SECRET SIM CARD SERVERS: What did the USSS really find? | Ep 660

Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an American patriot. Prepare to embrace the uncomfortable truth because this program has no time for comforting lies. Here is civil liberties enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello my friends and welcome to the Kyle Seraphin Show. Today is Wednesday, it is September the 24th and we have AI think maybe a wild amount of information to cover.

And so I brought in a pinch hitter with a little bit more gravitas in the particular topic. We're going to be talking about secret server farms that have the ability to disrupt the United States telecom systems. That's a good question about what the heck that even means. And I told you I was going to stick on this story yesterday, and I intend to. So I brought on my friend George Hill. He's going to be joining us momentarily. George Hill is a former analyst

with the NSA. He was a supervisory analyst with the FBI, spent about a decade and 1/2 on the federal civilian side, but also over 2 decades with the military intelligence side of things and in the US and overseas. So we're going to get some real perspective on this. I want to talk about things like color revolutions, what those mean, what they are historically, and why we might be talking about something like that right now.

We're going to talk about Islam, which might be a third rail for some people, but certainly not for us. And we're going to be talking about censorship and affirmative action and sort of how all of these things come together in one space and what the hell that may have to do with what's going on and the sort of threats that we're facing. Are they domestic? Are they foreign? Are they a hybrid version of both?

It's going to be kind of a heavy show today, I think for information, but I think you'll walk away with a lot more and you'll know more about what we're looking at here. Before we get started with that, let's go ahead and just remind you, my friends over at My Patriot Supply have called September National Preparedness Month. It's a great month to figure out where your holes are in your

security plan for yourself. You got to ask yourself questions like do you have enough food and how much can you survive during an emergency? Do you have clean water? What happens if the tap goes dry tomorrow? What about a storm? If it were to knockout power, maybe civil unrest? Somebody takes out a power grid. What are you going to do next? If you're anything like me, there's always room for improvement. That's why our folks at My Patriot Supply are making a

single kit, a bundle. It's called the Preparedness Month Mega Kit, and it includes over $1500 worth of emergency food and preparedness gear that they're going to add in for free on top of all the other stuff. It will solve many of the problems that you might be looking at. It's going to give you a full year supply of food, water filtration. It's going to get you a backup

solar generator and much more. And if you guys go check it out right now, you're going to get a total of 90 preparedness essentials totalling over $1500 in value for free. Website ismypatriotsupply.com/kyle. Again, mypatriotsupply.com/kyle mypatriotsupply.com slash Kyle right? Very easy. Make sure you guys go check them out. It's going to be front and center. You can see the entire kit that's sitting on the screen right now if you're watching on one of our video platforms.

Let's get in today's program. Let's not forget that preparedness is probably the right answer to a lot of these things. It is the anecdote to anxiety and fear so you guys can prepare instead of repairing. Here comes today's Kyle Serafin show. All right. And I'm going to do it with no further ado. We're going to bring on my friend George Hill. Good morning, Mr. Hill. How are you doing today? Oh well, good morning. What hat are you sporting right there?

Is that a firearms hat? Yeah, it is. Is that the is that a Sig Sauer? Maybe shoot yourself in the in the groin. Come on, man, don't go there. Please keep your finger out of the trigger guard. You'll be all right. George, you're also a firearms instructor. Did you say that your business has been picking up of late? Sadly, and I take no pleasure in this, but since the Charlie Kirk assassination, yes it has.

What what do you think is going on and what what has been the mindset of people that want training? I think there's a large block of people that have been rather ambivalent about the current events and Charlie's assassination, I think woke a lot of people up. And it's hard to talk about because I don't want to be looking look like I benefit from this at all.

Matter of fact, I've cut all my prices to the point where they're almost like losses for me to do them because we use some indoor ranges, some outdoor ranges, and I just want people to be able to protect themselves. What are you teaching as far as mindset goes? Because the weapon system is one thing, but knowing how to use it and or when to use it or how to employ it is kind of the bigger

piece it seems like. Yeah, use the deadliest weapon that you were born with, the brain that God gave you. And if you don't have to go, don't go. If you absolutely have to go, bring a friend. If you have to go and bring a friend, have that friend bring a weapon. So forth and so on. And the motto of my little firearms training company is stay out of the morgue, stay out of hospital, stay out of jail. And it's hard to do all three of those things at once.

Yeah, fair enough. And are all the people that are coming into your classes, are they generally conservative leaning? Where is your training based out of, if you don't mind me asking? And and. Yeah, believe it or not, in the Democratic Socialist People's Republic of Massachusetts, we're under represented in the state. It's a completely Democrat controlled state, yet over 60% of the state identifies as either Republican or

conservative. But these are people that have, I guess for lack of a better word, given up and have come to the realization that it may be difficult to live with people and talk to people who want to kill you. Yeah, that's a simple way of looking at it. And I guess, I guess we had that moment that that kind of kicked out. You mentioned the Charlie Kirk

assassination. Have you also seen the springing up about the the 1st Amendment and, and people crying about that and making this sort of false equivalence between death and and and some comedian who was already rich? That's hilarious isn't it? These people have no sense of self-awareness at all. The Internet lives forever. We can just replay clips going back over a decade. These are the same people that cheered the COVID shutdowns.

These are the same people like Arnold Schwarzenegger who said screw your freedom. They have no moral underpinning at all to stand on. But yet they persist. So we're going to do a quick little coverage of that because yesterday we announced it in the morning and it turned out to be the case in the evening. We had Jimmy Kimmel return to the airwaves. There was a discussion about that on Seth Meyers show with Jake Tapper. So those guys are fairly competent propaganda.

So I wanted to kind of put out what the false victimization looks like. And then we're going to talk about some of the real issues that I think are actually kind of scarier. This is maybe the information op that's kind of doing cover story right now. Here's Tapper and Meyer talking about the worst attack on free speech that's ever happened in anyone's lifetime. Apparently. Apparently. All right, Jimmy Kimmel, he's a friend of both of ours. You know him. I know him.

We know he's a good person. Obviously, this news is very exciting. But what was your? Original take on how this all went down starting last week. I mean, I thought it was pretty. Much the most direct infringement by the government on free speech that I've seen in my lifetime. Networks are allowed to cancel shows. It happens all the time. But this was the FCC chairman saying, local affiliates, it's time for you to say you're not going to air Kimmel anymore.

And then Next Star, which owned it with the largest owner of of local affiliates, it needs approval from Brendan Carr himself to to let this merger go through. Yes, Sir. How high do you want me to jump? Sir, they do it and it's just insane. Yeah, it's just insane. It is. I mean, I'm certainly we don't know the details as we're talking about, you know, if any sort of agreement was reached or if ABC just is sort of like, you know, there was an error in

judgment. But I sort of look forward to seeing obviously how Jimmy responds. That'll be the most interesting piece of this. Yeah. And well, look, I, I don't know why Disney and Bob Iger ultimately made the right decision and stood for free speech. They didn't initially. And that would have been the second example because we all saw what happened with our friend Stephen Colbert and and Sherry Redstone in Paramount with a different merger and a different pressure point that

the government has did. You notice how many times he says we don't know the specifics, we don't know the details, but they have a lot of opinions at it. Am I the only one who saw that? Yeah, absolutely. And we do know the details and it is a mixed bag. There's a lot of things going on here, you know, starting from the top. The number one responsibility of any business is to return value to the shareholders.

OK, So that's a simple business decision for getting rid of Jimmy Kimmel. He was a loss on the balance sheet on a nightly basis. So it's easy business decision. Then the FCC chairman is, you know, has been seen wearing a Romanesque sort of profile, gold pin profile shot of Donald Trump, you know, so there's that optic that's not very attractive to look at, you know, So there is that aspect of it. And then there's the merger that's going through, again,

another business decision. So it is a mixed bag. We do know exactly what's going on. But at the end of the day, I'm a capitalist, unapologetic, and we should come down on the side of that. It was a business decision. And why Disney reverse themselves, I have no idea. I guess they just have millions of dollars to throw away. Last I checked, their attendance at their theme park is down pretty significantly too, so I didn't. Hear these guys?

They weren't crying about Gina Carano getting cancelled for her speech. There were there's endless examples of it, these people so. They didn't cry about anybody, it's just they have, like I said, they have no moral underpinning that they can stand on. Yeah, that checks. I found it interesting that it's Jake Tapper. Jake Tapper has been ACNN anchor

for a long time. Do you want to talk about, because I haven't touched this in a while, if we've got some people that are new to the audience, You spent a lot of time in FBI skiffs. Is that an accurate statement? Oh yeah, exclusively. OK, who's on TV? What network is was on TV in your skiff?

