Chris Jenkins Pt. One - podcast episode cover

Chris Jenkins Pt. One

Oct 19, 202357 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

October 31, 2002. Minneapolis, Minnesota. 21-year old university student Chris Jenkins celebrates Halloween by going to a local bar with friends. After he is ejected from the establishment, Chris vanishes without a trace and his body is found in the Mississippi River four months later. While police initially believe that Chris’ death was an accidental drowning, his family uncovers disturbing discrepancies to suggest his body was not in the river the entire time he was missing and that he was a victim of foul play. After four years, the Minneapolis police chief reopens the investigation, reclassifies Chris’ death as a homicide, and issues an apology to the Jenkins family. What actually happened to Chris Jenkins after he left the bar? Could his death somehow be connected to the infamous “Smiley face murder theory”? This week’s episode of “The Path Went Chilly” examines a truly baffling Halloween night mystery.

Patreon.com/julesandashley

Patreon.com/thetrailwentcold

Additional Reading:

http://www.startribune.com/strange-case-of-son-s-death-propels-mom-on-tireless-quest/82751737/

https://www.mprnews.org/story/2006/11/20/jenkinshttps://www.twincities.com/2007/07/31/no-charges-for-now-against-suspect-in-college-students-02-death/

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/38601514/ns/solve_my_mystery/t/investigators-notes/#.W8jIv2hKhO-

Case Studies in Drowning Forensics” by Kevin Gannon & D. Lee Gilbertson

“Footprints of Courage: Our Family’s Struggle for Justice – Inside the Chris Jenkins Murder Investigation” by Jan Jenkins

Transcript

Welcome back to the Pathway Chili. I'm Robin, I'm Jules, and I'm Ashley. Let's dive right into this week's case. October thirty first, two thousand and two. Minneapolis, Minnesota, twenty one year old university student Chris Jenkins celebrates Halloween by going to a local bar with friends. After he is ejected from the establishment, Chris vanishes without a trace, and his body is

found in the Mississippi River four months later. While police initially believe that Chris's death was an accidental drowning, his family uncovers disturbing evidence to suggest that he was a victim of foul play. The police chief eventually reclassifies the death as a homicide and issues an apology to the Jenkins family, but the exact circumstances

of how Chris died remain unknown. After that, the path went chilly, So since we're nearing the end of October, we thought now would be a good time to cover a tragic cold case which happened to take place on Halloween.

The unexplained two thousand and two death of Chris Jenkins. Chris was a student from the University of Minnesota who decided to go up partying on Halloween night, but after he was kicked out of a downtown bar under very questionable circumstances, he never returned home and would remain a missing person until he was found dead in the Mississippi River four months later. At first, the authorities were contend to write off Chris's death as a tragic alcohol fueled accident or even a

suicide, but his family disagreed. Of course, you'll find a number of stories out there just like this one where a deceased individual's family with dispute law enforcements official ruling and maintain that their loved one was a victim of foul play. However, this is one of those rare cases where law enforcement eventually changed their mind and came to believe that the victim's death might have really been a

homicide. After all, Chris's case is still officially unsolved, and there has been speculation that his death might be connected to a phenomenon known as the smiley faced murder theory, but you'll hear our thoughts on that a little later. As it is, this is a very odd case in which it's incredibly difficult to come up with a concrete theory which makes one hundred percent complete sense.

Well, I'm really excited to hear more about this case because, like you said, typically we hear where families are advocating for police and medical examiners to take a look at their case and say, this is not a suicide, this was not an accident, and what ninety percent of the time they're shut down because a ruling is a ruling. There's a reason they came to that

conclusion, and many people are not willing to take a second look. But in this case, they actually changed the ruling to homicide, which is a really big deal. I'm looking forward to understanding how they came to the original accident slash suicide ruling. I'm assuming possibly being under the influence and stumbling off of some hill cliff something, or even jumping from a location would be their

explanation. But and then how they ended up changing that as well. So this smiley faced murder theory, I'm already incredibly intrigued and I can't wait to hear more. Our story begins in Minneapolis in two thousand and two. Our central figure is twenty one year old Chris Jenkins, who was originally born in Eden, Prairie and is entering his senior year as a student at the University

of Minnesota. Chris is an honor student with a three point seven grade point average at the university's Carlston School of Management, and is also a goalie and co captain on the lacrosse team. He's currently living with roommates in a rented house in the Dinkytown district and is preparing to graduate in the spring. On Halloween Night, a cag party took place at Chris's residence, and he dressed

up in the costume of a Native American. At around ten thirty pm, Chris, his girlfriend, Ashley Rice, and three of their friends left the party and went to the Lone Tree Bar and Grill, located at five twenty eight Hennepin Avenue in downtown Minneapolis. Ashley was an employee at the bar, though she was not scheduled to work that night. Since Chris's costume did not have pockets, he asked Ashley to hold his wallet, cell phone, and

keys for him inside her purse. Shortly after midnight on November first, Chris was ejected from the bar. Though the actual circumstances of how this took place have always been up for debate. The most commonly shared story is that a drink was accident spilled on Chris's pants, and when the security supervisor noticed this,

he assumed that Chris had become so intoxicated that he urinated himself. Chris was promptly removed from the bar, and the bouncers standing by the front door reportedly received a radio communication to quote not let the white guy dressed up as an Indian back inside end quote. By this point, Chris had become separated from his friends in the bar and could not inform them about what happened, and unfortunately, his wallet, keys, and cell phone were still inside Ashley's

purse. Not only that, but Chris's coat was left behind and he was not allowed to retrieve it, so he was now trapped outside in cold twenty degree temperatures wearing nothing but his Halloween costume. Since he had been driven there by one of his friends, Chris also had no ride home. He walked away from the bar and was last seen heading north, but unfortunately, this would turn out to be the last time he was confirmed to be alive.

