Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistleblower. An American Patriot prepare to embrace the uncomfortable truth because this program has no time for comforting lies. Here is civil liberties, enthusiasts Second Amendment, Defender and recovering FBI agent. Kyle seraphin. Hello, my friends and welcome to the Kyle Surf and show it is Friday. It is June, the 9th. It is 9:30 Eastern and 8:30 in Texas America and we are rolling live on Rumble.com.
Kyle seraphin, / live. You can find us there every Monday, Wednesday and Friday. When we start getting down, we've got some wacky stuff going on in this country right now. I went to bed, I woke up with a headache because it is such a ridiculous time and it's happening on all fronts. We're going to be talking about the indictment Moment of Donald Trump there's no question about that. That is on everybody's mind a lot of Fury and rage going on and maybe not all of the information.
So let's see what that goes on with. We're going to talk another piece about some attacks on the suspended ones that happened yesterday. Many of you probably didn't hear it because it was covered by the left-wing media. So we're going to give you those things including the letter that was written by. Stacey Plaskett and Jordan. What's his name? Jerry Nadler aka the Penguin and we are also going to get into a
older case. It went in front of the Supreme Court was kicked back down to the ninth circuit and is known as operation. Flex by the FBI, we're going to talk about the state secrets to fence and we're going to do so with my buddy and our friend, the real Steve friend. And of course Steve, I put you on here and I spent all this time trying to get all of our our camera angles, right? And then, of course, it just disappeared on me. So give me a second. I want to re crop it here.
Put you where I belong. All right, folks, welcome. Steve friend to the program as well. Steve X for joining me, buddy. Thanks and you are clearly an apparatus to the Deep State you buried. The lead There Are UFOs that were discovered in Las Vegas. Thanks a lot. Kyle serve were there. Indeed, some UFOs. There you are.
I lost you for a second. So there were some UFOs that were discovered in Las Vegas and they scrub the body cam footage, but we're not going to talk about those things because God knows what they are. God knows why they're there. And, of course, the typical live show. I got to put this thing back up where I can actually see where you are. So buddy, folks, bear with me. Just a second, we have the I'll challenge of technical failures while doing their. Yes.
Okay, my friend. There you are buddy. So you think the the the Vegas thing has any watered you talk to anybody out there in Vegas? No, I tried to reach out and then everybody's going to send me the YouTube videos of the some kid talking about it and I don't know, it just seems like every time there's some sort of major scandal going on that,
they just drip out the UFO. Shiny object and I don't know if maybe that they're actually trying to leak it out because it's legitimate and they figure that nobody's gonna pay attention to it because it's other things going on. Or if it's just to distract people but I couldn't couldn't get anything beyond just like the headlines. So yeah, they keep throwing this out there. They drop the you know here's a bunch of Navy Pilots.
Here's a bunch of guys that are involved in something and now we've got like there was also a like a deep State whistleblower. Supposedly 36 year old dude coming out of the Air Force, right? Yeah. Yeah I saw his interview a little bit of it and he he looked way too pleased with himself like he was. He was enjoying it a little too much. I just didn't get the vibe now. I don't know. The man, maybe that's just his regular demeanor but he didn't seem to have like firsthand it information.
Like, hey, I've seen Little Green Men. I put my hands on the UFO. He was like, well, I've got access to other people who have told me things, and I'm like, now, that's not going to fly, right? So he's talking about how he has seen things. He's talked to people who know And then they have confirmed to him. That's kind of not how this game works. At least not the way that you and I have been playing it. No no, I mean like I will have
to wait on the facts. He could do the bajeena rule, you got to give it some time, right? Don't don't be the first just be correct. The bungee no rule. Okay. So let's talk about our first of three things. This is going to we're going to get to the Trump indictment. Maybe maybe we'll get that up front since I think, I think the Trump indictment was actually a pretty ridiculous. I'm going to pull up a Web browser here real quick, folks.
Here we go. So the Trump indictment, this is a as reported by Politico. This is the Trump indictment cheat sheet, they need a cheat sheet and what to know about the classified documents cases, what are the likely charges house? Trump going to turn himself in blah, blah. We know that he was given a summons which is what we do sort of expect to see with this sort of a deal.
