Prepare to hear the truth from a real whistleblower, an American Patriot, here's civil liberties, enthusiasts, Second Amendment, Defender and indefinitely suspended FBI agent. Kyle seraphin. Hello, my friends and welcome to the Kyle Serafin, show, for Wednesday March 8th. Today we're going to be talking about the American Rorschach test and that's January 6th 2021.
So, recently Tucker Carlson on Fox News, released additional footage things that have not been seen before, but like so much in our polarized country in this polarized. America, no one sees that information the same way and it doesn't really matter whether you're looking at. Jacob. Chan's Lee who was a man wearing a viking headdress and body paint and parading around? With an American flag or you're looking at Tariq Johnson who's a former capital police officer suspended.
And then eventually resigned from his job for wearing a red Maga hat on the same day. One of them was clearly a trump supporter, the other was actually a Biden voter and yet both of them got pretty awful treatment. And I think a lot of it has to do with the polarization that's going on in this country. The way that we are looking at these things, the way that you look at the events on January, 6. 2021 likely is an indicator. How you see the rest of the political landscape? Was it?
A riot was an Insurrection. I'd like everybody to kind of have a unified position in to say that they went. When they look at the events, they make sense within their own mind that they eliminate cognitive dissonance and decide based not just on their assumptions. But on the facts and and have possess defensible positions, that help them establish a way to talk to their neighbors about it. That can be defended from all
sides. I actually just got out of a Twitter space not too long ago and that was the topic of conversation. I was being assailed from people on the left and stating you know that I had certain assumptions and the only way they can do that if your position is reasonable and Justified is by putting words in your mouth. So we have to be cautious about what people are saying actually, and listen to what the words are.
And our, though the words that we actually are willing to commit to additional, we're going to cover the arrest of some antifa activist down in Atlanta. We're going to cover the murder and kidnapping. That is States citizens in Brownsville, Texas near the
border. There's some things that are being discussed as far as the response to this type of behavior, this sort of violence that we're seeing spilling, even over into our side of the country and our elected representatives are resistant to do something about it. They are making either unjustified calls for Invasion or they are defending the actions of inaction by the Biden Administration. Want to kind of cover.
Some of those topics we're going to read them through the news and and Kind of get to it, but let's start off right away. What is a Rorschach test? What in the heck is that thing? These are those classic ink blot tests that people have been showing for a long time. I'm going to see if I can pull one up here. If you're not on our Rumble Channel, you can always look it up on your own and take a peek Rorschach. Test is an ink blot that has been used. I'm going to just read straight
out of here as a definition. It's a projective psychological tests in which the subjects perceptions of ink blots again, sort of like ink that is put on a folded piece of paper and squished. Over its, they're almost always symmetrical. They recorded and then analyzed for psychological interpretation complex, algorithms or both.
What does that mean? It means that they're going to try to determine people's personality traits and some of the characteristics and emotional functioning based on the way that they look at essentially a randomly squished out ink on a piece of paper. And whether that thing is valuable or not, I think that it is sort of an indication that we bring our own assumptions and biases to To, you know, an inanimate object, something that has a truth about it which is
that it may be nothing. And by looking at that thing and our projections on it is supposed to tell us a little bit about us January 6. Does that in a political way for the American people right now? There's no question about it that there are two views of it and and the Nuance positions are far fewer and they are far less widely held.
I would say we've got half the country that calls it, a riot that talks about There was a protest that devolved into a riot, that's actually probably the more accurate statement for most the people on the political, right? And the political left is dead set on it, being an Insurrection, an attempt to overthrow our government, you'll hear people crying about it. We care more about democracy than you do. Obviously, they obviously are better human beings. They're making a moral argument.
And that this was some sort of an attempt at throwing the country into chaos. So that, you know, the election would not stand. I've talked to people that were At January 6, I've talked to people who have investigated people who were there. I don't think that it Bears, any credibility. It doesn't hold any of the weight that that they would like it to that. Anybody was trying to overthrow the United States government.
And there's a reason why it's been such a tenuous argument when it comes to the federal cases that are being argued about it, on top of that. And probably more importantly, there is a pretty strong problem with It's trying to pin this on President Trump. Now I do think that the people that have been attacked that showed up at January, 6 and are being prosecuted pretty aggressively in a way that is not common for the federal government.
I think that that is happening because they are serving as a proxy for Trump, but I actually had someone argued directly last night that Not only was it an Insurrection, but it's Trump's fault for the Insurrection that he was the one that was so called, commanding the troops. And I mentioned that he's not the proximate cause of what went on that day. Because if you was, and it was something that could be proven, then they would have tried to argue that in court and they
have not. So I'm going to transfer over to a another page here. We're going to read an article from Miranda Divine Miranda, Divine obviously, a friend of the suspend apples, and an excellent writer. She has a piece in the New York Post. That was dated from two days ago.
January 6, footage shows Capital cops escorting q and Angemon through the senate floor and there's some interesting things in here and I think When we scroll through the footage, says newly-revealed footage from January 6. This is obviously the Tucker Carlson release shows the capitol police officers escorting. Jacob, Chan's Lee, the big horned so-called q a shaman, who
has come to symbolize the riot. Now for those of you who recall when it first came out, that was one of the early pictures at the media fixated on the man had body paint on. Like he was going to a professional football game. He's wearing like this fuzzy coonskin hat with horns on it. His body is painted and tattooed.
He's obviously A shirtless and wearing some kind of like loincloth deal or some, I don't remember what the pants were but he's got tribal tattoos and you know that came to symbolize the sort of Anarchy in the mind of the left that this guy was basically trying to overthrow the United States government. It's an interesting take, I think it's fully insane and the facts do not back this up. So as a our previous guest even friend mentioned, there is no Ultra super secret.
Ability to overthrow the United States government by getting a be horned shirtless man into the seat of the, the Speaker of the House on the house floor that doesn't exist on the backside of the Constitution. You know, you can watch National Treasure again and it's not there. Even if Nicholas Cage told us, it was that was a fiction. There is not a place in the United States Constitution that says, if you get your guy into this place like Tada, King me.
