Prepare to hear the truth from a real whistleblower, an American Patriot, here's civil liberties, enthusiasts, Second Amendment, Defender and indefinitely suspended FBI agent. Kyle seraphin. Hello, my friends and welcome to the Kyle serif and show. Today's Wednesday. Show on February 15th. I've got a whole bunch of things to tell you today. I don't like it.
When people say we've got a great show for you, I have no idea if it's going to great show, we haven't done it yet, and you don't know if it's going to be great either. So, you're going to stick around to find out. I got a couple updates on some of the whistleblowers that I'm friends with and let you know what they've been doing on Capitol Hill, we're going to talk about a piece that says gotten an awful lot of tension on my end for the FBI's targeting of radical traditionalist.
Flicks, probably a step too far. I got a whole list of things. I'm going to talk about it. We want to go over the Michigan State shooting. I think that is a troubling situation, but I think that we should have an honest conversation about what that means. And what it doesn't mean, let's talk about a little bit about what happened in to some individual students. That were visiting, the Smithsonian wearing pro-life gear yet another targeting of the federal government going.
After an agenda that they are not authorized to infringe on and it looks like the ACLU is going to step in so that's fantastic. Want to talk about a piece that Julie Kelly did about the proud boys. Trial and maybe something we can all kind of take away from that, including is the government doing entrapment. Might do some live grabs here because I'm I'm doing this solo with no dr. Phil, no producer, Phil rather dr. Phil someone else altogether.
Although funny story just came to my mind when I was a kid. I grew up in Dallas, and my younger brother played on a basketball team. And dr. Phil was his coach, so that's weird before he was dr. Phil with Oprah. He was dr. Phil, the basketball coach For my younger brothers, small, Middle School, basketball team. We're going to talk about a weaponization of the IRS again. Lois Lerner 2.0, got just the news article that I want to run through and kind of make sure
that you are aware of it yet. Another example of the federal government trying to pick winners and losers. Once again, it is not an opportunity that the FBI that the, the IRS that the Commerce department at the Small Business Association, should be taking on themselves to censor speech or thought. But it It mean they're not doing it and we're getting all the way down to the front line guards at the sodium, so we'll get into that. Let's, let's go ahead and start first right here at me.
See if I can open up this web page for you. There it is. Fantastic, let's do a quick move. So we're going to talk about the Michigan, Michigan State shooting, first and foremost, I think that was on some, a lot of people's minds. I'm seeing a lot of pro gun control posts. I'm seeing people talk about why this keep happening.
I saw a really good piece the other day and I was actually so on. A show with on a television show where they were before at the segment before, talked about, if this had happened in South East Detroit or in South Side, Chicago, there would be no conversation whatsoever. I think there are, of course. Correct.
This is a big problem that we are willing to talk about only gun control and, you know, all the other kind of nonsense that people get really excited about regarding firearms, safety, when it affects a certain group of people, People and it has nothing to do with what it's others. The discussion was, is it class-based? Is it race-based? I think that it's none of those
things. I think it's just whenever there's a political opportunity for politicians to move forward, an agenda that some of their base thinks is really important and this case gun control then that's when we're going to see it. So let's talk about the Michigan State University. Shooting at a really weird window into this particular thing. I got a DM on Twitter, asking me to join in co-host a space. If you're not familiar with the spaces program, it's essentially
Car panel or like a chat call. It reminds me of the old AOL chat rooms but we ended up having over 17,000. People come into the room at some point in time and listeners, you know, between 2000 and 3000 listeners listening in on what we were doing. Just kind of live tracking what we knew and when we knew it in the middle of the event, in the middle of this active shooter
until he was actually mitigated. And I had the strangest experience because I was asked to co-host that I didn't have a plan or agenda and I'm not a new Castor by trade, I'm criminal
investigator. But what I do have a lot of experience on is sitting in a car and listening to a police scanner and that's something I used to do and I've done thousands of hours of it. It's not an FBI skill per se but it was a safety skills that I developed when I was running my team because I wanted to be able to see what was happening in the area. I was in and what was going on in in the general community at large and more importantly, what
was the public safety aspect? Was there a fire department coming out to where we were? Was there going to be a police officer dispatch? For us, it's a huge especially when you're in a low visibility or a plainclothes surveillance
role. What you're trying to do is avoid any kind of attention from anybody and law enforcement attentions, probably the worst kind because everybody sees when the cops come onto a on a street, and having the cops come and stop by your vehicle, when you're doing surveillance, is as kind of a no-go. It burns you. And you have to explain to them who you are and then of course
they're going to run away. So we're looking at this, you know this case this active shooter situation, here's the things I'll pull up CNN because I think That's a good source. Any, in this case, talking about the gunman, so I'll access that. But one of the things that we were doing is I just pulled up a scanner and it brought me to the understanding that a lot of people have no idea what to do in a real critical emergency.
Where information is light, and they are dealing with a lot of unknowns, particularly, you know, they don't have a connection into law enforcement. So, what do you do when you find out? Hey, I just got a text message, I'm a student. And I got a text message saying, there's an active shooter on Mike. Piss or in the neighborhood of your children's school or in the vicinity of where you work and you're getting the shelter-in-place notice like, what is the action?
What is the plan? And if you don't have a plan, by the way, you're not going to have one in the moment, you're going to panic, that's what people do. So we started getting students actually coming into the Twitter space and they were interested in, you know what people knew that's, you know, they couldn't turn on the news. So Twitter was their Lifeline for a number of these people. And what I did is I just started broadcasting a scanner for Ingham County. In in Michigan State.
And we were able to access the scanner for the East Lansing the greater East Lansing Public Safety Division, which include both fire department, and we got the Battalion Chiefs coming in and saying, what are we to do? And different medic engines that were moving and and fire department engines, that were moving around the city. And then also a number of police departments including those who came in on the mutual Aid. And then we're accessiblestl to the dispatcher there.
A couple comments on that number one. Absolutely. Fantastic job by the Actors who were working that crisis, that that active shooter scenario. It is an overwhelming amount of information to keep track of and they seem to be doing an outstanding job just like you would expect your Public Safety professionals to do. They really earn their paycheck that night.
So just a great shout out that you know, unsung heroes is is dispatch and the people that are maintaining calm and Order and moving units around and they were clearing buildings and you know, working with the incident command structure in order to to Eight this threat which eventually ended up being this gentleman right here that we see in the photo. This is a 43 year-old Anthony, Dwayne McRae.
A couple things about him. It sounded like he was, he pled guilty to a firearm charge in 2019, he was sort of let off the hook. He was carrying a concealed weapon without a permit. Which is a felony in Michigan. I'm not real crazy about that, felony. I'm be curious to know more about this guy and whether he was on any sort of mental health situation, whether he was being
medicated, whatever. But he plead guilty to a misdemeanor year and a half on probation, still had his Firearm rights and then unfortunately turned around and ended up killing a number of people two nights ago, which is really awful. That is not the fault of the gun. That is a person. There's a person that made some bad decisions and obviously made other bad decisions and that resulted in the loss of life.
