The Power Shift: How Twitter Uncovered the FTX Scandal

about the battle for the fate of humanity. But I believe right now we are in the fight of our lives. This is we, the people versus the powers that be, the government, the state, if you want to call it that. The battle for the fight of our lives comes down to us having freedom, and ultimately it comes down to us being able to control our freedom and our rights

and access to technologies. And either we get the fire, we get the technology that enables us to continue to flourish as a society, continue to think, communicate, expand become more efficient and all these things, or the state, the ever growing state, trying to hold on to power, takes control of this technology and is able to remain in power and limits our ability to have freedom. This is the fight of our lives. I talk about it on

a regular basis. And the story that I'm going to break down for you today highlights this point better than anything. This is the signal that shows the changing of the guard. This story highlights, it emphasizes why all of these stories that I've been talking about, from freedom and privacy and censorship, why they're all coming to a head right now. This story puts a pin in this. And I say it all the time, right I say that technology is what

changes the world. Technology is what changes the world because it changes the way that we organize, the way that we communicate, right, And this is exactly what we're talking about. We're I want to show you today how technology has done this. I want to show you how you can see how it's this technology that's rapidly changing society as we know it. There was a court case, all right, a court case that brought this right to the front

of the public consciousness. If you know what you're looking at. Anyway, some people just look at it as a court case. But if you know what you're looking at, if you know where the dots are, you can start to connect this. And it's so important to understand is because it signals the shifting of the balance of power. The state has a monopoly on violence and force, but the balance of power is shifting back to us, we the people, with

this technology, and we see this pendulum is swinging. It's swinging the world and its shifting back from this centrally planned the centralization of power that you and the IMF, the BIS, et cetera total control to this decentralized world, this decentralized revolution. It's in full effect. It's in full swing now. The event that I want to break down for you might not be obvious to you, but the event I'm talking about is Sam Bankman freed, SBF, the

trial that just happened, the conviction that just happened. Of course SBF and the FTX crypt currency exchange. But this is not about crypto. It's not about cryptocurrencies, it's not about Ponzi schemes. It's not even about the fraud. That's

the story you've already heard. What I want to show you is what this story means, what this signal is, and how this shift and how this story signals this shift in the trust that we have in institutions, the power of the crowd, how it harnesses technology and it shifts the balance of power back to us, and more importantly, it highlights the reality of the fight of our lifetimes. I know there's a lot in this story that most people just aren't understanding, so let's just go ahead and

jump into it now. I do want to just shout out to Bology. Biology wrote a paper kind of breaking down a lot of these moments. I'm using his paper for some of my research. I'm going to link to it in the show notes. Shout out to Biology. Hopefully we'll be meeting up in Texas, I believe, next week at the Texas Blockchain Association. But I'm going to link to his stuff down below if you want to read his whole story. But you know, the story back to this,

who has the fire? This power that we have now with this technology and right now I'm talking about the Internet, and we're going to talk about like some cryptocurrencies as well, but mainly this Internet. And I've been talking about this a lot of you. If you pay attention to my show, you know this. I covered it in a book that was written called The Revolt of the Public. I had

the author on Martin Gurry. Go back to the podcast search the Mark Mass Show, search the Archives for Revolt of the Public Martin Gurry highly worth it or read the book. But basically, it's that the power of the state has always been in controlling the narrative, controlling the information that we have, controlling then what we think, what we can say. But the Internet is a piece is a piece of technology that's given us back the power

to communicate without the need of the state. We no longer need the states approved TV channels or radio channels. They have control over the SEC or the newspapers, and now independent people like me could just create a channel and start putting on information. And it's that ability for us to quickly spin up information, citizen journalism, the ability for us to discuss these ideas, that's changed this balance of power. And like I said, it's never been more evident.

