Leighton Smith Podcast #243 - June 12th 2024 - Guy Hatchard

now that someone has dropped dead. Fear of H five N two is already starting to ripple all over the globe. What about this one? Media is to blame for COVID vaccine's wall of infallibility? Or we got sold a dog on that particular occasion. The most delusional Paul Krugman headline

in the history of delusional Paul Krugman headlines. Keeping in mind that, of course, Paul Krugman is the economics writer for the New York Times, And we pay attention to the New York Times later in the podcast, and just for the sake of it, because I've got these lying around. Here's a couple more the WHO powergrab and enemies of

food freedom. But the constant debate between big farmer, the media and government departments, and the World Economic Forum and the World Health Organization, etc. Just might be starting to come apart. A few days ago, a former Japanese Minister for Internal Affairs apologized in a public speech to the

citizenry of Japan for COVID nineteen vaccine campaigns. Then, more recently, The New York Times admitted that the evidence that COVID came from a lab in Wuhan is overwhelming, saying that it's undeniable that US federal funding helped to build an unprecedented collection of SARS like viruses at the Wuhan Institute,

as well as contributing to research that enhanced them. But then, or more appropriately now, the British Medical Journal has published an article excess mortality across countries in the Western World since COVID nineteen pandemic, and the UK Daily Telegraph headline covid vaccination may have helped fuel rise in excess deaths.

These are just some of the matters that we'll be discussing with the guest on two forty three, Guy Hatchett, publisher of The Hatchard Report, a man who's been on this podcast on I think two occasions in the past, and somebody I've come to respect, and Guy Hatchett is next. There are essential fat nutrients that we need in our diets as the body cart manufacture them. These are Omega

three and Amiga six fatty acids. Equisine is a combination of fish oil and virgin evening primrose oil, a formula that provides an excellent source of Omega three and Omega six fatty acids in their naturally existing ratios. The Omega six from evening primrose oil assists the Omega three fish oil to be more effective. Equisine is a high quality fish oil supplement enriched with evening primrose oil that works

synergistically for comprehensive health support. Sourced from the deep sea sardines Anchovisa magrol provide essential Amiga three fatty acids in their purest form without any internal organs or toxins. Every batch is tested for its purity before it's allowed to

be sold. Equisine supports cells to be flexible, so important to support healthy blood flow and overall cardiovascular health can support mood, balance and mental clarity and focus in children, all the way to supporting stiff joints, mental focus, brain health and healthy eyes as we get older. Equas in as a premium high grade fish and evening primrose oil to be taken in addition to a healthy diet and

is only available from pharmacies and health stores. Always read the label and users directed and if symptoms persist, seeing your healthcare professional. Farmer Broker Auckland Layton Smith. The damn wall has finally broken. In the US and Australia. The chapter of silence on reporting COVID nineteen vaccine injuries appears to have slammed shut now. The article is from Adam Crichton,

who was the Washington correspondent for the Australian. He goes on throughout the pandemic, criticism of masks or lockdowns was permissible if frowned upon, but the vac the scenes attained an almost exalted status that ensured any critics, no matter the quality of their evidence, were unfairly disparaged as anti

vaxes cookers, or simply ignored. Why this was so remains hard to explain, but some fault must lie with a too credulous, incurious mainstream media naive to the political and financial forces that pushed governments to assume the more sensible part of voluntary COVID nineteen vaccination at a very outset. Compelling entire populations to take a scientifically novel vaccine produced on a political timetable against the disease that for the bulk of people was a bad cold, was a highly

questionable policy, arguably trashing traditional medical ethics about informed consent. Yet, even as it became clear through twenty one and twenty two that the expert's pushing vaccine mandates had been wrong over and over again, safe and effective, Safe and effective remained the mantra. Governments and experts insisted vaccines stopped transmission when clearly they didn't, even though Pfizer later admitted it

hadn't even studied that question. All of this was wrought upon us by the government of the day, including one Ashley Bloomfield, who is about to be put under the microscope for the rest of this podcast now the man who started the Hatchet Report that has been online for the last few years. Guy Hatchett, it's great to have you back on the podcast. Thank you so much for your time. Great to be here. Laden. You've been very active.

Most recently you've been responsible for helping establish something called GLOBE, the Campaign for Global Outlawing Biotechnology experimentation, and you've written the International Genetic Charter. Give us a brief on that.

to say what we do want. What kind of controls would we like to see in place that the disaster that was the pandemic doesn't happen to us again. And

the International Genetic Charter is very simple document. Actually, it's very short to read, just a couple of minutes of your time, and it lays out the right to refuse any medical intervention which penetrates the cell membrane and could thereby alter the genetic structure or function of a cell or multiple cells, including the right to be fully informed

if such as the case. So basically, during the pandemic, for the first time, with the covid vaccines, mRNA covid vaccines, afrozenical vaccines and so on, the medical interventions actually got into the part of the cell that controls the entire immunity and function of the physiology and altered it. And it did sell on a scale that was sufficient to affect many aspects of human health. And that was, you know, we crossed the rubicon. We need to have the right

to refuse that. And this is not a it's kind of an intellectual or a philosophical or a moral sort of requirement that we're trying to tout here. It's actually physiological life begins with one cell and then it multiplies and we end up with thirty seven trillion cells.