So there's some things we can do to mitigate those sort of situations, one of them is, if you are of age and you are legally able, you should train own and carry a firearm, I will vehement Lee advocate. On that, I do it everywhere I go. I'm obviously trained as both a former law enforcement and and former military professional but when it comes to training you can get training. A lot of places. A lot of it, you can do on your
own. There's wonderful access to a resources on YouTube teaching you drills teaching you grip, you can dry fire. And then I would say once you feel comfortable enough that you can load handle and move around with your weapon, safely, go and attend a class, spend some money. This is your personal safety, it doesn't matter if you're 21. Old.
It doesn't matter if you're 45 years old, doesn't matter if you're 80 years old, if you have the hand strength to carry a firearm, you should do. So, and that puts you, in a infinitely better position, then someone who is hiding in a dorm room hiding in a cafeteria hiding in a locker room as we found out, was we listen to the scanner and just barricading a door and praying that nobody comes in that door. That tried to kill you. It's, it's a hopeless feeling.
I have to imagine, it's very helpless one way or another and there's no reason why you shouldn't mitigate that threat. If you can now obviously within the law, I'm not advocating for carrying places that you're not allowed to. I don't know what Michigan flaws are and carrying, but this is a thing you could do in a lot of places. And a lot of states are figuring out that, you know, having a firearm in the hands of capable individuals.
The good guy with a gun thing is many hundreds of thousands of times a year. It plays out in the favor of the American public which is to say that it's disrupts. A firearm related crime on the other end when somebody is trying to be an aggressor and is illegally using a weapon to do something. We're already dealing with. Does that say that you can't kill you can't you can't go up
and use a weapon in a robbery. In fact, you can't Rob, so all these sort of things, they're already against the law and gun laws are not going to change the game. So what you do is you look at the world as it lays and you try to fix it and and try to get back to something. That makes sense, which is that you're responsible for your own personal safety, it is your job to be your own first responder first and foremost with no caveats to that.
I No, that might Glover does a really good job talking about it. He has a company called fieldcraft survival. You can go there and you can buy tourniquets and things like that. I highly recommend you carry a tourniquet. I highly recommend, you learn how to take care of your own emergencies and we'll talk about why that came up.
So during this this Twitter spaces, we found out that one of the students had a roommate or a friend or something that had become overwhelmed by the circumstances and had gone into shock. Commonly just, you know, just overwhelmed catatonic fainted or passed out and the question is, what do you do? You're not in a situation where you can get an ambulance to you, although that may be the best situation in the long run. Make sure there's no underlying
medical problems. But you want to make sure that you have an ability to mitigate the potential risk that person has, which is mostly just a collapsed, are way. You want to make sure you can save, you know, people. And then if there was actually a kinetic threat of some sort of a gunshot wound or blunt force, trauma, somebody attacking you want to know how to do these things. To it's very easy to learn this stuff. A lot of the stuff is available on YouTube.
It's available on Rumble. I'm not necessarily Go to put out that content but I am going to talk about it today because it's totally relevant. And if it's the only thing you walk away with the show from, you'll be a better person for the rest of your life. So number one, learn CPR. That's that's number one, you must learn CPR. It's very easy when in doubt pump on the chest if there is a very, very slow pulse. 30 beats a minute or slower.
That's one every two seconds. You don't have to be a scientist to do it. You don't even need a watch, if it sounds like this bum. Boom. Bump start doing compressions. There's a reason why you need to do compressions even when the heart is still beating because what you're seeing is a slowing and we're not moving any, we're not moving any blood around the way, it should be.
So people are circling the drain usually at that point obviously this is in the like if you feel your buddy, who's a, you know, feel their pulse in there, they run marathons or something or they're an Ironman, this is not the person you're doing this on. I'm talking about somebody who's symptomatic and has no pulse. That is that is moving down the the We want to do something about that and you can do that when there is a pulse till you don't have to wait for it to stop.
That's number one. Number two, you are generally speaking at, almost all states. You are not criminally liable. Even if you fail, if you attempt to in good faith, provide Aid to an individual, who is having a medical crisis or has a trauma? You can go and do the best you can. And you are generally safe from that prosecution. If you don't, if you're not successful. So don't be afraid go out there. I used to tell people when I taught What we call care Under Fire which is just sort of
emergency action medicine. I used to tell students FBI agents who were training that the number one goal should be do something most. People do nothing, most people do, nothing in all situations and their life. They do. They always talk about the fight or flight syndrome, but there's really three possibilities. It's fight flight or freeze, so many people freeze, most people freeze these days they don't take action and you'll know whether you're an action taking individual or not.
On your preparation for it the way that you're actually inoculated against the stress of that moment. So like I said, touch the patient touch the person. This is a human being that's having an emergency do something about it. If you can, there's no reason not to and if you're not successful and somebody gets there and they know more things, let them do it to. That's fine. It's great, CPR, learn it, it's very easy. You can pick it up by watching videos. You don't need a CPR card to do
CPR. You just need to push on the chest and know how to do rescue breaths. So, that's number one. Number two, I recommend people carry like a roll of gauze. It's very easy to do. You in your car carrying a backpack. If you're moving around, it doesn't weigh anything. And the other thing is the tourniquet, I will show you right now. I have a plate carrier sitting behind me. This is my plate carrier. That is my personal one. I have gauze right here, sitting
right there up front. And on the side is a tourniquet, it's actually sitting in a radio pouch, but this is my tourniquet. I carry a tourniquet whenever I'm doing firearms training, I carry a tourniquet in my car like three or four of them. Actually, this is an inexpensive tool that could save somebody's life. If they were having a massive bleed from one of their appendages, the arms or the legs.
We used to have a joke. I'd always see if I could get somebody to say that they were going to put a tourniquet on the neck when I was doing training and they would always somebody inevitably would always say that you apply a tourniquet for a head bleed. And I would say only a gs-15 or above for all the who work in the government, you know, gs-15 above no mental acuity at all. No thinking happening at all.
Just yes, men. If you are a gs-15, you can call me up or you can leave it in the comments below. By all means, comment about your gs-15 experience and why you're a good person and that's Okay, I will, I will accept it. There's plenty of good gs-15 so I'm sure but it's a good joke. Tourniquet. This is made by North American Rescue. It is the the cat tourniquet. The cat. This is the one that is the
standard for the military. It is the standard for most law enforcement agencies, it is the standard for the FBI. It is the standard for people who want people not to die from a bleed. That is a preventable death. Okay, these are very inexpensive. $30 is not a lot of money to carry around. They don't really go bad but break them out of the packaging stage them in a way.
You can watch videos on it. Maybe I'll do one but Days of tourniquet so that you can break it open and use it right away. Because any time that you're wasting is blood, that is being spilled blood that cannot carry oxygen anymore blood that you do not have to put back in somebody's body. You don't have it it's not carrying around with you very very few. Ambulances are carrying blood or blood extender products like hex and or whatever.
So it's just not common. The only people that generally have it are, you know, units that have a refrigeration. It's difficult to do. It's got to be thought out. It's got to be used right away. So if they don't know, there's trauma, it's generally something that they just keep it in. Emergency room, it goes into the trauma base. It's hard to put blood back in the body once it's gone and people suffer when they don't have blood. So put blood back in by keeping it in the first place.
