Hello, and welcome back to another episode of The Mark Moss Show, where we talk about, of course, the decentralized Revolution, talking about the way the world is changing, of course each and every week, looking at it through the lens of politics, finance, and technology. We have to look at those three things in unison together in order to get context of what's going on. So we can understand, of course, how we got here, more importantly, what's going on, and
even more importantly what is going to happen. And so you know, if you tune in each and every week, I try to bring to you some some interesting perspectives, some new education, some ways to look at the world differently, some of the latest breaking news, and of course some new and insightful and interesting guests. You have to listen to me all the time. And I have a big topic that I want to talk about today that happens again and again through history. It happens all the time
through history. As a matter of fact, what do they say, you know, those who don't know history are bound to repeat it. History doesn't rhyme and repeat something. You've heard those things before. And this is a topic that happens again and again, and unfortunately when we see this happening in a society, it tells us what's going on in that society, tells us what's going to happen next in a society, and unfortunately, it's not super good. And we
are seeing these signs, these warning signs. We are seeing this just flashing red everywhere we look. It couldn't be more obvious right now. It's a very very dangerous situation. It's one that you and I should be taking very seriously. We should be pay attention to. We should be doing everything in our power to bring attention to this and to push back on this because, as I said, this, when we see this in a society, it is a bad, bad sign, and again it leads to bad things. Now,
hopefully we can we can overturn this. Do you know that I am not a Duman gloomer. Of course I talk about the problems, but I believe that problems lead
to solutions. And so we're gonna talk about the problem, We're gonna talk about what we can do about it, and we're gonna talk about the opportunities, the solutions and opportunities that could be present from So it's not a due gloom, but it is something you need to know about, and it's something that's front and center, and it's a front and center for the world, as front and center for the United States. And this week we have seen
a full court press, a frontal assault on this. What am I talking about talking about the war of information? I'm talking about the war against truth, all right, this is a big deal. You might have heard of disinformation or malinformation. You might have heard of some of those things, and that's what I'm talking about now. Of course I talk about this quite often, so unless you're been sleeping under a rock or something like that, of course you've been hearing me talk about this as well. But this
is a big deal. As a matter of fact. It's not just a big deal for me. It's not just a big deal for history or societies. It's a big deal for the rest of the people in the world, most most importantly those that are trying to hang on to control over the world. As a matter of fact, the World Economic Forum, the WEFT, of course, they had
their big meeting. I talked about it in January and Davos, where you know, the self elected elites, the people who have self elected themselves to run the world, and I say self elected, because of course we didn't vote them and nobody, none of us had any say in this. We didn't vote for these people, but they were in Davos, and again I covered it back in January. But the main topic that they were talking about there was the
danger of disinformation, the danger of disinformation. A matter of fact, one of the I talked about it, former CNN host Brian Stelter, did a panel with a few people and it was dubbed the danger of Disinformation and hate speech laws coming to the US. All right, the panel was out of the Clear and Present Danger of Disinformation. Now I have to say that Brian Stelter is the former
host of CNN former because he lost his job. He lost his job because nobody wanted to watch him, and nobody wanted to watch him because as he constantly distorted and bent the truth constantly, nobody would watch him anymore. He lost all credibility and so he lost a job.
