OVERWHELMING: The Hits Keep on Coming | Ep 498 - podcast episode cover

OVERWHELMING: The Hits Keep on Coming | Ep 498

Feb 24, 20251 hr 12 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

Join the Kyle Seraphin Show LIVE 9:30a ET on Rumble, or

find me on Spotify for ad-free video: https://KyleSeraphinShow.com

__________________________________________________

Our Sponsors make this program possible:

https://PatriotMobile.com/KSS (Get one month FREE using Promo KSS)


https://PatriotCoolers.com/collections/kyle-seraphin (Tumblers & Coolers) 10%


Transcript

Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an American patriot. Prepare to embrace the uncomfortable truth because this program has no time for comforting lies. Here is civil liberties enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello my friends, welcome to the Kyle Seraphin show. Today is Monday. It is February the 24th and yeah, I cannot believe that's still February. This has been the craziest year.

We've only had Donald Trump in office for a month and I feel like we are just running non-stop. We have zero, yes, zero time to breathe. OK, so we're not the only ones who feel like that. This rush news cycle. Today's thumbnail for those of you who are listening, and if you didn't get to see it, and that's certainly reasonable if you're listening over on Apple, if you're listening on Spotify, iHeartRadio, and so on.

Thanks for listening over there. Let me just say shamelessly, you can follow us on rumble.com/kyle Serafin if you want to see the thumbnails. You can follow us on X. You can see it in various other places. You can see us on locals. But the thumbnail was a guy in the red and a guy in blue in a boxing arena getting punched into the corner. And that was the image that I

had as I woke up this morning. As I just consider, you know, we talk about the laser pointer and the fact that people are are chasing a dot on the ground and they're not chasing the actual hand that is moving the laser pointer. For most of the time in the last, I don't know, 10 years that I've been paying attention to what the media does. They're constantly jumping from topic to topic.

And people are outraged about this and about that, but they're not paying attention to the fundamental issues right now. The best analogy is an opposing boxer getting squared into the corner and he doesn't even have time to hit the mat and get knocked out. Right now we are seeing Republicans or conservatives or both throwing so many punches, this flurry of lefts and rights and and just piercing this guy up so badly that that he can't even fall to the ground and hit

the mat and get counted out. We're working towards technical knockout because it's so overwhelming. There's so many blows coming from so many ends. We were just getting people all riled up about Cash Patel on Friday and then we get the bombshell drop that Dan Bongino is going to be the deputy director. And now, now that's flooding over all across the new season. I want to just hit all the high points here.

I will get to my thoughts on the challenges that are going to be facing Cash and Dan very, very shortly. That'll be probably the last thing we we end up here. But what I keep seeing overwhelmingly is this team that cannot get themselves into the game. Like I said, they're they're not even slipping punches now. They're just getting hit. And the things that are slipping out are funnier and funnier. We're going to lead off with

some government stuff. Basically, we're living in a sketch comedy routine when it comes to the defense of government. And hopefully it ends up in some sort of like comedic way, which is that we resolve with something that is better than we started. OK, so that's where we're going to go with today's show. It's going to be a big one of lots of different information. I've got a bunch of clips lined up and I think you guys will get a kick out of it. Before we get started, let's go

ahead and say thanks to sponsor. In this case, we're going to sponsor the same sponsor that was sponsoring our Sunday sit down, which we did with Joe Biggs. I'm just thinking like that was, that was actually pretty painful. If you guys didn't watch that show, I, I encourage you to check it out. Same sponsor for today. That's going to lead us off It's Patriot Mobile. You guys can go to patriotmobile.com and they have a different promo code.

It's slash KSS, KSS. Just because the elections won, the fight to restore the nation has only begun. I think you guys are seeing that a lot of these hits are part of that. It's time to take a stand now and you can take a stand with Patriot Mobile as they lead the charge as America's only Christian conservative wireless provider. They offer a way to vote with your wallet. Now that you voted with your with your actual ballot, you don't have to compromise on

quality or convenience. It's not just about cell phone service. It's a call to action to defend your rights and your freedom. And it's an opportunity to spend money with a company that actually agrees on the things that you do. First Amendment, Second Amendment, supporting veterans, supporting first responders, the sanctity of life, things like this.

If you want to vote with your wallet, if you want to get great nationwide coverage, if you still have any other wireless provider, you can get wireless coverage with Patriot Mobile. They operate on all three major networks. If you have cell phone service in the United States today, you can get it with Patriot Mobile. They have a coverage guarantee. They also have US based tech support which is worth looking into. It's really easy to do.

You can keep your phone number, you can keep your phone, you can upgrade either or both. Maybe you got pesky people bugging you again. That 100% US based customer support team is accessible. If you want to call them, it's 972 Patriot. Otherwise, go to patriotmobile.com/KSS. patriotmobile.com/KSS and what are you going to get? You're going to get a free month of service with our promo code. Again, KSS. They're the only one that's different.

It is in the show description. Let's go ahead and dive into today's program. All right. And I do think that the left right now is upside down like they just can't keep track of this.

The flurry of punches that keep coming in, it's non-stop and it's left them in a position where they're defending things that if they had any moment to sit and think they're they're reactionary right now in a way that doesn't make any sense to me. Because if I recall, didn't the left used to hate sort of the military industrial complex? Weren't they the anti war people? Didn't they think that the intelligence communities were

all evil? Didn't they care about liberties and they were afraid that the Intel people and the CIA were spying on the gays and doing like didn't wasn't this like a leftist thing to jump into? Isn't that where they spent their time? They were completely fascinated with liberty, which is a good thing, I think. And they were doing so for like the most fringe group of people that probably mattered the least amount as far as like by

percentage of the population. I don't I don't know how you end up with this headline. There's a couple of really funny ones from CNN. I've I've gone back to the well, so bear with me here. This one is maybe one of my favorites. OK, You're seeing a picture of Langley, the the CIA headquarter building in Virginia. And the article was entitled How Trump's government cost cutting moves risks exposing the CI as secrets. I just have to take a second people that are riding for the

left. And by the way, they had to get 4, count them 12342 men and two women to write this weak article. And their defensive move is that Donald Trump might expose the CIA secrets. Isn't that what we wanted? Did we actually did? People just go like, hey, shouldn't our government be accountable to the people? Shouldn't it be transparent to us? Shouldn't it just tell us what's going on? Now they're crying about government cost cutting, cutting into the CIA's ability to hide

things from people. The CIA conducted its first formal review to assess any potential damage from an unclassified e-mail sent to the White House in early February identifying people for possible layoffs with some officers by first name and last name. And it could have exposed the roles, could have no evidence it did, of the roles of people working undercover, said a source familiar with the matter. How many times have we seen the source familiar with the matter?

That won't go on record. I can pretty much guarantee you because the intelligence community, also known as the IC, that the CIA sits in, the FBI is a piece of it. Other parts are as well, DIA and so on, NSA, they have really, really specific rules about talking to the media. And you know that the Trump administration didn't authorize this. So this would be considered a leak. This would be considered

problematic. You decided to go out there and share information that's not validated simply to what? Take a punch at the at the the executive office? Isn't that why Donald Trump was elected? Was he not elected? For two things. One, we believe that there is this horrifically bad waste that exists, and the other one is that the force and fraud that the federal government is supposed to be protecting us from is actually being perpetrated by the federal

government. The concept of sources familiar with the matter, the UN, the the unnamed sources, they've lost all their credibility. And that's why we're going to go into a couple of other things. People like the view, people like Joy Reid who lost her job, which is so traumatic. This is going to be her last week on the air. She's not going to be able to culturally appropriate Donald

Trump's haircut anymore. The entire purpose of our federal government, at the at the broadest level, should be to stop the American taxpayer from experiencing force and fraud. Not that the force and fraud should be perpetrated by said government, and certainly not that it should be perpetrated and then hidden by groups in the intelligence community or law enforcement or otherwise. The government's secrets that they're talking about there again, CIA secrets.

