Dem Voters Triumph; plus That Springsteen Movie - podcast episode cover

Dem Voters Triumph; plus That Springsteen Movie

Nov 05, 202539 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

Democratic candidates won everywhere they ran on Tuesday – Abagail Spanberger and a Democratic state legislature in Virginia, Mikie Sherrill in New Jersey, Gavin Newsom’s redistricting proposition in California, and of course Zohran Mamdani in New York City. Trump didn’t even campaign against any them. John Nichols has our analysis.

Also: Greil Marcus comments on the new film about Bruce Springsteen writing the songs for his 1982 album “Nebraska”, starring starring Jeremy Allen White of ‘The Bear.” The movie misses the context: working class decline in Reagan’s America. Greil Marcus is the author of two dozen books, including “Mystery Train,” which has just been reissued in a special 50th anniversary edition.



Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands

Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Transcript

[SPEAKER_02]: From the nation magazine, this is Start Making Sense. [SPEAKER_02]: I'm John Weiner. [SPEAKER_02]: Later in the show, Rock-Critic Grill Marcus will comment on the new film about Bruce Springsteen writing the songs for his 1982 album Nebraska. [SPEAKER_02]: The film misses the context. [SPEAKER_02]: Springsteen's theme is working class decline in Reagan's America. [SPEAKER_02]: But first, maybe you heard the news Americans voted in several key elections on Tuesday.

[SPEAKER_02]: John Nichols has our analysis in a minute. [SPEAKER_02]: The Democratic victories were big on Tuesday, big everywhere, for comment in analysis we turn, of course to John Nichols' executive editor of the nation, John will come back. [SPEAKER_02]: It's great to be with you, John. [SPEAKER_02]: Briefly, some of the highlights, in New Jersey, Mikey Cheryl won the governor's race with 56% that's a 13-point margin.

[SPEAKER_02]: In Virginia, Abigail Spanberger won the governor's race with 58% [SPEAKER_02]: That's a 16-point margin. [SPEAKER_02]: In California, the redistricting initiative won with 64 percent, that's a 28-point margin. [SPEAKER_02]: In Pennsylvania, the three Democratic Supreme Court justices, [SPEAKER_02]: All one retention by 61% that's a 22% divide and in New York, of course, Zahran, Mondani, broke 50% in a three-way race. [SPEAKER_02]: Let's start with New York City.

[SPEAKER_02]: They have elected a mayor who's a Muslim, a democratic socialist, and an immigrant. [SPEAKER_02]: As he made very clear in his victory speech on Tuesday night, [SPEAKER_02]: The pundits have all been saying New York City is unique. [SPEAKER_02]: It's a great place, it's an important place, but what works in New York won't work in most other places.

[SPEAKER_02]: But you and Katrina Vanden, who will have a editorial posted at themation.com where you say, Momsdani has the potential to transform not just the city, but the politics of a nation. [SPEAKER_02]: Please explain. [SPEAKER_01]: Well, there's simply no question that the New York mayoral race was nationalized. [SPEAKER_01]: Mom Donnie did that to some extent on his own, simply because he was an incredibly dynamic and interesting candidate.

[SPEAKER_01]: are their ideas, are their tactics, are their stances that can go beyond New York. [SPEAKER_01]: The answer is absolutely yes. [SPEAKER_01]: He won because he communicated aggressively. [SPEAKER_01]: He reached out to people. [SPEAKER_01]: He used social media in very creative and dynamic ways. [SPEAKER_01]: He was open and blunt and human. [SPEAKER_01]: That's a lesson right there. [SPEAKER_01]: You don't have to adopt all his stance on every issue.

[SPEAKER_01]: but the approach, the boldness, the clarity, that's useful. [SPEAKER_01]: But then let's get into the issues. [SPEAKER_01]: What do you say? [SPEAKER_01]: The most important thing is affordability that people can afford to live where they reside, right? [SPEAKER_01]: You know? [SPEAKER_01]: I mean, it's that's nothing radical about that. [SPEAKER_01]: I don't know, it sounds like communism to me.

[SPEAKER_01]: I know, you know, it's like to say to ask people, what do you need to get by? [SPEAKER_01]: And then to come up with practical proposals that can help them do it. [SPEAKER_01]: That's not radical. [SPEAKER_01]: That's what we used to call politics. [SPEAKER_01]: And it's only because the billionaire consultant class has come in and tried to define politics so narrowly that anyone questioned that. [SPEAKER_01]: So, of course, Mombani is transferable.

