Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an American patriot. Prepare to embrace the uncomfortable truth because this program has no time for comforting lies. Here is civil liberties enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello my friends, Welcome to the Kyle Seraphin Show. Today is Monday, December the 15th, halfway to the last month, end of the year, and it was kind of a rough weekend here in the Seraphin house.
We got some really bad news that my buddy Steve Friend was terminated from the FBI. We're going to go over the termination. We're going to go over the circumstances surrounding it, which I think is going to be interesting to you all. And and then the world in general had kind of a rough weekend. We had a shooting that was down in Australia. We'll go into some of that and I think it's drawn a parallel to a shooting that happened at Brown University. I'm less interested in the shooting.
That's the inevitability of living in the world where human beings are armed and people have bad ideas and there's evil. We're in the Advent season, so it shouldn't be surprising to people that there is darkness and that light is constantly trying to break free. But what I'm going to do is kind of zoom back out of this. We're going to talk a little bit with a gun control debate that continues to happen. I I feel like we're just living in this this silly.
It's like a police procedural. It's the same thing that you'd see if you watched like really bad theater or if you watched some kind of a formulaic drama where you can lay out what's going to happen. Person does bad thing, depending on who the person is, we're going to get some information or not. Law enforcement does what they do. Community grieves, people lose their lives. Some people are hurt. And then some people come out in favor of freedom and some people
come out in favor of tyranny. And they always want to end up trying to, you know, capitalize on these tragedies. So I, I see both sides of it. None of that has anything to do with whether or not Americans should have liberty. None of it has any. I I don't hear anyone calling about common sense restrictions on on free speech, even though they act that way. Nobody will say it out loud.
We need to restrict free speech. And so we continue to have this God-given right to defend ourselves in this country that people act like it's not just a second tiered right, but that maybe it's negotiable and maybe that their feelings have something to do with whether or not you can physically. I mean, imagine if they were trying to say that you could own a car or not, and or whether you could own hammers or anything else that could be used as a weapon system.
What we've proven. And right now we're talking about a story, a pipe bombing scenario that happened on January the 6th, January the 5th of 2021. It's interesting to me that whether or not you have access to a particular weapon system, human beings will find a way to do the things they need to do. And especially if it's evil, they're going to find a way. They always have. And so Australia is a pretty good example of that right now.
The guys there were using like straight pole bolt action rifles and shotguns. You know, it's not the most efficient tool, but it's the tool that they had. So that's what they used. So we'll get into that. But maybe the bigger story for me is I can't tell whether the FBI is now setting up the current director and that means setting up Donald Trump to look like an absolute fool, or whether there has a a creeping level of incompetence. And I'm 5050 on that. But I'm starting to lean a
little bit more. If I was going to start tipping one way or another, my, my energy is leaning towards an FBI that wants to show that if you want to fire people for stupid reasons and if you want to go out against all of the instincts that that that government employees would have, there is a push back. And the push back is you're going to look like a damn fool. Our FBI director just did another swing and a miss. A big, big whiff.
Took a victory lap on Sunday, a thirsty ass victory lap at that. Saying we've got a guy in custody in the FB is great work. Helped us get there and we knocked down the door and we pulled this guy into custody. This is in the Brown University shooting. And this morning, breaking news, they had to let the guy go, the guy that they found, the one from Wisconsin. That's a developing situation
right now. And so it's actually proving what my buddy Steve friend said, that these guys are so thirsty for a win for dad, Dad being Donald Trump in this case, that they are now making asses of themselves. And they're also making ass of the American justice system. And more importantly, maybe the the weaponized government that we thought we were worried about. It's actually being weaponized, but not in the way that we thought. I mean, it's just being
weaponized for stupidity. And so we're seeing a otherwise competent investigative agency take its ability to go after certain people and it did. And we saw that for years. And then rather than correct it and de weaponize, what they've done is they've just said, OK, fine, we're just going to make a fool of you. That's what I think is going on. This is an estimation and I'm open to being wrong later on, but this is kind of the preliminary evidence shows
they're not that incompetent. And Patel continues to step on Rakes that he places down. And maybe I'm starting to believe that there's members inside the FBI that are putting them down there as well. It's his own fault. He had an opportunity to correct the problem and give them a win for employees saying, listen, let's do the right thing.
Let's get the people that actually want to do what Americans signed up to do, you know, and, and what we expect of our law enforcement agencies to be depoliticized, to be completely just following the facts.
They could have done that. And then he started demanding loyalty tests and putting security details on his girlfriend and flying around in a private jet when the government was shut down and people weren't getting paid in the office, but then deciding to pay certain people and not other people. All of that is antithetical to an honorable position. And so he's I think he's reaping what he sowed. I don't know how long Donald Trump allows him to embarrass him.
I've got some evidence that that just happened. And so we'll just keep going. We're going to see where it goes. Let's let's pivot real quickly before we get deep into the weeds and talk about my friends over at Patriot Protect, the website ispatriot-protect.com slash Kyle. We're grateful for all of our sponsors that step in here and, you know, support what it is that we're doing in this program, folks, there are e-mail, ChatGPT, AT&T, Door Dash, Comcast, you name it.
Like any of the companies that you may interact with online. All of these things have the potential of being hacked, and these ones in particular had compromises and security breaches in just the last few months. The leaks will always expose things like names and e-mail addresses, but sometimes your actual physical address, your phone number, and it'll tell things like your behavioral patterns. That's why these companies even exist in the 1st place. A lot of them are just taking
down data about you. And if the scammers get a hold of it, then they can actually target you. Data brokers will publish these things for clicks. Scammers will buy them for cheap. And then you are now online with your home and your family and your habits and your age and your income and your online footprint and everything that might be needed to calculate whether or not you're a useful target.
If you want to make yourself a harder target, sign up with something like Patriot Protect. That's the ones that we use in this house. That's what my parents use. patriot-protect.com slash Kyle. Save yourself on the annual subscription by going to that website. Use my name at checkout. And what you're going to get is the search and destroy protocol that keeps you out of the pile of leads for these scumbags to try to take your stuff. Nobody likes the idea of it. It's very inexpensive.
We're talking about paying for ounces of prevention versus the pounds of cure. The average American loses over $600.00 per year when it comes to how much they are scammed. It's usually not one $600.00 thing per year. It's usually like 110 thousand or $15,000 scam per decade. So don't be in that category. It may be a small risk, but it costs very, very little to keep yourself away from it. So that's what we want to recommend to you guys. And again, we use the same story here.
Let's get into today's program. Check out Patreon dashprotect.com slash Kyle link in the show description. And here we go. So thirsty for a win for Dad. That was the words. Those were the words of Steve Friend a week ago last Friday. There it is. There's this attempt to get that win. I think that he was likely briefed by people like the FBI since they mentioned here's Donald Trump's true social
stacked back-to-back. Quote, I've been briefed on the shooting that took place at Brown University in Rhode Island. The FBI is on scene. That leads me to believe that's who told him what's going on. Boss. You can imagine the call, boss, our guys are on scene from Boston and the suspect is in custody. God bless the victims and the families of the victims. That's a reasonable thing to say. You're the president.
You're not, you're not running the FBI directly, nor are you running local responses to essentially what is a local crime. It's not a federal crime per SE. Someone shooting on a university and then you got the follow up 20 minutes later. And man, how many of these are we going to do? The Brown University police reverse their previous statement. The suspect is not in custody. Well, they didn't really actually reverse their their statement, did they?