The CIA doesn't actually get any secrets. The CIA functions underneath the executive branch, and this is something that seems lost on them right now. And so in their fervor to protect government workers, which is non-stop, it doesn't matter whether it's at the Justice Department. It doesn't matter whether it's at DoD, theoretically, organizations that the political left has been against for as long as I can recall.

I don't remember a single moment when you heard them championing the power of law enforcement or of the military or the people doing that. But suddenly now they want to go defend these people because they've taken over those institutions. It is possibly the strongest evidence to me of institutional capture that the people who are now defending said institutions have switched. That's my point. That's going to be the the

premise that I have. And all right, we're we're actually basically living in a sketch comedy. And I've got a funny clip from Elon Musk. This would almost be a palate cleanser for most days if you guys are not familiar with our program and the way that we do things. We get into all the heavy stuff and then we try to do a little bit of comedy at the end so that we can just kind of have our brains clear as we walk into the

world. Elon Musk is describing probably the most normal government interaction. If you are a private corporation, if you are a private citizen, everyone of you that has ever called the IRS and asked for information, if you've ever called a government agency and tried to get help, I get you guys emailing me all the time. It's like, OK, how do I get the FBI to pay attention to my case? And the answer is kind of like, you have to win the lottery.

You have to luck out. How do I get the agency to do the thing that the agency was established to do? It's very difficult. And so Elon Musk's story here, he's going to be talking about a, the study that he that his his space company was required to go into. It sounds hilariously silly, like it would be the premise of a Big Bang Theory or some kind of a sitcom that would go on prime time television. And yet that's the that's the sitcom we're all living in right now.

We're all watching comedy, except we're the victims of the joke. We're the we're the punchline. So it's not as funny. And maybe that's why we don't really have a lot of sympathy for these people to keep losing jobs, whether they're on the left media or whether inside the federal government. And I'll give you some examples of that in just a second. Let's start with that. Like I said, the sketch comedy that is our lives.

I guess like kind of funny this, you know, we have to do the SpaceX have to do the study to see if if Starship would would hit a shark. And I'm like, it's a big ocean, you know, there's a lot of sharks. It's not impossible, but it's very unlikely. We said, OK, fine, we'll, we'll, we'll do the analysis and then, well, can you give us the shark beta? They're like, no, we can't give you the shark data. Well, OK, well then we're in a bit of a quandary.

How do we solve this difficult this, this shock probability issue? And that's they said, well, well, we could give it to our Western division, but we don't trust them. I'm like, am I in a comedy sketch here? So eventually I think we, we, we, we got the data and, and we could, you know, run the analysis to say like, yeah, the sharks are going to be fine. But they wouldn't let us proceed with launch until we did this crazy shark data. And and then we thought, OK, now

we're done. They said, but what about whales? I'm like when you look at a picture of the Pacific, what percentage of the surface area of the Pacific do you see as whale? Because I see a look at a picture. I don't see any of you. This is like, you can't where's the whale? And and honestly, if the ship did hit a whale, it's like, honestly that whale had it coming because it's like the odds are so low. You know, it's like like Final Destination, the Whale edition.

He's actually really funny for a guy who's weird and socially awkward as he is. I wonder when you wrote that story down. That's crazy dumb, right? It doesn't make any bit of sense. It's completely upside down and it it's like it's majoring in the minors. The smallest and least feasible, the most the most minute portion of the population, the most like useless contact. If you had a, a, a spaceship that accidentally ran into a shark. So what it it, it's completely irrelevant.

The mission set is, is not there. And this government agency requiring that to go down, it's the same idea as focusing in on some of the things that we see the political left continue to do. And it's reason why they've been losing, right? So they set this up, they expose themselves, they wore themselves out on the smallest possibilities, the smallest fractions of the of the of the population that nobody cares, mostly because you just don't know enough of these people.

And if you did, it wouldn't even be enough for it to matter. And they've acted like there's a Holocaust coming. And so CNN is talking about this, that Donald Trump is a they're, they're not done by the way. They're not done with this nonsense. They can't walk away from it. So they're addicted to this losing they're and they're and they're doing something that

Greg Gutfeld said. They've basically tried to build up a foundation on what used to be the beams that upset regular people, calling them racist, calling them sexist, calling them fascist, referring to everybody as a bigot and nobody wants to be a bigot. And if you continue to do that and you abuse it, Like we all actually learn these stories when we were kids, did we not? How many?

How many people still teach their kids the story about the boy who cried wolf and what it's supposed to mean If you cry wolf enough times, if you worry about a spaceship potentially impacting a shark, which, by the way, has the ability to swim. And if you've ever tried to hit a shark with like, I don't know, a boat, which I may or may not have done when I used to spend some time out in the Gulf of America back in the day. It's actually not that easy. Sharks are really wildly

creatures. They're super smart. They've been around for millions of years. They're very unlikely to get landed on by a spaceship. I just it, it defies all of my experience with sharks, which is not, which is not none. I've caught several, punched one or two of them when they bit me too. Like you don't want to mess with sharks in the water. When you pull them out of the water, they're like snappy turds. OK, again, they're they're focused in majoring on the miners.

Watch this. This guy is saying that trans people are about to be deleted. First of all, how many of you actually deal with a real person like that? There's maybe one or two people that cross dress in my town. That's the only thing I can call them and nobody cares. Except it's like, I just don't want to go to that restaurant anymore where you're going to have a dude in his late 60s dressed up like a lady with garish makeup on.

It's just awkward and weird. It'd be the same thing if I showed up and you had a waiter that was wearing blackface. I just would be like, I don't think I'm going to take my kids here. I'm going to change my mind. This is a former NFL player and he got, he got debuted as an expert on CNN because he was a, he had a major in political science and history. Did he even finish his degree? It's not even clear to me. This is so silly.

Again, majoring in minors, things that don't matter, not the purpose of our federal government, certainly not Donald Trump's problem. I believe we're on the path that Nazi Germany went down under Hitler. And I say that as a political science and history major, as someone who has studied history, and the parallels are very, very clear. This administration is trying to erase trans people. This administration is trying to put obedience over duty to the country.

This administration is trying to thrust our country into turmoil in order to reap power for themselves. Bizarre claims, no evidence. This is the just trust me and bro consulting firm. I suppose he sounds kind of bro Y it's really hard to make that claim Meanwhile, and and by the way that that stopping and and moving the the goal posts there. This is kind of like the most classic version of projection.

