The Mark Moss Show 2-5-24

this as we try to navigate this. Now, in this episode, I'm gonna break down the difference between the one percent and the ninety nine percent. Who makes up who are the one percent? How their views differ. We're going to look at the polls. We're going to look at the actual data of what their views differ, and surprise, it is very shocking. I was a shocked. We're gonna look at the views how they differ from the nine percent. Why it seems like it's half the country but it's not.

We're gonna look at the data behind that, and we're gonna look at the historical precedence that we can learn as we all navigate through this. Now, if you're just tuning in, you're listening to the Mark Moss Show, we delve into the intricate world of politics, finance, and technology, really looking for the sweet spot where they connected. Today, we're going to explain what is going on with this seeming divide that we have, how it really divides so

we can navigate it, and let's just get going. I'm calling this the elite one percent versus the People. Now, first of all, let me just say I've been trying to reject that word elite, and the reason why I reject that word is because I don't believe they are elite. Well, let me just say I wouldn't hire pretty much any of those people to run my business. Now, if I was trying to figure out how to get some political goodwill, some political grifts, some political donations, sure I would certainly

hire them. So I suppose in the world of grifting, in the world of fundraising and washing each other's backs, I suppose they're pretty elite in that. But I'm trying to sort of get that word out of my vocabulary. But we're talking about today. We talk about the one percent versus the people, but I'm not talking specifically about the one percent in terms of income like we would normally talk about it today, we're going to look at it from a handful of metrics. We're going to lay

out what these metrics are. Now. There was a poll that I got most of this data from, and it's from Rasmussen. You've probably heard about the Rasmussen political polls they've done. You know, they've been doing American sort of political polls for a long time. I think they were founded in two thousand and three. They do two weekly national surveys, so they're surveying all the time, so they're getting the reason why I like this is in a business, the way I run my business, the way you should

run your business. You've probably maybe heard of the term key performance indicators KPIs. It's sort of like putting your finger on the pulse of your business. And the way they run these polls is sort of similar because they're doing them every single week, twice a week, and they're sort of getting the play by play, so as things change in the market, as things change in politics, to the news, et cetera, you can see this reflected through

the polls. It's really good. And what we're talking about today is the Rasmussen reports have noticed a big difference. What they've noticed is an anomaly. Right, So they look at lots of data. When you start collecting data like on your business, for example, a lot of times that data doesn't really mean anything to you, but when you look at it over long periods of time, it starts to tell you things. And specifically you see things starting to shape change and stand out anomaly, so to speak.

And so they noticed this anomaly. And what they notice is that out of every one thousand or so respondents, there would always be three to four who were far more radical than everybody else. So these the outliers out of one thousand, three to four back to the one percent, right, So every one thousand, they're three or four that were,

like I said, way more radical than anything else. And so what happened is after seeing this data change, after several months, after finding these seemingly, you know, unusual responses, Rasmussen realized that they all shared three characteristics, right, really maybe four, but we're going to look at three characteristics

that they shared. And so what they did, because they're a polling data analytics company, they aggregated all the responses for more than twenty surveys, and he realized these people made up a very unique elite one percent, all right, and that's what we're going to look at. We're going to dive into that. So first of all, who are they. Let's just talk about that, and then we'll look at the views, we'll look at how this affects us and

how we navigate it. But who are the elite? So, per all these reports, all this data he's pulled, there are people who have post graduate degrees right now, not just graduate studies, but post graduate degree. So they're the elite of the elite. They're the extra educated, if you will. They have family incomes that are above one hundred and fifty thousand dollars a year, so you know, getting close, not in the one percent of income, but they're certainly affluent,

let's just call it that. So they came from good families, they went to colleges, we'll talk about the collegees they went to, and they have postgraduate degrees. Also, they lived in large cities more than ten thousand people per zip code. And so I'm sure you've probably seen like a picture of the map or a map of the United States and it's like almost all red and then you see the blue is all concentrated around the cities and this kind of back set up, so they all lived in

large cities. More than ten thousand people were zip code. The elite one percent are surprisingly young. Sixty seven percent are between thirty five and fifty years old. The reason why we'll get back to this when we talk about the actual colleges, they came from the Dirty dozen, we'll call it that. However, it's because we've had a massive shift in our education system, and that's why they're predominantly

so much younger. The people older than that learned under a whole different education system with a whole different ideology, I would say, with real facts and history. Let's just say that they were taught different things. So sixty seven percent between thirty five and fifty four. Eighty six percent are white, forty seven percent favor like Bernie Sanders socialist policies, seventy three percent are Democrats. Now, the gap between the elite one percent and the rest of America is startling.

