From Centralization to Decentralization: Age of the Internet

the lens of politics, technology, and finance. And when you look at the world through those three lenses, in my opinion, it helps bring context to what all of this is, makes sense of where, how we got here, what is going on more importantly, where we are going, you know, And we like to look at it from a bunch of different angles to see how this world is changing. And one of the ways that it's changing is, as

I say, is the decentralized revolution. And so the world that most of us know that we've been living in for most of our lives is really an anomaly throughout history where we've had this continued globalization, if you will, where the world has become connected. Of course, the Internet has enabled that, and so all of a sudden, we can go hire people from Pakistan or the Philippines and you know, zoom conferencing and all those things, and it's

really connected the world. And it's always technology that changes the world, but that same technology is also breaking the world. Apart at the same time. So there's this effect of this technology that's doing two things. One it's connecting the world, but it's also breaking the world apart. But it's not exactly what's happening. The people of the world are being connected, the central planners or the governments are being disconnected. It's

an interesting phenomenal to see what happens. Like I said, it's always technology that changes the world, and so I talk about this all the time. You go to my main YouTube pianel Mark Moss and just looking under the playlist for these cycles. But basically from a super high level, we can see about every two hundred and fifty years

the pendulum swings from centralization to decentralization. And so roughly two hundred and fifty years ago was the American Revolution, which was America and France had a revolution basically rejecting centralization of the monarchy. Two hundred fift years before that was the Protestant Reformation, again rejecting the centralization of the the powers of the church and the state, and both

of those were driven by technology. Five hundred years ago during the Protestant information it was the printing press, the ability to have books the ability to have information that changed the world. When everybody was looking towards one central authority of information, which was the church and state at the time. Once the people got the printing press, we're able to start printing bibles, We're able to start to

read the information for themselves. They realized two things. One what the state had been telling us was a lie, and two, we don't need them anymore. We can get the information on our own. And it did. It broke that centralization. The world moved into a decentralized world. Then about two undre and fifty years ago, we had another

technological revolution, which was the Industrial Revolution. And the industrial revolution brought people from the farms and the cottage industry into the city, so it had this centralizing effect and we all moved into the cities so we could work in the factories. And over the next one hundred years, these factories got bigger and bigger. In their early nineteen hundred, Henry Ford, the father of the automobile but also the father of the assembly line, created these massive institutions to

bring the masses into factories. And everybody can basically do the same job, whether you were really smart or really dumb. You could both sit on the same assembly line and do about the same job. And a management style was created to manage these workers, manage the masses as cogs in the wheel, so everybody could do their part and

they could become very efficient. And because of that, we had a government style that grew in the same form as this industrial management style, and so we had just like we had this management system to manage the masses as cogs in the wheel of a manufacturing floor. Now we have this government that's grown to have these central planners that want to manage the population as cogs in a wheel. They want to boil people down to a

line on a spreadsheet. In Italy, the new PM over there, what's her name, Maroni, when she took over, she said, she gave a speech that was awesome and she said something about they want to take away our identities. I can no longer be a woman, a mother, a daughter. Now I have to be person one or person two. And she said, they want to take away our identities and make us just a line on a spreadsheet, basically saying the same thing. And that's how this management style

has worked. But the problem is, again we have technology and so the Internet has done two things. One, it's connected the world, as I already said, but it's also making the style of government that we have today obsolete. And we can see this in a bunch of different ways. We're seeing signs of this happening all over And one I want to dig into today, which I think is pretty important, is this leak that happened from the Pentagon.

