Welcome to The Rest Is Politics US update at 1.15 a.m. on Wednesday morning. Anthony and I have been in separate places all evening, but I am very glad that we have finally get back together again to record an update on how things are looking. Anthony, what are you thinking? Rome, Paris, London? Well, right now, in an undisclosed location, Caddy, I don't want to tell you what my plans are yet. What happened? The Camelac curious voters, it looks like they didn't turn out
for her. You had great data early on about exit polling. What happened, Caddy? So what seems to have happened is two things that young men did turn out in vote for Donald Trump and his spaniac voters voted in larger numbers than they have done in previous elections for the Republican candidate and black voters voted in larger numbers than they have done in previous elections for the Republican candidate as well. So that looks like the combination.
Now all of those may be what you call low propensity voters. They may be lower income voters who have been particularly hit by inflation or have other reasons for voting for Donald Trump, which is like the guy, but that seems to be what happened and women didn't turn out in numbers enough to compensate for that. So I have a theory. I want to test it on. You get your reaction. We had a four hour show
that we'd live stream tonight and then we'd roll. I know this is very frustrating because you've been on a show and I've been on a show and I haven't had a chance to hear what you've been saying, which is. Yeah, so I went back to my room and I went back and watched some of Trump's speeches in the last three days and he was saying something that
I wasn't hearing. And so listen, one thing about me because I'm a market participant, particularly when you're a portfolio manager, you get something wrong, you make a prediction, you get it wrong, you cut your losses, you admit you're wrong. I thought Harris was going to beat him. I thought she had momentum. I thought she had organization. She did not beat him. We have to talk about that at some point you and I have a whole list of things
and list of reasons why she didn't beat him. Of course, I would have had a list of reasons why she would have beaten him and I have both here. But what he did, which I think was masterful and I just want to point out to people, he said to black and Latino men, he said, you know, you're with me, you know, you're here legally and you're in my club. Oh, by the way, I'm protecting you from the migrants. I'm preventing those people who are trying
to come in illegally and I'm protecting your seats at the table. Okay, I have to remember this is a brilliant thing that he did and this is exactly how he thinks is he says zero sum transactionalist. He wanted those people to know and whether they are or not, it doesn't really matter. It's what he made them feel, right? Isn't that what Maya Angelou said? Of course. Now what you're saying is how you make me feel, they looked around and said,
you know what, I'm with Trump. He's talking about somebody. I remember I told you that I did a podcast in Colombia and the guy said, well, you know, I'm a green card holder. My wife is a citizen. He's not talking about me. I said, well, he's not talking about you until he's talking about you. Okay. And so that's what happened here. And I think it was ruthlessly brilliant on his point. So you think it was all immigration, immigration,
immigration and that this was all a play about the border. And I heard that too in those speeches and he made specifically point saying that immigrants were taking, I mean, he said it very as bluntly as that immigrants are taking black jobs is what he said early on in the campaign. And that's the message that got through. I think there's certainly will
have been some of that. I think there is a cultural affinity, some of the kind of machismo that we've heard from the Trump campaign may have gone down well with some of these male voters, whatever race they are. I think there's also the fact that rents particularly are a big inflation wealth gap. So rich people who own their homes have not felt inflation
as much as poor people in America who tend to rent rather than owning their homes. So he's talking to a group of the population, which is lower income is less college educated and those are the people who are particularly hard hit by inflation. So it could be a combination
of all of those factors. I think the other interesting thing to ask is why was that not offset by women voting against him, which is what the Harris campaign as early as Tuesday when I was texting with people, I'm sure you were too senior people in the Harris campaign who felt they had a lock on this because women we discussed it in our last podcast, that Anne Celtsa Paul showing that women in big numbers were voting for Kamala Harris particularly
older women. And that doesn't seem to have materialized for her either. Well, again, she said plus three in Iowa, he that state was called early for him. And he won by about plus eight or nine, I think. Plus eight, yeah, that's a 13 point, sorry, 11 point discrepancy, but I want to want to channel something for you. And I want
to get your reaction to this because I've been sitting here distilling it. I'm going to speak to you like a Trump supporter, a disenfranchised Trump supporter, where I feel like I'm not getting a fair shake for my family. So you have this woke culture on your side. You're telling me that you're indivalent about the bathrooms or telling me that men can play in women's sports. All they have to do is declare themselves as women. They can come in
and play on my daughter's a football team or against my daughter. You're distorting the country with hordes of immigrants that are coming in illegally. You reversed every decision that Trump made at the border anywhere from seven to 10 million people came in, which is wreak havoc on the country. You've shot up the inflation. We're running to wars. And you went after my guy, my guy, Donald Trump, you used law fair and went after him. You threw
everything but the kitchen sink at him from a legal perspective. In the middle of the campaign, you made him sit in a courtroom in New York. You gave him 34 felony counts. He's got other cases that are going against them that I think they're legitimate caddy, but I'm just talking like a Trump supporter that are specious. Right. And he still beats you. Hey, dummies, do you think you may be missing something about what is going on
