TIME is a FLAT Circle: Pipe Bombs and Kitchen Timers | Ep 704

Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an American patriot. Prepare to embrace the uncomfortable truth because this program has no time for comforting lies. Here is civil liberties enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello my friends, welcome to the Kyle Serafin show. Today is Tuesday, it is December the 30th. We are coming up to the end of 2025 and I welcome you to our program.

We're going to be covering a a bunch of topics which we neglected yesterday. And the reason we neglected him yesterday is because I think we had a very important breakdown and discussion of some court filings that went in the January 6th pipe bomber case, the January 5th pipe bomber case, if you will. That is the story of Brian Cole Junior and that continues to get more and more interesting, at least to me. Some of that is because of the things that you added as an audience.

So I want to take this one second right now, one I want to thank you for for listening and for sharing your expertise, your knowledge and your wisdom with me by comments, by the online chat. I think I can show you guys that you're out there working everyday as part of this program like this. This doesn't exist without the audience. And you're also an integral part in adding pieces that I don't know about. There are things that I would never have any awareness of.

I don't raise children with autism, but every time I end up talking to somebody who has a different experience as a parent who has a different experience professionally, industries that I don't work in, I gain a little bit from you. And one of your comments today inspired some of the stuff that we're going to cover later on, so I really appreciate you. This is our live chat. If you've never listened to the show live, just going to make a pitch for it on YouTube.

They have an opportunity for me to turn on advertisements in the middle of the program. Same story on Rumble. They can actually run them in the middle. We don't do that. I'm not sure if Rumble actually offers that, but I know that the the YouTube guys actually want to sell ads in the middle of the live broadcast. And I don't do that on purpose because I want there to be an incentive for people to join our live community and be there in the morning. There.

There are literally thousands of you that listen live between X, between Rumble, between YouTube. If you guys are one of those people that are watching right now, give us a little thumbs up. Give us the like on whatever platform it is, it does boost the algorithm and allows other people to see it. And so I appreciate that that's kind of the the deal that we

have. We don't monetize it in the same way, but that does actually boost us up so other people see it later on. And if you watch it in the replay, then you're going to get ads. And that's how I get paid doing some of the stuff. So I appreciate you guys doing that. You guys are insulating US against the alternative, which is that we have to take money from people that we don't want to. I don't want to do that. I'm not really interested in doing that.

I don't think this program would be what it is. It wouldn't be independent and it wouldn't be on its own without the ability to kind of stand around 2 feet and me say whatever the hell it is that I think is important, which means punching at both sides. We're going to do that today. We're going to talk about something that's I think is relevant, not not apparent to everybody.

At the same time. There's an ongoing fraud situation developing in Minnesota, not that it's new, but that people are aware of it and they're aware of it. On the conservative side, this has been going on in multiple states. It happened in Virginia during COVID. It's been ongoing for several years, at least in these specific instances of of COVID fraud of payroll protection and some other things like that that were going on. They're all over the place,

folks. Minnesota is a microcosm of it. It's very prominent. And it also involves kind of like a racial slash, ethnic slash cultural divide where we have people from a Somali community that do not fit into the mainstream American culture. They are not part of our dominant culture, if you will. And so it gives us an opportunity to shine a light on that.

But it's happening everywhere. And I think this basically makes the argument that I continue to make over and over again, the federal government is the worst solution to every problem, including when it's the only solution. It's still a terrible solution. It's just what we have. So we should be aware that it's not necessarily unique to the culture, unique to the political party. Both sides do it. It's everywhere. It doesn't matter whether it's John Cornyn or Tim Waltz that

are making these things happen. They're interested in their own money, their own power, their own ability to continue to project influence. And that means collecting, you know, fundraising. And so they're going to help

out. There's also that, that suicidal empathy where people that grew up in the, the boomer era that have this sort of, I don't know, softness towards other cultures and don't actually see them as the existential threat that they exist in. For those of us that are in our 40s, in our 30s and 20s that want to get into a market and you're seeing yourself edged out by folks that didn't even come to this country sometimes legally or come here even in the

in the 1st place, they weren't from here. We don't owe them any kind of allegiance. And yet here we are taking care of them, bringing them in in a very compassionate way. And I think that there is a weaponization happening on the left aisle, left side of the

aisle. What we're doing is we're seeing people take Christianity and they're using it against people who are Christian. And maybe they're not, they're not aware of what has been written or what has been said about this, but this concept of the order of love, it's being used. And so I'm going to show you

some examples of that as well. And it doesn't matter whether it's happening in Boston. I got some examples of maribou or whether it's happening in Minneapolis with with Mayor Frey Fry. Is that his name? The these people are using your innate good your your instinct towards, you know, faithfully helping out your community and they're adding people to the community that are not really part of your community to begin with.

And they are trying to basically subjugate your dominant culture to a less dominant culture simply because we're willing to do it. Or is my buddy George friends George. I just mixed Steve and friend and and George Hill. When you look at what George Hill has told me multiple times, he said if America chooses to act like a doormat, don't be surprised if you get walked all over. And so that's something we're

going to talk about today. We've also got the ongoing concern that I have about our federal law enforcement and I want to talk about that. We're going to discuss foreign terrorist organizations. The the playbook. There's another playbook case out of Dallas that Cash Patel announced. So an ISIS sympathizer, you guys are going to be shocked to find out, decided to enact his plan.

And he enacted his plan with an undercover FBI agent because they cannot actually create cases on people that are really doing things independently. What they like to do is they like to set people up and they make these cases out of nowhere. And so we've got another version of that couple other random stories on there. Zamdami in New York is, is bringing on lesbian firefighters. I think that also is the same kind of thing, using a faith to

bring in an ideology. Both of those ideologies, the weaponization of the Christian faith, weaponization of the Muslim faith, all these things can be brought into the same sort of, I don't know what this it they call it a watermelon in the is the, in the Islamic commentary space, green on the outside, red on the inside. So Islamic, there should be a version for Christianity as well. And in the inside of it, it's it's socialism or Marxism.

And so this sort of vessel to make it acceptable to people. I think Mondami is not going to give a religious minority community something he's going to give basically a political minority. That is the the socialist types, what they're hoping for. And I also going to tell you, I'm just going to make a prediction in New York. It's not going to go the way they think because all these guys end up being corrupted by the system as much as the system

can be corrupted. Their end up being working for the system. Same way we've seen folks like Kash Patel, Harmi Dillon, who I thought as being a pretty staunch conservative, at least generally speaking, agreeing with the conservative principles. And I've got some weird stuff from her too. She seems to be melting down about whether or not people are accepting the influence, the appropriate opinions that the Trump administration puts out. So there's that.

And the overarching thought is, is the reason that I care about all these things is because if they do not pull off the thing that needs to be done. If the the Trump administration at the federal level doesn't do the thing that they claim, which is de weaponized government, shut down the border and export people that have been bleeding us dry, then it's going to be

all for naughty. And Steve Bannon seems to understand that even if he keeps bringing on people who who say otherwise got a little piece of that from his from his speech at Turning Point, which essentially is the if we don't, you know, succeed, then we all hang together and some people are going to go to prison and people in this administration are going to go to prison. They're not acting like this is a fight to the death, even though I believe that it really is. So there's that.

That's where we're going to go with today's show. That's a kind of a long warm up, but that's how it's going to be. And let's talk about our friends over at Asylum. If you guys are worried about things the way that I am, whether or not you're going to see big tech or data brokers or whether you're talking about criminals and government agencies and so on, trying to have access to your digital footprint, then maybe you want to do something about it.

Maybe you want to put your phone in a Faraday sleeve the way that I do. In fact, I am a little bit behind the schedule right now, so I'm going to put mine in while we're talking. This shuts down all of the RF communication, the radio frequency waves coming out of my cellular device, and that means cellular and Wi-Fi and Bluetooth and GPS and RFID and near field communications. There's no tracking, there's no remote access, there's no bread

crumbs. It's the technology that special operations guys and covert operatives all around the world use to be able to shut down and secure their comms. That means that you only pop up on the grid when you choose to. It's also a really good way to dial back some of this digital chaos. Yes, it's useful to be aware, and I like to do that as well. Obviously, we do that as a

program here. It's also nice to unplug and not have your phone beeping at you with new meetings or reminders or stock tips or spam or e-mail or anything else like that. Sometimes you just want to shut it down and be part of your family so you can protect your freedom. You can protect your family, you can protect your digital footprint, but you also can protect your mental health.

And I definitely recommend that slnt.com/K YLE silent.com/kyle again, it's SLNT that's silent with no vowels.com/kyle. Save yourself 15%. They sometimes even do higher discounts. Go into that website and then use whatever promo code they recommend to you. If they have tiered buying. They make great products. I stand behind them. I've got about a dozen them in this room that I use on a regular basis. I've been using the covert concealed Carry sling on a

regular basis now too. It's nice to be able to turn off my phone, jump on a bicycle with my kiddos, and just ride out into the world and see what's going on without having any distractions. So you guys can all benefit from that, I guarantee it. Find a man or a woman in your life who's looking for a moment to unplug and check out my friends at Silent. There is a link in today's show description. All right, without any further ado, let's dive into today's program starting right now.

So I wasn't sure if I was going to lead with this or I was going to end with it, but I think I'm going to lead with it. I want to show you something Steve Bannon said. This is actually not a turning point. This was that some sort of an Academy speech. He's getting an award or he's giving an award. I don't even know what the context was, but I know what he's saying is relevant and it's not the way that people are

actually operating. It's part of my grievances and my gripes with the Trump administration. I got into a, an X space last night and I was listening to a podcaster and an attorney and a guy who is ethnically Jewish and generally speaking conservative. And he was talking about the, the American nation that we live in is a Christian majority nation has been and up until 197090 plus percent of people in this nation identified as a Christian household.

And I think that's relevant. And then over the last, let's call it 50 years, we've seen that slowly degrade to the point where people are only in the 60s. It's like 6062% of American households identify as being Christian. It's still the majority. It's still the dominant culture, but we're acting already like it is not. And so the history of America has always been sort of, sort of unique in the world.

It's very tolerant and accepting of incoming cultures, and you can be from somewhere else and you can be about something else other than what our dominant culture is, and you can still be accepted and allowed to be here and you'll be protected. But America lost the thread sometime in my lifetime, so I'm 44. In my lifetime, we've seen a break in what was traditionally American.

And what that meant was, is that we celebrated, we endorsed and we operated under a dominant culture and we protected and we insulated and we allowed the thriving and the flourishing and the success of the minority cultures. The non dominant cultures were still allowed to be here. We didn't persecute them. We didn't run them off and kill them, at least not in modern history.

We didn't go and destroy them. We didn't genocide them or export them or exile them or put them in concentration camps in this country. I mean, again, we're talking post World War 2 on that's been sort of the modern iteration of the way that America has functioned. And I think that was a good thing. I think it's it's it adds for it's something that nobody else

does. That's the uniquely special thing that America always offered protection of the minority, but celebration and rule by the majority. And we've gotten away from that. And maybe it's because it's been so successful, maybe because America has been so successful that now you have this, this entire group of people who didn't earn that success. You have an entire generation of people like that, the the oldest levels and most of them tend to be like the most senior people in our government.

They didn't earn the stability and the safety that we all operate under. And so they're really quick to fritter it away. I'm speculating on what I think is going on here. I, I don't know that to be the truth. I believe that that may be accurate based on meeting people and my life experience right now

and what I'm seeing. And so that that thing that we talk about being suicidal empathy, whether it's GAD, sad, you hear saying it or other people who've independently come to this idea that you are going to allow cultures in and allow them to hold more dominance than they actually hold for population majorities. It's very telling. And it's also really galling to those of us that are not living in those spaces where the people have actually given up that

territory. The Biden administration did some of this, but they didn't create it. They didn't, they didn't bring this to America, but they did recognize that it was a potential to to exploit like a power center. And you're seeing this in small ways in places like Minnesota. So the Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Saint Paul have it. New York is doing it as well. Boston has been doing it. Some of these areas of San Francisco probably does the same thing.

