[SPEAKER_00]: When you have access to so much information, you there begins to be this fundamental psychological mismatch, which we're like, how much you know and what you can do about it. [SPEAKER_00]: And this was not as bad of a problem when information was more gate-capped. [SPEAKER_00]: And like, there are also downsides to information being more gate-capped.
[SPEAKER_00]: But one thing it provided you was information in ways that like, it was that were designed for you as a regular person and not a subject matter expert. [SPEAKER_00]: to consume that made them make sense and contextualize them for who you are generally. [SPEAKER_01]: Hello and welcome to Tackle and Save Us made a partnership with the nation magazine. [SPEAKER_01]: I'm your host Paris Marks and this week, before we get to my guest.
[SPEAKER_01]: I want to talk about the fact that Tackle and Save Us is turning six years old this month. [SPEAKER_01]: First of all, a big thank you to everyone who has started supporting the show this month already to help us hit our goal of 100 new supporters by the end of the month to help us continue
[SPEAKER_01]: providing these critical perspectives on the tech industry that you learn from every single week that helps you better understand what the tech billionaires of Silicon Valley are up to, what these tech companies are doing to our world and our lives, and why we really need something else, right? [SPEAKER_01]: Why we really need to change this? [SPEAKER_01]: This is part of the focus of the show and has been since day one all the way back in 2020.
[SPEAKER_01]: I'm recording this a few days before the episode actually air so I can't say how many people have supported the show so far but we're already even as I record this over a fifth of the way to our goal and I'm sure we'll be even closer by the time that this airs. [SPEAKER_01]: So thank you so much first of all and of course if you do enjoy the work that I put into making the show every single week and if you also want access to a number of
[SPEAKER_01]: Premium episodes add free episodes full access to the new series that I'm working on right now that we're hoping to have out in May along with the premium interviews that will be coming after that you can certainly join existing supporters by going to patreon.com slash tech won't save us and signing up to join them and of course to support the show.
[SPEAKER_01]: And when you do that, you will not only get access to those premium shows, to those ad free shows, but you will also get access to our Discord server. [SPEAKER_01]: If you support at certain tiers, you will get access to stickers as well, that I'll be sending out to you in the mail, plus you get the satisfaction of knowing. [SPEAKER_01]: that your supporting tech won't save us and helping ensure I can continue doing this work.
[SPEAKER_01]: So, thanks so much, if you have supported it already, thanks for listening to tech won't save us for supporting the show and making it so that I can keep doing this after 60 years, which is just fantastic. [SPEAKER_01]: And, you know, I'm obviously biased, but I think we need something like tech won't save us to provide these perspectives on the tech industry that you're not getting in enough other places. [SPEAKER_01]: Now, let's turn to this week's episode.
[SPEAKER_01]: A mandimole is a Bloomberg business week
[SPEAKER_01]: She's been on the show before I think she does fantastic work and I wanted to have her back on this week because she wrote a column about this meme of monitoring the situation and it feels like today we are constantly monitoring the situation you know with wars in Iran with visions of Venezuela with everything going on in the world economy it feels like we are always trying to become an expert on the next thing that's happening we're always trying to you know collect data collect information off of social media and through other
[SPEAKER_01]: you know, other sources, I guess, so that we can understand what is happening. [SPEAKER_01]: And we talk about what, you know, what actually is the effect of the way that we consume information in this way, whether it's positive or negative that we do so, or, you know, maybe it's not either, right? [SPEAKER_01]: Maybe it's just something that we need to understand.
[SPEAKER_01]: But also, like, [SPEAKER_01]: the broader consequences of how we consume information today, what it means about the information landscape, what it means about our trust in media and, you know, traditional kind of institutions that provided us with information. [SPEAKER_01]: And ultimately, where this is all going. [SPEAKER_01]: To me, this is a fascinating conversation.
[SPEAKER_01]: Certainly, it intersects with the war in Iran that we have been talking about in recent weeks, but it is a bigger conversation than that as well. [SPEAKER_01]: You know, thinking about social media, thinking about the way that the internet is transformed, how information is consumed, digested, created. [SPEAKER_01]: And you know, what that means for this society that we live in. [SPEAKER_01]: So I think that you're really going to enjoy this conversation.
[SPEAKER_01]: I certainly enjoyed hearing from Amanda again and getting her insights on all of this, and I think you will too. [SPEAKER_01]: If you do enjoy this conversation, of course, consider going to patreon.com slash tech won't say about becoming a supporter this month to help us hit our goal of 100 new supporters for the shows six birthday, which again, it's just incredible that we've made it this far. [SPEAKER_01]: But thank you again for supporting the show.
[SPEAKER_01]: Thank you again for listening and consider going over to Patreon to help us out this month and get access to all the things that I mentioned before. [SPEAKER_01]: So thanks again and enjoy this week's conversation. [SPEAKER_01]: Amanda, welcome to Tech Won't Save Us. [SPEAKER_00]: Thanks so much for having me. [SPEAKER_01]: Absolutely.
[SPEAKER_01]: Always happy to have you on the show and to chat and really to read your column as well, which I love checking out because you write about such fascinating topics that are sometimes related to the show and the listeners, but other times are completely unrelated and are still fascinating and I love to read it. [SPEAKER_01]: But thank you. [SPEAKER_01]: Of course, of course.
[SPEAKER_01]: But you had this column recently where you were talking about this meme [SPEAKER_01]: monitoring the situation, right? [SPEAKER_01]: And I think we're all kind of monitoring the situation to a certain degree right now with everything going on in the world. [SPEAKER_01]: But what does this mean? [SPEAKER_01]: And what does it actually mean to monitor the situation?
[SPEAKER_00]: Well, monitoring the situation is a mean that both originates and I think almost exclusively lives on Twitter. [SPEAKER_00]: It was the first coin age that is commonly cited is a January 2025 tweet that has a picture of Jeff Bezos. [SPEAKER_00]: He is at a blue origin launch event. [SPEAKER_00]: In what looks to be a control room, he, you know, it has like those sort of like graduated rows of seating with like desks and computer monitors in front of them.
[SPEAKER_00]: He is in his jeans and a blue origin polo. [SPEAKER_00]: His biceps are huge, like straining this leaves. [SPEAKER_00]: He is standing arms crossed at attention. [SPEAKER_00]: He is staring into the distance. [SPEAKER_00]: You cannot see what he's looking at. [SPEAKER_00]: He is wearing a headset with a microphone arm. [SPEAKER_00]: He looks serious. [SPEAKER_00]: He looks locked in. [SPEAKER_00]: He is monitoring the situation. [SPEAKER_01]: He's looking awesome in the photo.
[SPEAKER_01]: Like, let's be real. [SPEAKER_01]: We see so many of these photos of Elon Musk in the control room. [SPEAKER_01]: He loves looking like the man who's controlling the rocket launch and all this kind of stuff. [SPEAKER_01]: He has never looked as cool as Jeff Bezos looks in this photo. [SPEAKER_01]: Like, let's be real. [SPEAKER_00]: Yeah, based also looks like a man of action. [SPEAKER_00]: He looks like a man who is doing something important and who is like purely focused on it.