That's the best move carry a tourniquet. Kari goes, the gauze is going to be for any kind of wounds that are junctional, that's going to be like your shoulders. It's going to be down in your hips where you can apply it. Your abdomen areas where you may need to stop a bleeding. That is not something you can apply a tourniquet to, you can tie it around things. You can put pressure on heads, things like that and absorbent cause great stuff to have.
So do that for yourself. Highly recommended. I did this whole podcast yesterday and it recorded with no audio, which is atrocious is the worst thing. So I'm doing it again and I'm going to run through an acronym that I think is really important.
Now when we talk about somebody who passed out on the floor in an active shooter situation, that's a very real possibility and in fact I did an after-action with some trauma surgeons and some paramedics who were being refreshed on their paramedic certification back in probably 20 18 and they were doing an after action of the Pulse Nightclub. Shooting 49, people lost their lives during that shooting seven of those people is it is my understanding from the the
debrief. I got seven of those people so about 14% of those people died needlessly because they collapsed into a position where they were not, fatally wounded, but they did die of what's called positional asphyxia. That's a hard thing to say. But essentially they collapse their own are way. They found himself in a corner of a room. They got a small as possible which is a totally reasonable thing to do when there's someone shooting at you and you have no cover.
You know, you're better. Move is probably to fight, but a lot of people are not prepared. Fight flight freeze. The freeze, the instinct is real. Seven people died from freeze. They got very, very small, they were wounded. They Crush their own. There are way they had a diminishing returns on the amount of oxygen, that they could recirculate, and, and minimal respirations, and that circled, and they ended up
perishing from that. And they could have been saved literally by pulling them off the wall and having them lay in what we call the recovery position. So, but a cover, what that is, you can I'll describe it as I For the students that were on the listening to the space. If you are just an audio listener, you can imagine this. I want you to imagine that you're going to put the victim or this person that has passed out on their left side.
That means their left hip, and their left shoulder or going to be on the ground there, right? Hip, and their right shoulder are pointing upwards. They are knife faced on the ground, okay? In order to keep them like that. The first thing you do is you pull the right knee and put that in kind of a Captain Morgan position. You just pull the knee. You can hold their body with your body or your knees. You literally just pull them up against You, you're going to put their whole body facing you
against your your thighs. And you're going to put a knee on the ground in sort of a triangular position, or a Captain Morgan, kind of like one leg extended, and that's going to keep them pinned up. Words, they don't roll over, then you need to work on the airway, the Airways easily accessible, you put their head in a neutral position and you use their left arm like a triangle putting their hand
under their ear. Once you do that you're going to have a stable base and then you can put the the right arm in the same way you're going to basically put it so that it's laying over it. It keeps their body from Clapping all those things, you can use the right arm and put it under on top of the left hand as well. So now you have two hands just like they're sleeping keeping
their head open. If they were to vomit or have any kind of obstruction, it's going to be able to be mitigated because they're an easy way where their body can clear it themselves. And even if they are struggling to breathe, it's going to help them, okay? It's a very easy thing to do. There's no medical knowledge required. There's no technology involved. It's literally grab somebody by the belt, pull them up onto that
side. So they're left side is facing the ground, put them against your body, pull their knee up, and now they are basically pinned in a good position. And this could save a life and would have saved Seven Lives. There's an acronym during trauma, there's an acronym that people who don't know what to do, can remember, it's very easy when you have somebody has a traumatic injury. Your thing to do is to march on, you need to March, okay?
And that is the the acronym that the military uses for self Aid and Buddy care. It's what the teacher will see the Tactical, casualty combat care, teaches law, enforcement and Military, how to handle active shooter, you know, blunt force, trauma, things like this. March there's one M. Usually, I like to say to the first m is movement move the patient to where you want to deal with them, but moreover that you can move them into the recovery position.
It's a perfectly good place to do a something. If you have to get back to them later you have them in a place where you could walk away deal with another patient, come back and deal with them while they're laying there in that recovery position. So, number one, M4 movement, but the real M. And the one that people always remember, is massive Hemorrhage, massive Hemorrhage means, big bleeds, like you took A liter of Coke and pour it on the floor.
That's how much blood we're talking about big blood. When there is a big pool of blood, you need to find out where it's coming from. And the only way that we're going to find a massive Hemorrhage is by exposing the patient's skin. So you got to look on the back. You got to look on the front. You got to look on both the legs. We do what's called a blood sweep. I would encourage you to go look
it up, how to do a blood sweep. I'm not going to go over it, but you're essentially just touching every part of the body front and back with your hands and checking your hands regularly, to see if there's blood and then if there is blood, you're going to try to find out where it's coming from, that's the goal of a blood sweep. And when you do that, that's your massive trauma. I'm sorry, your massive
Hemorrhage intervention. And the reason why is, as I mentioned earlier, once blood is out of your body, it's gone. It is gone. There's no way to put it back in in the field. So that is what carries oxygen and what I'm telling you march actually tells you the order in which a traumatic injury will kill you. The first is losing all your blood. Okay, so blood is number 1. Number 2 a.m. A, A is for Airway think of Airway as the container.
It needs to be solid container so it doesn't leak air out of it and that includes your mouth is not torn, open and doesn't have you no obstructions in it. Your throat, your your, your windpipe running all the way down into your lungs. And just being very simple about this, we're talking about your chest. Cavity is not compromised, it's not crushed and it doesn't have, it doesn't have holes in it,
which is a big deal. We are trying to make sure that the Integrity of the vessel all the way from your, your oral pharynx, and your nasal pharynx, your Open your nose all the way down to the bottom of your lungs are intact, okay. And if they're not we need to do things to stop that. That means maybe putting a piece of duct tape on it maybe putting a sliced open Capri-Sun, a gloved hand, there are things
that you can use a credit card. There's a lot of different techniques that you can use for field medicine that don't have to be special a plastic bag anything that will stop air from moving and you can either seal it down with tape or you can hold it with pressure. You want to stop and make sure that there is a there is a closed and Peyton are way so that we can get are from your mouth or a Actually the world in general down into your lungs, where you can actually move it
into your bloodstream. Okay. So that's massive. Massive Hemorrhage Airway are is respiration. That's the mechanical movement. That's your diaphragm flexing and relaxing and pulling air into your body. It has to pull it through your mouth and your nose down into your lungs. If you can't do those things then you need to have someone do it for you. And so that's where we move it. The intervention to the the Hemorrhage is going to be either packing a wound or doing a tourniquet.
The intervention to the airway is Making sure that the vessel is intact and then the intervention for respirations. If somebody's not breathing is to make sure that they breathe you breathe for them. That's what rescue breaths are. That's the CPR piece of it. Okay, after they are comes the C. C is for circulation. That's your heart. So once again, we need to have
blood in there in your body. We need to have are accessible to that blood and then we need to move that that blood around so that your body has perfusion to your brain and to your end organ. So those are the two most important things, essentially your kidneys and your brain with the too big. Has parts that have to because otherwise you get toxic and you can't filter out toxins.
So you'll die from that. And if you don't have oxygen going to your brain, then you will die as well because all the autonomic functions will cease and you won't do anything on your own. Okay. So we're doing those think. So sir, the CPR get that circulation that means you're checking the pulse. We're seeing. If somebody has a heartbeat, if they do great, if they don't we're beating for them with chest pumps. If you feel what your pulse is, it's probably 60 to 100 beats a minute.
