The Zombie Apocalypse

Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistleblower and American Patriot prepare to embrace the uncomfortable truth because this program has no time for comforting lives. Here is civil liberties, enthusiasts Second Amendment, Defender and recovering FBI agent. Kyle serif Hello, my friends and welcome to the Kyle Serafin show. Today is Wednesday, May the 17th and we're going to be talking about the leftist zombie apocalypse, The Apocalypse of white supremacy and what happens

when that narrative falls apart? Inevitably that narrative has to fall apart because it's based on political talking points, it's based on false and self-serving government statistics. And we're going to dig all into that and tear it apart for you. So that when you're out there in the world talking to your friends, and who seem to believe that there is a white supremacist around every corner. You are not talking to them in an unarmed fashion. We've got the Super Chat

underneath me right now. I see folks are in there. Thanks so much for joining us live. Remember you can always join us live at 8:30 Texas. America time, it's 9:30 if you're on the right side of the country and it's far too early. If you're out in California, Oregon or Washington. We do appreciate you guys getting in here, and joining us. Before we get started, I want to thank our sponsors. We have. With them and we're going to do them right up front here.

Number one, we want to thank Patriot coolers. You guys are familiar with them already. This is the website Patriot coolers.com. You can see that they offer soft-sided soft-sided products like the ones that's actually pictured on the rumble Channel. Now that is a zip-up lightweight, very functional cooler that will keep up to 10 can scold. I actually have that one sitting next to me. And for those of you that are interested in a hard Tumblr,

you've seen it on the show. I use it pretty much everywhere. I go, I've taken it to maybe 20 plus dates at this point, and excellent product, an excellent company. They put patriotic branding. They give small percentage of their profits back to disabled veterans, helping them with Mobility. It's fantastic way to go. And then, they also support the Kyle Serafin show.

So, we're appreciative of them. Check out patreon coolers.com, you can use promo code, Kyle, k, yl e, KY Ellie very easy, you'll get 10% off. Its Shipping, if you spend more than 50 bucks, it's easy to go on there and find more than $50 for the step you're going to like.

And then we're also going to say thank you to Catholic vote.org Catholic. Vote.org right now is suing the FBI, they're suing them over the infiltration of churches in the Richmond diocese and the potential that the FBI has been infringing on Church civil liberties. This is their website, you can check them out. They have an excellent little email chain that you can get on called The Loop. Whoop, I actually have a coffee mug. Here are hold on. Let's see this coffee mug. There it is.

Look at this. They sent me this little coffee mug. It's got the loop on. It actually have some of their, some of their merch hanging out. Great people. They are interested in family, freedom and Faith things, that probably resonate with many of you, you can support them if you want to get into a donation especially if you want to help support this, this ongoing lawsuit and find out just how deeply the FBI's corruption has been going on, check out their website if you're Catholic.

Tastic, if you're not Catholic and you're a Christian, they are in the same fight as you. They do advocacy for the proper types of positions, when it comes to a Christian worldview in our politics Catholic vote.org, check them out. All right, let's get Rowdy today, we're talking about the zombie apocalypse and I have experienced it in full form. A zombie is one of these mindless cretins that just sits and the jaw goes. There's no thought process.

Process, there's dead meat but there's walking, many of you have seen these, these videos, we all kind of think that it's going to look like the opening scene from. I Am Legend. We think that it's going to look like being chased down by these - hordes. It probably isn't happening that way, it's happening online. And I'm going to bring up a website here, which will show you Twitter. Twitter is full of zombies and here is one of them looking a lot.

Like, a klansman, I guess this is our president wearing these Robes, getting an honorary degree at Howard University. I want to share with you this video, I'm going to read you what I responded to and then I'm going to tell you, how many people had something nasty to say about it? Let's start off with Joe Biden. Telling us how dangerous white supremacy is if you are not watching on a rumble Channel,

this is from RN c-- research. This is the Republican National committee's sort of propaganda, Twitter handle, puts out some good stuff. Here's Biden talking, right? Now stand up against the poison white supremacist is I did my inaugural address to a single out as the most dangerous terrorist threat to our homeland is white supremacy. And I'm not saying this because I'm a little black, HBCU I say wherever I go. So stand up.

Alright, so he's not just saying it because he's at a black H, what does it HBCU that just tells you that he doesn't even know what that means. You won't talk about a zombie HBCU is historically black college and university which Howard University is he says I'm not just saying it because I'm on, I'm at a black. Historically, black college and university. That's actually the words. If you were to take the acronym, Talk about zombie stuff. So my response this was pretty straightforward.

I something I shared over the weekend, some of you heard about this. I didn't get to cover it because we had an interview with John Mattingly earlier and I want to get into it because it's just is not going away, zero believable evidence from this lying fool. I'm somewhat a little bit harsh on buying these days. I've worked the so-called white supremacy threat and more than a half dozen states. They were complete Fabrications that generated stats without

actual danger. Think about how many white supremacists I met personally this garnered 2.2 million views, it's still counting. It's easily the largest viewed tweet that I have to date since I've joined social media and it's a weird experience to have that. It was also a complete ratio as they say which is to say only twenty-nine hundred people liked it of the 2.2 million that is an awful lot of angry vitriol and bile. It's gotten almost 1,000 retweets, it got thousands of

comments. Many of which were angry leftist. Many of which were people who are in fact zombies. The biggest one was a account named Kevin crus. I have no idea who Kevin Cruces, 400, 500 thousand people do apparently, and they follow him and he was able to share this thing in a big way.

And his first point was the FBI's own statistics, so let's talk about Point. Number one, if you're going to be a zombie, if you were going to tell me government, Statistics published by the FBI that benefit the FBI. You are a zombie. It's a simple fact, there is nuts. If you can't believe that, that the government would lie to you at this point, it's probably do helping you. You're probably Beyond repair, but this is the Strategic report that was put up.

So, if you're watching on the rumble Channel, you, this is a fbi.gov document. This is what was excited to me, and if you're not, you can check this thing out. Out fbi.gov, they have a file repository and the the document is referred to as the Strategic intelligence assessment and data on domestic terrorism. I'm going to tell you why this is completely bunk but this is 40 pages written by the FB i-- and co-authored by the Department of Homeland Security.