[SPEAKER_00]: Yeah, he looks very serious. [SPEAKER_00]: He looks very focused. [SPEAKER_00]: He looks very masculine and the text of the tweet reads, you know, the masculine urge to monitor the situation. [SPEAKER_00]: And you know, this term sort of like, you know, it is, it's like immediately recognizable is something that is used as part of like corporate speakers as, you know, public relations jargon as something that sort of shows up in a lot of like official statements.
[SPEAKER_00]: that to give the impression that you were on top of things, your company, your organization, your office is locked in, is paying attention as in control as they can possibly be of what's happening. [SPEAKER_00]: And so the phrase sort of like began to bounce around Twitter after that and it sort of resurfaces, you know, a six months later and another sort of spate of memes and you see it sort of people attaching like particular types of imagery to it.
[SPEAKER_00]: You see like any ridiculous like computer set up with like 10 monitors and you know The room is dark, but the monitors are glowing and you are in them you are sitting back in a chair And you just have like sort of this collection of monitors like arrayed over you almost In sort of like a wally situation, but you are
[SPEAKER_01]: What it really comes to mind is that scene and I think it's like the Dark Knight or Dark Knight Rises where like Batman isn't front of that like big Screen of it's not even like video feeds. [SPEAKER_01]: It's like I can't remember exactly what it's monitoring But like that is what comes to mind when you describe it as well [SPEAKER_00]: Right.
[SPEAKER_00]: Yeah. [SPEAKER_00]: The, you know, the situation room with like a million different things on like a somehow clear glass background that you can still see what's happening. [SPEAKER_00]: It's a, it's a very cinematic, very evocative phrase. [SPEAKER_00]: I think it resurfaced again recently about a month ago when the United States in Israel began their spade of attacks on Iran. [SPEAKER_00]: And you really see, it sort of go crazy from there.
[SPEAKER_00]: So for the past month, this phrase has been sort of on the present.
[SPEAKER_00]: And you get a lot of people making jokes about it, but then like the jokes become like, [SPEAKER_00]: take on like a bit of half-joke half-serious because the you know as as is like clear at this point the war in in Iran has had a you know very serious effect on lots of sort of external indicators price of oil the overall US stock market liquid natural gas [SPEAKER_00]: markets, other commodities, all kinds of stuff.
[SPEAKER_00]: And you sort of layer this really multi-faceted crisis on top of everything else that's going on. [SPEAKER_00]: And the idea of monitoring the situation, I think, sort of meets its perfect confluence of events. [SPEAKER_00]: And you really see it take off from there. [SPEAKER_00]: And it has not slowed down the prediction market poly market has been the first major company to sort of pick up the meme and run with it a couple of weekends ago.
[SPEAKER_00]: They did it like a pop-up bar event in DC where they instead of showing sports on the first weekend of March madness, they had a bunch of Bloomberg terminals pulled up, they had a bunch of live news feeds, a bunch of [SPEAKER_00]: social media feeds, prediction market odds, moving in real time, things like that.
[SPEAKER_00]: So, and that's another element of this as well is this sort of dashboardification of, you know, regular people's media consumption online, this idea that you know, you're assembling your feeds, you're watching the stock market, you're watching maps of the straight-up or moves, you're watching different types of vessels move around the world and things
[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, I can't like it also, you know, when you think of the meme and you think of the notion of this, right, most of us have always wanted to be up to date on current events, right, but in the past that would take a particular form, you know, you tune into the news, you read the newspaper, there was only so much information available to most people to actually understand what was going on.
[SPEAKER_01]: And it does feel like in this moment, like obviously we can take that route, you know, of reading a few media sources to understand what the latest updates are, but it also feels like there's this incentive or this drive or, you know, it's kind of expected that we are searching through all of these different sources in order to [SPEAKER_01]: try to get our own picture of what is going on.
[SPEAKER_01]: You know, the kind of old institutional sources of information are not as trusted anymore and we need to like search them out ourselves. [SPEAKER_01]: So it does really feel like of the moment in a sense too, right? [SPEAKER_00]: Right. [SPEAKER_00]: For most of like modern media history, monitoring the situation was like a particular job that particular people have.
[SPEAKER_00]: Yeah. [SPEAKER_00]: And then if you were a member of the general public information about news and current events and global crises came to you in from like predictable sources and at predictable times like you get the newspaper in the morning you've watched the nightly news you'd, you know, get a weekly news magazine a time or a news week or a business week. [SPEAKER_00]: something like that.
[SPEAKER_00]: So your ability as like a like a regular person in the world to sort of like actively consume primary source information was sort of limited like they're just weren't flows of information that works like that that the average person had access to.
[SPEAKER_00]: that is one reason that, you know, the company I work for, Bloomberg, one reason that it's been around for so long because it produces an information flow machine, the terminal that allowed finance professionals to check all kinds of data and information in real time on their computers at a, in a time before that was really possible.
[SPEAKER_00]: As the internet has gotten more and more robust over the past, you know, 10 years, especially, checking real-time data is more and more possible, and it's more and more odd than present. [SPEAKER_00]: And the something I talk about in the column is the sort of logic of the feed, [SPEAKER_00]: social media has sort of trained people to expect like this sort of constant drip of information and updates and tips or cues on what you're supposed to be looking at in any particular time.
[SPEAKER_00]: So the these sort of desire to assemble feeds is something that I think. [SPEAKER_00]: we have all been sort of primed to do and now that like, you know, I can go on vessel finder and see what types of ships are in the or in New York Bay right now.
[SPEAKER_00]: I can go, you know, to a lot to, you know, various, come out of these price trackers, I can assemble graphs myself, [SPEAKER_00]: I can do all kinds of stuff and I think that the sort of logic of the feed has encouraged people to sort of attempt to reassemble this sort of informational flows that used to be the province of like professionals who could perhaps more able to evaluate the information for accuracy and usefulness and things like that.
[SPEAKER_00]: But we're just all full of feeds now. [SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, we're all monitoring the feeds and the situation happening on them, you know, on that point though, talking about the feeds, talking about how we're consuming this information. [SPEAKER_01]: One of the things that I found really interesting in the piece that you wrote and that, you know, I've seen a few other sources talking about since then is.
[SPEAKER_01]: this attempt to create dashboards, you know, you talked about the Bloomberg terminal, right? [SPEAKER_01]: This is something very professional. [SPEAKER_01]: This is something people pay a lot of money to get access to. [SPEAKER_01]: But people actually making dashboards with all of these different sources to, as you say, you know, monitor the situation. [SPEAKER_01]: Can you talk about what we're seeing there? [SPEAKER_01]: And like, is this a new development?