Projection is the psychological concept where you see a fault in yourself and then you you describe it and ascribe it to another party, right? It's very common. It's when you know that The thing is wrong and you don't want to accept that you're the one doing it, so you blame

somebody else. I've Ilhan Omar, who is an immigrant who came to this country as a child, who basically was given the gift of everything because she's from Somalia. And rather than be grateful for this nation, she's now telling us that we can't even talk because we're too dumb, our speech is too stupid, and the people who disagree with her are idiots who need to be silenced. I'm just going to tell you that's not American. And again, if that's where you're going to spend your time,

you're going to keep losing. You're going to be in the corner taking punch after punch. You're going to get Cash Patel. You're going to get Pete Hagseth. You're going to get Pam Bondi. You're going to get Dan Bongino now. You're going to get everybody just smashing you in the face because you've let your guard down. You tired yourself out on the stupidest thing. You cannot claim that we're the right people making a moral argument.

And the best answer for it is everybody else has to be quiet and we should silence them because they're fascists. We need to silence the fascists, and that's why we have to be fascists. Here she is making the claim again. There's nothing funnier than someone claiming everybody is dumb and then doing exactly the thing that she thinks she's describing. These, these people are just idiots.

I, I really, you know, I'm, I'm at the point where it's become really hard to, to have an intellectual to paint with any of these people because the level of stupidity that they are displaying every single day is frankly embarrassing, not just in, in Congress, but as, as Americans. And the fact that these people are allowed to say just the, the most ridiculous things tells you that the, the dumbing of the United States has arrived. Because how else do we get a

Trump presidency again? That's that's Ilhan Omar on Medi Hassan's program. So a pro Hamas guy with a pro Hamas congressperson talking about how else could we get Donald Trump right? All those things. You guys are so dumb. You're so dumb that you probably would fall for a multi millionaire who is also a senator who might be one of the laziest people in America, a guy named Bernie Sanders. Bernie Sanders needs your money. OK, that's how dumb you are. You'd probably give money to

this guy, wouldn't you? Or wait, is that the other team? I am once again asking for your financial support. I don't have to tell anybody that we're living in dangerous and unprecedented times. We are fighting now against the oligarchs, Elon Musk and the others who are essentially running the government, richest people in the world.

We're taking on Trump's movement toward authoritarianism, putting more and more power into his own hands, undermining the Congress, challenging the courts, not knowing what the Constitution is about. The Constitution is about because I just make it up as I go. There is Bernie Sanders. His net worth is how about it is over $3,000,000, between 2.5 and $5,000,000.

He needs your money coming before you again to ask for it so he can try to run some marketing is one of those real really classic democratic socialists. You know you can vote your money into his pocket. Bernie Sanders got six more years. He was re elected in 2024. How dumb are you when the guy who's walking around who has three homes and is worth, let's say an average of $3,000,000? I've seen a couple different estimates. Like I said, it's between 2 1/2

and five. How do you how do you sit there and listen to this guy? And he's like, yeah, I need your money. And like, where's your money? Put your money where your mouth is. You're old. You're in your, you're in your. He's 83 this year. Maybe he's 84. How much money can he use? Just spend it on all the things that are really important to you guy. What what I found interesting is, and I found this article how he made his millions, because that's really the question, right? Did he?

How would you make it in a capitalist society when you're a social, how would you do it? Maybe you would create a good or a service that other people might want to buy. That's kind of capitalist of you. That's kind of what he did, isn't it? According to his financial disclosures, he made $2.5 million between 2011 and 20/20/23, and those were from book advances and royalties alone. Two and a half, $1,000,000 from his books.

Now these are pretty big books. You probably have all got a copy on one of your shelves. Outsider in the White House. 20/15/2015 was a big year. He wrote another one called the Speech. Historic filibuster on corporate greed in the Decline of our middle class. So you probably have that one. Maybe you read Our Revolution, a Future to Believe in in 2016, or Bernie Sanders Guide to Political Revolution 2017. Where do we go from here?

2 Years in the Resistance, a 2018 tome about how to fight back against Donald Trump. Or his most recent book, 2023, which is probably something that you can jive with a lot as a man who's worth millions by that point. It's called It's OK to be Angry about Capitalism, Bernie Sanders. Interesting, right? That's a weird position to come from.

Do you know what I learned from listening to some of these, these folks in my new little life here that I had used to work in the FBI, didn't know anything about these types. What I didn't realize is that there's this kind of like backhanded deals that happened in Congress where you get to write a book and people get to ride, raise money. Now, remember, you can't pay campaign funds to yourself. That could be really problematic.

That'd be like what David Hogg is alleged to have done, his new DNC chair or DNC vice chair. You can't do that. You can't raise money for political contributions and then just straight up give it to yourself. But you can write a book and your buddy's campaign can buy all your books as a campaign expense. Now you get paid out for the books, right? And he paid with the campaign money, and so now he's out all that money and he didn't get anything out of it.

So then you buy his book and now you have two warehouses full of books that no one's ever going to read. Then you just give them out to people that are your donors or whatever, and you're like, here's a book from a guy I'm a friend of who I just paid hundreds of thousands of dollars in books, and then suddenly you have $2.5 million. Do I know that specifically that's what happened with Bernie

Sanders? No, but I'd be very interested to see because it's a common practice now in Congress to buy bulk of somebody and they buy bulk of your book. It's like money laundering. If you were a regular person, wouldn't you think that? It's certainly not what those donors thought they were paying for. They thought they were paying for whatever the hell Bernie Sanders just said, as he comes before you asking for money to try to to try to stop. He's trying to stop the Elon

Musks of the world. It's truly disingenuous. It's really, really ugly stuff and how people keep falling into it. I mean, don't get me wrong, Fox News does the same kind of propaganda, and at least Bernie Sanders has his has his audio dialed in. I'm actually going to play you a thing. I wasn't sure if I was going to play this, but let me just show you how bad it could get. You could be in Connecticut and you could have this kooky lady. I think this is the right clip

here. This is probably one of the wildest human beings to ever get elected into office. And she can't figure out how to use a microphone. She's way too close. So I guess if I had to choose between Bernie Sanders and this, I would actually choose Bernie Sanders. I guess if you just live in the Northeast, your options are minimal so you do the best you can. Yo, this is the ranking rizzler on appropriations serving Connecticut's third district.

It's time to enter your dark academia Congress era. All right, besties House Appropriation is the money moves in Congress. We are not chasing the bag. We are the bag. Democrats are making lives smoother for government funding. It's giving it's giving it so Sigma main character energy. But Republicans project 2025 is mad SUS eliminating the Department of Education negative borrow points. Basically the biggest phantom tax on the environment, on your education and your rights.

That may be the worst thing that I've ever seen created by any member of Congress. Like the cringiest, most disgusting, strange piece again, Rosa, that's Rosa Delorio, who is a representative 81 and she's what trying to do the the Gen. alpha thing where she's talking like a child.

Hey, if I had to choose between that and Bernie Sanders, I would get my money to Bernie Sanders. Just between us, I don't see any other way around it. Let's talk about somebody you should actually give money to. If you were actually interested in buying something and getting some value for it, then we're going to dig back into this nonsense because again, like you, you can't help them if that's where they're going to go. If those are your choices, like

your best choice is just to hide and not do anything, but if you had to choose something to do with your money, you could buy a Patriot cooler like I have, and I bought many of them. That's why they're on my wall. I just packed up an entire box. We're in the process of moving right now and I packed up an entire box, but I still left out at like a half dozen these things, which is not even close to my collection. Patriot coolers.com promo code Kyle. That's how you save yourself 10%.

Good company. They also understand values the same way that we do here. They support veterans. They support a veterans charity that helps mobility for people that have been injured overseas or in the line of service. And then they go and help them move around their house to save abled veterans. It's a good charity. It's a it's a good company. They're in Houston, TX. They're probably our best, like longest running sponsor. So like, we just can't say enough about it.

