Public Servants Have Become Petulant Children Ep-2319 - podcast episode cover

Public Servants Have Become Petulant Children Ep-2319

Aug 15, 202534 minSeason 1Ep. 2319
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

Angel Studios https://Angel.com/Todd
Join the Angel Guild today and stream Testament, a powerful new series featuring the retelling of the book of Acts. 

Alan’s Soaps https://www.AlansArtisanSoaps.comUse coupon code TODD to save an additional 10% off the bundle price.

Bizable https://GoBizable.com
Untie your business exposure from your personal exposure with BiZABLE.  Schedule your FREE consultation at GoBizAble.com today.  

Bonefrog https://BonefrogCoffee.com/todd
The new GOLDEN AGE is here!  Use code TODD at checkout to receive 10% off your first purchase and 15% on subscriptions.

Bulwark Capital https://KnowYourRiskPodcast.com
Be confident in your portfolio with Bulwark! Schedule your free Know Your Risk Portfolio review. Go to KnowYourRiskPodcast.com today. 

Renue Healthcare https://Renue.Healthcare/ToddYour journey to a better life starts at Renue Healthcare. Visit https://Renue.Healthcare/Todd


LISTEN and SUBSCRIBE at:

The Todd Herman Show - Podcast - Apple Podcasts
The Todd Herman Show | Podcast on Spotify

WATCH and SUBSCRIBE at: 

Todd Herman - The Todd Herman Show - YouTube

Petulant Children or Statesmen and Public Servants? // BREAKING: Schools Discover Fish Need Water // A Sample of ELCA’s Lutheran “Theology”


Episode Links:

Transcript

Speaker 1

Welcome to the Three Stories version of the Todd Herman Shows. Story number one petulant children or Statesmen and public Servants, Story number two Breaking schools, discover fish need water, And story number three a sample of Elka Lutheran theology, such as it is. We'll talk about this with the help of Renewed Healthcare and our free live webinar we're doing

September eleventh. Go to joined stem cell talks dot com, submit your questions, be at the wlive webinar and you will be entered to win a free weeks stay in Ubervararta beautiful Hotel. I'd been there twice, no three times now actually, And we'll get started with the help I've got almighty.

Speaker 2

The Todd Herman Show is one hundred percent disapproved by big pharma technocrats and tyrants everywhere from the high mountains of Free American Here's the the Emerald City, Todd to Herman.

Speaker 1

Today is the day the Lord has made, and these are the times to which God has decided we shall live. You can ask yourself a question, and you can really apply it across the board of world leadership, even local leadership. You can go from school boards and park boards all the way up to state senates, into state houses, to governors. You can go to the top of the tip of the top and you can ask a question, are we dealing with petulant children or are we dealing with statesmen

and public servants? And I don't know that it's necessarily that hard to look at this and say, there's a lot of petulant children running things? Are they any of them? Do they have any signs of being a public servant? In Washington, d C. President Trump is being, of course a what's the phrase, what's it again?

Speaker 2

It's what?

Speaker 1

Oh, sorry, literal hitler, because he has federalized the Washington DC police force. Because that's extreme, it is utterly It's never been done other than the two hundred and ten days of Biden's first term where the city was on virtual lockdown with National Guard members guarding everything and checkpoints and fences all around. Other than that, you know, that's this has never been done other than the other times

it's been done. And what President Trump is doing is of course very bizarre and very extreme because he is having police officers who are told to enforce the law go ingenforce the law. That's troubling. It's not troubling to have allowed crime to run rampant, or to have had a DC police commander falsifying apparently falsifying crime statistics. Now he's been arrested for that, and the union backs up police officers. The police officers, you need to said, yeah,

they're doing this, this is a habit of them. So are we dealing with petulant children or statesmen and public servants? A reporter asked, and this is an unfair question. You have to admit, this is deeply unfair because it's very technical. So reporter with a deep knowledge of military command structures and police command structures, he asked a He asked a the police chief in DC asked her a question. Her name is Pamela Smith, and he asked her a question

about well, it's just a very technical term. And I know that's going to come up.

Speaker 3

Is what the shame of command is?

Speaker 4

Now?

Speaker 1

What does that mean?

Speaker 5

Well, is it pam Bondi's greeks of amager.

Speaker 1

You or how does this work?

Speaker 3

So at the executive order is clear, the President has requested MPD services in our Home Rule Charter outlines the process. The President designated Attorney General Bondi as his proxy.