So we're talking about the SBF case and it's sort of like if you grew up on watching Scooby Doo like I did. At the end of the Scooby Doo,

it was like the Mystery Machine. They would go do this research and they would find, you know, this haunted mansion or this haunted amusement park, and they'd find out it was just some old guy that used to run it, and they would tie them up and they'd bring the police in and the criminal would be tied up, the police would come in, the case would be sealed, and then they would pull the mask off and the criminal would say, I would have gotten away for it if

it wasn't for you pesky kids. That's exactly what happened. That's exactly what happened with SBF. It was sort of like a Scooby Doo movie. And now the Internet, the Internet slews. They found SBF out. They delivered him hog tiede directly to the police with the case sealed. Now that he's been convicted, well, we were still waiting on the sentencing. We'll see where that's at. He's eligible to get up to I think one hundred and ten years. Some people are saying he'll probably get much less. And

you'll understand why I forget through this story. But now that he's been convicted, we're starting to see sort of like a rewriting of history, which is saying, look, the system worked, right, Look we found him guilty. You guys thought we'd let him off because he was a democratic darling, but look it worked. He got convicted. But that's not the case. That's not the case at all. They're trying to rewrite history to tell you that. So let me give you the long version of this, and so you

can understand. Like I said, this is a big story, the fight of our lives. This tells you why. So the system did not work. Don't let them tell you that it did. Right, if you get the last question right on a test after failing every other one, you still fail the test. And that's exactly what happened. The state, the legacy institutions, the politicians, the journalists, the regulators, the

criminal justice system all failed and then eventually succeeded. Okay, but it was only after failing everywhere else, and it was only after the demand of the public, only after the internet crowd the public, armed with the power of the Internet, built the entire case out for them, and didn't just build the entire case out for them, but then demanded that day take action. All right, So what am I talking about? Well, we know that it was people on the Internet. I'm gonna break this down for

you that really brought this to the forefront. Now, none of this would have ever happened, potentially if it wasn't for the power of us having this fire of the internet. SBF, we know that he stole people's funds. Now, we know billions of dollars, tens of billions of dollars. We know that he used that stolen money to help swing elections across the country. These are facts, These are non arguable facts. These actions that he did can never be unwound. Those

political figures are there now. So this means that in essence, SBF kind of took one for the team and the bad guys got away with it. Again. Now, this isn't some great triumph for the US establishment, right because again we have the Internet. The power of the crowd is what really caught SBF and brought him to justice, not the centralized state. All right, So we're going to break this down into a couple of pieces. I want to talk about how the the legacy institutions failed, how the

politicians failed. We're going to talk about how the journalists failed. We're going to talk about how the regulators failed. We're going to talk about how the criminal justice system failed. And then we're going to talk about how the Internet succeeded, how decentralized technologies and protocols help the Internet succeed, and then we're going to talk about the bigger reason as to why they don't want you to have technology and freedom of speech. Everything else that you're seeing is going

to make sense after we go through the story. Now, if you're just tune and you're listening to the markmas Show, we're always talking about the decentralized Revolution, talking about how technology is changing the world, and like I said, this story highlights it all. You do not want to miss this. We have a whole lot to cover, but I got to take a quick break. So I'm gonna do a quick break. We're gonna come back. We're gonna cover all those things. Don't miss it. I'm going to be right back,

all right, welcome back. If you're just tune in, you're listening to the Mark Maas Show, we're running through the decentralized Revolution. We're running through the court case of SBF and FTX and how he just got convicted. But it's a different story than what you're hearing in the news. We're digging into the failure of legacy institutions and how the power of the crowd swung this over so again, the system didn't work. Let's talk about the legacy institutions

that failed us. So first off, we're going to talk about the politicians. Now, if you remember, this is all over the news, SBF was the number two donor to the Democratic Party after George. So now I've been talking about George Soros for a long time. Lots of other people have as well. Lately, you've been hearing George Soros being talked about by Elon Musk. Elon Musk, I think was on Joe Rogan, so I got probably one hundred millions of views talking about how he was a threat

to society and evil danger on all these things. So, George Soros is the largest donor to the Democratic Party. SBF was the number two donor. Now it's been admitted that he was one of the people most responsible for putting Joe Biden in the White House. As a matter of fact, FTX, Sam Bateman Fried's cryptocurrency change FTX was created right when Biden announced that he was going to run for president. So it looks like that's pretty interesting.