And then he now takes over the government and this was a discussion that I got into Last night as well, even if, let's say that the, the worst possibilities that have been alleged about the the riders that were on on the capitol grounds and made it into the United States Capitol. Let's say they actually got whatever their worst mission was. They were able to execute members of Congress members of the Senate.
They were able to take out the vice president and a hang him all which some people are yelling. Apparently, let's say all those things did happen. The government would persist, the United States government would carry on. There is actually an entire office devoted to the continuity of the federal government. They've made shows about it, like designated Survivor and
things like this. But essentially, whenever most of the important members of the United States government in, you know, the elected representatives, get together, there is always a plan for that thing not existing anymore. If they were to wipe off the the United States Capitol off the face of the map with a kinetic strikes, While the president was giving the State of the Union Address, somebody would be able to continue on and be able, there's a line of succession and
it's well documented. And that person is well defended and they would be able to continue and make decisions on behalf of the federal government. And it would it would carry on there's entire bunkers and, and store houses. And there's a significant amount of equipment and money. That is dedicated to making sure that that happens. I used to be stationed at Kirtland Air Force Base. Base.
There is a big center for the continuity of government in the state of New Mexico. They've got bunkers, they've got radios. They've got fuel to last for an incredibly long period of time. I used to watch trucks driving into these Hollow mountains that were on the southern side of the Sandia, mountain range. All part of the Kirtland Air
Force Base territory. But you can find these pictures of these these these huge doors that they could drive, you know, two semis side, by side into one coming out, one coming in usually and you can find them on Like maps. You can literally go to the Kirtland Air. Force Base on a map on Google Earth. You can scroll down to the east side of that particular Air Force Base, and then start moving your way down the
mountain range. And when you get to the southernmost mountains, there are two peaks. Basically that are pretty low and they look like they might even be man-made when you get up in the air and you fly in a Blackhawk you can actually look down and they look very unlike the others. I don't know if that's a natural feature, if we just built those things up, but there's doors in them on both. Both sides and then on the south side and on the East and on the west, the north continues on in
the range. But as you look at those things, you can see, like, there's there's big doorways and they have an enormous bunker and Vault. And in fact, when I was first assigned to Kirtland Air Force Base and I think it was 2011, there was this big story. It was a scandal really? That the somebody had been siphoning off access to jp-8, which is the the jet propulsion fuel that the Air Force uses and stockpile.
You know, for this sort of continuity of government for continuity of military operations, in the case of a big strike. And they had these enormous tanks that were underground, and all these tanks were supposed to have a certain amount of fuel. And they've been holding on to it since World War Two and they cycle it in and so on. And there was some ungodly amount of it missing. I mean, it was like 5 million barrels or something crazy. I don't know what have to look up the numbers.
It doesn't really matter and the whole the whole you know, bass was a Twitter of who had stolen all this this fuel. And then it turns out they did some some X-rays of the actual tanks and found out that they were all leaking. And so like the water was full of jp-8 and that there was a Arsenic and other sort of poisons that were built into the base water supply and had been for probably since 50 years or so. So, you know these things exist.
I the evidence of them exist in these weird little stories like that. There's a story about the day before the Branch Davidian compound went up in Flames, there was this doomsday playing, it's a 47 or a 757 that had landed for some additional work and it had nothing to do with anything that was going on in Waco.
But there's a base out there that actually service this particular continuity of government plane, which is supposed to be resistant to EMT emps and and other sort of nuclear attacks and they can put somebody up in it and fly it around for a long time. And so all these things exist so that you can't have a Q&A on Shaman pop in and destroy the federal government with his, with his Viking helmet. It's just, it's just not the way that things are supposed to
work. There's some interesting things that were revealed I think by Tucker Carlson when he showed that video. The most interesting to me was that he mentions. It was 921 and I think it was actually ten to one in my count. But there's times when this guy Jacob translate is walking down hallways with, you know, massively outnumbered, by the Capitol Police.
And in this case, like before he got to the floor of, I believe it was the house, but he might have been The door into the Senate. There's like ten officers there and they could have easily grabbed him and arrested him.
If that was something that they were interested in doing, and by the way, he was not in the, I range of anybody that was with him, he was all by himself, just walking around with his bullhorn, and with his little, you know, spear device that had an American flag on it and shirtless and his Viking helmet. He's just cruising around the capital. And so, if that is not exculpatory evidence, and I believe it is, if that wasn't exculpatory and it wasn't shown
to this. Guy and his defense team and I don't know who is his attorneys were whether they were going to be public defenders or whether he was able to have something Source privately. But you know that sounds like he was denied due process. If you're not familiar with what that process looks like, whenever the government brings a case against you, you have a right to mount a credible
defense. And one of the things that you have a right to is what's referred to as Brady material, Brady material is things that would be detrimental to the government's case. And it comes from a Supreme Court decision from 1963. Brady versus Maryland, every law
enforcement officer knows this. Anybody who's ever produced Discovery knows that you have to provide Brady and generally speaking, if there's a significant amount of Brady material, there is no reason to bring the case, if there is something that actually gives a reasonable doubt in the mind of the prosecutor, they won't even bring the case because the minute you provide it. And in this case I think this is pretty significant. There's a bunch of cops letting
this guy in two different. Areas of the building. And at the very least it would it would raise a plausible defense because the government has to prove their case Beyond A Reasonable Doubt. So all you have to do is create the so-called shadow of a doubt and I would say that seeing a bunch of cops letting this guy roll around inside the capitol, definitely gives me pause and it would probably give you pause if
you were a reasonable juror. Although I don't think that was what was going on in Washington DC during any of these trials, but a reasonable juror should look at this information and they should Have a reasonable doubt, they should have a shadow of a doubt that this guy may not be guilty. Beyond, you know, all all question. Because why was he allowed in there? And once you introduce that question, it can dramatically change the result. I think of an honest jury.