They did not. What they did was have to go out and say you're getting bad Intel. And the bad Intel is not coming from us. It's coming from somewhere else. So maybe, just maybe, you might want to not have some of this nonsense coming out and it turns out I, I would suspect it's actually folks coming from our, it's coming from our own government. Not a great look to have that sort of thing happening. Let's go to a little clip here and I'm going to pull a couple
of clips that in in real time. I got a clip of a mom being interviewed about this. It always goes straight to emotion. We played you a little clip and maybe a palate cleanse the other day that was talking about how the emotionality the world is dangerous and then people try to sell you something. That's why this is such good business when it comes to something like CNN. So here's a little taste of how CNN covered it in real time. Putting a mom on the phone. Apparently their kid was safe.
But that doesn't mean that you're not going to get the the emotional pull of we better do something. It's a. Nightmare. It's a nightmare. They were, they were in the middle finals, so they were all on campus studying at the library. And about an hour and a half ago, the first text I get from my son is mom, there's a live shooting on campus and I'm going to run and I love you.
I was like, what? So we've only been texting and I'm getting live updates from him because he's been, We've told him to turn off his phone, not to make a single sound, But he's in the supply closet room on campus, barricaded with 12 students. They've turned off the lights. They've put chairs on their door. One of his classmates is having a panic attack, so the friends are trying to keep her quiet so that no sounds are being made.
They have a radio update that they're getting as students, and the most recent update is that there's nobody in custody and there's an active shooter that's still on campus. There's some casualties, but we don't know how many. We just know that their situation is not resolved at all. So not a lot of value in that. A lot of emotion though, and obviously really sad and scary.
How many people that are going to Brown University you think have a background that know how to handle a weapon system? How many veterans are going there? I remember when I went to school at Texas State, this would have gone back to 2013. I, I was obviously out of the Air Force at that point in time. I'm a grown up in my 30s, and I decided to go back and take some classes.
So I go there and I'm pretty confident they had a policy that said we couldn't carry a weapon and that wasn't good enough for me because I don't really care. I'd rather somebody find out that I was trespassing and kicked off campus, then find myself in one of those scenarios where I'm hiding in the closet with some girl that's hyperventilating and hoping that some guy with a with a weapon system doesn't come in and start executing my classmates. So I just carried a little small
9mm handgun. It's an opportunity to resist. It didn't cause anybody any damage. I'm a competent carrier. I carried, you know, with the CHL and so on. I think now you can do that in Texas. At the time, I don't think you could and I don't think I cared. I never felt like it was a reasonable idea to negotiate with the government about quote UN quote, rights that we believe are God-given. Call me crazy. Maybe that is a crazy position.
But the joke that I used to have with my buddies, we have this map, the United States, it's got all the states, they're all red, and it says these are the states that you can carry a gun in if you're not. And then it has an expletive. That's what I believe. If you don't negotiate with the government for your rights, you just exercise them. And if the government wants to come in, what are the, I mean, this is the other thing. What is the danger of, of
carrying and not needing? It's the kind of like having a seat belt on. Like I don't regularly run my vehicle into things. And in fact, even the small accidents I've had, I'm not sure a seat belt made a difference because it wasn't a big deal, but I'd rather have it than not. I put it on. That's just the way that we operate, right? It's a, it's a, it doesn't cost anything to have it on. And if you don't have it and you need it, it could be really bad. It's the same thing as carrying
a jacket. Some of you ladies don't like to carry jackets. You make your men carry your jackets. There's a whole routine in our family that we do. We saw some TikTok video where this girl's like doing it was Liza Schlesinger. She does this whole thing about carrying a jacket, not carrying a jacket. I carry jackets for my kids. Why? Why do you carry a windbreaker? Because the wind might pick up. Why do you put on a keep a
raincoat in the back of the car? You could because it might be raining and it wasn't when you left. Maybe you're out for a couple hours and you don't want to get, you know, destroyed by wet weather. OK, fine. It I mean, it doesn't cost you anything. You just you put it away. This is the attitude that most of us that carry a weapon, it's not like we're carrying it like looking for trouble. It's that there's trouble in the world and we might find it.
And I don't want to be caught in the closet with a parent or my wife calling into CNN and crying on air panic that I'm going to have to rely on fighting a guy with a gun with a chair. I'm going to fight a guy with a gun with a gun no matter where I go. I don't care what the rules are and I, and I'm just telling you right now, I, if you meet me, I'm armed. The end always. I don't care. I don't know. I can't read those signs. I don't negotiate with the
government or anybody else. And if they want to throw me out or not do business with me, that's OK too. I don't want to do business with people that that that infringe on simple things because I am totally competent. I'm the same guy that used to work at the FBI when I was allowed to carry a gun on an airplane. And I prefer that. There's a lot of you that are perfectly competent, perfectly capable, make good decisions. And of course, this took place in a place where nobody's
allowed to have a gun. And everybody who followed those rules, they got to experience terror. And I'm, I'm horrified for them. It's an awful scenario. So everybody turns around and what do they do? They blame the gun, they blame the situation, they blame society. Nobody wants to blame the fact that we have values as as a as a valued problem. My neighbors and I had this little conversation in the
cul-de-sac the other day. We got out and we're like, OK, American culture is screwed up right now. It's not good. The solution to it is not more government or more law, as it turns out, it's probably more value of human life. And that's only going to come from you interacting with other people in places where you might actually have value for their life. It's not going to be on social media. We know that for sure. Doggone it.
I know that reading my my feed, it's going to come from human beings making a decision. And no government and no law is going to stop somebody because they already broke some laws if they decided to go out and kill people, didn't they? This is so simple. But anyway, it can't be. It can't be solved the way this is a thing that I wanted to cover because this is truly frustrating to me. This is the last update that we got from the director of the FBI. There's one of the pictures from
his feed. Let's show it right here and I'm going to play you the Sunday morning update. We got update 22 hours ago. It's the last and most current thing from our most transparent FBI update on the FB is response to the Brown University. Again, this is that thirsty for a win stuff. FBI Boston established a communications post to to intake, develop and analyze
leads and run into the ground. OK, we've activated the the FB is cast the cellular analysis survey team same kind of people you'd have that were going after the pipe bomber in theory provide critical geolocation capabilities and as a result, FBI safe streets task force read that FBI plus quote UN quote. Local partners, with assistance from the United States Marshall and the Coventry RI PD detained a person of interest in a hotel room in Coventry, RI based off a lead from Providence, RI PD.
All right, this is where it gets weird because they claimed victory. Let's do the let's do the video of them claiming victory. Here it is. And then you guys are going to be shocked, but swinging a miss. It's a whiff. They had to let the person go. Let's at least hear how it was covered 24 hours ago. As I mentioned at the press briefing before this, I'll reiterate right now in in this day and age, there is a lot of
misinformation that can spread. As it pertains to official updates regarding the shelter in place or any future announcements, please follow the City of Providence official social media channels. We've also put out updates through our 311 system, but the City of Providence on Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram will be updating throughout the the evening. If that did not come from an official channel, then it is not official.
Right now. The shelter in place is the same as it had been earlier and it remains the same. All right, so this is their that official channel that they're talking about that was the mayor. So Providence and let's scroll back town timeline a little bit. They are looking for tips. So this is on the 13th on the 14th, very minimal information, kind of like not thirsty for a
win for dad kind of stuff. And here we have it detained person of interest connection with yesterday's shooting at Brown and the shelter in place has been lifted. So they've got somebody in custody. Oops. Turns out we have an update. Here it is. Let's just throw it on the screen. Update, Person of interest in custody, that doesn't fit very well. And then nine hours ago, we had to announce that the person of interest is being released beyond the investigation remains
ongoing, fully active. Uh oh, that's not a good sign, is it? They're asking for all video evidence and any kind of tips or photos and so on and they should be sent to the FB is tip line or they're local. Let's do the Fox News thing. Here's the Fox News of them announcing it yesterday morning. Again, how many of these are we going to take? Because I don't remember ever seeing this before. For whatever it's worth, I don't recall ever seeing. We got him.