All right, We're going to dig into that specifically, because when you see the way that they view the world, the way that they look at government and the laws and regulations and the way they want to manage things, it's very shocking. But let's just dig into a couple of these things for a minute. So first of all, they postgraduate degree. Like I said, they're younger, and so we can see how that changed. Now we're going to

talk about the importance of why that matters. Because these people with these high level degrees coming from these certain colleges we'll talk about the twelve colleges have gone into certain types of jobs. That's a big deal, right, But it also has to do with the types of jobs that they have. So the education have led them to a certain type of job, but it also puts them

into a different mindset. And so when you live in these large cities and you went to these colleges and you have these types of jobs, you just think differently then you do in what we would call the flyover states. So when you're in Kansas or Iowa, or you know, Michigan, or you know you're working on the farm, or you're out in you know, Montana or Idaho, you're living in nature,

you just see things differently. You're much more grounded, right, You understand the world from a rational lens when you're in nature, when you work with your hands, when you work for a living, and you just get the way the world works, like, for example, you have to produce before you consume. You see, most of these people don't

really understand that. Right they they're in New York City, they're in they're in their hedge fund in Wall Street, for example, they take their helicopter out to the country for the weekend. They look at they look out over this beautiful land that they have and think, oh my gosh, this is so pristine, it's so beautiful. We should protect this for forever, which is not a bad idea. But in order to do that, we should just shut down all the energy. We shouldn't get energy in the US

anymore because we want to preserve this. But they don't understand. They're so far removed. They don't understand how that all worked out. How did they even get their beautiful condo or house in New York, How did they make all that money? What went into that? Like real businesses that use energy to grow allowed them to build their wealth. They don't understand it because they're so far removed. It really comes down to this fourth turning. Right, you've heard

me references before, maybe we've read the book. The fourth turning really it's generational theory, and generational theory is basically four generations. So fore turning is eighty years four twenty year cycles, and it's basically hard times create strong men. That was my grandfather. He grew up on a farm, the hardest times. He was the hardest man my father. Then hard men create great great men. Great men create great times. My father grew up under that very hard

work on the farm, but he left the farm. Those great times create weak men, and then week men create bad times. And so then you know, I hate to say it, but then you know, I don't work as hard as my dad. I work very hard as far as my effort and my time commitment, but not as hard physically as my dad did. And now the fourth generation, my kids, they're not quite sure what work is. And so we can see how this changes. And that's sort of where we are with these elite at this stage

in the game. Now, I want to break down, like I said, the actual data of how they vote, because I was completely shocked and you're going to be shocked as well. We're going to break that down. We're going to look at how this affects all these institutions that are sort of driving and shaping our narrative and why it seems so overwhelming and how we navigate all of this. But you know, one of the ways that we can

do this is by protecting our wealth. Wealth gives us options, right, and when they're continually debasing the money, they're eroting your wealth. Even if you save that money in the bank, you're losing your wealth that way. Now, I'm going to come back with the way these people vote and the numbers are going to shock you. I'll be back with more in a minute. You're listening to the Mark Maas Show.

Don't go away, I'll bear back. All right, welcome back, if you just tune in, you're listening to the Mark Maas Show. We're talking about the one percent, the elite one percent versus the people. Now we broke down who they are, like the demographics, what the age they are, where they live, how much income they have and so forth. Let's talk about now about the data of the gap. All right, So, as we kind of framed up before. Rasmussen Polls, which runs data a couple times a week.

They send out these data and they collect all this data. They did a national survey of only people with those characteristics. So, as I said before, as they do these polls, they found these anomalies. Three to four people out of every one thousand had this very radical, very different viewpoint. So then what they decided to do is take that group of people and only pull them versus pulling the other people without them, so sort of splitting the group and

pulling them separately as opposed to aggregating the data. And they found some astonishing results. Let's talk about a couple of those. When all the others, so we'll say there's the one percent and there's the others. When all the others gave President Joe Biden, or actually, when we look at all of the voters gave President Joe Biden a forty one percent job approval, it's not that now it's much lower. But at the time side note, President Joe

Biden had a forty one percent job approval. The elite one percent rated him at an eighty two percent approval. It's a pretty big difference. It's one hundred percent difference. Think about that for a minute. Why is there such a disparity between those numbers? How can we be living in two different worlds at the same time. Certainly it's because you know, one group of people, the majority of

people don't trust mainstream media. We're gonna come back to that, and they're watching alternative news sources, and the other group is just watching you know, every TV in their houses on CNN, potentially you're watching two sets of news, and so we're seeing that. But it's more than that. As I already kind of went through. We went to different schools, we came from different families, we live in different places. We're going to break that down a little bit more.