So, does this guy get a mistrial? Does he get a? Does he get a appeal based on this? That's going to somehow move it into another venue. Where reasonable people can. Look at it and say, we've got more questions. I actually had somebody on Twitter in my DMs, Send me a video supposedly of him entering the building. And that's a question, you know, Tucker Carlson doesn't quite answer. There's some debate about what
happened. It looks like some doors were pushed open, but it looked like they were open from the inside. They appear to have big magnetic locks on them and we've had discussions about magnetic locks. You know, my friends have who are around January 6 investigations, I know people in the public of had the same sort of questions, you know, who opened the doors. They're really like magnetic locks are incredibly hard to open. And generally speaking are not
something you can open. If you're just a person and you don't have breaching tools. And so, if those things were opened and allowed to be opened, now, you would have the argument that Not only was he allowed in, but then he was guided around, that would be a serious wound to any governmental case for the sort of charges that he had. As Tucker Carlson mentions. They sort of look like, they're acting like tour guides, they're showing him different places around the video, footage is
short and it's cherry-picked. Has no doubt about it. So this is not a conclusive answer but it what it should do is put enough shadow of a doubt that if we are honest people who want to see you know, bad guys who knocked cops out, go to jail and people who walked around and paraded in the building, may be inappropriately slapped on the wrist and let go. This guy got 41 months in jail, that's a long time in federal
prison. Considering some of the things that happen when people don't do it and have to serve, I believe 80 or 85 percent of that. So that's going to be a significant chunk, you know, 10%. Life is 33 years old when this goes down, that seems like a big problem. So that's one of the things that I think is the obvious Rorschach test. When people look at that, they were people that were on television, like Network anchors.
And and guess on these panels sitting and saying shoot that man, you know you should he should have been killed for the actions that he did and they're not going to change their opinion based on what they saw with the Tucker Carlson footage. They're not going to change it at all. That being said, I want to move to the other guy that was in
there. This, this name was caught up to me at the first time I heard it was two days ago, friend who works in a in a think tank in d.c. mentioned that this was going to be happening. And so I wanted to be aware of it. So I'm going to bring it up. I'm going to actually play you the video and his name is Tariq art. Eric Johnson, rather. We're going to play it from Tucker Carlson's, quick interview and we're going to discuss, like, how people see that differently? So, here it is.
And let's get it going right now. Maybe, of course, the internet's not going to agree with me. So this is a police officer who had been suspended from the capital police, he was there on January 6, we're going to see a little bit of footage of him, and he mentions that he wore a red Maga hat on that day and that that was probably a life-saving thing for him. Here he is important, as not getting the members of Congress and their staff to safety footage. We reviewed seems to bolster
Johnson's account. The video shows Johnson conducting the evacuation of senators from the chamber yet. Tart Johnson was not rewarded for what he did. He was punished a photo emerged of Johnson wearing a Maga hat outside. The capital. Now here's the app cost him his career, sometimes I look at it and like thank you God for blessing me with this hat. And sometimes I'm like, wow, I wish this had never came in my
life abiding. Voter Johnson, says he donned the Hat in an effort to rescue fellow officers. He believed were trapped in the building. I figured if I had a hat on To be easier for me to navigate my way through the crowd. It was so what we're seeing right now in this footage is that essentially, this guy, Tara Johnson is walking up the steps of the Capitol and people are moving out of the way and they're being very deferential
to him. He's wearing a police uniform, which I guess could be a problem. You have to make a pretty strong argument that people would not have listened to a police officer walking up there. But it's a, it's a, at least a perspective that I think is defensible, having been in big crowds and in a non-uniform role and then seeing guys in uniform rolls, you do? Get treated differently and he's just moving in. He's got this red Maga hat on. That's, you know, it's
ill-fitting. And people are getting all the way and letting them up there. And he said he did it for a reason that makes perfect sense as a law enforcement officer that he is trying to fulfill his duties by getting into the building getting up where he needs to be. And then evacuating members of the either the house or the Senate. And we're going to see some footage of him in a second. Walking people out of the, the
Senate chambers. I believe, Isla self-preservation and the escalation and I needed to get up those steps. I couldn't say, what would have happened walking through that crowd without, but for the crime of wearing a trump hat, Johnson found himself suspended. Ultimately, he resigned from the force and lost his pension. He now works part-time as a Furniture.
Mover Yogananda Pittman, meanwhile, thrived two days after January 6, Nancy Pelosi elevated Pittman to acting chief of the Capitol Police. So, they've got some pretty unflattering pictures of this yoga Nama Pittman She is a decidedly not fit female who is a was made the acting Chief. You know, Tara Johnson looks like he's a pretty fit regular dude who would be in a law enforcement role. Looks like he can probably handle himself and unfortunately, you know, he was suspended.
I think they didn't dwell on that very long, but when you get suspended from one of these jobs, that's, that's my status right now. So I imagine he was suspended without pay in the same way, I'm actually in constant contact with him, and I'm going to try to see We can have them on the podcast. I'd like to have him. Tell his whole story in a much longer form.
Having been on Tucker Carlson, it's a big audience and there's no reason not to do it. But unfortunately the amount of time you get on television is very short, even if they give you a longer segments, it's only for a few moments. And I bet we can get into a pretty interesting story about a man that experience some bad treatment. It's mentioned that he's a Biden voter. So I think we'll talk about that just a second here. But once again, people who act a certain way got a certain look.
And that look was all that it takes for For people to treat them in very, very different ways. Despite this guy having the same politics is probably the people that that suspended him late. Last year, Pittman took a high-paying job as the head of security at UC Berkeley, which is right outside. Pelosi's congressional district. Berkeley announced Pittman's hiring with unqualified praised for her. Quote, steadfast commitment, to
social justice. Pittman herself boasted about her heroic performance on January 6th her Department. She said, quote save democracy See that day. All right, that's probably enough of that. What that tells us though, and I think it's one of those telling pieces, save democracy as an awesome statement. It's a thing that I heard from people on the left in these Twitter space debates, which I've been involved in them,
going back to the original. Twitter files drop going back, pretty much as far as I've been on social media. And there is it this this statement that we're better people the new and we care more about democracy than you. And you know the whole point of What happened at January 6?
I believe I wasn't there, but the people that I've talked to, I believe that their intentions were pure enough that they thought there was something utterly wrong with the election that we had in 2020 and they were there protesting at and they were there letting people know that they were dissatisfied with the fact that there wasn't a credible response from federal
law enforcement. I happen to have a little bit more information about that knowing that people like the Washington field office did not do those investigations the way that they probably should have and they removed people that they believe might be Trump voters.
