Steve Baker: Who was this Ryan Routh? | Ep 392

Take a look. Behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an American patriot prepared to embrace the uncomfortable truth. Because this program has no time for comforting lies. Here is civil liberties enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI agent Kyle Seraphim. Well, hello my friends, welcome to the Kyle Serfin show. Today's Wednesday. It's September the 18th. I'm going to see if I could do like a black voice. I'm going to do like a Kamala

Harris show. Like with the whole show is just me pretending to do an accent that I don't have. What do you guys think about that? This is a program where we have no room for comforting lies, which means we bring on people who had the similar sense of skepticism that we do, but also know how to connect dots and see patterns. So today my guest is going to be Steve Baker, and I will bring him on momentarily.

Before we do that, let me give you a rundown where I think we're going to end up going because I've got these articles up on and I want you to know what we're going to cover down on. We're going to talk about Ryan Ralph #1 The main reason is I do not want to let this story drop at this point. I watched them drop the first assassination attempt and I don't like it.

I don't like that they did that. I don't like that 65 days afterwards, another person decided to go try it again because the story wasn't talking about how nuts it is and how crazy this country is. So we're going to talk about that. We're going to talk a little bit about some new information about the would be assassin. We're going to talk about what I see here on my list, dogs and

cats and eating. There's some videos that have been coming out from the City Council out there in Springfield. OH, so we're going to keep talking about that. We're going to talk about Donald Trump being labeled a threat, which is I think how we got here and we want to do that. The Libertarian Party again from yesterday with Jeremy Kaufman. I want to get Steve's take on that and, and paging the 1980s. Hopefully all of you had marked this day safe from exploding pagers.

If you don't know what happened, we'll get into it. Let me unmute my friend Steve Baker and bring him on. I got to look up and there he is. Mr. Baker, how you doing today? Hey, I'm good, Kyle. Thanks for having me this morning. Are you at the Blaze Studios? I am, I'm actually in one of the conference rooms here at Blaze and I'm I'm actually double fisting it this morning for the coffee. I I thought I'd go and load up with two cops.

We got started here. That is definitely the right move if you are dealing with our program. All right, so let me do a quick intro and then you fill in any dots in here. Steve Baker is a former musician, folks, and a part time investigator who became a full time investigative journalist and now has the musicianship on the sidelines, although I imagine the capabilities haven't

gone anywhere. He worked behind the Iron Curtain exposing propaganda, which is kind of why I'm excited about this, because we're talking about possibly a propaganda op and an intelligence op. And you have some experience in that part of the world, or at least in that part of the the human cultures, the Slavic cultures doing this kind of thing. And now you work for The Blaze and you are also a misdemeanor terrorist. Do you want to tell people what

a misdemeanor terrorist is? Well, I am actually one of those people that I performed the act of accidental journalism or some people would say accidental tourism in the capital on January 6th. And I followed a story where the

story went. And unlike 100 other journalists that also went through open doors and busted open windows that day to record and document for their stories that they submitted to the likes of The New York Times or The New Yorker or whatever other publication they're working for. I didn't submit my stories apparently to the right organization. So as a result of that, I've been charged and something that I don't think you and I have even talked about yet, I actually received a plea deal

offer last week. I I don't think I've told you that so. How's it? How's it look? Surprise, surprise, it looks like a typical plea deal offer. There's no promises, as you know, in those plea deals that there's always the, you know, the the backroom insinuation that if you take the plea deal that it's going to be, you're going to be better off than if you go to trial or you otherwise plead guilty. But you have to waive your constitutional rights to appeal.

That's stated several times. And more importantly, and it's very odd, is that in these plea deal offers, they say it several times in the exact quote, is that Mister Baker will, if he accepts, will waive his constitutional rights. That's what a plea deal is from the federal government. That's the federal government telling you that if you accept our deal, you waive your constitutional rights.

I think that actually has a a lot to do with what we're going to be talking about in New Hampshire, that this concept of not understanding the Constitution and that these these constitutional liberties, the way they were written up, they predate the government. They predate the existence of the government. They are your rights because they're God-given. Right, right, right. Yeah, you would think so, but in this particular plea deal, So

what? They're here just to to get this misdemeanor terrorist thing over and done with. I was only charged with the four basic misdemeanors that most of the January 6th offenders have been charged with. Let's let's go ahead and right off the bat here once again, for the millionth time, dispel the notion that the capital was overrun by thousands of violent offenders by Matthew Graves, US Attorney over the District of Columbia's own words out of his

own mouth. He actually stated about a year and a half ago that only about 225 people actually did violence against law enforcement that day, 225 out of somewhere between a quarter of a million and 400,000 people. All right, so that with that baseline drawn, then there was probably somewhere between 350 to 400 people who have been charged with various acts of violence, aiding and abetting. They were in the wrong place at the wrong time.

They got, they got caught up in a pushing or, or shoving scrum or something like that. And so they were charged with violence, but they actually didn't overtly attack law enforcement. So there's a very, very small number of actual felonious violent offenders as it relates

to January 6th. Then you get into the other charges of seditious conspiracy, which was about, oh, gosh, there's been a couple of dozen people that have been charged with that and a dozen or so that have been convicted of that, including the founder of the Oath Keepers, Stewart Rhodes, who did not go inside the Capitol that day.

Who in fact, the FBI over and over and over again in his trial said we have no evidence that he ever ordered the Oath Keepers to invade the capital, to go inside the Capitol, to attack Congress, to stop the certification of the election or otherwise commit a conspiracy. This was actually the testimony under cross examination of every single FBI officer in that trial. I was there.

I saw it with my own eyes, heard it with my own ears, recorded it myself and reported on it at the time back in September, October, November of 2022, during that. Trial. Did you get clearance from the editor? Well, if we're talking about the food blogging editor, no, I didn't get permission at that time. OK, good. I wasn't on those terms yet with the Monsanto industrial complex. That's how it. Works all right but the bottom, but the bottom?

Line is is that you know, 3 1/2 years later of them wreck trying to wreck my life and trying to put me through the wringer. You know the as as they say the punishment is the process and going through their process for the last 3 1/2 years.

My the first time that I was contacted by the FBI was in July of 2021. And so all of these months and years later, after charging me, after arresting me, after putting me in leg chains and marching me before a magistrate here in Dallas at the federal courthouse here, they finally have sent me over a plea deal offer these many months later, because that was March 1st when they actually went Well, I say they arrested me, I self presented, and then they chained me there. They didn't.

Yeah. And you actually, if people remember, you got the only accidental pairing of two black FBI agents out of the Dallas field office. I'm sure that was completely coincidental that they just happened to get two big black guys out of a field office, out of a career field. That I would say is 10, maybe 15% black tops. Is that what it is? It's just not that high. Yeah. I mean, there were like 2 black guys in my in my Academy class of 50. So for whatever that's worth.

It's just really, really hard to randomly choose two agents to escort Steve Baker, the federal courthouse in. In what, Like they did a belly chain and leg irons in the whole deal? He just happened to pick two guys at random that just happened to be looking that way. I don't know. Yeah, and then, and then, and then the US Marshall that actually processed me, who was actually doing the electronic fingerprints and the, you know, the, the, the mug shot and all that kind of stuff.

As he's looking at my paperwork now. He was Hispanic, actually, he's from South American country. I'm, I'm going to try and not out him as much as I can because he was actually a, he was actually a really good guy. And I know you've talked favorably of US Marshals in the past. These these, these guys are, I mean, of all the federal quote, UN quote law enforcement guys, they seem to be more in tune with doing the actual work of protecting us from force and fraud and rounding up bad.

Guys, you know why that is. Steve, though, it's so simple because their mission is very simple. Their mission is 2 things they handle well, three things, I guess because one of them is a piece of it. They are involved in the protection of the federal judiciary. So in a physical way, they do physical protection, they do securing of those that are in custody, federal custody, and they go hunt down people that

are evading federal custody. But they don't do investigative work necessarily like the Marshall Service, even though you'd get some guys that want to like be on your investigation, they're not investigators, they're manhunters. So they rundown. Sometimes their tactics are sketchy, sometimes they're a little bit dangerous and scary, but they do really good work. They'll kick down a hotel room door and go get a pedophile like they're into that.

That's what they're all about. They'll go through the door, they'll go get the person. If they are evading, you know, if they are a fugitive, that is doing unlawful flight to avoid prosecution, which is what AU FAP warrant is. They're big on manhunting. So I think because they have such a clear mission set, the US Marshall Service is not our problem. Well, that's some other. Ones oh am I getting an echo again? You're right. You're right.

So the, the US Marshall that did process, I mean, he's looking at my paperwork as he's, you know, typing things in and he goes, oh, man, this is bullshit just like that. Just a reasonable guy reading something that seems like completely unreasonable. And he, I mean, he saw me standing there in the belly chain and leg chains for four misdemeanor offenses and went, this is bullshit. Right, because he knows what the what it takes to be in that situation. And in those circumstances.

Let me let me do a quick sort of promotion to our our folks over on locals. Saw a couple of you guys out there that are hearing this. Somebody said they're not getting any sound. It might be on your end. Anybody if you guys are having issues in the chat, make sure you let me know, but it doesn't sound like it is.

Folks. If you guys want to join our Locals program, it's Seraphin Kyle, seraphin.com, kyleseraphin.com that will direct you over to the Locals community and you can sign up there and you might as well sign up for Steve Baker's as well. You can sign up as a free member, You can sign up as a paid member. It's up to you If you want to get involved in the

conversation. I recommend you do it just because it's a really good group of people, they're solid, and you guys are one of the supporters that allows us to do these programs long form without a lot of interruption. Do you want to get into the weird stuff You. Know that's the only reason I got up early this morning, not just to hang with you, but to totally get into the tats and tatas. Tats and Tatas, hold on, let me

throw the the OK again. If you guys don't know what he's talking about, you're missing out on the thumbnail. Today's thumbnail. I promised Steve yesterday afternoon and and delivered this morning. Here's what it looks like, Tats and tatas. She has a Ukrainian tattoo on the forearm that's kind of interesting and the most cleavage filled photograph that I've ever seen in the Wall Street Journal. I don't know if that's your experience as well.

Yeah, I, I mean, I, I, I did go back through my memory banks, although I did not do any actual searching. I didn't Google up Wall Street Journal and cleavage, but that is a highly unusual representation for the Wall Street Journal. It's kind of suggestive and kind of strange. So let's get into who we're talking about. We're talking about this guy, Ryan Ralph. Again, I don't want this story to drop because I watched it drop the last time.

And we're not talking about Thomas Crooks nearly as much. And they're not talking about an assassination attempt where a bullet hit the man that's running for president's ear. That's unfathomable to me like that. We've gotten to this place. So here's the criminal complaint. I put it on the screen for those of you who are watching the rubble program. If you're listening, I will share you again, United States of America versus Ryan Wesley Ralph.

And there are only two charges against this guy at this point. And they are both 922 charges, which is the federal gun statute, 18 USC 922, Section G and Section K Kilo. And that is an obliterated firearm. So that's actually, there's been a West Virginia court that said that that's unconstitutional because it's an entire class of firearms. I don't know if you knew this, Steve. And then the other one is felon in possession that, Gee, that was overturned, at least at the

district level. There have been some attacks on that as well. So these are like iffy. I mean, they've been solid charges for a very long time, but I've got issues with it. Tell me what you know about this guy. Well, unfortunately, I know way too much and I, I know a hell of a lot more than I ever wanted to

know. In fact, I, to be honest with you, I was on my way to Dallas. I was driving from North Carolina, where where my home is, knowing that I was going to be working on some really what I think are infinitely more

important stories. But people keep trying to kill former President Trump. And that keeps knocking me off of my game because each time that happens, I get a, you know, I get a e-mail or a text from my blaze, you know, editor in chief and says, OK, you and Joe Hanneman are on the beat.

It's like, oh, here we go again. And so when it, I'm, I'm driving, I'm, I'm about an hour and a half out of Dallas on Sunday when this thing starts hitting the you know, the, the news and, and I'm, I'm getting my phone is blowing up and I'm like, ah, crap. You know, so I know that when I got to Dallas, I got here to the blaze mothership and, and the studios that I was not going to be able to work on the things that I really am looking forward to knocking out here soon.

But it is an important story. And you're right, it doesn't need to go away. It doesn't need to appear into the media ether. They're already downplaying it. They were downplaying it within a couple of hours this time. Yeah, minutes almost. I, I feel like, like within I, I think I had somebody from the, from the FBI reach out to me and said the evidence response team in Miami is spinning up for a possible assassination attempt on Trump outside the golf course. And I go, OK.

And then not 10 minutes later, there are people out there reaching out to discredit it and they're saying, well, it was just a gunfight between two dudes who were outside of the the area. You remember that because that was the first story that came down New York Post. Actually, I think you were the first one to actually ping me on my drive and let me know that this was happening. No, you were, you were, you were the bearer of bad news.