And it has a few more clauses. The right to full disclosure labeling of any food with genetically modified content or food derived from animals who've been subject to genetic modification. The right to know if there are biosynthetic substitutes in our food for natural ingredients, the right to have seed and food uncontaminated by genetically modified ingredients. And actually the right to protect the full meaning of the word natural.

That's what's getting bustardized now in the food system is the word natural is slapped on food that is not natural at all, doesn't come from a plant, doesn't come from an animal, comes from a lab.

the last few years. In twenty seventeen, the government actually agreed to the use of three thousand synthetic ingredients in foods, and by doing that they sort of opened a flood door, not just the three thousand named ingredients, but all kinds of other ingredients which are now being put in food. Garantine doesn't come from carrots and so on, and it's a very longlist. The point here is that what goes

on in our body is very very precise. There are lock and key mechanisms, There are vibratory modes of molecules, there are shapes of molecules, all of which are important electrical properties and molecules, all of which are very very important in the operation of our physiology. And this is a matter of comment in all the media these days. Ultra processed foods contain materials that are completely different than anything we've been eating in our evolutionary history.

the other It is sorry, is it? Because this subject matter falls into the same sort of category as numerous other matters now, where the public in general doesn't really have a clue. That's right.

irritable bowel syndrome Celiact disease. And if you read the scientific paper that they're kind of referring to, there is nothing yet on the horizon that is going to cure Celiac disease. The reason there's nothing on the horizon is of the side effects of what they're trying to develop. The side effects are so serious that they can't say when or if they'll be able to help the disease.

their problem when they haven't is misrepresentation. And this comes out of a publicity machine within Big Farmer that is promoting all kinds of activities, investments and potential medicines, experimentation on populations, and so on. We have to be protected from that. We are protected from a car salesman who's misrepresenting his product, but we are not protected from food manufacturers and medical intervention sellers big farmer in other words,

misrepresenting their products. If you buy a dead car it's gotsordust and it's geevox, you can go to an authority and they can sort it out. You can get your money back, and the man maybe band from selling cars. But then if you introduce a medicine that kills multiple people, you know, getting some kind of justice out of that very very hard.

by me because I'm a subscriber to The Australian. I wondered how it got by me. But nevertheless, there it was written over a year ago, and it's only now that the rest of the world seems to be well.

and that in itself is not unique. There have been a number of articles which have questioned the safety in scientific journals vaccine. But what was unique was that the UK Daily Telegraph, that authoritative newspaper headlined after looking through the article and analyzing it interviewing experts, COVID vaccination may have helped fuel rise in excess deaths. Experts call for more research into side effects and possible links to mortality rates.

Now that the figures in the British Medical Journal article point to three point five million excess deaths during the pandemic, and they point to the fact that this is very very basic science that the deaths were more closely linked to the introduction of vaccines and the continuation of vaccines than they were linked to the incidence of COVID nineteen infection itself, and that has opened the floodgates, the fact that the Telegraph is prepared to publish an article as clear as that.

illness in autumn twenty nineteen. They pointed out that there is no evidence connecting SARS COVID with any particular animal, but there is evidence connecting it with the lab and so on. It was a very very detailed article and really laying out written by a biochemist that really and

what was a game changing about this. Well, for four years, the New York Times has been an unrepentant promoter of of the theory that COVID came from animals, And the fact that they would publish such an article is a sign that things have changed.

Now the New York Times is even worse. And I just want to do a bit of history here. You go back to Stalin's Russia, then go to Hitler's Germany, where The New York Times published lies about what was going on in both of those countries at the very crucial time when the world should have known. They went out of their way to hide the Holocaust for a

long long time. They've done other things too, like they've been involved in Cuba, and they make no apology for it, except they did actually with one of those, and it was the I think it was the start in one whether they ended up apologizing for, but it was only only a matter of about ten years ago that they got round to doing it. The point I'm making is that they actually have a track record of misleading the public.

And what bothers me and has for a long time, is that we publish in this country articles from those journalists and newspapers which are incredibly wrong at times and cover up for all sorts of misdemeanors. Plus but I want to quote this from your from your piece the long essential read news. HEALN media is not alone in their lack of in depth analysis. The UK Daily Mail says sleep after a tipple of alcohol while airborne, can be fatal and fumes why eating one chip is like

smoking a cigarette. Also blames low fiber diets for a sudden surge in colon cancers. The New York Post agrees as it reports cholarectol cancer is rising rapidly among young adults. It also reports that a staggering sixty one percent of US adults will have cardiovascular disease by twenty to fifty if current accelerating trends continue. And by way of explanation, it offers becoming a father might be bad for your heart. Comments, Well, look at that one.

