Hello, and welcome to another episode of The Mark Moss Show, where we talk about the decentralized revolution that is sweeping the world right now. Of course, we always look at it through the lens of politics, finance, and technology, because those are the drivers of real change. And from a cycle's perspective, looking back through thousands of years of history,
we can see that these are repeating cycles. On a two hundred and fifty year timeframe, we have political revolutions, eighty year timeframe, financial revolutions, fifty year timeframe, technological revolutions, and all three are converging right now. Now. I've done a lot of talk about this, and it's understand it's important to understand this because it not only tells us how we got here, more importantly tells us what's going
on right now. And even more importantly than that, it tells us where we're going, what we can expect in the future. And so it's important to look at that. And you know, over the last two years or so, I've done a lot of work on this, a lot of work on the cycles. I've been on numerous shows talking about the and so forth. I've even started writing
a book that is still in its emphasy stage. But one of the topics that I really kind of go into and where I think this is headed is something I want to talk about today, and it's something really, really big, and I've framed it up in a few interviews. One of the best interviews I had it's on a podcast called What Bitcoin Did. You could just search Mark Moss What Bitcoin Did? And we've done a three part series. But the first one is the Battle for the fate
of humanity. And I know this sounds like a really big hyperbolee, like come on, Mark, You're like, you're what are you talking about? But I believe that the battle for the fate of humanity will be fought over the
next couple of years. And so what do I mean by that, Well, if you go back through thousands of years of history, you'll see that it's just a repeating cycle over and over and over where we have humans have freedom, and then a group of people comes and oppresses them, and eventually the oppression gets so bad that there's a revolution, and then there's freedom again, and then eventually another group comes in him oppresses him, oppression gets
too big, and then eventually there's revolution and it just repeats over and over and over and over. Now it typically happens on about a two hundred forty year timeframe, and we can really look at on like an eighty year timeframe. So in an eighty an eighty four year timeframe, there's what we call a populist uprising or a regime change cycle. So about eighty four years ago was the end of World War Two. We had Hitler, we had
Mussolini in the US, we had FDR's New Deal. About eighty four years before that, Karl Marx wrote the famous Communist Manifesto, which, by the way, I've written a rebuttal to that. It's called The Uncommunist Manifesto. Check it out on Amazon. Highly recommend that you read that book, The Uncommunist Manifesto. It came out on Amazon last August. Check it out. It's about an hour hour and read and
leave me a comment if you do. But the car Marks wrote the Communist Manifesto, which led to the largest revolution in European history. So happens eighty four year times, but on two three times eighty four equals two hundred and fifty two. That's the big ones. So two hundred fifty years ago was the American Revolution, the French Revolution. Two hundrety years before that was the Protestant Reformation. And
so we see these massive revolutions that happen. But the problem that I see is that we can't just look at political revolutions on their own. We also have to look at financial and we also have to look at the technology. And the reason I have to look at the technology is because technology is what changes things. Technology changes humanity. It changes the way that we organize, change the way the communicate, change the way we do commerce, changes the way we do everything. And it really has
this power to create centralization aspects or decentralization aspects. And so the technologies that were developed being right now, that are being used today and are becoming more and more prevalent, and over the next couple of years, I believe could achieve some sort of supremacy. I think these technologies could change or could end the cycles that have repeated for
thousands of years. Instead of this, as I said this, thousands of years of history of oppression, revolution, freedom, oppression, revolution, freedom, impression, revolution, freedom, I think that cycle ends and we either end up
in permanent slavery with no revolution in sight. Because technology will create a way to prevent any type of revolution or uprising from ever happening again, or or that doesn't work, or we win or we get rid of that and we never have to worry about that oppression ever again. That's the battle, and it's happening, and it will happen over the next couple years. It's happening right now, this very minute, and that's what we're gonna talk about today.
I'm gonna break all of this down to show you where we're at right now and what the race is, what the battle is, and what's kind of happened over the next couple of years, so you can understand exactly what this is. I think this is the most important topic to talk about period, which of course is what I've been talking about it for two years. This is the most important topic because, as I said, I think
this changes the cycle of humanity. So you know, for me, I'm good man, I'm good I got enough money, I'm old enough. I could just go ride this thing out right, I'll be dead, let other people deal with it. But that ain't cool because I got kids, and hopefully one day i'll have grandkids, and you probably have kids and hopefully we'll have grandkids one day, and I care about all of them. I care about the people that aren't even born yet. And I want to change this battle.