That's how fast you should be doing CPR if you don't know anything about CPR and you've never heard this before, this will Change your life. If you ever have to do compressions, you can do one or two things. You can do the beat of Staying Alive by the Bee, Gees now.okay that in your head, that's what you're paying and it's beat. Beat beat beat beat, beat staying alive, staying alive. That's how you do your compressions.
Now, if you're a little bit darker and you've been doing this for a while, and it's something that you're familiar with. You can also do another one bites, the dust doo-doo-doo-doo-doo-doo-doo, dundun, dundun, dundun. Doom, doom. That's the speed, boom. Boom, boom. You're doing. You know, another one bites, the dust. When you're a paramedic, that's something you tend to hear a lot too, because you just hear in your head, but that's how fast your compressions need to be.
They need to be quick. None of this TV, like push, come on, push, that's nonsense. You push fast. You push hard and you do it and make sure there's someone there to relieve you. So CPR is your correction for. See, the last thing is H and that's either hypothermia or head trauma. There can be, that's usually like h, / H. So two M's, two h's, the
acronym. March, remember that if you ever in a scenario where you have to treat people who are wounded, if you come across a car accident, if you find someone who's fallen off a ladder, these are all the same types of traumatic scans. This is what we would do for a head to toe and you would start with these, okay? These are the biggest life threats that will kill people, and when it comes to head
trauma, there's not a whole lot. You can do you have to make sure you keep their heads, you know, supported and when it comes to hypothermia, that's that's cold. The people who have the worst outcomes when it comes to traumatic injuries. This includes Ed's penetrating trauma, if you're out, you know, hunting and you get shot in the leg, or you take that Arrow from somebody, because they are carelessly doing some bowhunting, you fall out of a tree stand and break your leg.
I don't really care what it is. You get attacked by an animal, whatever you roll your truck or your ATV. All these things are all trauma. The fastest way for you to have a bad outcome, is to be cold. You will die from the cold, plus, the trauma, okay? So exposure is a real real threat. You want to First, make sure that there's blood, make sure that those are make sure that there's a heartbeat and that Are stable and then you get them
warm. It is critical if you have ever been in an ambulance that is like, 95 degrees. It's because we're trying to get it closer to body heat. It's really awful to sweat your face off while you're doing CPR. But if it's cold outside, that's what you have to do, you have to keep it hot. You have to keep that thing. So if you're running somebody on a an Emergency like this, if you happen to grab somebody and dragged him to an emergency
room, keep the car hot. Turn on the heater be uncomfortable as the driver be uncomfortable as the person in the back seat, helping your friend, but It maybe keep it hot and I would say do not wait for an ambulance, if you have the ability to get somebody to an emergency room, if it really is serious. So, that's something that the studies have borne out. You don't need to wait for an ambulance. There's no special vehicle
power. It's just getting people to a surgical facility where they can do the real solution, which is generally referred to as bright lights, Cold Steel. That's what saves lives and Trauma. There are wonderful surgeons. They have incredible capabilities, but you got to get people to them. So, I spent a lot of time on this because I think it's super
important. The second thing about that is There is a technology once again, like this this streaming this scanner technology, that I was using, was really a potential Lifesaver for people. And it's not because I was using, it's just something that people should know of. You're never going to know how to use it. If you've already, if you've never downloaded it and you've
never used the app. So, I recommend that people download an app, the one that I personally use is called 5-0, 50 Radio Pro. It has a nice little rhyme to it 50 Radio Pro. It's about $3 in the App Store from Apple. I know what it costs on Android. I don't use that but if you were to do that, you can get a free version of it just has ads and it uses more data. And I didn't have time for that because I literally have done thousands of hours of streaming on that 50 Radio Pro.com.
I'm sorry. If I've already a pro, the app, download that and then listen to it, like go somewhere and listen to it or find out an area that you might be traveling. And listen in on it and spend some time listening to radio code. The way that people speak on radios is not very easy to understand if you've never listened to it, if your ear is not trained, they have certain things that you will get familiar.
With when you hear them, usually a police officer or a medic unit will start with calling out their call sign or their unit number. So they'll say 171 and then you'll hear the dispatcher respond, 171. That's a go ahead, 171, but they don't say all that. They just say 171, you heard another voice 171, then the person who said 171 the first time will speak and they'll say their message. I'm being dispatched to this. I'm going to go this. I had a report of this, you
know, I'm whatever. Sometimes they use 10 codes. The nice thing about the 50 Radio Pro, is that it actually has the 10 codes or at least a common set of 10 codes in the The app that you can literally tap it on and it'll say info, and it'll give you all the 10 codes. So when they say, you know, we're ten, seven or ten eight, well, we're tend to. What does that usually mean? A lot of departments are moving away from that, but it doesn't mean that they're not still out there.
So it's worth knowing that and when you're traveling and you're in a place that you're not familiar with, you might want to know how do the police communicate. Their, I often times they won't say Ten-Four and they won't say, yes, they'll say direct direct is a police code that. I don't know why they do it, but they do it.
They say, you know, you know, Say the, the dispatcher will give some information and then what you'll hear is the officer, the responding unit will say I'm direct or direct.
And that means they're going. And yes, it's an affirmative that they are doing the things that they said they were going to do. It's bizarre, if you're not used to hearing it, you don't want the first time to hear that is when somebody is moving around on your business campus or stalking you, you know, you're in the parking. Lot of a Walmart, trying to see if your spouse is okay, or whatever. There's a shooting, whatever. The horrible scenario is that comes to your mind.
You'd want to know what that is. And then the other thing is this, Carrie earbuds, you should carry earbuds. It's silly, like all the stuff, but like, if you want to be able to quietly, listen to 50 Radio Pro, because something crazy is going on. Put it in your little go back, set at your buds, weighs almost nothing, they're good. For a lot of things including like ear protection, if there's actually shooting because then you can keep your awareness of
what's happening. So simple, tools, situational awareness, increase cost $3. There's no reason not to have something like that. There's many other tools. That's just the one that I like, that's the one that I know, and I highly recommend having access to that. I got a little sidetracked here on the the active shooter But I think it's super important that we remember that. The answer is not gun control or we don't have more guns. There's 400 million guns in public circulation in the United
States alone. We are not getting rid of guns in this country in any meaningful way. It's not happening. So, regardless of what they say, regardless with the ATF comes out and tries to do, it does not matter. Guns will be a part of our lives for as long as I'm on this planet. And probably as long as my kids are on this planet, they're durable goods. They don't go bad and they are around forever so we might as well learn to be safe around them and have some contingencies worked out.
So carry your own and be smart, get training. Be somebody who is a part of the solution and not part of the problem who's complaining, who's going to come save me. You? You come save you. Nobody else is coming. It's just you, if you think about it, that way, it's much easier. All right, whistleblower, updates my buddy, Garrett, Steve
friend is on the hill today. Right now, Garrett has already testified on my buddy, George Hill, who you heard on our podcast, doing a long-form interview and prior intelligence analyst with the FBI has already spoken. They've been deposed, they are Contrary back and forth, you know, discussions and kind of the rumor that we've heard. And I've got some contacts outside of these guys who's basically shared that the Democrat side of this committee.
