Dusty Deevers Wants to Criminalize Watching Porn - podcast episode cover

Dusty Deevers Wants to Criminalize Watching Porn

Feb 29, 202423 minSeason 23Ep. 802
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

Who is Dusty Deevers? Lawmaker Wants to Make Viewing Porn a Crime,

Rolling Stone, by Tim DIckinson, on February 2, 2024 , https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/dusty-deevers-lawmaker-jail-people-watching-porn-1234959499/

An ‘abortion abolitionist’ became an Oklahoma senator. The fringe is celebrating its big victory | Abortion | The Guardian, The Guardian, by Carter Sherman, on Dec 14, 2023, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/dec/14/abortion-abolitionist-oklahoma-fringe-victory-roe-v-wade


In a discussion between Scott, Jonathan, and Infidel, they focus upon the extreme views and legislative ambitions of Dusty Deevers, a fundamentalist preacher turned Oklahoma State Senator. Deevers aims to impose his Christian nationalist beliefs through legislation, advocating for the criminalization of activities such as viewing porn, having abortions, and even sexting. He envisions a society where the government is a tool to enforce God's will, dividing it between Christian and satanic forces.


The discussion delves into the invasive nature of Deevers' proposals, questioning the morality and feasibility of enforcing such strict regulations. There's criticism of his anti-women policies, including criminalizing abortion and eliminating no-fault divorce, which are seen as regressive and oppressive. Moreover, his radical views are seen as a threat to democracy, with experts warning about the dangers of Christian nationalism.


The conversation also explores the potential hypocrisy of figures like Deevers, who preach against certain behaviors while possibly engaging in them privately. There's a broader discussion about the dangers of religious extremism and its implications for society, particularly in terms of eroding democratic values and infringing on individual rights.
Overall, the dialogue reflects deep concern about the rise of extremist ideologies and the potential consequences for democratic societies. It highlights the importance of defending secularism, upholding individual freedoms, and promoting critical thinking to counteract the influence of radical beliefs.


The Non-Prophets 23.8.2 on February 28, 2024, with Scott Dickie, Jonathan Roudabush, and Infidel64


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.

Transcript

A fundamentalist preacher turned to Oklahoma State senators on a mission to enforce his extreme Christian nationalists beliefs through legislation. Dusty Devers wants to outlaw porn, criminalize abortion as homicide, and eliminate no fault divorce. Devers sees government as a tool to enforce God's will and view society as divided between Christian and Satanic forces. He aims to impose his moral values on others, even proposing felony charges for

peorn viewers. Devers radical views have gained national attention, highlighting the threat Christian nationalism poses to democracy. Despite criticism, he remains unapologetic, claiming to act in accordance with Oklahoma Republican's will. This story is from Rolling Stone by Tim Dickinson on February second, twenty twenty four. Jonathan, why don't you start us? I'm sorry, infidel. Let's go to infidel first. Start us

off with this one. One of the first things that struck me with this article was that Dusty Devers believes, and I quote that the government should tear arise evildoers. Now, for me, that just sounds like an admission that you're a terrorist. Starting off the top. I mean, according to him, government's sole purpose is to promote what is good in accordance with the will

of God. And as you mentioned, Scott, you know, he thinks that, you know, porn, it should be a viewing porn should be a felony up to twenty years and wanted a bounty system similar to what we have here in Texas. Horribly so on the abortion issue. He wants his neighbors to be reporting their neighbors about, you know, their porn viewing habits.

And I couldn't help but think how invasive is this for anyone to think that not only is it we got to peek under the stall to see what you look like when you're in the bathroom, but now we've got to peek through your windows so we can tell on you when you're watching porn. It just absolutely boggles my mind that this person could not only be elected but stay there because I had to check. I was just curious, is this guy married? Does does he have kids? And yes, he has six or

seven kids and he's married. And my next thought was poor missus Devers. But yes, absolutely, and you know, and even wants to criminalize sexting except between spouses, And I'm like, you're going to say that words that people tight to each other consensually is as bad as porn, that you should I mean, I don't have and I'm not making a judgment on porn, but I understand that there are certain groups of people who have an uptight mentality

towards the topic. But are you Jesus Christ, are you kidding me? You know, even sexting and eliminating no fault divorce. I just couldn't help but think how anti women all of his policies seem to boil down to abortion being homicide. Once we lock you down into a marriage, you're stuck and you got to stay. It's amazing that this passes for reasonable thought anywhere,