But but it was, it was immediately downplayed by so many elements within the MSM and within, you know, leftist influencers on social media, not only downplaying the severity of the alleged attempt on another attempt on Trump's life, but they were also immediately starting to once again defend their own actions, their own words as it relates to the inflammatory speech of accusing Trump of being the most sinister danger of all time to all democracies ever in the history

of the world on planet Earth. I mean, they've, they've gone beyond him being literal Hitler to being the most dangerous man who's ever lived. And they're actually out there now defending like, look, just because he was shot at doesn't mean he's not a real threat. And you're just going, guys, Scott Jennings seems to be the only person. Do you watch any of his stuff on CNN? Have you seen? No.

Well, I I have not. To be perfectly honest, since I checked into my hotel room here in Dallas on at 3:00 on Sunday afternoon, I have had I've purposely locked the television on MSNBC on purpose. Well, you want to see what the what the craziest side is saying it Scott Jennings has been. I think that I think CNN is actually in a play for ratings right now where they're like, I don't think we can only have whatever it is that that 25% of people that are on the hard

left. And it's probably smaller than that, but there's people that kind of lean that way. So rather than competing for the audience that MSNBC has locked up tight, they're actually competing for people that want to hear a little bit more balance. And Scott Jennings has been doing balance. Let me bring up this story here. This is coming from CBS, so I'm going to read this is kind of bullet point.

So I think it's useful for us to get kind of the facts as they are described by sort of a leftist, but not in crazy, not a crazy leftist. Source. So this is from reporting 2 days ago and this is what they basically said. They said that we know that there was an apparent assassination attempt. They're using the word apparent. The FBI has used the word alleged. People are kind of like trying

to shade around the edges. Dude with a gun sitting outside in a sniper nest for 12 hours equals an assassination attempt to me. I get why they're being cautious but still. Essentially they they saw the barrel of an AK47 is what was reported, but we know now it was an SKS because it was actually charged as such. SKS is a just a cheaper garbage version. Similar kind of gas piston system. Still shoots a 762 by 39 caliber round.

And for those who do not know rifles, and this is worth noting, that gun is probably an inside of 300 yard gun. But for real accuracy, it's got to be probably 200 to 150 yards. It's not an inherently stable or accurate round, which means people have said at 300 yards your groups open up to bigger than 12 inches, which means you're missing most man sized targets if your aim is not very good. And he had a scope on there and all this other kind of stuff.

All right, so he was he was engaged by Secret Service. Handgun was drawn, fired by a protective agent who was in the bubble. They did their job. That's good to hear. And essentially we start finding out about this guy who got in his car after he got shot at and he drove away and he was picked up by local law enforcement. I believe it was by the county sheriff's in in Martin County. Does that register with what you know? Yeah, yes, it does. That's exactly.

And then when they. Asked him and this is the thing that I think is the weirdest part because he we've seen pictures of him being arrested, we've seen the body Cam footage and they said do you know what this is about? And he said yes to me. That's very, very telling. All right. I'll let you kind of opine on what you think about sort of the original details from that. Yeah, so you asked the first question was, what do I know about this guy? I know entirely too much.

I and I, we've been going all the way back and digging. Joe Hanneman and myself also investigative reporter for The Blaze now formerly with the Epic Times. He's now with me. He's my partner in crime on a lot of these investigations. What a lot of people don't know is Joe and I were partner in crimes long before we were working for the same company because we were sharing every, everything together to make sure that we got stuff right. He was one of my, you know, guys that I trusted.

He knew I wasn't going to steal his stories. I wasn't going to steal his stories. We always hoped that one day we we would be able to combine our efforts. And, you know, kind of the way I always put it is Woodward and Bernstein the shit out of one of these big, you know, blockbuster stories. And so I'm, I'm very, very happy to have him here now. And, and we are working together on this. And one of the things that we have been doing is digging into this guy's background we've found.

Positive news stories on him going back to when he was 25 years old. We've got a new article coming out today, an analysis piece basically on his life and his history and where he was written up, where he, you know, he he had a heroic action where he saved the, you know, a damsel in distress back when he was 25. And the local Greensboro paper did a, you know, feature story on him. And he was he was a good looking young man had that long horse

face that he still has. But you know, nevertheless it was it was a positive story, but then things. This is 30 years old is what you're saying though. This is a 30 year old news story. This guy is in the news all over the place. That that's correct. And then suddenly in the late 90s, he basically becomes a career criminal. I mean, he breaks into criminality with, with Ferber

and gusto. We're talking about a guy who has over 100 identifiable criminal charges against him, not only, but basically beginning about 1998 up through just a couple of years ago. He has over Kyle. He has over 70 arrests. How many? How many years behind bars? Well, let's hold that thought. So over 100 criminal charges, over 70 arrests, multiple felony convictions, 0 years behind bars.

Now we're talking about a we're talking about a guy who notorious, most notoriously in 2002, held off the Greensboro, North Carolina Police Department and the Guilford County Sheriff's Department with an AK or an SKAS fully automatic rifle

at the time. That should get you 10 years just for holding it. As I and I spoke to the sheriff yesterday, the sheriff of Guilford County, who was the sheriff at the time, 24 years elected sheriff of the county there, and he was of course there when this incident took place. He said that he never personally interacted with Ralph, but he said his guys had interacted with him dozens and dozens of times over the years. They said he was notorious among his guys.

He said at the very least in that incident, there should have been a federal referral at that time because of the gun crime itself, but rather the locals pled it down to a concealed carry violation and it went away. OK, when was the assault weapons ban? The Assault Weapons ban was what, 9495? But it was a 10 year thing, What it I think it encompassed that time. Oh yeah, absolutely. Absolutely. I'm gonna I'm looking it up just 'cause I want the the years on it specifically, but we.

Already. But we already had a ban on fully automatic, you know. Sure, we did, but what I'm getting at is like this was all during the time when this actually was a thing that people cared about. And so this was 1994 was when Congress passed the ACT and it expired in September of 2004. He has a machine gun under federal law in 2002. No federal referral. Violation of the assault weapons ban, probably, definitely a violation of the National Firearms Act 1934.

Failure to register a machine gun. So, and then it was listed as a weapon of mass destruction, which must have been a state charge at that time, which is to say that if you had a Full Auto machine. OK, So this guy, this is where we start getting shady. And I talked about it yesterday. I'm not ready to call him a federal asset. But what I will say is, is when you start crossing the line and you have interactions with the United States prosecutor's office. I asked. I asked the the sheriff

yesterday. I said, can you give me an explanation for why this guy with multiple felony convictions, firearm conviction, stolen goods, I mean, this guy, this guy was in possession of stolen goods, multiple charges convicted, his suspended sentence expired and six months later he does it again and still doesn't go to jail.

I, I went through this in great detail with the, with the former sheriff of Guilford County. And what he told me was he said, well, Guilford County is notoriously liberal and, and he said, you know, I was an exception to the rule being a conservative, you know, sheriff at the time re elected over and over and over again. And he said, he said they in that camp in that county, they notoriously don't want to go through the process of trial with anybody.

They love pleading everything out and pleading everything down and allowing people to walk. And I said, OK, I said, I understand that about liberal courts, all right. But this is a middle-aged white guy with a machine gun. Right. Like this is not the people that we expect to see the white privilege card applied to. Right. And to which? To which the sheriff said, well, that's a good question. And I said so. So I said, all right, So I said,

engage me for a moment. I said, was somebody protecting this guy? And he says, I have no evidence of that, He said. But I can tell you he's this is this is a quote, he is the type of person that the CIA loves to bring in. All right, let's get conspiratorial because I've got a Mike Benz tweet up here and he refers to a story by John Solomon. But we're going to go to the to the actual story where it

started. So this was a breaking thing from John Solomon, the suspected Trump assassin flagged by the United States during his return from Ukraine. But or I guess it's pronounced Ukraine. I don't know. I don't know why I emphasize one part. But Homeland Security refused to probe. And here's Mike Benz's take on it. We all know Mike Benz loves getting into the thing called the BLOB, which is the, the, the Intel community. He says can't think of a reason

why they do that. A CIA targeter flagged him. CBP flagged him. He has 74 arrests but never spent a day in prison. Recruited Islamic fundamentalist to fight for the CI as war in Ukraine. But all government agencies kept their hands off. This is a big mystery. What kind of mystery are we looking at here, Mr. Baker? All right.

So you know this enough about me, and you and I have had these types of discussions enough times to know that before I put on my tinfoil hat, I always first go to just the facts ma'am, and then convince me of why I need to go down a conspiracy rabbit hole. Convince me I'm I'm having to do this one in reverse order. And the reason why I'm doing this one in reverse order is because what we know about how secrets and how they apply to for the protection of one of

their protectees. And the fact that they would have had to have notified local law enforcement two or three days in advance of where Trump was playing golf so that they could do allegedly, as we know, they're supposed to do, site survey inspections, things of that nature bomb sweeps, all the things that they're supposed to do for a protectee. Now, knowing Trump, like we know Trump, Trump could have very well LED them on and said, I'm playing at such and such golf

course. And then at the last minute said no, just for his own, you know, because, because world leaders have done that for throughout, you know, history for thousands of years. They, they've fooled their own Praetorian guards or their protective details or whatever, and, and change at the last minute. So he could have done that. But even if he had changed at the last minute, how did Ralph know when and where to set up a sniper's nest 12 hours in advance?

I there's, there's. I find it highly unlikely that he made a guess of where he needed to be now. Let's let's say why that is, though. Let's get really, really granular about this because I think it's necessary. People will incidentally do spot checks on a regular basis to see if somebody is where they want to be. I used to do surveillance. You used to do surveillance as an investigator.

You know how this works. If there's a place where someone is most likely to be, you might camp out there all day or all night, right? That's correct, but if it's. A point where someone might show up like they sometimes go to this grocery store or they have coffee on some Thursdays at this coffee shop. You might go hang out during coffee hours for like a couple hours, but then you're going to leave we or you'll just drive by and see if their car is in the

parking lot. That's called a spot check. So there's spot checks, there's the limited surveillance, and then there's the bunker down and watch. And you've basically tucked in to see when this person comes in, you're going to see them come into your field of view.

Yeah, he did the last one, you know, as we put these things out there and we were asking questions, we we were challenged as we should be. Somebody said, well, they, you know, it's it's not hard to spot, you know, Trump Force One and his airplane when it lands and he could have ran out there that that night after he saw the plane land. So. OK, reasonable question. So I immediately got on with our sources here from the Blaze and found out when Trump left Salt Lake City the night before.

Just so happens that Glenn Beck was on the same billing with him in Salt Lake City that night. So we had Beck security team telling me exactly when Trump left the building. We knew then that he was wheels up in his plane at 7:15 PM mountain time. So that's 915 W Palm, Florida time, right? And it's a four and a half hour flight. So he's not landing till basically about 2:00 in the morning, about the time that Ralph posted up. Right.

So we eliminate that kind. And so you have to go through these layers of, of trying to figure these things out and, and see if there was another reason or another motivation or like you said, maybe he just knew that that Trump, if he's home on a Sunday morning, that this is the golf course that he likes to play. We'll see what we don't know

yet. And the reason why I can't make, I can't answer these questions yet is because we have not been given the information about how long Ralph was in Florida. We don't know how long he was there. We don't know when he arrived from either Hawaii or North Carolina. And by the way, interestingly as a as an aside, we know from voting records in both Hawaii and North Carolina that he was vote, he was voting in both jurisdictions at. The same.

Time, at the very least, we ought to investigate him for, you know, a voter fraud. Yeah. So, so we know that we know that he voted on a Democratic primary ballot in this year in North Carolina at his old resident address, but he's been living in Hawaii for the last 6 1/2 years and his most recent vote there that we could find was 2021.

Interesting. One of the weird things about election records too is that left-leaning and very blue states tend not to wash their records and conservative states tend to wash them when you re register somewhere new. So I've lived in multiple states. The only one that I still am registered in, by the way, that I haven't lived in in for more than a decade. In fact, it's the only one that I've been registered as a voter

since I registered. And they won't cancel it no matter what I do. I send them emails, I'll send them stuff. I'm like, hey, I'm not going to go out there and get a notary public. It's California and I've been registered there since 2008 and I get I get information as a voter like in Glendale and they're like, Hey, we're running for Glendale City Council and I'm like, dude, I haven't lived there since O 9 when I enlisted. Give me a break. Let let's kind of.

They they hold, they hold your, they hold your registration in reserve in case. That's right. Well, hope springs eternal that I might come back and pay whatever their crazy taxes are. So the Wall Street Journal ran this piece. I've actually got the video clip of her talking to Jesse Watters, which we can play in a little bit here. But let's introduce the the tats and Tatas, if you will. Is that, is that a reasonable thing to do? Because this is where you hit me

yesterday. You hit me up yesterday and you said, what's up with this article? And you had me and Steve friend and Gerardo Boyle all review it. We all kind of came up with the same thoughts. And your thoughts, by the way, are not incongruous with the thoughts of many others that I sent.