And here it says, last year the federal government recovered more than 300 documents with classified markings from your Lago. We knew all those things, some of them are labeled top secret, the FBI sent in Hostage rescue team and an armed. SWAT team to go do a perimeter, clear of a place that is being secured by the Secret Service. Which is amazing and they grabbed 15 boxes of documents.
The indictment comes two months after Trump was charged in New York for the hush money thing to a porn star blah blah blah that was the Alvin Bragg situation. But now we're dealing with a Federal indictment which is coming out of Florida and it's the southern district of Florida and supposedly the laws that are being cited are things like the Espionage Act obstruction of a official proceeding, falsifying or destroying permanent record.
AIDS and some additional statutes like false statements and conspiracy Steve. Is there any there there I immediately struck by the obstruction of official proceeding charge that was thrown out that the Enron law that's been thrown at all the January Sixers. So, apparently walking in the capital is the same as having classified documents in a compound. Same law that you broken that we need to charge. I think it has all the indications of a point.
You made you made back to me like months ago and it was very spot on. It was the 1980s America would infiltrate and provoke a A coup in 2023 America this point because we're essentially a Banana Republic America from like the Red Dawn era. When we had real Action Hero was going on, would take over current America and do a culvert color. Revolution would send a CIA black team down, they would infiltrate there would be a regime turnover. I mean, just like every Chuck
Norris movie ever. That's exactly what happened. I think you're right. I think that's what we're dealing with. Okay. So, we're going to talk a little bit about what the Ah, Jack said, first of all the the Glee that is going on right now. When we talk about the mainstream media's, look at it. This is a CNN. For those of you who are watching the live chat, you can see that this is the latest on the Federal indictment of Donald Trump in the documents probe Steve. How many probes.
How many probes did you initiate when you work for the FBI? You said probes and you're just talking about UFOs and aliens, ha ha ha. How many, how many probes have you ever opened, as is there such a thing as a probe that the FBI does? And why does the media always cover it that way? They love their terms, man. It's like these stories were written months ago and they just got dropped. They're going to see that term
probe thrown out. It'll be just like dossier what everybody used it and quid pro quo, you will see in lockstep media because that's not an actual law enforcement term which means Means that they are just making things up as they go to sort of set the stage and make a good feeder. It's going to it's going to be a good story to tell that they can win their Pulitzer off of, but it's not going to be certainly fact-based. No, why would it be?
All right, I'm gonna run some questions that they have on the CNN politics live news feed and they have these questions and answers. Let's see if you can answer the same way that their panel of experts came up with. So question number one, has this ever happened before has a sitting president ever been indicted by a Federal grand No, absolutely not. Yeah that's their answer here too. Wasn't he already indicted? Yes. In State Court. Okay, excellent. Strong.
You're two for two right now. Can he still run for president under indictment? He can there was a socialist at did run for president. From prison was in it. Eugene, Debs the X and the 30s. That sounds correct. More. Importantly, he could actually hold office while in jail, there is actually nothing precluding him from holding that office in the Constitution. In which is what governs this. So you might not be able to vote. You may not be able to view his himself. Okay?
What if he wins before the end of the trial? What happens, what's the implications, what are the Democrats going to be worried? About a constitutional crisis at that point, because he's going to Pardon himself. It seems Seems correct. This is what it says. They say gentle words. They don't like the words like pardon. They said he could make it all go away. That was the CNS. Think on it and then let more could be in fact, dr. You yeah. It's a little more that's kind
of like a hmm. And then yes, he could make it all go away. And then of course, we just mention that he could actually do this from jail. This could all happen in that way. I think that would be the most actual the best outcome for America to have the president in a small cell where he would be completely cut off from all the just noise and focus on doing the job of the president, like being the plumber and fixing the leak. That might be the person that we
had to have that. That's an interesting thing. I think a lot of Americans have less faith in politics now than they ever have. What would that look like? He's just, he's been trapped away and that's yeah, he would just be there and they would have to slide them, the documents through the glass and have him sign stuff, right? Like he wouldn't be he wouldn't have Aids in his ear.
That wouldn't be all the books exposed out because all of his record, all is a conversation is being recorded, right? They would be, they don't be jail calls. Yeah. What would the Secret Service fully transparent? How would the Secret Service had about? Oh well, I mean now you got a bigger problem because they can actually, it's federal prison, right? So they can actually fire warning shots in the prison context.
