STEVE FRIEND: A Friendly Friday | Ep 594

Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistleblower and American patriot. Prepare to embrace the uncomfortable truth because this program has no time for comforting lies. Here is civil liberties enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello my friends, welcome to the Kyle Seraphin show. Today is Friday. It is June the 20th. It is no longer a federal, federal holiday, but it is federal Friday.

And so we have Steve, friend, former Fed, never again joining me. You know, this morning Brain was a little bit scrambled. The eggs were fried. We're going to talk about a kind of a mixed bag of stuff going on in the news. I want to cover a little bit on the Iran, Israel stuff because why not?

We're going to talk about some FBI stuff because that's kind of what we do in a new push to kind of make Dashpongino do the thing that they said they would do. And it sounds like my buddy Steve spent a little bit of time over on Blaze dropping some napalm on these dudes and putting their feet to the fire.

Some real strange comments coming out of the Trump administration talking about their overwhelming support and why we need to go and do military actions against Iran, which seems to have divided the mega base. We did a whole show on that. We're going to do a little bit more on that because I think it's still relevant. What else? People in Georgia are very upset that they couldn't kill a baby after the mom was found brain dead. That I was actually one of the

ugliest stories. We talked about abortion the other day and sort of this need and this push by OBGY NS not just to deliver babies, not just to bring human life in and make sure that women are covered with sort of maternal care. But also if they don't get a chance to kill babies, they're going to have to go pay out of their own pocket and learn how to do it because they are so desperate to be part of the abortion complex, which is very, very weird.

This story that I saw was actually really gross, and it goes to an underlying problem. Like where the heck are the dads? Shouldn't the dad have a say in this? Don't moms by default want to have babies? That's why they are pregnant and that's why they are trying to carry a child. I don't know. It just seems really important to me. Like the next generation before we get into all of that wild stuff and there's going to be all kinds of contentious things that we're going to talk about.

We're going to say something about my friends over at Patriot Protect website is in the in the show description. If you guys want to find it is Patriot Dash Protect dot com slash Kyle. There's a couple of little phrases in there, but you can find it very quickly. Scroll down and click through it right now. 84,000,000 passwords have been leaked and you have to ask yourself if you're going to

be the next target. A newly uncovered data breach from AT&T reveal these millions of logins, their credentials with complete usernames and passwords and emails left unencrypted and open wide on the Internet. The data is already circulating around the dark net where scammers can shop for their next victim. They can buy batches of these things and then target you. The breach includes access to bank accounts and e-mail providers, healthcare portals, government services and so on.

Criminals don't need to hack. They just simply log in if they can buy access to your information, if you want to keep your passwords secured, if you want to keep your digital data and your money, which is probably where all of us are keeping our money now, very few people are keeping them in the mattress, under the bed. Yeah, you might want to do something about that. You can use Patriot Protect to help remove your personal information from the dark web,

from public websites. They'll let you know what's being sold on the dark web so you can actually change those things so you're not a victim. And the website ispatriot-protect.com slash Kyle, get your phone number, your e-mail address, and all the other things out there off the public data broker websites. Make sure that the stuff that might be sold is something you're aware of so you can change them up And don't become a victim.

Make yourself harder as a target and therefore let somebody else be the one who has to deal with this problem. Not everybody's going to do it. It's going to cost you very, very little. It's just a couple bucks a month. Check it out. You'll save 15% on an annual subscription. patriot-protect.com slash Kyle. Check out our long form that we did with one of the Co founders too on the Sunday special a little while back. His name is Skip.

Check that out. And let's get into today's program with my buddy Steve Fran. We're going to be talking about all kinds of other things too, maybe even cyber attacks, maybe not from dark web scammers, maybe our government. What do you think about that? OK, Steve, friend, welcome to the program. Can you testify what happened just before we started going live, since you got to see it happen in real time? No disavow, no knowledge whatsoever.

I actually saw you melting down, and rightfully so, as all of the images that you had pre staged and set up and spent scrupulous effort and time preparing to put forward a show. Because you're definitely not 100% of fed Boy, OP disappear in front of my eyes. Which, I mean, it's pretty appropriate for a federal Friday, but there's a lot of

tech malfeasance afoot. I just got a message from a friend of ours, Brianna Barella. Her website just went down minutes after she posted a video supporting Garretta, Boyle and myself on social media. So maybe the tech guys came in on Juneteenth preparing for an assault. Well, that's kind of interesting. All this stuff is actually kind of launched from a little

interview. I think I actually played it the other day, but I was at the end of the show, so maybe people did not catch it. You're back upsetting people. You've got people in your corner over at the Blaze. You just did you want to talk about the interview? And then I'm actually going to play this little clip that Tom Fenton dropped on where he's sounds like you got Robert Barnes now stepping into the arena.

You've got the folks over at Blaze that are realizing like the stuff that we were early adopters on, it doesn't seem like Dashpon, Geno are getting it done. And it's starting to upset some people on the conservative right. I had an invitation to come on to Pat Gray Unleash this morning. His is a show that immediately is in front of Glenn Beck. So pretty, pretty prominent guy. And they interviewed me for a full hour and they asked me sort of what my experience was, his

background. But then also like what my assessment is of what's going on and things that you and I have talked about before, particularly about like the Hogan's Alley ninjas coming out of the ceiling, concerns that we have and how they've gone in with winning hearts and minds instead of shock and all. But then really I wanted to hone in on the talking point that we're seeing put out there all

the time. And I'm kind of in your camp like America, only Israel, Iran, I don't weigh in on it because I'm not a foreign policy expert it whereas everybody online apparently is when last week they were a due process expert, before that they were a tariff expert and then they were

virologists. But what my point was the Iran is trying to assassinate Donald Trump point we have highlighted how the Asif merchant assassination plot was a playbook case and that name I keep seeing put out there all the time. But he tried to kill Donald Trump. No that that wasn't he was just a vulnerable person and not a good guy.

I don't think I'd want to be friends with him, but they completely the FBI facilitated his arrival and travel into the interior of the country where he was going to try to bring about this scheme to have fake protests outside politicians houses and a woman descending into through the ceiling Mission Impossible style to steal classified material and recruit hit men from nightclubs for the low price of $500 that he was going to have to have his cousin from Pakistan loan him so.

That's not all right. So that's the same case that we're talking about. This is the guy that was driving around with a federal informant or was it a federal agent? I can't. Remember if it was New York Police Department undercovers? OK, so there's a JTTFUCS then that were driving this dude around to Brooklyn nightclubs so that he could find potential assassins.

And that's the story that like, you know, that means that Ted Cruz is actually correct that the that the the hitman from from Iran are actually not even competent. And and so there was this sort of outrage. I think Tucker is doing faux outrage on that too. I think they're both right, by the way, I think that Israel is the good guy in the fight compared to the Iranians. And I also think that like we have no business in it either. Is that? I think.

It's the America. Only position, frustrating to see a debate like that word. You want them to have an honest debate and present it, but they're doing like the gotcha thing too. So at the same time, it doesn't come off as genuine positions. And you can have a debate and disagree on things and just present the information as opposed to just trying to like own the other guy and get a viral clip, which they're both sort of endeavoring to do.

So it's like an inauthentic approach to an authentic debate where they do have legitimate policy differences of opinions, but they just don't present it in the way that I, I don't feel comfortable watching it because it's just too much of like the Borat style. I'm uncomfortable. We've got I've got. OK, so I didn't know where we were going to work this in, but here's actually the clip of the Tucker and and Ted Cruz thing. I'm going to tell you why I think this is really interesting.

And it's not because of the men who are talking. It's because who shared it? There's this really interesting push that we keep seeing, and it doesn't matter if it's a Mark Levin or Laura Loomer or if it's Owen Shroyer and Alex Jones or if it's Robert Barnes and Beaver. Frey. Is that how you say his name? Frey, Frey. Whatever Canadian or whatever. I kind of don't care either. Yeah, People are pushing their side of the issue. And so this was shared.

This clip this morning was pushed out by Dinesh D'souza. I don't know what his dog in this fight is either, but he was like, look, Ted Cruz owns Tucker Carlson. So I can tell what side you're pushing based on who you're saying won the debate. Chosen your fighter, you've chosen your fighter, they've chosen Ted Cruz. In this one, it did seem like Ted Cruz actually was shown flat footed on a lot of different topics.

But here he is talking about AIPAC and he was like, even Tucker has to admit it. And now you're hearing all this nonsense about Tucker Carlson was given $200,000 by the Qatari government. I read the Ferra form that Laura Loomer published. It doesn't say anything about $200,000, and it doesn't say anything about Tucker Carlson getting paid. And she was like, well, now you have to prove that he didn't get paid. It's like, no, no, no, no, no, honey, this is not the reality.