culturally in the United States? Oh, and by the way, Anthony Scaremucci, you're a dummy. You told me on your podcast that he had a 47.5% ceiling, possibly 48. He wasn't going to go through that. And he's likely to win the popular vote by 1% by tomorrow morning. So wake up. Okay. That goes for me and that goes for everybody listening. Wake up to what he is. And maybe Cadi K's friend is right. Your friend Jennifer Paul Mary. Hey, this guy's
an unbelievable politician. And this is the greatest comeback in US political history. I don't like what he's about to do to the country. And I will continue to remain a dissident if should he do things that are hurtful to my country or country? Anyway, I wanted to get those two cents in and get your reaction. Yeah. And look, if he gets, he's got the Senate. And if he gets the house, which looking at how well Republicans are doing around the country,
there's a pretty good chance that he gets the house. He will have for two years, pretty much unfettered ability to enact his agenda. I think what you just said is really spot on, Anthony. I was on set all evening with the Trump supporter of the last few hours. And I heard him say a lot of what you just said that this is Democrats acting like elites,
assuming that people don't hear it when Donald Trump is called a Nazi. And that they've un-have-not realized the degree to which the way American society has moved with on issues of, you know, even potentially even issues of gay marriage on trans issues have caused a lot of people to disquiet, potentially even on, you know, women's equality issues,
have caused a lot of people to disquiet and things have moved too fast. And they want a moment to think actually is that what we want for the country, combine that with the immigration message, combine that with the inflation, which has hit them particularly hard. And they're going to look at the things that affect them. It might be what Kelly and Conway said in 2016, there's a difference for voters between things that offend them
and things that affect them. And they feel these things affect them directly. But there is a degree to which Donald Trump as an avatar for dissatisfaction against elite college-educated urban America, the media, the universities that certainly quite a bit of what we see in amongst Trump supporters. And, you know, they have some good reason to feel that. That democracy, the exit polls, it turns out Elon Musk was telling people that democracy
is on the line. And if you don't vote for Donald Trump, you're being threatened by the left. They're going to take away your democracy. They were using the mirror image narrative for their supporters. And when people exited these polling booths, the exit polls said
that they were worried about democracy. So did Elon Musk, who I think was a better running Mayford Donald Trump than JD Vance and a better RNC than the RNC, did Elon Musk literally single handedly help this man get over the finish line? So I'm just going to break in here because Fox News has just called Pennsylvania for Donald Trump. So he's the president. It's only Fox News so far, but that would make him, if Fox is
right. And Fox has a very good elections desk. They monitor the data like everybody else. They are not waiting for, I guess, the rest of all these mail-in votes to be counted. But that makes Donald Trump the president-elect of the United States. And as you said, this is the biggest political comeback in American political history. This is a paid advertisement from BetterHelp. I would like to take a moment to thank someone
of my life. My wife, Deerger, for being an incredible spouse, friend, lover, but more importantly, when the chips are down, probably one of the most loyal people that I know. And you should take a moment to thank somebody in your life, too. This is a month of gratitude. And along with the person that I just shouted out, there's another person that we don't get to thank enough ourselves. It's sometimes hard to remind ourselves that we are trying
our best to make sense of everything. And in this crazy world, that isn't easy. Here's a reminder, the sense of thanks to the people in your life, including yourself therapy can be incredibly helpful. I find it useful to learn positive coping skills and learn how to set boundaries. It really empowers you to be the best version of yourself. As the largest online therapy provider in the world, BetterHelp can provide access to
mental health professionals with a wide variety of expertise. Let the gratitude flow with BetterHelp. Visit BetterHelp.com slash trip us today to get 10% off your first month. It's BetterHelp, help.com slash T-R-I-P-U-S. Yeah, no, no, no, no, no question, but I want to continue on this thread, though. Is Elon Musk? When the historians write this epic in American history? What will they say
of Elon Musk? I think that's a really good question. I mean, the degree to which Elon Musk affected the results of this election through Twitter or any, I think it's a combination antennae. I think it was Donald Trump making a concerted effort to use all forms of new media and the Trump campaign, as we just talked about establishment and elite programs, they dish 60 minutes. That's part of the elite establishment programming. He went on Joe
Rogan. He went on a podcast that had a large audience with the types of voters he wanted to reach. Elon Musk is part of that. I don't know that you can attribute this seismic winds that Donald Trump had tonight to just to Twitter. Yes, Twitter has an enormous audience. Yes, Elon Musk has tweeted 1400 times this year about voter fraud and illegal migrants. That reaches billions of people. This is not even about voter fraud. This is about
people actively wanting. There's no one here suggesting that he has won these states nefariously. This is about people liking Donald Trump's message and just as importantly, liking the Democrats' message. There's no question. But the mobilization of the $44 billion megaphone now known as X and the ideas around the sweepstakes and the ideas around outsourcing and mobilizing people into the swing states paid for by the Musk Political Action Committee.