So let's deal with a set. This is what they presented to the permanent select subcommittee on intelligence. The committee on homeland security and on the Judiciary, this is basically the FBI and DHS justifying their positions when it comes to white supremacy. And so on, essentially what they do is they define domestic terrorism under 18 USC. They want to make sure that people are able to understand what it is and that is going to be violent acts that are dangerous to human life.

That are a violation of criminal laws in the United States are would be a violation of criminal laws if they were committed in the United States that are intended to coerce a population, influence government policy or affect government conduct by mass destruction, assassination and kidnapping and so on, that's actually pretty specific and it involves violence and what's fun

about white supremacy. If there is anything that's funny about it, it's that white supremacy is an idea that is constitutionally protected, although it is full of obviously a-holes, who believe. So it is an ignorant position and it's not something that we need to be hiding. Let those people talk in my opinion, The sunlight to them and destroy it because it's easily burned down. The ideas are ridiculous, on their face.

All that being said, this is still the way that they produce it. So they've produced a 40 page document that is going to give you supposedly information. What's funny is no one ever quoted? A single bit out of this report? What they know was is the top-line presentation that the report says that there are in fact, violent extremists, who are out there to destroy the us but they didn't quote anything of substance and Some of the stuff you're looking at is its definitional.

So they're going to tell you who the the threats are to the Homeland and this case the same threats that they tried to say are inside the Catholic church when we were revealed the radical traditionalist Catholic document back in February. It says, ethylic or vile racially or ethnically motivated, violent extremists, that's DV. He's they show animal rights groups and environmental extremists so this should bother people on the left abortion-related violent extremist I guess this could be

pro-life. Or pro-choice as they State here, you've got your anti-government anti-authority types, this goes to the Timothy mcveigh's, the people that are willing to fight the government, that are willing to bomb things to get their ideas across, and then you have other domestic terrorism threats, which could be related to religion, gender, or sexual orientation. Apparently, they go on to say that white supremacy is the biggest one. Here it is, I'm going to read you the line since 2017.

I don't know why 2017. But oh, oh yes, I do know because that's when Donald Trump came. I'm into office. So, since 2017 DV, he's remain a persistent source of violence with racially or ethnically motivated. Violent extremists, advocating for the superiority of the white race. And anti-government are anti-authority violent extremists. Notice how they put them

together. They put those together because they want you to conflate the idea that white supremacists are people who don't like the United States government, whether the government is right or wrong, that is a big problem. It is a significant overlap and this is the same sort of fallacy that they've done with McVeigh. Timothy McVeigh famously blew up the the Alfred P Murrah building in Oklahoma City. He did, so, because he was angry about the government.

And this tiny little thing that they've tied to him and said that he's a white supremacist. Although there's nothing other than this that I could see, and I've done enough reading on its look, he apparently also liked an online novel or an online written series called the Turner Diaries, which are famously known for some white supremacist ideology.

I haven't read them. I don't actually have an interest in it. I have buddies to of bread, then they think they're interesting, but what they do more than most things is they get really deep into sort of gun culture and Cussing different types of weaponry. And that's apparently what Timothy McVeigh said he was interested in his own words. He didn't say he was a white

supremacist. The thing about white supremacist is they actually will tell you, they will put it out there in the front and say, this is my ideology, this is what I believe. And if they don't say that thing, I think it's probably strange to paint them with that brush. But not if you're the FBI and you're trying to drum up counterterrorism dollars, so they say that these anti-government anti-extremist Anarchist violent That seems like the antifa types.

Many of them are anarchists militia, violent extremists. This is again, right wing and Sovereign citizen violent extremists again. Generally speaking right-wing libertarian types that don't want to be infringed upon are presenting the greatest threats of violence this. Our MV e. This is the racially motivated are the primary sources. And when you hear our MV e or racially motivated, violent extremists.

You should be thinking white supremacy, because that's what the FBI that's what the federal government is thinking, DHS. And so on, they say that they are the primary sources of lethal. And significant violence with loan, offenders conducting lethal attacks, against targets of opportunity using non-complex attacks, and accessible weapons. So that's fancy language non-complex, attacks to say targets of opportunity, people who just popped up and shot up a

grocery store. For example, like we found out in Buffalo. Does that mean that this was some sort of mass movement of people trying to go and kill people at grocery stores? I don't think so, but it is good for funding. It says that they assessed at the broad drivers of domestic violent. Miss including perceptions of or responses to government activity, social political and economic conditions continue to feed this consistent level of domestic violent extremism.

Well, the problem with a lot of this stuff to is that it's all constitutionally protected speech until you actually start advocating for actual violence with a plan of violence and that is not very often. The case they go on to talk about the number of actual attacks. I'm going to try to find it in here, but it essentially says that there are 77 deaths associated with white

supremacist. Violence from this is the was dated in 2021. So from this 2010 to 2020 one, an 11-year period, we had 77 total homicides associated with white supremacy violence. And if that seems like a lot to you, you should know that approximately 90 people every year, have sort of a Darwin's award death, Due to dealing with

lawn mowers. As another way to think about it, you have probably a higher likelihood of dying in a car accident with a deer in the United States because deer are constantly on the roadways, particularly in the Northeast, they are even on the roadways here, in Texas people swerve, avoid, or actually hit animals and specifically, dear more often than they are killed by white supremacy and that can be a decade versus year comparison, which is to say, there are more

deaths from impacts with deer on an annual. Then there are in a decade from white supremacy. I just want you to get the statistical Fear Factor in there. That when you're talking about 77 death, over a period of a decade, if you are scared of that, you're also probably more likely to get hit by lightning. So it is not common, but it is a talking point and that's how you get into the zombies fear. I want to debunk this right away, let's debunk it with this article.

Now for starters, this is from a website called just T dot org. If you listen to me on the bungee, no show, I was on yesterday on his radio show. I've been on a couple of the programs and I mentioned this, we're going to get into it a little bit more deeply, but this is just security before we get started with what they're about. Let's talk about who they are. Just security is an online forum, for rigorous analysis, of security democracy, foreign policy and rights.

I talked to Emerald Robinson's producer the other day. And she said, anytime you put security and democracy in the same sentence, she thinks they're commies. She's probably right. But who are these people, they say right away that they are based in the New York University School of Law. If you're not looking at the rumble page, watching our live show or the replay, then I can refer you to just secure T dot org, you can go to their about us page and find out exactly what I'm saying.