You have made a claim and you can't back it up with facts. So all that's kind of goofy. Anyway, this is the clip again shared by Dinesh D'souza, who was part of the movie Police State. So we have like a pretty strong familiarity with the Dinesh, I'll say it that way. Also, one of the reasons why we spent some time around Bongino and his wife, which I've got a clip about that is weird.

All of that is strange that these people have decided to go all in. And it just seems like it's probably backing Donald Trump's position. Is that is that check with you? Yeah. I think ultimately they they kind of paused where they're going to stand on things and then fired an arrow and then afterwards drew the target around it depending on where Donald Trump was going to fall. That's actually really good analogy. All right, Here's Ted Cruz and Tucker Carlson, shared by Dinesh.

The Obama White House told every Democrat pick, you either stand with Israel or you're a Democrat and you stand with the Obama White House and almost every single Democrat member of Congress said I'm a Democrat first, to hell with Israel. And then I watched as AIPAC, every one of those Democrats got reelected and AIPAC did nothing about it and and it dramatically reduced AIPAC's influence. I agree.

I watched it and. And by the way, I told AIPAC, I said, look, the analogy of the NRA was supporting a bunch of politicians and cared about the Second Amendment, and you had politicians that vote to confiscate people's guns, and the NRA turned around and raised money for the people who voted to confiscate guns. You know what? No one would ever care what they said again. Sure. You're making the case that AIPAC is not as powerful as people say it is.

And I completely agree with you. I've, I've watched that and I'm not, I'm not making the case that AIPAC is all powerful and they're running everything and putting flour in the water. I'm not making the case at all because it's not true. So that's that's the claim, that's the push I'm resizing Steve Friends thing. It was bothering me. Steve, you just, you know, this is just the way that I work. I can't handle this stuff. OK. So we'll put you back on the screen here.

Does that argument land for you and is it more interesting the source of it, of it being pushed out there versus the actual discussion being had? Yeah, And I think that that sort of the way that the exchange was going on between those guys, it was pretty clear to me in that that give and take that back and forth between Tucker Carlson and Ted Cruz that there wasn't really a gotcha effort. They weren't trying to like lull the guy into being flat footed so they can spring the trap and

say, aha, see, I got you. And had it was actually just seemed like information that they were being shared there. It wouldn't. It was actually the one of the more calm and and reasonable moments within that exchange that they had the entire league. OK, now I've got one that I think is totally weird. And since we we brought up your Dash Pongino situation, I'll I'll play the Tom Fitton thing in a second here, But I saw this.

This is OK. So for context, I've seen the shared at least small, smaller bits of this by folks that I'm not really big fan of, like Stu Peters, The people that are not just like they they just hate Israel. Like they're doing the anti Semite routine and there's a lot of audience for that. Would we agree on that too? Yes, they're. Increasingly becoming more and more vocal online behind their keyboards. OK, this is one of the weirder answers that I've ever seen.

This de censored news has pushed it out. I've seen nine second clips of it over and over again. I actually found an extended sort of context. This is Dan Bongino. It's dated October 9th of 2018. That's relevant because that's in the modern era. That's while he was doing a podcast. I don't think he was running for political office in 2018. Nope. This is during Donald Trump's first term, too, so he's not even going to be like the vocal minority out of power. He's going to be probably a

little bit more outspoken. I don't know what would ever make like you would never get this answer from me, not in a million years. Not even if you made me go down my entire list of all the things that are close to my heart, It sure as hell wouldn't be the number one thing. It's a really strange. This is probably why people keep pointing it out there because it's kind of like without without context or understanding why he was saying this or why this was in his mind. I don't get it.

But here's Dan talking to supposedly his wife Paula. I don't remember Paula looking like this. Maybe she's maybe this is her like dressed down version. She looks a little different in person when I met her. But anyway, this is supposedly Paula. Who makes you laugh the most? Oh you, Gosh, you make me laugh. What is the one thing you need to have in your fridge at all times? Lenny and Larry's protein cookies. What? What causes dear to your heart? Cause is dear to my Israel.

Defense of Israel. What is #1 on your bucket list? Can you explain why anyone would answer that way? No, that's a completely weird exchange. I mean, you be having this conversation with your wife. And if my wife asked me those sorts of questions, I mean, you got to be the dutiful husband who makes you laugh. Oh, you honey, of course. And you're, you're answering questions that are about like your life together.

In that context, you wouldn't just immediately default to foreign policy, even if it is a very important 'cause for you. You would say something like the the rearing of our children or ensuring that you have the best. Political life to your heart. You're like a foreign nation that I've never lived in it and for some reason that I can't fathom. That that's the type of response that you get from a crazy St. communist, right? What's the cause?

Stopping global warming and from the river to the sea and cut off all the genitals of the children. It's super weird, man. I just, again, I've seen it. I don't get it. It doesn't make any sense to me. This is kind of what spawned this. This is why you guys are going back in there again. A couple of folks are getting into your corner and they're starting to talk about some real issues. People are seeing whistleblowers not reinstated.

I also, I'm going to ask you later about it's always Garrett and Steve. It's never Garrett, Steve, Kyle and Marcus. We'll talk about that in one second. But first let's hear what Tom Fitton said about this. This is self-serving. But also it's he's right. Can't they have it at least what amounts to some kind of an honorable discharge so these guys can go out and make a living again and be and be given some form of recognition for what they did to come forward

and tell the truth? Because in many respects, they helped to contribute to this last election win as well by the things that they disclosed. So is it too much for me to ask that on behalf of my friend Steve? Friend, is that too tough of an ask? No, it's not. And the fact that the whistleblowers haven't been vindicated or provided justice is a real, it's a real black mark on Cash's and Dan's tenure thus far. There's no good reason for it.

I know all the reasons why it isn't being why it isn't done. And because we've been representing whistleblowers and working with whistleblowers for decades here at Judicial Watch, because it's because the FBI culturally and institutionally doesn't want to do it. And the leadership is not is isn't going to buck it or haven't bucked it yet. Isn't that kind of our perspective that the FBI is being run by the FBI, but the guys that are in it? Institution is forever. They come and they go.

Hobbes say meet the new boss, same as the old boss, because that's what they're really expert at. I mean, I can bang on and you bang on them all the time for not having any sort of subject matter expert as it pertains to what they're on paper responsibility of oversight is.

But what they are really competent at is kissing up to the boss bubble, wrapping him, distracting him so that the institution can go on without any sort of interference, no speed bumps to regular standard operating procedure. And then we're seeing some other weird kind of like distractionary stuff because apparently we were supposed to see videos, there was AI heard, there was going to be a wave of transparency crashing over us. Have you witnessed this wave?

I mean, you didn't see who the the Dobbs leaker was. You didn't see the the footage of of John Roberts leaking that, by the way, not not illegal. I don't know why that was a priority issue other than it's a headline grabbing thing. We have the White House cocaine matter that's going to be reinvestigated even though not solved. If it's Hunter's, he's got a pardon. And then we're going to continue going down the credibility Ponzi scheme, like finding something more, something more.

I mean, I was glad that they did reveal about the the Intel product that said the Chinese were going to try to stuff ballots in 2020 and the FBI had that Intelligence Report and that customs intercepted 19,888 fake driver's licenses in route to the Midwest battleground states. But then the FBI pulled it back and basically obliterated the intelligence document because they had to reinterview the source and tell him what he really was going to tell them.

To me, that's the worst election interference of anything more than Russia, Russia, Russia more than James comedy honeypot scheme, more than the 100 Biden laptop because those were efforts to dissuade people from voting for Donald Trump or maybe encouraging them to vote for his rival. This case was actually stuffing the ballots and and we got transparency on that. But my question is, who goes to jail? We have to go beyond just

exposing things. When you're leading the premier preeminent law enforcement agency for the entire country, you would hope you'd have the capability to put handcuffs on some somebody instead of just going on to either Fox News or giving a a handout to John Solomon because he's your buddy, because you and him have the loan access to classified documents from Donald Trump. And then just saying, we'll see.

Look, I'm being transparent. Do you want to talk about that just a little bit more with the John Solomon piece? Because I feel like that's relevant. Well, it is kind of funny how John Solomon and Casper Teller are like the only guys they've gotten the the deputization from Donald Trump to have access to classified documents that are within his purview. Like it's just those two guys. Now look, I don't have a problem with John Solomon as a

journalist. I mean, guys seems to be always trying to dig things up. But I would think that you'd want to go for somebody who has bigger access, particularly if you're Donald Trump and you're like the PT Barnum of our time. Like we're going to have a celebration for the Army, but it's going to be the biggest and most beautiful parade of all time. Like why is just the news the the only outlet that you're going to go to with?