I sent this article out to a long list of my former intelligence community sources, special OPS sources, guys that have worked overseas, guys who have been in Ukraine in some pretty hairy stuff for a very long time, long before the recent conflict with Russia, and that have been involved very, very much in both the political scene. I'm trying to be careful here. The electoral process in Ukraine since 2014 and as well as covert operations there.

And so as a result of this, I sent this over to them. This includes, by the way, Kyle, not just former USIC guys, but also European. Yeah, and. And for folks awareness, like the techniques are the same, recruiting people, spotting people, assessing people and having them do things that you want them to do. They kind of are all the same. And it's usually finding leverage and squeezing. It's usually identifying them, you know, what their assets and their liabilities are.

You know, will they be a net positive to what I'm trying to accomplish? Can I actually suggest things to them that they'll do? Are they motivated and, you know, are they going to burn my OP to the ground or how how much do I have to kind of insulate and shield them? But these are standard things. I mean, these have been going on for thousands of years, it turns out in in a human history.

So what happened is universally, without exception, every single one of our sources that read this article after I sent it out to them last night wrote me back straight ahead. Bullshit. This is disinformation. This is a disinformation campaign, and there the Wall Street Journal is not immune to that. They are well known to be a voice of the IC community and have covered for the IC and DoD for decades, just as the New York Times has, just as Newsweek does, and so forth and so on.

And, and this is a quid pro quo situation, so folks understand how this works. It's like we're going to give you scoops and we're going to give you stories. And occasionally we're going to come and tell you that we need you to run a story that we need you to run. So sometimes you're going to get exclusive information that nobody else has and you're going to lead and you're going to break it. And that's going to build your

reputation. And sometimes you're going to be a shield for what we need because propaganda is also part of the deal. Are you in? And there are people that we've all identified and the names are well known within the mainstream media. And if you guys follow this program, you've seen some of them, That's how it plays. This is a quid pro quo game. You are. You are essentially whoring yourself out to the Intel community for great scoops and

sometimes propaganda. And that's exactly what somebody asked me last night. They said, why would so and so pick one of the writers either with WSJ or yeah, WSJ or Newsweek or New York Times? Why would they? Why would they do this? Why would they be a basically a useful idiot for the IC community? And, and it is exactly what you said, they're getting access that they would not get otherwise. They're getting scoops that they would not get otherwise.

And in exchange for that, they have sold their soul. That's exactly what it is. There are people that have written stories about the cartels and they got that information from deep inside of either DOJ entities like ATF or

or FBI or DEA. And then the trade off is sometimes you run a story that's favorable that we need you to, or you're putting out some sort of misinformation, disinformation operation that's going to be backstop and we're going to be giving you the unnamed sources to go and tell you, but we need you to do it. Let me read some from this Wall Street Journal article, which I pulled off and I put into the archive. So folks, I can actually link

this. I'll put it on social media a little bit later for your readings. Does the government suspected of attempting to assassinate former President Donald Trump acted so erratically during his his years as a pro Ukraine activist that other Americans who encountered him flagged him and his behavior to US authorities? He was taken into custody, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

But during his time in Ukraine, he traveled shortly after the Russian invasion in 2002, hoping to join the fight where his tumultuous life full of failures and brushes with the law seemed to spiral further downward and to alarm those who came in

contact with him. We're going to assess those who who who were alarmed because I think what you're seeing on the screen right now, if you guys are looking is supposedly a picture from the journal of the woman with the tats and Tatas that is there sitting there in that sort of seductive photo. And by the way, she doesn't look like that on Fox News. I don't know why she chose to pose that way. And it definitely made me read and stop right there.

I I went to Steve and I said, Steve, I'm going down a rabbit hole right now. I have no idea what you wanted me to read, but I just found a woman who's got an open shirt. What's going on here? This is the story. Her name is Chelsea Walsh and nothing against Chelsea was. I mean, I think it's an attractive picture. I think it's actually probably more alluring that she she presented herself on Fox. But it's just so weird for the Wall Street Journal to like throw a honeypot picture like

this. Says she's a nurse who encountered several people, including several times with Rouse in Kiev in 2022. Said his threats of violence worried her so much that she conveyed her concerns to Customs and Border Protection officers during an hour long interview at Washington's Dulles in June of 2022.

That's flag number one. She told the officer during the interview, which took place after she returned to the US, that he was among the most dangerous American she met during her month and a half long stint in Ukraine. That's a big, weird red flag. Why was she doing this interview and all of this? She showed the officer a notebook listing more than a dozen names of Americans and others who took actions who alarmed her.

She had a heading referred to as, quote, overall predatory behavior or antisocial traits, End Quote. And there were four names. Ralph's was on the top. And then she had another one which was entitled people who have been arrested in Ukraine, of which apparently Ryan was the only one. Talk to me about that, Steve. Well, the one thing that I have not figured out yet is what the the circumstances behind the arrest in Ukraine, because I don't have the access to police. So we have that now.

Yeah, we, well, we have it's alleged, but go ahead. Yeah. So the story, and I want to say this comes from John Solomon here. Apparently he, Ryan was one of the people and and told people at the time that he was organizing A protest outside of

Zelinsky's home. Did you get this background that he basically got a bunch of rabble rousers together, including foreign nationals, but also people who were domestically there and got them really riled up to go and do a protest that was considered unlawful at the time in front of the the House of the president of Ukraine. And therefore he was rounded up like everybody else because he was considered an unlawful protest. They did not disperse and they ended up being arrested over it.

That's the claim that was being made. That's what I'm seeing published. I'll find you where that is. I'll give you a. Second, yeah, we, we actually, we actually quote the Solomon story in our, our a piece that's going to come out later today. And, and the, and that's why I say we, we, I, I think I'm, I'm hesitating here because I'm trying to be as accurate as I can when we look at every one of these things, even if it's the

domestic police reports. When I saw, and I went through it the first time with a fine tooth comb and realized that everything on every single arrest and every single charge and every single conviction ended in either suspended sentence, parole, probation. And we could find not a single incident where he was actually incarcerated for one of his crimes. I didn't believe it as we're missing something. Right. We have to wait. We have to go further. So we did. And we, even though we were on

it from day one, we couldn't. We were waiting for. And sure enough, all of a sudden, NBC and Washington Post, the New York Times start corroborating. Yeah, we can't find incarceration either. We can't find prison time either. So we knew we were missing, Yeah. I well, I found the story. So this is the this is the headline for the story. This is actually coming from wflx.com. So this is a local news station and this is the paragraph where I read what you just it wasn't

in John Solomon story. I just did a search for it. Again, it says, quote, this is apparently according to Walsh, quote, Ryan told me the story because he was very proud and explained when he was arrested, which has not been confirmed. Again, as you just said, quote, shortly before I met him, he said that he enlisted a bunch of local Ukrainian citizens to start a protest in front of Zelinsky's house and the protest was about freeing the Azov defenders of Maripol.

I think it's what it's pronounced. Ryan said that they allowed nobody to do that protest. So everybody in got put in jail at that time, including Ryan. So that's the claim. That's apparently when he was arrested. You tell me when you want to play video of this lady, by the way, and we'll play the a little bit of the Jesse Watters bit. Oh, now see, I haven't seen the I heard that she was, she was on Jesse Watters last night. So I haven't seen it. So let's play it.

Yeah, OK, let's do this. OK, so here's here's Chelsea Walsh, the the gal from the photos discussing with Jesse Watters. I don't know how much we'll play. There's about 3 1/2 minutes of this clip. I'll put it out on social media again, but we'll play at least some of it here. Chelsea Walsh is the nurse who flagged Ruth to the feds after meeting him in Ukraine, and she joins us now. Chelsea, what about Ruth struck you? He had very bizarre and volatile tendencies as a nurse.

I'm a mandated reporter and we are also trained to determine when someone is a threat to themselves or others. I determined after knowing Ryan for a while that he was a threat to others, so I felt that it was necessary that he be reported to the proper authorities. And you reported? This to the federal government and what happened next? I haven't heard anything. I have had no correspondence. Nobody had tried to connect with me until today.

OK. Has someone from which agency specifically connected with you now A. A agency has connected with me. I would. I don't want to say which one, but someone has connected with me. OK. In your conversations and observations of Ruth, what were the things that he was saying he was operating in? Ryan got involved with the humanitarian side as well as the military side. He got involved with things that he shouldn't have been involved with.

He was able to con members in the Ukrainian military. He was able to con charities. He he was a good con artist. He was calculated, but he was also very volatile and sporadic. He got into just about everything. Drones, weapons, humanitarian aid. He got involved in things he shouldn't have been involved with because he didn't have a background in any of this. How was he able to con the Ukrainian military that?

You'll have to ask him. All right, there's more to it, but let's just leave it at that for now. What you thought? This is this is what my, and I, again, I'm being very careful. One of our European Intelligence Community sources has been very active with me since this began. He personally spent a lot of time in Eastern Europe, including Ukraine. His background by and large is he spent most of his his time over there infiltrating Islamicist extreme extremist groups.

That's what his that's what his background is. And, and he said, and I'm I'm just going to quote what a message I received from him this morning. He said there's only two reasons why. He said apart from ideology, there's only two reasons why Ralph was in Ukraine. He said it's either money or pussy, OK. And he said, and he said, he said. That's pretty straightforward

stuff. No, and that's that's what that's what is used to induce and attract and bring these types of people into these dangerous situations. They're being offered something they're not getting at home and that's all it is. It's no more complicated than that. It's base hedonistic desires for either you're, you know, he's he, they talk, she talked about and they talked about his failed business ventures, you know, as a roofer and all the other things that he was involved in.

And then he learned that he could make some money by other means, some other way. He also, as we talked about before and as the sheriff of Guilford County told me yesterday on the phone, he's the type of guy who's easily recruitable into these types of. Situations less people misunderstand what we're saying. There are basically three major reasons, because you mentioned the first one, but I don't want to leave that behind because that's always a possibility.

Ideology. People come over because they believe in a 'cause people come and work on behalf of the federal government because they believe that they're doing the right thing. Patriotism, however naive things like that, they believe in a religious cause, etcetera. So people do that. They do it for women or for men. They do it for some sort of religious, I mean some romantic entanglement or physiological connection and then they do it for money. Those are the major motivators.

This is universal, by the way. This is not like unique to this guy. And the simpler minded you are, the more easy it is to get you to hone in on one thing because all you're ever trying to do in one of these pitches, these a pitch for a source. It's a sales job. It's like, what do you want? Do I have it? Can I give it to you for you to do what I want? The edge. And, and this is could just be purely coincidental, but our Tats and Tatas girl just also happens to be from West Palm Beach.

Right, also very strange and you notice that the the CIA case officer that is cited in this thing. So I'm going to I'm going to read another little piece here because sometimes it's the CIA and we're just trying to make connections and sometimes someone from the CIA is telling you that they are involved in this story out of nowhere. It says here in this little piece article from the Wall Street Journal, like I, I feel like this is just a little like like a screw you homage from the IC.

It says Ralph was well known among the volunteer aid groups in Ukraine as a, quote, UN, quote, fraud and quote, UN quote, kind of a whack job, said Sarah Adams, a former CIA officer who helped run a network that linked fifty aid groups to share information and coordinate humanitarian and volunteer efforts. He claimed to be working with the Ukrainian government to recruit foreign fighters, but he wasn't, she said. Why does she know that? Probably because she was connected to the Ukraine

government. In reality, that's how these things work. The thing that I found really interesting is this woman, Chelsea, who was just interviewed by Jesse Watters. She's got a notebook. Tell me the kind of people that you know of that note names and their affiliations and put them into categories just based on your life as a man for 65 years on the planet.

All right. The only person that I would know that would do that would be my father, who was a private investigator and he journaled for decades. He wrote everything down. What if I asked you to do it? What if I said Steve? It'd be really great if you kept a list of names of people that were involved, especially American names. Could you do that for me as you travel abroad and you're working?

But as she said, as she said, Oh, and by the way, when I was in Soviet Union, I journaled every day. I imagine you did. I kept records. It was all in code I used. I invented my own, you know, alternate phrases and words to identify, you know, various people and organizations while I was over there. Why did you do? That why did I do that?

I mean, first of all for my own history, my own, my own historical account of what I was doing and what I was involved in. But also there was a high degree of probability that after upon exit from these countries that would they would confiscate my own documentation of my trip. And so everything was changed on purpose so as not to incriminate the people that I was meeting with did. That come from working around your dad? Did that come from somebody suggesting it to you?