These were tremendous benefits to the Trump campaign. Do you think that if Elon Musk had gone all in with the Harris campaign and been on the other side of the equation, are you suggesting that this might have been a different result? Yes, I am suggesting that. I would seem doing that based on his personality and his origin story. But I do think that people will look back at this and I'm channeling a little bit of Tim
Alberta here. People will look back at this and they'll say, okay, what happened here? This was the campaign where citizens united showed up on steroids. It didn't show up with a million dollar check here and a million dollar check there. It showed up with hundreds of millions of dollars. There were 60 billionaires that said, you know what? This man is a transactionalist. I am going to transact with him. I'm not going to put an op-ed in the Washington Post.
I want that government contract from my space company. I'm going to make sure I'm on the right side of this person if he wins. It was a ruthless billionaire calculation because they knew if they were deriding Kamala Harris and she won, there would have been no action taken against them.
That's what the traditional politician does. I guess the counter-argument to that is that it was Kamala Harris's campaign that spent way more than Donald Trump did on conventional things that you and I have spoken about, like to get out the vote operation that she had in Pennsylvania. She spent almost three times more than anyone has ever spent on get out the vote operations.
So it's not that she didn't have money. I mean, if Donald Trump wins, Donald Trump has one, according to Fox News, it's not because of lack of money on the Harris campaign. They had tons of money. So is it then just a question of how they spent it and how they used that money? I think I'm making a different point. I'm saying that the money does matter to a threshold. And then when it goes over that threshold, the ideas matter more than the money.
But Trump was successful at getting to that threshold by transacting with people that understood his quid pro quo nature. The Harris money was a little bit more organic. It was less quid pro crow in terms of its orientation. But your point is well taken that she had the money. And then the questions are going to be as follows. What do you think Joe Biden's legacy is through all this? He's probably sitting there, Gadi Gays, and hey, I'm the only guy that beat Trump.
Should have left me in the race. I personally think there would have been no chance of him beating him. What about Josh Shapiro? Shijia picked Josh Shapiro versus Tim Walls. There'll be so many different things that they're going to do. But I hope the one thing that they do do is say, wow, Trump is a formidable athlete in politics. He sees something about the cultural zeitgeist and the society that we have to accept. We can no longer poo poo these people that are showing up
for him, standing in line for him, waiting in the rain for him. We can't poo poo these people. We've got to figure out a way to win these people. And Democrats are going to have to have a real think about the issue of race and their appeal to non-white voters. Now, they still won Hispanic voters and black voters by large margins. I mean, they're still getting a majority of Hispanic
voters and they're still getting a very large majority of black voters. But they're not winning them enough that they can think, okay, we can rest on our laurels and assume these people are going to turn out for us and drive us into the White House every four years as they were thinking, you know, back in after the 2012 election, when it was assumed that demographics would be inexorable and inevitable for the Democratic Party because that's clearly not the case. And so
they're going to have to rethink. And they're going to have to rethink particularly their appeal to black men and to Hispanic men because that seems to be where they've really lost out of them. And I think the gender split that we have spoken about is very real in the country. Why is it that you've got black men and Hispanic men, historic numbers, turning to the Republican candidate when previously they would have gone for a Democratic candidate? What is the appeal there?
