Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistleblower, an American patriot. Prepare to embrace the uncomfortable truth, because this program has no time for comforting lies. Here is civil liberties enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI agent Kyle Serif. Well, hello my friends, and welcome to the Kyle Seraphin Show. Today is a Monday, it is June the 10th, and we are rolling live right now on rumble.com/kyle Serif.
And if you're joining us on the audio show later on, you're going to miss some good visuals today. There's a couple of graphs you're going to want to see. There's a headline you're going to just see and read because it's fun and you're missing out on what's going on in that live chat. So if you guys get a chance, you can join us at 0930. That's Eastern Time or 8:30 here in Texas, America at rumble.com/cows here.
And just like you see right there, you can also see us on X and on YouTube. We appreciate all that. And then for some reason we broadcast to Facebook, but nobody watches there. That's OK. I don't like Mike Mark Zucker that much. Anyhow, guys, we're going to get into a good wrap up of what's been going on over the last couple days. I keep seeing Mitch, Mitch, Mitch wraps Glock in our live chat saying this really loves the Frotagini.
It is a a staple at this point, I suppose of what goes on in this show. We're going to get into a lot of gaslighting, but a gaslighting is actually the broader technique and I want to talk about something that's called framing bias. Framing bias is what many of us are used to seeing. I'm going to give you some some concrete examples. I'm going to show you some examples from the news. We're going to cover down on a broad variety of topics as we are want to do on this here
show. We're going to be talking about the climate change nonsense and the framing that's going on there. We're going to be talking about the Hunter Biden gun trial, which is sort of nonsensical, but we're going to get there as well. We're going to be talking about what is not being discussed, some of the real issues of the open border. Everyone keeps hearing open border is sort of like the buzzword. It's a catch all phrase that doesn't really cover down on what it really means for
individuals. One of the strangest things that I got to do in my professional career was take a transfer to a place called Las Cruces, NM, which is a tiny town, about 100,000 total people, maybe a little bit less than 200,000 in Donana County, which is in the southern part of New Mexico that isn't America, even though many of my friends as I moved out
there didn't know that. And I keep the local news feed on my Google News sort of alerts primed to Las Cruces because it's a great little representation of a place that nobody looks at, nobody cares about. It's north of El Paso. Nobody even really cares about
El Paso, which is a major city. There are wild stories coming out of Las Cruces almost daily, and they represent the reality of what an open border actually is, not some sort of silly invasion, but the real criminality that happens and the actual victims. It falls in under local news. Many of you don't hear about it. So we're going to talk about that as well. What else we got. Credit card debt is soaring. We got a couple other things we're going to get. We're going to get really weird
into this thing. This is going to be a smorgasbord of things that I think are really represented by the framing effect. And we're going to start off by talking about my friends over at Catholic Vote. So if you guys want more news, including things that are going on in the International Space, they have a nice article about the four Israeli hostages that were just rescued. That's the lead story story about Russell Brand.
He's a comedian. He's sort of like a leftist, agnostic atheist guy who now has been baptized and he says Trump is the only way to save democracy. Interesting take. We're going to talk a little bit about that as well. They've got some stories about how lawyers are trying to figure out if the Supreme Court can actually rule in a meaningful way, pro-life way on anti anti
pregnancy pills. So check out Catholic vote dot org slash loop that'll just get you the loop or you guys can go to the main page, catholicvote.org and you'll just sign up for the loop. It's a great little opportunity and you'll also be able to check them out on the various social medias. It's at Catholic vote. If you're on YouTube, you can click on their Catholic vote channel and see between the lines.
And if you are watching us on Rumble, there's a link in the description to watch our new episode, which dropped on D-Day and I think was a fitting tribute. It was a discussion of pray to God but row for the shore. And if you're not familiar with that expression, I encourage you to spend 8 or 10 minutes and take a look at between the
lines. All right, let's get right into the reality of what's happening right now because apparently we're all going to die and I don't have People will die queued up. But here it is. This is the UN. This is the general chief of the UN saying that the world is on a highway to climb at hell. That's not nearly as catchy as the ACDC highway to hell. The climate hell makes it a little bit less fun. I think Ben Shapiro was the one who said it.
Whenever you add a modifier to something that has real meaning, you know, you add like, things like a racial justice in front of the word justice, it cheapens the word justice. I think it's the same thing here. Highway to hell sounds scary enough. Highway to climate hell sounds kind of lame. He says the The planet has endured 12 straight months of unprecedented heat. Now, many of you spent your weekends doing things outdoors like I did.
I have a fantastic and ridiculous shirt tan right now. I wore a tank top that I never wear it. One of my brothers bought me this like goofy Second Amendment type shirt and it says just the tip and it shows a couple of like 556 rounds or something stupid. And and I wear it only when I'm doing things that I'm going to destroy it. So I was sanding, I was taking apart a table and I was out there pressure washing and I was scalping the lawn to get rid of all the kind of gross stuff.
Anyway, I have this like goofy, like thick wife beater, you know, red lines on the rest of my neck and my shoulders. But that doesn't mean that we're all going to die from the heat. These were two actual lead headlines coming off CN NS main page. This one about the UN chief talking about the highway to climb in hell, and this other one which was talking about how people will die. Yeah, you can imagine punishing heat Dome will only worsen.
I love the heat Dome. And I I never heard about this when I was a kid. The heat Dome really like, and they're showing it over California and Seattle and Portland. And then look on the actual map that you're seeing on the screen here. Look where it's really red. It's really red where I live. It's like Burt, dark, dark blood red. That's where the real heat is. Folks, if you guys want to see what hot is, come down to Texas, check out Houston in the summer.
Give me this nonsense. California's really hot. But but it goes to a broader point, which is that they are going to frame certain pieces of information in order to scare you and in order to push you to a desired outcome. This is the DEI agenda. We're actually going to wrap up with our with our palate cleanser on this as well. These people have all bought into what my friend George Hill
calls the climate paganism. And it doesn't matter whether they're going to do the paganism about your sexual orientation or about your gender ideology or about your feelings about opening the border, like all of these things are all tied together to push you into one inevitable, inevitable consequence. Which is to say, there are too many problems. I want to surrender them to
someone bigger than myself. And as Christians and most Americans will look to God, however you call him, they will say this is, this is the solution. But people on the political left continue to push that government is the solution. And why wouldn't they? Because that's where their power lies. That's where they believe it is. I'm going to show you something about this guy that is the he's the secretary general of the UN. That sounds like a really important position.
I don't know why we have AUN anymore. I, I think we've just kind of moved on from it. But the secretary general is a guy named Antonio Gutierrez, and he's from Lisbon, Portugal. And I just chopped a little bit of his bio out and I just threw it on the screen here for you to look at. He's 75 years old and he studied physics and electrical engineering. He graduated in 1971 from an undergraduate degree.
He was actually given an award for being the so-called best student in the entire country in the late 1960s before he went into university. So I'm sure he's a pretty smart guy. Electrical engineering, it's not a slouch profession. All right, physics sounds good. Does that make him someone who's an expert on climate change, that he studied these two things at an undergraduate level in the 1960s and early 70s? I don't think so.