There's a Example of a man who had something like nine children or seven children Catholic guy who, you know, had a big family and they immediately assume based on his family and his religion that he was obviously a trump supporter and therefore he was removed by this. Now, Infamous, a sack, a guy named Timothy Tebow who didn't want any, filthy Trump supporters on the squad. This guy had over a decade of experience investigating election crimes.
So those are the people that you want doing that and when that didn't happen. And you know, those of us inside the bureau Were asking those questions in January of 2021? It's like who's doing the investigations? Why are there not investigation? Why are we not reassuring? The American people that we are doing things in the right way at the right time and the answer was always kind of like shut up in color. I had a supervisor that went to
the mat and ask somebody. This is the woman who ended up actually taking my security clearance and woman named Jennifer Moore, he went and asked her the questions you know on behalf of my squad working we're concerned. What is going on with these investigations And and the response that we got back was not satisfactory, there was no information but he seemed like he'd basically been put in his place and then shortly thereafter. He received a transfer to the place you wanted to go.
He was able to leave Washington DC and and he was out, it was a little bit after the time that I left. So he got his office, you know, transfer about maybe two months after I did and that was the end of it. And I just, I never felt like it was a satisfactory answer given to even the people that investigate and know the other investigators. So that seems like a real problem. I want to also read this little
piece here from from daily wire. This is Ryan savedra and it says X Capitol Hill. Cop says supervisors went silent during January 6, Riot and daunting the Maga hat cost him his career. I'm not so much interested in the Hat. Although I think that they would just basically make the argument that it was a Hatch Act violation that he made a political statement on duty as somebody who's been in these big crowds.
I've been in all black and I've done, you know how to Black Bandana on when it was appropriate to walk around and be Observe that way, obviously, I was in a plain clothes role so a little bit different animal, but sometimes you have to adapt to the environment for safety. And so his claim would have to be like really aggressively refuted and it sounds like his voting history doesn't show that he was going to make that
statement. So it's a really nasty thing that they did based on maybe just Optics. Again, that Rorschach test that instant knee-jerk reaction, you have a maggot hat on. You are the enemy of our group here and our group here, is I guess this Pro Democrat. You know, establishment situation. What's also interesting is is today we found out or yesterday rather we found out that the Mitch McConnell came down on the side of the Capitol Police Chief and stated that this release of
these videos was very dangerous. I'll actually read you from his thing, but he seems to be walking this party line that, you know, the chief of the Capitol. Police that Mitch McConnell that others in the in. Leftist media. You know, talking point crowd have all been saying the same thing.
And that thing that they are saying is is that it's really a responsible to release this footage that it's Cherry Picked and dangerous and that it's going to give away National Security secrets and all those are essentially absurd.
If they were being honest, this would have all been released under the January 6th committee that went on for all of last year, through that theater and the most important part of it, at least, from my position is they should have been giving exclamatory evidence to the People who were being charged, it's abhorrent. And then the last thing is is that that unselect committee or the select committee, but I guess Trump calls unselect. I think it's funny.
They didn't actually address the real security failures. Like, who is to blame for the fact that they were not enough Riot police and other you know, capable law enforcement entities on the day on January 6th, where the heck were they? I've made a consistent argument for the last probably four or five months in public and I haven't been in public that So that's most of the time that I've been there that that event should have been listed as an nsse apparently.
Dan bonds, you know, did a whole podcast about this and I would encourage you if you haven't heard it to go, look that up as well. And nsse is a national special security event, it is by law and by Statute, run by the Secret Service and it is managed by DHS under executive orders and under federal law like under the code of federal regulations. And what that means is that they are the core Her back.
So that there is one primary agency and everybody else jumps in on it. That means DC Metro PD would jump in on it. The capital police would jump in on at the FBI. The ATF, I'm trying to think of what the other entities US Marshals would be there. You would have a department of energy. You would have the department of the Interior under the u.s. Park police because most of the National Mall is considered national park space. So all of these entities would
all get together. They have a big command post and they deconflict and they send out. - teams and they put boats in the water, they put helicopters in the sky and they do it really big and they do it all the time in DC and one of the reasons why people like it is because there's a lot of money, there's a lot of money to be able to pay the overtime of
the the local police department. So they're 100% on board for it and you know that also helps out because people can work overtime and some of the other Federal Service as well. So we're going to read this article real quick from from daily wire. I've got to daily wire articles here today. This one says a fired Capital police officer who helped him Activate the capital during the
January 6, Right? Said the supervisors went dark or went silent on the radio, and that he put on the hat, in order to get to where he was going. He thought the crowd was hostile and therefore, he pushed through it. So Tara Johnson again, told Fox News that his bosses seemed ill-prepared for the riot. Once again, this like, lack of preparation is not common for a place that sees protests including unruly protests and maybe not on a daily basis.
But on a weekly and certainly on a monthly basis, there are a lot of protests that happened in d.c. Most of them are unscripted and usually there's some sort of announcement or social media awareness that they will happen. He said he was trying to evacuate the Senate side of the building as the crowd became increasingly hostile but couldn't get an answer much less authorization.
That sounds like the supervisors basically, panicked went into what we call vapor lock, I'd think and and didn't deal with this. So he said I was the person that thought I was going to. He said the person that I thought was going to authorize the evacuation. Didn't do it? Just stop responding.
In the fog of war in a chaotic situation which you often find and this is something that I've been dealt with as a surveillance Guy where we were doing an operation on something, that was a sensitive Target, we knew there was gonna be a lot of scrutiny over it and what you would do is you'd ask for something and the answer was nothing coming back which was essentially saying do what you think is best and that's what he
did in this case. So he was fired because he was seen in this picture and the picture. If you saw the website here as we pulled it up on the rumble Channel you know he's got this Maga hats it.