It's been all over the news, but I think most people have been covering the facts of what was going on, but really haven't discussed what this means. Right, So whenever get a piece of information, we're like, Okay, that's news. Okay, you read the news headline. Okay, information was leaked about the Pentagon. Okay, you know I had some telling things about Well, we'll get into what it was telling. But ultimately, what does it mean? Why do I care? What do

I do with this information? What does this tell me about where things are going? And that's what I want to talk about today. So let's talk. Let's talk first about what happened, So we'll get through the data stuff. What happened, Well, information got leaked. Now you might know that information leaks continued to get seemingly more and more prominent. We can go back to, you know, Julian Assan's with

Wiki leaks, but of course they continue to happen. So this d D leak, this Pentagon leak, was big news. Of course, we had other big news where the Supreme Court, one of the highest, you know, the highest divisions in our entire US government, the Supreme Court, their records got leaked over something super controversial, of course, which was Roe v. Wade, And of course we don't know who leaked that. We

still don't know. We know that the Supreme Court also had really struck a blow to what California was doing with gun rights, and the Attorney General in California said, we're going to do everything in our power to push back against this, and then mysteriously all the records of

gun owners in California just got released. We saw a few months ago, we saw the IRS had this strange leak where one hundred and twenty thousand taxpayer information's records were released, and they just happened to be for nonprofits that were mostly conservative leaning, sort of like operation took point under President Obama when Lois Learner was running the IRS and the IRIS was being weaponized against conservative non profits.

So we have this sort of these same things happening, these leaks that are happening, and they seem to be getting worse and worse and worse. And this leak is important for two reasons. And one I think it demonstrates that the Internet is taking away the power from the elite. They are trying to control the narrative, but it's also being used by the elite to push a narrative that

they need more control. So on one hand, it shows that the people, we the people, are getting the upper hand, but on the other side, the elites, the powers that be, want to use it to gain more control. So let's dig into this a little bit more so we can see, like I said, this information was leaked. A couple of things that I think were interesting is one, the information started being leaked in January and then some of the

more of the information started getting leaked in March. But the Pentagon says that they didn't know the documents were being leaked until like a week ago, So it just kind of shows how out of touch they are, which of course is part of their problem. We'll talk about that in a minute. We know that there was about fifty documents that were labeled secret or top secret that

were released. A lot of these went onto discord, which is a community site or app if you've been on that before, four Chan, which is a website that's kind of known for showing this kind of what they would consider Maybe I don't know black market data, but we know that these documents showed a lot of things that were sort of damaging to the United States intelligence community, like, for example, that the US was spying on Zelensky and uncovered a lot of things they didn't like about him,

and it had what was in there, so he didn't like that. We saw information that the US was basically trying to figure out how they could coerce Israel, and some of the ideas they had to coerce Israel were, you know, starting protests in their country, creating havoc for their president. At Yahoo, we saw that it showed that the Ukraine's air defenses were running out and they were very suceptible to an attack by Russia. Lots of information

that was in there. We saw information about South Korean officials didn't want to send any more ammunition to the US because they were concerned that it would be sent directly to Ukraine. Lots and lots of stuff. So we'll talk about that. But like I said, I really want to get into what does this mean? Why do you care? And how does this tell us what's going to happen in the future. That's also mean we're trying to always

figure out, right, what does this mean? What's going to happen in the future, So I know what I should be doing off of this information because the world's going crazy. One thing we do know is it's going to mean a lot more defense spending, It's going to be a lot more censorship and control, and it's probably going to be very bad for the markets, would be my opinion. Now, I think we can all agree that the markets have been a complete mess. The economy is crashing, inflation is

still raging. I gotta take a quick break. I'll be back with more in a minute. Don't go away, I'll be right back. All right, Welcome back. If you're just tune in, you're listening to the Mark Mos Show. Of course, we're talking about the decentralized Revolution, and we're talking about how the largest data breach in at least the last decade just happened in the US. And what does that mean?

