Earthquakes and Political Shaking - podcast episode cover

Earthquakes and Political Shaking

Apr 05, 20241 hr 1 minEp. 686
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

AEI's Matthew Continetti joins the Ricochet Podcast to discuss the internecine fight over the future of conservatism and the Democratic Party's abandonment of Israel. Plus, Peter and Rob have a bit of fun with earthquakes and hippie terrorists; swap lab leak theories and cheer themselves up with a reminder of the country's abiding unsung heroes.





- This week’s audio: NYC Mayor Eric Adams on this morning’s earthquake.

Transcript

I'll tell you the ground shakes. Yeah, pull let me know. Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country. Mister Garbachoff, tear down this wall. It's a Rick j podcast. I'm Rob Loong and New York, joined by Peter Robinson in Palo Alto. Our co host Jamesilence is once again a wall south of the border. Stay tuned. We got Matt Continenting a lot coming up. Let's have ourselves a podcast. All of us felt, in some way or another,

the earthquake that hit our city around ten twenty three am. We felt the impact of this four point seven magnitude earthquake when New Yorkers should go about their normal day. America is a nation that can be defined in a single word. I was gonna put him. Welcome to the Rick JE Podcast, number six hundred and eighty six. It's insane. No no, no, just lop off one digit one finger, six eighty six. I'm Rob Long in New York, co founder of Ricochet, and with me as always is Peter

Robinson, my co founder. Peter in Palo Alto. How are you in California? Well, I am suffering a kind of Bizarro moment the Californian. The Californian is about to say to the New Yorker, how bad was the earthquake? And I don't know, because I didn't feel it. I don't know what I was. Actually, I was either in it, kill you to make something up. I was either in the subway, meaning like somewhere in the in the subway system, either on a subway train or summer.

Or I was walking on the street and I just didn't feel it. But then, you know, I'll tell you, I live in a very old house in very old part of town, and when a truck goes by, the whole house rumbles, and so you know, for a second, it probably would had I felt it, I probably thought I was just a tructed very old. You're you're done in the village. Very old is now second half of the nineteenth century, first half of the nineteenth century, first half.

Oh really, Oh okay, all right, all right, you're in the village proper. I'm in the I'm in the village village proper. In fact, so weird. I am in this fantastic house, which you know, I just trust everybody not to, like, you know, camp out front of my house. When I tell you where I live, I live very close to, in fact, next door to the house that I think. I've said this more that Obama's friends blew up Are you serious? Idea?

And you could always tell the right wingedness of the people I'm talking to, because the right wingers when I say that, go, oh yeah, I know that house. Yeah, and the left wingers say, what are you talking about. Obama didn't know anybody who blew the house. Well, he did, of course he did. In fact, one of his dear friends, Bill Airs, was in the whole, the whole twisted story of

those The weather underground is so infuriating. Give us the date ish in the early seventies, now the early They're going to blow up a RTC recruiting center, armforce to recruiting center, and they were going to blow up a bank and they were going to kill They ended up killing a comper security guard for which they did. So it's a couple of burniting dorn Ato time and so Bill and so did she just died. I forget her last name. It's

a weird last name. Boudin. Yeah, Chessa Boudin's mother, Chessa Boudeen was the far left, progressive do nothing da and San francisco Is were called and they would committed murder and they went to prison and they got out and one of them became a tenured professor at Columbia. So in Columbia University, if you say to somebody, if you're a professor and you say to a student, hey, nice shirt, you will be arrested and fined and fired

for a sort of microaggression. If you miss gender somebody, that's out, you're out. If you commit murder, you're in. You're a tenured you get Yeah. So why did they blow up the house because they were go ahead and tell the story. They were trying to build a bomb and they

were barring their their grandmother's house. Because you know, this now is a very, very fancy neighborhood, but at the time it was really not, and it had always been in New York City kind of a working class, you know, not working lass, middle class, upper middle class neighborhood. It was never the fancy neighborhood. But it's just fancy enough that people at the top floor Garrett, where I lived, was where the Irish maids would hang out and or hang out. That's a nice way of putting it.

They would live, they would suffer, they would swelter in the summer and freeze in the winter. And so you know, over time, people's grandparents decided they can't keep up this house, so they just left it. And a lot of these houses were empty for a long time. And so this grandchild, you know, hippie grandchild, so you imagine her grandmother, her grandmother must have been, you know, born maybe in the eighteenth nineteenth century,

right, she built up. They're building the bomb. But of course they're dumb kids, and there's stupid dilettants, stupid hippies, and they just did it wrong, and they blew them up and they killed I think one or two of them died. Unfortunately they all didn't, honestly considering they went on to kill other people. And they blew the front of the building off, and then the side the wall behind me is you can see that wall.

That's what's rebuilt in the seventies, early seventies. And you can always tell this building, this house, because it's the one house on the street that doesn't look at all in this sort of neo federal style or the federal I guess the federal style. They call it. It's got the because the

facade was redone in the seventies. You couldn't do that now. If if there the terrorists blew up their mom's grandmother's townhouse today in a historic neighborhood, they would have to sort of rebuild it according to sort of historical standards. But back then you could make it a seventies facade, which is what they did. But you can still see people if you google it Grantwich Village bombing Dustin Hoffman because dusn't Hoffan lived in the garden department. Here, apparently you

can see dusn't Hoffan. It's a very picture of dodsn't Hoffin, who was by dad there, you know, pretty much a movie star looking at absolutely stunned and shocked at the at the with his back to all the trouble, and there's like fire trucks and rubble and stuff. It's pretty it's pretty interesting. Well that was better than the earthquake. Yeah, so the better the earthquake. In fact that I was walking home and I talked to the guy

who wants the family who lives downstairs, they owned the house. I said, you know, he said, oh, I we got out. The insurance people come in to check something, and we're trying to figure out time for them to come in, And I said, what are they worried about? This house has been through hell, including an earthquake. It's fine at this point. You know, don't touch it, don't don't mess up, don't don't look to don't look out of the hood. That's for sure,

because it's something. Whatever's holding it together is working so far well. Last note on the earthquake. I have a daughter in here's beginning, her senior spring in Hannover, New Hampshire, who did feel the earthquake. It couldn't have been much of a rumble up there. I have a feeling she may have been having trouble getting into getting her mind into her studies. Yes, she's looking for a natural disaster. To think it was that an earthquake.