So the irony of him hosting a panel based on this title the clear and Present Danger of disinformation when he is one of the main peddlers the CNN, one of the main peddlers of this disinformation, one of the shocking things that came out of this, though, was European Commissioner Vice President Vera Jirova said, quote illegal hate speech, which you will have soon also in the US. I think that we have a strong reason why we have this in the criminal law. So I hate to break
something to you. I'm just going to be honest with you for a second. Some people are mean. Some people are mean. Some people say mean things. They're gonna say mean things all the time. They're gonna say you're mean, You're gonna rude there, They're gonna say that you're fat, you're ugly, you're dumb, you're stupid, you're white, you're black, you're whatever. Some people are just mean. Where's the line between mean and hate? It's very blurry line, it's very
grade line. So if I say, oh, you're black or you're a woman, is that hateful? Or am I just mean? If I say you're fat or uglier, stupid? Is that okay? Now? I'm not okay with people being mean. I believe in the teachings of Jesus. He said the number one commandment is to love others, love your neighbor more than yourself. That's what I try to follow. I wish the whole world would follow that. I am not for hate, I'm for love. I'm for the opposite. But we have to
understand that some people are just mean. Little kids in preschool are mean. Some adults never grow up and they're also mean and they say mean things. And so where's that line between being mean and being hurtful and being hateful? And when does it become illegal? It's illegal to be mean. So if I call you fat, ugly, stupid, that's okay. But if I call you black, then that might be hate. I don't know. My daughter hates vanilla ice cream, So if I talk about that, is that hateful? And there
in lies the problem? Who defines this anyway? So this is the big problem, right, this is the big conversation the world. Lou Coming Forum says, it's the biggest problem. We have the clear and present danger of disinformation. The Davos Elite warned us that it's an existential threat. It's an existential threat, like this is the biggest thing. Now. The Washington Post, which was of course bought by Jeff Bezos so he can run disinformation and misinformation there. Their
slogan is democracy dies in darkness. It should be that truth dies in darkness, right, truth, so I'll set you free. The truth is what sets us free. The truth dies in darkness when there's no transparency. Would we're not able to discuss ideas, where we're not able to argue back and forth to sharpen our own ideas against each other,
That's when the truth dies. That's when democracy dies. Apparently, I don't know what the definition of democracy anymore, because our leadership in the United States and the world consistently constantly tells us that by having transparency and by showing the truth, by showing two sides of a conversation or an argument, supposedly, that is how democracy dies. Apparently, So I don't know what the definition of democracy is anymore. I don't even know anymore. I mean, because I thought
democracy was the will of the people. In order for the people to have their will, then they should have the information they need to make a decision, and then should be allowed to voice that. But if you take away there to have any information or to voice their information or share it or discuss it, then that is not the will of the people. They're not It's not the consent of the people, and the people do not.
They don't. They don't have it. So I don't know what they mean by democracy anymore, if if that's what they mean. But let's dig into this, all right. So there's a couple a couple of things that were going around this week. This is a this is an issue that is not ending now just for some historical context, because you know how much I love my historical context. This is nothing new, all right, This is nothing new. Every government has always tried to manage the flow of information.
Of course, they tried to manage the full of informations they can hold onto power. And this happens in every country under strict authorityan regimes like Hitler's Germany, Mao's Revolution. If you said the wrong thing, you thought the wrong thing, they would just kill you. But it happened in the United States as well. The bombing Cambodia in nineteen sixty nine. That was all private. Uh, you know, the Watergate scandal,
that was all private. We can go on and on and on, we can go back through history, but let's talk about more present times because there's some big, big things that are happening right now that I want to discuss. But if you're just tuning and you're listening to the Markmas Show. We talk about the decentralized Revolution, how the world is breaking apart. We're talking about a problem of disinformation today. Apparently it's the biggest problem that we have.
