What if EVERYTHING was an "Op?" | Ep 454

Are you familiar with FBI Special Agents Kyle Serpen? I'm familiar with the name. Is that yes, I'm familiar with the name, familiar with the name, familiar with the name. Let's bring in Kyle Serafin. He's the. FBI whistleblower who helped expose. Government censorship of our First Amendment rights. Now we only have this memo because a recently suspended FBI agent. Called Kyle Serafin brought it to the public. And we're grateful that he did.

Kyle, thank you so much for joining us tonight. He's the host of something that, strangely is called. The Kyle Serafish. Kyle Serafi, I can't thank you enough for speaking out. I knew you guys were out there and I knew it was just a matter of time. But you got a lot of guts put in your face and your name to this. You're doing a service on behalf of the American people. And from the bottom of my cracked and broken heart

sometimes, thank you very much. Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an American patriot. Prepare to embrace the uncomfortable truth because this program has no time for comforting lies. Here is civil liberties enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello my friends, welcome to the Kyle Seraphin show. Merry Christmas on this what, the third day of Christmas, I believe it is December the 27th. It's a Friday.

That makes it a friendly Friday. And we've got a special in studio guest. My father is joining me. He's sitting right across the room, so we'll bring him on in just a moment. For those of you who are monitoring the chat, you will see there is AC Seraphin hanging out there and Charlie will be with us momentarily. All right, so I got a whole host of things. It seems like the world lost its mind while we were all opening presents and hanging out, and some of the world lost its mind

while drinking it seems like. And maybe some people were even drinking on Navy ships or they just didn't get trained up on how to use the technology properly. The question is, is everything an OP? Are we all just being conned? Are we all being screwed around with? Are they just twisting our nipples? Is that what it is? Like an uncle that just had too much to drink? We're going to get into some really strange stuff. And every story I have I feel like is weirder than the last.

Whether it's trolling from Donald Trump saying he's going to annex Panama or Greenland, or whether it's Elon Musk telling everybody that immigrants have to come in here because Americans are too stupid to do tech. We're going the whole gamut. And then, of course, out in the wide world of everything, there are things getting shot down. We are seeing the Koreans now on a second impeachment in two weeks of their second president. It's just a mess.

But we'll see if alcohol has something to do with it, too, because we're going to cover down on some of our absolute favorite leftist weirdos before we get deep into the drunk, which is where we're going. Let's go ahead and say thanks to my friends over at Patriot Coolers. If you guys know, you know Patriot coolers.com. If you need your white wine spritzer to stay cold, there's certainly a great option. Go to patriotcoolers.com. Use the promo code Kyle. Save yourself 10%.

If you spend 50 bucks or more, you're going to get free shipping. Or you could do something a little bit more responsible in the morning. If you're not a day drinker, you could check out a coffee mug like this one. This is the 19 oz. It's got a spill proof lid, which I have tested.

So have all of my friends. It turns out if you have kids, you are going to test it. I actually had a kind of a funny little moment the other day pushing a stroller with the new major, which is their large, you know, industrial size 40 oz. It's got a big straw coming out of it. And my tiniest daughter, who is now almost at 18 months old, was pushing the stroller. I had the the Tumblr in the back of it and she was drinking from it while walking and not

impaling herself. It's a it's a rigid straw. It's an outstanding product. Even the little kid can figure out how to use it. So if you guys are interested, check out my friends over at Patriot Coolers. And again, look in the show description in the notes. You'll always find a link to the Kyle Seraphin collection, which is to say the suspendables collection. You don't need to put any stickers on. You guys can just get started by having it pre engraved from

those folks. We really appreciate them and let's get into it. OK guys, we're going to get into it with panel discussions. It's the first time I've tried this thing out. We've got Steve, friend and my father Charlie sitting on the other side of the room. Gentlemen, welcome to our friendly Friday. Thank you, I did not have Purple Nurple as my bingo card reference for their Friday after Christmas, but good to see you. And good to see you, Mr. Seraphin. Oh, I left him muted. Sorry, Dad.

There you go. Nice to see you, Steve. Steve, one of the the memes that runs around or like the sort of a new comment that I keep seeing is various different videos of guys walking from movie scenes, kind of cocky walking in. And it says me walking into the Christmas party, realizing that I'm now the right wing uncle that all the aunts are upset about. That's the thing now. That's that's where the purple nurple came from. It's just called winning at that point, right?

I can't wait for that. Unfortunately I'm the only child who has children in my family, so I'll never get the chance to be like the vast right wing conspiracy guy. You can't radicalize the other people's kids. Yeah, I've been seeing that. So we have a kind of a small circle of folks that have been sending us Christmas cards. And all my friends seem to have kids, at least the ones that send Christmas cards. It's a good sorting hat, right?

You get to realize who has kids and who doesn't, because if you don't have kids, you're probably not sending Christmas cards to everybody. You know the rector of my dormitory in college, Father V He's actually a good follow. On AIR did you say rector rector?

Yeah, he's like the boss priest. I went to allegedly Catholic University. And he made a comment during one of his homilies where he was talking about how the Christmas cards he was receiving from people or members of his former congregation, they had pictures of dogs as their children. And he was saying how that was such a problem, how people were starting to view their fur babies as actual babies.

And at the time, it's kind of like you're 1819 years old and you're like rolling your eyes at it. But the more I've seen how that's impacted as things have gone on in the decade and a half since I was in that spot saying that, Yep, Father V nailed it. We don't have people who are interested in making people anymore when they can just put their Yorkie in a carriage and push it along. And maybe the Yorkie can figure out how to drink out of a

Patriot cooler. I. Want to go to the senior Seraphin here on this. Why is it shameless plugs? Why an image right there? I'm just looking for the Yorkie and the Patriot cooler. It's doable, yeah. Yeah, you have to set it very low. What? What happened between your generation and my generation that that skipped out on making A next generation? Why? Why is it starting to winnow? I have no idea. Well, you were around a bunch.

Of, I mean, I've witnessed it as you have and it's just as strange to me. I don't know what the odds are. I guess 33% of those people who are in the world today have decided to have children. I have six children and two of my six children have children. So that's 33%, right? Steve, you're the math guy here. 33.3 but 33 A. Little more than 33. Thank you. He's not just the math guy, he's also the precision guy, so we can always. Count on. Hey, we love that about him. Yeah, he's the guy all.

Right. I don't know why. I mean, why don't people have kids? Why don't you know, let's do a survey. Why don't you have kids? Too selfish, too busy, too many things on television. 70 inch television. There you go. You want to just get that out right now, Steve, so you can just get get the folks you got to understand. Steve started by coming in hot, explaining how much he loves his wife. I do love my wife and the fact of the matter is that I appreciate her perspective on things.

She's the the gas pedal and I'm the brakes in the financial relationship that we have. And unfortunately I wasn't there yesterday. So there were no brakes on that vehicle when she came home with a 75 inch television to replace the one that burned out in our house. I know she did her her homework. I know she made several trips back and forth between stores to find herself a deal.

But when I unloaded that thing and it was larger than me, I thought maybe I shouldn't have checked out of this decision and been more involved. It is back to the garden, right? There's a reason that Eve ate of the fruit, because Adam is at fault. He wasn't there. He was too busy gaming, checking in on his fantasy football team. Same thing. I'm at fault. Yeah. I think that is the answer, Carl. I want to share that because if you remember back in the day, they used to have blackouts,

right? And they always said that a lot of babies were created during blackouts. New York had a rolling blackout and then there were a lot of pregnancies that resulted in children nine months later. And with today's technology and the improvements in technology and you're carrying your computer with you in your pocket, there's just, there are no blackouts. You're never disconnected. You're never really alone. The the telephone is on the night stand.

It's right there ready for instant messaging. So there's really no time to either create or raise children. And so it's the technology. I think that's a good answer. Way to go, Steve. We got to in a roundabout way. That's a really awkward statement. Speaking of the children, let's lead off with this because she's

in the news. And if anybody knows anything about Nancy Pelosi, the speaker emeritus emeritus, I guess, of the of the House, we know that the thing that she joined politics was always about the children. It had nothing to do with enriching herself or her lust for power or drinking or whatever it is from her own mouth. It was about children.

And I just found this clip highly interesting at this time of year because there's always a drunken aunt telling you things that you can't believe at every family gathering. And here is America's drunken aunt telling us about the children was necessary for me to run again because my goal was to make sure that what's his name never stepped foot in the in the White House again. And that was part of my mission

for the children. My whole I went from housewives to House member to House Speaker for the children, one in five in poverty, living in America and going to sleep hungry at night, that they were my mission in the Congress. They were my priority. Their health, their education, the economic security of their families, the safe environment, including safe from gun violence, in which they could thrive. A world at peace in which they could reach their fulfillment. And our country could too with

them. So that was my mission. The, the, the difference between the visions of the Democrats for the people addressing their kitchen table issues and the other side is so vast that I'll have to put out my, my enjoyment of other things for a while until we get that job done. OK. And she's obviously decided to stop putting away her enjoyment and enjoyed some things.

