UNBURDENED by what has BEEN: Kash and Kamala, cut from the same cloth | Ep 724

Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an American patriot. Prepare to embrace the uncomfortable truth because this program has no time for comforting lies. Here is civil liberties enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello, my friends, and welcome to the Kyle Seraphin Show. Today is Tuesday, it is January the 27th, and I welcome you to today's program. We're going to have a little bit

of fun today. I think we're going to be talking about something that I haven't heard anyone else discuss, and I feel like it needs to be done. I'm pretty sure that Kamala Harris and Kash Patel are the same person, the male and female version of the same person. They're both unburdened by what has been, and that means I'm going to subject you to some Kamala Harris just as a reminder of who could have been president.

The problem with picking people that don't have any principles, that if you go out there and you grab human beings that are essentially political water, you pour them into a vessel and they will fill whatever that space is, is that you get people that are squishy and sloshy and they don't have any principles. And we're seeing that in real time right now. I'm watching this strange moment of the FBI director who presented himself as being based and, you know, ultra

conservative. And he was going to go out and solve all the problems that we had that we didn't want to get killed off by a weaponized government. So we are going to see, you know, somebody go and dis dismantle that weapon system. And instead, what we've seen is a male version of the word salad. And they have other similarities as well. They both like pink jackets. They both are mediocre attorneys. They both are first generation Americans of Indian descent, at least halfway.

So yeah, I'm going to punish you a little bit with that. But I think we're going to laugh about it a bit. I hope we can. It's funny to watch how ridiculous our national politics are. The theater of it is good. Believe me. It's going to be a six to one version of Patel versus Kamala. I think we all got a pretty good taste of Kamala in the short little bit that she did a campaign. So that's what I want to talk about.

We're going to obviously talk about the situation that continues to develop in Minnesota. I think it is a a strange opportunity the Trump administration is missing. Maybe they've just missed where the base is. Maybe they wouldn't miss where the American people are, broadly speaking. But they're losing the narrative and they're losing the narrative war, more importantly. And so the left is slowly carving off the piece of reasonableness.

And that's not a good thing. Not for the bacon cheeseburger nationalist, not for the dominant culture of Americans in America. So that's happening currently. And I don't know what the turn around is, but I'll tell you what it is not. It is not capitulation. It is not softness, and it is not handing things over and allowing someone else to decide what is and what is not going on. And it seems like the Trump administration has actually done sort of a tactical withdrawal.

They're trying to, I don't know, go soft the the base. And actually the mainstream American position is the opposite. They should be pushing harder now. They should be doubling down, not pulling out people who have been upsetting the radical leftist, but capitulating to the radical leftist. That's exactly the way you'd expect them to be. Progressives push until they hit steal. And what they found is that the Trump administration doesn't

like mean tweets. They don't actually like getting bad coverage on social media from like mobs of of bots and and otherwise sort of mentally unwell people. So there you go. That's what's going to happen. So we're going to talk about all those stuff and also the possibility that I am no longer going to describe myself as a Texan. Texas, I'm very disappointed in you. In the last couple days, it's been, it's been devastating for me personally and I'm going to

show you. We're going to have to. We did the meme here in Texas. People, if you haven't seen the meme, I'll show it to you. All right, before we do that, the show is brought to you by my friends over at Undertack. Yes, they are the world's most comfortable underwear. I think that's probably true. They're probably right up there. Valentine's Day is coming. Our friends over at Undertack want to make sure that you're prepared. Prepared you say yes, this is a holiday we're having.

The right gear actually matters. So let's be honest, it's not about chocolates, it's not about flowers, it's about what you might be wearing or not wearing when things get a little bit less formal. And that's where Undertack can come in, the tactical operations in the post dinner situations, premium tactical underwear designed for and tested by real special forces guys operating in Africa.

I don't know what sort of less formal scenarios these guys are doing or bedroom situations, but I hope it's minimal for their own sake. Just thinking about the populations in Africa. All right, These are insanely comfortable undies. They're breathable. They're naturally antibacterial. They're built to perform when things heat up or go sideways. Yeah, they have a hidden E&E pocket in case you need extra sustenance. If you need a getaway amount of money.

Maybe you need an almond to power your marathon run that you do afterwards. I don't know if you're my buddy, Steve friend. That's what you keep back there. It's perfect for cash or handcuff keys or whatever sort of strange situations you guys are into. I don't know what your world's are about. So there you go. You got options. 20% off right now with Kyle, 2020% off with the promo code Kyle 20. Go to Undertac. That's UNDER tac.com, Undertac 20. I'm sorry, kyle20@undertac.com.

That's how you guys get the deal there. They also have other cool stuff too. They've got socks, which I wear when I work out. They've got hoodies. They've got joggers. They've got a women's line which look like booty shorts. I don't know what else you call them, but they look comfy. Their models look attractive in booty shorts. Maybe your model looks attractive too, so you can consider that as a Valentine's Day gift. There's a link in the show description.

That's all we're going to say about undies today. Think the rest of this is going to be far more above the belt hope you guys hope you guys stay tuned and make sure you like this video as we get going here we go all right as you guys can tell my voice is still not 100%

rehabbed. I would like to rehab my voice, but I also have children, which means my children don't do what they're supposed to do. And then they've been kind of doing or like all the dumb things you can imagine when we have a tiny little bit of snow, which we do in Texas right now. And so I'm not trying to bury white you. I'm just grovely and reedy from a a week of yelling in Las Vegas. All right, the meme.

The meme is something that people from actual tough, hard, cold places send to people in Texas who think that they're really tough. It looks like this. You guys may have seen this before. I actually like it. I like it quite a bit. For those of you that are just listening, allow me to describe it. It says when Texans talk about how badass they are and you've got a little kind of kid in skinny, skinny jeans wearing a cute little cowboy hat.

And he's wearing a pink and checkered cowboy button up Wrangler style shirt with a big old belt buckle. And he's got his boots on and he does a little spin and then he does that gotcha guns. And then it says on the other side, Montana, Idaho, Wyoming. And it's it's the guy from Aquaman whose name escapes me at the moment, wearing a woolen coat, doing this sort of like standing in the tundra with his hair blowing and frost in his beard, just looking with

disdain. Yesterday I had that moment. I went out and drove in the snowpocalypse that is Austin, TX. And it was really, really disappointing. Austin people, you guys are terrible. They shut down the road, they shut down the highways. I tried to go something that was 23 minutes away. It took me, it took me 50 something minutes. Jason Momoa, that's his name. Manoa. Manoa, Something you guys don't women, You know who he is? Heartthrob.

OK, here's the deal. It took forever to go somewhere and it shouldn't have been that big of a deal. I was driving on the highways, which were wet and not even slick. Of course, I'm driving in a reasonable size pickup truck, an actual pickup truck, not like a not like one of these little Tacomas or F1 fifties or something. But I'm driving out there just watching people white knuckling it, scared of water on the roads, little bit of snow on the side.

Very disappointing. And for those of you that are in the chat, I see you. I see you in the chat right now saying that Austin is not real Texas. Back off. All of the people in Houston drive like shit whenever there's a little bit of stuff on the water on the ground, especially when it's cold out. Same thing in Dallas, same thing in San Antonio. Don't act like you guys can handle a little bit of ice and snow. You cannot.

There's not even a freaking snow truck or a snow plower or a salt truck in the entire state as far as I can tell. I have done surveillance on people in Virginia in my own county that had access to more snow equipment than the entire state of Texas does. That's just because it doesn't snow here very often. But it was really disappointing. And this, this meme was the only thing I could see when I'm

driving. I'm just driving along looking over and seeing all these little kids in the in the pink shirts going, look how cool we are. We're out driving. We've got 4 wheel drive doing 40 miles an hour on the highway as I go past them doing the normal speed because it wasn't even freaking icy guys, that it wasn't even snowy. There was just snow on the ground in the vicinity. We could see snow. And so people panicked. Anyhow, that's not what I'm going to talk about today.

But I did want at least address that because it really hurt my feelings. I wanted it to be tougher. And now I'm going to hurt your feelings. Are you ready? There she is. Do you remember her? She looks like her proportions are all off. That's Kamala Harris. She was the Democratic nominee for president. They thought she might have a real shot. I was. I'm reminded of something kind of funny that happened. There are various conservative groups. I won't name them right now.

I don't need to shame them. I generally like what they do. But there are some conservative groups that were doing some war game scenarios during the 2024 election season, and they were considering what would be the play to get Joe Biden in to office. How would they do it?

And one of my buddies who will remain nameless and is welcome to expose himself later on if we talk in the future, one of my buddies did a war game scenario with them, was out there trying to figure out what would the Democrats try to do. And the thing he suggested is that they would swap the presidential candidates. They would drop Joe Biden, who was obviously feeble and destroyed and having a bad time in the debates. And they would sub in somebody else. They would do a pinch hitter.

And this conservative group threw out that possibility because it was unreasonable. And then we got this lady, this purple jacket wearing, what do you call her? She's just a woman who's essentially A communist, and she's unburdened by what has been right. That was the famous quote. And that meant for me that no matter what had previously been said, we could get a Kamala Harris to say something completely different. And she would act like she didn't say the first thing.

And today we have that same person with a male body, I assume, operating as the director of the FBI. And shame on me because I didn't vet the guy. And I've already said I'm sorry, but I'll say I'm sorry again. I thought that Cash Patel was going to get it done. I thought this guy was saying all the right things and it made sense. It sounded like he understood the problem when he went to people who did understand the problem. Then he turned around and said

the words that we were saying. He he told people the same things that we were saying because I knew it wasn't his words. They were they were mine, including some of the stuff he said while he was at his his

confirmation hearing. One of the things I pointed out to Patel and he he was happy to take on was during his confirmation hearing, he pointed out that the FBI had gotten away from a thing in the core values, had gotten away from rigid obedience to the Constitution of the United States of America.

And I told him that I said when I was there somewhere in the first week of September in 2020, the FBI changed their core value system, changed their fundamental mission profile, and they dropped rigid obedience to the Constitution of the United States of America to the 7th position. And it was below things like diversity and compassion and respect. NFI in the Intel world. I will use this regularly. No further information. I used no further information as kind of a discreditor.

This is something that you might say, you get somebody, you interview them and they'd say, yes, I'm pretty confident that they were actually weaponized ladybugs. They were all flying into my house and they were a slowly taking apart the walls. And the person would be giving you that information. You're an agent. You're, you know, a human gatherer. And so you would write down what they said and you would do it in, in a, in a direct quote. And then afterwards you'd put in

parentheses NFI. In other words, I have no further information about what this person said. And it sounds crazy to me, but there you go. That's what he said. Here's Kash Patel. Just kidding. This is actually Kamala Harris. This is the preparatory, the understanding of what we're getting into here. This is someone who doesn't seem to care one way or another about the the previous thing said, and she told you this was her values.

