Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistleblower, an American patriot. Prepare to embrace the uncomfortable truth, because this program has no time for comforting lies. Here is civil liberties enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI agent Kyle Serif. Well, hello my friends, welcome to the Kyle Serafin show. Today is Monday, it is June the 24th, and we are rolling live on rumble.com/kyle Serafin.
We are over on YouTube, we are on X Twitter, and for some reason we still stream to Facebook. But if you want the live chat like you're seeing over on the side of the screen, then you're going to have to join us on Rumble. You don't even have to download
the app. You can just go to rumble.com/kyle Serafin. If you add slash live, it'll always give us our most current show or give you the most current show and you can jump right into the live chat with all of these weirdos out there, including Garrett O'boyle, who's sitting in there lurking. Thanks for joining all of us. Thanks for joining us, all of you. There we go. Let's get this going. We got a lot to go on today. What a what a salacious thumbnail I've decided to choose for you today.
A werewolf and villagers and pitchforks of werewolves and villagers. What on earth does that have to do with what we do on this podcast? It turns out plenty. In fact, maybe all of it is about werewolves and villagers. I'm going to blow your mind today a little bit. I think we're going to talk about presidential debate. We're going to talk about the talking points, the four or five things that the Democrats are running on, all of which I think are losers for the American
people. So let's stay in the pocket. Let's work the technique, which is something we've talked about here before, but I'm going to play you again. We're going to bring back a Bill Burr clip that I've edited down to the tight 30 seconds of what needs to be done. If conservatives, AKA Republicans that actually mean it, are serious about holding power and wielding power and saving this country. It's not going to happen overnight, folks. You know what does happen
overnight? Me getting sunburned pretty aggressively. Spent some good time in the sun with my kids. I log off all social media. I have just disconnected from the news cycle over the weekend and people keep sending me links and I'm like sorry I'm not going to do it. I hope you guys do the same thing. I hope you don't end up red like me. I'm red now and I'm wearing a red matching shirt and my shirt comes from the dash suspendables.com. Did you see how I worked that in
the dash suspendables.com? Use the promo code Kyle. Save yourself 10% and keep my buddy GOB Actual who is sitting in our live chat right now, thrown out suspendables merch. You can buy patches. You can buy the suspendables pins. They are still 3 for $30. I think you can spend 15 on each one of them, or you can get three of them for 30 and you can give out one as a gift. That is a good, good move. They look fantastic if you're
wearing them on a suit. If you have a reason to dress up, you might as well Rep some suspendables merch. And what is that suspendables merch tell you? By the way, Eagle is down. That is the way you give it to people. You play it eagle down because our country is under duress. Just like our flag could be flown upside down right now and you will see something like this. That is our badge that is the badge upside down with the suspendables S in it.
The dash suspendables.com, the merch store folks check it out. If you want to keep my buddy busy and not coming up with bad ideas yes look at him he's actually scrolling through the chat right there and make sure you like this video subscribe and are you are following our channel? Are you ready? Let's lock into this thing. It's been about 3 minutes of us just chatting. So let's go #1 Leading the charge today is Fox News. It's the story that will not die.
The story will not go away. So I'm going to keep telling you what's important. It's actually the subject of our five star review today. Yeah. Why did the FBI authorize deadly force for raid at Mar A Lago? This is coming from Mark Levin sort of blog piece. They go and they quote him, but really, they quote a guy named Andy McCarthy, who's a former AUSA, which is a federal prosecutor. He's a Fox News contributor.
And I don't think he's a huge fan of Trump, but he's been fair, as far as I can tell, on some of the things. We don't have to agree with everybody all the time. That's the whole point. We're just supposed to get diverse viewpoints. This whole story, this clickbait headline, why do they authorize it? It goes on to say that they always authorize deadly force. So it's just what happens. That's just how the FBI operates. But I wanted to pull out two
specific quotes here. This is actually quoting two days after this sort of revelation, by the way, all the information that we're getting, especially that thing that I, I covered down on with Bill Shipley's piece, which was about a week ago now. It's all indicating that the Trump campaign and the legal team are working in tandem to try to get Trump the best deal in front of a federal judge. I'm not mad at any of that, nor should you be.
They are not lying to us. But if people that are representing themselves as journalists are doing that, that's a real problem. Here's the story. This is written is a byline from Andy McCarthy. It's a reprint from National Review. The Trump Mara Lago lethal force claim is just stupid, but it's par for the course. I don't think it's actually stupid per SE. Like I said, I think it's a targeted, it's a targeted PR campaign and that's OK. But here's what Andy Andrew McCarthy said.
As a result and as a matter of common sense, the FBI always has an operational plan for carrying out a court authorized search. The plan involves customarily reminding the search teams of the FB is use of force policy. You guys can see on the screen, he says that the danger is, is that when you're acting like there is in fact a lethal force specific to this particular court authorized search, that's political red meat for
conspiracy theorists. We want to avoid the realm not of conspiracy theorists cause a lot of those things turn out true, right? What we want to avoid is the realm of reactive stupidity, emotional reactions to news stories. We don't have to be emotional. We can be balanced and obviously understand what is going on. It's very important that you have good information and that is the subject of werewolves and villagers. That's why I'm bringing this thing up now.
I'm going to make the analogy. I guess I'll do it after we give you that. The context of what do those terms mean in, in, in light of this game that I just heard about, this little sort of villager and werewolves game. It's actually brilliant. It's so simple. It's a like a, it's like heads up 7UP. If you remember being a kid in the 70s and 80s, right heads down, thumbs up, lights go out. Somebody walks around and pops down a, a thumb, right, heads up 7UP.
This is kind of thing, but it's an adult game and it involves some strategy and some reasoning. It involves exactly what is going on in this country right now. There are a lot of people. Most of us are villagers, and we only have some of the story. There are werewolves. They have more or all of the
story. And then there's a couple of people like the suspendables coming out of the FBI, people coming out of the CIA, people coming out of various agencies, Border Patrol, Homeland Security and so on. And we're trying to bring the knowledge that the werewolves have been creeping around with to the villagers. Let me give you this clip. I think this is going to illuminate you a little bit. Take a deep breath and pay attention, because all these words are relevant.
Have you ever heard of a game called Werewolf? No, everyone gets a piece of paper. It's either got villager written on it but two have the word werewolf. Someone runs the game to make sure no one's cheating and they go OK, it's night time everyone close your eyes. Werewolves choose someone to kill and the werewolves go. They say, OK, everyone, close your eyes. It's morning time, open them again. During the night, Francis was
killed. There's then a conversation and this is where it gets interesting, between all the villagers and the two werewolves over who the werewolves are. Then at the end of the day, the the villagers have to decide who they're going to kill. And they say, well, we're going to kill Constant. It's revealed by the person running the game. I'm afraid Constant was a
villager and the game continues. The villagers win the game if they kill both werewolves, the werewolves win the game if they kill all but two villagers and the werewolves usually win. The game was invented by a student of sociology in Russia who wanted to prove his thesis that an uninformed majority will always lose a battle of information against an informed minority. So that just shows when you have hidden information. You can completely manipulate a
large group of people. Do you understand how profound that information was and that maybe 60 seconds of this clip lot going on there. Number one, sociology student, someone who studies people in Russia, which has a pretty interesting history of secret police, of totalitarian governments, of hiding the truth, of giving their their populace a newspaper called Pravda while doing something else with it, while disseminating the state's information, preferred information.
