Why Are We Still In Ukraine?

and technology. We're running through some of the latest breaking stories and news headlines of this week, and you know, we talk about the decentralized revolution, how we're moving from a unipolar world of peace and harmony and global trade and just in time supply chains and dollar homogene and moving to a multipolar world with multiple leaders and broken supply chains and broken alliances and things like that. And it's important to kind of document the process as we're

going through this. Now. I've done extensive work talking about how this happens in periods of time on tune your time frame, and how we're there now, but we're really we're watching it happen in real time. And so when people ask when is this going to happen, I'm like, it's happening right now, and I think, you know, we can look at lots of signposts would start to say that, or I would start I would say that it really

started with Brexit and Trump being elected. So really back about twenty sixteen is really when the pendulum started to swing the other way and the world started to go this direction back to a you know, leaving the globalist agenda,

going back to more of like a nationalistic agenda. And so we've been on this trend for a while, and it has really been sped up, of course, with the Russia Ukraine US war that's going on, which is now potentially spilling over into China and even the Middle East into potentially some sort of like a World War three or something like that, which is it's just insane. It's just insane. I mean, this is where we're at right now. I couldn't imagine ever that we would get here, but

yet here we are. And so we have this situation where it's really the NATO, the US NATO at war with Russia using Crane as a proxy. There's been numerous reports, numerous reports from very credible high ranking people who have said multiple times that peace has been brokeer like Zelenski and Putin have wanted to get peace and the US won't allow them to make peace. And so we know that to be true because if the US just stopped sending money and weapons, the war would be over. Peace

would have been reached by now. Now, Unfortunately, in a war, just like an argument, there's really no winners, right, Nobody wins an argument, they say, nobody wins a fight. Nobody wins a war. And so unfortunately, in order to end this, you know, hopefully a peace treaty can be brokered. In a peace treaty, probably both sides aren't super happy. They realize that it's in the best interest to accept this peace treaty, but they're not really happy with the way

it did. They probably have to make concessions that they didn't want to make. We don't know a hundred percent. We know that credited people have said this, but we also know, like I said, if the US stopped providing funding and stopped providing weapons, that this would all be over.

But yet here we are and they're not. Now. I listened to this interview with Jordan Peterson and Tulsie Gabbard this week, which is very informative, highly recommended if you care about this topic and just just go go on to YouTube in search Jordan Peterson, Tulsa Gabbard. But Jordan Peterson, he's so good at unpacking things, and he was just asking the question, like, what does winning look like. What does winning look like? Is there a win? And to the point I made, there is no win, So what

does it look like? And we know that now as things have been going on and on. Now apparently China now is saying they could potentially help Russia out in the side of the war. Now, of course, China has massive needs and motivations to do so will motivate it because of their needs. They need what Russia has, which

is the commodities. If you could take the you know, one of the largest commodity producing nations in the world, like US, and match them up with the greatest producer of goods and goods in the world, which is China, and you put them together, that is a massive alliance and alliance that the US would not want to have. And so here we have China saying potentially the support Russia, and the US came out and condemned that. As a

matter of fact, they condemned. That's the Secretary of State Anthony B. Lincoln made the accusation on Sunday where he said Chinese companies have already been supplying in Russia with non lethal aid and may soon do more. He says, quote the concern that we have now is based on information we have that they're considering providing lethal support, and we've made very clear to them that would cause a serious problem for US and in our relationship, Lincoln said.

When asked what lethal aid China might deliver, Blincoln said weapons. And so he's basically saying this outright, right right right run the news, and as you might imagine, it drew furious comments from China on Monday, not in a denial, China deny it, but they got mad. They said, quote, it is the US, not China that has been pouring weapons into the battlefield. End quote. That's from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson for China. Quote the US is

in no position to tell China what to do. We would never stand for fingerpointing or even coercion and pressurizing from the US on our relations with Russia. End quote. You want to get somebody mad, accused them of something they haven't done. You want to get somebody even more mad, tell them what they can and can't do. And so here we have Secretary of State b Lincoln saying on public news that China could do this or should do this, and they better not and China's like, wait a minute,

Wait a minute, wait a minute. You're the ones putting all the weapons on the battlefield. You're the ones starting this war. You're the ones perpetuate. Let's sit in, US stays starting. You're the ones perpetuating this war by pouring weapons onto the battlefield. The US is in no position to tell China what to do. Wow, strong words, but you can see how this is certainly going, which is not good. And then we saw this week Zelenski says, if China allies itself with Russia, there will be World