It doesn't make any sense to me. But what he is is is, you know, what is academic background is a little bit less important than what he actually spent his entire life doing. He graduated in 1971 and they claim for his his Wikipedia bio that he started an academic career as an assistant professor. That's also interesting to me, 'cause I didn't know that you could do a 3-4 year degree and then end up being a professor. But that's how it works over
there, so that's fine. Every, every academic system's a little different. In 1971, he got his first job out of college. In 1974, he left that job forever to become a politician. So this man has three years of academic experience and no professional experience outside of politics. And you'll be shocked to learn that in 1974, he became a member of the Socialist Party in Portugal. And he's been a socialist since 1974. I'm sure he was a socialist or
leaning socialist before then. So socialists are pushing the climate emergency on you. Why would they do that? Because the answer to the climate emergency is always going to be the way that they have framed it. It is a is a human problem. It is not a problem that exists because of a huge system that has many, many variables.
It must be man's fault. And in order to do to do a really good religion and every cult must have it, you must have sin, which is what you do every day as you use carbons and you drive fossil fuel powered vehicles and you run a lawn mower and you wear a jacket that's made of some kind of polymer material that comes from a petroleum refining process. Those are the sins. And in order to correct your
sins, you must have a penance. And your penance is to cede your power directly over to socialists who believe that they have all the answers. If you just give them enough power, it'll all be OK. That's the nature of socialism. That's the nature of progressive political leftism. It is a religion. They just need power.
And the fun thing about their religion is, is that they they operate under this unfalsifiable premise that if you just gave us enough power, then we could solve all the problems. I want you to think about that. What if you don't give them enough power? Well, obviously their solution is going to be incomplete. It's still going to keep getting hotter. The only solution is total and abject subjugation of yourself to the federal government.
It is antithetical to America. It's antithetical to our values as individuals. And one of the funny things about the thing that these folks always talk about is they always want to dress themselves in a thing called democracy, don't
they? I did this funny little research because I've always believed that democracy, at least the broader concept of it, which we do have some variety of in this country, democracy means two things at once, not the way the political left talks about it. What it means is that the majority rules that we do the greatest good for the greatest number of people by policy, but we do another special thing that nobody else does. This is a Western democracy.
The thing that we do is we protect the rights of majority of the minority. So you have two conflicting interests here. The majority is the group that you make policy for. Why? Because they encompass the greatest #50% + 1, or usually a a super majority, even better. But then we have small minority groups, and we don't trod over them and just inflict our tyrannical ideas on them. We also protect their liberties, and we protect their ability to be a minority.
We don't outlaw them, and we don't crush them. So Western democracy is constantly at odds with itself. It's trying to do the greatest good for the greatest number of people, but also protect the people that don't want to play ball like that. That's why we have a Libertarian Party in this country, a small group of people who are basically irrelevant. They don't get to make any policy, but we don't crush them and tell them they can't have
those rights. In fact, you're even allowed to have really, really disgusting ideas in this country. You can be a white supremacist. You could be a racially motivated violent extremist, as the FBI might call them. You're allowed to do those things. You could be a communist. You can be a Nazi. All of those things are protected under our system because we allow you to have the worst ideas, and then we hope that the best ideas will triumph.
The framing effect is used in order to present information that is technically correct, but misleading and false. The the media fact checkers would use the the expression needs context. And yet these are the people that are constantly not providing the context over and over and over again. Here's the most important context when it comes to this climate emergency. And for some reason, every summer we have to remind people excessive heat can kill you, but extreme cold still causes many
more fatalities. I found this article coming from Forbes. It was written last year during the summer in July. Actually, it was written on my my wedding anniversary. This article was written last year. I only say that because I always forget my wedding anniversary. You know, sometimes you just one of those guys my wife and I have missed, I think like nine out of the 10 that we've had. Excessive heat does kill some
people. Anybody who's ever been a victim of heat stroke, which I have been, and had your kidneys shut down and done something on a really, really hot military base walking around on the star course at Camp McCall. Yeah, it's terrible. Like, heat is awful, but roughly twice as many people die from cold. So when you look at the proportionality of it, we always frame climate change and global warming was always the thing. Why? Because people don't like being hot. It's really gross.
But people die in the cold. Overwhelmingly, people die in the cold because it is far more fatal to the human condition. For some reason we've been able to cope with heat and consider this, we have more technologies and more capabilities to cool, including things like, you know, running water which didn't exist for most of human history. We now have air conditioning units that can actually change the climate inside a semi sealed
structure. None of that seems to matter for the people on the political left. They can't look at anything honestly because every single one of their predictions is only geared towards give us more power. If you give us enough power to legislate the way that you live, then we will save you from the
heat, from the cold. You would think that these people would understand that adding carbon simply allows for more plant growth, which actually is a really good thing when it comes down to what our food eats and how things operate in reality. But that doesn't stop them from making these claims. So here's what I wanted to show you. This is a graph coming from that UN Secretary General announcement about how we're all going to die because of the heat.
What you're seeing on here, if you're watching on the screen, is monthly temperatures each year since 1940 world average. Well, there's a lot baked into the cake when it comes into this. This is a a classic framing #1 we're talking about averages across the world. Well, that doesn't make a lot of sense because people who live in certain climates have adapted to those heats.
Their heat proteins, their heat shock proteins are are higher their ability to actually build structures that handle heat. It changes the game as well, but what you're seeing is a slow increase for all these years that basically has been building up and it looks like a heat Dome, whatever that is.
You're seeing that from January. We have generally low temperatures and they get back down low in December and they spike somewhere between May, June, July, August and September. Some of us call that summer. It's uncomfortable in many places where we live now. What you're seeing is a highlight. They're showing. Look, in June of 2023 they had the highest heat globally on average for all the years since 1940, and May is already outpacing that line.
In fact, the year 2024 has been warmer than every year before. So should we panic? Are we all going to die because of this heat? The answer is actually quite funny. Again, heat kills some, cold kills more. Here's the thing that I found very interesting. It's very easy. All you got to do is see what was the hottest temperature in California on recorded history. It was in 1913.
It was 134°F. It was recorded at the Greenland Ranch in Death Valley, CA. Some people have contested it, but it was done by somebody who was AUS Weather Bureau observer that was stationed at that particular location. Again, July 10th, 1913, a 134°. Anybody who's been over to the Middle East and done some of the work in in the sandbox type of things like military or contractors, they know 130 degrees is insanely hot. But it was in 1913.
Well, that's outside of that graph that we just saw now, wasn't it? Now there's another little thing I did. I said, look, what about New York? What's the hottest temperature ever recorded in New York? Was it in the 1940s and until today? No, the hottest temperature observed in Central Park in New York City in history was 106°F, and that was on July 9th. You notice that it's kind of peaks right where the hottest times are in 1936. So it predates, it predates that 1940s little moment.
They also show that the coldest moment that happened was in 1934. And anybody who pays attention to weather and anybody who pays attention to the way that things are catalogued across the centuries, you'll see that. Oh, man, we had some really wild hurricane seasons in the 19 teens in Galveston. They destroyed the entire coast. We're talking about framing here, folks.
We're talking about cherry picking and cropping the data such that it looks like the thing that you are trying to convince people, and it's not gaslighting. Gaslighting is something different. I actually pulled a little AI definition for you of gaslighting. It's a psychological manipulation that involves convincing someone to question their own reality, their memories or perceptions. That's not exactly what we're going on and doing right now.