[SPEAKER_00]: Yeah. [SPEAKER_00]: I think it is a new issue development. [SPEAKER_00]: I think you saw a little bit of this sort of dashboard assembly happening during COVID, especially the early part of the pandemic when, you know, public data about case counts and about, you know, wastewater detection levels and.
[SPEAKER_00]: how the virus was spreading around the world and through the country, I think people sort of, because it was a crisis that sort of affected us all, implicated us all, people really wanted some sort of information about how this awful disaster was evolving and [SPEAKER_00]: and spreading and moving through, you know, physically and then like over time.
[SPEAKER_00]: So you saw a lot of a lot of places sort of spin up tracker, you know, feed options for certain types of public data that was being made. [SPEAKER_00]: made available daily or weekly for COVID cases. [SPEAKER_00]: I worked at the Atlantic at the time and we some co-workers of mine on the science tech and health desk assembled some information feeds that like the Trump administration was not putting together at the time by going to like state health state health authorities.
[SPEAKER_00]: So you saw this a little bit during COVID when people were trying to [SPEAKER_00]: incomprehensible situation a little bit more comprehensible. [SPEAKER_00]: But I think that in the intervening few years since that was really a thing, the ability to create more sophisticated looking dashboards has really expanded.
[SPEAKER_00]: I think that the approximate cause of that is probably Claude Code and other sort of like a biocoding AI software that has allowed people that don't have [SPEAKER_00]: to sort of talk to an AI chatbot and get some help in putting together something that looks slick that works to pull in the data feeds that they're looking for, et cetera. [SPEAKER_00]: So you see a lot of people assembling dashboards that way.
[SPEAKER_00]: In the past few weeks, some of these dashboards have become quite popular. [SPEAKER_00]: There's one called World Monitor that my former colleague at the Atlantic Charlie Whartsil spoke to [SPEAKER_00]: the guy who set it up and set he said that in the first I think 21 days that it was that it was up and running like more than 2 million people had used it. [SPEAKER_00]: So you see these things being spun up very, very quickly in a way that looks pretty sophisticated.
[SPEAKER_00]: Like they're able to do a pretty good UI job at pulling in these different feeds. [SPEAKER_00]: And they pull in stock prices, oil futures, liquid natural gas, they pull in certain types of [SPEAKER_00]: You can get like a lot of, you know, vessel movement maps for the straight-of-form modes. [SPEAKER_00]: You can get information about flight paths for flights that are in the air.
[SPEAKER_00]: You can get, you know, sort of all kinds of stuff, the maps have reported strikes throughout the Middle East. [SPEAKER_00]: And then also a lot of times what these dashboards tend to include is just also posts. [SPEAKER_00]: They need the posts in there, right?
[SPEAKER_00]: Yeah, yeah, this is all posts, you know, this is it's all it all [SPEAKER_00]: So you get headlines or you get like Intel pulled in and basically that is just pulling from like you know, groups of like credible seeming guys on Twitter, credible seeming, you know, posts that are about like US security or about, you know, a bunch of guys who are suddenly, you know, [SPEAKER_00]: experts in come out of these experts in how liquid natural gas is processed and moved across the world.
[SPEAKER_00]: So you get like sort of these de-contextualized little nuggets of information from sources sort of unknown. [SPEAKER_00]: And this also sort of pulls together and you can sort of toggle between different
[SPEAKER_00]: And there's a lot of weird metrics that show up in these dashboards that are not necessarily useful for anything, you get like a one to one to a hundred stability score of like the situation you get things like that things that are not necessarily numbers are metrics or types of measurement that experts in these fields necessarily use, but they are sort of designed to provide a sense of context. [SPEAKER_00]: to the amateur situation on other at-home?
[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, I wonder what's going into the stability index and what is actually generating that number at the end of the day? [SPEAKER_01]: Right, right. [SPEAKER_01]: I was wondering, one of the things that stood out to me in thinking about the way that people are consuming this information and searching for all this information is in part like the conversations that we have been having for quite a while now about,
[SPEAKER_01]: open source intelligence, and that kind of community and how there seems to be a lot more attention on that in recent years, certainly since the war in Ukraine, but it certainly wasn't something that only exists since then. [SPEAKER_01]: It's been around for a long time. [SPEAKER_01]: Is there any kind of overlap between that kind of community?
[SPEAKER_01]: I guess group of discussions and what we're seeing with these dashboards [SPEAKER_00]: I think that there is some overlap here. [SPEAKER_00]: I think that the dashboards are sort of as useful as your capacity to evaluate the information within them. [SPEAKER_00]: If they're pulling in accurate, Brent crude prices, if they're pulling in accurate maps of how ships are moving in or around the straight of our moves in the Persian Gulf, [SPEAKER_00]: like that can all be useful.
[SPEAKER_00]: That can all be information that the real serious people need and use to evaluate the process that's going on and and I think that that can be something that I think that you don't have to be like necessarily like credentialed or part of like a particular organization in order to be a person who is smart enough to evaluate that information and to find that information [SPEAKER_00]: the the open flow of information about conflicts is good.
[SPEAKER_00]: I think that we can see this with the with the war and gaza.
[SPEAKER_00]: I think that the global perception of that conflict is a lot different than it would have been if [SPEAKER_00]: there weren't open source ways of learning about what is happening there and getting primary sources and having the expertise of people who are really genuinely knowledgeable about the field but are not necessarily like institutionally associated with the groups that are allowed to talk about what is happening in one of these conflicts. [SPEAKER_00]: So I think that like,
[SPEAKER_00]: You know, the, I think tools in a lot of sense are sort of not necessarily value neutral, but I think that information and the flows of information can be used for good or for ill. And I think that like the capacity to find and evaluate this information as someone who was not necessarily, you know, institutionally associated is a valuable thing on balance, I would say.
[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, that makes a lot of sense and I even feel like you brought up the war in Gaza and even in that case, I still feel and obviously it has changed a lot in the past a couple of years, but that kind of like the narrative or opinion communicated by the media Certainly in Canada, I'm sure it's the case in the United States is quite different from the public mood on [SPEAKER_01]: What is happening?
[SPEAKER_01]: You know what that we see indicated in polling and and things like that and those things haven't really caught up and that is part of the reason I think why people have been seeking out that information in Say social media and alternative news forms because they're not getting it from you know those institutions that were that were traditionally more trusted and things like that Even though that has shifted in the in the past couple of years as well right as what is going on over there has become has become undeniable, you know
[SPEAKER_00]: Right. [SPEAKER_00]: I think that the sort of disconnect that people often feel with current events and like what they can see with their own eyes of like first person video and things like that versus the way that institutional media and institutional groups decide to speak to the general public about those things. [SPEAKER_00]: I think that there's, you know, and this goes well beyond Gaza.