War three. Who the heck is this guy to say, what's going to be World War three? Why does the entire world care? Who controls Crimea, that's the capital of Ukraine? Who who? Who in the world cares? Does anybody in the world want their entire life threatened because of nuclear war? Over that? Because of because Zelenski says that that now

the world is going to go to war. He says, quote for US, it's important that China does not support the Russian Federation in this war, Zelenski says, and state, and like I said, Lincoln warned that there would be consequences if China would would back them. I mean, this is just insane and it's gotten to a point where we should be worried. This week, put Putin came out and gave a speech which I think is important to touch on for a couple of topics. One it sounded

pretty good overall. I mean, he basically said that he blasted a degradation of humanity and the family unit. He basically dedicated a portion of his State of the Nation address to blast left wing the tax against the family unit, normalization of pedophilia, saying that pedophilia and sexualization of children have become the new normal in NATO nations. He's not wrong, he said, Well, with Russia, I went in on the

battlefield in Ukraine. The globalist leaders of the West have turned to information attacks that target kids with the express

intent of destroying our culture and historical truth. They cannot ignore the fact that Russia cannot be defeated on the battlefield, so they're waging increasing aggressive information attacks, first of all, targeting the young generations, lyne on every step, destroying historical truths, attacking our culture, the Russian Orthodox Church and other traditional religious institutions in our country, and what they're doing in

the West to their own people is even worse. Putin went on to say, look at what they're doing to their own people. They're destroying the institution of family, their cultural historical identity, and various perversions with regards to children up to pedophilia are accepted as the new norms. So there's some stuff to unpack there. I don't know if this is exactly what you think it is. So before you go and support Putin over this, I want to break this down down. If you're just tuning in, you're

listening to the Markma Show. We're going through some of the latest breaking news headlines this week, and we're talking about how the world is breaking apart as we sit here and watch it happened. So I got a whole lot more to cover and unpack. I want to first start by unpacking this, why this might be a bait and switch I want to warn you about, and some other stuff. So anyway, I'll be right back in a minute. I gotta take a quick break, but don't go away,

all right, Welcome back. If you just tune in, you're listening to the Mark Ma Show. We're talking about the decentralized Revolution, how the world's breaking apart right before our very eyes, leading into a world of decentralization, which in my opinion I think could turn out to be a good thing. But it's not going to be a smooth transition.

And that's exactly what we're seeing right now. I was talking about this speech that Putin just gave, where he was basically right in what he was saying, in my opinion, that NATO countries are quote destroying the institution of family, their cultural historical identity, and various perversions with regards to children up to pe Ilia as accepted as the new norm end quote. So there's truth to that. Yes, NATO countries America is trying to destroy the institution of family,

that's true. Their cultural historical identity is gone. So we used to have an American identity of shared values, values of freedom and responsibility and private property and the ability that someone could come here with nothing and build their life. We used to have those values, but today all those values have been destroyed, and now supposedly we align on identities.

So now supposedly whether you're man or woman or trans, or you're gay or straight, or you're black or white, or your male or female, you align on that not values anymore, which is exactly why this country is so torn today. We are more alike on our We're more alike than they want us to believe. They want us to belie that we're all different based off the color of our skin or sexual orientation. But that's not true.

We were Americans was shared values. But of course, as he rightly points out, Putin rightly points out, they destroyed the cultural historical identity or historical identity that made American Greek, that brought all the immigrants here from all over the world. That shared historical identity is gone. And then, even as he said, the perversions with regards to children up to pedophilia. So now they want to normalize pedophilia. They call it

a minor attracted person. Now they've tried to change the name. No, no, no, let's not call it anymore. People don't like that word. Let's call it just a minor attracted person. So you're just a person that's attracted to miners. That's the same thing they're normalizing pedophilia. What do they do unto the kids in schools here in California, in middle schools, they

have tampons in the boys bathrooms. They have kiddie litter boxes in schools, and even worse, they're trying to allow transitioning where kids can change their whole life by changing their sexual identity, having surgeries, puberty blockers, all these transition surgeries, even without consent of their parents. Those are perversions with regards to children. You can't drink until you're twenty one because you might get drunk and make a bad decision.