For the skiff, it was either CNNMSDNC or nothing who turned that there was actually agents during the Kavanaugh hearings, mostly female agents standing like wrapped around in a horseshoe circle watching the Kavanaugh hearings and and shouting and screaming at the television set. And they were in favor of Brett Kavanaugh. They thought that somebody shouldn't be facing allegations from 30 years ago that were unsubstantiated or something

else. Yeah, no, no, he was a threat to all female kind around the globe and they were just absolutely livid over it. And let's not forget Brett Kavanaugh had threats on his life from, oh, a left winger. So. Turns out I also saw something pretty wild when I was in the Albuquerque division down in Las Cruces and I had a very unhealthy overweight female support employee screaming about how Kyle Rittenhouse was acquitted. She was incredibly incensed on it, didn't know any of the facts.

The case, by the way, it wasn't a law enforcement officer didn't understand what self-defense look like, which is what you teach. But she was super upset about it. Of course, that was on CNN too. We actually did have kind of a a good moment. So I want to touch that when it when it's appropriate. I'm not a Jimmy Kimmel fan. I don't really care what happens to him at all. I think this is fake. I think this is probably acting. But at least he's he's faking

the right thing. And sometimes you get credit just for showing up and saying the thing that you you're supposed to say. So here he is sort of doing an acting routine and getting a little bit choked up. I again, I think this is stage play, but he is saying the right things about what Erica Kirk did at the memorial. So we'll cover that real quick. A moment over the weekend, a very beautiful moment. I don't know if you saw this on Sunday. Erica Kirk forgave the man who

shot her husband. She forgave him. That is an example we should follow. If you believe in the teachings of Jesus, as I do. There it was. That's that's it. A selfless act of grace forgiveness from a grieving widow. It touched me deeply and I hope it it touches. Many. And if there's anything we should take from this tragedy to carry forward, I hope it can be that. What do you think? Legit. No, there's nothing about that man. Legit, we've had over a decade to listen to his filth.

We know exactly where he stands. This is the same guy that did girls on trampolines. So he's an opportunist. That in and of himself doesn't make him a bad person, but we know where he stands. That's fair. He's talking about doing the right thing, being a follower of Jesus. I think people that listen to this can probably at least understand why that's such a powerful statement to go out and do it.

And, you know, I don't have to, I don't have to agree with everybody's decisions to say when someone does the right thing that it's right. I also can see something that is brewing in this country and the, and why we were there in the 1st place, why we're having a discussion. A man got up on a college campus, had a discussion with students or people who decided to show up. He took questions from an open mic. And that was so dangerous that it involved someone climbing up

on a roof and shooting. Did you hear what just happened in Dallas this morning? I did. I saw it as it broke. I happened to be scrolling through X as soon as it broke. I forget the the call sign call letters for that station, but yeah, no, it's you know, this is who they are. I think it's interesting though. The guy supposedly offed himself the sniper on the roof.

So this will be interesting to. To yeah, let me I've got to grab I grabbed it from Fox News doing their their breaking coverage of this for folks that didn't understand what we'll kind of talk about this and why I think that there's I think that we're we're watching something on play, you know sort of unfold right now in this country that is multifaceted. And I gave you a list of topics that I wanted to kind of run down and I think some of them are related to each other.

So we'll start with this one here. This is apparently three people were shot. We don't know who yet at an ICE facility in Dallas, TX. More as we get it in particularly we're interested obviously in learning about the conditions of the three individuals that were struck this morning. Yeah, that's that's I-35. The east side is where you see most of the traffic people are probably slowing down to. To to watch and see what's going on.

Look at all of the police cars. There's so many, so many lights that go all the way up to the to the top of this is the Access Rd. In Texas. You have your main highway and then you always have those access roads that run alongside or parallel to the highway. Hey Griff, I also notice it's. More as we. Yeah, that was super useful commentary. What I wanted to show was the visual there.

First of all, that looks like there's probably maybe a dozen closing on two dozen different law enforcement vehicles that are responding to this. Somebody apparently from an elevated position opened fire on an ICE facility with three victims. Unclear who they are and what their condition is at the moment as I went live with the show. So that may be something folks see in the chat and and report on to us as well. But elevated sniper positions is

not something. The last time I remember one of those was the BLM 2016 shooting in Dallas. Can you think of this being a common occurrence? Maybe in the last 30 years? Someone getting? Nothing. Not from an elevated position, but wasn't there just a shooting just a few months ago at a Dallas or Texas ice facility? I didn't have time to look it up, but if memory serves it was probably less than six months ago there was a shooting. It was in Texas. I want to say that it was further South.

I think it was somewhere closer like maybe McAllen. I'm now going from memory as well, but same story. Some sort of an ambush ice facility, this sort of ongoing discussion. Can you can you give a quick overview of the term color revolution? We'll hear people use it a lot, but do you, do you mind kind of giving a quick synopsis of like what do people mean by that? And where did it come from, if that's, if that's comfortable? Yeah, sadly. It came from us.

It started in the the post Soviet states. The first one was the Serbia's bulldozer revolution in 2000. Then you had Georgia, the country's Rose Revolution in 2003. Then you had Ukraine's Orange Revolution in 2004. And then you had the Kazakhstan Tulip Revolution. That was in 2000. But this emanates from USAID. This is one of the reasons that people on the left were so upset when USAID was defunded.

So what these are are influence operations using social media interlock interlocutors embedded in in the groups. You know, in a way this is kind of like in a non kinetic fashion. What are very own Green Berets?

Do they they weave themselves into the local population and then provide direction and guidance towards an objective that is suitable for the United States and outcome is suitable for the United States. So the State Department and USAID and our friends over at Langley have gotten very good at this over the last in almost 10 years.

And then there's concerns that we may be seeing some elements of a color revolution taking place in our own country because government does what government does, which is take care of government. And that's their primary objective. They're almost like an entity that that seeks to to, to continue to live above all else, regardless of who they were sent to serve. So you, you brought up Ukraine, you brought up the, the Green Berets, that special forces. That's an Army unit.

There is another Army unit that's out there that's a little bit more sort of shadowy. They used to be sort of without they, they used to be in a kind of a Tier 2 category as a support unit, but they've they've become a tier one special mission unit in and of themselves. You guys can find this publicly. This is not giving away any secret information, but they were known as ISA or

intelligence support activity. They they also are commonly known inside the Intel community as TF Orange or Task Force Orange. They are also known sometimes as the activity. There's a couple of other things just like there's the unit and so on and so forth. The Army has these out of Fort Meade, yes. No, the orange is out of Fort Belvoir inside the Beltway. It's it's part of that DC constellation of, of small

little bases around there. I had to go down to Fort Belvoir for a reason I'm not going to disclose. And I was very limited as to where I could go. And, you know, I provided input to Presidential Daily briefs. I had Red Stripe access. They're locked down pretty hard, but they were created to support Delta that they see. They have become really good at what they do and they've become

an entity in and of themselves. What is it that they do overseas, if we can speak broadly, you know, what is their, what is their sort of MO and, and, and what sort of tools that you, you talked about interlocutors and whatnot and I'm curious how that plays in overseas. Yeah, they're mostly technical and and intelligence related, but they also deploy energy director weapons which can cause agitation and people that have those weapons beamed at them.

We saw some evidence, possible evidence of that being used in Havana. There is talk about that maybe Ed and and energy directed weapons were used during the January 6th or sorry. Yeah, Yeah, you're correct. Yeah. So that. And some of the some of the stuff was, was Steve Baker's.

Reporting. They're stays, they're still in the shadows and there are people, friends of ours, who are trying to pull those curtains back, not to hurt the country, but to make sure that these type of capabilities aren't used against us. We so so colored revolution, sort of a end of Cold War term, as you said, like it kind of originates as a as an American intelligence activity trying to sponsor and support the downfall.

Would you say things like Arab Spring kind of had that sort of vibe as well, the sort of overthrow there, or do you think that was something else? Well, the Arab Spring is interesting. I mean, having had a kind of had a front row seat on that both on the military side and at the FBI side when that fruit vendor lit himself on fire in Tunisia. And we watch that spread, and we watch people like Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama openly cheer that as it went on.

And it took a while, but eventually it made its way to Syria. I didn't think that that that would happen. But, you know, Hillary cheered it on. She was front and center with the attacks on Libya to take down that government. They toppled the Mubarak government, which was very friendly to the United States. They installed Barack Obama's friends, the Muslim Brotherhood, which the Egyptians even said, no, we're not, we're not going to let these guys run the

country. And so I, I don't think, I don't see evidence that the, the Task Force Orange was involved so much in those revolutions because they did seem to, to spark spontaneously, but then they received a lot of verbal and moral support from our own elected officials. All right, in the context of color revolution and specifically the idea between color you mentioned that what Tulip and rose revolutions as well.

