Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistleblower in American Patriot. Prepare to embrace the uncomfortable truth, because this programme has no time for comforting lies. Here is civil liberties enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI agent Kyle Saraf. Hello my friends. Welcome to the Kyle Serafin Show. Today is Monday, It is December 4th, and I'm in kind of an adventure mood. It was the first Sunday of Advent. We like the purple candle.
And so I don't know today I I got into this idea that we were going to talk about something that's kind of strange a little bit, a little bit out of the news, but it is always news, particularly in this time of year. And the question is this, how does the Motion Picture Association of America and men adopting and and creating in vitro babies, how are they related? That was something that's come up.
My wife and I had this interesting discussion in the kitchen yesterday and that is the the genesis of today's show, which might get us cancelled from everyone except the sponsors that we have picked up. I think many of you will appreciate that there might be a little bit risk of of talking about this kind of stuff, which is pretty sad even on rumble. So we'll find out. We're going to test the limits of what their free speech platform has to say about it.
But essentially my my argument is this, the MPAA, which dates back to 1922, when that was created and when it was eventually adopted into widespread use in 1968, they they came up with a rating system that would help parents decide what was appropriate to show their children. The fact that we did that then told us that we focused on children as the end goal, that children were the end result.
And today we are completely upside down where adults are the focus and what is best for adults is the reason why people do things. And that that flip in our cultural values has resulted in an objectively worse scenario for children, whether it be child trafficking at the border or whether it be the exploitation of the unborn, our focus on abortion in this culture. So this is a cultural show today.
It's going to be a little bit spicy and I think you guys will really appreciate it or you will never watch the show again and that is OK too. If you are watching anywhere other than rumble.com/kyle Serafin, you are missing out on the live chat. I scrolled up and read something and then as I looked over, I noticed that I had paused the chat for a few seconds and there were over 99 chat comments that were sitting in there. So it's just flying through.
If you're not joining us on rumble.com/kyle Sarah and you are missing out on an outstanding community of people that will be discussing both the show and whatever else you guys get into today, I'm going to give you some things to think about, so I appreciate all of you being there. If you're there, go ahead and hit the like button. Make sure you move this up on the leaderboard. Let them know that you would enjoy this content if you do. If you don't, then you can give us a dislike too.
I guess there's a couple of feds that always want to do that. So without too much further ado, I want to say thanks to our sponsor that allows us to do things like this that bring us programming unafraid and willing to push through in this time of year. catholicvote.org. Go to catholicvote.org. We will do some over the next couple of days.
We're going to be starting to highlight all of those, those Catholic heroes of the year that Catholic vote is called out of, which I am in one of the brackets. That is a Sweet 16 style thing. We'll show you those again, we're going to do kind of a little profile on each one of them. I want you guys to know who's in the running, mostly because there are some fantastic people that are being highlighted by catholicvote.org. Again, you can go through and get the loop every single day,
which you should. They've covered some of these stories. You can even see as Ryan is scrolling on there talking about a pro-life clinic, check them out and you can also give to them on the top right hand side of the website the little green button there. It is the only one that's highlighted. You can either do a monthly or one time donation if you want to support Catholic vote. You don't have to be Catholic, you're not making a donation to a church.
This is an organisation of laypeople, which is to say non ordained, non clerical. They are not part of the Catholic clergy, they are simply Catholic people that want better things in this world and they are in the fight for faith, family and freedom. All things that are very important to me as a lay Catholic person, someone who goes to that church. But I'm not affiliated with the Catholic Church in any way. Many of you guys know that. All right, so, so let's get right into it.
First of all, there's this ongoing sort of meme culture on the web. It's all over the place on Twitter, It's on other social medias like Instagram and so on. And everybody always asks, how did you get radicalised.
Now we've taken that. Those of us that are in this, whether you're a radical traditional Catholic, whether you're a militia violent extremist according to the FBI, because you have a Betsy Ross flag on the wall like we do, whether you just love America and the way that America used to be. The idea is, is that somehow because you like things the way they were 20305080 years ago, maybe all of human history until just a few minutes ago, that
you're somehow a radical. And so I think the political right has sort of adopted that amusing sort of idea that you're a radical now because you like things the way they were and the way that they always have been. And I found this in my feed. I think I'll share it with you. You guys remember that ultimate radical Mr Mr. Rogers? He's a pretty radical guy. He radicalised a lot of us. This is a fun little meme video. If you guys are not watching this, what you're missing is the
question is who radicalised you? It's that sort of NPC, the non player character. It's a greyed out sort of generic leftist asking the classic Nordic man, the guy with the blonde beard and the and the hair and and this is the response, Ryan, if you want to play, that's going to be video #2. Let's run this thing real quick. And so is my boys are boys. From the beginning. If you were born a boy, you stay a boy. Girls are girls right from the start.
If you were born a girl, you stay a girl and grow up to be a lady. Everybody's fancy. Everybody's fine. Your body's fancy, and so is mine. Only girls can be the mommies. Only boys can be the daddies. Yes, Sir. Everybody's fancy. Everybody's fine. Your body's fancy and so. And so is mine. There it is. Everybody's fancy and everybody's fine. It's just simple stuff. It's basic biology. We didn't need to get so
complicated. We didn't need to try to pretend like we were gods, but that is what human beings do. In many ways, this is a modern day sort of parable. It's the story of the Tower of Babel. When man tries to to reach the peaks that God exists in, then you get to experience sort of the humility of being a human at a much lower level. That's kind of what I think is going on here. Let's start right into the history lesson. Let's just talk about the MP AA.
I don't know why this was the thing that I was inspired to to bring up when I was talking to my wife. We were talking about gay men either creating or adopting children. And this is where my mind went. So go ahead and pull up that first topic there, Ryan. We're going to get into it. This is just Wikipedia. There's nothing crazy about this, folks.
These are the ratings. Now. Many of you guys are familiar with them, and I think that over the years we've actually gotten really bad about keeping them. They're not what they used to be. They have actually moved a lot and they have allowed many more things under G and PG and PG13 than used to be allowed. But that's OK. The generally speaking G was supposed to be for all ages that there and this is literally listed all ages admitted nothing would offend parents for viewing
by children. That means that there actually is a code. There actually used to be a code. It goes back pre 1968 was called the Hays code of what you may show and what you were advised not to show. And that's the way this was originally set up. And the reason that the MPAA came up with a Hayes code and eventually came up with the MPAA guidelines was that they were under threat of censorship by
the federal government. Said, if you're going to show smut, if you're going to show things without any warnings, then we're going to start censoring you. And the folks in Hollywood said, well, we'd rather do it ourselves. We would rather take it on the burden and we would rather create an objective standard so as not to have children in and and to add moral depravity into the visual. You know sort of learning centres of these little human sponges that we call children.