As a matter of fact, on my main YouTube channel, just search Mark Moss FTX SBF, I did a video highlighting all of these connections between the time that FTX was created in Joe Biden announcing his campaign, if you want to look into that anyway. We know that he was the most responsible for putting Joe Biden in the White House, and we know now that he's convicted that he did this was stolen money, all right. Now, we know other democratics like Maxine Waters praised FBF for being candid.

She welcomed him to testify to Congress even after his fraud was public, Even after even after we knew that he took all these people's money, tens of billions of dollars, She's still invitedment. Maxine Waters isn't just some Democratic politician. She is the chair of the House Financial Services Committee, all right. She's not just some politician the House Financial Services Committee. She was quote surprised that SBF was arrested before he had the prestigious opportunity to make his case

before Congress. Why why was she surprised? She knew him personally, She'd been working closely with him. She was working with him closely on doing what capturing the regulatory state. She was putting through a bill that he was helping her with that would have criminalized all the decentralized finance platforms and instead benefited his centralized FTX platform, So he was using the state. They were working together to push a bill to criminalize you for using technology and only be

allowed to use his platform. So we know that the politicians failed. Their nominal job is passing laws that are in the best interests of the public. That's you and I. They're supposed to be public servants, watching out for us and putting in things that would help us flourish, like having access to technology, but instead she worked with a known frauds he Likestambankment freed to instead push a bill that would criminalize you and I for using software and

instead push everybody into his pocketbook. Now how did he accomplish that, Well, he legally bribed them, of course, he legally bribed them by being the second largest donor to the Democratic Party. Now, a few of you guys gonna say, yeah, Mark, he gave some money to the Republicans, doue. He did a couple. He did a couple, a couple, A couple couple coins went to some Republicans, But they were the Republicans that were on these committees that were pushing his agenda.

Don't get caught up in the labels here. Now, SBF legally bribed them by donating these campaigns. He pushed this legislation that was in his favor, and it would have it would have it would have favored his centralized power over everybody else. Now, he would have succeeded in this, him and the state. Maxine Waters would have succeeded if it wasn't for those pesky kids like Scooby Doo on the Internet. Now, the other legacy institution that failed us

was the journalist. Now, journalists were supposed to have freedom of the press, because the freedom of the press is supposed to keep the transparency of the state open. They're supposed to actually do research and they're supposed to actually do real journalism that keeps everybody honest that they know if if they do something shady, they're going to be found out and it's going to be exposed. That's why they're protected. But again, legacy journalism failed us as a

matter of fact, not did they just fail us. SBF was the toast of the town in mainstream media, the New York Times, maybe a mouthpiece for the government when all was just fawning all over Sam Bankman free. They were his they were his favorite or he was their

favorite character. And as a matter of fact, even after this all became public, after we found out that he stole billions of dollars from the public, after he took I don't even know, countless hundreds of thousands of people's savings, literally if people broke even after that came to public view, the New York Times brought him on to a stage to something called the Deal Book Summit. After they knew he had taken millions or billions. They gave him a

loud round of applause to speak to everybody. And it wasn't it's just that they did this, but they tried to swing public opinion in his favor after already knowing that he ruined people's lives and he stole billions of dollars. Now, if we contrast this to the other coverage that they've had of cryptocurrency, for example, we can see that the media's message for bitcoin is that bitcoin's a fraud, Bitcoin

uses too much energy, But not SBF. He's a friend because look how much money he's given to media outlets. Look how much money's given to NGOs. As a matter of fact, Legacy Media even went as far as to call him the JP Morgan of Crypto. He was the guy. So the journalists who were supposed to be researching this and bringing this, exposing this to us, they failed. We have trusted legacy media to expose these things. We have

trusted legacy media to educate us on these things. But they completely failed in their nominal job of informing the public and instead taking money and then trying to push public opinion. Even after we knew that he took billions of dollars, they continued to put him up into the public. They continued to write nice things about him. And again they would have they would have succeeded in this if it wasn't for those nosy kids, those pesky kids on

the internet. We're going to tell you how these pesky kids did that in a second. Now we also see that the regulators failed. The regulators are there to regulate people like this, so they don't do things like this. As a matter of fact, the main regulator is the SEC Securities Exchange Commission. Their role, their only role is to protect consumers like you and I. Did they do a good job well? Ten billion dollars of consumer funds were stolen right beneath their nose, So would that be