That well, let me let me show this on the screen because I bet you nobody's ever seen this before, at least not in our audience. I know that you probably have Steve, I've got you hidden, but you they'll be able to hear you. We're looking at a document right now. It's got Donald Trump's presidential seal on it, folks. If you want to tune into the show at 23 minutes in or 24 minutes in, something like that, or maybe it's 20. Donald J Trump June 19th, 2023 So this is 3 years ago

yesterday. It's written to the Honorable Deborah Steele Wall, who is the acting archivist of the United States at the National Archives. If you recall, this is where all of those cases that were about classified documents came out of. And it writes, Dear Miss Wall, I write to designate 2 individuals, Cash Patel and John Solomon, as my representatives for access to the presidential records of my administration pursuant to the Presidential

Records Act, 44 USC 22 O one. Kashep Prodman, AKA Kash Patel can be reached at. There's his e-mail, by the way. That's his real e-mail address. And it's publicly available out on the web. It's a Gmail account. There's his phone number. They're missing 1 digit, but that's his real phone number as well. And John Solomon can be reached at jsolomon@justthenews.com. That's his real e-mail address. And there's this 2O2 phone

number also listed on here. This is a legit document in the archives of of the Trump White House available by a simple link. This is publicly available information that you can find if you are so inclined, folks. This is available by a Google search and it says thank you for your attention to this request. And then it's signed Donald J Trump. That's a legit signature.

Why on earth, Steve, would you have two people, one guy who's like kind of a staffer that was doing investigations and one guy who's a journalist, give specific access to the presidential archives? Does that make any sense to you? I can't come up with a logical reason for it other than they seem to be good at handling the documents. I mean, Cash Patel's reputation was that he was the big name on top of the exposing the Russia gate, right? So I could see that sort of lining up.

John Solomon, I mean, just a known journalist and tends to be right of center. The only other theory that I can come up with is I know John Solomon is very good friends with Sean Hannity, who is very good friends with Donald Trump. So maybe in some sort of consultation with Sean Hannity, he got the name John Solomon and was like, oh, that's good enough by Sean. Then consider him vetted. OK. The problem is, is that that story that you were just talking about, it didn't go anywhere.

Like we saw it dropped this morning, and that's massive news. And you gave it to John Solomon, which is immediately discrediting, by the way. John Solomon in my book is a flippin snake. John Solomon pitched giving the story that we had about Gerardo Boyle. Let me just lay this out there. When we went forward with the story that was released months ago that I was actually the source of the James O'Keefe interview and that Garrett O'boyle obviously never did it

because I knew that. And by the way, so did the FBI. The FBI also knew that we were going to bring that forward with Empower oversight and Chuck Grassley was going to bless off on it and we were going to get a Tucker sit down and explain the story of how Garrett was the good guy, he never did anything wrong. That they came after me and I was already suspended so I wasn't beholden to FBI policy and we were willing to go through all of those things.

By the way, I submitted an affidavit saying that Garrett wasn't the guy and if they had done the right job that they would have interviewed somebody else. This actually happened right when they suspended Garrett and John's like, yeah, yeah, I've got the Tucker thing. It's all good. We're talking to his producer. And then it was like, oh, well, I can't get the Tucker thing. We're going to get CBSCBS is going to send a crew down and

we're going to do this. And so they negotiate all the stuff and we agreed to go forward with it. He agreed he was going to write the story. So they did. They dropped that whole story, Steve. And the and the final thing was we're going to get you on Sean Hannity for three minutes. I told I told John Solomon to F off. And so he's useless to me. And and I have talked to multiple journalists that are left of center, let's say.

And they all think that he's discredited because of the actions that he's taken over the years that he is such a he's like, he's a con man. He tries to handle people like a source. And so he's on the right what like Ken Delaney and is on the left like Fusion GPS Ken. He's an outlet for the government's mouthpiece. And that's why he got that story, which is why it didn't go

anywhere. In his footprint, I mean, to a completely different story a week ago when I was 100% vindicated with what I brought forward in a whistleblower disclosure about January 6th about how it was used to manipulate domestic terrorist deaths to artificially boosted 80% of the arrest of domestic terrorism arrests for the FBI were tied to January 6th misdemeanors, which weren't even terrorism charges. So. Who's the section chief that would have benefited from those

increased stats? Steve Jensen, Where's he at right now? He's fired, right? No, he's a Dick. The assistant director in charge of the Washington field office elevated and per the current director of the FBI who sat down with the sainted Fox News Channel talking to Maria Bartiromo, answering for that, said that Stephen Jensen had legitimate concerns. He raised them, but ultimately he did what the American people should expect from their FBI and he just followed orders.

He just followed orders and that's what we want from the FBI. Is that right? For the directors, so I mean, it's our, we're based now, right? It's our FBI now. So I guess that's fine. I guess Police Battalion One O 1 is based. That's troubling for me. I'm looking for a clip because I was going to try to figure out how that all worked. And I think that you're going to be able to understand maybe once we get the right, maybe we just need the right perspective on it.

Is there maybe someone we could talk to that would be able to give us the perspective on that situation? Is it this lady? We are. That is not the right lady, but that is funny. That's actually very funny. Where do you think I put that clip? I just I did it while I couldn't see it. Now it's gone. Maybe it's this one does is no, we're going to just you know what, Steve? I'm just going to go grab it again. It's going to be fine.

Grab that all day. I'm telling you, I had this set up and then some of these things disappeared. But the what I did not have was my favorite the official unofficial press secretary of the FBI here. And I want to just reiterate, Steve Johnson's hands are dirty on January 6th. There's in some cases, in some ways dirtier than others because he did take a lead role. So I'm not diminishing that. I'm not excusing it.

I'm not justifying it. But when you're looking for people who know where the dead bodies are buried, who knows where this information could be housed, who can explain how everything went down and who was really responsible for it, you have to have those inside sources to do that. And so look, I was defund the FBI, you know, burn down the building. I mean, I don't think I said that. So I don't want to be in trouble

for that. But that was when the Democrats were running it. So, OK, now we can shut down the FBI. Sounds like a swell idea. OK. I'm sure we can survive without it. But with it goes all the answers to the questions that we have. How many FBI informants and undercover employees and other assets were involved in January 6th stocking the events of that day? You saw Joe, Joe Kent so admirably talk to Mark, Senator Mark Kelly about that yesterday and saying that the intelligence

community is looking into that. Where is the pipe bomber? What happened to that? How, after more than four years, did that remain unsolved? So many questions that we still don't have answers to. We we're about to get the answers, I assume. I mean it. Well, today is day 119. We've been in place for four

months. It's our FBI. Look, I was really worried about the weaponized FBI when the Democrats had it, but now we got the ring of power and we're going to bring about all Mattacombs of justice here. And I'm going to tell you, just trust me, bro. And it's only been four months. We have to wait. I've 6 to 8 months apparently. I thought that we were supposed to be interested in like, outcome. Do not fall in love with Paul politicians.

Fall in love with what folks in the chat fall in love with what outcomes? Outcomes. Our chat knows what the what the answer to that is. Well, the outcome is Stephen Jensen is now the assistant director in charge of Washington Field Office. The FBI removed the hyperlink on the Washington Field Office's website to the press release that sort of gives his background so that you would publicly know that he worked for the domestic terrorism Operations section during

January 6th. I mean that that's a potential outcome. And we've elevated that guy. We've elevated the driz. Brian Driscoll, who was the acting director for a time and refused to turn over the list of January 6th and employees to the Department of Justice, he's been elevated to assistant director. I guess we held a Dennehy, James Dennehy sort of accountable when he refused to her hand over the Epstein list, which we still haven't gotten four months into

this directorship at the FBI. And James Dennehy, I mean, he was allowed to retire and collect his pension, walk out to a color guard ceremony and the thralls of hundreds of employees giving him a standing ovation. Outcomes matter. And the outcomes that I'm seeing see, meet the new boss, same as the old boss. Oh, by the way, on day 1005, Garrett hits day 1000 this coming Sunday of his indefinite unpaid suspension until the end of time.

I think ultimately this boils down to one question which I do want to ask you. I want to get you a legitimate, no tongue in cheek, not sarcastic response to this question. Marcus Allen, the only suspendable on record who came forward to Congress, was removed from duty and he struck a deal to be reinstated upon the condition that he would resign and get his back pay. That happened last year under Joe Biden, Merrick Garland and Christopher Wray. Joe Biden, Merrick Garland,

Christopher Wray, thank you. I think you've done a better job than Donald Trump, Pam Bondi and Cash Patel. Am I right or wrong? Yeah, you're right. Yep, yeah, you're actually there. And you know what the screwed up thing is, and I showed this is so Brianna Morello, who's a friend of the suspendables, broadly speaking, she's scared of my name now, which is very interesting. I was going to bring that up for you. And I don't mean to be too selfless. You know what, let's just have

some coffee first. Let's do some coffee. Let's do some coffee, Steve. Then we're going to do the Brianna thing. And then I do actually have some other stories that I think are just like broadly interesting nationally. But we're going to, we're not going to leave that I want to come back to. People are losing access by simply trying to champion a simple cause, which is should have been a no brainer and a

win. Let's talk about people that do things the right way, that are not cowards, that are making a good cup of coffee. It's my friends over at Blackout Coffee Guys. I have some on the desk right now. I need more of it today than I have on other days. If you guys are interested in checking out a coffee company that does it right and they have done it right since the beginning, you can check out my buddies over at blackoutcoffee.com slash Kyle.