And so we will give them an objective rating of what's out there and then from there parents will make the decision and and and that allows you to go in and you can actually take the PG rating says that parental guidance is suggested. It's not required. PG13 says that you should be checking out and then R actually says restricted unless you bring
your parent. Now you can be one of those parents who brings your young child to the Terminator or Aliens. Like my wife tells me she saw at a very young age on their TV. She came in and you know they sat her down and she watched the scariest movies that ever existed in the 80s and the 90s and you're allowed to do that. But that's the parents choice. That's the idea is that the the parent would be in powered with this information. PG was supposed to be the guidance was encouraged.
They were supposed to be some stuff that may not be appropriate for young children. We sort of just now. I think if you guys think the way I do that G and PG and even PG13 is like whatever can my 5 year old watch PG13 probably shouldn't, it's probably not great. Then again, many of your households, we've sort of slipped in some of our standards as the way that we talk and the way that things are because of the Internet and the speed at
which communication happens. I think kids grow up faster because of we let them grow up faster. All that being said, PG was something that meant something PG13 and then are. But the things that I'm most interested in are the the more explicit stuff, which anybody who knows, having lived in the 90s, the early 2000s, and now, if you're at least 25 or 30 years old, and especially those of us who are older than that, you can look into the way that
the society has changed. We've changed dramatically in what we're willing to tolerate and what is actually considered decent in in open society. And so there used to be a rating that was called X. You remember X. That was the thing that if you were a young boy in your teens that you were trying to figure out if you could get an X rated movie. I remember going to a house party when I was in high school and they played I think Debbie Does Dallas or something, which was horrible.
It was a horrible movie. It was, it was grainy and difficult to watch. And I don't remember there being a plot. I just remember being in the background and thinking like what a what a, just an indication of depravity that this house party was playing this and they used to have that X rating And then it turns out that the MPA actually created something was called NC 17. Some of you will remember that switch over.
It actually happened in 1990. I didn't know it at the time that it switched over, but I knew that they were somehow, you know, the same but they were distinctly different. And the reason was essentially that the MPA did not have a trademark or a copyright on the X rating. The pornographic industry took that over. And so they became, you know, how do we brand it in our own way. And they came up with a brand of NC 17 which was that no child admitted under the age of 17.
That was a hard restriction. You couldn't get in parent or otherwise. So there there were these standards that existed and they exist less and less. I was watching a a film of you know show is called I think the Justice League pets. Somebody will correct me in the chat. Maybe there was this it's got the rock in it. I think it sounds like Chris Kevin Hart maybe was in there was a number of different sort of big name film actors that had done this.
Batman and Superman and all these other Aquaman and stuff like that. And what was her name? The lady with the lasso. What's the lady with the lasso? I cannot think of her. Wonder Woman, Wonder Woman, there you go. And so all the superheroes and they end up with these pets and it's like how do they get these pets? They got these pets because of super dogs. Got dog named Crypto, which is right up your alley, right? I know you're a crypto guy. This was actually about the planet Krypton.
But in any case, all these these these super pets, whatever, one of them was a turtle and the turtle would keep swearing, which was really, really bizarre for a PG13. Now, even bleeping out the swear word, I would think would be kind of a movement in the standards we're seeing them move objectively. The the, the, the turtle would say I can't see, hold on. I wonder if I have this swearing here. Do we have it? I think I've got it right here. It says that, you know, I can't
see and you say it over. It doesn't matter. I still can't see. And so we even know what the bleep is supposed to be. Even kids know in context what that is supposed to be, that there's a swear word there, and even that might be over and it actually was showing on the subtitles that it was bleeped out. All that's being said is there's this erosion of standards and we're we're more and more OK with sort of using children in
the culture war. We're using children as not the goal of protection, but we're using them in a way that they are actually an accessory. They're just they're sort of in the way, they're a tool that is being used either by the political left, the political right, and and they're being manipulated in a way that I think is really disgusting and dangerous. I'm gonna show you something. My wife slipped under the door. This is bizarre and this is going to get where we're going here.
This is a magazine that we get at our house for kids. It's called High Five. You guys may have seen this before. If you have little kids, you probably seen it. It's done by Highlights. It's a kids magazine and this is one of those things that when you see it, you can't Unsee it. As parents, we're always on the lookout for things that are inappropriate for our kids, even in childhood magazines. Look at this. It's a story under fiction. It's an easy reader for young
kids to learn how to read. One sock, two socks. It's a story about missing socks. And if you look on the wall where the where the dad is sitting there with his two little kids and they're, you know, decidedly, you know, darker skinned parents, there's two dads sitting in A-frame photograph right up here. OK, let's see if we can get this thing to focus. Yeah, we can see it. Like, why?
Why would we need this? And how does that even, How did that become a thing where a child's magazine, like High Five and Highlights would show that, you know, this is the same thing as putting something like that, like Ranger Rick, which I remember reading when I was a little kid. It's like they're trying to reinforce their own bad behaviour and that they've made really bad decisions. So they need to soften the blow so the kids don't get picked on because of their bad decision making.
We're not, we're not in a place where the kid is the focus. The focus is what the kid brings to the adult. And I I was able to just type in a couple of different search terms And we came up with this article, which goes back to 1999, now 24, almost 25 years ago. And I'm going to just kind of walk you guys through a little bit of a weird history here before we pull that up. And. And. And you were correct pulling that up, Ryan, that's my fault.
Let me let me pull up something that made me realise that this was connected. If you'll pull up the article from Collider, this is a woman named Lisa Lehman, November 3rd of 2023. This was very current. What I typed in was MPAA. And then I said something to the effect of, you know, get rid of it or or delete or it's obsolete. And what I got was, of course, collider.com with this Lisa Lehman character says it's time to put the MPAA rating system out of its misery.
It's an outdated dinosaur for eras. It's time that we put it out to pasture. And you guys are never going to believe why that would be. It's not appropriate to have the MPAA rating system, which was designed to protect children, because in July of 2023 this year, Ira Sachs put out a film called Passages which has two extended sequences depicting explicit onscreen sex between two men, which got it in NC 17 MPAA rating.
And that rating means that most theatres won't carry it and many stores won't carry physical copies of it on their shelves. Oh, you mean like police state? That's interesting in it. In essence, the NC 17 rating is a death sentence for many movies. This is her writing here, hence why it's so avoided by features. And what her argument is, is that that this film is too taboo because it shows 2 explicit gay scenes of two men having gay sex.
And that means that it's really, really bad for queer people, that it's created a problem and a burden on people who are queer or queer lined or whatever the heck that means, she said. There's the fact that queerness and female sexual pleasures also something that irks the MPA board and it inspires movies to get MC 17. So anything that has this, it, it turns out it's actually just inappropriate sexual explicit
material. There's a there's a number of, let's say this article is actually worth your time, folks, if you actually, maybe we'll put it out there, maybe I'll get out there because it's actually really good. It says it's an obvious example of discrimination against queer people and women, making the MPAA ratings board a worrisome creation. It's a worrisome action. It's bigoted, it's homophobic and therefore it should go. It completely ignores the entire reason why that thing exists.