They say that they're grateful from the Craig Newmark philanthropies. Many of you may not remember Craig Newmark, but once I tell you who he is, you will Craig Newmark. Founded Craigslist in San Francisco, California as a way for people to be able to move. You know free services and goods and eventually started making money on post. He sold his stake for a number of million dollars and started this philanthropies program. He is an avowed left-leaning person.

I think he I'm not mad at Craig Newmark but just what he is the second support that they they're they're happy about is there's Craig Newmark right there. The second one is the open societies Foundation. You may know that the open Society Foundation under who we are says they're founded by George Soros. Everyone who knows who George Soros is might find that to be a little bit curious.

And then, lastly, they've got some other pieces here at New York University. It's obviously a university system, which makes it left-leaning. It's in New York, which makes it extra left-leaning. The last one that they have is listed as Al antic, Herpes. And I pulled up there Wikipedia page here right now for you.

They list them self as a, a philanthropic organization, giving information or giving cash on Health social and politically, left-leaning, public causes in the United States Vietnam, South Africa, Ireland, Bermuda and Australia, fairly vague. I don't know why that makes them the Atlantic group, but that's what they are. So that's the about us for just accurate e dot Org. The background is when they left a source tells you something That is counter to left this narrative.

I don't think they do it on purpose. They just can't avoid the facts. They actually have a different agenda than what we do. But we're going to just talk about what's true. They wrote a fantastic article here. This is dated May 8th 2023, this is a week ago coming up on ten days and the article is entitled us domestic terrorism prosecutions the reality behind the government's inflated numbers.

So if we think that the, the left, the political left in this country, is the one that's pushing the white supremacy narrative. What, in the world of these? Well interested in domestic. Terrorism also has a Dragnet that grabs black and brown people, for various different reasons and that offends these people sensibilities. It turns out it's not really a political agenda.

In my opinion, it's just the fact that our federal government is more than willing to quash, the rights of human beings that are living their lives and exercising, free speech. And they do. So for a significant amount of money. We're going to talk about how much money this article talks about the 9/11 attacks. This is essentially what we've referred to. There's really three buckets of terrorism that the United States government goes after. Number one is international

terrorism. That's people that are foreign and they come domestically here to cause damage and try to figure out you know scare us into Political policies and so on. So that's going to be your 911s. That's going to be some of the other sort of Trade Center bombings that happened before that. This is there. Not that common, their kind of a Black Swan events and they're really dangerous in so much as they can do significant damage and they obviously have no ties

to this country. They have ties against this country. The second is known as HV, he's or homegrown violent extremists. It's worth noting each VES sympathize with the ideologies from people overseas but they are domestic. That would be someone let's say in Minneapolis who is a first or second generation Somali You know, living in United Somali American, but Associates with al-shabaab and thinks that those ideologies are a proper way to convince Americans of anything. I don't know.

Sharia law in that area and so they may conduct some kind of attack to move forward. That's hces. Again, not that common, but that's going to be the ones that just security dot-org is most concerned about its things that people like Trevor Aaronson wrote a book about. So this is actually I was actually pointed to this website by Trevor Aaronson who's Leslie. And reporter working for the intercept and a very good reporter at that.

So if you're not reading The Intercept you're missing out on the other side of the news, in many ways, and then the last one is known as DV. He's that's what we're just reading about. That's the domestic violent extremists. Those are people who are from the United States with a domestic concern, a domestic ideology, and they are willing to use Terror to accomplish those goals. They want to push and further it so how much money over the last decade that's going to be?

This thing was written in 23. So since 2013, Over the last decade, five hundred million dollars of government. Money was used to prosecute Federal cases against anybody in the domestic terrorism space. That's D, OJ's money. That's not the investigation. That's the prosecution. It's worth noting that because they've claimed that they've won over 2,000 domestic terrorism related convictions and they've done almost looks like 4,000 cases and indictments from the

doj. The money from the FBI side is Way bigger hundreds of billions of dollars a year, hundreds of millions. So they try to hit these numbers because they're incentivized to do. So I'm going to just pull out some of the most relevant pieces here because this is the stuff you should walk around with, they analyzed 4,000 cases from 2006 January of 2006 to

September of 2020 right in the middle of covid. 4,000 cases, it's a nice round number and the number of cases that they were able to get access to because a lot of these things have hidden documents and they are not available to the public because the government doesn't believe in transparency. But when they did, if you're looking here, I'm going to highlight this the, the department went over 1140 not quite 12:00. So let's just do rough estimates

and Route it down. We're talking about 25% of the cases that they were able to. Look at 25 percent of the cases. A thousand out of 4,000 is a pretty good substitute for statistical analysis and of those Only 71 of those cases which is roughly 6%. Was able to make a clear connection to domestic terrorism and how did they do that?

Let's look at the rubric. They looked in the charging documents which is to say the actual crimes that they were accused of the sentencing memoranda which is what the judge looked at. And issued when these people are actually sentence, which is to say that they actually pled guilty, or they were convicted the request for sentence enhancements which is going to come from doj, that's going to be doj saying why this person should have an enhanced.

Ins. And some of those would be related to terrorist charges and press releases, which is the doj Zone words, about what they're proud of, what they've done, the charging, the indictment and so on, The Plea deals. And then the, the subsequent sentence in putting people 71 of 1140 We're actually connected to domestic. Terrorism of all flavors, by the way, not just white supremacy. All flavors to include all the other stuff.

We talked about whether it be animal rights, or environmental or anti abortion, or Pro. What do they call it? Or pro-abortion protesters all these kind of things. So that seems pretty pretty troubling what they did.

Is then they asked the sorry, the the judge which was a guy named judge Moss to review all of these cases that they had left over the Thousand that were untouched and they said, would you please take a look at these and see if our numbers pan out is it really only six percent of the so-called domestic terrorism cases actually tying to domestic terrorism. So, the judge did what's called an in camera review of the documents and just a sample of 20.

It's just a scooped bucket of 20 additional cases and of those 20, 19 of them. I'm going to quote the report directly. He found that 19 of 20 cases, he reviewed. Did not Again did not involve terrorism but they were mostly personal disputes and his conclusion was that the government's representation of counter-terrorist efforts is vastly overstated.

All right so what we're talking about is a large, look at a an enormous sample 4,000 cases involves you know, tens of thousands of man-hours on behalf of the FBI and DHS doing investigations. And they were only able to justify roughly five to six percent of those cases. Has that they called domestic terrorism. That's really dangerous. What that means is that your government is straight lying to you, and 2.2 million people. In my Twitter mentions 2.2 million.