The upside is is every time you guys get one, nobody's mad about it. Nobody's ever like, you conned me, Kyle Serafin. They go, hey, man, look at my cool product. Don't you want one too? And the answer is generally yes, I do. They're tumblers, easy to use. They keep improving the design. I think this is like the generation 3 lid. So it actually screws on. It's got coffee in here right now. Here, you guys can hear it. It doesn't pour out. It works really, really well.

That's the minimum standard. It actually takes one or two falls on an airport floor. Ask me how I know. Patriot coolers.com, patriotcoolers.com promo code Kyle. And if you guys want one at Kyle Seraphin show collection, check them out on our show description link. We'll get right back into this kind of stuff because it's, again, it's majoring in these minors. It's picking the dumbest kind of fights that you could find. This is another good one.

We're really upset at the Donald Trump Justice Department. It's unprecedented, OK? This is because apparently DOJ decided they weren't going to prioritize January 6th prosecutors and people who were brought on for a very specific job. I want you to think about, imagine if you had a job and you got hired to do the job and then you found out that that job didn't exist anymore. I may have had some experience with this before my FBI career.

I had a bunch of other jobs, and one of them was running in a restaurant, and I was picked to be the manager of a restaurant. It was a restaurant concept in Kansas City and it passed hands from 1 ownership group to another. Now, when you move to a new ownership group, generally with speaking, what happens is they go, we're not going to do the same thing and we're certainly not going to hire the same manager that we that you guys were because we're a new company

and we have our own people. We want to do it our own way. And so they chose to have somebody else. And so I basically transferred from one job. I went to go be a manager of a place that didn't exist anymore. It wasn't in the same ownership group and I didn't have a job anymore. That's it. It just, it just happens all the time. This happens in the private industry and it actually happened, it turns out, with a focus and priorities to people

who were not government workers. And there was absolutely no sympathy for it, was there? What about the pipeline workers that just wanted to have an opportunity, I don't know, to work on the job? That would actually be really, really useful. It'd be useful to the American people. What happened to those people? Do they just do we just ignore them? We just don't care about them anymore. I see. I had to find it over here.

Here's my clip, little 14. This is what happens when Jensaki was asked about pipeline workers who lost their jobs. Now, mind you, they didn't have all kinds of crying CBS pieces like this non-stop. It wasn't leading news that we had people that were actually providing a really valuable service. I don't know what the what the value is of January 6th prosecutions keeping grandmas locked up and going after trespassers. You're seeing the two like soft looking people here that are,

they're working for DOJ. They look so accessible, don't they? Look, the terms of service when you enter the federal government is for the first two years you're on probation. They can fire you for any reason or no reason. That's just the way it works. Everybody who worked for the FBI knew that if you're a veteran, you get a one year probation. In the case of these, these attorneys, they were there for a year and a half. They got hired on in a blitz of hiring and now they're no longer

needed. Sorry, what about the oil workers? Was there any crying for that? Thank you, Jen. I do have a push on filter, but first on energy. When is it that the Biden administration is going to let the thousands of fossil fuel industry workers, whether it's pipeline workers or construction workers who are either out of work or will soon be out of work because of a Biden EO, when it is and where it is that they can go for their green job? And that is something the

administration has promised. There is now a gap, so I'm just curious when that happens, when those people can count on that. Well, I'd certainly welcome you to present your data of all the thousands and thousands of people who won't be getting a green job. Maybe next time you're here you

can present that. But. You said that they would be getting green jobs, so I'm just asking when that happened, Richard Trumka, who is a friend, long time friend of Joe Biden says about that day one keystone EO. He says, I wish he, the president, had paired that more carefully with the thing that he did second by saying here's where we are creating the jobs. And then there was this inevitably crazy thing that happened that nobody could figure out how it happened in

the Biden administration. All the fuel prices went up because we reduced our capabilities of moving fuel around the Keystone Pipeline. Again, you're going to hear crying about DOJDOD commerce, USAID. There were people that were standing outside of the USAID building and that were cheering for the workers because the judge finally said like, look, yeah, the president can get rid of people, especially probationary employees. Those are the terms of service two years out for no reason.

The reason they do that is because if there's a big hiring push and and the government doesn't need them anymore, then you like first in or you know, what is it last in burst out. That's kind of how that plays. Here's Pete Higgs that kind of explaining how the Constitution works. That thing that Bernie Sanders was talking about. These guys don't know anything about the Constitution. Yeah, it seems like they do. They understand that the executive is in charge of the executive.

Go figure. 3rd and final bogus story that is out there is around our re evaluation of our probationary workforce. Now, this is part of something that was mandated by an executive order from the president. Remember, President Trump was elected. He is the positive, the prerogative to to advance executive orders. Our job is to follow them and

we're doing that. This re evaluation of probationary employees is being done across government, not just at the Defense Department. But we believe in the goals of the program and our leaders are carrying out that review carefully and swiftly. Now, bottom line, it is simply not in the public interest to retain individuals whose contributions are not mission critical and to restore accountability within the federal workforce. That seems like the most self-evident statement I can

imagine. It is not in the American people's interest to retain people that do not have anything to do with the mission set. It's it's almost like it's too sensible. That's why you're seeing a push against it in the government. Now imagine if the government was actually doing the job that it was supposed to do, State, federal, local. Imagine if they actually just focused on the things that we hoped they would do, get the hell out of our way and stop force and fraud.

You'd think that something like this would be an absolute no brainer. I want you to imagine that you live next door to a man and he breaks into another man's house that's on your street and he kills him with an axe. And then he eats his brain and then he eats one of his eyeballs and then he's caught. Which is what we hope that our government might do, that we hope that our government has a police force that actually acts on these things.

And then they lock him up. And then because of the policies of your end, because of the way that your government actually works, they decide after a couple years, like, screw it, let's just put them out there in the world again. Let's just see what happens. We used to have this motto on my surveillance team. The the official motto was let's see what happens. The unofficial motto was full

blast and half assed. I have to imagine that's what's going on with the parole board or the supervised release board that's going on in Connecticut with this story. I'm not even making this stuff up. This came straight from the AP. It's one of the wildest stories you will ever read. You just can't make it up how crazy it is. A Connecticut man was found not guilty by reason of insanity. OK, he was too crazy to be in

public. We get that because he killed a victim with a hatchet and then he ate body parts. He's been given conditional release from the state's only maximum security psychiatric hospital. Despite the concerns of like state lawmakers and the family victims and others. Tyree Smith, he's the man on the screen. He was ordered confined to the Whiting Forensic Hospital for 60 years in 2013. This is the problem with bad education. If you focus on gender ideology, you can't add 2013 and 60.

You should get 2073. That's when he should be released. But it's only 2025. If you have bad math, which may or may not be racist, then you're going to have a real tough time explaining how this guy got out because it definitely hasn't been 60 years. It's been maybe 12. He killed a person called Angel Gonzalez, mutilated the body, and then told his friend or his cousin, I guess in this case, that he ate part of Gonzalez's brain and he ate an eyeball while he was drinking sake, No.