You know, parts of California will do exactly that. They'll celebrate the, the the minority communities and give them outside influence. And so this is what sometimes people call majoring in the minors. You're, you're honing in on the minutiae and you make that part of the represent, you know, the biggest representation, when in reality, it's actually not doing the greatest good for people. And we've seen the churches do the same thing.

They've lost their footing, they've lost their moral standing. And so when you have people that are coming out and, and boldly proclaiming, I represent this faith community, I'm a Catholic, I'm a Protestant, I believe that we should be doing these compassionate things. And then you listen to it and you go like, that's just Marxism. Oh, you, you're a Catholic, but you also celebrate trans children.

You're a Catholic and you celebrate abortion and you want to bring people here to be able to, to, to have abortions to your states. You don't represent the thing that you're saying. And so you see this bastardization going on. Anyway, here's Steve Bannon talking about what the consequences are, and these are not fictional consequences. This is not like hyperbole or scare tactic. I think Steve Bannon actually

knows this. Why they're not acting this way, why he can't get this into the head of the administration, that they need to act with this haste is beyond me. And I will tell you right now is God is my witness. If we lose the midterms and we lose 2028, some in this room are going to prison, myself included. They're not going to stop. They're getting more and more and more radical. And we have to counter that. And what do we have to counter it with?

We have to counter it with more action, more intense action, more urgency. We're burning daylight. If you look across every aspect of this, we have to codify what President Trump has done by executive order, right? We we have to codify it and people say, well, they're just going to be messing about and press Senate. We got to we got to put aside these structural barriers and get on with it. President Trump today gave to the Senate when they came over for breakfast.

Even Lindsey Graham, some of the guys that liked and some of these institutions. I understand this is a very tough decision to make and you're going to see some people in the conservative movement that not in a million years because I talked to him today. I quite frankly, I had Holly on the show this morning, Josh Hawley and he's talking about it. I'm trying to play the institution well. Well, they called me up this

afternoon. So let's go through the 10 reasons we need to do it. And these are heavy hitters on what I would call the constitutional limited government constitutionalist in our movement. And they're about to come out over the next couple days and make sorry about that. I think it's funny that you've got you've got Bannon trying to claim that Josh Hally is a heavy constitutionalist. This is the same guy that was saying that we need to open up the government so that we can

move forward with SNAP benefits. Isn't it interesting that all these Republicans with all the conservative pedigree, they all vote for funding the agencies that they're claiming are the problem. They're all happy to put federal dollars to solve the the issues. They all think the answer to governmental problems is more or better or different government. And no one seems to go out there and address the actual root cause, which is that our our government is too big,

aggressively too big. And I'm pretty confident that Donald Trump actually campaigned on that. He said he was going to fund it with tariffs. The only way that worked, by the way, this is what I heard and maybe that was wrong with me. Donald Trump said we're going to get rid of the IRS. We're going to get rid of the income tax because we are going to fund it with tariffs. There's two ways that happens. Number one, you raise tariffs as a protection to domestic industry.

You don't tariff things that you you can't get in the United States. So you bring in things with free trade that you require that your your country doesn't create on its own. And then you protect the native industry so that you can't be undersold by slave labor or third World Economic conditions where people can make things cheaper than they can in America. And hopefully the trade off is, is that the quality is better in the United States, so people are willing to pay for it.

And you bring the cost up of that that imported third world developing nation good to the point where it's like, OK, well, the trade off is, is a 15 or a 20% increase premium cost for an American good actually makes sense to me. I'm willing to pay for the Craftsman tool, the Snap on tool, the Matco, whatever it is, because I don't need to go to the Harbor Freight and get the Chineseum stuff.

But if the Chineseum stuff is 110th of the cost, you're never going to be able to compete with people that are trying to make it, you know, make ends meet. So the way that you do that is you have to do one of two things. You get the tariffs going and then you eliminate enormous amounts of our government and all these people that are supposedly on the team of conservatism that seemed to

claim that all the right things. The minute that push comes to shoves, they're speaking Somali just like Jacob Fry. They are immediately going to roll over and they're going to do the most obnoxious thing. They're going to say, well, I mean, there are people who are really suffering in my state and therefore we need to get SNAP benefits to them right away. We need to do more of the socialist programs that we were actually campaigning against. And none of them will hold on.

Nobody will ever hold them to account. So Bannon out there saying that it seems to miss the point that there is a symptom and the symptom is big government and bloat and and and fraud. And we're going to cover a little bit of that in a second. But the solution is not like, well, how do we have less fraud? The solution is how do we fix the structure that is decayed to the point to allow it. It doesn't matter if you have more government looking into the

problems of the government. The government does what it always does. Ask a whistleblower on any agency. What happens when the government investigates the government? It finds out that the government did the thing, right? Technically, that's how it ends up playing. So you can't fix government with government. You fix government by getting rid of parts of government. You, you cut down to the nub.

You reduce it to the point where you have to build things back to the point where something fails because you actually lost something that was actually integral. That's how aggressively you cut it back. And that never happens with these people. And I don't see it happening anyway. What I see is, is them arguing and bickering over who gets to control the ring of power. Not one person has the balls to throw it into the fire and they never do.

It's all about who can be in control of the bloat and and the, and the corruption. That's troubling because the, the, the answer is that I should see people on the right answering. They should do the tourniquet, shut down the border. That was good. So Donald Trump gets points for that. And then what was the next move? Right. I look at this like an emergency medic. You walk in on scene, you got to stop the chaos.

You got to stop the bleed. You got to make sure that people don't actively die on your scene. One of those things is you drop a knee into a place that's bleeding. You cut off direct pressure. So that's your tourniquet. That's your shut down the border. Good job. OK, Now we've contained the blood in the body or in the the case of the United States, what we've done is we've stopped things from going coming into the United States from outside.

So that's helpful, but in the case of the the emergency medicine, someone who's bleeding out, you need to get them blood and you probably don't have that in an ambulance, which means you got to transport to him to hospital, you got to get them hooked up to some Ivs, you start dripping in blood. The alternative sort of the of that analogy would be you have to get rid of the pathogen, the thing that is, that is rotting.

And so that means either aggressively cutting back or exporting the things that are in this country that don't belong, that came in through that open wound, that open border. And what we're not seeing is mass deportation. We said this before the election. If they could deport 20% of the people in a year, that'd be great. But I didn't think it was ever going to happen. And what we're seeing is, is that we're, we're looking at like 5%.

There's a minor percentage of people and some people are claimed to self deport. But if you guys think that self deportation numbers, which is like 3 or 4X the actual deportation numbers, if that's going to maintain, that's not right. That's not how human experience should should lead you to believe. What you're going to find out is that all these people who are self deporting, they are the most motivated, the most capable, the most financially sound and the most likely to go

back to a good situation. That's why they chose to leave. They're going to abandon ship with what they've got. The people that have no other options, they will stay here. And so next year yourself, deportations will be none or very, very little. It'll be a massive drop off, exponential drop off. The only way that changes if you shut down the way that these people are getting funded, that they're able to actually mooch off the system and they're not

doing anything to change that. In fact, what's going to end up happening is the lack of aggressive action that that that Bannon was talking about is going to result in a loss in midterms. And I think you guys can bookmark it right now. November is going to be an awful moment. And it seems like even the Trump administration is starting to see that. Susie Wiles going out and talking about it.

I'll play you a clip in a SEC. And the, and the Democrats are salivating about taking back over and what are they going to do? Exactly what you think they're going to do, they're going to impeach, they're going to eventually imprison people. And they're saying it openly. They're not shy about what happens next. And instead of being bold the way that you'd expected this, this guy to come in because apparently Donald Trump was supposed to be a disruptor, It's just not.

It's not materializing. It's a lot more status quo than people are giving credit for. Anybody who's celebrating it is losing. And what I continue to see is this small microcosm that I focus in on federal law enforcement. They're operating as usual. If they're operating as usual, so are the other elements. They're all doing the same thing that they were doing. You're Swalwell promising you what happens next. This is why it matters, Congressman.

It sounds like you're saying that inherent contempt, holding these officials inherent contempt, or even the possible a vote on impeachment of someone like Pam Bond. It sounds like, though that may not happen until or if Democrats actually win the House in 2026. Is that right? Yes. And, and so we have to Telegraph that that's what we are willing to do if we are given the majority let. Me give you a news story about why I think this is a real problem is the first thing I saw

yesterday. Texas man charged with providing bomb components and funding to individuals he believed were involved in a foreign terrorist organization. Just look at the press release from DOJ. Individuals he believed were involved in foreign terrorist organization. This was celebrated as a massive

win. We had the FBI director go out and cheer on the same group that has been doing the same thing for as long as I've been doing this podcast and they've been doing it for basically since the since 9:11. Set them up and knock them down, Put up your own pins, throw your own bowling ball and, and roll a strike and then cheer it on even though you just lined them all up in one straight line. It's the easiest thing in the world. Why go out and find danger and, and, and fraud?

Why go out and do the work of dismantling terrorist organizations, which by the way, might be actually unconstitutional in some ways? Some of the things that people are doing that the FBI would love to investigate, they're constitutionally prohibited from doing because it's free speech. This is the dangerous reality we live in. But isn't it fun? We're not finding people coming in. We're not disrupting people who came in over the over the border per SE.

We're setting them up with undercover agents. Today's announcement underscores the FB is commitment to combating terrorism and demonstrates our continued work to disrupt and thwart terrorist plots against the American public. Let us serve as a warning to those who plan to attack, conduct attacks against the United States on behalf of terrorist organizations. You will be brought to justice. So says FBI director Kash Patel. Well, here's the problem with what Kashyap is saying.

This is the playbook, folks. This is the same playbook. You, you know it when you hear it if you listen to this podcast regularly. An alleged ISIS sympathizer has been federally charged with international terrorist offense for providing bomb components and money to individuals that he believed. But we're not actually acting on behalf of a designated foreign terrorist organization or FTL.

This case is an incredible it's, it's an incredible work of our federal agents, says Pam Bondi. It's a testament to the incredible work. ISIS is poisonous ideology. Well, that may be true, but this guy wasn't ISIS. He was just a guy. He was in the Northern District of Texas, and he decided that he found an ISIS friend. And that ISIS friend, it turns out, is an FBI agent. Because the ISIS friends don't even exist that way. They only stop the things that they set up.

It doesn't matter whether you've been listening to me or you've listened to Trevor Aronson, if you're on the left or the right, This is an ongoing issue. It happened in Michigan for people that were paying attention and they were like, holy crap. They entrapped a bunch of guys who were like MAGA dudes and they wanted to be the Wolverines and they wanted to go out there and take back the governorship and they were going to kidnap the governor.

Except like 40% of the people in the meetings were FBI informants or undercover agents. How does that work? We just saw it in Los Angeles. It's the same exact thing. This is theater. This is the bread and circuses. This is what they give you to keep the masses saying our team is winning. This is what I voted for. Is it you? You voted for this because for those of you that are starting to wake up to it, and I think a lot of you actually see this like as a default position now.

And I'll take credit for it because I think I've been saying it louder than anybody and I say it with some with some degree of authority. Having seen this over and over again. Every time these cases get briefed to the agents, they sound good. The SWAT team is not to blame because they were briefed on something that was super dangerous and scary. You can listen to Steve Friend talk about being briefed up on the guys that were in Michigan for the Whitmer kidnapping case.