So let's go back to 1999 here. Before we dig into that topic, let's do one more of our sponsors. Let's talk about someone who has been with us and probably probably will not cancel is based on this sort of thing. Our friends over at Patriot Coolers got one set on the desk right now. I've got it filled with stickers. My wife hates that I do this, but I put on some stickers from the Gargoyle Sweatshop. If you guys haven't seen these, the last line stuff sack the
upside down American flag. They're all out there, including one that I don't actually always get, but it is a the Joker Patriot coolers.com. Use promo code. Kyle get you 10% off. They are a fantastic company. We use them for my daughter's birthday. We used our our big cooler right there, the 50 quart, took it out, filled it full of ice. It works just like any other rotomolded cooler, except it says Patriot on the side instead of Yeti or Lifetime or something like that.
And they support the Kyle Serafin show and they support military veterans. They've got values that are more aligned with what you are most interested in. Good company, great tool. I'll tell you this too. The feet, the rubber stoppers on the feet, on those things. I've got a Yeti as well and I've been able to move that thing around on on picnic tables and stuff.
I actually thought that I had this thing weighing down way harder than it actually was when I tried to pick it up because I was dragging it laterally and it wouldn't move. I mean the the feet gripped into the the picnic table. We had it on so well that it wouldn't actually allow it to even come up until I lifted it straight up first to be able to break that sort of attention. Really nice if you want something to stay put and be sturdy and stable and it is very
well designed. So check out Patriot coolers.com. Use that promo code. Kyle will get you those 10% off free shipping over 50 bucks. That's going to be on all the different, all the different cooler products makes a great Christmas present. This is the season for that sort of thing. If you guys are, and it'll last you for a very long time. The really nice thing is to all of their hardware.
It's easily replaceable. You can actually buy replacement hardware should you wear out the things like the rubber. They may not wear out for a very long time, I imagine, just based on the the, the durability of the product in general. But you can always replace them, which is kind of nice. It's thoughtful. You have to go replace everything because something like a hinge died out on you.
And if you've ever dealt with that on like a cheaper Coleman or something like that, you know I'm talking about. All right, 1999 The Guardian. I found this article very interesting. Gay couple pays for surrogate moms. Twins. It was the only option left, they say, braving criticism from adoption workers and family campaigners. So the interesting thing here are several fold #1. They're braving criticism, which means that the Guardian is already supporting this particular type of behaviour.
It says The gay couple expecting twins by an American surrogate yesterday brushed aside criticisms of their decision to pay a family, to pay to create a family. Here's part one These families always either have a lot of money or a lot of resources. This particular group, these two men, a person named Barry and a person named Tony Barlow and DeWitt, they they spent £200,000 to bypass British laws. Notice this also. They're bypassing the British
laws and where do they go? They go to a third world nation. They go to the United States in order to do that. We're going to find that there's examples of this happening in other places as well over time. There are a millionaire gay couple who've been together for 11 years and they live in a Grecian bungalow. They provided sperm to, fertilise 4 different donor eggs to each, and then had them implanted in a woman named Rosalyn Bellamy, who was a married mother of with four sons.
The twins are already named, even though this was in September and the babies weren't due until December. Aspen and Saffron. They were born in California, where the couple also have a home and then they will be brought to Britain after the year. The Searcy deal, which was revealed in Women's Own Weekly, talk about that Women's own magazine. It's like literally the opposite of what women are doing.
There's so many spaces that women have basically cut out their own value for this sort of agenda. It drew criticism from adoption workers and so on and so forth. There's a whole British agency on adoption and fostering saying that there was a considerable evidence that single people and same gender relationships may be able to make really good families. And so why don't we try it out?
However, this is the real key that doesn't get talked about nearly enough, and we've sort of just bypassed this as part of the argument. Removing a child from the mother can have a great impact because there is a unique bond that is formed between them. Anyone who has a child and is a father, any mother, knows that there is a difference between moms and dads. There's always been a difference between moms and dads, and it's an important difference.
I made a a show a couple weeks back that got a comment from my own father. And I said something to the effect of is like, I'm, I'm a pretty good dad, but I'm a terrible mother. And he kind of bristled at that. And he said, you know when my when your mom wasn't around that I was able to maintain the household and everything ran the same way. We had all the same things
happening. I say that there's a lot more chaos when I'm running around and every dad is going to be able to execute household chores at a different level. Some of them are better than others. Some of them are going to be more on track. Some of them know the schedule better.
I know when my kids go and take naps, but I don't necessarily know what they always have for lunch because I may be working or I'm not around Anyway, Long and short of it is, we all have sort of different degrees of it. But I will. I will stand on my statement that the greatest dad in the world is also a terrible mom. Because mothers are different. Because mothers have a different skill set. They have a different set of just physiologically they're
different. Even an infant knows the difference between laying on her mother or his mother's chest and and fathers, it's different. It feels different regardless of what Pete Buttigieg and and Chastain buddies want you to believe. There is a massive difference and the babies know it. And all of this stuff kind of leads me to this sort of disgusting thing that we've left out, that it's not about the people.
Every single thing in this article is talking about whether or not these gay men can get Aspen and Sage. Is that what the names are? That's really obnoxious too, isn't it? Aspen and saffron. Sorry. Yeah, they really need to get these babies home so that they can live their best life. And it's about what that child is going to bring to the adult and very little about what the adults are bringing to the
child's life. It says you have got some people here from a right wing family group called Family Focus says that they have no right to be parents. Biologically, that's true. Historically, that's always been the case. There was no way for that to happen. There's more and more evidence that homosexual parenting can have a negative impact on children. This is going back 1999. You can actually say those things back then.
And they made the claim that this is a human right for a child to be brought up by a male and a female. But the couple is purchasing and deliberately orphaning the child from their mother. I have not heard that term before, orphaning a child from their mother. Isn't that something we should be thinking about? Isn't it about what the children are about? Isn't that the reason why we used to have ratings and why they want to get rid of it? Because they've moved the focus.
They've completely moved the focus away. Now go for 10 years. We're going to start with a video that happens 10 years later. Now between 1999 and 2010, a a tectonic shift happened in the world, especially Western society. And this has moved from being a novel idea where people could criticise it in a meaningful way to where it's celebrated in open. And we're going to play this video real quick. This is video #1. Ryan, let's go and play this. I'm going to cut it off at some
point. Works. I don't know how long we're gonna run it, but I want you to get to see just how this story is covered. Then we'll go ahead and read some articles about it as well from the Daily Mirror. So let's go and do video #1. Me to Adam Miller and and Kyle Bond known each other seven years, been going out together how long And just over 2 years. And he had a civil partnership earlier earlier this year.