People don't know. Okay, tell people with a deadly force, policy is so they understand that that's that's that's one of the caveats. That's the one of the caveats that no warning shots shall be fired outside of the prison context. They are entitled to shoot warning shots at the prisoners, right? Yeah. Alright, so I've just pulled up here. This is another piece from CNN
politics. I just wanted to show you just the, there's actually a pretty amazing little interview that was being done by some woman who I don't know her name. Oh her name is katalin Collins. I guess that's a person that is on CNN and she's barely able to contain her Glee. You can see that like the corners of her mouth are tipped upwards. She's so excited about talking about this. She's talking in this case, to Jeff. I think was his name, Jeff
trustee. He who is the the attorney that's representing Trump, who basically just says, you know, we got this almonds and that's what we're going to do. We're going to show up and this is all going to go down on Tuesday for the, the initial appearance that sounds like I don't know, like, I don't even know how this goes have. You had to work in the, the southern district of Florida at all? Did you actually have enough time there to get any cases, move forward?
Well, all my cases in Daytona were the the Middle District, okay. But I had to help Miami and they had a guy come in our area. So we were you working through both districts, but I mean, I really was involved with that. I was just kind of on the operational side and you just got off doing something with news max. You had a legal analyst there to anything that he shined on, I'll tell you kind of what I learned from. Shipley last night in a second here.
You know, they were they the one thing that struck me, that was mentioned that it was actually out of the context of Donald Trump but was more in with that, with the Joe Biden allege allegations of corruption and he was talking about impeachment proceedings and he said that the precedent was set for Donald Trump, where they essentially tried to impeach. A president who is no longer in office, that they would try to impeach Joe Biden as vice president.
Because that's when it happened, what during his vice presidency? Because basically the whole thing was, well this is old news, this is old news, it's not didn't happen while he was president. He's like, yeah, but we can instill impeach him as vice-president, you set the precedent with Donald Trump. Okay, well, that's a take on it. One of the things that was brought up is that there's a possibility that the Espionage Act is is involved.
We saw that just a second ago, we saw that, you know, being discussed last night and it's being discussed today on CNN. So I wanted to read some pieces from the Espionage Act and get kind of your thoughts on him. There's two sections. It's 18. USC 793 and 794 that's going to be the Gathering transmitting or losing of Defense information. And the second piece of it is sort of like either selling or handing it off to a foreign power.
Those institutions Which basically mirror each other with just like slightly different language. Here's the part that I think is going to be the most interesting. Look at your reflection on it. What it says is. Whoever for the purpose of obtaining information respecting. The National Defense, which is what we call National Defense
information. Not necessarily classified with intent or Reason to Believe that the information is going to be used to injure or to the injury of the United States. So again, that's going to be with intent or reason to believe that the information is to be used to the injury of the United States. Any thoughts on the intent piece of this, by the way that goes all the way across, unless you get to some really bizarre piece of gross negligence, which we already found out under Hillary Clinton.
There's, there's just no reasonable prosecutor. You beat me to the punch, man. All I could think of was a gross negligence versus care. This carelessness and these just these sort of loose terms and clearly the, the doj is going to take a very hard line interpreting them depending on the person that they want to go after here. So this is very, they're going to assign some sort of Nefarious
intent on Donald Trump's part. So so the question that I have to have, you know what, I look at something like this is I go, you got a man who is the former president, who supposedly took information, that he knew would be injury? Is the United States either had intent? Or he had the reason to believe that that him holding on to this information was going to be dangerous. It was moved by the GSA. The GSA is a government agency that just packed up stuff. That's what they do.
You know, you've probably seen government moves but they just grab things. And then they bring it back to you and all of these suckers were supposed to have caused possible injury and then he's going to run for president a second time because he's interested in the injury or has the intent to injure the country. Does that, does that sit with any jury in Florida?
Yeah, no, not Florida. Certainly not even in Southern Florida, which, like, overwhelmingly flip to conservative and 2022 elections as you want the. I going back to what you asked me. Did I learn anything? I think might be relevant here is apparently when the president's leave office, they the government will essentially lease space for these documents near them. So there's there's a hole location in Arkansas for Bill Clinton.