The weaponization committee has no interest in looking into the FBI at all and that should horrify everybody. The FBI is weaponized. There's no doubt about this. I will go on record saying it. Explicitly and I have examples and so do you. They've gone after people like, Mark out, they've gone after people who they've written. And saying that they're going to go after radical traditionalist
Catholics which is insane. They've gone after people that they claim are white supremacists, who have no instance of it, they are using Scare Tactics and they are doing some really crap work, despite the fact that there's also decent work going on inside the FBI, but there's an ideological Focus that is going on and permitted and it is bad news.
So the whistleblowers are telling me kind of that they're getting called in that the Republicans are trying to get to the bottom of it but it's a long time table and it's not going to be fast enough if they don't pass some bilateral support. Port for whistleblowers in general. It will not be successful. So the Republicans on the hill need to get together and figure out who on the other side wants
to do the right thing. They don't need a lot of votes but they better figure it out so that we have protections for whistleblowers or this is not going to get done because waiting until 2025 to event, examine what's going on in our FBI. Like we could have a much different uglier situation, develop in this country. And I think so many people are not concerned about the siop nearly as much or what we would call fifth generation Warfare.
Its fourth generation Warfare that It could Decay into that's a real possibility and if people aren't talking about it they're foolish everybody that I talk. So I talk to you. That has a serious understanding of how screwed up this country is right now is concerned that it will get what we call Kinetic, which is to say physical.
I don't want that, I don't want to be part of it, but it is a real possibility and if we're not honest about it and taking steps to try to mitigate that in a meaningful way. And that means a curtailed FBI and Intelligence on the domestic side. We're going to be in a bad space and it could happen, very, very quickly. So many people are talking about these You know balloons the Spy balloons and so on, it's all distractions. A lot of these things are distraction it doesn't mean that
doesn't need to be handled. It's just showing that we have a week Administration on many levels and this Biden Administration has gone fully into the pale by pushing on, you know, the the covid shot mandates and trying to root out the number of people that that are dissenting opinions and I'm going to get into that. Just a little further now. So let's get into the next article here. I've got a I think this is totally nuts. I'm going to throw this up on the screen here.
So this is an article from Life news.com or life site news. I believe is what they they go by that, right? Like news.com the article is entitled students ooh, Smithsonian after it kicked them out for wearing pro-life hats, they're literally wearing that. There's a picture here. If you're not looking on our Rumble stream which you should definitely come check out, this is from February 7.
So this is a week-old. I'm not trying to give you the, you know, the updates in the world that are happening in real time. That's not what I'm doing. I'm not a new site, I'm an analyst when it comes to this stuff and what I'm seeing is that you've got not the ACLU, which is What? I originally saw its the aclj filed, a lawsuit against the Smithsonian, National Air, and Space Museum, that used to be on my drive to work.
It's, it's out there in Virginia and they had some students that traveled from Greenville, South Carolina went to the DC area attended. The national March for Life, which if you've never done, it is an absolutely shocking event. And I mean that in a way that someone who hates crowds, I would go to the March for Life, every year, I'd be more than happy to the last time we were there. It was, it was closed down. Because it was 2020.
They didn't have it. But I went to the 2019 and Trump spoke and it was one of the more moving experiences that I can remember and certainly the most comfortable I've ever been in a large crowd. So I highly recommend the March for Life, the national March for Life that happens in DC. And so here we are. We're talking about these folks that they went in and they were a couple of hats. One of them had one that said Rosary pro-life.
There were other people who were wearing other political type hats and they were not kicked out. But you had the Smithsonian guards, kick them out. I'm just kind of scanning through here.
See if there's any fantastic quotes to put out there, the lawsuit says that the, the defendants which is going to be the museum and the staff there, unlawfully deprived, the plaintiffs, these are going to be the students who were those hats of their first amendment rights to engage in protected, speech and expression in violation of the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment. So the issue here is not that
they wore hats. It's the fact that they made a political statement was being censored and it was being censored by the federal government. The Smithsonian is our institution, we own it, we run it. We pay for it. I saw this from Julie Kelly's website, it's going to segue nicely into what she has going on on Twitter right now. But Julie Kelly is a writer for American greatness. She does a great job. She wrote this thing that I
thought was very interesting. So I pulled up here usajobs.gov. If you've never tried for a federal employment, this is where you do it. You go to USA jobs and you find all the list of jobs and all the different categories. Now, this is a pretty decent paying job. I would say for a security guard Front Royal VA, if you're seeing over here on the screen, I'm highlighting it. But it is where The Smithsonian Institute has the air and space museum. It's out in Front Royal I think
that's right. Yeah, sounds right to me, I'm open to the comments, telling me that I'm wrong it.
I drove that all the time and now I'm remember seeing front row and all the signs, but in any case, the Smithsonian is the Institute out there, they have their own police force, which is a federal position and it pays at the NZ November Zulu, 07 paid grade, which they say starts at 65,000 and it tops out at 85,000, for a baseline, police officer doing police, for Sony and Institute. Here's what I thought was really interesting and this is why I'm mentioning Julie Kelly.
When you go and you search for Education, there's going to tell you the education requirements of this position. Okay. And here it is right here. I'm going to highlight it for the for you that are looking on Rumble education. Quote, this job does not have an education qualification requirement none, not a high school diploma, not anything for 65 Grand a year. This is part of what I've always called the federal jobs program.
These are the people that are willing to do whatever they're told without understanding this early, even what they're getting involved in. They tell you how you're gonna be evaluated that you have to follow, like, noodles rules and laws and regulations, efficient practice law enforcement, but there's no education, requirement, that's pretty
shocking for a job. That pays that decently 65 Grand. Without even have to get a high school, diploma is a lot and then this is put into a suitability position of trust and fitness. No security clearance required. There is a drug test. I don't know, I just think it's interesting that you're able to go and be a cop and Have Federal arrest authorities like these people throughout these students without having any understanding of what the hell's going on in the law.
I think it's a problem. I'm going to bring up another little article here. This is one that's in Julie, Kelly's feed. I've actually retweeted it. So if you're following me should have seen this. And if not, then go look for it. In my feet or hers makes no difference. It's an American greatness piece, which is a pretty good little graphic. This is an article that's entitled did government until assets plant key evidence in the proud boys case and it says we
should be suspicious of weird. Incidences in the world of law enforcement, we don't really believe in coincidences, we should actually believe that there is a reason we just have to figure out what that reason is. Okay? So synopsis of this this article, I do think that it's worth a read on its own, I think, because of the, the particular allegations that are being made here are pretty credible and they think they're
a problem. But what it says is that there's a five, high-stakes criminal cases that are happening in the January 6 trials. Five members of The Proud boys. They're being charged with the quote-unquote suspicious conspiracy charge, and Julie's impression is that these are at To get Donald Trump as an unindicted co-conspirator basically saying that he was in control of a militia, which I
don't agree that. The power boys are saying that the proud way militia was being controlled by Trump and then being asked to execute a coup against the US government. This is the suspicious conspiracy or the, the so-called Insurrection that went on and they're using this, this extemporaneous comment that Trump made while he was in the,
the presidential debates. If you recall several months before the January sixth event happened in 2021, they Ask him to condemn the proud boys for violence or some nonsense like that. And this is Chris Wallace. Basically, spoon-feeding trumpet answer and Trump said, stand back and stand by. That's the quote, stand back and stand by which they use to mean that he was in control of them, and obviously had ordered them to do something evil and elicit.