I want to do my part to shift this power, this balance of power that's leading into this battle for the fate of humanity. So let's talk about this four minutes. So what am I talking about. Well, I'm talking about technology and how it reshapes society. And I'm talking about this technology that's going into place right now that could potentially put us into this matrix type world where we're
never able to come out of it. So, for example, we know that Facebook has been using AI algorithms since two sixteen, maybe sooner, but we know at least twenty sixteen to change the way we think. Specifically, they've run lots of tests to change our emotions, to change our behaviors, to make us sad, to make us happy, to make us stressed out, whatever it is. And they've done lots
of tests on this. And so they show you certain types of content and then waterfall that content to kind of build and build a build to get certain emotions out of you. So we know that we know they can manipulate our feelings, but they also manipulate the data that we see. So we know now. Mark Zuckerberg was on Joe Rogan talking about how the FBI was working with Facebook to censor information, so they don't want you to see certain information, or they do want you to
see other information. We know that also the same thing happened on Twitter. I've talked about it extensively on this
show with the Twitter file. Since Elon Musk has taken over Twitter, he's basically opened up, pulled back the curtains, and he's released tons and tons and tons of data of actual text messages, emails, etc. Of government officials coercing Twitter to change the way you think, to censor the information that you see, to control the narrative, to take people off that are saying things they don't want them
to hear. And so the problem is is that as this technology grows, as we depend more and more on technologies like social media and we're going to talk about AI in a minute, as we depend more on these technologies, the people that control them have massive amounts of control. So how does oppression and then revolution happened. Well, people living under heavy oppression aren't happy and they start talking
about it. They start seeing how other people are living or how people lived in the past, and they wish that they could have that themselves. If I could only have that, if we could only go back to that time. And then I start talking about it, and then those ideas spread, and then other people hear what I'm talking about, and then they also want to go back to that.
And so if they could keep us from ever seeing how other people are living, if they could keep us from ever remembering how it was in the good old days, like changing history that they're doing now, if they could prevent us from communicating and sharing those ideas with others, they could prevent that revolution from ever happening again. And it's just getting started. Wait till you hear about the technology that's in place right now, already being used, and
what the plans are for this. If you're just tuning in, you're listening to the Arms Show, we're talking about the decentralized revolution, and I am shaping up what I am calling the battle for the fate of humanity. It's that big. And so I'm gonna break this down and explaining what I mean, and I'm gonna leave you with hope because I do believe that we win. I believe that we have the tools. However, it's not guaranteed. It's a big road. It's a long road ahead of us. And if we
do the work, I think we'll win. We have the tools to do that. So I'm gonna break all of this down for you. It's a big show. I'm gonna be talking fast. You don't want to miss any of this. So I'm gonna take a quick break, but don't go away because I'm gonna be right back with more in a second. Don't go away, all right, Welcome back. If you're just tuning in, you're listening to the Mark Moss Show.
We talk about the decentralized revolution. We look at it through lens of politics, finance, and technology, but today specifically, we're talking about what I am calling the battle for the fate of humanity. And that's big. It's really big, and I mean it and this is what I mean.
And so I'm gonna break this down for you. So I was talking about before the break, how tech knowledgy is change you think and technology is at this place now where the people that control this technology could prevent us, the people, we the people from ever uprising against them. Ever again, so I've kind of broken it down. Let's let's talk about this. So we know I've talked about many times. Unless you've been living under a rock, you
know this that China is a communist country. It's not controversial. It's in the name CCB stands the C stands for communist, and so of course you would expect them to have all types of surveillance and control, which of course they do. They have what's called a social credit score system, which
I'm sure you're familiar with. I'm not going to go deep into that, but basically the real high level of view of that is that they give you, just like you have a credit score based off of how well you pay your bills and don't do pay your bills, etc. And they give your credit score, and then that credit scord determines whether you can do certain things like get a new credit card or buy a car. Well, they have what's called US credit score, and very similar to
your regular credit score. It is a score that you get individually that allows you to either get access permission ability to do certain things. So for example, if I do things that they deem to be bad socially, like for example, I say mean things about the government, or I say mean things about somebody else, or I don't pay my electricity bill, all different types of categories they have.