People were able to see this tweet and most of them most of them, the vast majority of them took offense at the fact that I said, white supremacy is overblown, I'm going to tell you what it looks like from my end. When you're actually looking at a white supremacy case, the the information that we were given was almost Always the same. This is a white supremacist. That's it. Well, what are they done? Shrugs confusion. He's on Reddit. He said some things he had some racist tweets.

He's friends with people who are associated with white supremacy, to be fair, many of you are to whether, you know it or not, because they've tagged white supremacist everywhere when you are a hammer, you're looking for a nail, the government is the hammer, the nail is white supremacy. They find it behind every corner. I've mentioned on this podcast, a number of times that I got briefings in 2017. That's exactly when they started pushing this narrative. Those briefings were incredibly

ill-informed. They were talking about the proud boys. They talked about The Oath Keepers. They talked about the three percenters. They talked about all these different groups and they Associated anti-government feelings with white supremacy. I don't know why I, oh, actually no the motivation other than it's an enemy of the political

left. But here's the thing, I don't know anybody in the political right that sympathizes with white supremacist, in fact, you know, Plenty of people in the public sphere that will tell you, there is nothing more nasty than the way, the left treats black brown. Otherwise you know different skin colors that are also conservative. Anybody can look at, you know, the way that the the LA Times referred to Larry Elder when he was running for governor or when he was running.

I don't know if he's put his hat in for president and some sort of way but he's, you know, he's put his name in as a potential political candidate and they called him the white or they called the black face of white supremacy. And they're happy to talk about the Brown face of Supremacy anybody that apologizes for conservative positions is essentially a white supremacist, which was my response to most people on Twitter. It's like everybody who disagrees with me as a white supremacist.

That's what it looks like to be a zombie. Folks, it looks like everybody who disagrees with me is a white supremacist and that's the way that they respond and then if you tell them that they immediately just block you. If you tell that to somebody in person, they won't have anything

to answer. They don't have statistics like we just read Um, a leftist organization supported by George Soros, to tell you that in fact, maybe five or six percent of the overall Charge cases are in fact domestic terrorism of any flavor, let alone, white supremacy in my experience, it's way more. It's far more than 90% of the cases are complete garbage. So most cases look like this.

Twenty something year old white male, Goes to Starbucks wears sneakers and, you know, khakis and a polo shirt and is on the phone Tweeting, or on Reddit, in some sort of racial Forum saying, things that are probably awful, but constitutionally protected in this country and that will get the FBI looking into you. They don't have any plans for violence and you wonder well, Kyle, how do you know that? Well, I know that because we introduced under covers.

So generally speaking, when you Involved in one of these groups. They're fairly infiltrated by confidential. Human informants. Confidential human sources either by the FBI, by the local police departments by state entities by DHS, so on and so forth. They move these people into a space so that we can keep track of this so-called threat. This goes back to the FBI's, you know, Clan fighting days when they were doing this in the

1960s and 70s. Interestingly enough, the FBI sort of espouse some white supremacy beliefs or maybe they just didn't like Martin Luther King. Junior and the in the civil rights movement and the same time. They're also supposed to go after the clan. I don't know if it's because they sympathize with the Klan or what, but you have these two very strange idea is sort of fighting each other in the FBI's

history today. Very good at infiltrating, these groups because they have a historical precedent for causing violence, and I don't think that's terrible per se. Although, I think that the First Amendment Liberties are 100%

infringed upon, all right? So we do this, this infiltration, we put a confidential human Source, the Horses job is to introduce an undercover, if you want to know what it looks like to be part of an undercover op, it looks like you made a new friend, they get along with you. They're really enthusiastic about all your terrible ideas and then they want to teach you or introduce you to a new friend and that new friend is able to help you carry those ideas out.

That friend is an undercover that's a fed and what they do is offer you guns and money and explosives, and planning, and tactics and capabilities so that you can sign on to a terrible plot and then go to jail for your white supremacy. And or The government anti-authority or militia violent, extremist ideologies, which are constitutionally

protected. So when they do put these under covers in the Undercovers job is to push forward for a case, their job is to get people to say yes that they're interested, they are trying to suss out in an investigative way whether or not. This is a legitimate threat and overwhelmingly and I've covered the meetings and then we get the debriefs after the Undercovers go in. We've sat out there and parking lots of restaurants and coffee

table, you know, coffee. Cops gun range trips parks and so on, and all of these things come down to the same. They're not actually interested in doing a violent act. They're just talking online, they're just mouthing off and that sort of thing is supposed to be protected from government

overreach. It's not but it's supposed to be what the FBI does traditionally is they put a little caveat on every one of these reports and it just says First Amendment caveat, the FBI doesn't look into people specifically Ali for you, no free speech for freedom of religion their assembly and so on. That's false, they do 100%. They just put a caveat on there and that's what Chris Rea always reads. In fact, he's used that as his defense for the way the FBI handles business.

It's kind of gross to listen to it. It is just the nature of the way they do operations. I will give you one concrete example, that is not to say that. There are no white supremacy types that are out there, looking to do violence, there was one example and it goes back to probably 20, probably 2020. If I have to dig through my memory banks Of all the cases that we're and out and we ran down, I don't know a dozen a

year or more. This one actually was supposedly going to actually get violent and this was a Canadian of all people who had been out of the United States military. Sorry, who'd been in the Canadian military, not the Unites States, he snuck into the United States by avoiding ports of Entry avoiding border checkpoints and he crept all the way down to Canada. I can't remember his name, you can look it up if you want somebody can throw it out there

in the chat if they want. The, the guy was associated with A group called The Base, which I believe was a play on Al Qaeda and the base was a Neo-Nazi group, allegedly, whatever that means. And then he snuck down to Atlanta hung out with his buddies there. The FBI was onto him right away. They were actually national news story saying that nobody knew where he was and he was on the loose that was false the entire time. The FBI was tracking his movements and knew where he was

the entire time. He was in the u.s. they followed him from Atlanta, to the edge of the state of Virginia. My team picked him up from the surveillance team that followed him there and we followed him all the Way to Maryland, we put him down in a business, or in a like an outbuilding of this this business, or this sort of rural, sort of property, whatever it was. And then a couple days later our SWAT team came in and took him into custody, along with two

bodies. One of the Buddies looked like this sort of like acne need and sort of ugly version of edge, Sheehan kind of goofy-looking redhead. And then the, the Canadian was taken into custody, as well. None of these guys were able to commit any violence. But supposedly, they were talking about doing something, maybe in Baltimore, because it's a very black City.