But let's get back into the data, because it gets worse. Fifty seven percent of all the voters when we look at the voter base together, fifty seven percent of all voters say there's not enough individual freedom in America. What would you say, do you think there's more freedom in America? Do you think that individual freedom is getting better or getting worse? Do you think individual freedoms around the world is getting better or worse? Are we seeing the rise

of authoritarianism more control? It looks like every time I turn around, they want to micro manage the minutia. Here in California, for example, this Scott Wiener who's putting through every draconian law you could ever imagine. I want to tell you, I mean that they control your kids, how they control them. He just put a bill forward that wants to make a law in California where auto manufacturers are no longer able to sell cars in the state

that go more than eighty miles an hour. Now, we already have speed limit laws, but no, that's not enough. He wants to micromanage the details of your life so much that your car can't even go over that. And think about this, auto manufacturers now have to make a completely different car just to be sold in that state. So anyway, back to the individual. Fifty seven percent of

voters say there is not enough individual freedom in America. However, seventy percent of the elite one percent say there's too much. Sixty percent say there's not enough. Seventy percent of the one percent say there's not there's too much freedom. Do you think there's too much freedom? I guess you can figure out. Are you on the elite one percent or you do you side with the regular people? Based off of some of this, but it gets worse, let's keep going.

Ninety three percent of average Americans reject cheating and will accept defeat in an honest election. Right. I remember this when the whole Trump Biden thing went down. I'm like, look, man, this is pretty easy. We don't need all kinds of new technology. All we need is just like, why not have a Republican a Democrat both in the room, both

look at the counts. Maybe we live stream it over YouTube, and if you know, one of them fairly won, they won, and that's what the people want, and then let's just accept that. And basically that's what this pool says. Ninety three percent of Americans reject cheating and would accept defeat in an honest election. Only seven percent reported that they

would cheat. Seven percent of the average Americans, however, sixty nine percent, sixty nine percent, twenty percent of the elite one percent would rather cheat than lose a close election. What is this world that we've grown up in? How could we be so different? I mean, I will just think everybody would reject cheating. Ninety three percent do seventy percent of the elite one percent would rather cheat than

lose an election. Let's keep going. Six percent of most voters have a very favorable favorable opinion of members of Congress. Six percent. That's extremely low. Most people do not look favorably on the leadership. They understand how corrupt Congress is and they don't like it. However, sixty nine percent of the one percent have a very favorable view. I mean, it's almost unimaginable. How can they look at the at Congress and say, oh, sure the inside of trading is okay.

Sure Nancy Pelosi is the best investor in the world. Sure they all beat the hedge funds. Yes, how can they see that? We hardly because they're made up of that class. Six percent are unfavorable. Seventy percent of the one percent are favorable. Ten percent of all voters have a favorable view of journalists. Ten percent means ninety percent don't. Ninety percent do not have a favorable view of journalists because they've lost our trust. They're constantly lying, they're constantly manipulating,

they're constantly omitting the truth. Things like that. Ninety percent of voters view them unfavorable. However, seventy one percent of the one percent voters view them as favorable. What like, how can this be? Ninety percent think they're unfavorable, seventy one percent think they are favorable. I mean, the disparity is amazing. Let's just keep going down to illustrate the scale of this gap. Look at a couple other issues. So those were more about like do we trust our leadership?