They were near peer operators. Then you go find them and you're like, they're living in a freaking vacuum store repair basement and they literally don't have a pot to piss in. Borrow a phrase from my father. And then they all go back there and slap each other in the back and they all get more funding for what they're doing. And it's made-up. It's it's literally made-up. The FBI worked apart alongside the local law enforcement partners.

By the way, the local law enforcement loves being called partners of the FBI. It's like it's it's like a really gross relationship. I keep finding quickly arrested an individual who intended to provide bomb making materials to an FDL. We're protecting the homeland. Yeah, but are you from who? This is a guy named John Michael Garza, 21 years old, from Midlothian, TX. Right. He's a Panhandle guy. He's 21, and he's an ISIS sympathizer.

Maybe he gave he gave bomb making materials to a person that he believed was a quote UN quote, ISIS brother, but in reality that was an undercover agent.

It's every time, guys. The number of actual of actual foreign terrorist aligned sympathizers that are ready to conduct attack in the United States is so small that they either get by and they do it. Think about what happened like a year ago almost to the day, January 1st we had an attack in Ware New Orleans. Did anyone catch that guy before it happened? No no because the FB is busy

doing these cases non-stop. According to the complaint, in mid-october of this year, an undercover United New York Police officer noticed a particular social media account, later determined to be Garza's, that followed several other pro ISIS accounts online. You're allowed to do that. It turns out that's what that's what free speech means. That's what the 1st amendment allows. And wrote a comment on a pro ISIS post. And then what happens? They're like, got it?

You have dumb ideas, you're online, we're going to go ahead and set you up. Not we're going to go find out where the real bad guys are. No, we're going to go engage a 21 year old guy who's a Mexican American living in Texas who also thinks that ISIS is a good idea.

Where does that come from? They had continued conversations because the the New York Undercover reached out to Garza on social media That New York PD Joint Terrorism Task Force combination FBINYPD is a serious, serious issue because their entirety of their their huge budget is contingent on making these cases up. And they're running a guy out of Texas because they found him online.

That means that you had an undercover employee paid for with with federal dollars, most likely under the JTTF, sitting there and engaging back and forth with dummies who are 21 years old living in the middle of nowhere in Texas. And Midlothian is not a big place. It's certainly not a hotbed of ISIS.

So this guy Garza described that he had ISIS ideology and he sent some cryptocurrency and he believed he was supporting ISIS causes, including buying firearms and other materials, which he wasn't buying because he was sending it to an NYPD Joint Terrorism Task Force task force officer. Then he sent over propaganda pictures and some videos. So then we got to take him down. We needed to win. And what do they need to win? Why do they need to win?

Because they're doing this because our FBI is also involved in setting up like the actual people who actually did something really dangerous, but looks like it to be a a governmental coup that happened in 2020 and 2021 in the J6 pipe bomber case. They're going to have loss after loss. And the faster they can move the new story away from that, they already did their circle jerk press conference. They already got to celebrate the win. So God forbid we have to talk

about it again. It's every time with these people. I'm going to cover a couple of other stories because I think there's a couple of them. Like I said, the the situation in in Minnesota, what we saw was is chasing headlines. We watched our federal law enforcement not doing the aggressive proactive work, although they claim that they have no, they're looking for where is the next media buzz? How do we distract from failure?

And then the ongoing operations of continuing to set up people and do the things like what we've seen in this administration is celebration of the status quo. But rather than do what we saw in the previous administration, which is that these law enforcement agents did just did

what they did. Now we've got a couple of social media podcast influencer guys that are screaming out the everyday work of these agencies in their own way, highlighted and framed for for positive PR. So people are like, yeah, how come they didn't do this before? It's like, well, they freaking did almost every one of these great successes that you find out, like even right now you're going to hear announcements.

They're they're talking about the announcements of arresting people in in Minnesota. Well, those cases have been ongoing since 2022 and nobody wants to go out and high 5 Chris Ray on the political right and nor should they. Is it too little, too late? Is there not enough focus? Are we busy going after J Sixers when in fact you should have been going after people that were defrauding the American

government? I'm telling you, there were literally millions of dollars in fraud happening in the DC area and they were low burner, back burner, barely interested cases. We would do a little bit of surveillance on them with my team, but we prioritize the stuff that's fast and transactional. We'd rather watch gang members because we can get that arrest on a weekly basis because there's always more gang members because the border was open, so

they had an unlimited supply. Why would you want to do the long term difficult thing that only the FBI is actually really funded to go do these complex white collar fraud investigations and governmental corruption. That's the only real reason for that agency at this point. They don't need to go after quote UN quote, Interstate crime. They need to go after what's called public corruption. And do we see that being

celebrated? No, it's a crackdown on social media and it's this weird discussion about like ongoing terrorist cases that they create themselves and then they celebrate and they bend over backwards patting themselves on the back for it. You guys are listening on on any of the audio platforms without video. This is a great time for you to check out our video platforms. Spotify would be a good way to do it. Kyle serifandshow.com. You may hear a Spotify ad right

now. Otherwise, if you're watching on Rumble or YouTube or if you're watching on X, give us a thumbs up. You can always join us on locals and support the program. We appreciate that wherever you're watching, make sure you're subscribed to the channel. Make sure you guys are notifying if you want to see us go live and skip some of the ads. And of course, you can always, you can always give us free support by literally just clicking the like button.

And I appreciate when you guys are doing that stuff. Let's continue on with with some of this stuff. Let's talk about the the Minneapolis scenario viral video. OK, you guys have probably seen this video. I'm going to play you one of them. There was a whole series done by Nick Shirley. It's a 23 year old YouTube guy. He's got a lot of balls. I give him credit for it, but he didn't invent the, the discovery of this fraud scenario. They've been out there and they've been, people have been

aware of it for quite a while. But he went out and he documented some of it and he went out and did some basic answers. Do you? What I found when I was in the Bureau is that people don't want to go knock on doors and ask questions because then they might know we're investigating them. I can't let them know that we're investigating them.

When you start recruiting a certain type of person and you start taking people who are not law enforcement and who are not in military as your background, by the way, the Biden administration, Chris Ray's FBI did that aggressively. Only about 1/3 of the people in my class had a background military law enforcement carried a gun before. It's not common. They were more happy to go after attorneys and computer programmers and linguists and things like this. This is who they hired.

So when you hire people that are used to working behind a desk and they think they can find fraud, instead of going and knocking on the door and finding out if the fraud is there.

This is why I had a job that I had in Washington, in Washington DC. My job was to be the person that they didn't want to be. And this actually relates a little bit to the pipe bomber case, because when I said that I would go knock on a door, it's because I knew the people that were working those cases didn't want to knock on doors. And sometimes you got to go bang on the door and find out what the Hell's going on. This is the story as covered by

CNN. First, a viral video, then a quote, UN quote surge of federal resources to investigate alleged childcare fraud in Minnesota. That's a pretty fair headline. I think as things go, the FBI and DHS say they are, quote UN quote, surging their resources to investigate fraud in Minnesota, including at childcare centers. Because what we're seeing is that there is significant amounts of fake childcare centers that are receiving a

huge amount of federal dollars. For me, the story is really straightforward and maybe it is for you as well. The story says something more about who is paying for it. Why are there federal dollars and state dollars that are being allocated to child care centers in the 1st place? These are things that could open on the free market. So why does there have to be money coming in from the state? That's the simple question. Instead, people were like, well,

there's fraud. We got to go after the Somalis. We got to no, how about we go after the mechanism that allows it to happen. Is anyone saying maybe we should be cutting these programs? Forget that there's there's certain people that are taking advantage of them. I don't hear anyone talking seriously about the issue. The issue is, is that there's money that comes out of my

paycheck. It comes out of your paycheck and it goes into a federal program and then it gets so anonymized that nobody knows where it's going. And then it gets sent back down into the states to be handed out to people that end up being like useful constituents. I'll play you that interview, but let me just show you why there's going to be a massive protection of this and why you're seeing the left actually like they're lionizing the group of people that are involved in this fraud.

That's because it's a massive voting base and it's obviously a massive donation base. Here's the mayor of an American city, one of the whitest people you'll ever find, doing his half assed version of Speak in Somali, whatever that is. Magaegewa, Jacob. Fry, Dolckemegalada. Minneapolis Daman shabka Somaliade Kayemid Mogadishu garaway hargesa bosaso edabo kismayo wahan raba in an hidin shego. Sheta Sheta Kalaka. Taka Baba. What the hell is this guy doing?

First of all, you know, he doesn't speak that language, so he's just reading some sort of phonetic bullshit off a teleprompter. And secondly, and maybe more importantly, why does he think that that is a winning thing? When that goes out on the Internet, it's there forever. That is obviously the way that you maintain power and money in that area. And that is a horribly cynical, disgustingly cynical sort of calculation that's been made.

And maybe that's why you end up with these learning centers like this. Is the federal government going to be the solution to it? No, it's not. They can go and do an investigation and find out who's involved. But at the end of the day, how about we go back and we look at these quote UN quote, constitutional guys, the same ones that were crying for snap. There's a reason why they love handing the stuff out. We used to call it pork when I was a kid.

I used to hear it all the time. Oh, there's all this pork in the bill. Nobody even says that anymore. I read all the major news outlets. I read CBSABCNBCCNNN, New York Times, NPR, Fox News, some of the other like smaller fringe stuff as well. Nobody ever calls out pork the way that I used to hear it. I grew up listening to News Radio where constantly the the squawk from the right was there's too much pork in each

given bill. One of the crying articles that I saw today, which I'm not going to cover, but let's just call what it is, there was a crying article, I think it was on ABC, but don't quote me on that one. It was on the main page talking about how the defense authorization bill had been, had been gutted of fertilization, you know, fertility treatments for military families, as though that somehow had anything to do with with the National Defense of this country.

I mean, I, I think we should be having babies too, but I have no idea why we need to be paying for fertility treatments and why that's part of the National Defense authorization acts. Completely bizarre. Just like I don't know what the federal government's investment is in making sure that childcare centers are funded with our tax dollars for subsidies. Here is the here's the YouTube Nick Shirley doing a great job asking questions with a researcher, talking to a Somali,

you know, daycare center. And some of the stuff. It's really good viral content because it's well edited. It's also really easy to go do not that you have to have like specialized equipment or anything else. Why are federal agents not knocking on these doors and finding out who's in there and doing head counts? And the answer is because the government will never be able to police these things itself because it allowed them. And it continues to allow them. They seem to be closed.

No one's opening the doors. You work here. OS Yeah, let's help them. Where are the kids? It says it's licensed for 74 children right here state of Minnesota. Where are the kids? They got paid $1.26 million in fiscal year 2025. It says they have a capacity for 74 children. When, when, where are the kids? Right here, state of Minnesota website, you work here and you don't know. I don't know. I was there before. I don't know what's going on were. There any kids when you worked here?

He's there, kids there. What's how many? I don't know. You don't know? Yeah. You worked here. OK, well then you're not of any help. Can I put my son in a daycare here? No. No, no, I don't know. Can I speak to someone? No, I don't. Know No, Yeah. I would like to see if I can put my son Joey here. Who's his son Joey? My son Joey, can I check out daycare center? I'm going to my son. No, I'm the owner. Do you, do you put your kid here in this daycare? There is one child in there, Yeah.

I'd like to know if this is a legit business. Yeah, I'm scared of you too. How come I explain it's a thing? You're scared of me. Yeah, what's up for you to cut it? Because of my color? You said you're scared of me because of my color. Does that make you a racist? Yeah, no, but you. You said you're, you said you're scared of me, 'cause of my color. I'm I'm not saying you. You, you said you're scared of me 'cause of my color.