You can just see the saying, oh great, we have something to talk about this morning. Yeah, we don't have to study. Well. I mean it is true. I think if you are a Californian, I should say, well, your kids are native California's basically that you you kind of have this. I mean, I think you kind of have this attitude where you wait, you hear the ground, feel the ground and shaking, and you just kind of wait, let's see, Okay, what's happening now?

Like is this going to stop? Is going to keep going? I think it's going to come falling down. I mean, that's the yes. When I was when I was in business school, there were a number of little tremors, and I would, because I was an Easterner at coming to business school out here at Stanford, the first thing I would do is look at the Native Californians and see if they looked worried. And during the nineteen eighty nine earthquake, I was in the office of an accounting professor whose course I

simply could not follow. I was stopping to buy to beg for help, and he had lived in California for thirty years. And oddly enough, the first thing that I recall is a kind of sound you could hear the rumble before you could feel it. And his face went instantly white, and he said, oh, this is a bad one, and disappeared under his desk. Okay, where do I Where do I disappear do? I really didn't

have much of a place. There's a little table I climbed under the table, and that whole building bucked and rolled and rocked, and the books came off the bookshelves. That was an unambiguous earthquake back in nineteen eighty nine. Oh God, yeah, I remember it. But I was slightly slow to get under the table because I thought, wait a minute, I've been through these little tremors before. When his face went white, I knew it was different. Yeah, it's also not a terribly I mean, at least my

my in my animal reaction to it. I was just trying to remember that I was in LA, and then I was in the LA for eighty nine a quake, and then I was in LA for the ninety four the really big one, really really big one that collapsed the freeways and did a lot of damage, The Northbridge quake we'd call it. Happened at five in the morning or four p thirty some early times, and I woke up because a glass of water that was on my bedside table I sort of a higher shelf

above the bed. It fell over and fell on me, and I woke up soaked like my woke up because somebody had splashed cold water in my face and then dropped the glass on my nose, and that was but my then. Of course, we were I think we're in production at that moment. I'm trying to remember. And there was a massive series. It was a

big quake, so huge aftershocks. So they were telling us now that they're going the aftershocks today too, there are apparently, yeah, and we were in the stage and now the stage was built nineteen twenty something, Stage twenty five at Paramount Studios, and it was originally built they shot that They shot the original King Kong in there, and so this place had been retrofitted to a fairly well. When they first built the sound stages, obviously they were

built not as sound stages as they were built as just silent stages. They didn't have roots, and they would string they would like they would put a white canopy, a white silk over the roof to kind of diffuse the sun. And they called it, they call it silks. And then sometimes if you're shooting outside just a side, you're shooting outside and it's and it's just cloud cover. It's perfect, you know, right right right right, They

called God's silk. We're gonna use God's so they put us and but no ins instance, over the time they you know, put they fixed the roof and they do the two pipe and chain the roof so they can hang the lights. And there's heavy lights everywhere. This is where they shot is Love Lucy when they shot is of Lucy in the in in when they moved to La and we were in an earthquake and everything was shaking, and I stood

there and I thought, okay, don't panic. And my assistant was standing next to me, and I could tell he was panicking, like what do I do? What I do? And I just grabbed his arm and I held it. I said, it's like, look up, look up, look up. And then it was over and we waited a minute and then we said one about our business. But everybody else scurried to the side. And I thought I was being very very, very very smart, and in fact people told me later like you idiot, that was the worst I can

be able to It's just stupid, dude. Don't stop there, go to the side. It's okay to run to the run to safety. But I thought, oh, I don't want to panic. But in fact that was dumb and it could have gotten me and my poor assistant horribly, horribly named and disfigured, and I don't know how we don't have James. James is in Mexico, so James would do a segue. At this point, I can't do a segue from earthquake to this great commerce platform that revolutionizes business and

has done so worldwide for many years, Shopify. But I can do. I can only tell you that Shopify has changed the way people buy and sell things. It's the commerce platform that is revolutionized business worldwide. They've already taken the cash register online, helping millions sell billions around the world. But did you know that Shopify can do the same thing at your retail store. It

can give your point of sales system a series upgrade with Shopify. Shopify point of Sale EOS is your command center for your tail store, from accepting payments to managing inventory. Shoppify is everything you need to sell in person. You get a powerhouse selling partner that effortlessly unites your in person in online sales into one source of truth. Track every sale across your business in one place, and know exactly what's in stock. You can connect with customers inline and online.