I just didn't realize this was universal to people that were like her mediocre attorneys of Indian descent who had first generation, you know, upbringings in the United States who desperately and aggressively wanted to be something or someone and it didn't really matter how they got there. Maybe that's why he stabbed those of us in the back.

They were expecting those of you out there in the in the audience listening and those of us who knew him personally a little bit, we all thought we were going to get something better. Instead we basically got the male version of this. Imagine what can be and be unburdened by what has been. You know what can be unburdened by what has been, what can be unburdened by what has been, what can be unburdened by what has been, what can be unburdened by what has been.

What we can see, what we believe can be unburdened by what has. What can be unburdened by what has been. What can be unburdened by what has been. What can be unburdened by what has been? What can be unburdened by what has been? Who we can be unburdened by who we have been? What can be unburdened by what has been? Where we can be unburdened by where we have been, and unburdened by where we are right now. What can be unburdened by what has been? What can be unburdened by what has been?

What can be unburdened by what has been? What could be? Is that enough? Is that enough for you guys? Sorry, I said. I was sorry up front, didn't I? It's so. It's so powerful when you put that piano music behind it, it really makes you more pensive and thoughtful. I wish we could put some piano behind some of the Fox News stuff. And so we will. Here's here's that guy. This is the stuff we played you yesterday. I'm making a point to you early

on here. I want you guys to see the main point, which is that Patel will go out and say something that he thinks is the right answer. He recognizes that it's not the right answer because he must have either he's scrolling or his people are scrolling. Maybe Erica Knight, his publicist are sit there scrolling and they're looking. They're like, Oh no. And So what is it?

What do they do? They immediately flip it on his head and they will just go back like they never did that they like they never said that you can't carry a gun to a protest that you can't have certain things you can't do certain like they immediately will pivot. They go from tyrannical to semi reasonable to full libertarian within the same 24 hour period and they act like it's never been. I don't know who the audience is for this.

They they seem to pretend, and maybe this is just the Fox News audience, that whoever is listening has the memory of a goldfish. You tell me I'm wrong. But as secretary, no, I'm said no one who wants to be peaceful shows up at a protest with a firearm that is loaded with two full magazines. That is not a peaceful protest. And you do not get to touch law enforcement. You do that anywhere. This FBI is going to be following the leading the charge to arrest those.

But but how was he threatening Border Patrol? You. You've collected the evidence, you said, right? You have the handgun in your possession. That's right. And, and how was he using that handgun in terms of threatening Border Patrol? What was the threat? He had his camera, right? He was filming it. That's something that I let the DHS and the prosecutors, because they are the ones investigating that case. I don't want to stylize that evidence, but I trust them.

All right, let's not stylize the evidence. I do, please. Whatever you do, Patel, can you just not stylize the evidence? Because I don't know what we would do if you had stylized evidence, whatever the hell that means. His word salads are always my favorite. OK, You got pushed back on by a woman working at Fox who is inclined to agree with you, who is inclined to do the best thing possible, to present you in the most favorable light. And you sounded like a fool.

Why was that? Oh, because the things you were saying or not, they were not reasonable. And the minute that you got confronted, like, hey, wait, what was he doing? He had a phone in his hand. Was that dangerous? What happens? Bam. Listen, I'm not trying to stylize some evidence here. That's a Kamala Harris word salad that's as good as anything out there. And then he started on the clean up routine.

Patel immediately turned around and went on Benny Johnson and Sean Hannity and did everything he could to backtrack and almost pretend like he hadn't just said those stupid things that he said. You can absolutely show up at a protest with a with a firearm and a magazine or two magazines or 11 magazines. If you're so weird that you want to carry them in a backpack, nobody cares. I would do that in a heartbeat. And I have done that.

I've showed up to the No Kings rally carrying extra magazines. You know why? Because there's a bunch of people and they're doing wild stuff. And if you have to shoot your way out of it, which I don't think you're going to have to do, but it's least something that we can prepare for. It takes very little for me to add like another magazine on there.

Now, the general rule, and I'm going to put this out there as something for the chat to consider, if you're in America and you have a choice not to go somewhere where something stupid or dangerous is happening, where you don't need to actually carry extra magazines, you could do what DJ Shipley said. He's a former SEAL Team Six guy. He runs GBRS, does a lot of

training for people right now. It's one of my favorite, sort of like in the, I don't know, SEAL Team influencer type guys only because some of the stuff he says really resonates with me. Consider this, if you need an extra magazine, then you probably should be wearing a plate carrier. If you're wearing a plate carrier, then you ought to be

carrying a rifle. If you need to carry a rifle and a plate carrier to go somewhere in America, then you should be asking questions like, why do I have to go to this place? Now, there are reasons that you might. In my case, I want to do some press coverage. I want to do some riot coverage. I want to go to a place that might get a little bit spicy. So sure, I'll do that, but I know exactly what I'm doing and it's a real specific thing.

If it's my everyday where I have to go into a grocery store and I'm have to think about carrying a plate carrier and extra magazines to go into my grocery store, maybe I find a different grocery store because you got choices in America, there's reasons that you may not want to carry additional stuff. Mostly you're you're taking on certain risks, but. Under the circumstances where you say, listen, I need to be

out there to protest. I don't know why you feel that way, but I'm but you're allowed to. You're allowed to protest. It is the position of this show, First Amendment absolutism. If you want to protest, do it now. If you're violating like various little laws and stuff like that as you do so, like you're blocking traffic on a freeway or you're doing other dumb things, I'm not a big fan of that. I don't think that makes sense. But I'll tell you something. This is the reason why we're

losing this this narrative war. What you're not seeing is the Trump administration point out enough. I saw Christina do it once, so I'll give her credit. What you're not seeing is people point out that there are crimes being committed, but those crimes are not federal crimes. It would be really nice for me if we saw people actually hold on to their principles. The federal principle of this administration ought to be close to 2nd Amendment absolutism.

It's not, regardless of whatever Harmony Dylan and her blocking of everybody who doesn't agree with her says. It's not the position of this administration that we're dealing with a Second Amendment absolutist and I'd like to see almost a First Amendment absolutism too. That'd be the conservative position. Allow me to say something else. I would very much like to see maybe the next presidential cycle, maybe we could get a political right wing in this country.

Because as it stands right now, and I don't know any other way to say it, we are dealing with hard leftism, which is essentially collectivism bordering on the communist, Marxist, socialist, take your pick. That's what's that's the driving ethos of the hard left. And so that's where the Democrat Party is at least looking, whether or not they're there yet, they're putting a foot in the in that pool. And the alternative to that is 90s liberalism. That's Donald Trump.

Every person that I see that puts this crazy nonsense out that says Donald Trump is the most conservative president of my lifetime, you're a crazy person. Donald Trump is more liberal than Bill Clinton was on most things. That's just how it is, right? Pro gay marriage. That was not a thing that was being discussed. He's open to abortion. He's not even saying the safe legal rare. He's saying he's pro-life. But at the same time, he's talking out of both sides of his mouth.

He showed up at the March for Life, which sounded great. And then they turn around and they do other things that sort of cut it back. We have 90s liberals AKA 90s Democrats versus today's Democrats when we have elections and we have a few people that hold principle that are not water, that are not Kamala Harris slash Cash Patel and they're considered jerks. They're considered problematic.

It would be nice if the bacon cheeseburger nationalist had someone that represented our basic dominant culture without apology. And that's what I'm saying. It's like, listen, I don't I'm not being mean to you if you think that you're married to a woman and you're another woman. I'm not trying to be mean. I'm not saying that you're not a person. I'm not saying that you don't love somebody. I'm just saying that that's not

marriage. That's not that's not a tempting to to subjugate you or anything else. And then you can do whatever the hell you want. You and another consenting adult knock yourself out, but don't try to present the same thing that it is a marriage between a man and a woman. That used to be not just like a common idea. That was the dominant idea in America. And I think it still is.

How many of you hear that somebody, a man, is married to a man and you think that's his quote UN quote husband, but you don't think it's actually his husband because you don't think that's actually marriage. Regardless of what's public society or polite society, it forces on you. This is the same kind of stuff when I'd have my mother, who I love, I love dearly, say things like that's not politically

correct. When I would say things, it's like, yeah, I don't care about political correctness. I just care about reality. I just care about the world that I live in and the world that I grew up in, and I don't want to try to present some fake nonsense simply because it makes people happier. It makes them feel better about something that's not real. You're not actually married. I'm not mad at you. Doesn't mean that you haven't dedicated your life to that person.

It's just not the same. I promise you it's not. How do I know? Because I can't experience what you're doing. But you definitely can't experience what I'm doing. A male and a female bringing other life into the world. It's just not. And it turns out it worked all the time for all of human history, right up until about 15 seconds ago. So there is no political right in this country.

And when that happens, you end up with this weird fight over narrative on the left, which is essentially what I see happening in our in our media right now. Everybody is trying to angle to get a piece of the left that they like the the appropriate version of the story. It's problematic. OK, Cash Patel just told you you can't show up to a protest with extra magazines. That's not protesting. Watch him pivot. This is that was the night before and this was yesterday morning.

Ready go. In that vehicle was not just firearms that just thankfully we recovered, but was information about law enforcement, federal agents and their personal information. Look, we've always said that, you know, we are going to defend absolutely your right to peacefully protest under the 1st Amendment, and we're also always going to uphold your right to bear arms in the Second Amendment. That's never changed. We're going to equally protect all of those.

The only thing we're not going to do is allow any of those amendments to be violated when you pursue a course of action of violence against law enforcement. It's that simple. That position has never changed. So on January 14th, we referenced a mob literally rioted and destroyed federal police vehicles. Of course, we jumped into action. We caught and arrested four individuals responsible for breaking those vehicles apart and dismantling them completely.

But I have an update for you. In that vehicle was not just firearms, which thankfully we recovered, but was information about law enforcement, federal agents and their personal information. Individuals used that personal information on the ground to issue threats of life against not only FBI agents, but their wives and their children. So just last night, the FBI arrested one of the individuals responsible for making those threats to federal law

enforcement. And we're going to have more arrests on that same matter today and tomorrow. We're not. Done. OK, stay tuned because we've got more. We're promising you all the things and probably we're going to release some files to Congress so they can do an investigation because we can't do it now. The things he's talking about include the Signal chat that was uncovered by on the ground journalists in in Minnesota. The proof of organization in a very militaristic format in a

very, in a very operational way. It's pretty obvious that there's organization, there are planned protests. There are people that are being sent out in certain units. They've divided in the the physical terrain into sectors so that they can approach it. But what do we have our FBI director doing? He's just trying to talk tough and he's promising more and more things. But one of those things he's really promising, we're going to protect FBI agents on the ground.