This is patently absurd. This is an absurd Claim by absurd people. They are not serious and yet they are going to court and they are taking the time and they are actually, you know, Facing down like the proud boys are facing down real jail time because of this thing. Even though it's a totally insane contention. Including as I understand it, Andre Kate REO. Who is the not the founder of, but he's the current leader. It was founded by Gavin McInnes. So here's the thing.
The FBI has very little understanding of what these groups are about. I sat in briefings in 2017 from counterterrorism, one. This is the number one squad for counterterrorism at Washington field office. So, that's going to be the people that are dealing with this and then there's counterterrorism for, which is now the domestic extremists quad. People and it was this lecture was given by table O'Connor, who
is now retired. So I'll say who he is and he's the former FBI agents Association president. He was there for a long time him and his wife, both agents, they both retired and they were given this talk about the proud boys, about Gavin, McGinnis, and about about keka Stan. He's they were talking about Jordan Pederson and Miley innopolis in a bunch of this other nonsense. Richard Spencer, these were all in the same lecture by the way.
This was all for like new agents, to learn about domestic terrorism and they had no idea what they were talking about in my Estimation and I'm a pretty aggressive follower of this kind of information because I want to know. Who are we talking about? What's going on in this movement? Are they conservatives that I agree with? Are they people that do things that are dumb and in some cases? Yes, some cases. No. But very weak understanding of
these things. They didn't understand what the whole Keck movement in the Pepe the Frog and all that.
So if you're listening to me and you're familiar with those things by all means, you know, you can also put some comments down there, how about your take on it but I can tell you the FBI doesn't have a good understanding of it and the analysts are very very left-leaning when they come to it. So the Crazy thing about this, this particular articles that is talking about how Matthew Graves he's the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia,
he's actually attending these trials on at least three separate occasions. That's not common. If you're not familiar with the way that Federal prosecution happens. Generally speaking what you get isn't it? An assistant United States Attorney that's a front line prosecutor known as a USA's. That's the the acronym and the ausa is the federal prosecutor
that does the cases. You never really see a United States Attorney. That's a political appointee they always show up when they think it's really important. To be there. And it doesn't mean that they're not good prosecutor. Some of them are probably wonderful. I've actually met one or two United States attorneys, who were wonderful people. They were under Bush and they are living in Texas.
Now, in private practice, but incredibly bright and very, giving and capable and had a background as serious prosecutors. That's not always the case, it is a political appointment. So it runs the whole gamut of people that are totally incompetent but never have to do anything, like people who, you know, might run for district attorney, but have never prosecuted a single case, but
they're an attorney and they run. - elected and some leftist nonsense City and then they just like try to do policy. They don't actually do Frontline prosecution, so worth noting. Anyway, they're talking about this being a militia group that's really bizarre this entire document. I'm sorry. This whole this whole article hinges around a discussion of a document entitled 1776 returns. So that's the name of the document.
The allegation was is that this document was the blueprint that the proud boys were using in order to go and take over the federal government and overthrow the United States, a totally absurd. Surd contention, there are thousands of law enforcement officers in Washington. D.c. there are hundreds. If not thousands of national Guardsmen that arse like hanging out there. You are not going to overthrow Washington.
D.c. even with every single person who Associates with the probably in the entire United States. I will confidently. Say that that's a crazy. Contention not happening and yet they're on trial for it. So, and here's the real quote, that's so wild in two separate criminal indictments prosecutors explained how the document. This is the 1776. Ended up in the hands of Enrique torrio the leader of the proud boys, quote on December 30th 2020, an unnamed individual Centauri.
Oh a document that set forth a plan to occupy a few quote unquote, crucial buildings in Washington DC on January, 6th including the house and the Senate buildings around the capitol with as many as possible. People are many people as possible rather to show our politicians that we the people are in charge. Okay. The document is listed as being a high level summary. Prosecutors are like banging their case on this egg. This is a big deal, it's a plan.
It shows the individual buildings how to get in how to cause a distraction pulling fire alarms. Distracting law enforcement, making a crowd so they can get in there and and occupy and demand. A new election, wasn't that weird. They're doing a, an Insurrection. In order to demand a new election. I just feel like that's absurd on its face.
The FBI agent that's testifying is a guy named Peter, Peter dabrowski sounds like he's out of New York, I don't know him personally, he was a Jag attorney from my quick research on him and work for the Army. And it's more than happy apparently to testify in these things and just find it really disgusting that FBI Personnel are engaged in this stuff. It bothers me at no end but we'll continue on so long and short of it is this document goes on and talks about how it
was kind of a thing. But here's the real crazy part. Here's a quotation from one of the most recent motions filed by the defense, it appears that the government itself is the author of the most incriminating and damaging document. In this case which was mysteriously sent at government requests to proud. Boys leader, Enrique, torrio immediately prior to January 6, in order to frame or implicate, torrio in a government, created scheme to storm, the buildings
around the capitol. This is Roger Roots. He's an attorney working for the for the defense and they are seeking a mistrial with this motion. This is a request for a mistrial. So the real question is, does the government frame people? Do they, do they implicate people, and create this. These sort of situations, I'm going to do a quick search here for a book that I think is relevant to our discussion. So I'm going to pull it up on Amazon. Let's go ahead and flip this back over.
If you want to take a look, should be coming up here on Amazon, there, it is slowly loading. As I'm using up all the bandwidth for this. The book is called the terror factory inside the FBI's manufactured war on terrorism. Now, this is not a new book, this is coming from October of 2014, it's written by a guy named Trevor Aaronson. I've spoken to Trevor Aaronson. We agree on how things work in the FBI.
His book was listed as required Reading required a requirement to understand the way the FBI Works. Counter terrorism cases by my friends when I joined the surveillance team in Washington, d.c., I think that's really interesting. Why is that? Because what do you centrally says? And his whole purpose is and Trevor is a very left-leaning type guy. He is got a new podcast out called the alphabet boys, talking about how the FBI infiltrated, the BLM in antifa in Denver, I think it's an
interesting. Listen, I am not a partisan guy and when the FBI is wrong, it's wrong. And this case, it's always wrong when it comes to CT. F, c TB, and counterterrorism, the way that this particular book is written and the way that it helps, you understand it. And this is the high level overview is that essentially, the FBI finds people online or in person at mosques in the world, on Reddit, whatever it may be social media.