Yeah, right. So now you want to start the family, but the way the way you do is gonna, you know, there's an element of controversy in a civil partnership at the best of times. But you you really seem to be trying to to push the push the envelope as far as controversies concern. Tell us what you're going to do, what you're planning to do. Well, basically we've decided, you know, we've been together awhile now we've just, you know, become recently married and we've just decided that it's
time that we start a family. You know, we can provide a good upbringing for a child and as much love as a strike, but you don't want, you don't want any old baby. Though I know we don't do anything by half, so some people would maybe suggest adopting or fostering, but actually you're taking this one step further. So we did look into fostering and we've always wanted our biological children and we've always wanted them to look like us. So we looked like a a proper family.
So what we've done is we're going to have a surrogate, obviously to incubate our baby, so to speak, because obviously we haven't got room or anything. And we're going to have a friend of mine that's donating her eggs so she can give us some eggs to use. And then basically we're gonna have the baby made through IVF and there's a boy or girl. OK for you. And well, we're picking a boy first. But you can't do that, can you? The you just you you get, you get what you are lucky enough to
get a boy or a girl. Why specify boy? Well, that's the thing you see over in Los Angeles where we're having the treatment done. We can actually pick the sex. So we're going to select a boy first, then we're going to have a girl after and then we're going to have to win. And if you got you be telling me you want to just specific hair colour, eye colour. Now, yeah, we're gonna go for a baby boy and at the moment the names Preston, but that could
change so many times. But it's gonna have dark hair and blue eyes and that is only, you know if that's happened, what happens. It's not 100% guaranteed at all, but that's that's what we would prefer because we want the children to look like us, so we that we look like in complete family. So, well, they'll be biologically related to us and then they will look like us.
So we will look like a complete family and that's the sort of thing we want to do. So a couple things that are being said in the chat at this exact moment. Number one, you guys also honed in on the fact that the baby will be made and be incubated and this is not, this is not the way that we talk about children. Also that we are going to select, we're going to select the sex.
They're going to, they're going to go and have in vitro fertilisation, they're going to fertilise the number of eggs with their sperm and they're going to be able to create these these embryos and then they're going to select based on sex, which means that we're going to be casting some of them off.
That's also interesting. There's a there's a real dark sort of cost to IVF and anybody who's gone and done any of the looking on this, I think live action does really good and Abolition Rising does a good talk on this as well. What they're talking about has nothing to do with the child, has nothing to do about about providing a wonderful home for a child that needs it. They're going to create an accessory, an accessory that looks and makes them look like a
proper family. Their words, not mine. They want to select a boy first because that's what they're most interested in. And I want you to think about every time that you've ever had a conversation with your friends and family who have children, especially a pregnant wife. When that happens, the question is, do you want a boy or a girl? And the correct answer, you know, I would prefer this. I would prefer that our, our, our daughters have a brother.
I would prefer there's all kinds of little instincts on it. But the end of the day, if you really had to nail down almost any parent down, I've never heard anybody really say I'm going to be disappointed if I have one of the other. The answer is always, I want a healthy baby. That's the correct answer. If you don't know what the correct answer is and you have a pregnant spouse right now and you guys haven't found out the sex of your baby, that's the
that's the correct answer. I want a healthy baby. The end. That's what you should be aiming for. That's what your hope is. That's what your prayer is. And even if not, we had a very interesting experience going through our OBGYN where they were asking us about the, the prenatal screening. They do, they do all these screenings that they can charge you for. So they love the idea of it. And they were asking my wife and she was like, you know, why is
it important? And they're like, well, you can make a decision about the pregnancy if you find out that the baby may have some defects. And she was like, what sort of decisions? And they're really, really hesitant to say, well, you could, you could, you could terminate the pregnancy. She was like, you're asking me if I'm going to select my child and if my child is not healthy, then I'm going to have an abortion.
Is that what you're offering? And they're like, they're very uncomfortable about it because they know how ridiculous that sounds from 20 years ago. Today, it sounds normal to people. But even 20 years ago, that would have been absurd. And so I think we may have had the screenings on our first daughter. I don't, because we didn't know any better what was being offered or why, and that didn't happen. After that, we didn't do it again. Because why? Well, what am I gonna do with
this information? Nothing. We're going to have a baby and then we're going to love her or him and take care of them. Now we have 4. And the other thing is really interesting to show you a video a little bit later on. I find that people who are selecting and creating and making a by the way, this was gonna cost them $100,000. You wanna go ahead and pull up that article here from the Daily Mirror a gay couple to spend
$100,000 creating designer baby. OK, now when you're creating a designer baby, it's not about you. Imagine if you had to go out and buy a jacket and you were cold. And you, any jacket would do. In fact, Ryan, you gotta, you gotta, you have a sweatshirt on right now that I might, man, I might show you. Yeah, show. Show me. Show me what you got going on. So there it is. You got it. You. Express right here, so. Ryan has a Sherpa hoodie on because it's cold.
He sits. He's working in the studio, which is insulated less than it ought to be, and so he's got this suspendable Sherpa that would you would any other sweatshirt work if you recalled though Ryan? Now, I didn't cut it, man. This was it. I had to have this one. Ryan's only in designer babies. The fact of the matter is if you're if you're going over function, function is something that keeps you warm is good enough. A baby is a baby.
Unless you want a designer baby. And this is a fame hungry couple as described by the Daily Mirror, the now fame hungry wannabe couple who appeared on Britain Britain's Got Talent. They did a Britney Spears drag act. Oh, it always comes back to this ohm. Interesting. Why are the drag drag people interested in babies? They had a civil ceremony in July and then immediately recruited A surrogate mother.
The mother is a stunning female model pal who who's giving them eggs in return only for a 2000 LB pair of shoes, some designer shoes. The story of this is actually like one of the most nauseating things you'll ever read and many of you probably have not heard this. And of course this is now 13 years old. It says they went in through this selection process.
They also realised that sex selection wasn't illegal in Britain, so they had to fly to a third world country and go to Los Angeles in order to create this first child. And like all designer trendies, they're very choosy. They said they would also very choosy about whose egg they would use. Obviously. One woman said she would donate her eggs, but she wasn't suitable. She had hardly any nice clothes at all and that's just not what we want. Another woman was so money grabbing.
She said she wanted a credit card from us with no limit, so she could buy whatever she wanted every single month. But we found our perfect model donor. She's a friend, she's tall, she has dark hair, blue eyes. She's intelligent and very beautiful and we were talking about the baby one night and she just turned around and said go on then you can have my eggs. And we were so happy and she said she would donate again if we wanted to have more children.