And she was in, I think, Luxembourg and allegedly lost her footing on a marble staircase, fell while on a congressional trip for no particular reason, and had to be flown back to the United States to have emergency hip surgery. The explanation is actually quite simple. There's nothing nefarious. There's certainly not a martini involved. The explanation is her spokesperson, a guy named I'm sorry, that wasn't her

spokesperson. This is Representative Michael McCaul from Texas, not a spokesperson at all, wrote quote. She likes to wear high heels, very high. She was on one of her last steps on this marble staircase that didn't have a railing. It's the obviously the fault of the stairs and the railing blacking. She lost her footing and she fell to the ground. But now she'll get a new hit out of the deal. That's the story, gentlemen.

Dad, you've met Nancy before. Yeah, and I was just thinking, the housewife, she was on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors in the 1970s. She was very much involved in politics. So when did she have time to be a housewife? Maybe she had a full career as a housewife and raised adult children before 1974. So let's see. That would make her 22 and 74. You do the math, Steve. I'm going to count on you for that. But. Wow. She's older than she says.

If that's true, no false. And Steve, what about the double eyebrows? Were those real eyebrows? Was that AI? I think that that's just the, the fact that these people have no soul and they, they've sold their souls for power and all the accoutrements behind it. It manifests itself later in life, which is why you see the inside coming to the outside. It's after all the collagen has left them and there's no amounts of surgery that they can do to hide that fact. Those are legit.

The double eye eyebrow looks. That's just a shadow from her caved eyeballs. And she talked about giving away up on the the more comfortable things in life. You know that the 25,000 $1000 refrigerator that she has in her house with all like the $15 a carton ice cream and she's, she's really like slumming it for the people, it's for the children, don't you know? It's for the children. She's not my favorite drunk person in Congress.

We actually had someone else who used to be in Congress now is sitting over at the Naval Observatory for last couple days. And I didn't realize how multicultural this country really was until I started learning a little bit about Kwanzaa and some of the most important principles. This is not a gag. This is a real video that was really taped by a real person who really ran for president in this country and we're told was this close. And every bit of that is

shocking. Again, let's go to America's second favorite drunk auntie, because she also has no children of her own. She's not running for the children per SE. She's running for that principle of Chakawakala or whatever it's called. Stand by for Kamala. We narrowly dodge this bullet, ladies and. Gentlemen, you know my sister and I, we grew up celebrating Kwanzaa every year. Our family would in our extended family, we would gather around across multiple generations. And we tell stories.

The kids would sit on the carpet and the elders would sit in chairs and and we would like the candles and of course afterwards have a beautiful meal and of. Course, there was always the discussion of the seven principles and my favorite, I have to tell you, was always the one about self determination, Kuji Chagalia. And you know, essentially it's. About, you know, it's about be, be and do, be the person you want to be and do the things you want to do and do the things

that need to be done. It's about not letting anyone write our future for us, but instead going out and writing it for ourselves. And that principle motivates me today as we seek to confront the challenges facing our country and to build a brighter future for all Americans. So, all right, that was my coochie Tagalia. Can you just address your thoughts on that one there, Dad? Was was always my favorite principal as well. Do you remember any of the other seven, out of curiosity?

Does she? The rest of them I I they slipped my memory but it I don't know why I but I was alive and well. I I found all that. Kwanzaa was invented, so I know that, and I believe it was invented in the East Bay when I lived in the San Francisco Bay Area. So I was, I was close to the creation of Kwanzaa. That's sort of like almost being in Bethlehem, you know, back 2000 years ago. It's very similar. Kwanzaa was created in 1966, so that would have put you, I think, in high school.

Yeah. Oh, OK. I thought it was in the 70s. Sixty 6. It didn't really take on because most people couldn't pronounce the seven principles. Steve, I'm going to give you some of the principles which I've pulled up here on the screen. 7 principles of Kwanzaa are Umaja. Please correct me in the comments if I didn't get that. That's the principle of unity. Cuji Kamalia, the self determination, which is obviously which is Kamala's favorite Ujima. That's collective work and

responsibility. Sounds very Marxist coming from a Marxist professor of Africana studies and activist author. A person named Ronald McKinley Everest, but he changed his name to Doctor Malajanana Karaja Karenja. Totally irrelevant. The easiest principle to remember is NIA, which is interesting that Kamala didn't choose that one. That's purpose. You could see that being a thing.

She doesn't chose choose kuumba, which is creativity, Imani, which is faith and ujamaa which is cooperative economics, also known as socialism. So anyway, this is fun and I just I like to know that holidays that were created we're also celebrated by the so-called Christian, the maybe Hindu, not really clear religious situation of the Kamala Harris, the cultural chameleon that pops up. Do you have a favorite principle

that I've just read to you? I'm going to go back to the Kuja Kamaliya because it just reminds me of them thinking like that sounds like, could you Kamala answer this question? Because if that was early enough in the administration where they thought that she could actually string a thought together and then she started doing the word salad, the bee and the do and and Joe Biden, you know, guess what? By the way, he needed to have somebody who just has who is

more black. So they're like, hey, Kuja Kamala, could you go after the Kuja Kamaliya and be more black for us? And she went out there and crap the bed like she always does. You just Biden and gave me the comp, the combination of the Dana Carvey, which is fantastic. Really, really, really well done. Yeah, I like to crap the bed myself, but. Joe Biden does that. The Biden does that all the time. Guess what, by the way? Yeah, he has. That's all very upsetting.

Thank you for sharing all of those horrible images for me. I want to go ahead and kick into the OP that has been going on. Steve, have you been paying attention to Twitter when you should have been paying attention to your new big screen TV and your family? The TV hasn't been wired up yet so I was staring at the computer in my pocket a non-stop. All I care about is the XS. Do you know about the right wing warfare tech Bros versus mega? Are you ready?

I'm very, very familiar with this and very if they're buying it, selling it, I'm just a hold because I don't care. But yeah, let's do it. OK, so here's the story folks, because Newsweek covered this, which means that this is the this is the OP that's going on right now. Right wing warfare. It's pitting big Tech against the MAGA people over H1B visas. All right.

And if you're not familiar with this because you have been doing the things you're supposed to be doing, which is focusing on family and Cuji Kamalia over the Kwanzaa slash Christmas holiday, this story is fantastically written. Sometimes they just really nail it. MAGA evangelists like Laura Loomer believe that Elon Musk's influence within Trump's circle serves his own interest. Coming from someone like Laura Loomer, that's pretty

incredible. That's actually one of the funniest things that you will ever hear. Loomer has singled out Elon Musk and his tech allies, including Box CEO Aaron Levy and PayPal Co founder Peter Thiel and some others, saying that the Doge initiative for government efficiency is actually just cover for sending funds into Silicon Valley entrepreneurs and that they are going to hire more Indian people under the H1B visa program. There's this big break out here and we're seeing this aggressive

push to fight about immigration. Everything about this suggests to me an algorithmically driven OP to promote Discord. This is that Apple of Discord thrown in there to the fairest. It's like, how about good immigration ready go and then you saw people break along ideological lines. What do you see happening there, Steve? That's exactly what my assessment is, is exactly yours.

Look there, it's a distraction to get away from what's honestly going to be necessary to happen beginning in January 20th. And that's going to be marching Abuelas down to the border. Entire families and all the sob stories. They're going to be thrown to us by the legacy media where they're going to say, you know, do you want 90 year old Abuela separated from her family because she doesn't have health insurance or her granddaughter's working 3 minimum wage jobs in

order to support her. And that that sob story is already written. And they're going to pull on heartstrings. And on top of that, they're trying to fracture the the MAGA movement or wing for what they can about it so that they can paint it as racist. Look, Vivek Ramaswamy can say whatever he wants. He's not in the position of power or authority. He wasn't elected to anything. You could actually sit on the fence on this one. They can.

Both sides can make points. You can say, hey, we appreciate culture and it's a it's a issue of are you willing to assimilate? Are you willing to work hard? Are you spark? Are you capable? Can you make our society better and then melt into the belding pot? And that's a good thing. And you can say, hey, look, we have an obligation as a country that we should look out for our own. There's been a net loss of jobs for native born Americans. Those are all legitimate things to point out.

You don't have to pick a tribe in this one. And certainly when you have Laura Lumber saying like I am the MAGA, like the Anthony Fauci, I am the science, it's just not worth engaging in the entire debate because I'm more interested in let's get rid of the people who murder people like Lake and Riley from our society rather than does Elon Musk or any of those other tech Bros have enough coders.