And so on that have terrible ideas and say them out loud, often times, these people are very low IQ or they're very low awareness of what's going on in the world and they have these awful ideas. They are they FBI pay sources to get close to them. Introduces, Undercover operations. And then, basically
manufacturers the case. So that, that person can take care of it. And if you want an example, Gretchen, Whitmer, when you had, you know, six people in a car and for them or FBI informants, and, or agents, that's how you do a manufacturing of Terror, that's how you do this thing. Now, Aaron's case is all about the fact that the FBI goes ever
black and brown. People his thing is, you know, foreign terrorism which is known as like Islamic terrorism, that kind of thing, that's his purpose but you could literally swap out the word Islamic terrorism and black and brown people for white. And domestic terrorism and it's the same thing. It's the same Playbook. Why does the FBI do this? Because they're incentivized to have these cases open and to conduct X number of
dismantlement and disruptions. These are the statistical accomplishments that they claim inside the file that earns them, the Kudos and it gets the bonuses for the senior Executives that are run in the field office. That's the guy like Steve the Antoine, oh, who was the one running the, the Detroit field office and then was eventually promoted to the Washington field office? He hit his metrics, no doubt about it.
Big metrics to and then he was in charge of the Washington field office on January 6th and obviously did that and he's since retired, Julie Kelly was very excited about reporting that but I want people to know that this is a very important book to read. He has a TED Talk. That's 15 minutes long Youkilis is that it's got over a million views and I've watched it myself.
This book has been passed around the FBI because it's legit it legitimately shows you and the the cover if you're not looking at it is a bear trap and inside the bear trap is the local of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. So Tara Factory highly recommend that. I think it's worth your time but moreover is it possible that the FBI set up the guys in the problems? Of course they have already admitted that they had sources there and that's 100%. Now they do things who wrote
that document 1776 returns. I think it's relevant and if there it was in fact written by some governments or written on behalf of the government based on, you know, an FBI agent, who's running a source and said, hey put something out there and get it to this guy. Big problem, big problem, not something we should easily handle, and we shouldn't be comfortable with it, but it's out there.
Okay. A couple of the things I wanted to. Note, because they're having problems with media, obviously in this country. Also, scan back over here. So, this is from just the news. This is John Solomon site, half of Americans believe mainstream media, tend to mislead and misinform the public. That's the actual purpose of it. This is a nice foundation and a Gallup survey fully fifty percent of the respondents said
that they do not intend. They do not believe that national news organizations are interested in giving the public good information, that's not good. Only 25% of the people in this country said that they felt very confident about that. So, Yuck, not a good situation that we're living in. We're living in a time when you have to be very discriminating against media, discriminating in your choice of media, even more over and, you know, their
stories are not being covered. I don't know if you've noticed, but the the burning wreckage that was happening in Ohio and I'm no expert on hazmat, but that was happening and very little coverage. I actually just saw it last night. I turned on CNN. I was watching a very disgusting panel of people, including some like cartoon characters ladies with like these weird, you know like cats eyeglasses And weird hair colors and silly make-up.
And, you know, this very effeminate black guy in a suit and there's other lady who's the anchor, whatever it was. They were all talking about something very important. Nikki Haley, just announced he's running for president, like, I don't care, but it's amazing that what they will cover. And the meantime, they were not covering the the burning fires that were happening from polyvinyl chloride.
In, you know, tanker trucks that went off the rails in Ohio and what's going on in Texas with a derailment outside of Houston. So you just got to be careful with your news sources. You should be looking A lot of different places you should be looking at left and right. That's what I try to do is what I did when I was in the FBI. It's what I recommend people do. Now, the reason is nobody's telling you the truth, you got
to figure it out yourself. Once again, like being a first responder go out there and find it yourself. You're responsible for what you think you're responsible with
for what you know. And if you listen to me and you're in the FBI like go out and find some information that disagrees with what you think, figure it out, learn what a pureblood is, I found out that guys in my office that pureblood people who are talking about pure Bloods, which is obviously a Harry Potter reference in a joke. Joke about people who didn't get the covid shots, they thought that was a white supremacy reference. It's absurd, it's totally crazy. But it's because you're
uninformed. So don't be uninformed the world's too. Volatile right now. For you, not to have information gonna bring up another article here, this is from John Solomon as well. This is just the news. Lois, Lerner 2.0, we talked about it on the opening here, I wanted to discuss the IRS once again. This is the government getting
involved in your free speech. It has no business being there, Federal prosecutor by the name of retired Federal prosecutor by the name of Bill Shipley. Many of you.
Him as Shipwrecked crew. Online used to write for Red State, he wrote for uncovered DC.com, but big deal, like big deal that he said the right thing on the one of these spaces that I was sitting in panel discussion and he said that the government has absolutely no interest in the outcome of prep criminal prosecution and I would argue that it doesn't have any out like outcome interest at all. It's job is to just execute process. That is not what we're seeing right here.
So if people don't remember Lois Lerner and 2010 was found to have been the personal One who was running the IRS exempt, organizations unit, that's going to be the unit that assigns the
nonprofit status. 501 c, 3, 501, C 4 and so on two individuals who are seeking that tax-exempt status because of their Church affiliation or nonprofit or whatever, you know, the crow the qualifications that they have to meet Lois Lerner's organization you know she was the one that was kind of the one at the face of it. It was exposed a couple years later they were going after the Tea Party and some other additional like right wing type things.
Under the Obama Administration and She and the invoking, the fifth saying that she wouldn't talk about it and she wouldn't talk about it because she didn't want a self-incriminate, that's bad news. This is another lawsuit that's
coming in here right now. The sort of reminiscent of that situation and it's a by a non-profit Educational Foundation that known as Adams Baldwin and Covey Adams Baldwin and cubby Foundation Incorporated, also known as ABC in this case and what they did is they went out there and they said that the B Administration. Now, this is the Biden's policy that is being implemented by the IRS obviously, Jill Biden probably doesn't do it directly, but it is empowering these
organizations to go do things that are infringing on First Amendment protected activities, that's not okay. That is not an acceptable thing so the IRS questions they claim are quote further Evidence at the by demonstration believes it has the authority to license thought and speech and it does not and that's obviously true. It does not have that Authority. And so you know what sort of evidence are they talking about? They have one of these questions.
I'm going to find it out here there, you know, a couple of really fun questions or quotations from the law firms that are representing. This ABC Foundation saying the thought police have found Home in the by Administration and that's obviously very troubling. So IRS questions that were being posed. Include things are, have you held a particular position or view on certain topics or issues? If you do please detail the position or views of your organization.
Hello federal government you have no business asking those questions. It's none of your damn business. You stay out first amendment protected activities, which is what your views and your positions are. That's the whole thing. We can assemble, and we can petition for Grievances and we can have our own religion and worship the way. We want and we can speak freely in this country, that's the whole. Freaking point is the whole point.
That's what the first amendment is it says that you don't get a say in that, the government does not have a vested interest in that and it has no interest in picking winners and losers in the Free Speech game or in the policy games. So here's another one IRS do you have any policies or policy or policies or guidance in place to avoid unsupported opinions or conclusions and inflammatory language in these activities.
Look there's a lot of unsupported policies or positions or guidance that has Ben's in the Church of any church, whether it be Scientology, whether it be the Roman Catholic Church, whether it be, you know, an Evangelical Church, whether it be a Jewish synagogue or a Muslim Mosque. You, there's a lot of it that's unsupported by factual things, it's based on faith. That's the whole point. You're allowed to have these things. So even if it's an unsupported position or it might be
inflammatory, nobody cares. You're the IRS. That's not your job either you. They get tax exempt status because they meet the The minimum requirement so they don't. So this is really gross stuff and it gets me hot and bothered like Angry. Sorry. Not hot and bothered. I guess like more flustered because it's just such a disgusting thing. I've got another our question here. Explain how you ensure the content presented in your educational activities are fair
and unbiased facts. It doesn't need to be you can take a policy position that's that's allowed and that would permit an individual to form an independent opinion or conclusions based on these represented facts. Again the Catholic church is a Catholic non-profit You know, it's a religious nonprofit. They have schools.