So as I understand it, correct me if I'm wrong here, the the goal is to basically unite a bunch of I don't activists in the street that are able to recognize itself. And same maybe not with a a formalized uniform, but with the wearing of a colored bandana or having a specific colored T-shirt on or having some sort of symbol, whether it be a rose or a Tulip or anything else. So they were called color and

flower revolutions. As I saw them sort of historically, we sort of just landed on color revolution as being the term. With that in mind, this is one of the most prominent protest organizations in America. This is I'm taking this on, on the authority of the people that have grabbed this clip. This was a one hour long call discussing trying to unite the resistance against authoritarianism and Donald Trump under a very specific type of self recognition. Me same you, same pattern.

I don't want your reaction to this. These are two people that are that are on a call here. That is a Zoom call. That was a nationwide call I think last week. Kathy asked a question that is a hot topic of debate internally. Leah, we need a national symbol of unity to stand against authoritarianism or for pro democracy. I'm interested in using purple bandanas. It's not about being red or blue. It's about standing in solidarity with each other for a democracy.

How can we as a group come up with something we can stand behind? So we, we have had this conversation internally and with a lot of the New Kings coalition and other folks and we're circling around an idea that Leah, we're not allowed to fully announce anything yet.

I mean, so we're we're actually. I would just say we, we agree this is a gap and one of the backing and trying to figure out is like what, what's getting organic pick up that we can start to pull out and, and capitalize on, right?

And so thinking about things that we're seeing pop on the Internet, things that we're seeing start to like take off in places like Reddit, the color yellow, yellow and black have come up a lot, which is obviously very like, you know, kind of people taking pieces of the Know Kings logo and running with it as a color scheme. We agree this is like a need. And what we really want to do is try to figure out like.

What's? Already starting to organically take off that we can collectively come in together on but but we hear you and we think this is something that we're this is something that we're very much thinking about. Right now what? Do you make of that? She said it about over a half a dozen times, organic, organic, organic and that's where you plant the seeds for these color revolutions with inside that self generating and self perpetuating organic movement which is pretty widespread in

this country today. It's accelerating. I'm not Co opting the the acceleration as movement, but they actually are part of this. But this is about taking that organic uprising and then starting to organize it and then using human nature against us. I think you covered it the other day. You didn't use the term, but fear of missing out where people just want to might have been Nick Giordano. I can't remember that. People just feel like, Oh my God, I need to get in on this.

And they they just check all their own critical thinking and beliefs and go right along with the mob. This is how mobs and riots start. You know, if you pull somebody out of a George Floyd riot, not everybody and and asked them like, why are you here? What are you doing? Chances are they some of those people would not be able to explain it. It's just like I just had to. I had just had to join in. They just want to be part of something.

This concept of being on the right side of history seems like something people talk about a lot of times. Yeah, they they suffer from the Joe Biden syndrome, fear of missing out, FOMO. OK. I'm, I'm going to make some, some links here. We had a shooting in Dallas. We don't know what the the background is, but it is a shooting and it is at an ICE facility. And that tells us maybe a little bit of something about the targeting.

Yeah. And obviously somebody very specifically got up on a building and took aim at a very specific location. We'd have to assume that they knew what they were shooting at. We've got these people on some national protest call talking about getting a symbolism. They're backing the No Kings rally. Do we do a purple bandana because it's a combination of red and blue? Do we do yellow and black, which seems to be like sort of like the Antifa?

I've seen a lot of Antifa stuff that's either red and black or yellow and black. And then you got this guy a probable contender in 2028 for for the presidential run on the Democrat side. Gavin Newsom is making these. I've got 2 clips from Gavin Newsom that I'm going to want your reflection on as well. And I and I seem to see these being connected. As a Democratic Party, we have a lot of work to do to make up for our failures in the past.

We got crushed in this last election, and now we're in a position where we are struggling to communicate. We're struggling to win back now the majority in the House of Representatives. And that's a big part of what I'm doing, not just today in terms of the work out here, raising money, but also raising awareness around how Donald Trump is trying to rig the midterm elections and how I fear that we will not have an election in 2028.

I really mean that. And the core of my soul, unless we wake up to the Code Red, what's happening in this country, and we wake up soberly to how serious this moment is. This is maybe the 4th politician on the Democrat side that I've heard say that there will be a rigged midterm election and therefore potentially no 2028 election. What are they doing with that language do you think? They're laying the groundwork for public shoot.

Let's alert disobedience, mass public disobedience, that the people that govern over us, over us have no authority. Remember this started with rich slave owning white men had no moral standing to to construct the constitutional framework. Our country is fatally flawed. Now they're ready to lay on that other layer of bricks saying that the current crop of politicians also has no moral standing, no legal standing to

govern this country. Therefore, if your government has no legal standing to govern, then you're easily manipulated into You have a moral responsibility to, and we've heard this word before, resist. They're doing sort of a delegitimization, OP, it sounds like using language saying that if, And these are the same people that talk about democracy

endlessly, right? And so if your, if your democratic vote doesn't count in the same way, then you have no other choice but to choose the alternative, which is something I've heard the right use for the last couple years. And these guys immediately fell into the same sort of game. It's interesting you brought up the slavery and the legitimization of, of, of the Constitution writ large because it was written by certain people.

I haven't listened all the way through this because it's hard to listen to because it's Hillary Clinton. But this just was something on Morning Joe and I grabbed it because she's talking about the quote UN quote more perfect union. And she brings up slavery as one of those things that apparently is getting whitewashed. And that's another thing they talk about.

If we forget our history, which they don't seem to know in the 1st place, then suddenly it gives them a reason to to push back and and create their own fake history. Just let's do a reflection of this two of our most loathsome creatures there, the Hillary Clinton and Gavin Newsom types. And I'm proud of the fact that we have always been a work in progress. You know, we haven't gotten to

the more perfect union. And we fought a civil war over part of it. And people have been protesting, you know, for hundreds of years that, you know, things were not as they should be given our ideals and how we should be moving toward them. So I think that's what makes us

so special as a country. And the idea that you could turn the clock back and try to recreate a world that never was dominated by, you know, let's say it white men of a certain persuasion, a certain religion, a certain point of view, a certain ideology is just doing such damage to. What we should? Be aiming for and we were on the path toward that. I mean imperfectly lots of, you know, bumps along the way, but I agree with you. We were on the right trajectory. What?

Do you think about that? Again, the little smile on her face was calling people of a certain persuasion. The smirk was a priceless, typical classic Hillary, but again, delegitimizing the fundamental underlying foundations of the country, which is the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. So she she's sweeping that away, which is what the communist playbook is. You need to sweep the way everything in order to be able to build on what it is you want to build, which is a Marxist

communist utopia. They specifically, we, we started off talking about the shooting that just happened at the ICE facility. And interestingly enough, Gavin Newsom just signed a bill that said everybody who is in law enforcement must take off their mask. You and I know that based on the supremacy clause in the Constitution of the way that the FBI and the DHS and and the other sort of DOJ or DHS entities work, they're not going to listen to what California State law is.

Just like they don't care what kind of firearm you're allowed to carry in California. It's irrelevant when they do their own work. But it's interesting that he's out there sort of highlighting this. So I'm going to play you a Gavin Newsom clip. Same same interview he was sitting on this was on CBS and he starts talking specifically about masking.

And you'll notice that he strangely leaves out the people and the Antifa types that were wearing masks for the last couple years and have no problem like putting on a COVID mask and then doing violence. So I'll just kind of we'll kind of compare these things here to. That's happening in the United States of America. Masked men jumping out of unmarked cars, people disappearing. No due process, no oversight, 0 accountability happening in the

United States of America today. People ask, well, is authoritarianism. You're being hyperbolic. We're being hyperbolic. If you're a black and brown community, it's here in this country. And so I, I'm deeply proud that I had the privilege of signing the nation's first bill to address the issue of masking. Also, to require you have simple identification to your point, I mean, if some guy jumped out of an unmarked car in a van with a mask on, tried to grab me, I mean, by definition, you're

going to push back. And so this, these, these are not just authoritarian tendencies. These are authoritarian actions by an authoritarian government. You saw what Stephen Miller said last week. This should put chills up. Fine. Called the Democratic Party an extremist organization. He's basically a terrorist organization saying he's going after his enemies. You saw the tweet that Donald Trump sent out, true social, basically telling Pam Bondi, I want these three people taken out.