And all she wants in return is a 2000 LB. Chair pair of Christian Louboutin. I have no idea what this brand is. Shoes. Now the kid, the guy adds that it'll cost them £100,000 from their savings and earnings, but it means they can have our perfect baby and we want a boy with dark hair and blue eyes, as you just heard. And we've been assured that that's what we can create. The way they do that is they create enough embryos and then they throw out the ones they don't want.
That's how that works. That's the hidden cost. They met us podium dancers. I don't know what the hell podium dancer is, but I can imagine in Birmingham three years ago and they've longed for a child really, really nauseating. Also, I don't know if you want to Scroll down, if you want to show the woman they allowed to have the the surrogate. Also, kind of funny, there's a surrogate named Jackie. You see that? If you go about 3/4 the way down the article, you may be able to
find that on there. Long and short of it is these people are interested in a custom accessory. They're not interested in a baby for the sake of the baby because they're trying to provide this thing. They found this woman who's on board with it. This woman looks exactly the opposite of what she would expect. Keep going down. There she is. That's their surrogate. She's the opposite of what the mom is going to look like.
So that's even weirder. All of this stuff is truly pretty just bizarre on every level, but it continues to go because it's all about it's all about the person involved. It's not about the babies. And so we have another example of that coming from Huffington Post. I felt this, this moves forward a couple years. We're going through the timeline here, folks.
This is 2016. This article is from their blog with tags under gay, lesbian and IVF in vitro fertilisation and the blog post is entitled Lesbian Designer Babies. No one has ever thought to control or limit the heterosexual production of babies. But suddenly when the LGBT couples by the way they didn't have more acronyms back in 20/16/2017, our force are attempting to build up a family then using medical methods. Suddenly the procedures are strictly regulated due to
ethical concerns. Caitlin McGarry is the contributor of This and economic Students at Wesleyan College and a lesbian. Interestingly enough, what Caitlin seems to not be paying attention to is that it has nothing to do with whether or not it's the LGBT part of it, the part that is the concern for most people. The ethical concerns I would imagine is having babies raised in a household with a biologically are impossible. So here she is. She opens her article with an
inflammatory statement. I hope he'll be tall, blue eyes, WAVY brown hair, and smart. He has to be smart. You thought I was talking about my future husband? I'm actually describing my ideal sperm donor vomit in my mouth. As a gay woman who will likely use artificial insemination and or in vitro fertilisation to start a family, this is the thing that's so insane. Why? What is the purpose of the family?
She says. I've watched the debates regarding the ethics of designer babies over the last few years with confusion and frustration. Everybody has an opinion on whether it's morally permissible for parents to influence the genes of their offspring. But very few of these voices come from the LGBTQ parents, who are overwhelmingly the concern of the consumers of artificial insemination and IVF technologies. The media is especially harsh when parents private decisions appear to enforce races or
ablist attitudes. That's even funnier to me when the left eats their own on this kind of stuff. They claim that white couples who only want white sperm donors are racist, and that the parents who choose to fertilise embryos with a lower chance of developing autism are ablist and eugenics and prejudice and all this other kind of stuff. Yes, of course all these things are kind of fun to watch them
eat their own on this. But the real reason comes down, I think, to the fact that there actually were laws historically, and they were they were cultural norms that were meant to protect children. They were designed to protect children. That the outcome was not about whether or not the lesbian couple gets to live their best life and have a designer baby or this gay couple can choose a little boy or a little girl with blue eyes and dark hair.
You know you don't get to choose those sort of things in real life, not when you just have a child. We always laugh like one of my we have a a streak of of red haired jeans in our family. I have an uncle with red hair and and my children have come out with like kind of Auburn looking hair and then they've changed. They've gotten darker. But it's always really interesting. We always laugh like it could happen. You never know you just it would look funny. Also my best friend is red
haired so that's also funny. He he kind of roots that on. Very weird to think that you think that you should be able to select your babies and that you would be able to basically terminate an embryo based on the way that they are biologically going to look. But it comes down to this fundamentally evil premise that has nothing to do with the child or their best existence or upbringing. I want to bring up this NPR article from about the same year
2016 as well. Says a gay couple wins a case, gains custody of baby born to tie surrogate again leaving, leaving first world nations like Spain and going to 3rd world places like Thailand or Los Angeles. Is the way that this is done. You have to actually leave places where they have a little shred of sanity and have a little bit more of that western Christian idea that they're supposed to be not terminating babies simply because of their gender or their sex as they're born.
Says the next story is one that goes about the length that one same sex couple has gone to have a family. They hired a surrogate mother in Thailand who carried A donor egg that was fertilised by one of the partners in that same sex marriage. The child was born. The mother claimed custody even though she said the baby should
not be raised with a gay couple. Oh, when the hold on when the when the when the child was born, the woman who donated the egg said that the baby should not be raised by a gay couple, but she's not the biological mother. Do you see the kind of ugly nastiness Discuss goes on. So what they did is they just left the the man.
One of the men from the couple stayed in Thailand with the surrogate because that's what's best, and hung out there with this baby, baby Carmen and refused to come back to the UK because the egg donor was filing a a custody claim on the child saying that this is inappropriate, donated the egg, maybe not knowing what couple was going to go to. And then it got litigated in the Bangkok Family Court, which made
it somehow legal. And then they can bring the baby back to the UK. Like, all this stuff is truly crazy to most of us. We're going to get into IVF in just a second, but I want to play this video because this makes me want to puke The same sort of vibes that you saw, the same sort of vibes that you saw from that British TV in 2010. Here's one from this year, the same exact sort of mockery of God as what Ryan just threw in the chat. And that's exactly it. Look at this.
I want you to look at the eyes. If any of you have ever held your your new baby, my, my, my daughter is just over like 12 weeks old. Now. If my wife and I are talking about our baby, we're not talking to each other. We're looking at the baby. Why? Because that's what you do. You look at babies, you you focus in.
That is the purpose. That is the focus of what you're trying to do. You're trying to do things that are for the child, and even if you're talking to someone else in their presence, I often find myself simply looking directly into my daughter's eyes. So watch what they are doing when they talk about this. This is video #5. This will probably make you guys want to puke in your mouth, but let's roll this thing out there. Let's just see it. You tell me what you think in the chat.
So this is how we chose our beautiful egg donut. So we wanted her to have a lovely big eyes. I wanted her to have really thick hair cause I've had two hair transplants. I wanted her to have a really wide, nice smile and just look like a kind person. Yeah. And we wanted her to be creative because we love the arts. Yeah. So how it works is you join up with the egg donor agency and you literally go through thousands. That's what Stuart That's what I did.