How does it work into this decentralized revolution thesis. Well, if you're just tune in, we're talking about the release of these Pentagon documents, this classified these top secret documents that got leaked onto the web, and how the DoD Department of Pens was like the last one to know about it, which is pretty interesting. And so what is

this what does this tell us about this decentralized revolution? Well, as I was saying, it shows that this technology that we have is changing the world, and that's the Internet. And what we're seeing all over the place is that the powers that be, the elites are having a very tough time maintaining the narrative. And the reason why is because of the Internet. Because we have this collective mind. And this is why central planning never works. Central plan

never has enough information, enough data. One guy or a couple guys or a committee of people will never know what the collective millions or billions of people will know. And so why we need to have free markets so the market collectively can work together. Why we need to have free open communication so the market collectively can discuss these ideas, because collectively we're more or more powerful we're smarter, we're more creative than one guy or a few guys

or a committee that could do that. But of course the powers that we want to maintain control and so a few things. I talk about this in this decentralized Revolution, and I've framed it up many times as the battle for the fate of humanity, talking about how the goal of these elites, the goal of these people that hold power today, is to install this digital panopticon that can control us, like this digital prison that we may never come out of. And of course China is the test

bed for that. China has been working on this social credit score system for a really long time and they've been very successful with it. Now they of course, they have their central bank digital currencies, which are sort of like this last piece, and they've been blocking people's ability to move freely around the country. You know, you say mean things online. You know, I allowed to buy a

bus ticket or a train ticket. We've seen most recently in the last year or two, they're using this health passport, this COVID health passport, to stop people's movements. So there were bank protests going on over there. For example, people were trying to go to the protest and oh now my passport show's read. I guess I can't buy a ticket, I can't go anywhere. They're doing that, and we know that the rest of the world wants to put this

in place, and they need to control two things. I mean, really they need to control well, they want to control our movement, they want to control our ability to transact our money, but they also really want to control our ability to communicate, to talk, to have open communication, which of course leads to this censorship. And so when you see them talking and Davos talking about misinformation and malinformation is the biggest problem. And then you also see them

talking about a cyber pandemic. Of course, they're predicting that we'll see a massive, massive, massive cyber pandemic in the next year or two. I think within the next two years, they predict this. And so they're sort of using, if you will, like a carrot and a stick approach to get us to where they ultimately want to get to. I was talking with someone the other day and I

was explaining how I'm new to having livestock. I have a little ranch going and I got some cows and goats, and it's been a big learning experience, and we recently had this little baby goat and we were having to move the baby goat into the stable every night. And cows, well, I say, cows and goats aren't like dogs, where dogs will come, but my dog doesn't come, come when she's called.

So that's kind of a bad analogy. But trying to get these goats from the pen over to the stables has been very difficult, and we use two different things. We were dragging like a little bucket full of their feed that they love, and so they would chase the bucket. That's like the carrot and actually I try to carroy it first, and then there's the stick, which is then I'll have somebody else like my wife come alongside of them and like clap their hands to scare scare the goat.

And so we're using the carrot and the stick, or in this case, we're using fear clapping a hand, loud noises or greed which would be their their feed to move them to lure them into the gate into the into the stable. And that's sort of what they're doing here. And so it's like this, there's the there's the stick,

and then there's the carrot. The stick is the fear, and now we're seeing here says the White House tells journalists that they have no business this on reporting on the leak because if you do this, information is getting into the wrong hands and this could be the end of America. Our national security is at risk and you could die, your family could be killed by terrorists if you do this. So there's that fear, and now, of course we're also seeing them use it to their advantages.

I think it was a manual under the Oba administration. He said never let a crisis go to waste. You've heard that saying many times. And now, of course the Biden administration is molling over expanding online surveillance after the leak, So never let a crisis go to waste. Well, it looks like we got found out, our data got leaked, and now we just have to crack down even more. We just need even more power and we could stop this from happening some of the things that we're in there.

Of course, like I said Zelenski, we found out that the US has been spying on Zelensky this whole time. We found that Chinese hypersonic missiles have a high probability. We have penetrated in US defenses. That doesn't sound very good. We saw Australia's defense chief got really upset, saying that he considered a serious incident. A couple other things that we saw on there. We saw five photos of a printed presentation slide showing the training and preparation of the