Oops, wrong guy. We had to release him. Please send us your tips. Maybe you all can remember some examples of this. The shooter is still at large as the chat is now asking. Yeah, that's what we're learning. We're learning that despite announcing everything's fine, kind of like they did in the middle of the Charlie Kirk manhunt, right when they were looking for somebody, whoever it was that killed Charlie Kirk, they said we got him. There's a person in custody,
Turns out not the guy. This is a similar sort of announcement. This is the Fox News thing. Sorry, this is what I thought. I had queued up first. The federal agents and the geolocation tools that were used to track the cell phone of the person of interest to a hotel in Coventry, RI, just before 4:00 AM Eastern this morning. The hotel again where this person was detained only about
20 minutes from Brown's campus. Patel wrote that it all came together based on a lead from Providence police, but when Providence leaders were asked for more specific. Today, they repeatedly said they couldn't say anything else. The shooter opened fire more open fired more than 49mm rounds inside a classroom in the engineering building, per a law enforcement official. Students inside said the attacker shouted something before firing.
The shooting killed 2 students and left nine others injured. The attack also forced the campus into an overnight lockdown that wasn't lifted until shortly before 6:00 AM local time. Surveillance video released by police is believed to show the suspect someone dressed in dark clothing that appears to walk calmly away from the scene. The shooting again killed 2 students, left nine others injured. The attack and police.
They had this to say when they were pressed about why there are not more visuals of the person who inflicted so much terror. So what we shared with you the other day is what we have that we could share and then we'll continue to, again, we're continuing to collect evidence as we speak. We have detectives out there trying to continue to find SO. And we don't know the identities of the victims at this hour.
But Brown's Provost said that all remaining classics classes, exams and papers of the semesters of the semester have been cancelled. Yikes. Yeah, so they cancelled stuff. I get that. How about this? How about a a a full on release of not just who the person, you know, who they who they that they grab somebody, a person of interest, they actually named the person and they went into a whole background detail. This stuff looks like it was all leaked.
This is not a good situation. Benjamin Erickson released from custody. They went into the whole background on who this guy was. Now I'm seeing this story was updated last night. I was reading about his military history. They went out there and they reached in and found places that he had trained. They went out and talked to people that he had worked in the military with. And then now they have this sort of backtracking scenario and there's this funny little
playback and forth. Right now, Providence is saying that the FBI got the tip. The FBI is claiming that Providence got the tip. All of this looks desperate and thirsty. It's almost like Steve Friend was 100% correct and that they will grab and put anybody in custody simply to make sure that they don't look bad. And who looks bad? If you ask me, it's our FBI, which is not incompetent. It's not.
And occasionally you get the wrong person, but you don't go out and announce it. That's how you know that it wasn't a big deal. Investigations are fluid. They happen ongoing, especially in the spur of the moment. If you're out there in the middle of a manhunt, You don't tell people we got them when you don't know who the him is and you don't know if the him is the right guy. Oh, you found a guy in a hotel room and he happens to have a
small Glock and a revolver. How many people are staying in hotel rooms with one or more guns in this country right now? They're away from home, and that's what they did. He was in the military and he chose to use a Glock and a revolver to go into a classroom. Come on now. None of that makes any sense either. Let me just read from this story here, and I'm going to leave Donald Trump's true social posts as a reminder of what we're
talking about. The Providence Mayor Brett Smiley confirmed in a press release, while Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Naraham explained that investigators initially followed leads that appeared to point to Ericsson but later determined those leads were incorrect. Well, we wouldn't know the screw ups if it wasn't for somebody out there trying to get credit for them before they actually
have earned the credit. This is the equivalent of like hitting send on a draft e-mail when you haven't proof read it, or turning in your first draft and you haven't had an editor come and look at it and you have grammatical errors and you have factually inaccurate statements. This guy said sometimes you head in One Direction, then you have to regroup and go in another. That's actually true. That's very true.
Investigations are a fluid until you actually lock down what the case is. I would liken it to trying to keep a tarp down in heavy winds and until you can start stamping down certain corners of the the tarp, it could be all up in the air. To go out there and advertise that we've got it under control while the tarp is still flapping madly in the wind is foolish. And there's only one group that I keep seeing do it over and over again, and it's the people
in the 7th floor at the FBI. They are doing what did what, what did my friend refer to it as? Ready fire aim right. God forbid we care about the accuracy. What we care about is being first. That's like the same thing that you'd think that a Dan Bongino rule would apply to and, and, and maybe a Cash Patel, who spent a lot of time in media would understand. You don't have to be first. You just have to be right. That's my rule here. If I can try to do it, I don't need to break news.
It's not my goal. We might break a little bit of news today, but it's not my goal to break news. I just want to be right if I can. And if I'm wrong, then I easily fix it. But we have a much smaller platform and I'm not advising. The president of the United States Attorney general for Rhode Island says, unfortunately, it was really unfortunate that this person's name was leaked to the public. It's hard to put that back in the bottle. Yeah, no kidding. His name is at the top.
His his photograph went out to all of the crime reporters that were covering the story. So what damage was done to this guy's reputation? How many people won't even see this on the retraction? And they'll just always assume like, hey, weren't you the guy that they arrested for that thing? People who knew him, people that might employ him. That's the first result that's going to pop up. You're going to see FBI released
him from custody. And the context is what unclear, but at least we got some really thirsty shots of the cast team working in the rain and the evidence collection guys going out there and doing that. It's not a good look when the agency that is meant to get things right, they don't need, they're not a they're not a news organization. So what's Donald Trump say about this now? Because this is pretty bad, I would think. And again, here's the Washington Post covering it.
Authorities are still seeking the gunman because they released the person of interest 24 hours later. Now we had the shooting happened like 2 days ago. That's a long, that's a pretty good jump start. And the guy was able to just walk away. Did you guys see the video? And how bad? I don't know if we're just living in a in a silly timeline, but this is apparently like, this doesn't make me think you want to catch somebody. The best footage they had was
this FBI poster. I'm a play it for you. I think we can loop it. Yeah, let's do a loop real quick. Check this out. That's it. I'm just going to turn the volume down on that. I'm going to leave it on the screen and and just in case any of you recognize people from grainy footage walking backwards, I think we could probably, that might be Bigfoot. The traffic signal is not even in good. You can't even see what it says on the traffic line. OK, so there's a guy walking.
Apparently that's a person walking away from the university. Please help us find this person of interest. If you recognize people from the back. You know what would be really helpful in this, weirdly enough, would be like a gait analysis. Would would that be helpful to you if you had a gait analysis? Why is the grass green by the way, too?
Can we also just add in that I don't see any snow on the ground, but apparently, like when you go over and you look at what the FBI was responding to, there's snow everywhere and the whole campus is covered in snow. Is anyone else looking at this and, and wondering like, is that even? Is that even the same time? Is that coming from the same moment, Huh. Yeah.
So anyway, if you recognize people from the back wearing dark jackets and a hat and and dark shoes and dark pants, if you can recognize that gate, perhaps you also can help the FBI out. Well, like, we're just, we're living in a very silly and unserious time. And it bothers me that the people who used to have like basic, at least the FBI was good at a basic competency of
manhunts. So my question then comes down to, are we talking about an agency that has the Boston field office responding, They're going, you know what? We're going to embarrass the living hell out of this guy. We're going to show Donald Trump that you put the wrong person in charge and we're going to do it in a way that he can recognize because apparently he responds to social media and Twitter pressure and and bad Fox News hits.
How do you try to cover that up? Well, you go out and you call your buddy John Solomon and you say we've had a pretty rotten run right now. Maybe you would give us some favorable press coverage. Could you help me regain my image? Let me sit down with you and let's do a A1 on one where I tell you that the FBI was politically hijacked and I talk real tough.