Very easy to do. If you haven't tried it yet, We're going to break it down. The company built on hard work and grit and American values and kind of thumbing it to the man starting in a garage, growing into a large warehouse, employing 30 hard working Americans who are not going to have an ice raid on them. No corporate nonsense, just a damn good cup of coffee. It is a very good cup of coffee. I like the branding. I like that it's simple. It's black and white. That's all I can handle.

No Shades of Grey in the morning for me. I just want to boil up water, grind up beans, toss in some espresso mix, let it sit for 5 minutes, plunge it or let my kids plunge it because they like doing that and pour myself some cable cups of coffee. blackoutcoffee.com slash Kyle. That promo code Kyle Kyle will save you 20% on your first order. You're keeping the American

dream alive. You can support real coffee by drinking blackout if you guys do not want to drink weak coffee and you do want to kick in the beans to get you going. I'm telling you when you're up all night because your kid is potty training and so you're like waking up at 10:30 and then 11:45 and then your wife is up again at 2 1/2 and you're like, when will I get to sleep? Never. But you can get yourself motivated and awake with a cup

of coffee from Blackout coffee. blackoutcoffee.com slash Kyle. By the way, you guys were the ones who first told me about blackout, so I appreciate that. And we are espresso rose people here. It does look like a good cup of coffee and it is a cup of coffee that we can enjoy. Steve doesn't drink coffee, but he is riled up. You got actually warmed up on television. Why can people not say the name Kyle Serafin in conjunction with

Steve Friend and Gerardo Boyle? I don't know that I've asked you this before. Oh, you're too politically hot. I mean, that's what Jim Joyce is that. Is that all it is? I just hurt. Feeling like Craig doesn't want to talk to you because you're just like you're way too much on fire. Steve. You are fiery but mostly peaceful and you are not afraid to hurt feelings. So baby, that's why I don't know and I'm ultimately though I got to go back to it's the complexion.

It's the floor of sunshine face of the franchise. Clean shaven is the way to go. Suspendables face at Real Steve Friend. My, my buddy sent me a, a video today and it was an Asian lady and she was like, listen guys, if you're a white guy with a beard, I'm just going to call you any one of the following names. They're all good. Steve, Sam, Matt, Kyle. And it was like 3 other names. I was like shoot and on the on the text thread it was like me and my friend Matt, my buddy

Mick sent it over. He was like, Kyle, I'm mad. You guys are just white guys with beards. Is the beard the problem? Is it threatening? It does make you lose access. It's a really good way to get cut out of the deal. You have to mouth the party line. And that's I think why you see Dinesh D'souza sharing the Ted Cruz, like, dominated, dominated Tucker when he was talking about this. You're seeing some other people do it, too. You remember Kaylee Mcinally? Former press secretary?

Sure. She is also now doing a tour, mouthing the right things. You have to say the right things if you want access. Somebody actually mentioned that the other day, too. There is no penalty for violating any federal rules in the in the Trump administration as long as you're on the side of Donald Trump. I I read that and I went like, that probably is true.

That's probably true because we saw yesterday Dan Bongino violating the FBI social media policy, AKA using his personal social media to talk about work stuff. Even doing that in general is just a, it's kind of a general no, no in the entire federal government. You just, it's not a good look. You let someone else say that

stuff for you. And it's sort of an unprecedented time and position for having a deputy director who's an outspoken public figure who had this podcast with millions of people who who know who he is. So, yeah, that's never been unprecedented. But yeah, I mean, theoretically, he's under now the same policy that you and Garrett and Marcus and me were under, which and also raises an interesting point of does Garrett A Boyle is still

an FBI employee? Is he violating that policy every single time that he posts on that? Anything, because the FBI gave Garrett the same letter that they gave you and me, and the letter said that we were no longer responsible for any of the duties or responsibilities of an FBI agent or employee. So I don't know. I assume that released me. By the way, they didn't stop them from putting social media posts in the proposed termination documents I got, which is funny anyway.

Or. Stopping my access to the Justice Department's website or potentially hacking into my phone overnight. You're not sleeping because of potty training. I'm not because I'm potentially having a remote access to say what happened. Just just share people like how goofy this is. I'm going to give you the full screen. He's been complaining to us quietly about being woken up in the middle of the night by a phone that should be quieted, but it's not. I mean, I'll let the audience be

the judge here. If you put your phone on a charger, silent Do not Disturb overnight and close down all the apps on your phone before you do it. Then in the middle of the night, when the American Radicals podcast placeholder video goes on full blast on your phone, waking both you and your spouse up, that might raise a little bit of alarm bell, which it did for me.

And then the following day, the Department of Justice apparently found my IP address, maybe with an administrative subpoena, because they had remotely accessed my device and put child porn on my computer, and then blocked my access from accessing the Department of Justice's website. And then the following day I'm hearing my phone chirping overnight at 2:42 AM because I happen to be alive and awake and expecting a SWAT team to come hit me at that time.

Because the suspendables are very much like the British Empire were always awake at all times. Somebody from the suspendables crew is always awake, and if it's not you, it's either me or George Hill, so yeah. I'm I'm either seeing digital ghosts or, I don't know, maybe getting a preponderance of evidence accumulating that something is about to go down. I had somebody say inside the current FBI, at least I knew where I stood with Chris Ray's

FBI. I'm actually much more worried about working in the current one. But we do have character issues per current leadership. All right, so anyway, you got to get in line if you want to maintain access. If you want to be part of the cool kids, you have to go out on Fox and make the argument that just, you know, Israel is is strong, Iran is weak, the United States is strong. Strong likes to beat up weak

when weak is bad. I agree that Iran is not cool, but because Israel picked a fight with Iran, we also have to be involved in that. She actually doesn't make an argument other than like like peace through strength through war because war is strength. Anyway, you guys tell me if you

understand what this is all. About and Trump his doctrine, his peace through strength, an optimal word in that is strength and identifying the moments to show American strength, as he did with Soleimani al Baghdadi when he acted in Syria in 2017. To the isolationist crowd, my question would be what makes your position materially different than the beachside

foreign policy of Joe Biden? Sticking your head in the sand is no different than sitting in the sandy beaches of Delaware and saying don't when we just said don't, which is what Biden said. What it got us was 2 global wars, one in Israel, one in Ukraine, both of which are raging. It got us the fall of a country to the Taliban. These are the facts.

The facts are this. Iran is in the weakest position they have ever been in. Not because of the United States, because of what Israel has done. This is a narrow window I don't believe we will ever have again. A narrow window to conduct a pinpoint strike. Not regime change, President Trump has said, I'm not taking out Khomini, not ground forces. A precision strike to take out a nuclear weapon site that only the United States can do. That's the opportunity. That's the moment.

And here's the alternative. Political playbook says meanwhile in Europe. OK, well, what's happening in Europe? Foreign ministers of Germany, France and Britain plan to hold nuclear talks with Iranian counterparts. Who do I trust more, Germany and France to conduct foreign policy on behalf of the world to make sure nuclear proliferation doesn't happen? Or the man that gave us peace through strength, decimated ISIS? The man who doesn't want forever

wars. The man who made sure no wars happened on his watch and four presidencies. Russia did not invade under Trump's watch. Does this work on boomers? Is that like who? Who is the audience for this particular like, illogical statement? We're going to have peace through strength by doing a war. Peace through strength. That's a Reagan argument. I mean that that's essentially

what it's for. I mean, look, I'm not going to weigh in on the merits of one or another, but that they I'm going to weigh in on the merits of her argument. Her argument is that strength is a good thing, and you're going to appeal to authority and say that the person who exercised strength in the past is the person who should be in charge of exercising strength now to carry out an attack on another

nation. We'll never have another opportunity like this to do a pinpoint strike, even though apparently America always has the ability to do that, because America is America. Always have peace through strength, and we're always the preeminent and strongest military there. I mean, I think that China's probably a strong nation, so are they justified if they go and invade Taiwan because like, they're stronger than the weaker 1? Yeah, they have to show strength

and that's how they get peace. Anyway, I I agree with you. Like I I kind of don't care except that I just. I want a sound argument. I I want to know the the true threat that exist and justify it, and I might agree or disagree with you, but at least make the argument. I'm just I don't hear the argument there by the. Way the peace through strength argument historically was that we're so strong that nobody will screw with us, and therefore we have peace. That was like the pox Romana.