Speaker 1

We need to watch the services for me. Because the police chief begins to answer the question and then a lawyer type steps up, like the question was do you know what the chain of command is? Now? And the DC police chief pameloss missus, what does that mean? If you've ever watched if you've ever watched an episode of mash, you've seen the chain of command. If you've ever watched a police show, you've heard a reference to the chain

of command. The people who are being put in charge of us are people who don't even have a light dusting of cultural understanding of the culture of law enforcement, which relies upon shaine of command. And in fact, it used to be the case that lot of cops had served in the military or in fact been cops. So let's just watch this again. Here, what the shame of command is?

Speaker 6

Now?

Speaker 1

What does that mean? Well? Is it?

Speaker 4

Pam Boondi speaking of.

Speaker 1

American I mean, give the lady in the yellow jackets some credits she recognizes. What does that mean? So ask yourself, petulant childs or a statesperson and public servant, statesman Eric Solwell. Eric Solwell who tried to or maybe even did get to have sexual relations with a Chinese spy that Eric Solwell, who the other day posted a video that he was he was bragging about he could be doing legislation, but instead he was he was repping. He was benching baby

bention in one thirty five. Just like my niece who's sixteen, can bench one thirty five big time, Eric Solwell, he wrote on Twitter, which is a white supremacist platform run by a white supremacist. Guide to Elon Musk, Eric Solwell, Trump's federal takeover of DC's in safety, it's about distracting Americans from comma high prices, a bad jobs report, a folding economy in the Epstein files. Interesting because way back in the day, Eric Salwell had posted this on Twitter,

which is a platform owned by an apparent white supremacist. Well, that's what we're told, that's what the muckenberg he says. Wait, they've stopped saying that since he and Trump got into a fight. That's weird. All of a sudden, Elon's a good guy again. Solwell wrote this. My wife and I play these scenarios over in our head all the time. We've practiced going out through the back seat to you your kids out of our car for carjacked. This is

not normal, soft unviolent crime. Prosecutors are letting too many dangerous people threaten our kids. And a conservative journalist, Peter Hassen pointed out, this is an interesting take from a guy who had to practice getting carjacked. And he went and found that tweet and Eric Solwell public servants statesmen or petulant child? Which way does the scale go for you? To me? It's all petulant child. Now, how is this playing out in public? And does it in fact cross borders?

Is it just a United States phenomena? It's not. It crosses borders. How's it playing out in public? I'll show you from the screens at CNN how this is playing out in public in just a second. Because images are very very powerful things. Angel Studios knows this. They know that images are very potent things, and that storytelling is

often how Jesus Christ spread spread his word. They're out with the new series called Testament, and what they've done is they've taken the happenings in the Book of Acts. And that's where Luke went back and investigated and learned about how the Apostles built the church that Jesus told them to build. That's the Book of Acts. What did they do? They've transplanted those happenings into a world where there's a technical surveillance state, high tech surveillance censorship states,

and where people hate the truth. Does that sound familiar? You can stream Testament right now. By becoming a Premium Angel Studio Guild member, go to Angel dot com slash todd You can stream Testament. You will also get two free tickets to all their theatrical releases. You get to vote on the stories that they tell and distribute and with which they change culture stories like they've done before Sound of Freedom, King of Kings, and now the series

Testament goes. Stream it right now at Angel dot com slash Todd. So, CNN, this guy on CNA, I don't know how long he can keep his job because he keeps bringing news out that people in CNN must hate. And this has to do with President Trump's handling a crime versus that of figurehead Biden or the Democrats. It just sort of.

Speaker 6

Gives the game away here because Donald Trump is like Airic Jordan, towering over Joe Biden when it comes to their handling a crime. Look in twenty twenty four, look at where Biden's net approval was on crime way under water there at minus twenty six points. It was one of Biden's wars issues. Granted, pretty much every issue was one of Biden's warst issues. And again look at where Donald Trump is way, way way above Joe Biden.

Speaker 2

What is that?

Speaker 6

That's twenty seven points. So Americans vastly prefer Donald Trump's approach to crime than they dit to Joe Biden's. And again, I think it gets back to the point that Americans are far more hawkish on crime than a lot of Democrats want to it.