And so there you have it. This is the most recent update from John Solomon as of last night, after a terrible press conference, after a disastrous like announcement of we've got the guy, we got the wrong guy, we're going to do this. We are not weaponized. We are not politicized. We're removing the fangs of weaponization. Who uses those terms? Fangs, attack dog weaponization. Who uses those? Where do you think those came from? Anyone, anybody in our chat know
where that comes from? He said it's a contrast to the to the FBI under Chris Ray. I don't think so. I'm seeing the same exact. In fact, I'm seeing a Dumber FBI now than what we previously saw. Got this fun little little taste of what does it look like when Cash Battelle goes out and talks to his buddy John Solomon? Does it seem like it's a hard
hitting interview? Is this something where he's going to give you nothing but truth and and everybody should trust what he has to say or are we talking about we talking about guy that goes out and is so desperate for a win that he's going to announce the wrong person and he's got nothing? You got a goose egg. This is this is at least strike two with a swing and a miss might be worse. The men and women of the FBI I've known always wanted to do
the work. The thing that surprised me the most is that that prior leadership allowed so many people who had a political motivation to operate a law enforcement agency. I knew there was something. Remember, I ran the Russia investigation, so I knew that there was a number of folks there, but I made a commitment. To the American people and the President Trump, when I got this job, we're going to we're going to find them all.
And I think there's more that we found in this FBI in these short seven months than the American public ever even expected. And we've expelled all of them. And if there's anyone remaining that's doing a weaponization or politicization at the Bureau, they're going to be removed. Immediately, I don't think he's wrong, but the person who's weaponizing and politicizing the FBI is the guy that said that statement. Isn't that something? Isn't it funny when projection
just makes it out? I think God has a sense of humor. Sometimes. It's really awful that we're living through it, but he just said that we've gotten everybody that's a problem. Well, you're part of the problem there. Cash. And forget about what you promised the American people. How about what you promised Steve Friend and Garretta Boyle and Zach Shofstall and just Mike, how about what you promised me? Because you said you were going to do it right and you blew it.
You absolutely failed. And you were going to see lawsuit after lawsuit. You're going to see the FBI continue to lose those lawsuits because the things he did was completely improper. And if he had just listened to somebody who knew what they were talking about and wanted the best and doesn't want to work in the FBI ever again, I have no interest in never doing it. I did want you to win, bud. But you blew it. And now your reputation is going
to take a hit. And all we're going to do is look at it, point at you and laugh like a Simpsons episode because he did to yourself. We're going to get more into that in a second. I've got some 2 little bits of news. First, we're going to go over Steve Friends termination letter, which I think is incredibly telling. We're also going to play the offending clip that was listed as a threat. I'm going to show you that the the FBI actually broke the law.
And that means whether it was Patel or Bongino or somebody else, maybe maybe Ben Williamson in the FBI 7th floor, one of you broke the law and you violated the Federal Privacy Act in 1974, which does not allow you to share this information about a regular employees employment status. So I'm going to show you that because we've got the text messages from the New York Post to be able to just give you a little taste of what goes on there. You want to talk about politicization and
weaponization? I've got it and I've got it here in spades. So we'll do that one second after we talk about my friends at Patriot Supply. themypatriotsupply.com slash Kyle is the website. They're doing a Christmas special. You probably heard about it last week. If you listen to the program and you can give the gift of food security. It's the second thing behind maybe a weapon system that you might want is something that you can make sure that you can feed yourself calories to be able to
to run the weapon system. It's a buy one get 2 free Christmas special. You guys have to check it out all month long. If you buy one of their emergency food kits, they're going to give you 2 additional ones that you can give as a gift. And maybe that's a little nudge or maybe it's actually something that that just gets somebody on the right. So or maybe it just adds to a supply they've already got. These are going to be a four week emergency food kit that you
can keep for yourself. You can give it to someone you love to they throw in two one week kits, which could easily go into like a vehicle or they could go into a bug out bag or they could go to your your kid in college. You may need to be able to, you know, do an E&E and make it back home. The one week kits are perfect gifts for anybody on your list who is not right there on the
preparedness. Or maybe they're already there and they just want to add to it and they want to add it to a vehicle or something else that's transient. Put it in their work backpack. These days, it makes sense to have emergency food stored away. I have friends that got stuck on I-95. That's a thing on the on the East Coast. And they could be stuck in your in your car for, you know, a day or two.
Wouldn't it be nice if you didn't have to sit there and hope that you had some, you know, gummy bears or something or you had like a, an old candy bar? How about real food? That might be a thing. All right, you're going to get a unique and meaningful Christmas gift for your family. It's mypatriotsupply.com slash Kyle. Again, mypatriotsupply.com/kyle. This is a company we believe in here in the Seraphin House. We've got the 90 day kit sitting underneath my stairs.
It's ready to go and you can always add a little bit. This stuff will last for up to 25 years when it's stored properly, which just means kept out of direct sunlight. That's not a bad idea. This is a long lasting gift. I like to think of it as a food investment. All right, so we're going to do a little more on that, but check out them link in the show description as usual. All right. He rejected the claim that it was politicized. Should we give you a little
taste of what got my buddy? Let's just let's do this. Let's read the letter. Let's read the letter. Miranda Devine reported on it. Thank you, Miranda Devine, for continuing to be a friend to the suspendables. And here it is all right. Also counting on this one just just for funsies, because I'll, I'll scroll up and read it. This is Father VI. Don't know Father V, but Father V, let's open up his tab real quickly.
Is a Catholic priest. And he claims, and I don't have any reason to doubt him because he's a Catholic priest. And more importantly, it sounds like he he taught Steve friend at Notre Dame. He says Steve was on my staff at Notre Dame. I've known him as a man of the highest integrity. Oh, you don't have anybody putting those things out about Cash Patel. The people there are all about politics. So here you go, Hero, FBI whistleblower, real Steve
friend. Our frequent guest has been fired by FBI Director Cash Patel. And I can vouch for Steve's integrity. Remember, Miranda Devine was the person who broke his story. My story went out to Dan Bongino. His went out to Miranda. He's got a great relationship
with her. For many years she Steve has been pushed to the breaking point and after waiting out the Biden administration to receive justice, he was only slapped in the face, anonymously smeared, and then betrayed by Cash Patel and Dan Bongino. These are strong words. This is the reason why Bongino lost her when he stopped acting honorably and he referred to her as Deep State Divine the other day. This is like a bunch of like kind of BS drama. Except it's not.
It's not just a a personal spat or feud. This actually reflects the sort of character that that agency is being led by, which is low character. They should have reinstated him immediately like Scott Besson did with Gary Shapley and Joe Ziegler. Remember, there is a precedent for them doing better in this administration. It's not every single department that is failing, but this one, the DOJ certainly does.
And the only person we know that's gotten back into the job is my buddy Gerardo Boyle. He's doing the job, but he hasn't gotten his back pay. They haven't gotten his leave right. As far as I know, they still have him on the wrong insurance. They did everything they could to screw with this guy. They gave him the wrong pay grade when he came back. And so Steve was never reinstated, not in any meaningful way. I'm going to read you the the letter, which we're going to do
almost in its entirety. This came from the Jacksonville field office. It's signed by Director Cash Patel. This is pretty personal. This is another one of these personally. You're now going to find yourself on the list having to explain what happened. He's going to have to go because there's obviously going to be a lawsuit about this.