Charlie, do you have any instinct as to, is this a historical thing that the political right pushes back against immigration? Is this a left or right issue, this America issue? Where does that live? I didn't think so until just a couple of seconds ago, but then I figured it out. We need to have virtual immigration because in the digital realm there there are no limits, right? So why do people physically have to come? They don't have to go to the

office to do work. Why do they have to come to the country to do work? So why don't we just virtually import any of the great technicians that we want in the high tech industry and let them work from home in their Hut, wherever it may be? Do they have Internet in their Hut? Well, let's get them Internet. Let's get them Skylink. There we go. We've solved all the problems and we don't have to feed them or house them, but it seems to me that would work.

Skylink is the Chinese bootleg version of Starlink I think, so I think that's actually OK too. They can have that as well. We're talking to India, so they're closer. They are closer. OK, so interestingly enough, this is professional level commentary.

This could have made it on CNN. You guys are going to be shocked to find out that this is essentially the same discussion that was being had by Caitlin Collins, who doesn't appear to be an OP at all and is totally not excited to try to drive these wedges in between the Vivek the Elon, the Donald Trump and the MAGA AKA Laura Loomer, who is apparently like a Palpatine character. She puts on the cloak of MAGA and discerns what is and what is not. Here we go. Not against legal immigration.

I think most individuals who voted for Trump aren't necessarily against legal immigration as it pertains to H1B. But Americans didn't vote for Rama Swami, They didn't vote for Elon Musk.

They voted for Donald Trump in part because of his tough stance on immigration illegally, but also because I assume they believe that the president-elect wouldn't increase the number of individuals, individuals coming into the country, even legally, that could potentially negatively impact or disproportionately affect Americans as it pertains to certain types of jobs. And so, again, I go back to my original premise. We need to focus on domestic

skilled development. I understand what mayor, former Mayor de Blasio was saying. We got to bring people in with the goal of getting to that point maybe in the decade or so. I get that. But why not limit the cap where it's at and focus over the next decade of increasing skills within our own people? Most Americans don't want to see good paying American jobs going to people from India or China. Yeah, but wait a minute, wait a minute.

The competition, the global competition is happening right now. And we, if we don't grab that talent, sure, Michael, I hear you. But if you don't grab the talent now, someone else does. And if you really want to grow the economy so you'll have that opportunity for Americans, why would you leave talent on the table? You know, grab what you can now and build toward the goal you're talking about.

It's not either or. That was Mayor de Blasio telling us I can't take him seriously after watching the COVID video, since we're talking about OPS when he was really excited about getting a shot because he might also get a burger. And are you telling him that he could get this delicious burger and French fries? That all will always haunt me. I think some of these people sold their credibility cheap when they did, and now they will always have to deal with that.

So we'll go back and kind of address that because it turns out the COVID origin story is back in the news and we can't hide from it. So we're going to just embrace it. All right, so the question then, why do we all distrust these people? Maybe because they were lying from the beginning. Steve, hold your horses on this one 'cause this is coming out of the Daily Caller today. This was put out day before yesterday when we were not on the air.

The intelligence BLOB, that's a little homage to Mike Benz who uses that kind of term. It's the intelligence apparatus which includes parts of big tech, includes government, includes non governmental agencies and and all these groups that sort of fund the movement. The Intel op, they've boxed out the lab leak proponents and they sold it to Biden as he was mentally fading in favor of the

national origins theory. The natural origins theory being that it came out of a wet market or that it jumped from one species to another. I'm going to tell you this because they're talking this about bird flu right now. The federal agencies and scientists, suspecting that COVID-19 began with a laboratory leak in China, were boxed out of key presidential briefings and their reporting was not allowed to make it up to the White House.

That's just it. The FBI was the only intelligence agency that had a moderate confidence in the lab league theory, but the agency was not invited to a key August 2021 briefing with Joe Biden. This is the thing that I, I have a problem with, gentlemen. It seemed really obvious right away that this was the case. We all had friends in various places that were saying it, whether they had a position or just using their own sort of, you know, scrutinizing powers.

It was never really a chance that somebody had eaten a bat. And then it somehow it like made it to, to Seattle. That just didn't make any sense. Steve, were you hearing rumblings when you were working for the Bureau about this sort of lab leak situation or was it just where did you hear it? I just heard it. From consuming content. I mean I was in a pretty remote location, but nothing ever made sense about the the wet market to me.

I mean, the premise was that a bat that nested 600 miles away somehow flew that distance and then gnawed on a pangolin, which vomited into a Stew, which made its way into somebody's mouth. Like when there was a bio weapons lap that's in that town and it's run by a guy who's in charge of bio weapons for the Chinese Communist Party. I mean, let's just use some

common sense here. I mean, and even just to throw it back to the the last clip that you played, This is why we don't trust anybody because Bill de Blasio was named Warren Wilhelm until he turned 40 years old. And he realized that that sounded like it was too Waspy. So he changed his name from Warren Wilhelm to Bill de Blasio because everybody can vote for just Bill de Blasio. He sounds like it's from New York City, right? Not Connecticut, like Bill de Blasio is really from.

There's nobody worth trusting in this. And we saw everything that was related to coronavirus, even changing the name to COVID. Coronavirus was changed to COVID over a weekend because they said that it was potentially racist against Latinx, Latinx people because Corona or something when that's Latin. There was nothing about it that was authentic the entire time, and that includes up to today, where people are still working from home.

We're going to talk more about that because apparently some of them are going to have to come back to work in the office. And I've got that for our last story. Dad, you got censored 'cause you did a radio show during the COVID time and you guys were uploading. Will you tell that story 'cause I'm not sure everyone is aware

of? So doing a local radio show in Payson, AZ, with a population of 16,000 and a listenership of 600, I said that we were using the online resources of YouTube to catalog the stories, so the shows. So every day they would put the recording and they would store it on YouTube because we didn't have the capacity at the radio station. Anyway, it got censored and they took us down because I said I thought it was really stupid to try to make young children wear masks.

It just didn't seem to serve any purpose. And that came back and it was stamped with large letters across the screen, medical misinformation. And that was the end of the. And that was your opinion? That wasn't like you weren't making a proclamation, correct? No, but I, you know, as a parent, someone who's been around children and a grandparent, someone's been around children trying to put a mask on a toddler.

I common sense try to try to put a sweater over the head of a young child sometimes is the same thing. So it just, it was just dumb. It was stupid, but to your original question, I thought my gut reaction to all of this whole bat theory and I didn't know about the vomiting and the Stew. That's new. That's actually pretty less. Information, yeah. It just always was illogical. It just didn't.

That didn't make sense. But a biological weapons lab in China, that made sense, that seemed to fit with the common knowledge. So you know, I was there. The goofy thing was too is that there were people inside the the agency and of course, at that time I was based out of DC. And so there were people talking about it in the various offices because it is actually the work of the intelligence agencies to

go out there and do that. But then they started pushing it and we had ACIA whistleblower come forward, who is now back with the agency, luckily, but worked with Feds for Medical freedom. And I'm not going to say his name, but you guys can find him if you want. It's it's available. It's just I don't need to out

him at the moment. Went to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and said, you know, not only did the analysts pretty conclusively decide, like, the most compelling story is the thing that every American assumed that was being logical about it, including people like Jon Stewart, who basically had the same story about your, your, your, you know, vomiting in the Stew and the Penguin.

He's like, there's no way that you can convince me that this huge chain of events took place when it's so easy that someone walked out of the lab and neither made a mistake. And I don't think it was necessarily intentional. That's that's The funny thing about the Chinese. And this is what we're going to be kind of talking about.

They don't need to have an intentional leak to be able to take advantage of a situation because they have lots of very long term plans and they think about things methodically and they have, you know, 50 and 100 year plans on what they want to go do. And if something fits into the plan, then they just enact it. But amazingly, that got you kicked off social media. For those of you who are doing

that. It got you kicked out of polite conversations if you were on the wrong side of it, and it got you a bonus if you lied about it, which is what essentially was done with the folks in the agency. Those analysts that were willing to go along with the story got bonuses and some other people also got paid off. It seemed like we haven't heard a lot of talk about Anthony Fauci in a while. Steve, what do you think Anthony

Fauci is up to right now? He's actually a professor at Georgetown and he has a protective detail provided to him by the United States Marshall Service. the United States Marshall Service has spent $15 million of the last 18 months protecting Anthony Fauci. So he's a good and faithful servant by the regime because what they do in the regime is reward their friends and punish their enemies. He gave 40 years and he's going to receive way more than his 30

pieces of silver. Unless there's some sort of accountability here. And I don't think there's going to be, other than the viral clips of Rand Paul saying that you're a liar. I don't know what we're going to

get out of this. He deserves to be at the end of an l-shaped hallway in solitary confinement somewhere in Leavenworth. But I think he'll probably just live out the rest of his days, even though he knows, he knows better than all of us, because he is the science, that he doesn't really have a biblical worldview, that you know, when it all fades to black, he'll just be fine.