It is a form of emotional abuse, per the AI thing. I think that's really funny because we are being emotionally abused by those who are trying to tell us what is happening in the world. They're abusing the trust that they have, but framing is actually using real information and it is using it in a way that is disingenuous by, you know, not including the things that show a bigger picture. They are framing it very specific to tell the story they
want and not the full story. Being stuck in the chat just said lies, damn lies and statistics. Framing errors and framing biases often come from using statistics, but you can use in your own life. I want you guys to think about this because this is a very simple thing. We learn how to do this at a young age. Imagine somebody asked you when you were a kid, did you do well on the test you took today?
And your answer comes back. You're like, well, they wanted an 8 page essay at the end of it. And I wrote 12 full pages. And you go like, oh, now in the mainstream media, that's how they answer the questions, is it not? They exclude the part where they said that those 12 full pages were a story that had nothing to do with what was being asked on the essay. And it was an abject failure. I got there early. I was really ready to go. You can talk around the edges.
You can frame the argument such that you are not actually discussing the topic that is being questioned. And we see this over and over again. We see it specifically with the climate stuff, but we see it with a whole bunch of other things as well. And I'm going to kind of dig into those in just one second here. Before we do, let me thank my buddies over at the Patriot Coolers guys, Patriot coolers.com. You can get yourself a handsome
mug just like this one. I'll tell you what the the camera doesn't do this this mug justice. It is such a finely embroidered or not embroidered. What is it engraved, etched with laser. It's a white mug. So it's kind of a handsome looking thing to begin with. But it's got our suspendables flag on it. It's got the last line sub stack rifle sitting here by the flag. It's so small and so intricate. Only someone holding it will be able to see it. Someone who walks up and sees it on your desk.
If you guys want to get your own Patriot cooler mug or water Tumblr, it is hot. We should be hydrating. You guys can do that at patriotcoolers.com. The promo code Kyle. Again, Kyle saves you 10%. You'll get free shipping if you order about two of them. That's usually the way it works out. And go ahead and just before you add it to cart, go to customize, customize it, add it directly in whatever sort of logos you want
to grab. And if you want to use some of our stock images, go to the suspendables. You're able to click on that and add suspendables logos right there. Patriot coolers.com promo code Kyle. To save you that 10%. Yeah, they're the best. I've got so many of these tumblers, by the way. I should start giving them to people. I should just give them as gifts
because we've got like a bunch. I keep order and every time I see one of my buddies who's ordered one or one of you guys post one online and it's a different colour that looks neat. You can also get them silk screened on there. I'm like, oh, I should have that one too. Those are good looking. I want to, I want to talk about a different story then you'd think. What does this have to do with climate? It has nothing to do with climate. It has to do with framing.
Has to do with framing right here. This is a story that led CNN. Father of a transgender teen attacked in school says attackers should face charges. Now, I read this whole article and I went looking for the facts because that's what I want to see. What happened here? That's a boy that you're seeing with long blonde hair. He looks like a nerdy boy that played Dungeons and Dragons when he was a kid. Which, by the way, there's a movie called Dungeons and Dragons on Amazon Prime right now.
It's actually pretty good. It's got Michelle Rodriguez from Fast and the Furious, and it's got Chris Pine from all the things that Chris Pine is in. And it's pretty charming, even though it's like totally a weird story. I have no idea if there's like inside nerd jokes about Dungeons Dragons. Wasn't my cup of tea, but this guy looks like he probably played that and now he identifies as a girl, which is ridiculous.
And he's changed his name. He calls himself Cobalt Sovereign. Sovereign Cobalt. That's how you name girls, right? That's what a man who thinks a woman would be named. So the father of this particular transgender, we'll put that in air quotes. High school students says that he was beaten in school. I'm changing pronouns to be accurate. And once the students who beat or harass his daughter, who is really his son to face criminal charges were being were being just lied to over and over
again. They can't even get the basics on it. The thing that I found very interesting is he said there has to be some repercussions for their actions. Never in this story does it mention this was a fight that started apparently in a bathroom, started in the hallway and ended up in a bathroom, then ended up in a hallway again. They never talk about who did the fighting, who did the hitting, who did the punching of
this young boy. It is my belief, my guess only from reading between the lines here, that we're talking about girls defending themselves in a locker room environment, in a bathroom environment. And I've got no problem with this. When boys start going in with the twig and berries intact and they want to hang out in the girls bathroom, I'm sort of fine with this. Now the claim was there has to be repercussions.
Nobody's been charged. For some reason, it's our fear that it's going to escalate into further behavior. When you get away with this stuff, there needs some be some kind of punishment. This is the dad talking. There has to be a serious discussion about whether those kids should even be allowed to come back to the same school. How about your kid is weird? How about when we talk about the way that we make policy, we do it for the majority.
Now, we protect the minority. You're not allowed to hit minorities. But we also don't make bathroom rules for one person when everybody else has figured out what it is that their parts do. And in fact, so does that kid. That kid can't fake what his plumbing is designed to do. This is something funny from the dad. The dad looks like he's probably in his 50s. He's got Gray hair. He's not in great shape.
He says it's unacceptable. The whole transphobia and homophobia thing, by the way, I don't understand how the trans movement and the homophobia movement, people can all be on the same team. It makes zero sense. Just because you have an alternative sexuality doesn't
mean that you're in line. In fact, if all of your sexuality says that you're interested in somebody from a different sex or the same sex in case of homosexuality, how on earth are you going to try to, you know, unroot what actual biological sex looks like? It's just cognitive dissonance is very strong there. He says, you know, in my opinion, these homophobia and transphobia thing, it's so 20th century. And that's the thing, isn't it?
We need to move past this and move into this modern thing. It's clear that the climate is getting worse in this regard. Is it? Or have you forced something into ridiculousness because you've been framing people to the point where they think you're a loony and you're also endangering young girls, young women, You're putting weirdos. We've shown videos on this, on this show of women having to confront men who look like men wearing tube tops and other weird things, their hairy chests.
It's disgusting. It's disgusting because there are real victims and it's not this kid. Like, should this kid get hit? No, that's not right. But what did he do to incite that? Don't they always ask that? Who started it? Isn't that the basics of it? That's probably why the Minnetonka Police Department did not get in, although they said it was a possible hate crime and now they're going to have to investigate why? Because of public pressure.
That's what CNN is all about. Now, when you Scroll down to the bottom of the entirety of this article and I've highlighted it here on the screen, you're seeing quote, this is the editorial piece that's supposed to be the crime and justice reporter sharing information. Listen to this framing. The attack comes amidst a rise in anti LGBTQ legislation and as advocates say LGBTQ students have faced an uptick in threats
and violence. It comes nearly four months after the decks the death of Nex Beddick, a non binary 10th grader in Oklahoma who told the police about being beaten to the point of blacking out during a confrontation in the school bathroom. That entire paragraph is framed. It's garbage, It's nonsense. A rise in LGBTQ legislation. Well, you say anti LGBTQ legislation. I say we're going to just defend biological reality. Who's correct and why do you get to be correct simply because
you're writing it on CNN? Advocates say that there's been an uptick in threats and violence. Really. You'll notice there's no hyperlink there. Is there any statistic to go along with this or do you just want to do the emotional triggering thing about how some young girl who didn't understand that she was a girl died and it had nothing to do with being in a fight, but they made it look like it didn't? Those are true facts. That is a truthful fact.