I was that And a mask. He's got a face mask on and you know, that's not a very right wing position these days, but for whatever it is, he says, according to daily wire says he voted for Joe Biden in 2020, and that his only priority there because this is actually, the sworn duty of Capitol Police was to get members of Congress and their staff to safety. And the security footage that Tucker played basically
cooperated that. So it's hard to find fault with someone doing that, but once again, if you are, are looking at anybody in a maggot hat as an enemy, then that's what you're going to see. I want to read the response to the Tucker videos and obviously both of these things are part of the videos that came out. This is the from the desk of the chief, so will transition over here. This is coming off the Twitter feed of one of the reporters. I don't know who this reporter is here.
I'd like to give credit Possible investigative reporter for ABC News. Has this particular thing. So here we go. This is a letter from the desk of the chief to be read at all roll calls and posted on all bulletin boards and it's entitled, truth and Justice. It's signed by Jay Thomas manager, who is the chief of police with Capitol Police. So I'm going to skim through some of this. I'm not going to hit all of it but it says last night and opinion program I guess that's
Tucker Carlson aired commentary. That was filled with a defensive and misleading. Conclusions about the January 6th attack. Remember the Rorschach test? We're back to this thing. He has to see it one way. So everything he's going to do is going to be framed. That way, quote, the opinion program, never reached out to the department to provide accurate context. And quote, I don't think that matters like, who cares?
It's video, it's video footage, the video footage shows what it shows and then Tucker Carlson. You know, he's a pretty intelligent guy and he describes it in a way that I think is accurate to what the video showed his conclusions to it. Are not inaccurate. They may be incomplete, but they're not wrong. That's certainly the truth. It says, one false allegation, this one's kind of frustrating
to the suspend double crew. One false allegation is that our officers helped the Riders and act as tour guides. This is outrageous and false. This department stands by the officers, in the videos that were shown last night. I don't have to remind you how outnumbered our officers were on January 6. Well, whose fault is that? That seems like a thing that should be addressed.
That should like we failed, you would be the thing that a You for take, especially because he wasn't even the guy that was in charge, on that day. He said, I don't have to remind you how outnumbered our officers were. Those officers did their best to use the escalation tactics to try to talk to Riders into getting each other, to leave the building, okay? And then they use the cherry picking claim because we're just going to do left as talking
points here. And then this is really interesting because the medical examiner's report on on Capitol. Police Officer, Brian sick, Nick said that he died of natural causes and then made the sort of illogical jump.
And you know, this is not a thing that would be I don't understand how this this corner put this down but wrote that it was likely also contributed by the events that he took part in on January 6. Well, either it was natural causes or it wasn't, it's not relevant that you know we all die of living living is one of those things that you don't get out the other side of with everything intact. And so I would say that everybody who dies of natural
causes did. So based on the events of their life, this This commentary on there. So anyway, he was ruled a line of duty death. I have to believe that that was something that was done to help his family and I think that's fine. You know, giving him a line of duty death but then they created this false narrative. So here's what it says. Finally, this is a quote from the chief. Again, the most disturbing accusation from last night was that our late friend and colleague.
Brian sickness, death had nothing to do with his heroic actions on January 6th. That's what natural causes means. By the way, that means it had nothing to do with January 6, like his life lived. I think that the whole idea that he had Strokes, I don't know if they were hemorrhagic Strokes, maybe that would lead to that, but that would not be a natural causes, that'd be traumatic.
And if The Strokes ended up being something that were obstructive, if he had a, they called ischemic stroke, that basically led to stopping blood moving around. Then what would that have to do with January 6? Either it just what would it have to do with getting bear sprayed and getting hit in the head with a fire extinguisher when you had a helmet on, it's not logical, but this That, you know, they're defending their perspective because they don't
need facts. They don't need, you know, they don't need accuracy, they just need emotions. And the emotion is, he was one of ours, which I sort of understand. It says, the department maintains as anyone with common sense would well, we might argue there that had officer sick, not fought valiantly for days or four hours on the day. He was violently assaulted sick. Nick would not have died the next day.
So the department is going to say that he fought and then died because of it. But you know, the medical examiner's report It actually doesn't say that and if it says that he died because of it on top of natural causes then one of those things can be true in one cannot be.
It doesn't make any sense and I've read Coroner's reports, I used to do death investigations in my last year in the bureau and then he gives this sort of fighting statement to his men and women saying you fought like hell on January 6 and you risked your life to protect the Constitution and everything this country stands for. I don't think they actually keep the Constitution there. That's my understanding. I thought it was a Miss Smith. Anything.
So maybe not that you along with our law enforcement Partners saved every member of Congress and their staff. Well, so there's a perspective, I don't think it's an accurate perspective but that's somebody who's looking at that ink blot and they've come up with the conclusion that democracy was under attack. The Constitution was at risk.
No further information. And it doesn't really seem to be backed by, you know, that really pesky thing like facts, the possibilities of eliminating, all those things really tough. I want to Pivot to some fun stuff that happened down in Atlanta because I think I just learned something. By watching this stuff. So the background is that there is a training facility that is being constructed outside of the, the city of Atlanta. And it's being called cop City
from everything I can gather. And essentially, there's a bunch of money that's going to go in there going to build up some like realistic training facilities and then they're going to have access to it. I'm sure state federal and locals will be able to go out and use it. So that all seems like a good thing. Now on paper, the left generally says that they don't like cops, but they do want better training for cops. They don't want to defund police and make them less.
But they don't want to give police any money, so they don't have a unified position but not too long ago, maybe a month ago or so. They were clearing out these protesters who were in the area of where this cop said he is going to be built this training facility and they were known as Forest protectors if you want to believe what CNN had to say.
And one of these idiots who was in a tent or something to that effect, or some sort of a temporary lodging took a potshot at a cop, who was trying to clear him out and then was killed for his troubles, and the police officer was Injured. So this is not a place that's not with, you know, without violence. This is a obviously a contentious thing and Atlanta is not the same place as Portland. And yet the attempts to sort of stop, this thing are still
ongoing. Now, there were 23 or so of them of these protesters were arrested the other night. I'm going to show you some video here. If you're watching the rumble footage you're going to see it. But there's no there's no actual. What do you call it? There's no sound to this but this is a Fleer image from looks like, probably a helicopter and it is showing a seriously large number of people coming in.