Do we trust their media? But let's look at some of the issues that have been sort of shoved down our throats over and over and over again. Now this is all going to be from the one percent, and this is all around climate issues. So from the one percent. On climate issues, seventy seven percent of the one percent would like to impose strict restrictions and rationing on the

private use of gas, meat, and electricity. Seventy seven percent of the one percent think that you have to be controlled and you should be rationed on how much gas you can put in your car, so how much you could drive, how much meat you're allowed to eat, how much electricity you can use up? No more video games, no more Netflix for you. Seventy two percent favor banning gas powered vehicles. Yeah cool for them. They're rich. They

can afford that expensive tesla. What about you, Oh well, you can't afford it, so you can walk and ride the bus. Now that's how to touch They are sixty nine percent of the one percent elite favor banning gas stoves. Again, they're so out of touch. They live in the cities. They're in their high rise condo, you know, a million dollar condo. I'm sure they can cook on electric stove whatever, But what about you in your house? Gas is cheaper.

People use gas to cook food. And regardless of what you want to use, how can they be in favor of micromanaging how you cook your food? And is that more freedom? Fifty eight percent of the one percent favor of banning sport utility vehicles SUVs fifty eight percent, almost sixty percent want to ban what type of or tell you what type of car you can drive. My wife drives an suv. We have kids, she drives other kids,

my kid's friends. She drives them to soccer games and things like that, like well they don't play soccer, but sporting events and school events and things like that. And they want to say that they can't drive that. Now, think about the knock on effects of this. So we can't drive an suv. So now instead of my wife driving a bunch of kids to this event, than everyone has to drive their own car. Does that backfire? Have they thought through second, third, fourth order? Now if you're

just tuning in. You're listening to the Mark Mas Show. We're talking about the difference between the one percent and the rest the ninety nine percent. We're talking about some of the data behind the difference, and I want to get to how do we get here and more importantly, how do we navigate all of this. I'm going to go live next week talking about this. Check it out, go dot one, Markmoss dot com, slash u turn, go

dot one, Markmoss dot com, slash u turn. But I got a whole lot more to cover when I come back. You do not want to miss this. We'll talk about what we're going to do about this. I'll be back with more a minute. Don't go away, all right, welcome back. If you just tune in, you're listening to the Mark More Show. I'm running through some of the data between the difference in ideology and thinking between the one percent, elite one percent, and the rest of us, the ninety

nine percent. So I was talking about really the most shocking stat was the elite one percent think we have way too much freedom and the rest of us don't. And I was running through some of the stats about some of their viewpoints and it's shocking. Seventy percent favor banning gastows they want to tell you how you can cook your food, or fifty eight percent favor banning SUVs. And I was talking about second, third, fourth, fifth order.

So why would they want to ban an suv? Okay, they say it's bad for the environment, too much CO two or something like that. Okay, great, So instead of my wife being able to drive three or four kids or five kids in the car to go to the tennis match like my daughter plays tennis, now those four or five families off to drive separately. So now instead of one car driving, we have four or five cars. I mean, think about that. Does that backfire? Does that work?

If they really thought through these issues, my guess is no. And this it gets worse. Fifty five percent of the one percent are in favor of banning what they call non essential air travel. Over half of the people in the one percent want to ban you from flying. You shouldn't be allowed to go travel. You shouldn't be able to go see your grandmother. You shouldn't be allowed to go vacation in Mexico or Hawaii. You shouldn't be able to go skiing or whatever. It is that you're doing.

Go to a conf Now they want to ban what they call non essential, but what's essential? Who gets to choose what's essential? Now? We saw how that played out during the pandemic, when they close what they considered non essential businesses. Well, if that business paid for myself and my family, it's pretty dang essential. But they said it wasn't.

So that vacation might be essential to my mental health, that vacation might be essential for my family to have good bonding and build memories so we raise better kids. That travel might be essential because I'm going to go help a nonprofit or go do some mission work or serving opportunities. I mean, I could lay out a million reasons why it may be essential to me, but not to whoever gets to choose this. But the fact that fifty five percent are in favor of taking away your

freedom of choice is just beyond me. Fifty three percent favor banning private air conditioning? How dare you? How dare you be cool? I can't even believe this is I read it. Fifty three percent in favor of banning private air conditioning. Now, in contrast to this, the ideas, These ideas are opposed by the nine and nund percent between I'm not going to read through all of them. Between sixty three percent to eighty three percent oppose all these ideas.