Shopify helps you drive store traffic with plug and play tools built for marketing campaigns from TikTok to Instagram and beyond. You get hardware that fits your business, take payments by smartphone, transform your tablet into a point of sale system, or use Shopify's point of sale Go mobile device for a battle tested solution and their award winning twenty four to seven help is there to support your success

every step of the way. Do retail right with Shopify. As a side note, I can tell you having traveled recently in Morocco, Shopify has empowered so many small merchants there. It's really kind of revolutionary and I think a very in general, a very very very positive step for the world economy and for prosperity inflow mashing. General side note political note. They didn't tell me

to say that, but I believe it. So sign up for a one dollar per month trial period at shopify dot com slash ricochet all lowercase shopify dot com slash ricochet. Go to shopify dot com slash ricochet. Take your retail business to the next level today. That's shopify dot com slash ricochet, and

we thank Shopify for sponsoring the Ricochet Podcast. Next, we have an old friend from the on the site that He wrote on the site for many years and has gone on to be the founding editor of the Washington Free Beacon, which has caused trouble up and down the line for since it's exception, Thank God. He is the author of The Right, The one hundred Year War for American Conservatism, which is a wonderful, sweeping story of the conservative movement

in America. He is the director of Domestic Policy Studies at the American Enterprise Institute. He's an old friend, and we welcome him. Matt COTTENETI, Matt, welcome, gentlemen, Thanks for having me. We are obviously going to have to get an to the things the wars abroad. But why do the wars abroad? Can we just talk a little bit about the war at home and specifically the Internst. Sine War. For I guess the heart,

the soul, the direction of American Conservatism. I find more conservatives yelling at each other about where there who is the real one and who is not a real one than I have ever encountered, I think in my long life, which is I hope could go longer. But still I don't recall that who's right? Rob. That can't be quite true because I've been calling you a

rhino for three decades. Yeah, I've been a rhino. Was still still on the right, all right, all right, fair, I've been working on a little toast I have to give to Ed Fulner, one of the co founders and longtime president of the Heritage Foundation, in a couple of weeks and reading about Ed Fulner, listening to him, you get a sense of an individual who really came of age knowing what it meant to be an American

conservative and what it meant to belong to the American conservative movement. And Fulner tells a story about encountering Russell Kirk's The Conservative Mind and reading about Russell Kirk's traditionalist conservatism and the different canons of conservatism that Kirk presents in that text, and then reading Barry Goldwater's Conscience of a Conservative published in nineteen sixty, where Goldwater really talks about what it means to be a conservative in politics in the

national life. And he said he got theory from one book and practical applications from another. And I wonder, sometimes, is it possible for a young person to do that today? What would be the texts that they would look at for what it means to be a conservative. Who would they be turning to So many people get their information and their news and opinions from social media today. Yeah, but you know, they'd be looking at Tucker Carlson. I hope many of them would look at Ben Shapiro, who I think does

come closest to continuing in the tradition of the American conservative movement. But there's so many different options, and it's so easy to kind of kind of pick the suite of political views that you like that I think it's very hard Rob to say, oh, this is the true American conservatism in the year twenty twenty four. Yeah, but it feels to me like that's the high note.

It's going to start to get gloomy soon. Yeah. It feels to me like the problem is that each whoever claims to be the conservative not only

doesn't think the other people are sufficiently conservative. Right. So it's not like just screaming at old Rob that he's a rhino squish, although that's always reward, which is always been fair, but it's sort of like saying, well, you're the enemy, right that the person who's who agreet with you seventy percent of the way or sixty percent of the way needs to be purified. So may I may ask a subset of this question, and Matt is,

the author of the right, is the perfect man to answer this. Actually, I can't think why now, why I haven't just gotten on the phone and called you, because this really is a question in my head. When jd Vance attacks Ronald Reagan and says he started illegal immigration, which is nonsense.

But we have a highly intelligent, sitting United States Senator attacking Ronald Reagan, when Ross Dow that uses the phrase, uses the phrase zombie Reaganism, which seems to become a kind of standard phrase with Ross, again, highly intelligent, articulate. These are the annoying bit about all this is that you

can't dismiss these people. I can see part of what might be going on, and part of what might be going on would be I can remember back in the eighties when I was a kid, there were Democrats around who still talked about FDRs the great figure, and Democrats my age were sick of it. It was purely generational. They wanted their own time. They wanted this huge figure from the past whom they didn't even remember. They wanted it gone

that's fine, that's normal, that's perfectly human. I get that. What I don't get, though, is zombie what exactly to the extent that there's substance to what they're saying, to the extent that they're saying we are inventing something new. Are they saying, ay, Reagan was mistaken, he made one mistake after another. Or are they saying times have changed and we have to adapt Conservatism to the new circumstances. And if that's what they're saying,

then why do they seem so angry and so insistent about it? I do not quite get it. Well, it's a great question, and I can't speak for either advance or doubt it, but I'll come at it this way. At first, I think it's always important to note and you both remember this. Reagan came under a lot of criticism from parts of the right throughout his career, including while he was president. Various parts of the rights. Some of my neo conservative friends thought that he was too dubbish when he started

the I and F negotiations with Gorbachev. The social conservatives felt that he was just paying lip service to a lot of their agenda, and there was always a suspicion among some traditional conservatives that Reagan was really at heart just a cold warrior and interested in economic growth and cutting taxes, not so much about preserving traditional American culture and mores. So that happened at the time of his presidency,

it's persisted ever since. What I think you're pointing to, Peter, is that in the way that the Right talks to itself today, there is close to zero interest in coalition building. One of the major strengths of the conservative movement in the sixties and seventies was that figures like William F. Buckley Junior looked around the scene and said, Okay, you know, I got a group of kind of weird ex communists libertarian thinkers around me. We can

barely fill up a room. Our message is starting to catch the energy of young people. But in order to actually convey my ideas into the national scene and to have an effect on American politics in the world, I'm going to

start need I'm going to have to make friends. And so he reached out to populous conscerservatives, to neo conservatives, to the religious right when it began to emerge, and instead of that type of coalition building today we have almost a efficient rather than a fuchie, where people don't want to build bridges or connections between the various factions of Conservatism, but are much more interested in expelling people from the movement, whether that's on the basis of ideas or whether that's

