The o'chilly Effect is sponsored by Wall Street Window dot Com and listeners like you nowelly on here we are. It is the sixth day of September. Is it the sixth I think it is, let's see it is. It's the sixth day of September, or allegedly according to that thing we call a calendar. And this is a show you might have been looking for. It's the Ochilly Effect and I'm live here on a Wednesday, and it's definitely a wildcard swore tonight. If you're hearing me on the live stream, it's great.
I know we went to air real late about quarter after or well more more than quarter after jeez. Anyways, it doesn't matter if you're hearing the podcast or if you're catching the video. Now, I was going to have my my friend here on the video directly, but there was a little bit of an issue with technical stuff and sound and all that. So this time we're not going to see him on video, but I've got him on audio.
His name is Alex Harris. Now somebody might say, hey, I might recognize that name, and others might say I have no idea who the heck. That is no problem either way. He's conducting research though, And he's conducting research and a specified area regarding the JFK assassination, and that is the photographic evidence. Okay. I had a fairly long conversation with him on the phone just the other day and was introduced to the idea of this young man
by people that are organizing the Lancer conference. Guess why he'll be presenting. And I'm fairly certain he is the youngest presenter ever to go to any of the Lancer conferences, maybe any of the conferences on the Kennedy assassination and actually present reminds me of my own story because I started when I was still in high school. Taking a look at this event seriously, now, does that mean that this kid is anything like me? No, he's not, because
he's not Juleman of Delinquent and he's younger. Okay, So at the age of thirteen, here he is, and he's going to be fourteen when he presents at Lancer this year. Really fascinated at how much he has his stuff together regarding the assassination is knowledge. The historiography of the photographic evidence alone is better than most of the people I run into claim to have some sort of expertise in general on the assassination already. Plus he's looking to assemble archives,
this and that. Maybe he's going to tell you a bunch more, but first we're going to find out a little bit about his background and how he got into the case right here on the show. And before I even get to that, Alex, how are you doing tonight? I'm doing good. It is really good to have you on. I'm really happy to have you on strange situation. I never thought and could never get, say, my own kids to take a look at the Kennedy assassination as teenagers. When I
was a teenager, I was definitely all alone looking at the case. None of my friends who were musicians, none of my friends who were also well, some of them were hoodlums and such. They were not all good kids, okay, and hardly anybody wanted to know about the Kennedy assassination or any of that crap. I was a nut onto myself, and I'm being blunt here. You First of all, you're you're a nice guy. You're you're
a level guy. You don't sound like the average thirteen year old to me to begin with, and clearly you're not because you're into the assassination, so let's let's go for it. And I don't even know the details of this story, guys, I'm gonna learn this along with you, Like how he actually got into the case. I kind of asked a couple of questions about it, but didn't really get the full story. So I'm gonna let Alex just tell you. So you're ready to roll and tell us exactly how it
is. You just decided that this was a big point of interest for you. I mean, in your own words, go for it. Yeah, I got I've knew. I'm known for a while about the assassination. I've known that it happened. It wasn't until about towards the end of when I
was in fifth grade that I really started getting into it. I just so happened to be on YouTube and I watched the Subpreterer film the first time, and something about it just got me interested in the case, and I just got looked at I looked into it a little bit because I had never looked into it that much before. And well, so what you're saying, yeah, So what you're saying is it's just you stumbled across the Supruder film on
YouTube, and that's it. I mean, you just saw that and you went, Okay, I know about the assassination, but now I've seen the Supruder film. Something is wrong with this idea? Is something is wrong with the image I'm seeing. I mean, what was it that grabbed you? Just like wow? That's it. That's what people have talked about over the years that I was sort of familiar with. Yeah, okay, fair enough. So what what came next? I mean, you saw the Supprter film.
That's striking. It was available on YouTube. By the way, do you know what channel or what version of the Supruter film you were looking at? Because there were a few on on YouTube, I believe. I think a lot of people have launched this version. It's for some reason. A
French magazine posted a version straight from the MPI digitation decizations. It's a very low quality, but it's is acceptable, right, So what you're telling me is that the French magazine, which by the way, I can't remember the name or probably pronounced it myself, but you're you're saying the MPI version.