That's happening in the United States. Isn't that interesting? They they Telegraph these moves and it turns out if you push on certain buttons, certain people start acting in a very specific way. He's supposedly he's actually very bright, but he memorizes things and therefore he cannot respond to direct questioning. So once you get him outside of that, apparently he's like a turtle on its back, which is something it would be fun to see if he decides to run for president.

But he's he's lying and gaslighting all in the same. I guess in some ways are kind of the same, but he's creating the foundational framework for terrifying everybody, half the not half the country, but saying that they're just randomly picking up people that aren't as white as I am off the street. And everybody knows that's a bold faced lie.

But Stephen Colbert and him and they put this out there and you know, we're talking about, you know, when that woman was talking about organic, you know, we're talking about low information voters. We're talking about the suspension of critical thinking the the inability to read anything like that One not so manly man. That was on a video clip you put down you posted.

I saw all the books behind them. If that wasn't a computer generated image, I'll bet you there wasn't one contrarian book that did not go against his belief system. That was a that was a like an indoctrination starter pack. I saw all of them. They were about activism. They were about left wing activism specifically. And for whatever I could read on there, I saw exactly the same thing you did. And those aren't there by accident. Those are virtue signals to the

people that are listening. This is my. Background. Therefore, therefore what I say counts. Right. I have legitimacy. And in the same way, what we heard was Gavin Newsom basically saying because of these masks, because they are quote, UN quote, scared to show their faces when they're doing law enforcement, which federal agents operate differently than police officers. Police officers interact with you because you may have imminently committed a, a specific crime.

You rolled through a stop sign. You didn't use a blinker when you turned. We now have probable cause to stop you and give you a traffic violation. And maybe we'll interview you about something else. But that's not how federal law enforcement works. Federal law enforcement actions are targeted.

They're long term. You've worked on the Intel side of it. I've worked on the kinetic side of it, where you know, we're not going out there just randomly encountering a member of the public and then finding out what happens next. We know that's what's happening. Right. And, and so he's, he's, he's playing on a low information group of people that think that police and federal investigators are doing the same type of work. The sad thing is, is I feel like Kash Patel's actually playing

into that too. This whole like, let your good cops, let cops be cops. That's not what the FBI is. You were there for 11 years. Did you see people who are our FBI agents as cops? Did they ever describe themself that way? No, they were armed investigators so that when we had special events, you know, whether it be the Marathon or the Boston Pops or whatever, and they were out, you know, in plain clothes working amongst

the crowd. They would always be partnered with usually like a Sergeant or somebody from local Police Department because they're not really well trained on doing Terry stops and, you know, interdicting something, you know, as is being witnessed. So that they're not, I'm sure somebody's going to push back and say, wow, I, I worked a special event and it was just me and another special agent doing it. OK, fine.

I'm just saying what I observed in Boston for over a decade was that we were always partnered with somebody who actually worked in public safety, who has training and experience in that sphere. And often times they have different authorities. I mean, not often times all the time, but yeah. So if you're, if you're a, an FBI agent, if you're ADHS, you know, 1811, you don't actually have the authority except for policy wise.

They say if you witness a violent felony, that would be a felony under state, which you didn't study. You know, if you, if a common person would believe that what they're witnessing is a violent felony, then they can intercede and policy empowers them. But there's no, there's no actual federal statute that backs that up. No, if they were cops they would be pulling people over for blowing through a stoplight in their G ride. They're not police, they're not public safety.

Alright, I'm going to take a quick break over here and say thanks to my buddies over at Shield and this is something that rings true from where we started. George does a lot of self-defense training. He teaches people about firearms. My folks over at Shield Arms will get you guys the deal on increasing the capacity of your personally carried weapon.

If you guys are like me and you want to carry a micro pistol because it's more convenient and you're no longer working in law enforcement, check out Shield Arms. Their Shield S15 magazines hold 50% more. Same thing for their S nines, which hold more than the issued stuff that you're going to get out of a Glock. Use promo code Kyle. You're going to save some money on all of it. You can also check out their soft goods. They make them all in house.

They're making them in Big Fork, Montana in America. They've got this little Fanny pack that you see there on the wall. It's called the junk sack. I use that when I go for a jog. It keeps a pistol close by. It's on neodynium rare earth magnets, so that's kind of a neat little option to be able to open it. You're not fighting against zippers and hoping that you're going to get it open if you had to go and do a a serious draw and you can use it in your training.

Otherwise, check out the other stuff they've got there. Great company, good people making smart and quality products. Their AR fifteens are excellent. I don't know if they're second to none, but they're they're engineering, especially on their lowers right now. It's one of my favorite lower setups because it allows you to fold an AR and not have to add the extra weight of like some sort of internal adapter and have some sort of mid buffer system. That doesn't mean anything to

you. It means nothing. But I'll tell you this, the guy you're seeing on the screen right there, Mike owns the gun store down the street from me. He's been stocking their lowers and sells a ton of them because they are just a good design. And so if you use them on anything else with any other upper, you're going to get a solid product. Check them out. They're not the cheapest in the world.

They do make solid products. They're making them in America in their own facilities, which is cool. That's not everybody. So we will. Yeah, We'll just turn you guys over there. That was SHOT Show, by the way, that they invited me out to SHOT Show and gave me a ticket to walk around and I got to see what it was all about out there. George, I feel like you, you were looking at their, their, their, what do you call it, their chest rig At one point in time, did you ever end up buying

one? I did not I'm I'm reconsidering. I'm still reconsidering too. Yeah. Like I'm trying to decide if I ever need just to throw on the top chest rig. Yeah, I mean, if I think somebody's going to be shooting back at me, I prefer Level 4, but if I need to go out and check something out quick, chest rig's a nice idea. OK, let's dig back in. What I want to do is I want to actually pick your brain about this. Antifa is a domestic terrorist

organization. What that means, what it doesn't mean, what that looks like from the Intel side with sort of tool boxes. Before we do that, let's also play this other clip from Hillary Clinton, which is fantastic stuff. She's actually trying to help the problem. She wants to turn down the rhetoric 'cause she just wants to not demonize the other side, except for maybe the political right.

George, you listen from You tell me if she's actually turning down the rhetoric or if this is just more sort of hiding behind virtue and taking potshots. That raises a larger question. I mean, we have, and I include myself, we have got to stop demonizing each other. Yeah. Now, I think most of that right now in our country's history is coming, you know, from the right, coming from people who

want to dominate. They want their point of view, their right, you know, writing out slavery from history. That doesn't make it go away. You know, we have got to stop with the finger pointing and the scapegoating. We can have legitimate disagreements, right? I mean, how do you provide quality, affordable healthcare to everybody? Let's figure. Figure that out how? Do you deal with what's going to be job loss from AI? Let's get working on that.

You know that's what we should be doing, but we should do it in the truth based reality, right? That am I crazy or did she say we can have the conversations as long as they're about the things that I think are and I frame the arguments so that they favor my position is that. Not you know what she reminds me of that that clip reminds me of. I'm sure it's in a comedy movie somewhere of the bully beating up the little kid holding his wrist and using the little kids hit fit hand to hit his own

face. Like stop hitting yourself, stop hitting yourself, stop hitting yourself. That's right. It, it, it, you know, I want, I want to make sure that we, we don't demonize anybody. But most of the ugly stuff is coming from the right. As long as we can just agree on that, then we can stop demonizing each other. That was incredible stuff. Let's talk about Antifa because Donald Trump there, he's always the punching bag on this. This is authoritarian, blah,

blah, blah. He just said signed an executive order. Antifa is now going to be listed as a domestic terrorist organization. Is that a real designation that exists in law enforcement in your experience? I've never seen one. OK, so no such thing as a we have what's called FT OS, right? Right. What is an FTO? Foreign terrorist organization and that opens up a whole giant toolbox of of tools that are available from the national level on down. What is?

What is the designations? Where does it come from? What are the criteria that go along with that? Yeah. So I mean, they have to be engaged in, you know, asymmetric activities to influence a political outcome where it's gotten bastardized. Is it that we call groups like, for example, the Taliban a terrorist organization when their primary focus is to drive

invaders from Afghanistan? So in order really to be a true terrorist organization, you have to be operating outside essentially of where you live, because then you fall into the category, and this is where people screw language up and they call them, well, one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. That is not that's not correct either from a legal standpoint or from a dictionary standpoint.

A freedom fighter is working with inside their own country to overthrow either an authoritarian regime or an invader. You know, even just. Stuff I don't like, it doesn't have to be any particular freedom fighter equals I have a certain perspective, You don't have that perspective. I want that perspective in my own country, yeah. Right, right.