So of the one percent, sixty to eighty percent want to ban all this, your air travel, your ability to buy gas, your ability to put SUVs. The ability to try all that. But on the other side of the ninety percent, sixty three to eighty percent are opposed to these How did we get here? Like, what the heck is the difference in this? And again it comes down to where they went to school, what they were taught. Obviously,

I think that's the biggest piece. Where they were raised, what kind of families they were in, and where they live, right, those are the things. And they think that this represents all the voters, but a dozen't right. The one percent are living in an echo chamber, okay. And echo chamber is basically when you just talk to the same people. It's sort of like I when I go to bigcoin conferences, it's like I'm talking to the echo chamber, Like everybody

here's already a bit winner. But they not only grew up in an echo chamber, but they continue to live in an echo chamber. So they're not aware of how the rest of the world works. All right. So for example, we already talked about where they came from. Let's talk about that a little bit more detail. So the one

percent went to the dirty dozen. So they went to one of twelve colleges Harvard, Yale, University of Pennsylvania, Northwestern, John Hopkins, Columbia, Stanford, Berkeley, Princeton, Cornell, MIT, and the University of Chicago. Huh. So they learned what they know from this. Now, this is part of the reason why, you know, a lot of times when we're talking about certain types of freedom type of issues, a lot of times I might use the word they, and people always

are always saying, well, who are they? Who are they? Who are they? Like there's some you know, one person or a small group of people that sort of pull the strings for the whole world. I know, maybe a lot of you think that, like there's one group of people it's the Rothschild's or it's you know, the bankers at the BIS and this smoke of people really pull the strings for everything. And I just have never believed

that to be true. First of all, they're not that elite, They're not smart enough to be able to organize the whole world by that small group. What it is is it sort of like birds of a feather flock together. So I kind of use an analogy sort of like if you had a bunch of birds flying and you see them up in the sky, right and they have like this v formation. It wasn't like they all had met ahead of time and said, hey, Larry, you take that row and the seventh seventh position back and Bob,

you're on the right side in the thirteenth position. They didn't make any grand plan. They just all started flying together and they all just sort of start to move together. It's basically what terrorism is. Right. One of the reasons why the US is and never beody able to win the war on terrorism, nor will they ever be able to, is because there's no head on the snake, if you will. There's no one central, central authority that they could get

rid of and then disband terrorism. Instead, it's all different sales, all different groups of people who are all driven by ideology. They all want death to America. They don't have an organized plan, they're not working together. There's no central leader leadership. They just have a shared ideology and that's basically what these elites are. They have a shared ideology, they went to the same schools, and they were all taught the

same thing. So it's not that there's one cent in my opinion, and now that there's one group of people that are pulling the strings of everything. It's they're all birds of a feather and they're all flocking together. They all learn the same thing, they all share the same ideology, and they all just are sort of moving in the same direction because they believe the same thing, and they're

sort of moving off of each other's all right. So, for example, Columbia, I did a video on my main YouTube channel, Mark Moss, and I think the title was the real reason for the migrant crisis at the border or the invasion of the United States or something about that, and I was basically breaking down how not just the US. Obviously we have a massive invasion problem, calling it that on the southern border, over three hundred thousand people are

coming across the border unchecked per month. But I was also talking about what's happening in Europe. You know, Italy is being invaded and so forth. But I was talking about it specifically because in that video, I broke down something called the Cloward pivots strategy, and the cloud pivot strategy is basically the strategy of what they're using to cause this immigration. If you want, you should go watch

that video. And basically the premise of this cloud pivot strategy is that is to overwhelm the system, call the nation's bluff. So because the US is willing to give welfare for example, well let's one depress the economy so more and more people have to go on the government welfare, you know, whatever you want to call that, all types of programs, and let's bring in at this point when are we up to nine million immigrants and put them onto the system as well, so we'll over tax the

system and collapse it. Now that Cloward pivot strategy was taught at Columbia. To Columbia, Well, it turns out lots of very important politicians went to Columbia. Barack Obama went to Colombia. The previous Attorney General, Bill Barr went to Colombia. I think the current Attorney general went to Columbia. Secretary of State Blncoln went to Columbia. So all these people went there and they all learned this. So who are they? Well, I guess you could say who are they would be

the teachers that taught this. Let's keep going, all right. Charles Murray in his classic work called Coming Apart, he analyzed zip codes and he proved that graduates from these dirty dozen universities that Rasmussen described live, work, and play in the same zip codes. Right, So they're isolated. They're in this echo chamber. They live in these echo chambers. They only work with other people of them just like that. And they really created this kind of power aristocracy, if

you will. They have no knowledge of how the rest of us live in work, and that breeds contempt. Now they have contempt for most, you know, for the nine which sort of explains Hillary Clinton's basket of Deplorable's line right now. In Rasmussen's identification of the elite one percent, it begins to explain the depth of the tension between most Americans and the tiny group of elitists who control what Vladimir Lenin called the commanding heights. What does that mean?