Was it something you read in a spy novel? Like, where'd you come up with that? No, I mean, I had gone through what they very and look, I don't, I don't mean to overplay my own history at all or oversell it, but I did go through what we call the Slavic training camp for how to interact and how to deal not only with the citizens behind the Iron Curtain and their

unique psychology. As you know, for instance, I mean, look the in in 1981, my first time to go into the Soviet Union, the the Russian people had been in bondage for 1000 years. This effects them to their core, to their genetic core of how they interact with people and how they interact with foreigners. It it's it's not, it's not a customer is always right.

You know society. It's a pessimistic, it's a pessimistic world out view in the same way the Chinese have a collectivist look, you know, the people, cultures have different ways of addressing and looking at the world, different values of human life, different standards for human interaction and so on. So yeah, getting was that something put on by the US government, this this acclamation thing and and any you.

Know State Department or something, this was a this was a private organization and and of course one of the most important aspects of the the training that I was put through was also how to deal with the police with the KGB. We would most definitely have interactions. Our rooms would most definitely they, you know, they put you in what they call in tourist hotels.

This was, these were the hotels where only foreigners could stay, not only for the benefit of controlling you and monitoring foreigners, but also because they could scoop up the Western currency there. Western currency was incredibly valuable at the time because at the time the ruble was not exchanged, you know, on the world currency exchange. And so hard currencies, as they said, the American dollar or the US pound, I mean the UK pound or the Swedish kroner was very

valuable to them. So they could scoop it all up in a concentrated zone. So that's why they put you in those specific hotels. But we also, we also knew that every one of our rooms were, were bugged. So, I mean, as soon as we would walk into the room, we'd walk up to the light fixtures and the, the planters and the, the, you know, the, the plastic flowers and we testing, testing 1-2 and we would talk to them and, you know, give. Give me a levels check. Yeah, yeah.

And, and, and of course after the great thing, the incredible part about this, Kyle, was after the the wall came down and after the fall of the Soviet Union, then historically, you know, they actually had a, the equivalent of a Freedom of Information initiative that was enacted in Russia. And they actually started showing. I've seen it, I've watched the videos of the actual listening rooms in all of these hotels, hotels where I stayed, they're

now museums. So with with all the old gear and all the old listening devices and everything, they're actually museums and these old in tourist hotels now. I think Mike Waller was saying that he was actually there trying to collect some transcripts and things like that as the the wall was coming down. So he was on that end of it, seeing the fruits of what you guys have been out there, talking to the the plants, knowing that they were there.

And then he was there running around through the Kremlin like as the thing was coming down and they were going like here, you could take some of this stuff, like stuff in your briefcase. So, you know, the stories of people interacting with the

stuff is normal. It is a totally abnormal way to live, to be under surveillance and to be in a foreign area where you are a complete foreigner and interacting with Intel assets and not know, you know, And then you've got this lady, this Sarah Adams, former CIA case officer who's talking about who Ryan is. You want to hone in on this for a little bit? What? Your thoughts are so yeah, but but listen to what she said and what she told Waters, she said. As a nurse, I'm also a reporter.

A mandated reporter, now that's a real thing. So folks understand mandated reporters. I was one as an FBI agent. I was 1 as a paramedic. My wife was 1 as a mental health counselor. There are certain jobs in the United States where you have to report things like child abuse or people who are mentally unwell. The funny thing is it doesn't extend internationally. That's not a real thing. That sounds like plausible deniability on why I was keeping a journal on these people's names to me.

Yeah. And and when when you're a woman that looks like she does, let's, let's call her, you know, moderately attractive and certainly could be used for other operations overseas. Particularly lowering operations. Yes, alluring operations and to be a quote UN quote reporter in that circumstance that means that she is reporting to who and then she denied Jesse Waters questioned in that interview about who she was currently interacting with, which agency she was interacting with do.

You know what I find weird about that too? Can we add to that? Yeah. When you talk about the FBI, what do we call it? When we what, what do you and I call? It well, we might call them shitheads, but what what? They're the Bureau right there. We call them the FBI. They're an overt law enforcement agency in this country. When we talk about the DEA, we talk about the DEA, we talk about the ATF. We might have some choice words

for them as well. But again, these are all, they're law enforcement, you know, agencies. They have the names and they're pretty straightforward. The only people that I know of that are referred to as an agency, real specifically, it's usually a capital A. The agency is the CIA. That's government speak. That's the euphemism. In the 80s they used to call them the company. They're all these little

euphemisms. But as it stands right now, now they have things for NSA and they talk about those. And there's different little monikers where someone says oga, you know, sometimes that's the CIA, sometimes it's NSA, but it's always like a very specific Intel when you start saying I'm not going to talk about the agency that I'm talking to. Are you talking about capital T, Capital A? Because that's what it's sounded like. That sounds like a slip to me. Just saying.

Yeah, and, and, and again, going back to this story from Wall Street Journal that I sent out to literally every single source I have in in the Intel community and, and otherwise for and I didn't, and by the way, I didn't prep them. I sent it out just like I sent it out to the suspendables last night. I read, I read something is fishy about this. What do you give me? Your thoughts? This is exactly the the text. I imagine you probably just forward this to everybody.

It says read the story and tell me what you think. Something is fishy. And the link that was it. That was the prompt that that was. All I sent out to everybody and then I just got an avalanche of responses, particularly from the IC guys.

And, and of course then they go into the detailed explanation of what's the things that you and I already know about, about how the, how the NGOs are layered and how the, the former CIA operatives are our agents are now contractors and, and they can build 2 and 3 levels of the contractors. So a guy like Ryan Ralph would be contracted by the contractor of a contractor, all of that funding. Yeah, all totally plausible deniability.

You've got this from Steve friend here, which I'm just going to out Steve because he said this. I said the nurse sounds like achs. That was less than two minutes after you sent the story. I sent you a picture. I sent you a picture of cleavage because that's what I did, because I I like to give you a hard time and that's that's the joy that in my life. But Steve immediately honed in on that and he said, how did this all happen within a day or two?

Because this happened on Sunday, folks, and we are now Wednesday and we still don't know much about Thomas crooks. I I get it. He's dead. So maybe less important, or at least less imminent, but we have an awful lot of info on this guy right away. And we suddenly and we suddenly have a media celebrity nurse who was in Ukraine who was interacting with Ryan Ralph on a regular basis, 3 down notes about him and then who also just happens to be from West Palm Beach, FL.

This is amazing. This is an amazing series of coincidences and circumstances. And you know, so if I can, if I can take this a step further, so and I, and I don't mind talking about this because I'm not going to out any of these guys, but I have AI have a contact and a source particular in particular from that community. He's only been retired for just a handful of years. He's so he's very recently retired from the IC and he is still very active as a, as a

contractor. He does go off grid frequently because he's still involved in operations as a contractor. And he, he came, he reemerged last night after I sent him the Wall Street Journal article. Now I've been trying to reach him for days and he reemerged and I said, are you available to chat? He said yes.

Called him on a one of the encrypted apps and we chatted for a while specifically about this circumstance and about Ryan Ralph. It just so happens he has just now recently received a call from Florida engaging him in the investigation. He's headed that way and he's headed down there. And he said, and this is exactly what he said, he said, I am, I have 0 interest in Ralph's domestic activities. He said, now this is a guy who speaks 5 languages, including Russian and Ukraine, Ukrainian.

And he said I have my interest is who his contacts were over there. We find out who his contacts are there. We'll find out if in fact and then who activated him here. That makes sense to me. Interestingly enough, the first thing I got a clip here from Tucker Carlson that I wanted to play. And so we'll take a little coffee break. Tell me what you think about this. This is, I guess, smashing down on Lindsey Graham, which I'm always down for. Here's Tucker Carlson and I'm

I'm watching this. They're literally telling me that this guy whom they've arrested is a Trump supporter. Huh. So you flip channels, and then you learn that I've flipped over to a channel I used to work on, and there's Lindsey Graham. And I know, I know, I know. He's a Republican senator from one of the most conservative states. How does that happen, by the way, if democracy is real, how is Lindsey Graham a senator?

But whatever. So I'm watching Lindsey Graham, and Lindsey Graham's looking right into the camera, and he's like, you know who did this? Iran. Iran. So I looked into this. Yeah, that's for sure. Well, it turns out someone to see a war monger. Well, the guy who shot Trump was also a war monger. And in fact, the closer you look at it, the more you realize his politics are exactly the same as Lindsey Graham's. He's a neo con. He literally volunteered in Ukraine.

And Lindsey Graham's like, no, Iran did. It's like, no, you have no opinions that are different from this guy's and you're lying to me. In the audience I used to speak to five nights a week. You were lying to them. I'm shouting this in my hotel room. Nobody heard me. My wife was brushing her teeth. She's like, what is that? They're lying. I don't know why he always does that weird laugh. Right, right. That's a strange thing, but he entertains.

Himself, he entertains himself as much he. Clearly does, and he has this thing. I don't know anyone else who laughs like that, but what I do know is that somebody's running information and they're pushing it out to wherever that what wherever Lindsey Graham was on right, that's Iran. That doesn't that doesn't sound like a checks, although they had an interesting little downfall, which we'll cover in just a second here. Some of the some of the the assets there.

What do you what do you make of pushing these counter narratives based on what you were just talking about in the in the background of the sources you've been dealing with? Look, I I am becoming singularly focused throughout this entire process, all right? I have been wide open to all possibilities and technically, you know, intellectually I still have to be, I have to be open to any suggestion, any possibility, any pulling on any thread and what that thread will unravel.

But the more and more I get into this, the more and more I see and reveal and it's revealed to me and, and it becomes more ingrained in my, I don't, I don't want it to be part of my knee jerk inherent expectation. But I see that it's all connected, Kyle. I see that this is all coming

from a singular source. And it doesn't matter whether we're talking about Thomas Crooks, if we're talking about Ryan Ralph, or we're talking about the 2014 Ukrainian election for president, or we're talking about the 2020 election, or we're talking about January 6th, or we're talking about

COVID-19. And the sudden release of that bio weapon upon the planet Earth and then the subsequent, you know, government reaction to that and the imposition of the mandates, the lockdowns, the vaccines and all these things. Every single time I pull on a thread from each one of those keeps going back to the same source. And the agency. And you have a hat for it. Yeah, I do. I I wear the hat frequently on purpose. I just do illicit response and reactions. I've worn it on your program.

Yeah, it's really good. You've worn it into hotels where I was sitting at and came and sat down with me and then everyone gave me weird looks. That's right. That's right. And, and, and, and of course, you know, part, part of the, part of the, the things that you and I go through. I mean, you're, you're, you are a former Fed, but you're a current Fed according to, you know, the Internet, the Internet, right?

And and of course I I am now a fed because when I don't take the absolute 100% conspiratorial line on any story, I am obliterate. You know what? I, I want to show you, I want to show you, and I'm sure you get this as well, but I want to, I want to read something to you that I get. This is not quite daily, but it's almost every day. So on a regular basis I get leads, right? So I'm an investigative reporter. I work for the Blaze.

Somebody has a story. If I don't take their story, and we've documented this, if I don't take their story and I don't, you know, and, and run with it or, or I don't have the exact same version of events that they have in my reporting, they'll get on a frickin airplane and fly halfway across the country to confront me. It's how nobody does that to me, Steve. What? How come nobody wants to fly and confront me? I don't know, maybe it's part of the maybe it's part of the blaze

magnetism. I don't know what it is, but they they have come out. I mean, you can't see it here, but outside this very window right here, our security in this building has confronted a stalker that flew halfway across the country to track me down. I get these stories too. We get, I mean, so folks have to understand, like they'll send you the story, they'll tell you something that immediately, you know, there's something off with it because the first line of it

is unhinged. It starts off with Kyle, I'm the whistleblower from and then they cite some evidence of like something that no one ever heard of. Like I'm the whistleblower from the the, the 1997 scandal that involved Crisco Foods. And you're like, I don't even, I mean, maybe there was one, but I don't know what the whistleblower is. So now that that's called me same you same. That's how they do it in recruiting. We're look at we're the same,

we're simpatico. And then the next thing they say is, is I've been chased by government, you know, energy weapons by drones for the last three decades. And I have an implant in my foot that tracks my place. And then you're like, all right, I'm done with you. And so you just go, thanks so much for your story. Or I don't answer it. And then they get pissed and then you're a fed because you didn't cover their story, which is nuts, by the way. It's always.

Been and, and, and I had one of the implant persons, OK, one of the, you know, the implant persons, a lady who lives in Chicago, she read in my, you know, ex announcements that I was going to be covering a particular trial at the District courthouse in DC. I walked out of the courtroom one day and she confronts me. She flew from Chicago to DC specifically because I would not take her story and. Run the other so that this actually gets us back to Routh a

little bit. The man's been flying all over the world that cost money. It cost money to fly to Chicago to confront Steve Baker. So there's two possibilities in my mind because I would love to know how these things were paid for because that's really where it comes down to for me. Possibility one is they live like many Americans. They make a terrible financial decisions and they live in constant debt and threat of basically having complete

financial meltdown. So they have 0 money and they're spending the money they don't have and running up credit card debts and someone offered them something.