A non binary 10th grader in Oklahoma told the police about being beaten and that person is also dead. Are they related? Do they have anything to do with each other? They do not, but they have been framed as such. They are framed to tell you something that is not real. You would be led to believe that that child 10th grader, and it's awfully sad that a 10th grader
is dead for any reason. But you would be wrong to believe that they school confrontation resulting in a beating to the point of blacking out, which by the way, is also false. There was no blacking out. The child was sitting in an exam room. A police officer body Cam showed it. If you've never seen it, I may play it on the show at some point. Maybe the Amrads will play it long form. The cop comes in and talks.
The mom is feeding lines. The child is fine and she talks about getting in the fight and she's very casual about it. Anybody who's been beaten up to the point of blacking out usually has a little bit more of an emotional reaction to that, especially girls. That's not what happened here. They're unrelated, but we are being framed to believe that this poor young boy was beaten up and this is some sort of a
national disaster. This is this is generalizing something that is in fact a very, very minute problem. The FBI, which is pretty gay and you guys know that, is celebrating Pride Month right now. And they do a study on your tax dollars to find out how many people inside the FBI are involved in and alternative sexualities. It's under 2%. You won't be shocked to learn kind of like the percentage of people that are grown-ups that actually that represent these
different populations. I'm not mad at people who are gay. I'm not mad at people that have alternative sexual preferences. I don't want them around my children per say. That doesn't mean that I'm angry at them. And yet we're talking about less than 2% of the population. Again, the preferences which we keep hearing from this political left that they will defend. Democracy should involve majority rules. Minorities are protected, so we should protect those people from
beatings. Yeah, I don't think that's good. It was a legacy of the 80s that wasn't fantastic, but people kind of knew that you didn't go after kids with it because that would result in something that was inevitably pretty bad for you and that might have been useful. The mainstream. What did you just say? Framing bias is mainstream editorial bias. In fact, editorial bias and framing bias are the same thing. Editorial bias is simply which stories will we cover?
There's a a little piece that we're going to talk about towards the end here. It's MSNBC lamenting the fact that Jon Stewart is getting good readings readings and he's doing both sides ISM is what they call it, which is to say he's covering both ends of the spectrum. You know, like comedians used to always do. He, he runs a comedy show called The Daily Show. And the comedy show that he does specifically is supposed to call out the ridiculous nature of the political left and the right.
They made fun of everybody. Historically, that's what made places like Saturday Night Live funny, because human beings are very funny and they're ridiculous, especially when you can call them out with plain speech. That's the nature of comedy. We get to truth by dismantling the narrative. They're really mad at Jon Stewart for quite a few reasons, one of which is that he's giving fair takes to things on the political right, God forbid.
OK, now one of the things that is going to be covered all over the place this week as it starts wrapping up is the story of Hunter Biden and the gun charge. I'm going to go on record and say I think that he will not be convicted of these. There is a so-called silver bullet that they are looking
for. They being the defense team, they are hoping that they can tie up the jury in enough knots that they'll either be hung or they will be able to have a mistrial or be able to say that, listen, we we can't convict. So they're going to end up dropping these charges. And we spend a lot of money as a country on this.
There's a couple reasons why that's actually a pretty decent thing for conservatives #1 if you are a conservative like me and you are a Second Amendment absolutist and you are a constitutional extremist, then people being prosecuted for any gun charges are actually not great. If they used a gun illegally and they committed a crime of violence, I'm not crazy about it, no. So let's go after those people. Those are crimes that infringe
on other people's liberties. But one guy owning a a fancy cult revolver, which it is a fancy cult revolver. He had a Cobra. These are not cheap pistols. If you happen to own a handgun and you're a drug addict and you didn't do anything terrible with it other than like make bad romantic decisions and your brother's widow, who is your girlfriend, threw it in the trash can, I'm not a big fan of those things. Those are pretty reckless.
That's pretty dangerous and stupid, but it is your property. I'm sort of down with that. I think you should be able to own firearms, and who needs a firearm more than somebody who deals with drug dealers on a regular basis? Can we be real about that? If you're a convicted felon and you've served your time, shouldn't you be able to have your rights restored? I'm also very uncomfortable the fact that I just found out we had Etan Heim, our Doctor Who exposed a bunch of gender surgeries.
He just had his firearm rights removed. We'll have him on the program probably later on this week. You know, he had his firearm rights removed because of a indictment. This country has absolutely lost the constitutional foundation that it comes in. We're supposed to believe that people are innocent until proven guilty. So why do they lose rights to their firearms if they haven't ever been convicted of anything? I see Dexter Taylor's name popping up in our chat.
Dexter Taylor built guns in his house that no one ever saw, and the only reason that they found out is because an overreaching federal task force was able to go and shut down a lawfully operating business that shipped parts that were legal to buy. We've lost the thread here. So I don't think people should be cheering on Hunter Biden going to jail over this, and I
don't think he will. And that actually is is a favorable position for conservatives if we can be intellectually honest about it. Why do you want to see that? What you want to see is that 2 tiered system of justice that any normal person would be convicted, but not a Biden and certainly not in in Delaware. I want you to show you to show you guys, for those of you that are not gun buyers or don't buy them as often as I do, this is the form that is in question.
So you all understand what is at play here because there's going to be a lot of commentary. I'll actually play you a little bit of it. This is the form that is in play. It's called the 4473. This is an ATF form, has Department of Justice markings on the top, the firearms transaction record. This is the federal government's record, which is not supposed to go to the federal government. But it turns out if your firearm dealer goes out of business, they get all these things.
These are the forms. It's like 2-3 pages. It's actually 2 pages, but it's folded over and I think it's printed on both sides. So it might be a total of four including all the fine print and you fill in some basic biographical information. By the way, I always click the following. I always click that I am, where are they on the form white, And I also click American Indian, Alaska Native. You can click anything you want on these forms, by the way. You can check them any way you
want. You don't have to include your Social Security number unless you have a very common name and you think you might get jammed up. So if you've never done these before and this is intimidating, stopping you from buying a gun, this is the form that you're going to go. So you can actually look it up and know the answer to the questions before you go in there. It's a good idea. Basically, if you are a legal firearm owner, you go to question #11 which is the non biographical stuff.
These are the legally binding pieces. This is what Hunter Biden is being charged over. And question 11 has a bunch of subsections. Section A should be yes. If you are doing it legally. That means you are the actual buyer of the gun. That would make you a straw purchaser if you answer yes when you in fact are buying it for somebody else. All right, you have to be the intended purchaser of said gun and you intend to hold on to it at least at least in the
interim. Now, you could change your mind when you get to the parking lot, but when you're buying that gun, it has to be your intention that it's going to be your gun. That's question A. That's yes. The rest of them should all be no if you're AUS citizen who can
legally own a gun. And the specific section that is at play for Hunter Biden is section 11, question number E, subsection E. It says are you an unlawful user of or addicted to marijuana or any depressants, stimulants, narcotic drug or any other controlled substance?
This is the piece that's in play warning the use or possession of marijuana remains unlawful under federal law, regardless of whether it's been legalized or decriminalized for medicinal or recreational persons at the state where you reside. You see that piece? This is updated in 2016. It may not have actually said that at that point in time when Hunter was doing this. This is the 2016 form.