Dear Mr. Friend, this document provides official notice that you're being summarily dismissed from your position at the FBI and removed from federal service under my authority as the FBI director, effective immediately. The problem is, you'd have to actually probably show that he was in fact reinstated to the FBI, which is obviously not the case. He had no security clearance. He had no background check on file. He had no independent access to the buildings. He had no access to the computer
systems. He had no chain of command when he was speaking to me. They were randomly paying him small amounts of money which are not enough for his paycheck which we looked into. This is such a you guys are calling it petulant and vindictive juvenile behavior in the chat. That is exactly it. This is a small man doing stupidly small things. You've demonstrated unprofessional conduct and poor
judgment. Specifically after being reinstated September 2025. This is what it's going to hinge on because he was never reinstated September of 2025. Just because you signed the letter and you're in material breach of it doesn't mean you did it. I think it's kind of ironic and I as I read this, I had this moment last night. Steve Friends spent a huge chunk of his FBI career working on Indian reservations.
And isn't it funny that a guy who tried to bring Justice to an Indian Reservation, which is not a place where justice lives, had the exact same experience signing a treaty with the United States government as a lot of the Indian tribes did? That they just went back on their word and they just said we're stronger and we're going to do whatever the hell we want. They are not honorable people that signed this agreement.
On August 26th, you entered into a settlement with the Department of Justice. On September 21, 2025, you were reinstated in a paid duty status as an FBI special agent. Nobody knows about this, by the way. He got no update, no contact, no saying, here's your access to the administrative policies. Here's what we signed on.
Have you ever been to a job where somebody hired you on but didn't tell you to come to work, didn't tell you what you were going to do, who you reported to, what the the pay was going to be, give you access to a leave and earning statement, give you a paycheck with any sort of background, they just randomly start putting money into your account. They could have done this the right way. They chose not to and it was it was on purpose.
And if a a an agency that has 38,000 people, many of whom are in the support support employee, what they call professional staff. If you couldn't get your HR people to figure out how to get one guy rehired and put back into the job. If you couldn't figure that out, then you should probably be disbanded for the incompetence
of that. It's one thing I would bet you that they spent more money trying to figure out how to screw over and what back pay they could sort of peddle on with oh Boyle and and Steve friend. Then they actually would have to pay these guys. I bet you there are 6 figure salaries locked up and they are constantly trying to tweak this to screw it over rather than just rounding up and being like we owe you this much money. It's just the salary for this number of years.
It would have cost nothing to do that. They could have just said three years times the following salaries, whatever. Nope. And they still didn't pay these guys. They're over three months in arrears now, coming up on like four months. How do you fire somebody that's never actually been reinstated just because you claim it is not so? And I'm sure that the lawsuit is going to actually go ahead and expose this.
In October 2025, you participated in a public dissemination of media sources regarding FBI open investigations of two pipe bombs. These were open source discussions, guys. We have no special information regarding the pipe bomb. They put it out. We went over their exact words. You appeared on a podcast with members of the media. That's yours truly right here. You offered commentary on ongoing FBI investigation from a position of presumed credibility
as an FBI special agent. Those of you who want to hear, go back and check the tapes. Hobbyist podcaster, definitely not representing any federal government employee because he was not actually paid by the FBI at that time. Not for being a special agent, that's for damn sure. Do you know how I know? Because I was. Special agents have badges, guns, they have authorities, they have responsibilities. They have a background check. They've got a boss who's a supervisor, a supervisory
special agent. This is all silliness. In November, you were reminded of your obligations and requirements as an FBI employee. However, you made additional comments regarding the ongoing pipe bomb investigation, including that the FBI was deliberately withholding evidence. Well, that's obviously true because we've seen that you said that you use the same exact stuff that you've had for five years despite hold on and discussed the alleged suspect or subject on your podcast.
Well, it's not his podcast, it's mine. Shame on you, Cash, despite the lack of credible, verifiable evidence necessary to publicly identify the subject. So we have gone and crapped all over their bad job and that was offensive. That's not really what it came from. It says after being reinstated, you continuously appeared regularly on podcast with members of the media discussing FBI matters and ongoing in FBI
investigations. You did not seek nor did you receive authorization to engage with the media regarding FBI matters on December the 5th. Here's where it gets down. You appeared on a podcast devoted to analysis of the FBI's recent arrest of the pipe bomb suspect and you stated that the FBI was engaged in a put up job. You said if the FBI was engaged in a put up job. I'm going to just, I'm going to say it because the word if is so important right here.
You stated if that's a hypothetical people, the FBI was engaged in a put up job with respect to the subject, then do you know what an FN statement is? It's a conditional statement. It means that it's not something we know is true. But if one then the other, yes, it's a logic. It's a logic construction. May God have mercy on your soul. I'm going to end with this. I'm going to bring out my Amber Commodus and then so on and so forth. I'm going to play it.
This is a conditional statement. This is not a threat. It's not even close to a threat. And by the way, the threat is, is that if God were to make me the person in charge of justice, I would make sure that you were not hung for doing this evil thing. If you did it, I would make sure that you were in prison for life. That's what he actually says. Should we play it for you? I feel like we should feel like that's a reasonable place to go.
Let's play the thing that got Steve friend fired from the FBI. It would be wrong otherwise and I captioned it. So for those of you that are listening for the FB is 7th floor. You're going to want to RIP this part of the video. I captioned it for you so that you can see the word if appear multiple times as a as a conditional you fools, you're going to have another lawsuit. You just fired the Neil team six guys. They sued you. You fired Palmer. He could fire. He could sue you.
He was the guy that was over at SURG. You fired the five guys, one who was flying a jet, another one who was involved in the Arctic Frost and or the the Jack Smith investigations and three executives, Fools all of you. They're all going to sue and win. They all have this. They all have the law on their side. So you are now operating in a political, lawless, weaponized fashion. Just shame on you. This is about 90 seconds.
Now if there are people back there who are Marilyn Milky style at the FBI worried about what our foreign adversaries might think if it came to light that the FBI was actually involved in a rice dog fire modern day and they had to cover it up. And I don't care what the justification is or worried Maryland Milky style. Maybe this guy was a this Cole character was an entrapment playbook person who you already had on the hook. And what does it matter what sort of case we put him in, this
one or the other? Maybe he's a Chester the Molester pedophile who you've got on a kiddie porn case and you said, hey, why don't you just plead guilty to this one because the time will go easier for you in prison as a WMD guy rather than a pedophile. Or maybe you're in a position of executive leadership and you're just so damn thirsty to get a win for dad so that the the president will be proud of you finally and your fans will return and and have devotion to
you. Whatever the motivation is. If you were doing another put up job on this guy, I think we spelled out a pretty compelling case that this probably ain't the guy. Then May God have mercy on your soul. And I'm going to end with this. I'm going to bring out my inner Commodus. You better pray to Gaia or Vishnu or whatever your maker is. That real Steve friend is never in a position to be an instrument of God's wrath. Because I will be merciful, I won't give you a trial and a
hanging. I'll allow you to breathe every breath that your body will have for the rest of its natural life inside. That's a hell of a threat, people. First of all, if God were to put me in a position where I get to judge and you did this thing that we think you may have done, you put somebody up to a, you know, you arrested somebody that you don't have the evidence to back. If God ever puts me in a position and if you did the thing that is bad, then I will
be merciful. That's a hell of a threat. Shocking threat is what Conservative Tree House called it and Dinesh D'souza put it out a shocking threat. I mean, it is shocking that somebody would see such a grand injustice that a member of our law enforcement community, particularly what they what who would describe himself as the top law enforcement officer in the country behind Pam Bondi,
that guy. The shocking threat would be that if you did this, if you were so thirsty for a win, And I think we think that that's true here at this podcast. I do. How do I think that I can just look at what Donald Trump tweeted out and how he had to go and take it back. You're so thirsty for a win. You're so quick to say we did an awesome job, but we got the guy
when you haven't gotten the guy. You didn't get it with Charlie Kirk. You didn't get it at Brown and I don't think you got it on the pipe bomber. I think you keep screwing up and you're so desperate. They know it. I think the Bureau knows it. I think they see that you are so desperate that whatever you, whatever lifeline they throw you, you're going to pick it up
at every single time. It's like watching Wile E Coyote and the Roadrunner. The Roadrunner leaves you and out and you run right into the freaking tunnel that's actually just a mural. The Roadrunner leaves you. This it's just a bomb that's going to blow up in your face. The Roadrunner gives you a rope, but the ropes tied to nothing and you fall down the hole. It's just stupid and sad to
watch. But Steve Friend's point was if God puts him into a position, and if you did this thing, then you should live the rest of your natural life in a prison because that's what he would do. He would have you breathe every single breath without being hung. Dang, that's a hell of a threat, people. That's a hell of a thing to say. So that can't be that can't be allowed. It's not tolerable. I'm going to pin that to the to the Twitter feed.