That's what I heard. And not Border Patrol. We're not doing long term investigations like the purpose of the FBI is to do long term investigations that nobody else can do. Anybody can do a reactive investigation to threats of against themselves. Anybody can. It's actually not that hard. So what is he doing? He's pivoting immediately to tell you how proud he is that they are stopping the the dissemination of people's personal information that was in

the car. Let's just do a real quick check here. Why under any circumstances, did they have personal information about officers, wives, their addresses, or anything else in the car? This is like rule #1 secure this stuff. So the, the, the OPSEC, the operational security of what's going on in there. It sounds completely haphazard. I'm very disappointed with that part.

Again, that was a direct pivot. He went from you can't carry a magazine to a protest that makes you necessarily a threat to law enforcement to of course we're going to protect your First Amendment. Of course we're going to protect your Second Amendment. It reminds me of those left wing Tiktok videos where you see the like the lady walking down the street and she's like, she's like, I'm a girl boss.

Of course I'm going to tell people what to do and get me a coffee or whatever the hell it is that they say. It's the same attitude. Of course we're going to do this. And he did Sean Hannity where he even tried to moderate it even more. And of course he got Sean Hannity. Consider this clip with Sean Hannity for a second. And I've got two of them. In one of them, Sean Hannity actually tells us that he walks away from armed conflicts.

Does anyone think that Sean Hannity ever like that doughy, jowled, soft, makeup filled face has ever had to deal with like physical conflict in any recent time that anyone can remember? Anyway, here we go. Let's just let's do a little bit more of this sort of like media curve completely unburdened by what has been completely unburdened by the Christy Gnome and the Cash Patel statements that you cannot just show up with weapons. Of course you can show up.

They just got bad backlash and so they acted like it never happened. And I've also told stories that, you know, in situations, if I was knew I was on camera and I could get away from a confrontation, knowing that I had the ability to defend myself, I would turn and hightail it and run rather than ever have to pull out a weapon. So if you have a weapon, do you belong in an environment that is

as contentious as this weekend? Do you bear responsibility knowing that you have a firearm with you? What that could do to a situation? Well, Sean, like you said, we truly fully support the Second Amendment, people's right to bear arms.

But when you enter into a situation, a volatile situation like Minnesota, where there were riots on the streets and people attacking federal law enforcement officers and ramming them with vehicles and continued criminality and burning down and literally destroying federal vehicles and stealing information, we have to, we have to ask people what's prudential, what's smart? And it's not smart to go out there with a fully loaded weapon. We're just saying be careful and be reasonable.

You've outlined if you have a right to a permit for a firearm, that's OK. But you cannot incite violence. And you cannot. Break the law. Enforcement officers. Yeah. OK, so we have real footage of Sean Hannity carrying weapons. One of you guys in the chat was telling me that that Sean Hannity carries a weapon. OK. I think he carries it like this. You remember the Mccluskey's in Missouri? Was it Missouri? I think it was that's this is the way I imagine Sean Hannity

carries a weapon. He he tucks it underneath his elbow and he holds it at his hip and he grips it really tightly and doesn't know how to cite the weapon. Yeah, I'm sure that. What is this nonsense that I just heard Kash Patel say about a permit? That's a state thing. There's no federal permit. The federal permit is called the United States Constitution. It's the Bill of Rights. It's the Second Amendment. It tells you that you your right to keep and bear arms shall not be in French. The end.

I'm an absolutist. That's where I said they had a bunch of people on Fox that were tilting the narrative back to say, well, if you are in a place where you're allowed to be and you happen to have a weapon system and you're abiding by all the appropriate government permission slips, as long as you've asked all the people you need to and you don't actually believe that it's a God-given, right, then perhaps you are in fact allowed to. But you still be really careful.

Yeah, every right has responsibilities that come along with it. That's simple. Everybody should know that you say things. There are going to be consequences to your words. You may lose your job. That's OK, as long as you know what you're doing. You carry a weapon system. There are only certain times when you're justified at pointing it at someone. If you pointed the wrong person, they may be able to shoot you first. They may have a right to do that.

They may have a right to defend themselves. I'm down with all that. I understand that this whole people in the federal government from the Trump administration pointing to permits required by absolutely ridiculous fascistic places that for just a second ago didn't even want to issue you a permit that had may issue instead of shell issue laws before we had the Bruin decision. I don't care what those people have to say.

And by the way, when it comes to local gun laws or walking into federal property with or without a gun, basically my determination is, is someone going to be able to tell with a metal detector or not? And if there's no metal detector, then I don't really care. I just don't. If I have to go to an airport, yeah, I'm not going to carry a gun in there. But everything else, I can't read those signs.

I don't know what state law say because I have this weird problem with just like not wanting to infringe on my own rights. Patel's promising all this cool guy stuff. He always says we're going to keep doing what we've been doing. The word salads, just like Kamala Harris are staggering. And when you guys hear it, you're like 90% of what this guy says is crap. It's not real. It doesn't even have any meaning.

If you were to translate it. If the cash Patel is The Walking equivalent of let me be clear or varieties there in allow me to be crystal crystal clear. Let me be clear is 2026 political tell. It's the move that you do in poker where you let people know I'm about to tell you a lie, but I want to sound really convincing. It's kind of like when you're doing an interrogation of someone and someone says I'm not going to lie to you. It's like, what were you doing before then?

Were you lying to me then or allow me to be candid with you? What were you not being candid before you were being cagey? What, what was going on there? If you say preparatory statements that have no meaning and all they do is to serve that. Now I'm going to be extra honest. Now I'm going to be extra transparent. All this stuff is nonsense. It's frustrating for me because I can see it and I just go, who is the audience for this? Who's buying this crap?

Who's buying the slop? And there is awfully, awfully high delineations for the slop, right? We're going to do the couple extra little clips here and then we're going to go into some other things. Again, it's not. There's several people in the Trump administration doing this and they're all in the news right now. And what's interesting is the White House is actually trying to pivot away from them.

So we'll get there. One SEC, guys, if you're watching over on YouTube, give me a thumbs up. I would appreciate the like, I don't like the smash thing on you're clicking it. So like unless you are smashing an actual button, there's no smashing. OK, Same thing with rumble. Go ahead and click the like on that as well. There's a thumbs up. You guys see, you can subscribe to the channel if you want to know when we go live, you'll get less ads.

If you want to join us first thing, it's 9:30 Eastern Time. That's the East Coast. It's 8:30 here in Texas, America. And it's some ungodly early hour if you're on the other things, whether you're on mountain time or Pacific Time. And I just experienced those. So I pity those of you that want to get up that early. But if you want to do that otherwise, find us over on Spotify. It's very easy to do. It's the easiest place to get both video and audio.

You have the most kyleserifandshow.com the best part of Spotify, I think is that you get chapters. So there's going to be things that you're not interested in loop. You can skip right to them. You can Fast forward any of the commercials if you're so inclined. You have all the control that you might like and there's even a transcript if you want to search for certain things. After you heard something, you want to go back to it, which people always ask me about,

subscribe there as well. Make sure you guys like give us a comment on any of these things. Anything that like hits your your fancy and you're like, aha, yes, I agree with you. Or you're like, Kyle, you're a moron. I disagree with that. Do it politely and I'll probably give you a response. Response back. Do it in a sarcastic way. You'll almost always get a response back from me. That's my favorite. Questions, comments, sarcastic remarks always welcome on our program.

Let's do a couple of these other things. Let's go to another Sean Hannity clip. I don't know why I like Sean Hannity so much. You guys know it's because he holds a gun and he carries and he's doing jiu jitsu or whatever. He says he's got a friend like Dan Bongino. Here's Kash Patel kind of telling you that they're going to keep doing what they've been doing. I think this is the biggest tell in all of it. The biggest tell is we know. We know you're going to keep

doing what you're doing. It's just not that impressive and we know that it's all PR and not reality. And what we are going to do is what we have been doing across the country under President Trump's leadership to deliver this historic success from year to year. It's not a trust me situation. It's a look at the last year. It's a look at what we did when the FBI opened up their task force in the state of Virginia under President Trump and our great partners at DOJ and the attorney general.

We wiped out crime in the state. And we're going to do that in every single city. We've done it for the whole year. And on this type of specific investigation, what you do, generally speaking is you send out subpoenas. You collect data, you put people in grand juries and you find out who broke the law and if anyone broke the law and incited violence. Remember, that's the key here. We are not going after people and infringing on their freedom of speech to peacefully protest.

We are definitely not going after people in their Second Amendment right to bear arms. Only if you incite violence and or threaten to do harm to law enforcement officials and break the law in any other way does it become an investigatory matters. I don't know of any peaceful protester that shows up with a gun and ammunition rather than a sign. This is a violent riot when you have someone showing up with weapons and are using them to assault law enforcement

officers. But as Secretary Noam said, no one who wants to be peaceful shows up at a protest with a firearm that is loaded with two full magazines. That is not a peaceful protest. I I think it very easily can be a peaceful protest. Again, unburdened by what has been. These guys just do it. They just decide to say something and then they go, well, let's just act like we didn't say that. Have you ever heard anybody in the Trump administration? But I'd really like to see Patel do it.

Come out and say, you listen, I misspoke. I said something inaccurately and I need to own that. I got carried away with the moment and I'm concerned about law enforcement. And So what I want to say very specifically, I want to redefine the statements I made previously. No, they don't do that. They just try to like skirt the edges. They try to like shave off what they had said. One of you in the chat mentioned appealing to performance from last year is not the flex that you think it is.

For those of you that that aren't aware, I actually scanned both the chats on either side here. I'll put them back on the screen. I actually have them on both sides of my screen. So there's one here and there's one here if you guys are listening. There's the YouTube chat over on this side and I've got the rumble chat running in the side.

We can't combine them just yet, but I'd like to and I, I just kind of peruse what's being popped through there and what sort of thoughts are being had in real time. If you guys ever doubt that the live audience is important to this program, you probably saw it last week when I was in Vegas and I was doing kind of these, these like dry camping

recordings. So rather than being able to do the show live as we normally do and stream out while you were watching, I had to do, I had to do this sort of, you know, hybrid version where I go and record it, then I'd upload it. Then you guys would have the chat while it was streaming live. You guys have a lot of input into it. 2025 was not the flex that the FBI has been acting like it was. And for me, the frustration is there are plenty of people that buy it.

There are plenty of influencers that get behind the cheerleader attitude and they don't critically look at it. It's real simple. The arrest benefits the the bump in arrests that were being done are almost not, they're almost 0 bumps up from regular FBI arrests. They're nearly 100% just coming from ICE operations and they're being dual claimed. So ICE is claiming the arrest, whatever other agencies are also involved are claiming the arrest and so is the FBI. So they're like we did 25,000

arrests. We normally only do 13,000 arrests. It's like, meh, no, no, no, we know better. And by the way, everybody can claim an arrest if they're all on the operation. Everyone gets the same arrest at especially if they're on different, they're on different squads sometimes or different violations. The the people who do the best work don't have to tell you they're doing a great job. They really don't. And more likely than not, they probably assume they need to do a lot better.