Are you an unlawful user or are you addicted to marijuana, depressants, stimulant, narcotic drugs, other controlled substances, the end That's the question. If you answer no, which is the way that you will get this form back and be able to actually possess the weapon, but you actually are an unlawful user or addicted to see, here's The funny thing, everybody in the in the defense is going to play on that. He didn't know he was an addict.
This is the hope that they have. Their belief is that they can convince a jury that he didn't believe he was an addict because he was in denial. You'll notice that the that the words of this particular question do not matter in that case. Are you an unlawful user of addicted to is irrelevant. Now, what they're going to also say is that he wasn't specifically using it at that time. However, I think the prosecution's done a pretty good job of pointing it out.
When we see that he is not convicted 'cause I don't expect him to be, then you get 2 tiers of justice, which is exactly what's been argued. And that is fundamentally good for the argument. It's bad for the legal system in Delaware. It's bad for people who want a fair system and a fair shake. But it's good for people that are making an argument right now, which we are making, are we
not? The argument is there are two systems of justice and it used to be that the people who were wealthy got one and the people who are poor got another. Now Donald Trump is as wealthy as anybody in America, is he not? He's certainly in that upper stratosphere of of wealth that many of us and most of us will never see or be part of. But he's experiencing criminal justice effects and they don't seem very great.
So what does that mean to me? It says that the system has changed from wealthy versus non wealthy, that you get the justice that you can afford was the old joke at the OJ time. We've moved from that. And now as we get the justice that your political party will allow, which shows us an ideologically captured federal government, in other words, a weaponized federal government. In other words, exactly what the suspendables have been telling you for quite a while now.
And I think it's very important. We have to know that that evidence, even though it's bad individually, it's actually pretty good. And I'm going to do a quick Fact Check for framing because Donald Trump has said some things that were false about Hunter Biden. We should be accurate about where it is, but we should also be accurate.
But the question that is being asked all right before we do, if you guys want a a fantastic snack that supports the Kyle syrup and show, Mad Hat jerky.com/kyle is the place to go. Up to 20% off. I think their Father's Day promo is still running so you guys look for that. And who else has a love it or your money back guarantee on food? I don't know very many places that have it. Check out Mad Hat Jerky promo code Kyle Kyle Mad Hat
jerky.com. It is the best when it comes to a high protein snack that is Also, it's not too chewy. If you get the, the USDA prime, it's outstanding and I highly recommend it. It, it is my favorite. We're almost, I think my bag, oh, my bag is almost empty. It's under the, the desk. Look, we are down to the last like tail. There it is. It's almost empty. I'm going to have to put my order in soon too. All right, I'm at, at
jerky.com/com. Folks, listen, I'm telling you this stuff particularly we want to be accurate about the things we say. Those words have meaning on that form. You're going to hear it. Well, let's just play a quick Fox video because what they're talking about on Fox is that they're going to try to find the sweet spot of denial. I don't think denial matters when you talk about are you an unlawful user of it? And you've stated it in multiple things.
And the, and the real key is, is they found, they found drug residue on the gun case and on the on the truck that he was driving. The biggest thing that I've ever seen that is insane, but true. Federal prosecutors can actually go after someone who's never been convicted of a crime if they are an unlawful user. That makes you a prohibited person under federal law from owning a gun and ammunition.
And we have seen people who have gotten federal prison time for holding 122LR cartridge like a three cent screw up in their pocket at the time when they were using drugs and they were arrested. And a federal prosecutor said they are a prohibited person and they have gotten those people to go to prison over it. I don't think Hunter Biden will but the but the evidence would convict anybody except him, anybody except the Democrat favor favored child.
Listen to Fox News take on this. He may make this take the stand. That could be very interesting for some of us only because I think the sound bites that'll come out will be good. But let's listen to Fox News take Hunter Biden's federal gun trial resumes Monday after prosecutors rested their case. Biden's lawyers revealing they may call Hunter to the stand
after the weekend. This wraps up a week of eye opening testimony in which prosecutors claim Biden's truck and gun case had remnants of drugs on them. Hunter's daughter Naomi, later testified that she did not see any drug paraphernalia in her father's truck. So here to unpack all of it is criminal defense attorney Mark Iglarsh. Mark, great to have you this morning. Let's start with Hunter
testifying. Likelihood. Yeah, I think that they're definitely considering it, not because they want to, but because they have to. The government has done an amazing job painting him as a drug user and an addict. The only one who can contradict that is him taking the stand and saying, at the time, I wasn't a user. When I got that gun I wasn't using. At least I looked at it as literally at that moment and was I an addict?
Now I realize I probably was. At the time I was in deep denial about my addiction, like most addicts can be. And I didn't lie. I wrote down that I wasn't an addict because I didn't think I was. So how does that? Work, Mark, we know that ignorance is no defense when it comes to the law. You can't say I didn't know something was against the law. But on this particular instance, in this particular case, Hunter's attempting to kind of parse the knowledge of being an
addict. So if you testify I'm not an addict, and you believe you're not an addict, but you are an addict, are you safe? I think you are. I think that jurors who love the Bidens in Delaware are more inclined to believe his testimony that he didn't lie because in his mind that was his truth, the subjective nature of truth. This is the thing that we have to be fighting against, folks. His truth, right?
And as we've said, it sounds like the jury pool is fairly a fairly good set of peers for him that at least half of the jury has had some experience with drug addiction or substance abuse and recovery. Things like, you know, total fairness here. And one person apparently is a former Secret Service employee married to a current Secret
Service employee. So with all that stuff out there, I wanted to cover down on the one thing that made me wonder, 'cause I always thought Hunter Biden was actually dishonorably discharged, which is another section, by the way, of that, that question #11 one of the subsections asked, have you ever been discharged in the military under dishonorable terms? And I always believed that, yes, because I knew he was kicked out of the Navy for cocaine.
But luckily, we have places like Reuters doing fact checks, doing the heavy lifting and carrying water for Hunter Biden and letting us know that in fact, his military discharge was administrative. I can't find the terms that he
did. So if you guys actually know the years that he supposedly served in the Navy, apparently he's got assigned to a public affairs post in a a naval base in Delaware and then one month in tested positive for cocaine and that was the end of it. Now, Donald Trump has said that he was dishonorably discharged. That was something that was done
on the debate stage. This is something that they went and corrected back in 2020 when we saw the mainstream media covering all the, you know, the positive aspects and and trying to debunk any negative things about Hunter Biden, including the laptop. What was also funny is that Donald Trump said that Hunter Biden has never had a real job until his dad became Vice president. They rated that claim false. I want to read you this because you want to talk about framing something.
I suppose literally and factually they may be correct, but are any of these actually really real jobs for a guy that has a a law degree, got kicked out of the military and he's a grown man and they act like he's a baby, that he's been infantilized in our mainstream media. These are the things the Center for Responsive Politics, which is an independent think tank that tells me that they're probably not, tracks the effects of money and lobbying on
elections and public policy. They said that Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden worked for the MBNA Corporation from 1996 to 1998. He worked for the United States Department of Commerce from 98 to 2001. He worked for a lobbying firm that it had his name on the door on it from 2001 to 2009. So the longest job so far. He worked three years for the government while his dad was a senator. I'm sure that had nothing to do with it. And then he spent eight years working as a lobbyist for a firm
that had his name on the door. I'm sure he did a lot of great work there. And then another lobbying, first the National Group LLP from 2003 to 2005 during that time as well. So he was working for multiple lobbying. He also, this is my favorite, served as a board member and the vice chair of Amtrak of all things from 2006 to 2009. And then he started running around the world picking up bags of cash because, you know, they definitely weren't buying influence of the vice president.