The commanding heights? It's the elements of power which control the rest. All right, So we're going to talk about this. I'm going to come back if you're tune and you're listening to the Mark Mass Show. We're always talking about the way the world is changing, and we look at through the lens of politics, finance, and technology. Now in the world of finance, I'm doing a live presentation next week to break down how this is gonna affect our money,

our retirement and more. If you want to check that out, go to go dot one, Markmoss dot com, slash U turn Go dot one, Markmoss dot com slash u turn. When we come back after a very quick break, I'm going to talk about why it seems like the country's divide in half, but really it's not, and how we navigate this. I'll be back with more a minute. Don't go away, We're back, all right, Welcome back. If you just tune in, you're listening to the Mark Mass Show.

We're talking about how the world is changing and how it seems like the world is divided. And we have these two ideological camps. And what I'm doing is one, we broke down the actual data, the actual issues and the data behind it to show you, yes, how divided the world really is. But what we want to look at now is that it's not divided down the middle. It's not that you know not to get into it. But it's not that Trump and Biden got almost the exact amount of votes by just a couple left or right.

It's not that the country is not divided down the middle. As a matter of fact, it's broken down to one percent and ninety nine percent. We gave you the data. Now why does it seem like it's split down the middle. Well, like I said, if you look at a map of the United States, you can see the whole thing is red. The big cities have blue, and of course they're higher density, so we have that. But more specifically, it's because of what I just said right before the break, which is

what Vladimir Lenin had called the commanding heights. So what the elite has done, the one percent elites have taken control of these commanding heights, and this is how they hang under power. Right, So they dominate the universities. They're the ones that have the universities. They're the ones that are teaching the next generation, your kids whatever they taught

you and your kids. Right. So, because you see it in the university and they have this position of power, if you will, being a professor, you feel like it's more prevalent than it is. They control the news media, so they're controlling what you see on TV, on CNN, CNBC, ABC. They control what you're reading, you know, Washington Times or

Washington Post or LA Times, for example. They control the judiciary, so they've taken over the judges and the legal side we call it lawfare now, intelligence agencies, giant foundations, and most major corporations. So these elite were trained at the best colleges and they went and got the best jobs, and so they have an abnormal amount of control over the the core things that we sort of see back

to the commanding heights, if you will. Although they are few, there are relatively few people, but you know, then they marry each other, and then their children go to the same schools, and then they hire and they promote each other. So that's how that works. Now, once they've gotten control of the education system, then they continue to push those narratives down and they teach your kids to hate you and to hate their country and to think that we

have too much freedom, and that's the problem. And if we only took everyone's freedom away, if we only took away their ability to do buy gas and travel and meet and all those things. If only we did that, then maybe we'd have a better world somehow. As I said, they all favor Bernie Sanders' socialist policies, and then they take control over media, and then they constantly gaslight us and lie to us, over and over and over. We

can see it no matter where we look. Just last night, Jimmy Kimmel probably you know who he is, late night talk show host. I don't watch him, but apparently some people do. He suggests said that it was a crazy conspiracy theory to believe that Joe Biden might be suffering from dementia. That's what he said. He said quote. So

let me get this straight. The same people who believe Joe Biden has dementia and needs Kamala Harris to feed him butterscotch tapioca every night also believe that he has somehow planned and executed a diabolically brilliant scheme to fix the NFL playoffs so the biggest pop star in the world could pop up on the JumboTron during the Super Bowl during a Kia and a Tostito's commercial to hypnotize her eleven year old fans and devoting for Joe Biden.

But you see what he's doing. He's taking a couple of things and twisting around is what we call gaslde and to make it seem unbelievable, the same people who believe Joe Biden has dementia think he's also plotting a diabuckle plan. No, those two things don't have to be true at the same time. Now, let's look at some of the data. Okay, per a CNN pull, I didn't

pull a Fox Bowl. I pulled a CNN pull. Per a CNN poll released last year, they found that fifty six percent of Democrats and seventy three percent of Americans are seriously concerned about Biden's mental competence. Everybody in the world knows this. This last summer, I spent a month going through Europe with my family. We did a couple of weeks in Italy and Greece. We went over to Egypt, and as we traveled around, I like to talk to people. I like to get their viewpoint, I like to get

the boots on the ground information. And pretty much every single person I talked to, and again this is antidotal, because I didn't talk to millions of people, or even tens of thousands of people. But I talked to a lot of people, and every single one when I even mentioned Biden's name, because I said, you know, what do you think about the dollar? What do you think about the monetary system? You know, what do you think about politics?