[SPEAKER_01]: Not in exact details, but again, in the boldest, in the clarity, in the focus on accountability, and if I can offer one more thing. [SPEAKER_01]: Is there a Mombani spoke bluntly about Gaza? [SPEAKER_01]: He did so from the start of Gaza's not necessarily, you know, issue that New York is going to have a profound impact on on any given day. [SPEAKER_01]: But it offered a clarity about where he was coming from.

[SPEAKER_01]: And when he was attacked on that, he didn't back off his position. [SPEAKER_01]: Mom Downey has shown the Democrats across the country that on controversial issues, on challenging issues, if you hold firm to where you're at, if you talk about it, and if you willingly engage with people who disagree with you, you often can get the support of people who may be convinced to adopt your position, but even if they're not who's said, look.

[SPEAKER_01]: This is a person principal who believes in what they're saying. [SPEAKER_01]: And I can agree with them on a whole bunch of other things. [SPEAKER_01]: I'm going to vote for this person, even though we might have this disagreement. [SPEAKER_01]: Democrats desperately need to learn that lesson.

[SPEAKER_02]: Mombani had in the end a hundred thousand volunteers doing canvassing, knocking on doors to get out the vote, not since Obama has there been such a massive outpouring of volunteers who want to work for a candidate.

[SPEAKER_02]: Bernie, of course, also had a massive outpouring of volunteers, but, you know, Obama never did anything with his volunteer army and Bernie hasn't done much with his, what about what do you think my mom-dommie could do, what should he do, what do you think he's likely to do with his 100,000 volunteers? [SPEAKER_01]: Well, that's a very important question, probably the most important, because we know that now that he's won.

[SPEAKER_01]: Zaramam Downey is going to face a pushback and assault from Washington and from the billionaire class that spends tens of billions trying to feed him. [SPEAKER_01]: They're not going to stop. [SPEAKER_01]: So what Mardani needs is to have that base highly mobilized to push back and to push forward. [SPEAKER_01]: And what I've heard in talking to the bomb down he folks is that that has already been a part of the planning.

[SPEAKER_01]: When we interviewed Zormon Gani for the nation, we asked him about this months ago, and he said very clearly that he intends to keep using a social media in the way that he does, to keep moving around the city in the way that he does essentially to keep campaigning. [SPEAKER_01]: Of course, he has focused on governing. [SPEAKER_01]: That's a given. [SPEAKER_01]: But in this case, to govern, he needs to have the people on his side in a big way.

[SPEAKER_01]: For many of the things that Mom Downey wants to do, he needs the State of New York, particularly Governor Kathy Hockel, who did endorse him toward the end, to remove barriers to that funding, et cetera, and so having a highly mobilized space in New York City that is clearly supportive of what Mom Downey is doing, where you can see the numbers, where you can see the communications that has a real potential to move Hockel and New York State government, if that happens, then Mom Downey can start posting successes.

[SPEAKER_01]: And this is the critical thing. [SPEAKER_01]: Mondani promised a lot. [SPEAKER_01]: Now that he is going to be mayor, he does have to deliver the more quickly he delivers on some of those core promises. [SPEAKER_01]: The more space he will have on the really difficult ones. [SPEAKER_01]: So I think having that organized basis critical, I think you're going to see the launch of a project to keep the base organized. [SPEAKER_01]: I will tell you, I think in coming days.

[SPEAKER_02]: Mamdani in his victory speech explicitly addressed four words to Trump. [SPEAKER_02]: He said, quote, turn the volume up, that's a challenge, that's a provocation, that's kind of daring Trump to attack New York City. [SPEAKER_02]: You know, it's true that Trump can do a lot to hurt ordinary New Yorkers first by sending his armies of deportation thugs, and then by cutting funds for vital public services.

[SPEAKER_02]: That'll make Mombani more important nationally as the leading target of Trump, but can [SPEAKER_01]: I don't think it's reckless. [SPEAKER_01]: I think it relates to your previous question.

[SPEAKER_01]: And that is, how do you organize a city to trump profit, right, to have a base of people that are ready to respond in nonviolent ways, if you're in the streets, but also in put very political ways by petitioning, by communicating, by letting Republicans in New York [SPEAKER_01]: New Yorkers want their city to succeed. [SPEAKER_01]: They want to work with people.