Of course, mostly it's socially, mostly against the government. If I do these types of things, my credit score, my social credit score gets deemed, and my social credit score could drop and drop and drop, and eventually it drops so low that I'm not allowed to get a train ticket, I'm not allowed to get a plane ticket, I'm not allowed to buy certain things, I'm not allowed to travel, I'm not allowed to do all types of things. Now, this isn't like eventually it drop so low that most
people will ever drop that low. No, no, no, no no no. In twenty eighteen, I believe it was something like thirty five million people. And this is in twenty eighteen. Imagine where it's at today. Here we are in twenty twenty three, five years later. But in two thousand and eighteen, something like thirty five million Chinese people who had been restricted from buying a train ticket because their social credit score is too low. I would imagine that's hundreds of millions
of people today. This isn't just like some little thing. No, no, this is really big. Now. They've been doing this for a long time, like I said, restricting people's every move based off of the social credit score. Now, of course, in order to get that social credit score, what do they have to do, Well, they have to collect every
single piece of information on you. They need to know every single thing that you search for online, every article you read, everything that you look at, everything that you say, all your communication online on social media, what you post online, what you say between your friends, what you say via text message, phone call, all of that data has to be collected. Because, of course they don't collect the data,
how can they give you a rating. So China is this giant surveillance state that collects all of this information and then of course weaponizes that information on you against you, and of course they do because they're a communist country. Now, if that sounds good to you, well, then you can
just move to China. If it doesn't sound good to you, like it doesn't sound good to me, then I certainly don't want to be a Chinese citizen, And I certainly don't want that coming to the Land of the Free, to America, I certainly don't want that coming to anywhere else in the world. However, some of the most influential people in the world do like who well, like our good old buddy everybody's favorite, James Bond Villain Clout Schwab, head of the World Economic Forum. He said that he
said that China has a quote very attractive model. He praises it. Klaus Schwab says that what China is doing, what their social credit core system doing, is amazing. He said, it's a model for the world to model for the world. Now, not just him, we have Justin Trudeau, the PM of Canada, which of course was trained under Klaus Schwab, with the world coming for him as one of the young global leaders, who has implanted in the government. Per Kloud Schwab's own words,
that's what he said. And of course we have Justin Trudeau also praising China. He said that he said that I sometimes wish that we were communists because we would have so much more control. Well, of course we'd be able to do so much more good, is what he says. Right, So they want this, they like this and Kloud Schwab's quote a very attractive model. Now what is this model that they're talking about. Well, if we dig into this
just a little bit China. We call it this panopticon, this digital panopticon, which is coming for the whole world, which is framing up this battle for the fate of humanity. And what China wants to do. And Jijingping, the President of China, they want to continue to build out this technological capability and specifically they want to use artificial intelligence to enhance the governments totalitarian control. And even better, they want to share it. They want to share it, they
want to export it. They want to export this technology to regimes all around the world. Now they use all types of things, all types of what they would consider practical innovations, including IRIS, Irish recognition, including that's a retinal scanning, all types of cloud based speech synthesis, and all of this is spending off Chinese tech giants, AI startups and even their own army. Yeah, it's that bad. Now. President je has said that he wants China by the year's
end to be competitive with the world's AI leaders. Now, some people might say that China might have already reached that. Other people say, no, you know, the US and the free world is way too far ahead. But President g has said no, this is our goal. This is where we're trying to be. And he wants China to achieve AI supremacy by twenty thirty. That's his goal. And not only do you want to develop it, not only does you want to test it, not only you want to
use it on his own people. He wants to export it to a country near you. But it says he also wants to use AI's awesome analytical powers to push China to the cutting edge of surveillance. Of course, how do you control people if you don't survey him? You have to see every single move, every single thought, every single thought. Think about that, every single thought. Now, I'll bring your attention back to where this world that comic
forums own Nothing and Be Happy came from. It came from an article written by I believe it, Ida Alkin, who is one of the top people at the WEF. And in the article, she opened it up by saying, the year is twenty thirty. I have no privacy, I own nothing, and I've never been happier, something to that effect. And in that she said she owns nothing and she's happy,
But she also said she has no privacy. And if you go through to read that article, it talks about how even her dreams are being read, especially has no privacy, even her dreams, every single piece of communication, but even every thought is being read. And so without this ability to surveil, without the ability to see everything the panopticon, of course, how they can how can can they control that?
