Attention. You're listening to the top Huff radio show, America's home for conservative not bitter talk radio. Be advised. The content of this program has been documented to prevent and even cure liberalism, and listening may cause you to lean to the right. Here's your conservative but not bitter host, Tod Huff. All, my friends, we've got a bond of stuff to get into today, a lot of stuff to sift through, catch up on filling some gaps on all that sort of stuff. So we're gonna get to it quickly on
this fantastic Friday. Hard to believe we're at a Friday nearing the end of the month of October. It's a good uh, plenty of stuff to talk about. Let me say that. So email address if you want to be part of that conversation, you know, the drill Todd at totefshow dot com. Just make sure that you include the appropriate amounts of adoration and praise.
You can text us three one seven two one zero twenty eight thirty three one seven two one zero twenty eight thirty Yes, message and data rates may apply, so lots of things. As I mentioned, vying four our attention. You know, as I've I'll just briefly mentioned this. I've said this before, but starting this program, what are we at now? Eight a little over eight years now, eight years ago? You know, sometimes I want
to go back. I don't do this, but sometimes I want to go back and listen to the first show and that, you know, maybe somebody doesn't. I think you can still. I think it goes back all the way in the archives if you go to the website. But anyway, I just I just remember those and I remember thinking at the time, back in twenty fifteen, having been new with this, I had never never done this
before. I just remember thinking to myself self, how in the world am I going to carry on a conversation into a microphone without someone giving me feedback and so forth during that conversation. I never dreamt that we would have so many things vying for our attention. If I could only go back to the tod of twenty fifteen and give him some assurances that there are plenty of things on the horizon to discuss. But we of course have this situation with the
Speaker of the House. We have the situation, of course between the Israelis and Hamas in Gaza. We have of course, what amounts to an insurrection. I mean that's how look that I don't make the rules them as the rules as they say that someone goes into the capital group of people by the way I think. I mean, there are people getting arrested left and right. I didn't see a you know, some of the footage from January sixth shows people walking in a single file line through the rotunda. And look,
I'm not I have been very consistent on this. If the law was broken, I don't care if someone is politically in alignment with me or not. I don't care if they were there. I mean it's nice that they were, you know, trying to protest something that they believed, and that's that's something that's fundamental in this country. But if laws are broken, then I
mean, that's that's not anybody else's fault. It's not my fault. That doesn't mean that just because we agree that something fishy may have gone on in the twenty twenty election, maybe much more than fishy, but that doesn't mean that we are complicit or guilty. I mean, I I reject that stuff. I don't know if some people just is is it a lack of confidence? Is it's just I don't know, is it just playing by the narrative
of the day. I just reject that I had nothing to do with January sixth, And I also know there were plenty of people there that didn't do anything wrong or illegal. They were at the capitol, they didn't storm at break things or anything like that. And there were some that did. But if you compare what happened here on what was it Wednesday, I guess Wednesday evening at the capitol A bunch of pro Hamas protesters. And that's it, folks. That's how this has to be framed. And I understand. Look,
I completely understand. I value all innocent human life, I absolutely do. But to blame any single casualty on Israel that happens in Gaza without any evidence, simply because for example, this situation with the hospital that was allegedly bombed, which other reports said it was the parking lot, I mean, that's the other thing. Who the world, who the heck knows what's going
on. But the rule for me is which one of these groups of people is engaged in full time propaganda, and it is, without any doubt, any question whatsoever, it is Hamas. Hamas is Hamas looks at pr as the messaging of what's going on. That is their number one concern, That is what they are infatuated with. They focus on trying to tell the narrative
in such a way so as to get global support. It's almost, in my opinion, that they know that there's two ways that they believe that they can eradicate Israel, every Israeli from that piece of land known as Israel. Historically, yes, I know that it was called the British Mandate. It was known as an area of Palestine, but it was known as Israel long, long, long before that. Regardless of all of that, though, regardless of all of that, it's almost as though Hamas knows that they have
two options. One is they can enrage the entire Muslim Middle East against Israel and wage full, just wide open warfare against them, bringing in Hesbealah, bringing in the Iranians. By the way, if you go to today's stack of stuff, you're going to find a story. It's really more of a You're going to find a piece that is talking about what happens with the end of what's known as the Transition Day for the Iran Nuclear Deal, which is
basically right now. And so when you look at quote unquote transition day and that, I know it can be confusing, especially for those who are preoccupied with the transitioning from male to female and all that other stuff. But this is a transitioning, the transition day of something pertaining to the Iranian nuclear agreement. When you look at what's happening there and the timing of that and the lifting of restrictions, which is now right, it's here, We're at the
point of lifting restrictions. And you look at that in the broader scope and context of the Israeli conflict, and it adds a layer of problems. It adds a layer to this already complicated situation. But Hamas knows. Hamas knows that to get rid of Israel, they are going to either need the help of the Muslim world to go in militarily, or they're going to need to win the propaganda battle, to win the hearts and minds I guess of the world, and that is what we're engaged in. We are this country.