The second thing is, is the conclusion that an informed minority will always have an edge against an uninformed majority when it comes to the battle of information. We are currently in that battle. If you listen to people like General Mike Flynn, he talks about us being in what's called 5 GW, 5th generation warfare. That is information war.
If we are in an information battle and we are a poorly informed majority, which I do think the majority of people are poorly informed #1 and more importantly, the majority of people, they actually agree with each other. They have the same values. It may not be 80 or 90% of us that believe the same way, but I think it's a solid 60, maybe 65 percent. 2/3 of this country good enough to pass things through the Senate is what it should look like, right?
So if we as Americans in a super majority enough to be able to pass laws, are unable to do any of those things because we can't get along and agree on these things, what is happening? I believe that we are being manipulated by that small number, that number of werewolves. It's two werewolves in a entire village are enough to kill off the entirety of the village, right? That's the, that's the, the way the game is played out. And as he said, more often than not, they win that informed
minority. That is what the suspendables, that is what the whistleblower sort of protections are supposed to allow us to do. What's supposed to happen is people who are working on the werewolf side look around and go, I didn't sign up for this. I thought we were protecting the village. I thought we were being sheepdogs to, to borrow some analogies here, right? To, to get into the sort of killology framework. I didn't know that we were going to be wolves.
I thought we were going to be sheepdogs. I understand that we look like wolves. I thought we were actually going to be tracking the wolves. We're not going to be doing that. We're going to be killing off the people, the sheep, the villagers. I'm out. I'm going to blow the whistle on this. Blowing the whistle, by the way, is a terrible analogy. It should be throwing the flag like you see in football. It's like I just saw the play and I'm throwing it.
We're not going to do this, but instead those people are attacked. And then the best thing that can be done, and this is exactly how that werewolf game works, right? The villagers get together, the rabble, the the mob, the people who are scared and saying that something is wrong and they kill off somebody and it turns out that somebody was on their team. Even worse, if they kill off somebody on their team that is also informing them of what needs to be going on.
If they are giving the best information possible and those people are also attacked. That's why the story can't really fall away. I don't know why Fox News printed it today. It's just is a relevant thing that we're going to talk about. But as we continue on today, as we work towards the end of today's show, I'm going to show you there is a strong argument being made. The government is actually arguing in court that people do
not have a right to be informed. It's one thing for us to see them doing censorship and kind of vaguely talking about how they need to police our cognitive infrastructure and they need to protect us from our own stupidity and all this kind of thing. It's quite another to say that we don't actually have a right to be informed that that information should be hidden from us because we are in bad shape and we cannot be trusted with taking one sided bits of
information. OK, we're going to continue on with this theme, but I want to start off with the the basics of the argument that is being made. This is why I think the 65% majority of America can probably agree and why the polls are strong in favor of guys like Donald Trump at the moment. If he can simply execute the technique, if he can stop being baited into anything foolish and he can hang in there, there's some evidence that may be the case.
That would be great for us, but Donald Trump is a populist and he also has a lot of a lot of pride. And so he tends to go after things when people come after him. There are reasons not to do that in an emotional way. We're going to talk about why that is specifically, though. I want to, I want to punch in on the techniques. So look, I actually wrote this down for a show a while ago and I wanted to keep it on my desk.
It's on my little notepad here. So you guys can see, this is my notepad, my crappy handwriting, and these are the things that I wrote down that I believe the abortion, I'm sorry, the abortion, this abortion is one of them, if you guys want to guess. These are the things that the Democrats are so all in on that their media sycophants continuously raise as real serious issues for Americans. And I don't think they result in any of the things that move the
needle for real people. A very, very small minority likes this. There should be no flag but the tranny flag in the LGBTQ flags. That's the pride flags and so on. That's their take. The American flag is very bad. That goes to the other thing that white supremacy and racism are everywhere. They have to be looked after. So the American flag is racist. You have to have this weird inclusive tranny LGBTQIA flag.
They want abortion for all. Today is the two year anniversary of the Dobbs decision. It's been 2 years already and they've lost their mind. And so all of the front pages of all of the news sources that I go and kind of peruse to keep us informed about what is being disseminated falsely, ABCNBCCBSCNN, all of them, they're all talking Dobbs decision. They're all talking about how abortion was in danger. Newsflash, folks, there were more abortions in 2023 than
there ever have been. Some of that is because it's funded by you as they're bringing in all these people illegally into the country. Which brings us to the other piece of it. We hate the Republic. We hate the Constitution. We hate the idea that this country exists as it does and therefore we must have an open border. Everybody can come in at all
times. And then lastly, and this is one that I left off my list previously, but it's obviously apparent to them right now in the wake of this Cargill decision that is now put bump stocks back on the shelves whenever they start making them again. If they do, which I believe they will.
The last one is related to all of that because if there is a white supremacy, institutional racism, America is very bad, then the founding principles from the Bill of Rights, including the Second Amendment, need to also go. They are losing their minds about machine guns and proxies for machine guns. They are conflating things that are obviously not machine guns as determined by the Supreme Court accurately, that rate of fire does not, in fact, equal an
automatic weapon. But they're losing their minds about this stuff. And so there are multiple articles, one of which we're going to cover, talking about what they call Glock switches, which is an auto seer that goes in the back of a Glock handgun, which is probably one of the most popular handguns in America. They're talking about that which is in fact, a machine gun, and
it already is illegal. And it's already illegal to kill people with any guns, including machine guns, if you don't have a justifiable purpose that is defensible by law. But they're going to trot out the guy who actually invented the Glock switch and talk about how he is now ashamed of his creation. He wanted to help SWAT teams.
He wanted to help the military. And instead he feels awful because people in Chicago, young men, generally speaking, between the ages of like 16 and 29 are killing each other recklessly and they're killing others recklessly. They're spraying bullets from from 9mm handguns because they don't know how to do anything with them. And they just think that it sounds cool to have a machine gun. I mean, it sounds cool. It does, you know, it's not cool.
It's killing like a six year old sitting in their living room. That's about the worst thing. I think that the punishment that that should be befalling some of these guys if they were public and swift and we talked about them, which we're not allowed to do because remember, America's racist. So you can't show who it is that is involved in a lot of these gun crimes, the most of them. And then there's a whole story about mass shootings and how the numbers are fake.
I'm going to show you how fake the numbers are and how rare it is for what they call an active shooter versus a mass shooter. They have to discriminate because most mass shooters actually happen in gangland sort of killings. They happen in urban areas that are controlled by Democrats with incredibly high gun restrictions. The laws don't work. It turns out if you're willing to run through the murder statute, you're also willing to build yourself an illegal machine gun.
And so who is it? It's generally black, but sometimes black and brown depending on the the ethos of the area. You will see young black and brown males specifically involved in drug related and otherwise criminal activity violence. We can't talk about that because that would give us what the real definition of mass shooters are. So what they talk about are
active shooters. Active shooters are a thing that doesn't even make sense because by the time that they are talking about the statistics, they are no longer active, right? Those things cease within a period of time, 24 hours, 48 hours tops, when you have some guy on the loose that's running around doing something wild. And that's happened only a few times. Maine comes to my mind. And the numbers of these are infinitesimally small. There are so few of them.
But I want to focus, focus in on the last thing here, which is the climate change agenda, because that continues to be out there. And this was one of the more, I would say, amusing articles. Sometimes they they try to actually backstop these stories. These are misinformation campaigns. These are false information trying to arm the fools. They have to go out there and religiously worship this kind of stuff. And who better than a great propagandist, Bill Nye?