So Z wants to use the analytical powers of AI to be the cutting edge of surveillance, building this all seeing digital system of social control patrolled by algorithms that identify potential dissenters in real time. Because that's the thing. If their ideas were so good, they wouldn't have to worry about dissenters. But they do, because of course nobody
wants their ideas. If you're just tune in and listening to the Mark Moss Show, we're talking about the battle for the fate of humanity that is shaping up over the next couple of years. You don't want to miss this. It's really big. I have a lot more to cover when I come back, so don't go away. I'll be right back, all right, Welcome back. If you're just tuning in,
you're listening to the Mark Moss Show. Of course, we talk about the decentralized revolution, every week talking about the way the world is changing as we look at through the lens of politics, finance, and technology, and of course today is well we're talking about all three of those as we always do, we talk about the convergence of those three, and I'm talking about I guess some politics, mostly technology, and we're talking about the battle for the
fate of humanity. If you've missed it, don't worry, I got your back. Go check it out on the podcast to search the Mark Mass Show, or you can find it on YouTube if you search Market Disruptors on YouTube. You can watch me and listen to me at the same time. But we're talking about china social credit card system and what gzping is doing to try to scale that and by using AI, this new AI wave that we're seeing now, China has this system already. They're trying
to grow to be bigger and bigger. But China already has hundreds of millions, hundreds of millions of surveillance cameras
everywhere watching every single thing. However, it's not enough. They have all these cameras and they need this AI technology to parse all this data and put together because what they want in the future is for every person who enters any space to be instantly identified by an AI that could match them to all of their personal data, including every text communication, their bodies, their gait, their walk, their stride, and even they're one of a kind protein
construction schema. And it says that China is on is on the path to do this, they'll be able to string data points from a broad range of sources, including travel records, friends, associates, reading habits, purchase habits to predict what to predict political resistance before it happens. Pre crime. There was a movie from with Tom Cruise called Minority Report and it was all about this pre crime, and that's exactly what they're talking about. They want to predict
political resistance before it happens. This is now. First of all, I'm reading some of this from this article on the Atlantic, and just just so you know, The Atlantic is no proponent of freedom. Let's just say that I would consider them to be a very very very far leaning left outlet news outlet, not a like I said, not a fan of freedom necessarily in my opinion, And so for
them to write this, it's pretty bad. So what they're saying, if you're picking up on This is a couple things, right, So they want to use precog algorithms to identify potential dissenters, dissenters of what, dissenters of the state. Now, if people love the state because the state gave them so much value, why would they be dissenting from that? Of course, the answer is they wouldn't. And here it says to predict political resistance before it happens. Why are we dissenting? Why
are we resisting the political system? Well, because they're forcing us to do things we don't want to do. Now, I can't speak for China, well I can. I mean, they're communists and they want total control, not you. In the United States, we the people are supposed to have the power. We the people, You and I. We are private citizens. That means that the government should know absolutely nothing about us zero because we are private citizens. The government, however,
is public servants. That means they are there to be public servants meeting they're there to serve the best interests of us, the private sistants. So they should know zero about us, and we should know everything about them. We should know everything about them, Like how did Nancy Pelosi
become the best wall street trader of all time. How do these politicians like Obama or Nancy Pelosi or any of the other hundreds of them, how do they enter public office broke and make one hundred thousand a year two hundred thousand a year and become worth ten twenty fifty hundred million dollars by the time they retire. How does that happen? I'd sure like to know, because I might like to do the same thing, would you? We should know that about them, But of course that's not
the case. So China's government could soon, as says here, soon achieve an unprecedented political stranglehold on more than one billion people, one billion people, And like I said, as rations are to export this beyond the country's borders, in trenching the power of a whole generation of autocrats, in trenching this is what I'm talking about, the battle for the fad of demanding. If this gets put into place,
in trenching the power, it says, this may never get repealed. Now, it says China's digital infrastructure could shift the balance of power between the individual and the state worldwide. So there's something about there's always returns, returns on your investment ROI. You've heard that there's returns on my energy, return on my time. There's also something known as a return on violence. So the state, all states, including the US government, has
a monopoly on violence. They can use violence on you anytime they want. They can send the police officers to your house with guns. You can't use violence on other people, right, So the state has a monopoly on violence. And so that's the balance of power between the individual and the state. The problem is the return on violence. So a lot of people say, oh, the government's gonna come take all
your bitcoin. So the government's gonna go house to house to house three hundred and thirty million plus people, house to house to house three hundred million times, and torture people until they give up a couple dollars for the bitcoin. Like the return on that violence is way too low. Like there's just there's no there's no way they can do that. And it's also why even in some of the most you know, more strict i'll say authoritarian regimes,
there's actually a lot of freedom in those areas. And the reason why is because you know, maybe Mexico is actually their government's more restrictive than the United States, but because their economy is so poor, because their their technology is so poor, they can't really enforce it. So in most of the country people don't even know about the government. They don't even they know nothing, and so they can't enforce it. The return on violence would be too low.