What happened at the Capitol building. I've got some sound bites from Rashida Talib, who spoke at one of these rallies outside the capitol before I think they stormed the capitol. Their of course calling for a ceasefire. By the way, I saw a guy that was on with a British reporter who said that Israel is the only nation that has not ever been allowed to win a war and that's really the root of this problem. And there's a lot of truth
there, this call for a ceasefire. It's it's like the folks that are storming the capital, the folks that are defending Hamas by making this about the Palestinians, the innocent folks, the folks that are you know, not involved directly in this conflict, who want to make it just about that part. They overlook the fact that Hamas is the one putting those folks lives at danger.
They are the ones who are constantly lobbing missiles at Israel. They are the ones who use things like hospitals and mosques and schools and residential communities to stage attacks from this is what they want. It is I hate to say, well, as a human being, I hate to say that the elected officials, and I know that they're Hamas and they're terrorists, but just the idea that the elected officials of a group of people seek the bloodier it can
be for the civilians. Hamas views that as a victory in the propaganda war. They absolutely do, and so these calls for ceasefires ultimately don't let the problem. Don't let the Israelis fix the problem. The idea that radical Islamic extremist terrorists in Gaza, in any part of the world for that matter, can just be told that we're going to have an agreed upon ceasefire. Now, they may be wanting it, and they may at the time come out
and say, oh, yeah, we'll agree to anything. But the problem is, the problem is they don't agree to anything after it's written on the paper, right they It's just like the Iranian nuke deal. It's just like the North Korean nuke deal that we had back in the nineteen nineties with Clinton.
I used to say on this program when I talked about that, they sign a piece of paper, they make a pinky promise, and leftists liberals are all proud of themselves, pounding their chest, thinking they've accomplished something extraordinary, when all they've done is added to a piece of the propaganda puzzle. They've given them another platform another piece of paper to point to and say, well, we signed the paper, we agreed to a ceasefire. We don't
know where those missiles came from. Someone must be someone else must be doing it. And the problem is you have to be able to allow Israel to eradicate the people who are continually provoking the situation, and that is the leaders
of Hamas. And that is why what Israel is doing and preparing for a ground invasion of Gaza to go in potentially building by building, room by room, tunnel by tunnel, whatever they're going to do, whatever this is going to look like, they have to be allowed to do that because any agreement of a ceasefire, I mean, how naive. And I say this as I was. Those words are coming out of my mouth. I was there were other words that I was thinking. I was tempted to say, how
stupid, how ignorance. But let's just how naive does one have to be to think that there's a situation over there that's been boiling forever. You have a group of people in Hamas who have created an organization. They're founding document says we want to push Israel into the sea. We want them to be no more you read that document, you'll see numerous examples of where the group of Amaas seeks the absolute destruction of the nation of Israel, of the Jewish
state. They don't want it to exist, and so they'll fire rockets, they'll fire missiles, they'll carry out skirmishes here and there, and every time Israel is patient and result, and sometimes Israel strikes back, undoubtedly ending up striking a mosque that Hamas was using as a command and control center, or that Hamas was using to launch these missiles from or whatever. Israel then,
of course is demonized. How dare you strike the mosque? And the rest of us are thinking, well, why is it okay for Hamas to use it as as a battle site, as a commanding control center? How on earth does any of that make sense? It doesn't make sense, by the way. And so every once in a while, Hamas or whatever other radical Islamic terrorists is leading, the Palestinians and Gaza will get together and stage some more serious operation, as they did a couple of weeks ago October seventh.