There's a spot in Texas. As for Bush, as one in Chicago for Obama where they can actually house their papers. But when it came to Donald Trump, they didn't lease any space. They basically took part of moral law, go over and said well this is the spot we're going to use. So they made of actually might have actually been setting him up for this by putting the papers there on behalf of the government and then claiming that he had them improperly. So that's pretty weird.
I hadn't actually thought that are heard that, but I was always kind of interested in why it was the mirror log of space. Why did he just put it in the in his garage next to his Rolls-Royce or his Corvette? I don't know. But I was blown away by the spot that they showed for. And I mean maybe it was a stock footage like a Getty image, but it was like a strip mall in Arkansas for the Clinton won.
And I was, I mean, it looked like it could just be any sort of storage location that they could take didn't look secure or anything like that, but You would think, actually, if they're going to put into a compound that secret service had full control command and control over that that's probably preferable to alternate location, which they would then have to staff up and and keep oversight do.
But yeah, just back to do. They set him up for this sort of weird obscure Espionage Act because he had documents that he was actually able to declassify sort of charge, I don't know. Yeah. And once again that statute does not require to be classified per se, it just it has to be National Defense material. So there's a whole list of what those things can be and it's you would be shocked. I mean it's like boat designed its its fuel Depots. It's anything that could Aid a war effort.
So there's a lot of things that are built into that sort of that statute as far as descriptive of what defensive information is even stuff, that was Declassified. And that's sort of the allegations being made is that because they had, he may have Declassified it. They wanted to do an end around and kind of short circuit that that defense tactic. And so You know, they could they could say well this is doesn't have to be classified. It just has to be defense material.
Do you think this whole thing, regardless, about shakes out and because of the politics of it, I guess I'm all answer my own question. It won't generate the necessary attention, but it should highlight the fact that there's over classification. Classification going on and what are the motivations behind that and how P everybody wants to say that their job is super uber important and so they have to have this great security clearance in order to know the
menu. The lunch menu for what served at the White House. So we're going to have a classification for that. And then, you know, I could put that on my resume for when I move on to my private sector career after government service. But what are the most motivated and how motivations for that, and how we need to reform that because there's just these layers of classification that are completely unnecessary. I think you're right.
I think that's true. And moreover, I think we're going to discuss that at the end here with operation Flex, which is in fact, the name of this particular podcast episode You're going to enjoy that. Some of the stuff that you may know, some of its stuff will be new to you, but I'll still get your Reflections on it. Let's pivot real quickly to our friend Garrett. And this is a picture of Garrett up here, throwing up on the screen.
It says, this is an article that we all read yesterday, we all being the suspended balls read. This is an NBC news article written by Ryan Nobles, who seems to be fast and loose with the facts. And it says FBI agent who testified for Republicans was suspended over leaked sensitive
information. The house Democrats are asking attorney general Merrick Garland to investigate, whether Garrett oil, boom, Republicans presented as an FBI whistleblower lied to Congress. You think there's any chance that our buddy Garrett lied to Congress? No, I know he didn't. I was there and I witness his
entire testimony. And he's talked about how they had the really loose allegation, was about his legal representation, where they asked him, who they try to basically make it look like Donald Trump and cash. Patel were He's bought and paid for and paying for his legal representation and he expressed in his deposition that he
believed. That cash is charitable organization, was paying for his legal representation, unbeknownst to him, but was revealed at the end of his hearing, was that in fact, his lawyer is working pro bono. So good on that guy for doing that. But then also clarifying, that and then that information was new to Garrett. He he'd answered honestly and wasn't trying to mislead the committee.
And then still the Democrats said that he Hurt himself because he misrepresented who was paying for his legal representation, which was free. Yeah, so they realized that that was pretty weak and so that Uriel today they've moved on to a new charge which was that he was actually suspended by The Bureau for an internal investigation which had concluded. He leaks sensitive investigative information to the right-wing group project.