Ukrainian brigades. We saw other documents lead from the Pentagon but that showed that Ukraine's air defenses would be exhausted by May twenty third. Like I said, we saw how they were exploring how to persuade Israel to provide lethal aid to Ukraine. We saw a CIA intelligence claimed that Israel's massad intelligences he had made explicit calls to action

against as I said Prime Minister Benjamin Nutt Yahoo. I mean, these are some really damning things, and of course it's all leads to more crackdown on information and this really it's a battle. It's a cat and mouse, if you will, where you have one side us the information and the internet to share this information. On the other side is

trying to contain it. And it's really this paradox where a nation knows that it needs to have free and open speech in order to have education, or to have communication, or to have creativity, if they want to continue to have progress, if they want to continue it to invent things like starlink satellites or you know, spaceships or you know, their yachts so they can go vacation on them in the summer. And they need this educated, creative society in

order to get those things they want. But the problem is if they allow this free flow of information and they can't control it, and the people are going to continue to revolt and push back on that form of government. You know, it's interesting the Internet back to this kind

of hive mind, this crowdsource mind. It's that there's no longer this single source of truth anymore, because you know, I'll see something on Twitter all the time where someone posts something where I'm like, wow, that that's pretty important, and then I'll just start to read the comments realize that they were wrong, and it's really brought down all

credibility of mainstream institutions. And that's why we're seeing the New York Times and CNN and all these people lose relevance because they're constantly being found out to being liars. As a matter of fact. Just this week, we saw two of maybe the most prestigious news outlets both just kind of shoot themselves in the foot, if you will, got found out for just completely lying. And as fast

as they're losing relevance, it's only continues to accelerate. So I want to talk about that when we come back, and then I want to talk about what this means moving forward and what we could expect. If you're just tuning in, you're listening to the Mark mos Show, of course, we talk about the decentralized revolution each and every week, and right now we're talking about the big news of

this Pentagon leak. What happened. We talked about that, we're going to talk about what this really means, and like I said, more importantly, what you can expect moving forward, what you should be doing. So we'll come back with more on that in a minute. Don't away, we'll be

right back. All right, Welcome back. If you're just tune in, you're listening to the Mark Moss Show, we're talking about the decentralized revolution, of course, each and every week, and we're talking about right now this big breaking news that happened this week that really just drives home the point that we are going into this decentralized world, a multi

polar world. Of course, we talked about, i believe last week, talking about the rise of the bricks nations and the de dollarization, and now we're talking about just how governments are breaking apart and how technology is to blame. And so we're talking about this leak, the Pentagon leak that leaked a whole bunch of classified information. We got of talked about what that was, but more about what it's doing is that it continues to drive these countries apart,

and it continues to unfortunately bring down America's competence. Not only do we have leaks that continually happen over and over and over, we have President Trump, we have President Biden, Vice President Pence, all being caught with having classified information at our homes or wherever they have it unguarded. Stories of this are just kind of rampant, and it shows

a couple of things. One, I mean, if this is how they're handling the very most private and secret information, how do you think your own information is being safeguarded? And I'd say it's probably not. But this continues to just stoke the fires of this war unfortunately, and some of the stuff that we saw come out of it shows the levels of corruption that are around these types of wars. Julianasaw On, who again he was behind Wiki leaks, which is one of the the biggest data leaks in

history as well, all about the Iraq War. You know, he talked about the Afghanistan war as a way the elites were using The elites were using the Afghanistan war as a way to funnel money from the taxpayers and into their own pockets through a war. That's what wars do they get. They get the insiders rich. And we saw information about that come out as well. The levels

of corruption that were pretty crazy. I've talked about and you might remember hearing about this Seymour Hirsch in his article he was talking about how so so, first of all, Seymour Hirsch is a rather old investigative journalist when actually journalist journalists used to actually investigate things and actually would write things that would sort of expose hidden conspiracies. I believe he's a Pulitzer Prize winner. He's won many awards

for his investigative journalism. So one of the good guys. He's been doing this for a really long time. Of course, he came out with his story that he did his investigative journalism into talking about how it was the US that was behind the Nord Stream pipeline. Now, of course he's been discredited. A lot of people came out, you know, all the mainstream media press outlets came out against him