I want to actually see the dollar comparison between what they spent on the security detail for Donald Trump and the one that was spent on Anthony Fauci, since one of them has had assassination attempts and one of them is just an A hole.

Here is kind of a compilation of why you need a security detail maybe significant lying for a significant period of time that affected people like you and me and probably every like certainly all three of us had some effect and I think a lot of our listeners probably experience it as well. Just a little little walk down memory memory lane here. Not the not the L shape hallway where he belongs.

So now we have 2 vaccines that are really quite effective, the mRNA vaccine, highly effective, extraordinarily efficacious, 94 to 95% for mild to moderate disease and virtually 100% efficacious because the real world effectiveness is even more impressive than the results of the clinical trial. All right, and it goes on and I'll actually post this over on the local channel for you guys to watch that if you don't haven't, if you've never seen the headline montage, which is

actually fairly compelling. And it goes on for about 3 1/2 minutes. And it's all of the things talking about the effectiveness and the efficaciousness and whatever the heck that word means. Did we ever get a real definition of what that word means in real life? Do you, do you have a a grasp of that Dad? I think it's spelled with an A, not an E affectacious because it affects people.

It's 100% effective. Affective it's effective at raising the the bottom line and making sure that that Pfizer makes record profits and I need to amend I was corrected by your chat here on the Kyle Seraphin show. The Marshalls quietly dropped the protective detail for Anthony Fauci last week. He's now getting private security, so. Are we paying for that?

That's an excellent question. Well. We've already paid for it, if you think about it, because he never was able to disclose the honorariums that he received for being science, literally. Representing all of science. Science became man, and Anthony Fauci was it. That's kind of wild. Yeah. How? OK, I'm, I'm troubled by that. And the reason why I'm troubled and the reason why I bring this stuff up is not because I just want to run down memory lane, although we do have a fun little tip.

This is another little piece of that affectacious. It was 100% either affective or effective at something, but it's not really clear what that something was. So I want to kind of get another little taste. By the way, these are the tickers, Dad, that you, you talked about the death tickers that allowed most of us to see through the OP. And I want you guys, if you're watching this, to pay attention to the right side of the screen while they're discussing it. They're going to have a panel.

They're going to talk about some incredible numbers of things that you better do. And then they're going to have a death ticker like the National Debt Clock that was telling you exactly how many people died because probably 'cause Donald Trump, it was his fault. Again, pay attention to the right side of the screen. We do have some. Breaking news, Drug maker Pfizer just announcing the results of its vaccine trial for adolescents.

It says its coronavirus shot was 100% effective at preventing infection sickness among 12 to 15 year olds. This could be a major game changer for reopening schools across America. So joining us now is Doctor Chris Pernell. She's a public health physician and fellow at the American College of Preventative Medicine. I'm Doctor Pernell, great to see you. 100% effective. Is that? I mean, I would John and I haven't heard numbers like that. Is that unusual to find that efficacy rate?

Find that efficacy rate, well, that's even higher than what we were reported when we had 95% efficacy in adults. Look, we know these mRNA vaccines are a game changer. The technology is different. The technology is very promising. I mean it's 100%. I mean, I mean, you know, it does not get any better, guys. It doesn't get any better. I mean 95 is not even 100 and 100 is bigger. We have to explain that 100 is bigger than 95. Meanwhile, trust the numbers we

have in the corner there. To me, the ultimate where, you know, it was all contrived and and it was pretty clear that it was from the very beginning. But I don't know if you remember there, there were the Daily Press briefings that Donald Trump was doing and he was having Anthony Fauci and Debbie Brooks go out there with her bedazzled face mask.

And the question went out. It was very circulated amongst the media that we had just surpassed the death total from Vietnam, and every single media person out there was. Now today we have crossed over the threshold. The death toll here is worse than Vietnam. And I'm like, this is completely artificial and fake and you don't have any of the data. It's impossible that you could have gotten it. I work with people in the

government. They take sick leave and annual leave and just leave and they've been told to stay out of the office. This is impossible that you would have gotten any of this information. There's no uniformity. There's no system in place to do this. You're making up these numbers and it's being done because you have this unique opportunity now to both spike the president in his last year in the in the run up to the re election attempt and to boost your own ratings.

Because we're in a interesting time. And I've talked about it before where we had really good and comfortable lives. And it sounded really kind of interesting to Rev the engine on that fear. Let's go pretend to live in the zombie apocalypse for two weeks or a month or four years to to flatten the economy. It's, you know, I missed it before, but I just saw it. When you put that screenshot up there, the last one when you're trying to sell something, you never say it's $10, right?

You say it's 998 or 999. That's a selling technique. And the number up on the screen was 550,998 OK. So, you know, it's just like. Wow, so many people. It could have been 551,000 rounded out, but that obviously wouldn't have resonated the same way people would have looked at that went well. That might not be a real number. That seems like an. Estimate 998. You're right on. You're. It looks like the price of ATV, yeah. There you go. And you need that TV.

OK, let me add to that because I had this really interesting little chat. It was a throwaway conversation with a gal who was stocking shelves at the Natural Grocer yesterday because my wife and I went and bought toothpaste there. I don't know why I need $9 toothpaste, but I do need $9 toothpaste. Apparently this is not my choice, Steve. My wife gets that. She's a luxury item chooser and

her thing is potions. We need to hack into that signal chat between the suspendables wise it's a conspiracy. Well, if you start getting $9 toothpaste then you'll know what's going on. I got the $7.00 toothpaste which was the budget version of it and it still tastes exactly like baking soda. So I don't understand what I got. But what I did notice is on the door in in reference to what Charlie just said and the selling technique, they have hours in that store.

They start at like I think they start at 7:38 and they close at 8:36 PM. Have you ever seen this? Because this is real. This is, I'm not making this up. Anybody who lives near a natural, it doesn't matter if you live near a natural grocer, look up natural grocer on your, you know, Google Maps and go look at the hours of the store and you'll see that it closes at 8, 36 PM or 7:36 PM depending on the time of year. And so I asked the lady and, and

my wife is like, don't ask her. She's not going to know. And I'm like, oh, I guarantee you, because that's the first question I've got. What are the hours that I'm working right? And why is it 8:36 PM when we close? What the shit is that about? Because that's a really weird number. And she said that people when the original store opened up, they always wanted to come in after the hours. They were still in the store and they needed a few more minutes.

And the woman who did it basically decided to do a hard fudge. So they like, it's kind of like the old hours in a bar that used to be we're, you know, we're open till closing. If you've never done that, I used to run a bar and they're like, hey, how long you guys open tonight? And I said, till we close, which is always true. That's the easy thing to do. And it's like until the business basically dries up, you might as well be open because you're still turning a profit.

And so for whatever reason, they opened at this time, it was like till 8:30, but people would want a few more minutes in the store. So she made it a weird number so that no one really knew when 836 was. And it's the same thing I've used previously when I want to screw with people and they say how long is going to be till you get there? And I say, I'll be there in 17 minutes.

Nobody has a concept in their head of what 17 minutes is, but they do have a concept of 15 minutes and 10 minutes and 20 minutes. So if you give them that rounded number where they're used to it, they're going to look at it. Be like, dude, it's been more than 10 minutes, where are you? But if you say 17, no one's going to do the math and figure out what that looks like. So they'll be like, oh, are you? Be like, I'll be there in 12 minutes.

I'll be there in 8 1/2 minutes. That will get you a lot of extra time. And that's the wiggle room. And they were using that stuff on CN NS website like in real time to the American people and some of us who are kind of like natural fibbers and like to push this envelope, we saw it. And my dad is 1 and you are one and I am one. And it's probably why we all get along. But how many Americans just bought this hook, line and

sinker? How many people walk by that store that see 836 closing time and never once asked that question? All of them, just about all of them. Most, I mean, we all had the stories that we saw the absurdity where things made no sense. I mean, look, it was at the time where they started doing and then they enhanced it because of the social distancing rules, which are completely arbitrary and capricious, you know, the definition of tyranny.

The online groceries where you could buy and then just go and get the pickup. And it was convenient and the weather was crummy in Iowa, so it made sense of the time. That's what I changed. I mended. I said there's no question, no way I'm ever doing online

pickup. I am walking into that store and I'm walking the wrong way down the one way aisles because people need to know that this is stupid and I saw people who were shielding their children putting their bodies in the way of me as I. Walked the wrong walking the wrong way. Guys up the dad, you know, the sleeve tattoos and the Don't Tread On Me T-shirts, 33 inch pythons because they're Rogan Bros who had double masks on and the American people were weighed, measured and found

wanting. But for the most part, which is why I have no confidence that another emergency will not come around and people will just line up. I think you're probably right. So do my friends over at the Wellness company. So thanks for the Segway there. We're going to just go right to it, folks. Anish Kumar, JA, he's a former Joe Biden administration Covic 19 response coordinator, recently gave a chilling speech at the University of Michigan, the School of Public Health.