Now, for the uninitiated out there, we are talking about the home video version that was released, most likely under the title image of an assassination, and it was done through vhs actually in the late eighties, and MPI released a series of documentaries and other things related to the jfkks during that time. But quite famously, there was a reconstruction, a scanning the better qualities of
bruder film. For a long time was contained on that videotape, which I don't even know if they turned it into a DVD, because it was popular for a bit at your local blockbuster for sure back in the day. But there it is yet transferred onto YouTube by some French magazine. I recall that video. I don't know if it's up anymore. Actually I think it is okay. But but either way, I mean, there are many different versions. Some people have reconstructed them, restabilized them in different ways, shown us
the Sprocket holes not the Sprocket holes. Did you start to dig into that on YouTube as well? Like, let me see what other versions there are. I certainly looked for other versions of it, and I did find quite a few. Well, at one point you could have stumbled across one on my channel when I still had a channel a couple of years ago. Yeah, because I mean it seemed like anybody was interested in the case had some sort of copy of the Subruder film up there, even though the Suprter family
retained the copyright. And then, uh you know, sold the allegedly extant film in the nineties to the US government and then donated their copy of the film to the sixth Floor Museum as a tax write off. I'm sure you learned that story later on, but that was the process of what the records collection, right, So, look, the Subruder films one thing, But what happens next? Because the Subruder film is not the beginning in the end
of the photographic universe here. So what was the next step after you were captivated by the Z film? Uh? You know, did you watch Oliver Stone's JFK? Did you catch other documentaries? Did you turn on I know, Grandpa, nobody watches TV anymore, but did you turn on the History
channel? I mean, tell me about it? What was next? I mean, I know I was certainly interested in looking at other photographs around the assassination, so I started looking for those, and I eventually stumbled upon the next film and the much more film, which both of them I washed, of course, Yeah, right, Okay, So then you got the films from the other side of the street, two of them at least. And okay, so those contain the sequence which also contains the headshot, just like
the subruder film. Logical progression, all right, So the motion pictures are one thing, and then if you dig deep enough into that rabbit hole, you find that really the filming around Dally Plaza. You've got tony something films there, everything from Pascal to Darnell, to Cook to Zabruder and on and on. And no, I didn't put him in alphabetical order. Why bother all the way to Jack Daniels film which Jack Daniel and the s is for it belonging to him. Jack Daniels film, who was on the other side
of the Triple Underpass as the limo passes through. And so you have a bunch of films in this sequence, even the film which is captured by the US government right the made into a documentary what was it called The Last Two Days something like this, And okay, so there's a lot of footage. Now where do we go. Did you see guidance, did you start to read, did you get into documentaries or what was next? Yeah? I certainly did look into watching some documentaries. I don't I can't remember how many
I watched, but I did watch quite a few. Those definitely got me more interested in the assassination and eventually stumbled across other images surrounding the assassination. And yeah, but the photographic and motion picture evidence to something I've always been interested in from the start. Well, here's another question. Were you interested in photographs or photographic evidence of any other historical events or was this the first
one that grabbed you? Because clearly there are other events which have been photographed, not quite as much, it seems as this, which is odd from various amateur cameras mostly, but some professional cameras captured many events surrounding this historical event of significance. But did you study any other historical events or were you just like a photograph photography above? Did you just like cameras? I mean,
tell me about that as well. I mean, I know, since I was sairly young, I have been interested in other historical events such as the Hindenburg disaster and god, I can't think of another one right now, but I did look into those quite a bit, but not none nearly as much as what I'm doing now. Of course, Well there's not the same library of stuff. Look, with the Hindenburg, there's only two films as far as I know, two motion picture films, you know, I think
there's six to wow. Okay, well you know what, the one that was discovered later. I think Mike contained clips to all put together, the one that I'm thinking of as a second film. Maybe there are six, but I only know too. And by the way, I used to live and work right by lake Hurst Naval Base, Wow, you know, in New Jersey. So it was a point of interest for me as local history. Uh, an interesting place to be in general. And of course that
is a fascinating thing. Everybody's familiar with the radio oh god, the humanity and all that, you know, the radio replay and of course the most iconic film of it. Most people believe there's only one film, but there are indeed more than one film, and maybe they're six. I'd like to see that. Maybe you can send me a couple of links to something later and I'd love to learn about it. But anyway, yeah, so,
okay, the Hindenburg, so history and film coming together. You could even take a look at the still photos you know, from an assassination one hundred years earlier than Kennedy, if you wanted to to study some interesting photographic archives that were kept by the US government, even including the execution of the conspirators when it comes to uh, you know, the Lincoln assassination. Right. But anyway, so Kennedy got you, and you had sort of a general
interest in history and film. All right, so let's take this further. What goes on next? I mean, what drives you to next really study this and get into the stills and everything else. I mean the arrays that you can get a hint of from say Robert Groden's books, which you know, contain what eight hundred and a thousand pictures of piece each of these things. I mean, I've got it right here just as a point of reference. I didn't know if we were going to bring anything up, so I
was gonna reference them. I got the Search for le rvy Oswald Absolute Proof and the Killing Book I dropped something, but the Killing of a President. Have them right here in case we needed to go to them. But the books are interesting and they give you, you know, copies of a lot of things. But you didn't want just the copies you went after other things, So tell me about that when you started to try and collect and what
your sources were. I mean, give us all an idea about what's the next step for somebody who wants to dig deeply into the film as far as you're concerned still or movie. I mean, I know, uh, gosh, what upset I think? Definitely, I've been interested in all the copies of everything for I can't remember what I was gonna say, dang it, but you know it's okay. First of all, let's just tell you guys listening right now, that you know I don't believe Alex has done a podcast
at all before h in a long format like he's doing right now. I think this is the first time ever, and I'm fairly certain this is the first time you've done it talking about this case. So it's not like this is old hat for you. This is brand new. In case somebody's wondering, why is he forgetting what he's saying, it's all right, first of
all. Secondly, even though that voice is really mature, again, I'm talking to a guy who's at this point in time thirteen, and when he presents at Lancer this year, he'll be fourteen, and I'm not making excuses for you. You spoke quite eloquently to me on the phone, and you're doing a good job. Now, don't worry about it. If you lose track of a thought, just fill it in with another. I am trying to discover just how you got here, is all I'm trying to get to.