and said, oh, he's just some reporter. It's like he's not just some reporter, right, He's still arguably one of the biggest and kind of best known investigative journalists who's broken many great stories, like I said, award winning and so he was sort of discredited. They threw out some you know, half assed kind of response to who really blew up the nord Stream pipeline, But he's been able

to defend his position with data and facts. Anyway, he put out another article this week that I thought was pretty interesting, and he really dug into the corruption that's actually going on in the in the situation over there, and he talked about how the Ukrainian government and of course President Zelensky over there, how he was using American taxpayer funds to basically, you know, fund the war effort, but skimming hundreds of millions of dollars off the top.

I've seen videos online and you might have as well of high ranking Ukrainian officials in their you know, very very very exclusive and fancy and expensive exotic cars, rolls royces like that. Of course, we know Zelensky, as was evidenced in I believe the leaking of the Panama papers about a year ago, has hundreds of millions of dollars parked offshore. Like, where does he get hundreds of millions of dollars from? Right, Well, this is part of the

way he's taking the money from American taxpayers. You and I the hundreds of billions again, hundreds of billions that the US has sent over there, and he's skimming off the top, at least according to Seymour Hirsh. Now we don't necessarily have to take Seymour Hirsch's word for it.

We can just see that there's hundreds of millions of dollars in Zelenski's bank accounts, and then you would just ask yourself where did he get those That's certainly not his salary being the president of a war torn country. He was a TV actor before that, a comedian at that, and he certainly wasn't making that kind of money then so you just ask yourself where that money come from.

And I think it's it's pretty interesting. One of the ways that Seymour Hirsch talks about how they're able to skim money is that Zelensky's government is paying for diesel fuel. It takes diesel fuel to fight the war. And we know that the Pentagon was paying as much as four hundred dollars per gallon of gasoline during the war in Afghanistan back to Julian Nissans. That's how they siphon money out. And so the Pentagon was paying four hundred per gallon

for gasoline. And then what we know is that Zelenski is also buying fuel, and so potentially the Pentagon is paying him up to two three four hundred dollars per gallon of gasoline there. But instead of buying the expensive fuel that he says he is, he's actually buying fuel from Russia, the country with that. Yeah, Ukraine's and Washington are at war with and the Ukrainian president and many people in his entourage are skimming untold millions of dollars

from American taxpayers that are earmarked for diesel fuel payments. Now, he put in his article as an estimate by analysts from the Central Intelligence Agency the CIA. By the CIA put the embezzled funds at four hundred million last year, four hundred million. Another expert compared the level of corruption in Kiev in Ukraine as approaching that of the Afghan War and said quote, although there will be no professional

audit reports emerging from the Ukraine, HM, Surprise, surprise. Of course, there's no professional audits coming from the Ukraine, just like there was no professional audits that came from the war in Afghanistan. Two trillion dollars was spent in Afghanistan. Now, when we give Afghanistan, we spend two trillion dollars in Afghanistan, Where does that money go mint spent, it goes to Somebody's got to follow the money. But of course there are no audits. Of course we know the Pentagon has

never passed an audit. The Pentagon can't pass an audit. And trillions and trillions and trillions, tens of trillions of dollars are just gone, just gone missing, and they're gone to people just like this. Four hundred million dollars just last year now, says many government ministries in Kiev have been literally quote, heating to set up front companies for export contracts for weapons and ammunition with private arms dealers around the world, all of which provide kickbacks. So that's

how they do it, right. The money goes to somebody, but it goes to overpriced, overpaid contracts with massive amounts of kickbacks to come back to them. War's a racket, he says. Here. The issue of corruption was directly raised with the Zelenski in a meeting last January in Kiev with CIA director William Burns. They said the CIA director said, hey, we see what you're doing. We understand what you're doing.