It seems very questionable about what would cause them to not allow part of his party to go out with him, especially if he was highly intoxicated, Like you would think you wouldn't dump somebody outside. You'd figure out who he's with and get them outside and say, hey, your friend's causing a problem,

you need to go. But here it seems like they were pretty negligent of saying, like, listen, this kid's drunk, I'm putting him outside, doesn't have a jacket, it's freezing, and clearly they believe he's incredibly under the influence. So it almost feels like they didn't try to protect him whatsoever. I get he was assumed to be a nuisance there, but why not

allow his party to be reconnected with him and all of them leave. Yeah, Like, even if his death legitimately was an accident, it's pretty much a given that this was negligent behavior in the bar, just ejecting him and not letting him contact his friends and retrieve all his personal items in his coat

and putting him outside in these cold weathers. And we're going to talk about this later on, But there was someone else in the bar who may have had an ulterior motive to ensure that christ was removed, and that might be the reason that happened, But it just seems ridiculous that they see someone spill a drink on his pants and just automatically assume that he urinated himself without even asking for his side of the story. I mean, from what I can

tell, he was not causing a disturbance. He did not look drunk, so it just seems really irresponsible to just kick him out like that. It's almost worse if he is so intoxicated that he did urinate on himself. This is somebody who isn't If that was the case, and I'm not saying that it was, he wouldn't be cognizant enough to be able to phone somebody to come and pick him up. You would almost ensure in those temperatures that he

would potentially freeze to death. And I'm just assuming that these bouncers were twenty something guys, because there isn't any nurturing energy in the bunch here. Just at least let the guy get his coat or let him retrieve his cell phone in his keys. It just seems like such a cruel action to take, even if he was so intoxicated, because lots of people get intoxicated, but

you're putting him in the path of harm here. When Chris's friends could not find him inside the bar, they just assumed he went home on his own. Later that morning, Ashley visited Chris's house to return the items, which he'd kept inside her purse, but he wasn't there, and since there was no sign of his Native American costume, this seemed to indicate that he never returned at all. Words soon reached Chris's parents, Steve and jan Jenkins,

along with his older sister Sarah, that he could not be found. The Jenkins family traveled to Minneapolis and attempted to report him missing, but the Minneapolis Police Department said they could not officially launch a search for him until he was missing for seventy two hours. One officer even tried to tell them that Chris had probably gone off on a road trip somewhere and was quote unquote sowing his

oats. Of course, the Jenkins has found this idea to be ludicrous, since all of his important possessions were left behind at the bar and he had nothing on him at the time, and if Chris had gone to spend the night somewhere, he likely would have called contacted somebody, but none of his friends knew where he was even after the mandatory seventy two hour waiting period ended, it would still be a few more days before the Minneapolis PD took any

action on Chris's case. The Jenkins family decided to organize their own search for Chris, and hundreds of volunteers, many of them students from the University of Minnesota, attempted to look for him. This is the worst. This is of course, because he's over the age of eighteen. They come up with this idea that, look, he probably left on his own. But it's insane these cases we cover where the family in their gut says, no, this isn't like them, Like he went to this party with his friends.

They had clear plans that evening, and he should have arrived back at his residence. There's no reason he shouldn't have come home. And that waiting period is horrifying for the family, who's saying, please listen to us, something's wrong. And here, of course, the police are trying to reassure them by saying, like he's off sewing his oats. He ran off on the road, and a family and the girlfriend and all are saying, no,

you don't understand. This is ridiculous. He left everything of importance, including the people he was with, with no mention of leaving. He did not go on his own. Yeah, I'm sure the police like have to respond to a lot of complaints about students disappearing, and that probably a lot of the time it turns out they just took off on a road trip or something

and came back safely. But in this particular case, it makes no sense because Chris didn't have anything but the clothes on his back, and there's just no way that he would take off without his cell phone or any of his personal items. Okay, And like you're trying to tell us that he's out there sewing his oats a guy that is so drunk that he urinated on himself.

Like, I don't know. I'm sure there's some women out there that wouldn't take issue with that, but I would think that most who he would then approach with a wet crotch looking like he's peede himself, aren't going to be in the mood to be getting down. So I just don't understand this. He's out there sewing his oats with what woman, Like he has a girlfriend? You don't just leave a bar in that state, And that's what's like on your mind, and you're able to successfully achieve it without your wallet,

without your keys, without any other clothes. None of it makes sense. And I find it so triggering because I told you guys about the traumatic experience I had when I was in my addiction, like in my mid twenties, and I left a bar without anything, and I didn't have my coat, I didn't have my wallet, I didn't have anything on me, my

phone was dead, And what a vulnerable position that puts you in. It was one of those situations where luckily I ended up living through it, but in a situation like this, where this situation seems even worse because the temperatures were even lower than what I dealt with. But it was winter when I had my experience, too, so I can completely understand. So if I seem triggered at any point in time during this, you both know why. Oh yeah, I remember that story, and I am glad you were found

safe before they had to get the police involved. And of course, another key difference is that you were dressed in a Native American costume, which is going to look unusual for Chris if he's wearing that the day after Halloween and I don't think he's going to pick up many women while he's dress like that. Due to a lack of interest from police, the Jenkinses hired their own private investigator named Chuck Losch, who went to interview employees from the Lone Tree