[SPEAKER_01]: There's so much about turning the volume up on the positive messages of Mondani's campaign that I see as smart politics. [SPEAKER_01]: It's not a provocation, right? [SPEAKER_01]: It looked Trump has provoked again and again and again. [SPEAKER_01]: I think what Mondani is saying is that in the face of Trump's provocations, [SPEAKER_01]: Mombani wants the people in New York to say what to say what they believe, to be confident, to be strong in the face of threats from other places.

[SPEAKER_01]: What we know about Donald Trump is that when he faces a city, a state that is strong, there are instances where he is backed off. [SPEAKER_01]: LA has seen, you know, a horrible assault, but then some back down on the part of the friends. [SPEAKER_01]: And so, and I think that's rooted in, in the fact that people in LA really organized strongly and really pushed back. [SPEAKER_01]: Remember, one of the things that happened in LA was that you had people on the street.

[SPEAKER_01]: and but you also had very mainstream politicians all the way up up the ladder aligning with uh... these movements that are saying that we don't want our city invaded and we don't want Donald Trump you know doing all the stuff that he does and and i think that what my dad is saying that new york will similarly [SPEAKER_01]: seek to resist, we're necessary, but also seek to build the political base to push back. [SPEAKER_01]: And can I offer one final notion on that?

[SPEAKER_01]: The results from yesterday, not just in New York, but nationally. [SPEAKER_01]: suggest that there is a much broader political base to be built, a much broader political movement to be built around some of the concepts we heard with the No Kings protests around many of the concepts we saw expressed in this election.

[SPEAKER_01]: And so with that in mind, the possibility that we are entering into a new political space, one where [SPEAKER_01]: where it is possible to say no to Donald Trump and to amplify that no and then cause if not Trump himself at least some Republicans to rethink that's certainly worth exploring. [SPEAKER_02]: Well, we have to talk about California redistricting initiative prop 50 got 64% yes.

[SPEAKER_02]: And surprisingly big turnout, this was an election with no candidates and only one thing on the ballot, this proposition. [SPEAKER_02]: It will create five more democratic seats in the house to match Texas, Jerry Mandarin. [SPEAKER_02]: You know, it wasn't clear at the beginning that this was going to do so well. [SPEAKER_02]: Now, if the outset, the no side had a lot behind it at a lot of money, $10 million from a right-wing billionaire was the initial funded initial mailers.

[SPEAKER_02]: We got a couple of them right away in the first week, a former Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger was kind of the face of the vote, no, but Gavin Newsom succeeded. [SPEAKER_02]: He raised, they say, $114 million.

[SPEAKER_02]: We saw [SPEAKER_02]: ads on this world series out here vote yes ads that featured Obama a.o.c. [SPEAKER_02]: Elizabeth Warren Senator Alex Padilla and others and they said it was $38 million raised in small donations from supporters responding to those let's call them irritating text messages emails instagram posts the [SPEAKER_02]: Prop 50 redistricting California has made Gavin Newsom the Democrats chief antagonist to Trump. [SPEAKER_02]: Do you think that's right?

[SPEAKER_01]: Probably look I think even before Prop 50's results were in he had become that Newsom has worked very very hard to kind of counter Trump on Trump's own ground if you will And that is to create social media that is combat of that is funny that is challenging [SPEAKER_01]: You had to be careful to differentiate between someone who is a face of opposition to Trump and someone who will necessarily replace Trump as president.

[SPEAKER_01]: I was there one other thing, John, and this is separate apart from the personalities. [SPEAKER_01]: California intervention at this point shows A that you can push back against Trump. [SPEAKER_01]: but also even in red states where they are red drawing lines. [SPEAKER_01]: In Ohio, in Indiana, in Missouri, there's an effort to grab some seats from Democrats for the Republicans.

[SPEAKER_01]: Now that you've seen the success of the California pushback, I think you will see pushbacks in, for instance, Ohio, where you can petition a referendum onto the ballot that puts changes on hold. [SPEAKER_01]: and so. [SPEAKER_01]: Same in Missouri. [SPEAKER_02]: Same in Missouri. [SPEAKER_01]: That's right. [SPEAKER_01]: It's a lot of work, right?

[SPEAKER_01]: But what inspires you to go out and work to do something like that, to push back prevent the the Jerry Mandory, then a massive victory in California. [SPEAKER_01]: I think it's very influential. [SPEAKER_02]: We have to talk about Virginia. [SPEAKER_02]: Virginia had been until this Tuesday, a purple state. [SPEAKER_02]: In that every public in governor, Republican state attorney general, the state legislature was very closely divided.