[SPEAKER_00]: I think that I think it makes people more likely to seek out these sort of aggregated [SPEAKER_00]: primary-ish sources, because there is like a general distrust, some of it earned some of it sort of astro-churfs, of like institutional and establishment narratives about a lot of world events, about conflicts, about things that people perceive, and often rightly so, to be delusherious to their well-being, to the well-being of
[SPEAKER_00]: of other people around the world to the general stability of their lives, and I think that the combination of that general feeling of distrust and mismatch between official narrative and experience and personal perception and all this information being more and more available to sort of gather on your own online. [SPEAKER_00]: I think that this is just sort of a logical outgrowth of all of that. [SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, I think that makes a lot of sense, right?
[SPEAKER_01]: And as I'm hearing you talk about that, you know, as we're discussing it, I'm thinking on the one hand about how, you know, there are very real reasons to be seeking out this information, to want to double check what it's going on, to be looking for as you're saying, you know, more primary sources that are able to share their experiences, their expertise, their knowledge, maybe even their people who are on the ground and you're being able to hear things firsthand.
[SPEAKER_01]: in a way that you might not, if you were just tuning in to CNN or something like that. [SPEAKER_01]: But then on the flip side of that, with all of that information, I wonder if there is kind of an overwhelm or why we feel like we need to be seeking out so much information and checking so much and whether because the information is there, we're taking a step too far in trying to consume everything and that just becomes a bit too much.
[SPEAKER_00]: I think that this is very much like a double sided coin on the one hand, the free flow of, you know, first person information primary sources is good is is like a like an arguable good in the general world and people wanting to be informed about the world they live in.
[SPEAKER_00]: I think that the downside of that is that because the general public often doesn't know what to make of a lot of these, even if the information is accurate, which is like itself, you know, not a given by any stretch of the imagination.
[SPEAKER_00]: I think that because a lot of [SPEAKER_00]: people are just, you look at oil prices, you look at maps of ships moving around the world, you look at headlines about liquid natural gas, processing facilities, and you are probably just a regular person who does not have a real sense of how any of that affects you, how any of that affects gas prices, how any of that affects the general global stability.
[SPEAKER_00]: I think that [SPEAKER_00]: it can keep you sort of like locked into those feeds. [SPEAKER_00]: It can draw you further and further and try to find more and more information to try to make things make sense, to try to find somebody who feels trustworthy, who feels knowledgeable, who can explain this to you. [SPEAKER_00]: And I think that that can, you know, suck people in, it can make people feel overwhelmed.
[SPEAKER_00]: It can, it can really, I think, start to harm people's mental health. [SPEAKER_00]: Honestly, not to be like GC about it, but I think that it is, it is easy to get overwhelmed. [SPEAKER_00]: It is easy to feel like things are spiraling out of control. [SPEAKER_00]: And you don't have a sense of what's happening. [SPEAKER_00]: It's easy to read a couple headlines, not really understand what they mean. [SPEAKER_00]: and catastrophize.
[SPEAKER_00]: It is easy to sort of become one with your phone, one with your feeds. [SPEAKER_00]: And that is like the logic, that is like the logic of the feed, that is what these social media systems platforms have like set us up to do, set us up to feel like, you know, if we just read a couple more posts.
[SPEAKER_00]: that you know just refresh again that the post that that explains it all that solves the problem is coming you just have to stay locked in and I think that this sort of like continuous drip of little bits of information about a global crisis to complex and to multifaceted even for experts to really say anything concrete about
[SPEAKER_00]: The average person trying to deal with that information, even if it's accurate, it can be, I think, really overwhelming and really delusherious to, you know, someone's like day to day, mental state because like there's, you know, you can refresh the fetus many times as you want. [SPEAKER_00]: There's no post coming that is going to.
[SPEAKER_00]: You know, black-filled, you know, prediction market addicts is just feeling like you have like, you know, the world is a big scary place right now forever. [SPEAKER_00]: It is, there's a lot going on that is terrible that you can't get your arms around no matter how you're hard you try.
[SPEAKER_00]: And I think the sense that like if you just try a little harder, if you just read a few more posts, if you just like get one more get your feet a little more dialed in, that it can feel sort of like you have a sense of control that you have a sense of participation, at least, and I think that that sort of like chasing that dragon is is not going to be satisfying ever, it is going to keep you engaged though. [SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, absolutely.
[SPEAKER_01]: Like it feels like, you know, listening to what you're saying that it kind of provides like a false sense of agency. [SPEAKER_01]: It's like, oh, because I have access to all this information that now I have some degree of power or influence or control over the advance that are affecting my life when really that's, that's very unlikely to be the case, unfortunately, because these things are such large forces, that are well beyond
[SPEAKER_01]: many cases maybe even a president of the United States control but you know he's obviously costing a lot of the problems now as well if he wasn't bombing a country we wouldn't be having oil shocks and things like that right but then on the the kind of
[SPEAKER_01]: other side of that right I guess there's there's there's that agency but you are also talking about the engagement and how it can kind of warp your perceptions and things like that and you know obviously we're all watching a war play out in front of our eyes and you know we've been watching a genocide play out for the past few years but I feel like [SPEAKER_01]: You can even think about it in much more mundane ways.
[SPEAKER_01]: I talk to people and this is reflected in the data as well that because they're getting all this information through, say, Facebook or certain other platforms, they end up feeling that their communities are less safe because it's focused on, if you think of things like next door or the Ring Door Bell videos that go around and people end up
[SPEAKER_01]: feeling that they live in a far less safe community, then they actually do, then the number show, then the reality of the lived experience would suggest. [SPEAKER_01]: And that can extend to so many other parts of society, right? [SPEAKER_01]: Even just people thinking that the world in general is a more dangerous and scary place, then it is in reality if you are out kind of living in it and experiencing it.
[SPEAKER_01]: And I feel like that is kind of connected to what you're saying, right? [SPEAKER_00]: Right, absolutely. [SPEAKER_00]: I think that, you know, not all information is equally useful to every person.
[SPEAKER_00]: There is information that you need to have to be like an informed citizen to make certain choices in your day-to-day life to understand how the actions of your government affect the lives of people overseas, to understand how, you know, American Empire functions to understand. [SPEAKER_00]: You know, it's good to understand oil markets. [SPEAKER_00]: It's good to understand how global logistics works on like sort of a basic level.
[SPEAKER_00]: It is good to understand how your life and well-being is linked up to the well-being of people. [SPEAKER_00]: You'll never meet in places you'll never go. [SPEAKER_00]: It is, I think, sort of fundamentally valuable to know all of those things. [SPEAKER_00]: To know how they are changing on a minute by minute level, on even like a day by day level, it's not, I think, useful. [SPEAKER_00]: to most people.
[SPEAKER_00]: It is not information that you have the context and capacity to put to use in a healthy, active way. [SPEAKER_00]: It is not something that the average person is going to find helpful in their understanding of their everyday life. [SPEAKER_00]: And it can be, and when you have a lot of information, but not a lot of capacity to process it or understand it or contextualize it yourself, that is like a target rich environment for bad actors.