So, in this case, white is hot. If you're not familiar with looking at Fleer, you're looking at a zoom in and maybe some cloud cover here, but there are maybe 100 on the on the right side of the picture and then on the left side of the picture, there's probably like a half dozen or so that are creeping in. These are mostly black-clad males and they are Marching around and they have set fire to this. The piece of earth-moving equipment or maybe a front loader or something like that.
So they had a expensive tractor that gets burned up, you can see the Fleer image, it's just like burning hot and then the cops actually backed off on this. So we've got a couple different images. One of them is from the helicopter. This one is a ground footage. You see, cops basically like retreating and and they were praised for doing what they did. In other words, they weren't going to cause loss of human life.
It's probably appropriate. Although I don't think any of these people could replace this equipment but there's a couple of Earth moving pieces and And it looks like the cops are in full Retreat because they're literally outnumbered, man, they're outnumbered. Probably 15 to 1 or worse and and then these clowns that are in there.
These, these Rider, you know, protester types have decided to go on, you know, and they're all wearing black, they're all throwing rocks and stuff at this thing, trying to take down some kind of electrical system there like a big high voltage power lines to but yeah, just destroying. So you see the cops basically pull out and and leave that space to these to these Riders until they come back in. And Force and this video has 1.3 million views on it.
The funniest thing to me about all of it, I'll just call your attention. If you're watching our channel on the video, the Atlanta police department at Atlanta underscore police is giving Ariel. Not Ariel like a, ER, but Ariel AR iel, like The Little Mermaid. So the response to all these people on Twitter are pictures of The Little Mermaid because they mistakenly spelled The word wrong.
But you know, the number of people that came through and I once again we're just showing a loop right now for a second, the number of people there man that's got to be over 100. There are so many people cruising down inside the fence line in towards this Earth, moving equipment, it's pretty
incredible. And I think if you have a dozen guys, in a couple of vehicles, like this is not the stand, you want to make because the only way you do it is by just executing people wholesale and that this probably doesn't doesn't allow for a loss of life. I bet you they're deadly force. Policy wouldn't cover it. Not sure that even FBI would stand behind people doing that. So it's worth noting. But what I do want to also point out is this other daily wire article here, which I think is
relevant. So we're going to show actually, they've got some pictures of the people in broad daylight so they're marching through this Creek. I didn't realize that they're marching and you can see how many of them. There are says, Atlanta police release aerial footage of training center, rioters. So they show the footage. But this is the part that was most interesting to me, I'm going to scroll down most of the way said they did about a hundred fifty thousand dollars
worth of damage. That's pretty easy to imagine base. On the the Earth moving equipment cost and having seen what those things cost to having buddies. That you know, that have paid that kind of money to do it. So, the officers supposedly, exercised restraint, we're seeing that in air quotes here and use non-lethal enforcement to tuck the arrest of 35 people. 23 of those individuals face it. Domestic terrorism charges once again, assign Atlanta is not the same as Portland they have now
killed. One of those people who was trying to kill a cop. That's an interesting move and then the second thing is you've got A of them facing these these felony charges for domestic terrorism, literally charged with terrorism under State Statute. Pretty interesting could result in up to 35 years in prison, but the piece that was really interesting to me, and I was notified of it in multiple ways today, including people who have
written books about the splc. The far left nonprofit, Southern Poverty, Law Center it. Confirmed that one of their employees was in fact, arrested there. Here's where it gets interesting for me the end I'm going to read a quote directly from The splc spokesperson quote and employee at the splc was arrested while acting and identifying as a legal Observer on behalf of the national lawyers. Guild, and LG the employee is an experienced legal Observer and
their arrest. It's actually his arrest and his arrest is not evidence of any crime, but if heavy-handed law enforcement intervention against protesters and the Governor Brian Kemp said that they will not be tolerating to Mystic terrorism. So that's all good. But I think the thing that was most interesting to me I'm going to pull up the next article. If you don't mind here.
This is the picture of the guy and his name is Thomas, Webb Jurgen so Thomas Webb. Who is a clean-cut kid looks actually like my youngest brother and kind of interesting also, an attorney probably also pretty left-leaning, although probably not dumb enough to get caught in something like this. They mentioned that he was part of the national lawyers.
Guild also just sort of For those who follow daily wire the best is that they talked about, you know, his work with the splc and so on. And then if you get down to the last paragraph, they mentioned last month, an FBI whistleblower lie to document showing the FBI was investigating radical traditional Catholics and showing that they were using the splc as a source for naming hate groups. So, another little interesting shout out daily wire still tracking what we're up to, so that's fun.
But let's talk about the national lawyers. Guild, I'm going to add some some personal flavor and spice to this when my team was deployed to Portland. In. I believe it was in September. It was either September or early October but I'm pretty sure September of 2020 of yeah, 2020 we went out there and we were going to be observing the potential of federal crimes. We were not necessarily assigned to a specific subject on all
days. But we did have subjects that we were watching that were being accused of federal crimes that had cases against them that were in the antifa, BLM movement, and part of the riot scene that was going on for 100 nights and days. And one of the things that was immediately Parent is number one. That antifa is not an idea. It's an organized group of people because we dealt with organized groups all the time.
And the second thing was, is that despite the media representation that there were these like nonpartisan, you know, third-party legal Watchdog groups referred to as the national lawyers Guild, that those people were actually embedded with sympathetic to and part of the antifa organization which wasn't organization. I have. No qualms saying that and there was evidence of it and I'm going to share that evidence with you like my personal.
Ants and I'm going to tell you that the FBI has it as well. Alright. So the way that the national lawyers, Guild identified themselves, was easier with green shirts that said National lawyers, Guild on them and the big letters and LG or they were green hats or both. Now, one of the things that's most interesting to me as while we were on a couple of our surveillance has.
We were watching unruly protest that got really, really strange for those of us who have been in urban areas and done a lot of surveillance, the members of this this unruly crew.
Would send what I would call scouts out that were they were like, Parade route managers, they were on you, no Vespas and bicycles, and they would go block off traffic and allow people to start marching, they would drive up streets the wrong way and just block things off wholesale and tell people to move around and people did because they didn't want to run over some, you know, fat chick on a Vespa which was one of the people that were watching it turns out.