I went through thousand, thousand, thousand. I shortlisted them. Senator Francis. Yeah, him decide. And then we had three or four in front of me and then we have a diffusing calls with the ones that we liked and then the first I'm gonna let us down few minutes, so let us down yeah, humid. And then by the 3rd we literally found her and I was like, oh
she's incredible. And when we got on the zoom call we were like, we can't play it now, don't be too keen and luckily she said yes and this is the result. Look at our little accessory that we are choking out because we don't care about. We don't know how to handle babies because they have no idea, because it's just, it's completely, it's completely foreign. That's totally upside down. This is not about children.
It's not about children at all. Nothing about those two men holding that baby led you to believe that it was about kids. Look at the baby's eyes. The baby's just drifting off. Like, what am I doing? How did I end up in this, this hellish existence going to be pampered with a bunch of designer things, have a bunch of looks based standards that are not. They're not natural. It's totally outside of the norms. That's really gross to me and it makes me sad.
And so like I said, we talked about let's talk about IVF a little bit. Let's first let's do a quick thanks over to our friends over at 4 Patriots. You want to prepare for the coming disaster, maybe the biblical plague that is coming our way for all these sort of rings with God. If you if you keep track of the story of the Tower of Babel, it doesn't end real well for those who are building it, and we are clearly building it right now. You may need some survival stuff.
Go to fourpatriots.com/kyle, fourpatriots.com/kyle. Find yourself some some water purification, some of your stuff that you may be able to use dual purpose for both camping and RV but also for survival. Should things go sideways, check out the Survival food run. You want to click on the Survival food pack. There it is. Lots of different options there. You guys can go from 72 hour survival packs. That's just for one person, or you can go all the way up to the three month or the one year.
These things are designed to last 25 years. As long as you keep them in the shade and don't put them in direct heat, it tastes better than MRE. Despite some of you weirdos who like them. Yeah, there's a couple of you out there. I know. I keep getting messages of people like I don't know why people want to tell me that they really love MRE's. I feel like that's a that's like a character indictment. That's just something bad about you. Or maybe it says that you've
been institutionalised. Check out some of these really interesting products they've got on here. They've got these flashlights that are solar powered stuff. I'll tell you what, if you been in the dark and you've ever been in power outage, if you live in a place where you might lose power, having a backup option to be able to just see there's nothing weirder than being in your house and then suddenly realising that you have no ability, you're just going to
bump into your own stuff. You actually don't know your own house as well as you think you do. So anyway, go do 4 patriots com slash Kyle or just use the promo code Kyle. If you go to the website, check that out and get yourself prepared for forewarned. Is forearmed and be prepared. You never know. Somebody asked me if I know Dave Rubin. No, I don't know Dave Rubin, but I do not support Dave Rubin
having babies. My wife and I have talked about that quite a few times and it's pretty disgusting to me. He may be a really nice man, but it's narcissism. That's what that looks like to me. It looks like narcissism. If you are getting a baby, it has nothing to do with the baby. It has to do with you. That's what you want. You've made a lifestyle choice. The choice is that you have another partner and your partner is a man. Two men cannot make a baby.
Mr Roger, can you play the Mr. Rogers one more time? It's real quick. I just like that that video too. Let's do one more. Mine boys are boys. From the beginning. If you were born a boy, you stay a boy. Girls are girls right from the start. If you were born a girl, you stay a girl and grow up to be a lady. Everybody's fancy, Everybody's fine. Your body's fancy and so is mine. Only girls can be. Only girls can be a mommy. I mean, look, you choose your partner.
You choose your outcome. It seems like it's It used to be known for all of human history. You didn't get an error if you were a man who was married to a man or had a man as a partner. That's just the way it works. It's not that hard. It's not that hard, folks. And yet we are now in an era where let's pull up topic #7 here real quick.
If we'll get into the the IVF, this is the the Scientific American. And so they they're sort of trying to debunk some of the stuff, but at the same time, they're also also talking about sort of the cost of what it looks like says a new era of designer babies may be based on overhyped science. Yeah, it's actually old science. The science is trial and error. It's the equivalent of if you go and have it, it's like the Henry the Eighth style.
Instead of instead of getting rid of each wife that provides them with not a son, he gets rid of the baby too. That's kind of the way it works. Genetic testing with IVF is being marketed as a means to choose healthy embryos despite questions about the soundness of the technology. For better or worse, genetic testing of embryos offer a potential gateway into the new era of human control over
reproduction. Couples at risk of having a child with a severe or life limiting disease such as cystic fibrosis or Deshane's muscular dystrophy have used pre implantation genetic testing for decades to select embryos created through IVF. There is an argument here that is actually you look. The argument here is actually in favour of the child's life and that there is at least a discussion here that is reasonable.
The reasonable discussion is if you had a choice between implanting an embryo that was going to to have a negative outcome and a very difficult experience on the planet, then you've got that. You've at least got a moral foundation saying that you are looking to be what would be the best for the child, not the parent per se. The designer baby movement is like, how do we make this, this
child look nicest? OK, now they always try to couch it, the likelihood of confronting common illnesses like heart disease or diabetes or schizophrenia and so on. And would you pass these things on Parents to be can use IVF along with orchard this is a company that they're talking about here. This this company called Orchard Biosciences upcoming embryo screening packages to identify the healthiest of their embryos and then only implant those for
pregnancy. Man. You know, if you're trying to screen out for certain genetic diseases, that's going to have a child that doesn't, that doesn't live long. There's something there. Ryan and I were talking about that offline and we can, but there's also, if you want to, to screen based on whether or not you are going to be having these problems, you can actually screen a lot of these things before you marry somebody. And people you see that that used to be the entire reason why
they did blood test. You guys know that they used to do blood tests. They would say you go out there, you go to the courthouse and you have to get a blood test. And I think, I think my wife and I did a blood test. They try to make sure that you are not immediate immediately biologically related because once you are, we've determined that you have basically narrowed the amount of the gene pool and you increase the likelihood of certain rare recessive diseases.
If you have one, you're more likely to pass it along because recessive recessive genes can only go that route. So if you are more biologically related to your spouse, if you are much closer related to them, then you you have that higher instances of rare genetic disorders. They've actually found this in the Brits.
The British population is this weird study because they brought in all these different people, the Muslim majority countries, and there tends to be a high incidence of inbreeding that goes on in those populations and they account for like a third. There's something like under 5% of the total population of Britain. I remember reading the study I think we've covered on the show before.
They're under 5% of the overall population of Great Britain, but they account for like 33% or more of the rare genetic disorder. So that was the goal. The goal was, is you actually decide whether or not your partner is biologically compatible. And one of them was, is like, you can't be that closely related. That's why you can't marry your sister, your cousin. You're not supposed to.