on the basis of their views on Donald Trump. Say so, Matt, follow up on that one, to what extent? Grant entirely what you say. And Donald Trump, although he's been leading in poll after poll after poll for six months now, still has not broken fifty percent. He's still in the forties. Now, maybe that'll be good enough. Bill Clinton won the presidency with forty three percent of the vote. If Bobby Kennedy you on and on a go. But what I'm wondering is to what extent has the nature

of the game changed because of technology. In the old days, it was extremely difficult to know exactly how to reach your base, how to energize them, So you were constantly trying to increase the pool because you really couldn't quite control the pool. And today we have technology. Neighborhood by neighborhood, ward

by ward. I can remember a friend out here telling me that Barack Obama as long ago as Barack Obama's campaign, they had developed software that they could put in the hands of volunteers and within six the volunteers would go door to door and read questions off their iPhones and all they needed was six questions to know if this person was going to be voting for Romney Off, we don't spend money on them. If they're already committed to Barack Obama, we don't

spend money on them. But if they're a swing voter, we know exactly what. Okay. The point is, you can identify by name and address exactly who your base is, and now you can work on them. Now you can concentrate on getting them out. And the political consultants will say, that's where the return on your campaign dollar is best spent, getting to the polls, energizing the people you already know are on your side. And that's

because technology has changed. That is a pure hypothesis on my part. Well, cell phones and social media, the iPhone, all of that makes what you're describing ever more important. It's not just your base, it's a sliver of your base. It's the super fans. John Ellis has written about this phenomenon on his news items substack is it's the core of the core, the real fanatics who are going to go out and basically you crawl through broken glass

in order to support That's who. That's who everyone is targeting right now. And the damage done to I think conservatism and to just our politics national is very real. I just want to say one more thing about some of the critics of so called zombie Reaganism. What some of them are trying to do is move American conservatism away from its belief in freedom and its traditional defense of

the American legacy of liberty. And for so much of the history of conservatism, the conservatism that I adhere to freedom is at the core correct Your individual freedom accompanied by personal responsibility is the core of the philosophy. And there are

some people for whom that is dangerous philosophy. They look around the world today and they see actually too much freedom in the world, and so they're trying to kind of cast off Reagan not just as someone who only talked about the Soviets and tax but also as one of the great champions of freedom in American history. And that I think is a dividing line within the movement that needs to be fought over because American conservatism without individual freedom is not a philosophy I

would want to belong to. We just talked about nuts and bolts for a minute, because you're I know, it's now wrote that we say things like, well, of course, with technology and the abilities to slice up the electorates so closely, you can pinpoint your ads, you can pinpoint your message. We sort of assume that that's going to be successful, but oftentimes it's

not. I mean, it just it seems to I'm what I'm baffled by is that these are very smart people running the Democratic Party in the Republican Party. They're not dumb, and their goal seems to be to win the White House by one vote, or if they can win by half a vote, right, because for one reason, they think they can do it right. They think, actually, that's doable. That's this technological precision that they can

get. But also then it frees them up from the messiness of having to sort of appeal to that middle deciding ground at ten eleven to fifteen percent, because but I think an elections pass that ten or fifteen percent has been what

we call undecideds. They're unaligned undecideds. The wait and see. I think that if you look at the American electorate now, the ten or fifteen percent in the middle hate both of the candidates with a passion, and instead of trying to win them over what they're really the only absolution they have is to try to make the other guys seem like a dangerous lunatic who's going to be

the end of America. So Joe Biden is saying vote for Trump, and you're voting for the end of America by and Trump is saying exactly the same thing. This just feels like market failure to me. It feels like Hertz and Avis got together, Coke and PEPSI got together and decided to ruin the business. Right, what's it all take? It started with the of course, the rise of the attack ad. Right, politics is the only business where you go after your competition and the nastiest, nastiest, you know,

most low down way other companies. If they were to do that other industries, it would be the end of their industry. I don't know if there's a solution, to be honest with you, Rob, I mean, I think your diagnosis is actually correct. This election will be determined really by the double haters, voters who hate both Trump and Biden, and it's just a question of where do they fall. You know, in twenty twenty two, a lot of those double haters ended up voting for Democrats despite their dislike of

Biden. But Biden wasn't on the ballot in twenty twenty two. He'll be on there this time. And it is a mystery to me. That's not really a mystery. I mean, it's in character with Trump. But you know, every time Trump spends his rallies talking about the January sixth, quote unquote hostages, I think that's a reminder to those double haters, do you

really want to live through another four years of Trump? And every time Biden kind of ties himself into notts ober foreign policy, or you know, keeps cheerleading this economy, or it seems to deny the outright deny that he issued the trans Day of Visibility proclamation on Easter Sunday, then the double haters are like, oh, my god, can we live through another four years of

Biden? Right? So I continue to believe that this election will look like a toss up until pretty late in the game, and it will just be something happening in the final weeks where enough of the voters who are those double haters say I can't live with the other the other guy and Matt. What do we make of Bobby Kennedy Junior. Yeah, I think he's a real danger to Biden, to Biden. Yeah, he has swung against Biden. Now it's unambiguous. Now he's going after Biden, isn't that? Yes?

