The muse expressed by caller Schools or anyone else who happens again on the air, who Kelly dot Com is not necessarily and we are not responsible for. Now. The exemplar of the controlled opposition and how it's fed to you was perfectly illustrated during the State of the Ununion or the State of the Onion address that we got from Donald Trump recently. I'm not even against all of
what he's doing. I'm not even against him personally, really, I mean, if I wanted to talk personally, I mean, he's he's just typical, you know, he's he's another real estate hustler from Queens. But he happened to be in a privileged position where he was always risen above the rest, always granted the entrance into the greater media zones, always given the hand up when it came to loans and
all that stuff. But you know what, I don't care because it don't almost sounds like there would be somebody who's jealous of somebody doing well, And nah, I don't have jealousy for that. What I have is an issue, an issue with the idea that this great hero, this great truth teller, is going to do all the things that you guys have for years, and I've been listening very carefully to you for more than a decade on the o'celli effect, telling me you want it done, revealing
the truth. Let's go to one of the smallest items on the Greater culture or agenda that we could possibly go to, because it only covers something like one and a half percent of the population, and that is this gender identity issue girls in boys' sports, or more accurately, the problem with boys and girls sports, which is lunacy for certain from a physiological standpoint. I mean, I don't know how else to say other than the common sense
way boys developed differently than girls. They are not the same when it comes to competition in sports, sure, and that's a big issue for some people. But the funny thing was, there was this issue of retraining people for the new gender identities and stuff in schools. Right and Trump touted the story of January little John and really the story of her child that was identifying in some non binary way whatever, and they were saying that it was secretively done by the schools and this and that.
But what is not mentioned, as per usual, is all of the facts related to this it was brought up as an example of what Trump has done so well to fix these problems in the culture war. And these are big achievements according to some. Now, I don't even want to say that it's a little achievement, even though it is. It's again like smashing a cockroach with your shoe in a house instead of getting rid of the infestation.
But let's assume that he got anything done regarding January little John, who he pulled up as an example of somebody he saved from the grand liberal agenda of swapping your children out, which, by the way, there is an agenda to do that. But is it only the vocal public suspects that are out there to destroy our genders. No, no, it's not. But let's just play the game for a moment.
You would assume that the entire story is that the school turned around and went along with this craziness of the girl wants to be a boy or the boy wants to be a girl, and therefore they were going to secretively go around the parents back and screw around with parental rights, which, by the way, neither party cares about. They care about the ability of the state to influence what they own and make no mistake, you report that your children were born, but you don't own them anyway.
Back to the poisonous tree from which the information comes, January little John is allegedly somebody who was saved from the liberal agenda by people putting into place and repairing this thing that was being done secretively behind her back with the school, when meanwhile, publicly accessible documentation things that people never bother to read, that are years older than the most recent declaration from the Little John family, which
that's their little name. January is this woman's first name, Little John is her last name based on her marriage. I don't know her child's name off the top of my head because it's actually redacted and most of the publicly available legal documentation out there, although it has slipped and has been made public despite the fact that Miner's
never be revealed in legal documentation. But anyway, pay no attention to the small things, right the Little Johns in a email sent to the school long before the lawsuit, long before Trump being involved in all of that good stuff a few years back, obtained by a Foyer request from a couple of different news agencies, show that the Little Johns initiated the idea of gender reassignment, basically by socializing it and asking the teachers and the school to
go along with this new set of pronouns that their child wished to be addressed by. They made the initial request, they asked for it to be done. I know that sounds crazy, but if you go and do the research for yourself, you can find it that a few years before they filed yet another lawsuit declaring that the school was doing things behind their back, and this and that, as if it was a grand surprise, we find out that they initiated this action and then at some point
changed their mind. In fact, they told the school that perhaps they didn't have to intervene socially, but just recognize that there was a change in the child's pronouns and they should respect that. The school followed suit and did it based on the parents' request. But missus little John January said in that email, perhaps she will handle the social aspect of this with her peers on her own