So. But Antifa is actually a global organization, so why not then go ahead and designate them as a FTO, as a foreign terrorist organization, which, and I'm not advocating for this, I'm just saying it gives the administration a lot more authorities to to go after them more aggressively. So calling them a domestic terror organization, I wouldn't be surprised if I see the administration change that designation to an FTO. Which is the same thing they did to the to the drug cartels.

And it opens up a suite of tools. It also probably opens up some national security monitoring and some signals intelligence gathering capabilities that that's kind of concerning in some ways to me. No, no, that's what I'm saying. I'm not advocating for it.

I'm just saying that if, if you want to be pure in, in your, your logic, since they're, they operate internationally, you know, we see them in the Netherlands at the riots the other day in France as well in Paris, burning things on the street, burning buildings. We saw black block out in force in those two countries just earlier in the week.

They're absolutely an FTO with a cell that's operating here in the United States. You know, so then if you want to get a FISA on something like that, you're going to have to be able to show, which really doesn't matter because our seems like our FISA court judges don't give a damn, but you're going to have to show them communicating with organizations outside the United States in order to get. Some sort of, yeah, some sort of comms foreign Nexus. I am.

I do have a method to the madness this morning. People are not paying attention. Obviously the, the title of today's program is about the Secret Service farms, the secret SIM server farms found by the US Secret Service in in New York. And I'm going to get to that. And the, the reason why it's going to be at the end of the program is because we have so little information about what it is and what the capabilities

are. So George and I are talking about some of the things that I see that I think are related at least in the the potential threat. And then when you add to the end of it, we're going to talk about what the Intel gaps are and what we don't know about what was reported, which was very, very little. And, and some of that I think is the wildest thing I want to continue on the information op game.

We, we briefly touched in Antifa, there's another information op that's going on. And that is exactly what Hillary Clinton just did, framing a specific narrative and doing so very repetitively. We called it the illusory truth effect. I've done a lot of talk about that. If you repeat, that's the the old game. If you repeat the lie long enough, it becomes the truth. It's not really the truth. It just becomes the thing that people believe and it becomes

harder to to, to, to shake away. And we're talking about low information people, potentially low IQ people. One of those people strikes me as this representative who has always held up as a civil rights icon. But he's either a disingenuous actor or he's not that bright. And I'm not willing to speculate 'cause I don't know him personally. His public persona seems intentionally, let's say, obtuse to be very nice about it.

This was a discussion that was brought up about Jimmy Kimmel, a discussion that was brought up about Charlie Kirk. And I would say this is that weird false equivalency between losing your show when you're worth $20 million a year in a contract and being shot in the chest and take it away from your children. So this this ongoing sort of false equivalency is being played. First of all, the collective anger.

Over someone losing their job from the left was way more than someone who lost his life first and foremost, second of all. I would argue, Congressman, you're absolutely right. It's more important to have an open and honest, fair, robust conversation, getting different viewpoints when you have a global pandemic that came in from China that was unforeseen, that was unprecedented and no one ever thought possible. On top of that, it's always the Republicans.

It's always conservative views that get silenced, shadow band censored from these various algorithms. The glitches never. Cut the other way. The mess ups in the coding never skew against Democrats. It's always conservative. So Jimmy Kimmel coming back to air fine. It was a business decision made by the parent company when he clearly wasn't going to apologize. He wasn't going to say he lied even though he clearly did. The facts were already out there

that it was not a MAGA shooter. He tried to make it so so. They have every right to kick him off the air and they have every right to bring him back on. And Brad and I are going to disagree here. I don't care how many jokes he tells about conservatives versus liberals. I don't care how many guests he has on whether they be more conservatives or more liberals. The marketplace will decide his fate and his future. And if he can't get ratings, as he can't now, chances are his

days are short on ABC. They don't like that very much. George, he's, he's making a reference to a, a recent decision by Google to basically say that yes, they did censor people for political speech. They did censor people that were on YouTube and they are now rescinding those bans. So you're starting to see maybe a roll out. A lot of this came out over COVID-19. So that was the quick touch on that. We saw a lot of this sort of messaging campaign happen.

And for those of us that were paying attention in and out of the government, there was obviously a, a heavy hand. That's what we learned in the Twitter Files, that the FBI specifically, but also the rest, the Intelligence Committee, was trying to push their narrative that they liked best for some reason. Unclear why. Was Elvis Chan contacted ahead of Google's decision to do this? Great question. Unknown.

Sounds like he was able to go out into retirement on his own, so he was able to walk away off the GS15. Nice, nice. Good for him. It's always nice yeah I mean, you know, apology kind of doesn't bring very. It doesn't ring true after you've wrecked people's subscriber base and income stream. It's like we saw already wrecked your life. But no, we're back.

You can come back now. It's like the restaurants that were shut down said you can't have any customers come in for a year or two years or three years unless you play by something that is not going to be able to be conducive for business. But now we're sorry and we've changed our mind and we were wrong back then. So why don't you restart your business up from nothing? But that's how the government

does it, right? They break your leg and then they put it in a plaster cast and say you should be thankful. Well, Jim Jordan says yeah. Jim Jordan says we should thank him because he had a great victory for us.

So that's helpful. This is a Fox News story about it. Does the new policy from Google, which is also known by its parent company Alphabet, could affect both average users and well known figures like FBI Director Dan Bongino and the White House counterterrorism chief Sebastian Gorka. War Room podcast host Steve Bannon and all others who were permanently banned in recent years for COVID-19 or other election related content reflecting the company's commitment to free expression.

Google, AKA YouTube, will provide an opportunity for all creators to rejoin the platform if the company terminated their channels for repeated violations of COVID-19 or or elections integrity policies which are no longer in effect. What? How do you read that? Well, I noticed first he left out Amazon Web Service for crushing Parlor, you know, so not all the guilty have been punished here and it's just a fundraising tool.

That's, I'm sorry, I'm cynical, but you know, having been down this road that I've proceeded onto in good faith and was left with a giant, you know what sandwich. That's all. My friends get screwed over it. It means nothing. Nice words, though. It makes for a good sort of sternly written letter or a victory claim for the for the folks in the the judiciary. Here's the other piece of this this pervasive the man wasn't was a racist, so you can't excuse his history.

We're going to try to do the false equivalency between someone being canceled for speech and then someone being killed. And at the same time, we're also going to argue that, you know, he was killed for speech that was actually really, really bad. And we're having very notable public figures go out there and try to reclaim that ground. And I'm watching this happen, and I'm thinking these people are probably too smart to actually be saying things this dumb. But I'll let the audience make a

decision. I'm not going to decide. You know what you guys think about how smart Representative Clyburn is in this case? I'll tell you one thing we do know, though, is that when Melissa Hortman, the speaker of the of the Minnesota Legislature, was shot, there was a commemorative resolution in the Congress and every Republican voted for it. When Charlie Kirk was assassinated for his political beliefs, there were 58 Democrats who would not vote for a resolution to honor him So, and

that was one of them. Why do you think it was? I don't mind on an end about his life. I've got a problem with their legacy, and I know what the legacy of Kirk was. When I turn on my TV and I see someone telling me what an awful person Martin Luther King Junior was, when I see somebody that's telling me if I get on an airplane and there's a black pilot, I begin to wonder, is he qualified? What does that mean? That's those are the words that came out of his mouth.

That's not what he said and that. That's exactly what he said. I got the exact quote. It's not in context at all what he was talking about. It was a conversation. About. Affirmative action. You know that, Congressman. This has been well litigated and well developed. The same all about Brassy was about affirmative action. So what's wrong with affirmative action? No, look, you're telling me that when I came out of college and couldn't get a job, that is because I was not qualified.

That's not what I'm saying. But what are you saying? What I'm saying is Charlie Kirk was very clear. If these companies openly say that they have to somehow fill a quota of people, whether it be a race or gender, not based on merit, but based on their race or gender, the obvious should be clear to everyone, which is, is that person then qualified?

So it's just an obvious question because of the bar that the corporation itself set up by saying publicly we're going to do this type of DEI hiring, then you have to wonder is it because of their race or their generous? That's my favorite. That's that's when I, I don't know who's wanting to tune into a bunch of people going, but you know, the minute you say something that drops the the hammer on these people, that's where they go with it. It's kind of fun to watch.