I have no idea why you'd want to go do anything in Baltimore, Baltimore tears itself, apart as it is, you don't need any help to make Baltimore worse but supposedly they had bomb-making equipment and things like that when they did the search. So that's the only one and and none of that says they were actually gonna go use it for all. I know they're going to blow stuff up on this Farm. Or, you know, not be able to blow stuff up because they

didn't know how to build bombs. But the Canadian that came in that was part of the Canadian military. Was alleged to be a An expert in explosives. I think they said he was an explosives expert and I don't know what that meant because they never substantiated what training he had. Like, I don't know if he was an engineer, a combat engineer, which maybe he was, then an expert. But end of the day, they could say the same thing about someone like me who's gone through a

basic explosive course. You know, I know how to use C4. I know how to use Dynamite, I know how to use electric and non-electric initiations. So you know, I built shape charges, I built improvised explosive devices, using commercial and otherwise end of the day is he Suppose of expert. I don't know using household materials maybe maybe he was just capable of using the stuff they had in the military.

It really helps when you actually have the, the professional tools that you would have as part of the member of the military and it's not like you can run off with those things. Generally speaking, taking demo off the demo range, not very easy. Usually ends up in a bad way. All right.

So that's what white supremacy. Looks like when people are out there defending it, it tells me that they don't actually understand what's going on and that their Is not even United, but they are Mindless and they are willing to go after sort of the Joe Biden piece of it. We did about a half hour on that, I think that's enough for you to understand that this is not a real threat. It's not real, in the way that anybody should be concerned about it.

It's something you should just be aware that the talking points, keep getting marched out. And then we can kind of pivot, and we'll talk about the Durham report. What you want to talk about talking points. We've seen the same sort of zombieman narrative, and when you start deconstructing these things, they literally just Melt down, they fall apart. The Durham report I think was kind of like the book and to the

molar report. The molar report was a deep State attempt to show that there was Russian collusion between the Trump Administration or the Trump campaign, rather and the Russian government. They came up with nothing. They came up with no ability but they sort of still said, we don't like Trump, we don't like the way he did things, but he didn't break any laws. So no indictments and that was very disappointing for the political left. I think that the Durham report actually says.

As it has the same effect, but it's actually the opposite. It says there was an incredibly damning weaponization of the FBI that Trump was, right. That he is 100% Vindicated in saying the FBI was coming to get him. And we know who the players were that were driving it. So the report itself which we will pull up in a second. First, I want to get sort of a non balanced perspective on it. So I'm going to switch you over here. I'm going to give you my former boss.

This was the deputy director when I came in and he was the acting director of the FBI while. I That Washington field saying his piece on Anderson Cooper on CN n. So you know, we're going to get only the most trusted news. This is a former former FBI agent. Former deputy director, Andy McCabe beginning, exactly what John Durham was going to conclude and that's what we saw today. We knew from the very beginning, this was never a legitimate

investigation. This was a political errand to exact some sort of Retribution on Donald Trump's perceived enemies in the FBI. That's what. Mr. Rooms done and you stand by the original Rush investigation. Absolutely absolutely. Listen the Miss so for those of you who cannot see what he just did, he shook his head and said absolutely. There's some really funny quirky mannerisms. That people have these micro Expressions that they do when they are disavowing their actual

actions. And he literally said, I'm gonna actually play it one more time. So, if you haven't seen this, you can come to the 35 minute Mark here on the show and take a look at this. 36 minutes, maybe, and check this out. Here he goes again. Anderson Cooper asked him do you stand by your original assessment? Opening this dot this investigation which was Crossfire hurricane dermis and you stand by the original Russia investigation. Absolutely, absolutely.

Listen, the mistakes with the Carter page fisa or regrettable should never have happened and had I known about those mistakes in the packages. I never would have signed those applications. I don't believe you. That's Andy McCabe giving his take on it. Like I said, absolutely. They would have still done. this thing they still would have opened it up and he's

politically motivated. The guy, his wife took money from Terry. McAuliffe's cutouts, she was running for office as a Democrat that he immediately ordered outside of policy. Peter struck to go and do this Crossfire hurricane, they opened it up on an allegation. I'm going to actually show you. I'm going to read you something. Probably off my phone, it's the from the dialogue. The dialogue is the FBI's domestic investigations operation guide. What it says is that an actually

just just security dot-org. Posted the dialogue that Got in a, in a foia. And what it shows is that you cannot open a full investigation with simply an unsubstantiated allegation. You have to open a preliminary investigation, which is the right thing. And then funnily enough, I actually got blocked by Peter struck on Twitter yesterday because I tweeted at him that he did it wrong and it's funny that he was out there.

You know, claiming that the clintons were actually being treated unfairly, which is absurd because they actually got away with all the things they were. A shutdown, which I'm going to give you some some quotes from that as well, but the the dialogue actually tells you how to do it and they did the wrong thing rather than take my word on it. Why don't we take on our friend, FBI Barbie here? This is Nicole.

Parker as you know, this, this person drives Steve friend, a frequent guest of our show and a buddy of mine, fellows to spendable. Absolutely up the wall. But this is a woman that Fox News thinks is relevant. I want you to listen to this for as long as we can handle it and you tell me if there's any information being passed along.

In this particular Fox segment, this is so strange that they spend their time on it to put this in perspective, one, line of this that sort of sums up but where this entire Durham report went for the better part of four years based on the review of Crossfire hurricane looking into this whole matter, by the way and related intelligence activities.

We conclude that the justice department and FBI fail to uphold their important mission to strict Fidelity to the law in connection with certain events that activities described in this report, he's quoting the report Is an understatement to cope winsett. This that this is the, this was your, this was your home. This was your base. This was your very DNA and something like this happened.