[SPEAKER_02]: Tuesday night, I think we can say, we turn Virginia blue. [SPEAKER_02]: Abigail Spanberger won by a massive 15 percent margin she got 57.5 percent of the vote Kamala Harris just a year ago got 52 percent and the Republican vote in Virginia fell from 46 percent a year ago to

[SPEAKER_02]: 42% this week, the hard one, which Democrats won was electing the Democratic candidate for Attorney General, Jay Jones, who won by a comfortable margin in the end, the most amazing one was the House of delegates, where we need a clear majority in order to do the redistricting that will create a couple of more Democratic House seats in Virginia, Democrats won every

[SPEAKER_02]: district for the House of delegates, flip 13 seats, expanded the Democrats' majority in the House of delegates from a one-seat majority to 64 to 36. [SPEAKER_02]: This is really a historic blue wave that is probably going to change the whole future of Virginia and Abigail Spanberger just won more votes than any gubernatorial candidate in Virginia [SPEAKER_02]: What goes beyond blue? [SPEAKER_01]: I mean, that's the question.

[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, what you saw in these results, every county in Virginia, every single county, the most rural Republican areas, all shifted significantly toward the Democrats. [SPEAKER_01]: And so it was a stunning victory.

[SPEAKER_01]: And in Georgia, which is a very much a battleground state, Democrats winning in counties where they have never won, or at least never won in the modern age, they were winning their numbers [SPEAKER_01]: to the extent that there are people who follow Georgia closely, who say, you know, if you had this pattern last year, a couple of or four years ago, some other, in some recent elections, Democrats would have been in a very, very good position.

[SPEAKER_01]: And so I think what we need to take away from this is that everywhere across the country, you saw movement. [SPEAKER_01]: And what that movement was, that purple states became blue, [SPEAKER_01]: In some cases, red states became purple, and even in the red is to red places, you saw breaks through winds. [SPEAKER_01]: What this tells us, there's a pushback against Donald Trump. [SPEAKER_01]: It's real, it's national, it runs deep.

[SPEAKER_01]: Secondly, there is a pushback against the, frankly, and I'm trying to find the scientific word for it. [SPEAKER_01]: Oh, yeah, stupid approach of Republicans to this negative advertising, right? [SPEAKER_01]: They got this theory that you could go wildly over the top. [SPEAKER_01]: and that somehow attack ads that said wild, crazy, irresponsible things we're going to work.

[SPEAKER_01]: I think this election showed that people have developed some real perspective about that, and they don't work as well, and I think one final thing is, it is possible, not certain. [SPEAKER_01]: But it is possible that Democrats may finally be figuring out that mobilization of their base is the way to win. [SPEAKER_01]: And my amdani did that's truly in New York. [SPEAKER_01]: But the Virginia mobilizations were very effective as well. [SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, yeah.

[SPEAKER_02]: So where does this leave Trump and the Republicans Trump? [SPEAKER_02]: didn't even try to campaign, wouldn't spend any of his own money on his own candidates. [SPEAKER_02]: Obviously he didn't want to be associated with the worst people in the world losers. [SPEAKER_02]: Turn out to be his candidates. [SPEAKER_02]: And what are their issues? [SPEAKER_02]: Transathletes? [SPEAKER_02]: that doesn't seem to be something to work. [SPEAKER_02]: How about the menace of illegal aliens?

[SPEAKER_02]: You know, the Paul's show. [SPEAKER_02]: People like immigrants. [SPEAKER_02]: They think the immigrants are good for America. [SPEAKER_02]: Terriffs. [SPEAKER_02]: Is that a winner? [SPEAKER_01]: I don't think heard to lose her. [SPEAKER_02]: I don't think so. [SPEAKER_02]: So. [SPEAKER_02]: How can Republicans maintain control of the House a year from now?

[SPEAKER_02]: Really, there's only one way voter repression using the power of the federal government to prevent people from voting, send federal troops to intimidate people outside polling places in blue cities, try to disqualify the democratic winners. [SPEAKER_02]: And of course, the Supreme Court allowing unlimited gerrymandering.