or they whatever the pronoun was at the time. The child, let's call them, will handle this socially with their you know, friends, socially. But you, as teachers and administrators acknowledge it. That was their request. At some point the Little John's changed their mind about it, the child continuing on with their desire to do so. And I have no idea who influenced that in the first place, because that was not documented based on what I could find. But either way, at
some point this is all very very true. At some point the Little Johns, the parents changed their mind about the level of acceptance they had for this non binary assignment for their child. The school continued on with the discussion and stopped informing the parents about it, which the
suggestion would be based on documentation. Once again, although not absolutely declared, the suggestion is that for some reason, an unknown reason, the child changed their mind regarding keeping their parents in the loop about what it is they decided to do. Now again, this is this is within a short amount of time. This is a you know, uh, I guess teenager now, but at the time maybe preteen,
maybe teenager. I'm a little unclear as to the exact age of the child because again their statistical information is somewhat protected publicly. But anyway, at some point the child decided to take the parents out of the loop and continue this discussion with the administration with their friends socially and so on and so forth, and they decided to take the parents out of the loop. With that in mind, the parents sued, stating that the school had, against their
will begun this situation. But the truth is again that in emails dated a couple of years before this became an issue, January herself was issuing instructions to the administration to do this. Now, there is some controversy or controversy over whether January had informed the administration that there needed to be a change in absolute form and they needed to no longer encourage this or return them to their gender assignment at birth, whatever it is you want to
call it. I don't even know what you do when you reverse this. What do you call it? I'm not sure. But the point is that something that was initially thought of as a good idea by the parents and then they changed their mind on their whole problem is that
the school didn't keep pace with their change of mind. Now, I would state that I would rather than a school with my child for you know, a good portion of the day, five days a week, most times, I would prefer that they would focus on teaching them stuff instead of directing their pronouns, their socialization, their name whatever. And oh, by the way, January did instruct them to change this child's name to a name that is also not being released.
But a name change, a gender change, all these things. Call my child this and identify my child as this was initiated, encouraged, and instructed by January Little John. To begin with, is this a primary example of somebody going behind somebody's back and snatching up a child and reading
them into the radical left agenda? Or is this just a school attempting to deal with one of its students asking for a customized experience in a school where they also have to contend with, you know, people's handicaps, people's learning disabilities, parental requests, religious exemptions, etc. A lot of things being placed upon school administrators who are not paid to sort these things out. In my estimation, most times
their actual job title doesn't involve this. But in an attempt to accommodate the January Little John and husband family, there may have been a misstep, a miscommunication, a lack of communication, or a misdirection based on not being able to keep up with the thing. This is way different than they forced upon a child or they encourage the craziness of a child just all by themselves. They took
it upon themselves. No, it's not that. So the thing that's often clearly shown to you as a primary example of something often is not. Now, I use this very small because it's very inconsequential to the majority of us other people that you know. I just got done waiting on hold for the John B. Wells program, and apparently they do a open line Friday thing too, and I'm going to try and get on there one day confront John B Wells maybe about how he's avoided putting me
on his show. And you know, because he is an all in Jesus guy with the Trump esteem, you know, concept all over him, because there's the savior. Guy's got a great radio voice and used to be one of the more intelligent people out there. Too dangerous for Coast
to coast, am too dangerous for the mainstream media. But hell, if you could ever say anything about that smooth, helbity deep voice of John B Wells, I can't even mimic the guy well, but it's fascinating to me the outdated information, the idea that if those completely crushed usaid the fifty billion dollars that would be stopped if it was all corrupt, all a waste of money, all insignificant, strategically, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera, if it was all gone tomorrow,
you're talking about a budgetary issue of fifty billion dollars currently at the admitted numbers of our federal budgets, something akin to one plus maybe a little bit percent. And I don't mean one plus another couple percent. I mean one plus a points something percent. Let's be generous and call it one and a half percent of the annual budget. And we spent a week discussing how great or evil or practical, or how much needs to be saved, and