He warned of a new age of pandemics fueled by bioweapon development and natural threats. He called for a massive investment in vaccines against pathogens that don't even exist yet and encouraged a war on so-called misinformation. That's probably us if we're being honest. The question we need to ask is who's working on bio weapons? How many labs are out there globally and who's going to send

them our way? Yes, Donald Trump got the win, but Eagle is still lurking in the background and being prepared is still your best defense. The Wellness company contagion emergency kit engineered by doctor Peter McCullough, one of the voices of truth in the last few years and his medical board. They include five critical life saving medications like Ivermectin, Tamiflu and nebulizer hydroxychloroquine. Something every household can have access to now, which won't be nearly as hard.

And it cuts through the red tape. It's very simple. You just have to fill out a digital intake form. Your kit will arrive at your door in one to two weeks. Do not wait until our friends in the government have decided to put these plans into action. Just stay ready. Expect the unexpected, and you can do so by heading to TWC dot health slash Kyle. Again, that's TWC for the Wellness company dot health slash Kyle Kyle. Use the promo code Kyle Kyle to

save yourself $32 off. Plus, you'll get free shipping over there. Again, TWC dot health slash Kyle, it is timely to have these kind of conversations. I feel like it is something that is continually on the other radar and we're not done with it yet. For whatever reason. We're not done because there's a bird flu, you guys, and you probably knew this. We're done with bats. We've moved on to birds. It still has wings and it looks like this. This is the story. There's a virus that was found.

It's the variant of the Louisiana bird flu, and a bird flu patient in Louisiana is showing a mutation that could emphasis on could. I'm sure they didn't emphasize increased transmissibility to humans. CDC analysis finds. I read the story for you. It turns out that the H5 N 1 bird flu, which we've been told over and over that these bird flus are going to be more potent, more transmissible and coming after us.

But #1 the best part of this entire story is in the first line of the story, Steve Friend, it says, but there's no evidence the virus has been passed to anyone else. The patient was infected from sick and dead birds in a backyard flock. The CDC found out through some

analysis. Found out that a dude who liked to play with dead birds in the backyard got sick from dead birds but nobody else has is. That like a militia violent extremist group with a low propensity for violence, IE 0 because there was a really low number. But it could be violent if the right situation happened. Yeah, I think so. I think it's what it is. The CDC has no credibility left at this point. They don't know that yet though. That's why this is interesting

to watch. That's what this the the that's the the most interesting thing about this is that this hand got overplayed I think, and that's why everything looks like an OP. The problem is is that there is still plenty of people that have done route BII tell you guys, I I feel like this is true and I'll get your reflection individually, but it seems like people had two choices during the COVID. One of them was question everybody, the sort of X-Files

trust no one. And the second one is everybody is lying. So I'm just going to believe whatever the hell I want. And that's my favorite new theory. And that's why the earth is flat and the moon is made out of cheese. That is also a flashlight. And and nothing that I've been told is real because I just live in my own fantasy world. Gravity is fake. Those people, they're the ones that are kind of like the most likely to now be taken in by God knows what. Birds aren't real.

The CIA controls them all. I I share that sentiment. I think you had the opportunity to be skeptical and do your own homework on things and take everything I with a healthy grain of cynicism and real and check the sources of it. Or you could do what the the latter group is, and that is they said you lied to me, so I'm going to assume you lied to me about everything. And I think it's even more directed than that. I'm going to assume the opposite

of whatever you told me is true. It's not even like we're going to whatever I want to be true. Like even fantastical things like, oh, gravity doesn't work. I don't feel pulled down. I feel more pressed down from above. You know, something absurd. It's that, oh, well, you told me the Earth is round and I've seen globes in school. Ergo, it has to be the opposite of that has to be flat. Dad, did people doubt the moon landing when Neil Armstrong was doing the famous? Broadcast.

I don't think so. I not not that that was that came on later. The movie, I think had a lot to do with that. They made a movie about the faking the moon landing, but I think the people were people were enthralled at that time. We were on the verge of a new era of discovery. And we've always, you know, talked about going beyond the limits of the atmosphere and and it was a it was a really exciting time. I think 1969 June Shining on the Moon.

Yeah, that was cool. I, I announced that on a radio station in Madison, WI Got to play the audio tape from, you know, one small step and it was good. It was, I think it was a good time. I'm still back to the guy. I think people will. As long as people will play with sick birds in the backyard, people will believe anything. I think that's the connection. There was a video that I saw and this has nothing to do with anything, but it was, you know, are there fire breathing dead

chickens in India? And somehow somebody either like pulled a gas inhalant into the lungs of dead chicken and had an ignition source underneath or something similar to that. I don't exactly know what happened here, Steve, but I did see the video. The guy was like squeezing out. Like if you squeeze a dead bird, the lungs will inflate just because of the way that the, the, the, their chest cavity works. And then they'll, they'll exhale. I knew a friend who'd like play

dead ducks. He would try to make a tune out of them. You'd arrange them, you know, the musical mind. So he would go shoot ducks in a pond, pull them out, and then he would play the ducks. And you could set up a couple of different notes because they all squawk at different levels. And somebody was doing it with chicken. Yeah. You know this guy, by the way. Yeah. Then someone, you know. But yeah, so they were doing

with these chickens. And it was like fire was coming out of the nostrils of the dead chicken. And they were like, what's going on? Like, are these? And then people would be like, oh, my God. It's like, well, you got a lot of things out of camera here. It's just showing the face of the dead chicken and not anything else. Like, who knows if there's a guy with a name and flame underneath it or whatever. But yeah, if you're going to play with dead birds, it's a possibility you end up with a

bird flu, I think. I think it's probably real. We used to be a little bit more serious and a little bit less of this, like, viral clicking. I got a really fun video of a wild human being that somehow made it to be president as well. I think a lot of comparisons have been driven Donald Trump and Reagan, and they're not the same kind of person. Reagan was a really, really good speaker and he delivered messages really well. He was really inspirational.

I don't think Donald Trump has that talent in the same way, but they're talking about a lot of the same things, like crushing working men and just like obvious common sense things and with an understanding of business for an actor, which is where he came out of. This is 1975 S, six years after our lunar landing story. And I think it still rings true that you could run for president on this today and people would want to elect you if you were getting people to listen.

When you and I were boys back in the Midwest, governments, federal, state and local were only taking about $0.15 out of every dollar earned. Today they're taking almost half of every dollar earned in the United States and most people don't realize it because the taxes are hidden in the so-called business taxes. You know the politician that stands up and yells oh let's save the little man, let's tax

business. And everybody yells array, but they haven't figured out that every tax on business is just a part of the cost of production and the customer winds up paying it when he buys the product. It's a hidden sales tax. There's 116 of them in a the suit of clothes that each one of us. Is that right?

Suppose a lot of economists have suggested, and I don't know they'll ever come to be in this country that they're if they closed all of the loopholes and corporations and maybe tax loopholes and even on their rich certain loopholes and and made a percentage income and made a flat fee without all of the deductions that the government might raise as much money as they do now. Oh sure, and really, the loopholes. This has been overdone by the

politicians too. The bulk of the money that is taken by what are called loopholes are the legitimate deductions with which if the people didn't have them, they couldn't pay their income tax, interest on their mortgage, interest on the installments on their on their car, their property taxes on their home if they have one, and so forth. These are, in politicians eyes, loopholes.

But we ought to have tax reform, and we ought to start by making it so simple that you don't have to hire a lawyer to find out how much you owe every year. That's for sure. It used to be. It used to be a little. Simplified, but not anymore. We. We, Johnny, we live in the only country in the world where it takes more brains to figure out your income tax than it does to earn the income. What a great line.

He's the goat man. He just, and that's a serious intellectual conversation happening on a nighttime comedy shows. Johnny Carson and Ronald Reagan, he was an actor. He was also in charge of the Screen Actors Guild union. So he was involved with with politics in that regard. He was an employee.

He was a spokesperson for GM. He was a serious thinker who had come around to these issues and put a lot of thought into him and talked about it for a long period of time before he eventually ran for governor of California. But I mean, how far are we from that? Where you contrast that that image where, you know, you have Reagan, who at that point had not been elected president. He wound up losing the nomination in 76, but he was definitely on a short list of candidates to to be in that

position. And then you flush forward to 2020 or 2021 where you have Stephen Colbert doing a dance with vaccine marionette puppets or, or mascots. I mean, like, that's just a completely different time. I want to live in that country. I do too. You want to find something. This is an interesting tie in. Are you guys ready for this? Because they were making suggestions about what is now being called Doge, the Department of Government efficiency.

That was actually part of what Reagan was talking about in that clip. And I'm going to go back to it and I'm going to play something that Rand Paul has made a career out of talking about government waste and inefficiency. But this is also it's just the common sense party that we kind of are losing or we've lost. And it's been a, it's been a theme for what is that 30 years now? And I'm sorry, 50 years. Is that 50 years that we're talking? Is that right? Do the math on it. Yeah.