[SPEAKER_02]: They can really only win by attacking the whole system of voting itself and that won't be easy because voting in America is not controlled by the federal government. [SPEAKER_02]: It's controlled by the states which then empower the counties, the county register our voters is the one who runs the voting system. [SPEAKER_02]: So we're going to see a big battle over voting suppression in the next year and it could get pretty, pretty ugly. [SPEAKER_01]: It'll get very ugly.

[SPEAKER_01]: We saw quite a bit of it already in New Jersey. [SPEAKER_01]: New Jersey was a state where there seemed to be a lot of dirty tricks being played out by the Republicans' release of military records that was far more extensive than was appropriate. [SPEAKER_01]: Release of financial records against the Democratic candidate.

[SPEAKER_01]: A lot of threats and intimidation, especially in cities with large minority populations, the arrest of a sitting member of Congress, when she tried to inspect the detention center, the threat and arrest of brief arrests of the mayor of Newark. [SPEAKER_01]: These things are not all related to the election, but they have a tension around them, a pressure or a highlighting of issues.

[SPEAKER_01]: And in New Jersey, I think there are many people who thought that that race for governor [SPEAKER_01]: You know, narrow down and and what Cheryl, the Democratic candidate did at the end was just run clips of ads showing her opponent saying he didn't disagree with Trump on anything and I think it devastated the opponent was who had previously been relatively mainstream new new Jersey Republican. [SPEAKER_01]: And result here is that I think we've had test cases.

[SPEAKER_01]: I think we've seen that you can push back. [SPEAKER_01]: It doesn't mean that it isn't going to be difficult. [SPEAKER_01]: I think it's going to be very difficult, challenging time. [SPEAKER_01]: But this election gives a lot of hope for how you can can challenge us. [SPEAKER_01]: And if there's one final thing I would suggest, it is that I think that Trump is not the only Republican. [SPEAKER_01]: He, the party, is a culture personality. [SPEAKER_01]: He is central to it.

[SPEAKER_01]: He does threaten fellow Republicans. [SPEAKER_01]: But after this election, if I'm a Republican from a congressional district that voted for Joe Biden and for Kamala Harris, as there are a number, if I'm a Republican who's facing a tough reelection, am I going to do everything Trump tells me to do, or am I going to try to scramble toward, you know, a somewhat more sane position. [SPEAKER_01]: Most won't. [SPEAKER_01]: Most will stay with Trump.

[SPEAKER_01]: But I think there is the possibility that you start to see some real, you know, some fissures, some divides within the Republican Party. [SPEAKER_01]: And of course, if Trump and his allies get all freaked out about that and are focusing on discipline within their own party.

[SPEAKER_01]: that creates a much more open lane for Democrats to just head toward no member of 2026 with renewed energy and with perhaps an opening up of hope not just to flip the house but even perhaps with the mobilize turnout the right candidates to flip the Senate. [SPEAKER_02]: An opening of hope, John Nichols, pretty to miffinemation.com. [SPEAKER_02]: John, thanks for talking with us today. [SPEAKER_02]: Great pleasure to be with you, sir.

[SPEAKER_02]: Now it's time to talk about the new movie, Springsteen, deliver me from nowhere. [SPEAKER_02]: It's about Bruce Springsteen in 1982, writing the songs for his Nebraska album. [SPEAKER_02]: For that, we turned to Grill Marcus. [SPEAKER_02]: He's written many books, mostly about American music, including lipstick traces, and most recently what nails it.

[SPEAKER_02]: His column Real Life Rock has been running since 1986, [SPEAKER_02]: Now it's at Substack, and his first book, The Classic Mystery Train, has just been reissued in a special 50th anniversary edition with a new introduction by the author. [SPEAKER_02]: We reached him today in Minneapolis. [SPEAKER_02]: Greel, welcome back and congratulations on the 50th anniversary of Mystery Train. [SPEAKER_03]: Well, thank you. [SPEAKER_03]: I'm glad to be talking with you again.

[SPEAKER_02]: Well, Nebraska was the Springsteen album that followed the river, which had been his first number one album. [SPEAKER_02]: The river had a gigantic tour, 140 shows, performances that lasted up to four hours. [SPEAKER_02]: At Madison Square Garden, he did four sold out shows, total of 80,000 people, all of them singing along on everybody's got a hungry heart. [SPEAKER_02]: And then he did Nebraska. [SPEAKER_02]: Please explain why that album was such a shock.