Then when Israel responds with serious force, everybody suddenly wants to cease fire. It's like you let the provocateur do whatever he wants, and then when Israel tries to make sure that it never happens again, everybody in the international community steps in and they says, oh, Israel, take it easy, take
the high ground. Well, how's it the high ground? How is it the high ground to allow for a group of people to continue to exist and operate militarily in Guyza, threatening and killing your own citizens, And what universe is at the high ground? The high ground, my friend, is to do something about it. The high ground is to eradicate these scumbags from existence. That is what they have. They have chosen their side. They have
decided that they are prepared to slaughter and torture. I don't know if you've seen this. I don't know if you've seen this, but I've got this in the stack of stuff too. There is evidence that when they stormed and invaded the Israeli towns and cities on October seventh. I don't want to get into this too much. It's gruesome. There's evidence that not only did they kill them, which is terrible enough, there's evidence to show that they tortured
the vast majority of these Israelis, including children. By the way, including children. And I know that there's I don't know, there's debate over whether or not this horrific story about the Hamas. Again, young ears need to be covered here, but Hamas beheading babies, as though that was like that was an awful example if it happened, and the reporter I saw doubled down
on it, and now others are saying they can't confirm it. Whatever the case, But whether or not that particular part happened or not does not have anything to do with the overall argument that Israel has every right to go in and I would say responsibility to go into Gayza and eradicate these absolutely evil and atrocious leaders of Hamas. And it's not Israel's faults that we're in this situation.
It is unequivocally the responsibility of Hamas. And I'm going to talk a little bit about this this hospital that was potentially whatever went on there, I just want to talk about that after the break as well. But we get lots of things vying for our attention, this again, speaker Jim Jordan, potential voting around that, of course, what's happening in Israel. There's even
some things that left us at least liberals. I don't know if they're completely off the rails leftists, but some pretty extreme liberals would agree with yours truly on which is a remarkable place to be. Anyway, We'll talk about those things as the program unfolds, but I've got to take a break with my friends. You're listening here to conservative not better talk. I am your host,
Tad Huff Back in a minute. Welcome back, my friends. So, been talking here about what's happening in Gaza as Israel prepares for the next stage of this conflict with Hamas, with a group of terrorists. That is what we are dealing with, and that cannot be overlooked. We talked briefly, we mentioned this situation with the hospital, and of course there's all sorts
of as of right now. Anyway, what I've read conflicting reports, and it's just amazing how quickly people are prepared to blame Israel, and the narrative for a lot of these people is that Israel is engaging in genocide, in genocide against Palestinians. My friends, if Israel, You've heard this said in a lot of different ways. I think Netanyahu said this, I've heard other people say, I don't know who initially said this, I didn't come up
with this, but I think it's true. If Hamas laid down its weapons, there would be peace. If Israel laid down its weapons, there would be no nation of Israel. I think that there is I think that is undeniable. I think that that is an absolute truth. Now, I guess I'll carve out a pretty important little caveat here and say, outside of God's protection of the nation of Israel, but outside of that, just on paper,
that is a true statement. I've also heard people say that Hamas uses its women and children, the Palestinian women and children that they are supposedly protecting and acting in the best interests of governing in hum excuse me. In Gaza, they use women and children to protect their weapons. Israel uses their weapons to protect their women and children. These two are not comparable. Another way of looking at it is is if Hamas had the weaponry, the air force,
the military that Israel had, what would Gazil? What if the roles were reversed. What if the Jewish people were partitioned or sanctioned or given areas of land in Gaza and the Palestinians in particular, under the leadership of radicals and terrorists like hama Us, what would Gaza look like, folks, There would be no Gaza strip. They would flatten that place. They would annihilate that place, again, notwithstanding a divine intervention and power of God and protecting
the nation of Israel. But that's what would happen. This is I don't think anyone. If someone disagrees with that, I would need to understand in what universe? What what is the thinking that would arise cause one to arrive at any other conclusion than that Israel is not engaged in jedocide. If Israel wanted to flatten Gaza, which absolutely should be never happen. But if Israel wanted to, you know, with indiscriminately just level Gaza, they could have
done that. They have the means to do that, and they haven't. So I just none of this makes any sense whatsoever. So you look at the situation with the missile or the hospital strike. Within minutes of this thing happening or being reported, you'll find all sorts of stories, and I have it here in the stack of stuff where is this. There's a whole bunch of stories that headlines that came out talking about just well blaming Israel for all
of this stuff. I'm having trouble finding it at the moment. I should have pulled that up before. But there are countless headlines Israel did this, right. Israel, of course, is to blame. Israel militarily struck this hospital, right. That was the immediate that was the immediate response. And the more information that came out, it's become almost virtually certain that the strike actually came from a Hamas missile that misfired. There's actually video of this.