They are educational. And they do not provide unbiased Fairfax per se. Because they believe that the worship of Jesus in the way that that the Catholic church has always said, is the best way, that's what they're advocating for. It's an advocacy group and it's still nonprofit because it's religious. So these are, these are foolish types of things.
It makes me really concerned, but it does lead me to my final thing which has been getting a lot of media traction to put me on Tucker Carlson this week this week last week on last Thursday I guess almost a million views on his On the little piece of it that was up on YouTube. And if you haven't seen it, you can find it on my profile. I might actually pin it now that I think about it. And yeah, just a, an obvious
problem with the FBI. This obvious problem is that the Richmond field office put out a document that has since been rescinded. Thank God. But, but it was still an attempt to open a door. I found out a little bit more about it since then apparently a just out of college Intel analyst. Got it approved by a supervisor. It was, it was allowed to be published by the chief division Council, which is the top attorney in the Richmond field office.
That supposed to be calling balls and Strikes and whether something is constitutional, and it was a document that allowed for the or advocated the source recruitment inside the Catholic Church of all places to try to keep an eye on once again white supremacy. This this Boogeyman that the FBI has because they believe that it is something that is going to be familiar to people in the traditional lat.
En masse and what? They're calling radical traditionalist Catholics. Now I've been a Catholic for 5th 41 years rather. I was baptized when I was a child was confirmed in high school. I went to Catholic schools going through a number of different Catholic schools including different denominations. Sorry rather different liturgical Traditions. I was in a cistercian school. I was a Jesuit school. I've been to just parochial schools.
So on I've had Navy chaplains as my as my religious education, you know, teachers and things like that. I've had people that came out with Seminary degree from Notre Dame you name it. I've been through a lot of it and I've never heard of any white supremacy as part of the Catholic teachings or any alignment. But what they did is they essentially try to draw line saying that if you are someone who likes the Latin mass and you have a very traditional view on Catholicism.
Then you also then you also are sharing common cause on the issues of abortion rights which is not, you know, that's in the ideological Avail drop, that's the writer. Telling us, I say abortion rights and Air quotes because it tells us that the the writer believes that there is a position in the federal government has and I'm pretty confident, that's what the Dobbs decision says it doesn't have a
stake in moreover. It says that you know things like lgbtq rights or that agenda immigrant issues and things like that are going to share a common cause between these traditional Latin Mass goers who are radicalized and, you know, white supremacist, even though it admits in the peace, that white supremacist generally speaking. Don't like Catholics, I don't know if people know this, but the KKK used to go and try to do
the same. Thing to Catholics that it did to the Jews and blacks, it's not a friendly organization, white supremacist, where they do exist are not people that are going to be able to find a home in any church, I would imagine, but certainly not people that are here. Instead, the traditional Catholic mass and the pre-vatican do traditions of the Roman Catholic Church Bazaar Bizarro world. But as I discussed with somebody who was a, who was a an FBI whistleblower, brought it to me.
This is an attempt to open the door up to going after Christians in general, I firmly believe that. So if you haven't read the piece, you can go see my piece that I wrote uncovered e si.com, our friend, Tracy beans, who is wonderful. It's been real helpful.
It has gotten me some some news play on people like Tucker Carlson. I've been back on my friend, Dan Brown, Gino's radio show, some of you have probably listeners, they're probably most of you are Glenn Beck had me on the other morning to talk about it. It's a real problem when the FBI is once again. I'm trying to pick these winners and losers and what speech is and isn't protected by doing so, under the guise of this counterterrorism peace where there is no burden of criminal proof.
There's no burden when you work criminal case, I'm sorry when you work a counterterrorism case. The burden is like, does terrorism exists. Yes. Can we articulate this person? Maybe should we be able to do things to mitigate it and getting sources into the Catholic Church? To keep white supremacist out his full crazy. If you haven't listened to our long-form podcast for this week, Do it came out on Monday, you can download. It's about 90 minutes long or close to it.
I talked to Mark, how talking about, you know, radical traditional. Catholics, I would say Mark is pretty darn close to that sort of thing and a wonderful man and a great person who was talking about being a leader, a projector and a provider, as a man, unapologetically masculine Catholic, a man, who defended his son and was attacked for it by the doj in a way that is totally illogical. So go listen to our interview with him.
I learned some things on it. I feel like there are people in this world that are fighting the spiritual battle and there's no doubt. I like to think that I'm part of it, but Mark is definitely on the front lines and has gone to the mat when he knew when he was right. And he had his wife, supporting him all the way. So that's really wonderful stuff. So, check out our long-form interview there.
If you haven't heard it already. I'm gonna pull up real quick on the fly but I could do it. Here we go. If you do like what you're hearing here, we appreciate it. If you share it with your friends, if you will subscribe to the podcast at anywhere you do. You're obviously listening to it. So you could hear what that is. But subscribe if you haven't
already and the five-star. Views are things that we really do appreciate if you can throw one on nothing better than a five star review to let us know what we're doing. And if there's things that you don't like you know let us know that too I'll take a I'll take any other reviews as well. Go give us a review give us a like give us a share. Here's a review that comes from Mimi number five with the American flag after it way to go Mimi here it goes.
It says valuable insight into the inner workings of the bureau five stars before this episode. I had not a clue as to how the FBI's inner workings could make this entity as disk. Jointed and cumbersome as it is now I can see how what seems to be common sense that the public about Miss opportunities is legitimately plausible by the sheer disconnect from upper management to the good men and women in the field.
Yep. That's all true in my career, working in management with a large corporation, the success of the business could not function. The way. The FBI is run, all our right by saying, it needs to be dismantled and rebuilt with Kyle and Chris. I assume Chris Gonzalez in the lead. Thank you. I will become an A follower of the podcast and I would like to hear more about the changes needed for reform so much changes needed. Thanks so much.
Mimi for your five star review. Folks, we still have a gift then go up if you want to do that. I'm working on some sponsors. So if you are a business owner and you'd like to get in on the ground floor here, it'd be amazing if we had some sponsors. I've got some products that I've already been using for years that reached out to me. And I'm going to be kind of negotiating with them to see if that makes some sense end of the day. Thanks so much for listening.
It really does mean a lot that people care what we have to say, not just for me, but I'm speaking on behalf of all the suspended oils, Steve Garrett, George. And any of you that are also suspended, although you who have drawn A Line in the Sand and decided that you will not back paddle on your principles and that you will not give up the fight in for this country because it needs to be done and
I do think it's worth it again. You've been listening to the Kyle Serafin show, we'll see you next time. Thanks for listening to the Kyle Serafin. Show be sure to follow him on Twitter and Truth at Kyle seraphin. Thanks for listening to the Kyle Serafin. Show be sure to follow him on Twitter and Truth at Kyle seraphin.