That's one possibility because that would be the most logical for a crazy person or someone's financing them and they're paying in cash because someone's giving them cash to be able to do it. And then they're a fed, they're being they're being sourced by federal funds or international, federal, you know, international operations, whether it be I see here or somewhere else, because that's the only way that you go all around the world and you are able to break laws with

impunity, still return without losing your passport, without getting flagged. Like, how is it that if somebody gets arrested in Ukraine, which we're giving billions and billions of dollars to, and theoretically we have some relationship, State Department, intelligence community, why are they not sharing information on Americans 'cause I have to

imagine they would. If you get a vest arrested overseas, if you went somewhere and got arrested in Europe, Steve, the State Department would know about it and the FBI would hear about it very shortly, no doubt. No doubt about it. So let me, let me read you this new one. This is the latest. So at the end of last week, I get this guy he's and he's got a story, right? He's got it's it's, it's massive and it's and it's how he leads it off.

Dear Mr. Baker, I would like to discuss some high level corruption at DHS. Interested. Message me back. Oh, corruption at DHS? Hell yeah, I'm interested. But I said to him, I said just please give me a hint about what you have. Right. So he goes into this little, you know, little description about these people running fake immigration rackets and, and, and printing up a fake green cards, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera.

Please kindly investigate this. And then he says, and then he says something to the effect of if you have a strong moral sense, you'll do this. Well, right now I know I got a wacko right. I knew you had a wacko from the opening just for whatever, right So. So he says, well, usually 99% of the time it is, it is. So, all right, So Monday morning, this Monday, this is we're not even 24 hours after the second assassination attempt

of, of, of the president. And after, by the way, my editor in chief has said, OK, Steve, you and Joe, you're on, you're on the assassination beat again. So he so he sends me another note and he says at 7:13 AM, hello Sir, what's your feedback? Will you report this crime? Please let me know. To which I responded and said I'm working on the new assassination attempt of the president right now.

And he said would would you please delegate it to some other staff or associate, anyone who can work on this. Now this he sends me that at 9 O 5:00 AM Monday morning, 4 minutes later. Hello Sir, because I'm not responded yet, 20 minutes later, may I get a response Sir? 5 minutes later. OK, you work on your fake assassination story you moron. No one would believe right wing liars like you. Just fuck off and tell Trump to die peacefully. That's what mental illness looks

like, folks. This is a this is an everyday experience if you have enough high enough profile where people think that you might take their story and you become their only hope. I've been getting hammer emails from a guy in in Arkansas, which I I rarely ever worry about these things. But when you start talking about putting bullets into people's heads and other wild stuff, then I end up calling the police and telling them who I am. It turns out I speak the same language as local police.

I speak the same language because I used to run on an ambulance. And I said, look that your EMS probably has them on a frequent flyer list. If you guys are not familiar with them, you should know, and most of you should know in case you interact with them, you should probably just put a little tag out there that if your officer just happened to run this guy's tags, plates show up at his house for some disturbance, he's unhinged.

And I'm going to send you over the emails and here are the list of them. So I do that stuff very, very infrequently because I just don't necessarily care to. Sometimes people need to be, they need to be told like that they're really dangerous. And yeah, we get that.

So yeah, these kind of people also are perfect opera because anybody who's going to show them attention is going to get all of their attention, and you can ask them to do things on your behalf because they're asking you to do favors. It's totally reasonable. These are easily recruitable, not for my purposes certainly, but for other people who have

nefarious purposes, I think. And, and in fact, if you need somebody to run a recruitment operation in Ukraine that these types of people would be easy to bring over for either money or pussy and to get them involved and then you start feeding them. Now. You know, the one of the amazing aspects of this overall overarching story is that apparently Ryan Ralph had the ability to offer these radical Islamic militant terrorist fundamentalist to come over and fight in Ukraine for $1200 a month.

Now, I don't think that's enough to induce an American to come over and get his ass blown off in Ukraine. But they were fighting for free in Syria. Right, right. But $1200 a month to, you know, ISIS, Al Qaeda, you know, Islamists, that might be a year's salary. I don't know the metrics but. And where is that money coming from and how do you have it to pass on? And once again, this guy's flying around the world and doesn't seem to have any

credible business. No obvious source of income is the way that it would be annotated in the file. No obvious source of income when you look at him. So how is he clean dressed? Where did he get a gun in Florida? He's not from Florida. He's a felon. He bought an obliterate. He bought something off the street, obviously.

How do you like if you or I went down like we probably could, if we went to go buy a gun in Dallas or in Austin and try to buy it in some crappy neighborhood, like they would pay us as cops right away. They're not selling to us. Why are you selling it to a 58 year old white guy who who just got back from Ukraine and he's relatively clean cut And he's, I mean, he looks like dudes. I was on surveillance teams. But I mean, he looks exactly like a couple guys that I worked

with. You know, they were, they were less crazy eyed. But that build that, you know, the height, the general physical fitness, the whiteness, the clean shaveness, you look like a cop bro. Like, I don't know, I'm not selling you a gun in a way. I just don't know how he comes up with that. Right. So right.

And you know, another one of my guys, also a guy that speaks native Ukrainian, another guy from the the IC community here retired, he's been retired for quite some time, but he spent a tremendous amount of his career in Ukraine. And this is a guy who immediately jumped on this story, began investigating through his resources overseas. And one of the things that he told me yesterday, and I'm not, I'm not, I probably won't put this in writing.

I'm saying it here to you because we're having a discussion. I don't, I have not personally vetted this allegation or this sourcing from him yet. Although the individual is highly credible is that he told me he's already he's already attached Ralph to at least 2, most likely three different NGOs that he's been able to source already feeding him those source those resources in Ukraine to perform the operations and the recruiting services that he was

doing. And it's not just that I mean, he's doing basically running websites, printing. I mean, the guy's, you know, he's, he's got recruitment, he's wearing recruitment T-shirts, for God's sake. I. Mean it's definitely all of these things again, they all take money. They all and if he's doing it with NGOs, that's the perfect version of a government cut out because that's how it works.

And anybody who pays attention to this stuff, you guys can follow Mike Benz and reading about all the things that happened domestically and internationally. You can read any number of reportings, but Mike's kind of a he's kind of fixated on that kind of like autistic way and I don't he wouldn't he wouldn't mind me saying that. I think he he embraces the autism sort of end of it this sort of this need to understand what's happening. Do you mind if we zoom out a little bit?

Can we zoom out? Yeah. OK, let's zoom out to the rest of Trump.

I do this. Before we do, I'm going to just say if you guys are not getting enough news today, go check out my buddies over at Catholic Votes, catholicvote.org, Faith, Family and Freedom. They're putting out a new ad that's pro Trump, that's going against some of these lies that have been said by the Harris administration or the the Harris Waltz campaign where they're talking about how they did nothing and they had nothing to do with transgender surgeries.

Of course, they can prove that that is demonstrably false and fake. So if you guys want to support them, it's catholicvote.org. Get signed up for the loop. Follow them on social media at Catholic Vote, follow them on YouTube specifically and on Rumble at Catholic Vote, where we'll put some stuff out and we're going to get a little bit broader here. We're going to talk maybe about the bigger threat. Yesterday I talked about it and

I want to continue. I promised you guys more than just one topic, even though Steve and I can get very, very aggressive on a single thing. We're going to talk about the threat that Donald Trump represents to the left. And one of the things that I saw that was pretty nutty was Jonathan Gillum, who's a former FBI agent and he's a former SEAL and he's someone that I've got a little bit of a connection to. And I know some people that know him.

I think I've been on a program once or twice with him and Seb Gorka, he, he was cut off, He had his microphone cut off specifically for saying one single thing. He said. It's very obvious that people on the political left, particularly Democrats, but also I guess more specifically people that people that are in the news media apparatus, the sort of propaganda sphere, they keep saying the word threat, eliminate, put a bullet in. They're talking about killing Donald Trump.

And nothing would make them happier if there's this resistance to agreeing on that. So I'm going to play you guys again. These little clips, these little clips of Jasmine Crockett, Dan Goldman, some defense that's being run by a former prosecutor saying that Donald Trump is the threat because he won't accept election results. All of these things right in the wake of, seriously, it was Sunday. It was Sunday afternoon that we

got this story. I remember because, you know, my wife and I were like, prepping for dinner and we're finding out that there's a dude hanging out in the bushes. It's like 2:00 PM on a Sunday that wanted to kill the man. So here again, I'm going to I'm going to belabor this. You guys heard this yesterday if you listen to the program. But if you're with us right now, listen to Jasmine Crockett, Dan Goldman, using this terminology about domestic threats.

And I know that we hate listening to him, but it's important to be able to kind of put this evidence forward as we continue to move forward about the election threat that Donald Trump represents to them right now. I feel like MAGA in general, they are threats to us domestically. And we see it time and time

again. And I think that's why you see so many national leaders, whether they're Republicans or Democrats, coming together to say there is only one person qualified to be the commander in chief, and that is Kamala Harris. Now, Oh, there's no question. There's no question, says Jen Pasaki, ginger Gobbles. So a propagandist on a propaganda network, MSNBC, quite obviously, we're going to have another one. Same story, same program, same host.

You heard Steve Baker say earlier that he is absolutely pinned. Steve's probably seen all these clips. If he's pinned to MSNBC, then these are the things that he's seeing. This is Dan Goldman saying the exact same thing Dan is talking about, how there must be an elimination of Donald Trump because he's this existential threat. We've got a couple of more examples. So here we go again. If you're watching MSNBC, this

is what you're getting. Just unquestionable at this point that that man cannot see public office again. He is not only unfit, he is destructive to our democracy and he has to be. He has to be eliminated, OK, He has to be eliminated. And lastly, they're worrying about, oh, there's this both sides situation. Like people are hitting the left because of the rhetoric, because of the the concern about calling Donald Trump a threat. Well, he is a threat, they say as they double down again.

I would argue very, very comfortably that the political left wants, needs, hopes that Donald Trump dies. They won't say it out loud. The only thing that you're not allowed to do is say that out loud. It got microphones cut off on Fox Business the other day. Just saying here's the last little clip. I'm going to play this and we'll go back and Steve and I'll talk about it. This is a former United States Attorney prosecutor, like an assistant US attorney making the

same argument. He sounds very credible. He also looks very feminine and might prefer the company of men. I'm struck by on the defense of this or I guess on the attack on Democrats on this threat to democracy stuff, is that, for instance, Trump has not committed to accepting the results of the election, right? That sounds to me like a threat

to democracy. And I don't think it's that unfair to to question someone's commitment to democracy if they're saying that they can't commit to the results of the election. Another one is a lot of defenders of the former president have latched on this dictator concept. Except that Kamala Harris said that Trump might be addictive. He said those words himself. He's now, he might have been joking, but he said I will be a

dictator on day one. And I guess I'm struggling with this idea that echoing those points is somehow putting chum in the water to drive up violence against. I mean, I would say, though, that, you know, that rhetoric has changed and Vice President Harris isn't really talking about democracy as much. And it's not, you know, the reason may not be be related to political violence.

It's related to the ballot box and the fact that this democracy message wasn't actually working very well for Joe Biden. And she's we, it's, it's Donald Trump's fault for being Donald Trump. That's why people need to kill him and need to try. That's the take, Steve. Yeah, did you see the op-ed that JD Bance wrote yesterday? I did not. It was published both on his his ex page, but it also was an op-ed here at the Blaze and absolutely incredible. I mean, he he makes one of the

most powerful statements. And I want to, I want to pull it up if you'll give me, excuse me, the scrolling time that I'm doing right here for just a moment to pull this up. Because he makes an absolutely astoundingly profound statement related to this idea of these threats, the idea of democracy being suspended, especially the suspension of, of, of First Amendment and free speech rights. And I'm not going to I'm I'm not going to continue to dig for it.

But listen, you dig for it. I've got a clip of Peter Doocy. So he'll give you about a 92nd clip. Peter Doocy asked the right question. And of course, we had a completely an unhinged response from Korean Jean Pierre, who is the new Ginger Gurbles. She's now Sideshow Bob. That's that's her phrase over on our program because she looks just like Sideshow Bob, but she's the one who's doing the propaganda mouthpiece. He asked, should you tone down the rhetoric?

And her answer is double down. So listen to this and Steve's going to find the output. Two days since somebody allegedly tried to kill Donald Trump again, and you're here at the podium in the White House briefing room calling him a threat. How many more assassination attempts on Donald Trump until the president and the vice president and you pick a different word to describe Trump other than threat? Peter, if anything from this administration, I actually completely disagree with the

premise of your question. The question that you're asking, it is also incredibly dangerous in the way that you're asking it because American people are watching.