[SPEAKER_00]: That is a target rich environment for people who are trying to warp your understanding of reality through warping your understanding of what that information means. [SPEAKER_00]: I think that that is the sort of downside of the, you know, sort of constant drip of information we have access to about [SPEAKER_00]: everything now.
[SPEAKER_00]: I think that because so many people want to feel like they are participating in their lives, so many people want to feel like they are participating in what their government is doing, that they are understanding how these actions beyond their control mean for actions within their control.
[SPEAKER_00]: And I think that because there is this sort of desperation to that desire to consume this information, because there is that desperation to find the post that explains it all, to find the metric that explains it all, to figure out how to understand what is available to you, that is where things go really, really arrive for some people.
[SPEAKER_00]: Because the media has, you know, I've got my criticisms of institutional media, but one of the things that it's very good at is having people that are subject matter experts on understanding information that comes in and understanding what is useful to disseminate to the public, what is not useful to disseminate to the public, what means something, what means nothing.
[SPEAKER_00]: Not all information isn't inherently meaningful, and it's not all inherently meaningful to every audience or every person. [SPEAKER_00]: So the ability to sort of like, you know, gather information, contextualize it and give it to people in a way that makes it make sense, even if you're not a subject matter expert is like a really... [SPEAKER_00]: important responsibility of media, and it is a sort of mode of operation that's easy to play act.
[SPEAKER_00]: That is easy to sort of adopt the signifiers of reliability of, you know, factualness and to [SPEAKER_00]: a lot of people in the process because they don't have the context, the expertise to look at what you're telling them and go, you're full of shit. [SPEAKER_00]: This is not what that means. [SPEAKER_00]: It is easy to lie to people who don't know what information means.
[SPEAKER_00]: But who feel like they are empowered to understand things because they do have like this sort of raw information. [SPEAKER_00]: And I think that that is something that we see happening like across the internet. [SPEAKER_00]: Like, and you know, it is not necessarily, I think the situation in Iran, the [SPEAKER_00]: you know, whatever misinformation merchants are out there doing with what is available right now.
[SPEAKER_00]: I don't see it yet causing any particular sort of like pattern of like radicalization or, you know, people breaking off into like the sort of weird ideological subsets that you get with some types of catastrophes that are that the generate like a QAnon or something like that. [SPEAKER_00]: But I do think that like, [SPEAKER_00]: I wonder what will happen with that because this is such an environment that is that is so right to take advantage of people's desperation to understand.
[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, definitely. [SPEAKER_01]: I think you're completely spot on with that, right?
[SPEAKER_01]: And I think it's something that we always need to be like aware of and thinking about and I feel like, you know, when you talk about the role that media can do, you know, some of the media that I read the most and that I pay the most attention to is actually like kind of like the financial and business media because it's like, I don't know, you know, people running companies need accurate information on what's happening.
[SPEAKER_01]: And so like the financial times in Bloomberg are like some of the sources that I go to most often, which is not to say that there aren't other sources that I rely on too, but it's like they're probably the media organizations I read some of the most of, right?
[SPEAKER_00]: Yeah, and it's interesting you say that that's one of the reasons that I decided to come to Bloomberg two years ago is because I think that financial media is interesting and that like the people who pay for it, the people who subscribe are people who really want accurate information because. [SPEAKER_00]: You know, capital of course has ideology and has a belief system that is not necessarily always based in reality.
[SPEAKER_00]: But if you're trading on financial markets, if you are, if your job is heavily tied to, you know, what particular companies are up to, what particular financial institutions are up to, what particular, what what is happening with, you know, commodities, like you have to live in reality. [SPEAKER_00]: you have to live in a world where like the actual facts and what they mean matters. [SPEAKER_00]: And I think that like before I started working in financial media, I read a lot of FT.
[SPEAKER_00]: I read a lot of Bloomberg because those, if I was researching a story on something else, like I knew that those sources would have reliable information because the people who pay for them require it. [SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, absolutely. [SPEAKER_01]: And I feel like in the US context, obviously, financial taxes is the UK, but owned by a Japanese company that Bloomberg doesn't have the same maybe objectionable ideological tilt as the Wall Street Journal.
[SPEAKER_01]: And so, that's what I rely on more. [SPEAKER_01]: But I feel like when you're talking about that and all that, what it also brought to mind is, I feel like for me, I'm probably, [SPEAKER_01]: the least tuned in that I have been in a number of years in part that's just because like, you know, the past nine or so months I've been working on my book and I haven't had the capacity to take in the amount of information that I would have in the past.
[SPEAKER_01]: And so like, you know, when I when I read your column, it was the first I had ever heard of these vodka to dashboards. [SPEAKER_01]: And like usually I feel like that was something I would have been aware of, you know, much earlier on. [SPEAKER_01]: and I was like, did I really miss out by not knowing about that before? [SPEAKER_01]: Like, I don't think so, but I still think it's really interesting now that I do know about it.
[SPEAKER_01]: And I kind of encounter this, you know, I'm not on Twitter anymore. [SPEAKER_01]: I don't post on Twitter. [SPEAKER_01]: And really much of last year, I still wasn't using it, even though I wasn't officially often and whatnot. [SPEAKER_01]: And I feel like some of the discussions I have with people now and I'm like, yeah, why not get off of it.
[SPEAKER_01]: One of the most common things I hear is like, yeah, but that's where, you know, you get the breaking news events and the post about breaking news when it's happening. [SPEAKER_01]: And at least for me, like, I believe it, you know, I'm not denying that it's that it's a reality. [SPEAKER_01]: But for me, I'm like, I don't, I think I'm doing just fine.
[SPEAKER_01]: Like, maybe I don't need that degree of, like, granularity in, you know, the kind of minute by minute updates on what is happening in a, [SPEAKER_01]: particular event, you know, as you say, I'll read an article all, you know, watch some news report from, you know, a certain news organization that I trust. [SPEAKER_01]: If there's something really big, it'll kind of find its way on the blues guy, most likely, or if not, I'll find it somewhere else.
[SPEAKER_01]: I did, I feel like in the past, I would have been one of these people who are like, I need to know every little bit. [SPEAKER_01]: And I feel like in the past six or so months, it's like, [SPEAKER_01]: I've become not so much of that person. [SPEAKER_00]: Yeah, it's like, do it.
[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, and my response has not been like, I need that more, but actually, how do I retreat from it even further and not have this constant grip of information that's like distracting me from other things? [SPEAKER_01]: I don't know how you feel about that, but yeah.
[SPEAKER_00]: Yeah, something, you know, some occasionally a post will go around Twitter or blue sky that's like, what is one thing about your profession that is widely understood within it, but that people outside of it don't seem to understand. [SPEAKER_00]: And one of the good ones for journalism is that breaking news reporting is often wrong. [SPEAKER_00]: Um, you know, and this has been true forever.