a passing grade? Did they protect consumers? Could they lead that they were ignorant about it? Well, again, if you go back and watch the video I did when all this broke through again, go back to my main YouTube, Pianel, Mark Moss, search Mark Moss and FTX, you'll find it. Gary Ginsler is tied directly into the entire FTX fiasco. If you want to see the dots, go back and watch that. Gary Ginsler, who's the head of the SECU, whose job is to protect you and I the consumer,

is tied directly into this. Gary Ginsler went and met with SBF privately. Now this is not something that he does normally, this is not something that's given to other projects, but he did meet with SBF. Now there's a whole

lot more to cover. If you're just tuning in, you're listening to the Mark Moss Show, I'm breaking down an event that just happened, SBF getting I'm convicted, But it's not the story that I'm telling I'm telling you why the government wants to censor and control us, and how this cracked this wide open and it shifts the balance of power. I'm gonna have a whole lot more to cover, but I gotta take a very quick break. Don't go away,

I won't be right back. All right, welcome back. If you just tune in, you're listening to the Mark Mas Show. I'm talking about how Sam Bankman freed SBF and the FTX fiasco and how he was just convicted. But that's not the story we're talking about. You know that story, it's all over the news. What I'm talking about is what happened here and how this signals the shift in the balance of power that's happening, and how everything else that you're seeing in regards to censorship and spine and

regulations all makes sense if you understand this story. So we covered how legacy institutions have failed us. We talked about how the legacy the politicians failed us. We talked about how the journalists failed us. And now we're talking about the regulator. So Gary gins are the head of the SEC again. Their only job is to protect the consumers. Consumers lost over ten billion dollars, so they failed. Gary Ginsler should resign in disgrace. The SEC should be shut down, dismantled,

just on that alone. Now let's take a look at what actually happened. So whether he was, whether he knew about it or not, doesn't change the fact that he failed in his job to protect the consumer. So whether he knew or didn't know, he still failed. But did he know? So again, if you can watch that video on my Manuguer channel, you'll see the ties that he had with SBF. But he met with SBF privately, and

again most people don't get that. Now, not only did he meet with SBF privately, so he had inside information, he was privy to information about FTX that most people didn't have. Not only did he do that, did he see that and not do anything? He then went and attacked all these other projects publicly, cases that he's lost publicly. The meeting that he had with FTX mentioned quote conditional

no action relief. What does that mean. That means in regulatory translation, that they will not pursue enforcement against FTX. So so he went and met with him. Apparently maybe Sam bankman free to open the books. We don't know. There was lots of information he received and we know now this was the biggest fraud scam in the entire industry. Ten billion dollars, and Gary Ginsler, right under his nose, right after a private meeting, just said Nope, we're not

going to do any regulatory action against them. Oh, but we are going to go after a whole bunch of these other things that we don't learn anything about. And we ended up losing. So the regulators failed in their nominal job of one flagging a bad project, two passing good projects, and instead they spent their time meeting with SBF and attacked bitcoin ETFs when Gary Ginsler has said that he knows their commodities, when we know it's a

decentralized cryptocurrency. Why why did Gary Ginzer do that? Could it be that it's because SBF was his ally? How was he his ally well donating money to their party, using people like Maxine Waters and the Financial Service Committee, using Garriganzer to push for more regulatory power. So if you have power, you and I most likely we don't want power. People in government they do, they want more.

So if SBF is giving you money and helping you pass bills to give you more regulatory power and giving you more money, then you want that, which is why regulators gave him special favors like private meetings, which is why Congress steered cryptoregulation to his preference, to his business. And they would have all gotten away with it if it wasn't for those pesky kids on the Internet, like Scooby Doo. Now let's talk about what did work. The

internet worked the power of the crowd, crowdsourced information. There's been all these tests done where you test the power of the crowd, and so like at a county fair, they'd have like a big steer, like a cow, up on stage and they'd say, go, guess the weight of that steer, And as long as you had people that were reasonably knowledgeable, like farmers, and they would go put a vote in, like how much the cow the steerway,