What's your initial reaction? And by the way, Katanji Jackson Brown, he just threw that out there. What do you think of Katanji Jackson Brown as a as a as a mic drop? I agree with Amy Coney Barrett that Katanji Brown is out of her depth and she is not intellectually up to the task of being a Supreme Court Justice and maybe not even up to the task of being a judge. It it doesn't mean that I'm a racist. I'm just looking at the her opinions I've written, you know,

read what she's written. She's just very unimpressive. Just like I read Joe Biden's doctoral thesis. I was unimpressive, too. And we all saw that video the other day. It went viral on Instagram and Twitter of a female soldier failing to operate an M240 machine gun and almost kill everybody around her. You know, we put people in these positions to everyone's

detriment to include their own. Well, I'm going to push back and let you know that probably you are racist based on some racist people saying something in just one second here. But before I do that, I'm going to break away and I'm advise you, we're going to do a quick break for a Spotify ad. So if you guys are listening on the audio platform, you may hear one. I do like to give you the warning if you're listening anywhere else, make sure you're hitting a like button over on Rumble.

You're doing the same thing on YouTube. If you're if you're watching on X, give us a little heart there. We appreciate that. You can join us at kyleserafin.com. That's just my name. If you want to find the locals, if you want to join us on Spotify, you could just type in kyleseraphinshow.com and you can send it in a text message to one of your friends, check them out, see what they think, ask them to listen to this show or one that you found impactful. If there's something you like.

If you want to join the community again, Kyle seraphin.com. Free or paid memberships over there, Very easy to do. It's a rumble product. And then I'll just remind you one more time, if you're seeing this on the screen, make sure you're making sure you're hitting the like. We appreciate all that. I'm going to give George a run for his money here if you guys are cool with that. But first, before the run for your money, let me just point out that it's not good for the

goose. It's not good for the gander. Misinformation and saying false things and using not context and all that stuff. It's totally acceptable for talking about Charlie Kirk. What it's not acceptable about is a global pandemic, right? This goes to that Google censorship thing. I just want you to track the logic here and see if you can. Here's Clyburn again. I don't know if he's a bad actor or if he's or if he's unintelligent and just can't grasp how funny this is.

He does this 180 here. Well, I don't think they're the same simply because Biden, if any of this took place, these weren't jokes. This wasn't ATV show. This was a pandemic, and we didn't need to have misinformation going out about this pandemic. There was enough coming from the president at the time. What put Clorox in your veins? That's the kind of foolishness the Biden. Do you want? Did you remember when he was telling, when Trump was telling people? The Clorox in the veins?

Unbelievable. And to take what was it fish tank cleaner or some, you know, baloney like that? I mean, yeah. Yeah. Yeah, The thing is, is good ideas and bad ideas need to be exposed to full sunlight. And at the end of the day, the good ideas are going to be the only ones that survive, and they refuse to allow the marketplace of ideas to be, you know, fully vetted by the country. And shame on him. He gave this country Joe Biden. He handed it to Joe Biden, a

man. I'm talking about Joe Biden now, who referred to J Byrd, Senator Byrd, a former grand Wizard of the KKK, as his North Star, as his moral guidance. These are horrible people. Well, Speaking of horrible people, maybe two of the worst people in public life in the media space are Don Lemon and Joy Reid. Both of them lost their programs and now they are relegated to

the thing that I'm doing. They're doing podcasts, they're doing man on the street, and they're letting you know that they are probably the smartest people except for Katanji Jackson Bryan. She's actually smarter as. Smart as I know my ass is, Katanji Brown is smarter. Smartest person I've ever met in my life. You smart, I'm smart. that Lady is smart on a level I've never seen before. And her three roommates were

even smarter. These girls were so smart that we were shocked that we'd ever met anybody that intelligent. And Amy Coney Barrett, on the other hand, is a Supreme Court Justice just like Katanji, even though her qualifications are miniscule compared to Katanji's. Maybe that's the affirmative action we've been getting. White people who are essentially mediocre in scale compared to a black person getting the spot because they wanted a conservative.

Maybe the way that JD Vance got into Yale is because they were tired of just letting in white men from New York, from Choke, from all the elite schools, and they wanted an Appalachian white. That's how that man got into Yale. I promise you. Same thing with Ron DeSantis from a small town in Florida. They wanted to just get out of the New York DC matrix, Massachusetts matrix and let somebody into Harvard and Yale who came from a different place. He came from Florida, baby.

That's also affirmative action in DEI.

So before y'all start going crazy about DEI, just meaning they let black people in just on the basis of being black, think a little more critically and think about the fact that it's also disabled people, military veterans, people who come from Appalachia, white folks who come from Alaska and different places that they don't normally come from, indigenous people, Latinos, Asians. And the last thing I'll say about this for all the y'all people on Fox that are going to

clip this because y'all mad about affirmative action because yes, I embrace affirmative action because I belonged at Harvard and I was smarter than all the legacies I went to school with who only were there because they were rich and their parents had a name on one of the buildings and they didn't go to

class and I did. So I'm just going to let y'all know that we see affirmative action as these schools searching for people they wouldn't have ordinarily found without deliberately looking for us. They would have just let the same mediocre white men from rich families in but. I'm convinced. There's nothing in her argument that could withstand 2 seconds

of scrutiny. This is the same woman who insisted on her show every night that Joe Biden was firing on all 8 cylinders and was running circles around everyone. So you know what you know? May God have mercy on her soul like she's a horrible human being. It's so simple. That's it, OK. That is the broad grasp that I have of the information on we're we're seeing people set up as victim despite not being

victims. We're seeing pick people that are looking for a way to unify behind a color, a bandana or some sort of symbol. We're seeing official messaging coming in from politicians, whether they be in Congress or whether they be in the executive branch out in California. Take your pick. I've seen leaders in the in the the Senate to say the same thing. Everybody's saying there's authoritarianism and we've got

to to do something. Federal government has been delegitimized because we're not in charge of it. They're wearing masks and they're very, very bad. And all of that happens. And then we get this story and I want analysis on what this could mean. What we know, it actually does from what we hear.

And then maybe some of your biggest concerns, George, This is the breaking story from yesterday that is still not making front page news everywhere, even though it seems like it ought to. CNN has learned about a plot that could have overwhelmed the city's cellular communications. What began as an investigation into swatting by the Secret Service LED them to a server farm, and it's. One that could be remotely operated by foreign governments and criminals. And this could go far beyond

swatting. So what we do know is that foreign governments and criminals located in the United States are using this network to run their organizations. That includes cartels, that includes human traffickers, that includes terrorists are on this network. We're joined now by Juliette Kayam. I don't want to be joined by Juliette Kayam. I want to hear what George Hill. What do you see as the information that was actually given? I've got one more clip from Matthew Mccool and he what a

cool name. By the way, that was the that was the special agent in charge of the New York field office for US Secret Service and and he looks like Clark Kent. For those of you that are just listening. He has like the glasses got the haircut. What? What do you make of the What we actually know information? That's a press release that tells us absolutely nothing. He tells us who it was used by, OK, Does he? Hopefully we'll see some evidence of that at at some point in time.

Doesn't tell us who put them there. Doesn't tell us who rented the half dozen apartments to put them in there. Doesn't tell us who signed the lease. Doesn't tell us if any foreign governments are using any of this. And my biggest concern is, are there others around the country? He doesn't tell us exactly how they, quote, discovered this. Were they using a Stingray running around New York City?

A Stingray, for those who don't know, is basically a phony cell tower that causes cell phones to connect to it. So that for use for further exploitation. We use them in aircraft that the the defense in this Defense Department does. It's called a man in the middle. It poses as a cell phone tower. So we use a Stingray on the ground. They were used extensively in Iraq and Afghanistan. Did they use them on a Stingray and what prompted that? Was that part of their normal

security protocols? I don't know. I'm not with Secret Service. Maybe Dan Bongino can tell us. Did they get a tip from a foreign government? So that there's a myriad of questions here and it goes beyond just information operations and a color revolution in this country. Is it part of a kinetic attack? So some of the that can be answered to some extent if they find them in other countries or I'm sorry, other parts of our

country. You and I know and I'm not going to give it out here, but there is a three digit code that FBI can use to get to the front of the line during a crisis when using their cell phone. Because in a mass attack, especially, you know, a kinetic attack involving loss of life and injury, destruction of property, the cell phone system is going to be overwhelmed. We saw that happen on the marathon bombing. We saw what happened during 911.

But the cell phone network really was kind of almost in its nation stages in 2001. But it can happen. It can happen very easily and it could certainly have been made to what happened with what was set up there in New York City. So sadly, like you said, Kyle, it it's it's off of the it's out of the news cycle. We're in Dallas now on a on a

shooting. And you know, this is going to be sideline, just like Butler has been sidelined and just like the the pipe bomb has been sidelined or the cocaine in the White House or or whatever you want to talk about. Whatever the media and our government officials, our bureaucrats in federal law enforcement, they don't want to talk about it. That was yesterday. It was yesterday. This is the the piece. So Mccool actually went out and made an official statement.