Whenever someone tells me that I had a great show, I'm like, man, I feel like there's a lot more I could have done for. It's nice that you guys say that. It's really, it's thoughtful. I get those comments on a regular basis. It's like, OK, well if that was good, I need to really aspire for more. I see the exact opposite. I see self congratulative, you know, self congratulation. I see unlimited knob slobber.

You guys probably saw that there was this, this, this trending statement on whether or not the Border Patrol commander who's been kind of running around at large, his name's Greg Bovino. Apparently there was a question on whether or not he was going to stay in his position and there was a statement sent that he was going to be basically demoted and moved out. He's the like sort of Border Patrol commander at large.

You know what you don't see that guy doing is running the cameras all the time and dressing up and wearing cool guy tactical stuff. He's wearing the same stuff he wears on the field. I just know because I've seen videos of him like in the field doing his job. There was a a push back on the Trump administration saying that he wasn't relieved of command, but they are saying he's returning back to El Centro, CA. It's frustrating because the, the, the actual answer is not

give the leftist what they want. The, the the answer should not be we are going to kowtow and shade this and say, yes, we're going to give them a temporary victory because all the left loves is a small victory to say we're winning. They're recognizing that we're correct and they remove the bad man. And this particular bad man is is commander at large Greg Bovino.

He's resuming his chief as sector and in California, but not where the biggest contentious problem is and where he's been on. So now we're going to distract. We're going to act like it was a win. And always, always the shading, never saying, you know, we got some bad messaging out there. We initially thought we were going to remove him and then we realized actually we cannot remove him because that would be kowtow. But they're still going to try to send in Tom Holman as a

replacement. How about the guy that's been on the ground that's been doing it? Why are you pulling the guy that's actually getting the job done or he's at least trying to get the job done? He doesn't have the right support. All of this stuff ends up being a messaging game, and the messaging game is tiring. I saw this yesterday. This was promoted. Like, if you guys don't know, I get every update that Cash Patel puts out just because he's kind of my personal bugaboo.

And when he's gone and somebody else is running the FBI, someone serious, we're going to be in better shape as a country. I hope. I hope. It could be the worst, I guess. I guess we could get a Kamala Harris type again, if this is not the self congratulatory nonsense that we all hoped we were going to avoid. Like, don't tell me, show me how many of you people think that the that the current FBI is different than the previous FBI?

If you listen to this program, we've been pointing out regularly that the same personnel are in management. You have people that came in that are DEI hires that are non agents that are the absolute worst, you know, promoted by Mueller comedy and Ray. And those people are now still at the top of this agency. So how are you going to go out there and promote that? And so I'm going to stay in this

theme for just a second. We're going to get back to the to the to the thing in Minnesota in just a moment. I got 5 or 6 articles we'll run through real quickly just so you guys get an idea of what the headlines are saying about it. But this concept of bringing in people that are morally flexible without principles and politically water that will fill whatever the vessel, the vessel unfortunately is MAGA guys.

I saw a bunch of people on the influencer side saying that there is no reason to bring a gun to a protest. And many of those people have either participated in or cheered on 2nd Amendment protests where people showed up open carrying rifles. So what are we doing? Where's your principles? Maybe you clap like a seal for this kind of stuff, but that's not, that's not what I'm going to do. I can't. This hype video, that's what I call this. This is the Cash Patel hype video.

This reminds me of the same day that he walked in day one and started cheering on hostage rescue and talking about recruiting and saying all the same garbage that we saw comedy say and Ray say. Like FBI directors, they end up becoming the role. The role does not take on the form of the man. So here's some more of this word salad nonsense. I'm Kash Patel, the 9th director

of the FBI. In 2025, this FBI got back to basics by focusing on. Hold on, I'm going to do it one more time because I want to be on the. Screen I'm Kash Patel, the 9th Director of the FBI. In 2025, this FBI got back to basics by focusing on 4 priorities crushing violent crime, defending the homeland, rebuilding public trust, and driving fierce organizational

accountability. You crushed violent crime, first of all, just even saying crushing violent crime, Whoever messaged that is so embarrassing and silly, OK? You're defending the homeland against what? The threats that you guys created. Got it. OK Rebuilt public trust. Not with me. Not if I have anything to say about it. I don't know who's doing it, but his. He's doing that. You guys see? How many takes do they do to

make this happen? I'm Kash Patel, and I've got eyebrows, and I think that this is a total sell. She's doing the people's eyebrow right there. All right. Fierce accountability. What does fierce accountability even mean? This is word salad. This is Kamala Harris. All right, here we go. The result? A historic year of accomplishments for our country. There's these little micro expressions you'll notice too.

If you guys have never seen this, people do what's called like I'd like denial body language. And so you'll say something like the results and you'll shake your head no, like you don't actually believe it. It's discrediting your actual the sort of like sub insurance. The sub instinct of your body is to actually deny outwardly while you're saying words that you don't believe. It's really funny. Somebody said crushing Adderall.

Maybe that's what the sniff is. On behalf of the entire Bureau, I'm proud to share the highlights of those accomplishments with you. In 2025, this FBI worked non-stop to make America safe again and crush violent crime. Thanks to relentless work through operations like Summer Heat, we took bad guys off the streets and as a result saw historic 20% drop in the US murder. It's a historic drop. It's really wild to me that they keep claiming that they dropped the murder rate.

I know that I heard Patel and I know that I heard Bongino say under Biden that when they were touting a drop in murder and in violent crime, which by the way, they did theoretically the trend has been going downward that we could attribute it to the fact that there's a bunch of major cities that are not reporting. It was a statistical problem. These guys claiming the the value of a statistical problem that they used to call out. This is peak, you know, principle list water like

politics fill the vessel claim. Great work. I'm waiting for him to praise Donald Trump. I'm sure it's coming, right? In 2025, a 100% increase in violent crime arrest and 197% increase in total arrest over the previous year. OK, that that, that 197%. It's almost all ice. But that's not all. They're literally showing you the ice guys that they got. We disrupted 1800 gangs and criminal enterprises, an amazing 210% increase. So disruptions are a real

specific thing in the FBI. It's a term that they use for whenever they run an operation that like seizes drugs make they could do a buy if they were to buy drugs at full price and take them off the street while they're building their case. That's a disruption. Dismantlement is when the gang no longer works. So they have these little fun. You'd think that disrupting a gang sounds like you've actually like stopped them from being able to do their work.

But these are actually statistical accomplishments they actually claim within the Bureau and they have a very specific definition and they're counting on you not knowing what those are. I'm kind of running a little interference on that. We seized. More than 2100 kilos of fentanyl, enough to kill 150 million Americans, 31%. I love that they always tell you how many people could be killed by the drug.

They can only be killed by the drug if the drug was actually something that you consume, which you don't. So there's that. We. Located more than 6000 child victims, shut down more than 3.8 million pedophile accounts on the dark web and arrested 1700 child predators and almost 20% increase. So that's all good. I mean, and that and that's what they should have been doing. But the question is, is what is

located mean? Did they save them or they just found dead bodies or they found out that they were overseas? We couldn't do anything about it. Now he goes on to tout the PR victory. Cindy Rodriguez Singh might be the best example. They added her to the 10 most wanted list like 2 months before they got her. And she was in India, if memory serves. Or maybe she was in, maybe she's in Thailand or something like that.

They got her overseas, which means that they were negotiating with this probably for like 18 to 24 months to be able to get her. So this actually started long before Kash Patel was there. We also captured 4 of the FB is 10 most wanted fugitives in 2025 and in the first days of 2026 just captured our fifth. That's more captured in one year under this FBI than during the previous four years combined.

Through it all, we built our relationships with local law enforcement all across the country, now coordinating with them more strongly than ever before. No, none of that's true, all right. Anyway, so locals don't trust the FBI with good reason. You're seeing Homeland Security Investigations, amusingly on the

wall right there. There's some pretty good information circulating kind of in the rumor and intelligence sphere saying that nobody in HSI, nobody at DHS, broadly speaking, has a strong belief that the FBI is going to do things in a non corrupt way. And so they're actually not even going to, they're not even let them do investigations. I'm hearing some rumors that the the Alex Pretty investigation is being done by HSI, even though it's a federal agent shooting.

It should normally be done by the FBI, but they don't trust it. So they're actually holding it back and HSI is doing the work. That's the allegation. We'll find out more soon. I bet you that's probably true only because I know that to be the case for other investigations. They have not rebuilt the

partnerships. They have basically showed that they want to be an island, that they want to be the top dog, that Patel actually bought the hype that they tell you at Quantico that you are the premier law enforcement agency of America and therefore everyone else must bow down to you. Anyway, all of this is just

going to show you. It's a different kind of packaging, it's a different kind of sound, but the word salads and the completely unburdened by what has been attitude that Patel has literally within 24 hours of his misstatements and his stupidity, all he is is about hype and branding. If you got down to substance with policy on Kamala Harris, you'd find out there's almost no substance, none of it makes any

sense and nobody cares. It's the same problem with Patel. He actually does the same sort of thing and again, some of the similarities are out there. I'm showing you obviously 2 pictures where they're both wearing pink jackets, and that's just on purpose to show you. I see a lot of similarities, more than just the way they dress, but the way that they present themself to the public. It's very specific and it's very disingenuous.

It's such a cynical way to approach an audience that I think as an audience, you're too dumb to know what I said 18 hours earlier. And so I can say anything I want. And even taking credit for things that you didn't do, that's the thing that happens a lot right now. And we're seeing this happen more more. Similarly, watch Patel try to take credit for what independent journalists are doing. Listen, the FBI will constantly come in and take local credit.

Anybody who's ever been a local knows what I'm talking about. Like the FBI will say, oh, we did this amazing thing with our local partners. Meanwhile, the quote UN quote local partners did the entire investigation, did the surveillance, did all the grunt work, got all the paperwork on a local and then the FBI was able to take custody after they were already arrested in a high risk operation. That's a real thing. That's not me just crapping on

the FBI. That's a that's a regular complaint that the locals will have. The state's law enforcement agencies regularly find that frustrating. There's a lack of humility. This is the reason why they have task force officers because the task force officers are a full force multiplier, but they actually do a lot of the things that the FBI could never do, like vehicle stops and access to things like source networks.

Because if you're getting right down to it, if you send someone like me, an FBI agent who came out of Texas and now I'm in Virginia, how am I going to know what the politics and the, and the street situation is in Virginia? If I'm going out there and trying to recruit sources? Compared to a cop who's been there his entire life, has spent all of his time working in the local community, going to school there, maybe going to a local Community College or whatever.

And now he's in the state law enforcement agency and he's running around in an area that he grew up in. He knows people, he knows culture, he knows neighborhoods. He knows how they've changed. I'm a new guy. I don't know that that's why they always bring these TF OS in these task force officers, which are going to be from the state and the local agencies. And then to go in and say, you know, our state and local partners, It's gross.