And to say that, to say that from the administration who has consistently condemned political violence, from an administration where the president called the former president and was thankful, grateful that he was OK, from an administration who has called out January 6th, called out the attack of Paul Pelosi, called out and said we need to lower the temperature

after the Butler incident. And now for you to make that kind of comment in your question, because it your question involved a comment and a statement and you know, it is that is also incredibly dangerous. She's just exasperated. She is just she, she talks like a very frustrated kindergarten teacher, Peter. I mean, how dare you say the thing. And then let me double down on the fact that we have just

decided to do false equivalence. We're going to talk about Paul Pelosi. Did Paul Pelosi had some weird thing happening with a dude and underwear and God knows what and I don't even care. It's not the same as a dude put in a bullet or someone hanging outside your house with a gun waiting, lying in wait for 12 hours who has all these strange agency connections overseas. It's not the same.

They keep they keep doubling down on this and we're going to keep saying threat until someone does what we want. I, I said it earlier and I, I mentioned it. If you saw this, what's his name? Gillum got pulled off Fox News the other day. He was talking. He said Democrats want to see Donald Trump dead. They keep saying it. The only crime is you saying it out loud. And Fox said we're not going to engage in that conspiracy. And they dropped him off the air.

Right. Even though it's being said, it's clearly and it's not A and it's not being. It's not a conspiracy. It's not a conspiracy because two people have actually tried and, and, and what we've seen is doubling down on the on on the rhetoric. Not hey man, maybe we really ought to stop this because someone is going to end up trying to kill him for real and actually have some skills. Here, here are the concluding 2 paragraphs to JD Vance's op-ed that came out yesterday.

As I said, you can find it on his ex feed or you can find it on Blaze Media. And he said, and this was very profound and I'm going to read a couple of these sentences twice because it really needs to sink in. He says when you reject censorship, you reject political violence. Embrace censorship and you will inevitably embrace violence on its behalf. Let me read that last sentence again. Embrace censorship and you will inevitably embrace violence on its behalf. The reason is simple.

The logic of censorship leads directly to one place, for there is only one sure way to silence a human being permanently put a bullet in his brain. Can I throw something on the screen here that's going to go to the perfect segue to this? Yeah. Yeah. Steve, this was the Libertarian Party of New Hampshire. Did you see this tweet? Yes, I did OK. It it's in poor taste, there's no question about it. And I I reject the idea of thinking this is a good idea to

put out. It's certainly not the position of a political party and it's definitely not the position of all libertarians, certainly not even all libertarians in New Hampshire. But American speech is dangerous. That's the nature of the speech. It is meant to be inflammatory and occasionally get out of control. And this is well, well defended by Watts versus US. If people are curious. This has been decided already. When you talk about hypotheticals, there's a 2 pronged thing.

It has to imminently incite violence and have a probability of doing so for it to actually be a real problem against and not be protected according to our case law. I think even that stuff is probably I'm a First Amendment absolutist and a Second Amendment absolutist. I just believe the bill right says what it says. You don't need a lot of like Gray interpretation, but this is what the the the the tweet says, folks.

We talked about it yesterday, quote, anyone who murders Kamala Harris would be an American hero. End Quote. That's the entirety of it. And then people got upset and they ended up getting a visit by the FBI. You just pointed out that censorship, which is that you must take this thing down. It's it's a call to violence because the federal government or the state government, whoever's doing the censorship shows up and they look like men with guns.

Can we play that clip? Is that reasonable too? This is what this is what actual censorship is. It's people showing up under threat of force that work from my former agency, which we call the Bureau or shitheads or whatever. It's. It is a government agency with men with guns on their hip and a badge who will not tell you their name because they are ashamed of what they're doing because they apparently haven't read the Bill of Whites rights or they have read it and they

know that it's wrong. This is Jeremy Kaufman again. We played it yesterday. I'm going to play it again. How can I help you? Hey there. Jeremy Yeah. How? Are. You here we are, I made. You O'Donnell with the. FBI, Can you give your full name please? I made. You O'Donnell with the FBI? Is that sufficient? To identify as the only one O'Donnell affiliated with the FBI in new. Hampshire, yes. Could you please state your full name, Sir? Could. You please stop recording.

No, it's Scott O'Donnell, those who want to know. What's your name, Sir? Absolutely not. You can show me your name and identification or I'm going to go back inside my house, OK? I don't really want to. Broadcast. Oh, this is going out right after you guys walk away so you can show me your name, ID you can walk away. I'm not going to talk to people who claim to be federal agents unless they can show me identification. You see our badges? I I need to see but use your full.

Name on that badge? No. I'd like to see something with your full name or I'm not going to talk. To you, I refer you not to broadcast. This will be going online as soon as you walk away. All I want to do is talk to you about a post that was made and if you happen to be the one that made. The I want to talk to you. And then he goes on and gives them both barrels of his disrespect, which I'm totally fine with him doing. Not the most advised route, folks.

You should just close the door and not engage. That's smarter for you. And yet you're allowed to do that in America. He literally just said we're here to talk to you about a post. That's what censorship looks like. And it and it comes along with that, that threat of violence because he tapped his badge. And what I happen to notice behind it is a Glock 19 sitting in a holster issued by that agency without a without a flashlight, by the way, which is

ill advised. It's not how you should carry your weapon. If you're an operator that wants to be a serious law enforcement individual. If you want to go out there and protect the public, it's probably going to happen in hours of darkness. That's Kyle's here aside. Put a flashlight on your guns, folks. Steve, you saw this. What were your reactions when you first saw these videos and this sort of running around the Internet?

Well, I obviously I saw this shortly after it was posted it it was making the rounds, as they say, you know, among the suspendables. And so I get tagged in these things as well nowadays and, and, and happy to be an honorary suspendable full member. But the thank you. But the you know, it reminded me of a story I just published a couple of months ago myself about the, you know, the knock and talk raids that the FBI are now notorious for.

And they seem to be making more and more of these on a regular basis. And these are these guys showing up at your door. And more often than not now they don't have the force of law yet like they have in the UK when they show up at your door. And they would just want to talk about your post on social media in the UK. They're basically there to arrest you already. Yes. Yes. And, and, and they don't approach you that way.

It seems like they want to talk, but by the time you're 5 minutes into the conversation, they're informing you that we. Oh, yes. Oh, by the way, yeah, we are arresting you and taking you in. We just wanted to see if you had to incriminate yourself any further. By the way, the FBI already has an investigation of some kind, even if it's just a lead that they're following down from the E guardian system. They're there for a reason.

I used to have this joke and I don't know if I've told you this, Steve, but I would get these new agents coming out of Quantico and that we, I would say, look, if you're going to go out on an interview with me, I need you to role play with me. I, I came out of the paramedic world where we constantly talk to like plastic heads and and mannequins and you do treatments because you don't want to sound like a fool when you're talking to a real person. So you get used to it.

So I can walk up to an inanimate object and treat it like a person. That's just my skill set. It's kind of like an acting thing. And if you're going to be an FBI agent and go interview people, you better not sound weird if you're going to be with Kyle Seraphin. Because I don't want to be hanging out with weirdos. That's just I know how to talk to people. And so I would ask them, hey, knock, knock. Who's there? I'm Kyle. How can I help you?

You know, and let's do this. And so you would get these new agents and they'd say, well, hi, I'm, you know, I'm Mark, I'm from the FBI. And congratulations, Mark, you know, and I would just put them off like with a little bit of just this kind of antisocial thing. And they would go, right, what can I do for you, Mark? Why are you here? Well, your name came across my desk. And I heard this from from like a dozen new agents. Your name came across my desk.

To which I would always say, well, do you have like a conveyor belt? Like, it's like the sushi restaurant where you just pick off the 1:00 you want? Is it is it like a Wall Street ticker where the name just scrolls across on a thing? Why did my name come across your desk? What does that mean? And they they go, hey, time out. Can we pause? I say, sure, yeah. You want to start over? And they say, yeah, I said, what is your name came across my desk mean? That's a that's a phrase with no

meaning. And they would go, yeah, I don't, I don't know. They must be teaching at the Academy. That's the same attitude. But that guy's a senior agent. He was the SSRA for like 7 years. He ran two different resident agencies, which are the satellite offices. So he's a senior, experienced guy, and he had that same vibe. Your name came across my desk. How about someone made a social media post? We believe it was you. We're here to make sure that you're not a threat to anybody

else. You don't have any obligation to talk to us. So we we have straight for decades seen, you know, of course, this this is from television and the movies. And we've seen all of the examples of the two a pair of FBI agents coming to the door, whether it's for a knock and talk or for an interview or whatever the case may be. Back in the days when they wore, you know, the black suits and the ties and all of that.

And they were buttoned up G men. And they were, you know, exactly what Hoover would have expected from his his agency or his Bureau rather. And so the point being is, is that we always saw them first thing. I'm so and so I'm special agent so and so with the FBI. Here's the badge first thing. You didn't have to ask for it. What you tell me what's going on here? Is this new coming from the Academy? Don't show. I don't think it's coming from the Academy. There's a there's a conflict

between policy. This is a really good, that's a good journalist question coming back my way so you can share this with people. There's a, there's a conflict between policy and normal human interaction. That's what's going on. You can see the agent struggling to balance two things. You're filming me and therefore this is going to be public. And I don't know how public, maybe very public, maybe millions and millions of views.

But there's a DOJ policy or specifically an FBI policy that your credentials are not to be photographed or surrendered to be photographed. So now you're at odds because the order, the only way that someone's going to talk to you is you going to give them your name and show them your credentials, which by the way, have no identifying information on them. I posted mine on Twitter the

other day. If you guys want to know what FBI credentials look like, I've done it on this program before, but you can see a scanned copy of mine. The only thing you can't see are the like the holographic watermarks and that's on purpose. I think that's good. You can't see that. So there are some some safety mechanisms. You should see a holographic watermark when you look at them. But having somebody examine your credentials in order to get credibility is why they gave you the credentials.

That's literally what it is. It says your name, that you are a regularly appointed special agent of the FBI under the authorities of the attorney General general, signed off on by the office of the Director of the FBI, and it has credential numbers in the top right hand corner. FBI agents don't go by badge numbers, they go by credit numbers. And mine were 26662. That was my credit number. So if you ask me for a badge number, I don't have it, but I'd give you my credit number

because I don't care. They could look it up. Nobody has any access to it, and they retire the credit number. Then it goes back out into the field again. So now somebody else has 26662 because I gave mine back in and I'm no longer there. So somebody else has my number. You literally had the mark of the beast in. Your I literally did, yeah, but the twos were very important to me. For whatever it's worth, I just two by two, but yeah, I had this. I had. Those were my numbers.

And so they're they're in conflict. They're like, I'm not supposed to let this be photographed. At the same time, you have a bigger obligation to do your job and and identify yourself to the member of the public. And it gives nothing away to show those credentials. It's not a, it's not an 8K resolution photograph that can be turned into fake credentials. It's going to show like a 1080P maybe or maybe a 4K version, which is still not going to go

out on the Internet that way. So nobody is losing anything and nobody has gone out from DOJ and said, look, body worn cameras are a reality. They're an expectation of the public. They are public. You know, First Amendment auditors that are going to do this. Show your damn creds to people. Who cares if they videotape it. Your job is to get information and do your job and be be credible to the public. There's a credibility crisis and you're now furthering it with

videos like this. But instead. He was right. Body cams, not just body cams, but ring cams, of course it's. All I've retweeted, I've shared video footage of a woman who is out of the Washington field office who by the way, this caused a major stir at WFOI love knowing that I'm causing anxiety in my old ex girlfriends offices. And she showed her creds on a ring Cam and you can see what it is, but it's like it's not that you couldn't recreate it from that ring Cam video.

So show your creds, FBI agents, we used to call it, hitting them with the roast beef. Have you heard that expression? No, I haven't heard. That that's what it's called. It's called, it's called hitting them with the roast beef. It's like when you walk up and you're like, I'm Kyle Seraphim, I'm with the FBI. Bam, you roast beef, I'm right there. It's a long, it's a long story. And it's just like one of those goofy things.

If you know, you know, but that's what that's what old school FBI agents used to recall it. If you walked up and immediately throw your credentials at somebody that's roast beefing them, you're hitting them with the roast beef. And and that's what you're supposed to do because that's what people expect. The reality is, is that's what TV showed. The FBI was very complicit in creating all of them.

Those, you know, those videos and all that propaganda stuff, Silence the Lambs and so on. The reason why they got access to FBI personnel and people and you know, they were able to use all the kind of trappings of the FBI is because the FBI wanted it to look good, same as the Navy Seal's give a lot of access. And so go out there and roast beef people, who cares? Like let them see your creds, let them take a picture of it. Who gives a shit? It doesn't matter.