[SPEAKER_03]: Well, you know, it's an album. [SPEAKER_03]: It's essentially a folk album. [SPEAKER_03]: That's also a punk album. [SPEAKER_03]: Dave Marsh said at the time that it had more in common with punk records like the Advertis Gary Gilmore's eyes, which was a song about what a Gary Gilmore donated his eyes to science to an eye bank and you got them and you're living your life seeing through Gary Gilmore's eyes.

[SPEAKER_03]: And the sex pistol's bodies, that's what Dave Merse said that, you know, that there is something absolutely raw, unfiltered. [SPEAKER_03]: dangerous and damaging in this record. [SPEAKER_03]: It's also a folk record. [SPEAKER_03]: It also goes back to Dylan's early albums, goes back to Woody Guthrie, goes back to murder ballots by Clarence Ashley and Doc Boggs in the 1920s and 1930s. [SPEAKER_03]: and that's what Nebraska is made up of.

[SPEAKER_03]: That's the cosmos he's inhabiting. [SPEAKER_02]: So Springsteen's new songs in 1982 came out of this old American tradition, but they also came out in a specific context Reagan had just been elected president. [SPEAKER_03]: the most felt rejection of Ronald Reagan's America, which was meant to enrich the rich, impoverished the poor, marginalized, everyone who was white, was male, didn't deserve power. [SPEAKER_03]: Let's seem to me, absolutely inescapable.

[SPEAKER_02]: Yeah, you wrote in 1982 about Springsteen's characters on Nebraska that they speak with the bleakest acceptance with a refusal that does not know itself. [SPEAKER_02]: Close quote, thought that was terrific. [SPEAKER_02]: Now the movie has a different approach, let us say.

[SPEAKER_02]: This is the movie where starring Jeremy Alan White of the Bayer, director Scott Cooper explained recently [SPEAKER_02]: In the movie, his springsteen is, quote, just trying to understand himself to reclaim a piece of his humanity. [SPEAKER_02]: And of course, springsteen himself has written about being depressed after the river tour, but you think this is not just about trying to understand himself. [SPEAKER_03]: No, not at all. [SPEAKER_03]: I don't, look, I don't care.

[SPEAKER_03]: I never care about the performer, the artist. [SPEAKER_03]: I don't care what Bruce Springsteen was going through. [SPEAKER_03]: I don't care what he thought he was writing about or what he thought his motives are. [SPEAKER_03]: Any more than I care about those questions when they apply to Lana Del Rey or Bob Dylan. [SPEAKER_03]: they're meaningless to me. [SPEAKER_03]: What I'm interested in are the songs and what they say, what they say in the world.

[SPEAKER_03]: Once you put a song into the world, you lose control of it. [SPEAKER_03]: other people hear it, and they hear it in ways that make sense to them, and may make sense of their own lives or part of their lives.

[SPEAKER_03]: So I don't, I have no interest whatsoever in this being some sort of confessional album or as it appeared to me, [SPEAKER_03]: in the movie, an album made by Bruce Springsteen's inner child, you know, working out his childhood traumas and somehow coming to grips with his place in the world whatever it might be.

[SPEAKER_03]: I could care less, you know, I know Bruce, I like Bruce, I consider him a friend, but I'm not interested [SPEAKER_03]: and I think it's a reductive way to listen to watch. [SPEAKER_03]: I got very, very tired in the movie of the black and white flashbacks to his childhood and his abusive father and his protective but [SPEAKER_03]: and it creates social characters. [SPEAKER_03]: Characters who make political sense in a political movement.

[SPEAKER_02]: I'd like to talk about briefly about the song that ends then the Brasca album, reason to believe. [SPEAKER_02]: A lot of people see it as a kind of anthem of hope. [SPEAKER_03]: reason to believe. [SPEAKER_03]: I know to Bruce was meant to be a deeply cynical song about how people will always fool themselves, that things are going to get better, that everything is going to be okay, that there's a way out. [SPEAKER_03]: when there isn't.

[SPEAKER_03]: And I remember talking to Bruce at the time about this song and his utter bafflement that people took this as some sort of redemptive or even uplifting song.

[SPEAKER_03]: And he says, look, it starts out with a guy standing over a dead dog thinking that if he stood there long enough [SPEAKER_03]: Well, Jeremy Allen talks about discussing this song with Bruce and Bruce saying essentially if, exactly that, there's no hope in this song, and Jeremy Allen writes as, well, you know, I feel hope in this song, and then he says, I said to Bruce, don't you think that when you record a song, you lose control of it.