Of course, decentralized technology solves that problem for us. And we're gonna talk about problems and solutions in a little bit. I got a whole lot to cover when I got to take a quick break. Don't go away, I'll come right back, all right, Welcome back. If you're just tune in, you're listening to the Markma Show. We're talking about, of course every week, the decentralized Revolution, how the world is
changing today. We're talking about disinformation, misinformation, malinformation, whatever you want to call it. Apparently, according to the World Document Forum, it's the greatest threat to the world. According to these hyperbolic leaders in the United States, it's the greatest threat to our democracy. If we have open discussion and democracy dies. So again, I was saying before the break, I don't know what democracy it means in their minds. It's certainly
not the classical definition of democracy, certainly not that. But you know, there's lots of things that just continue to keep coming up over and over and over. I saw this article this week and it talked about how the United States Special Forces want to use deep fakes for psyops. So after you know, the US government has spent years
warning us about deep fakes. If you don't know deep fakes are, it's basically where they take your face and your voice and they use like AI to make it look like it's a video of you saying something, but
it's not really you. So they could get you know, President Biden, or Joe Rogan or even me, and they could make a deep fake of it, and they could make it look like I was saying something that I would in And so while the US government spent years warning us that it could quote destabilize democratic societies, now it comes out that the US wants to actually use it. Of course, they do what government doesn't. Governments have always
been engaged in propaganda since day one. I mean World War one, World War two, they dropped flyers out of airplanes. They were dropping flyers out of planes. That was the easiest way to get them, get them to the people. And so at the time when they're warning is that this could happen, they're also trying to figure out how they can use it. Of course they are. Now on top of that, we have, you know, very very rich and powerful leaders who are trying their best to sense
of the truth. As a matter of fact, everybody's a favorite villain. Well Knocklaus Schwab, the older villain. I'm talking about George Soros. You know, he's uses his billions and billions of dollars to influence the world. He's doing what I am encouraging you to do, which is build the world that you want. And I know that George Soros and Bill Gates are building the world they want with their billions of dollars. But are you Are you building the world that you want? We'll come back to that
in a little bit. But we saw that a state department backed group is severance connections with a disinformation Index group backed by the progressive megadonner George Soros, following reports about the group's efforts to muzzle conservative media outlets by blacklisting them. So George Soros and this group is putting all this information, they put together what's called a disinformation index,
specifically to blacklist the opposing voice. The National Endowment for Democracy, a private foundation created by Congress, whose funding is part of the State Department budget, said it will no longer provide grants to the Global Disinformation Index. So a government organization was giving money to George Soros's group, the Global Disinformation Index, to silence the other side of the aisle.
That's what's happening. So, look, if your ideas are better, they'll win in the open and honest discussion of public right. So you don't have to coerce people to take action on things that are good for them. If they're good, they're gonna want them. If the ideas are good, they're gonna want them. You don't have to force them into that. And it's gotten so bad that most people can see this. I guess if you're listening to this, you can see this.
I saw this week obviously. Yeah, I've talked about extensively. So if you've been tuning in at all, if you've heard me talk about how you know Elon Musk bought Twitter and how he thinks it's the most important thing that we have, this open dialogue. It's the town, the public square as he calls it. You know, he's been very well. It appears let's say it appears that he
is really trying to bring transparency back. So we you know, had these Twitter files where he opened up the documents and showed reporters you know how the government was coercing people in Twitter to censor people and stuff like that, which that's a really big deal. Now it looks like the government's coming after him. How dare he have transparency? See when you have to hide something, that means you have something to hide, that's the disinformation. The truth doesn't
need to be hidden. The truth should be public for everyone. Anyway, Elon Musk hints, and this is great, that he should slap CNN with a special warning label over the network's pandemic coverage. He suggested on Monday that he could slap SNN with a warning label after a new report this week alleged that the company stopped reporters from looking into whether the pandemic originated in a Chinese lab in wuan See. I can say that now a year ago, I would
have had all my channels deleted. I'd been deleted off of YouTube, I'd been deleted off a Twitter. I would have been d platformed if I would have said that. But now apparently it's okay to say now, apparently because the US Energy Department, you know, because all these government organizations have can now come out and said that. The Department of Energy now came out and said it. The FBI is now coming out and say it's supposedly now,
I guess we're allowed to say it now. But CNN actively stopped, actively blocked reporters from doing their job into looking into that. The Wall Street Journal reported last week that the Department of Energy now assesses that the pandemic originated from a lab leak, an assessment that FBI Director Christopher Ray said that the bureau agrees with. Musk responded to Twitter user who asked, Musk, when you're going to label CNN is a state and filled media, and he said,
good point. If an organization portrays itself as balanced but is not, it should be labeled to inform the public who's the perpetrator of disinformation misinformation. Now, there's a couple of big topics that I want to dig into, specifically, one that has blown well, there's a couple that have been blown wide open this week. Actually two really really really big ones. I mean these are like ground shaking, earth shattering, and I'm gonna have to warn you up front.