There's actually I referenced this yesterday. There's actually chatter between two Hamas terrorists operatives who are communicating with one another. Now granted I don't speak I don't speak Arabic, so I'm trusting the translators here, but the translation between them in that conversation, so it shows one Hamas terrorist operative communicating to another who basically said, that was our missile. I think we did that. That's the gist of it. And it hit the parking lot, it misfired, and
there's a large percentage of Hamas missiles that have been misfired. Who would have thought you have a bunch of radicals that don't really. I mean, they haven't been formally trained on a lot of this stuff. They get their hands on these missiles, undoubtedly from people like Iran or of course some weapons that we abandoned in the nation of Afghanistan. They get their hands on some of these weapons and they don't know how to use them, and that creates one
of the problems. That creates additional problems, which is misfires and other strikes within the striking their own people. And so apparently this missile struck the parking lot, some say it struck the hospital, killing what is it, five hundred That was the initial reports. But the media, the media ran with us right away, and the media blamed Israel right away, and they want
to condemn them. They want to say that that, you know, absolutely was the fault of the media, excuse me of Israel, and that is you know, they're they're to blame, they're engaging in genocide and all this. Well, what if what if the missile that struck the hospital, if that's in fact, Again, I just I'm skeptical of reports because we have to remember we're first and well a big part of this is a war of
propaganda. Right if Hamas can think that they can use something to win the hearts and minds of people look like they're the victims instead of the perpetrators, then they're going to push it. It makes no difference to them whatsoever if it's rooted in truth, as long as they can get you the American people are other people in the international community to believe that they are somehow the victims
here, then that's what they're going to do. And that Israel is the aggressor the perpetrator, the one who's engaging in ethnic cleansing and all this stuff. Well, what happens. What happens if it is demonstrably proven, beyond the shadow of a doubt that this was a Hamas rocket. What happens? Because I mean people were prepared to I mean, just you, we've seen what happened. We've had the capital stormed, We've had an insurrection staged in
the United States capital after this? Would there be the same anger, the same outrage if it turns out to in fact have ben dismissal What if what if it struck in the parking lot, what if it didn't kill as many people as had been reported, or what if this turns out to be a fabricated story. I'm just saying, for the sake of argument, sake of positioning here, would the people that immediately blame Israel for all of these things? Would they not see the made up story? If that is the case.
And again, I'm not saying that it's completely I'm just saying, I'm just for the sake of understanding what we've got going on here, would they have the same amount of outrage that Hamas was using, using stories, fabricating things so as to basically get the blessing and approval for continued terrorist activities against Israel. Remember, women and children died in Israel too. Why are those
deaths not as problematic for people who are supporting Hamas? You see, by the way, Marjorie Marjorie Taylor Green yesterday or recently, I think it may have been Wednesday, she came out and said she called the caucus between Elon Omar AOC Rashida Talib, she called them the Hamas caucus. And I mean, there's truth in this. They're defending the behavior, they're parroting the narrative that is being pushed by the radical Islamic terrorists in Hamas timeouts in order.