[SPEAKER_03]: It's out there in the world for people to make [SPEAKER_03]: And I completely agree with that. [SPEAKER_03]: You know, Jeremy Ellen White's sense of that song may be completely different from mine, but it's his. [SPEAKER_03]: So if he performs that song in the movie with an element of redemption in it, that's because that's how he feels that song, and that's the way he can't help but put it across.

[SPEAKER_02]: I find it hard to imagine anything more hopeless than this image of the dead dog in the ditch as our world that we live in now. [SPEAKER_02]: So I'm kind of with you on this. [SPEAKER_03]: There are verses that follow that aren't as rough. [SPEAKER_03]: At the end of every hard working day, people find some reason to believe. [SPEAKER_03]: And isn't that great? [SPEAKER_03]: Isn't that what keeps us human? [SPEAKER_03]: You know, that's how a lot of people heard that song.

[SPEAKER_02]: There is, in the movie, a very uplifting moment towards the end where Springsteen's manager, John Landa, alone in a room with Bruce, plays him on the 1955 record last mile of the way by the sole stirers of Sam Cook was the lead singer of the sole stirers in those days. [SPEAKER_02]: Tell us about that part of the movie. [SPEAKER_03]: That was fascinating to me and utterly moving. [SPEAKER_03]: I didn't know that song, I'd never heard it.

[SPEAKER_03]: So this was completely new to me. [SPEAKER_03]: And it's majesty, it's depth, it's range, the way it creates an entire world that you wanna be part of was just kind of shocking. [SPEAKER_03]: And to me, [SPEAKER_03]: That scene of John Lando puts on this little cassette and he plays this song and he and Bruce just sit back and listen to it.

[SPEAKER_03]: You know what that said to me was this is showing both of them, a picture of a place in music's heaven that they will never reach and yet it's something to reach for even though you'll never make it. [SPEAKER_03]: There's no way that Bruce Springsteen [SPEAKER_03]: or just about anybody else on earth will ever be the singer that Sam Cook was. [SPEAKER_03]: And yet you hear that and you say, I want to feel the way he must have felt when he sang that song.

[SPEAKER_03]: And so I'm going to sing a song that seems as true to me is that must have seemed to him. [SPEAKER_03]: at that moment and go as far as I can. [SPEAKER_03]: So a picture of how far there is to go, even if you'll never get to the end of the road, even you'll never get to the end of that last mile. [SPEAKER_03]: That's a great thing. [SPEAKER_03]: That was my favorite scene in the whole movie.

[SPEAKER_02]: Well, let's talk a little about mystery train, the 50th anniversary edition, the subtitle of the book is Images of America in Rock and Rolled Music. [SPEAKER_02]: It changed the thinking of a lot of us, in some cases, it changed the lives of a lot of us.

[SPEAKER_02]: It's about six-metre musicians, Robert Johnson, Harmonica Frank, Randy Newman, the band, [SPEAKER_02]: and about how each absorbed in transformed their moment in American culture, Bruce Springsteen said about mystery train that it, quote, gets as close to the heart and soul of America in the American music as the best of rock and roll. [SPEAKER_02]: So those quote, mystery train I know is an Elvis song.

[SPEAKER_02]: was his last song for Sun Records that long black train got my baby and gone. [SPEAKER_02]: You say in the book it's one of those songs that say this is the way the world is and there's nothing you or anyone can do about it. [SPEAKER_02]: But actually Elvis does something with this song. [SPEAKER_02]: What is it? [SPEAKER_03]: Here is a song that goes back. [SPEAKER_03]: It goes way back.

[SPEAKER_03]: It goes back most explicitly to 1930 when the Carter family recorded worried man blues. [SPEAKER_03]: It takes a worried man to sing a worried song. [SPEAKER_03]: I'm worried now, but I won't be worried long, meaning I'll be dead. [SPEAKER_02]: So be dead and they'll be in heaven. [SPEAKER_02]: That's why they're not worried.

[SPEAKER_03]: It's a song that came out at a year into the depression when the country was falling apart when people were losing their jobs when they were starving two years before Franklin Roosevelt became president. [SPEAKER_03]: And this is a song, it touched a nerve all over the country. [SPEAKER_03]: People heard this song as describing their lives in that moment. [SPEAKER_03]: A man lays down by the river to sleep. [SPEAKER_03]: He wakes up. [SPEAKER_03]: He's bound in chains.