Bill Nye looks like he is a skeleton dressed up in skin at this point, But he's being trotted out as anybody knows the background of Bill Nye. It is not that he's a climatologist, even though that's his passion. He's an engineer, which is practical science. He's just a liberal talking piece at this point, stepping out and doing whatever is required of him to try to push an agenda that doesn't really actually make sense.
Here it is. Bill Nye says record-breaking extreme heat is, quote UN quote, a taste of the new, a taste of the normal of the future. And he bases that based on nothing, just his feelings because there's no data. We don't have data enough to show this kind of stuff. All right, research shows that human induced climate change is intensifying extreme weather. You notice that the words extreme weather has to be used because they can't talk about heat. Why can't they talk about heat?
Because they're also worried about cold. Whenever they make a claim, it can't be actually substantiated. This is quite funny. So they had a science educator, that's what he's referred to as. He's a science educator. He was on the week and he's talking about the extreme heat and flooding that are making headlines because that's what happens in the summer. If anybody remembers the summer ever, there are mud slides, there are tornadoes, there will be floods. This happens every since it's
called weather, it is a pattern. It'll also be very hot. Shocker, I'm red. Many of you are red. Many of you have gone outside and found out, shockingly, that as we enter the end of June and the beginning of July, it will be hot. It turns out July 4th is always hot every year. That's just how it works. These guys are acting like this is some sort of revelation.
The best for me, though, was saying that 100 million Americans across 27 states are under heat alerts like they are every summer from coast to coast, and two, including two of the nation's largest cities, New York and Los Angeles. So you guys know, the very important people who live in the coastal elite areas of New York and Los Angeles are feeling heat in the summer, and therefore, you must also be very concerned.
The best is that they had this little line, this almost throwaway line, that extreme heat. Is the leading cause of weather related fatalities according to a service that measures fatalities, the National Weather Service. Well, that's kind of odd, isn't it? Is the National Weather Service really a group of people that are in charge of tracking heat related fatalities? So they had a hyperlink and I like to do the fact checking that they have done.
I want them like, hey, if there's data and I happen to be wrong, if I am misinformed that cold is the biggest killer of people both worldwide and in the United States, then I want to check it out. That's what I want to do. So I went to the National Weather Service page and that's the hyperlink right there. National Weather Service page 404, air page not found. The page you requested could not be found. Please try something else. You can't make this stuff up, right?
They made a claim. They backed it up with a government agency that is not responsible for tracking fatalities of any kind. And that page doesn't exist. Now, I'm not one to just say, well, the link is gone, so that must be the end of it. No, I actually looked it up. I actually typed it into the National Weather Service and I found out that they do actually track some sort of weather related fatalities going back. And apparently the year of, of of record starts in 1979. All right.
And in 1979, they started tracking that. Today, on average, we see 175 deaths related to heat on average per year. OK. And I multiplied that out and it comes out to a little over 7800, just under 7900 deaths total. So 7900 deaths is what they attribute to heat according to National Weather Service estimates. And I don't know where they're drowning it, but let's assume that they're good with it. Why not? Let's just say that they got it
right. Well, then I went and I searched about cold related deaths because it was my belief and I don't want to be wrong, that that cold kills more frequently. Look, I'm a paramedic. I have been by training. Everybody knows who's ever dealt with trauma. Cold kills. It's rare that heat, like there are heat emergencies, but you have a much bigger window and the number of heat related deaths I've heard of are far smaller. So I looked it up and here's
what you have. Now this comes from the EPA. Why on earth if you guys want an argument against government agencies, the National Weather Service and the EPA are both tracking cold and and climate related deaths. Does that just show you the overreach of what's going on with our federal government in the executive branch? These ridiculous groups are are trying to compile death statistics. I guarantee you the CDC has their own. I'm sure NIH has their own as
well. All the public health agencies doing the same thing. This has to stop and we're paying for all these idiots to go do this stuff and then they just do this circle jerk where they just cite themselves. In fact, this data that you're seeing on the screen right now comes from the CDC series of 2018. Now it only goes up to 2016 again, and I did the estimate up to today for 2024 under 7900 related to heat but related to cold, 1979 again that magic year to 2016.
A total of more than 19,002 1/2 X 2 1/2 times people are killed by cold, then by hot. And we don't even have eight years worth of the estimates in there. So let it be known all of this stuff is fear mongering. They are giving you fake and false and inaccurate information. Why? Because if you're bickering amongst each other, the werewolves can do what the werewolves do. And who are the werewolves? I'm going to get into that in
one second here. First, I want to say thanks to my buddies at Catholic Vote. If you guys are missing out on the loop in the morning, then you are missing out on the best couple minutes e-mail to keep you informed. If you want articles that you can share that are based on faith, they are based on family, and they are based on freedom values that we hold dear here at the Kyle Seraphin Show. catholicvote.org is a place that you can go and get them.
Just go and put in your e-mail address and your zip code and get the loop. They're doing fantastic content over on YouTube. They're doing the same thing here on Rumble. If you are watching on YouTube or Rumble, or if you're watching on X, wherever you go, you can follow them at Catholic voteitsrumble.com/catholic Vote, it's youtube.com/catholic Vote and on Twitter it's at Catholic Vote. So there you have it, very easy
to find. You can also find them on Facebook. They do a lot more over there than I do. Check out the loop, check out our new Between the Lines. I'm going to give you guys a little taste of it tomorrow. I think Between the Lines as though it is the short podcast, it's like under 8 minutes for this week's and it's talking about something I think is very relevant to all of us, which is that you got to do the work. That the journey is supposed to be the reward.
And that it's always been the case in America that you have to do things that are difficult in order to appreciate those rewards. If you try to get instantaneous results, which is a lot of what goes on right now for these younger generations, you're actually cheating them out of doing the work. And I don't want to flesh it out any further. There's seven or 8 minutes of it. It's almost like an American
sermon. And I and I cripped a little bit of notes from my friend Steve Friend talking about how when you do America, you have to do America as an action verb. So go check that one out. Highly recommend. I'm going to talk to you about the werewolves. Are you prepared for the werewolves? Here they are. This one is coming from CBS. Active shooters targeting the public spiked from 2019 to 2023. Why do they choose that period in time?
Why not? It's always interesting when they decide to give you a very specific time period going back to 1979. I'll accept that as a pretty good grasp, looking backwards and saying, OK, well, there's a a representative sample of at least whatever I can remember in my lifetime, and it's going to be at least from teens on for most of our listenership. Some of you were a little bit older, but why five years? That's my first question.
I'm always, I'm always a skeptic when I look at these things and then look at the numbers. They had thirty in 2018. There were 61 in 202150 in 2022. Apparently this was a spiked and represented an elevated time. Well, one, number one, this is under Joe Biden's America, if we're going to talk about things in those terms. So why are mass shootings spiking under this Democrat president? They also Fox News, I'm sorry, not Fox News, CBS News.
They brought on an FBI senior executive who worked as the special assistant to the executive assistant director of cyber crimes who wrote a long study. She looks like she's never been a real agent. She's a female FBI agent, which I have a lot of questions. Some of the very competent females worked in the FBI, but all of the worst agents that I knew were all females. Men were a much more of a mixed bag. There are fewer women, so they stood out.