how foreigners are ripping us off and everything else. When you're talking about a penny and a half out of every dollar being spent percentage wise in your name for things that you allegedly support or don't because the politicians selected them, the lobbyists that decided, the big farmer groups, the people that are really the paymasters of our alleged representation, decided it needed to be focused on for one reason
or another. It is great to see people get interested, but when they're interested in one penny on the dollar, or let's be nice to them and say two cents on the dollar, literally putting their two cents in, and they think that is a great issue and has accomplished
anything at all. One begins to wonder where your value judgment is because if that's a great victory, then I gotta tell you they could make you happy overnight by cutting you know, I don't know one chef out of the White House budget guaranteed, they'd save you know, one percent of what they spend just on the President and taking care of his needs, whether it's to have a button depressed, to get a diet cocone demand, or it's you know, somebody to come along and change old man
Joe's diaper. I mean, it's irrelevant. You could cut down on that staff a little. I you could cut down on the updates to the beast and the other parts of the motorcade. Maybe the first Lady doesn't need a motorcade because she's not looking to motorciate around so much. Maybe Donald Trump's grown children already have security and don't need secret I mean, there's a lot of money that could be cut. You know, it's good that they cut secret service details off of former important people in the
cabinet who might have international enemies. Yes, sure, good, But there's people that served under Reagan that probably don't know where they are and nobody even remembers their name, that still have protections Bush Reagan everybody. Now you go beyond
you know, you go into Carter's administration. I mean, he died, and I assure you most of the people that were involved and could have made international enemies, they're mostly dead too, So I'm sure they don't have much secret service protection or protections in place for their personal well being or their families or whatnot, because nobody even knows who the hell they are. Even Americans don't remember the names of who was in the cabinet, who was important, who was controversial,
even among those that have survived. Think about it. If you're an American listening to me right now, just tell me three people that were in Carter's cabinet that are ready still alive today. Good luck. And hey, no using your phone or cheating via Google, no fare. Just do it off the top of your head. Bet you you can't.
But anyhow, there's a lot of things that could be cut from the governmental budget giving a million dollars a year to former presidents, I mean, including people like Bill Clinton. I mean he's got a million dollar a year travel budget that he can take advantage of from the US government. I know he could call up friends like Jeffrey Epstein and use the Lolita Express plane. But oh wait, he's dead now, so he can't call that guy. But I'm sure there's another smaller type of Epstein. Maybe he's got
an older private chat. You know, these guys have other avenues. And if they were running low on cash by some miracle, because the Clinton Foundation isn't raking in enough money off a third world causes where they're bsing or getting enough money from Hillary making speeches in air quotes to different banking groups and stuff. If they weren't taking in enough money, I'm very sure somebody would toss them alone that they don't got to pay back, because that's the way business
is done with these guys. So anyway, I found it interesting being able to tweet at Elon Musk when he said, oh, Elizabeth Warren has let me go look at it. Actually, let me give you the right numbers so I don't miss quotes. You know, the real missus Trump or the real mister Trump along with the other mister Trump, because these two are joined at the hip in a way that I'm telling you now is closer than Milannia and
Donnie at this point. So somebody just tweeted at Elon Musk Joe Biden killed the chickens h and Elon Musk responds, it's true. There was an insane slaughter of one hundred and fifty million egg laying chickens ordered by the Biden administration. This is what he's tweeting about. But let's go look at an earlier tweet from today. I want to go to Elon Musk's x account, where I often tweet at him and message him, and he doesn't seem to respond
to me at all. But justin Bill Nye apparently does a Nazi salute, even though he's got a thumbs up in this picture, so it doesn't look much like a Nazi salute, unlike that thing that Elon did. But hey, Democrats are demented genocidal war sluts. He's retweeting that and saying, yes, war sluts ever heard the expression? Takes one to no one there, mister starlink. Anyway, let me find this thing
about Elizabeth Warren because I thought it was funny. And it's probably eighty tweets down now because you know, Elon has a lo to say. Touche maybe, but he has a lot to say. But let's get to this one thing that he had to say that I had to respond with, you know, something very logical. But he didn't
like it much. I'm certain he didn't like it much, and nobody else liked it much because you know, hey, why bother with reality when you can spin a good story and keep people interested with the one and a half cents worth of bs instead of the other ninety eight point five percent of the dollars being busted over other people's heads, buy those in power, the actual owners. Anyway, Elon Musk tweets out a picture of and I love this a picture of Elizabeth Warren's hands. Oh it's a video.