And I think they have to think about that. They've got a lot they have to think about, but the autopsy will be done on the Harris campaign. We'll get into all of that in podcasts over the next week or two. And it's worth looking at because I think it gives us a sense of the direction of the country in terms of, I mean, elections are always fascinating because they tell you so much about
the country and what people's priorities are and what they want. And I think we've had a Democrats, had a big wake up call and a lot of people watching this election have had a big, we always knew as possible Trump would win up until about a week ago, you and I were saying it was quite likely that Trump was going to win this. We always knew that it was possible, but the degree to which he's underperformed, I think I certainly didn't anticipate. And I did hear the
confidence with which they were speaking over the last week. And that Des Moines Register poll and that seemed to feed into a different narrative. So I think there's going to be questions about polling. There's going to be questions about how the Democrats fail to reach those groups. What do you think this means? And we'll get into this more, but just off the top of your head, Anthony, what does it mean for America and for the rest of the world that Donald Trump is
reelected with the Senate and the House? If we don't know about the House, wait, because we don't know about the House, but certainly with the Senate. And I guess the House would make a difference. Okay. I have, you know, and this is the complexity of Donald Trump. And I've said this before on our podcast, but it does bear it bears worth repeating because he could go in a direction of here are the keys. I'm turning it over to some smart people. I'm going to go play golf.
It could go in a very arrogant, very narcissistic direction where you guys went after me, you scorned me and I'm now going to go after you and I'm going to organize in a way to go after you. And then, of course, you and I got a lot of comments about the Trump mine virus that you and I were talking about. He may have a group of people in there that are going to try to out Trump Trump in terms of their immigration policies in terms of their trade policies, the only person in American history
to come back and serve a second term after losing election as Grover Cleveland. And that happened in 1892 and Trump often just once and Trump often talks about taking this country back to the 1890s where 97% of the country's manufacturing was consumed here in the country. That it's literally an isolationist country, walled off medic forerically and walled off figuratively from the rest of the
world. And so the real issue is which direction is he going to go in and I think we'll learn quickly which direction he's going to go in and how many willing accomplices will he have in either of those two directions that I'm portraying. And so for me, I don't know the answer. But I do think if I was in Kiev this evening, yes, and I was part of Zelensky's leadership, I was part of his Ministry of Defense, I was Zelensky himself, I would be gulping in saying he's coming for me.
He's already said publicly that the war is quote unquote my fault, even though Putin is the one that crossed into my borders and he's coming for me and he's going to give Vladimir Putin something the Vladimir Putin wants. And man, that's going to be a very rough time in Eastern Europe. It's going to be very rough time in United Kingdom and other parts of our alliance.
Yeah, there's going to be a lot of nervous leaders in Europe at the moment. I'm looking at these election results, looking at the prospect of tariffs when European goods going into America if that plan is enacted, certainly looking at what Donald Trump does with NATO, the degree to which he decides that America is no longer going to be central to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
And of course, what happens as well with Ukraine, just before we're going to leave, because you've got to get back to that live stream, Mark Cuban has tweeted out, congrats at real Donald Trump, you won fair and square, congrats to Elon Musk as well, hashtag Godspeed. I don't think that that's what you would have heard from Elon Musk if this had gone the other way around. But this is without the major networks, apart from Fox calling Pennsylvania, but Mark Cuban doing what is conventional
in American politics and conceding to the other side. Yeah, again, I will offer my same congratulations once it's official, but in the immortal words of Barry Diller, Cadi-K, when he lost the paramount merger in the early 1990s, he said, and I quote, they won, we lost next. And I think it's really that simple. Campy a sore loser, campy a baby, let's get going on the next project. The thing you can always rely on in American politics is the next presidential
election starts the day after the voting in this one. And by the way, Cadi-K, it'll be the most consequential and most important election in our history. And most historic. And most historic. Judging from what Mark Cuban has just tweeted out, who's of course very close to Kamala Harris, I would expect that Kamala Harris will concede this election. The Democrats don't want to be in a position of not conceding and of not accepting the election results, particularly when they've been
decisive. It seems like this one has, and we're looking at these results much quicker. We haven't heard Donald Trump because he's about to speak in Florida. There had been speculation that he would claim victory even if he didn't have it. It looks, Anthony, like he can now claim victory, and he has got it. Yeah. And then the real question is we know from the campaign, the Harris campaign that she won't be speaking tonight, that's sort of something that Secretary Clinton did
in 2016. The real question is, will she call President Trump tonight to offer her congratulations? I believe she will. I expect her to do so. And secondarily, will she attend his inauguration? I believe she also will. That's it from Anthony and me for the moment. We've got those results in. We can give you most of them. Of course, we'll be back with more on Wednesday evening. We're going to meet again and tape some more then. We miss you here, Cady. We miss you here. Wish I was
with you. Yeah. We got Marina surrounded by, it's like a sausage factory for this poor woman. You know, all these brutal, depressed men, you know, trying to keep things lively. You keep telling me about the sausages. Can I just say don't swap me out for somebody surrounded by sausage? If you're thinking of a change, then you're stuck with me. Even though you damage my car, you're still stuck with me, okay? We'll be back, guys. We'll record more of course during the
course of this week and bring you further exodes. Good to be with you.