[SPEAKER_03]: He has no idea what he's supposed to have done. [SPEAKER_03]: There is no court. [SPEAKER_03]: There's nothing to appeal to. [SPEAKER_03]: It's just an completely absurd situation that described the actual lives in allegorical way of anyone who listened to it in 1930. [SPEAKER_03]: And this song travels through the decades until 1953 when Sam Phillips and Junior Parker write a new song based on wordman blues about a train.

[SPEAKER_03]: They take one verse out of wordman blues with train I write a 16 coaches long. [SPEAKER_03]: There's a woman on this train and the singer can't reach her. [SPEAKER_03]: It takes her away from him. [SPEAKER_03]: When Elvis records the song two years later in 1955, like you say, it's the last record that he would make at Sun Records before he goes off to New York and RCA and World Startum, he sings the song as Sam Phillips and Junior Parker rewrote it.

[SPEAKER_03]: He sings it as this incomprehensible tragedy, [SPEAKER_03]: It took my baby. [SPEAKER_03]: But it never will again, no, not again, and at the very end of the record, you can hear him laughing. [SPEAKER_03]: Just breaking out in laughter. [SPEAKER_03]: I don't know if that's because he's laughing because he did such a fantastic job singing the song or if he's laughing at the idea that the train thought it stole his baby and he got her back. [SPEAKER_03]: I don't know.

[SPEAKER_03]: of self-belief of victory, the victory in the shadows in the middle of an allegory, you're not supposed to, you know, go into an allegory and come back with a prize. [SPEAKER_03]: And it's just marvelous. [SPEAKER_03]: He is singing a blues and he turns the blues inside out and it rings absolutely true. [SPEAKER_03]: You know, it doesn't sound like, oh, let's pretty this up. [SPEAKER_03]: Let's give this a happy ending. [SPEAKER_03]: You know, people like happy endings.

[SPEAKER_03]: It's not like that at all. [SPEAKER_03]: So that it's just a marvelous moment. [SPEAKER_03]: I was going to call this book Photograph Blues after a song by Robert Johnson. [SPEAKER_03]: But after I was listening to Elvis for a couple of years and listening to songs hundreds of times, mystery turned God, you know, what a great title I'm going to take that. [SPEAKER_02]: Thank you for using it.

[SPEAKER_03]: If that book had been called phonograph blues, it never would have lived a life there would be no 50th anniversary of phonograph blues. [SPEAKER_02]: Well, the original text of mystery train was 172 pages. [SPEAKER_02]: The notes and discographies that the end have been updated and expanded. [SPEAKER_02]: Now are almost 275 pages.

[SPEAKER_02]: That's because you've [SPEAKER_02]: There I have to say there's some fabulous things in the notes, Barack Obama singing Robert Johnson's sweet home Chicago at a White House Gala in 2012. [SPEAKER_02]: You have a link to the video. [SPEAKER_02]: How did he do? [SPEAKER_03]: He sang the song as if he'd heard it all his life. [SPEAKER_03]: He sang the song as like, I know this. [SPEAKER_03]: You know that. [SPEAKER_03]: And you know, you've heard Barack Obama sing amazing grace.

[SPEAKER_03]: You know, [SPEAKER_02]: Grille Marcus wrote about the movie Springsteen deliver me from nowhere at the latest real life rock at Substack. [SPEAKER_02]: Grille, thanks for talking with us today and congrats again on the 50th anniversary of the Mystery Train. [SPEAKER_03]: Thank you. [SPEAKER_00]: I was a pleasure as always. [SPEAKER_02]: You've been listening to Start Making Sense, a podcast from the Nation Magazine. [SPEAKER_02]: Renee Reynolds is our associate producer.

[SPEAKER_02]: Alan Minsky is our producer. [SPEAKER_02]: Jack Merkinson is Executive Producer. [SPEAKER_02]: Pascal Sunkara is President of the Nation. [SPEAKER_02]: Katrina Vandenhuvul is editor and publisher of the Nation. [SPEAKER_02]: Our theme music is from Barcelona. [SPEAKER_02]: Afrobe licensed by Creative Commons. [SPEAKER_02]: You can find out more about Start Making Sense at the Nation.com.

[SPEAKER_02]: And you can subscribe to start making sense on Apple podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts. [SPEAKER_02]: I'm John Weener. [SPEAKER_02]: Thanks for listening.

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android