And I want to show people what that is, what that journey might contain. So you take your time and tell it your own way. We're here to listen. Go go right ahead, and I'm happy to hear it anyway you tell it. Yeah, I wanted to go back to something you said earlier about the Hindenberg. Sure of one of the films of The Assassin of the Hindenburg. Gosh, but I was shot by a person named Thomas Joseph P. Craven whose fun actually was in the Dallas Motorcade, who's known
as Thomas Joseph Craven Junior. And of course I'm sure several people know about the Missing Daily Plants, a Craven film. But yeah, I think that's interesting keywork for CBS. Okay, that is an interesting and odd connection. We often find that there are weird h connective tissues between figures and events in history. Uh did not know. You just gave me a fact. I didn't know that there was a connection between the craven who took the film the
Hindenberg and the craven in the motorcade. There that is interesting, thank you? So okay, cool, go ahead. What else did you want to tell us about? I think that's all I can think of right now. If I did you have any other questions? Yeah, no problem Again, I want to go back to what was the next thing? I mean, did you, uh, you know, get get some books? Maybe you got Roden's books like I mentioned, because those would be easily accessible, or
a book we talked about off air the other day. Pictures of the Pain was a really interesting resource course for me at a certain point. I was really glad to see when that book came out, okay, because it helped me a lot trying to collect things in the days before the internet, you know. Yeah, and I needed it in the days before we started swapping things on message boards and we're no longer doing it by chain letter. Yeah, so it was. It was helpful. But I mean, which book
or what did you turn to next to give you a reference? Guide or give you an idea of what the photographic evidence could possibly contain if you were to attempt to collect it all. Say, I think I did go to the Harold Wiseburg archives, which are there's quite a bit of it online. It's just a resource that I stumbled upon. I can't remember when, but it's certainly a useful thing. There's probably hundreds of thousands of documents on there.
They're all very useful. I just started reading through a lot of them. I think that definitely helped me get into the photographic evidence more. I think, actually, I think Harold Wiseberg photo copied a little bit of pictures of the pain and I was able to read a little bit of it from there, but I hadn't read the full book. I didn't even actually know where that photocopy had even come from until I got the book. Right, So, you went to the Harold Weissberg papers, which are held at a
university. Remember which university that was? I cannot at all. I think I'm wanting to say it's hood in Texas there, right is? Yeah? Yeah, Okay, So now I have not made a visit to that archive, although some of it, like you said, is available online now. They have a couple of different research archives there, and Weissberg kept quite a bit of documentation, but also took some time to study photographs in different versions
of some of his self published books. I think it was maybe Whitewash four might have been the photographic study, but I'm pulling this from memory from a
long time ago. But either way, he had taken time to study stuff and even got involved in the earliest debates about the guy in the doorway and whether that was Lee Harvey Oswald. And I think Harold was working with maybe not the best material, and he came up with some ideas that possibly that was Oswald in the doorway, etc. And the Alkins photo, which now brings us into Look, you have professional press photos that were taken by newspaper
people, by the Associated Press. You have a film that was taken by TV. You have film that was taken by a white House photographer, for sure, but there's also tons and tons of amateur photographs and films, everything from the Dallas Cinema Associates reels to Abraham sub Bruder on the films, And I mean, it's crazy to think about the the all the different photographers, everybody from Mary Mormon, right, Mary Mormon Kramer all the way to God.
Who else there? There was the girl? She was very young and she took stuff within a Towner town or Tina Towner, yes, because what her father had the film camera, or maybe she had the film camera. I forget which, but it's like a family with cameras standing there. Uh right. I think it was Bill Towner, Bill tamp Mate, William Towner, I was it was James Towner. James, Okay, great, Look
some of this stuff is a little blurry in my mind. But I remember going through these pictures and thinking to myself, this is amazing that there were so many different photographers. There h so many different people trying to capture images of the president that wound up capture, you know, images that lend some
sort of information about the circumstances regarding the assassination straight to us. And the way that these things have been in some cases preserved, lost, rediscovered, found again, even the Patsy Pascal film, which was not seen for a long time. Although the HSCA was aware of it, it didn't get on
TV for a long time. And then you know, what was it around the thirtieth anniversary or something there were people trying to sell it, and they were broadcasting it on Dallas TV. You know, something they were incapable of doing on the day of the assassination. Anyway, I digress. I want to go into the universe where you went into it. So you got a hold of some information on the assassination, went through the Weisburg archives. What
was the next part of the journey? I mean, did you say, all right, I see some of these pictures, some of these photographs I don't usually see them. I've watched some documentaries. I see the steel images that they keep using over and over again. Of course you saw all kinds. Of course you saw parts of the uh, the official White House Photographers documentary about the weekend of the assassination. Of course you saw that. Of
course you saw you know Mary Mormon's still image. Guaranteed that was there at least in a quick rush, uh, you know, because that was a polaroid. Interesting quality on that. And it's the Bruners film constantly shown to everybody. Okay, but there's a whole lot more to it. So where did you go from there? Did you say, Okay, what do I do next? Do I just search online for these things, What do I
find? What did you do? I think from there? What I did is my third looking back on there's probably hundreds of blogs and posts online from really the early two thousands that I looked back upon, and those certainly helped me with some of my reefs. Ly, it got me an interest in the autopsy photographs. But there's several two websites like that that I looked back some from like two thousand and five, two thousand and three around that time
that I did look back upon. A lot of them I don't think are up anymore even, but I was able to look at some of those and read what some people were putting on there, and that did get my interest more. Right, So, okay, the publications, Now, what year is this that we're talking about, because two thousand and three was the fortieth
anniversary and we're getting close to twenty thirteen. I guess after a little bit, if you're looking at two thousand and five and all that, Yeah, there was a bunch of like very blocky, sort of rudimentary websites that sometimes
had great photograph, great photographic images on them. It was like the that's part of the website, and it's strange because okay, the autopsy photos you brought up, so you're aware that officially the autopsy photos have never been seen, but you ended up having to learn about the fact that there is a copy or a copy of a set of photos out there that are legitimate somehow,
although they weren't meant to be released. So when did you learn about that or do you want to bring up the the what I always called the Fox set of photographs? Yea, with good reason. Good I mean, I've seen a couple of those for some reason, used in a few news articles, but I didn't see the full set of those for a while until gosh, I can't remember when I found the full set. Actually, I think it was Robin unders Big Archive online, Robin Hunger. Yeah, yeah,
that would be that would be a good shout out there. And uh yeah, indeed, shout out to Robin Hunger, who had Again I don't remember how much him and I agreed or disagreed on many a thing, but he definitely had some photographs of interest. I ended up with pretty good scans, and there were some that were making their way in the press because ready for this one, the National Inquirer published a bunch of them. At a certain point, so you had the uh, the the stare of death.