and they didn't see the other guesses. What they found is that when they averaged those out, it was crazy close. They did that with like cows, they did it with how many eminem's were in a jar, things like that. The power of the crowd is extremely powerful, and that's what the Internet gives to us. The Internet allows us to have all this information. So when somebody like the state spreads misinformation, we can instantly disprove it. Instantly, we

can do the research. We can find the information and we can show it, we can show pictures, videos, whatever it is. And that's exactly what happened. The power of the crowd blew out legacy institutions and how did they do it well. It started with crypto investor Nick Tomino and he tweeted that FTX was suspect in both its trading activity and its policy advocacy. Now it started on Twitter. If Twitter was still controlled by the state, would that have allowed to be happened? I mean, we don't know.

That's why Elon Musk said he wanted by Twitter. That's why he believes Twitter is so important. We need to allow this information to get out. Now, if it's up to this, they would have wanted to suppress this information. He tweeted it, and he tweeted about FTX suspect and his train activity and its policy avoccy. Then another crypto ceo, Eric Vorhees, confronted SBF on a podcast and that kind

of blew it open. And then it culminated in another Internet site called coindest published an article by Ian Allison talking about all these shenanigans that SBF was doing, and it blew this fraud case wide open. Now none of this was driven by legacy media, legacy politicians, legacy regulators, or police. None of it. Even Washington Post, another mouthpiece for the government, admitted that citizen journalists outshine traditional media, the power of the crowd, the power of the Internet.

But if you need to hide your agenda, if you need to control a narrative, you could easily understand why you wouldn't want the public to have access to this information. You see, the elites want to push what they call a technocracy. That means a government, a state that's run by not technologists, by experts. That's what a technocracy is. It's run by experts. So they want to have all the information. They want to have the power of the information.

They don't want us to have it. Never did they imagine the balance of power would be shifted where the public would have access to the same information that they would and they would no longer be able to hide in this murkiness opacity, because now we the people, would have access to information, will be able to expose him,

just like what happened. Now, after this happened, After Coindesk broke this article, things started moving really, really quickly, Binance CEO CZ said he was going to sell his stakes. SBF from FDx said, oh it's fine, it's fine, no big deal. But very quickly the community tested his claims. All this happened on the Internet, so everybody saw this, and very quickly the Internet, the power of the crowd, the decentralized community was able to fact check him because

of Bitcoin. So bitcoin has an open, transparent ledger, so you can say, hey, we have the bitcoin, but the open transparent ledger shows the truth. And so because of the Bitcoin blockchain being open, Sam Bankman Frid couldn't continue the fraud. They couldn't cover it. Now, we can't emphasize this enough. It wasn't legacy journalists, wasn't politician, wasn't regulators,

it wasn't the police. It was the Internet, the power of the crowd, and the decentralized power of the Bitcoin blockchain that was able to bring him to, you know, showing that he was a fraud. SBF was saying that oh, everything's fine, assets are fine, but they weren't. And because we could fact check it, he failed. So the network succeeded. The decentralized network succeeded, where the centralized power of the state failed. It was crypto Twitter that asked the hard

questions that the crowd to the actual citizen journalism. They found the smoking gun. They published the proof on the Internet. And after that, only after that happened, Only after the power of the crowd, the Internet, the Scooby Doo mystery Magine went and found the crime, found all the evidence exposed it, tied it up and gave it to a gave it bow tide to the state. Did something happen? The Internet had cryptographic proof that SBF was a criminal

on historic scale. By a November eleventh of twenty twenty two, when ftx paused withdraws, they said that customers thought there was twenty thousand bitcoin in ftx, and we quickly found out they only had one, not twenty thousand bitcoin. One bitcoin that was found out and that was delivered. Now, SBF and his cronies they lied to the public. They said that, you know, they came up with all kinds of reasons. We have plenty of funds, but you know we can't we can't give them out right now for

whatever reason. But they couldn't lie. Because of the bitcoin blockchain, millions of witnesses could independently confirm that their money was stolen by monitoring the network. Now, if you're just tuning in, you're listening to the Mark Maas Show. I'm breaking down what happened with SBF and FTX, but not the story that you're hearing in the news. I'm telling you why this is bringing to front the battle for the fate of humanity, the battle of our lives. Right now, I'm