It might have you ever heard a cognitive distance? What that means is that I might tell you something that you don't want to believe, because if you believe it to be true, then all the other things that you hold to be true have to be questioned. And so a lot of times people want to continue live believing a lie because they don't want to accept that because they know if I believe that lie, then everything I know is false. And we got a couple of big
ones here. The first one is this whole January sixth thing. Holly, Molly, this blow wide open? And how did it blow I open? Well, it blew wide open with transparency. You see. It turns out when you stop a lying and censoring and hiding and the truth comes out, turns out it blows things wide open. Now we can just say right now, there's an FBI whistle blower that came out this week claiming that the BI agency forced him to juice up the
domestic terrorism numbers. According to the FBI. You know, extremist white supremacists are the greatest threat to this country right now. Apparently the greatest threat not the nuclear war that could potentially happened in Ukraine. Not the five million illegal immigrants that have come across the border. Not the non Antifa that burned down cities through twenty twenty, Not the groups that are firebombing and spray painting and graffiti all the
planned parented pro life businesses. Not those. Apparently it's domestic terrorism from white extremists. But according to a whistleblower, the FBI is basically forcing them to juice those numbers up in order to get the narrative that they want. Of course they are. But let's dig into some facts. All right, Well is the whistleblower. I mean, we can kind of believe take his word for but let's dig into some
more facts that we know. If you're just tuning in and you listen to the Mark Moa show, we're talking about disinformation and misinformation and what this means for us and where we're going. I got a whole lot more to cover when I come back. I'm gonna have to talk really fast. You don't want to miss it, so don't go away. We're back, all right, Welcome back. If you just tune in, you're listening to the Markmas show, we're talking about of course, each and every week the
decentralized revolution, how the world is breaking apart. Part of the way the world is breaking apart, of course, is always about technology. It's always technology that causes the decentralization. Centralization of content gets us all on the same page. When we can have different thought, we become decentralized. Goes back to the Protestant Reformation in the fifteen hundreds. There was a new piece of technology that came out about seventy years before that. It was a brand new piece
of technology. It was called the printing press. And the printing press allowed for mass production of Bibles at first and then other books, and that information allowed people to receive information directly of having to be told by some central administrator what the truth is. The Internet has been that for us. CNN tries to control the narrative there. You know, before the Internet, we had you know whatever, three newspapers and three news stations and that was it,
and they controlled the narrative. But with the Internet, people like me can get out there and say other things Joe Rogan, etc. And you can now hear other things. Now to me, that's a good thing because, as I say all the time, the truth is found through open and honest dialogue. I see it all the time. Like I'll see someone post something on Twitter. I'm like, oh, man, that's good. I didn't think about that. Wow, that's crazy, that's whatever, right, And then I'll start reading the comments
and then I'm like, oh, well that's actually wrong. Oh this guy disproved that. Oh that's why that's wrong. And in the comments in that conversation, people collectively bring that information together and can instantly disprove that. You know, I get forward to a ton of stuff. By the way, please continue to forward me stuff. If you see in information, if you see stories, if you see topics you'd like me to cover that you'd like to bring to my attention so I can cover them on my shows. Please
send them to me. Just reach out on social media at one Mark Moss. Just at number one Mark Moss and just DM me if you have any that. But I get foward of these stories all the time. I love it. Please do that. But I don't instantly want to just run with those stories. I need to go fact check them. So then I'll go do my research and then I'll look at all both sides of the story. I'll see what's out there, and so that is how
the truth is found out. But as you know, the January six trials that the Democrats were holding, and not to make this a left or right thing, but it was obviously very controlled by the Democrats. And you know, supposedly it was the worst attack, you know, since the Civil War. Never mind you know, the trade tower bombing that killed thousands of Americans, never mind that, never mind you know, Pearl Harbor, never mind that. Apparently this was