But at twelve you can change your whole life take out your reproductive organs at twelve. But no, but but but don't drink till your twenty one because you could happen to make a bad decision. You can't vote to your eighteen because you're not smart enough about about politics to know what you may or may not want to vote. But at twelve you can just take out your reproductive organs. So what he's saying is correct. The one thing that I fear, though, is that actually, before we talk about this,

he goes on to talk about the priest. He says, attacking our culture and attacking the Russian Orthodox Church and other traditional religious institutions. And so you don't have to go super far to see that this is exactly what Zelenski has done. If you think that we are fighting for democracy and freedom in Ukraine, you are sadly mistaken. Now, I don't want to see anybody get invaded, and I don't want to see anybody killed, and I'd like to

see everybody kind of sit to their own their own borders. However, if you think what we're doing in Ukraine is fighting for freedom, you are sadly mistaken. And there's one hundred data points I can give you, but let's just talk about one. Zelenski took a page directly from the Bolshevik playbook, So the Russian Revolution in the early nineteen hundreds, where they basically, you know, a communist marks his takeover, went and killed everybody, and he's basically doing the same thing.

He announced a ban on the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, a government answered crackdown. Zelenski claims they can't be trusted because scripture isn't under the control of the Ukrainian government. That's right, God's word. The scripture lies outside of government control. It is what it is. It's a book that was written thousand year it's the oldest book. As Jordan Peterson sums up,

it's not just true it's the truth itself. It's the first manuscript we have, and so yes, it's not under control of the Ukrainian government or any government for that matter. Zelensky outlawed the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, just like the Bolshevik crackdown implemented before. Now the Russian Orthodox Church is fifty

two percent majority of Ukrainians. So if you think we're standing for a democracy, if you think Ukrainians democracy, the majority over fifty percent of the people are Orthodox Christians. So wouldn't democracy be what the people want? But yet not to them, they went and shut it down because to Zolensy's quote, it can't it's not under the control

of the Ukrainian government. So, just like the media outlets, the churches now are only allowed to operate in Ukraine with the express consent and direct control of the Zelensky government. So if you think there's freedom or democracy and we're

fighting for that, you are sadly mistaken. That is not the case at Also, if Putin was right about saying that, however, what I'm afraid that Putin might be doing is really trying to appeal to this entire segment of the world that feels that they're being shut down, where their voices and being heard because sort of like any good president would do, sort of like Trump. Trump hit a chord with people talking about you know, legal immigration, things like that,

and that's sort of like what Putin's doing. However, what does what does his own history and his government say? So he certainly persecuted and killed lots of people in Russia. Russia is not the bastion of freedom in the world. And so while he is saying these things which leads people to go wow', he kind of gets it. Maybe maybe he's a good guy. I wouldn't go that far. I wouldn't say that Putin is a good guy, like I said, by historical standards, he certainly is not, so

be careful with that. It's right, what he's saying is right. I'm afraid that he might have some suspect intentions, and I guess only time will tell. However, so the speech went out, he went on the offensive. Now, apparently the US is trying to pick a war with China, saying hey, you better not or else. And on top of that, Lady mcplutin now said that Russia is pulling out or suspending the nuclear arms treaty. So we've been in a nuclear arms treaty with Russia. It's called start sta RT.

It started in nineteen eighty five. Back then Soviet leader Michael gorbus Chef and President Ronald Reagan made this treaty saying, quote, a nuclear war cannot be one, so must never be five is under something called the mutually assured destruction, Like, hey, if we go to war, we're both going to kill each other, so let's just not go to war. And

so we've had this. It's been affirmed as recently as January twenty two by Putin and Biden, as well as leaders of China, France, in the UK who will have nuclear weapons. But now Russia says it's suspending its participation in the treaty. That's not good. It sounds like escalation. In my opinion. It sounds like we might be actually getting closer to nuclear war than we were anytime since

nineteen eighty five. So I want to break that down more into detail and kind of explain exactly what's going on and how this is growing even past Russia and Ukraine. It's going to be it's a it's a big story. I got a whole lot to cover when I come back, don't go away. You listen to the Markamas Show. I'll be back after a quick break. Don't go away, all right, welcome back. If you just tune in, you are listening

to the Mark Moas Show. We're talking about the Decentralized Revolution, and we're talking about how the world is actually decentralizing, like literally, like all of the peace and harmony and cooperation that we've been enjoying for the last you know, fifty sixty years is coming to an end, and it's coming to an end very very quickly, and it seems

like it's all being driven by the United States. You know, one thing, when when Donald Trump was elected, all these people were saying, you know, he's a hot head, which which he is, and you know that that's probably that's one of his greatest character flaws, you know, is he kind of is his hot head and he kind of says things off the cuff. And so they said, he's his hot head, and if he's elected, he's going to lead us into nuclear war. We just know it. Well,

he didn't. As a matter of fact, he was nominated for a Nobel Peace Price because for the first time in like decades. He actually brokered peace in the Middle East. He got rid of Isis that had propped up under Obama. He got rid of that, and he broker peace in the Middle East, and the world had peace. But under Biden, we're now facing nuclear war. We're facing nuclear war with Russia, We're facing war with China, and we're even now facing war in the Middle East with Israel, Israel and Iran.