What do you think? You know, now I have appeared on your program on other programs recently and it's sad to say, but this is exactly why I left the FBI. This confirms my decision to leave the FBI after serving With Honor when I was working. You know, cases such as violent crime crimes against children white-collar crime. Something of this nature takes down the entire organization and I, you know, they say, oh, it's 2016 2017, the FBI's made reforms. I understand, I was an FBI

agent. I had to be held accountable for other people's choices that had nothing to do with me. Several Thousands of agents that had nothing to do with this. We all had to take the hit for the board. We also not involved, thousands were not involved but you know what, the unfortunate part is, the entire organization is now taking the hit and it is unacceptable to take an oath. You swear to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America with the highest level.

She reminds me of that girl, that was, that was in one of the beauty pageants that said that, she believes that may be because of maps and because the Iraq That's kind of the way that she presents herself. I don't think she knows anything. She's never worked counterintelligence from what we can tell. So she doesn't have any experience in what you can or cannot do to open an intelligent investigation.

They're very different. But what she does have experience in apparently is handling hundreds of murders. I actually had a local, sheriff, who is a retired FBI agent with multiple years. If you guys have seen our episode with Mark Crider, he and I still talk, he called me yesterday, and he goes, what's the story with this Nicole, Parker, you know, where did she come from? And how is it that? She's done all these things and I go, well, let me just tell you.

She was the coordinator for crimes on the high seas out of the Miami Field office and the funny thing about being an FBI agent with the title coordinator, if you are the, the the applicant coordinator, you are not investigating cases, if you are the high seas crime, coordinator, you're not investigating cases. You're simply taking paper from somebody else and you're putting it into a file that the bureau maintains or you're actually going out and setting up some

kind of events. You're only the public affairs coordinator, the diversity coordinator, you're not doing. Work. You're not running FBI investigations into federal crimes so I don't know how much work she actually did, but her reputation in Miami is suboptimal with people that I respect highly. They said that she managed to show up on crime scenes where she had no business. Being, she always had on her a

jacket. Her hair was always done nicely with perfect makeup makeup and then she always staged herself in front of a camera somewhere. So I don't know if this was all about her trying to show and preen but she's not particularly Chocolate. She doesn't necessarily have a perspective and she doesn't say anything about the Durham report. I don't even know if she read

it, you know? All she did was mentioned, the Constitutional oath that's been essentially stealing the the talking points that the suspended balls have been putting out for a while. And that's one of the things that really upsets my buddy Steve friend. Let's talk about the actual the actual report and there's plenty of stuff in here. I'm going to switch over and show you a picture of this. This can be found if you want to read 306 pages of this nonsense. It's at Justice dot-org, I've

moved my screen above me now. So if you're looking on the rumble Channel wondering why I keep looking up. Instead of left, I try to move it in central. This is the name of the report. It is the report on matters related to intelligence activities, and investigations arriving out of the 2016 presidential campaigns, kind of a broad topic. And the special counsel actually

narrows it down. I'm going to roll down here and kind of give you what they believe the scope of their questioning was supposed to answer. It's worth noting that because they tell you about all the backstory here. Our there's a full executive summary but the the assessment of what went on here. It is my apology. So as we scroll through this thing, here's the conclusion, this is the executive summary

conclusion. There is there are hundreds of pages worth of documents that kind of back the stuff up, but this is what they said based on the review of Crossfire hurricane again. The investigation into Trump which was an Intel investigation, it wasn't looking for a crime per se and related intelligence activities.

We conclude that the department and the FBI failed to uphold their important mission of strict Fidelity to the law in connection with certain events and activities described in this report. As noted former FBI, Attorney Kevin Kline Smith, you'll remember him. He committed perjury, and then he, he fabricated documents, he committed a criminal offense by fabricating language, in an email, that was material to the FBI, obtaining a fisa surveillance order in other instances.

FBI Personnel, working on the same fisa application, displayed at best a Cavalier attitude towards a cure. And completeness, that might be the best line of the entire thing, a Cavalier, attitude towards accuracy, and completeness. That also sets very well with our sort of zombie apocalypse scenario.

That white supremacy is coming for all of us, it's a little bit Cavalier with the facts that there are less than 10% and probably less than five percent of the overall cases tagged with white supremacy, even involve any domestic terrorism let alone white supremacy specifically so worth noting. The real pieces here that That are of serious concern for me, are the discussions of how they open these things up in and how they violated FBI policy in order to do.

So, it makes the reference here. If you're looking in this particular document online, you're going to see the AGG Dom that the Attorney General guidelines for domestic intelligence and domestic operations. This is the, the sort of the Bible of FBI policy, and Peter struck, and Andy, McCabe, both of whom appeared to be very Cavalier with their attitudes, as As Durham stated they just

did their own thing. What they did is they also cut out here, the the requirements in order to do any type of investigation, there are three levels of FBI investigation, the lowest is an assessment. There's no such thing as a probe, by the way, you hear in the media, all the time, there is no probe assessment preliminary investigation, full investigation, and criteria, that can be used there.

In the FBI, can open an assessment, if it has an authorized purpose and a clearly defined objective, that means that there is a very low bar to open it. They have an Erised purpose and they are defining what they need to find out. We want to find out whether or not there was election interference. We want to find out whether or not there was a Russian cut out to the Trump campaign, that's an assessment.

The pollutant area investigation is based on information or allegation that a federal crime has taken place or that a threat to National Security. May be occurring. This can come from an unvetted Source, including a brand-new CHS, a confidential human source that has made a credible

allegation. You can open up an Meant to determine whether or not it's true and that would have been the appropriate at the highest level that they could have opened but instead they jump directly to a full investigation and that is the standard for opening. A full investigation is the articulable factual basis for the investigation that reasonably indicates activity

constituting. A federal crime or a threat to National Security is or may be occurring and the investigation May obtain information related to that activity. So I'm going to say it again because it's It's worth quoting that when you open a full of FBI investigation, you get all the tools. Particularly when you're doing National Security and there are ways that you can do.

So you have to have the are textual, the articulable factual basis for the investigation that reasonably indicates that they were going to be able to find the information about a federal crime. You have to know that not only did this thing possibly occur and it seems like there's a better than average chance that did. But also that you're going to be able to get information about it through your investigative activities.

That is not the Case of some random Australian until Source saying, you know, we heard a story about this, that's it. A plenary investigation at best, all right? And then there's all kinds of guidelines about how to do analytical Integrity. There's a piece on here. There's a piece of the Durham report that says that they actually failed in their at their academic rigor. Their their analytic rigor, to vet this material. And you say, well, the FBI is put out a statement.