trying to take aquick break. I'll be right back. Don't go away, all right, welcome back. If you just tune in, you're listening to the Mark Maas Show, I'm talking about the SBF, the FTX fiasco. SBF just got convicted, it's facing one hundred and ten years. But that's not the story I'm telling. What I'm telling is a story that

signals this massive shift in the balance of power. And if you understand this, you'll understand exactly why the state wants to censor and control technology all right now, So basically, the power of the crowd the Internet. They found all the information, they they bow tied SBF up, they gave him to the DOJ Department of Justice to go after But yet they wouldn't do anything. For weeks, nothing happened, Sam bankmin Freed was free going around. He's going around

on TV shows. He's going to Good Morning America again. As I said earlier, the New York Times hosted them at an event and gave him a round of applause. He was still welcome to testify before Congress by the Chair of the House Financial Services after we already knew that he did this, but more importantly, while he was doing this. This is the point we have to drill into because one of the core lies being circuledl online right now is that the state succeeded in this. But

that's not what happened. During this time. As he was allowed to remain free, as he was allowed to go on the speaking tour, as he was allowed to come in and testify in Congress, the legacy media and politicians were basically making his case to the court of public opinion. A lot of times these high profile cases, there's like gag orders and things like this because they don't want them to affect what the public perception is or what the jury might see. But during this time, they were

changing the public perception of what was going on. That's part of the reason why this took so long. Now, this didn't happen in a vacuum. People see this, but most people don't understand this. Now, why did it happen so long? Why did it break down like this? Well, again, we broke down the legacy institutions, one of which was the justice system. Now we know. Back to George Soros, the bigger downer in front of SBF, being the number two.

Soros has basically said, ah, you know what, let's not focus so much on the big presidential election, which of course he's there. Let's go more after the district attorneys, the dast Let's not try to change America through like changing the constitution or voting. Let's just change the justice system if we can change the way they prosecute crime. And that's exactly what's happening. We can see now crime is de facto legal in most American cities. We see

that all over the place. We see all through the major cities, the stores, even in Beverly Hills, the stores are having to leave because they can't afford to be there anymore. We're seeing prosecution of actual crimes winding down, put the prosecution of political crimes ramping up. Sure, go ahead and firebomb pregnancy Advocate center, go ahead and spray paint, graffiti, hate messages and threats. But if you're silently peacefully preying on a sidewalk, you're facing a decade in prison. These

are political crimes, That's what's happening. We're seeing it all over. We're in the era of show trials, where Russiagate charges are slowly admitted to be false, while the Hunter Biden allegations are gradually acknowledged to be true. For years, we were fed this Russiagate phony case, which a lot of people saw through, and eventually they admitted that it was all fake, but they quietly did it, slowly did it

Hunter Biden. Everyone knew it was already true. They said it wasn't and then eventually they said it was true. Why because the power of the crowd was able to figure this out. But all this was only after the elections had already happened. We found out about russia Gate after it already changed the course of the election. We found about the Hunter Biden laptop after the election was

already decided. No, the Biden administration pushed a letter with like fifty intelligence analysts saying that the Hunter Biden thing was false, even when the laptop had been known to be true since twenty nineteen by the FBI. None of this is justice. So this is why we don't trust the justice systems, why we don't trust the police. The fact that criminal justice system eventually grudgingly was forced to do something because the public put so much pressure on

them they couldn't go any longer without it. And this is the point that we're talking about the government didn't want to do anything about it because they wanted SBF there to continue to donate, be the second largest donor to the party. They wanted them to continue to push these regulations. They wanted him to be able to continue to fund them, and they didn't want to have to give the money back. Now, justice delayed could be the same as justice tonight. So this is the second point.

Why did it take so long for SBF to get picked up? Now? The powers that be want to tell you, oh, because that's the justice system. And people in America are innocent until proven guilty, which they are I would agree with that, So everyone should be innocent til proven guilty. But then why do you see people like Alex Pertsev jailed within days. Who is he created a piece of code for a tornado cash All he did was write

the code, and the OFAC created some new law. They interpreted an existing law, and then they went and grabbed him and held him without charges for writing a piece of code. In twenty twenty, the FBI went to go investigate that fake new story at the NASCAR within twenty four hours. We see them move fast all the time when they want to, and part of this was that they wanted to allow this court of opinion to be changed.