That makes you a racist. So right now they're all getting mad 'cause he's shown the paperwork of this business being registered as a business. 74 children, no children. He saw one child when the lady opened up the door. Wow, wow, wow. So now they're all getting mad. What was this money spent on? 1.26 million? What was that money spent? The Dollar. MAGA. Egawa, Jacob. Frye, Dolce. Megalada. Minneapolis, Daman Shabka, Somaliade, Kayamid, Mogadishu I.

Just can't. I just can't not think that's funny. It's so awkward and weird. So you've got NBC News covering it. The FBI is surging resources to to Minnesota. It's one day after the fraud, but Patel actually says that they were involved in it beforehand. I've seen Harmony Dylan go out and make the claim just like, yeah, there were 99 indictments and and 62 convictions. It's not enough if there are billions and billions of

dollars. I've seen reports saying as much as $24 billion in fraud happening in that place. It's not accidental. It's pretty clearly not accidental. It's that they've seen, OK, this is an opportunity for us to to, to do what we need to get done. We're going to find a group of people that are going to support us and we're going to support them. This is a patronage system. There are people claiming this

as well. That's what this this video of, of, of Jacob Frye kind of insinuates this story here from NBC News claiming that the FBI went into OverDrive. It's only because there's PR there to be had. So we have a government that's literally chasing headlines. They were doing this work. Don't think they weren't. There was clearly a white collar fraud unit that was working out of Minneapolis and they were doing that work.

But nobody celebrating that. What they're doing is they're giving credit to the new team, even though it's the old teams work. Because as I continue to make the argument, in the same way they're doing terrorism cases the same, they're also doing the same white collar fraud. It's just whether or not it's, it's got some, you know, some, some high value in the social media sphere.

Watch this one right here. In 2022, during the Biden administration, federal prosecutors announced initial indictments on what they called a $250 million fraud scheme to defraud federally funded child nutrition programs. As of last month, prosecutors charged 77 people. These are always long term investigations. This is what the what the FBI was designed to do. It shouldn't be political. It should be. You're taking money from the American people.

We have an $11 billion agency that goes and investigates public corruption and fraud and Interstate crimes. They have a national security mission as well, which I think is problematic. And So what do they do? They, they do everything that all normal government agencies do. They try to find the easiest way out. One of the one of the great examples I'll share with you, and there's more to this.

One of the easiest things that you'll see is how do I find the easiest way to continue doing my job? Everyone does this, by the way, like everyone wants to find the shortcut, right? If you can find an easier and a more efficient way to do your job than you do it. The difference is are you still achieving the mission. In private industry you're going to be held accountable for results in the federal government you're basically held accountable for numbers. Can you brief a number that

looks good. So here's the biggest secret that most people don't realize. One of the major, major drug operation enforcement that the federal government does this is DEA and this is also FBI. Does this is rather than go after the cartels that we hear about in Venezuela smuggling in drugs or the Mexican cartels that are moving things over the

border. It's way easier to set up on doctors, on people that are really close to you that don't require a ton of work because they're operating overtly in a public business. So almost every single what's called healthcare fraud service or healthcare fraud squad, the FBI has all these different squads and they're all named for different things. Very, very unique.

So there'd be a squad that was dealing with Chinese counterintelligence, There'd be one that would do global counterintelligence, all the small dogs, there'd be one for Russia, right? There'd be counterterrorism that was focused on domestic extremism. There'd be one that'd be focused on international extremism,

etcetera, etcetera. And then you get into the the criminal aspects of it. And so you'd have people that we had an entire squad in Washington Field that literally just did Asian gangs, specifically with Asian ethnic people that were, you know, out of ethnic communities, Vietnamese, Chinese, you know, triad type stuff. If they were Japanese Yakuza, like the things you see in

movies. Like there was a squad that just handled that and they weren't super busy, but there were some squads that did that, Asian boys and some others that were out there operating. Then you had another one that was dealing with like Latin American gangs, your Ms.

Thirteens, you know, whatever. And then you'd have other types of things like healthcare fraud, white collar fraud, public corruption in this area, Washington DC, public corruption in Northern Virginia. So that'd be your, you know, governmental agencies, your city, your county, your state,

etcetera. One of the things they always had are these healthcare fraud squads and healthcare fraud should be people that are defrauding the government by falsely billing Medicare and Medicaid and doing things under a medical license that allows them to get access to the billions of dollars, whether it be at the VA or whether it be through Medicare, Medicaid, etcetera. Federal programs that I don't think we should even exist because I have no idea what the federal government is involved

in healthcare. I don't understand it, but we assume that's true. And so these guys were supposed to be rooting out that fraud. You know what they did instead? They went after doctors who are prescribing opiates, what you'd call pill mills, because it's really easy. It's less work, it's very transactional. You get all the statistical accomplishments of regular arrests, and you don't save any money from the federal government because pill mills don't really cost the American

taxpayer all that much money. There's no real upside to it. So you took an organization that was meant to go after fraud. You'd have a dozen agents aside to healthcare fraud, and instead they would go after and do drug cases that are super easy. We'd run down the people that were selling the drugs. We'd go after murder cases when someone overdosed on the drugs.

Why do the hard thing that actually achieves the mission when you can still get the same paycheck, you can still achieve like results, and you can still claim victory. And this is the same reason why they do counterterrorism cases against people that are like a Mexican American born guy in Midlothian, TX who's 21 years old and he's selling nothing. He's selling absolutely nothing to an undercover agent.

Did anyone get saved by that? If that guy didn't run into the ever color agent, is he going to accidentally find like an ISIS dude hanging out online that's going to help him do his thing? No, the guy was never going to be an operational terrorist. None of them are. So this governmental answer is not like, it's never like, oh, well, how do we get the government more focused on the thing it was meant to do? How do we, how do we fix this fraud scenario? You just don't have that program.

That's the right answer, as far as I can tell. It shouldn't actually be that hard. And all you're doing is you're setting up, you know, the, when you look at the the way that the other side does it, what they do is they immediately run into claiming that you're morally bad, that you're not doing something nice. And so they're weaponizing that, that segment of the population that's willing to look at you and say you are not holding up the virtue that you don't even believe in.

And what we're going to try to make you act like you do. You're a Christian, aren't you? Aren't you a compassionate person? Don't you care about other people's outcomes? This woman is running for Senate in in Minnesota. Watch her immediately dawn the cloak of Christianity of of Catholicism.

And then I can show you that there's nothing Catholic about this lady, but she's going to make you feel bad about it because she's going to say, listen, as a as a Catholic who goes to Mass every Sunday, I believe these things. It just turns out that none of the things she says are actually in communion with the Catholic Church's teachings. And that's something. All we got to do is look one layer deeper. Oh, there's a bunch of fraud here. How do we stop the fraud?

Well, the easiest way is to stop the agency that puts it out. Well, we never want to do that. We just want to correct the problem so we can continue giving that money out. We just want to give it to the right people. This woman is going to go and make the emotional argument, which is what I see the left do on a regular basis.

No, I, I'm Catholic. I go to church every Sunday, and I am very clear that my face tells me to welcome the stranger and that I often wear a medallion of Mother Cabrini, who's the patron St. of immigrants. Oh, my God, I'm not carrying my rosary on me. Is this going to turn into a very Catholic episode of the show again? No, no. But it is just so clear what we are called to do.

And you know, when we are watching these images of that mom who was in front of the school, who was just pulled from her vehicle, right? As we hear children crying, as we saw a 15 year old in the suburbs of Chicago who was detained. Like it is as we watch these folks in a whole communities just be terrorized. We have to speak out. This is it's just wrong. And we can disagree about policy, but when you completely strip the humanity and any kind of due process from people,

that's just called kidnapping. I mean, that sounds very compelling right up until I look at the point that the underlying point of your argument, the entire hinge of what you started off with, your appeal to authority, was that you're a Catholic. This is the Lieutenant governor of Minnesota who tells people if you're seeking an abortion, come on in. You are welcome here. We want to enable your abortions as Iowa prepares to enact one of the strictest laws in the nation.

This happened a year and a half ago, July of 2024. She went out and said, why don't you come here and have your abortions. There is nothing that is in communion with the Catholic Church about abortion.

When I see people have things like pro pro-choice Catholic on the back of their car or even, you know, Catholic Democrat, which I see sometimes at mass, these people don't get to make that argument because they're, they're completely out of communion with what the church actually teaches on these things. And they're they're using it in a weaponized fashion. She's talking about due process. What due process did you engage in when you came into this

country illegally? Did you care about due process? Why should we give you due process when you actually are getting due process? They just don't even know what it means. Amusingly enough, there's a administrative process that happens when you come into this country illegally and we remove you. It doesn't mean you go in front of a court of law and then a jury of your peers because you don't have any peers because

you're not from here. There's an administrative judge that looks at it and goes like, Yep, yeah, you meet all the criteria, out you go. That's how it works. But this lady's going to tell you that she's Catholic here. You can see it if you guys are listening. You're missing out on a picture of Peggy Flanagan wearing a Protect trans kids with a freaking with a freaking knife on it. Was that a buoy knife?

What they failed to look at, and this is something that I think the American, the American dominant culture needs to re establish, is something that Saint Augustine called Ordo amorous. This is the order of love and the way that things are supposed to stack up. God first, then family, then neighbors and friends, then your city and your nation, and then the world. Last. It means that there is a priority system because we're human beings and we can only

focus on so much. So if you are a real Christian and you want to look back at the history of what Christianity has taught about love for all people and welcoming the neighbor, you don't welcome the neighbor and sacrifice and kill off your friend. You make sure that your family is taking care of first, that those that are in your community and the ones that are immediately in your vicinity first. You don't immediately start throwing all the things you have off into the world.

It's like throwing a cup of water into the ocean. It does nothing. Or taking even better a bucket of water and tossing into the desert. It immediately evaporates and there's no impact. But that bucket of water may be enough to water plants in your neighborhood or give somebody a drink who's dying of thirst. That is a friend or a family member.

It's pretty interesting when you hear people make these appeals and everything that they are appealing is immediately contradicted by their own words and their own actions. It can't be done. And again, she's a Catholic. Maybe she needs to go read some Catholic teachings. This is this is so easy to see for me sitting on the outside of it because I don't have to be on anybody's team. You're going to make emotional appeals.

And that probably sits really well with a nice, generally speaking, compassionate 50 to 75 year old white lady who's sitting there going, yeah, we should be kind to strangers and neighbors. All my needs are met. I live in this house and I'm comfortable. And how, how dare I sit here and not, not help out these poor people. Meanwhile, those people did nothing to help veterans who came back with PTSD and are living on the streets in their own nation.

And So what do we do? We open up and we bring in 100,000 Somalis or 100,000 Afghans, some of whom want to kill us, some of whom clearly have none of the same feelings or, or beliefs that we have and actually think you shouldn't be allowed to have them. And they're doing everything they can to work against it. That's suicidal empathy. So it should be pretty straightforward.

It's easy. It's like, OK, fine, let's eliminate the, the governmental programs that support this stuff and let's just see what the, what the human beings will shake out. We talked about it a couple weeks ago. This is probably at the beginning of December, James Madison essentially stating one of the guys who helped frame the Constitution that charity cannot be mandated by the government. That's where we see the subversion happening in this nation.

The structural problems, which Bannon kind of alluded to, they're never being addressed. They always go after symptom every single time. How do we stop the symptom? Don't worry about the root cause. Don't worry about the fact that we've democratized a, a part of our legislature. So that should have never been democratized. Another one of you made the comment about the 17th amendment to me the other day. I'm telling you, you can track the stuff back well over 100

years. There is nobody alive today that is to blame for the failure and structure of this government. So don't think I'm putting it on any group of people or any administration. It it's, it's not fair because it, it predates us by 120 years standing here today. And yet how many people are looking at root causes and saying, how do I fix what is wrong?