So that being the case, they had these marches going all over the place there, you know, up and down certain streets. And they'd go doubt the wrong way, down a one-way and it would get blocked off by these people. Now, while we were out there observing and we'd be posted back, you know, a block or two blocks, whatever we are washing and sometimes we would see people that would kind of creep past our vehicles. There was one woman in particular, wearing a national
lawyers, Guild hat. It's a green hat. And she was very notable because she had sort of large breasts and no bra. I only say that because I had a bunch of dudes who were in their 50s that have nothing better to do than watch people. That's what we do all day. A long and as they were watching this woman came up over and over again. She was she was very obvious because she would go running and you can just see men, know what
I'm talking about that. We have a sixth sense for catching, that sort of thing, even in like rearview mirrors. So this woman is back there. She's very, very obvious and then she's holding, like a personal FR-S radio, FRS radios are easily use their easily bought. Any way you can get them at a Bass Pro Shop, you can get them at a Walmart, you can get them off Amazon.
So on And the bureau had noted before I got there, that antifa was accustomed to using FRS radios to move themselves around and to do logistical support. And this woman with the nlg hat on, who claimed to be a legal Observer, that was what that statement was, that's what that hat was supposed to mean.
And who yelled at us about, you know, being a, you know, she was observing for people's rights was using an FRS radio to call out the license plates of the people that she believed were quote, unquote, feds And that was their statement about it. Now, the bureau captured all of this radio traffic, it's all unencrypted, and it's public information because it's just
thrown across the airwaves. So they were gathering it in and recording it as evidence of the larger conspiracy that was going on in Portland. I've never heard anything done with it. I've never heard a public comment on it and I don't ever expect to see prosecution. But what we did see was she would call out a license plate. Wearing her green, National lawyers, Guild hat. And then a security element from the antifa crowd would show up
wearing all black a black block. There was a woman that famously showed up that was wearing. She was wearing a leather skirt or like a pleather skirt and fishnet stockings and then like a tactical vest and then four or five other guys wearing tactical vests, I don't think they had body armor in them. That wasn't my impression from looking at them, but I don't know for a fact, but they all had this like, sort of silly uniform that showed them to be this sort of element and then
they came out and harassed. A number of guys that were on my team and also me They came out and did that to me, you know, later on, on a different day. So, on multiple days, we witness this Behavior. They would call out a license plate number. We would get the the command center or the command post for the FBI would call us up and say, hey, they're calling a license plate. Looks like it's fill in the blank vehicle.
You know, are one of you driving those vehicles and in the case of like three of us, you know, a couple people got run off, they said go ahead and move, so you don't, you know, expose your
position. So they would drive off and we've been, you know, we got chased at one point, one of my colleagues prior Marine. Now retired FBI agent was driving, a Nissan Armada got cited and spotted by this woman who he identified later on, in our actor action, and he went driving off because the license plate was burned, which is what we would say that they were, you know, they were made. So he goes driving off, he gets chased by a bunch of people on
bicycles. That was the security element and some guy on a motorcycle came up and join them. So you have Nissan Armada five or six people on bicycles one, motorcycle, and then three federal agents in No other vehicles because we weren't going to let him just run off in his own. We were going to make sure that we stayed with him to make sure that he could safely elude them
and go somewhere else. So we followed you know and they were running he would run lights, they would run lights, they were going in against traffic wherever they needed to to keep up with this guy. And eventually he just kind of ran them off by just Cheerilee, outdistancing them, and driving
in a vehicle faster. He was, you know, one break Tap Away from ending this security elements day, but chose not to was probably the right move, but my point is, is that there is an You're thinking action that these people have the same tactics and the same support, the national lawyers, Guild in Atlanta doing the same sort of violent and Tifa BS that we saw in Portland. And I don't hear wide-spread calls for running them all down or prosecutions or you know hang
all the insurrectionists. When they're out there doing the same sort of thing. These are the same people that were burning down a federal courthouse that were attacking like most of the downtown of Portland from what I could I could. See that all the windows were boarded up. I mean, it was a captive State and so many ways. And you just have this bizarre Instinct where the left is more than happy to be very mad at a
guy. Wearing Viking horns and other people as well, obviously, who went into the capital that broke glass and did damage, which some of those things are felonies and some of them are misdemeanors. A lot of them are probably misdemeanors and you don't have that same outrage from them at people that are quote unquote, on their team. Again, the national Rorschach test is if Look at a crime.
Do you call it a crime? And January 6th is sort of the differentiator between whether you do or don't what I keep finding is that people on the right almost, all of them will look at a crime and know that it's a crime and they say, look you punched a cop, you should go to jail. There are some of these things that don't raise to the level of the FBI's, actual investigative requirements things that are misdemeanors are not investigated by the FBI until
January 6th. So that should be a problem for all thinking and honest people. But it isn't So, we have to just kind of live in the world that we're in. It is the way that it is, but that doesn't mean that we shouldn't continue to push for good actions and good actions by our politicians and by our fellow man. The last one that I want to kind of cover here is a really wild story of kidnapping and murder down at the Texas border.
So I'm going to switch over here, we're going to pull up the Los Angeles Times and I'll read it so you don't have to. But it says to kidnapped Americans found dead in Mexico to others rescued and Return to the United States. This was written by Kate litha command, Patrick McDonald on the 7th. So yesterday and updated in the evening, they're updating from Mexico City. I don't know why they're in Mexico City because Browns bill
is nowhere near that. But essentially what they're saying is that two of the four United States citizens who were kidnapped at gunpoint in northern Mexico, were found dead on Tuesday. The Mexican authorities said that the other two were rescued after an intense Manhunt that renewed, the u.s. focus on violence at the southern border.
These things do happen every so often they're not incredibly common for Americans to be kidnapped, but if they do happen, it says, the Americans were located Tuesday Morning in a small. Wooden house in a field outside of the violent Border City of mataró switch.