chips or fathering children and so on. You have to look at something new. That's basic science. And the fact is that excess deaths suddenly accelerated in a number of categories neurological illness, cancer, and cardiovascular disease. And they accelerated starting in twenty twenty one. Not twenty twenty. Twenty twenty was when we got COVID. Nineteen twenty twenty one was when we got the COVID vaccine. And that's what the BMJ was pointing out papers have to pick up on

this this article in the UK Daily Telegraph. Our papers often print articles from the UK Daily Telegraph. Why can't they print this one saying that excess deaths are linked to the vaccine. This is a big issue here in New Zealand because we have a small media pool and it's growing smaller, and we have just come through a period where the government has really been educating or deceiving people into believing that the government always tells the truth

and they shouldn't look elsewhere. This is a big issue in this country. That information has been basically withheld and we need to move on from that.

still calling for almost persecution of anti vaxxers. The head of the World Health Organization whose name I can't pronounce is are both saying the real problem is anti vaxers. They're still saying it, and that's a sort of to my mind, considering the evidence that has come out. Now, that's a sort of fanaticism. It's not related to the evidence, and that's I think very dangerous. It speaks of a polarization in society that has been associated with the pandemic,

and polarized societies are very unstable. I think you just have to go back to the evidence, and you have to go back to the fundamental principles of the science. Here, the fundamental principles of risk management and safety, of assessment of what went on and what happened, How did it happen that supposedly signed and aerodyte people suddenly became proponents

of something that wasn't working and was doing harm. And fundamentally what was swallowed was the idea that these vaccines could not have a wide range of effects, so there was a very narrow list of possible effects of the vaccine, and the science the people at medsafe looked for that very narrow list of possible effects, which did include eventually myocarditis. It included things like Bell's palsy, things that were known

to have happened with previous vaccines. They didn't look at cancers, they didn't look at neurological disease, they didn't initially look at heart disease, they didn't look at strokes because they basically felt that this couldn't it couldn't happen. I'm sure it's going to be saying. It was a sort of a faith thing. And now people are looking at these much wider range of effects, excess deaths and so on, the writings on the wall. But people have become so

stuck in their ideas that they can't change gear. And that is the level of thinking that is at the top level of the World Health organization.

dangerous and unfit for purpose the WHO has become. There is clearly no way that any vote should proceed on anything of importance that the WHO may be required to implement in the coming week of the WHA deliberations, ted Ross's emphasis was on pandemics and the faltering agreements intended to address their risk, the New Pandemic Agreement and the

amendments to the International Health Regulation the IHR. While these are watered down and the Pandemic Agreement may not even get a vote, continued justification for centering greater coordination and power at the WHO speaks volumes about the problem we face. Then I'll bring it up to date with June four

from our friend David Bell. Last week, amid fanfare from both advocates and opponents of centralization of future pandemic management, the world continued its unfortunate stumble back to old fashioned public health fascism. The World Health's Assembly, the WHA, adopted the package of amendments to the two thousand and five International Health Regulations, apparently just hours after a final text had been agreed by ITSIHR working group. David Bell wrote

the first quote that I had. I've just realized the amendments were watered down from previous proposals under which countries would undertake to place areas of their citizens health and human rights under the direction of a single individual in Geneva. Nonetheless, they lay vital groundwork for the further subversion of public health toward a recurrent but lucrative cycle of fear mongering, suppression, and coercion. Now it goes on for five pages, but

David Bell is extremely good at his task. Having worked with the WHO for a number of years, he knows that inside out, and that's the approach that he takes. And I would imagine that you would agree with that in every which way.

And at a conference in the UK, one of the speakers said the maglid tide should be put in the water supply. This is the kind of thinking that you get once you put someone in charge of everybody's well.

your appetite, that actually interacts with your brain. How does some egnotide work and interacts with your brain to alter your appetite. So this is a kind of discussion that is going on now in terms of public health, and the problem with it is, of course the side effects which we I've discussed at at great length, kidney damage

and again coming off semeglotide very problematic. Once you're on it, you're on it, and if you come off it, then you've got a whole range of problems that emerge in physiology. Why are people talking like this that when really there are very simple solutions to being overweight. There are dietary and exercise solutions that really do work that haven't got any side effects.

that you're not. It's not your fault that your fat is, as I understand it, an acceptable reason for being overweight in some circumstances. Don't ask me to explain. It's just something I picked up along the way. But you're quite right that if you've got if you've got a weight problem, there is a way of addressing it.

another point. Actually, there was a very interesting paper in the journal Transplantology entitled Personality Changes associated with Organ Transplants, which was published about a month ago.