So those you follow me on next, you can find it over there. That cannot be allowed. And so let's do this. This came in on Friday night. Steve Friend technically allegedly was a employee that was hired on a Monday and fired on a Friday, except they screwed it up like they screwed up the
other thing. They didn't get the gunman and they didn't get Steve Friend fired when you were supposed to because he was out of town because his boss told him his boss that said you don't have a gun, you don't have a badge, you don't have a credit card, you don't have any authorities. Here's a badge. You don't have any reason to be in this job. So why don't you just take leave? We're not going to allow you to
have admin leave. We're just going to have this fake thing where we tell you to come to work, but there's no job and you can't actually even go in the building on your own. So just don't come in the building want you to take leave, which I, I think it's going to be also really problematic. How can you say that you have been approved for this job that you're not approved for? And so he was out of town on Friday and he got this message from the New York Post.
More on that in one second. Hello, Steve. I just sent you this on X, but I want to make sure that you received it. Oh, really? This came in at about 6:30 Eastern.
Steve had gotten contacted by his his chain of command out in Jacksonville at about 5530. So an hour after they thought that they had gotten him out, a reporter reaches out from the New York Post. She says, I'm a reporter with the New York Post. And I saw Kyle Seraphin's tweet earlier about your attorneys dismissing you, right? He got fired by the attorneys first. Empower Oversight is part of this. It's my belief, Kyle Serfon's opinion, so nobody thinks that
I'm stating fact. I believe that Jason Foster, Tristan Levitt, and Empower Oversight conspired with the very agency that they were supposedly fighting to get Steve Friends made whole. And they conspired with this agency to allow this to go down. Because now the FBI knows you're in the open. You're not unrepresented. So now you're going to be easy. She said I'm writing a piece about them firing you. That's odd.
The the attorneys firing you following the wrath of God comments you made on Kyle Seraphim's podcast that were apparently about FBI Director Cash Patel. Couple problems with this. Do we think this woman, whatever her name is, Caitlin something or other? I'll look her up in a second here. I've got a picture over here. Hold on. You want to know who she is? She's this lady. Oh, that's her sitting with Vladimir Zelensky, the the president of Ukraine. She was super proud of that.
Do we think that this woman is a regular watcher of the Kyle Seraphim show? It's possible. Smart, smart people do watch the show. People who want to know what's going on inside the FBI, they do watch the show. So it's not totally outside the realm of possibility that she saw this. Or is it more likely that it was fed to her by the FBI director, who's also still so thirsty for a win and thought that this was going to be that this was going to be his dunk?
Her name is Caitlin Dornbral Dornbos. Dornbro. Sorry, I'm just going to put her silly face up here. There you are, Hun. We see you. This is a weird picture too. We should agree on that. There she is. All right. So what does she go on to say? You said something about wrath of God again. The wrath of God was that if if in in a position, Steve friend would let them live forever and as long as they could so that they could think about the the what they did wrong.
Kind of like a dad might do for a kid. Go sit in your room and think about what you did. Right. All right, I have reporting that suggests your comments may have been have put your employment with the FBI in jeopardy. Oh, do you really? Who gave you comments about the his employment being in jeopardy? Would it be the same guy, Cash Patel, who actually ended up firing him and signing that letter? Would that be the person I bet. I'm wondering if you'd like to respond.
Well, of course, Steve Friend, if he is in fact an FBI employee, that's a double edged sword there too. We're going to make some salacious allegations about it. And you've been working in the media for a while now, but now you've been called back into duty even though you don't have actual the ability to do those duties. So would you like to talk to the media and violate the policy again? She said.
I also have reporting that you secretly filmed FBI agents who came to counsel you after you initially refused to participate in the overzealous SWAT raids related to January 6th, which presented a security threat and broke Florida law. The two party consent. Would you care to respond to this allegation as well? Thank you. Listen you freaking whore. This like this is a horrish thing to do. This is a selling out for access. There's no other way to say this. Shame on you.
This is not journalism. This is disgusting and he wrote a whole freaking book about it. Lady, I'm so disgusted by the guys that work at the Bureau and the coordination in this little hit job done by these people. You're trying to set him up for what? Something he wrote a whole book about that cash Patel celebrated as heroic. Disgusting. Why don't you go hang out with tin pod dictators like this guy? That'd be way better. I rarely let the emotion part of it get the better part of me.
But I look at this face and I I despise you. I despise everything about access based journalism. There's no moral here. There's no, there's nothing good or just about what you're doing. Imagine spending your time going to journalism school, what they call J School, and then you turn around and you get a master's degree from the University of Texas at El Paso in like security studies just to be fed slop by a thirsty, pathetic FBI director who can't even get
simple things right. Like we got the right guy in custody. I just saw my phone just went off. Patel just tweeted out that they just got that they disrupted another terrorist threat. When in doubt, run to the playbook, guys.
Well, since we're talking about terrorist threats and we're talking about these scumbags here doing this stuff, let's talk about something that I think is actually warrant some more scrutiny because one of the things we pointed out is the amount of money that Patel has from places for reasons that we can't understand. And then those people seem to
get access to this guy. The director, we mentioned that he got money from a company called Xian that's held through a holding company in the Cayman Islands. This was brought up in his his Senate confirmation hearing. This was brought up at multiple times by Wired magazine and others trying to say, what is it that this guy knows about a Chinese e-commerce giant that they want to give him up to $5,000,000 worth of stock for and that he doesn't have to divest. Why is it?
Well, here's the other part of it. The FBI director signed a security deal with Qatar, which he used to lobby for. Does that seem like a conflict of interest to you? I don't know why Qatar keeps popping up in this administration, but there's clearly some connection there. We know that that Bondi was involved with Qatar. They had a deal through Ballard Partners, which is where Susie Wiles was a managing partner in
the Jacksonville office. The FBI directors November 2024 pledged to recuse himself from business. Dealings with Qatar expired last month. And then in less than 30 days he went out there and signed a deal, a memorandum of understanding with Qatar. We still don't know what he did for Qatar when he worked there on their behalf and he did not register himself as a as a foreign register. You know, a foreign agent. No fair. How about that?
Are you guys getting the, the hint that this guy when you start hearing people like Alex Jones going out and claiming that these guys are are compromised. We don't know what he did or how much money the FBI was, was paid. I'm sorry, the, the now director, the, the, the, the, the future FBI director was paid
at the time. And I'm just going to tell you, if you guys don't understand how long games work in Intel circles, there are a few things that are always important #1 if you ever had a security clearance, you're always of interest to certain enemies. The Chinese would be happy to pay someone like me for my previous interest and my previous knowledge working the Chinese threat. Even if it's old Intel, they still would like it because it
might. It might solidify some of the information that they think they have. It might actually substantiate some of the reporting they got. They don't care if you have a current active security clearance or a former security clearance. It's all good and they're willing to pay for access. And maybe you had it, maybe you'll maybe they think you will have it. This is pennies on the dollar for long game type stuff. And so let's just be real
serious about that. It's really important to people understand that you don't have to be in a position of power. They're willing to hedge some bets. Have you guys ever seen people make a, you know, they make a proposition kind of gamble, They'll put money down on someone because that person may be in office. How many major donors backed Kamala Harris's campaign not knowing if she was going to be president but hoping she might? And if and if she was, well, you can always look back.