How about even worse? How about claiming credit for what local journalists are doing or people that are running around on their own dime trying to do investigations because they're trying to figure out why the hell are governments failing? So this is a this is kind of a take on what happened with Cam Higbee, who got access to some Signal chats. I've got a a breakdown by Andy. No, which I think is really good.

These guys, Cam is a little bit newer to the game from at least in my perspective, but Andy's been doing this sort of breakdown of Antifa and organized protests for a long time to the point where I used to regularly read his stuff while I was while I was working the Bureau because I wanted to

know what was coming our way. Whatever happens on the on the West Coast, on the Antifa space and sort of the, I don't know, the anti authority, communistic, whatever and cap type folks, they would end up in DC with the same sort of tactics. So it was just starting one place and move towards us. Here's Patel basically taking credit for that and claiming that they they opened it up to the public to do their job for them. Why do they not do the job in

the first place? Because they're actually setting up people. They're too busy doing their counterterrorism missions, setting up and running the playbook, which we call out here on a regular basis. The ongoing investigation involving the shooting last week is being led by DHS and of course we're supporting our Energy Agency partners there, the signal check. I'm sorry, what was that? They're being led by DHS.

Why would that be? Again, I just told you, I thought you just had great relationships with all those federal agencies. The ongoing investigation involving the shooting last week is being led by DHS and of course, we're supporting our Energy Agency partners there. The Signal Chat group is information we collect from the public because we repeatedly request the public provide us

with information they have. And what we are going to do is what we have been doing across the country under President Trump's leadership to deliver this historic success from year to year. It's not a trust me situation. It's a look at the last year. It's a look at what we did when the FBI opened up their task force in the state of Virginia under President Trump and our great partners at DOJ and the attorney general. We wiped out crime in the state.

And we're going to do that in every single city. We've done it for the whole year. And on this type of specific investigation, what you do generally speaking is you send out subpoenas, you collect data, you put people in grand juries, and you find out who broke the law and if anyone broke the law and incited violence. Remember, that's the key here. We are not going after people and infringing on their freedom of speech to peacefully protest.

We are definitely not going after people in their Second Amendment right to bear arms. Only if you incite violence, violence and or threaten to do harm to law enforcement officials and break the law in any other way does it become an investigatory matter. So this Signal chat is something that we, the FBI, are looking at and spearheading. Fantastic. Unburdened by what has been.

Listen, we are not going after your First Amendment and we are certainly not going after, you know, your Second Amendment. I just want to reiterate that even though I said that previously, that is not what my position is today and we're going to keep doing what we have been doing. How many times will you hear? You'll hear Patel say this all the time. We're going to keep doing what we have been doing, dude. We know that's the problem.

You're not being transparent. You're not doing the thing that we expected you to. I have a correction too earlier. And when you guys in the chat on Rumble caught it, so well done. I said, and I said Anne Cap and what I meant was Anne Com, which is anarcho communist, and that's not the same as the anarcho capitalist. In any case, very specifically. I'll tell you when I get something wrong, it happens. I say words sometimes and I mean another word.

You know what? I don't say weird things like investigatory matter. That reminds me of of Zoolander. It's like you're trying to make a name for yourself as an investigatory journalist. I'm not even sure investigatory is actually a word. It may not be a word. Somebody will have to Fact Check that one. But what a goofball. We're going to do what we've always been doing under the great leadership of Donald Trump. He got some knob slobbery in

there. This is an A+ Patel presentation, completely shifting from what he said previously. And then they always do the thing where they do the list, which is a filibuster. This is what has to happen. We have to go and get into evidence and we have to go and put it in front of a grand jury. And then we have to go and decide whether or not we can get an indictment on there. And that is how you do. It's like, we know, dude. We know.

That's not what this is about. Nobody asked you about the process. They asked you what you're doing. They want to know why are you the one who is not involved in the investigation into a federal law enforcement shooting? Why is DHS taking lead? How about that one? Everybody knows that you guys are not being, you know, held to the same credibility level that

previously existed. Do you want to address the lack of reputation you have on federal law enforcement, that people look at the FBI as a dismal and destructive force, that the reputation that you claim that you did with fierce accountability is completely out the window?

And the people who actually know, who are actually working over at DHS to try to do this thing, they're looking at you and going at any moment when the next team comes in, and there will be another team, whether it happens at the midterms, whether happens after Donald Trump's term, somebody is going to take

over. And they'll probably still be either 90s liberals or they'll be far leftist, you know, progressive Democrats. And when that happens, they will use the FBI to hunt down the people currently working at DHS. That's my ongoing prediction for you. I'm going to say it regularly because the FBI is the tool of the administration. They are the most dangerous

tool. And rather than do the thing that they promised, which was dismantle the weaponized portion, Nope. They're hit or miss intermittently firing people that Kyle Seraphin calls out. Guys, they fired Vanessa Tibbetts while I was in Washington, DC. We've had to update the Grim Reaper mean. I called her out in August of last year. They fired David Geist. I called him out in October, they fired him in November.

As far as I can tell, every quote UN quote purge and termination of people that have happened under quote UN quote this FBI, which is just to say Cash Patel, all of them have been called out by me first either prior to them getting in for like a long time, the Neil team, Sixers and stuff like that, or while Patel was in as a way to motivate them. I'm pointing out that they don't even know who's involved in their own operations to the point where the guy's flying

around in a private jet. And one of the guys from CR151 of the case agents who whether he was the guy who was the case agent when the Mona Laga raid happened or afterwards is sort of irrelevant. Like the guy was part of that team. And here's the other crazy thing. Let me be clear, right? I don't want people from the FBI fired. I want them put in places where they're not in power. You don't have to fire these people. Do what we said. We gave a solution.

We me, Steve, Fred, Gerardo Boyle, George Hill, Bill Kennedy, people who have been inside the FBI, guys like Bill Taylor, guys like Zach Strawstall who all were part of the FBI, who can look at it and go look, there's obviously some problems. You don't need to fire people and ruin their lives. You don't need to give them a lawsuit. You're going to end up paying them anyway. All these people are going to get their back paying money or they're going to get reinstated.

Take your pick. Move them to places where they don't cause problems. Move them into places where they are not political. This is actually not that hard. Don't go out and make freaking hype videos. Send people in. Senior management, everybody from the GS15 level up under Chris Ray should all be hanging out in Guam, hanging out in Puerto Rico, moving to places where they are not causing problems.

Put them on an Indian Reservation to do real work and then fire them if they actually don't do their job. But maybe they will give them an opportunity to not 'cause the issues. Instead, what you've done is you've done these sort of like silly little publicity hits, these little stop bleeds because Serafin is out there naming people and, you know, it looks bad. And whenever they do it, what do we get? Nothing. They're going to all get lawsuits. They're all going to get their,

their, their jobs back. They're all going to get paid. So pay them to retire somewhere. This is the right answer. The other person we keep pointing out is Shannon Perry. Shannon Perry was hired in 2002 as a linguist in German, of all things. She is now the number four person in the FBI. There's a tier of the deputy, or there's the director, there's the deputy, there's the ADD, which is the number three person, and then there's a tier of multiple people at the AD level.

And Shannon is one of those people. She's a number four person in the FBI, one of the most powerful people in the operational end, and she's a freaking hard leftist. She used to run the insider threat program that haunted guys like me and my friends who are being whistleblowers who are just bringing out the problems, not in a political way. If you guys can tell, I'm not a Republican. I don't love the Republicans at all. I don't love the Democrats

either. I think the Democrats are are terrible, but the Republicans might be worse because they're stabbing me in the back. They claim that they were coming from principles and it's pretty obvious they are not. Meanwhile, at least the people that are stabbing me in the front told me that they were my enemy. I can handle an enemy that says that they're my enemy. I struggle with the alternative. So here's the deal.

We're getting into a bad scenario or watching the left have an opportunity because these guys didn't do what they said and they're walking back their words and they're forgetting to remember the very simple thing. All that matters is do the American people support what you're doing in this moment? Are you supposed to be deporting people? Is there a federal charter to do so? The answer is yes. Is that what ICE does? Yes. If Congress doesn't want it, they can get rid of them no

problem. All they got to do is go no more. This is CNN telling you that the majority of Americans still say get rid of all the illegals. So anything less than that is a failure. Anything less than saying we are only going to accept that we're going to push as hard as we can. We may not get everybody, we're going to be realistic about it, but in reality, we are going to target all the people that are bad, the worst ones. Somebody asked me on social media the other day, how is this

happening? You know, what is the, what is the targeting process? There's a list of people that are, that are meant to be deported in every single area of operations and the ice guys and the people that are assigned to help them get that list. And they can go through it and prioritize people based on the, the nastiness of that human being, the sort of danger to the public, you know, whether or not they have some sort of egregious crime against children or women,

etcetera. And then they go out there and try and find them. So they're going to grab they're, they're prioritizing 2 things. How bad is the person and how likely are we to find them? Sometimes they're going to get people that are not as bad because they're easier to find. That's it. And then if anybody's around them, then they get them in what's called a collateral move. If you're in the military, we call those targets of opportunity. You went after a high value target.

It's a Lieutenant in the Taliban. You guys were going to do a capture kill mission on that guy and it turns out he's got a bunch of his buddies around him. They're going to get rolled up or shot too. That's a target of opportunity. So they're getting a bunch of other people that are also illegal aliens. But if they just focused on the facts that most people, the, the, you know, more than average number of Americans are behind, get them out of here because regular Americans know what it

takes. Illegal aliens steal identities. They're not trying to be mean, but they have to function in the society. So they're stealing your identity, they're screwing up your tax records, etcetera. OK. They're driving in a dangerous manner because they don't come from this world. They don't come from this part of the world. The developing world is not the same when it comes to driving. They don't obey our laws from coming in.

So they're more likely to do some other things that are dangerous and they may not be always the most violent of crimes. There's this point that I keep seeing made by leftist that says, well you know, that the illegal aliens of this country are are far less likely to commit a crime than native born citizens. It's like, no, they're just not discovered. They're in places that crimes don't get committed. That's not the same thing. You guys aren't comparing apples

to apples. Americans by and large support the deportation effort. That's what they're forgetting. So going soft just gives the Democrats A narrative victory. And I'm going to show you those narrative victories in just a second. Yeah, sometimes I like blunt questions because they sort of get at the underlying feelings that people have. So this is about as blunt of question as you can get. Deport all immigrants here

illegally. I will note the ABC News poll asked about undocumented immigrants. So we have slightly different questions, but these were all taken within the last month. And there's real uniformity here. That's what I really think. You see. You see real uniformity. Deported all immigrants who are here illegally, 55% of the New York Times, Marquette 60, 4% CBS News 57% ABC News with a slightly different question, 56%.

So what you're seeing essentially here is very clear indication that a majority of Americans, in fact, when they're asked this one question, which I believe gets that the underlying feelings do in fact want to deport all immigrants who are here illegally. There's no arguing with these different numbers because they're all essentially the same

across four different pollsters. Feelings towards immigration in this country, feelings towards undocumented immigrants and deporting all of them have been, they become considerably more hawkish. But I think that gives Donald Trump much more leverage to go with the American people and sort of have these hawkish, some might say harsh, different rhetoric and also issue based sort of going after immigrants who are here illegally. What? Man, that was kind of a word salad, too.