This is something from Newsweek, but it sounds like he sat down and did like a like a TikTok tile video. So I want to play that as well. It's a slightly more information and then it still leaves us with all these questions like you just said. And then I'm going to add something on top of that because we had the discussion you and I. Does this mean we're talking about very organized criminal cells? Are we talking, you know, cartel, transnational organized crime?

Are we talking about trans are foreign terrorist organizations because that's pretty specific and and also pretty sophisticated for them or are we looking at like nation state actors depending on how many of these turn up?

Let's do the Secret Service director 1st and we'll come back to it. We are making this announcement as a matter of public interest given timing, amount and concentration of material recovered during a recent Secret Service protective intelligence investigation following multiple telecommunications related imminent threats directed towards senior U.S. government officials.

This spring, the US Secret Service began A protective intelligence investigation to determine the extent and impact these threats could have on protective operations. The investigation LED us to the New York tri-state area where investigators discovered 10s of thousands of Co located and network cellular devices capable of carrying out nefarious

telecommunications attacks. These devices allowed anonymous encrypted communications between potential threat actors and criminal enterprises, enabling criminal organizations to operate undetected. There's so little in there. The thing that I saw him, the Nexus, I guess the Secret Service, because this has been a question you and I have, like, why the hell was the Secret Service investigating this? And they don't actually seem to say, but they said protective

intelligence investigation. He said it twice. Exactly, and the faint towards, you know, criminal enterprises, criminal enterprises do use those sorts of setups, but not to this magnitude. That is a lot of money to rent a half a dozen apartments in New York City for, you know, even though a criminal enterprise can can, can do it, what they go for is high ROI return on investment. So just to throw that out there that it's a criminal enterprise.

I'm sorry, you're going to have to show me some receipts. And and yeah, unless they're doing some sort of high volume scam operation and that's where, you know, I think a lot of us have gotten these things. I get these spoof text messages saying they're coming in from the toll service and they say, oh, you're, you got a Texas phone number, so you, you owe us tolls. I click on this. Is this what they're talking about?

Is that a self funding operation where if they can send out, you know, 10 million text messages and they scam 15 people for several $1000 each, is that how they're winning? But again, I don't know why Secret Service is running it down specifically. The claim was, is that MTG and some other high profile Republicans had been swatted and somehow this played into that. So this was maybe an anonymizer

on this. The Intel gaps that you see specifically, can you kind of name them out like and, and maybe tell people what an Intel gap is so they understand what we're talking about here? You want to start collecting evidence. So basically it's empirical what's right in front of you, what you can show to someone else and they're say, yeah, that's a, that's a gun or whatever, or yes, that's an IP address. So you're going to start, you're going to be able to start with

all that. You're going to be able to start with, you know, the maker of the SIM cards, the hardware, who signed the lease, things of that nature. Then gaps are going to start to manifest themselves like, well, who, how, who, how did this lease come about? How the payments been made? You know, they'll just start to

list themselves. And then you try to go ahead and fill those in. It's kind of like starting a crossword puzzle where you start with your corners and your perimeter, and then you start to fill in the mosaic as it comes along. But everything that's missing is an intelligence gap. So he's throwing things out there and he may very well know that it's a criminal enterprise. I don't know. We don't.

We do know that from the size and the scale of that, it would certainly serve a nation state very well. We do know that the usual actors have very robust capabilities. So I'll just just list them in no particular order, but you know, Russia, China, Iran and the Democratic People's Republic of North Korea, they all have robust cyber capabilities. So did this investigation come about as threats against Marjorie Taylor Green and and other quote, right wing

politicians? I don't know what a right wing politician is, but that's their term. And if it did, why would Secret Service be investigating threats against, you know, congressional representatives? They're not that lead investigative authority for that. They don't really have this capability. Oddly enough, I did see United States Postal Service having that capability, but they're overwhelmed with the war on drugs. So I don't know. It's just we'll see. Yeah. So, you know, just to just to

hone it down. Any dark holes on this one? No, but we're hone in on what that investigative process looks like. So as you said, we're talking about 5 locations supposedly and 300 plus SIM server cards that had 100,000 SIM cards, so 100,000 phone numbers. That's assuming that they were all doing single and not rotating. So that's a lot of phone numbers. So we want to know, OK, that's probably 100 grand on the conservative side a year just in rent for the physical locations. At least.

Yeah, let's just assume that it's a one bedroom studio and they were just, you know, they were doing the minimums there. You're talking $2000. Let's just, you know, make it real simple. But if it's. Yeah. You think it's 3000. So 100,000 a year, $200,000 a year.

That's the first. That's an initial investment in just New York City. NY City is not where you're going to get your biggest ROI when it comes to being able to do this 'cause you could have these theoretically in the United States and be able to operate across the entire United States. So why would you have it in New York specific, right, Unless this is something that they have in multiple locations. So we want to know that. And then you talk about, OK, so someone must have signed a

lease, right? Was it done with a corporation? Was it done with a person? How was that that location scouted? Was it done online? Was it done in person? Was there a physical representative there? Who set up these physical networks? Who physically had access to the buildings? What are the security cameras show for people doing insurance and outs? You know who set up the the the the billing for your Internet

connectivity? Who set up the billing for power going to these places which are going to draw significant amounts of power and, you know, air conditioning and so on. So all these questions get really, really specific. And then is this one, is this a one off? And again, I'm still not convinced that Secret Service is the right federal agency to have this Nexus and how that came in and, and whether they just stumbled upon it on accident or

whether it was something longer. And they're not telling us a lot. And it sounds like the the media is like, oh, it could have shut down the com system. It could send encrypted messages to everybody in the United States. Also breaking today is some other story that we're going to talk about. Like that was it. That was all they cared about. They just said this thing happened.

And of all the news stories that I've read probably in the last couple of months, this is one of the wildest things that doesn't seem all that crazy. Like, it's less crazy that we had this story about the, the, the, the man who attempted to assassinate Donald Trump stabbing himself in the neck. By the way, for those who are not paying attention, yesterday, he was found guilty. This is Ryan Ralph.

So he was tried in Florida and immediately upon the guilty verdict, he apparently tried to stab himself in the neck and was unsuccessful. He got dragged out. I actually may even have a clip of that. Here we go. This. I'll just play this real quick. This is the news from yesterday, which is nowhere near as shocking as 100,000 SIM cards found in five different locations in New York.

It's quite shocking. As the verdict was read, it appeared to our producers inside the courtroom that Ruth tried to stab himself in the neck with a pen. That's what it appeared to to look like. Then 4 marshals dragged him out of the courtroom. Took his coat off. They then shackled him at the waist and ankles and then they brought him back into the courtroom. So again, this just in from our producers. As the verdict was being read, Ruth tried to hurt himself in the neck with a pen.

So there you go. And, and that got breaking news and that's very exciting. And then maybe they'll talk about him a little bit. They've also kind of swept him under the the rug. And there were all kinds of bizarre things about that man's story. The the press coverage was almost none. That was almost a blackout when it came to what was going on. Maybe because it was federal court, but all I saw were a

couple of sketches. Yeah, I mean, obviously he's not Jason Bourne or he'd be dead by now. So, but but back to the SIM card thing, you know, if if you're going to run a criminal enterprise, why would you run it somewhere adjacent to something like the United Nations? Why would you, you know, why not it somewhere inside the Beltway around, you know, around some of the federal buildings, whether that be the Eisenhower Executive Office building or wherever.

You know, why you would want to put it somewhere this innocuous out of the way, some place where you're not going to have Secret Service sniffing around ahead of of a protective detail. So no, I'm I'm not buying it at all. This look, if, if we were investigating this, if, if, if somehow the suspendables that were re resurrected and and had access to tools, we would know by the end of the weekend.

Pretty good idea of of where where this threat emanated from and into the degree that it poses to the country. My guess is we're not going to learn very much more than what we already know today, which tells me it was probably a

pretty big deal. And is your instinct that just based on the ROI, the location and the other things that this is more likely a nation state actor if you're going to do some, you know, high level analysis on this, does that sound more probable to you than the alternative just in the the limited information we have? We know that New York City has been a target since the time they've tried to 1st blow up the World Trade Center by parking that van in the in the parking

garage. So I'm my best is going to be nation state actor, maybe using a cut out, you know, and it could be a terrorist, you know, organization here in the United States, but with the support of a nation state actor. If it's a criminal enterprise. Boy, talk about the gang that couldn't shoot straight. Why didn't they put it in Wichita, KS or some place where rents a fraction of what it would be because you can call it all over the country anyway.