Daddy, it's very interesting that you're going to call all those things jobs. It reminds me of the same kind of guy who did three years worth of academic teaching and then became a full time professional socialist politician. Why are these people weighing in on anything? Why are these the people that we are paying attention to? We're not living in serious times, but they are framing it as such. They're framing it like these are the things that are really important.
Meanwhile, check this guy, guy being gal. Coast Guard Academy official resigns. She said she was directed to lie to Congress as part of the cruel sexual assault cover up. There was a thing called Operation Broken Anchor that was going on at the Coast Guard Academy. They were trying to stop this, this sort of significant number of sexual assault and covers up that have been happening for decades. Apparently this woman, her name is Shannon Norenberg.
She resigned from her role. She was the head of Sark at the US Coast Guard Academy. And that's kind of interesting. Anybody who's been in the military knows a little bit about the Sark people. They're kind of the worst. They're like the the killjoys, the no funds. They're the ones that make you do the briefings on sexual assault that almost never have anything to do with you except when they do. Sorry. It was called Operation Fouled Anchor, not broken Anchor.
And it was a cover up. Apparently she's now a whistleblower. So she's gone forward and said that she was told to lie to different members of people that were sexually assaulted and to members of Congress, and she did so for a number of years, but now she's coming clean. So she's a whistleblower. This is the person who did something that was dishonest, it sounds like, per her own statements that I'm reading. I'm, I'm open to being corrected
on that. But she said she was sent on an apology to her basically to get victims of sexual assault to keep their cases quiet. And that members of Congress, she believes that they were intended to dissuade them, the victims from going to the member of Congress to complain about it, to try to keep this thing quieter than it was. You know, that old institution over constitution thing. Apparently this woman went along with it while it was convenient,
but now it's not convenient. So now she's come forward and she's talking about, well, good for her for doing the right thing eventually. It's the thing that the the suspendables have that is so frustrating. Some of us refused to do the things that were illegal, immoral or unethical right away. Yeah, you guys are talking about this in the chat about how common this stuff is.
It actually is quite common. And one of the reasons that it's so common is that you have alpha male type testosterone driven people that need to be in war. People like Jake Mcnasty that we heard about, guys that won the day on D-Day and that went in and did things that are dangerous and aggressive. Those kind of guys are kind of tough to keep in Garrison, it turns out, and it's really dangerous to put them around a bunch of women in the same uniform.
It's inevitable that when you put men and women together in hard situations, weird stuff happens. I don't think that we've thought this through as a society. It's yet another one of those sort of gender equality sort of pushes. I don't think it's a good move. I worked in all male units in the military and I never had any need for women. In fact, the worst people that I dealt with in the military were women. That doesn't mean that women are bad people.
I just didn't like them when they were dealing with me because I was there for a different purpose. I've had female staff sergeants and tech sergeants when I was enlisted telling me, oh, listen, you know, you have to understand this is a great job. This is a desk job. And I'm like, I came here to blow people up and kill them. Enemies of the United States were meant to die at my hand. If I'm not doing that, I don't want to be here anymore.
And she was like, but I have a desk job and I get to see my kids on the weekend. We signed up for different purposes. If you didn't sign up to break things and hurt feelings, then what are you doing in the military? And overwhelmingly, that's not what women are about. In any case, quite interesting that this woman is now being celebrated as a whistleblower, by the way, from CNN. I've covered a couple different
things here. We've hit Forbes and we've hit Fox and we've hit Reuters, but and ABC. But how weird is it that they're willing to celebrate whistleblowers only when it's convenient to them? Even though she did cover up work, This article is actually kind of damning. It talks about a Facebook group that they basically they haunted down all the people that were making allegations that were dangerous and damning to the
institution. And rather than live up to their duties and do the job that was required of them, they didn't. They simply tried to help cover it up and eventually sounds like she felt guilty. She actually has a an active, active LinkedIn account you guys can find. She's apparently an expert on sexual assault prevention, despite the fact that it happens all the time. Because you've set up something for failure. Not great. All this stuff is being framed
to act like the problem. Who's the problem? The military's the problem, right? We agree. Yeah. Weaponized government. It's a problem. Suddenly CNN wants to do that. These are the same people that called you, me and my buddies, the so-called whistleblowers, all of you who decided that you didn't want to get a shot and said, you know what, maybe not. Maybe you don't have that sovereignty over me. All of you people were the crazy people. You were the ones that were the
issue. But at some point they'll just switch and act like it never happened. And this is the biggest and probably the most dangerous of the gaslighting things that I'm seeing right now. We've told you on this program before, and I want you to not forget this. DOJ is not interested in election fraud. They've said it themselves. They're interested not in election interference in the way that we're talking about where somebody comes and changes ballots or goes in and runs fake ballots.
Or what they're interested in is making sure that people are not disenfranchised at the most number of people can vote, including they would rather see people vote illegally than people not be able to vote that are legally allowed to. That's a good idea if you're actually competent. We're talking about the government here.
This is an opinion piece that came out and I've been holding on to it for a little while from MSNBC talking about how Trump's 2024 election theft attempts will look different than 2020. Did you see the frame right there? Just the actual statement that is being made in that headline. It's clickbait garbage that you would already have to agree that the premise that Trump attempted to steal the election in 2020. They're assuming facts not in evidence.
He's never been convicted of that as far as I can tell. The charges on that are weak and baseless and probably won't hold up. He's been indicted for a conspiracy against rights of people. But how did he attempt to steal the election when he was the president and he didn't actually do it? Because they're living in a false and alternate reality.
They're framing things to make you more scared of The Dirty, dirty and dangerous Republicans. This is Alice Wagner coming from, I think it's from ACNN piece. It's a no. This must be MSNBC because she's on there talking about this Alice Wagner. There she is. She's actually one of my favourites now because she's just blatantly partisan and I just enjoy the fact that people are willing to wear it on their
sleeve. She's going to attack the fact that the GOP is doing the actual correct thing, which is to say they had an alternate set of electors. Those people did not vote. They did not go to the Electoral College and do anything. So they've been accused of conspiracy to do something that didn't actually happen. I always find that to be completely misleading.
And then the people in the GOP, in these Arizona and Nevada, have doubled down and made them the actual electors for the next round in 2024. They're standing behind people. This is the only move at this point. This is what Steve Friend calls mutually assured destruction in the political sphere. It means that you are going to stand by your people, even though it's not ideal. I tell you all the time, I don't think Trump is the best vessel in the world to do all the things that you want.
But you can't let the other side get away with not having him and kicking somebody out on their terms. This is the GOP locally at the state level. Like I said, Arizona and Nevada doing it correctly and it is outraging people at MSNBC. Good.
Enjoy the outrage, folks. That's what we should be getting for That was one of Nevada's fake electors, a guy named Jesse Law, singing the national anthem after signing fake documents to try to overturn the results of the 2020 election for Donald Trump. The gentleman standing next to Jesse Law is Michael McDonald. He is another fake elector. And today, these men gave new meaning to the phrase fake it till you make it.