If you step out of line, we destroy you. We will envelope you and make you part of the empire, and you will no longer exist. We'll wipe you from the face of the earth. So don't do that. And then we have peace. It's not mutually assured. It's like. If you tried to do hearts and minds instead of shock and all, like if that was the case, then

why isn't Iraq the 51st state? Buddy why is the FBI not coming to heal and still keeping like dudes who are grown men, you know married to another man doing Disney vacations with their with their beagles? Why is that guy have a job and our buddy Chris Toompas is not back in West Virginia? What's that all about South? Peace through strength should mean you have the balls to even take over your own government.

We haven't even seen the Trump administration get all their own people in and we don't even have a GOP. They can't agree on confirming Trump's cabinet picks and or sub cabinet picks or political positions, but they apparently all agree that if it means spending billions of dollars and dropping like precision munitions in a country that we didn't pick a fight with, then that's something we have to do. All of that makes me want to puke. I I feel like we've lived this before.

I've lived this movie. We can't even get the GOP to agree it to cut $9 billion in spending that the Doge, which they were all on board for, said that you shouldn't give $9 billion to NPR and PBS and USAID, which has been exposed to be a State Department boondoggle where the there was a recent report about how, you know, there was the indictment the FBI brought down $500 billion kickback scheme.

They were still giving that same guy who's giving kickbacks to get a $500 million contract, $800 million on another no bid contract because he was a black guy. It was a no big contract to him and he partnered with somebody. Else was that yesterday's program you guys did? Yes. OK, I'm just trying to remember where I heard you guys talk about this.

So folks, if you did not hear about like the con artist that managed to scam like it's north of a billion dollars, is it not a billion dollars worth of contracts? It's actually a really wild story. It's classic government. It's like, oh, are you absolutely useless and have you been proven to be a nefarious actor? We'd love to just give you another opportunity to have it and. By the way, can you write the policy for us for how we should give you the money? You could probably generate

that. In the meantime, this is another thing I threw on the screen earlier here. The CIA politicizing information on China and COVID. You talked about them the the FBI sort of disappearing and recalling Intel notices showing that there was a potential problem with the 2020 election. This was also another problem with the 2020 election. The entirety of COVID, as far as I can tell, had a massive impact.

Let's just leave it, broadly speaking, that we can 100% say that COVID policies and COVID experiences change the way people voted in 2020. And this is a story that goes back. Who wrote this? I think Wall Street Journal. It was written by John

Ratcliffe, by the way. I don't think it's the same John Ratcliffe, but John Ratcliffe and Cliff Sims wrote that a, a whistleblower who I know personally and I'm not going to out because he currently works for the agency, but a whistleblower went forward and exposed that there was a, a push within the CIA to hide the lab leak theory at that time. And they gave people financial incentives to do so. They gave them better jobs and promotions and so on.

So the CIA was politicizing the collection of intelligence. That's not shocking because Intel collection is always sort of politicized. But we're talking about the entire Intel community mobilized to do one thing. And has any of that been corrected under this? Like now that now it's our Intel community? Does anyone seriously believe that?

Not until I I want the name. I mean, I know that that politicization of did the virus come from the lab or from the wet market where the bat flew 600 miles and didn't bite anybody along the way, but then sort of gnawed on a pangolin and puked into a Stew. There was like 6 out of seven people that said it came from a lab, and they said, no, we're going to give you bonuses, though, to say it definitely came from a lab. Who were those people?

What are their names? When are they indicted and then arrested and put into solitary confinement? That's what I want. To know it takes 628 months. 6 to 8 months cutesy time happens twice a day, 628 and we're coming up on June 28th, which is cutesy day. Happy Juneteenth. Happy cutesy day. Dude, actually I think I started with the FBI on June 26th though that would be that would be on a it was.

So close it. Was so close I was so close to the to the to the proper anniversary yeah I'm one week away from what would have been how many years it is it we're in 2025 so we. Would have gone like 9 years. We're really close to June 28th being the one day 100 of the deputy director at the helm. It was really close too. And we're like you said, we're coming up on day with 1000, a lot of mile marks that are not being met.

But again, all these people are like where I at least I'm seeing it in the social media, the people that are paying attention. People are not letting this go. You can't go out there and say that Epstein didn't kill

himself. Say we're going to show you a video, then not show you the video, tell you that we're going to solve all these cases, then not solve all these cases, Tell you that we're promoting Steve Jensen, who was the guy that literally he was the one that was benefiting from the whistleblower disclosure that you were putting out. You've been vindicated on it because the stories have come forward showing that you were right about them juicing the stats and that was a real problem.

The guy who got his stats juice and look great, he's promoted. He was promoted supposedly to go after the pipe bomber. The single most terroristic thing that happened on January 6th. No pipe bomber. Let's do a pipe bomber story real quick 'cause I don't see the FBI involved in this. This is a local news story that should be national. If you're serious. I'm guessing this guy has some right leaning implications. This is a story. Have you seen this?

I think I saw this headline but I didn't read through it because. He's a he's a 31 year old Pennsylvania man, all right, and he was arrested at a no kings rally. By the way, for those of you in the chat, I did see you and I'm aware that they're going to redo no Kings 2 point O. It was so good the first time that it needs a sequel. They're going to do it on July the 4th. That sounds brilliant. I'm not going to be attending a July the 4th.

No kings. Rally with the Army parade and then July 4th so they could have a counter that looks like great like America Rod White and blue Lee Greenwood contrasted with riots. Right. And so listen, this is the guy's house that you're seeing on the screen right there. So this is a local police going in. You can see an American flag hanging. He's got security cameras. There's like it's a regular brick American single family

home. The 31 year old, he was arrested on suspicion of carrying a gun near the No King protest outside of Philadelphia. And then investigators went and served a warrant at his house because and, and this one bothers me just a little bit because he was wearing like some sort of like fake police uniform. So they got a search warrant for his house, and I'm not sure how the probable cause follows unless he said something specific. There's no indication that

that's the case. His name is Kevin Krebs. He's of Malvern, which is a suburb. He's facing charges of felony possession or manufacture of weapons of mass destruction, not federal charges. Steve Friend, these are county DA's charging this guy because they found I think no less than 13 pipe bombs or improvised

explosives. They were alerted by a bystander when they saw this guy strapping something akin to a tactical vest, putting a handgun in his waistband and wearing it under a like a neon yellow raincoat that approximated what police were wearing. And so he was dressed like a fake cop carrying a loaded. It's all, I don't know why they always say like it's a loaded. I Do you not assume that all guns are loaded? Isn't that one of the cardinal

safety rules? I would think so, but also like does anyone carry unloaded guns around in their waistband? Is that a thing? Maybe within the no kings. Riots maybe in the No Kings riots by the No Kingers. Anyhow they stopped him and found that he had AP 3/20. He was lucky it didn't shoot his D off. He had a bayonet knife. I have a bayonet knife over like. It's just called a bayonet. Yeah, but it's a bayonet knife. It's in court.

Like being like white Hispanic. He, yeah, he was also carrying pepper spray and several magazines of ammunition concealed under his raincoat and his clothes. He had an AR style rifle that was at the floor of the rear seat of his vehicle. None of those things apparently are in and of themselves illegal. But he didn't have a carry permit, which I actually think

is dumb. So the fact that you have to have one anyway, he didn't have a carry permit so he was charged with carrying a firearm without a license. He was released on bomb on bond and then they made him stay at his parents house so they could do a search at his house and then they found explosives. That's really man. It makes me have some kind of like playbook vibes. I wonder if they just knew they were going to find explosives

there and how. Yeah, detailed that or I saw something I mean completely different violation. But the state of Michigan is partnering with the FBI because there are pro Palestine protesters on the University of Michigan campus and they think they might have done a vandalism. So the FBI helped them execute a search warrant on a vandalism charge. And this is like show me a man and find me the crime.

Like, hey, we have this charge and we know it's weak judge, but we need to go get fruits of the crime here. That's look, look over here. But at the same time we're doing the we're hoping to find something else. Did the vandals also have a new shaped garage door pole so they could really get a whole team of FBI agents to come in for? That at least a Baker's dozen do to address that.