Speaker 1

Make what approach to crime? What was Biden's approach to crime? His approach to crime was to fly cartel members and their soldiers into a country using a CPB one app to allow them to set up shop and supply chains into American cities, knowing that they are coddled in separate countries like Seattle and Los Angeles and San Francisco and Minneapolis and New York and the list goes on. He didn't have an approach to crime other than he wanted more of it. Sometimes he did have enough crimes, so

he needed to invent crimes. The president's approach to This is popular everywhere, but in the minds of people who think that the previous administration was the reasonable administration. Remember, it was Joe Biden who partnered with Baracuscain and Obama to allow the Taliban to partner with Mexico based drug cartels to bring heroin into our country. They stopped indictments. That is an approach to crime, and that approach was to allowed to happen. So petulant children or statesmen. Let's

look up north in Canada. So in Canada, there's been these wild fires. I live in an area of the country north Idaho where we get wildfires, and there's something you need to be serious about. But one of the things we don't do here is go out to become petulant children or little handmaids telling people what they can do and not do. In Canada, they're doing just that.

They have admitted that walking around in the woods doesn't cause forest fires, but they are still going to find people for walking around in the woods.

Speaker 7

Going for a walk in the woods is going to cause a fire. I can understand why people think that that's ridiculous, but the reality is it's not that you might cause a fire. It's that if you're out there walking in the woods and you break your leg, we're not going to come and get you because we have emergency responders that are out focused on a fire that

is threatening the lives of New Brunswickers. And if you take your boat out fishing in a pond and crown Land and you capsize, we're not going to be able to come and help you out because our first responders are focused on an immediate and serious threat to our province. And so it's the possibility of diverting emergency resources away from where they are really needed.

Speaker 1

That is Susan Holt, who is the Premiere of New Brunswick. So we're not going to do that. We're not going to let you walk around. And what they could have just said is, hey, by the way, if you go walking in the woods, we're not coming to get you. If you break your leg, you're on your own. If you break down in the woods, handle its, we're not going to come and get you. They could have that message go out and guess what a lot of seeing

people would say, I'm not going in. Other people would say, you know, I've been hiking in the woods my whole life. I'm not afraid of breaking a leg. It hasn't happen be force, so I gonna have again. If it does, I'll take care of it. Jeff Everley is a Canadian military veteran and he decided to go out and test the fine they were gonna levy on Canadians. He thought it was about twenty five thousand dollars for hiking in the woods, so he did go test.

Speaker 8

This is the Department of Natural Resources where the conservation officers work, who issue twenty five thousand dollars fines for going in the woods.

Speaker 1

But back here, this is the woods.

Speaker 5

So I have a couple of conservation officers with me right now who are not on camera, but have advised me that if I go into the woods, if I defy their orders to go into the woods, then I will be fined. And they also said that they would double my fine to fifty thousand dollars. So I'm gonna walk down here and go into these woods and they have me on.

Speaker 9

Camera forced BacT twenty five. So one fine is twenty eighth and seventy two fifty.

Speaker 8

Okay, I thought it was twenty five thousand, it's twenty eight.

Speaker 4

Victim piece.

Speaker 1

Oh, victim victim piece. Thanks very much, Bund you're victims.

Speaker 8

I appreciate your courteous approach.

Speaker 1

He made it very very easy on them. God bless him for being so courteous. And he wants to test this in courts. Petulant children or statesmen. Oh by the way, also out of Saskatchewan, out of Canada, not New Brunswick, but Saskatchewan, a firefighter went out to set fires. He decided to go light fires, often using hey bails. He set about thirty of them in a month. What's happened to him? A fine? No, No, well, he's going to

get community service for two hundred hours. He could have been fined seventy six thousand, five hundred box or seventy six thousand, six hundred and fifty bucks, but no, they're just going to put them on a community service for two hundred hours. Petulant children or statesmen. It is happening across the world, and I'm leaning towards one hundred percent

petulant children. Story number two, there is a breaking news coming out as schools, and this is that school districts have suddenly discovered that fish need water, and people need air, and we all need gravity. They're going back and discovering things that should have been clear to everybody who's ever been around kids, and God blessed some school teachers for speaking up about this. There is a structure to our minds. There's a structure to when we're able to learn languages

and retain languages. There's a structure to our mind where we're most adept at memorizing things and repeating things. The human mind changes at a point and we're able to reason and employ logic and make arguments. There's a time in the development of our mind where most adept at understanding numbers and figures in geometry, and then there's a time where these all gel and we're able to take this information and aggregate it and use it to write

advanced papers, et cetera. God has planned our minds around gestational growth. And it used to be the time when people who taught understood that a certain point all kids need is memorization. They need to be able to memorize, let's say, passages from the Bible. God's word is always good for teaching, review, concrrection, and it's a great way to learn God's Word at the same time as you're learning to read and to memorize. You're exercising that part