Today, Nevada's Republican Party nominated those two fake electors to be the actual presidential electors in the upcoming election. More than that, the Nevada Republican Party has now nominated 5 out of the six Nevada fake electors, all of whom have been criminally indicted for their roles in that scheme. The Nevada GOP has nominated those fake electors to be delegates at this summer's Republican National Convention.
There it is. I think she used the word fake like seven times in that little segment there. It was short 60 seconds. She used the word fake over and over again. That's the illusory truth. The fact that at play, is it not? We're going to introduce that word to you. They're fake electors. They were fake documents. What does that mean? What is a fake document, by the way? How do you how do you get a fake
document? They were signing something and they said it was a document, but it was really a carrot or a piece of celery. Like what? What is it? What is a fake document? Or they documents that they said didn't have legal weight? That's a different animal, isn't it? That's a legal argument for nuanced people that want to have honest discussions. That's not what we're doing right here. We're talking about using the word fake over and over and over again, and now they're going to
be actual delegates. Well, guess what? Good. I don't have to like the people that are involved to like the tactic, Which is to say, you've been gaslighting us, you've been lying, and now we're going to play the same game. Mutually assured destruction. You want to call them? They, they just slanted those people in a way that they thought was really reasonable. They said that they've been indicted. How dare they. Innocent until proven guilty in America. Isn't that the way that we're
supposed to be living? Isn't that what these people who keep crowing about democracy say? It doesn't seem accurate to me. And while they're doing all of this, they're going to try to sit out there and push the envelope talking about, Oh my goodness, they're going to steal the election. Like they almost stole the election that we stole in 2020. It's like your head explodes thinking about it. What's really going on? Anything to distract from a complete failure.
Like the saddest, most ridiculous situation, which is that we have a present pushing a agenda about opening up our borders. And it is devastating to people that he thinks are his constituency, people that are low economic status, that have the least amount of income, that are the most at risk because of illegal immigration, people who are living paycheck to paycheck and are seeing inflation chip away at any money that they're able to be able to store.
Like people aren't even saving. I'm going to show you the last little piece here. It shows that credit card debt is actually, people are starting to fail at paying their debts at a rate that's incredibly dangerous for this country. Anything to distract us. We want to talk about fake
electors. We don't want to talk about the real issues on that side because if you do, it's devastating ending in the fact that there is a man standing in Normandy or standing in front of our UN assemblies or walking around in New York City who might actually be actively defecating in his own pants. And Ben Shapiro wrote a really
good piece. Some of you guys don't like Ben Shapiro, but I respect every time that he writes something that I think is very, very well thought out and he has an article entitled Poop and Joe that we're going to end with here before we do. Speaking of election integrity, one of the things that people get riled up with and like to support Mike Lindell is because of his big work on that. I don't know if Mike is correct on everything, but he seems like
a nice enough guy. mypillow.com/kyle is how you get the discounts on his website. They also have the Lindell Offense Fund. That actually is the right answer animal. I'm not donating to anybody's legal fund at the moment. So you guys take it for whatever it's worth. But if you're interested in supporting the work that they do, if you want to get behind it, the idea of an offense fun is better than a defense fun. It is actually something that this fight should be taking
these people. You guys can use promo code Kyle if you also just want to support the company. And that will get you up to 50% off. I just had to throw my towels in the wash. They do a really good job of holding underwater. But you know what, when it's like 75% humidity like it here is in Texas, you still got to wash your your towels. I didn't. I don't remember washing my towels when I was a kid. Did you guys wash towels as a kid? All the time.
Being an adult sucks. They do a great job when they're cleaning their fresh. Someone just said they don't like the pillows. Yeah, not my jam either. But you know what? The towels are legit. And actually the sheets are the same ones that my parents sleep on. So there are people that love them. Every time I talk to somebody about Lyndell, they always have like these strong opinions. mypillow.com/kyle, if you guys want to support them and get them going. Listen, this is the stuff that
we're missing out on though. We're missing this piece. I told you about local news. We have to bring this stuff home. We need to open the frame up to see that local news is in fact now national. When everybody is dealing with border issues. These are a the top one is a little thing talking about a memo that agents got in a key sector to release all migrants. Again, they're framing the words. Even Fox is using the word migrants release all illegal
immigrants who creep in here. They creep into our country in in violation of our laws. And meanwhile, Biden's executive order just said they're going to change the way that they're going to deal with asylum. It just came out out of the San Diego sector. There was this thing that said they were supposed to release single adults from all but six countries in the Eastern Hemisphere and classify them as
hard or very hard to remove. In other words, the Biden administration is protecting more and more people and putting a shield over more and more people. What is the result of this kind of policy? The result is what you get in only local news right now.
And I encourage you if you live anywhere near any border city, if whatever's the closest one to you hours away, it doesn't matter if it's in San Diego. It doesn't matter if it's Sierra Vista. It doesn't matter if it's Nogales. Like, pick a border area and put it into your news feed to read about and you will see stuff like this. Two men arrested for allegedly kidnapping. Again, here's that word. Migrant children north of Las Cruces.
Anybody who knows Las Cruces is about 30 or 40 minutes north of the border. So these people were basically in the no man's land. But there is a Border Patrol checkpoint that happens north of Las Cruces that they probably don't realize is there. It's about 30 minutes north of the city and it's en route to Albuquerque and then the world. These two men were arrested by a New Mexico State Police officer who are some of the lowest paid police officers in this country.
They do a really good job. I actually love New Mexico State Police. I feel like they need more training, more money, and they need more people, but they are dealing with some of the most aggressive violence in a really, really tough situation. They arrested these two because they were accused of kidnapping 2 migrant children. Of course, it wasn't just two children in the vehicle, there
were also eleven others. The story goes a 23 year old whose name is irrelevant and another guy here who I think was 29 years old. These two guys decided to take 11 illegals and transport them in a human trafficking operation they were supposed to take and present them to Border Patrol agents. And the kids were supposed to be able to be reunited with their mom who's living in Mississippi, also illegally from what I can tell.
Instead, instead what happened was they figured there was probably a lot more money in taking these people and doing whatever the hell it is that these guys planned on doing. They were supposed to be taking them to a Border Patrol checkpoint and turn them in, which is a good technique to get released back into this country. And instead they thought, you know what's more valuable than that?
Take this five year old and 11 year old child who's stuck in the cargo area of an SUV and we're going to take them and sell them for whatever our purposes are far more lucrative then whenever Mama paid them to sneak them across the US border. And here's the real story here for me. It says here that the Doniana District Attorney was contacted and approved charging these two with kidnapping and child abuse. Do you know what that also means?
Those are state charges. That means that our federal government is not going after these guys for doing the thing that they did, illegally violating our border sovereignty. Kidnapping could be an FBI crime, couldn't it? It could, especially when we're talking Interstate or any country. Instead you have the, the New Mexico State Police made the arrest. It didn't get picked up
federally as far as we can tell. And the Doniana District Attorney, which is a tiny little town, like I said, it's a tiny little county that has about 200,000 people in it. They're going to do the prosecution and you can imagine how hard it's going to be on them. These guys will get very, very little for this and they'll go back to doing what they were doing, which is why we come to poop and jail. We're going to end here on this.