And the worst FBI agents I ever saw were all women. Hands down the most scary, the most dangerous, the ones that were the least comfortable carrying a weapon. This woman has written a lot of books. Her name is Carried Swekat. I think I went and looked her up. She's written books about guns, how to talk to people about guns. I'm sure she's an, an expert. She is a Chicago area lawyer.
So, you know, she probably grew up around a bunch of guns and is very competent to talk about it. I would not want to match with with her, lest she find out that her her expertise is lacking. But as we read this, they're talking about active shooters violently targeting. So active shooters we have to redefine. We're not talking about mass
shootings now. We are now trying to slant you into a belief that we're talking about mass shootings, but we're going to use the term active shooting, which they're going to define as something new. And it was up by 89 percent, 2019 to 2023. This is all driving the narrative that guns are bad and we have to get rid of them, specifically the guns that we say, but all the guns are really problematic because all guns can be used by quote UN quote,
active shooters. She makes this weird convoluted argument in the actual video interview, which I'm not going to play for you, but it says something to the effect of legal guns are often used in these things, but they are illegal when they are used because they are taken into a place where they are no longer legal. So there are places that have LAX gun laws and then they drag them in to states that have good gun laws that she argues in favor of and then those guns are
used. The fact of the matter is, is people running through murder statute, the worst thing that we can do in society, maybe outside of sexually abusing a child, is taking the life, removing the ability for someone to continue
on into the future. We're going to make the argument that a statute that controls an inanimate object, a piece of property that you own and can manipulate and sell and trade for a car or a television that you can turn into a piece of art or you can use to kill an animal and feed your family.
That thing is responsible according to these loonies for crimes, even though we already have statutes that outlaw all of it. That you probably cannot brandish it at a person, that you can't point it at someone unless you are justified to do so. That you can't pull the trigger unless you are justified to do so. And then either wounding or or or killing somebody. They're already all against the law. So here they go. They start talking about these things.
I want you to know how rare these things are. These things being quote UN quote, active shooter situations. Last year, 105 people were killed during active shootings in 2023. That's the big spike. 105 people in a country of 350 million. For whatever it's worth. Over 800 people on average on any given year going back for the last 20 or 30 years, 800 people are beaten to death with what are called personal weapons. That's going to be hands and
feet, folks. 8 times as many people in this country on average on any given year. Not on the highest year that they could find in the last five years, but on any year in the last 20 to 30 you will find about 800 people are beaten to death with these. What does my buddy call them? My my friend from Long Island likes to refer to them as the Hammer brothers. Jack and Sledge right and then his his two legs. I think he calls Walker and Texas Ranger or something silly like this.
The joke is this. 8 times as many people are killed with no weapon at all except what is part of your body as given to you, got by God, and you're worried about a few people. Now don't get me wrong, every human life is precious. That's why we don't like things like abortion here. There's a reason why we want people to be able to continue on, if only even if they're crappy people, for them to repent and find God before they die.
But when we talk about public policy and we look at aggregates like 105 people, that's a rounding error that just disappears off real discussions about actual death in this country. If you're going to talk to me about quote UN quote, active shooters and think that 105 people killed is something that we should be discussing on a national scale, are you really going to just go over the 50,000 people that are killed because of drunk driving? That seems like a preventable problem.
You're not out there running after cars in the same way and I don't think you should either. Are we going to talk about the half million or so people on any given year that die because of medical malpractice and malfeasance that the failure of the actual people whose whose oath it is to protect us to do no harm first. And like tons of people are harmed a huge amount. 105 people doesn't even make the scale individually. That's an emotional trigger.
But when we talk about public policy, we look at aggregate and there is no reason to even be discussing this absurdity and definitely no reason for it to be front page on CBS News. They have an entire story talking about how on some years it's as low as 50, as you saw here, 30. These are the things that we're talking about 30 people. You're going to have the FBI spending all of its time. Why is that? Because they are trying to move the needle about guns specifically.
And I say that because here you have this sort of fear porn. It continues on and it will not stop. We're going to do Patriot coolers first. And I'm going to show you some of this fear porn because it's almost, it's almost shocking how obvious this stuff goes down. All right, you guys want to get something has a gun on it. You can do so by going to patriotcoolers.com. My friends over there make these very handsome, attractive coolers. You can get them in multiple
colors. You can get them in blue, You can get them in feminine colors. I don't know what those are, but they're out there. You get them in black. You can get them in olive green, which is actually very, very attractive looking. And you can use promo code Kyle. Kyle, These things work so well. Let me just tell you, when I fill up a Tumblr like this one right there, which we took on the road with us yesterday with water and ice.
What I'm kind of hoping is that as I drink the water, the ice will also melt and then I'll have more water. But they work so efficiently that when I was done leaving this thing in the hot summer in the in the cup holder of my car where it fits very nicely in my minivan with no windshield cover, just direct sunlight beaming directly down onto my cup. Sitting in that minivan in 100° weather in Texas, it was still full of ice even though I drank all the water. I couldn't drink the ice.
It was just ice sitting there all the way up. You know what it makes those kind of like structures inside these things are highly efficient. And so check them out at patriotcoolers.com. They will keep your ice cold. They will keep your beverage cold. You will be happy that you did. And their tumblers and their coolers are equally good. Check out the coolers too. Patriot coolers.com promo code Kyle there. Here we go. Ready we talking about this thing we got to now reinvent the
past. We're going to go back and we're going to have an article that's written. This is I believe by who is this by? This is by ABC News Bill Hutchinson is the the the byline. I feel terrified. I don't know why this guy feels terrified. This is Jorge Leon. He is the inventor of the so-called Glock switch. It's a select fire system that he was patented. He was able to get AUS patent on and in 2016 the patent ran out. So the detailed drawings became
public information. And then all these different companies, including places in China, in Chinese, the people in Chinese are now making these clock switches. They claim that they're for airsoft and they can actually put them on real Glocks. And then you get a bunch of idiot teenagers in Chicago and other Lib areas shooting each other with fully automatic weapons, which is really incredibly dangerous. It's dangerous to the people that they are not intending to shoot.
That's who gets hit. But this guy now feels quote UN quote terrified. And he says that his creation is the regret of his life. We have to find a way to control. Are you ready for this? We have to find a way to control this unleashed bad thing. What is this unleashed bad thing? It's a machine gun. And but for the Hughes Amendment in 1986, we would all be able to own these things.
With a $200.00 tax stamp. We could buy a $50 piece of metal that goes in the back of your clock and you could have a fully automatic what equates to being a Glock 18. You can't have them now because under Ronald Reagan, a law was signed in that said no new machine guns after 1986. We've demonized machine guns. The number of people that were killed with machine guns between 1934 when they started regulating them with a tax stamp and now is also a rounding error. It is almost never used.
Legalized, federally registered machine guns have not been used in a serious way basically in American history since 1934. It doesn't exist. It's a fake outrage. It is a fake concern, but that won't stop Democrats from trying to make political hay on this stuff. They cannot help but demonize the item because the people that they are trying to protect are actually the really bad actors.