Well, at least he was drinking sake. That's very, like, culturally friendly. He was reaching across the aisle there and drinking a Japanese beverage. What are the actual hell people like? How do you kid like this? Maybe it's because the people around you are focused on the wrong things. It's not false force and fraud and it's not solving the problems that government is supposed to solve. It's solving problems that they

created, just made-up problems. Here is another made-up problem from a neighbor nearby to Connecticut. This is a woman in Maryland. Her name is Kathleen. I'm probably going to mess this up. Zelgia or Zeliga. Zeliga. I think she's a district representative in Baltimore County, and she's up trying to say that maybe Baltimore County shouldn't spend their time passing local ordinances requiring condom vendors in schools from K to 12. I'm not sure they should be in high schools.

I'm not sure that's the government's business in a public school, but I sure as shit know that it shouldn't be in a kindergarten. And here she is talking about how how how they are wasting their time and they are going to spend more and more time on this. Again, majoring in those minors, doing things with your government power that are not the purview of government. This is how you lose. This is how you keep taking

hits. Thank you, Madam Speaker, I rise to agree with my colleague from Harvard County. Condoms for kitties. This goes too far. So next time, next year we're going to have a bill regulating what can go in these condom machines. What color can the wrappers be? What words can go on the wrappers? I mean, imagine walking into preschool with your 345 year olds. You walk by the machine and they say mommy, daddy, what, what's

in that machine? Or they're learning to read and you're having to explain to them what those words mean. This is the over sexualization of our children and it just goes too far. It is much, much more than just what the the floor leader said. This is true, by the way, because she's right. They will come back on another regulating how it's done and how it's stalked. And then they'll go out there and they'll try to find like the right company that's going to be able to supply it.

And those things are going to be a waste of money. They may even have a a study on it to make sure that nobody is offended by the types in the same way that Elon Musk was talking about hitting sharks. This is what happens when your government just gets like at every level. And that's the local level, by the way, when it gets just beyond what it's supposed to do for some fraud and it starts focusing on absolute nonsense. This is another good one.

This is a little thing that popped up into my feed. This is a kid six. He was rejected by 16 colleges. And it's interesting because you read the headline and you go like, well, that doesn't sound that crazy. Lots of people get jobs out of out of high school. If they don't go to college, they just get a job. His name was Stanley Zhong. This is a Sacramento Bee article. The the article's entitled Rejected by 16 colleges. 18 year old got job at Google. Now he's sues for discrimination.

That seems like pretty straightforward, but it's not actually what the story is. He got a PhD level software engineer job because he's brilliant, because he aged the SAT, and he had a near perfect GPAI have no idea why they're adding so many points on top of four point O, but let's just say that he had very good grades and an excellent IQ, which is what the SAT tends to measure, like the ability, aptitude, and learning. He was 13 when he first heard

from a Google recruiter. 13. That's sort of like a prodigy level, is it not? This is not about, this is not about some kid who just got hired out of out of high school because he couldn't get into college. This is about a kid who was being discriminated against by the state because he's Asian, which is what they're not explicitly stating, but everybody can read between the lines here because the story's really simple.

He got hired into a PhD level job because five years after they first approached him, they realized that when he was 18, he was probably like more vague than he needed. He didn't even need to go to college, but he got turned down from the colleges because of a name like Zong. And the fact that he was Asian because they over admit Asians and then they go, well, we can't have any more.

When you started off to stop from force and fraud and one of those things was you were trying to stop discrimination and you start discriminating, you've crossed the line. You've gone over the the functionality of your institutions. And California is deeply in this. What's crazy is, is that people actually are defending it. That's how you get people on the political left who don't want the intelligence community keeping secrets to cry about Donald Trump revealing the

secrets of the CIA. That's how you get there. It's when you've no longer like, you've served your purpose so far that you've actually crossed over and now you're arguing for the other side. And we're seeing it on so many different levels. Here's this local story, which has national implications when you get down to it. Palo Alto teen hired straight out of high school by Google as

a PhD level software engineer. Yet he was rejected by most colleges he applied to, including five UC campuses, even with a 4.4 GPA and a 1590 out of 1600 on the SA TS. Some of them were certainly expected. You know Stanford, MIT, you know it's. It is what it is, right? But yeah, but some of them, like Cal Poly, some of the state schools, I really thought, you know, I had a good chance. His name?

Stanley Jong, and he and his father just filed a lawsuit against the University of California and the US Department of Education. The Jones allege that UC is engaging in racial discrimination in emissions, despite the law banning the use of race in the process. OK, so then the state goes on to say, well, no, we just use it for a demographic information because we just want to know.

We're totally not looking at it. This is the same problem I had with the FBI saying like, well, we use FISA information for information purposes only. We totally would never generate a criminal case out of it. But like, just because we are all criminal investigators, you can just trust us.

The government can't be trusted. It's the whole reason that we have all of the Bill of Rights. This was the original discussion that happened between the federalist and the anti federalist who helped found this count. This country. The the the reason that people like Bernie Sanders make no sense to me and don't understand what the constitution is, is because they're more than happy

to stomp on all of your rights. Remember rights, they are defined, but they are not established by the constitution. They predate the constitution. They are acknowledged by the Constitution, our Bill of Rights and many of the amendments that have gone out there to correct the wrongs within the constitution specifically is the acknowledgement that certain rights predate pre exist our God-given. They have nothing to do with whether or not government has the ability to even step into it.

And what you find is that the people that are quote, UN quote liberals who should be kind of like against the way the government works, they should be more leaning towards freedom, more towards the individual. They've now crossed over into the line where they are out there fighting against their own best interest. You'll never be able to convince me. I, I had a, a friend's dad. He was a physician, is a physician.

And one of the things he said, the difference between conservatives and, and people on the left right now, people on the right, on the left, if you're on the right and you don't like guns, you just don't buy any guns. You don't care if anybody else does. If you're a conservative and you are a vegetarian or a vegan, and I'm sure there are some, I don't know who they are, but you know, for some reason you don't want to eat meat. You just don't eat meat. You don't have to stop everybody

else. If you're on the political left, the characterization now is that if you are a anti gun person, you want to ban guns for everybody else's ownership, even though it has nothing to do with you. You want to go out and reach across and stop their ability to do something. They do the same thing when it comes to like vegetarian, like how about the PITA people?

They don't want anyone to be able to eat meat because they don't agree with it. If you want to universalize your opinion, you tend to be kind of like on the left, and then you call everybody a fascist or an authoritarian when those are the principles that you're dealing with. Remember the most simple answer, force and fraud. We want to stop it. What would be a nasty fraud that you could perpetrate on the American people?

How about men dressed up like women taking women's scholarships and opportunities and potentially knocking them the hell out like we saw in the Olympics? Masculine, you know, feminized weird dudes and women face. Is that, is that really what we want our federal dollars to go toward? The biggest part of our government, which is supposed to have the most sweeping and broad mandates? No, so Trump has gone out there and been like, hey, we're just going to try to correct this

because it was really dumb. We don't want to do that anymore. How about the NCAA has complied, but Maine doesn't want to. And the governor of Maine in the in a room, like an open room, this is what people are voting for. They're voting for common sense. This is how people reached across the aisle and said, even though I don't agree with all of Trump's policies, I do agree with sanity and I don't want my girls have to deal with this

stuff. That's why people in Maine would, you know, be behind this kind of thing And they're going to hold on to it. They're going to major in this minor position that boys have to dress up and be able to play in girls sports. It's craziness and they're going to keep getting hit with it. The. NCAA has complied immediately, by the way, That's good. But I understand Maine is The Maine here, the governor of Maine. Are you not going to comply with it? I'm complying with state.