How many people are looking at it the same way that like a clinician would look at the problem and say, OK, here's the symptom that's going to kill us. We have to stop that. And then we have to go and treat the root cause. We have to either cut out the cancer. We need to add blood. We need to put a, a, some sort of a, a, a, a pharmaceutical that's going to kill off the pathogenic Organism that is expanding through our bloodstream and ending our life. How do we do that?

How do we stop the infection? We don't ever do that. Not ever. We just go like, how do we make this headache go away? How can we make ourselves feel OK about it? It's pretty simple. All right, here's here's the governor of Minnesota who's now facing all these fraud allegations. And his first thought is also the same as Peggy, but he's less sophisticated about it. He just said that you're a racist. This is a you should be worried

about your own problems. This reminds me very clearly of a don't worry about the, you know, the, the, the speck in your neighbor's eye, like go for the plank in your own. It's good. It's good. Except what if the neighbor doesn't have a plank in their eye? What if they have like a beam that is crushing them to death because the government is taking all your money and giving it to people that have no business

being here. And by the way, they don't actually feel that way because they're not Christian. Look, it's not law abiding citizens, if they, if that were the case, there's a lot of white men should be holding a lot of white men accountable for the for the crimes that they have

committed. I think for the community to maybe educate their population, because I think what you're seeing here is their secondary victims in this, that there's there's providers inside the community that are then victimizing the community himself by signing them up. Because when we're going to some of these people, they're like, I had no idea I was in this program. So I think it's, it's asking us then, you know, for every crime, which of course the majority being committed by white men,

asking us to do more about that. I think it's crime in general. And I think the biggest thing on this is it's just making sure that we're educating the population. And again, this is 80 people or so that have been convicted in this, maybe some more in that out of a broader ring, Medicaid fraud will stretch across all racial demographics, all all ethnic groups. So I think it's really important for us to note each each community's got this in their

own midst. But to blame them and say that they should have been responsible for stopping it, I think that's a pretty hard reach. I think we continue to educate folks about why. Nope. That's you making an apology for people that don't require the apology, that don't deserve the apology. What are you doing? That's like, yeah, we've identified fraud. We're going to root it out. It seems very particular to this community, this particular style of fraud.

So we're going to go out there and focus on this community with this type of fraud. And also we'd like to go after some Medicare and Medicaid fraud. And it doesn't matter who owns them. It's like, OK, there's healthcare companies. I used to work for a healthcare company that would bill $1000 for, for an ambulance ride when an ambulance wasn't required. They would bill more if I sat in the back versus if the, the

other guy sat in the back. We both were just sitting in the back riding along with you and like maybe we did a blood pressure check, maybe we'd run like a quick EKG on you. If you had a cardiac condition, they'd bill 1000 or 1500 bucks for a few minutes down the road for ambulance transportation. I couldn't do anything about that. And the more I saw it, I was like this, this is awful. I don't want to be part of that. I want to go to the clinical

side. I want to go actually be in the hospital because what we're doing here in this private ambulance service is just taking federal dollars because we can, because it's enabled, because it's allowed. And I imagine that they probably have a pretty strong lobby that allows that to continue. So, yeah, there's fraud going back all over the place. And. And what about the agencies that should be handling it?

They're not handling it. So if we can't police ourselves inside government, if our government cannot handle policing, you know, governmental fraud, then the answer is don't have that part of the government. That's never what you have. You just hear this blame game. This is Nick Shirley going on Fox talking about this exact same thing. And this is an even broader question about whether or not it's about white supremacy, which is where it always ends up.

If you take these things down to their logical roots, which is an emotional appeal, you're a bad person because you don't want to do this thing. Never address the actual thing, because that would be difficult. You have to admit that these people are doing things that are wrong. Doesn't mean they're the only people, it just means that they are. So they always deflect this. And again, this is subservience to a non dominant culture.

It must have enough dominance. It's presented itself strong enough that these people actually want to go and service them. This is what happens when they target communities for their own benefit. This is what happens when they scapegoat. And this is what, say, happens when they no longer hide the idea of white supremacy. So it sounds to me, Nick, that Governor Tim Walz is saying that you and others that are out there trying to expose this, you know, you're doing it because

you're white supremacist. What is your response to him? Yeah, Tim wants votes. There are entire apartment complex that where white people have been pushed out of these apartment complexes because Somalians have taken over and they're inside of these towns like Minneapolis where they can go and go get votes from these people.

And if you have 100,000 people that will vote for you because you're going to enable and let this stuff happen and because you're going to call white person racist for calling out facts. This is what's going to happen to a state like Minnesota. Minnesotans, they seem Minnesota nice, but they are very upset. And I totally understand why they're upset because they don't have a governor who's actually working for them. They're he's actually working

against them. It it, it's not the only place that this is happening. This is clearly happening in other places that are dominated by the political left. They've gone out there and they've taken a a small minority group, given them outsize power and influence, given them basically like moral authority and said This is why we have to support them because previously something else bad happened.

Again, it's all people that didn't actually earn the sort of comfort and and freedom that they live under. They want to seed it, but it all of this stuff goes back to an age-old cycle. This is a cycle as old as time. It doesn't matter whether you read judges in the Bible or whether you go and just look at human history over the last like 200 years, things get good, society is stabilized. It takes strength, it takes effort, and then what do they

do? It creates people that are soft, that have known nothing else, that have not had to deal with hardship, didn't had to actually craft it out. They don't know what the consequences of their failure is. And so they go out there and they seed it and fritter it away. Doesn't matter if it's second generation wealth or third generation rich kids who go out there and you know, they have all kinds of substance abuse problems. They throw all their money into a casino or something.

I mean, it happens all the time. And then what happens next? Then you have people that are destitute, or you have a nation that's destitute and it's fallen away from its principles. You got to go and you got to go and build it up the hard way again, manually. If you want to see what what, what the answer, or what would a personification of good times create soft men? It looks just like this in New York City right now. This is Zoran Mandami.

It's going to be the mayor. He's walking through the streets. He has no real work experience. He's 34 years old. And again, this, this whole concept, this democratic, this democratization of America, that was never meant to be like that in this country. We were meant to have sort of a hierarchical structure. We were meant to have like an oligarchy, which is really what it is, or an aristocracy that meted out and, and, and balanced out the masses. You guys, look at the founding

fathers. They were kind of elitist in a good way. They were like the people matter and the people should be served. But also we should probably put a check on the on the instincts and the appetites of the mob because the mob is very fickle and it turns and makes bad decisions. Like putting a socialist 34 year old guy that's never run anything in charge of America's biggest city. What a wild thing to do. We'll see what it looks like. You can tell it's not going to

work out well. The people that have money are going to leave. The people that have influence are not going to experience anything. And I'm going to bet you more likely than not he ends up more corrupted by the system than he can do to dismantle what he thinks he's going to dismantle. I don't think he'll be successful in the thing he even says. And he's already placating people, right?

He's already going out and making bizarre decisions like putting people into positions that you cannot fathom them being in. And like, why would you want to put, what would make you think that putting a, the EMT lesbian in charge of the fire department would have a good outcome? Well, it wouldn't matter. But all you're going to do is you're going to cater to a very, very small minority of people that you've said are important. And so that's what you do.

You go out there and you just give them what they think they want. The sad thing is, is that the New York Fire Department does a lot of good work. Can't imagine them doing anything useful. And you can't imagine someone who's never been a firefighter being in charge of a fight like an agency like that and being an EMT and being a being someone in charge of the emergency medical system. It's not the same.

I don't know, putting a fat lesbian in charge of the New York Fire Department is actually a pretty good slap in the face. See how many people want to stick around and do that because they can find work elsewhere and you can get paid just as well to do the same work and actually be appreciated. Lillian Bond Signor is a career first responder. In just nine days, she'll be running the world's busiest fire department. One of the most important appointments of the incoming administration.

And they deserve a leader who cares about their work because she did it herself, who understands every detail and will fight tirelessly to empower FDNY and make it the best firefighting force in the world. Lillian Bonsignore began her career as an EMT in 1991 and was ultimately promoted to chief of the city's EMS division, where she served for three years before retiring in 20. Lillian Bond Signore is a career first response. Sorry about that. I had that bumped up to like, 115%.

So the speed made it sound even more ridiculous. The helium voice was perfect for that, wasn't it? That's about how serious that looks. It's terrible. It's a terrible decision. They've done this, by the way, in Los Angeles. You guys are calling it out in the chat, and rightly so. If you make decisions based on people, the DEI decisions that didn't earn it, Yeah, the results are predictable. You put people that are not competent there. The answer should be OK, are we doing the job?

Are we fulfilling the mission? If the answer is are we just checking the box and putting people that look good, sound good, or, you know, sort of placate some group of human beings? You forgot what the mission is. The mission is not to promote lesbians into positions of power. The mission is to make sure that buildings don't burn and that you have an effective firefighting force and an emergency medical team that can go out and deliver that life saving capability.

Who cares what the person looks like? And there's no chance that that person is the most competent. There's none. I'm just going to tell you right now, the number of paramedics that you meet that are women, it's very fractional. It's small. The number of firefighters that you meet that are women, it's very small. It's the same as is is in a law enforcement, in the military. The odds that the best and most capable person for that job is a chubby middle-aged lesbian is

none. It's none and everybody knows it. Look was not a single person was like, yeah, if I had to bet the best person, if I was going to draw them out, I'd sketch out this person, a lady wearing a men's suit with a pot belly. And why does it matter that it's a fat lesbian? Why does that matter? It really does. It actually matters because EMS work. It's physical. It's demanding. Oh, how do you know?

I was a paramedic for 10 years. It's lifts, it's CPR, it's getting into awkward spaces and pulling heavy people that have had like really, really dramatically bad things happen to them. It's dragging a £300 cardiac patient out from behind the toilet where they fell down and had cardiac collapse and you bring them out into the living room so you can actually do something.

It's you and your buddy grabbing someone by the belt and the foot and pulling them out of a tile room and putting them somewhere where you can actually access their patient, you know their problems and see where they have veins and you're working in bad lighting. If you're working in the back of an ambulance, it's bouncing you around. So you have to hold on and have like good core and then you may have to do something really aggressive.

You know, you may have to pull somebody in in a a dangerous scenario where they may die. Firefighters lifting heavy bodies out and stuff like that in really unnatural and uncomfortable positions. So being a it's like seeing a chubby nurse and I see them all the time too. And there's a lot of nurses out there that are very unhealthy. They're living a non healthy life while they're out there administering to people that live non healthy lives. And they don't see the irony in it.

The saying there's a, there's a physicality to certain jobs. And if you want to go lead people in a physical job, there's a reason why Pete Hagseth actually has the respect from people who are the actual troops and why that actually matters. And there's a reason why guys like Kash Patel don't because they're pretending if you go out there and you are the thing that you that you claim to be and you were that thing and people can look at you and go like, got it.

You know what I'm doing. You understand the thing? You're even still meeting the mission requirements of my mission, even though it's not required of yours. I can follow that leader. That person leads from the front, as we say. Then you see the alternative. The alternative is putting some middle-aged lady who's never done that job in charge of one of the more important things.

Like there's a ton of money, there's a ton of budgeting, and more importantly, there's a ton of like required Esprit de corps because firefighters, they don't get paid nearly as much as they could and their job is kind of boring and kind of stupid right up until it's your family and it's the worst day of someone's life and they get called to be there. That's the funniest part about it's the same thing you find in

law enforcement. Mundane, non interesting, just hanging around and then suddenly it's like go for all the chips and somebody's family member may or may not come home based on your ability to be prepared at a moment's notice in the middle of the night while you're sleeping, Bing tones go off and you're out there running. People like that are going to look at that woman and think that they got it right.