And the stupid thing is because Democrats are so racist in this case that they will not because America is full of white supremacy, right? That's one of their that's one of their bylines. I've got it sitting here on my notepad. Because there is so much white supremacy, because there is so much racism, we can't actually
blame the group of people. Like I said, 16, the 29 year old black males are the overwhelming number of people by the way, they kill overwhelmingly people in that age bracket. It's black males killing black males in this country. If you want to look at the, the handgun deaths, that's where they come from. So this is awful. This is an awful thing for so-called Democrat voters. They believe that they have a, a, a mass hold on black Americans in the voting polls. They, they, they think these
people have to vote for them. You even heard Joe Biden say it, right? If you, if you have a question of who you're voting for, then you ain't Black. Your, your ethnic identity, your racial identity is on the line when you go to the polls. So you have to vote in favor of stupid Democrat ideas, even though they're afraid of saying
what is true. And amusingly, I think people like Kathy Hochul, who is in New York by the way, at one point in time, she answers the question and she starts with the word, yo, just listen to that 'cause it's very fun. She's blaming our Supreme Court for actually caring about what the Declarate, I'm sorry, the what the actual Constitution says and what laws actually mean by giving credence to the actual words in laws. You are now living in the 1700s.
I understand that Democrats would love to live in a post constitutional, post factual world and many of them do. They are trying to seed us with bad information and act like that is a problem that you actually care. Again, these are what werewolves are doing. They are giving you bad information. So you go after the wrong target. You kill off your own and not those you're going to be mad at.
This guy Jorge Leon, who created the device, made some money off it trying to help military and police with his claim on why would we think otherwise? He just wanted to turn clocks into into machine guns. That sounds cool. That sounds very interesting on just an engineering principle alone. Can you make this thing that was not designed to do this operate this way? And he did great. Here's Kathy Hochul. This is the governor of New York.
You guys do not know, saying that basically the Constitution is obsolete and so is the Supreme Court. Aren't these the people that are always talking about delegitimizing branches of government, that an attack on the FBI is a real problem because you're actually not letting them do their work? How about the Supreme Court? A Co equal branch of government superior to the executive in New York, at least the way the Democrats think about it.
They want the the the federal government to be able to out outrule and outlaw anything that goes on in the state if it's preferable with their political outcomes. Here she is talking about this. This is on I believe this is on CBS that she's talking. Is the Supreme Court I filter yo? Absolutely. I mean, they are so out of touch. They're literally living in the 1700s.
I mean, they go back to what our founding fathers said about guns at a time when we had muskets, we didn't have bump stocks, we didn't have machine guns. We didn't have the capacity to have a mass shooting that steals the lives of people in my hometown of Buffalo or that killed so many at a gathering of young people out out West at a a concert. So the world has changed since the 1700s.
I know the Supreme Court doesn't want to believe that they're trapped in the past, but this is what Donald Trump gave us. But American people, they will. The fever's going to break. I really feel this. We're going to realize what's at stake when they realize that Donald Trump is cozying up to dictators. He is envious to them. He wants that ability to amass power. And we have fought so hard to preserve our democracy.
I mean, think about what Benjamin Franklin said back in the 1787. He was asked, is this a monarchy or a Republic going forward as we build this young nation? He said, it's a Republic if you can keep it. This November election will determine whether we are able to keep this Republic and not have it descend into a dictatorship as has befallen so many other countries. That's what's on the line. It's everything. It's everything we stand for as Americans.
So people will understand, Women will understand it. They'll be reminded of rights that their mom said that they don't have any more. Everything about that hurts. Guys. If you're not following us over on Rumble, do so. Make sure you'd like this video at some point in time. Can we just break down how weird it is what she just said? This is a classic female argument, the argument to wandering and meandering thought processes. I don't know what else you call
this men. You know what I'm talking about, women. You have been, you have done. This doesn't mean men don't do it. I just see it in women more often. She just claimed that the Supreme Court is living in the 1700s. Then she did did an argument to the 1700s by talking about Benjamin Franklin, did she not? Was that not just what happened? I just heard her say that it's a Republic if you can keep it. Then she talked about abortion. A created right that was corrected.
It didn't exist in the 1700s then they created it in the 70s and then they fixed it with the Dobbs decision. She talked about how machine guns didn't exist back then, except they did. It's the same story that Joe Biden talks about how you can't own a cannon, except you can. You can own a cannon today if you are so inclined. For like 10,000 bucks you can go by yourself a flipping cannon right now. You can have it shipped to your home. It's not even considered a
firearm. Did you know that you can have a cannon today? It's something that'll blow a hole in the side of most armored vehicles that the federal government would run around in law enforcement. Yeah, you can have it. You could put a 12 LB cannonball at whatever amount of charge you want to put behind it and send that sucker down range. You can also own a trebuchet if you're so inclined. You're responsible for what you
do with it, by the way. If you hurt somebody, you're still legally liable, just like you were in the 1700s. What on earth was that Lady talking about? She went around meandering through all of the crazy. And the reason why they do this is because they are trying to seed you with false information. That is the werewolves. That is what the werewolves look like. They are the people that are lying to you so they can actually take the things that you want.
They want to win the game with secret information. I think she actually knows now. It's possible she doesn't. She claimed that she grew up in a trailer park, and maybe that's trailer park logic that you can just argue any piece that you want. You can pick off the the American buffet of Constitution or not Constitution based on what it is you're talking about. It's pretty incredible. But again, abortion, she hit that guns are bad, OK. We need to give Americans all these rights.
We need to do the democracy thing where everybody can come into this country and do whatever it is that they think they want to do here. Either we're a country of rules that operates as a constitutional Republic, which by the way, it was very not democratic, or we're not. You can't make the argument we have a we have a Republic if you can keep it. The question was a monarchy or Republic. A monarchy is where you have a very powerful executive that essentially just ruled by Fiat.
Oh, you know, kind of like how Democrats want to rule. We're about to have that election. We're about to have that discussion in this country. And whether it's fair or not is another discussion. But what's amazing is the polls are not favorable to people that have bad ideas. Like, what's on my pad right here? It's not really negotiable. Why is it so close? They wonder, Here's Kamala Harris, who you must actually, at this point sort of feel pity
for. Has there ever been anybody in American politics who was so out of her depth and given so much air time to just, It's like a rope and she just hangs herself with it. She's an expert noose tire. Even when they give her a tiny piece of rope, she's like, oh, I can make a noose for my head. I can slip that on and choke myself out. Watch this weird thing. Like, what on earth is she even saying? People are going to be discerning. I think they're not. I think the opposite of what
Kamala Harris is saying is true. I know it's Monday. Let's get started. Here we go. Here's Kamala Harris. We can't help it. That's not Kamala Harris. This is Kamala Harris. Why is the race so close? These races are always close. It's it's the election of the president of the United States, and everyone in an election for president of the United States will critically examine, follow the issues and make a decision.
The importance of the passage of time is that as time passes that it is important as the passage of time is always relevant to the passing of time. What is she talking about? You think that people in this country are informed? You think people actually know and make critical decisions? No, they make emotional decisions. They make stupid decisions all the time.
You know who also knew that? The people who founded this country, that's why they took really important things away from the people and they kept a buffer zone. They said, hey, you might make good decisions locally, like picking your state legislature, because you'll know that person. They're going to go work in a State House that's down the road from you, unless you live in Texas, in which case it could be
hours and hours and hours away. But most places you could probably ride a horse to where the State House was from where you lived. Might take a day or two, but you could get there. You could go watch that debate. You're not all going to be able to go to Washington, DC, so you're going to elect one person by the popular vote. That's going to be a congressman.
And then you're going to have your state legislatures where you actually have some accountability for them and they're going to appoint the senators. There's not supposed to be direct election of senators that broke our country. And there's also not supposed to be a direct election of the president because the president's not not supposed to represent like some populist king. It's not supposed to happen.