We're gonna shift heres a bit on the other side of the break here, my friends, but you're listening to conservative, not better talk. I am your host, Tot Huff back in a minute. Welcome back to my friends. I am gonna play briefly here. I'm gonna play briefly. Let's see Rashida to leave. But this was on Wednesday. This was before the Capitol
was breached. This was before the insurrection. I don't know. I guess we could say that she incided an insurrection since she spoke prior to the Capitol being stormed by a bunch of people engaged in trying to overthrow our government in the midst. Remember this is in the midst of choosing the speaker of the House. I mean, this was beyond This is so dangerous, as we've learned from the January sixth stories. I don't know where Aoc was, If
she was crying in the closet somewhere, I don't know. I don't know if law enforcement off doesn't appear. I haven't seen the videos yet of them opening up doors and ushering these people into the Capitol. I don't know where Kinsinger's not there. If Kinsinger was there. I don't know if he would
cry and recounting what happened at this event yesterday. I don't know. I'm just playing by the rules that I've been given, and the rules that we've all been given is that if you speak to a group of people and then they go to the capitol, you are one hundred percent responsible for everything that happens. I mean, that's isn't that what Trump's on speech for. I don't are on trial for. I did not hear the whole speech of Rashida
Talib. I don't know if she liked Trump told these protesters to peacefully and patriotically. I'm sure she didn't use the word patriotically, but nonetheless, could she have used the phrase peacefully and patriotically head over to the capitol? I want to be clear and all that that's a little bit of hyperbole and just just to point ain't the picture of the of the stupidity in the double standard? Number One, people have the right to protest. They have the right
to protest even if I fervently disagree with it. And you know what's ironic. You know what's interesting to me is that I would defend I would defend the rights of these folks here to be able to protest and to make their opinions known, well, at least to be able to express them. We don't have to pay attention. We can say that's crazy, that's violent, I don't wanty thing to do with it. That, by the way, is my what I've chosen. I think that what they're doing and saying personally
is bacrap crazy. I think that it's ridiculous. I think that they are painting a narrative. They are carrying the proverbial water for hamas for terrorists. Some are misinformed or uninformed. Others are radical leftists who make no mistake, make no mistake about it, hate the God of the Bible. They are godless extremist, radical leftists. And there's a group that that that is accounted for by that, you know, by that definition, by that, by
those types of individuals. Some again, some are misinformed, some are uninformed, some are radical, godless leftists. And so people have the right to protest. People also have the right to not listen to say, you know what, do your thing. I'm not paying attention because I think it's crazy. I think it's evil. I think you're excusing the real problem here in Gaza and the fight that's happening over in the Holy Land is to lead.
That's what I think. You can say what you want. Likewise, as I've said on numerous occasions, if you protested the election results of twenty twenty, if you went to the capitol, and if you did peacefully and patriotically protest, you absolutely have that right. You absolutely have that right. You were not engaged in insurrection by being at the capitol. Now, for those
who broke the law, they should be held accountable. Likewise, those who broke the law, who stormed or enter the capitol illegally, or did things they shouldn't have done during this protest, likewise should be handled the same way. This I don't understand. I do understand because everything in this world is political and it's emotionally energized. But what in the world is so controversial about that we should all be able to agree with what I just said. Everyone
has the right to protest. I have the right to listen or not. And if you protest, that's one thing. If you riot or break the law, then you need to pay the consequences. This is if someone can't say that we've got a much deeper problem here, a much deeper problem here. So I said, I'm gonna play this sound bite from Rashida tale, but I'm glancing at the clock and I realize I'm gonna have to do that
next segment. So all my friends, I'll do that next segment, and then we'll shift gears a little bit and talk about the House of Representatives situation as they search for a speaker by a time outs in order back in a minute, Welcome back to my friends. Just looking at some comments on TikTok, I can't believe I'm even saying this, but TikTok we're on there and someone said Todd Huff is a pretty cool dude. I'll take the compliment,
but I would have to disagree and say extremely cool dude. But nonetheless I appreciate it. Let's listen to this sound by from Rashida to Lee prior to inciting a riot at the nation's capital on Wednesday. Get you to watch people, I think it's okay to Obama hospital. We're children. You know what's so hard sometimes as why Chino's videos and the people telling the kids don't cry and like let them cry, and they're shaking and somebody you know this.