Yeah? I think so. I mean, you know, he the messages, the messages he's promoting are pretty progressive. His vice presidential selection, his running mate is very progressive, more progressive than he is. And I look at a recent poll out of Pennsylvania, actually pretty good poll for Biden if it's just Biden v. Trump, But you add the three independent candidacies or RFK, Cornell West, and Jill Stein in there, and then Biden's margin

narrows within the margin of error against Trump. So I do think RFK Junior is hurting Biden more than Trump. There's a lot of celebration about the fact that No Labels has announced it won't feel the candidate, so there won't be a No Label's candidate. But in truth, the way that the No No Label's movement was heading, I think no labels would have hurt Trump more than

Biden. And with them leaving the field, you have three left wing to far left independent candidacies who, if they combine for over three percent of the vote in states, are nationwide. I don't see how Biden can win. And I'm struck in the last First of all, I was very struck by Bobby Kennedy's choosing the running mate, because that made it unambiguous that he's going after Biden. And now I'm struck in the last few days he seems to

have settled on this with real anger. Biden's denying him Secret Service protection, and I get these kind of overtones of don't you understand my family made the Democrat the modern Democratic Party. Don't you understand I lost my uncle, I lost my It's personal, it really feels personal. And so now you have not just Donald Trump saying Biden attacking Biden personally. Now you have someone who has to his left in many ways saying this is not just an effective man

a dement but this is a bad man. That's new, and that strikes me as a serious danger. He's to the left of Biden some ways. He's also in a way kind of more solidaristic in his rhetoric than Biden. Is you talk more about our national purpose and our national community than Biden. So I think he's been underestimated throughout this process. I couldn't agree more. I think it's remarkable the level at which he's polling consistently. His real challenge

is ballot access. Will he be able to be on all the ballots, or especially the ballots of swing states, the seven states which will decide the election by November. If he is on those ballots again, I find it very hard to see Biden pulling this off all right now, from politics to something that really matters is the state of Israel. Yeah, we have October

seventh, unbelievably brutal, vicious attacks that cost Israelis. I don't know what the sort of settled number is, but it's around sixteen twelve hundred, twelve hundred, I'm sorry, twelve hundred. We have hostages still in tunnels beneath Gaza, six of whom are American citizens. And we have images day in and day out of a kind of healthscape in Gaza. And now we have

I'll just name three items. Chuck Schumer gives a speech on the floor of the Senate saying it's time for a change in leadership in Israel, and breathtaking thing for a member of the United States Senate to say about a democratic ally.

Last I think early this week, we have Benny Gantz, a member of the war Cabinet, calling for early elections, and we have a renewal of massive protests in Israel, several tens of thousands of people protesting outside the Kanesset at time of war, and then in the last forty eight hours or so. It seems to me we have to distinguish between American policy and the

Biden administration's rhetoric. But at some point rhetoric becomes policy. And we have the President having a phone call with bb Net and Yahoo in which he demands the BB engage in a cease fire, make new concessions, offer get the hostages out. We have Anthony Blincoln putting pressure on bb and then Kirby, the White House spokesman, summed it up yesterday. As I recall, I think I'm quoting him almost exactly. Unless there's a change in Israeli policy,

there will be a change in our policy. What is to be done? Well, my takeaway from the past several weeks and especially the last twenty four hours, Peter, is that Biden has lost the plot on the Israel hamaspital. The most important thing in this war is to maintain one sense of moral

clarity, to be able to distinguish between Israel and Hamas. Israel and which was at a state of peace with Hamas a tenuous piece, but a peace nonetheless on October sixth, and Hamas, which invaded Israel on October seventh, twenty twenty three, committed all the atrocities you describe, makes no distinction between uniforms, soldiers and civilians, murders, indiscriminately holding the hostages, is stealing the food into these convoys. One has to always remember that Hamas is ultimately

responsible for everything that happens in Gaza. And I think because of domestic politics, because of a progressive inclination to believe some of the information warfare that's being waged on Israel on the internet and in the media, the Biden administration, the president himself has just lost that sense of moral clarity, and so it's leading us to this place where if Biden administration policy were followed today, Hamas would remain intact and BB Netting Yahoo would fall. So, no matter what

you think of Netting Yahoo, he's Israel's longest serving prime minister. He's an extremely controversial figure. He is the democratically elected leader of an ally, and yet the one consistent through line in Biden Israel policy has been hostility and opposition to him. And so that that, I think shows you the ridiculous situation

in which America finds itself. And that's why I just urge all Americans to follow the example of a democrat, John Fetterman, a man who you know the label progressive because he was he's too concerned about what that label means these days, but who is speaking a lot of sense on a lot of different issues, no more so than on Israel, where he has said, in response to this debacle involving the attack on the AID convoy, look, Hamas

will be the party that ends this war when Hamas surrenders or when Hamas is defeated. And the best way to end the civilian casualties and to restore humanitarian aid and limit the risk to AID workers is by defeating Hamas. Everything John Fetterman says on this issue is a display of the moral clarity that we so utterly need in Washington. By the way, we should say he seems to

have recovered entirely from the stroke. He's amazing and his depression, right, remember it, because he entered Walter Reed just last summer and yet something happened to him. I think he has recovered and he he under has a sense of mission, and his mission here again is to just point out who is the enemy and who is the heroes of this story. Yeah, I mean, whatever he's taking, any depression or his stroke, get us out.