Why would you put it in New York City if New York City wasn't the target? It's just a question. I'm not saying that that it was the target. I'm just saying using a a logic string to say like, if, if it's a criminal enterprise, why would you put it in some place where you're going to have a higher degree of scrutiny?

Put it some place where you're not going to have a higher degree of. Scrutiny and I can't fathom that 100,000 phone numbers doing simultaneous operations is enough to shut down anything in New York City because their grid has to be big enough to support New York City, which has 12 million in the local area. So I don't know how 100,000 people simultaneously activating their phones. There's probably 100,000 people on it on any given day and a

bump in 100,000. I can't fathom that that would actually be a real denial of service attack, even though that's what was claimed. It doesn't make a lot of sense to me either. Crazy. Let me, let me ask one last question specifically to your expertise in signals intelligence.

And there was kind of the speculation that we had in our little suspendables chat discussing inside or outside the United States the value of putting a node like this, some kind of a, a cell phone node inside the US versus outside when it comes to collection parameters and who would or would not focus on it. We saw that Secret Service is going out and talking about it. We're not hearing anything out of NSA specifically, not that we would.

But look, can you talk about the responsibilities for Signal in intelligence that happens inside versus outside and where it originates, if that has any bearing on this? Sure, we are the victims of Nsas success and I don't mean victim like in a negative sense, but the NSA has done such a an excellent job of identifying threats electronically that emanate from outside the United States that according to Akamai, 63% of all threats now emanate with inside the United States.

And we have groups like SISA who are supposed to be protecting us from things like this. And you know, the auspices of DHS and sounds like they missed the ball on this. So like I said, the NSA were victim again, not so much in a negative sense. It's not criticism in the NSA, but they're a victim of their own success.

They've done such a good job of hoovering up everything outside the country that now more than half, you know, approaching, you know, starting to close in on 75% of the threats now originate from with inside the United States. So we're talking about threats. So obviously then we're not talking necessarily about criminal organizations. We're talking about foreign countries and foreign terrorist organizations. So where is SISA on all this? Is that who's who this would fall under?

In theory this would fall under an insist and then maybe FBI is sort of the the follow. On action they would work with FBI, there would be a cyber task force put together and and get out after this. OK, so this is not NS as purview to necessarily be scanning through all this kind of stuff? No, but they would absolutely should be part of a task force because they bring a lot of expertise.

So if you're going to start to, you know, if any of that those activities were beaconing and sending data outside the country, then NSA would absolutely get involved. So if if I were putting together a task force, NSA absolutely would have a seat at the table 100%.

That makes sense. And just so people understand, then NSA focusing externally and so there's an external signal either coming in or emanating outward data heading out, then that's where you want to have the NSA interface, SISA, the what is it, the Cybersecurity Infrastructure Security Agency. Yeah, the one who told us we had the most secure election ever in

2020, that those guys. Those guys should be involved and the and the internal end of it, the domestic comms part of it and and setting up this part of it and then the FBI. You're saying the way it should work. I'm not saying it's going to work. Totally agree. I just, yeah, I just wanted to get your insight on that. I'm not going to let this one go because I'm going to keep asking and I'm going to keep seeing if

we can find something. I'm going to put some news hit alerts on this and hope we'll come back and talk about it soon later. Any any final thoughts as far as the the biggest as you're looking, sort of broadly speaking, we talked about cover color revolutions at the beginning. We've talked about this marketing campaign that's going on.

We're talking about high level actors trying to delegitimize current government in the US. This, you know, potentially bizarre story with with comms going on Highline. What do you what do you see in this country over the next couple years? I always give you like a an opportunity to say your most bleakest thoughts. So go ahead and give me some of those. If you don't mind, drop out some dispense red pills our.

Elected officials, in conjunction with those in the legacy media, are creating a moral framework wherein that will give license to people who ascribe to their ideology for violence. And that's what really concerns me, that they're giving license to the worst people to do the worst things. And we're seeing more and more

evidence of that every day. And we just saw it this morning in in Dallas, TX. So when you're giving Pete, when you're othering one side, demonizing one side, and then you're giving moral license that there is no real framework for this, this wretched country that you live in. So go ahead and do your worst. And so I think people should be concerned about that. And hopefully we can get by with some counter messaging at some point.

But you know, they control the school systems and we've been training multiple generations that this country is fatally flawed and we don't teach civics. So it's going to be an uphill battle. Yeah, luckily you're living in a place where that's one of the worst, worst penetrations it seems like too. And can't miss. They got you. Isn't that a Marine Corps thing? They got us surrounded. Yeah. They got. Us right where we want. Them or something, or we got them right where where they want us.

Yes, they can't get away this time. We're surrounded George Hill. Thanks for joining me. I really appreciate it. Follow guys. If you guys want to follow George on X you can find him at Senior Chief EXW and you'll get your your daily negativity with also really good information and analysis. Is that true? All right, go get some leg day done my friend all. Right, it's child. All right. Thanks so much all right, so that's that and I every time George comes on I it expands my

mind. I hope it does the same thing for you. It also gets you guys kind of screwed up in your algorithm. If you're listening and you're used to being able to do this, the show at 1 1/2 X and then you suddenly get George and you're like, oh, now I got to go to two, but then I go back to talking. It's going to mess with your speed play.

So that's always fun for me. While we're talking about it, make sure you guys are liking us over on the various places you can and make sure that you are listening on Spotify if you're on any of the audio platforms because you'll get video too. What the heck, might as well it's rumble.com/kyle Seraphin. It's youtube.com slash at Kyle Seraphin. Find me on X at Kyle Seraphin locals is Kyle seraphin.com.

You guys see how we do this and then very simply Kyle Seraphin show over on Spotify. While we're talking about Spotify, let's go ahead and do a quick little a quick little snap here for another Spotify ad since we went kind of long and that gives us that opportunity for all of you that are in the chat. I do appreciate you guys being here. I did send up something here that was going to be kind of funny. And this is not going to go the way that you thought it would go

this video. So as a palate cleanse going off into our Wednesday, there are still rational, thoughtful people that you look at them and you may not immediately think, yeah, that person gets me. This is a man. I don't know how else to describe it nicely. She is a very thick, built, I'm going to say stereotypical looking lesbian type woman who also understands that women are women. You know what? There's a lot more of us that are rational than people might

think. If you look at this woman, you might judge her from her outer appearance, but you need not because there's more of us than them. This is just kind of a nice. This made me feel good listening to it. I was misgendered yesterday. A little girl at the mall, she was maybe 5 years old, sitting in a wagon, kept staring at me. So I made eye contact and she said are you a girl or a boy? Her mom started to go Oh my God, we we accept everyone that's so rude you can't say that.

And I laughed and I bent down on her level and I said that's OK, it's confusing sometimes. I'm a girl. I just really like boys clothes. They're pretty comfy. She got all excited and she said I'm a girl too. And I gave her a high 5. I said isn't it so great being a girl? I love being a girl. She said, yeah, that's my brother, he's a brother because he's a boy. So I said you're right, brothers are boys and sisters are girls. There's only boys and girls. If you're born a girl, you're a girl.

I was born a girl. I can almost see the release of error coming from her mother's body and just the the ultimate sigh of relief that I wasn't going to be indoctrinating her child or teaching her child something that maybe she didn't want her to know. I continued to talk to the little girl about her brother and her very cute dog who was also a girl. I said I hope you have a great day and I went about my business. That is how you address gender to children.

You don't. That is how you empower little girls and let them know that it's OK to be a girl who dresses however you want without having to change your gender. That is how you avoid confusing children, especially children that aren't your own, and projecting your bullshit on them because you might be offended that they use the wrong pronoun.

It's so sensible. It's so easy for all of you that have Tom girls in your life, whether they're daughters or whether they're granddaughters or whether they're your wives and they just want to wear boys clothes sometimes or what we can perceive to be boys clothes. That seems like a really sensible take. That seems like the kind of thing that I grew up with in the 80s where people still didn't have their heads so far and firmly in their own navels.

We'll say that they could look around and say it doesn't really matter, you know, who cares? How about that? Keep your own BS to yourself. I really like that message. I hope that resonates for you guys as well. Leave me a comment if you guys are so inclined. Anything you didn't disagree with? If you see some other Intel gaps that we did not discuss, love to hear that too because I'm not going to just walk away.

I do think this story has so many more legs to it and I've got so many more questions and the less we hear about it, I think the more telling it is as well. So God bless all of you. Thank you for listening to the Kyle Seraphin show. I look forward to seeing you tomorrow again. Thanks for listening to the Kyle Serafin show, streamed live weekdays on rubble.com/kyle Serafin Bobble Kyle on Twitter, Truth Social and Instagram at Kyle Serafin.