That's my understanding. The best part about this, the pipe bombs contain nails and screws, which is what you do. They found improvised detonators in a box labeled no touch. Please PLSI often label my own. Have you ever been on like an ATF search warrant? I have not been on an ATF search. Warrant because I avoid the let me just if you own a garage in America they found elements of a

bombing right. I'm like, I have bolts, I have nails, I have, I have wing nuts that are sitting in my garage right now. Those are well, those could be used in an IED. So you have bomb making material in. Constructive, constructive intent. If you have things that could be used to create a bomb, then you also, by definition by having them, you actually had the intent to do it. It's a thing they do about suppressors like oh do you have a a mill and a lathe and some sort of tubular thingy.

You could also could you do you have a do you have an ability to thread pipe? You also are constructively creating. They actually consider the lathe to be a suppressor, depending on how the ATF was interpreting these laws. By the way, so broad they could actually put thingy or bazooka in the charging document. The judge would sign off on it. So my buddy has done that, I think I've told you, but he worked bazooka in for six months

whenever possible. Instead of saying any other weapon, he used the word bazooka and he put it in quotes and not quotes and he got judges to sign off on it. He got supervisors to approve his his, his three O twos. You can get away with using the word bazooka. It may or may not be on the list of words that I'm supposed to say I got served. We'll just share this too, because if I share it, then we have to disclose this podcast. I got served yesterday or the day before?

I think yesterday, no maybe the day before by a process server. I am. I am now being called as a witness in the Project Veritas versus James O'Keefe civil trial. Just sounds out of the Southern District meaning like trying to have a riot on July 4th. Well, it's James wants to be able to get depositions that he can record. It's being requested by his people. So I'm quote UN quote, like a defense witness, I guess, or a counter counter suit witness.

And they want to be able to take footage from my deposition and use it in his documentary the plot against James O'Keefe to steal Project Veritas, of which I know nothing about. So it was like at one of the one of the great questions in the discovery was like, you know, like name every board member of Project Veritas that you've interacted with and all your comms with them. And I'm like, I don't even know who the board was. Like, I don't care.

I don't work there. I've never been to Project Veritas. I just knew that James was kind of like a Nancy boy and so the kind of guy that doesn't need to shave his chest because he never grew chest here in the 1st place, that kind of guy does. That hit home. You should just. You should do the deposition and insert changes of Nancy boy in every other sentence. I'm go, no, I, I think we're going to do some other weird things. I'm going to, I'm going to, I've

got some plans. I'm going to work the word bazooka in for sure. There's zero chance that I won't work that in. And then also we're going to try to live stream it. If possible. I'm going to do a live, I'm definitely going to tape it myself and I will share it with our folks on locals. But if possible, I'm going to say some silly things that I

would normally say anyway. And so now they can look up this podcast and they can play this clip back to us about me telling them that I'm going to say things that are true but also funny to me. Maybe now they'll serve me too. Maybe they will, hopefully in all anyway, this guy had 13 improvised explosive devices and or constructively intended to be explosive devices. He was rearrested on Monday.

Again, no FBI involved in this 13 felony charges for possession and manufacture of weapon of mass destruction. This seems like a like a like an FBI wet dream. They can't even get the pipe bomber in DC. They've got a real dude who was going to go do some sort of like weird. Like that's a pretty good indicator you want to do terrorist defense. He went to a protest. He's got bombs that are in his garage. Where's the FBI? Rearrested, which means the FBI is claiming 2 arrests.

No, the FBI doesn't have anything to do with this. This is 100% local. I know, but they're going to have an open case on this. They're going to claim 2 arrests for a WMD case. Dude. They're. Raking on the metrics right now when they finally take it. Yeah, it's just not there yet. I found that to be weird. All right. Should we should we hit this? Your your wife's an immigrant, isn't she? Allegedly, yes. Yes. Hold on, tell me more. What do you mean allegedly? Is she not?

Well, I mean, she she does. I mean my wife comes from the Ukraine, but you should say only Ukraine. The Ukraine is insulting. I've. Learned why? Is it insulting? Did she come in a student visa originally or did she come here before that? No, she came here as a 14 year old because her mother married an American. Like a legit immigration thing and they immigration Immigration Services in this country are so great and fantastic.

They misspelled her name and she just never went back and corrected it. So this day, her government documents are misspelled. My my last name comes from my grandfather not knowing how to spell before spelling was cool like back in the 1890s I think when he got here. Well my wife's name is Anastasia and they added AY in the middle there just because it looked cool, so she's always had that. Does she spell that way now? Yes, she had to learn this re spell her name. That's outstanding.

I'm, I'm for that. That's, that's getting Americanized. That's America putting its brand right on you. And you say why? Because we got to, we put it in there. The State Department has issued new guidelines on Wednesday for more extensive social media vetting of all applicants of international student visas and exchange programs.

And this is very, very bad. The CBS is upset that they are now going to look for any hostilities towards the citizens, the culture, the government, the institutions of the founding principles of the United States of America. We are not going to just accept people to come into this country without looking at it and see whether or not they, like, you know, hate America before we bring them in. Like, Can you imagine being outraged on this?

They are. Can you imagine being the guy that presented this and thinking like this was a new and novel concept? It's like, wait, wait, guys, maybe we should vet them. And the jaw, the the slack jaws you got around the conference room table. Like this guy has middle management written all over him. We totally need to promote him. So NBC has a similar story and it says and and you read this headline this before we got

started. So I'm going to tell you what the story actually says, but it says Trump pledges mass deportations. He's creating more undocumented people. And I watched your eyebrow kind of go up with that. Do you want to know how Steve I, I'm. Going to need you to square this circle. OK, more than a million people were granted legal entry to this country under different programs, but they're now considered illegal.

They're considered illegal because the Trump administration withdrew the temporary status that they had, the keyword there being temporary. They go and they talk about a woman. Yeah, it's a woman. I'm trying to figure out what pronoun they used. Had a bleak future in Haiti and then got a hope for a new life as a cashier in Miami. After coming here legally with a sponsor, Donald Trump just declared that she and more than a million other people no longer have that permission to stay

here temporarily. In other words, your country's fine. Go back to it, please. Donald Trump is seeking to go down in history as the president who carried out the largest deportation in U.S. history. It's not even close. But he deemed that the Biden administration has allowed these people to come in, and now they don't want them here anymore. So they've rescinded this temporary protected status, and they gave them time to deport.

They said it is now time for you to go home to the place where you're from. The Trump administration has created a larger class of undocumented people by literally delegalizing them, says this woman, who is the director of action, the Justice Action Center. By delegalizing, what they mean is that the administration has pulled the permissions that they were given, which is their right

to pull. So it's a contract when somebody has a temporary status here, that there is a point where where we're going to say that the time, the temporary time that you're here is elapsed and you can go home. So we're exercising that clause of the contract, which is a legal document. But apparently that's delegal, which isn't a word. Not without a fight they said,

though. On May 30th, with the Supreme Court allowed the administration to strip more than 500,000 people, the Supreme Court agreed that this is the right of the executive. These 5500 thousand people are from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela, also known as CHNV and the CHNV parole program which was temporary is no longer

in effect. Christy Noem said that they issued a notice that they terminated the parole of these people and the work authorization, so they are no longer allowed to work and they were directed to D deport or self deport immediately. And, you know, like you're not from here. And even the concept of a parole in an immigration context was so bastardized under the Biden administration because paroles are for like unique

circumstances. The best example is we need somebody from Mexico to come and testify for this drug cartel case. So we give them a this parole to come in for testimony. And then the agent of the government walks them back over the border or watches them get on the plane. And the moment that the plane gets into the air, they then withdraw their ability to be in

the country. Apparently the Biden administration said this is just another mechanism that we can flood in hundreds of thousands of people who do not want to buy into our social compact and come into the melting pot. They just want to create their own stand alone CHNV little town in whatever spot in America we drop them. And we're going to use this as a mechanism. And the Trump administration rightfully came in with a mandate that said we're not doing that anymore.

And we're what's good for the goose is good for the gander. We're going to exercise another clause of the contract that says the temporary time has elapsed. You gots to go. So they didn't create any more people. It just said how dare. You they're creating more

undocumented people. It would be almost the same as if you said in an at will employment state, which means that you could be fired for any reason or no reason at all that the company that hired all these people is creating more unemployed people after firing all these people. It's the same exact sort. Of I would, I would say say it's something different. Like a Biden administration says that anybody can walk into a bank right now and just take

$100 and walk out. And then the Trump administration comes in and says that was bank robbery. So we're going to prosecute it. And now we've created a lot of bank robbers. You can't do that. It's it's mean families belong together.

So save the sign on the screen here, OK, That plays into the second thing of here that an appeals court heard And in a three O decision in California and the 9th Circuit, no less, the appeals court agreed that Donald Trump has the ability to deploy the National Guard Los Angeles over the powers and the wishes of Gavin Newsom, which is pretty funny.