Come on, CNN, you guys can do better than that. Hawkish. Why? Because Americans see opportunities drying up for them and they see people doing scams and they're coming into our country and they are not making the country better. They are just burdening the systems that were meant to protect people inside this country. I'm not a big fan of any welfare thing. I actually don't want the federal government paying for almost anything. I don't know why it handles

child care. I don't want it involved in medicine. I don't want it involved in whether or not you have access to a cell phone. I don't want it paying for rural broadband or any of the other things. I just don't. I think the market will fill that gap or it won't and you'll choose your own best option for yourself. If you need high speed Internet like I do, then you got to be near an urban area, at least relatively. If you want to pay for satellite, then you can pay for

satellite. If there's enough people that want to pay for satellite, then they'll create technologies that allow you to go faster. This is my thought on it. They get it at CNN. They see that people are frustrated and those were all left-leaning polls. That was a BCCBS, Marquette, New York Times. How many Fox News listeners are going to hang up the phone when a New York Times pollster asked the question?

A lot. I'll just tell you because I know when I've asked people I love taking polls like that, they never call me. I'll talk to anybody. I don't really care what your political leaning is, because at the end of the day, I want my voice to be heard in those polls so that it's reflected properly. And the answer is, is that a lot of people want to see this thing go away.

The folks that are out there organizing and doing wild stuff, Why is our federal government not going after the actual people that are doing very small, rare and targeted operations to try to subvert what's going on in Minnesota? So you've got NBC News covering the Signal chat being tracked by ICE. Yeah, it's being tracked because independent journalists are doing the work. And then you're hearing that Kash Patel is claiming that it's his. That's problematic.

I'm going to show you kind of the chat screen. So there's no audio to this, but this is just a scroll of a bunch of stuff that's going on. Cam Higbee got into a Signal chat. You're seeing all the different names, all the anonymous type pieces on it, right. So there's a lot of people doing a lot of organization in order so that they can get forward. They can, they can stop a lawfully mandated and I would say voter required action of deportations. Number of you guys have sent

this over. Some people asked my father about a little bit. This is a retired Green Beret. I'm taking that his word. I don't know, but I I'm sure he is. And I followed him for quite a while. He's followed me back and forth. I've seen his name for quite a while. This is Eric Schwalm and he goes by at Schwalm. That's SCHWAL M5132. I wonder if that was his ODA. He talks about being a a Warrant Officer in his bio.

It says he was a chief Warrant Officer for I think multiple rotations running counterinsurgency OPS. If you guys don't know what the Green Berets do, if you don't understand what special forces does, it's hearts and minds campaigns. It's unconventional warfare. It's going in and recruiting indigenous populations and using psyops and using non traditional recruiting tactics so they can get access to people who can help them achieve their mission without a huge footprint on the ground.

Our special forces does that at a very, very high level. You can go read the book Children Chosen Soldier if you guys want to get into understanding the differential between some of the direct action special operations teams, the sort of, you know, kick down the door and kill people, teams who are very good at what they do as well. And Green Berets can make that happen 100%. But there are also some really useful capabilities that Special Forces has it nobody else really does.

And anybody else who tries to get in it, they don't have the same sort of infrastructure behind it. G BS have cultural training, they have language training. It's part of one of their phases going through the the selection

of the Q course process. So as they come out with their green hat, these guys have, you know, one of my best buddies, he went in trying to be a Spanish speaker and they came out and he learned Urdu and you would regularly give me blessings and Urdu, which are really funny because that's the operational area. Who's going to be spending time

in read a lot of this stuff? I just want to kind of give you a sense of it. The people who have seen information operations and have seen sort of counterinsurgency or low level insurgency work overseas are seeing a lot of the same tactics being employed in the United States right now. And this is where the FBI should be stepping in. The Signal chat should not have been discovered by freaking journalists. Let's be serious. The nation state level tools for national security, those are

available to the FBI. So what the how is the value of having an Intel agency that's also doing law enforcement if they're not going to do it? It's still my position that we shouldn't have that capability. But if they have it and they're they're touting that they're using it, you know, they're lying in their branding when they're not.

And this is what this guy says. So he says he's a former Warrant Officer, multiple locations running counterinsurgency OPS, hunting insurgents and trying to separate them from sympathetic populations, he said. I've seen organized resistance up close give some examples in Afghanistan from spotters to cut outs to dead drops. The modern equivalents discipline, comms role specialization, and a willingness to absorb casualties while bleeding the stronger

force slowly. This is the same tactic that that absorb casualties while bleeding a stronger force. This is something the war of attrition has been done since Vietnam. It's a very, very classic insurgent option. What's unfolding in Minneapolis right now is not a protest. It's a low level insurgency infrastructure built by people who have clearly studied the playbook. There are ways that you can execute these things and he's talking about it.

The Signal group with 100 member, 1000 members per capita zone dedicated roles including mobile chasers, plate checkers, logging vehicles into databases, 24/7 dispatch nodes, vectoring assets, salute style reporting. That's going to be the way that you go back and you tell people and it's a an acronym the military uses for size, activity, location, unit time

and equipment. It's the way that you give a situation report on what the enemy combatants are in the area and what their strength and got size, activity, location, unit time, equipment. So you can kind of find out who's operating where with what on suspected federal vehicles. Daily chat rotations, time deletions to frustrate percent percent forensic recovery, My bad vetting process for new joiners, mutual aid for sympathetic locals.

This is going to be your kind of your hearts and minds part of it. Home base coordination points, rapid escalation from observation to visual obstruction or worse. It's not spontaneous outrage. This is AC2 or command and control with redundancy, OBSEC, hygiene and task organization. That would make an SF team Sergeant nod recognition. And he sang it in a way because he recognizes what these school, these skills are. Replace ICE agents with occupying coalition forces.

And the structure map is almost one to one in the early stage urban cells that we haunted in the mid 2000s. This would be in Iraq, this would be in Afghanistan. This would be in other places too. They do it in the Philippines. All of these things are well documented. Counterinsurgency or low level

insurgency type operations. The most sobering part is that it's domestic, it's funded, it's trained somewhere and directed by people who live in the same country that they're trying to paralyze law enforcement in. And when your own citizens build and operate this level of parallel intelligence and rapid response networks against federal officers, complete with doxing, vehicle pursuits, and harassment that's already been turned lethal, you're no longer dealing with civil disobedience.

You're dealing with a distributed resistance that's learned the lessons of successful counterinsurgencies and insurgency operations. Stay below the kinetic threshold. That means staying below whatever is going to be necessary to be able to put the Insurrection Act. At least the American public is not ready for that yet. In many ways. I have friends that are advocating for it. But the fact is, is most Americans would freak out.

You do force overreaction when possible, and you maintain popular support through narrative and the ever present single center of gravity. Allow me to also suggest to you that what he's seeing here and the the bullhorns, the whistles, the banging, the noise overloads, all those things are cortisol dumps. They're all sympathetic nervous system response mechanisms that make the person in the environment overwhelmed by circumstances. The louder it is, the hard it is to focus.

If you guys have ever been in a car and you've been trying to do something, when you start navigating and you're like, holy crap, I don't recognize any of these roads. I think the GPS took me in the wrong spot. How many of you will turn off a radio or you'll tell your kids to be quiet? I'm trying to figure out where I'm going. Maybe you're driving in the snow because you're a Texan. Maybe you're driving in the snow and you're doing knuckles on the wheels, no extra noise.

And don't take any phone calls and put your phone on mute so that you can simply hold on tight and not hit that little patch of ice that might be out there. That's what we're seeing. We're seeing people who are overwhelmed and they're doing it on purpose.

And what happens when you overwhelm people with circumstances and situations other than guys who are trained military operators, people who've spent a bunch of time down range in loud and crazy and noisy environments where you go and you specifically are are insulating them against the bad decision theater that happens when people are overwhelmed.

You've got a recipe for disaster because a lot of the folks that are in this law enforcement space, they're not ready for the noise, the loudness that the crowds that are surging around them. Almost always what you see is local law enforcement step in and do their job. They step in and they keep people away. They handle violations of state and local law, which is like,

you can't stand in the roadways. You can't go out there and, you know, blast a bullhorn because you're going to be involved in something that most people would think is like, you know, disturbing the peace. Instead, what we're seeing is an ignoring of that. And so whether the local politicians are complicit, whether they're just allowing it, it has the same function and effect. It's allowing something really problematic to to take part.

We'll finish off this whole post here because I actually think all of it is worth it, he said. I spent years training partner forces to dismantle exactly this kind of operatus, and now pieces of it are standing up in American cities, enabled by elements of local government and civil society. I just covered what that looks like. That should keep every thinking American awake at night, not because I want escalation, but because history shows these things do not de escalate on their own.

Once the infrastructure exists and the cadre believes that they're winning the information war. And by the way, they are winning the information war, and we're seeing the Trump administration back away from it. Either we recognize what we're looking at or we pretend it's just activism until the structures harden and spread. Your call, America. But from where I sit, this is not, this isn't January 2026 politics anymore. This is phase one of something we spent decades trying to keep

off our own soil. And people fought in other places. All right, I'm going to tell you it's ongoing. I've got a couple of little examples here. This is how I know the narrative loss is happening. Tim Waltz is going to carve off your support and people that are squishy around you. And the Trump administration is is saying that he's right accidentally. And it sounds like it's it's Susie Wiles who's involved in this. I'm just taking his word out of it.

This was yesterday's press conference. Tim Waltz carving off people who are quote, UN quote Trump voters and people that otherwise support that they're doing exactly what they said. And by the way, you know what's crazy? Some of you guys don't like it. But Alex Jones called us out as the Podesta plan quite a while ago. I've been on his program when he brought it up. You absorb some casualties.

You do the Cloward pivot routine where you overwhelm the local area and then you get people overwhelmingly to back the play of the victim because America likes an underdog. America likes lawless, you know, like, doesn't like a lawless federal force. There is no appetite really to come in and squash things on the the insurrection app. So you're not going to see the federal government come in with a, a large national force to try to quell this thing. And actually that's not what's needed.

What we need is a functional local government to actually do the job of the local government. But instead, they are pulling back and it appears intentionally, especially when you listen to guys like Tim Walz, who's the who's the governor in Minnesota. He's creating that space. And then he's also offering, why don't you come to our team? We're sensible, we're reasonable. We say things that make sense. Here we go. Ready. Let's do a Tim Walz video real quick. This is his press conference

yesterday. I I labeled this carving off the MAGA support. You're allowed to decide at any point that you're not with this anymore. If you voted for this administration, heck, even if you thought Operation Metro Surge was a good idea, sounded like the thing to do a month ago, you're still allowed to look at what's happening here in Minnesota and say this isn't what I voted for and this isn't what I want.