They said that, they fix this in 2016 and 2017. What they did is they had us Us the us being the agents working. This type of stuff, everybody who might touch a fisa had to take new training on how to handle a fisa. The problem with that is, is that it had nothing to do with

the agents, doing feyza. I watched, guys doing, fisa, they do a great job of it, you know, there are whole squads of men and women, that are doing phi's as, and they were doing a good job on it, they are keeping track of foreign intelligence because that's their job and they do it with rigor. It's what happened at headquarters between two of the highest-ranked people in the FBI at the time.

The deputy director Andy McKay was number two in the I and then you had an assistant Deputy or sorry, a deputy assistant director, d&ad of counterintelligence that was Peter struck and they played fast and loose with the rules. Interesting enough that sort of crappy ability to adhere to policy. Has gone all the way down to the field office level, which is what we saw in the Richmond field office with the radical traditionalist Catholic document. It lacked analytic rigor.

They used bad sources. This is a pervasive problem in Elegance. Because once you are looking to confirm your own biases, you are willing to do anything to get you there. This is the big concern. It's an ongoing concern and is a cultural problem. It is not a technical problem, it is not a rules-based or policy or procedures problem in the FBI it's cultural. It is cultural to Intel agencies that are looking to affirm their own thoughts. Allow me to scroll down here a

little bit. I'm going to do a couple of quick quotes that I think are worth noting about how badly. They did this investigation. I think we've actually gone too far, bear with me. I'm going to end up switching over here, I'm going to pull up the Twitter feed because the Twitter feed that I put out actually had all the best quotes that I was interested in, so I will share them with you. If you don't follow me on Twitter you could do so at Kyle Serafin. And that's where I put out.

A lot of the stuff. When I started reading this, I essentially just rage tweeted, the the most important quotes I've shared these in a number of different programs when it comes to being on National media, Ah, here we go. We'll read upwards. Here are the quotes that I found to be very telling. They're all tagged with the hashtag Durham report. There's a lot of other people

that did so as well. And I see see the FBI on my my tweets because I think they should hear how bad it was quote, the speed and manner in which the FBI opened and investigated Crossfire hurricane reflected, a noticeable departure from how it approached matters. Prior involving possible attempted for an election interference plans aimed at the Clinton campaign.

So they have set up. Up in the Durham report, the difference between the way, the clintons were treated and the way that trumps campaign was tree treated treated, bad news. Another one, and a third investigation, there were multiple investigations, by the way, into the Clinton Foundation, which was part of the Clinton campaign

investigations, okay? In a third investigation, the Clinton Foundation matter, both senior FBI and Department officials, that's doj placed restrictions on how those matters were to be handled. Such that essentially no investigative activities occurred months leading up to the election. In layman's terms, they shut down the investigations. They put the brakes on and they put so many restrictions on the agents investigating the clintons that they were unable to actually accomplish a real

investigation. So they were essentially, let go scot-free. They didn't have any reason to necessarily interact with those that may be appropriate. It's called a sensitive investigative matter for a reason. Those things are a sensitive and they can actually we move the the way the, you know, political campaign goes. So they shut those things down, that was not the case for Trump, okay?

So I also tweeted that something to the effect of hey everybody always wants to know what happened to the Clinton Foundation. Why didn't they continue doing those investigations? The reason is because she ran for president, that doesn't turn out to be a safe haven for people like Donald Trump. And then lastly, Crossfire

hurricane. Again, the name of the investigation that counterintelligence investigation into the Donald Trump campaign and members around him was quote, markedly different from the FBI's actions with respect to other highly significant intelligence pointing to a Clinton campaign plan to vilify Trump by tying him to Vladimir Putin. So as to divert attention from her, use of a private private email server the last and most damning at the direction of deputy director, Andy McCabe

d&ad for counterintelligence Peter struck. They open Crossfire hurricane immediately as a full investigation. Struck had pronounced hostile feelings towards Trump and the matter was opened as a full investigation without verifying The Source. The Source was an Australian Intel source that was unvetted and previously. And as far as I know, it was never actually interviewed by the FBI in order to obtain veracity and what we would call validation, they didn't validate

the source. They simply went after Trump because it fit their political narrative and we've known that for a long time. But now it's in the public sphere and even people like Jake Tapper have to eat a little bit of crow. But they still are going to kavi out this thing. They're going to still say well it's sort of validates. What? Trump said no. Hard. Stop know, it completely validates what he said guys, like cash Patel guys, like Devin Nunes who are out there saying

this from the beginning going back as far as 2017. 2018, this was always the case. This investigation was bogus, they should never have opened it. People defending their positions is Andy McCabe clip that I showed you shows you that they will double down on it but even he doesn't believe it because he says it like this. Yeah, you know. Oh I totally would have opened that Russian that case up. It's funny how our body.

Trey's us. When we say things that we know that we can't even believe, there's no way that would have happened. And then you had struck, who was ideologically, motivated because he had pillow talk with his, his his sidepiece. We worked with Lisa Page, and then we see that they're literally doing Pillow Talk on government phones because there's such capable operators that they are using a recorded government phone. They're putting all the stuff out there in the sphere.

That is going to be captured thinking that they're going to get away with it because they always have because there are no consequences has to the FBI. If you think about it, Peter struck got a ton of money coming through a Gibson go or I what do they call him? Go fund me. If you're on the left, you get a good GoFundMe far, more money than any of this Expendables were supported with when they came forward with information. That was correct.

And you also see that you've got a, you know, Peter struck got but half million dollars or a million dollars in his. Then he also got his pension back and he was fired, for lying, pretty incredible, pretty disgusting, but it is it's what you should expect from. FBI that doesn't have any guardrails stopping it from running over the running over the First Amendment protected. Liberties I want to touch on one more thing. I didn't know if I was going to get to it but I did want to get to it.

It's worth noting will just throw the outrage bomb on you. This is a something that came from Lee Fang. This is a story that he broke this weekend. It was on the 12th. We're five days later. I'm still seeing people to show this on Twitter and they're saying breaking news. It's not breaking at this point, but it is shocking this Is a report by Lee Fang, who was part of the Twitter files? Many of, you'll know, he's a

good independent journalist. He works alongside Matt Taibbi, it says the FBI surveillance contractor, Flashpoint probed, anti-vaccine mandate activists. This is yet another First Amendment violation Falls in there if you don't fall into the covid narrative. You are part of the zombie apocalypse. So here it is Flashpoint. It was a surveillance contractor.