There you go. Here we go. Watch this. Be right. We've gotten in the habit over the last 40 years of thinking the government has the answers. There's very little that government can do as efficiently and as economically as the people can do themselves. And if government would shut the doors and sneak away for about 3 weeks, we'd never miss them. Our biggest problem is that we have built a permanent structure of government, federal, state and local, the permanent

employees. And they've come to the place that they actually determine policy in this country more than does the Congress of the United States. There are 14 and a half million public employees in the United States. That's quite a voting bloc. And the bureaus and agencies not in Washington. I heard you talking earlier about some of the research programs. What would you say if I told you

about one? A study in which this was called the The Demography of Happiness. And in this study, the government found out that young people are happier than old people, and they found out that people that earn more are happier than people that earn less. And they found out that, well, people are happier than sick people. That's good. This was $249,000 to find out. It's better to be rich, young and healthy than old porns. What do you think about that

one, Dad? Yeah, it's, it's funny because I saw that clip online yesterday or the day before, too. So it was, it's it's really powerful. And what you've been saying all along is shut the government down and no one will notice. The other point, Steve, I'd make about Reagan is that he studied economics in college and he he was an economist. I mean, he really did have a good sense what was going on. And the movie career.

A lot of times people with other skill sets get into a, you know, a side business that can earn a lot of money for them. And he did that. But his position in the union and his position later in politics as governor and as president was predicated on a a base of knowledge that he had in a philosophy that he had that was consistent. So he didn't just wake up one day and start talking about things that he didn't know about.

It were there were things that he had considered seriously for a very long time in his life before he became a public figure. And that's that's kind of lost. We don't, you don't see too many of those. You see a few. You know, Tom Massey always comes to mind because there are people, contemporary people who have that intelligence and educational background to justify their positions on, on different things.

But most, most politicians today are just blowing in the wind and you know, whatever, if it's dancing with the the COVID vaccine puppets, then so be it. I have this instinct that that that's more evidence that this the so-called OP. The OP is just basically that there's a status quo and we're all sort of just playing along. You, you don't get to really move permanent Washington. It's just been growing slowly. It's been growing since 1975. It was growing four years before

that. If you listen to what Reagan's talking about. And now here we are 50 years after that conversation, we're having the same thing. So that's 100 years of growth, which goes back exactly to the thing I said that the minute that the federal government got access to our bank accounts, the minute they started getting access to an income tax and they could fund themselves and vote. It's not about voting Congress for its own raises. It's about the government voting to fund itself.

That the money is not voluntarily put out there or that they're not taxing the States and the states get to push back on it because we don't have the states represented in the Senate anymore. It's just, it's just funny to watch this. So I, I typed this into Grok this morning. Grok is the AI product that sits inside of Twitter or X. And I don't know what this means. Folks who are listening in the chat and those who are listening after the fact. I'm going to describe it to you though.

I said draw everything you know is a lie. That's the exact thing. And I'm going to show you the what it would have generated, generated 4 pictures as it does everything you know is a lie. Has a picture of a black man that is very sad, an Asian, maybe Chinese man that says everything you know is a lie on the wall behind him. A book that says everything you know is a lie. And Barack Obama looking very serious. No idea what the hell that means, but it's really weird.

And it's funny that that's where it went. And by the way, every time that I regenerated this image, it included Asians and black people. I don't know what the Hell's going on with the grok function, but it is really funny and strange to see that. And it kind of led me down the path of sometimes you just talked about side hustles being a thing where maybe you're a politician. And that's what you're known

for. But you had a different thing that made your, you know, major intellect develop. Donald Trump theoretically understands international business, at least at some level. He has to because he's been able to continue to have far more money than most people. And all the left is always said, well, he lost money. And it's like, yeah, he's got more money than you. So maybe, maybe he knows a

little something. This troll that's been going on where he's focusing on something and making Americans think about things that they haven't before. I don't know what it means, but it makes me laugh. Look at this story, this they're really upset right now, the left because Donald Trump wants to annex Greenland, Canada, Mexico and Panama. And so here's the story. Trump again suggests that the United States should own and control Greenland. He said it's absolute. It's an absolute necessity.

I've absolutely no idea what the what the argument behind it is, although there are some that is going on. It's it's upsetting to people for the purposes of national security and freedom. This reminds me of like a Falkland Islands kind of argument. The United States feels that it should have ownership and control of Greenland. And this is getting people pissed off. And what it led me down this road is that there's all this other crazy stuff going on.

Guys. I want to just hit them all like like wave tops. So give me one second here. This is the stories that led from both CBS and ABC, theoretically sort of mainstream media outlets. So Trump should control Greenland. Russian aircraft, an anti aircraft system shot down an Azerbaijani plane that happened over the weekend. So that's crazy. Israel is hitting Gaza and Yemen and hit an air did some air strikes at an airfield where The

Who chief was about to grow. By the way, Trump wants to pull out of The Who as well. So that's kind of interesting. The South Koreans have a acting president who's getting impeached for the it's the second person to be impeached in two weeks. So there's all this civil unrest there. And then lastly, we've got, I guess this is the Azerbaijani plant here. There's another look at it just saying that it doesn't look like a bird strike. It looks like the Russians

actually shot them down. So we've got this new focus on a million things outside of the United States because pretty much the entire campaign that I saw them run was all about mega, mega, mega US focused, United States centric sort of America first, screw everyone else. But in order to accomplish that, it sounds like you've got to actually start opening your eyes up in this little discussion about immigrants from India and

the global economy. I think a lot of people that might otherwise just drive a big Ford truck and and have a big MAGA bumper on the background and kind of a piss off in a Trump flag. They're having to start considering things that are out there. Like should we annex Panama like my wife argued 10 years ago?

Should we conquer these things because the United States doesn't operate in a vacuum and maybe people just don't realize that until they get hit in the face with the idea of Annex in Greenland. I don't know what it's a it's a free spinning idea of a bunch of weird shit happening all at once to me. I wanted annex Greenland so we can put the FBI headquarters there. I'm all, I'm all for that. I mean I I just looked it up the the population of Greenland is 56,000 people.

Is it really? Giant landmass my town in Port Orange, FL have. Have you heard of Port Orange, FL? We have 65,000 people, right? Right. We'd have a large Las. Cruces, New Mexico, yeah, Las Cruces, NM had 100,000 people in it, and people asked me if I was moving out of the United States when I moved there. They didn't even know it was in America. So that entire country basically, I mean, it has no population whatsoever. It's just interesting that we're now looking at the sort of

territorial expansion. I don't know this about Reagan. Did Reagan want an empire? Was that a discussion that was being had at that time in the late 70s when Reagan was coming to power? Dad? Not that I recall, no. He probably did a movie with a dog sled team though, and I know they have those and and. Yeah, you were reading about their their military spending increase. Was that because Donald Trump

wants to annex them? Is. That no, they said it was just an it was ironic that Denmark up, I think it's 1.6 billion, something like that. Their defense budget, which would include more dog sled teams because those are very effective when you're trying to cover the the polar areas. Have they not invented snow machines? It didn't say anything about snow machines, it just said dog sleds. There's probably more snow machines in the town you grew up in. There a lot.

Which is not very big, but they race them than there is in all of Greenland and we could probably overrun them with just a bunch of people from Wisconsin who decided you just go populate Greenland. Snowmobiles, yeah. You don't have those in Florida either, so. Steve, you got. Some things you're missing out on, Steve. I'm just telling you you. Know fanboats and alligators. Trump dog. Fled Team A competition. What do you think in South

Florida? I I made a firm commitment that I gave the last full measure of devotion for seven years in Iowa, shoveling snow by hand by myself. And I will never be cold again, even if that includes having to put on a shell jacket in a hotel in Houston when it's 90° outside. While I did a appearance on the Kyle Seraphin Show, my fingernails were blue. It was justified. I want to, I want to talk about the last full measure of devotion. Some federal employees have decided it.

They may be dragged back into work kicking and screaming. We had some interesting stuff, folks. Some reporting coming on this later. We're going to go along today. This is a fun story that I saw and it's going to go into the disruption of life and also proving something that my father told me a long time ago about multitasking, which I want to kind of touch on as well. Jason Lacroix felt privileged to work from home. He's the father of two young children.

We talked about kids at the beginning of this. He needed flexibility when his son, who was six years old, suffered a brain injury and was in intensive care. There are reasons why people might need flexible accommodations and supporting children does seem like a important piece of it. Doesn't say anything about what the mom's story is in this, but apparently people are getting dragged back into work and Lacroix, who was a senior systems engineer, is one of them.