And. Federal laws. Well, I'm we are the federal law. Well, you better do it. You better do it because you're not going to get any federal funding at all if you don't. And by the way, your population, even though it's somewhat liberal, although I did very well there, your population doesn't want men playing in women's sports. So you better you better comply because otherwise you're not getting any any federal funding. Every state. Good, I'll see you in court. I look forward to that.

That should be. That should be a real easy 1, is what he says. Like, that's great. This is why Joy Reid lost her show, by the way. She's been majoring in the minors. I got some good examples of it, but apparently they decided to cancel her show over at MSNBC. Do you know why people's shows get canceled? There's really 2 reasons. One, they something say something that is so antithetical to the brand of the organization that employs them that they can no longer be associated.

They have to divorce themselves. It's a public, you know, public relations move or they're no longer profitable. I found Joy Reid's audience. I actually went looking deep and I found it. I'm going to show you who Joy Reid was broadcasting to, and there's not a lot of them. Obnoxious leftist white women who are keeping up with the N double ACP awards. I think there's only one. That's probably why they couldn't get any advertisers anymore and why they had to cancel the show.

Here is, I think, the entirety of Joy Reid's audience. This woman is very disappointed Joy Reid is being cancelled from MSNBC. I wonder if MSNBC is cancelling the newly minted M double ACP award that she just won. Actually, two of them. I'm sure it's on their website. You know, because they're all about equality. This is. Bullshit. Oh, well, they don't have to worry about the end. Like they don't work for the NAACP Awards. Did you also notice that her blinker was going the whole

time? Was she waiting at like a light? And then like, is that what people do? She's too old for that. I'm too old for that. How is that Lady not too old for that? She had her phone set up. She's making like a like a turn. She's got the blinker on. Or does she just sit there with the blinker on because she likes the sound effect of it? It's possible. Maybe she likes the metronome. Maybe it's calming to her because she's nuts.

In any case, Joy Reid lost her audience because she said things that nobody can believe anymore because it's been proven. And you know what's fun, and I think this is one of the major reasons why we've seen Dan Bongino get picked up into the FBI. I'm getting there guys.

I will, I promise. Cash Patel made his bones in Republican circles proving things that showed up in the Nunez memo, if we played it the other day, but he basically the the book, the plot against the President showed all of the the receipts, the the financial movements and the machinations of political entities, intelligence sphere stuff and then laundering things to the FBI to go after the sitting president United States to try to delegitimize the 2016

election. That's what happened, right, and Cash Patel made his bones on that. He showed this. Nobody has been following it more heavily, certainly more heavily than I ever did then Dan Bongino, who was in the podcast based at the time. Imagine in this year that you are still trying to float out that Donald Trump works for the Russians. OK, We're simultaneously told that Russia is some tin pot dictatorship. It's this like third rate power.

It's a Cold War holdover. A a guy who is run by gangsters and then also he somehow has the ability to buy one of the wealthiest men in the world in the United States of America where he could get any number of other corrupt opportunities. It's the same thing. That doesn't hold true for me with the Israel argument, by the way. The Israelis are like this big and they somehow have enough money to be able to move the entirety of the United States.

There's no other opportunity for people to be corrupt. It doesn't mean that they don't have outsized influence. If you've ever worked in the Intel world, you understand that Israel is considered kind of like a frenemy. They're a friend on some things and they are a net positive for the United States interest, but they're also an enemy because they're like stealing our stuff and they're doing things that work against us. And so this is delicate balance.

That's the real world where you live in the Gray, where there's no black and there's no white. There's no good guys and bad guys per SE. There's people who are good in some aspects and they're bad in other aspects. Or you can live in Joy Rhee's world and you can just talk about how Donald Trump is probably a Russian recruit. You're mentally ill if this is something that sells, and of course it doesn't. That's why she got cancer.

For years it has been said by analysts and former intelligence officers that Donald Trump has at best a profound affinity for Russia and at worst is and has long been a Russian recruit.

And look, I get that it's easy to dismiss all of that as nothing more than Russia, Russia, Russia hyperbole or pointless Democratic talking points that Republicans furiously dismissed, just like they dismissed the Mueller report and the first Trump impeachment over strong arming Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

But seriously? But seriously, you can't tell me that if Ronald Reagan were to rise from the grave tomorrow and read what Donald Trump, a Republican president, said that he wouldn't be stunned and think he was anything but Putin slunky. Is that a thing that people want to hear in 2025? Is that really useful to you? Like it's nonsense. The best is is that she's been on when she does actually take on a combative, intelligent conservative guess she gets wrecked.

She gets absolutely wrecked. She took on a woman who's been on this program before the the founder, one of the Co founders for Moms for liberty, a woman named Tiffany Justice. I found this clip because it's amusing. What she did is she went to credentialism. What right do you what expertise do you have now? Leftist love credentialism. They love to lean on degrees and experience and so on, except when it doesn't work for them. What expertise do you have to say what is appropriate for

children in public schools? The simple answer is being a parent makes you an expert on what's good for your parents. I think all of Americans for most of American history would would agree with that right up until the political left went

out there and try to run away from the most common thing. 20 years ago, if you tried to make the argument that pornography belongs in public schools because of, like, I don't know, artistic sentiment or the 1st Amendment, nobody would have taken you seriously because that is a serious position on the

hard left. They have lost influence and they are going to take a beat down, a smashing from regular people who might not even like Donald Trump as a person and may not be that thrilled about his picks. But it is infinitely more sensible than being ridiculous. Here's tippity justice, answering such a simple question as how dare you? It's like, are you out? Are you that far out of touch again? I guess it is. You leave your blinker on.

You leave yourself Tik Toks when you're in your 60s, sitting there talking about NAACP awards. That's how out of touch you have to be to think that there was any way of winning this. What is the expertise that you have and other Moms for Liberty advocates have to decide that a book, an award-winning book like All Boys Aren't Blue isn't appropriate for students to read. What a tragic story of a young man who's annually raped by his adult family members. So you have incest, rape,

pedophilia, joy. You said you. Let me answer, so I'm going to answer for you. In what context is a strap on dildo acceptable for public school? Just let I mean, that's my question to you. Tell me what the context around the strap on dildo or the rape of a minor child by a teacher? A second no. No, we're. Talking about public school, 1 moment. All right, so now. Yeah, well, it's like I have no points on that. I have to talk about something else. Of course you do.

Do you remember that? Probably the most analogous version is the real life version of The View is, is watching these people just like, you know, they're crying nonstop about how Donald Trump was a felon. And my wife and I talked about this the other day and I and I'd forgotten. It's like, oh, yeah. Do they bring that up still? They do. If you go to the right places, you hear them talking about how

Donald Trump is a felon. Now I listen to a pretty good breakdown of how how many imaginations had to happen for them to be able to pull that off in the state of New York, which is why, again, a victimless fraud. They're not protecting from force and fraud because the fraud basically affected nobody affected people, made more money. But God forbid, this is yet another example of of sort of the, the comic justice. You say something and you're accusing somebody of something

that you're actually doing. This is the view * Sunny Hostin. She's married to a surgeon who is now stand accused of insurance fraud as exposed by Doge. Now, do I think that they necessarily knew that? No, the way that billing works is kind of nasty, and the way that the medical industry is, it's basically propped up on the federal government is going to write checks for all kinds of

crazy things. However, in this $450 million lawsuit, the federal complaint filed in the Eastern District of New York alleges that the defendant sought to take advantage of New York's no fault auto insurance laws, which require auto insurance companies to reimburse policyholders for the cost of necessary and documented medical care up to $50,000 for personal and private passenger vehicle injuries arising from accidents, regardless of who is at fault.