But if they can put this digital infrastructure in and now they don't need police officers and military people everywhere because now technology does that. Now the return on violence can get very high. That's this balance of power that we're talking about. But the one thing that we have is that for now, anyway, it looks like industry analysts expect America to retain its current AI lead for at
least another decade. But it's not very much comforting because it says here China is already developing powerful new surveillance tools and exporting them to dozens of the world's actual and would be autocracies, And it says that an emergence of an AI pirate authoritarian block led by China could warp the geopolitics of this century. It could prevent billions of people, billions so huge percentages of the world across large swash of the globe, from ever securing any measure
of political freedom. That's a big deal. It's a real big this is this is already in place, This is already growing. The tools that they need to institute this are own, are growing at a at a rapid rate. As a matter of fact, the rate at which AI is growing is astronomical, and it's growing so fast. And so they have the systems in place, they have the technology in place, and they have the aspirations to do it. Of course, which government doesn't want more control over their people.
And so this is leading to a very scary place. It's sort of like George Orrel's nineteen eighty four on steroids. Now they have the you know, they have all these things, but who controls the AI, what's the purpose of the AI? And more more more specifically, I said that there's a battle for the fate of humanity that I think we can win. So how do we win in the face of all of this, that's a bigger question. And I think we have the tools to do it, and I
think I don't think. I believe, I have hope. I hope. I have hope that we're going to do the hard work. I have hope that we're gonna be able to push back against this. I have hope that we're going to defeat this, and I have hope that my kids and your kids will live in a much freer world on the other side of this, on the other side of the Battle for the Fate of humanity. If you're just tuning in, you're listening to the Mark Moss Show. We're
talking about the battle for the Fate of humanity. We talk about every week the decentralized Revolution, which I think is going to overpower the battle for the Fate of humanity. We're gonna talk about all that. I still got a lot more to cover when I come back. You don't want to miss this for the conclusion, what gives me hope and how we can win. Don't go away. I'm going to come back in a minute with more. I'll
be right back. All right, Welcome back. If you're just tuning in, you're listening to the Mark Moss Show, where we talk about each and every week the decentralized Revolution, and today specifically, we are talking about what I'm calling the Battle for the Fate of Humanity. Yeah, it's a big, big, big topics, something I'm sup passionate about. Something I talk about indifferent pieces and segments all the time. But we're
really seeing this come to the forefront now. AI Artificial intelligence has been in development at least since the seventies, you know, depends on what kind of development do you want to talk about there, But we've been working on for decades and decades and decades. But it really was thrust into the mainstream. I believe it was November thirtieth last year, twenty twenty two, so it's been about two and a half months, not even ninety days, that the
public has gotten access to this AI. Of course, it was launched with this Open AI. You might have heard of that. I've talked about it before, Open AI, and
it's leading to this massive revolution. They launched what's called chat GPT, and now chat GPT kind of gave everyday people like you and I access to the AI where now literally through a like a search bar command, I could type in all types of things like, um, you know, do some reef search for me, tell me the answer to this, take this article and summarize it, produce emails, give me sales copy, but also like righte code, write new programs commands, even ones that can create images and
videos and all types of stuff, and so this is now really taking off. I've done a video on my main YouTube channel. If you want to go watch it, just search Mark Moss. It's my main channel, and I did a video kind of breaking down this AI. But now that we're seeing like not just private companies and governments using this, now we're seeing people using this. Now, this is going to find its way into everybody's everyday lives where you know, high schoolers, maybe middle schoolers, students,
let's just call it. Students will be using this to like I said, do research for different topics, have them help help them write papers. Professionals will use this to write articles and blogs for their business. And with SEO optimization, you know, creative people will be using it too, like I said, create images and create videos and things like that. This will find its way into everyday writing code right,
every way of life. Now, the AI isn't going to go change your toilet, and it's not going to go build a road or build a house. And so m AI is not going to replace every job. A lot of jobs we're still going to need humans for. Or's gonna need that, and LA's gonna need the creativity of humans. But I'm not gonna get into all that right now. But what I'm what I do want to say is that this AI one, it's it's been being used by governments and private co operations, but now it's being used
by the people. So that's good, right because now the people have their own well not really because who controls it for the people? Now? We know that we can see that chat GPT. There's been all types of tests and it looks like there's a problem with chat GPT where it's very liberal biased. And of course, right an AI has to be trained. It's only as good as the data as the infration it's been fed. So who fed at the data and what data did they feed it.