I ask you not to stand by idly, speak out, share what you're seeing and others urge others to put politics aside. We're no longer having a political debate. We're having a moral debate. We all want secure borders and immigration enforcement that prioritizes criminals. And I want to thank the press, especially the local press, who has done a deep dive to show that's exactly what Minnesota does. But what you're seeing is not common sense, lawful or humane enforcement.

That's not what this occupation is about. That's not what this occupation is about, really. The federal government, the United States government is occupying you. Do you take federal monies? Do you pay federal taxes? Do you consider yourself a citizen of the United States? You carry AUS federal government passport from the State Department. What's the occupation? Doesn't matter because it's a narrative victory. That's what's going on there. And by the way, we're the reasonable people.

We just want civility. We just want to do things like everybody's always done. Why don't you come over to our side? You may have voted for this, but you don't have to continue. You don't have to say that this is right now that we've seen some life loss. How many people are carved off there? How many of the squishy people that are that are of feminine of instinct that go look, I want the illegals deported, but I don't want anybody dying over this.

Well, they set this up. The people on the left made this happen. If you guys don't think so, here's another politician trying to do this is a man who's running for office in Texas and he goes out there and lists his bona fides. I'm an F16 pilot. I was a NASA astronaut. Those are always like top tier awesome, like boyhood dreams for most young men. And then he goes on and puts a bunch of caveats on top of documented rights that are non negotiable, at least at the

federal level. I can read the documents myself. Congress is not allowed to pass a law that prohibits the freedom of speech or religion or protest right petitioning for redress of grievances. Congress is not allowed to pass a law that infringes on the Second Amendment. So these people always go, look, I love the Second Men as much as anybody, just like Cash Patel says. I love all the freedoms just like anybody. But also I need you to be sensible here.

And can't we have some reasonable ground in the middle? No, no, we cannot. And he uses his bona fides as a guy who was a former F16 driver. I bet you he killed some bad guys. I bet you he helped take out some real bad dudes. So at some point you were OK with using some force and you understood what it was necessary to do. I don't know if this guy is cynical or if this guy is just a squish or if he got older he became a squish. I have no idea.

Like he was in the Air Force. So Air Force officers, you guys know what I'm talking about. Could go either way. But look at them set themselves up as the the common sense alternatives to some of these others. So this is a. This is an attempt to run for office using the same exact messaging. Jerry Burt's here, former Air Force F16 pilot, NASA astronaut, and I'm currently running for Congress right here in the Houston suburbs in Texas. I want to talk to Trump voters

today. If you voted for Donald Trump, if you're a Republican, if you're an independent, or even if you're a Democrat, I just want to talk to you. I'm going to start off by talking about the Second Amendment. I'm a gun owner. I cherish that right to keep and bear arms legally, and I swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution for 30 years in the Air Force to defend that right. This administration is trampling our Second Amendment rights.

They just came out with this outrageous thing. You're not allowed to legally keep a properly registered firearm on your person at a protest. That's outrageous. The NRA, the Republican Party, should be up in arms about that. Let's talk about the First Amendment, the right to protest. It's a very. Can I just pause him for a second? Did you hear what he just said? Do you guys know how insidious this language is? And I just want to break it real quick. I'm a gun owner.

You know who else has said that? Cash Patel. Also Kamala Harris, interestingly enough, I'm a gun owner and I love the Second Amendment. But it's always that it's always the caveat. It's the but. And basically when you this this old law that whenever you hear someone use the word, but you can just throw out the stuff before it. So I love the Second Amendment, but OK, Well, you don't love the Second Amendment. What do you really love?

And what did he hone in on? A properly lawfully registered firearm, Really. There's no federal registration. The ones that have are not supposed to exist. The ATF does it, but they shouldn't. Isn't that interesting? Just I just want you to kind of tune into that to that ear where they say things like, I have this thing and I'm going to. I'm just like you, OK? I'm talking to you conservatives. I'm talking to you libertarians. I'm talking to you independence.

All right, I got it. I'm just like you. I also love liberty, except when liberty is not going to be helpful to what I'm trying to say. And they immediately go into state legislation and things like that. The fact the matter is, if you love the Second Amendment, if you believe in those things, then the answer should be is that nobody has a right to do it

either. The 14th Amendment says that nobody can go and make a, a, a restriction on a right that is tighter than the federal government is allowed to. That's kind of what the 14th Amendment has been applied to. That's why we end up with things like gay marriage and other

stuff like that. Or they actually believe in the federalist system, which I'm actually OK with, by the way, which would say that the federal government is not allowed to infringe on these rights, but the state can do it all they want. They can tell you when you can speak, they can tell you when you can think. And then you move around to whatever state you want to live in. The left always wants to have

both. What they want to do is say, I believe in the federal restrictions as often as I can get them. And if I can't, then suddenly I care about states rights and then I want to restrict there anyway. I just wanted to hone in on that little bit because he did immediately do caveats. That was talking about things that were restrictions and the concept of like a registered firearm that hits with people

who don't own guns. There are no such things as registered guns in most places in America, but in the few places where it can happen, by the way, he lives in Texas, there's no lawfully registered firearms. So who is he talking to really, and where is he getting these talking points from? That's like New York, California, New Jersey, Massachusetts type talk, just so you guys know. American thing This administration is suppressing our right to protest.

It's outrageous. Let's talk about the Fourth Amendment. The government has said they can come into your home without a warrant, without a judge signed warrant. That is outrageous. It's unconstitutional. We should all be up in arms protesting about that. Look, these are things that the Republican Party traditionally has believed in. And if you voted for Trump, I talked to a voter last week, block walking here in my district. He said I voted for him. This is not what I voted for.

And many people are thinking this is not what I voted for. If you feel that way, call your representatives, call your senators, Tell him to stop this nonsense now. He missed the point. It's not what I voted for either. I voted for more of it and more aggressively, and so did that voter. Most likely this is not what I voted for. I did not vote for Americans to be killed on the streets. I voted for every single illegal alien to be ripped out of this

country and thrown out. And I don't care whether they have kids or not. It doesn't matter because we can't discriminate at this point. If you've had a 20 million plus people, 30 million people roll into your country and take over and they are accessing things that they have no right to do, then the answer is yes. I voted for a lot more than what they're doing. They've let me down because they came in weak and squishy. And what I want is a dominating A dominating presidents in this

particular situation. And I also want the de weaponization of government. I want to see less government except where the government needs to be. And the government needs to be on the border and it needs to be doing things like deporting illegal aliens. There are a few places where we can look at it and go, yes, this is clearly a federal matter. The states can't delineate it.

It's actually done underneath the United States Department of State. And apparently if we're going to have a Homeland Security Department, which we have for the last 25 years, then they ought to do Homeland Security stuff like get rid of people that don't belong in this nation. What they're doing is they're giving you the squish and they're trying to angle people to say, yeah, you're disappointed.

Well, I represent your disappointment, so why don't you come across the aisle with me and try something a little different? That's not what most people are really upset about, certainly not on the conservative side. And honestly, if 56% of the people, and I think bacon cheeseburger nationalists are probably about 70% of America, I think we have about 15% on the whatever MAGA right is that doesn't understand the commonalities that we have with

the left. We have people that are on the radical light or left or whatever and right. Those are your 215 percents. The 70% of Americans want to be left the hell alone. They want to be able to order and eat whatever the hell they want. They want to be able to practice their religion and speak and own firearms and not be in threat of danger. They want law enforcement to be functional but not to be

tyrannical. They like the law enforcement to go catch bad guys and stop people who are speeding in their neighborhoods, but maybe not keep them out of freaking churches when there's COVID or shut down parks. This would be a very, very strong and simple way to launch a political party in America. How about we look at the things and say what are our commonalities and what are they?

What are they aligned with? And basically, if 60 plus percent of Americans still identify as Christians, which they do, and this country in my lifetime was close to 90% Christian, then I don't care whether or not you go to a church at a Christian Church. What I care is, is do you share the same values as me and can we get along on that and can we basically vote that this is what we want?

Doesn't mean we're going to kick you out of your Hindu or Jewish or Muslim and then you don't have a say. You get to say it's just small. We're going to protect you as a minority and we're going to do what the majority does. And it's a, it's an overwhelming majority. I want more of this. I'm not going to go vote for some squishy dude who may have been a really nice guy and may have been a total stud as a pilot and maybe even as an

astronaut. But you just gave me caveats about the Second Amendment and try to say you're like me. I think felons should be allowed to own weapons because I think either felons are allowed to be a citizen because they've done their time, they've served their debt to society, or they haven't and they need to be in prison. I don't believe in some half assed version of it, like let them vote and carry a gun or don't let them out of prison at all, whatever that looks like.

And that's a hard and fast line because either you could be part of civilized society or you can't. If you need to create tears of civilization, the people who do that have always been murderous scumbags. They've always teared the population and then killed off a bunch of people. So let's not have that, please. Like, again, America needs a political right, an actual

conservative political right. And it wouldn't even be that conservative considering where people sit in an average group of people if you were to go and pull them about normal things. I've had reasonable conversations with New York Times reporters, with MSNBC reporters, with people from NBC, with people from the bulk court, you name it, left wing outlets.

We would basically agree on a lot of values and we could easily stay there and we could major in the main majors instead of the minors, which is what these people all try to do. It's so strange that a small fraction of people desperately want to be controlled and then people go like, well if people want to be controlled, I guess I should be controlled too. How about those of us that don't want to be controlled, which I do think actually is the majority of people.

I only say that because I'm watching my children. They are basically untouched hard drives and they don't want to be controlled. You go out there and try and tell them what to do. They have their own ideas. My 2 year old has her own ideas and so do you and so do all of your neighbors. And it turns out a lot of those ideas are like, don't screw with me when I'm doing my thing and get rid of people that are screwing up my thing.

Don't make it dangerous. This is actually not that hard on how I wanted to. I wanted to show you that because it's clearly something that's going on right now. And what I also see is a major distraction from the one thing that I thought was going on. I thought we were about to find out why on the on God's great earth, a bunch of people came to this country starting in the 1990s, have a ton of money, have a ton of fraud access and are screwing over our system.

Is it, is it reasonable to conclude that all of this chaos was incited not because there's some deep love of whatever the hell is going on in Somalia. Sorry, Somalia in in Minnesota, which I do see as kind of a little Somalia. Isn't it interesting that this kicked off by highlighting a bunch of fraud in the Somali communities?

I'm reminded of an interview that was done maybe like a year ago on the Sean Ryan show and things that had right about that same time, I had people reach out to me and go, hey, Kyle, I know people in Minneapolis. I know people who work in law enforcement in Minnesota, and they also were saying this to me before the Sean Ryan show. So I'm going to do a little flashback. It seems like a lot of this is about covering up for fraud in the whole mechanism.