They kept telling them not to cry in Arabic. They can cry, I can cry. We all can cry. If we're not crying, something is wrong. And so I'm telling you right now, President Inviden, not all America's with you on this one. And you need to wake up and understand that we are literally watching people commend your genocide and killing the vast majority just like this, and we still stand by and say nothing. We will remember this, but all of you you need to know. I swear to you.
Oh, you are on the right side of history. You are You're doing everything possible to save lives. What is right? That? Stop it? What tried to to try to politicize it? Now she's said there at the end, stop trying to politicize this. Well, I mean, okay, can we all agree to that? Is that just a one sided statement? Now she's free to express whatever idea that she wants to express. There she can blame whoever she wants to blame. But what does again, the
evidence suggests? What does the evidence suggest? I would disagree with her, well, several points. But she said we should all be crying. See, I think we should all be focused on actually solving, well, we can't personally make these decisions, but we can hold folks accountable, and we
can actually speak these things out publicly. And the more people that agree with this sentiment as to who is responsible, the more likely it is that politicians will have to will have to take the steps necessary to actually stop the ones who are truly responsible for the deplorable situation in this region of the world. And so I don't think that it's virtuous to sit around and cry. In fact, I saw something recently where it's almost I don't know, it hits
people differently. I just there was something really weird about it. There was something I saw on somewhere on social media where people were basically all getting on there and saying how they couldn't sleep at night. They were so sad, and I looked. I understand that everything hits people differently. People feel guilty for what we have. I think we should look at what we have and
say, my goodness, we have it so good. Let's appreciate it, let's defend it, and let's try to make sure that it spreads outside of our nation, of our community, of our states. Let's see more and more people benefit from what we have been blessed with historically in this great nation. But of course we have people now at the helm that are embarrassed to this country. They don't like this country, they hate this country as it was founded. It's hard to do that if that is your position on the
founding of this of this great nation. But the problem needs to be eradicated. There's no there's no virtue signaling. I just I think that there's some people that virtue signal by saying, oh, well, I'm super upset by
whatever. It can be this crisis. It can be global warming, it can be whatever, and people use this as a as a gauge to just show how wonderful of a person that they are, when the real problem, the real the real way to show concern is to demand that these things be dealt with proper, properly, to demand and this country, by the way, there is so much agreement. I mentioned earlier that there's leftists that I agree with John Fetterman. Even John Fetterman is out there saying that people blaming
Israel for this need to knock it off. The last coherent statement I heard from this man, I don't even know. This might be the only one I've ever heard he and I agree on this anyway. Really briefly, I don't have a lot of time now, but this fight for the speakers. I had a SoundBite. It's in the stack of stuff if you want to listen to it. But the fight for the speaker in the House of Representatives, of course, is intensifying. There's been a couple of votes now.
Jordan has dropped from his initial vote of two hundred and there's been one hundred and ninety nine. There's going to be multiple potentially multiple votes, but I think there were fifteen votes, fifteen votes for McCarthy, So we're nowhere near that point yet, my friends. I still think I still think Jordan can pull this off. We'll see how this plays out. But there's soundbites, there's articles on the stack of stuff that actually will help give some context.
I just don't have enough time to play it on some positions that some of these representatives in the Republican Caucus have taken. So just out of time. Hear this segment, my friends, quick time out, come back and wrap up for the week. Back in a minute. Welcome back, my friends. If you want to be prepared in the event of a natural disaster, a power outage, a food shortage, or some other disaster created undoubtedly by the leftist running our nation today, I encourage you to check out for Patriots
dot com. Consider getting their three month food supply at last twenty five years. They come in breakfast, lunch, and dinner options. They come in stackable totes. These can actually help you navigate some of those difficult and trying situations. And of course, given this world that we're in, it is a crazy time, my friends, it's never a bad idea to be prepared. Visit for Patriots dot com. Four. That's the number. Four. Patriotswitans dot com. Use promo code huff my last name, not my first
name. Huff is the promo code. Saved you ten percent again for Patriots dot com. Folks, have a wonderful weekend. Thank you so much for listening. SDG