I don't know that City very well but it's just outside of Brownsville and that the Attorney General of the state there, noted that there was one subject who had been detained a guy named Jose Guadalupe N. I don't know if they're breathing his last name or what 23 years old, who was guarding the house with these two and the two survivors who made it back home are Latavia McGee and Eric James William both of them had they were in a van apparently that had North Carolina plates
and it got shot up and then two people were killed and then two people were returned recently. So I want to talk just a little bit about what that might mean. And then The responses to it. That I think interesting, what it might mean is that they were one of two things either. They were a mistaken, identity, high possibility for that. They were in a very generic white Chrysler minivan and could have been mistaken for somebody
else. The other possibility is that they were involved in the drug trade and that they got in some sort of scrimmage and didn't understand what they were getting into on the wrong side of the border, both of those are possible, I'm sure that we probably won't hear much more about it unfortunately because it's not a very good name. Before the by demonstration, but the FBI was called in. Because this was a kidnapping case and it was an international kidnapping case that's FBI territory.
I have friends who have worked these cases down in New Mexico, you know, crossing the border either in the in New Mexico or over the bridge of the Americas in El Paso. And generally speaking, we generally find people and they're generally alive as long as they're American citizens and if they're not, then Anything could happen. But in this case, it's interesting those names.
I'm gonna guess that Eric Eric James Williams and Latavia McGee are probably black and they came from North Carolina. So I don't know what the heck they were doing down there. That doesn't mean that they shouldn't travel down there. It just means it's an interesting data point.
It would make mistaken identity less likely only because the people that are down in Brownsville are either Texans who live in Texas, and I don't think they have a big black population down there, and they have a pretty high Hispanic
population. So these people would probably Stand Out visually, I don't think they'd be as easy to mistake, but anything could happen and I couldn't say one way or another, but if I was leaning 60/40 on one side of the other I'm guessing that this was probably something we're going to find out that was a maybe a business deal.
Gone bad. That's that's my educated speculation on it. I'm open to being wrong shortly and I'll correct it by m. The thing that's worth noting is the United States government should be pushing to stop this kind of thing on every level. Because we should not be allowing the cartels to run our borders. I think that Dan Bungie know who I talked to today for 15 or 20 minutes makes a very compelling case, that Biden is afford. Agent is in, he is acting on behalf of foreign interests.
Not that he is a spy, or doing some sort of Espionage, but that fact that he's actually using his influence to keep these borders open and there's some compelling interest compelling coincidences will call them that indicate that the cartels are throwing money into the Biden crime, family as it's called, you know. But the sort of a hunter Biden experience, they are moving money into that pot through some
third parties. These Arco states that exist in Eastern Europe. That's all really troubling stuff, if that's the case. There's like I said, there's some coincidences that need to be explained and are pretty troubling and the by demonstration is not helping themselves by leaving such an open border and leaving these spaces. Open now, there's a left and a right argument against allowing these borders to be open in this
way. And allowing the tar tells to have this sort of American territory that they can control the, the right-wing version of. It is a law-and-order version. It's a Values of and saying that we don't want people, invading our Sovereign Nation. I think that's pretty strong. But even on the left, it's resulting in a lot of human suffering on the people that are generally compassionate speaking liberal types. You know.
There's a fairly strong argument stating that you're moving people from One captive environment to another, they're coming here and they're being trafficked, either for labor or for sex. They're coming in here and they have no access to law enforcement. Many of them don't speak English and they don't know what the rules are living in America, and they end up victims of some sort
of organized crime syndicate. It, whether it be MS, 13, or 18 Street, you know, or whatever these groups are, are working to bring people over because then they have more people to do whatever it is, that they are either extorting or trafficking and so on. So, neither of these things are
good. Now, there's been some arguments about talking, you know, there's Senators that are mouthing off about we should, you know, name the drug cartels, as terrorist organizations, and then be able to unlock some military tools. I think, generally speaking, that's probably a good idea. And then there's this little push. Back saying, well we shouldn't do it because it will open up Asylum claims in the United States.
If you listened to our podcast with Aaron Stephenson and with Tara roads a week ago, Monday, you will know that the Biden's Administration is already looking to open those floodgates up and allow Asylum officers to make the decision instead of immigration judges. And if that rule goes into fruition, if it actually happens, then what we are going to see is a Floodgate. It makes no difference whether or not we call the cartels domestic terrorist.
The people are going to be getting their Asylum claims, granted at a rate of about 85% if the numbers hold and there's no reason to think that they won't. So I'm going to just once again Circle back to this thing. Like we look at the border, the border is just another thing that if you probably believe that January 6 was a riot, then you probably want them to close the border.
And if you think that January 6 was an Insurrection, then the Border being open is good because we're such humanitarians this Rorschach test is not going away. It is an easy way. For us to analyze and look at each other in one single event and sadly, it shows exactly how divided America is. And that is just a, just a
crying shame at this point. All that being said, I hope that we figure out our differences sooner than later and that we can start seeing some common ground because this is not a sustainable position. And I don't know that it goes into 20 24 in a way that that doesn't involve more of these dust Ops, like we saw on On January 6, because so many people are getting fed up. Ladies and gentlemen, you have been listening to the Kyle Serafin show.
I hope that you would please consider subscribing to our show. If you haven't already, just push that button on either. Rumble on Apple on Spotify. On, I heart radio or wherever it is that you are listening to our show. And if you did enjoy, what you had to hear, please share this content with a friend, maybe two, maybe 50. If you got 50 friends, you might be more popular than I am. It's always appreciated.
It helps us grow both the audience and the number of people who have access to some of the first hand Source information, some of the inside, Baseball that I'm able to share with you and a lot of our really good guests that come in on Monday, and we do appreciate your feedback. If you have an opportunity to leave us a five star review, on Apple podcast, we do appreciate that as well.
We're up to 260 something last time I checked and I can't access them because I don't have fill here for me, but generally speaking, if you are listening to our podcast, you'll see producer, Phil give us a library of one of those. So we'll make sure we get that done on Friday show. You've been listening to the Kyle Serafin show and we'll see you all next time. Thanks for listening to the Kyle Serafin. Show be sure to follow him on Twitter and Truth at Kyle seraphin.
Thanks for listening to the Kyle Serafin. Show be sure to follow him on Twitter and Truth at Kyle seraphin.