I, I supported you way back then, right? It, it goes on both sides. This is not like just one person
or another person. In a curious twist, during his confirmation process, Cash Patel failed to disclose significant personal financial information until after the Senate hearing in January, when his nomination on his on his nomination to become FBI Director. Consequently, one peculiar item listed on his financial disclosure received no attention during that hearing, Patel's work as a consultant for the Embassy of Qatar. And on this document, Patel did
not specify what he did for Qatar or how much he was paid. And even now, when was this written? This was written, I think in, in May of this year, after he was FBI director. Even now, three months after he took the helm of the nation's top law enforcement agency, the details of his Qatari connection remain a mystery. Flash forward a few months, signed security deal with Qatar. We don't know what it means because we don't even know what he did. Mother Jones contacted the FBI.
They texted Kash Patel. They asked if he would reveal what services he provided. He did not respond. Neither did the FBI. And then here you go. It's just one of several Trump administration aides who have financial ties to this Arab monarchy. You've got Susie Wiles, who's the chief of staff working for the lobbying firm Ballard Partner that represented Qatar. The attorney general lobbied for the Qataris.
Mike Huckabee, ambassador to Israel, paid $50,000 in 2018 to visit Qatar. That's a lot of money for a visit. Steve Witkoff's special envoy to the Middle East also pocketed money from Qatar. In 2023, Qatari's sovereign wealth fund bought a Park Lane hotel from Witkoff's company for $623 million. And the Trump Organization itself recently struck a deal for a luxury golf course and resort in Qatar. And now Qatar is considering handing a gift of the jumbo
airliner. This is during the airliner thing, $400 million jet that would be used as Air Force One. It's a 747 that would be updated and then transferred to the presidential library when he leaves, right? These are real serious questions. This may be a left-leaning source, Mother Jones, but the question of what is going on here and why they're involved in this, What did you buy? What did they pay him for?
The claim is is that here it is. The Atlantic reported that Patel claimed he worked as a security consultant.
No idea what his expertise is on that for Qatar during the 2022 FIFA World Cup games in Doha. But in February, as experts were questioning whether or not his consulting would have required him to register as a Justice Department for an agent under Farrah, the right wing Federalist reported a source close to Cash Patel's confirmation told The Federalist. That's Sean Davis and Co who took to social media this weekend to slam Steve Friend and I claiming some things that are clearly false.
The Federalist said his work for Qatar was limited to securing the 2022 FIFA World Cup and other security measures, not the kind of representation that would require Farrah. But Patel himself has not given this World Cup explanation. He said nothing publicly about it. He's kept his mouth shut on it. And the weird thing is, is that it seems like the money actually continued on after the World Cup. Moreover, his paperwork states he was working for Qatar until November of 2024.
So if you were trying to secure and do security for a 2022 soccer event, what does that have to do and why would you continue getting paid for another two years later? These are totally reasonable questions that should be asked by everybody and I've shared them with some of the left-leaning media sources and I hope that other people will as well. That's two years past the World Cup. He was providing security
services. I'm just reading again at that point for an event that had long since concluded. Also, his financial disclosure form indicate he was paid by the Qatari Embassy in the United States, not the Qatari Sports Committee which would have been the ones involved in this. So when you hear people ask whether or not Cash Patel was compromised and some of us start thinking that he is and you start looking at his petty, tyrannical type things.
Does he think he's like these guys, that he's just a king of a crappy little country? There he is handing over a Tommy gun, the classic FBI G man weapon. I don't own one of those. I don't really have a lot of interest in the in the Tommy gun. What are what are we doing here? Why are you posing with the Qatari monarchs? Why are you flying to Chinese and saying that you negotiated deals that stopped fentanyl? Does that mean the fentanyl deaths have stopped in this
country? So here's where it comes down to the question. And you could even have, I don't know, like a whole movie about this, maybe a cartoon series. Who watches the watchers? It was one of the the better, sort of like AI original, kind of like dark film noir type action figure ones, right? The Watchmen, you guys remember this, It's a question that we've always asked. How do you get somebody to look into the somebodies that do the investigations? Who investigates the government
for wrongdoing? More government? I don't know what the answer is. If it is more government, it should be government that's not accountable to the central government. We just found out that the MSPB, the Merit Service Protection Board, which theoretically if you got fired from an FBI like I went to to MSPB, if you go there, by the way, in power oversights, President Tristan
Levitt used to be at MSPB. They side with the government who pays them 99% of the time, 1% of the time the appeals to MSPB are substantiated on behalf of the person that was what they believe is the victim, the plaintiff. The government is the defendant always wins. And that's something it's like OIG, the Office of Inspector Generals, that'll keep them accountable, right? Even though the OIG actually answers, like the Justice Department, OIG answers to the attorney general.
So when Kyle Serafin makes an allegation, puts out information that maybe Merrick Garland lied, Underoath, who investigates it, Merrick Garland's employees, how do you think that's going to go? It goes exactly the way you think it would. It does it every time. So we're dealing with supposedly the most transparent organization, the most transparent FBI in history. I guess we're going to find out.
There's the termination letter. It's signed right there by Kash Patel. You can see it on the screen. If you guys want to do it, you can find it on Miranda Divine's Twitter feed very easy. This stuff is out there. Should we do an exclusive? Should we tell you some stuff? Yeah, Let's do that. Let's go to my buddy Alex Jones here. Breaking exclusive. Breaking exclusive. Breaking exclusive. All right, here's the exclusive. It's my story. Nobody else can tell it. Not like I can.
We've sued the FBI again, Serafin Media, and which is just me, we've sued them over FOIA. My attorney has just let me know that this filed this morning. They're in violation of the Freedom of Information Act, just like they violated the Privacy Act of 1974 when they went out and leaked information to a journalist that they were not allowed to. Here's the statement of facts. Director Kashyap Patel has become the 9th director of the FBI on February 20th, 2025.
The director's girlfriend, Alexis Wilkins, has sued several individuals, including Mr. Seraphin, utilizing attorneys who are believed to be the director's personal attorneys. You guys know that we've talked about that. The Director has likewise acknowledged his relationship with Miss Wilkins publicly calling her his, quote, partner in life, D Cash Patel, and his personal statement that he made
on that day. On November 12th, 2025, the plaintiff submitted his FOIA to the FBI for the following record. This is what we asked for.
It's very simple. All records from February 20, 2025 and on from Director Patel's government accounts, including but not limited to his emails, his Signal, Telegram, Facebook X, formerly known as Twitter, or other government communication mediums referencing the following topics, Alexis Wilkins, Jason C Graves, Jared J Roberts, the Banal Law Group, PLLC, and yours truly Kyle Serafin. That's what we want and they ignored it, as they do the most transparent FBI in history, right?