I guess some people do. If you're like Angelina Jolie or whatever her name is, but you're not supposed to, that's the whole goal. And the and the reason is for the children it's focused on. Those were laws that were put in place specifically for children to make children have better outcomes as the opposite of what we're talking about here. In any case, what this article goes on to say is essentially that this foundation is that they really can't do all these
things. So what they do is they just do it the old fashioned way, which is you make a bunch of things, you sort out the things you like and you just keep the ones that are good. And that is essentially what designer babies looks like. It means you are calling a soul
out of the void. If you're a Catholic or you're even a most pro life Christians, you're going to believe that life starts at conception, that the the soul is cold from the void into existence put into this body and then you are going to cast them aside or keep them in suspended animation forever. You notice that one of these, this, this, the the couple will talk about how the the female was going to give them multiple
eggs. They were going to have a boy first, but then after that they would have a girl. After that they would have a girl. So they would have multiple, you know, babies. And that baby would be able to be just sort of sitting in suspended animation, conceived at the same time but waiting for later. I've seen this with my own eyes.
I don't want to get into the personal experience because it's not my story to tell, but there is a story in our family that is actually really tragic about the same sort of thing. And one of the two had a good outcome, and one of them has a very bad outcome so far and is living a very difficult life because the parent chose an accessory child and not a child
for the sake of the child. Which is why there's this weird line we walk when you're a parent because having children is one of the most selfish things you can do, but at the same time, it's the most selfless thing you can do. You've basically said, I think the world needs more me, right? Right. You know, I'm talking about you say the world needs more than me, and so you have children.
My wife and I made the decision about four, so the world needed more of us. We thought that's kind of what you do. But then you basically sacrificed your life for the next 18 years, making sure that those people are successful. It's a mix. It's a real interesting dynamic that is very different than when you choose a designer baby. And I think it's really
nauseating. Let's go bring up our our fearless Mayor Pete Gay. Pete Buttigieg, Z and his family says that his family deserves to be supported. In response to the House Speaker's previous comment, this was his claim that Mike Johnson, the new Speaker of the House, here, is a real problem, and it's because he doesn't support Pete Buttigieg's family. I I join Mike Johnson in this particular situation. Here's what people just says on
CNN. I think we've actually even played this clip here, but I'll just read it, he said. I will admit it's a bit difficult driving the family minivan to drop our kids off at daycare, passing the Dome of the Capitol, knowing that the speaker of the House sitting under that Dome doesn't even think our family ought to exist. That is not, historically a strange position to hold biologically and and historically, their family shouldn't exist. Period. No caveat. None at all.
Alright, but because we are living in a world where they are going to celebrate 2 gay men having a child that they spend $100,000 on, not only do they have to break the laws of their country and leave their country in order to do so, it's like baby tourism. You know, we we look really sort of not very fondly on people that engage in what's called sex
tourism. They'll they'll leave the United States and they'll go engage where prostitution is allowed and they'll go and do that and they'll come back here. It's not illegal. They've broken the law in some other place and since they're not in the United States, not breaking U.S. law. But it's not exactly like if your friend tells you that he likes to go whoring in in Thailand for one month out of every year, I don't know. That's probably not someone that I'm going to be wanting to
associate with. I'm certainly not to let people like that around my kids. It's the same kind of idea to me that it it takes that sort of mentality for people in Britain to be able to have a baby. They have to actually come to the United States, where our standards are lower and do not protect children in the same way. Johnson, who secured the Speaker's gavel last month, this is going back from the beginning of last month now.
This is a one month old article. So now, two months ago, has a history of harsh anti-gay language from his time as an attorney for a socially conservative legal group in the mid 2000s, the mid 2000s. That would have been 5/06/07. You know, right before they started pushing this agenda like we saw in that 2010 little article. It's just, it's very interesting to me how quickly that slippery
slope has slid. It really has gone very quickly, hasn't it, From that point where people were talking about, hey, are you really removing a baby from from his or her mother. And you are now making that child an orphan in that way to you're a bigot if you don't accept our family, which biologically can't exist and require science and the casting off of embryos left and right. I know this is sort of a heavy topic to start on Monday on, so there's that.
But it's interesting, he said there's another editorial that says your race, creed, sex are what you are and while homosexuality are cross dressing are things that you do. This is something that Mike Johnson said, I totally agree with that. Look, you've made a certain choices. You could choose to ignore that particular impulse. I'm not saying you should if you're gay. I think you should be gay if that's what you are. Do what you do.
I don't need to judge you. I got enough sins of my own. But I do know that you shouldn't be bringing babies in. I know that's true, he said. This is a free country, but we don't give special protections for every person's bizarre choices, and they are statistically very, very rare, all things considered, Overwhelmingly, this is not how
babies are made. In fact, even that 2016 article from HuffPost acknowledges that the biggest consumers right now of this particular technology are not are not heterosexual couples. They're actually homosexual couples that are stepping outside the bounds of what happens in nature and they're doing it through science. And I'm not confident it's very good.
Like I said, a modern day Tower of Babel in so many ways, let's bring up the the inevitable consequence of where this goes, because the inevitable consequence about this is that it actually ends 2 bigotry in the opposite direction. We've done a full swing from 1999 to 2023. We bring up that topic from Catholic News Agency. This story, which we we touched on briefly, was carried in the loop. So if you're not getting the loop, this is one of the things you're missing out on A story
that I think is of relevance. This is the story of Michael and Catherine Burke. They live in Southampton, MA. That's their mistake. They chose to live in a place that is so overwhelmingly left wing that they were actually denied approval to become foster parents. They're not trying to create babies. Their foster parents, they wanna be foster parents.
They wanna take kids who have no parents, or whose parents are now in some sort of dire straits where they are no longer able to provide to them, whether they be drug addicts or abuse or whatever else. And the foster care authorities denied this Catholic couple approval to become foster parents simply because they hold true to the Catholic teaching on marriage, on sex, on gender. And so now they filed a lawsuit. He's an Iraq war veteran. He owns a small business.
He's an organist for the diocese, plays organ at church. Catherine is a special education caregiver, a small business owner, and she also sings for their diocese in in the churches. She's a cancer at Masses and the lawsuit which was filed basically said that they're loving couple, they just want to welcome children to their home. They've experienced infertility, They've applied to become foster
parents. They've gone through all the lengthy interviews, 30 hours worth of training, home assessment, health assessment, family life assessment. However, they're troubled because many of their home interview questions focus on their Catholic views about sexual orientation and gender dysphoria, which is in fact pretty rare. Statistically, whether you like it or not, it's not the overwhelming average and is not
the most common thing. And after months of interviewing and training and after years of heartbreak because they couldn't become parents on their own, are on the verge of finally becoming parents. They were absolutely devastated to learn that the state of Massachusetts would rather let children sleep in the hallways of a hospital than let them welcome them into their home when they needed it.
And that was simply because the authorities stated that, according to their interviews and based on what they learned, that they would not be affirming to a child who identifies as LGBTQ LGBTQIA man. We covered this about how the government agencies are doing the same thing, but this is where it ends. It ends with people who would otherwise offer a good home who are only interested in this case, or I would say, would our majority interested in offering.