So it wasn't it wasn't Trump taking its to nuclear war. It's Biden that did that. Now this isn't a left or right thing. Well, it sort it is. It's sort it is. So now now Russia has pulled out of their treaty that's been brokered, and for what again? For what? A poll was just recently done and that Americans do

not support shipping of weapons to Ukraine. An Associated Press Center for Public Affairs research found that Americans do not support shipping weapons and tax dollars off to Ukraine for war with no end in sight that has already cost you, as taxpayers, about one hundred and thirteen billion in less than a year. Americans are more concerned about how they'll foot their wildly inflated grocery bill or handled declining wages due in part to the influx of migrant at the

US border. Meanwhile, a fent in all crisis thanks to truckloads of illegal drugs smuggling in the country via the same disastrous border policies, is wreaking havoc on poor, blue collar communities. More than one hundred and seven thousand Americans died from drug overdoses in twenty twenty one. Americans want Biden to focus on issues at home home. Let's talk about that five million illegal aliens poured through our southern borders. Five million. That's an invasion. I would say that's a

failed policy. We have the number one cause of death from eighteen to I believe forty four. You can check me on that. Eighteen to forty four I believe is fennel which pours through our southern border and being shipped over here from China. So there's an attack by China coming in through our southern border. Five million people invading the country. The number one cause of death is because of that. We have grocery bills out of control that

can't be handled. We have attacks all over our energy grid, from our energy grids to all of our core stuff. I talked about that in earlier segment. How the attacks on our energy grid have almost doubled last year. Could that be that of the five million people that entered

the government country illegally could be potentially terrorist coming. So we have a massive crisis going on a home, students graduating from high school that can't read or write, and now we're arguing about kitty boxes, kitty litter boxes in high school, a massive problem at home. So failed policy at home and then failed policy abroad. We're literally phacing a nuclear war and it's escalating, and now we're at

war with China. So yeah, I would say people are more concerned about what the heck is going on here than we are sending more weapons and more money to to Ukraine. This as the US tax payers have already spent one hundred the US has already sent one hundred and thirteen billion. I've seen reports that show up to two hundred billion has already gone going to Ukraine, two hundred billion. Two hundred billion when people can't afford groceries at home, and that and and that probably is even more.

We don't even know. We know that the Pentagon now the Department of Defense couldn't find another two and a half trillion dollars, but we don't know where it went. Now, I say another because this is not the first time they've lost trillions of dollars. A matter of fact, they've never passed the au they can't pass an audit. They can't even show where the money's going. So between one hundred and two hundred billion dollars has gone there, and

Americans don't support this. You would think the president or any politician for that matter, should be out there thinking about what's in the best interest for Americans, and in any president of any country should think about the best interues of their people. What is going to war over there? Supporting how is that in the best interest for people. We're not supporting freedom, we're not supporting democracy. We've already talked about that. So what are we doing? And now

we're supposedly crossing another red lines? We've already crossed proverbial red lines. We've you know, we know that NATO said that we would never move East. Russia wants a buffer in between where NATO is and where they are, which makes sense, and so Ukraine was supposed to stay this neutral place. And as Ukraine was moving into NATO. Russia said, hey, don't do it. Don't do it. You've already you've already gone back on every commitment you've made. Ukraine's the last stand.