I'm sure you don't remember this because you weren't even born yet when this was happening, and a lot of people don't talk about it anymore. But that's the first place a lot of those photos wound up being seen, believe it or not. And then of course, uh in what was it called? It was Groden's book first with Harrison Livingstone. Uh active, No, No, No, that's that's David Lifton's book. Uh something about act of treason or something like this. I gotta I'll go look it up real fast.
Treason, high treason, thank you, that's what it was. And they published a photographic section which contained good copies of the good black and white copies anyway, of some of the autopsy images. But by law those are not actually the official set. Those are still sitting at the National Archives so under a data gift, and you have to be a doctor and get permission from
the Kennedy family's lawyers to be able to go view them. Yeah. So anyway, I'm sure you haven't done that, because only a handful of people that I know at all i've ever gone and done that. But anyway, and I've known plenty of people that made the application but didn't get it too. However, you used what you could, and those are publicly available, and from what I understand, they do represent some of the images in the set of photos for sure, So it's not like their fakes. It's not
like they're not represent what goes on. The one that they used to love to use in the press, by the way, is what they called the Stare of death where Kennedy's eyes are open and he's on his back, just you know, eyes open on his back on the table. Kind of grewesome image, but of course they would crop it and just show you this dead looking face and tell you about the autopsy photos in news articles. Yeah, so you saw all that stuff, and you saw online debates maybe uh discussions,
independently published blog articles, and it just continued your journey. But where do you start collecting your own sources on this and try to get toward the best copies you can and everything. When when did that start to happen? Uh? I mean, I know that happened from the start. I was interested in saving a lot of them, but I never For a while, I couldn't really find good information on who took what and so that was a
big struggle in getting my archive together. But I soon was able to find sources said who took a lot of the photos, and I put together a pretty decent archive and it's been growing ever since. A couple of controversies you probably came across where you have more than one photographer being named for certain photos, some misidentifica even some of the films have been mislabeled. You know,
for years and years there there there have been different ones. You want to tell us about a few of those, A few things you had to solve because at first maybe you thought it was it came from a certain place and wound up coming from somewhere else. Could you tell us about one or two of those? Yeah, One photograph I found it was taken by Arthur rickerby of Life magazine. It was of a few of the cameramen on the knoll
after the assassination, filming the newmans. I actually found a source I can't remember where, but it claimed that there was that image was taken by a newspaper to photographer by the name of Donald Grant Pewort four. I think the donas Morning News but I found that eventually to be not true. Well, there were a few misunderstandings here and a few misappropriations. After all, as I said, there were local news reporters. There was a team of photographers
there that took pictures after the assassination. Have you ever seen Jesse Curry's self published book or not self published, the one that was published by the Southland Corporation and distributed. Yeah, I've never been able to read it, but
I've heard of that he published a book. I see. Well, you know what, I'm gonna have to bring a copy of it with me to Dallas to show it to you, because it's got some interesting photos in there that at the time it was published, we're not seen anywhere else, by the way, very interesting stuff, and some of the stuff that's identified in there, I've got questions about still. And that book was published maybe in nineteen eighty. I think I'd have to look back at it. But it
was called like Jesse Curry's a Personal Police Chief File or something like. I have a copy of it on the shelf over there, but I'll bring that to Dallas. I'm gonna have to bring a few things with me when I sit down with you and Dallas, because yeah, I already told you I'm gonna make a gift of one book till you've got to read, but I'm gonna I'm gonna show you some other stuff because I want to assist you with
this research. You're only legitimately and I'm not saying this to put you down at all, but you're only a couple of years in to something that some of us, you know, take ten years before we even begin to speak a word about it. Because is deep. Every single aspect of this thing is deep. If somebody thinks, oh, okay, so what, there's only a handful of films, there's a handful of photos. It's not that
big of a universe of stuff to study the photos. First of all, you're wrong, But secondly, give people an idea about that, like, exactly how large of a pool of stuff are we talking about when it comes to photographic evidence regarding this case just limited to the event itself and the autopsy. And by the way, that's not the only part of the universe there is. You can follow the casket around, you can follow the motorcade around,
you can follow them the day before. You can check out Johnson landing. I mean, there is photographic and film evidence of hundreds of things if you want to look at it from hundreds of sources. But give people an idea of how big that universe, how big that archive of yours could become. If you were to collect every single image that was captured surrounding these events.