They've gone through all these hoops. Is it simply because Is it about money? No, they're not. They don't seem to be particularly wealthy. They're small business owners, but the fact that they have traditional views about things that have been basically held for all 10,000 years that human beings been walking around on this planet, they're the problem now. They're the outlier. And that's the radical shift that we've seen. It used to be about us protecting children.
And if you were interested in protecting children, what you would do is you would actually only have children in homes that affirm children's safety and their nutrition and that they get hugs and they're cared for and they're looked after and their education is continued. And not whether or not that we affirm some sort of like fringe sexual identity that doesn't even have any play that is still in NC 17 for them to be able to
carry out in real life. Because the kids that we're talking about being adopted are gonna be all under the age of 18 cause they age out of the system at that point And that's something, it's pretty crazy and it also leads to awful and immoral positions like this one from video 4. We're going to play this. If you guys don't know the story, this is the kind of stuff that my wife and I are always
talking about in the background. These are the things that outrage my wife and women like her, the women that kind of hang out. We just did a birthday party for our five year old. She's about to turn 5. My middle, my middle daughter. And when women get together, they talk about things like labour, pains and pregnancies and how many children they have and raising children and the functions of things that go along with that.
Men don't talk about that. That's not what men get around and do not, in my experience at least. And I've been around a lot of men for a long time and I was in the military with a bunch of men. That's not what we get around and talk about. Women talk about things that are uniquely situated towards child rearing when they are mothers and they talk about things like this. That's why this is so horrifying. This is the kind of stuff that
they share. They do #4 let's go and just run it. It's a woman giving commentary. You guys are not going to believe this. Two men hired surrogate Brittany Pearson to have a baby for them. And when she. Was 22 weeks pregnant. They found out that she had breast cancer, so she wanted to have chemotherapy immediately and offered to deliver the baby at 25 weeks so that the baby would have a chance at survival and she could also survive and have her chemotherapy treatment.
The couple did not want her to have the baby at 25 weeks, but she needed her treatment so they told her to abort the baby. She refused to abort a perfectly healthy maybe. She offered to adopt the baby. They said no. They threatened her with legal action, and so she had the baby at 25 weeks. The couple then allowed the baby to die without having any kind of medical services because they didn't want a baby with any kind of health issues that was born
before 38 weeks. This is medical murder, and it's legal in California. It's medical murder, California. Like I said, Third World nation. That's where people go to do their most absurd and disgusting things. I don't need to add any commentary on what she said. That's it. That's the story, is the story. You guys probably already heard this thing. If you're paying attention, if you have not, this is the kind of stuff, like I said, my wife and I discussed on a regular
basis. These are the kind of things that are out there and we're just bringing it in this show because I think it makes sense. Should we leave with something a little bit light hearted? I I get it. That's heavy and and and appropriately so. I just want to throw something kind of like some levity into it over the Over the weekend, FBI jobs continue to put out their absurdities, and our friend FBI Panty Raid made some fun commentary on this. This video is also presented
with no commentary. Let's just play it because it's fun. Video #3. A little bit of lighter way to start off your week. Just think, if you are physically or mentally disabled, you could also be part of the elite workforce of the FBI. Go ahead and fire it up, Video #3. The FBI is looking for the best and brightest people, and with more than 30,000 employees, not everyone is a special agent. About 2/3 of those people are what are what are considered
professional support staff. So those are people that don't carry guns, that don't carry badges. That's my girl specialist who has a vision impairment and says even if you have a disability, you can apply to work at the FBI. Matter of fact, you know they are encouraged to do so. And the fact that just because you do have a disability doesn't mean that you can't do the job. Garlic has worked at FBI headquarters and several field offices and says reasonable accommodations are provided for
persons with disabilities. If you apply and you get the job within the FBI, then the FBI will supply you with the tools to do your job. Our jobs at the FBI for you go to www.fbijobs.gov I'm Neil, chief of the Bureau, and that's what's happening at the FBI this week. That's what happened at the FBI this week. All they're saying is that they comply with federal employment
law, which is a requirement. But what they will also not tell you is that if you're a conservative, or if you happen to vote for Trump or you think that he's the guy that is actually incompatible with FBI service, many of you guys already know that instinctively, that's just the way it works. That's it for today, folks. We're going to wrap this thing up with a couple of thank yous #1. If you have not hit the like button on Rumble, this may be a
somewhat controversial topic. So go ahead and let them know that you appreciated us sharing it. Give us comments, grow if you agree, If you disagree, I went through a sales training once. They said questions, comments, sarcastic marks. Go ahead and leave those down in the comments, not in the chat. We'll take them and maybe take a look at them for tomorrow. Let's do some thank yous.
How about our five star reviews? If you guys are listening on Apple, on Spotify, on iHeartRadio, you can leave us a five star review for the audio podcast. We appreciate when you do JB 7778, said good dude with quality contact entertaining. Check. Valuable content? Check. Decent, honest person at the helm? Check. Shaka sign. Keep rolling. Serafin. I will do it. Thanks JB. Appreciate you guys. We're clearing. We're coming up on 855 Star Review, so keep keep them.
Women, as we go towards the new year, we really appreciate. You guys do. We may not hit 1000, but we do appreciate all of that. And let's do some, some rumble rants here from Jack Penis, says you. Who else doesn't like MRE's? Gay dudes who designed babies? Probably true. That's definitely true. Justice is Blonde says. No Pete. You don't deserve anything. You either earn it or it's given to you by grace. You are owed nothing.
And peace, Sturgis, with the last minute comment saying I'm grateful for all the work you do to keep us informed. From now on, my rants will be in memory of my mom and dad. Rest in peace, Bonnie and Paul. The facts that killed them. Man, that's tough news. Yeah, well, rest in peace to both of your parents. I'm sorry that they that your family is going through that, especially at this time of year.
I feel like it's one of the time of year when when death is particularly hard for us to to deal with. So that being said, we're celebrating life in the life and the birth of Christ and maybe the birth of babies. So maybe this Advent, maybe as we are in the Christmas season, we can remember that it was about the coming of God to man.
And most importantly, he came in the form of a child, a defenceless child, because our society was literally built up in, in the Christian tradition, in the Western tradition, to defend and protect children. That's the message that I took away from this sort of thing. That's what I thought about when I was putting this together. I hope that means something to you. We do appreciate all of you guys and we really will look forward to seeing you again tomorrow.
Go out there in the world, Have a great day. Be safe. God bless you all. Talk to you in the morning. Thanks for listening to the Kyle Serafin Show streamed live weekdays on rubble.com/kyle Serafin. Follow Kyle on Twitter through social and Instagram at Kyle Serafin.