It has your name and your middle initial and your cred numbers and nothing else. It doesn't have your birthday, it doesn't have your address. It is non identifying. It's the equivalent of saying I'm Officer Kyle Seraphin and my badge number is 26662. That's the same thing. So man up weirdos. Like I don't know why they're doing that, but they keep doing this and the threat of force is. And it also comes from shame, I think. As I said, as I said, this is not there.

We've not quite crossed that Rubicon here in the United States yet. They're not showing up on these knocking talks and then hauling you off for your social media posts yet. But this is the precursor they are now testing. This is R&D right now. Yeah, this is a pressure test. It's a pressure test of what America will tolerate the same way that COVID was, the same way a lot of other things were. Exactly. How, how much more will they, will they test this?

And in the process of doing this, they're also finding out that they're not being shot at. OK. That's right. The Bubba, the Bubba effect is not kicked in yet. This is something that, you know, Glenn Beck, he started talking about the bub Bubba effect probably 10 or 12 years ago. And he said, this is we're eventually going to be put into that pressure cooker to the point where the good old boys who can no longer take it and they maybe are a little bit off

in some way. They've had some troubles in their life. Their wife has left them. Their children have abandoned them. They're in, you know, dire straits financially. They're barely holding on to their home or whatever. But they do have a collection of guns. And the knock and talk happens and then they go off. This happened, this is a real thing, by the way, we saw people like Timothy McVeigh where that kind of a guy like the idea that this is out like outlandish. It was in the 90s.

We just got away from it because of the Patriot Act, because of 911 United this country. And we sort of had this moment where we were like, Oh yeah, LE is always the good guys. There was an entire Patriot movement going on in the and, and militia movement that was happening in the early 90s and separatists and so on where people were just like, I'm sick of this government, I'm sick of tyranny. And we reset the clock on our tolerance for it and it's fed up. Now.

I want to play a little clip here from the this is from the March Springfield, OH City Council thing. Because people are tired of being lied to and told that they're completely out of their minds. You got the entire left saying that the idea that Haitians might eat animals and I don't know if they're eating dogs or cats. I don't really care about that. Like, I don't think that's necessarily the big threat in the world, but snatching animals out of parks.

I've heard stories about this for over a decade about people killing squirrels and eating animals that were like in public parks and, you know, by people that don't understand our customs because they come from a third world shit hole, as Donald Trump accurately stated. And so here's a little evidence. There's more and more of these videos that have been popping up because people are going through the City Council meetings and finding out that this allegation is not originated by the Trump

campaign. It was and it wasn't originated by JD Vance. I'm sure it percolated up like all things do from people who heard it and said, hey, this seems like an issue. Maybe I'll call my congressman. Here's a little video, just a little taste of that. As laws and and you know. Culture.

Is 180° different than what they're used to And one of the things that hurt that I heard that bothered me very much, I've actually had quite a few people contact me here lately is some pretty horrid things occurring to domesticated animal in the neighborhood. We've had some stuff in the park that again, they they're being taken advantage of for reasons other than and if. Shake your head, Brian. No, no. I asked the same. I asked me if there was proof. I just.

Don't have proof of I haven't had. Anything people that have confided in me have asked me for anonymity. I'm not. I can't give their names up. I mean, we haven't seen the proof that you're that you're and I've heard, I've heard about it. Yeah. All right. So all that's sitting there and they're just trying to defend. They want to defend the idea. Oh, this. There's no proof yet. It's like, OK. But that was going back in March

of this year, folks. So this has been going on where people are saying there's some allegations. We hear some troubling things from our neighbors. Can you guys look into this? And they don't want to be interrupting that, that that money pipeline or the, you know, saying yes to the federal government or whatever it is that keeps politicians. Politicians don't like scandal. Like, that's pretty universal I think, right? Well, I'm going to give some of your listeners some bad news.

Do it. Cat. Cat meat by way of human consumption is a cultural thing in virtually every continent on this planet. It's Asia, Africa, South America, It is delicacy, it is ritual, it is religious, it's worldwide. And so if you don't think now we may not have the conclusive kill shot video evidence of all time in Springfield, OH, yet. But to think for a second that we're allowing millions of people coming in from every continent.

I don't know that we're being invaded by Australia and Antarctica, but we are being invaded from Asia, Eastern Europe, South America. And to think that they're not bringing their own cultural identity expectation mores as well as their gastro. Gastronomic preferences look at this. Your preferences it, it, it's. It's absurd to the extreme to think that this is not taking place. Here's here's a a call.

This is actually a call note from a 911 call that came in and this is dated 828 of 2024. So that's like almost a month ago, right? This is, I'm going to read the comments for it. They blocked out the phone number. That's good news. The lat long of the caller there it is RP that's reporting party AADV that's usually advising. So reporting party advises she thinks her neighbors stole her cat and chopped it up and have

it in their backyard. She is advising the neighbors are Haitian and she doesn't know who they are. Then it goes on a little further. Reporting party is requesting an officer come out and speak to her to reference this. Then it goes on. There's a officer that's assigned to the case, spoke with Anna, that's the person, that's the reporting party and she advised that on 8/24/24 her cat went missing and has not been seen since. She found quote UN quote meat in

the backyard. That's obviously a direct quote by the by the officer thinks it was from her cat. No bones, no fur around the meat. She suspects that it was the Haitian neighbors. No evidence to support the claim. Unknown if the meat she has is actually cat meat. She has also collected the meat and put it in her freezer in hopes to get it cremated, marked assisted. So look, there are reports, there are 911. Of course they are. Before that this quote UN quote,

scandal broke out. They happened. People are upset about it because you've brought in people from places like Haiti that have very different theories about what domesticated animals are used for. And like, this is something that people have done in desperate situations for a long time. In fact, the movie Roger and Me, which was the Michael Moore movie that brought him on the map. I also used to think that that movie was called Pets or Meet. Did you know?

I don't know why that was the case because there's a famous sign and a famous scene where they are talking about raising rabbits in Flint, MI and times are so desperate that the sign said you can raise the rabbits, you can have them and they're either used for pets or meat. Yeah. And I actually thought that was the name of the movie and and. You know, I'm, I'm a, I'm a couple years older than you are. I'm a couple years older than probably most of your audience

is right now. And I grew up in an era, and especially growing up in Louisiana, where back in those days, our, our animals, our pets by and large were all outdoor animals. And I'm talking about growing up and over the years having dozens of dogs and cats. Sometimes they just didn't come home. Sometimes, you know, they roamed in packs and our dogs would join up with the other dogs in the neighborhood and they would roam

in packs all day. And then they would come home because their food was at, you know, in our driveway. Or they killed something like somebody's cats and then they had food somewhere else. They bring it home or we would have the animals that would come back with our animals and they would be manged up. They would have problem disease, suspected rabies and we would take them out.

I mean, it was just, it was just a common thing to walk out the back door and shoot a dog and that and it it because not because we hated dogs because we loved them. And I, I've, I've. Yes, there's no, there's no needed defense in this. This is normal. Like animals that are a threat to like human beings come first in the value order and the and the hierarchy.

Some animals get put down because, you know, like if a raccoon wants to hang out in your backyard in the daylight, you put it down because that's a threat to your family, like. But the culture, the culture and the laws have changed significantly since I was a kid growing back up in the 60s and 70s. Now we have laws we don't have. We don't see the roaming packs of dogs in every neighborhood anymore. Unless you go to an Indian Reservation. Yeah, yeah, exactly.

But but we don't, you know, people's animals are more more domesticated than they've ever been. They're parts of members of the family now. They don't go outside unless they're on a leash. There are leash laws and there are you know the the the glorified dog catcher catchers now or you know, the animal control are active in the neighborhoods they don't allow stray. Animals and they're not rolling out there with like a 22 rifle to smoke a dog and then throw it

in the back of the thing. They're actually trying to catch it and and then rehabilitate it or take it to a a no kill shelter or whatever The thing is. Look, and I, I got nothing wrong with that, but your your point being very, very important. Unless we lose it, yeah, the values that exist here do not exist everywhere.

That's correct. And So what I'm, what I'm trying to say is, is if these immigrants from these populations who actually consider cats or other animals that we cherish as members of the family and domesticate, they consider his delicacies in their culture. Had this been taking place 40 years ago, these people would have been living large because those animals were outside all the time. And that's right in the neighborhoods now. They're not getting the access.

So we're cameras now, and we all have a camera in our pocket and we all have a Ring camera on our front porch. We're not going to probably see as much of this as we would have seen back in the era before the cameras and before the massive immigration that we're dealing with from these societies and these cultures that are coming in who would consider, you know, Fido or Fluffy to be, you know, their next meal.

Let's go to one more. I promised one more topic and then we'll we'll be respectful of your time, which I appreciate you giving me so much of this is the next topic. My friend just sent me this in a meme. I actually added this slide in while we were talking. It says blowing up my pager and it's the the Arnold meme with a Carl Weathers from predator and the two people blowing up your pager are your mom and the Massad. So let's it's so dark, it's so weird.

Let's see if I've got AI actually have a story that I wanted to put on here. This is opinion piece and I don't know why I didn't create a slide for it. So let me throw you on the screen here while we talk and I'm going to go find this slide. Essentially what we found out is that yesterday at about 3:30 local time in Lebanon, a bunch of members of Hezbollah got blown up. What? What else do you know about

that, if anything? I, you know, I don't know anything beyond the wonderful means that we're seeing now. They're so good. Stories of, you know, and obviously I've, I've heard the speculations on the technical details of how the Israelis were able to pull this off, if in fact it was the Israelis. But the the the reality is, is God bless the IDFI mean this was this was this was, well, sheer genius. That is not the take, by the way, of the Wall Street Journal nor the Washington Post.

They're very upset about it. Yeah, we'll screw the Wall Street Journal and the Washington Post and all the above. This was this was brilliant. In in fact, the only thing that I could think of yesterday when we learned about this that I could compare it to there was a oh gosh, what's what's the actor's name? Pollard is his, is his last. Anyway, He he. Come on, help me. Pollard, Pollard. Pollard actor, Famous actor. Anyway. We're not doing this one. Pollard. No. But he was in.

I need a film reference. What's that? I need a film reference. OK, well he anyway, he, he played, he played the president in a movie and it was AI think it was a late 90s, early 2000 movie. He was the president. The president's motorcade was caught in a snowstorm in mountains in Colorado. And, and the entire movie, The entire set of the movie is inside of a diner where the president and his Secret Service detail and the the few local customers were all trapped in

this snowstorm in there. Is it Michael Pollan? What's that? Michael J Pollard, is that No, No, no, no, no. Not, not Mike. You're going to know it. And I'm going to be mad at myself that I've that I've forgotten. We'll tweet it out later. But it, but it's but the, the, the, the gist of the movie is that as the president and this particular scene, he's, he's trapped in this situation where he can't go anywhere. He can't do anything.

But if they've got radio comms and but they are now under the United States is under a nuclear attack coming from an Islamic, you know, warlord or whatever, ostensibly Iran or whatever. So we're actually under nuclear attack. Well, the whole time that he's in this diner and he's interacting with people and they're hearing the reports of launch. I mean, there's launching nuclear weapons and he's just drinking his coffee and eating his hamburger. Kevin Pollard, thank you so

much. Timothy Hutton's in there too, apparently. Yeah, yeah. So phenomenal and he's so and I'm going to. It's called deterrence. I'm going to blow. Yeah, yeah. Deterrence. And I'm going to, I'm going to, I'm sorry, turn it off if you want to watch this movie. But I'm going to. I'm going to. I'm going. To the spoiler. I'm going to deliver the spoiler

here. And the bottom line is, is that the reason why he was not concerned about the nuclear attack and was not organizing a response to it is they had already reprogrammed all of those missiles to detonate before the nuclear bombs were, you know, activated. And so, and he knew that. He knew that our intelligence and that our military had already done this and had reprogrammed those missiles. Oh. That's a good deal. Now you've ruined the movie for me because I am going to go watch that.

I've never seen it. That sounds. Fantastic. And so, and so that was the, that was the first reference that came to mind with this is to have this thousand 4000 pagers programmed our, our a Trojan horse in, you know, built into them to be activated in a moment to take out this many guys. And then to see the videos of the hospitals and the chaos in the hospitals. It's just, it's just brilliant. I actually do have a video of at least one of these pagers going

off, which is pretty wild. If you guys are watching this video, the first thing I think is a street scene. The second one is like overhead Cam footage of somebody that's at like a convenience store. You're going to want to look to the far left. It's a guy who's wearing like a yellow shirt or yellow shorts. I can't remember which one, but you can actually see it's, it's it's barely on camera. You hear like a phone ringing in the background.

That's actually people watching the security Cam footage. It's not actually from the the video, but I'll show you this because it's pretty wild. It's pretty, it's pretty crazy to see. And then like you said, the aftermath was like almost 3000 people. They had like 9 deaths and 2800 people have been incapacitated. Some of the I'm sure are incidental bystanders. But this is Hezbollah. Hezbollah, which is in Lebanon. This is in Beirut for the most part.