Veritas this is according to Ryan Nobles again on nbcnews.com this says they now accused him of lying. I'm gonna get the specifics of it for Right here. The lawmakers learned about the reason for a barrel of oil suspension which was previously unreported in testimony. That our dear friend, Jennifer more AKA drunk, Jenny the FBI executive director, executive assistant director for human resources, Who provided testimony in front of the
weaponization committee. Parts of her testimony are included in a letter that were sent the letter is linked. I'm going to show folks the letter here because we always bring the receipts for what's going on. It says, in the letter, Jerry Nadler and Stacey Plaskett to Democrats of Minimal value to the American people detailed several instances when O'Boyle in his interviews denied that he had leaked information to the media.
So let's just be clear. The Democrats are alleging that the FBI has come has completed a fantastic investigation that has positively concluded that Garrett, O'Boyle did a thing that he claims he didn't do. And curious if you think that the FBI is is capable of such an internal investigation, I know they're not competent to that level. I know they're completely able to just lie and make things up.
Garrett, didn't do what they said he did and I think we have some sworn affidavits to show that he didn't. All he did was take the information as he is entitled to do, and sworn to do to Congress. He didn't leak any classified information to the media. I'm back.
He's bent over backwards and held back from talking to the media until after he Testified. So that's a guy who sat on his hands for nine months and churned out every single offer from media and still, even to this day when he's on media, he's boober careful and saying I can't talk about certain elements of that. So he's very buttoned up with it and Jennifer more. She needs to be a verb, we need to come up with a verb for her because she's just a despicable
human being, who's gone? After people that were just doing things the right way, for the right reasons, but she told the party line and was rewarded for it. So, interestingly enough Garrett was suspended last year in September, which is noted in this thing. And it also says that in February, he went in front of the weaponization Committees attorneys.
Same thing you did gave this, this compelled deposition or is sworn testimony which was done behind closed doors and then leaked as part of a sort of a smear campaign their first attempt was to say that he had perjured himself there about his legal coverage which I think you just covered accurately and then they have some of these other Out of quotes that they pulled out saying. Can you tell me the contents of the security, or the suspension notice?
And his attorney said, we're not going to be discussing anything specifically. There's a couple pieces on here, folks, if you want to see this, it's, it's available. It's a doj letter or letter written to the doj rather. But the thing that I think is very interesting, is they cut away from Garrett, stuff to go and discuss the the Jennifer more piece. Here's what's very interesting. The allegation is, the allegation is that Garrett
O'Boyle Went to project veritas. This is James who keeps outfit that he founded. No longer is with at this point after some drama that happened this year. But last year the project Veritas folks had access to a number of documents that I disclose the Congress. And I'm going to tell you guys, exactly what happened, which the Democrats wanted to, you won't hear this pretty much anywhere else because nobody else knows the story Garrett and I were working on whistleblower activities.
While we were suspended, I was suspended. He was not and, and Steve, I think, you know, this as well. Well, and during that time, I decided to go public with my story. I started giving some information in the background to members of Congress in different offices. You can imagine that members of Congress, have lots of different contacts.
They are able to share things with the media at will especially things that are unclassified things that I would give, was giving them things that I was making allegations about. And sometimes project, Veritas is a vehicle for sort of those things. Fox News is also a vehicle. We've seen numbers of documents. That we've put forward pop up in the media. The first one, which made me a public figure in a way that I didn't care to be was what I went forward with that edu
threats. Edu officials threat tag email and that wasn't for public consumption. That was me sharing it with Congress saying this is the problem. It looks like the the Attorney General Pershing himself and sure enough, two weeks later, we see it in the national news. I know things that you've brought to public have also ended up in the national news.
So this is not like a this is not a new game but the and that they're making is that Garrett went to the went to project Veritas while he was working actively before he was suspended. And that's absurd because I actually introduced him to project Veritas after he was suspended, they had asked me specifically and I had an ongoing working relationship with them about certain things.
Once I had already been made public, it's like, well, screw it. I might as well talk to these guys and after that conversation a number of months later, I was able to bring Garrett to them and to this point He hasn't given any interviews to them other than they reached out and asked him if he would do an interview and so far he's declined which you have never seen gerd O'Boyle do an
interview with project. Veritas is that more or less line up with the way that we've been seeing things here? Yeah, with the I guess that's the accurate story, that's not what's going to be reported though and that's where you have the mouthpiece at NBC. Run a story to scare off potential future whistleblowers. Because clearly, the levers of power will turn and spin to a drum up, criminal charges
against you any way they can. If you come forward as Garrett did, which is again, we're back to. This is the kind of Country that the 1980s America would infiltrate and provoke coup to overturn because it is a South American style Banana Republic. Right, that makes sense. So your contention is that they're doing this to chill whistleblowers? Yeah, yeah. I mean what they they tried a bunch of different things.