We can see a couple of tests that were done here and it was talking about doing some writing things like that, and they'd been doing some stress testing on it, and they noticed that how to liberal bias when they when they asked it to do certain things. I don't have the examples here in front of me, but basically they'd say, you know, write something critical of Joe Biden and it says, oh, I can't do that, and then say, oh, write something of Donald Trump and it can do that
I want. I don't want to go into that. I don't want to go into the tip for tat on. This doesn't really matter for what I'm trying to talk about, which is the point is is now even if the people, even if we have it, but who controls it? Who fed it? It's a big problem. Now there's a video I watched with Peter Diamandis and he was interviewing the founder of stable Diffusion. His name is Immad Immad mystique if I'm saying that right. It was an amazing easy
interview at how do you recommend it? Just go onto YouTube in search Peter Diamantis and Stable Diffusion, and in that they talk about how email it has started this new AI to basically rival or compete against open ai. Now the irony is that open ai isn't open. Open ai is actually a closed AI that they control, that they feed with the data they want, which returns answers
that they want to give you. So how is this when everybody in the world, as I said, right from students to professionals to programmers and coders are trusting to get good information, but they're being fed only what this group of people who control it wants you to be fed. How does that start shifting and changing the course of humanity?
How does that start to shift our collective intelligence, our communication, etc. Well, Stable Diffusion has started an AI that's an open source AI, and their goal is that all of us could have our own AI that's built and trained for us, as opposed to an AI that's controlled by somebody else. So we're getting these tools to help free us. It's decentralized.
So why I talk about the decentralized revolution. We are moving into a world that used to be unipolar world where the United States was the global homogene and the US dollars the reserve currency of the entire world. And we're now moving into a multipolar world where we're going to have many competing governments. Of course we've already seen that with Russia and China and what's happening with that,
but also competing monies. And we also have a technology now with bitcoin that's a decentralized technology, and so it allows us to decentralize all types of information and value. And so we have this technology and AI can be very centralizing in the aspect if we all use open ayes AI and who controls that, but we also have the tools to go against it. Now more specifically, I'm talking about the battle for the fate of humanity. So one, as entrepreneurs, we can continue to build new tools, just
like what Imad's doing with stable diffusion. We can continue to build tools to fight back against this all right. But more importantly what we can do is we can realize that the source of all the state's power. When I say the state, the government's the US government, the Chinese CCP at, Chinese government, etc. The source of their power is the money printer, their ability to print money.
With the United States right now is going through this debt sealing limit debate, which we go through every couple of years. We need more debt. We need more debt. We're adding more debt at a faster pace than we have anytime in society. And without that debt, the government can't continue to grow. We can't continue to fund all these new well one, all all the obligations that we already have to pay, and we can't continue to spend
new obligations and pay pay for new favors. And so without the ability to continue to print more money, the states wither and die. The state would be a tiny little shell of itself. It doesn't get the money that it needs from tax revenue, It gets it from being able to print it. So if we could take away their ability, the state's ability to print money, then we could affect and limit the size of the government. They wouldn't have billions or hundreds of billions of dollars to
dump into AI and social credit score system technologies. The US or whatever government would be happy to import this stuff from China if they could just go print a few hundred billion dollars and pay for it and bring it in. But what if they didn't have that money, Well, they wouldn't be able to do that, And that's how we win. We need to take away their ability to print money. And if we take away their ability to print money, then we cut them off at the source.
They're not able to bring in this technology. They're not able to implement this technology. They're not able to build this digital panopticon that can put you and I and our kids and our grandkids into future prison for all eternity. That's where this battle is gonna be fought. It's gonna be fought over the money, which of course is why they're trying to rush in the final piece, which is the central bank digital currencies. They want to control the money,
but we cannot let them. We have to retain control of over our money, and we do that with bitcoin. It's the only option. If not Bitcoin, then what It's not dodgecoin, it's not ethereum, They're not decentralized. It's only Bitcoin that is our tool that we can defeat the money printer. We can take away their ability to continue
to grow. And if we can do that over the next couple of years this decade, then we can prevent this from happening, and we can win the battle for the fate of humanity and prevent them from ever getting the size they need to ever put us back into prison. You're listening to the markmas Show going on a rant here about the battle for the fate of humanity, talking about the decentralized revolution, like we talked about each and
every week. If you missed any of it, catch me on the podcast at the Mark Moss Show, and that's what I got. Thanks so much for listening. Until next time.