of your mind. When people expand beyond that, then they can take the information they've read and begin to repeat it back. That's another stage of growth. There's an approach called the trivium, which is a classical Latin form of education, and it follows in this path. Kids who go through this end up being being able to retain information and make better decisions and how to present it. Back in

the day, we used to teach people Latin. The reason we did that is because English is a Latin based language, as His, Spanish and many others. When you learned the Latin roots for things, you can figure out what a word means, even a complex medical word, because you can go back to the Latin root. What do these Latin roots mean? When school was changed to creates, not people who learned how to think, but people who learned how to work in factories to go be worker bees, they

began to change the approach to school. Memorization was still important, but it sort of ended there. How much of your school life was about memorization all the way up into high school. Think about the tests you had. What year did this war happen, what year did it end, what was the name of this president at this time? How much of that was memorization. And unless you were in a trivium based or a private school, you probably never got to the point where you're really taught rhetoric. We

ever taught how to make an artful argument. We ever taught the rules of threes and fives in making a rhetorical presentation to someone, that the minds of people tend to take information up better in rules of three fives, and if you must sevens. This has to go with bullet points and how you present information. We ever taught that, We ever taught how to use socratic inquiry in order to draw out from people what they know but they

don't want to think they know. These were tools that people who were taught to think had, And suddenly we're seeing now schools beginning to discover that fish need water. In other words, there are things people need for education to be fruitful, or rather, in this case, things they don't need. I'll share something a teacher said in terms of things kids don't need, which is really fish need water.

In just a second, we all need to clean our bodies unless we want to be disgusting, smelling, stinking banana peel love and hippies. So we use Alan soaps at this program, which is made in America. It's all natural. It's made by a family with three generations of soap making expertise. More important than that, it employs people who the rest of the world will not employ. Allan is

the chief soap officer there. He's thirteen, he's been through about eighteen operations and he is effectively nonverbal because of autism. His brother Ian works there now, also affected by autism. Now that's all good news that we employ them. Here's the bad news. The patriarch of that family, John has terminal cancer. He just made his last airplane flight to see his mom, and he's asked me to share this

with you. It's okay. I'm asking you to try the soap, and if you love it, to subscribe, so that in John goes to the Lord Jesus and his wife takes over the company, it will be easy for her to run. Please try the soap and only continue to buy it if you love it. But if you love it, subscribe Alan soaps dot com slash Todd that's Alan Soaps dot com slash Todd, a teacher, decided to describe what happens when you have a phone ban in schools.

Speaker 10

School my state ban the phones, ban the phones. Today all of my students, one hundred percent of them, took notes in my class, did their assignment, asked for help when they got stuck, and turned it in, and then when they were done, they talked to each other.

Speaker 1

It this easy the whole time.

Speaker 2

Have have.

Speaker 10

I have been pulling my hair out for like eight years? Has it been this easy of a solution the whole time?

Speaker 1

Yes, the ENTRT Yes, I mean this isn't going to be the complete solution. But when you take something out of someone's hands that has become an idol, that has become their emotional connection to the world, that has become their painkiller, that has become their porn connection, that has become their friend connection, it has become their fake front connection, their handicap. Yes, when you take that away and to return kids to a natural environment of learning, it really

is that easy. Fish deeed water and kids need schooling, and they also need schooling that respects their minds. And praise God that we're beginning to see some common sense actions in the school praise God for that story. Number three, I want to provide you a sample of the theology of the Elka flavor of the Lutheran Church. They've had a series of meetings over the past many years and got very serious about it this past year, trying to

justify their support for same sex marriage. And the writing that I've read that I've read a series of these is fascinating in that it barely barely mentions a certain book. It barely mentions the Bible. And what I'm seeing is a series of philosophers and theologians quoting each other as philosophers and theologians. I want to give you a sample of this, but I also want to show you where this leads. When you depart the clear teachings of the Word of God, all of a sudden, everything is allowed.