I mean, it's true that if ten twelve key Democrats just went on betterment meds, they'd have a much better shot at regaining the House, the Senate, in the White House. Uh, I guess I'm you know, the politics aside of it. It just seems to me that the that's the brutal truth is that if Hamas Hamas in October seventh attacked Israel, attacked unarmed civilians

in the most savage way. It was the Manson family, murders times every household, and then they came back to Gaza and they hid behind civilians and hostages, that if we let them get away with that, it's over right. I mean, once you say that you can do that, because that is the that is not hard to do, and it means you don't really need to that many. I mean you you could have accomplished all of what they accomplished in on October seventh with knives and machetes. They did in a

lot of ways. You don't need to go be a client of the Iranians for advanced weapons. You don't need to do any of that. You need to cause mayhem and then you retreat and hide behind civilians. So but I guess what my concern is that that not so much that the Biden has lost the plot, but that we may have lost the plot. That it is true that what happened to the the world global kitchen workers was horrible, and it is true what is happening in Gaza to these people, in innocent people

or whatever dozen's is horrible. It is true. All that is true. But it seems like we need to gird ourselves for that, as that's the inevitable price that you pay and it absolutely can't go any other way. But I don't see anybody making that. We're looking for the solution. The ceasefire solution is so attractive because it means that maybe it'll all go away. Yeah. And the problem is that if you yeah, but it's which we'll think, it leads us down a path where it's not a ceasefire, it is

in fact a capitulation to the strategy. Well, and that Hamas is done right, So how do we get out of that? The upshot of so many Biden policies has been more war and more violence. I mean the withdrawal from Afghanistan's thirteen US servicemen killed Americans, drone a family in response to the terror attack and called Kapol Airport. Isis K reconstituting itself in Afghanistan most recently launches this attack in Russia. The policy in Ukraine, Biden's fear of providing

the Ukrainians with long range weapons platforms has extended that war. It undercut the offensive, the counter offensive that Ukraine planned. It's now putting Ukraine in a position where Russia's massing forces and most likely to gain ground in the coming months. And what are we doing. We're telling the Ukrainians, Oh, don't target Russia Russian energy supplies because we don't want the price of gasoline to go up higher now we were in Israel and what are we doing in Israel?

Well, I think Peter's absolutely right. At some point the rhetoric becomes a policy. And even though Biden has continued to supply Israel and to protect Israel somewhat in international institutions, that began to dissipate when the US abstained from the UN resolution calling for an immediate cease fire the other week. The rhetoric at some point is going to lead to just another one of these situations where Biden's ties himself in knots and the result is more war, more terrorism, not

less matt Israel again. Up until the sixty seven war, France supported Israel. Until two weeks ago, Germany for good reasons, supported Israel. Israel has lost Europe, and now Israel has lost the Democratic Party. John Fetterman, notwithstanding, we're so astonished, and we rally to him the way we do, precisely because he's an exception, no Europe, no Democratic Party. Will the Trump Republican Party stand firm? Who are the good guys, Tom Cotton, yes, JD. Josh Hawley. What is your feeling there?

Well, I think that the Republican Party still will have a sense of responsibility and affection for Israel will continue to be pro Israel. I've been watching what Trump has been saying about the conflict. His most recent comments to q Hewitt just the other day was that, look, Israel's got to finish the war quickly, and Israel's losing the pr war. Both of those statements. That's correct, just correct. They're empirically true, right, So I'm not reading

them as a distancing from Israel in the way that some others have. So I still think the Republican Party, for various historical reasons, for religious reasons, will remain pro Israel. I do worry, though, Peter, about the lack of religious faith in the United States and religious affiliation. So many Republicans who are Christian are pro Israel because for them, Israel proves the Bible is true. The existence of the state of Israel is a miracle that shows

the Bible is true. If Americans become less religious, less tied to the Biblical traditions, I think there are going to be less likely to have that sense that Israel is there for a purpose. Israel has a special place among the nations in America as another conveinental promised Land has a special relationship with Israel.

That's a trend that I worry about. I think it's very much visible in polls of young people turning against the state of Israel, and I do worry eventually that secularization that's already affecting the Republican Party one day down the road, it could also affect the GOP's view of Israel. Rob will not take us out with tap dancing and a joke. All right, yeah, all right, but you're surely finding that now. With sorting out what America First

means and what America's national interest means and what it doesn't mean. That does seem to be a very serious debate that we're having in a very unseerious ways. That's as we seem to be absolutely destined to do. I'm trying to

find something funny. Well, there was something funny in that Trump interview with Hugh Hewitt, because right before he made those statements on Israel, he was going on a rant about Biden. It was a pretty effective campaign rant, but he ends up not with any of the policy disasters, but Trump ended up by saying that you know what, that thing about Biden. He's also a horrible golfer. And there's no way Trump said that his handicap as as

high as Biden says his handicap is. And it was just it was just a classic Trump moment. And you know, start girding yourself. We might have to have at least four more years of them. Yeah, if twelve percent of Americans decide that they despise Biden and they repelled by Biden, but they despised and are repelled by Trump, just a little bit less. It's not really something you can put on a bumper sticker. Matthew. You have to promise to come back, because we didn't even touch your wonderful work on

the realignment that's taking place. Why are Hispanics moving to This is fascinating material. But our producer told us that on your side, you made him swear that we'd only keep you for half an hour. And I see you're in a jacket and tie, which must mean that you're headed to the green room at Fox. You've got to run, so I'm afraid we'll have to release you, but I want you to promise on the record for listeners that you'll return. I'll be here, Peter, Thank you, matt thanks, Matt,

thank you. Yeah, it does seem. There was a we had a little little discussion group on Thursday nights, and when somebody asked like, well, what consolations do you tell yourself? What do you tell yourself so that you can look at the front page of the newspaper every day, meaning it's filled with bad news. What how do you what's the consolation for your

bad news? And I would just say I think I said this last week, but I really do mean it. I'm obsessed with the pilot of the containership in Baltimore who went thirty seconds, yes, saved lives and did it and nobody, you know, unsung hero, local guy works the works the port of Baltimore and probably not the only pilot there, not the only, but certainly there's the every every port has many of them, and they're all real. They all have to be really good. We only notice things when

they go wrong. And in case things do go wrong, I don't know what yet. You know, I could tell you something. I'll give you something to cheer you. And that is the new Dick Wolf documentary series Homicide