But what's interesting about this is, he says he told the Ukrainian President Lensky, hey, I was told by the CIA, the intelligence official, that you know, you've been getting money, and he was angry because quote, he was taking a larger share of the skim money than was going to the general's end. Quote. So according to the CIA, a meeting was done with the director, Director William Burns, and he told the careing president like, hey, we see that

you're skimming money, but you're taking too much. You're supposed to give more of a kickback to the other generals apparently, Burns CI director William Burns also presented Zelensky with a list of thirty five generals and senior officials whose corruption was known to the CIA and others in the American government.

Zelensky responded to the American pressure ten days later by publicly dismissing ten of the most ostentatious officials on the list and doing a little else So he got rid of ten people that were bragging about the money they were driving around of the new Mercedes. They were making them look bad. They got rid of them. Interesting, now, as this money is continued being printed and sent over to Ukraine, that leads to inflation that just won't seem

to go away. And if you're just tune in, you're listening to the Mark mass Show talking about the decentralized Revolution. I'm going to take quick break, maybe be right back. Don't go away, all right, welcome back. If you just tune in, you were listening to the Mark Show, we're talking about the decentralized revolution, and we're talking about the way the world's decentralized. And we're talking about the latest breaking news of this Pentagon leak and what that means.

Of course, not just what happened. Anybody could watch the news for themselves, but what does it mean and where does this go? And we talked about how it's really just changing the narratives, changing the discussion right, that the Internet has now allowed for this free flow of information and they can't control it, they can't stop it. And the problem is is that it continually shows that the

emperor is wearing no clothes, so to speak. We saw this week it was it was awesome on Twitter, which if you're not following me on Twitter, you should check it out. I'm at one Mark Moss. That's just the number one Mark Moss. Hit me up on Twitter. I'd love to hear that you're watching the show. Ask me some questions there. I probably spend too much time on there,

so feel free to reach out. But on Twitter they use these Twitter spaces and Elon Musk had a Twitter space this week had three point three million people in the room watching live. Now to put that in perspective for you, CNN, which used to be the number one news source in the United States, maybe the world onlike their primetime shows, gets I think somewhere like five hundred thousand people watching, like five hundred thousand, so half of

one million. Elon Musk had three point three million people in the room at one time listening to him, and he was joined. He was being interviewed by a reporter from the BBC, which is another global news source, respected news source. And what was interesting is a couple of things. One, how Elon Musk is able to get three point three million people in a room at one time when no news outlet can do that, And so it shows you the authority that's been in place, how the narrative has shifted,

where people get their information has shifted. But also the head of the BBB was grilling Elon Musk, not the head the reporter, I forget his name off the top of my head, but it was grilling Elon Musk about now that he's allowed this free speed and how there's all this information, misinformation, all this malinformation. Elon Musk has gotten rid of moderators, and how that's such a bad thing. And he goes on to say something about he goes on to say something about, you know, now there's so

much hate speech and all these things. I see it all the time. And Elon Musk says, Okay, could you give me some examples of that, which of course he couldn't, and then Elon Musk said, so you're lying. Then basically just called him out in real time. James Clayton was his name, that's it. So yeah, he kept pressing Elon Musk on these topics and Elon Musk was just like, okay, well give me an example, right, and he couldn't. He

couldn't come up with one thing. As he was making all these baseless claims, basically that there was after must takeover, there was hateful content. He said, there was you know, racist content, and he said, you know, give me a specific example of the hate speeds that should be censored on Twitter, and Clayton came up empty and he said, quote, I don't actually use that feed anymore. And then mus said, quote, you said you've seen more hateful content, but you can't

name a single example, not even one. Clayton continued to avoid given an example, but Musk would not let him off the hook. Then I say, sir, that you don't know what you're talking about must stated, so it must says you just lied. And so, right there in front of three point three million people in real time, the people got to see exactly what goes on. You have very biased reporters making baseless claims that can't be backed up.

And just like that the emperor was seen to be naked, the Emperor wearing no clothes, you have the BBC showing right there, perfect illustration for the whole world to see, all three point three million people, which many more have seen it now because it's it's not being talked about of course, and the recordings have been released. But in real time they saw how these news outlets, trying to

control the narrative, just throw out lies. And in the past, people would watch those and take that as truth, take that as fact, they would believe that. But now in real time we can just openly discuss it, openly debate it, and instantly find out that they are lying about that.