I mean they obviously the FBI itself was used all of the all of its full arsenal to deprive Garrett and Marcus myself, you of a paycheck and in any way they could and we'll get into your letter that you received from them. So the FBI itself as weaponized, all of its processes to chill. Any sort of whistleblowing action has introduced more training to make Whistleblowers look like their Insider threats and now they've partnered with the Democrats and mainstream
media to make it very public. And they're not, they're not hiding behind any sort of mask. They're just saying pretty openly, like if you come out you will charge you with a crime and the only response to that is going to be just refuse to produce a painted. It, I mean, we're just the entire process is a farce. Wherever Garrett is he can Count Me In a side. I'm not going to, he's not going to surrender himself, I'm not going to let him.
I mean, all 150 pounds of meat will just hold him down because I'm not going to let him surrender to this sort of tyranny, from our government. So, there's a page 14, they actually bring up me. I'm pretty confident that you are also addressed in here, but they mentioned the checks that we had written to these guys, which we are having them hold onto and not cash, until we figure out whether or not. There's some tax implications since in America.
If you raise money for someone in good faith, the IRS still may want a piece of it. Even though it wasn't your money and it otherwise complies with legal donations, it seems like we're going to be okay on their. We're going to you've got just one more person we're going to check with before they catch this. Yeah. What they what they wrote was specifically on May 30th. Kyle seraphin, an FBI agent who resigned after being suspended for weapons violations. You know me, very unsafe with
weapons. That's my problems posted on Twitter images of checks that he was providing to Mr. Boyle and mr. Allen and the amount of 255,000, 194 dollars each the memo line checks, describes them as a gift for quote, unquote, Holding the line. How out of touch? Do you have to be as a congressperson? You got to talk to Stacy Plaskett and I don't know if Nadler was there or not how out of touch with reality? Do you have to be to not know what quote-unquote holding the line means just willful
ignorance. At this point the same rationale people who went up there and said that. Well this Twitter account is Marcus Allen on it, so we're going to sign anything that that random Twitter account says to
you. Because you have the same name or And Goldman, who's one of the richest members of Congress implying that I and and Garrett were bought and paid for and just clearly financially beholden to Trump lieutenants when in fact we had sacrificed six-figure careers and received 5,000 dollar charitable donation at Christmas time from man. Who neither one of us has ever actually met his charitable arm
Not even from him personally. So it's a completely just divorced from reality, and you never met cash. I forget that you guys have never met cash. He did something. That was I think very nice. I think that's just his nature, he's a, he's kind of a pretty regular dude. When I met him and hung out with him, the he offered me a Coors Light which I thought was kind of a funny. Like this is, this is a regular Haas, you know, Hotel beer, beer bar that had all kinds of you
know, Imports or whatever. Like no, he's a chorus guy. Okay, I was actually just thinking with it with regard to the checks once we get the final, you know, sign off on that, which is ridiculous because people donated their money that they've already paid taxes on to these guys and the government's going to want a piece of it. That's no, that's absurd. Maybe cash can hook us up with one of those sweepstakes giant checks and we can do an event where we hand over, like the 4x6 giant Jack.
Yeah, we need a Our check for Garrett because he's so big. It won't it won't look as big if he's not no it'll just look like a little button. So their citation, this is in this is in the Congressional Record record. These are letters that are being sent by members of Congress to the doj and they have pictures of my Twitter feed saying that.
If you are uncomfortable, making an online donation, you can go ahead and give the money through our physical address and just address it to catch Patel. I literally sent a text message over to cash. And said, would you be willing to receive money on these guys? Laughs, honestly, like there's enough money in the online version of it. Just put it towards the next whistleblower and he was like, yeah, that's fine. So there's no coordination.
There's no Financial coordination with the capital Foundation, anything else, much to the surprise that the Society of former agents who we got, we got a blow that one up. Go for it. I know that's not on the adjust, I'm just said it, just go for it. So, you had a contact from a member of the Society of former agents, which is essentially has it It slips surgically attached to the anus of the director's office and the FBI.