Bar and Grill. The security supervisor denied the claims that Chris had been thrown out of the bar, while the other bouncers became very defensive and provided no useful information. It turned out that an off duty police officer named Mike Casey was present at the bar that night in order to work security at the adjacent Henepin Center for the Arts. Ashley Rice knew Casey and had even borrowed the shirt from his police uniform as part of her Halloween costume as a sexy police

officer. When Chris arrived at the bar with Ashley, she introduced him to Casey. Witnesses were called Casey being verys with Ashley. That night, after the bar closed, the owner held an employee meeting, which was attended by Ashley even though she was not working at the time, and when the meeting

ended, it was Casey who gave Ashley a ride home. Rumors circulated that it was Casey who asked the security supervisor to eject Chris from the bar, and there was gossip that he wanted Chris out of the picture so that he could make the moves on Ashley. Chuck Losh's inquiries into the Lone Tree Bar quickly hit a dead end, as the owner essentially issued a gag order for

his employees. He instructed them to stick to the story that Chris walked out of the bar on his own and not to speak with the police or any private investigators without an attorney who represented the bar. Officer. Casey made no attempt to contact the Jenkins family and was never formally questioned by the Minneapolis PDE. According to Chris's parents, the police told them, quote, he's a married man with children. We don't want to break up a family. End

quote. Okay, this is really disturbing because you have an off duty officer who's I'm assuming moonlighting as helping with security there. He supposedly has an attraction to Ashley and wants to get rid of this kid who's with her so that he can make the moves on her. What enrages me is that the police department's time the family listen he's a married man, Like, that's just not in his cards. Okay, that's not in his deck of tools that he

uses to have an affair. If anyone has spent time around high stress, high commitment, and loyalty to other people, and you think that affairs don't take place in the workplace or with people that are interacting with, you're crazy. Almost every law enforcement agency knows that several people in their department are having

extramarital affairs. It's something that when I work with law enforcement, it's like it's just such a high stress, high crazy job and you get to to make deals and sometimes it's for money, sometimes it's for sex, sometimes it's for drugs. It's wild. So the fact that they just pacified and say he's a good man, he's married, He couldn't have done anything to contribute

to this makes me furious exactly. And also considering that I don't know the exact age of Casey, but I assume that he's a number of years older than Ashley, who is still just a university student. But you have to sense that there might be something to this relationship because like how many older men would lend their police officer shirt to like a young girl so she could wear

a sexy police officer costumes. So it just gives me the creeps that like he just wanted to like possibly get her boyfriend under the bar so he could hit on her. And then this guy, this this boyfriend suddenly goes missing and now the police don't want to cooperate because they're more concerned about this married man's reputation. Is that even allowed? Are you even allowed to lend your uniform to other people? Like? I don't think so, that's what I'm

thinking. It does not sound like that goes with regulations because I know that most of the time, if you want to be a sexy police officer, you just buy a costume with a uniform shirt. It just doesn't seem right to be like lending an official uniform as part of the Halloween costume. No,

it's definitely not right. It's like the Tachi way when people borrow someone's military uniform or by a military uniform from a thrift short It's like that was somebody's service uniform, you know, like I don't know, but there's some maybe police officer, no way, but there's something intimate about borrowing somebody's uniform.

Like, I just don't feel like you would just have a casual kind of like just know you on the street or like acquaintance type relationship to lend somebody that, or to feel like you could even ask somebody to borrow that. Don't you guys think, Yeah, it does seem strange. I think like most police officers would be reluctant to do something like that, especially to like a young university girl who's probably like several years younger. She's gonna spill

alcohol all over it, she's wearing it on Halloween night. It doesn't seem like the chance that you're going to get it in Christine conditioned back are that great. And I don't think Casey's wife would approve either. That's exactly what I was just about to say. And I don't think that this amazingly married man who has his family at the forefront would be at the bar on Halloween

night loaning his uniform out either. Chuck Klosh would pursue other leads, which included checking the surveillance footage from two outside cameras at the Federal Reserve Bank. If Chris had attempted to head back to his house after walking away from the bar. The quickest route would have involved walking across the Hennepin Avenue Bridge.

The cameras outside the Federal Reserve Bank pointed directly at the bridge, but there was no sign of Chris at all in any of the surveillance footage from Halloween night or the early morning hours in November the first. The surveillance operator maintained that it would have been impossible for anyone to cross the thousand foot length of

the bridge without being captured on camera. The Jenkins hired the services of some canine units, and two separate bloodhounds would attempt to track Chris's scent from the Lone Tree Bar. On both occasions, the dogs traveled to Times Square Pizza and Subs, located across the street from the bar. Before following Chris is sent into an underground parking garage next door and coming to an end at a

spot in front of parking stalls eighty nine and ninety. In addition, dropless of blood residue, a piece of red string, and red feather fragments which possibly belonged to the headband from Chris's Native American costume, were found in the garage, Though this was all apparently dismissed as potential evidence by the Minneapolis PD.

It's also worth noting that the friend who originally drove Chris to the bar parked their vehicle at another location, so there would have been no logical reason for Chris to enter the garage on his own, So there was no reason for him to go towards a vehicle, maybe thinking Okay, I can meet

my friends at our car. But there does seem to be a scent that ends right there, meaning either he did go that direction and was met by somebody else and taken or went that direction, met with someone else and voluntarily got in the car. But then you add the droplets of blood and the feathers and the string. It's very disturbing. Do they eventually go back and link this evidence to the case, or did they just miss it at the

beginning? It never went back. They do die further into it and look into the possibility that someone affiliated with the bar might have been parked in that garage on that particular night, but they aren't able to conclusively prove if Chris

actually left inside a vehicle. But the idea that they was dismissed right away by the Minneapolis PD is pretty disturbing because like the string and the feather, fragments like those aren't normal things you're just ordinarily going to find a parking garage.

So it seems pretty likely that these did belong to Chris's costume and that he was there at some point, Like at least you think that they would explore the theory that there could have been foul play based on the fact that there seems to be some actual evidence, rather than landing on he's sowing his

wild oats when we have absolutely zero evidence of that transpiring. So more bloodhound tracking was performed in December of that year, and this time they followed Chris's scent outside the parking garage and through the downtown area for four point four miles before it came to an end at the northbound ramp of Interstate ninety four.