the greatest attack ever on America. That's what they tell us. And of course, you know, they don't show us any of the information. You know, they had. There's about, well as we know now, about forty thousand hours of security footage that they wouldn't release. They wouldn't release any of the reports. And so how are we supposed to believe any of this when they politicize it and they don't give us any information. Just shut up and just take our word for it is what they tell us. But
that just doesn't work, all right, that doesn't work. You know. I use this analogy all the time. If I was lying in bed late at night and texting on my phone and my wife asked me, hey, Mark, you who you texted in bed this late at night, and I was like nobody, and I like hid my phone, and I tried, and I got mad at her and tried to switch the subject. She would start to be suspicious of me, right because I hid the truth. I didn't I didn't have transparency. I wasn't open with her, and
that leads to wild speculation. The way that you stop wild speculation, it is by being open, having transparency. All I have to do is just show my wife the phone and go look at my mom and she go, what's you want? Oh, she wants to have a birthday party. Okay, that's easy. It's easy. All I do is just tell the truth. The only reason you don't tell the truth is if you have something to hide. That's hit. I'm gonna come on, this is simple. You learn this stuff
when youre an elementary school. Now, what happened this week is that the leadership in Washington changed from a Democratic control to a Republican and Speaker McCarthy. Now Speaker McCarthy has taken over, and he gave the footage this is just video footage. He gave the video footage of the Capitol to Tucker Carlson, and now he's offering to give it to all anyone else who wants it. He just gave him the footage forty thousand hours of all the security cameras. And what we can see with our own
eyes is what happened. We don't have to have somebody else tell us what happened. We see it for ourselves. What we can see, and you've probably seen by now over and over and over, is that crazy guy, the qn On shaman, the guy that had like the buffalo hap with like his painted face and et cetera. The one who was the leader of this insurrection, this violent insurrection, the worst insurrection in all of history since the Civil War. Apparently he was literally being led, being escorted through the
Capitol by the Capitol police or security. I'm not exactly sure they're title. I want to make sure I'm correct. I believe it's Capitol police escorting him, I mean, like leading him. There was two offers for a lot of the video clips. There's two officers him in the middle, walking through the hallways, and the lead officer is checking the door. Oh no, this door's locked. Let's go to another one. Oh no, this door's locked. Okay, let's go
back over here. And then at one point they walked through being escorted two officers with him in the middle, walked through a group of like six or eight other officers just standing there, just walked right through them. And then the officer led him into the capitol area, where the eventual famous picture of him sitting at the speaker's desk was. I saw this with my own eyes, and you might have seen this with your own eyes by now, all right, he was being led. He walked through like
six or eight or nine officers. He was not armed. They could have grabbed him, they could have stopped him, but no, this officer led him, checking doors and guided him to the room he was supposed to be in. Now it's the same officer who went on an HBO special talking about the dangerous insurrection and how his life was threatened. The same officer that's in these videos. Now, of course, people don't like this. As a matter of fact,
Now apparently everyone's coming out. Well, by the way, this guy, the shirtless you know, bullhead guy was sentenced to forty one months in a federal prison. Forty one months but for what for being escorted and led? I mean you can see in the video they're actively checking for lockdoors, and they guided him to the room that he was trying to go into. There was no attempt to stop him. He was not armed. One officer could have grabbed him.
Certainly the nine could have grabbed him. Now, apparently this is a big problem. Apparently people don't like this. Now, apparently this is what will destroy our democracy. They tell us, how dare Tucker Carlson put this conference this information out there?
Other other information? There was a Capital cop, Brian sick Nick, and supposedly, you know, they told us that he was one of the victims of January six, He was murdered by President Donald Trump's supporters Right and Capital, even though an autopsy report showed that he died of a stroke the following day. So the autopsy report told us that that's not what happened. But that's what they told us happened. But surprise, surprise, Now we have video footage. Imagine that.
And so now there's video footage that says he was slain on that day. But as a matter of fact, we have video footage shows him walking through the building after he was supposedly murdered by the mob. Outside. We have the video footage, all right. Now they're trying to tell us that this is you know, this is this is this is a threat to the democracy, This is going to destroy the democracy. Schumer. You know, Chuck Schumer goes on and tells demands. Fox shuts Tucker Carlson down.