These are guys who are never was, or has been that best who just continued to mouth what the FBI wants to do. And they talk about the good old days of the bureau. They have not recognized that the organization that they once worked for is a completely gone. At this point, it's it needs to
be dissolved in broken down. It's a weapon of the political left, this country, but all those homeless characterizations aside this I reached out to you and wanted a full audit of membership or of contributions to this, and in imply that this sort of torpor type of effort, because it was so successful was right for corruption, or graft, or something like that.
It was written in a way it was almost like he was trying to get an information, which I'm sure he would just personally accept and just for his own edification, not necessarily going to provide that to anybody who is his lips or surgically attached to. The anus of and wanted to make sure that his money was just, you know, not going to be misused or her pocketed by you because you are clearly a person
of questionable honor, right? And unfortunately for him there's a counting record of your contribution. So even if he just was really worried about his money being spent, his five dollar contribution to this charitable effort. I'm sorry, doesn't entitle him to the And that he was seeking and let me just say, if you are so beholdin to the organization because you want to accept a pension from them, you're going to kiss their ass.
Well into retirement, how sad are you that the pension that they gave you that you sold your soul for only allows you to contribute five dollars to a charity. Yeah yeah. So the quick and dirty is a guy gave $5 and then asked us to have a forensic audit and a Board of Governors that would hand out the money that he contributed all five dollars to look. We appreciate every single donation that went to these guys. I really do.
It's you know Americans opened their hearts in their wallets and they took care of my friends are friends and showed you know that they were willing to stand with these guys who have now faced something pretty withering. And I'm going to just push this up on the screen real quick as well. It says, mr. O'Boyle and mr. Allens acceptance of two hundred fifty five thousand dollars 194 from mr.
Serafin the Raises additional concerns regarding whether they complied with all FBI and justice department, regulations concerning the receipt of gifts. And for these reasons, we asked you to move expeditiously to examine whether mr.
O'Boyle has lied to Congress in violation of 18, USC 1001, when converted and committed perjury under 18, USC, 1621 or violated applicable, FBI regulations regarding the acceptance of GIF, we ask that you move expeditiously to investigate what whether mr. Allen has violated applicable regulations regarding the acceptance. Lots of gifts. So there you go. We have a congress. This is what weaponization looks
like of a federal government. This is what happens when your federal government decides to come after people in a disgusting way I think. And in a way that is totally unwarranted other than they are trying to serve the doj and serve the FBI. These are, this is the self licking ice cream cone. It continues to lick itself. It seems like. And right now, it's benefiting Democrats, but I'm about to show you a story where we can realize everybody is in danger. Yes, you agree.
Yeah, I mean Goldman, why aren't you giving $5? You should just give him $5 and then demanded the forensic audit representative Goldman. Levi, Strauss are right worth worth, what half a billion dollars, something like that. So so let's talk about weaponize government for a second here. This is something that you and I are focused on.
This is what you are doing with your work as a senior fellow at the center for renewing America. I'm gonna bring up a document on the on the on the screen here, many of you are familiar with this. If you're not watching our Rumble Channel, you can tune in, and check this out at the timestamp. What you'll see is the domain perspective, which I shared, which I was able to expose to the American people showing that the FBI was willing to investigate Catholics at their Church in Richmond.
And that it would show that people who are interested in the Latin. Mass people who wanted a traditional Catholic experience. Obviously we're ripe for being recruited by white supremacists that they had the Of being white supremacist for their standings on border security for their standing on lgbtqia, whatever you want to call them rights that are being pushed into the public space and their
anti-abortion stance. And the reason we know that is because appendix D, which is right here, front and center, the Southern Poverty Law Center, a hate group in and of itself, defining, radical traditional. Catholics as a hate group, this is the entire document folks. This is the original one that you may or may not have seen on uncovered DC.com, I wrote an article about it, the entire thing was available to all of you. You still is up there under FBI doubles down going after Christians.
That's what this is about. Let's talk about operation Flex. Do you know anything about operation flexi? If you ever heard of them because I may just be sharing it with you. Yeah I mean I think you spoke about this operation some podcasts to go a couple months back I think. And that was really my first rev that's the first time I've ever learned anything about it.