This seemed to indicate that Chris had entered or been forced into a vehicle inside the garage, which transported him to another location, while one of the garage's attendants claimed that on Halloween night, either stall eighty nine or ninety had been occupied by a vehicle driven by a bouncer from the Lone Tree Bar. Though it's unclear which one one of the bloodhounds did walk by this person's vehicle and produced a mild hit for Chris's scent, but for whatever reason, there was

no indication that this lead was ever followed up on by law enforcement. It's also worth noting that a weird message was found squawled on one of Chris's missing posters, which was posted only two blocks from the Lone Tree Bar. It read quote loaded in trunk, paid by dollars green end quote. Chuck Losch would also speak with multiple witnesses who were called seeing a group of at least ten people attacking an unidentified mail in front of Times Square, Pizza and Subs

in the early morning hours after Halloween night. It's unclear if the victim was Chris, but it's been theorized that the attack may have been some sort of gang initiation. This is wild. Their initial assumption is Chris had an accident or completed suicide, and yet we have the undercover police officer who might have wanted him out of that bar so he could hit on Ashley. We have a cent that's followed to potentially one of the bouncer's cars with blood present.

We also have a potential gang initiation or attack that happens in that same area. So how when you have these pieces of information, is your gut and an eventual ruling that it's an accident suicide and not undetermined at the least. And at this point, Chris's body has still not been found, and this is December, one year after one month after he went missing, So obviously

this goes against the theory that he was out there sowing his oats. So it makes you wonder why don't they jump into action, like Chris has been gone for over a month now and we have evidence of foul plays, So it just blows my mind that the police are not taking this more seriously.

Well, Chris would continue to remain a missing person until after the new year, but there would finally be answers on February the twenty seventh, two thousand and three, when pedestrians traveling across the Third Avenue Bridge reported seeing a male body floating on the east side of the Mississippi River. The body had gotten wedged in the branches of a large tree located next to the upper Saint Anthony

Falls Dam. The victim was floating on his back with his arms crossed in front of him, and when he was retrieved, he was discovered to be dressed in a Native American costume and conclusively identified as Chris Jenkins. Even though Chris had been drinking before he disappeared, he was not believed to be overly intoxicated, as his blood alcohol level was only zero point one two percent.

There are also traces of the date rape drug GHB in Chris's system, but since GHB is also a substance which can be produced by the body naturally, this did not necessarily mean that Chris was drugged prior to his death. Given the amount of time he was missing, Chris's body had relatively little decomposition. The medical examiner found no signs of foul play, but nothing to suggest that he died of natural causes, so the official cause of death would be listed

as undetermined. The tragedy affected the community in a huge way, so for the first time in their history, the University of Minnesota decided to award Chris a posthumous degree. However, while the Minneapolis PD leaned towards Chris's death being

an accidental drowning or a suicide, his friends and family disagreed. They immediately discounted the suicide theory because Chris showed no signs of depression and was excitedly preparing for the future, as he already had job interviews lined up after his graduation. Yeah, there's nothing here. None of his friends said anything about something going wrong that evening. He had plans after the night out, So it doesn't seem like suicide is one of the explanations I'd at all come to here.

He was separated from his party on Halloween night and wasn't seen for what five months were his body's discovered in the water. So I'm just devastated here. I can't imagine what the family is going through, saying like, Hi, did anyone want to do a thorough investigation? Was anyone going to help us find our son? Or was it just easier to pretending nothing to happen

until you were forced to when the body was discovered. And it's particularly frustrating because this was only a couple miles away from the bar where he originally went missing, and you think to yourself, if anyone had been performing in search of this area, like right after Chris went missing, maybe things would have turned out differently and we'd have more insight into what actually happened to him. There was also some question of how Chris wound up in the river to begin

with, since he had no broken bones. This seemed to discount the idea of him following or jumping off either the third Avenue bridge or the head of an Avenue bridge, which was located approximately one quarter mile northwest from where Chris's body was found. Believe it or not, one police officer stated that perhaps Chris had drowned after jumping into the water while attempting to save a duck.

Misresolved, Yeah, that's clearly how this theory ended up, going from being in the confines of his brain to him speaking it into reality in front of other people as beyond me. Since the Minnesota PD officially considered the case to be closed, the Jenkins family were forced to conduct their own independent investigation and

consulted with noun forensic pathologist doctor Michael Bodden. Doctor Bowden's biggest issue with the accidental drowning theory was that Chris was found with his arms crossed in front of him and he had his hands clenched if one were to accidentally fall into a body of water. Their first natural reaction would be to attempt to swim, which is why drowning victims are usually found face down with their arms out towards

their sides. Their clothing is usually disheveled, and it's not uncommon for one or more of their shoes to be missing, but this was not the case with Chris or his Halloween costume, as his nylon shirt was tucked into his drawstring pants and he was still wearing both of his oversized slip on moccasins. Chrisma's family also found it unusual that he was found with no bruising on his

body. Since he was a lacrosse goalie, it was very common for Chris to get bruises on his legs or forearms, and he'd played in two games and gone to practice during the day before he vanished. Since these bruises were not present on Chris's body, this led to speculation that he was alive for at least three or four days after he went missing, allowing enough time for his bruises to heal. Who There's a lot to think about in this part, Okay, So if he had been a victim of an attack, then

he would have definitely had bruising even three to four days later. And it seems odd to me that you would hold a person like Chris captive. He's twenty one years old, he's a strong athlete, and you would have him in the same close. He wouldn't be beaten those kinds of things. I'm wondering how you would hold somebody like that against their will for three to four

days and then dump their body. And it does seem like something had happened and he was then placed in that location, because, like you said, Jules, if he had been alive and conscious at all, he would have been trying to save his own life, not the duck's life, but his own life. And yeah, I would have probably taken that stupid, you know, Native American costume off and put him in something else if I was holding him hostage for several days. It just none of it makes sense for

any of the explanations. If he was held for three or four days, we would likely see either needle marks because you'd have to sedate him in some capacity, or you would see bruising on the wrist because they would have to bind him in some way to be able to control him. You would either need drugs or the ability to bind him. So it just doesn't really seem to line up with like what you said, Ash, Like his costume is pristine and he doesn't have bruises all over his body, so how would they