Mr. Serafin specifically disclaimed the records from Director Patel's non government accounts and thus limited his FOIA request to records located on the government's governmental accounts. We're not looking for personal stuff here. We're looking for the government stuff and comms. So the lawsuit has been filed and now we'll see, and we'll see that they do nothing about it because this is not a transparent organization. This is a group of people that are interested in their own
ends. And they've done exactly what we hope they would do the opposite of They've weaponized the government. They just turn the weaponization. They've just swung the Wrecking Ball in the other direction. I really wanted this guy to succeed. I really wanted him to not do what he's doing right now. So I guess that we'll leave it to the court. Shocking. But these things don't often return to anything. And the FBI will almost always find one of the exceptions to
hide behind. But let you let you be a, a witness to this. We've asked them for something. They didn't return it. And then when we turn around and we find out that they didn't they, they have excuses for everything. You just don't let him get away with saying that we're the most transparent FBI in history because these are clearly personal things and we have to spend money, cost money to go to to court. It's a couple $100 to do a filing fee.
And then whatever the attorney, my attorney tends to volunteer is time for this. And then he has to sue the government first time later when they give us nothing, which they will like the odds of this is basically, I'll just go on record right now and tell you I don't think they're going to give us anything. But what they have given us is this ongoing ridiculous embarrassment. And Donald Trump shouldn't stand for it any longer.
If you're a member of the FBI that is setting up cash Patel to to look ridiculous, you're doing the wrong thing. But it is amusing to watch from the outside. So let me just say, I see you. I understand. I don't think it's good. I think that we should try to catch bad guys, think we should go out there and run them down. And I don't know that somebody at cast would would do that.
But I do think there are people in the management that would be more than happy to see them leave, especially the Essers. We got people that are sitting in the wings right now ready to just step right in and take up that rein and take that FBI back to where it belongs. The nonpartisan, Trump hating, conservative destroying, radical Catholic investigating organization that it always wants to be right. How dare you come in and fire people? How dare you come in and be an idiot?
And that actually is probably worthwhile cash Patel has done the one thing that you can't do in the FBI. You know what that is? You can't embarrass the FBII think he's done it. I think that's the cardinal sin. I'm going to go on record with that as well. I think Patel has finally found himself doing the thing that you're not allowed to do in the Bureau. And it doesn't matter if you are AGS 13 brick agent or you are the director. You embarrassed the FBII think
you're out. So I expect that's what's going to happen next. Can we do something that's kind of fun? I've got a whole bunch of other clips here. I've got a bunch more about gun control that I actually thought about covering down on, but I'm not sure I even want to do it because this this in and of itself is enough for today. I think I'll give you where we're going to go and why I think that the we're not going
to see any kind of progress. This is a woman who's talking about what you have to do. Both sides are truly ineffective and they are both basically saying that you're too dumb to understand. We're going to feed you slop and it doesn't matter whether the slop is on the left or the right. Here's the leftist slop. Just so you guys know about where the gun control piece is and and we'll do more on that maybe tomorrow.
Talk broad themes. You have to boil it down to nuts and bolts, and you have to be pithy. What do I mean by pithy? How about this? Republicans want to kill your kids. It's actually true. If you're going to oppose vaccinations, if you're going to stop breakthrough medical research, if you're going to allow minors and all sorts of people to get semi automatic weapons which they use to shoot up schools, well then you are responsible for kids health and
death. Unfortunately, it has to be that simple and that direct, and it has to be over and over and over again. I'm going to say that if you're pretty cool with killing off babies in the womb and you don't care whether a human being gets a chance to enter the world, then I don't really care what you think about vaccines or guns or anything else. I actually don't care about anything that you have to say because we don't have a value system that aligns. See how easy it is?
If you don't care about some innocent human lives, why would I care what you think about any other human lives? No, that's how I say it. Pithy. If you believe in baby murder, then your opinion is useless to me. That's what I have to say. That's my pithy comment. But again, they both kind of dumb it down. That's the left version of it. The right version of it is, is like, we got the guy, we're doing the greatest thing. We did everything.
They're all telling you that you're too dumb to see the evidence with your own eyes. God forbid you actually open up evaluated and say, man, this is like the third time that you've had a really sketchy lie. Oh, this is the second time you've done a swing and a miss. How many times can you with and still be a professional baseball player? If you went up in your first couple at bats and all you did was swing and not hit, they brought you up from the from the
minor leagues. And that's pretty accurate for Patel brought him up from the minor leagues. They put you in the game, You went up there full count. You're a pinch hitter swinging a miss strikeout. They put you up again in a pinch spot because you're the you're the clutch hitter swinging a miss. He's got 2 now. Big ones, prominent ones. We'll see where they find this thing.
They both think you're too dumb. This is why the position of here is that, like, one, we don't like any political party. And more importantly, like I'm really, really, really interested in making sure that I insulate myself against stupidity on either side of the aisle. So make sure you guys like the video. If you guys are watching, and I appreciate you guys doing it. This is the best place to go. These are the places you can
catch the video. It's going to be on Rumble, it's going to be on X, it's going to be on YouTube, but it's also going to be over on Spotify for the replay. And if you're having any issues with the feed ever, if you don't join us for the live show, consider watching us on Spotify, which is at kyleseraphinshow.com. You can download that, you can send it off to a friend. There's comments sections there just like you'd find on any other sort of video platform. We can interact there and I do
see some funny stuff. So I appreciate you guys mixing it up there. If you want to support the program and what we're doing, if you guys want to be part of the the team that's that's making these legal cases possible, that's where you go to kyleseraphin.com on locals. But regardless, make sure you are subscribed to our channel. We are going to get to 20,000 probably in the early part of next year. Organically, slowly, just one at a time. People who say, hey, you know,
that's a different perspective. I'm interested in hearing somebody who doesn't try to just cheerlead for a team. Our team is truth, regardless of who that offends. So if this is common sense, if this even irritated you and you didn't agree with it, guess what? I don't mind you disagreeing. I think that we should all come to our own conclusions. Let's evaluate what we can see for evidence. You guys heard a guy saying a bunch of conditional statements and he got fired for quote UN
quote threats. And the threat was, I want to keep you alive so you can experience God's wrath later. Take it, take it how you like. Thanks for being part of the program. Make sure that you have signed up on there and let's do a like a pallet cleanse of some kind. Let's do something funny. It's the holiday season.
We used to be a proper country where you could have a joke, particularly a racial joke, and it didn't offend everybody around you that you might have friends who have different color skin and you'd look at each other and say funny things about that skin based on ethnic stereotypes. It happens in fire houses. It happens in team rooms in the military. It happens on the parade grounds while people are waiting as the CEO is passing and doing inspection. It used to happen in all kinds
of regular places. It used to happen in hospital rooms. It used to happen with ER nurses and so on. Men and women could joke about things because it wasn't the most serious thing in the world to call out skin color because we had moved on from it. We had all kinds of fun racial jokes. Here's people who understand the mission, getting a kick out of things that are just like they're fun. That's what stereotypes are about.
If we can laugh about it, then it takes the power away from the evil part of it. Or you could do what the left doesn't cry about. Anyway, here's a little Christmas Jamal Claus clip. I got a black friend. What? What the fuck is that? Santa. He's black though. Yeah, it's a black Santa on the festive. What does he do to steal shit? Bro what? You leave him out chicken and in Kool-aid instead of milk and cookies. Do you know how racist that sounds? Oh, what do you even call this
dude? We call him Jamal Claus. Yeah, figured tags just don't want it. 2 definitely stole that shit. I. Heard that these guys did a skit because it's funny. It's Christmas, go out there and have some fun with your friends. I hope you guys are getting family out there. I hope you take a little bit less seriously as well. And God bless you. Look forward to doing a full week on some of the stupidity that's going on. We have no other choice, but we are going to laugh about it.
We're going to laugh about it, even in a irreverent way, because otherwise we can't connect. We're going to just cry and there's no solution, obviously. We're just all observing this chaos as we slide down the hill. So look forward to seeing you guys again later on this week. Share the show, talk to you then. Thanks for listening to the Kyle Seraphin show, streamed live weekdays on rumble.com/kyle Seraphin. Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth Social and Instagram at Kyle Seraphin.