How dare he share this information? Tucker Carlson invited Senate a majority leader Chuck Schumer to come on and talk about it. He said, hey, come on, come and talk. Let's let's let's talk about this footage. Now, what do you think happened? Do you think Chuck Schumer was willing to go discuss the truth? Remember, the truth is found through open, honest discussion. If Schumer actually has some facts, actually has some points, shouldn't he want to go bring
them on Tucker Carlson's show to challenge this misinformation? Of course not. Of course he denied the chance to go set the record straight, because if you don't have the truth, how are you going to go How are you going to go lie against what people can see with their own eyes? Obviously you can't, you obviously can't. And this is only the beginning. This footage is coming out strong
and heavy. If you're just trying to listen to the Markmas Show, we're talking about misinformation, disinformation and where this leads us as a society. I got a whole lot more to cover. I'm just getting started. Don't go away, I'm gonna be right back, all right, welcome back. If you just tune in you're listening to the Markmas Show, we're talking about the misinformation and disinformation and malin formation and all those disses and misses and mouths and whatever
they are. According to your leaders, you're too stupid to know what you're seeing or reading, and so they believe that they need to just you know, shut everybody down that doesn't say their desired opinion. That's basically what it is. Tucker Carlson got access to forty thousand hours of capital footage, like the actual video footage, like you know, like there's like my side of the story, and then there's like, you know, your side of the story, and then they
say there's like the truth in there somewhere. You know. Cops now are supposed to wear like body cams so we can see the footage because the camera actually captures what really happened. So then like both people can tell their story, but we could watch the camera and then we could make our own conclusion. And we got the footage. Okay, we got forty thousand hours of footage. You can see it with your own eyes. You don't need Chuck Schumer to tell you what to believe or Nancy Pelosi that
you don't need them. We can see it for ourselves, and we can see that everything they told us is a lie. And of course they have no other choice but to try to shut down the truth. So now they're demanding that Fox News, you know, get to get Tucker Carlson off the air. They're going out on full scale alert, you know, trying to shut down anything Tucker says,
trying to discredit what he's saying. But of course, when Tucker Carlson invited Chuck Schumer on to Fox to come and, you know, speak his mind, tell him what he got wrong, explained to the American people that what they saw wasn't right. Now, of course, if what we're seeing isn't right, you know, maybe it's taken out of context or something like that, they could show us the other evidence. But remember they've sat on that video footage for over a year. Remember
that never once did they release of that. They had the footage for a year, they didn't want to release it. Now that we're seeing it, there tells, Oh, but what you see isn't real. Don't believe your own eyes. You're an idiot. Your eyes are playing tricks on you, and you don't believe it. Now they're more than they're more
than welcome to release their own footage. They've had it for a year, but of course they won't, said Chuck Schumer said in a press conference that Fox News and speaker McCarthy are willing, capable, and powerful accomplices aired one of the most shameful hours we have ever seen in history, in the entire history of cable television. Schumer said, Tucker Carlson is a propagandist publicly pretending to be a newsman. He continued, their liars. They're destroying America for some kind
of monetary advantage. M Well, what I saw was he showed a video clip that allowed me to make up my own decision. What I saw. What I saw is video clips that were sat on for over a year and weren't allowed to be seen, And now that we're seeing, they're claiming that Tucker Carlson is the problem. And as I said, he would not come on, and he wouldn't come on and talk about it. They're trying to censor, They're trying to lie. Now we know this is lies.
We know that officers Sydnick sick Nick wasn't murdered. We know that Ray Epps lied under oath, We know all of these things that happened. We know that the q N and Shaman was actually escorted. Wisconsin GOP Senator Ron Johnson says his staff saw footage of a large door left open that allowed more than three hundred protesters to enter the capitol. So this whole thing about this violent insurrection,
according to the video footage, they were escorted in. According to the video footage, the door was left open and people just walked in. Ron Johnson says that the January sixth narrative will continue to morph as more security footage emerges. Remember, the Democrats constructed a narrative. They told us what happened, but they never once let us see any evidence. Now the evidence is out. Now we're gonna choose for ourselves. Now. Oh man, I spent a lot of time talking about that.