have been able to subdue him? And I don't put much credence into the bruises thing, because even though it was common practice for him to get bruises while playing lacrosse, I don't think anyone is one hundred percent sure that he got bruises in the games and the practice that he went through right before he went missing. So for all we know, he may not have had any bruises on his body at that point before he went missing. So this is kind of a red herring, okay, And like, I just have a

few questions about the duck. So do ducks often get into dire straits in the water? Do ducks often get into situations where they could be potentially drowning? And how would Chris be able to spot this duck in the dark and know that the duck was in danger? Did the duck quack out for help? Yeah, that makes me wonder how does a duck get into danger in the water unless it's going into the path of an oncoming boat or something like that. I don't think you should be too worried if you see a duck,

They're not going to drown. So yeah, I do not know what this police officer was thinking. And that why you would actually say this out loud in front of Chris's family. Sounds like a theory that somebody would come up with while they were like smoking a joint or something, and they'd be laughing about with their friends, not an actual theory that you would share in

public with other human beings. It's embarrassing. Hydrologists from the University of Minnesota's River Lab, who are known for profiling the Mississippi River, were also consulted about this case, and they had a hard time believing that Chris's body could

have in the river the entire time he was missing. While temperatures during Minneapolis winters can often get cold enough to freeze over the Mississippi River, this did not actually occur during the months after Chris went missing, and the first real

freeze occurred in early January of two thousand and three. After that, there were three separate periods of daytime thawing, with the last one occurring on February to twenty seventh, right before Chris was discovered, So if Chris's body had originally gone into the river shortly after he went missing, it likely would have

flowed downstream and been seen during those four months. The area beneath the third Avenue Bridge was also searched by police and canine units on multiple occasions in November of two thousand and two, and they never saw any sign of Chris. It turned out that there were large amounts of snow and ice on Chris's upper body, particularly his right hand, which seemed to indicate that they had been exposed to the elements, and the last day a major precipitation in the area

was February third. If Chris was already in the water by that point, then his body likely would have been placed there at a different location, possibly after he was already dead. It may have floated downstream for a short period of time before it got caught and froze into some tree branches, but wound

up being concealed for weeks after the river froze over. When the river on thought in February the twenty seventh, that's when Chris's body became visible, Chuck Losh spoke to witnesses who had crossed the Third Avenue Bridge on February the twenty sixth, the day before Chris was discovered, who looked down into the river

and were certain his body was not there. On February the twenty seventh, another witness who crossed the bridge claimed that they saw Chris's body entangled in tree branches about one hundred yards away from the spot where he was eventually recovered. She called nine one one, but it seems likely that before police arrived, the body had floated in the direction of the upper Saint Anthony Falls damn. When the tree branches got stuck, they prevented Chris from going over the falls.

The hydrologists also theorized that Chris's body originally entered the river approximately one mile from where he was found. This meant his possible entry point would have been northwest of the Hennepin Avenue Bridge, a location Chris had no reason to visit on his own if he was attempting to walk from the bar to his residence on the night he vanished. Another unusual anomaly was that the combined weight of Chris's lungs seemed to equal half the weight a one normal, healthy lung.

This seemed to suggest that his cause of death may not have been drowning, but suffocation, possibly by having a plastic bag tied around his head. If he was murdered in that passion, that could account for why there were no noticeable signs of foul play on his body. Could he also have been smothered with a pillow or something that wouldn't have required physical hands or a ligature around his neck? That's true. Yeah, a pillow and also a bag like

anything that was not going to leave any noticeable marks. And it makes sense where you look at Chris's body is almost in pristine condition. They said there was very little decomposition, which allowed them to see that there weren't really signs of physical attacks on his body. But it seems like he was really frozen in the water the whole time, so that would preserve it and keep it as if it had just been placed there. But it could have been there

for months based on what you were saying, correct, it's true. Yeah, like it could have been there for months, but just in a location where it cannot be seen by the general public. Yeah. I don't put much credence in the girl either, who said I'm or the person who said I'm positive that they were not there that day, you know, the February twenty sixth, and then someone says, February twenty seventh, he was there. Yes, his body could have moved, but someone would have just been

wrong as well. You could just glance down and you might not see it. One thing I do find really startling is the way that he's posed. It almost seems to be like a funerary posed, right when you pose somebody with their arms crossed, like across their chest. It just doesn't seem to be the way that somebody would drown. But I don't think that he would

be moved to that position at that point. It just seems likely that with the freezing, his body then became visible and those eyewitness maybe just didn't get a good enough look or were mistaken. Maybe they just weren't at a good vantage point when they chose to glance down there. We talk about eyewitnesses all the time and how easy it is to be incorrect, but to believe wholeheartedly that what you were saying is the truth because you were recalling it as your

truth, but it just isn't really the universal truth. Yeah, if someone asked me months after the fact, Hey, when you were walking across the bridge on this particular day, did you happen to glance down into the water, It's like, I'm not going to remember that with accuracy. So I may convince myself that I look down, but in actuality I may not have

been looking at all. In two thousand and four, Stephen Jan Jenkins had a meeting with the newly appointed Minneapolis Police Chief Bill McManus, who assured them that a new investigation would be launched into Chris's death. But it would only be a month and a half later when Chief McManus sent them a letter informing them that the case was now officially closed. A surprising discovery was made during

the spring of two thousand and six. During a review of autopsy photographs, one of the Jenkins' neighbors noticed what appeared to be a clump of hair clutched in Chris's left hand, and sure enough, this hunch turned out to be accurate, as human hair was found sealed in an envelope simply labeled foreign matter

in left hand, which is why it had never been tested. DNA testing would eventually determine that the hair did belong to Chris, though there was no explanation for why he was clutching a clump of his own hair in his hand anyway. By this point, Bill McManus was no longer Minneapolis Police chief,