even in Oklahoma. You know, I guess I've grown accustomed to hearing this type of behavior and these type of things from people in Florida and here in Texas. I knew Oklahoma was bad, but I didn't know they were going to try to become a subsidiary of Texas or Florida. And with that in mind, I can only hope that people's eyes are open and realize just how

absolutely unreasonable, unhinged and incredibly invasive. Doing something like this would be I have no idea how you would stop people from watching porn, but since this is all cutting into my porn time, I figured I'll go ahead and pass this over to you, Jonathan and see what you have to say about this. When you get done with yours, you can send it to mainly before

it becomes a felony. Said it over the internet, right. I don't know where to start with this pos and you can use your imagination on the term. I'm getting really tired of trying to people trying to sell me a bill of goods that really actually attempts to harm and criminalize normal human rights, seeing government as a means to coerce the public into their dystopian desires of a discat dictatorship of Christ. I got news, buddy, Christ don't exist.

So you know, mellow out, you know, take a chill pill. I have some I could recommend to you. But there is unceasingly an attempt to victimize and demonize already marginalized people. They wouldn't do it on a majority. They have to attack a minority, some small group of people who aren't doing anything to harm you or society and demon demonize them all for this fantasy

attachment to the chair. He picked words of a book of fables from the Mid East Bronze Age, ostensibly written compiled in Bibelos and Lebanon about seventeen to fifteen seventeen to maybe nineteen hundred years ago, and before that passed for hundreds of years like a game of telephone, so before it was ever written down. And this they think is what they think is a holy thing and is absolutely worth trading in all the liberty, rights and equality we've gained in the

last two centuries. So I'm like Dusty Divers loudly shouts the quiet part. He wants that. He wants legislate what where, and what you when you believe. To him, the government should be used whatever force necessary to uphold his draconian Dark Age mythology. Women should be persecuted, prosecuted, even face the death penalty for losing a baby or even having a miscarriage. How fucking bad is that? Pardon my language, but damn, you know where does

this guy get from that? You know, he's a deranged individual. He's even hated by mainstream pro lifers. You have to be really, really bad to get those people afraid of you, you will poison their movement. So the maniac sees the world as a battleground of righteous Christians, only righteous if they agree with him, of course, on all things, and against everything else, I mean everything. If you're not part of that, then you're

evil and need to be destroyed, including the country if possible. This is beyond anti democracy, anti American, anti republicanism. It's anti everything we stand for and a lot of people who died to support it and to keep it. So as there's no doubt in my military mind, this guy is a total idiot. We need to better Civics education in school and a mandatory class

in the history of the separation of religion and government. And that would mean getting into the letters of people like Madison and that and telling them some of the other literature that said that displays the mind of the founders. They just left religious wars in the country they came from that killed thousands and thousands of people, and they were trying to prevent that by saying you can't have a religious government, it has to be secular. So anyway, if you think

differently than that, you are dead wrong. Not only that you've been lied to a lot. Start digging into the actual history and you'll find out what's really going on. I know you won't, but just friendly advice, educate yourself free of charge, free of charge, and the immortal words of an MMA coach. I know. Fuck this guy, of course would add, and not in a good way, you know. So you know that's Scott.

I'm getting vulgar. You might want to take this from me. That's to follow there, and so I'm gonna have to crank it up a notch from the vulgarity. So if you'll turn with me and your Bibles to the Book of Proverbs thirteen, verse twenty four, which says those who spare the rod hate their children, but those who love them are diligent to discipline them. And Dusty Devers wants to be that rod. He wants to be the shaft that's shoved in and around the face area of America, or perhaps smuggled

in through the back door of the legislative process. When we think of horrible pricks, Dusty Deaver wants to be damn sure that we think of him. And I tell you he's off to a great start. So in our last segment for this week we talked about the dangers of Christian nationalism. Well, here it is. I mean, this is what we're talking about. This is what we're looking at. This is what it looks like. This is what the end of that particular Well, geez, I hope it doesn't get

worse than that, but you know, this is what's happening. Okay. He wants to put people in jail for watching porn. By the way, infidel with your admission there, I think he just won me to ten thousand bucks, but I'll have to double check on the jurisdiction there. He wants to punish anybody that's involved with an abortion. He wants to force people to stay married against their will. He wants to and this was good too.