that when investigated more closely. They found that the kind of personality changes that the people experienced were related to the people who were doning usually deceased of course, people who were doning the organs. And this was a very unexpected result. People have sort of accepted the heart, you know, maybe people's heart has changed, their behavior has changed. But how does that happen? And while there were three, there

are three sort of explanations. One is psychological centered around magical thinking, the belief that certain words, thoughts, emotions, or ritual behaviors imprint themselves on the world around us, but it's rather vague. The other one was that there were electric electromagnetic field ideas about transplant trait transfer, but they related more to the heart, which does have a big

electrical feel. The third type of nation involves the possible storage of memories in cells, including their epigenetic DNAAR and A or protein components, and it was it was this hypothesis that fits the facts of this study. It suggests that all living cells contain memory, meaning that history and hence future actions can be passed on from a donor to the transplant issue via this to the transplant recipient via this tissue that they get.

affect people's consciousness? And that's really a huge red flag. The implication is obvious biotech interventions that cross the cell membrane and insert cellular genetic material like gene therapies, DNA and our mRNA vaccines, gain of function, viral material, etc. Are even more risky than it has been imagined by anyone to date. They could be editing what makes us human. This is, you know, incredible. I've written an article about

it which has gone very widely. And when you look at the COVID pandemic or the mRNA vaccine, they actually start to influence the physiology on a scale that's commensurate with organ size. For example, It's estimated there are as many as ten billion COVID varyons present during peak COVID infection, and each COVID shot contains trillions of the m RNA molecules, which changed the genetic operation of billions of cells. Well, a human liver contains around two hundred and forty billion

cells and a kidney far fewer. So COVID infection and mRNA vaccine technology are just in the right ballpark to influence our psychological and behavioral profile. That's a huge red flag area that we don't know anything about. The people haven't studied. And then here where we're faced with a pandemic that certainly has affected this the social consciousness of the world. There's been widespread polarization of ideas. There have been the proliferation of extreme ideas. Have we been changing

the way people think? I want to New York Times thinks we might have been.

England centuries ago. What if if those genes have affected or have carried forth through the generations, and that I or you or whoever all of us have them, have the memories embedded in our system, we just don't know how to find them.

there in biology. And this is something that really I've talked a lot about and written a lot about, is that intimate relationship between biology and consciousness, between mind and body. And as we become more invasive in our medical interventions, we have potentially more damaging effects on the psychology. And again it's a part of mainstream publishing that almost all

medications do affect consciousness in some way or another. If you're going to get into that level of genetic organization, which then you're going to affect the psychology, and how does that work? As we started out with this interview, the body protects the uniformity of genetic intervention. If we're going to change that uniformity of genetic information, what are we changing. We don't know, because we don't know exactly how higher human emotions and values emerge from or are

supported by our genetics. These are questions that no one has answered, and this opens up This is the world that we're discovering now with this mass vaccination, we're starting to discover has it changed the world that we live in? And I think you talk to almost anyone and they'll tell you the pandemic changed the world that we lived in.

There are other things, and there are wars, and the wars. The wars might be a very good example at this point of time, for instance, this is a slightly different different perspective. How long is the is war been going on? Thousands of years? Exactly? Exactly? How much do we know about those thousands of years? The majority of people haven't got a clue, And kids who are going through school now have no clue whatsoever, So they take to the

streets because they're so stupidly ignorant. And whose fault is that, Well, you can only say that that's the fault of adults, because they before them haven't followed any enlightening path. But there are other things. The Ukrainian War, they've been going what is it four years? Four years they've been fighting this.

talking here about past events being stored in the physiology. Well, certainly these events are stored in some kind of sense within cultural groups and just continue on. And that's why I've been a big fan of meditation, because meditation releases stress. It's very important that we have ways to release stress in society. There's otherwise it's going to break out in war. It's not acceptable war.

What a quote from it. Eight years before the COVID nineteen pandemic, scientists knew about the risk of an accidental or deliberate release of a new version of SARS covid ie, and they also knew that the disease had an un usual feature vaccines made the symptoms worse. Yet, somehow, biotechnologists in both the West and the East decided to initiate gain of function research, which developed more virulent types of

coronavirus upon its escape from a lab. They forced the widespread use of a range of novel biotech COVID vaccines on the public, following minimal and obviously inadequate safety testing, as though we were a bunch of rats to be experimented on while mad people tried to play god. Given what was already known to science, none of this makes any sense unless there was a much darker motivation or plural motivations somewhere in play you want to expand on it.

like this particular paper that you've just referred to. It was published in twenty twelve, Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus. They were ignoring what it should not have been ignored. They were ignoring the failure of gene therapy trials, the fact that people were dying in gene therapy trials and

still are. They were ignoring obvious risks, but they were putting out this so of quas a religious philosophy, that this is the era when we'll live long, will live healthy, and we'll have genes that where everything is fixed. And there was no basis to make such claims they should have looked at the science and realized there were problems.