Things like that? Every single one laughed when bringing up Biden. Everybody knows it's why. It's why Putin has challenged Biden to a debate, That's why Trump has challenged Biden to debates. Why why Biden won't go to a debate? Right, everybody knows this, Even the C and M puls fifty six percent of Democrats, seventy three percent of America and say

that they're seriously concerned. But here Jimmy Kimmel is going, Aha, those same people, they don't know what they're talking about, right, and then he throws shade on the whole like Kamala Harris Joe Biden thing. But then we saw this week as well, James O'Keeffe, he got his disguise on, he sat down with a top White House cyber official and they told him, quote, they can't say it publicly, but the White House wants to replace Kamala Harris and confirms

President Joe Biden has mental decline. Right, it's all on video. You can see this video. So like we know this, we see it, like you don't have to be a genius for this. But yet the elites, the elite one percent, are using their position of power to gas it us. Now we see this all over. There's no border crisis, even as three hundred, three hundred fifty thousand people are

coming across the border. I think there was ten retired FBI and intelligent analysts wrote a letter, I think in the last week or so to Congress saying that you cannot overstate the danger that has been caused by having this open border. Like everybody sees it. Right, we have avoy going down there right now. It's all over. But yet they're telling us there's snowboarder crisis, even if there is. Kamala Harris is on it. But that's not the case.

Kamala Harris boasted in El Paso that the administration has made quote extreme progress over these last few months. It's extreme, all right, it's not progress. Well, it's not progress in the way that would fix it. Right, We've been told all these things we've been told, you know, the pandemic was caused by an animal in a wet lab or a wet market. When we found out, we all kind of knew all along that it was came out of

a lab. And now, of course that's all been documented and so over and over and over we can see this. But really where it's most evidenced is in the definition of democracy. You see, all of this is being done to save democracy. If the people get their will, that that's a threat to democracy. If you're allowed to vote for the candidate you want and that candidate just happens to be not them, if it just happens to be Trump or anybody else probably for that matter, that's a

threat to democracy. I guess they think that democracy means it's democrats in part and in rule. We've kind of grown up to believe democracy is sort of like the will of the people, where like mo rule, where we take a vote and whoever the most of the vote, whoever gets the most votes wins. That's not the definition they use democracy buy and for the elites. Old author Tuckerville predicted that an immense and tulitary power would replace

genuine popular rule, and that's about it. We can see today that only fifteen percent of the American population approves of Congress, only fifteen percent. So are they governing for the people? Are they doing what the will of the people want? Now? I know, I know a lot of you are going to say this. The US isn't isn't a democracy. The US is a is a constitutional republic. I get it right, I said, the elitian is all

on my life growing up. My point is they're saying that we have to protect democracy, but their word democracy no longer indicates much about popular rule. It basically refers to a hypothetic goal that gives those who invoke gets mandate to do basically whatever they want, even when it's the opposite of what the people desire, which is why Congress only has fifteen percent approval rating. We can see this over and over and over, but it's not the case.

I wanted to go into a couple other things. I'm running out of time here. Just today I saw on Twitter. Rep. Il han Omar, you might know who she is. She is attacking El Salvador, saying that she's urging members of Congress to take action on threats to democracy in l Salvador now in l Salvador, they have a massive voting base that ninety percent of the population of El Salvador approve of the president's leadership. Ninety percent approve, whereas in

the United States fifteen percent approve. So which one is more democratic? The President of El Salvador fired back on Twitter. He said, we are honored to receive your attacks just days before our election. I would be very worried if we had your support. He's a savage. You're not following them on social media? You definitely should. But if you're just tuning in listening to the Mark Mash Show breaking down the data between the divide and just let you

know it's not as dark as it seems. The population is not split down the middle. It's one percent versus the ninety nine. All right, At the end of the day, we are going to win. We have the masses. We just have to speak up. We need to have a voice. You need to have money, I need to have influence. That's what I got today. Thanks so much for listening. Until next time,