I don't think so. It's amazing though, because you're seeing this cover by the for the mainstream news. This is ANBC story on it talking about the the most important thing is for Muslims in New York. His victory bridges a long standing division. I saw like four articles on Mandami. That's why I'm covering him today. His inauguration represents a bridge for Muslims. What does that have to do with being the mayor of a large city?

You're essentially the CEO of a massive, massive organization with 12 + 1,000,000 people in your general area that do commerce there and live in your and, and, and what does it, What does it matter if a Muslim person feels good because another Muslim person who doesn't even seem to be that Muslim? That's the funniest part about it. Again, we talk about the, the concept of the watermelon green on the outside Muslim and and red on the inside socialism. I don't, I don't know that this

guy is, is particularly devout. I think he's playing the game the same way that Jacob Fry is. Zora Mandali's election to the New York City next mayor has become something larger than historic. First, for many Muslims in New York, it's a rare moment of visibility and unity across the city's Muslim communities. That's what we need, a fractionalized number of human beings. Less than 2% of the US population are Muslim. Statistically irrelevant for whatever it's worth.

And yet non-stop articles written by Myrna Al Sharif, whoever that is giving outside influence to things that don't make any sense to me. It's wild because they're talking about how it has the potential. It's a meaningful blend for Shia Muslims who often felt sidelined

within their own faith. Talking about the the wife of Mandami coming out and telling people that she's Shia and there's a Sunni majority stuff that doesn't matter to Americans. We don't care what sect of Islam you're part of. That's not what we're about. It's so fringe, It's so small. I had a discussion with somebody

last night. They were telling me about Jack Mormons. If that's, if I'm even saying it correctly, Mormons who are basically Mormons in name only and don't actually adhere to the tenants of, of, of the Mormon faith. I was like, who cares? Who cares? Seriously, Who cares about this stuff you're getting in here? You're getting into the such minor minutiae of it that you want me to care about it. I don't understand. Like, I don't understand why you

think it matters. How about the big deal issues in America, which is do whatever the hell you want for your faith. Practice it however you choose. Don't try to project it on to the, to the dominant culture of America. This is why I keep telling people that that my, my movement is, is, is going to be really simple. This is what 2026 is going to be about for me. Bacon cheeseburger nationalism.

I don't mean it in a mean way, but seriously, if you will not eat a bacon cheeseburger with all the things that come along with it, then you're not my tribe. And by the way, you're not the dominant tribe in America. And if you think otherwise, you are sorely mistaken. I can go out on the street in any major city to America. Go walk up to people, any male over the age of 18, and find out whether you're on my team or not.

Very simply, if you can eat bread and you don't ask me whether or not there's going to be a nut allergy involved in it. If you can eat cheese and not cry to me about your dairy problems. If you can eat beef without saying something about how that offends your sensibilities, whether you're vegan, vegetarian, Hindu, or whatever, and if you can eat bacon, which is delicious, then you're part of the dominant culture in America. Period. It's not.

It's not even negotiable. It's such an easy thing that all of you know that's true as you listen to it. And if there are people that have problems with these things, you can exist. I'm not saying that you're not in America. I'm saying you're not the dominant culture. So stop trying to put your other garbage on us. That's really simple. America is meant to be ruled and governed for the majority with the protection and the insulation for the minority to

continue to be able to thrive. Bacon cheeseburger nationalism. I'll show you the opposite of it. Are you ready? This is what the RNC is. This is why I will not be and you will never find me at an RNC. And this is Nick Fuentes making commentary on it. This was the only one that I found. One of you guys made this comment to me yesterday on social media. So I'm sharing it with you because I think it's both amusing and I don't think he's out of line.

I feel the same way. This is Harmey Dillon, conservative influencer who's been married three times. Her recent husband passed away, so she's a widow now, but three marriages just like Donald Trump. That's not a particularly conservative position for Americans. She has some really good ideas. And then she went to the RNC and she did this, which I never actually sat through and listened to.

This is crazy to me that you would take the most non dominant thing and bring it in to the dominant culture of America, which supposedly represents people who listen to the show and people who are generally speaking, conservative without being, you know, Republicans. There is no party that represents us. There is no bacon cheeseburger nationalist party. And that would not be an

offensive party. In fact, it would do well for all the people, the Somalis. It would do well for the people who are Hindu. It would do well for everybody because nobody's out there like shoving it down your throat. We're just saying like this is what our national food looks like. Go anywhere in America. Go anywhere in the world and ask them what it is. They will tell you it's American. They know anybody who's traveled knows this.

Alternatively, you could put this in and bring the quote UN quote big tent. And then you're going to wonder why you don't get the, the, the, the reactions and the successes that you'd expect. It goes on, it goes on and I can't do much more of it because 1, I don't like a tunnel singing and two, this is how you give guys like Nick Fuentes room to operate. This is why Nick Fuentes has the following that he has. I had someone say like, I'm not

following you down. You're Nick Fuentes, you know, phase. It's like, I don't really care if you can't acknowledge what this is. That's the voice of every regular bacon cheeseburger eating person in America going, what the shit are you doing? Why are you putting that in front of us? What does this have to do with our political structure? Like I don't even need you to go out and say a prayer at all. You can have a completely secular version of your of your

governmental policies. They just have to be governed by basically Christian values because that's who the majority of America is. Period. The end non non negotiable. You want to make people get pissed? You want to make people decide that they will just abandoned your party and have the thing that we talked about Steve Bannon worried about. You want to get slaughtered in midterms, go promote that nonsense. Go promote Vivek Ramaswamy saying things that occasionally sound really good.

And he was talking about, I mean, I that guy was such a cartoon, wasn't he? When he was running on the round wearing like the American flag jacket, putting on the cowboy hats. Like, dude, stop, Just be you. Stop being fake. He's a really smart guy. Vivek Ramaswamy is a very smart man.

He's also very savvy. I'm also a little bit suspicious of him at this point because he says things that don't make any sense to me. Got a great little clip of him, of his words being read by people who are sort of incredulous in the way that he actually comported himself. I'm going to find it real quick for you because when you hear it, you're like, oh, this seems problematic. If you want to open up the quote UN quote tent. This is the reason why big tent politics, politics suck.

What you've done is you've brought all the people in that don't hold your principles and then you act shocked that there is in fact no principle that that governs your, your, your administration. This is I think the reason why MAGA people, some of them ones that are paying attention to outcomes and really want to see things like they don't care about the person, they care about the actions.

The people that want to see reduction, not of like fraud, but of the program that allowed fraud to exist, the underlying conditions, those people are going to be pissed. They'll always be pissed because they got sold a bill of goods they thought they were getting. Everybody joined our tent because they thought we had the best chance of doing good

things. What they didn't realize is we brought in all these people into the quote UN quote big tent and all they did is dilute the values that we actually thought we had. So there was in fact no principle and they just put the name on it. America First. Not actually like America is First, but America First trademark, whatever that brand means. Do you know the brand that says the CIA is now going to do drone strikes in ports in Venezuela?

Is that really the biggest threat to America right now? Is that really who we need to go pick in a fight with? I understand the idea that you want to influence your hemisphere Monroe Doctrine, but it's the opposite of taking care of America First to go pick a fight with Venezuela. At this point, I'm pretty confident. I saw Donald Trump say that we were going to campaign on the

idea of no new wars. In fact, we are going to shut down all the foreign conflicts, kind of the opposite if you're going to turn around and start doing CIA drone strikes at ports in Venezuela. As reported by the New York Times, the attack last week on a dock purportedly used for shipping narcotics did not kill anyone. To people briefed on the operation, it was the first known operation inside of Venezuela by U.S. forces. This is an act of war, whether you like it or not.

When you go out there and you do a kinetic strike, sending explosives from the sky into somebody's infrastructure, you're attacking their nation. If somebody did that to Los Angeles, we would also be furious. And you should expect the same from them. Now, is Venezuela like, capable of doing as much as the United States? No. Can they project power and force the way that we do? No, they cannot. Do I really, really care desperately about whether or not there's a dock or a port that's

still functional in Venezuela? As a human being who cares about cheeseburgers and making sure my kids get educated? No, I don't. I actually don't. I, I, I personally do not care all that much, except I know that it's not the values that we're being were being sold. It's not the values that we were, we were told was coming our way. It's pretty interesting too, because we did an interview and it's been brought back up to my attention again with a guy named Jordan Goudreau.

A lot of the things that I've, that I've done on this podcast, they stay in my head and I kind of like I have them in my head, but I don't actively think about them all the time. And you guys will remember them because they were they, you received them differently than I did. You know, I was part of it and you were observing it. And it actually helps to be further away.

And if you remember what Jordan Goudreau came on, he was a Green Beret. And he talked about how the Trump administration one point O had actually asked him to go out there and create a, a coup of of sorts in Venezuela. That was something he was trying to do. It was a priority of the first administration, per him. The DOJ went after him aggressively under Biden and still the ongoing DOJ, which is the same DOJ, they went after him. He's now a fugitive from

justice. Jordan Kudrow, former former guest of this program. Here's an open international warrant from our Justice Department that's kind of interesting. And when I briefed my buddy George Hill about it, who spent a lot of time in the intelligence community, and I was like, what do you think about that guy's story? He said it's highly plausible. But the odds are is that his OP wasn't the only OP that was going on. And that's the way that these

agencies operate. And that's what people are starting to become aware of. The operations are circles spinning against alternative circles spinning against alternative circles. It's a clockwise with a counterclockwise on the inside with another clockwise with another counterclockwise. And so each one of those individual circles has to have an achievable goal. His achievable goal was landing like munitions and getting a guerrilla force to actually operate in Venezuela, which is

an achievable mission. And even his own operation had two different circles spinning in it. One was the actual objective and the other was actually landing like a a boarding force that was a distractionary force, both of whom had achievable tactical goals. This is how these things work. And so when you start looking at it and you go, oh, shit. And now we're dropping drone strikes over there. Multiple different people

reporting this. I think this is also coming from NBC News on their national security desk. Took out a big facility, the alleged drug boats are going on like this seems distractionary to me and I don't understand the nature of it. And none of that sounds like America first to me. Call me crazy, but I read these stories in the morning. I see that multiple agencies are covering them, multiple different news agencies. They're pushing out the idea that this is the thing.

It sounds like, hey, we're not getting it done where we need to. We're not actually exporting the number of people. We're not putting blood back into the body or exporting the toxin of a of a bunch of illegal aliens who are doing fraud. So maybe we can go over there and Dick around in Venezuela if you guys think that I'm seeing our chat, which is really funny to me guys. I watch the show live and I actually read a lot of what you

guys put out there. Watching people say that somehow going after and striking a dock in Venezuela is going to attack the the Venezuelan ability to influence and meddle with our elections technologically. It's sort of an absurd. Just listen to yourself and you ask me if that makes any sense. You guys decide, you tell me and put in the comments below.

Do you think that striking a dock lethal or not lethal blowing up boats in the Caribbean, whether you agree with the, the you know, the drugs coming in or not headed here or not, Like regardless, is any of that stuff going to change the, the election system in the United States?

Or is that all just kind of like bread and circus distractions and people cheering like seals when they declassify another video from thermal, you know, images of a of a drone dropping stuff on it. Like it's cool to use military toys. It's cool to put up a Predator Drome or a Reaper or something, or drop some sort of ordinance.