I mean, it's frightening. Actually this paper in twenty twelve, which clearly spells out the fact that there will probably be another coronavirus epidemic and we should be careful because vaccines are going to make it worse. It spelled out in black and white. Sort of frightening that we then suddenly entered into an era where, according to the New York Times investigation in Wuhan, they literally developed using gain and function, thousands of versions of coronavirus that were stored

in a B two level lab. B two level is a very low level of security in the lab of biosecurity. It should have been be four level. Well, it shouldn't have happened at all. It was madness, but it happened

in a lab with a low level of biosecurity. Unbelievable that that would happen, and unbelievable that the perpetrators, the people who were helping and funding and designing it in both China and the West, people like FACCI and DAZAC and so on, that they would then try to hide what they'd done, that they would then do everything to obfuscate the issue and make people believe it had come from animals where they knew very well what had been going on in that lab.

from this madness that has overtaken the entire world. There are thousands of labs all over the world and they're in all kinds of countries. They get almost every country now, including New Zealand fields. It's very important to have research labs doing research on very serious illnesses, and mistakes are absolutely inevitable. Again, you look at the published research that there's a lot of research on how safe these labs are.

They're not safe. Escapes are normal. Fortunately, most escape material sort of gets eaten up in the environment, but occasionally it doesn't and now we're multiplying what's going on. So the solution is not to pick one villain here, but it's to look at a system and regulate it properly.

to this kind of enterprise. I'm afraid we're going to have to use go back to things that you said, you know, Stalinis, Russia, or or Hitler's Germany, where vast enterprises where millions of people are complicit. And that's the situation that we're in, only it's not confined to one country. It's it's global. We're in a globalist world and we have to work out how to proceed from here. And I have ideas about that, but that's another it's probably another podcast.

that we washed all the eggs before we cracked them. Now, I don't know what you think of that, but I'm asking you.

per year per country. And it's been going on for twenty seven years that we've known about bird flow. Now, during that whole time, even up to today, no human to human H five N one transmission has yet been recorded. In other words, you catch bird flu from animals, and if you want to wash your eggs before you eat them, that's fine, But the number of people catching bird flu

is very, very very small. Indeed, and then the suggestion that we got from doctor Michael Baker that because of this announcement by the World Health Organization we should all go back to wearing masks is insane, insane because there's no indication that it's airborne infection at all due to

actual contact. And you know, there's a recent study on mask wearing that this is what it found is that by wearing these masks, you were inhaling volatile organic compounds xylene acrolene, per, polyflored alkali phalate, lead, Cabbian copper, and so on, all kinds of things that you're regularly inhaling. If you're going to wear a mask regularly for a disease that actually you can't catch from the air, this is the kind of sort of panicked response that we

don't need. We just don't need this sort of panicked thinking. And why is this even coming out? I mean, look, it was a moment's work when I saw first started seeing the articles that suddenly appeared in our papers. There was a moment's work to look up the scientific studies and the actual data. I mean, newspaper writers should be

capable of doing this kind of research. They can't just have some sort of release from the World Health Organization land on their desk and they reprint its content without really thinking about it. What they can well, they do, yes, But it's no wonder you referred earlier on to the Washington Post, the editor or the owner getting it annoyed because the articles that they were printing were trash. Well, I think the same implies here.

out more about the International Genetic Charter. If you want more in depth writing on dangers of genetic engineering where we look at the articles with a very sort of tight focus on what exactly is going on with biotechnology and genetic engineering in medicine, then you can glow to Globe dot global and so you'll need the h T T.

Layton Smith. Now from the fabulous range of products that really work, which means that you don't from wet and forget. Let's have a look at some indoor products like pet pong gon. If you got pets and they're giving a grief inside, then this is for you. There is a hand sanitizer too, and particularly I want to mention the wet and forget indoor disinfect and cleaner. There are so many bullet points to this that I'm not going to

try and include them all. But it kills ninety nine point nine percent of bacteria and viruses, inhibits the growth of mold and bildew, no bleach or irritating fumes. It's easy spray and white formula cleans, disinfects, and deode arises in one labor saving step. Eliminates dirt and soil, cuts through tough grease and grime and destroys mold odors at the source. And it doesn't just mask odors, it eliminates them. Have a look at Wet and Forget online for the

Wet and Forget Indoor disinfect and Cleaner. You can order it online at Wetinfiget dot co dot Nz. You can call them on eight hundred and three zero three thousand, or of course you can call into any one of their twenty one standalone stores nationwide. But don't forget the Wet and Forget Indoor Disinfectant Cleaner. Now went to the mail room for two hundred and forty three and missus producer, you will lighton. I'm okay, why don't you lead?