Excuse me. See, Like I said, I wanted to get it all straight and quote it correctly. And it's from Terri Bull. Okay, Terra Bull, get it clever. Terrible eight eight, which has a veiled reference to Adolf Hitler. But anyway, eight oh eight is if you don't know your numerology. Get back to me when you do, anyhow. And Elon Musk has a subscribe option on his X account. Why does he need a subscriber fee from you for him personally on his EX account? I don't know, but it's
pretty funny anyway. March fifth, this tweet came from so let's be accurate. It was from a few days ago, but it only popped up on me earlier today. On my feed, Terrible tweeted out a video of Elizabeth Warren. And I'm not even gonna watch or play the video, but it says Elizabeth Warren's salary two hundred and eighty five thousand dollars a year, which is already obscene for these senators. And you know, think about that math for
a minute. All these people need nearly three hundred thousand dollars a year, plus their travel benefits they're free mailing of. It's their health insurance and all that stuff, pensions set for life, most of us living well above our heads if we had any piece of this. But okay, Senator Warren two hundred and eighty five thousand dollars a year net worth ready ready sixty seven million dollars want wants to stop you capitalized you all caps from finding out
where your money goes? Now, is this a good point? Sure it is. Elon Musk adds to this, where did Senator Karen get sixty seven million? Question mark? Now? Do I object to this question? Absolutely not. But here was my response, get back to us when you have about five hundred questions regarding the fortunes gained by R D and I reps in both houses. I further stated in this tweet back at Musk, the Dems do insider trading just like the reblood Lickans. And that's how I spelled it.
R E b l o O d l I c k e n s reblood lickins d Monocrats d E m O n I c r A t s pick a foreign interest or ten to sell out to and do insider trading at home. And then I used my all caps function and ended my tweet with all of them Elon in all caps. Does this make me a bad guy? Does this make me insane? Maybe? But is anybody else talking about that? Is anybody else willing to look at the net worth of every single senator and House rep who's been there for you got to be
there for a couple of years to build. But when you look at their salaries versus their net worths when they go into office and when they leave, the math doesn't work out. Because if in four years you make approximately a million dollars using the Elizabeth Warren numbers, and I'm not even saying that those are entirely accurate or account for all the money that they could gain as a representative, either as a Senator or a House of Representatives.
Again I use the word representative. You know, you get what a million plus over four years. They do not gain only a million plus in four years, and that would be assuming they spend none of their money. Their net worth rises at an astronomically higher rate than what it is they are getting paid publicly, than what it is they report on their taxes, than what it is
they actually show as income one way or another. And there might be a handful of people that don't do this, but everybody from the old man standard, like Mitch McConnell, you know, Moscow Mitch. Some people call him Cocaine Mitch. I'm still confused about the cocaine thing because the last thing that I think about when I look at Mitch McConnell is cocaine, because if cocaine does that to you, I gotta say, there's a lot of people that might
stop doing cocaine just based on that. But the one party system has this commonality, and we will see it again very soon. Because I've been given a heads up from people that usually predict things that I hate when they do predict things. I've been giving a few heads ups, and one of them is that by the time twenty twenty five, the calendar year is over, we will have
an active war on our hands. The United States will not the stuff that we're doing now here and there, and nobody's calling it a war, and nobody's even reporting that US troops are there, and et cetera, et cetera. And oh, by the way, how much of the UN do we run? Has Trump even mentioned the amount of contributions that the US makes to the UN? Or are we just using our veto authority to side with Russia there? Lately?