Doesn't seem to benefit me. I'm sure it benefits whoever's like the weapon manufacturer that gives an opportunity to put another couple hours of of maintenance into it and another set of armaments. But these are symptoms. These are not fixing the problem. Not to me. And our government continues unabated doing the exact same thing that it's always been doing. All right, all of that is to say, let's let's let's go to this this craziness that just

dropped today. And this is a good place to have a little like kind of a a Segway cut. So if you guys are watching over on YouTube, I appreciate it. If you guys are listening on Rumble or if you're listening on any of the audio apps, rather check us out on Spotify, Kyle seraphinshow.com. This is going to be a hyper fast and then refresh on some of the stuff that we talked about yesterday with Steve Baker. I'm going to run through the document that we briefed in a short like maybe 5 minute

segment. And then I also want to cover down some new stuff that was just filed because you're watching live, make sure you hit the thumbs up. If you're watching in the replay, hit the thumbs up. YouTube Rumble X please do that subscribe share. We've crossed over the 18,000 subscriber boundary, which is awesome. And that comes from you guys

doing what you guys are doing. Let's do let's do some documentation, which is a little bit, it was a little bit of a yawn, but we're going to do a quick run through the highlights from yesterday. And by the way, you, you may hear a Spotify ad right about now. People get mad when they don't get the heads up on it. OK, so this is the government's memorandum in support of

pretrial detention. I went over this long form with Steve Baker. If you guys want to listen to a nice conversation and hear that Steve Baker is alive and well. I think he actually got stronger through yesterday's interview by doing the work we had this morning conversation real

quickly. I actually do believe that the Holy Spirit gives you strength to do things even when you don't otherwise have them in your body when you're doing the thing you're meant to do. My experience of that was going on Fox News when I had COVID and I had like 105° fever and I went into like a studio that was just me and one other person in there and I think he was fine. But I walked in there.

I drove down to go to Phoenix to be on this Fox News hit with Bongino for the first time on Fox, and I was deathly ill. Like I thought I was going to die. I just felt awful. And I walked in and the minute I got to the studio, like the fever left, the chills left and I was fine. And I whirled in there and I did the interview and I, you know, sat there for 45 minutes in the chair and all that kind of stuff.

And I finished up and I left. I got back in the car and immediately I started driving and I felt like death again. And I think that was the situation that that was for Steve yesterday. He felt stronger and strengthened by doing this work. This work is really important. Talking about this case, so I I was reminded of the concept of time being a flat circle. If you guys have never seen True Detective, it's one of my favorite shows ever.

I watched it the I watched it non-stop on loop when I was at Quantico for the FBI Academy. Time is a flat circle is something that Matthew McConaughey says that is the reason we're for today's thumbnail. All right, I'm going to show it here. There's this iconic moment where he's sitting in an interrogation room by the cops. They're trying to figure out if he did something evil and he brings up a beer can and squishes it, and he's doing all the stuff.

He's building all these figures and he's involved in, like hunting down some real dark evil. He talks about time being a flat circle. Keep that in your mind, time visualized externally as a flat circle. Let's go through this really quickly. This is the stuff that the government filed. There's a couple of really bizarre moments, and I think these are the biggest holes in the story. They're supposed to be a

detention hearing today. We'll find out if that actually goes down #1 We covered the fact that he was driving a 2017 Nissan Sentra. It's a dark blue color, and it passed a license plate reader at 7:10 PMI need you guys to understand that this is the timeline that is relevant to this case. We're going to do a quick brief on it, OK? The time starts at 7:34. This document the government provided does not tell us anything new. They don't claim to have any

other video footage. In fact, they rely on his confession to say where he was before and after the loop that you're seeing on the screen right now, which is the little area where the DNC and the RNC are located in Washington, DC, 7:34 PM, January the 5th, 2021. There's a red ingress route that you're seeing where he goes crosses down from the middle heads up on New Jersey. He goes across D street, goes down, drops the bomb includes the the moment we're sitting

underneath the the Bush and then the yellow is the egress route. I'm saying he because that's what the government is alleging that he Brian Cole did this. I obviously don't believe that. Then disappears off camera at 8:00 PM. So 7:34 to 8:00 PM. There's a gap in the video footage and then the bike bomber in the hoodie appears again at 8 O 8:00 PM in 10 minutes is able to drop off the bomb at the RNC behind the Capitol Hill club and then disappears.

Egress is off. And allegedly, according to this document that we see the government has posted, Brian Cole junior confessed to being parked at 2nd and D Street, which is near Folger Park. I believe if we actually see the video of this, what we found out are a couple things. Number one, number one, finding from this, this, this document, there's videotaped interview. I was worried they didn't do it, but they videotaped the interview with Brian Colt Junior

for all four hours. That's what we're told. Number 2, they answered the question of where are the Nike Air Max Speed turf shoes? And the answer is they're gone. Don't worry about it, OK? They've been, they've been destroyed. He got rid of them. They were ratty and so they're gone. So now we've answered 2 questions. Did did the confession get taped? Yes. What happened to the shoes? Well, they're gone. Don't worry about that. They're gone. What about the bomb making

material? One of the questions I asked early on is what what about the the bomb part of the bomb, the explosive material? Well, he claims he got rid of them. He got rid of them. He dumped him in a dump. The problem is this filing actually undercuts that while they make that argument thing #3 how come they didn't find him earlier and some of this other stuff? And the answer is like, oh, he was like super security conscious and he was like wiping

his phone all the time. Except the problem is that he didn't wipe his phone for the 18 months after the the alleged crime. He was able to go and run around Washington, DC, apparently with his phone on him in his own vehicle with stuff that he bought with his own credit card. And then he was so security conscious that he waited until like June of 2022 before he started wiping his phone compulsively and did so 942 times after the crime. That's absurd. So I'm scrolling through some of

the stuff on the high points. They didn't actually add any value. What I think they did is they actually took away from their own case by making this filing that was supporting his detention. They also make some arguments in there that are pretty unsettling that basically it's the presumption of not innocence. The DOJ is arguing that the the crime is so heinous and dangerous that he cannot be trusted to stay out as a free man. OK, the sneakers are gone, the

bomb making materials gone. The only problem with that is they also make the argument we're going to skip the cell phone pings for a second. They also make the argument that while he got rid of all the bomb making materials, he also kept buying freaking bomb making materials after the fact. And we found that out yesterday that he bought bomb making materials three weeks after January 6th and the placement of those bombs on 1/21/21, he bought another kitchen timer.

Keep that in your mind. Time is a flat circle like an egg timer. OK. He also bought more pipe bomb size 8 inch pipes with nipple so threaded on both sides. He bought more end caps. He claims per his his confession that he drilled them by hand. I made this comment yesterday to Steve Baker. I'll make it again to you all. Drilling end caps, rounded steel with a, with a carbide bit that's meant to go through steel and a hand drill is very difficult. Even if you're skilled at doing so.

You have to start with a detent or a, or a nail punch or a, or a metal punch that's going to give you a like a starting point. And even if it has a good pilot point, often times they do what's called walking. The bit is spinning really fast, which makes it really easy to kind of slide around. So you leave all these sort of like scraggles and and squaggles. What we saw on the on the bombs as they were presented in the actual case file, I'll show them

to you guys on here. We've seen some pictures of the end caps and they look like they're very cleanly drilled and they're well filed. You know, like somebody who had a vice and A and a drill press. Now I'm open to them showing us that there's all kinds of walking, you know, walking squiggled lines from a car by bit walking and somebody drilling it by hand. But that's not what I saw in the pictures that I saw of those end caps.

Now I don't know where I've seen the end cap, so I'll have to go and try to find those pictures again. But they seem very clean and well placed and that's a big deal. So he he manually built these things. He didn't build any bombs after the fact, but he was interested in building potassium chlorate, which is used in fireworks. He got rid of the shoes, he got rid of the bomb making materials. He kept buying bomb making materials.

He felt so guilty about seeing himself on video that he got rid of the bomb making materials. That included buying them right after the fact. So he had all these things and this kitchen timer, I think it's going to end up being the demise. We don't know that it's the same kitchen timer that was found on the bombs and that seems really important. We don't know that that was the exact same one. They just mentioned that it was

a kitchen timer. If you guys look at the bombs as they are actually shown here, it's not the entire kitchen timer. The the the the timer part of it or the housing was removed. So I don't know if they were able to lock these things up. But this does not seem rock solid. In fact, it seems the opposite of the case. And we find out that the sulfur that he bought supposedly, which was a part of the the homemade black powder was bought as early as may. Let me double check the the date here.

I don't want to get it wrong. I think it was like May of sorry, it was January of 2018. So starting back years prior, over 2 years prior, he was preparing to drop bombs in Washington, DC. There it is on the screen right here. Sulfur 1 LB Amazon 1/14/2018. So those are the major pieces. We answered the story of the shoes, we answered the story of the bottom making materials.

Where was the rest of it? Apparently he bought more of them though, even though he throw them out, we have a confession of where he placed the car and that he was not seen getting out of the vehicle. The government does not allege that they saw him getting out of the vehicle wearing the outfit. So we're now 100% in the category of he was sharing this through confession, the confession he denied for two hours during that confession that he was involved in this.

Then he was threatened with another felony for lying to the FBI, gave a 15 second audible pause, put his head down, put his head back up and said yes, I did it. And then basically told them everything they wanted for the next 90 minutes. But first they left him alone for 20 more minutes to Stew. This is important. I think, and I am reading in here, this is Kyle Serif's analysis. So take it for what it is.

There's some seriously interesting stuff in a most recent filing that went out yesterday. Sorry, it came in today. Document 23 in this case. Guys. Ready for this one, because this one's fun. Time is a flat circle. I found out from our listeners this morning that people with autism tend to use kitchen timers or other physical ways of representing time. They need an externalized version of it. Allow me to show you. It made me go and do this. Look, this is just a quick AI

overview. Kitchen timers, especially visual ones, are powerful tools for autistic individuals because they externalize time. They create structure. They reduce anxiety during transitions like from playtime to chores. They help manage and focus like only 10 minutes left and having a visual cue. They help build independence by making abstract time concrete and manageable. And they give control to individuals. It often helps boost their success when it comes to living on their own.

And there's a whole bout. I'm going to put this search results. I'm going to put these over in the in the show description of the links. It'll be a long link that says the Google search, but I want you guys to be able to see it. I, I basically did autism connection to kitchen timers. That was the search. If you guys want to do your own search now, nobody had confirmed previously that this guy was in fact autistic. That's something that the family said he was autistic.

Like it was something that I heard from neighbors that he had. He presented himself as though he were an autistic person. That was kind of thing developmentally delayed. So the question was, is he actually autistic or are we just using that term loosely because it defines people that sort of don't fit in and have developed developmental delays? This is where this gets really

good. The defendant, Brian Cole junior, respectfully submits this response in opposition to the government's motion for pretrial detention. They also submitted 1 yesterday that said the government needs to turn over discovery immediately, not later now, and they should have access to it, which they should have already

done. It says Mr. Cole should be released pending trial because governing multi factor analysis demonstrate that bail is required under a strict set of circumstances and they propose it. They are asking for him to be released from detention. And I think it's very interesting how they did so. The government presumes that basically he's so dangerous he

can't be allowed out. And they are taking the opposite, saying that the government has the burden of proof and they have not met that burden to show that he cannot be let out. I'm paraphrasing some of this stuff, but let me get to the part that's most interesting to me. On Page 3 says the the burden of the government is far greater than merely reciting Cole's criminal charges and concluding without any more that he is

quote UN quote, dangerous. Again, they are basically operating under the presumption of guilt, which is not the way our justice system works. The question is whether or not he is a present danger, a contention the government has never actually made. And something belied the the opposite is actually belied by his past four years because he's lived without incident and caused no additional harm. So here's the facts that they cite. And this stuff just snuck in there is really, really

critical. I put it over. I pinned it on my social media right now #1 Mr. Cole is an African American adult who's been diagnosed with Autism spectrum Disorder level 1 and with Obsessive pulsive Disorder. He's an ASD level 1 and A and an OOCD sufferer. At this point that has not previously been confirmed. I'm guessing that's what they got out of their analysis recently #2 He has 0 criminal history. He has no issues complying with court orders.