How give us just a rough idea how large that could be. Yeah, I'd say if let's say from the morning of the assassination to the autopsy, all those photos combine amateur, professional, all of that, I'd say there's about almost ten thousand photos alone easily. Now that's that's if you don't break the films into individual frames. By the way, that's count the film as one thing. Even though okay, and you still got ten thousand images, I'm sure, uh yeah, so yeah, No, you're accurate.
You're absolutely accurate. And by the way, sometimes there are brand new things that are discovered because you know, somebody didn't realize they had something in their personal collection. Occasionally things have popped up like that over the years. Yeah. And also, let's not forget you know, part of that photographic universe could include have you gone into the Lee Harvey Oswald area? Of this. Have you gone into the Oswald life photographs because he only lived to be twenty
four years old, and still there's a fair amount. I mean, after all, like I said Groden, I always point to him. Sorry to keep bringing him up. I mean, I hope you meet him sometime because you want to have some fun learning some new stuff. This book right here gives you an idea that there is a universe of photographs related to a twenty four year old man that you know, we could learn a great deal about. Now. As to whether he's actually the assassin or not, as another
question, yeah, not going to answer that one today. But his photographic record is fascinating for the fact that he was only twenty four and he was involved in photography, so okay, But putting that aside, just the events, just the autopsy and the assassination from the morn, you'd, like you said, ten thousand images and that's again. You might discover brand new things or you might discover very overlooked things where people have, you know, played
find a needle in a haystack And I love that. The array and Deally Plaza alone keeps me busy for days on end if I go into it. Looking for something, which, by the way, have you assembled a fair amount of stuff regarding Dealy Plaza to your satisfaction? Do you think you have a decent collection regarding just those few minutes there that the presidential limousine was in Dealy Plaza in that area at all? And I do say a few minutes.
I realized the shooting event took place in seconds. But we have film of them coming down certain streets. We have Elm Street, we have Main Street, we have so there's a lot of images that were taken there, guys. So there's a lot to be studied. And it's over the course of a few minutes before and after and then of course getting to the hospital. There's a lot there in those few minutes during this event. So are you satisfied with the collection you have of that just yet? Number one?
And number two? When you get there? I mean, do you find that most people are not fully aware of all the things that could be viewed regarding the photographic evidence on the event itself out? Oh, hopefully I didn't lose you or you mute it or something. Gee, all right, I don't see him there, but you know what, maybe maybe he lost me
on zoom and he'll come back around, I hope. So what I might do is decide to take a break here on the live stream and see if we can't reconnect with Alex on the zoom call, which I'm sending out live on Ocelli dot com right now. But yeah, stick around and we'll return after this. In Denial Secret Wars with air Strikes and Tanks by Larry Hancock. Secret wars became a staple of US covert operations and are still happening today. Marry Hancock's book In Denial rips the cover off many of them, using
new files. It exposes things about the Bay of Pigs that no one has ever written about before. It shows why it really failed and why the United States did not learn from it. It also shows why other countries today are doing secret operations with more success. This is the book that puts what some want to deny into the light. In Denial, Secret Wars with air Strikes and Tanks Larry Hancock. For more information, go to Larry hyphen Hancock dot
com. Pick up your copy of In Denial at Amazon dot com in digital or physical. Well as about god Damned time at Wait they wake up Now? I've been talking about this is nineteen fifty nine, about the corruption, the incredible lies deception of the entire superstructure of Western civilizations, and the incredible treason, lunacy, lies deception. It's just amazing how much has been done in the past hundred years, said the human Family. That was Joldan Maxwell
on the Chelly Effects. For more pods with Jordan and Chuck, search out Chelly dot com, along with hundreds of other shows and topics as presented by Chuck out Chelly on the Chelly dot Com. Thanks very stench. Do you like history? Real history that you were never taught in schools? Why the Vietnam War Nuclear Balls in nation Building in Southeast Asia by author and Mike's Swanson, with new documentation never seen before that will open your eyes to events that
led up to this. Why the Vietnam War Nuclear Moms in nation Building in Southeast Asia nineteen forty five through nineteen sixty one. Get your copy today at Amazon dot com. Why the Vietnam War by author Mike Swanson, Wall Street Street Window dot Com, Gold Silver, the stock Market, Wall Street Window dot Com. Perhaps you're invested deeply, Perhaps you're not in deep enough maybe you're thinking about getting started Wall Street, Windows dot com, do dot com.