New York. Oh great, it's it's it's Dick Wolf. So he's a total professional, and of course they're beautifully produced and paste and takes old murder cases in the eighties and the nineties and what you get, and it goes back and talks to the cops and the detectives who work the case, and you see in every single one of these you get this notion of good human beings who are just working hard and never expect to get their names in the

press, and are doing it to raise family. They can't afford to live in Manhattan, even though they take the train into Manhattan to investigate all these crimes. But they've got to get when the when the phone rings, he's coaching his kids softball team out in Queen's and you just you're just reminded. For me, it's especially effective because I think of New York as just this overwhelming and of course, in fact, what it comes down to is New

York is a town of neighborhoods and overwhelmingly good hard working people. It's the same sort of thing as we know that Pilot, if there's ever a documentary, you know that we know that Pilot is just going to be a good, hard working guy. Right Yeah, Okay, so the country is still filled with people like that. I think it's very true. I think it's very true. They're just just nothing. We're running for office. You and I are one. You and I are not among them, of course,

right Well, it's always nice talking about Continetti. He's incredibly smart and has writes is. His columns are terrific and I recommend that you follow him and listeners of course the commentary magazine podcast every day. He's co host of that, which is not an easy job. I guarantee you. And if you're listening to this podcast, it means you're listening to a Ricochet production. And Ricochet is a website. You can find it on the web ricochet dot com.

It's a conversation site. We also do podcasts, all sorts of podcasts, but we also do one other weird thing. Our members every now and then get together. Last year Ricochet members got together at the on the National Review Cruise, which is an or later this year. They could do it in National viewkers June. As much going on in June, if you think there's still spots, So if you're looking for something fun to do in June, that'd be a great thing to do. Uh, there's a meet up

in July and Milwaukee, and in October in Saint Louis. And then there's a are going to do the last call for April eighth, which is Monday.

It's Monday, Monday, Yes, some clay clips Clips Day, which of course after the earthquake, earthquake Day, Yes, Omega Palette and one to remember at Mega Paladin, and it is hosting uh in Dallas a watch party to watch the Total Sol because so the it's a and there's a creepy name for where it's in the total effects, something like when you're in the part of the zone, in the zone where yes, yeah or just look up. Who cares? But it's happening on Monday, April eighth, So

join Ricochet. Go to Ricochet, figure that out and enjoying anyway, because these things are happening all the time, and of course we need or support. I have a question for you for for a couple of last minute banter, for a close showing banter. You are still at work on a documentary, I believe a radio yes, an audio documentary, yes, on a couple of weeks. Okay, So tell us tell us that how has that changed your thinking? What have you learned give us the topic. The topic

is really you're well into right now. I don't know how you yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, So the topic is really First, what I wanted to do was do a very deep dive TikTok into COVID, right seen through the eyes of our friend doctor j Batichari. And then I realized that the story really is that pretty much everything we needed to know about COVID we knew, we knew in March of twenty twenty, and we just chose not

to pay attention to it. And so now it's a question of what do we do to the guy who was saying, hey, wait a minute. And Jay's position has been some character time like hey, lay wait a minute, let it rip, Hey wait a minute, just let it go. And in fact it's much more nuanced than that, much more smart than that. He wasn't asking us to do nothing. He was asking us to do

something very specific. And just the way and the pattern at which we as a culture and a political culture and a bureaucratic culture and a media culture just went bananas is kind of interesting, and it's sort of now is the time take a deep breath four years later and figure out what happens, so they can never happen again. But the problem is is that it's gonna happen again because we are going to have just the way the world works, it's going

to be another contagion of some kind. And the great thing that I don't see us recovering from. I mean, I'm just investigating my own heart. Here is the legitimate lingering skepticism. I mean, that's, to put it nicely, of our bureaucratic public health officials and their political bosses and then their

accolytes in the media. So that little, that tripod of power, it's really kind of has really lost the confidence of most Americans, and that is not a good place to be. And so it's it's highly possible that there's gonna be a contagion that in which you do have to stay at home and we should close the schools for a little That's possible that this don't It wasn't as if that never happens. That just hasn't happened yet, And it didn't

and it wasn't necessary for COVID. But when when that happens, When and if that happens, who are you gonna believe? I'm gonna call it Jay right, right, But because I feel like Jay is sort of willing to look at the at the number and then come up with an answer that may not. You know, I saw a great debate. We have some audio of that debate, and one of the arguments he kept kept saying was like he was a focused protection. He was for something called focus protection. I

know, I we don't go over this too much. And the focused protection idea was, you know, you pick the people who are most vulnerable and then you protect them, and you don't shut down businesses and schools and things. We let other people go in with their lives, but you focus on the people you can help. And because you've limited it and you focused your

protection, you're much more effective at it. So if only the people who need to wear masks, really the most vulnerable, are wearing the right mask, the N ninety five mask warned the correct way, and you focus on that, you actually can affect some kind of protection, not a lot, but some. But if you just say everywhere a mask, then everybody kind of wears a mask, and you at you get as a D minus kind of protection. But the argument against that was, well, how are you

going to do that? Well, how would you even do how would you even protect old people? Just can't be any harder than shutting down the whole country for good. Well, well, that's the problem is that actually turns out that, yeah, shutting down the country's easy. Now, the economy, the country, schools, they all have an off switch. They just still have an on switch. And that's the problem that we have. Without an on switch, you can't turn it off. So it just was the