I wanted to show his sub stack. The the full story is actually covered better because I don't have access to a sub stack on Christian Health, the sorry, the Children's Health Fence Network. This is Robert Robert F, Kennedy's juniors website about anti-vaccine stuff, big Pharma and they do a pretty decent little big Tech Roundup on their news. The defender is like their newsletter and their

publication. What they said was is that this Flashpoint contractor which was famous during war on terror stuff, they actually made a bunch of money working for the FBI doing surveillance. When we say surveillance, we're talking about AI based and online, you know, scrolling and scanning. And what they do is they've been infiltrating G groups specifically close channels like u.s. Freedom, flyers.

And that was a group of no mask, no vaccine Airline and you know, flight attendants and pilots and crew members that didn't want to be infringed upon this contractor. Went out there and was able to infiltrate their telegram group and then bragged about it in a presentation to their stockholders into people as they were trying to sell their products and they get paid by. The FBI says, in this case, we're searching for a closed Channel.

Of u.s. Freedom Flyers. It's basically a group opposed to vaccination and masks. So they showed all the sort of work that they were trying to do to get into these private chats, the way that they create bot, accounts that can enter in and they sell the sort of quote, unquote threat intelligence to people. Like the FBI, they get into Discord chats, they get into

WhatsApp groups. They get into Reddit forums and dark web message boards gathering information for clients including the FBI and other corporations could have also been paid for by the airline industry. Itself. I was actually a member of a couple of these things. There's one that's called move freely you move freely America and they were the same thing.

All they wanted to do was medical freedom and a Bill of Rights. That said that, if you didn't have the vaccine and you were allowed to not have the vaccine in your state, which was everywhere. Then if you went to somewhere, like, California or New York or Maine, and you got into an accident. If you broke an arm, if you were injured or got very sick that the hospital would be required to treat you.

That's all that they were trying to push but instead, you've got the United States government spying on them. The stuff is really really dangerous. It's Happens when you have a captive media and you have a captive political narrative coming out of the left side. That says, anybody who doesn't agree with the government's

position is dangerous. If you'll remember the people that didn't agree with the government's position, founded this country, that's what the founding fathers, did that is the way that they operated and they overthrew it for far, less than this, the British government was infringing far. Less than what we see the United States government.

I am confident that our founding fathers are not just rolling but also spinning Like helicopter blades in their graves, unfortunately, because we have given away. All of this capability, we have allowed a government to overstep all of its bounds and it's pretty terrifying. Stuff. I'm going to wrap it up. We're going to go on tomorrow. I expect to do a live stream. They are going to have all of the suspend apples that I care to see. They're going to have Gerd

O'Boyle. They're gonna have a guy who I don't know, but I liked his story. His name is Marcus Allen, he's a Marine Corps veteran and wasn't in an Intel guy. He was actually working as an SOS in in the FBI's field. Office. I can remember what field office. He was in somewhere down south, maybe Atlanta, Marcus Allen is going to be testifying in front of Congress as is Stephen friend, our buddy. I've already heard their opening statements, they are powerful and strong.

I will be covering them in real time. Will do a live stream with kind of a Mystery Science Theater reaction to what goes on and we will Lampoon the Democrat comments that are going to obviously going to be attacking the messenger. My boys are very well prepared. They've been what they called Murder boarded which is to say they were asked all the questions that they could be, they have I'm prepped as Witnesses so they will be able to answer themselves end of the day.

They have the armor of God in the armor of Truth on. I have no fear that the spendables will be embarrassed. I am scared that they may get angry because my buddy Garrity is a big dude. He at 61 62, he weighs about 275 pounds, he's got shoulder-length long, black hair. You guys are going to finally get to see him and he will be on the show soon. I'm sure of it. He's giving a Jesse Kelly X. Sorry. Now Jesse Kelly a Jesse Watters exclusive tomorrow.

So look for Fox. To have Jim Jordan, Steve friend and suspended. Bulgaria Boyle, who actually I'm going to stand up a bit here. If you're on the rubble Channel, you can see he has a sub stack called, the last line. This is his T-shirt, last nine strength. I've been wearing it all day and support. You can't see it because the chats covering me up right now, but Garrett is going to be public soon. And I look forward to hearing what he has to say and being

able to get his voice out there. He's been waiting for this for quite a long time, folks. Kyle Serafin show that you've been listening to very appreciative for your time. I'm, we are very appreciative for you showing up here and listening to us every morning. If you like what you hear, please hit the like button. If you're watching us on Rumble, you can subscribe to the channel there as well. I would appreciate that. It grows our reach and it helps more people. See it.

Moreover if you want to leave us a five star review on Apple, we have broken 450 5 star ratings. We are 5.0 out of 5 on Apple simply outstanding. I'm going to read a quick Review. If you want your review, read, go ahead and leave it. There type me up something and I will read them on the show. This one is by Rob Osborne Rob, thanks for the review. Five stars, my favorite. Excellent job. You are exposing government

corruption. Like, no one else and I truly appreciate it. I used to trust the CIA and FBI and now I see that those survivalist conspiracy believing people. I used to think we're nuts were Weren't I think he misspelled word. The proofreading, not so strong. Oh, big deal. It says, do not trust the government, especially the federal government of course. Rob, you're correct.

That is the case. You got to watch out for all the three letter agencies, they all are looking for themselves, they're looking for their own budgets. That is how the government works. Thanks for leaving us. The five star review, five 451, let's get it up to 500. Let's break that 500 marks a please leave us a five star review today. If you haven't done, so already on Apple, you can click the link in the description below. Check out our sponsors again.

And Patriot coolers.com promo code Kyle. Kay yle. Check out Catholic. Vote.org my friends at the Loop there, you can get their newsletter, it costs, you nothing, and you'll be informed on Christian related, politics and things that are going on both in the Catholic church and in the Christian faith in this country, particularly threats to pro-life causes and so on, check them out folks. We will see you again. I'm going to be on here tomorrow rumbling live.

We will be streaming the weaponization committee so look for that. I will check you again. We'll open up the the chat and do the same format here. Do a picture in picture and scan it. Look forward to seeing you, then thanks so much and we'll follow up again on Friday with another review of the current events. Thanks for listening to the Kyle Serafin. Show be sure to follow him on Twitter and Truth at Kyle seraphin.