This is This is Ben Shapiro's editorial article that came out over the weekend. I think it's quite good. Might have come out on Friday, actually, now that I think about it. He was talking about the stark contrast of having a president that wanted to be like Ronald Reagan for the 40th anniversary of D-Day, giving a famous and wonderful speech, one of the most iconic American speeches about men serving in wartime. And instead what we had was a
doddering, frail, weak old man. Now, Ronald Reagan was no spring chicken. In fact, as I read here, it says that he was 73 at the time. You guys can Fact Check that, but I think that's probably correct. He was not a young man, but he was still almost a decade younger than Biden, who's coming in at 81. And the contrast that we're seeing right now also goes to those wild animals that are in the Democrat Party that are trying to frame something that makes absolutely no sense.
Number one, you have to believe that Donald Trump is an authoritarian, that he's literally Hitler. And that's why while the boys on D-Day were able to jump off landing crafts and run across, you know, machine gun defended beaches and face artillery shells and hear bombs whizzing overhead, you just have to go to the voting box. That's the claim that's being made by multiple Democrat operatives, senior Biden officials. Hillary Clinton has said the same thing.
She said that thousands of brave Americans fought to protect democracy. That word again on the shores of Normandy. And this November, all we have to do is vote. They are framing things in a way that makes you believe that you're just as heroic as someone who would have laid down their life on a foreign land for a concept that is fundamentally American. Liberating those people who are oppressed by tyranny. And what they're talking about is just vote for more tyranny.
Just give us the power. We just need enough power to be able to do it the right way to stop the climate change, to allow all these people in, to make the the the world more just and equitable. It's all silliness. It's all sad. The Babylon Bee did a really good little piece on this that's going to be our palate cleanser for the day. This is a funny way of looking at it and Sayaka Masqui does a good job in this representing the Equity faction. There's a couple of others in
here. If you guys are not familiar with Babylon Bees little satire pieces with Satan. They are some of the best and here is one of them as we wrap up today. Thank you all for meeting with me. You're all doing some wonderful work destroying the world, but I think it's probably time for us to re evaluate. Sorry for the interruption, but I think we're in the wrong meeting. We're not here to destroy the world, we're here to save it. You see, we are some of the leading leaders of.
Liberal causes, and I'm with the Human Rights Campaign who focus on LGBTQ plus and trans rights. You see, I have the equal sign to let you know that I'm a good person. Oh, excuse me. Women's reproductive rights. Climate. Free Palestine, open borders. I misspoke before. You guys are not destroying the world, OK? You are saving the world. What's up with those scare quotes?
Pretty sure I didn't use scare quotes when I said saving the world is The important thing to keep in mind is that there's a big election coming up. And you and I, we're all on the same page. OK? So if we want Biden to win, he needs to win in order for us to save the world. If we want Biden to win, you folks, how can I say this? You, you, you might need to tone it down. Just tone. Down what? Oh, that's a good question. You're you're women's reproductive rights, right?
OK, excellent branding, by the way. That's it's much easier on the ears than baby murder. So kudos to you on that one. But opposing any restrictions all the way through to the 9th month, I mean, you see how you're kind of tipping your hand, right? Makes people think, wait, maybe they actually want to kill babies and we do obviously. No, we don't. Oh no, we don't we. Right, we don't. But you see how you see how it can kind of look that way. So that's, I mean, that's all I'm saying.
You know, let's tone it down. And you immigration, clearly we don't want a completely open border that undermines any sense of national sovereignty, driving down wages for the working class and overtaxing the welfare states. You guys haven't seen the whole clip, Go look for it. I'm not going to play the whole thing because it's like 5 or 6 minutes long, but it's outstanding work. Babylon B continues to be sort of profit type comedy, if you
will. If you guys are watching us on Rumble, make sure you've given us a like give us a thumbs up on this video and and this podcast and make sure you're joining our live chat in the morning. Listen, they just laid out what Biden's policies are open border abortion till the point of birth, racism. We need to take the less than 2% of the minorities out there in the world and make sure that
they are the most protected. They're the ones that are the biggest say what a ridiculous statement when you put it out there like that. That's what comedy is supposed to do. And that's why Jon Stewart is very, very bad and why they really upset people.
I actually told you I was going to share that with you and I don't have it up on the screen here, but essentially the anger was is that MSNBC saw Jon Stewart making fun of people on both sides when it comes to people celebrating the victories of Donald Trump's conviction. He decided that that was worth making fun of them. That's what he does.
He does political commentary in a funny way and the entire article spends an entire multi paragraph hate rant angry because he's not acting like Walter Cronkite Cronkite when he's actually a comedian. That's what he does. He's a comedian. They're mad that he does right wing mock ups and that he used to make fun of everybody, but mostly people on the right, and now he's making people on the left look silly because they're absurd.
Here's The funny thing, and this is something we might get into in another episode, folks. Walter Cronkite also used to be part of the same framing mentality, the same exact game. That's called editorial bias when you want to make it sound like it's something Professor Oro. It's called framing bias when you want to be honest about it. And framing means we are trying to set up something that didn't
actually happen. We're going to give you just a shot of what we want you to see and not the rest of it, right? It's selective, it's ongoing. We all do it. We should also be aware of it when it's coming at us because it really, it really does slant the narrative. And you got to love it when Satan is the one telling you all the pieces in that little comedy bit about what what the Democrat Party is trying to say and what it actually sounds like.
If you're being real honest about it and why they don't like it, of course it sounds terrible. It's not a sellable position, which is why they want to focus on guys like Trump and they want to make all of that about you and your bad bad and how he's evil orange Hitler because God forbid they have to actually defend their own record, which involves little kids getting trafficked and people losing
their jobs and their wages. That's the end of that for their We'll we'll come back and touch more of this tomorrow on Tuesday. I appreciate you guys sticking with us here. Let me give you a five star review walking out the door. This one is from DS5099. It says a self-described Truth Bombardier. DS. I'm going to straighten you out real quick. Truth Bombardier actually came from one of our five star reviews.
It came from a gentleman named Atticus who was associated with and got us hooked up with Mad Hat Jerky. I just want you to know the back story on it. I didn't name myself that somebody else said it, but I do like it. Kyle spends an hour each day discussing corruption and forced political and social agendas that shape our federal government.
If you are a believer in our Constitution and our God-given rights, I highly recommend that you watch or listen to his Daily Show. He provides the quote UN quote uncomfortable truths. Those are no scare quotes. Those are real about what the radical left hijacking of our nation looks like. That is as as close as we can get. Although like I said, I want to just straighten you out on the truth Bombardier piece. I do appreciate all of you guys joining us here.
If you guys have any questions, comments, sarcastic remarks, weird ideas, thoughts to save America, send them over my way. Kyle serafin.com, there's a contact me section. Make sure you have hit the like on this particular video before you go. Do that and then fire away. We'll take whatever you got. We look forward to seeing you guys again tomorrow morning. I hope you had a wonderful
weekend. I hope that you are recovering from it the way that I am, sunburns and all, and I look forward to seeing you guys after a productive Monday. Don't forget our sponsors right there. We'll see you in the morning. God bless. Thanks for listening to the Kyle Serafin Show, streamed live weekdays on rumble.com/kyle Serafin. Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth Social and Instagram at Kyle Serafin.