What else happened this week the pandemic. Now this has been covered up. You knows has been covered up. Everyone knows has been covered up. We know we know it's been covered up because if I said one thing, I would just be deleted Again. Why are they deleting people because there's something too high? The truth doesn't need to be hidden. And now we saw this week the previous head of the CDC, not some conspiracy theorist, not some whacked out doctor or internet researcher. No, no, no, I'm
talking about doctor Robert Redfield, the previous head of the CDC. Okay, he went before went before the government testimony testified on Capitol Hill, and he was asked about the benefits or the dangerous gain of function research that happened. He was asked if he could point to a single pandemic gain
function research and if it had ever prevented anything. They asked him, you know what happened, where this came from, etc. And I don't really want to say exactly, because you know, I still don't want to get my accounts deleted and turned off, which, by the way, I'm afraid of YouTube censoring me. And if you want, you can always watch these on YouTube. They're on the Market Disruptors YouTube channel. You can check them out over there, but not some
right wing crazy conspiracies. The head of the CDC basically came out and said it was doctor Fauci. The NIH and the state funded the lab and we know the Department of Energy and even the FBI says it was a lab leak. Now, the former head of the CDC said doctor Fauci is basically responsible for the greatest pandemic that happened in the entire world. That's what he said. Now, that's not the that's not the narrative that they're trying to have been trying to feed us for the last
couple of years. We know that, we know that that the Fauci authored a paper medical paper to disprove this lab league theory. And apparently the group that put out the paper at first had said that it was from a lab leak, but then after Fauci went and talked to them, they mysteriously changed their opinion and said it
wasn't from a lab league. And even more suspiciously is than about a week later, nine million dollars showed up in their accounts, so they completely one eightied and changed their opinion, and then nine million dollars just magically showed up in their account. Pretty interesting. So basically what we know now according to the Department of Energy, according to the FBI, according to the head of the CDC, the former head of the CDC, we know that everything we've
been told about the pandemic was a lie. We know that the entire response was based on lies. An opinion. That's not misinformation, that's not malifiation. They gave us misinformation and malinformation. They are the ones that lied to us. The truth would have been found out. What about the war. There was an article that came out Seymour Hirsch, one of the He's not some blogger. The government's tried to paint him as some blogger. He is one of the
oldest and most respected investigative journalist. You know people that journalists that would actually do research. He's a Pulitzer Prize winner, He's a fame journalist for articles that he's had. He came out and said that the US is the one that blew up the pipeline. Now, now, of course, the government's trying to run misinformation on that. They're saying that's all a hoax. They said it was friends of the Ukraine. Did it friends of the Ukraine? Now the Ukraine is
trying to dis themselves. Wait a minute, Wait a minute, no, no no, no, no no, we didn't do this. There weren't friends of us. So we're supposed to believe that just you run of the mill terrorists used a sailboat and went to one of the most highly patrolled areas of water in the world, went thousand of mile down under the ocean, and we're able to blast through layers of concrete. There's like a couple of countries that have navies capable of doing that job, not some random person on a
sailboat does that. But that's what they're telling us today. Misinformation, malinformation. That's what we've been fed on J six, that's what we've been fed on the war. That's what we've been fed on the pandemic. The truth sell shut is free, but the truth only says free if we're allowed to openly discuss it, if we're openly able to look at the information, if we're able to have transparency. And that's what's coming back. Decentralized protocols are bringing back the truth
and transparency. It's going to change the world. Otherwise we're going to a very dark and dangerous place. If you're just tuning and you're listening to the Mark Moss Show talking about the decentralized Revolution, talking about the misinformation today, that's what I got. Thanks for listening.