He's a High School graduate who's had continual employment since his teenage years. All of these things work in his favor. This is someone who, just like a lot of the January Sixers, shows no previous inclination towards danger, nor any past inclination. And of course, it's the it's the predicate that we're we're advertising here that he didn't do this. Mr. Cole's lived in the same community since childhood

without incident. His neighbors and others who have dealt with him over many years can vouch for his character, to include, as you heard from Steve Baker, going and knocking on doors, Secret Service, FBI, local and state law enforcement, other federal employees. He's surrounded by people that are working for this government and nobody thought he was a problem. His neighbors who have dealt with him over many years vouched for his character. He has a reliable job waiting

upon release. He works for his father, which I think is amazing. I think it's great that the family member is able to give him purpose in the world. He submits the house arrest, submits to an ankle monitor, weekly reporting. He submits to unannounced pretrial visits by pretrial services. No one was actually harmed as a result of his conduct.

I think that's critical because these bombs were inert, as was briefed to me and others, and no property was damaged as a result of the conduct for which he's been charged. Nothing happened, and yet the government thinks he should be locked away. I go to this thing from from Autism Speaks, which is a website, an organization that is dedicated to kind of giving information about autism. Somebody asked me today on social media.

Most local law enforcement and state law enforcement agencies get regular annual training on how to deal with autistic individuals because the prevalence is way higher than it's been and it's very specific and how you deal with them. The question was, is how much training do FBI agents get in dealing with autistic individuals? The answer is none. I've never heard of it. I never got any and I have to imagine that was pretty common.

I don't think anybody gets specialized training on how to deal with autism spectrum disorder as a subject. And so they go through the different levels. Because he was diagnosed as a level 1. Level 3 is sort of profoundly autistic, requiring substantial support. There's people there that are in non verbal, they have non social, bunch of other things that are kind of there that's not him.

So restricted behaviors. Level 2 is requiring substantial support, can have verbal deficits, non verbal communication skills, social impairments, even if they have support systems in place. That's not him and he's level 1, which is sort of the lowest level. So it goes one to three in terms of severity. Requires support. Without supports in place, deficits in social communication can cause noticeable

impairments. This is visually relevant to people who are in the neighborhood they recognize as seeing him walk around. Without social supports in place, the deficits in social communication will cause noticeable impairments. Difficulty initiating social interactions, as confirmed by the the 711 owner that Steve Baker interviewed. Clear examples of atypical or unsuccessful responses and social overtures may appear to have decreased interest in social interactions.

A person who is able to speak in full sentences and engages in communication, but the whose to and fro communications with others fails. So just though they may be able to present themselves or answer questions, doesn't mean that these things make a lot of sense to them. And the timers are quite interesting because we have at least three documented purchases of timers.

And you all pointing out to me that timers have a significant ability for folks who have a hard time transitioning between time and taking the concept of time that we can see on a clock, for example, and translating it into a mechanical flat circle. Time is that flat circle for them. Being able to take that and translate it into something meaningful. I can imagine 20 minutes of not being able to see. The 20 minutes felt like

eternity. Sitting inside a an interrogation room with FBI agents who are accusing you of something pretty aggressive. They also mentioned restrictive and repetitive behaviors. We found out that he has OCD often times categorized by sort of like ticks or these repetitive motions to soothe. You'll see people doing light switches or turning doors or flipping locks or ticking their head back and forth or rubbing something.

These are self soothing characteristics that are basically trying to make order out of chaos, take control of things that they feel like they don't have control of. Combine together. You have somebody who's doing something and and should have actually probably had a very specific type of interview that it that doesn't sound like you did and it's videotaped. So that's going to be damning

for the government's case. And my, my evidence to you is the fact that we had a guy who wore his, he wore his, his earphones in ADOD or a DOJ rather in processing picture. They took a mug shot, processed him in for criminal charges and they allowed him to keep personal devices like his earphones on, which are a soothing and a comfort mechanism. And that's something because they had to have known at that time that if they took those

when they probably did. To be fair, I don't know if that part was videoed, but we could get it from we could get it from the agents that actually did it. They should be put on the stand and asked that. What happens when you try to remove those earphones? Oh, he lost his mind. He flipped his shit and we wanted to keep him calm so we can get our confession. I'm going to put the map on the screen one more time. From 7:34 to 8:00.

The DNC bomb bomber was visible on camera, disappears for 8 minutes from eight O 8 to 818 that window from 7:34 to 8:18. If Bryan Cole Junior is somewhere else in Washington, DC in the general vicinity of these pings, which is what it looks like is going on. Because when you look at the pings as mapped by our friend Armitas over on X, the pings, at least two of them fall very clearly outside of the area that they are meant to fall within. Ping #3 is on the margins.

Ping number 2 is in the center. Ping #4IS outside. Ping number one is well outside. So you have at least three of the major pings that the government's case hinges on to be able to identify Brian Cole Junior. And here is their exhibit from that document that we showed you

yesterday. Those are massive swaths of Washington DC. And it'll be very easy to ping against all of those things and not be anywhere near where the pipe bomber thing is. Again, normally what you do is you'd identify the person there and then you would go and you'd say, aha, this person is physically in the place and we can identify them. And by the way, the cell phone pings confirm that that was their cell phone. What they did is they said cell phone things are generally in

the area. There's someone walking around. We believe it's this guy because his car was driven and and that's it. And by the way, he bought the things that would be necessary to build these bombs. They went about this case backwards and it was obvious from the complaint that that's the case. You can call the Patsy file or anything else you want. At the end of the day, they picked a target of convenience and they're slowly leaking out that they got the wrong guy.

I'm guessing they didn't know that he was autistic. I'm guessing that they didn't go interview the neighbors and find out the things. And here's the crazy part again, there are federal agents that live within a few houses of this guy and they would have been available if you were doing a good job. All of this is starting to look more and more intentional to me. I'm not trying to be

conspiratorial. I'm just saying that the odds look more favorable that you've got federal law enforcement because they're not going to be embarrassed by this. But the guys who are running it and the guys who took the the victory lap the other day, the cash Patels, the Dan Bongino's, the the Jeanine Pirro's, the Pam Bondi's, Darren Cox's that were high fiving each other saying we got him. How many of you are going to remember the the assistant director of the Washington Field office?

Not very likely. You're going to remember Patel and Bongino when this thing explodes and you're going to know. I just wanted you to know that this this whole this whole case is going to slowly unravel. And I do think that's the reason why Steve Baker was strengthened as he was speaking yesterday. So consider that most of you

probably had these materials. Consider that most of you probably couldn't do a real decent hole in a, in the top of a curved steel end cap without it walking on you unless you have a drill press. And then consider they explained away the things that were so important to this case that were the, the, the whole reason that they were actually honing in on the subject. They were. Remember how important those shoes are? They threw it away with a single line.

Oh, yeah. He got them and he got rid of them. They got ratty. So don't worry about the shoes. What about the bomb part of the bomb? Oh, yeah, He threw that out too. But did he buy more of them? Yeah. Yeah, actually, he did buy more of them. What about the phone wipe? Well, he wiped it. That's why we put it in the device. But then again, he didn't wipe it for 18 months after the crime because he didn't actually see it. None of that confession is going to hold up.

I'm just going to go on record right now saying the analysis of what they've put out there is garbage and they must know this, which is why the government tried to take it out of the out of this detention hearing that's supposed to happen today. Out of the pretrial hearing where they get to discuss probable cause and try to take it to a grand jury where they can indict it in front of a group of citizens and they don't

have to share everything. Remember, you could indict much more easily than you can't handle.

If you decide to charge by complaint and you don't get a an indictment right away, then you're going to be subject to putting in front of a judge who actually understands what's going on. And I'm going to tell you, as I told people that are listening to this program in or out of the FBI, people who are attorneys, people who are journalists, the stuff that we've seen is exculpatory to the point where I can almost guarantee you there's no conviction in DC.

I don't think a jury of DC liberals, white or black, Hispanic or otherwise, are going to look at it and say this guy did this thing based on the standard that is required in in federal law, which is that it has to be beyond a reasonable doubt because I've got reasonable doubt on my computer right now. Hopefully we don't get hacked by

the FBI for that. That's where I wanted you guys to see this is this is an ongoing thing and there may be some more information tomorrow if they hold this hearing. And it has what it should have in it. And I hope, I hope they throw this thing out. I hope they let this guy out right away. I hope that as you guys are saying, I hope they free your coal. It's funny. We can be, we can, we can play with this. We should be a little bit irreverent because we're talking

about a government agency. This is not making fun of Brian Cole. This is making fun of the agency that went after him and set this thing up in such an awful way. All right, that's today's program. I know that was long. I've been going longer and longer and some of the stuff I think needs to be done. That's what happens when I'm off air for like 5 days and I'm having more stuff to cover down on. Make sure you're supporting the program at kyleserifinshow.com.

If you are listening in the aftermath and you are not getting the visuals, you are missing out on a big piece of it because we show maps and we show pictures and we show videos. So check them out. Kyle serifinshow.com. You can also join us on locals at kyleserifin.com if you're looking for any of the links. Otherwise, you can find them on Rumble and you can find them on YouTube and you can find them in

the comments below like there. Subscribe there to the program wherever you guys are watching and make sure you share it with a friend. Turn the notifications on if you want to see us go live. I brought you a pallet cleanse today because this guy seems like he's speak in my language. I kind of like to just get away from people. I actually like not seeing human beings a lot.

It's my favorite. There is nothing worse than when you go to your quiet place and and then people show up in your quiet place and they make you do the thing that you were trying to avoid, like small talk. Found this on Instagram. This guy's got a good sense of humor for it. Many of you probably feel the same way. You are not recharged by finding people in your quiet place. So you know, if you go out in the woods and you see somebody else, you can ignore them. It's OK.

It's hard for us. Probably, probably. We could be more like Brian Cole in that way. Oh. What are you doing out here in the woods? I'm trying to get away from it all. Nice, man. What are you doing in the woods? I'm trying to get away from it all, too. Oh, sick. I feel like I have to make small talk with you now, and I don't really want to do that. Me either. That's the whole reason I can't. Oh, yeah. There's a bunch of guys in the woods already.

No, you got to go, man. There's too many guys in the woods already. I'm just trying to get away from. We were doing that first, trying to get away from it all because then we are the all that's trying to be gotten away from. Today's my only day off, so I'm not leaving Shane. Oh really? What do you guys do for? Don't do that small talk with us. Is this where the party is? No. Who are you now? I heard there's a ton of guys in the woods, so I came out here to

party. No, we're trying to get away from it all. There's way too many guys out here to be getting away from it. You're making it work. Go home, man. There's so many guys out here. I'm going to come back and open a business. You better know, don't even think about it. Hey. Isn't that how it goes? It's like, man, I really love being out here in the wilderness by myself, Maybe I can monetize this. Don't do it. Leave us alone.

If you guys see somebody in the woods that doesn't want to talk to you and they don't want to make eye contact, keep your phone in your Faraday bag and just move on. Anyway, that made me laugh. I hope it makes you laugh a little bit too. The world may be fallen and screwed up, but it doesn't mean that we can't go and get away from everybody every once in a while. We'll see you again tomorrow. I hope you have a fantastic day. Hang in there, this year's almost over.

Next year's going to be very interesting, I think, for a lot of reasons. See you tomorrow. Thanks for listening to the Kyle Serafin show, streamed live weekdays on rumble.com/kyle Serafin. Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth Social and Instagram at Kyle Serafin.