He wants to enact what he calls an eye for an eye punishment for people filing false police reports, meaning that he wants the accusers to receive the same punishment as the crime for which they're making the accusation. I don't know this, but I wonder if he happens to have a personal stake in that particular one. But anyway, for him, obviously, it's not about justice or fairness or rehabilitation or any of that stuff. For him, it's all about

inflicting pain via punishment. And he said he believes we talked about this already. He believes the role of government is to protect innocent people and to punish and terrorize evildoers. The suffering is the point to him. So I want to hold this guy up as a warning to Christians. This is the kind

of thing that your belief supports. I know I say this often when I'm on the show, but it's that it's those liberal Christians, the followers of Christ, the you know, whatever you want to call it, the softer, lovey dovey Christianity. You're providing shelter for this kind of belief if you engage, if you endorse irrational beliefs in your philosophy, then you are giving tacit approval for other people who have irrational beliefs, and they're not maybe not

going to be quite so nice as you are. Now. I don't know how else we can say this does. If it doesn't persuade you, then I don't know what does you know? It's hard to it's hard to imagine what it would take to demonstrate the endgame, the results, the consequences, of this kind of of accepting this type of belief. The article used this word to describe divers and I thought it was really cool. It was Manichean.

Manichean. I had to look it up. It refers to anything related to Manicheism, which is a dualistic religion that combined Zoroastrian, Christian, Gnostic, and other beliefs in a theology of a cosmic struggle between good and evil. So he sees himself as a general in the army of God. And you can't get more black and white than that from the article here. This

is a quote from the article. Devers embodies a threat that experts believe Christian nationalism poses to democracy by literally demonizing his opponents and casting compromises moral corruption. That's key there. In his eyes, compromise is moral corruption. His intent, he's said, is to steer society away from the judgment that we deserve, warning that otherwise the country will suffer not just from the effects of bad

policy and wicked rulers, but under the judgment of God. Brad Onishi, author of an extremist History of a Christian Nation, recently described in an interview with Rolling Stone. If you're a person who is convinced that the United States is under threat by a Luciferian regime compromised, and here he hits all the buzzwords here comprised of a Marxist, globalist, secularists, feminists, the LGBTQ community, and so on. Democracy is not your sacred value. That's it

right there. Democracy is not the sacred value here, Infidel. Do you have anything to add to that. I've got plenty to add. All right, let's hear it. Let's hear it. Preach to us. I don't think that Dusty believes in the American form of government. I think that's quite

clear. What he wants is something else, and I think that is something that's very important for those people that we've talked about previously who they become radicalized and they have this view that when Christianity comes to power and we do what God wants us to do, in their mind, what God wants them to do is what they believe is right, and that varies according to individual. You can't even find ten people in the same church who are going to necessarily

agree where those lines are. So when you start allowing someone to make those decisions to decide what is right and wrong. What you're doing is you're setting yourself up. You know, I don't know how many you have ever seen Handmaid's Tail, but I've got a sneak in suspicion that there's going to be more than a few people with missing fingers are hanging up on the wall if this ever were to come to fruition, because they're not Christian enough. And

the truth is is that we've seen this time and again. Christians are savage towards non Christians, but they can be really savage towards the ones that are their brothers and sisters. Supposedly they can really take into the cleaners. So they need to be more careful than we are because we're already labeled we're no good, we're bad. But when the people who are supposedly on your side betray you, that's even worse in their mind. So be careful what you

look for. And one other thing I wanted to point out is that time and again we hear about people who rally against LGBTQ and we find out that they've been, you know, having relationship same sex relationships, and we're all shocked. This is what happened. We sear people talking about all these things, and we read about, you know, pastors who are sexually abusing and

assaulting people in their church. This isn't something new, and so I have to wonder how long is it before we see Dusty Deb's porn hub account and really find out what's going on? Because the truth is is that when I was a believer, and I was growing up in a very conservative sect, we would go to these different churches and we'd hear these preachers rail against fornication and adultery and homosexuality and all these things they would just completely obsess over.

And then five, ten, fifteen years later you find out guess what, and he just screams against things a bit too much. Now he may be a true believer, he may be the real deal, because there are those two. But if he is, I can assure you one thing, he should never do any inside the political realm, because I don't see how in good faith he could take that oath of office and declare to uphold the constitution of this country because what he is standing for is completely opposed to what this

country stands for. You don't believe, you don't want to view porn, then don't view porn. You don't think people should have abortions, well, don't have abortions. You don't believe in same sex relationships, then don't have one. Those are all choices you can make if those are things that you

believe you shouldn't do. But when you start crossing in and telling other people that you can't do this and call yourself an American claim to uphold the constitution of this country, that is what you call And I'm going to be very tactful here. That's what you call a liar now. Having said that, take us away, Jonathan, Oh gee, I me. He thinks he does protest too much. You think you think, and I don't mean you in Fidel. Yeah, there's something about Christian nationalism. I think that the