We saw another piece this week came out the New York Times, another well known establishment piece that's you know, put up on this pedestal of you know, apparently giving us valuable information truth et cetera, put out a hit piece on bitcoin mining in Texas, specifically Riot Blockchain, and basically,

you know, they put out this. It was a hit piece talking about how bad it was and how bad they were for the environment, how bad it was for the power industry, and all these different things, all these claims. But the problem is they release it to the Internet, where instantly thousands and millions of people can debunk all the information they put out. It was all debunked. From the name of the town that they were reporting from was wrong, the photo that they used of the town

was doctored. All of the facts and information not all many of the points that they made in there were debunked and proven to be false. And just like that, the collective crowd was able to take that information and destroy it. And not just destroy it, it destroys the reputation of The New York Times, just I could destroyed the reputation of the BBC. If I continue to lie to you, it's going to destroy my reputation. Eventually, You're not going to listen to me anymore. You're not going

to believe anything I say anymore. And that's exactly what's happening with the New York Times, That's exactly what's happening with the BBC, and it's exactly what's happening with the US government, which is exactly what happened in the prostant Reformation when people were able to get the books off the printing press, the Bible, and they said, wait a minute, everything you've told us is a lie. And that's exactly what we're seeing. Everything is a lie, and it's exposing

all this corruption. Like I said earlier, we were talking about how Ukraine has been caught skimming even the CIA says potentially up to up to four hundred million dollars has been skimmed off of that and so now with this information moving around, they just can't contain it anymore. Talking about corruption, we also saw a massive corruption coming out this week. It's sort of interesting. I saw the

White House Press Secretary Jean Pierre. She's been being grilled asking why is it that Biden never comes out and answers questions anymore. She said, well, what are you talking about. He's taken more press questions than Trump, Obama, and Bush combined. That's what she said. If you remember when Trump was running aainst Biden, he called him hiding Biden because he was just hiding out in the basement. He never came

in to address the press. You remember, Trump stood there every single day just getting hammered by the press, and he would just deal with it. So anyway, they said, hey, why is it that he never comes talk to us. He won't take any questions from the press, And she says, what are you talking about? He's had more questions than all these Trump, Obama, and Bush combined, which of course

is a lie. And it's not just a lie. The White House actually had to come out and make an adjustment to the transcript of the press Secretary's Google gaggle is what it's called, and so they wanted to come out and they had to adjust it because it was a flat out lie. Now why are they trying to protect Biden from these press questions? Well, it's because of

all this information that's coming out. We saw lots of news that have come out in the last last week or so that a lot of people would like to ask some questions about, but he won't make himself, like, for example, bank records showing millions of dollars in transactions between Hunter Biden and all these China firms, or how China sent not so subtle threats to Joe Biden by revealing Hunter's bank records, or how Joe Biden knew that Hunter Biden was on the bure he is him a

board in Ukraine at the same time he was pushing for natural gas in Ukraine. And this is from the former Obama stenographer who says he has enough information, first hand information, whistleblower information, to put Biden in prison. Like this is stuff that we know. This is stuff that's already been out in the open, but now it's becoming

very exposed. It's being brought back up. And of course Biden doesn't want to make himself available to these questions, which of course is why he won't and of course when his White House Press secretary tries to cover up, she is caught lying as well. So what do we

do with this information? Well, expect for this to continue and continue to see the world continue decentralized, and of course we'll have to continue to protect ourselves by securing our savings, securing our purchasing power, and of course I think that bitcoin is one of the best ways to do that. If you're just tuning in you're listening to the Mark mal Show, we've been talking about what this data breach means, not just in context of the US this week, but in the world and where it's going.

And it continues to lead into this decentralized thesis. Hopefully that helps you make sense of what is going on in the world today and where we're going. That's what I got for you today. I appreciate you listening. Thanks so much, Until next time.