What a moron. You can't make the argument for democracy and also claim that we have this Republic and that you care about the constitution except when it's inconvenient the constitution. You either take it all or you don't. These people with their pick and choose things is how you end up with Kamala Harris saying whatever the hell that was. Which makes no sense. It's non-stop with these people. They can't defend their stupid policies because they don't stand on their own 2 feet.
And it continues over and over and over again. There are more examples of this than there are not. I'm going to tell you about the Dobbs decision here just because this is, like I said, one of the one of the tenants, one of the planks that the Democrat machine wants to push forward is that Roe V Wade being overturned was one of the worst things. And they want to mobilize people on it. They think that's what won them the 2022 election.
When it comes to giving them the closest minority in the House and also giving them that just razor thin majority in the Senate, this is the incredible thing. They're arguing that Republicans have done something terrible by appointing a Supreme Court that basically ruled in favor of the Constitution, saying there is no constitutional right to an abortion. So you can't do it at the federal level, Knock yourself out of the state level, write the laws and then evaluate them as they come in.
But the claim is, is that they ended the constitutional right to abortion. That's actually in this, this is ACNN piece. And that was ACNN where we heard Kamala talking, right? Setting off a fierce fight for reproductive rights at the state level. Abortion is emerged as a key issue. Why is it a key issue? Because the media is pushing it as a key issue. It's a stupid issue. It's a state issue, so it shouldn't even be a federal
question. But here's the other thing that's really disturbing, probably the worst thing that I've heard. Fourteen states have a total or near total ban on abortion. Texas, Alabama, Idaho, Tennessee are the big ones that we've been hearing about. That's what they're claiming. But abortion rates have reached a decade long high in the United States. Why is that? Because we are bringing people into the border at a shocking rate.
We are bringing people into this country and we are aborting victims of rape, which is predictable. And they have thrown so much money into raising abortion awareness to get people. They've actually promoted abortion as a positive good in this country, despite the fact they're killing off babies. The estimate says that there were more than 1,000,000 abortions. It's an 11% increase last year, so a 1,000,000 abortions, 11%
increase since 2020 alone. And there are some that don't even report it. It's possible that they've actually seen a 26% increase in certain areas. That's a lot. That's a shocking amount. 2/3 of them would have been covered by this abortion pill case that was going in front of the Supreme Court, which they did not rule on based on whether or not they were merits to the case they ruled on based on standing, which means that they didn't
have the right to bring such a case. 642,700 were medical abortions is their claim. In other words, taking pills to induce abortion. It's pretty incredible that they put this much effort into it. Again, that was CNN. Then you end up with this one from ABC. These are the legal challenges and again, they're they're, they're championing and cheering. How many abortions were had in the last year that so many women are having these abortions? Whatever happened to the party
of safe, legal and rare? They've absolutely abandoned any principle that makes any bit of sense. They can't defend their thoughts. So now they've just gone into zealotry. They're showing pictures, by the way, this last one over here. This is the where is it here? This is the the CNN piece. Those girls in the front that you're seeing that are crying and hugging each other, they're crying out of happiness because because the Dobbs decision overturned it.
And the women that are screaming in the background that are wearing the green shirts, they are aboard every baby all the time. It's a fundamental failure of a society to not believe that having children is it is an actual good. It's the only reason that the federal government should have any involvement with the the whole tax argument of why marriage matters.
The only reason is because of the next generation, because governments are incentivized to have more citizens because otherwise who the Hell's going to pay the bills when people get old enough to stop working? Governments actually have a vested interest in growing population, and we're not interested in this country and having more Americans raised and born in America under American values.
We're only interested in importing people and having less and less people that are from here that are forced in the values that are from here. So of course they hate the Constitution and the 1790s are abhorrent to them. Those are people who are going to be resistant to the program. The program is is the government is the God and gives you the good. So don't worry about your babies. We're going to import people, come in and do work. And by the way, we're going to
also let them vote. We're going to let them pick us so that we can continue to be in charge. It's very short sighted because where the hell does it go? I don't understand where it goes. There's no way that this works out in their favor, which is why we keep seeing failure after failure of people who care about what's going on with the border. They're like, hey, don't you see
some problems in your policy? And the American voters are kind of going, yeah, more people are starting to open their eyes because people like Aaron Stevenson, who's come forward and been a whistleblower coming out of people that have come out of DHS, people that have come out of FBI, people that have come out of the vetting agencies, Border Patrol agents that are coming forward now. They're like, look, whatever you think we can do, we can't do it. And we're going to show a couple
arguments in this. Watch Liz Warren, who has gone from being somewhat sane in the 90s to just being an unhinged lefty as long as she can get elected. A woman from Oklahoma, right, Who's going to get me a beer now? She represents the the poor people of Massachusetts. Isn't that right? Like here she is just getting owned by facts. The facts don't care. She's just wrong. The numbers are overwhelming in favor of a a guy like Donald Trump. Why is the race so close?
Oh, that's Kamala. We can't do too, Kamala. Sorry. Here's Elizabeth Warren, equally cringy but here. We go There have been more than 6.9 million apprehensions at the southern border thus far in Biden's term. There were just over 2 million in Donald Trump's entire term. What did the president do wrong? Now, this isn't about what the president did wrong.
Remember, on the very first day that he was sworn into office, President Biden asked Congress both for the resources and for comprehensive immigration reform. The Republicans blocked it, blocked it, blocked it, blocked it. Donald Trump didn't have that either, Senator, He didn't have that either. And there were two million during his entire term last fall. The president tries to deal with the problem that is presented to him. He can't deal with it if Congress and the Republicans
continue to block him. And so the president is using the tools available to him but to create border security, but he doesn't have the resources because the Republicans are blocking access. What? Who does she talk to that hears this? Kamala Harris just said that people are very informed and they make a critical decision and that's how these elections get done. Does anyone then look at that what that woman just said and believe her?
You're telling me that under the exact same laws in immigration, Donald Trump had 2 million and Biden had three and a half acts as many, and we have six more months to go in his first term, Huh? This doesn't make any bit of sense. It's insane. And anybody that was paying attention knows that they were celebrating it. They've rescinded all of the Donald Trump executive orders on day one. That was the first thing he did with a stroke of a pen. But now that's coming home to roost.
And it turns out it's really shitty to run on bad policy. So they're running. They're trying to get something else again, open borders, white supremacy, racism, nobody likes the Constitution, abortion for all and the tranny flag, trans, the kids, Those are the things. And the last one is gun control. Those are the things you're running on.
They're fundamentally UN American and they don't help anybody that lives in America. And that's why they have to run this because this debate is shaping up to be an absolute massacre. Let's just assume that Joe Biden isn't cognitively impaired on that day that they got him doped up with whatever The Alchemist comes up with.
And it's fair to say that he'll actually come out there and be hyped up. Like we saw him at the State of the Union where he's like trying to do like push ups and stuff. Like Rocky, He's going to do some jumping on the top of the stairs. Real possible. They're going to get him as doped up as possible to do whatever. He comes in at full speed. He's got nothing on the week. He's going to basically be resting until it happens. I think it happens on Thursday.
So he's going to be resting until then. And whatever they dope him up with, he's going to still have to defend a crap record, a garbage record that nobody likes. Almost 7 million so far. It'll be 7,000,000 by the end of the next month. It might be 7,000,000 by the end of the next couple weeks, 2 weeks. So you're going to be at 350% more illegals. And then they go like, well, how come Biden seems to be losing the Latino vote?