and another man named Tim Dolan had been appointed to the position. The jenkinses decided to present their findings about Chris's death to Chief Dolan, and this time the new evidence seemed to make a strong impression, as Dolan ordered the case to be reopened. Later that year, Stephen jan would be called into a meeting with the medical examiner and two officers from the homicide unit, who finally

conceded that Chris had likely been a victim of foul play. On November twentieth, two thousand and six, Chief Dolan held a press conference in which he announced that Chris's death had now been reclassified as a homicide, and he even issued a formal public apology. He stated, quote, we made an assumption, and because of that assumption, we probably caused pain. Well, I know we caused pain in the Jenkins family, more pain than they had to

suffer and then they already had suffered. And for that, for the Minneapolis Police Department, I want to apologize to the Jenkins family. End quote. Stephen jan accepted their apology and there would be some new developments in the investigation.

Let me just say, holy heck. When do we ever hear of a whole department taking accountability and the police chief saying, I'm pretty sure we messed up and I owe a big apology to this mom and dad who lost their son and were not given straightforward answers and were kind of misled for the last four years. That alone, when I work with families, the validation, the respect, the just empathy that you show for a family like what

Chief Dolan did. Wow. Wow. Even though they didn't have answers in two thousand and six, they did get a piece of the puzzle where they said, we were heard, we were believed. Chris received a form of justice that day by saying he didn't take his own life. This was no drunken accident. Our baby went to a Halloween party, was being a twenty one year old kid, and he lost his life due to somebody else's hands. It's interesting when you talk about the fact that Chris could have had his

own hair or did have his own hair in his hands. What if he was being smothered by a pillow, had a sweatshirt tied around his face really tight or something, and he's gripped at the edge of that material, trying to rip it off of his head, trying to pull a huge blanket pressed against him, a big pillow press against him, and he's gripping at his head so hard that he's pulling his hair out and his hands clenched like that

in his death. That would make sense to me because I think that if this was an accidental drowning, like I'm sure he would be flailing his arms and trying to clutch onto something. But if you're in the water, I'm not sure you can get enough momentum to literally pull your own hair out of your head. But if you're being held down and struggling like you're being suffocated or something, then yes, I think it is possible that you might pull

your own hair out just out of desperation. I think that's a good theory. Ash That makes total sense to me. Around the same time period, an investigator revealed that there was a suspect slash witness and custody in another state on an unrelated charge. Well, it would turn out that a witness had told authorities that they were present when Chris was murdered. They said an acquaintance of theirs attempt to rob Chris on Hallowey Night in two thousand and two and

proceeded to toss him off the Hennepin Avenue Bridge into the Mississippi River. However, there were some major credibility issues with this story. As you recall, none of the security cameras at the Federal Reserve Bank captured footage of Chris walking onto this bridge on the night he went missing. The bridge was also brightly lit and had heavy traffic at all hours of the night, so it seemed unlikely that anyone could have thrown a person into the river from there without any

witnesses seeing anything. If that wasn't enough, the bridge also had a high safety railing, along with a steel support beam and vertical metal cables. If Chris had been thrown over the railing, he certainly would have hit the beam and the cables on the way down, but he had no injuries on his

body. In July two thousand and seven, the Hennepin County District Attorney's office announced that they had been approached by the Minneapolis pd about filing charges against the suspect for Chris's murder, but they ultimately declined to do so, but would not provide any further details. So, okay, in July two thousand and seven, they say that they're going to arrest somebody right file charges and nothing happened. That's true. Yeah, And at the time they did not provide

any details about the suspect or what evidence they had against them. But we're going to talk about it later. But there are some other people who committed another murder in Minnesota that I do believe that this is the suspect they were planning to arrest, but for whatever reason, they just decided against it. But I don't think this person has ever been eliminated as a suspect. Let me ask you this. Have the other people that we've looked at before.

We had the bouncer at the bar, we had the police officer who was off duty, and we had the individuals that they think were attacking some one at the pizza place. Were any of those people interviewed and excluded as suspects or were they always on the suspect list. It's never been officially confirmed. Like the gang members who attacked the guy near the pizza place. I don't think they ever identified who those people were, and the details about the bouncers

are very vague. I'm not entirely sure if they were questioned. I don't even know, like if the identities of the bouncers have been released publicly. And of course Officer Casey, they didn't want to interview him back in two thousand and two because he was a married man and they didn't want to damage his reputation. But I would like to think that when Chief Dolan took power, he did finally have Casey interviewed, but I don't think they found any

evidence that he was directly complicit in Chris's murder. In two thousand and nine, John Jenkins published a book titled Footprints of Courage, which celebrated Chris's life but also expressed the family's frustration at having his death ignored by the Minneapolis PD for four years. Well Jan greatly admired Chief Dolan's attempts to make things right,

she also found herself dissatisfied with the lack of progress from investigators. Since Chris's case was reopened in twenty eighteen, The case was featured on episode of the true crime investigation Discovery TV series Breaking Homicide, which revealed some new pieces of information for starters. On the same night Chris disappeared, two men nearly got into an altercation at the Lone Tree Bar because one of the men had walked in off the street and was attempting to hit on the other's girlfriend.