I think that's it. Nobody's talking about the money going to the UN, but NATO is on the table anyway. The real criminal thing here is that opposition will still be controlled. You people who think that you sided with the opposition, who was against the globalists, who was against the new world order? You think you sided with an outsider,
You did not. You're going to find confusions if you take the time to think, and if you remember those I don't know, those standards that people stood upon, where the idea was that the technocracy is not a good thing to hand ourselves over to whoever's programming the computer and what it is they think and their biases, because, by the way, even the ais that are developed show the bias of the programmers who generated them in the
first place. And eventually the very simple logic of dead people don't cost money, and dead people don't make wars, and where there are no people, there is no conflict, and you want to solve every problem with nature and let nature run it. Of course, mankind is one of those disruptive apex beyond apex predators. Do you want computers to think like that? I mean, really, Skynett, who goes, I know what the enemy is? Everybody? No, you don't
like that idea, or maybe you don't care. Maybe humanity's time has passed and you think you're gonna get to go into the singularity along with a friend mister Teal and all his friends, and you'll be part of a newly transformed computer consciousness that will be out there, and we'll survive because it'll just somehow. Even though we can't figure out a way to make solar work too well, even with this gigantic farm we had which was recently shut down nobody paid attention to that can't seem to
make it really work well. But it will be the eternal power source for the singularity and the new existence for humanity, where our souls will go into computers. Hell'll live as long as the computer can, and then when the computers break down, we'll just upload into a new model Windows ninety nine thousand, the non human experience. All I can say is, welcome to the matrix. You're concerned
about the redhead and red or maybe she's blonde. Your experience may vary, but you don't recognize that the people that think they're participating in doing their jobs and doing the right thing are not just trapped inside the matrix, but they are part of the matrix. Indeed, they are
the matrix. And guess what it's you. I'm trying to figure out how to communicate all of this without a w sapp channel, without access to Facebook, without Elon Musk's approval, and without telling you that I'm gonna stupidly choose one side or the other of the double sided coin that is the one party system. America doesn't run the world. Donald Trump doesn't run the world. However, these concepts and
these ideas they might run yours. And just like John Cena turned heel the other night on uh RAW Raw or Broken or NXT or Next Generation Big Time Smasher SmackDown, whatever wrestling was on the other night, John Cena turned heel because the Rock told him to. Well, at some point, Elon's gonna tell Trump to turn heel, and you're all gonna blame Biden. But at the end of the day, they're all fed by the same corporation that allowed Trump
to become minted as an actual billionaire. This time that brought Elon Musk in an unelected position to be not a bureaucrat because Bpete said, what about all those bureaucrats that are in Yeah, that guy can aggravate you and disrupt your day. Elon Musk could disrupt the year and the lifetime of many people at a whim. I will not be surprised if voices like mine are silenced very very soon. I hope a few of you will learn
something before I am out of breath. It's not about siding with this one or that one, or against this or that, or signing up for the right party or
choosing the correct team to root for. Either you are on the side of humanity's survival or you're with the butchers that see us as nothing more, I hate to say it, than the goyam, the cattle, the chattel, the monetized commodity that is human flesh that they'll only once in a while allow some to fall into the pork band allegedly, but pay no attention to any of that. If you refuse to accept that you're feeling pain, it doesn't mean the painful thing went away. It just means
you've decided not to experience it. And I wish that sort of diversionary power were utilized by many more to understand the deception and the complete and utter lack of choice. You are being handed and you are being granted oh Chili dot com revelation through conversation