gotta take a quick time out back in a minute. Yes, that's right, my friends. The left, the Biden administration wants you to think they've got nothing to do with any of this stuff going on with Trump. Their hands are clean. This is the Department of Justice, that is, no matter how hard they try to deny it. The Department of Justice falls under the responsibility of the executive branch. It's a part of

the executive branch. Biden's campaign co chairs out there saying that they are not even interested in talking about the legal problems Trump is having in the campaign. They've already tried to fundraise off of it. Anyway, The fingerprints are all over, by the way, my friends. In the closing seconds, I'll tell you that our second issue of our column is being released tomorrow. Go to our website, Toddhufshow dot com to sign up for that. It's absolutely

free at Todd Huffshow dot com. Friends, have a great day. We'll see tomorrow. Take care, SDG.

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android