One thing that stuck in my mind is the date of twenty thirty eight for bringing the government books back to the halcyon days of two thousand and nineteen's abject profligacy two thousand and thirty eight indicates to me that this sixth National Government has already conceded defeat on the economy. No government since the Holy Oak National Government, which was nineteen sixty to seventy two, has ever lasted more than

three terms. That means the best this coalition can hope for is to survive till twenty thirty two, and based on this budget, they will be lucky to last that long, given it seems they're happy to just manage the decline. On the upside, I suppose maybe by then things will be bad enough we can ask Ruth Richardson for forgiveness and a return to Parliament.

has poisoned our education system. Thankfully, the same university's professor Elizabeth Rahta counted the stupidity with her own ophead last year entitled in Digitization threatens the University's very foundations. I'm glad Labour and Green's managed to inject critical race theory into our education. I'm glad LGBT activists managed to push sex change surgeries for kids against pair wishes. I'm glad

that the Democrats successfully committed perjury against Donald Trump. I'm glad that the left always goes too far, and in going too far, people wake up. If the EU elections is any indication the conservative giant within us is finally stirring, and I have a dream that one day we will have people like Dr Oliver Hartwich and Professor Elizabeth Rater running our ministry of education.

from past experience? I mean, it just it frustrates me enormously because that's exactly what happens, well, write the other because they offer them money essentially, and then when they realize that it's all bug it up, they race back to the common sense approach and we have to go through the procedure all over again. Because you only look at Chloe what's an ound Schwarbrick, and you'll see exactly

what I'm talking about. Layton, May I please inquire to the nature of the mentioned local tax in place of rates tax and by what function would it be collected. There has been a number of proposals postulated in the past re revenue streams, including GST type tax to replace rates, although some seem to think that it should be as well as where does this one fitted? Among others? Has the work been done to estimate how much a local tax would need to be set at without making it

an excuse to simply fleece us all. Further, bearing in mind that some places are much more than the likes of Auckland or christ Church. Well, my response to that is there's been a lot of suggestions made in the past that you just have to dig them out and

then try and find a better one, I suppose. But as for the comparison of size of places, that would be simply reflected in the amount of money that was collected in each, But no mention of how aspects of the Swiss model or other could be practically modified to work in New Zealand, the most critical of which is how in the world would the politicians be relieved of their power monopoly over the New Zealand people also checks and balances on both sides to ensure that right things

happen and I guess bad things don't. Our track record has brought us to where we are today under the embrace of the current chosen model at political parties endowed by it. The proposed models presented to the public to choose from at the time were all broken models designed to disempower the people. None gave the people authority over their representatives. While in office we bear the fruits of our labors. Is put a capital L on labors because what you can work out?

things a lot more convenient. I'm also aware that the Department of Internal Affairs has spent a great deal of time, money and energy investing in this system, having spoken directly with the people responsible at conferences and when I've called him in the lift. Now this is, like I said, very long and if I can, I'll slip it in the whole thing. At the very end of today's podcast.

Justin Trudeau just handed over twenty percent of Canada to the Indigenous people, which has a total population of twenty seven to forty thousand, and he sends you an SBS link, the largest land transfer in Canada's history. This transfer gave full mineral and resource rights. The Indigenous peoples don't have the infrastructure or experience to manage us land mass, so an NGO is appointed by the UN which will manage

this land on their behalf. The UN drafted the Rights of Indigenous People Agreement to essentially secure land, using the ignorant Indigenous peoples to secure it for themselves, managing the resources and well through their NGOs. I think this is where three waters might have been headed in New Zealand under the ar Durn government.

Absolutely sickening for those awards to be sullied in such a manner and deemed utterly worthless. A pity for those who are recognized for actual, worthy reasons. Vincent, I was more disgusted than you, and I know that because nobody could have been more disgusted than me. That excuse for a politician deserve nothing but to kick up the backside and a good hard one. And if I say any more, I'll offend somebody.

everybody being squished into Auckland. If councils had to compete for income, they would aim to attract business and enterprise to their own region, thereby benefiting the citizens to which they are answerable. Such a common sense approach, sadly is unlikely to see the light of day because it's too sensible.

Johann I've never known a leak. Nailed it in the Weekend Australian of the first of June. See the cartoon below. See it's a skyline buildings and the tallest building is a banana sticking up out of the back of the rest of them. Furthermore, the letter that you read at the end of the podcast about the Lost generation brought to mind an item on Channel seven on the fourth of June, which reported that a twelve year old boy, who police claim is a serial violent crit all, was

facing court. He has been charged and released seventy three times on over two hundred crimes over fifteen months, and as broken bail conditions repeatedly. This time bail was denied. A former detective says he fears we are losing an entire generation of youth. Here is the link to the footage if you wish to look at it. It goes for nearly two minutes, Chris, I really appreciate you sending that, and I did look at it, and you described it perfectly,

so I didn't really need to. But nevertheless, I took a shot with my camera. I took a shot of the places where he has committed these crimes. You ready, If you don't know Sydney, doesn't matter because it tells its own story. But if you do know Sydney, then you'll have some idea of the zone that this kid has been operating in Mount Druett, Marsden Park, Plumpton, Emerton, Saint Mary's Sydney, which means the city, Wentworth Park, Paramatta, Redven,

Pendall Hill, Gireween Blacktown, Bondi Junction. And we know what took place in Bondi Junction recently. Ed's never heard of it. Castle Hill, West Pymble and Ross Hill. Now West Pemble is the closest to where I grew up on the North Shore. The rest of them are spread north, southeast and west. This kid's been hopping on trains and going everywhere to Committee's crimes. Here's the question. He's now behind bars, But what do you do with him? What do you

do with him? Because you can't tell me that we don't have kids of similar ages who have been doing the same sort of thing over here, maybe not quite as bad, who knows, but certainly who need some serious attention, missus producer, I thank you, thank you. Later, I shall now spend the next two hours editing to get all your coffs and things out.

