Episode 42 - Bite-Size Research on Attention and Retrieval Practice - podcast episode cover

Episode 42 - Bite-Size Research on Attention and Retrieval Practice

Aug 08, 201914 minEp. 42
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

Episode 42 - Bite-Size Research on Attention and Retrieval Practice Learning Scientists

This episode was funded by listeners like you. For more details on how to help support our podcast and gain access to exclusive content, please see our Patreon page.

Listening on the web? You can subscribe to our podcast to get new episodes each month! Go to our show on iTunes or wherever you get your podcasts. We’re also on Stitcher!

Show Notes:

In this bite-size research episode, Althea describes a study about how attention affects learning with retrieval practice when students are studying on their own by Neil Mulligan and Milton Picklesimer (2016).

Generally, they found students tend to forget after a delay, but retrieval practice improves memory after a delay. It is better not to be distracted (divided attention) when rereading. However, the students’ learning was not as affected by divided attention when they practiced retrieval. Retrieval practice seems to be a particularly resilient strategy!

Re-created figure from Mullican & Picklesimer (2016) study 2.

References:

Mulligan, N. W., & Picklesimer, M. (2016). Attention and the testing effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(6), 938-950.

RSS feed: http://www.learningscientists.org/learning-scientists-podcast/?format=rss

For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android