easy solution, and it also seemed to blanket the country. And you know, in my view, not Jay's view. Jay's very scrupulous. He does not endorse my crackpot vision. In my view, the reason why nobody wanted to hear what his you know, the whole story for me is the Santa Clair County study that Jay did in March, right, in which he discovered that there was an enormous that we had underestimated the number of people who've been infected by a by COVID by some giant factor, which proved that it was

much less deadly than we thought. Exactly, the denomin is already too late, and that it was already out there. The denominator was much larger than we thought. But the numerator was the same, same number of people were the many non people effected. That is actually great news, that's the news

you want. And nobody wanted to hear it. And I think they didn't want to hear it because they kind of knew that this was something special, this virus, and that this virus was going to be mysterious in some ways, and they knew that because they paid for it. Now Jay doesn't say that, but you know, I'm put on my Hercule Piro hat and you're like, well, why somebody's giving you good news and you're not listening to

it. Why aren't you listening to it? And then and at the Santa Clara study, I mean I make fun of it with him, and he Jay is such a nice guy. He's like kind of takes it like you're saying, you're el cheapo. You know grade z bucket shop study that you did in Santa Claric because it didn't didn't cost that much. Nobody did another one. It's not like the CDC and FAUCI and the collective bureaucrats when they

attacked his study or they criticized it. They did some unfair criticism, but they just a fair Christmas, which is like, you know, you didn't spend enough money and a sample. You didn't do this, you did that. Oh that's true. They could have done and read one that study I couldn't agree with anytime. That's almost the point and the whole story at which

I myself just lose it. The CDC has a has a budget of ten limits of billions a year, and in a crisis like that, it was just unlimited, absolutely unlimited, and they should have had a thousand studies underway. Oh thanks, you're done. One a week exactly a million dollars a week, two million dollars a week. What do we care? That's what That's good money to spend, right, And they didn't do it. They

didn't do it. Why didn't they do it because they didn't want to know the answer because the answer they pretty much figured was going to be the answer that j came up with, which meant that it's going to be without a giant. You know, look, if you it's the old I mean, this is completely unfair what I'm about to say, but it's the same kind of idea, and I've written it. I don't think I'm gonna I don't

know what I'm gonna say I'll say it here. The best way to commit a murder is to kill somebody and then burn the house down, right, true. The best way to cover up a lab leak that was I don't think it was I don't think it was evil. I think it was just incompetent, because that's what happens is create a giant crisis. So it's not about the lab leak. It's not about where it came from, Peter.

It's about, you know, protecting the young people in schools, which you can do what you can only do once because eventually people learn the truth and then they never believe you again. And that's not where you want to be with doctors. And when will when can we expect to hear this? When will we start to do? You know, I will I'll do some seak previews. Oh, I'll do some sneak previews for Rickechet podcast listeners. Maybe,

but we're going to release them because we're doing it. You know, we're doing our new initiative, which is the Ricky Step Productions, which would be long form, multi episode podcast on a topic. And we've got a bunch of them in the you know, in Developer We've got one which I'm absolutely can I'm super excited. Boy. We have one which Charlie Cook is doing on the Second Amendment. We have one about called war stories, which

is going to be dynamite. I just have to like convince a bunch of people to tell me stories that may or may not get them arrested for revealing national secrets. But I'm close. We were working on one about school school or form school choice from the parents perspective. Parent, these are not these are not issue. We're not talking about issues here. Talk about stories,

American stories. That's how we're telling our That's how we're telling stuff. So I want to make sure that when we release these things, it's like released like you know. We We've got another one ready to go, right, so we promoth the previous are coming. It's It's been super fun, uh and I'm excited about the stuff. That's stuff that we're we're guiding but I'm

not doing. But I think it's going to be great. You know, Charlie Cook is doing Second Amendment. And it's the funniest thing you ever heard is this english Man talking about guns and in Florida buying a gun. And we've we've found in our budget enough. I hope we may not. It depends on how much these are. I was with a Rickchet. We had a Rickchet meet up not that long ago in New Orleans and it was loads

of fun, and Charlie came. We all had a good time, and then we're having dinner and we're sitting around and then we start talking generally, so it's like there's a lot of people there. We have a general conversation. And because Charlie knows a lot about the Second Amendments, somebody says to him, what's the deal with the Second Amendment and what do you think about?

And Biden said, you know, something somehow came up that Biden recently said, Hey, some of these gun nuts think you should be all up. You should be able to go out and buy a cannon, right, And Charlie was like, he's like, head exploded. But that just makes me so mad. He's sputtering raguous, because of course you can already do that. You always could do that. A cannon is not a firearm. A cannon is ordnance, and that has been legal forever. It is not

illegal to buy a cannon. It's perfectly legal to buy a cannon. You can go out buy a cannon today, And so we found some money in the budget for Charlie Cooked by a Cannon, and that's kind of what we want. That's the title of the series, that Charlie buys a cannon. And as you would imagine, the people selling cannons are mostly in Florida, so it's gonna be geographically convenient for Charlie go by a cannon. So that's okay. I'll leave you with that, and he will start firing it at

sunset every day. Yeah, exactly right, exactly right after he passes his five day whatever, the five day background checked by you. Okay. Now, of course you don't have to have because you're allowed to buy a cannon in America. This has been the Ricochet Podcast brought to you by Shopify. Support them please for signing up at ricochet dot com and take him into leave a five star review on Apple podcast. That is important. I know it

sounds dumb, but it really does matter. It like allows the listeners to find us. He keeps the algorithms happy and keeps this show going. We would love to see you at ricochet dot com as a member along with us and a bunch of other members. Out of other members around the country, around the world, talking and having great conversations about every topic under the sun. Kind of like this podcast. Have a good weekend. Drop next week. Next week, Ricochet Join the Conversation.

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android