to much of this. After covering off a little bit of history, he says, however, unbelievably, for the New York Times and other newspapers, the effective cover up of the Holocaust was not the first time they knowingly censored the horrors of genocide while it was occurring from approximately nineteen thirty two to thirty three, Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin starved the people of Ukraine, resulting in the mass genocide of

millions of Ukrainians. Bruce Bartlett, writing in Human Events, explained that the Hollidamore or Great Famine of nineteen thirty two and thirty three was the culmination of a long struggle between the Soviet state, non Russian nationalities like the Ukrainians, and historically independent minded farmers who had been forced into or onto collective farms. It also resulted from Stalin's need for foreign exchange to buy Western machinery to aid industrialization.

In late nineteen thirty two, wrote Bartlet, Stalin decreed that all grains should be confiscated and anyone interfering with this action should be considered an enemy of the state. Throughout the countryside in Ukraine and other grain growing areas, starvation set in. Stalin sent troops to prevent farmers from leaving the land, where increasingly there was nothing to eat. In response to please for food aid, Stalin called the famine

one of the minor inconveniences of our system. Close quote a Manchester Guardian reporter Malcolm Muggridge traveled to Ukraine to see for himself what was taking place. In her book Stalind's Apologist, Sally Taylor recounts that in a series of articles published in The Guardian at the end of March nineteen thirty three, Muggridge confirmed the existence of widespread famine.

In his eye witness account, the peasant population, he wrote, was starving quote I mean starving in its absolute sense, not undernourished, but having four weeks next to nothing to eat. It was true, Muggridge wrote, the famine is an organized occupation, worse active war. Thus, even from other new sources such as The Manchester Guardian the New York Times had to know the truth about the famine that was taking place

in Ukraine. Even more, as Hoover Institution historian and scholar Robert Conquest wrote in his book The Harvest of Sorrow, let us insist on the fact that the truth was indeed widely available in the West. In spite of everything, full or adequate reports appeared in the Manchester Guardian, the Daily Telegraph, lumatan Lea Figero did, a bunch of other newspapers from European countries, and scores of other Western papers.

In the United States, wide circulation newspapers printed very full first hand accounts by Ukrainian, American and other visitors, though these were mostly discounted, as often appearing in right wing journals and the Christian Science Monitor. The New York Herald Tribune and the New York Jewish for Words gave broad coverage. However, The Times longtime man in Moscow, Walter Duranti, a propagandist and apologist for the nineteen seventeen Communist revolution in Russia

and later Stalin and his murderous regime. He reported otherwise. Indeed, The Times was proud of their man in Moscow. In nineteen thirty two, Guranti was awarded a Pulitzer Prize for a series of articles in The Times that covered up Stalinism's atrocities, and from nineteen thirty two to nineteen thirty three Duranti wrote news columns for The Times, not only denying the fact of the catastrophic famine taking place in Ukraine, but censoring Stalin's role in the genocide of multiple millions

of Ukrainians. Then we come to the next paragraph and covers the star if you like of a movie that came out in twenty nineteen mister Jones. Another Guardian reporter, Gareth Jones, also filed news also filed news stories about the famine Ukraine. Like Muggridge, Jones had gone to the areas where white spread starvation was occurring, traveling some forty miles into the midst of it, and was also horrified by what he witnessed and was told, which he reported

in detail. But Duranti then took aim at Jones's credibility and used his powerful perch at The New York Times to publicly demean him and the accuracy of his reporting in the newspages of the Times. On March thirteen, nineteen thirty two, Guranti wrote a piece in The Times titled Russians Hungry but not Starving, in which he, among other things, dismissed Jones's first hand accounts and counted him with disinformation. Quote. Since I talked to mister Jones, I have made exhaustive

inquiries about this alleged Taman situation. I have inquired in Soviet commissariats and in foreign embassies with their network of consoles, and have tabulated information from Britain's working as specialists and from my personal connections Russian and foreign. All of this seems to me to be more trustworthy the information that I could get by a brief trip through any one area. In other words, he's apologizing, sort of making excuses for

not having gone and experienced himself. The Soviet Union is too big to permit a hasty study, and it is the foreign correspondence job to present a whole picture, not part of it. Duranti then exclaimed, and here are the facts. There is a serious shortage of food throughout the country, with occasional cases of well managed states or collective farms. The big cities and the army are adequately supplied with food. There is no actual starvation or deaths from starvation, but

there is widespread mortality from diseases due to malnutrition. In short conditions are definitely bad in certain sections the Ukraine, North Caucuses and Lower Lower Vulgar. The rest of the country is on short rations, but nothing worse. These conditions are bad, but there is no famine. Of course, this was a flat out lie. Do I need to go any further, Probably not, but let me The famine peaked

in the summer of nineteen thirty three, unbelievably. On September seventeen, nineteen thirty three, Durante was added again in another report from Russia. Duranti assured the Times readers that all was well in Ukraine and that suggestions to the contrary were nonsense. The writer has just completed a two hundred mile auto trip through the heart of Ukraine and can say positively that the harvest is splendid at all. Talk of famine is ridiculous everywhere one goes and with everyone with whom

one talks, from commonists and officials to local peasants. It's the same story. Now we will be all right. Now we are assured for the winter. Now we have more grain that can easily be harvested. But Gurante knew the ugly truth, as Professor Lubami Maire Luchuk of the Royal