Maybe because the people that are coming in illegally are putting pressure on the job market for people that came here and are first generation Americans working to get their foothold. And how about the people that came here legally are probably really pissed. The people that can actually vote that are Americans and Hispanic should be furious that their family members had to wait long times, that they went through the right process. Of course you're going to piss those people off.
But the Biden administration can't figure out why anybody wouldn't be mad because all Hispanics are the same, by the way, and All Blacks are the same. This seems to be the Democrat talking point. I want them to run with this, make them stand on their record with this. To be clear, the question is why is Joe Biden losing ground with some Latino voters right now? Well, I don't know. I think that you got to play this thing out and see actually how it works.
Latino voters are like everybody else. They move around from space to face. You see this with African American voters as well. The point of the matter is most Americans want a safe and secure country. They want a stable president. They want somebody that is fighting for them. And at the end of the day, I think that they're going to vote for Joe Biden. There's no evidence they will.
At the end of the day, if they want to stay a safe and stable president and they want economic security, they want a country that's safe, you should vote the opposite. And what's fun is for me that we've got this piece that I found over the weekend and and this was run on a Sunday. So that may be like a high sort of Newsday when people are looking for the Sunday paper, but they go to the Internet
instead. This story was written by a guy named Phil Mattingly. Five ways a second Trump administration would be different than the 1st. I don't know if they were trying to pitch me on Donald Trump, but if this is the case, it sways me more than anything that I've read on the right by a lot. OK. The claim is that Joe Biden was on clean up duty. I'm sorry, this is a different article. This is the this is the story of how they have a hard time with
with the first debate. So let me let me go back to the the new one here. So Phil Mattingly, I've got on the screen. I've got it on my screen too. It's a little bit more than a month before the Iowa caucuses says Republican political operatives were sitting in a Washington bar taking through the dynamics of his party for the presidential primary. This is a Republican strategist sitting here. And they said the one thing that has changed dramatically. This is now Trump's party.
Everything has changed around him to his benefit. Six months looking forward. He's a convicted felon. He's a presumptive Republican nominee. By the way, that conviction and the felony also resulted in record-breaking, record-breaking fundraising, which is kind of hilarious. That was a massive backfire on
their end. But there's other factors that they say is going to validate an overarching point where Republicans have actually closed ranks for the first time since 2015. They've closed ranks around Donald Trump because they've actually been able to see what is going on in a clear way. This weaponized government. They are seeing that the that the wolves, that the werewolves
are operating. And people are starting to get a pretty good instinct of that small voting bloc of two werewolves in the village that are trying to kill off people that are not them. Men are like, hey, they keep pointing fingers at stuff. They seem like the real problem here. That's secret police. There's a reason why you go after the intelligence agencies if you want to go ahead and capture your government. They've got the secret knowledge. They are the secret informed people.
That's the FBI. That's going to be the CIA. That's going to be DHS as well. By the way, folks, the people that have access to the statistics, that have access to the information and can give it in a way that is beneficial to them only that's the real thing. And we're seeing Republicans go, oh, this is the reason why the mayor Lago, the MAR a Lago raid, sorry, I'm going to say it correctly, the MAR a Lago raid and the, and the lethal force thing is so foolish to me.
It actually makes the point that the FBI treated Donald Trump like a petty drug dealing criminal that I dealt with on my first day on the job at the FBI. They actually are making the point for us. They treated a former president like they treat scumbags in Washington, DC Southeast. What is a better argument for weaponized government then saying we have two tiers of people and it's not the wealthy and the poor? It's not a class based argument like it's always been in all of my life.
I've always believed that if you had enough money, you could probably get away with something. And if you don't have enough money, then you're the one who's going to get screwed. That's kind of the way justice has worked, quote UN quote justice in the American system. If you can afford a really good attorney, they will probably be able to come up with something. That's not what we're seeing right now. What we're seeing is A2 tier that is based on political preference.
Andy McCabe, Peter struck, Lisa Page, they got a settlement from the FBI for being treated meanly. They got paid out by our Justice Department. Garrett O'boyle still unpaid 22 months. Marcus Allen just had to finally fight 27 months to get settled for something that he was righteous in the 1st place and the FBI smeared and slandered him. Me still not made whole. 14 months no pay, folks.
That's what's sitting in the back of my mind when I wake up every day and I'm a little bit pissed about the Bureau. It's 14 months of this garbage, OK, They take care of their own. And the, and the raid at Mar a They dropped the veil for that raid, and it continues to be one of the overwhelming, most proud moments in my life that I was kicked out of the Bureau before they did that raid because it said that I was no longer fit to serve in an agency that was willing to go do that thing.
Do you get it? The wolves, The werewolves are those that have secret information and are trying to dole it out. The problem is, is that there's only so much you can hide when you are rabidly lobbying on behalf of things that are favorable to you and you're going after what's good in the public interest. And this has brought it together.
These things that they're talking about in this particular article, it actually sells me more on a Trump presidency than a lot of things #1 the lawmakers have changed. They used to be all kinds of people working against Donald Trump. Now the people that are getting into office are either MAGA or they are not getting into office. That's a big deal for Republicans. A little bit more solidarity would be a good deal. The judges are in favor.
We now have federal courts. Remember, Donald Trump's sort of lasting legacy in the judiciary was that he was able to get more and more federal judges approved. That's Mitch McConnell's actually only good point in my book in the last couple years is that the guy actually got federal judges approved. So we have a favorable court
system. Doesn't mean there's not some lefty loonies out there that are going to do dumb things, but overwhelmingly we're seeing the judges move, you know, dramatically and specifically in favor of the 1790s America, the one that actually cares about the Constitution. It's a big deal. It actually means something.
In my personal case too, which I might bring up later on, policy makers, the people that are actually trying to get bills forward get it. And they are moving more and more towards the things that favor what America First or America Only types are interested in. All of these means that the House is getting an order. The biggest problem with Donald Trump's first presidency was
chaos, right? He was trying to get his footing and he kind of sucked at it. I'm saying I don't see a ton of evidence that that he's fixed that problem with personnel with getting his messaging right. He's talking about a new headquarters for the Bureau. CNN is worried about it. That actually reassures me in a way that that anything from Fox would not. His advisors are more in lockstep. All this stuff is great. And then the candidate himself, he's talking about straight up a
revenge tour. If you're going to get what's good for the goose is good for the gander. If they're going to use these insane things, we're going to use the same tools. That's what they're talking about. And he maybe has a better idea about it because he's facing prison in in Rikers Island right now. He's facing detention by the state of New York. We like that's the biggest advertisement for Donald Trump that I've seen coming out of the Sunday. CNN main page five ways.
The second administration would be different. All of it basically says that they're aligned in there in lockstep. Good, outstanding. I certainly hope so. Meanwhile, they're doing cover jobs over here. This is an ABC piece I think. No, this is actually still Cnni have like 3 CNN pieces and they're almost all back-to-back here. Check this one out. Ready. They're, they're doing this cover I told you about this last
week. They're covering the fact that former presidents always get screwed up in debates. And you know how we know? Because the great Barack Obama himself in October of 2012 needed Joe Biden to step up and help out because he did a bad job in his first debate performance. And why is that? It's because presidents are busy with very important things.