So this entire article is talking about returning to the office can disrupt life. The thing that people have always had to do, like go to work somewhere that was not in the house. As long as you work in an industrialized society, you have to leave the house. And they have some tips to go ahead and help you navigate the change. How, how did we end up here, Steve? How? How are people now needing coping skills to be able to go

to do their job? Because when we sent everybody home, it addicted them to their devices and left them without the ability to have any sort of cognitive abilities. They're waiting for instructions on how to do everything at this point. Because you you see it from the intention span that people have, the people, people are always on and scrolling. They can't focus on a thing. And then you get people addicted to comfort. And that's exactly what the entire thing was.

I mean, this is been something I've been trying to push out there about how the government does this to people. They set up a system where they spend inordinate amounts of money to inflate the currency and import a whole bunch of people to take away jobs and leave people who are native born and they're citizens in a position where they cannot

thrive in the current economy. And then they they resultantly have to rely on the government's kittens in it is a recipe for the government to always expand and always have control. And this is just another cultural extension of that. People sat home and got addicted to wearing non restrictive waistbands. And now they just can't even at the very thought of having to go back to work.

So something that that it's not like you're going to have to ask your dad be like, hey, Charlie, what was it like back in the old days when they had to go to work? I mean, this is not ancient history. No, it was like 3 years ago. Yeah, this is the other piece of the OP to me. And, and This is why people always, they always think it's like they're trying to sell us something. It's like, no, no, they gave you

something you wanted. They gave you the opportunity to work from home and not even do that much work at all. A lot of people don't do any work at all from home. Some people work their asses off and some people work not at all. So that's always the case. That happens. At least in the office, there's some accountability. And now we're seeing this moment where people are quitting, they

are leaving their job. They would rather be unemployed than have to go back and work at Apple for really, really good salaries. And this has been going on for a couple years as people have been coming back in. Now it's hit the federal government, that thing that basically doesn't do jobs anyway, those people are really upset. And so there's all these coping mechanisms that they have in here, which are very funny.

You can ask your employer to adjust your hours so you can work when you want to, because it doesn't matter when the work is like. Like answering the phones for American citizens, You can work it at 3:00 AM. Look, the best example of this was a lady that I talked to and I talked to a lot of people in tech in in customer service on the phone and they're always working from home now. And sometimes I know that because they have the chirp in

the background. When I have Tamika who works for the US Postal Service and she's doing customer service. By the way, she was a really nice lady, but her fucking smoke detector in the background was chirping at me and I couldn't focus on what I needed done. I was like, this lady is going to burn to death because she probably lives in a not very nice apartment. That's what I'm hearing.

I'm hearing that you are living in a place and the one thing the government does, although it doesn't do very many things very well, it changes. It buys batteries and it changes smoke detectors and smoke alarms. I never heard a chirp in a government building for more than like a few minutes because that is a full scale roll out of everybody's capabilities. Anyway. It's just crazy to see this kind of thing of people crying about it. And maybe this is where it leads

me to my multitasking dad. What do you say about multitasking? It's a good excuse to do more than one thing poorly at the same time. OK, And we got a picture of this woman who also looks like sort of a Indian goddess, I guess she's got all these arms, which is kind of a funny little picture. Multitasking, Is it a myth? Here's what experts say about divided attention. You need to get a PhD if you

want to really talk about this. This is coming from a woman named Erica Robinson. She's all too familiar with multitasking. She studied it at Apple and at Microsoft. She started studying it years and years ago, 25 years plus. And in 1998, she coined the phrase continuous partial attention, claiming there really isn't anything as such as multitasking. We never do anything simultaneously. We're just rapidly tasked switching.

Or if I remember the way my dad used to say it back in the day before he got more polished and more statesman. Like he used to say, it's just an excuse to do a bunch of things. Yeah, poorly. Or you just do everything shitty at once. She studied it and apparently you can't do it. You can simply have like chewing gum and walking and that's about as far as human beings can go. You can do 1 task and an unrelated task, a motility and A and like a consumption.

But even when I was in basic training, they told us not to do that. I just remember every time I stand up from the table now, if I'm still chewing, like if I want to go fill up a drink or something, there's a there's a, a drill Sergeant in my head that's yelling at me because you're not supposed to chew and walk. You're supposed to finish each individual task.

There's probably some value in that, that we used to know we've lost it. But in any case, I just think it's funny that multitasking, no one's doing it and you're definitely not doing it at home. If you're hanging out with your kids and watching your kids, you're watching your kids. That's why you got to go to work. Or you can be task saturated by the actual work. Anyway, it's all part of the OP to me. This is why people are terrible drivers because driving on busy

streets, it really does. I mean, you say, oh, it's driving, It's one activity. No, that you're having to do a lot of different things at the same time. You're having to pay attention to what's in front of you, what's on the side of you, what's behind you, the speed this traffic signals, the signs coming up. A lot is getting thrown at you and you can just watch a average day on a semi busy St. and like how many near accidents or how

many actual accidents occur. It's because it's multitasking and people just are not not equipped for it. Yeah, we can't do it. We can't split our attention. We've created though, a situation where we develop technology to do all those things. So in the new vehicle, right, it can see ahead of you, it can see the potential danger, can see on either side, you can see behind

you. And basically you're, we're being programmed not to use our brain, just to just shut it down and let the let the upside down world take over and, and handle things. We're going to. I'm bringing on a new sponsor pretty soon. That has a lot to do with this. I'm not going to, I'm not going to tease it out just yet, but one of the sales pitches is exactly the opposite of what I thought the pitch would be for the product. And I think it's brilliant.

So that's one of the reasons why we're going to partner up with them and we'll just put a pin in that. If you're listening to the show and you're thinking like, OK, what in the world you talk about, we will come back to that, 'cause I want you to know. But since you brought up technology solving problems that I didn't need solved, it turns out we've been able to drive for like 100 years and it was fine.

Like you just, I need to not have a phone that has like the entire Internet and I need to not be reading an e-mail while I'm trying to decide whether or not I can navigate the red light, which, by the way, I'm guilty of just as much as any of you are. This is a thing that I didn't know that people needed. So those of you who are single, those of us who are not, we look at you not just with pity, but with fear and skepticism and real concern because there's a

thing called online dating. And I understand that that was coming online about the time when I was getting offline. And that's all great. Being able to meet a match using the Internet is not a terrible thing per SE. I think that there are some characteristics that are not awful. But this might be the worst thing that I've ever read. And that's saying a lot in 2024, at the end of the year here, dating online is about to change radically. This is from CNN subscriber

pieces. Those are some very feminine hands. But apparently a man's watch. So, so confirmed. Steve friend, I'm going to read this to you because it scares the crap out of me. For those of you that are still doing this. Personalized chat bots dating other chat bots on your behalf, period. An AI concierge fielding questions about potential matches, advanced algorithms predicting capabilities and compatibilities better than ever before. Dating apps are on the cusp of a

major transformation. Essentially saying that that for the last several years, dating apps have been learning who you are, whether it's the parent companies of match.com or Twitter or I'm sorry, Tinder, Hinge, OkCupid, our time and more. They've been basically gathering all your data, all of your interactions, including the way that you text and you chat and you go back and forth in private messages with those that you might be dating or be interested

in dating. And they are creating a virtual version of yourself that can now find the virtual version of somebody else and determine compatibility based on machine learning. This scares the ever loving shit out of me. I don't know any other way to say it. This is how you end up with no children forever, I think. What do you think, Steve? Are you? Can you imagine that like you? How long you been married? For 13 years. OK, 13 you got more years than me.

You were dating. This was not a reality. This was like there was no online dating, at least not in a meaningful way. No, I, I've said that I felt like I got on the last helicopter out of Nam before that that entire system came in the, the, and look, I understand that you're, you're trying to use technology to help people, right? But there's just been downstream consequences of this. And it's so obvious that this is

going to go wrong. Like the downstream consequences of the online dating in general is that men and women are very different. Shocker and as a result of that, the pool of guys who are getting swipe rights from interested women is very small. So those guys are getting the repetitions, we'll say the opportunities to meet with

women. As a result, now you've got other guys, the lion share of guys who are unable to meet a partner and they're unable to actually get the skills that are necessary, the social skills to communicate and be successful in pursuing and ultimately gaining partnership for the foreseeable

future. This is now going to even that that limited pool of people, they're not going to develop those skills now at all because you're just going to outsource it to AI to do it. And then what are you going to outsource the, the, the marriage? Are you going to outsource the, the child rear everything? It's just going to be disconnected.

Ultimately, it's reverse matrix. People just want to be plugged into the Matrix. They can sit in their little closet with VR on their face and just get their government, check their Ubi and never have to interact with anyone at all. I just want your open reaction to what I just read to you Dad coming as a 75 year old guy. I guess it's virtual children. I guess that would be the next logical step, right?

That the one bot would mate with another bot and create a virtual child that would grow up and go through the stages and a. Perfect punted square. You could check once and zeros. Right, you check in, you you turn the screen on and and watch your child develop and interact gig of them and yeah, cool.