[SPEAKER_00]: This was, this is not the situation where it's like, um, you know, the day of reports in newspapers, um, 50 years ago, were all pristine and we have been irrevocably corrupted by the internet in that way. [SPEAKER_00]: But like breaking news reporting has, has been an, um, an exact science, the entirety of its existence. [SPEAKER_00]: getting things right immediately when like there is still so much information about anything to be uncovered is impossible.
[SPEAKER_00]: Like it is, you know, the process of uncovering information takes time even when you have like a live event. [SPEAKER_00]: So I think that people, again, I feel really strongly that this is a desire to feel a sense of agency in your everyday life because like, when you have access to so much information, you there begins to be this fundamental psychological mismatch between like how much you know and what you can do about it.
[SPEAKER_00]: And this was not as bad of a problem when information was more gate-capped and like there are also downsides to information being more gate-capped.
[SPEAKER_00]: But one thing it provided you was information in ways that like it was that were designed for you as a regular person and not a subject matter expert to consume that made them make sense and contextualize them for like who you are, [SPEAKER_00]: Generally, you know, where you are in the country in the world, you know, what your assumed level of knowledge about something technical is things like that.
[SPEAKER_00]: So the more that there is like a disconnect between your ability to use information to have some sort of agency and your ability to have information, I think that there is this like fundamental like psychological stress to that. [SPEAKER_00]: on the present. [SPEAKER_00]: You know so many things you can't do anything. [SPEAKER_00]: And that is like irritating to people.
[SPEAKER_00]: And so I think that like understanding that you were in a situation where like a lot of the information you're getting isn't good information. [SPEAKER_00]: And a lot of the, I mean, honestly, a lot of the analysis you're getting also isn't good because [SPEAKER_00]: a lot of people, you know, there's somebody's an economics expert one week. [SPEAKER_00]: They are a constitutional law expert the next week. [SPEAKER_00]: They are a commodities trader that the week after that.
[SPEAKER_00]: Like there are people who have huge platforms that are just there for engagement on whatever the topic to sure is that is the job they have set up for themselves. [SPEAKER_00]: So you are you're getting a lot of information and you're getting a lot of analysis of variable quality and you still can't do anything.
[SPEAKER_00]: You're still just like a normal person who is living, you know, in whatever town you live in, [SPEAKER_00]: trying to, you know, you know, provide for your family, trying to make sure your kids do their homework, whatever. [SPEAKER_00]: And I think that realizing that that causes you stress, and perhaps does not always pay you any particular dividends. [SPEAKER_00]: And then acting on that realization is like a healthy thing for most people.
[SPEAKER_00]: Because if you read the story two days later, that has all of the information that has all of the videos embedded in it, that are, you know, authenticated videos that are actually [SPEAKER_00]: that can tell you, you know, who drops that bomb, what was the facility that it hit, et cetera, or whatever it is for the news story that you're interested in. [SPEAKER_00]: I think that that is probably a less stressful but no less informed way to interact with that information.
[SPEAKER_00]: It means that you have to identify new sources that do what you want them to do for you, whether that's mainstream news, whether that is independent journalists, whoever it is, you have to do a little bit of groundwork to find those new sources that are giving you the types of analysis and information that you value.
[SPEAKER_00]: And then you have to be able to stop yourself from just constantly [SPEAKER_00]: reloading that feed and giving you that sort of like momentary hit of like, I'm in control. [SPEAKER_00]: I am part of this event. [SPEAKER_00]: I am part of, you know, I am one of the protagonists of reality. [SPEAKER_00]: I am here experiencing it with everybody else. [SPEAKER_00]: I am in the arena. [SPEAKER_00]: Because like you're not, you're on your phone.
[SPEAKER_01]: We're mostly we're all just on our phone. [SPEAKER_01]: No, really, unfortunately, right? [SPEAKER_01]: Yeah. [SPEAKER_01]: I feel like with what you're saying, like, it resonates so much with how I feel like I know that I'm missing out on little details as they come out. [SPEAKER_01]: And I know and I have no problem with the fact that I'm missing out on internet beefs because I really don't care.
[SPEAKER_01]: And I feel like there are so many people now who I have no idea who they are. [SPEAKER_01]: And I'm completely content not knowing who they are. [SPEAKER_01]: But I don't feel less informed like I still know what is going on.
[SPEAKER_01]: I have as you're saying I have the sources that I know I can trust I you know go to my financial press when I need that and I also see that like You know when it comes to say the reporting on Gaza I or even what's happening in Iran now I turn a lot to Al Jazeera. [SPEAKER_01]: I turn a lot to channel four news in the UK Which I find is really good for those sorts of things and then of course I can pay attention to what is going on in other
[SPEAKER_01]: of US media, other media in different areas, recognizing that maybe I'm getting a certain part of the story there, and I'm getting another part of the story from a different source, and hopefully I can kind of bring that together and come to an understanding based on that, but it's not based on all these little pieces that I'm trying to put together with no context at all, you know? [SPEAKER_00]: Right.
[SPEAKER_00]: Right. [SPEAKER_00]: And I think that like the skilled labor of aggregating and contextualizing information is valuable.
[SPEAKER_00]: I'm not just saying that because I'm one of the people who does it, but I think that if you are a person who has other things to attend to in life, [SPEAKER_00]: I think it is valuable to farm out some of that understanding to sources that you have evaluated and decided you can trust and I think that having multiple sources and having multiple points of view on major important events is valuable.
[SPEAKER_00]: you can to a certain extent like once you've done that like work of deciding what you think is is valuable and trustworthy, you can sort of set it and forget it. [SPEAKER_00]: You do not have to be right there alongside the people who are tasked with gathering and presenting that information, you do not have to be doing it with them. [SPEAKER_00]: You are not getting paid.
[SPEAKER_00]: You have another job, and I'm sure whatever your other job is is valuable and we want that those of us who do that work Once you to concentrate on it because we're not capable of doing whatever that is Totally, I'm completely with you and I wanted to you know before we start to wrap up our conversation I wanted to [SPEAKER_01]: talk about one other angle of this that comes up in your story that you brought up earlier as well.
[SPEAKER_01]: You know, we're in this information environment where there's so much coming at us. [SPEAKER_01]: And obviously there are a lot of huge events happening as well. [SPEAKER_01]: But this also comes at a moment where we've had the, I guess like the deregulation of gambling in the United States and many other countries, you know, Western countries certainly.
[SPEAKER_01]: And that has kind of brought up these platforms like Polymarkid and Kalshi that [SPEAKER_01]: are leading people to bet on a whole load of things now, you know, I feel like we saw, I feel like it's kind of like, obviously we had this crypto moment a few years ago where there was a lot of kind of speculative money going into coins and NFTs and all this kind of stuff, and now it's like the bedding has moved away from
[SPEAKER_01]: scam, financial products, or whatever, into information and trying to figure out what's going on. [SPEAKER_01]: I wonder what you make of how everything we have been talking about intersects with the rise of these platforms, especially in the past couple of years. [SPEAKER_00]: Yeah, I think that the deregulation of gambling is something that we will look back on as a society and wonder why we did that. [SPEAKER_01]: Oh my god, I thought it was an increase.