We never end up getting to those mechanisms. We never get upstream of this, the emotionality of it. At least it seems like we don't. Have you ever looked at cardiac arrests involving smallies? It's like, I kind of rocked what she was getting to and I was like, you mean like, are Somalis dying of natural causes and being reported?

And she was like, yeah, she's like, I was talking with Minneapolis police officers and none of them ever remember responding to a cardiac arrest, aneurysm, stroke of a older Somali person. And you're just looking at the actuarial, actuarial tables. You would think 100,000 people out there, the odds say that some of them are going to have heart attacks, they're going to die, and then the police or the emergency services are going to be called to respond.

None of the police officers ever remember going to a Somali DOA. And so I go to some of my sources in the Lewiston Police Department and ask, do you remember ever responding to Somali DOA's cardiac events? Like they start laughing, like, you know, we were just talking about this station and no one really remembers responding to Somali DOA.

So, so what's happening, You know, based on that sample, you know, it's not, it's not totally scientific, but we know there's some natural deaths happening from medical events within the Somali community that are not being reported to the to the state, to the medical authorities, to EMS. Now why is that? He talks a little slowly for my taste. So let me just say it real

quickly. If you are not reporting natural deaths, if you are getting rid of people who are dead but are on the rolls for Medicare and Medicaid, they're getting Social Security and so on. If you're paying out those benefits and those people disappear, but you keep paying out those benefits because their death is never reported, there has to be a means and a mechanisms to do that. And one of the things that was brought up over a year ago was,

isn't it interesting? How many funeral homes are there? Where are these bodies either being buried or cremated? But those are crimes if you are doing it to cover up actually what's going on. And I suspect that that's actually part of it. There are natural deaths everywhere, in every population. They always happen. And in America, we carry them off to a corner. We go to a Funeral Home, we report the natural debt. We get a death certificate in other cultures that want to scam us.

It is very likely that they are not sharing that information. And they are using this stuff to continue to fund operations. Whatever the hell is they're doing, even if it's just they're they're sort of grift off the American public. You had a big problem with that. I don't know why that conversation went away. And it seems like that should come back up. That's what should be happening.

I'm also going to point out to you that if you listen to what we heard in that little, that little paragraphs or several paragraphs that was given by Eric Schwalm, one of the things he said was, is that a, an ability? I'm going to go back and read it specifically because I want you guys to consider this because this is where the real scary stuff happens. Discipline, comms role specialization and a willingness to absorb casualties while bleeding the stronger force slowly.

What we are seeing is the willingness to absorb casualties because you're seeing Renee Goode, you're seeing Alex pretty. Those people were both killed. You're seeing other people doing dumb things and they are they are they are sympathetic figures because of what they're trying to do and what people associate with it. So I think the only answer is to lampoon these people. So I will give you a quick little lampooning of this.

Number 1 is a is a man who apparently thinks he's a pirate and he's trying to recruit more people to the cause. And these things end up going viral because they're funny. If we can lampoon them, we need to just, we need to discredit people's willingness to think that they're being brave and heroic doing really dumb things and get back to the central position that most Americans favor deportations. OK, so here's a guy saying some really dumb stuff about it's

time. People have been asking when's the time? Cool, that sounds super tough. Somebody did an AI rendition of what he was actually saying and I think it's probably more accurate. So let's lampoon people. My wife and her boyfriend asked me to leave the. Room So I've been sitting in the bathroom listening to this song that makes me feel like a pirate. Yeah, his wife's boyfriend told him to leave the room. That's kind of what we get.

There's a lot of this stuff where people are pretending to be something that they're not. That pirate sounds really cool. That was some real bassie voice, by the way. I love that song, it sounds awesome. How embarrassing. Now he feels like a pirate. Is he really going to go out there? Here's what happens when dumb people actually go out there. This is not our palate cleanse, but it is funny. I had a viral post on accident like 5 million views over the

over the last two days. And the point of it is, is that there are some real obvious rules when you decide to do dumb stuff out in public #1 pro tip, if you've never been around military or law enforcement, pyro, don't pick up the flash bang until after it explodes because it'll go off in your hand like a firework and then you're going to be calling for a medic and the medic doesn't have an extra hand for you. Just saying. Burns on the hand are a life

changing event. Here's a lady living her own version of, I guess Saving Private Ryan. Oh. She's. Down. Oh my God, Oh my God. Oh my God. Oh my God. Oh my God. Oh my God. And we'll be right back. So here's the deal. Listen, they always say that there are no atheists in foxholes. It turns out there are no atheists watching some lady who's an atheist blow her hand off while running around in the snow in in Minnesota.

She thought she was protesting ice, but then she was demanding that she needed ice because she has a freaking hand on fire and it's like smoking. Anyway, we need to point out how stupid this is. Remember the people that are actually running these types of campaigns, They have a willingness to absorb casualties while bleeding the stronger force slowly. That woman brings about sympathy. We have to continue to lampoon them. Not because it's funny to get

hurt, it actually sucks. But if you're ever been in the medical world and you ever seen people do really dumb things and really injure themselves in a really bad way, we point out that you're being stupid so that other people don't do it. Yeah, you guys are funny on the chat, too. You guys are getting it. She wanted to get rid of ice, but now all she wants is ice, right? Of course, we point that stuff out. All right, that's where we're going to be for today's program.

Let me just show you, I have a whole bunch of things that I'm going to list over if you guys want to do some like required reading in this space. Couple of things that are going on #1 the Justice Department is being asked by Democrats to give us information. That's not going to happen. So I just like, that's ACBS news story. The mob mentality is going on. This is that whole point of like getting people riled up. They're willing to absorb casualties. That's coming from Fox News.

That was their lead story. So all this stuff is in the same thing. Now you've got NPR talking about the sensible version of why don't we have body Cam footage? Federal operations are not the same local operations. So they do things differently. Very simple. I'm going to put these. So you guys, if you want to read through some of them. This is the stuff that I read before I started talking to you today. So I don't just talk out of my head.

I try to figure out what's going on in the in the news space. And then I give you my my calculus and analysis. A terrible miscalculation. This is a discussion about what's going on people inside DHS. This is CBS News, I think slanting whether or not there's support within the agency to do the mission of the agency. You guys already saw this Trump basically distancing himself from some of the stupidity of Patel and from Kristi Noem statements about the 1st and 2nd amendment.

So that's out there as well. This story we already covered. Lastly, I do want to share that if you guys want to read more about the signals chat that Cash Patel did not find, even though he said he did, even though they're going to keep on doing what they were doing and you know, does some really good reporting. I'm going to link a sub stack so you guys can do that. And I'll give you this viral post that Eric Schwan put up, which has at this point about

here. Let's do a quick refresh, just because I'm curious, and almost 33 million views, 34 million views and counting on this particular commentary, which is actually responding to Cam Higbee's post showing the signal. So that has 22 million. Our response to that post has 34 million. There's a lot of Americans that are looking into this that have experience from overseas that are going holy crap, that's exactly what this is. All right, I appreciate you guys

watching. I appreciate you guys giving us a like over on Rumble and doing it on YouTube and doing it on X. If you happen to be watching on X but come to one of our other platforms so you can get access to our chat. Our chat is fantastic. You are an integral part of the show when it comes to the live part of it. If you're watching after the fact and you want to get the best version of it, check out my little link over here it's Kyle

seraphinshow.com. Go over to Spotify, check it out and watch it that way and see if you like it. You've got access to to transcripts, you've got access to chapters If you want to skip ahead, all those good things. And then, of course, you've got the video and the audio, which you can watch either 1 whatever sort of suits you either way, subscribe wherever you're watching. I would appreciate that give us a like wherever it is.

Give me a comment. If you happen to be in a place where you can do so, that's going to be YouTube and Rumble, and you can do the same thing on Spotify. All that stuff is to say keep your head. Keep your head about you. This is not, this is not going away. This is going to be an ongoing sort of fight about this. And the narrative victories are where the fights are happening right now, not kinetic

victories. OK, All that is to say, some people, Cash Patel, Kamala Harris, people on the political right right now that want to get on the right side of whatever it is. They want the right tweets and the happiest people that are watching them. They're looking for a little bit of a win. JP Comedian does a really good job of encapsulating this.

This is a longer video. I'm only going to play a piece of it, but I think that he's nailed the ethos of what's happening on the social media sphere where people are trying to capture audience and they sound freaking ridiculous. So this is your palate cleanse of the day. We don't have to take everything so seriously. I mean, look, I don't know what else you people want from me. I've got an American flag. It is. It's really big, for crying out loud.

Like, just stop with all the hateful comments. They used to like me. I'd say stuff and they just agree. I don't know what the fuck is going on anymore. Hold on, I just need to check my tweet. Make sure I got mad at the right people. This comments shit got it wrong again. Tell me what you think of this tweet. I'm all for ICE doing their job. This is what I voted for. No no, that's too strong. No what about we need border security? But this isn't the right way to do it now.

I I mean, that's too weak. Oh, yeah, I think I got it. Ice was wrong. Three shots to the face was too many. One. Maybe 2 would have been enough. No, I mean, I don't care either way. It's just what's the position on this for us? It's hard making conservative content now. Everything you say, there's going to be a rageful knob attacking you. What? The libs? No, the conservatives. It's very stressful. Liberals have been leaving us alone, though.

Hey, where do we stand on this take over Greenland thing? It's a wild claim. Candace says she doesn't know, but she knows. What do you think that means? I catch hell for every piece of content I make. Like there's no winning positions you can take with these people, with my people, whatever they are. How fun is that? He's right. If you're chasing audience and you're trying to go out there to peas like some sort of a mob, then you're not operating on

principles. And that's essentially what Cash Patel is. It's what Kamala Harris is. And I wish we had less of that in our politics really. Do I think we'd be better off for it? So also, I've been watching JP for quite a while now, probably like 6-7 years. And one of the things he said in one of his early videos was about meat and how he only eats meat and he's like a vegan version of a Mediterranean or whatever the hell it is, like a like a full carnivore guy.

The funniest moment is I got to use one of his lines while I was in Las Vegas. My friend offered me some celery, some carrots, some broccoli, like it was like a crudite if you guys know what that is. He tried to give me some of this crudite thing and the girl there is like, I was like, do you eat this? And she was like, you can. And I go, I don't like it when people eat my food's food because all those vegetables are

clearly what my food eats. Anyway, I stole that directly from JP. So JP Sears, very funny guy. Guys, thanks for joining us for today's program. I hope you joined my friend, Steve friend on the American Radicals podcast. It's at AMRAD pod on Rumble. It's at AMRAD pod on X, and it's at the American Radicals Podcast over on YouTube. Check him out. He'll be going live in just a little bit like 45 minutes. And God bless you all. Look forward to seeing you again tomorrow. Have a good one.

Thanks for listening to the Kyle Serafin show, streamed live weekdays on rumble.com/kyle Serafin. Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth Social and Instagram at Kyle Serafin.