Don't do it. Don't do it. That's the red line. And yet we did. And there's the red line. And now they're saying that. Blincoln Secretary of State Anthony Lincoln is now saying that if you know, they want to get Ukraine to retake Crimea, and that would be a red line for Putin that could lead to a wider Russian response. So Russia got Crimea and now they're trying to get Ukraine to take back over Crimea, and they're saying,

this is a red line. Don't do it. And I'll ask you again, no matter where you are listening from in this world today, you could be at risk of a nuclear war. This is where we're going. If you're young enough, you could go to war and potentially die over this, or your kids or your grandkids could go to war over what? Over Crimea? Even point to it on a map, Why do you care who controls Crimea? But that's what Ukrainian forces want, says their crosshairs are

on Crima. That's where they want to go. They want to go where the red line is. They want to continue to escalate. And I'm going to tell you again if you just tuned in, don't don't let anybody tell you this is a proxy war. This is the US is a war with Russia. And I say that because without the hundreds of billions of dollars we've given them, without the weapons that we've given, and this war would be over. We have all the American leaders that have come out and said we will win, we will stick

with it until the end. So this is this is not a proxy war anymore. This is a war. Russia knows it and you better know it too. And and this is spiraling out of control. As I said, China is now potentially jumping in. They're mad because the US is trying to tell what to do. And now we have this growing shadow war between the US, Israel, and Iran. So remember Trump had brokered peace in the Middle East,

and now that's all fallen apart. We can see that preparing for an armed conflict with Israel and the US. The IRGC, which is the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, have evaluated their weaponry in Ukraine selling Russia the Shahid drones. In return, Moscow has pledged to help Tehran in air defense and potentially help to enrich their nuclear program, which is a major red line of Washington and Tel Aviv.

Of course. So now the US has been trying to keep nuclear weapons out of Iran's hand, and here Moscow is like, hey, we'll help you out, and we'll give you air defense and you give us some drones and let's just all work together. This is another war spiler out of control in the Middle East. If Iran gets nuclear weapons, obviously that threatens Israel. Israel said that they would attack before that ever happens. And so now we have war with China and Taiwan, and in Russia and Ukraine,

and now with Israel and Iran. And this is spiraling out of control. This is not getting better, This is getting worse. This is leading to the decentralized revolution. What does all this mean for us as investors, Well, it means that inflation is going through the roof. It means prices are going to get high. It means that if you think supply chains were a problem two years ago,

just wait until what happens next. If you're just tune in, you're listening to the Mark Moss Show going on a rant about the decentralized Revolution, breaking through the biggest stories of this week. I got more to come. I gotta take a quick break. Don't go away, I'm gonna be right back. All right, Welcome back. If you're just tune in, you are listening to the Mark Moss Show talking about

the decentralized Revolution, how the world is breaking apart. And we went through all the wars Russia, China and the Middle East, and I mean, this is getting bad. I want to shift gears a little bit, but as the pendulum swings, we're not done with globalism yet. And so at a time when globalism it's dead, I mean it's dead. Come on, look, I mean what's happening in China, Taiwan, Russia, Ukraine, Israel. I mean it's over, but doesn't stop the globalist push

from trying to go forward. And one of the biggest stories I saw this week, one of the scariest stories I saw this week that you need to be aware of, is that the United States government wants to lay down its sovereignty to be underneath the globalists, underneath the globalists. So the US is no longer the captain of their own ship. Now this started with Obama. Okay. Obama went around. He was the first president going around and apologizing for

the US. Obama laid us under the power of the globalists, including put us into the Paris Accord, including putting us under the UN. He brought the UN in to watch US elections. Okay, And as soon as Trump came elected, he went to Davos and he said, look, the US is a sovereign nation. The US will never lay down its sovereignty to globalists. As the president, my job is to think about America first. Now, he said, look, we'll cooperate, we'll work with everybody, but we're always going to be

thinking about Americans first. So he pulled us out of the Paris Accord, and of course that's what put the target on his back, and the global said to get

him out. Biden the first day back in office, put us back into the Paris Score, back under this globalist and now here we are we have Now we have the Biden administration wants to put us give all of our power of health and pandemic response to the who the who, which has been proven completely corrupt, which has been proven completely incompetent, which has been proven to be under China's control. Now they want to put us under that.