And so they went deep into this. This is like ambulance chasing stuff. And it turns out that 2 of Hoskins, this is Sonny's husband's patients were cited in the lawsuit as allegedly being treated in 2023, which means that he would have in fact benefited from this sort of abuse, this abusive use of government thing. Now let's take away the the criminality of it and let's just talk about what the function of the government is. The function of the government is get out of the way.

The function of the government is not to try to weigh in on something nonsensical. And this is New York. So we've now hit Connecticut, Maryland, New York, right, Maine, all areas that are blue and all areas that are focusing on things that are not actually problems and creating new problems because of it. Maybe it comes from thinking like this. Here's Scott Jennings. Yeah, elegantly. Like you said, there's not that much to say about cash at this moment.

We've we've covered it for two full podcasts, so you guys can go back and listen to last week where I was getting pretty amped up about it. Dan hasn't even been sworn in yet as the deputy director. I'll give you like, basically the, the, the nuts and bolts of it in probably 90 seconds. There's just not much to it. Plus, I've got some really funny videos of people protesting Trump's as artists, which I don't want to miss because that's good.

Here's Scott Jennings talking and then a woman letting you know that women in America are really going to be upset. Not when their daughters are accosted in a bathroom by men or young boys. Not when their daughters lose sports scholarships. They're going to get mad when they can't get blueberries because we've kicked out all the illegal aliens. I kid you not.

This is the point being made on CNN, that if you are trying to actively hire illegal immigrants, if you think that's best, if you are trying to game the system, if you were trying to help someone break U.S. Federal immigration law. I think if we're going to have a true crackdown on illegal immigration in this country, it has to involve everybody who's participating in it. And I think you've raised a good point with this topic. And so employers and anyone else

who's part of this. Pipeline, I think. I think they ought to be put on notice. And you got to play by the rule. Everybody has to play by the rule. I don't want to hear that they're doing work that no one else will do. Talk to guys in the building, trades, plumbers, contractors. Picking strawberries. I mean like these building. Trees guys are being are being hurt. I can't wait. I shouldn't be here. I can't wait until American women can't get blueberries for

their smoothies. I cannot wait until there is a full crackdown on all small businesses as if that's going to be the solution to the immigration problem. It is just going to put immigration related issues further into the darker corners. We're not going to see them. It's just going to become even harder to solve the problem. It's it's, it doesn't make sense to punish individuals and people

when there is a broken system. I don't know why they all talk like this and they all have to say things that end as a statement with a question mark, because I don't even know how the teleprompter would say that. How do you do the captions for a thing like that when somebody just responds to all statements with their own statements which sound like questions? I want to put my head in a blender. Speaking of blue blueberries and smoothies, I, I, this is Jen

Arnold by the way. She actually, she was on some of our, our earlier clips where she was making a little bit of sense where she actually realized now she's gotten the talking points back in order. She's a Democrat stratish and she says OK, because she was part of Federman's campaign. She was part of Biden's campaign in 2020. It's time for us to get back on message and start defending the stupidity. It's indefensible. Let me give you, we're going to decide.

I want to, I want to go to, to Stephen Miller real quick here too. Stephen Miller explains exactly why these people don't understand what's being discussed. And so this is going to segue into our, our, our coverage of Dan Bongino being picked up as the deputy director. That's the best way. And then I'll end with some funny stuff because like, we're going to need to. Speaking of the FBI, who here is thrilled about Cash Patel? Let us not forget.

Let us not forget what President Trump endured in order to get to this point, to climb to the top of that Everest summit. Let us not forget what this whole movement has endured to reach this glorious day. 8 long years of weaponized government. The Russia hopes the Ukraine hopes. One lie after another. One fraudulent impeachment after another, one hoax. 1 smear. Government weaponized at every level against democracy. Government weaponized at every

level against the people. Democrat prosecutors, Democrat attorneys general, Democrat careers, using their power to try to sabotage the democracy of this country, to try to keep President Trump off the ballot, to try to throw President Trump in jail, to try to arrest his aides and his supporters. And authoritarian movement in this country that has at every step tried to stop the workings of our democracy. And President Trump on a field in Pennsylvania nearly lost his

life. And a few weeks later, another assassination plot. And let me ask you this question. When the lawsuits came against President Trump, when the law fair came against President Trump, when the weaponized law enforcement and intelligence community came against President Trump, and when the bullets came against President Trump, did he falter? Did he back down? Did he yield? Did he surrender? Did he waver?

Or did he stand up tall and strong and raise his first into the air and say 3 immortal words Fight, fight, fight. So that's very straightforward. If you go back and look at the history of what happened and why people resonated with it, because they eventually saw people got on the bandwagon at various different times that there was a lot of unfairness. You don't have to be a Donald Trump fan to realize that unfairness is not an American principle that is easily sold.

It's not. People don't like it. They don't like to see somebody getting the shaft over and over again. Look at every single movie that that formed my, my like looking into the world in the 80s and even the 90s. Like at some point in time we started acting like the wrong things were right. But as long as people were basically looking around, going look in a fair fight, the best person should win.

What happens when you start leaning on the if the if the deck is slanted, if the judges are paid off, if the gloves have something that is heavier in a boxing match, if somebody puts in steel in there, if they're cheating. I'm thinking of the movie like Bloodsport. What about the guy when he throws the dust in the eye and now the guy has to fight blind? Does anybody root for the guy that is using all of the the dirtiest tricks? No, you don't root for the guy who does dirty tricks.

And if you're going to weaponize government, if you're going to go after in state and federal and local prosecutions, if you're going to do all of that crap, you're going to take all of the institutions that you've been slowly capturing. And again, the evidence of them being captured is watching the political left now suddenly defend institutions that they have historically gone after. You only defend things that are part of your own clan, unless you're being a totally fair and

honest operator. And I don't see that from the left or the right. To be fair. There's a reason why I wasn't at CPAC. I've no interest in going there whatsoever. It seems like old guard, just people who are interested in clout and money. I'm happy to be home. I'm happy to not be part of that. This is not complicated stuff. And so, once again, what are they going to do? They're going to try to delegitimize things. This is how you end up with getting Dan Bongino, a podcaster.

By the way, by the this is Politico reported it. CNN did the same thing. Trump announced his podcaster, Dan Bongino, is FBI deputy director. Well, turns out he's got a little bit more of a background than just podcaster. So that disingenuous thing, that's what Americans saw through. And that's why even Americans who might otherwise not like it are going to deal with it, and they're going to be fine with it. Dan's got an uphill battle.

I wish him nothing but the best. This is not a job I would want. I wouldn't want it for me. I wouldn't want it for most of my friends. There's a few people I know who can handle this job. I hope Dan's up to it. It's going to be a real difficult thing, totally candidly, and I'm rooting for his success. And you're foolish not to. I have no interest in any personal grievance or any frustrations. He said some things that were not the nicest thing about me.