I want to give you some samples of this how everything is allowed from a guy we've had on the program before courtesy of Protest You. He dressed up as what a Star Wars character last time. This time he's determined that Jesus Christ is very very, very very queer. Yeah, it's a slippery slope arguments. I once had a liberal friend of mine say that slippery slopes don't exist. He said, if slippery slopes existed, we all be standing over sideways. Well,

guess what we are. This is a piece in a series justifying the same sex union and marriage position of the Elka Lutheran Church. It's written by guy you know as a very serious thinker because he calls himself H. Frederick Rees, Junior doctor H. Frederick Reees a generous Orthodoxy the Elka's choice on sexuality and opportunity for generous Orthodoxy generous orthodoxy. This would mean that God's plan for the

world is not generous. God's offer of free salvation is not generous, that God, who sets some limits on what he'll accept in terms of human sexual behavior, is not generous. And it begins like this. The Elka social statement Human Sexuality, Gift and Trust was written through an extended process of seeking responses and suggestions. Its conclusion should not be dismissed

as being hasty. I hope that many of us will counter persons who are saying that this whole process was a sham engineered from quote above a Chicago and the result of a predictable conspiracy of church liberals. I've heard all those charges and reject them. Oh you reject them? Okay, I don't. It's been clear for a number of years. In fact, see my daughter is yeah, she's that old. It's been clear for about eighteen years that you intended to take this position, and it came from on high.

Although I'm not wholly satisfied with the current text of human sexuality, Gift and Trust, for the most part, I think it's a viable statement. Are you noticing a trend here? I think? I think, I think. I think our pastors and lady can use a statement of theological wisdom and practical pastoral guidance on the many issues surrounding sexuality and expressions. The statement is useful sections for counseling and teaching. I hope that pastors and lady will make use of its

proportion of its portions in their ministries and communities. I believe our community will be weakened in mission if we continue to spend a great deal of time and energy rehashing the two thousand and nine Assembly actions, even seeking to rescind them. The next paragraph begins with I think, and then that sentence next is I know the man is quoting himself and he's referring to theological wisdom. What does the Bible say about wisdom? The beginning of wisdom

is fear of the Lord. You would need to go through page one, which is full of paragraphs, page two, which is full of paragraphs, and we get down to hear, Oh, this is important. My experience with commitment to homosexual Christians his experience. There's a whole lot of eye statements in this. I believe the writers may intend to very deep. You'd have to go to page three of six and in that case, down to the middle of page three of

six where you get this the biblical witness. A few biblical texts condemn certain types of homosexual activity, and he quotes Genesis two eighteen to twenty four, nineteen one through thirty, Levitigus. He quotes Romans, Corinthians, timpathy. The question is whether this condemnation extends to all forms of homosexuality and same gender sex. No, that's not the question. No, the question is this, what

did Jesus say? That's the question. What Jesus Christ said is that a man leaves his mother and father and clings to his wife, and they become one flesh. The same Jesus said you've heard it said you shall not commit adultery. But I tell you, look, a man who looks, he said, a woman with lost in his eyes has already committed adultery. Jesus raised the bar for sexual conduct. He recognized that sin begins in the mind, that thinking

of sin is sinning. He never came back to say, hey, you know the whole thing about same sex unions and so called marriage, which was unthought of at that time, unthought of that you would have same sex marriage. Even in Roman culture, it was unthought of. And he was never went back and said, hey, we got this wrong. Because he's God almighty, wasn't is God almighty? Jesus did change some things. He made it very clear to the Pharisees that it's not what goes in the mouth, but

what comes out of the mouth that defiles you. It's not the food you eat. And the apostles said, hey, explain this to us. And actually one of those times where Jesus not his patience. He couldn't lose his patience, but he spoke firmly to them, saying, are you really this dim What you eat is digested by the body and eliminated, but what you speak goes into the world and can cause harm and lies to others. So it's what comes out of the mouth that defiles, not what

goes in. He was changing the approach. The Pharisees had the dietary law, and he did it specifically and overtly. He never did that with sexuality. Never. So the question is not whether these passages condemn a certain form of homosexual contact or even same sex contact. The question is what does Jesus say. What I'm truly bothered by, and much of this writing is that I think, I want, I hope, I think, I say, I don't care what

you say. Show me scripture. If you can show me scripture that shows that Jesus Christ is okay with same sex marriage, I'll celebrate, because then one of the toughest issues I've faced personally, because it's harmed people I know, it's well, it's harm relationships, it's harm my relationships, it's stolen from me, the relationships with people I love, and I may never get them back. I would celebrate, but it's not there. It's not there. When elka An organizations

like this a race Jesus. Then they also opened the door to people who, having seen Jesus a race come and withdraw him as something he's not. I'll show you the latest example of this with a pastor who has reasoned out why Jesus was a very very queer man, a soul called pastor or as our friends at protest you say, an impastor, and being an impastor is a

dangerous and bad business. If you're a business person, small, medium size, even a large business that's fairly sophisticated, you're probably counting on having a firewall between you and you and your business assets. So, for instance, if God forbid, one of your employees was grievously injured and it went past ELLENI and they came at you to sue you, or as insurance company came to sue you. We want our money back, we're paying for this guy's surgeries, etc.