Michael Swanson, the brilliant author of the War State, understood these trends professionally for many years, and now he gives you the benefit of his knowledge. Wall Street, Street, Little dot do go there, now go there, now go there, now go ahead, call it. And this is in the Truth about the Jay of a Assassination. Right, well, what do you want to know Judie Baker's wild claim? Oswald girlfriend, if you knew Ruby and Barry answer weapons, Really, I imagine I could claim I
have four wheels. It doesn't make me a wagon. But okay, Oswald was on the gold and I'm trying to prevent the murder of John Kennedy. Come on, now, has a real effort on the day of assascomation. Go into her claims. Go to Amazon dot com, enter Judith Baker in her own words. You'll get results for a digital copy of a book where Walt Brown utilizes her own words and the known evidence in the case to get
at well a different perspective. Let's say you can get Judith Barry Baker in her own words from the author himself, signed if you request it by contacting doctor Brown at Kia s jfk at aol dot com. It's a fun book and it actually dissects the many, many fantastic claims Judith Barry Baker in her own words information Chili dot Com. The War State by Michael Swanson explains the great national transformation that took place and put the Kennedy presidency in the context of
the times and reveals never before published information about the Cuban missile crisis. President Kennedy would not have been assassinated if he had been president two hundred years ago. His assassination took place in the context of the Cold War and the rise of the national security state. Before World War II, the United States was a continental republic. In the decade that followed it became an imperial superpower.
Generals such as Curtis Lamy not only wanted to invade Cuba, but knew that there were short range missiles on the island armed with nuclear warheads that they could not destroy because they were on mobile launchers. Their invasion could have led to a Third World War, and they wanted to go to war anyway. The War State by Michael Swanson reveals why and will show you what President Kennedy was
up against. For more information, war State dot Com there on things I will make you understand, so lessen your way less and show I am strong enough to save you from save you from yourself no time when my sa just just as you sas myself says, getting mind, lay your side. Don't don't say I jo got my ya got by. This must be sorry. This is for you. Take lest dog the same boy you don't say about I take this stop, don't press the soph y'all y'all, by my yall, Joe, my ya got down, my y'all, wi my y'all,
y'all do this must be so yall say is going on? Saw? I was like I took a style so wide show down and down and opened out and only could hold open the Shelley dot Com Radio revelation through conversation. The second segment on a Wednesday, Wolden's Day, middle of the week, and it is a wild card. But Alex dropped off the call there and so we're just going to continue where we left off. We got him back on the zoom, so all is well. Anyway, let's let's turn my microphone
down a touch on the live stream. All of a sudden, it's spiked up loud. All right, hey, live radio. It's the way it rolls. Anyhow, if you're hearing the podcast, you don't care, it doesn't matter. Time is yours and you can move it around all over the place. And maybe you didn't even get this far in the podcast. Anyway, welcome to it. Alex Harris is with me and we're talking about the
JFK photographic stuff and how he got into the case. And that's about as far as we've gotten, so I'm gonna shut up and let him tell us a little more about it. We were up to the point of saying, okay, how large would you say is the universal stuff? I mean ten thousand, he said, And then I was asking him if he satisfied with his Dealy Plaza collection thus far, if he thinks he has nearly everything that could be gotten. And then a second question of follow up was what have
you learned in collecting that array which focuses around Deily Plaza directly? So I'll just give you those two easy ones. There, are you satisfied with your collection? And what have you learned from collecting those photos of the many things that happened it justin Dealy Plaza in the space of a very short amount of time. Do you have a complete photo array of all of it? Do you think? And if not, what are you missing? And like I
said, are you happy with your collection? And what have you learned? So Alex go ahead? Yeah, I say, I'm fairly satisfied with my collection so far. I know there's definitely more to collect, and I'm finding more almost every day, but yeah, I'm fairly satisfied with my archive at the moment. See what was the other question, Well, I did ask you know what you have, Let's go this way. What have you learned as a result of collecting those photos that again are just very tightly collected around
the events in Daly Plaza that day at that time. What have you learned of significance just by collecting those photos. I've definitely learned that there's quite a few more photos than I thought related to the assassination. I've learned quite a bit about the assassination through the photos. I have a very good idea of a timeline second by second in daily Plaza of all the photos. I could
definitely make a timeline. I just haven't yet it's kind of difficult. Well, that is one of the ultimate goals that I had always hoped to get to if I could have kept my collection together, but an ex wife made
sure I couldn't. But you know the thing is, if I kept my entire collection together, I wanted to lay these things out chronologically and really say, look, this was happening here and here and here, and almost lay out a second by second of events, people's movements and stuff like that, like a good, for instance, a very controversial, uh you know, individual that's often called the Babushka lady, is of interest. When you put together an array of all the photos in Daily Plaza, guess what I found.
There's about four of them. Now, maybe you found something else, but there's four ladies with babushkas on their head during that time. And then I saw what about you? Uh, there is definitely seems to be more than one people with that head covering, right, But I say, uh, there's only probably one or two. With a camera. And the one we talk about almost always, the one in the grass section by Elm Street, is definitely not a movie camera. That's a common misconception with that.