They're very important. They have a lot going on and they can't waste their time worrying about debates, even though that's all Joe Biden's going to be doing for the next like 5-5 days and he's been doing it for the last couple days as well. He's basically taking like an 8 day vacation so he can do a debate for one or two hours. That's how much they got to get this guy charged up. But yeah, presidents are steeped in pros is what David Axelrod
said. They haven't debated in four years and they know it. Here's the only weird thing. Trump also used to be president. So he hasn't debated in eight years or four years like he did in 2020. It's nonsense. They're they're sitting here covering for Biden as best they can, knowing that it's going to look really, really bad on Thursday. We all know it. But the reason doesn't even have to be his performance. Like I said, even if he's juiced to the gills, his reason is going to be this.
I don't know why I keep holding up this notepad, but I'm telling you, it's all in the notepad. It's been like this for weeks. It's been available to us who have been watching since day one of this presidency. The priorities are not in line with American priorities. They're jacked up. So that's why I'm going to recommend again, we got to see them stay in the pocket. You got to stay in the pocket with truth, with accuracy, with knowing what's going on. And you will destroy the ability.
Because once you do that, you will see that the partisanship on the other side is not in favor of the villagers. It's in favor of this evil that is killing off our people and our country, our our national ethos. You ready? This is the technique told by a comedian who I love. This is what the argument was about. I was so right. What happened? OK, you're winning and they just start saying that crazy shit out of nowhere. Just know in that moment you've won the fight, OK?
All right? Don't get mad. Bob and weaved slip all of that shit. Maybe you guys, you got a little dip. Just let that. Slide stay in the. Pocket of the argument. OK, it's over. The argument is over. You've won. Just take a knee and run out the clock. The argument is over if you just stay in the pocket here and you just dodge all the nonsense. I mean, they've even called Trump. They've talked about Trump's
manhood, have they not? That's why they had the Stormy Daniels testimonies over and over again. Just salacious garbage. The border sucks. You're transing the kids is not good. Nobody wants it. You have record abortions. Are you really proud of killing off a million babies last year? Is that what you want your legacy to be on as the Catholic president of the United States? Seriously, what a flip and let down. The economy is garbage. The inflation has made things unaffordable.
People can't buy houses. Everything was better when I did it. Everything is worse when you did it. And drop the mic. Just take a knee and let him run out the clock and defend the indefensible. And by the way, your racial policies are terrible. Your crime stats are awful. You can claim that they're better, but we know that you left out all the big cities where the big crimes are happening. You're a liar and people should see it. Make them defend that.
Make them defend the record that doesn't actually have any defense. And when you do that, you will expose exactly the vicious and angry and the lying. Again, the reason that this administration and the reason why the lefties for the last probably decade and 1/2 had been running after the intelligence community is because they want the secret information in the minority. They want to control the narrative for the majority. So the uninformed majority loses, even though they make up
more people than not. As long as they can keep people ignorant, they win. And that is what we're all about on this podcast. We are all about pushing that information forward. If you guys want to support our show, you guys can always go visit my friends over at Matt Hat Jerky. They have a code right now, USA, go to matthatjerky.com/kyle. So they know that we sent you. That's going to tag your account coming in, so we'll get credit for it. But use USA. You'll get 30% off your first order.
And if you've been doing something you know by using it and you've already made an order and you can't use the promo code that we already give you, go again, go to matthatjerky.com/kyle. Use USA. Catch yourself 30% off some of the best jerky in the world. As far as I can tell. They have some that are USDA prime cuts. They are tender, they are moist. They are very, very non leathery.
As I told my daughter the other day, she doesn't know a dot Martin is, but I said, hey, usually eating beef jerky is like eating a Doc Martin and she didn't know that I don't like eating boot leather. I do like eating meat that's been dehydrated. You guys want to go there? Mad Hat Jerky, matt2tshat1tjerky.com. Fair enough. All right, I think we've covered an awful lot for today. I've got a palate cleanser for you. But before we do, how about a
five star review? This one is coming from G Man for Equal Justice. Now G Man for Equal Justice gave us a three star review that I took dramatically to heart and it's why we let off the show the way we did today as I promised G Man for Equal Justice. Do I take it to be a former FBI person? But let me know otherwise. You can always reach out at kyleserafin.com and do the contact me if you want to send me a note of some kind.
We have a lot of former FBI agents that are furious and they want to know that truth is being represented and we're going to do it fairly. They know their agency was captured, but that means we still have to be accurate. This one says keep fighting for the whistleblowers and explosing the malfeasance at the FBI. Keep fighting Julie Kelly and those supporting her no matter whether our side or not.
Guys like Bongino, no one understands the control of the districts, especially the Southern District of New York has over everything with the criminal side of the FBI and similarly the Department of State and the CIA over the national security branches in CT. That's counterterrorism and CI. This is some inside baseball type stuff folks. The number of agents knowing what's right from wrong is rapidly diminishing as retirements and recruiting since the Obama comedy era has changed
the compositions of the agents. It's the things we keep talking about here on the show. Bush created the Intel Division to create an entire section of deep leftist believers. Those are the werewolves. The entire FBI cannot do what's right because they're broke by doing what's right. They pulled the stuff away from us, folks.
This has been a long seated plan of infiltrating and they're in here working against us. When you know, you know that's what the that's what the suspendables are all about is lifting up that veil and showing you who's there. We're letting you peek during the night when the werewolves are killing and we're telling you why. And that's a spot on answer. This intelligence agency that is also a law enforcement agency means they can do both the knowing and the killing at the same time.
They are doing the manipulating and they are also doing the kinetic action. It's the most dangerous thing in this country. It is antithetical to American liberty. And that is why I continue, I continue to advocate against having an FBI at all. And so do some former agents. Now they're starting to look and realize that if we can't break these two up, we can't have it
at all. At the very minimum, you need to get rid of the national intelligence mission, the domestic intelligence part of it. We cannot have a secret police in this country. It's so critical. All right, how about a little bit of light heartedness as you go to start your week? This is a little sympathy for all of you mothers working at home who are nursing. We've got that going on in my house. The the stress and the struggle is real. I get it, I see it.
I've seen it over and over now in my house. So this lady, her name is Big Merla MERLA, you can find her on Instagram and some other places. She actually does a whole musical thing. You can actually e-mail her if you put a request, I guess at Big Merla dot business at Gmail. So there you go. I want to hawk all people's credibilities when we take their song and play a little bit of it. This stuff is great. Playing Missy Elliott with kids toys have a taste.
She queuing around baby invade my house she call me. Mother what? She gonna run this town. I gained 50 lbs. Beauty sagging down ladies with the paper ripples. Call me cow when I seize my crown. My icky sticky couch. I'm doing Keep my lust. Sweep my tiles. Mama. Baby's calling now. Parents falling out. Postpartum broken out. Sympathies, ladies. You go through a lot to bring people into this world. That's why. That's why we know abortion is terrible.
There's a cost everything that is good cost you something. Make sure you guys have liked this video. Make sure you share it out there and go follow the incredible talents of big Merla. Appreciate her. If you guys want to send us questions, comments or especially sarcastic remarks. Those are my favorite, especially sarcastic remarks with like no response required. Kyle seraphin.com to contact me there. Otherwise, make sure you are supporting all of our sponsors
and including my pillow. Use my promo code over there. Kyle, same as all the others. Appreciate it guys. I hope you have a wonderful afternoon and God bless you and we will see you again. But in seats 0930 Eastern Time 8:30 here in Texas America on the Kyle Serafin Show. See you then. Thanks for listening to the Kyle Serafin Show streamed live weekdays on rumble.com/kyle Serafin. Follow Kyle on Twitter, True Social and Instagram at Kyle Serafin.