It apparently went off local time at about 3:30 their time. And you know, Hezbollah is a terrorist organization and they're aligned with Iran, and they got funded by Iran as they got started. And they've been a problem for a very long time. So stand by. This is what the video looks like. Seb Gorka tweeted out the other day. Mess with the bull, get the horns.

I guess that's true. All right, there's just chaos scenes and as you said, you if you guys want to go find videos of it, apparently there's a couple of speculations that people might have used like Petten PETN, which is a high yield or a high capability explosives. It's what they make grenades out of the, the fragmentation shell of a grenade is made from. It's very, very high explosive, which means we're talking about the the, the movement of of that

gas expanding. I don't know if you've ever done explosive stuff, but like 2500 feet per second, but it's like almost instantaneous. It's incredibly fast. So you saw that guy get hit in the yellow shirt? Yeah. I mean, like, apparently there was a delay built in so that the page went off and then it gave them enough time to either hold up to their face and look at it or to page them, you know, so they were like checking it out. Some people left at their pockets when it went off and

they got their ass blown off. They got their bellies blown off right at the waistline. Horrific. I mean, like, like human casualty, like when you see the pictures of hands blown off, but you just disabled a bunch of enemy fighters. And so like you say, that's kind of why I want hands off with Israel. I don't really want to be involved in any of it, but like, I, I respect the game. The guys play it at a high level. They don't ask, they don't ask permission and they don't apologize.

So you can dislike the fact that they are sort of disregarding human life, but I think it plays into what we talked about with the cats. People in other cultures don't consider human life the same way that we do in America. And and the Israelis consider their lives to be more important. And I don't kind of blame them because so do we as Americans. That's why we don't mind carpet bombing other nations that are that are, you know, threats and

enemies. Yeah, I mean, if only we would get back to the good old days and carpet bomb, you know, like we did in Dresden the way God intended us to. You get really upset people about. It I know I. Know, apparently, yeah, I know it's super funny 'cause you're seeing people that are. Recognize tongue in cheek. I know exactly. Right. Let's let's, let's be honest, let's just I'll, I'll, I'll close, I'll close it out here

with you. At least set you up for the clothes by saying this, the I don't care how you feel about Israel. I don't care how you feel about Jews personally, whatever religiously, politically, I don't care what your feelings or you think your knowledge is of Zionism or anything else of the sort. But let me, let me just say this because this is a soapbox issue of mine and this is soapbox issue has been mine for decades. This is not new and it's not new to the most recent conflict

since October 7th. This is good. This goes back to many, many decades and my own travel, my own research, my own studies in relation to this thing the the Jewish people. Let's just start off as a religion. Judaism as a religion is not a proselytizing religion. Now, for those who don't know what I mean, I'm going to give you the briefest description. Christians have what is called the Great Commission to go into all the world and share the gospel.

Now, centuries ago, before literature, literacy was available to the Western cultures. The church, the Roman church, was able to lie to the people in mass and tell them that they had to spread the gospel at the point of a sword or a spear. In other words, you know, a point of a gun. If they had guns back then, that's what they told the people. And it was literacy. It was the invention of the Gutenberg Bible. It was then the allowance.

And you see, there was a, there was an era where it was illegal for anybody other than a priest to own a Bible, much less read it read. But once literacy began to overtake the Western world, we learned that Christianity was not to be spread at the point of a sword. Just go into all the world and preach the gospel, end of sentence, not kill them if they don't. Now the exact opposite is true in the Islamic world. They went centuries without the same low, with the same low

level of literacy. But once literacy began to proliferate within the Muslim world, then they became much, much more radicalized because they saw inside their book that even the stones would cry out and say, there's a Jew behind the rock here, come kill him. All right. So there there was. There was a cross differences in what was happening as a result of literacy between the two major religions. Now, Judaism has no such call to proselytization, has no such call to recruitment.

They don't care. You can become a proselyte Jew. I mean, I could marry a Jewish girl and then join the church or the synagogue and the faith. And they were. I would go through a ceremony and all the other things that I would have to do in order to become a proselyte Jew. But I can do that. But they don't require that, and they don't care if you do or don't, because they don't have that commandment. That's as a religion, as a

country. They are not an expansionist country that neither do they have a mandate like the old Soviet Union or like the Chinese satellites. And let's just be perfectly honest, there are Chinese satellites on this planet today. Doesn't look exactly like the Soviet Union used to look. But this is this is not a requirement of them. They just want to be left alone. And I think and I, and please, if I get it wrong, as far as which former Prime Minister, I want to say it was gold in my

ear. But she was the one that, you know, famously said or one of the Prime Minister said that, you know, if, if we, if, if, if the Palestinians would just lay down their arms, there would be peace because we're not going to attack, right? But if we give up our arms, it's

we're eliminated. We're we're eliminated from the planet Earth. Yeah, and we used to know that back in the we used to know that in the 90s and people were not in conflict of it. And the Internet has been an interesting thing for people 'cause it's allowed all the worst ideas to proliferate and things that are not backed by reality. But hey, again, I defend your free speech. You can think any way you want.

You don't have to agree with me. I just think it's funny when like people who are terrorist scumbags that have tried to kill my friends in places where they have been. Yeah, if they get their hands blown off or their Dick blown off because they were using the pager, it's like, look, your pager went off and the news was explosive. Shalom, bro. That's that's, that's the memes that are going. Out there, if you're carrying a pager in Beirut or Gaza or somewhere else.

You're probably doing something shady. You you are. You are on call to be activated for your shady, illegal, immoral, let's call it terroristic endeavors. I 100% agree with that, which is why cell phone technology is ubiquitous in this on this planet. There are people that are in places that don't even have electricity that are running around with a cell phone and can charge it. So agreed. The people who got blown up mostly were people that were involved in this.

I don't think they had a whole lot. And, you know, it's just amazing. It's like an amazing thing to be able to decide, hey, you know what we're going to use? We're going to use 1980s technology. We're going to send a page with a delay and we're going to send an initiation. And that means they probably had to capture it at the supply chain. They either had to get the batteries injected or they had to like surround the area.

I've heard some reports saying there were two ounces of explosives basically injected into the battery compartment. Whatever they did, pretty epic. The results are in and it was, it was wild. So anyway, that's that that's a full day of news. I got 2 little things that'll make people laugh as we kind of wrap up our, our local channel just dropped off because we can only go 2 hours and we've exceeded the two hour maximum there. But Steve, thanks for joining me.

Let me throw this on the screen so you can tell people where to follow you. And you said you got a new story coming out there it is. That's not the one I want. How about this one? Boom, there you are. There's your handle. Let's get let's get you to 100,000. We need 700 people that are watching this to go and follow him on Twitter if you're not already. Yeah, we're that, we're that close. Yeah. So, yeah, let's let's do that today. Why not? Why not?

But obviously that there's my handle TPC for USA, that's all of my social media, including locals. And it's just TPC for usa.com, just like Kyle seraphim.com. TPC for USAI may or may not change that soon because you know that I'm with, I'm no longer rating under my own blog, which used to be the pragmatic constitutionalist. That's what the TPC is. It's a little unwieldy, but it's

there. It is it is unwieldy, but it's just I haven't gone through the process of changing everything over yet and and so that'll happen soon more than likely. But having said that, Facebook true social me we obviously X and locals. That's where you can find me is at TPC for USA. And you can also find his reporting over at theblaze.com/truth. So guys, check that out. Make sure you have Steve. Thanks for giving me a bunch of time.

Thanks for getting up a little bit early and hanging out and drinking coffee with me. I'm going to send people off with some funny things because it's been a heavy day. We need some weird stuff, but thanks for being there. Thank you Kyle for having me. I really appreciate it, always enjoy it. All right, my friend, let me break away here and let's do a palate cleanse. I got two of them for you guys because we went extra long.

So let me play you some fun stuff thing #1 Actually, I got to pull up my my list sheet, my CHEAT SHEET that tells me you guys know that they were eating the dogs or the cats. Maybe they were, maybe they weren't. But what's more important is there was a song made about it and it's a, it's a banger. Like I enjoyed it.

You'll enjoy it. Here's a little song about eating the dogs and cats with Donald Trump as a cameo in Springfield. They're eating the dogs, they're eating the cats, they're eating the pets of the people that live there. They're eating the dogs, they're eating the cats, they're eating the pets of the people that live there. People love Springfield. Please don't eat my cats. Why would you do that? Eat something else. People of Springfield, please

don't eat my dog. Here's a catalog of other things to eat. They're eating the dogs. They're eating the cats. They're. Eating the pets of the people that live there. They're eating the dogs, they're eating the cats, they're eating the pets of the people that live there. They're eating the dogs, they're eating the cats, they're eating the dogs, they're eating the cats, they're eating the pets of

the people that live there. They're eating the dogs, they're eating the cats, they're eating the. Pets of the people that live there. Whoa, whoa, whoa. Whoa, I'm just saying it's pretty good. It's catchy. It'll stick with you, I promise you that much. Let me give you a 5 star view and then I'll give you another one. Someone we want to promote just because we're all about free speech here and when people are not screw them. So here is a five star review.

This is from driver 4A came in last week on Wednesday. 5 stars for a fellow A hole. Kyle can come off as an A hole. So why do I like his show so much? That's right. I too am an A hole and a shooter. Kyle, if you ever find yourself in Western Arkansas America, you've got an open invitation to bank some steel with us at the gun club. That was a nice offer. I feel OK about being called a fellow A hole. If you're an A hole, then I'm an

A hole. Maybe we're all a holes and we're probably on the A hole list for the federal government. Let me give you this last little taste. There's a guy whose name is Tyler Fisher, and he created a comedy special. He does a really good impression of Donald Trump. What you're going to see in a second and he was kicked off YouTube and demonetized. So he's sharing it all over social media.

I encourage you guys to go find in my my timeline and retweet it yourself if you can and allow it to be monetized. Shame on YouTube for getting rid of good comedy. And he is a good comic. And here he is talking about the interview that just went down with Theo Vaughn, another comic and Donald Trump. So I'm going to give you a little taste of it and encourage you to go to my my timeline on Twitter on X and retweet it to get this guy whatever monetization he can for putting it out there.

He put it out for free. It's about 18 or 20 minutes long. It's good stuff. Here's a little taste. You can follow him. It's at Tie the Fish. That's FISCH, Tyler Fisher. Enjoy. Did you guys watch that? Interview with Theo Von and Donald Trump. So he didn't really get few fonts. Wild sarcasm. He'll bomb me like. Dude, I heard a fucking bite in the. Fucking crazy dude. He went down to the border, dude. He went to a Borders bookstore. That's fucking crazy. Trump was like that sounds very

sad that he did that. Unfortunate because he's lost his mind. He's confusing. Bookstore with the border which I made so great and it feels like, dude, I heard your brother was an alcoholic. In my town we had a guy named Doseki's. Damn brother. This guy would follow Doseki's in his ass and squirted out like the Blasio pound Trump like that sounds really unfortunate for your friend Dan. How is Doseki Dan doing That's that's terrible and probably not doing so good because of inflation.

And I've made the the price of Doseki's is through the roof. So much spending, a lot of money to funnel. The beer or the alcohol into his asshole. It's really sad we're going to change that from Doseki Dan. Let Toseki Dan though. Poor Doseki Stan. All right, we've done a really long one. I hope you guys enjoyed what we had to talk about. I hope that takes you down the rabbit hole too. There's a lot of indications out there. We only try to go. Those are the dots.

The lines are not all in between yet we certainly had cannot conclusively say anything. Anybody who's saying it is just they're getting out over their skis. The information is not available to them and it's not available to us in the public. But there's a lot of really strange. You know, where there's smoke, there's fire. There's an awful lot of smoke around this guy. Quite strange. Anyway, I hope you guys enjoyed a little bit of levity and humor

at the end of all of this. The the Tats and Tatas, you guys get a little kind of sense of how the brain works here. And a big thank you to Steve Baker for joining us. Make sure you're following him. Let's get him over 100,000 followers on X. If you guys are on X and you're not following him at TPC, the number 4 USA, very easy, I'm following him. You'll see that. And we'll catch you guys again tomorrow on Thursday. Remember, tomorrow is our local call in show and I've got the

technology set. I hope kyleseraphin.com for locals check that out. Follow us. You can leave us a voicemail if you want before the show even starts and we'll play it and we'll see what you guys are all up to. Otherwise, I'll give you some prompts and some topics and we'll do that call in show tomorrow evening. Until then, I'll see you tomorrow morning here on the Kyle Seraphin show. God bless you. See you soon.

Thanks for listening to the Kyle Seraphin show, streamed live weekdays on rubble.com/kyle Seraphin. Follow Kyle on Twitter, True Social and Instagram at Kyle Seraphin.