It's almost definitely a box type still camera. Yes, uh, you know what. I concluded that many years ago, and people take an issue with me because that contradicts the story of one Beverly Oliver h you know, who stated that she had a movie camera and that that is indeed her. Now, look, I'm not asking you to say whether that is Everly. You're
not in your opinion right now. A matter of fact, maybe that's something you might talk about in Dallas. But it's interesting you can go into deep studies here and see for yourself a great many things that have been ambiguous, a great many things that we had to take certain people's words for at certain points. But if you look at the photographic evidence, you find people that said they didn't step into the street did people that said they were facing certain
directions at certain times, like the Warren commissions. You know what, star witness who said he was looking in a certain direction at a certain time, If you look at the photographic evidence, guess what he's lying, you know. I mean, these were my conclusions. Alex. Perhaps you could correct me, because well, I'm assuming you have better eyesight than me, and you might see things differently, But I doubt you had studied it as long
as I did. Doesn't mean you didn't come to better conclusions though, because I needed magnification and I do certainly have bad eyesight. But with the best evidence I could find, there is a whole lot of interesting truth that is revealed in the photographs that contradicts a lot of people's statements. I can say that at a minimum, what do you think I'd say? There is a fair amount of people who either didn't remember right or did lie about what they
were doing at the time of the assassination, or before or afterwards. Something interesting that I came across is Associated Press photographer James Altam's he took a few photos apparently took a few photos over at the intersection of Maine in Houston, but it's come to my attention that he might have lied about who took those photos. They're obviously on the same role as his other photos, but there
is some controversy over how who actually took the photos with that camera. Ah, so it's on the same role of film from the same camera, but as to who was actually in control of it, there may be a controversy that is interesting. Did you happen to track down anything related to I'm jumping around a bit through the photos now in Daly Plaza, if you don't mind, did you happen to track down anything on one mister Powell regarding his photograph
of the school book depository, because that is a rather controversial issue. First of all, how is it that an individual with his background got there. I'm satisfied with his story that he jumped off a train, went over there to go see Kennedy in the plaza, and then jump back on its train. It's a strange story, but I actually think it's correct. Oddly, what do you what are your thoughts on that and that photograph even of the
book depository. Yeah, something I'll dropping real quick here. I am interested in letting people know a lot of the photographer's full names. That's not an issue that I see talked about a lot. But I will be using the photographers full names and probably be shortened him to the last names whenever I can. But yeah, there was a photographer he worked for Gosh, it was the He was an Army intelligence photographer by the name of James Wheeler Powell and
Gey Plaza. I think he took a few photos of the motorcade going by. He said he did, and Something interesting I found is I saw someone claimed that they found how in the Alptin six photogo. But the place where he is standing in that photograph, I believe it is him, is not not at all consistent with his photo. And I've stood in the place where he allegedly is an Alton photograph and it does not match up with his photo. So either he ran across the intersection of Elm and Houston, or he
was lying, or that's really the only well he could have misremembered. He could have lied, or yeah, that's about it, you know, because the statement contradicts what you see in the photographs. And here we go again. There's a ton of this kind of stuff. Even and look, you've been to the plaza, so you've taken a look at the different vantage points that would have had to have been necessary to get certain photographics images created. And when you start to do that, and you start to try and place
people in the right place, it becomes a bit of amaze. You can use their testimony to help you sometimes, but does it reveals and quite often that things don't line up right. I mean, there is a lot of oddity here and a lot of things to be sorted out and this has caused a lot of controversy over the years. So look, I see that you've gotten into some deep studies. I wanted to give people an idea, So
we've done that. Can you do me one last favor before I let you go for tonight because we had this little technical issue and a few other things. La la la la whatever, And don't don't worry about it, no big deal, and you're doing great. By the way, here's the thing you're going to present in Dallas. Do you already have your presentation laid out? I do not right now. I was going to present on something,
but I change changed it a few days ago. I don't know right right now what I'll be doing, but I know it's going to be something fairly specific in the photographic evidence. I'm not sure what excellent. Okay, So you couldn't even really give us a good little mini preview here because you're changing
it up as we speak. I mean, it is just the beginning of September, and you and I will both be present at the JFK Lancer Conference, the November and Dallas Conference, which will run from the seventeenth to the nineteenth of November this year. And we'll be there. What is the name of that hotel again, I always I keep forgetting it. It's the Lorenzo Hotel, the Lorenzo, right, the Lorenzo Hotel, and that's where we will be. I intend to be introducing Alex and others at the conference.
Perhaps if if I find something significant enough worthy of presentation, I'll make a presentation, but otherwise I intend to introduce people and do a breakout and maybe show a film. I got a few plans in the works, and I'll be giving away pens and a few other things to people at the conference, and I'm planning on bringing a couple of things specifically for Alex. I want him to have some resources that I so happen to have extra copies of.
And I want to see his research go further because I stressed it a little bit at the beginning here. But you're thirteen years old. This is great that you're interested. I want to see more people in your age group interested before we're done. Since I couldn't find out about your presentation, let me
find out about this. Do you have any peers your own age who are into this, who you've been able to get into this, or are there any friends who are into this just for the photographic aspects, just with his historical aspects. I mean, do you have any friends that are interested in history or well deep politics of any kind or any of this stuff? I mean, or are you really the lone wolf in your age group in your
area there studying this stuff? Again with great access because you're in the state of Texas, and you have much more access to places like Deily Plaza and the other historical sites that could be linked to these events very easily. You have ready access to any historical societies and local residents, et cetera, et cetera. But interesting thing is do you have any peers though in your age
group? I mean, there is a few of my friends that I've gotten to do a little bit of more research with me, but none that have done the amount of research that I have. I'd say I'm the youngest one that has done this much research. Right, Well, I expected that answer, and I say again, look, I got into this twenty fifth anniversary was nineteen eighty eight, Okay, And that's when I got into it strong
and started doing actual research. Are to call enough people and trying to speak to witnesses, which I found was not the best way to gain evidence, but was the best way to gain a great many leads. And an interesting thing happened there. I was only sixteen. Now you're three years younger than I was, and I was certainly an odd ball. I was a musician, I was a juvenile delinquent, etcetera, etcetera. And I mean that seriously, I was. And uh, none of my peers cared about this,
none of them. Not the juvenile delinquents, not the heavy metal musicians, Nope, Nope. In Jersey it was like, shut up, boy, what are you talking about? That crap is on TV? Go watch the thing on TV, because they ran a bunch of documentaries then, and TV was the way to reach Generation X, but YouTube was the way to reach your generation, least up until recently. I don't know what it is
now, TikTok. I don't know. Anyway, I'm guessing I got I got kids older than you and younger than you, so I know what they're being reached by. Unfortunately, but none of them are taking an interest. I can't even convince my own children to take a real interest in this case. I couldn't. They look at it as dad's crazy crusade, and that's all there is to it, you know. And the youngest one is nine, the oldest one is twenty three. And guess what, I'm a nut.