[SPEAKER_00]: Yeah, it's like was that the best idea we ever had probably not. [SPEAKER_00]: I think that like it's sort of a logical outgrowth of this idea that you have a lot of information, but not a lot of control, not a lot of agency. [SPEAKER_00]: So if you have all of this information, but you can't like. [SPEAKER_00]: stop your nation's government from bombing a, you know, a girl's elementary school. [SPEAKER_00]: You can't stop, you know, a lot of things from happening.
[SPEAKER_00]: You don't have that type of agency. [SPEAKER_00]: It's like, well, how do you express some sort of, [SPEAKER_00]: control. [SPEAKER_00]: How do you express some sort of agency? [SPEAKER_00]: How do you derive some sort of benefit from being locked in from monitoring the situation, from having all of these dashboards, from pulling your second monitor out of work from home storage and setting it up and getting your feeds dialed in.
[SPEAKER_00]: Like how do you [SPEAKER_00]: If you are a person with information in search of control, gambling has to look like, has to look like a big opportunity for you because something that gambling sort of exploits is the sense that is your individual sense that you know more than you do.
[SPEAKER_00]: And that you have more of an advantage than you actually do, that you watch enough football to understand who was likely to score a touchdown in this weekend's game, that you understand who was likely to hit this particular pitcher who your baseball team is starting in the next game. [SPEAKER_00]: over-wrought sense of expertise and sense of understanding out into the news environment in general.
[SPEAKER_00]: If you're someone who just cannot get off your phone and you know all of this or you feel like you know all of this stuff or you have all this information that you don't really have a chance to contextualize. [SPEAKER_00]: why not place some bets? [SPEAKER_00]: Why not? [SPEAKER_00]: Why not look at yourself and go, I'm backing me. [SPEAKER_00]: I have done all this research. [SPEAKER_00]: I have done all this reading. [SPEAKER_00]: I have set up my feeds.
[SPEAKER_00]: I have my second monitor going, you know, I haven't talked to my kids in weeks. [SPEAKER_00]: Um. [SPEAKER_00]: Yeah. [SPEAKER_01]: I need to grow on your face and that to invite me to show up. [SPEAKER_00]: Yeah, yeah, you're just, you're just, you know, you're in the extra bedroom, you have your, you have your set up going, um, you, uh, your wife is mad at you, um, um, the kids, the kids do not call you dad anymore, but like you, but you know it all.
[SPEAKER_00]: But you know it all, you have your feeds, you have, you know, the steady drip of information, and you feel like because you have consumed all of this information, you should be able to draw some conclusions. [SPEAKER_00]: So what is going to reward you for drawing the correct conclusions? [SPEAKER_00]: It's certainly not like your day job or your personal relationships, but like maybe.
[SPEAKER_00]: You know, you put some money on what you think is going to happen with, you know, a ground invasion of Iran. [SPEAKER_00]: What you think is going to happen with car island, what you think is going to happen with, you know, TSA in the U.S. with funding DHS, like you, you look for places where it feels like you can exert some control and even if that's just putting a thousand bucks on, you know, ground troops and do Iran before March 31st, then.
[SPEAKER_00]: maybe that's as good as it gets for you, maybe that as much as much control as it feels like you can have. [SPEAKER_00]: But it feels like something that you can do with the information you've gathered with your dedication to knowing things as they happen to the best of your ability. [SPEAKER_00]: So I think that, you know, it paints perfect sense.
[SPEAKER_00]: The polymarket was the company to sort of like adopt the monitoring the situation mean first, because like prediction markets are basically
[SPEAKER_00]: They are, you know, some place to do financial arbitrage on current events, so if you really think that you are more locked in more, you know, a rest of the situation, then 99% of the population then it starts to feel like you are leaving money on the table not to like put some money on on what you think is going to happen with some of these things that you've spent so much time absorbing numbers about. [SPEAKER_00]: an absorbing like sort of dubious Twitter analysis of.
[SPEAKER_00]: So, like, why not? [SPEAKER_00]: And that is, I mean, that's the same logic of sports gambling. [SPEAKER_00]: I am a huge football fan. [SPEAKER_00]: I have sports gambled on on football before. [SPEAKER_00]: I have made a decent bit of money. [SPEAKER_00]: I am not bad at it, but I stop doing it after a while because, you know, the lines get more efficient over time, the more information you give.
[SPEAKER_00]: to the sports books the more they get good at beating you and you know so for the first six months it was legal I had a wolf on with it and then it was like no I don't I'm not actually an expert like like I am I'm gonna take the my you know 500 bucks or whatever that I ended up up and I am going to go but like a lot of people have a hard time doing that and you know these
[SPEAKER_00]: betting markets, whether they're first sports or other things, are designed to make you have a hard time doing that. [SPEAKER_00]: I'm lucky that I was able to psychologically go, not for me anymore. [SPEAKER_00]: I'm going to cash out because so many people are just sort of pounded by these things, and pounded by the desire to go back to the table metaphorically.
[SPEAKER_00]: And when you're in an environment where they're such like a mismatch between information and your personal agency, [SPEAKER_00]: I can see why that is tempting for a lot of people. [SPEAKER_00]: Because what else are you going to do with the fact that you spend eight hours a day on your phone? [SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, definitely. [SPEAKER_01]: And I think it's really good that you were able to be able to pull yourself away from that and not feel the desire to go back.
[SPEAKER_01]: I remember one of my kind of formative memories of gambling was I was young, probably like a young teenager or something. [SPEAKER_01]: and I was with an uncle of mine and he put $20 into a VLT and we were up to $70 and I was like, let's take it out. [SPEAKER_01]: We've made this money. [SPEAKER_01]: This is great. [SPEAKER_01]: You can put a 20 back in, then we got 50. [SPEAKER_01]: But no, he had to keep using the machine until there was nothing left.
[SPEAKER_01]: And I was like, [SPEAKER_01]: this is wild. [SPEAKER_01]: We had all that money and now it's got, you know? [SPEAKER_00]: Exactly. [SPEAKER_01]: And so, yeah, I completely get what you're saying.
[SPEAKER_01]: And like, it's it's grim to hear that, but also like not surprising again, especially like when you are pushed to do these things by these companies who have particular incentives, they want to drive engagement, obviously they want to get you to be betting on, you know, whatever they can get you to bet on because they're making money off of it.
[SPEAKER_01]: and it really just shows how the whole environment, the whole infrastructure of the world that we interact with is created for these incentives that are like so beyond what is good for any of us. [SPEAKER_01]: I guess, you know, and I guess I just wonder like to wind down our conversation like, where do you think things go from here?