Christian nationalists may not realize. And I actually remember this from one of the rallies they had, and one of the preachers, similar to Devers, got up and railed against the Catholic Church. And the next person was General Flynn. He's a Catholic and he says, I'm a proud Catholic. So you can see, you can start seeing the cracks in this already. Like I

said, the Founders escaped warfare religious warfare. And now you know, if one of these people, you know, six out of nine on the Supreme Quarter Catholic, if this religious group manages to take power, we're going to have another set of religious wars. It's not about all us people getting our right steped on. It'll be about how much they can kill each other in

very gruesome way. And they'll be killing each other, you know, And that's something that's worthy of avoiding by not trying to push your particular version of morality or reality, which isn't reality, but it's you know, your particular fantasy of what life should be like on the rest of the religious world, I mean, or US atheists. But you start pushing that shit, and what happens is you get pushed back and the other side is just as just

as adamant as you that they're right. So your guy's going to get into a very nasty mix up. Just take a look at the eleventh through the sixteenth century and well, you know, in European history, okay, and you'll see that there were over I think the ones I know about, there

were thirty two crusades. And it's not just the Holy Land, it's Eastern Europe it's Germany, it's all sorts of places, and they just flat raped and murdered their way into Christianity. And you're going to see that happen once. Martin Luther in fifteen hundred or so and Protestantism. Look at all the hundreds of thousands of people who were murdered with them, and think about that and alls it. It proved was that nobody was right. And that's what

I wanted to say about that. And again he does protest too much, so he might start pinging on my gatar if he keeps doing that. Well, let me ask you this. Let me ask you this. Do you think this guy, this Dusty Devers, do you think he was inevitable? Do you think it was inevitable that this? Is this a product of human nature? Is this a product Were there specific things in history that happened that kind of guided us down this path here? Or do you what do you

think, Infidel? Do you think this was bound to happen eventually? Calvin?

I think that it is absolutely inevitable. When you start moving that line away from freedom and start going in the method of fascism, it becomes a one up because things that were once completely unreasonable that you knew were absolutely unhinged, become reasonable now because in the backdrop of the whole anti LGBTQ scenario, the whole anti women's rights fiasco, all these things, I think have emboldened them to the point where all the other things that they used to whisper among

themselves and their echo chambers. That's what we're starting to see bubble out because I don't know if you remember this, but you know, thirty years ago or actually more than that, forty years ago, I'm old. I remember my dad getting these things from what was Perkins Group, and you know, they used to go out there and stand out in front of you know, seventy elevens and things, protesting adult magazines behind the counter, and that kind

of faded away. With the advent of the Internet and things like that. People have kind of, you know, moved away, but I don't think that the viewpoint that was behind it ever went away. And that is exactly

what we're seeing here. We're seeing those people who who you know, they don't have a they don't have to stand in front of abortion clinics because they've already criminalized that, and they think they're winning every other debate, and I think they're saying, Okay, let's go on to new territory, let's find a new thing that we can ran about that will get attention and get me elected. And I don't think they care about the consequences. I think the

consequences are completely inconsequential to them. Jonathan, again, an answer question, answer my question. Do you think this was inevitable or do you think there was specific things in history that kind of led us this way or was it just a product of human nature. I think that it's a I don't think it's human nature. I think it's a product of society in general. And I also think that it's inevitable. When people become convinced that they're being downtrodden,

they have several reactions they can take. A lot of them turn to religion, and sometimes they turn to the most extreme form of it, and you know, like death cults, like the resurrection shit, you know, or the ones where they fall into we need to take over the government so that we can stop being you know, this oppressed quote unquote group, which is not true. Christians are not oppressed in this country. They are in charge of this country. So you know, I'm kind of sure about that.

Are you sure about that? Because because you know, they have to sell cakes to gay couples, right, yeah, that is bad. Yeah yeah, well yeah, that's a whole other thing that we've done before on here. But I'm just thinking to myself that, yeah, it's an inevitable this is going to evolve out of a complex society and Alvin Toffler's future shock. Add that to a religious upbringing, and they have to get more extreme. As we said in the last article, they're getting hardened, meaning they

have to get more and more extreme because they're losing ground every year. And they may not know this, but unconsciously they feel it happening, and they know that their culture what they want it to be, because it never was the real culture, but their fantasy or what the culture is is diminishing and fading away, not fast enough, but hopefully before they do any real damage. All right, Well, that's a great place for us to end this

conversation. I appreciate everything that both of you had to contribute.

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android