We're coming after you. That happens, you may be thinking, yeah, they can do that, but they have to sue my company, and my company's got insurance. Not necessarily, if you had an employee really really injured in the insurance company wanted money, you know what they do. They'd go find out how your company is structured. They'd go and investigate and what they'd probably find out is you do not have corporate credit.

Therefore your company is you and they'd know they could get at your retirement accounts and then they'd come at you. You can help find out right now if you actually have corporate credit, in other words, do you have that former firewall, and you can do it for free in a no obligation discussion with my friends at bisible that's gobisible dot com with a Z. Brian and his team will do what the insurance companies would do. They're gonna look at your corporate filings, they're gonna look at your

bank accounts. They're gonna come out and they're gonna tell you whether you have corporate credit or not. Here's the great news. If you don't have it, they'll solve that for you in seven easy steps. Their website is gobisible dot com. That's gobisible dot com. This is a fake teacher, a false teacher pretending that he thinks he believes he has determined that Jesus Christ is very, very queer.

Speaker 4

How queer was Jesus? He was an observant Jew, but he was thirty years old, no wife, no job, hung out with twelve other dudes. That's pretty queer queering. The Bible takes Jesus and other outsiders and religiously stigmatized folks in the past and juxtaposes them with contemporary queer folks and Christians.

Speaker 1

Yeah, when you're crying the Bible and you're trying to make Jesus something he's not, that's exactly what you do. Incidentally, have you ever heard of a monk? I hear tell them. There's these people called monks, and they're men who live among other men, and they're not all same sex attracted. In fact, most of them aren't. In fact, back in that day, there was a guy named Well. He wore camel skin and he ate a honey and locusts John the Baptist. There were plenty of rabbis who toured I'm

tought and we're not married. Jesus wasn't alone in this. That doesn't make him queer. It made him a rabbi, married to his work, and he was the model of not sinning. If you're saying he was queer, you're probably saying, well, therefore he went out and acted on that, because Jesus has already said that thinking of a woman, and you could extend that easily enough to a man, and you think of them sexually with lust in your eyes and your mind, then you've committed adultery. What we know is

that Jesus committed no sin. Why because the Bible says he committed no sin. He who had no sin became sin on our behalf. So yeah, you can go out and queer anything. You can queer a lemon, stand if you want.

Speaker 4

Realizing that despite our past cultural differences, sexual and gender differences, that we share similar histories of out of placeness or vilified sexualities and gender diversities. Jesus kingdom practice is queer in the sense it questions identities and blurs distinctions.

Speaker 1

Jesus' mission, his ministry, his kingdom is queer. The Apostle Paul made it very very clear, and it's a hard teaching for people who love the same sex attracted. He said that people who practice homosexuality, like pre people who practice theeving, like people who practice adultery, have no place in the kingdom of heaven. Practice not having committed an act for which they repented and stopped sinning. Jesus always said, go and sin no more, but his kingdom, his kingdom

is queer because he's questioning identities. He didn't question his identity. Who knew who he was? He didn't question our identity. Who knows who we are? None of this, none of this can be compared biblically.

Speaker 4

Luke presents Jesus as leaving the patriarchal household and challenging both cultural hierarchies in his egalitarian meals, transgressing gender roles and radical inclusion of outsiders.

Speaker 1

Radical inclusion of people. He created. And he was questioning not the authorities, because he was and is the authorities. He is the authority. He is the way, the truth in the life. Authority doesn't question authority. God is the pre eminent authority. What Jesus did was confirmed authority. He was who he said he was, and he proved himself to be who he said he was in signs and wonders and miracles and conquering death. Only God himself could

conquer death. Jesus did it, he predicted he'd do it. He did it in front of people. He reappeared to people, five hundred at a time. He send it into heaven and left behind a gift only God could leave behind the Holy Spirit. He was a teacher extraordinaire. He was God Almighty, and there was nothing about him that was queer. And the erasing of Jesus by the Elka Lutheran Church opens the door for the redrawing of Jesus by people

like that. This is the todd hermansheaw. Please go be well, be strong, be kind, Please make every effort to walk in the light of Christ and celebrate for me as I get to go hang out with my beloved wife,

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android