[SPEAKER_01]: Are we able to find a better balance or is this just going to be something [SPEAKER_00]: I hope that there are regulatory solutions in our future. [SPEAKER_00]: I don't think age verification is it. [SPEAKER_00]: I know that that's something that a lot of politicians want to talk about and want to implement. [SPEAKER_00]: Now, I do not think that is a good idea, broadly on anything. [SPEAKER_00]: I don't know exactly what the other regulatory options would be.
[SPEAKER_00]: I think that there is just like an argument to be made from a legal perspective, and I'm not a lawyer, but this is just the sense that I get, that Kalshi and Polly Market are just illegal betting markets, and should not be operating in the U.S. You know, when I was in college, I remember my freshman year, [SPEAKER_00]: there was a, this was back in the mid 2000s.
[SPEAKER_00]: So it was, we all had laptops, but we didn't have like sort of universal Wi-Fi and not everybody had like a great laptop. [SPEAKER_00]: So there was a computer lab in the first floor of my dorm building. [SPEAKER_00]: And for a lot of the, you know, my freshman year in college like you'd go in and out and there would be guys playing, you know, online poker on those computers [SPEAKER_00]: And it really did just go away. [SPEAKER_01]: Crazy, you could do that. [SPEAKER_01]: What?
[SPEAKER_00]: Yeah. [SPEAKER_00]: Yeah. [SPEAKER_00]: It was just regulated out of existence and the sort of ambient visibility of video poker just didn't exist anymore. [SPEAKER_00]: He didn't see people doing that anymore. [SPEAKER_00]: It was like they flipped this which.
[SPEAKER_00]: And I have to think that there has to be some sort of regulatory possibility of doing that with these prediction markets because I do think that they sort of do a little bit of arbitrage on our sort of corroded information environment. [SPEAKER_00]: And in a way that is like probably not healthy for people. [SPEAKER_00]: So there's that I'm not sure what to do about the rest of it.
[SPEAKER_00]: I'm not sure what to do about the sort of like the the sense that like we have a lot of information and most people don't know how to contextualize it don't know how to understand what of this they're looking at because that is beyond beyond you know the prediction markets that is like fertile ground for bad actors and I don't know.
[SPEAKER_00]: how you fix that, except with a robust media apparatus that is responsive to the demands of the general public, in responsive to good standards of factuality and [SPEAKER_00]: ideological unbiasedness and things like that. [SPEAKER_00]: I don't know how that works out. [SPEAKER_00]: If you're able to, if it's in the cards for you, paying for media is one of the best things that you can do.
[SPEAKER_00]: And that doesn't mean necessarily like subscriptions to big media organizations, although some, you know, if you find one valuable, go ahead and subscribe. [SPEAKER_00]: But that means podcasts, that means newsletters, independent media, most major and medium-sized cities in the US.
[SPEAKER_00]: I think have a local media organization or two that is trying to do good, rigorous, responsible, community-based reporting that might be more your speed than [SPEAKER_00]: local newspaper is owned by GANET or by Alden Global Capital. [SPEAKER_00]: If you can, you know, throw a couple bucks, someone's by, that is doing work that you find valuable and that you find rigorous, then that is, that is a great step toward. [SPEAKER_00]: sort of beating some of this back, I think.
[SPEAKER_00]: And then also, like, once you find your the sources that are valuable to you and that give you what you need, try to get out your phone a little bit. [SPEAKER_00]: Don't, don't monitor the situation. [SPEAKER_00]: Trust, if there are journalists, you trust media organizations, you trust, then trust them. [SPEAKER_00]: Set it and forget it. [SPEAKER_00]: let it go.
[SPEAKER_00]: And try to live in the world with the people around you, try to live in your community, try to live, try to do things that are beneficial for the your community with your time instead of looking at your phone. [SPEAKER_00]: And I know that that's like, you know, [SPEAKER_00]: we should all probably be doing better at that than we are. [SPEAKER_00]: But I think that if you feel overwhelmed right now, the best thing you can do is put your phone down.
[SPEAKER_00]: Read a book, go volunteer at a local organization that helps your unhoused neighbors pay for a, you know, independent media that you read on your laptop and not on your phone. [SPEAKER_00]: Make the unit a thing that you go to instead of a thing [SPEAKER_01]: I'm with you so much like even pick up a magazine or something, you know, if you want to catch up on things that way.
[SPEAKER_00]: I took a long flight recently and like 11 and a half hour flight and and I didn't do this on purpose, but I I brought like some books and some magazines that had piled up that I hadn't had a chance to read. [SPEAKER_00]: Because I like print media. [SPEAKER_00]: I subscribe to a bunch of print magazines and I didn't think entire 11 and a half hour flight without listening to a podcast and without.
[SPEAKER_00]: You know, scrolling my feeds too much like I just I read a New York magazine basically covered a cover there was a lot of fascinating stuff in there that like I probably wouldn't clicked on the link, but like when it was holding it there in my hand it looked interesting and I read a couple graphs and I kept going there, you know, different ways of consuming information provide different things for you psychologically and intellectually that are worth pursuing and over whatever is happening on your phone.
[SPEAKER_01]: uh, I'm completely with you, but my, my, I'm not a, I'm not like a movie watcher on planes and I find it so wild like seeing so many people like glued to the screen on the, I like read, I do work, you know, all depending, but it's like reading, working listening to music is like my, [SPEAKER_01]: my plane adventure, you know. [SPEAKER_01]: But I'm completely with you, right? [SPEAKER_01]: You know, we need better funding of media.
[SPEAKER_01]: We need to be looking at regulatory options, ban those betting platforms for a start, but maybe also looking at, you know, design solutions rather than age limits on the social media platforms to address some of the ways that they've designed their platforms in harmful ways, and you know, we're starting to see lawsuits on that front and things like that. [SPEAKER_01]: But then also, [SPEAKER_01]: cut your screen time, you know, get off the phone a bit. [SPEAKER_01]: I love it.
[SPEAKER_01]: I think that's the approach. [SPEAKER_01]: You know, certainly we need to know what's going on with the situation. [SPEAKER_01]: Maybe we don't need to monitor the situation as closely as we're often encouraged to do. [SPEAKER_01]: Amanda, always fantastic to chat with you, really enjoyed having you back on the show. [SPEAKER_01]: Thank you so much. [SPEAKER_00]: Of course, anytime I love, I always love chatting with you.
[SPEAKER_01]: A mandomol is a Bloomberg business week seen your reporter and writes the buying power column. [SPEAKER_01]: Tech won't save us with made-in partnership with the nation magazine and is hosted by me, PowerSmartx. [SPEAKER_01]: Production is by Kyla Hucen. [SPEAKER_01]: Tech won't save us relies on the support of listeners like you to keep providing critical perspectives on the tech industry.
[SPEAKER_01]: You can join hundreds of other supporters by willing to patreon.com slash Tech won't save us and making a pledge of your own to help us hit our goal of 100 new supporters for the show's 6th birthday. [SPEAKER_01]: Thanks for listening and make sure to come back next week.