Military College of Canada has written. On September twenty sixth, nineteen thirty three, at the British Embassy in Moscow, Durante privately confided to William Strang that as many as ten million people had died directly or indirectly of famine conditions in the USSR during the past year. Meanwhile, publicly Duranti orchestrated a vicious ostracizing of those journalists who risked much by reporting on the brutalities of forced collectivisation and the

ensuing demographic catastrophe muggerage among them. Even as fertile Ukraine, once the bread basket of Europe, became a modern day gold Gotha, a place of skulls. Duranti plowed the truth under occasionally pressed on the human cost of the Soviet experiment. He did, however, evolve a dismissive dodge, canting, you can't

make an omelet without breaking eggs. Indeed, wrote Conquest, he had personally told Eujane Lymes he was a United Press Moscow correspondent, and others that he estimated the famine victims at around seven million. What the American public got was not the straight stuff, but the false reporting. Its influence was enormous and long lasting. Well. The New York Times did apologize for it in an editorial a few years ago.

I still have a copy of that somewhere, and I think I've probably read it on radio, to be honest. But nevertheless, it wasn't the first, and it won't be the last time that the New York Times can be held or should be held accountable for misleading its readership and much of the rest of the world. Now, just to repeat, the extract I read was from Unfreedom of the Press by Mack Livin, and there are six copies of it in the Auckland Library system. Can't speak for

anywhere else. And the movie Mister Jones, I've seen it probably I think in twenty twenty, and i'd like to see it again after reading that extract and watching the trailer for it a short while ago. But I can't tell you where it might be streaming at the moment, but you might like to do have a look, Layton Smith.

Now I'm regretfully going to park the long letter that John Elcock wrote to Patrick, and I've put it aside for another time because I had something planned for this part of the podcast, which is the conclusion Bird flu Fear and Perverse Incentives by David Bell and published June eleven,

New Zealand Time. A fifty nine year old man unfortunately died, and I should say I'm going to read the first the first section and the final section because it's six pages long, and encourage everybody to read the whole thing for themselves. Details at the back. A fifty nine year old unfortunately died in Mexico in late April, having been bed bound for weeks and suffering from type two diabetes and chronic renal failure. He was at high risk from

respiratory virus infection. It became newsworthy, and the World Health Organization thousands of miles Distant even released a media's statement because recent advances in genetic sequencing allowed the presence of type A, that is, H five N two influenza virus, a type of bird flu to be reported in a

single clinical sample. A month later, refuting the Who's Distant bureaucrats attributing mortality to the virus, Mexico's health secretary is reported as noting that it was chronic illness that caused the death. Irrespective of cause, deaths are a tragedy for family and friends. This one made global news purely because of advances in diagnostic technology. The WHO, the media, and a growing pandemic in industry had been waiting for this

inevitable event. Testing and screening as it's critical to perhaps the largest business scheme in human history. Note that the largest possible largest business scheme in human history. There are hundreds of billions on the table and the will and means to take it. We all need to understand why and what is supposed to happen next. So to the

back end and the last couple of paragraphs. Unless wider society regains control of the agenda, the farmer industry and its investors are set to make a killing through bird flu. It will be at least as big as COVID. It will also serve an important role in further building the pandemic industry, justifying the finalization of the postponed WHO Pandemic Agreement treaty. It is a vital cog in the great reset.

Outbreaks do occur, and we shall monitor and prepare for them. However, we have allowed the development of a system where outbreaks are almost all that matter. Perceptions of risk and resultant funding have become grossly disproportionate to reality. The perverse incentives driving this are obvious, as are the harms. The world will be increasingly unequal and impoverished and sick building on the outcomes of the COVID response, Fear promotes profit better

than calmness and content. It is on us to remain calm and continually educate ourselves regarding context. No one will sell these to us. Now. You can find the article the Brownstone Institute site Brownstone dot org bird flu, spell, flu, fear, and perverse incentives, and it runs through all sorts of aspects of this particular situation, and I want to seriously encourage every one of you to look it up and read it. That will take us out for podcasts two

hundred and forty three. If you'd care to write to us, hope you do Latent at newstalksb dot co dot NZD or Carolyn Carolyn with a Y at newstalksb dot co dot nseid. We shall return shortly with the podcast number two hundred and forty four and it's going to be a ripper. Until then, as always, thank you for listening and we shall talk soon.