Got another story saying the National Guards that were deployed to this is I think these are related because what you have is you can deploy the National Guard or not. What you're seeing is Gavin Newsom said we're not going to deploy them at all. And Donald Trump's administration came in and did so. And the courts, including in the 9th Circuit, including in a panel review of three, they were like, yeah, he can do that.

So Albuquerque, AKA New Mexico, which is a, a testing lab for a lot of like really bad Democrat policies. They do it in a very small space where nobody cares because nobody even knows New Mexico is part of America. They, I mean, it's true. Literally I moved out there and people were like, oh, is that an Oconas post Las Cruces? It does say Mexico, so yeah. Yeah, it says Mexico. They just the Nuevo part is confusing.

National Guard troops are being deployed to Albuquerque, but they're putting him out there, not in military uniforms and not armed. Can you see anything wrong with trying to do like some sort of peacekeeping, crowd control, law enforcement function, Steve with no identifiers? I can see only disaster happening because you would just be like who you and what are me because you just look like a

regular person. Yes, they're going to just have these people stand around since they've been trashing businesses, putting bullet holes in all these places they call the place. This is funny. There are bullet holes in his shop's windows. Gryce and officers from the Albuquerque Police Department told the News that they have a name for this part of the city known as Central Ave. Corridor.

It's also known as officially it's called the International District. I used to live in Albuquerque, but unofficially it's known as the War Zone and I pulled my surveillance team down there when we were deployed to Albuquerque in early 2020. Not too specifically. We went down and followed a subject into the war zone, AKA the International District, and I had guys that had spent time being police officers in Baltimore. We had dudes that had worked in Richmond, VA, which is not

particularly nice. We'd all spent a bunch of time in Southeast DC and some of the other like rough areas. We've been recently deployed to parts of Pittsburgh that were 100% Islamic and like really dark and scary kind of places. Like not good things happening. And every single person was absolutely flipping blown away with the war zone in Albuquerque, NM because it is a special version of screwed up. Two of my guys on a team of eight were approached by

prostitutes. Like wow, they were doing surveillance. Did they have beards? One yes, one no. OK, equal opportunists. Equal opportunity. Listen, the ladies of Albuquerque, the ladies of the night and or day in the war zone do not discriminate. It was very wild. They were like, dude, they're on the radio. They're all blown away with how crazy it was. And then when you drove in, they decided that it was like, you

know, like the cops were there. And so like a couple of prostitutes got picked up, they all got rounded in. They drove into this like this parking garage slash repo lot thing and they closed the doors. So their compound, it was it's Mad Max style. Anyway, it's pretty neat. So they're going to deploy unarmed, UN uniformed National Guard there. The interesting thing is I think they're trying to set up like something dangerous happening.

Then they can show that Trump is really bad and he's putting our troops in danger. If you can't get troops out of the hands of people, then you just show that they're in danger. This has always been about presenting A narrative that these were peaceful protests. They were lawful until the Orange man, literally Hitler sent in the troops. And that's why all the footage that you've ever seen before the National Guard was necessary.

Well, that was actually a cheap fake or we're going to say, well, that happened after the the troops got there. So it is the fault of this king. This would be tyrant despot who tried to keep the peace and stop the riots from happening, to aid local law enforcement, to actually allow local law enforcement to this job. And the job is to allow you to peacefully protest and assemble to exercise your First Amendment right. That's why police is there. That's why the National Guard is there.

It is to make sure that the law Breakers don't impede your right to protest and speak. It's not to stop you from doing that, but they're going to say that that's exactly what it was. Well, and all of this, I think is reaction to the fact that they're losing in court, which I don't think they expected to do. Here's MSNBC. Look at the face of this lady. She looks like someone slapped her with a wet fish. And it's very surprised she didn't expect that kind of fish.

This decision in essence gives Trump's the green light to use the National Guard in other states. And and the administration has been hinting very publicly that they're going to go into New York City, Chicago, maybe some other states all happened to be blue. What is the mood like, Elizabeth, that you that you sense from talking to lawmakers, state officials about where this goes from here now that the president does have the legal

green light to use the national. Guard, I can tell you that in New York City, if he deploys the National Guard in New York, there will be it will cause is going to it's going to cause it giant outrage and create probably more violence than there would be anyway. Isn't that what he wants? Well, that's the office. That's, of course, one of the working theories that he wants to, you know, create this all over the country and then, you know, declare martial law.

How big was that fish? Man, she, she had sucked on a lemon before being asked that question. That was brutal. Watch, she did not like she did. So let me get this straight. They're sending the National Guard potentially into areas that are blue. You mean every city in America? And and then they're sending the National Guard into areas where there's riots.

So shouldn't you be saying thank you for allowing the peaceful people to protest peacefully the way that the Constitution lays out and getting the people who are breaking the law away from you so that you can continue to exercise that right? Oh, no. By sending in the troops, he's actually going to create more law Breakers. Well, then you should be grateful the troops are there.

Thank God. Yes. And, and I do think that these are tied, and I don't think I've seen this drawn together in anybody else's analysis out here, but I'm just telling you, losing in California made them try playbook #2. The first goal was, if Trump brings people in, can we get instigation? Can we show National Guard troops being undisciplined and dangerous and causing violence? And so Donald Trump's responsible for that violence, even if they don't provoke it.

The second thing is it sounds like he's actually authorized to do so. And these guys are acting professionally. Maybe we could put them in danger by taking their weapons and their any of their like uniforms which make them look like they have a status of authority and move them into place. And why not try it in Albuquerque since most people don't know where Albuquerque is on a map?

I want to see them make the case that we're going to make it so bad and uncomfortable or win legally so that the Trump administration withdraws the National Guard, because that'll be true victory for us. And that's why we'll see the Chaz CHOP instead of being 6 square blocks over like 1 square mile. So we can have lots of rapes and murders and assaults and violent attacks going on and burning ability. That will be total victory.

And we can present that on July 4th next to the Lee Greenwood boomers who are waving flags and singing the national anthem. That will be a winner for us. This is let's take the 1% of the every 99 to 1 issue. Yeah, where everybody else just wants safety. And by the way, the reason they're doing this is because the the analysis is not shaking out. You even got CNN over here. Look at the. I can't remember what this guy's, this host's name is, but he's also kind of a doofus.

He's getting a legal analysis that he's not prepared for, which is to say, if I was advocating on behalf of California, I would tell him not to take this to the Supreme Court. You're going to make this thing like you're going to make this a real case law situation. If I was in California's legal position here, I would tell the governor, you don't want to appeal this. You don't want to bring this up to the Supreme Court. Yes, you have the option to ask them to take it.

That's your sort of last best chance here. But I think you're going to lose California. I think if you look at this opinion, it was a three to zero unanimous opinion from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. You had two Trump appointees and a Biden appointee on that court. I don't see any way any of the six conservatives on the Supreme Court say, sure, a trial level District Judge can overrule the president on this issue just because he disagrees.

I even think some of the liberals might join with the conservatives on this, as we saw with the Biden appointee. So it's an interesting strategic decision if they do bring it up to the Supreme Court. California. And if the Supreme Court rules again in favor of the Trump administration, then that's going to be nationwide binding. An even bigger loss for California, maybe a bigger loss

for all states. Because I actually do want the National Guard to be mostly and generally speaking, under the control of. But I think it was brought up that nobody would ever imagine that we would have such bad faith actors, that they'd be willing to sacrifice their own cities and their own safety of the citizens that live within their borders simply to try to like own Donald Trump.

I don't think anybody could ever have fathom that when they wrote some of these laws up. And take the exact opposite position that they were taking four years ago when you had like in my state in Florida or a governor tried to stand up the state guard, which exists in dozens of states. And they're saying, Texas, how dare a governor try to empower the people to actually defend their own state?

And now they're saying, well, it should be up to the governor to empower the people to defend their own state. I mean, never let having a consistent argument get in the way of making the political expedient argument for yourself. That's. Where we're going to end it. Oh, we got one more and I couldn't. OK, so folks, I tried to put together a a quick visual of the woman. Take my word on it.

This is a black female who has a a young child who looks like he's probably somewhere between four and six years old. This story blew my mind. I wanted to just end with this because talk about not having consistent positions or even like human positions. The story came from ABC News. A brain dead pregnant woman in Georgia was kept on life support and experts say that that raises ethical and legal questions.

The ethical legal question is Steve, how come we can't kill this lady and the baby along with her? Why can't we just let her die when she has a life that is that is developing in within her? That's the story. That's literally the story. They're very upset that they couldn't do it, that the family members of this woman didn't have the right to kill off the baby. The only thing that was going to continue the life and the and the lineage of this person who is now brain dead.