They want to believe that their hands were tied they were giving him due process, but we see all the time the state doesn't do that when it fits their agenda. The state put millions of innocent people under indefinite house arrest, but they couldn't get SBF under legal arrest. It took an entire month after we knew that he had stole billions of dollars of funds from customers before they finally went in. And part of it is because there's an

entire embarrassment to the party. We've seen that there is now no trust in the police, there's no trust in the DOJ, and they wouldn't have done anything unless it was pushed by the power of the internet. Again, we can see this all the time, but the rest of the world sees it as well. Unfortunately, it seems like a lot of people in America have been gas lit into this, but the rest of the world sees this. Everyone who lost money into that sees it. Democratic Party

even admitted it. They said that they were quote watching the case closely, and part of the reason why they are watching the case closely is because again it was their second largest donor and they didn't want to have to give the money back. But this is a good question to bring up. If these politicians were in fact covering for some of the crimes, if in fact we see that even some legacy media like New York Times

might have been helping to cover up the crime. If we see that, well, now that he's been convicted, we know that he swung elections with stolen funds that can't ever be unwound. But do those investors get their money back? What happens to the politicians that took the money from FTX? Will they be able to keep their seats should they be removed? And we should bring in the challenger. What about the money that they received. Now, there's lots of

court precedents that shows how there's clawbacks. We know that. Denish Desuza, who's a conservative filmmaker. He makes documentaries. He made a movie. Oh, he's made a bunch of movies, one of which was The two Thousand Mules, and he kind of talked about the twenty twenty election. He made one back in twenty sixteen. It was about Obama, and Obama didn't like that very much, and Obama went to the Obama administration and the DOJ went and found him

guilty of campaign finance finance violations. I want to say it was about twenty five thousand dollars orth less, and I think he was convicted for like eighteen months a year, eighteen months something like that. Don't fact me. I'll go ahead and in fact check me on that, somewhere in that range. But yet here we have hundreds of millions of dollars of stolen funds. Now, Denis Desuza weren't stolen funds,

he just didn't declare them properly. Here we have one hundreds of millions dollars of stolen funds of customers who want their money back given to politicians to swing a vote. The damage is forever done and the people are out their money. This is not about this is not so much about politics. This is framing up why this is the battle for the fate of man. This is why

they don't want us to have the power. So when you see digital IDs and central bank digital currencies, and privacy and misinformation and malinformation and controls on AI, now you know why they don't want you to have the power of the technology in your hands so they can continue to manipulate this. And this is the battle for the fight of our lives. Now. One of the ways that we've been able to always protect our life is by having our money, access to our money, because money

buys us options. Now inside money like CBDCs will be controlled by them and controlled through censorship. One of the best ways is to get money outside the system, and for five thousand years, the best way to do that has been with gold. That's why I buy gold, and that's why gold, I think, is going. It's rallying. It's up big. It's up nineteen percent in October. Silver's up twenty two percent in October, and it's because people see this.

They want to get their money out of the bank into assets like gold, and I get my gold from a company called Universal Coin and Buoyan. I've met with doctor Mike Fulgens and his company. They're trustworthy and they have great prices, and they have a special price on a silver one ounce American silver ego coin with no dealer markup, just twenty seven dollars each, but a limit of three. They'll even ship it to you for free.

If you mentioned my name, give them a call called Universal Coin and Buoyan to get either a twenty seven dollars Solver ego coin deal or they have a forty seven dollars Donald Trump Tribute label silver ego coin deal. Get either one with free shipping. If you mentioned my name, call one eight hundred uc B Gold again one eight hundred U see b Gold, or go online to universalcoin

dot com. Slash Mark Moss. If you're just tuning in you're listening to the Markmas Show, We've been breaking down this SBF court case, but more importantly, so you can understand what is really at stake here. Hopefully enjoyed it, let me know hit me up on the comments on social media. At one Mark Moss until next time.