Chris apparently intervened and attempted to play peacemaker in order to get both sides to cool down. A fight never wound up taking place, but it's unclear if the incident played a role in Chris getting ejected from the bar. The show also contained an interview with an anonymous informant who shared an unsettling story about frequenting the Lone Tree Bar about two months before Chris went missing. This man had contacted the Jenkins family fifteen years earlier, but this was the first time that

he was willing to go on the record. The informant claimed that he ordered a drink at the bar, which he thought tasted weird, so he decided to go outside. The gets a mare. However, as he was walking, he could feel himself losing his senses, and he then remembered two bouncers grabbing him and removing him from the bar to take him towards a parked vehicle

outside. The informant was able to pull out his phone and contact one of his friends inside the bar, who quickly showed up and intervened before he could be placed in the vehicle. The informant now suspected that someone had drugged his drink with JHB and that this was an attempted abduction. Well, that's absolutely horrifying since we know for a fact that he's kicked out of the bar under circumstances that don't seem very threatening, and it wasn't like he was in a

fight, It wasn't like he was making people feel uncomfortable. He's kicked out of the bar. We know that a scent is tracked to a parking location where we believe at least one of the bouncers was parked, and there was blood there. So if this informant is telling the truth, his situation very much could align with what happened to And we know that Chris had a presence of GHB in his body. Now, he did not have a very high blood alcohol content. It was point one two, which is over the legal

driving limit. But that doesn't mean that you're, you know, incredibly intoxicated necessarily, and we do know that once you pass away the GHB, those chemical components can present themselves in decomposition. But what if he actually was slipped GHB and what if he was taken to that parking spot where the bouncer was and abducted the way that this individual says they almost were. Yeah, and it's such a strange story. And unfortunately we still don't know the identity of

the anonymous informant and know how much credibility he has. But it's the way he describes it. It's like, does this bar just have like this crew of bouncers who like to sleep slip GHB into the drinks of men and then like attempt to abduct them. Because he specifically said that these bouncers were taking

me towards a parked vehicle before my friend intervened. And I keep wondering, like, did you tell the police about this back when this happened right before Chris went missing, because it should be a major red flag if it feels like this bar is drugging people and then trying to abduct him. I wonder if they were too embarrassed to say something. I mean, you're you're a man, and you were somehow compromised, and you have grown men trying to

take you somewhere. I wonder if it's one of those things where it's like, geez, I'm never going back there, and I'm going to tell everybody I know not to go there. But I'm kind of embarrassed or I don't really understand what happened to me, so maybe I'm crazy. I wonder if there was a lot of that going on in this individual's head. I think it's likely if it indeed did go down like that, it would be something

that you would have those feelings of shame. But I also question, like from another perspective, if those bouncers were in there and they were somehow trying to drug people with GHB or maybe the bartenders work, I would think the likely targets would be women or girls and people that they're going to take advantage

of. Less likely going to be the cross place saying men. I mean, there's a potential there, but imagine a scenario where they're trying to drug a girl but by accident he got this guy got the drink, and so rather than have you know, him be a huge puddle and mess outside and have potentially the police get involved, because now other people are going to find out that he's been drugged, and then there could be kind of finds levied

against the bar or an investigation that they then were going to put him into a vehicle and just dump him elsewhere, so that it wasn't their problem.

That is true, Like it couldn't have been. It may not have been like an attempt to abduct him and kill him, because if it was just like an accident where they drugged the wrong drink and like the intended target was a young woman, it may just be a case where, well, if we take him out of here and dump him, he'll have no memory of what happened, and he won't have anything if he wants to contact the police.

But the biggest revelation on breaking homicide involved the convicted murderer named Jeremy Alford. In two thousand and five, Jeremy and his younger brother Luis Alford were charged with the murder of a man named Douglas Miller. They were both sharing a mobile home with Miller in New Brighton, Minnesota, and were about to be evicted before they proceeded to stab and bludgeon Miller to death. The brothers

were captured in their home state of Iowa the following day. Jeremy eventually pleaded guilty to first degree murder and received a life sense, while Louise was found guilty of second degree murder and received a twenty five year sins Anyway, Jeremy Alfred would tell the FBI that he was involved with a gang of killers known as the Dealers of Death, who had murdered between thirty to forty people, and his right hand man was a guy nicknamed Zami Lei with a Z.

A female informant supposedly told police that Alfred had bragged about murdering Chris Jenkins, and Alford apparently did divulge some information which suggested that he had inside knowledge about

what happened on the breaking homicide episode. Another anonymous informant, who was apparently a former member of local law enforcement, claimed that Alfred and his crew were regular patrons at the l Loane Tree Bar and may have been there on the same night as Chris's disappearance and gotten into a scuffle with him when contacted to inquire about his potential involvement in Chris's case. Alfred simply responded, quote, I really don't want to talk about any crime I have been charged with or

convicted of. End quote. Thus far, there is no conclusive evidence to implicate Alfred, and the death of Chris Jenkins continues to remain unsolved. So I guess you could say the path went Chile. Is it possible that Alfred is one of the individuals that was getting in a fight that Chris tried to break up. It is possible, yes, I mean, they've never been able to conclusively determine if he was in the bar that night, but I

do think that's a possibility. And I also think it's possible that Alfred was the suspect that they were planning to charge with murder in two thousand and seven before they decided against it. But because they haven't revealed that information publicly, it's all just speculation. Okay, So I don't mind saying this straight away.

I'm really not sure what to make of this case. On the surface, if you didn't delve too deeply into this story, it would be easy to assume that Chris's death was nothing more than a tragic accident and that he somehow fell into the river while attempting to walk. Hope. The condition of his body seems to go against him having fallen from a bridge, But one theory I've seen pushed forward is that perhaps Chris walked down to the edge of

the river somewhere in order to relieve himself, but accidentally fell in. Of course, even if there was no foul play, you could still argue that the bouncers from the Lone Tree Bar and Grill, which is no longer in business in case you were wondering, were guilty of negligence because they tossed Chris outside on a cold winter night without even allowing him to retrieve his coat, whilet cell phone and keys. It doesn't sound like Chris actually did anything to

justify being ejected, so you can understand his family's frustration. I just mentioned this case's appearance on the TV series Breaking Homicide in case you've never watched it. It was co hosted by police detective Derek Lavassor, who has since gone on to co host the pod cast Crime Weekly, and forensic psychologist Chris Muhandi. What's interesting is that while a Vassor firmly believed that Chris was the victim