The thing that that kind of freaks me out when I heard this and I'm reading it, if you're going to have a chat bot, learn your mannerisms and you're going to have some algorithmic prediction of the way that you're going to interact, which works most of the time. That's the thing about human, human beings. We actually operate on some pretty predictable things. But I had this fun conversation with one of my best buddies from high school.

Americans have this belief, I think like human beings that I deal with have a belief that they are rational creatures and a lot of their things can basically be disguised by rationality right up to the point when they do things that are completely irrational impulse buys. For example, a 75 inch TV without having room to put a 75 inch TV in your house, Why did you buy it? Because it looks different when you weren't in your house and you just felt like that was the thing.

A chat bot's never going to make that irrational decision, but that's the thing that changes the way that you're human interaction, $8 toothpaste, which I would never figure out how to do, but I will tolerate all day long wrong because of the person that is there. Now, if you went and looked at my buying history, you'd be like, oh, that Kyle's not a guy who can tolerate an $8 toothpaste, but I can for my wife as many $8 toothpaste as she wants.

And so you, you're what I imagine happening. And this gets to the thing we talked about the other day about war games. The only way to win is to not play the tic tac toe analogy that happens. You can imagine these bots looking at people as though they're rational actors, which we know they are not because we live with people and people are totally irrational.

They believe in COVID or they don't believe in COVID, both of which have medium degrees of rationality to them and a lot of sort of just feelings and instinct. And if you're going to sit there, what they're going to eventually have your, your bouts do is the bots are going to work out the relationship, the virtual divorce, the virtual children's separation, the pet that gets split at all the things. And then basically do the calculations, say this is not going to be worth your time.

So don't ever connect. But I think that's the craziest thing about human beings is that against all odds, in all of our experiences, there are people that continue to have positive experiences that the sum is greater than the parts. And there's no predictor of that. You have no way to know. This is going to bring me to something that has nothing to do with any of these things. But it's my, my take on Matt Gaetz lately. And it it's something that my dad and I were chatting about

last night. So I'm going to share with you, Steve, and you've met Matt. I have not. I've I've interacted with them a few times. There's this big push about his health axis complaint, whether or not he was a scumbag and doing scumbaggery and getting involved with, you know, young girls and paying for sex and all those other kind of crazy stuff. And the left wants to run this big now that he's resigned from Congress and it basically doesn't have any power. Same way they're running after

Elon and the fake. And my instinct is, is maybe some of those things may have been true about him. But if you look at Steve Friend, the unmarried guy, and you look at Steve Friend, the father of two boys who's out in the world, those are not the same man. And I'm not the same person that I was before. And I imagine my dad, Charlie, is not the same man that he was before he was a parent and certainly not the same guy that he is as a grandparent. And so there's no way to account.

There's no chat bot in the world that can estimate how another human being in some of these experiences will make you a fundamentally different person. Matt Gates doesn't even look like the same guy. He lost weight. He sounds different. He acts differently because you become protective as a man when you have a female that's under your charge that you have to go out and look for. So we all end up differently. And there's no way you could do that. But what you could do is

eliminate possibilities there. And again, that to me looks like the OP. It's like, how do we keep people from from being able to connect? And making themselves better because that's human beings tend to make each other better. And I know our chat is a great example of that because there's people in there that have become more than the sum of just people who watch a podcast together with us. Anyway, that's that's my encouragement for humanity.

You know, going back into the office is not a bad thing. Going and dating in real life is probably not a bad thing. And get rid of this crap. So that's why this new product we're going to be bringing on in a little bit in a couple days, I think will be interesting. And it's not going to be for the reason that people think. Any thoughts on those things?

I think you should put your phone in a drawer for at least an hour, preferably a longer period, two or three hours every day and have separate from the virtual world. Because if you are constantly attached to the virtual world, you lose that that human connection. You miss so much by looking at the screen of the things that are happening around you in nature. And I, I'm, I'm totally serious and it's really hard. There are very few people who probably can do it.

But think about it, it's not that tough. Put your phone in a drawer and it go outside, go for a walk, have a conversation, do something. I don't even if you just you know, about the only time we tend to do that in today's world is when we're watching a movie or or some other video presentation.

But turn off all the electronics for a short period of time and see if you can get to a longer period of time and try to, you know, what a miracle if you could go for a whole day and not be connected to the virtual world. And I, and if we don't start, it's going the other way because there are people, how many people have their phones by their night stand and they wake up in the middle of the night and they got to check, did I get it? You know, an e-mail? Did I get a text?

What's going on? What's the latest? And that's the, that's the beginning of the end from an old guy. That's that's we didn't have that. And was the world better off? I think so. Were there better relationships? That we make mistakes? Sure. That we screw up, that we have all kinds of problems? Yeah, we've always had problems, but not like what you're seeing.

That disconnectedness is a direct result of the relationship we have with technology and you and I'm not anti technology, it's great tool, but it's it's become an addiction and not a tool. Dave. Yeah, I would never ask my kids to do something that I was unwilling to do myself. And look, we we put Christmas presents out under the tree and we told the kids you can't open those presents right now. I mean, it's the exact same proposition as you can't look at your phone right now.

And now, as Charlie suggested, do it for an hour. We and our kids not open their presents for like multiple days. So I think you can make that sacrifice. And I mean, even just back to Matt Gaetz, you know, not this is not an argument for people not to be held accountable for any sort of like the serious wrongdoing, but one of the the best scientifically, as long as we're talking about the science at this point factoids that's out there.

Is that the slowest cells to regenerate in your body or actually your bones, the cells of your bones? And it takes seven years. Every seven years, you basically your skeleton is completely different than it was before. So you're a new person every seven years essentially, which is makes marriage interesting, which makes the premise of even going back to work interesting. Hey, look, you're basically over halfway to being a completely different person at this point.

There's going to be an adjustment period to going back to work, but you just make that adjustment and hopefully you've improved yourself in the, in the interview leading time and you're going to go back and have the opportunity to be the better worker, the best worker that you've ever been. And you should, should benefit from that. This is an opportunity. This isn't something to look down on and say like all this is going to be a disruption to my life. This is an opportunity to maybe

have a better life entirely. And people should be open to that proposition. What do you got coming up on American Radicals tomorrow? The final, the finale of our three-part series we're doing tomorrow on amradfumble.com/amrad Pod is where you can go. 1030, the finale of we're covering all the news stories, the big bombshells for 2024. So we're going to be looking at September, October, November, December should be a lot of stuff, particularly around politics because that was when

there was an actual election. So we're going to have fun with that. Encourage everyone to to join us. That's again at rumble.com/amradpod Dad. You're going to be heading home, so I wanted to make sure you got on the program in person, in studio live with me. And Steve. Thanks for joining me this morning. Thank you for having me, Steve. Thank you for being Steve friend and a wonderful inspiration to all those who watch Friendly Fridays be included. It's great.

It's like, it's like having a like a real live representative from our chat because my dad is active in there every morning, which is really which is comedy to me as well. You talk about a digital interaction. I get to see that. All right, gentlemen, we're going to shut it down here. So let me switch over here, folks. Thanks so much for watching. I did not do this without a palate cleanse. You know that I wouldn't leave you hanging on that.

I have something just to make you all kind of remember we need each other and women. It's the end of the year. Consider this as you reframe the way that you talk to your husbands. For any of you that are complaining about mansplaining and you know who you are that listen and comment regularly, consider what would it be if it was the other way around. Here is a little song about mansplaining from the guy's perspective.

I just read the definition of mansplaining and it sounds a lot like how my wife explains things. A kind of standing tone of something that is obvious, but I guess it's only patronizing if you've got a dip. Because I can't remember when a time my intelligence wasn't insulted by the results of a comic that she said, like how to crack an egg or how to put my son to bed. 5 nephews, 5 nieces telling me make sure you hold his head.

But if I tell you to be careful when park in the car not to scratch the rims, everybody's like here we go again. Now it's all toxic and masculine. She's not bought, she's got. Happy husbands, happy wives, that's what makes it go around. All right, y'all, get off the Internet, get off your social media, get off your phones, go out there and do something, even if it's crappy outside. Spend some time with family for these last couple days of the year. We'll see you again on Monday.

Hope you have a wonderful weekend. God bless you. Go to church, go meet some real human beings. If you're out there in the dating world and you're thinking, hey, where are the good people at? They're probably attending Mass on Sunday and they're looking around saying who's not holding anybody else's hand? Who's standing there? And the pews all alone might be a good opportunity. Way better than a chatbot. It's the original connection, all right. God bless all of you.

We'll see you all soon. Have a good weekend. Thanks for listening to the Kyle Serafin show, streamed live weekdays on rumble.com/kyle Serafin Bobble Kyle on Twitter, Truth Social and Instagram at Kyle Serafin.