I can't possibly fathom, regardless of where you are on, you know, what stage of the pregnancy is it okay to murder the baby? Unless you are an absolute demon Satanist who believes that at any point in any point of the life, like, oh, we can abort a three-year old. That you would take the position of it is wrong to keep a person on life support so that the baby can properly gestate and be delivered and have a life and saying like that's wrong. There's an ethical concern there.

If you're on that side, you're an even smaller minority, or I hopefully I pray that you're in a smaller minority than the people that say that we should not allow peacekeeping National Guardsmen to allow people to exercise their First Amendment right. OK, here's the crazy part of the story. First of all, it's a black woman, as far as I can tell, unmarried, which is a problem. So the kid doesn't have a dad in the future or in the picture, at least not legally, as far as I can tell.

So I'm I'm reading because they don't care about that part of the story. They don't actually care about the fact that this is it. There's a child that's in play who's losing a mother and potentially the one thing that would outlive this, this situation. And the situation's awful. And it makes me think about vaccine injuries a little bit just 'cause I don't know one. She's a nurse. She works at the Northside Hospital where she did work in metro Atlanta. She was 30 years old at the time.

Her name was Adrian Smith. Her name is Adrian Smith. In February, she began developing severe headaches and her mother, April Newkirk, said that they gave her medication and she was sent home. She wasn't given ACT scan. She wasn't kept overnight for observation. They're going to second guess the doctors. And then Newkirk said Smith's boyfriend woke up with her daughter grasping for air. So that's the the woman who ends

up being braid dead. She was taken to another hospital, Emory University Hospital. CT scan showed multiple blood clots in her brain. All really, really bad. She was declared brain dead on February the 19th. So yes, boyfriend equals not married. This woman basically had maybe some suboptimal medical care or not. Like, headaches don't necessarily mean one thing or another. And then they said that the baby

has to be able to be continued. They actually delivered the baby very, very early on as a premature child and then put into a NICU. And that's bad. And the family said they wanted, they didn't know that they wanted the right to kill the baby, but they wanted at least have the option. And then not having the option to kill the baby made it more traumatizing to lose this woman.

Well, I not having the option gave you the opportunity to have legal representative, legal representation coming in from the Planned Parenthood's of the world who are going to promise you lots and lots of dollar bills because that's where it is from their perspective. And look, there's no argument to be made here that this is a personal autonomy. There is no person there because you don't believe it's a person,

right? There's you don't even believe that the person who is on the outside is a person. You can't even define if it's a woman at that point. It's just a a birthing unit from your perspective, But they're going to go with this side of the argument because if there is any victory that the pro-life side can say, say like, hey, look, this is an awful medical circumstance, but look at this baby. We should name this baby Miracle

because he or she was born. We can't let the pro lifers have any sort of argument at all, even if that includes we're going to murder the person who's brain dead so that the baby can be murdered and say that's that's their right. It's it's almost the most pure case of what would a mother want? There's a concept called implied consent, which means that if you're not able to say, we just assume the normal thing that people would want.

So if I come upon Steve friend and he's been running and he has decided that he's not going to eat an almond for a full week and he still runs his 12 miles and I find you and you are incapacitated and you're hypoglycemic. The standard of care is regular people would want me as a medic to treat them, including you. I can assume that you'd want to be treated if you don't have DNR tattooed across your chest, right? That I would want life saving

recitation to be done. And the same story would be that a mother who is pregnant with a baby would want said baby preserved, even if she has no more say in it. She's brain dead. Her body will do nothing more than bring a life into the world. It's the perfect incubator situation and their thought is what we also don't want to deal with this baby. It's like inconvenience instead of protecting the. Implied consent it would it's on par with this is a brain dead

individual who is pregnant. Of course they would want the baby to be born. It would be like if you came upon Steve friend who hadn't eaten an almond in a week and was passed out. You say, well, I can't definitively say that he doesn't want me to amputate both arms and both legs, so we're going to go with that option as opposed to trying to resuscitate him. That's exactly right. Yeah. Completely illogical things that

mothers don't wish. Mothers who have babies don't wish to have their babies killed when they're no longer able to make their decisions out loud. Anyway, all of this stuff is super gross. And again, it also belies a problem about fatherhood and the fact that, like, apparently the boyfriend has no say in it. I'm assuming the boyfriend's the dad. But like, maybe we shouldn't assume that the family just wanted the right to be able to kill, quote UN quote, terminate the pregnancy and cause the

death of the fetus. But the state law doesn't allow it. So again, don't give any sort of wins the pro-life crowd. It just shows you people that are willing to take the worst position, sacrifice our cities, do the dumbest things, maybe put our troops in harm's way. I think the right is also guilty of this. I don't think the left is like unique and they're building. That's how tribal and stupid we are as a country right now. I just want my team to win. Steve just want him to win.

We're so back, baby. We're based. It's. Really gross. All right, I do have something funny to play because we're going to need it. It's been like one of those weeks. Why don't you tell people what you're going to see on American radicals if they want to join you for the Saturday morning broadcast, just do your grab bag tomorrow. What's coming up?

Saturday, Grab Bag on the American Radicals podcast on rumble.com/amradpod, 10:30 Eastern Time, we got just pulling a whole bunch of different stories. Going to talk about how artificial intelligence is driving up electricity, electricity costs, talk about how the FBI is not being transparent, have some fake sob stories about deportations, and we'll get into what is the most popular restaurant in America. And I was surprised. So join us tomorrow, Saturday, 10:30 Eastern Time on Rumble.

I don't want to blow anybody's mind, but the most popular restaurant in America is actually the subject of today's palette cleanse as we go into the weekend.

Before we do, let's just say real quickly folks, you can follow us over on rumbleitsrumble.com slash at Kyle Serif. And if you're watching over there and I see so many of you, including Mr. Friend Stevens dad, who's making generous donations into our our pot of money and also funding Dan Bongino because that's where that money goes to. Thanks. Thanks, Gary. youtube.com/ahead, Kyle Seraphin support us over there. Give us a like, subscribe to the

channel locals. If you guys want to get the Sunday sit down a day early, you're going to see his name is Shamgar Connors. He's a wild dude. That's over at kyleseraphin.com. And Lassie, you can share things. If you want to share the show with somebody on Spotify, it's Kyle seraphinshow.com. Yeah. Your dad is over there directly funding Dan Bongino's pocket. We got to talk. To him, my dad is also making threatening calls to Chuck

Grassley's office, which I have. To hear about I love your dad. I don't even know your dad, but I love your dad because I think it's great. Thanks. Thanks, Gary, for being such a good a good guy. Let's do something. America's top restaurant. Is this the top restaurant? Steve Friend, this is a leaked training video about how to be more successful in your work as a Waffle House. Waffle House server. Excuse me. These eggs are running. Can it be cooked again? And my waffle is fine.

Can I get a new one? If a situation like this arises, please do not throw hands. We know it's tempting, but court dates cut into smoke breaks. Instead, try using de escalation phrases like bar waffle. And eat around it, bitch. Or my favorite, the you expect this is Waffle House. Remember our goal is to reduce physical altercations by 12%. We crushed the numbers and the only company to pay their employees more to fight was the UFC.

So that means no uppercuts on the clock, and if you must square up, clock out first like management does. Now let's see how the associate handles a situation. My waffle is burnt. Can I get a new? 10 Your waffle. Is burnt. Then eat around it, bitch. Excellent. The customer will receive exactly what they asked for and a little extra. Congratulations, you've completed our core training. Now let's take a look at a few situations you'll be learning in our next training video.

What to do when a customer brings a raccoon inside. Proper spatula stances during a brawl. What to do when a waffle is used as a weapon. How to tell if those are firecrackers or gunshots. Safely retrieving a tip from an active crime scene. How to properly scramble eggs during a race war.

Acceptable slurs for you to say after you've been hit in the head with a coffee maker, where to ash your cigarette when you're cooking on the grill, and is it acceptable to blow into a customer's breathalyzer so their car will start? Remember, it's not just a Waffle House, it's a Waffle Home. I love Waffle House so much. Steve, if you come here, you're going to have to eat some carbs. I'm going to take you to a Waffle House. That's happening. Either that or Cracker Barrel, we got to do it.

I don't do Cracker Barrel, I'm only into Waffle House. I hope you have a great weekend. Thanks for joining me. Have a great one. We'll see you tomorrow too. Thanks. See. You all right, buddy? Folks, that's it for today. I don't know why I think it's so funny. I love Waffle House, my daughters actually, and I did a cross country trip from Virginia going out to New Mexico the first time and we stopped at Waffle Houses every single

Saturday and we saw zero fights. It's almost no fights unless you go in there after, I don't know, 10:00 on any weekday. Nothing good happens after 10 or midnight or something. So there's your dad advice for the weekend. That's your safety briefing. Have a great one. We'll see you guys over there for the Sunday. Sit down or we'll catch you on Monday. God bless you. See you then.