of foul play, Mohandi still leaned towards his death being an accident. Former Minneapolis police Chief Tim Dolan was also interviewed on the episode, and he actually stated that while he did have the case reclassified as a homicide, he now felt that the percentage of likelihood for Chris's death being a homicide was fifty percent, accident around thirty percent, and suicide twenty percent or less. However, it cannot be underestimated just how uncommon it is for law enforcement to do a

complete one eighty like Dolan did. Like I stated in the intro, I have seen countless cases like this on shows like Unsolved Mysteries, where a victim's death is officially ruled to be a suicide or an accident, but their family is convinced it was foul play. They'll subsequently do things like hire their own independent investigator who will review all the evidence and concur with their assessment that it

was murder. But in spite of this, ever changes. But here a big city police chief had the death reclassified as a homicide, ordered the investigation to be reopened, and made a formal public apology to the Jenkins family that type of situation is pretty rare and demonstrates to me that the evidence pointing towards foul play must have been fairly convincing. Even if Dolan is now confirmed that he can't say with one hundred percent certainty that it was murder. I never

believed for a second that Chris's death was a suicide. And while one can't completely discount the possibility of an accident, you would have to come up with explanations to account for a number of odd things which don't make much sense. At the very least, you have to feel that someone else was directly involved

with what happened to Chris. Yeah. Absolutely, the way his body was located, in the clump of hair in his hand, and the fact that he's sitting there with his arms crossing, his hands clenched, it just doesn't seem like an accident. It seems like if it was an accident, he would have tried to brace his fall, he would have tried to swim. There just would have been so many other physical signs that he was fighting for

his life. Here it looks like he was deceased. His arms were crossed and he was placed in the water, and then Rigamortus could have said it, and maybe he stays in that seated position or in that cross position even

when his body floats down the river. It's maddening to me. If you guys remember about two pages back, I said, Oh my gosh, how profound is this that this is in two thousand and six, such a healing moment for the family to say, the police chief apologized, the police chief validated us, and then you have the same police chief say, I mean, I don't really know what happened. I'm fifty percent sure it's a homicide, thirty percent sure it's an accident, and twenty percent sure it's a suicide.

Can you imagine being the family members sitting there who have been fighting since two thousand and two for justice for their son hearing that statement alone. I really feel for the family, like that would just be so heartbreaking, especially we're like, okay, well, he's a fifty percent that it's likely homicide. I'm sure the Dolan worked tirelessly to get that ruling reverse so that it

was ruled to be a homicide and not just accidental. At the end of the day, I guess there's just not enough concrete evidence and I think that goes back to the police initially not investigating and not asking the right questions of the right people up front. And like when we're looking at a situation where

we've got this feather, we've got the blood. We have these issues with Casey and his girlfriend Ashley, where maybe they had a relationship, maybe they didn't, but either way, Casey's trying to get Chris out of the way. And then we've got these bouncers who reject him in this irresponsible way.

And then we have his lungs, which I only had about half the weight, which was really something that would have been more indicative of somebody who was strangled or suffol hated, So that doesn't seem to line up with drowning. And then, like Ashley pointed out with her brilliant theory of a bag could have been placed over his head while he's clutching, he's grabbing, grabs a tuft of hair. Would you really see that in an accident If you're drowning

thrashing your arms, why would you grab your hair? And then the position that his body is found in it seems to lean personally to me more towards homicide. But you know, you can never conclusively say when we just don't have the answers, and we can't go back retroactively and ask the right questions of people, because at the time they didn't want to break up happy families and that was their justification, and they thought he was out sowing his wild

oats. Yeah, I really hope that Dolan told the family about that whole fifty percent line and they didn't learn about it for the first time on national television when he said that, I mean to be fair, This is twelve years later, So perhaps after further investigation, Dolan did find evidence which showed that there was a less likelihood of homicide and that maybe it was an accident. But like we mentioned earlier, back in two thousand and seven, they

came very close to arresting someone in charging them with Chris's murder. So it makes you wonder what has happened within the past decade that has made Dolit less certain that homicide took place. But you have to feel that there's a lot of information that they have just never shared with the public. So I think this would be a good time to bring an end to Part one. But join us next week as we present Part two of our series about the unexplained

death of Chris Jenkins. Robin, do you want to tell us a little bit about the Trail Went Cold? Patreon? Yes, The Trail Cold Patreon has been around for three years now, and we offer these standard bonus features like early ad free episodes, and I also send out stickers and sign thank

you cards to anyone who signs up with us on Patreon. If you join our five dollars tier tier two, we also offer monthly bonus episodes in which I talk about cases which are not featured on the Trail Went Cold's original feed, so they're exclusive to Patreon, and if you join our highest tier tier

three, the ten dollars tier. One of the features we offer is a audio commentary track over classic episodes of Unsolved Mysteries, where you can download an audio file and then boot up the original Unsolved Mysteries episode on Amazon Prime or YouTube and play it with my audio commentary playing in the background, where I just provide trivia and factoids about the cases featured in this episode. And incidentally, the very first episode that I did a commentary track over was the episode

featuring this case. So if you want to download a commentary track in which I make more smart ass remarks about Jewel Kaylor. Then be sure to join Tier three. So I want to let you know a little bit about the Jules and Ashy patreons. So there's early ad free episodes of The Path Went Chili. We've got our Path Went Chili mini's, which are always over an hour, so they're not very mini, but they're just too short to turn into a series and we're really enjoying doing those. So we hope you'll check

out those patreons. We'll link them in the show notes. So I want to thank you all for listening, and any chance you have to share us on social media with a friend or direct ate review is greatly appreciated. You can email us at The Pathwentchili at gmail dot com. You can reach us on Twitter at the Pathwink. So until next time, be sure to bundle up because cold trails and Chili pass call for warm clothing. Music by Paul Rich from the podcast Cold Callers Comedy

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android