I think he'll actually find out that I was right when he works for the FBI. So that's kind of the comic part of this piece for me. But this is going to be a really hard job. The reason why the FBI deputy director is usually somebody, and by usually I mean for all of time, it's always been somebody inside the FBI because you got to have people. When someone calls me up and asked me about an FBI agent, I can usually vet them.

I had a member of, let's say someone close enough to Trump that it would, you would know, you'd know the name, reached out and said, hey, what about this person that they called me and I was able to, I was able to vet that person in under 20 minutes and said here's what I know about this person. Here's his background. Here's his military. Here's what he's done. Here's his political takes as far as we can tell. Here's the way that he runs cases. This person can be trusted.

I think you're in good shape. 20 minutes. You have to have those sourcings. If Dan has those, great. I don't know that he does. It's actually really hard to have those at the further away you are. And he's been away from it for a long time. So I hope he's able to get in

there. I hope they surround themselves with smart people that know the Bureau because the job of the, of the director as an outside entity is to come in kind of like the president and be in that, that civilian ownership of the military where they run the organization from the outside looking in. When you're on the inside, you have a different understanding. You understand the structures and the language. You know what people are doing to hide. You've seen how people get away

with kind of shenanigans. And the, and the job of the deputy is to be the inside man inside the Bureau representing the Bureau to the director, the director, the director represents the president and the people to the Bureau. So this is going to be a tough job. You got 2 outsiders stepping in. I wish them all the success because we need it as Americans because of what Stephen Miller just said. It is truly important, but there's not that much to cover on this yet.

So there are some people that I think would do this job more effectively, at least from the outside, but you never know until someone steps into it. Dan's a smart guy. He runs a lot of different businesses. For all of the personal bullshit that goes in in between it, you can't take away from what he was able to build. You can't take away from the fact that he's agreed to step away from millions of dollars a year. You keep hearing people say a successful podcast.

It's a very successful podcast. And I know the kind of money that they're making. At least I can I can calculate it from being in the same space. So I wish for the best. I'm I was 100% behind Cash Patel and I'm 100% behind the people that Cash wants to work with. Whoever they are, it doesn't matter to me. Whoever he names, get it done. America needs it. We're like we're we're counting on you because we only get one shot at this. We got about two years tops before the midterms.

And there's got to be sizable movements before things get defunded, before things start getting held up, before the the nerve goes away, before that mandate and that feeling goes away. We need to strike while this is still going on. OK, so I'm going to step away from this and talk about something that's really funny. We need to step while this is still the instinct of of the political left while they're doing this crazy stuff. This is when we can make progress, actual progress and

and safe make things safer. This is a lady named Kiera Hart Mendoza. Why not? I think there should be A-IN there. Can Kiera Hart Mendoza is part of uprooted dance. They are doing dances to stop Donald Trump. This is not even our palate cleanse yet. You ready this? And by the way, the vocal fry is prominent here. This is what we need to strike.

We need to strike while this is the opportunity cost that the left is involved in. It feels like a bit of an assault to come into the Kennedy Center and threaten our freedom of expression. I think expression is what artists do best, and it fosters conversation, reflection and bringing people together in community. And when that is threatened or devalued, we feel like it's an assault on our constitutional right, our First Amendment

right. It's a it's a threat on their constitutional right and and this is what their right is. I'm going to turn the music down, which is actually very beautiful and I'm going to just let you watch. They got a kid involved. Their constitutional right is that they are entitled to your money to plan and execute a Trump protest dance in the cold while wearing beanies and mittens. And we're about to see it kick off. Here it is.

There are arms in the air and there are people who are waving at phantom things and now we're playing micro violins and on those are some hands punching together like a hookup or whatever the hell. Like, how much money did it cost to put this on? Are these people all on salary? Because it's like, discontinue all of that shit. While they're doing this, though, it's time to solve problems. So let them do this all day

long. Let all the crazy lefties and all the vocal fry Karens and all the people who are worried about blueberries on CNN dance around outside the Kennedy Center and protest Donald Trump ineffectively with whatever the heck this is. And let's start cleaning things up. And it doesn't matter whether it's at DOJ or DoD, whether it's at Commerce, whether it's at the IRS, All of that needs to be moved forward right now.

The other funny thing is, is that I've got a, a pretty outstanding clip that we're going to close off with from SNLI. Have to assume this is SNL. It's either that or Mad TV. And it is borderline hysterical. They don't even care about the truth, which is why political left has lost all their audience.

They've departed from it. The people that are interested in the truth are going to continue to seek it out and they're going to find it. What they're going to find it on is on the right and the center right. People that want to just be honest about things. Again, you don't have to be that that wildly out of control to just have a neutral take. I actually got asked, hey, can you give us a take about the Bongino appointment? I'm like, yeah, but it's decidedly neutral.

It's analytical. It's that there's a difficult job and I hope he does it well, but I don't know if he's going to do it well. And neither do you and neither does he, honestly. So let's root for him because I root for America. I root for America being de weaponized. Or you could root for this kind of stuff if you're a partisan. This is a spoof of Morning Joe and it is so good because it doesn't even matter if the things are true. Poison. Is there anything that you didn't include?

Well, sure, Probably the worst one is the the baby races. What beg your pardon? There were baby races. Trump would ask to have two babies placed in his office, usually of different ethnicities. Someone would put a bowl of goldfish crackers on the other side of the room and. Trump would say 1000 bucks on the black one. Is that real? Yeah. Now, Michael, there's been several errors pointed out in this book already. Do you take responsibility for those?

Look, you read it, right? Yeah, of course. And you liked it. You had fun. Yeah. But what's the problem? You got the gist, so shut up. You know, even the stuff that's not true, it's true. I knew it. I knew it was true. The White House is a cesspool. I can't and I can't. Hey. This. One Mika has been at an 11 for the. Past year. OK, I think you're hangry. OK, this one's hangry. Come on. Hey, who? Calm down. What do you want to do for lunch? All of us are potentially guilty

of falling into our own biases. So continue to be a skeptic. Continue to ask questions. Continue to just evaluate things, not because you want to believe it, because it actually has some evidence behind it. It's the only thing you guys can do out there. If you want to go ahead and combat stuff like that. If you want to combat that on the left and the right, by the way, because Fox News has just as much of that where you're hearing it and you're like, I'm outraged. They'll ask the point.

Now go buy a catheter or a reverse mortgage or a gold IRA and and lose all your money. Like that's what they're trying to do with you. Again, it's, it's not one sided. They can all do it. All right, folks, that's the end of it. We, we've got to the to the to the time limit here and, and as much as I care to go, we'll cover more stuff again tomorrow. rumble.com/kyle Serafin's where you can find the live show. If you guys want to join us live in the chat like many of you have.

I appreciate you all being here. It's great to see you like the video, share the video. Make sure you're notified when we go live. If you want to listen to us after with no ads, you can do it on Spotify. If you need a cheat code to share with your friends, Kyle serafinshow.com. It's just a little redirect that'll take us to the Spotify page. It's a free app. It's a free show over there. The only ads here are the ones I read, and those are people that I back up and I spend my own money on.

So I just let you know. And they're willing to pay us to be part of it, to have access to you. Thanks for joining us. I hope you have a wonderful kick off to your week. We're winning again. Let's stay in the pocket and keep pushing them into the corner. God bless you. See you again tomorrow. Thanks for listening to the Kyle Seraphin Show, streamed live weekdays on rumble.com/kyle Seraphin. Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth Social and Instagram at Kyle Seraphin.

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android