My daughter understands that I'm a nut. She sympathizes with me, and I know she's okay with me being a nut. My two boys, I'm not so sure, but it's all right. They know that Dad is into this. Gonna have to bring some extra resources to Dallas, though, to show you. I'm looking forward to whatever it is you decide to present. If you need any help with your presentation, I'm gonna do this in public right now. If you need any help, please, by all means,
I'll be more than happy to give you any advice i can. I've seen a lot of these I've been through a lot of this stuff. I'm aware of the evidence. I'll tell you all about the controversies that you might step on, like landmines here. If you say certain things about certain people, are certain theories, you know, regardless of the fact that you have facts and you know evidence on your on your side, it doesn't matter. Get
ready for it. It is a lot of fun. I really look forward to seeing what it is you do, and I hope you stick with this because, man, oh man, we need people your age, you know, not too long ago, I was seen as one of the younger people. I'm fifty one now. Yeah, I was seen as one of the younger people, you know, twenty years ago, okay, around that fortieth anniversary, Around that thirtieth anniversary, I was one of the younger people. And believe me, if you were in your twenties and into this, you
were still an oddball. But it's it's okay. I say oddball lovingly, Alex. Don't worry. I'm not picking on you. Yeah, this is great. I'm so happy that somebody younger is getting into this. And if there's anything you want to say, or anything that we should have said during this discussion, I'm gonna give you a chance to turn the floor over to you right now. But again, I want to remind you, guys that
will both be at the Lancer conference November seventeenth and nineteenth. A bunch of our friends are going to be there from the network, not necessarily Alex's friends, but they'll probably want to meet him because they heard him on the show,
you know, and things like that. But a bunch of my friends, including the guy I'm going on a road trip with, and maybe my producer and a couple others will be along for the ride, and hopefully we're going to do a little breakout room for the tenth anniversary of the o'chelli Effect, where we've done hundreds of shows on the JFK assassination and I even did an awful, awful presentation in twenty seventeen. But you know, live there, and I'm so glad this is face to face and thank god we're not
having to mask up and stay six feet apart, I think. But anyway, we're gonna go forward with this. This is going to be a good thing, and Alex will be there as well and really looking forward to it. So again, if there's anything you want to throw in, Alex before we're all done tonight, anything you want people to know, anything you want people to think about, whatever you think is important, my friend, go
for it. It's all you. Yeah, I just wanted to I mentioned this a little bit before, but again, I'm interested in identifying all the photographers and cameraman's full names. I just wanted to say the White House, the last two, the photographer of the last two days that film that was Thomas Moore Atkins. That's correct. Yeah, and there's several others I know
the full names of. I won't list them out right now, of course, but yeah, I am interested, and I'd like to hear from people if they happen to know any of the photographers full names, because there's quite a few I haven't found. Well, I assure you that people that have focused on the photographic evidence can provide eyed you with a great many leads.
Verify everything though, as best you can, you know. And it's interesting too because you have situations like you got into the autopsy photos, and one of these days we'll have a discussion deeper about that, because after all, John Stringer is the photographer of record, right, But here's the problem,
he doesn't claim ownership of some of the negatives that are in existence. So and you have this kind of thing has happened a few times where somebody claims the providence of a photograph has come from a particular photographer, came from a particular source. The oddity of say, even the backyard photographs. And guess what, Geneva White I think had possession of one of those photographs before the HSCA got a hold of it. You know, there's all sorts of things
floating around, and did Marina Oswald actually take those photographs or not? Depending on which testimony you read, you can answered a bunch of different ways. It's not always easy to nail down exactly who it is. So sometimes I think you got to put an asterisk next to the photographer because quite frankly, it's almost impossible to determine on occasion where some of these images came from.
Yeah, and also, unfortunately, we were in an age where people have doctored things, people have damaged things by digital representation, by other forms of mutilation, etc. And frankly we're in we're in a bit of a big catchup game when you're trying to label ten thousand pieces. But I figure if you're determined, you'll get it done. I think you'll get it done.
So and I'd love to see it. I'd love to see a full on archive of the photographic evidence available to well the world really but if you could collect it, I would be most grateful, and I'm sure there would be others who would be as well, especially if we had a search database of like every photographic image you could possibly use in order to study aspects of the case. I think that would be great, and perhaps we'll talk about that in the future. But anyway, we're all done. Is there anything else
that you want to add here? I think that's all all right. So I'm gonna end this show the way I end all of my shows. And I want you guys again to remember that we'll both be at that Lancer conference in November, and I hope that some of you will join us there. But in the meantime, remember this much, please, I am merely o'celly all of you, or indeed the effect. Good night,