As member states of the World Health Organization WHO prepared to gather in Switzerland next week and negotiate final terms of an accord that will give the WHO centralized authority over US policy in the case of a pandemic. What wait, what did you get a vote on that? Did you hear anything about that? No, you didn't. Well they want to have we want to give the WHO authority over the US in the case of a pandemic. Now, luckily we have some Republican senators pushing back on this with

an effort to reinforce congressional power to authorize treaties. Now, this draft accord would be quote legally binding on all one ninety four member nations. WHO gives the WHO the authority to declare pandemics and submits member countries to the quote the central role of the WHO as the directing and coordinate authority on all international health work in areas like oh lockdowns, treatments, medical supply chains, surveillance and yes

and disinformation and false news. Once a pandemic is declared, now you might know that we're still in a pandemic in the United States, and so what's even in a pandemic anyway? So the central role WHO, We're going to basically give them all power over lockdowns, treatments, medical supply chains,

surveillance and disinformation. Wow. Seventeen years senators led by Ron Johnson, Republican and Wisconsin introduced the quote Know WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty without Senate Approval Act on February fifteenth, states the pandemic award must be deemed a treaty, thus required the consent of the supermajority of the Senate. Other sponsors of the bill all Republicans. Of course, I'm not going to

read them all out here. The WHO, along with our federal health agencies, felt miserably in their response to COVID. Senator Johnson stated this failure should not be rewarded with a new international treaty that would increase the WHOSE power at the expense of American sovereignty end quote Senator Johnson. But some doubt this bill, even if approval, will stop the WHO Accord from going into effect once President Joe

Biden signs it. Are you listening here. The Obama Biden administration is back doing the same thing, trying to lay down US sovereignty to globalist, non elected leaders. Currently, the United States is the largest contributor to the who's six point seven billion dollars budget. Of course, Bill and milind the Gates Foundations is the second largest donor to the WHO, contributing to the nine percent of its budget. So the US and Bill and millinivigates, they're the main funders of

the WHO. And it remains unclear if the Biden administration will need senator approval from for this, which is insane. How can somebody lay down our sovereignty? I mean, this is just insane to me. Now, like I said, this is not a smooth operation. Now, they're going to have control over one hundred and ninety four nations, but these one hundred ninety four nations are breaking apart. I certainly don't think Russia or China are going to want to lay down their sovereignty to the WHO. I highly doubt

that's going to be the case. So we're getting a lot of pushback on this. Now. Another piece of news this week I talked about before, Jordan Peterson is setting up a new organization to counter the World Economic Forum. So there's pushback, there's capitalism. Does another one I want to talk about this week? Who saw Vivik Ramaswamy. He

announced that he is running for president now. He's the author of a couple of books called Woke Inc Inside Corporate American Social Justice Scam and also Nations of Victims, which is dealing with identity politics. He's also the co founder of Strive Asset Management, which was set up to work against Black Rock. And he says that America is in the midst of a national identity crisis. We embrace secularis religions like climatism, Covidism, and gender ideology to satisfy

our need for meaning. Yeah, we can't answer what it means to be an American. He emphasized the importance of merit and decrying illegal immigration and affirmative action. So he described affirmative action as national cancer. So we're seeing the pushback to this. So on one side, we have Obama, I'm sorry Biden, Obama and Biden pushing us to lay down our sovereign tis through globalists, and yet we have other people standing up to counter this. No, we need

to cancel this, We need to push this back. This is the This is the volatility at the top before the pendulum swings back. Now this is getting massive, as you might imagine, massive public support. We can see another poll this week that says Americans prefer businesses stay out of politics. The majority of general election voters say they would prefer to do business with companies that do not engage in politics and tolerate viewpoints of employees and customers

across the board. Hm, who would have thought? Who would have thought? The people you and I were tired of this. We don't want businesses involved in politics. We don't want what Claus Schwab is calling the public private partnership. We want businesses like black Rock out. We don't want them pushing their agendas on them on us. And we can see this. It's happening in polls. We can see the rise up of alternative news sources. We can see Jordan's

Peterson rise and push back. And even Elon Musk this week came out and blasted a one world government at the World Government Summit. He says, quote, I think we want to be a little cautious about being too much of a single civilization, because if we're too much of a single civilization, then the whole thing may collapse, he said. He praised what he called quote civilization diversity. I think we want to be a little wary of actually cooperating

too much. It sounds a little odd, but we want to have some amount of civilization diversity so if something goes wrong with some sort of part of civilization, that the whole thing doesn't collapse, which is exactly what happens. You see civilizations rise and fall, and we need to have different civilizations that can compete and so we can

start to see the better way. If you're just tuning in, you're listening to the Mark Moss Show, I've been talking about the of course, like I talked about it every week, the decentralized revolution. How the world is breaking apart right before our very eyes, and we're seeing it Russia, Rain, in the Middle East, Iran, Israel, we're seeing it with China and Taiwan. It's happening, and it's happening fast. That's

what I got today. I appreciate you listening. Let me send me a message, let me know if you're listening, and any questions you have. Until next time