But I think that this the latest Revelation from this, this article that we were reviewing earlier today, just shows how we're back to our concerns about the government hiding behind the veil of National Security and ongoing investigation. We had to preserve sources and methods and how that itself is just weaponized against anybody, not just those evil dastardly Republicans in the oversight committee evil indeed. So the this story goes a long way.
As back, this goes back to 20 2006 beginning of the war on terror or at least the beginning part of the war on terror. The first 25% of it or so. This is a an article that I'm going to bring up here from the ACLU. So by no means a right-wing source, and they are covering FBI vs. Blue Gaza Faz AGA. How do you, how do you think pronounce that vizago? That's better. So FBI versus vizago who was an eye mom in Orange County, California.
We're going to read through the quick basics of this thing here. This was a landmark case that went up in front of Supreme Court it was kicked back down to the ninth circuit on a 920 ruling stating that they in fact needed to go back and have it read adjudicated. And essentially the summary of this case which we're scrolling through right in front of you.
On the rumble Channel says that the case stemmed from an FBI operation in 2006. And 7, it was known as operation Flex due to the fact that the informant was using his time and his skill at the gym, to try to recruit other Muslim. Men to potential plots, that would involve terrorism.
It says the FBI informant in discriminately gathered names, telephone numbers, email addresses as well as information on the religious and political beliefs of hundreds of Muslim Americans again in Orange County California so by no means a right-wing Place. Although Orange County is actually pretty right-wing for California.
This was in, this is sitting in the ninth circuit and there they are still considering giving the government this credibility even though I would say that Muslims in general have been a protected group. He's FBI, handlers were conducting electronic surveillance in at least eight area. Mosques. This should not Shock anybody that this was going on.
But this is far before we ever had the outrage about the Catholic church, this is the all they came for fill in the blank and it wasn't me. And so I said nothing, here's a quote from the from one of the plaintiffs here. He says, as the I'm on of the, I'm Orange County Islamic Federation. I worked diligently to establish trust between my community and United States Government. After the horrifying attacks on September 11th, more than 20
years ago. Go. I invited the FBI to come speak to members of my mosque. They looked us all in the eyes. And a shirt is unequivocally that they were not spying on us. We trusted them, but they lied. And our sacred Community was shaken to the core. This is again, the the I mom that was out of Orange County. This is vizago, who is the named plaintiff? There are two other plaintiffs to members of the congregation showing that that the FBI was going in.
And one of the things that the bureau did Steve and you can kind of speak to this as well. The the bureau gave this guy Key fobs and other recording devices, which would be familiar with, for making up a confidential human informant. And he left the room and just left these on tables and gathered, hundreds of hours of recordings. Where does that fit in the the dialogues policy on how you can use recording devices? I think it's a departure. I think is a very the legalese on that.
I think it violates two-party consent or one-party consent. Is essentially a wiretap at that point. Point, which you would need an enhanced ability to do, you need a judge to sign off on, right? So without a fisa which would be the warrant that would allow this kind of wiretapping. Then you you can't just leave something. You said, one could party consent. Can you explain to people the difference between one and two-party consent? I think that's probably.
It gets bandied abound a lot. I think journalists generally have a pretty good grasp it, but people in the world don't necessarily need to know. It's not part of their life so maybe expound upon that for a sec.
Yeah, it's just a, it's normally, it's a state-by-state basis about recording conversations and if the state happens to be a two-party consent law, that means that both members of the of conversation you and I having a conversation, we both have to agree that we're all okay, with that conversation being recorded, other states is one-party consent. So I could surreptitiously put a recording device on myself, record my conversation with you. And that would be Perfectly kosher.
There are exceptions obviously so in my case in the State of Florida, it's a two-party State. However, if you were doing something for law enforcement purposes as an officer of the law, you can do one party. And that's how you would record a phone call with, say a suspect and have him on the phone. Say, yeah, you know, I did the crime and then you'd have a taped confession of it definitely. So this article came out in Time magazine or Time online.
Time.com yesterday. I'm going to bring it back up here. This is a an article that is related to this operation flex and and the reason why I think it's so absurd is that essentially the FBI is arguing. This is the title of the article. This is written by Sonia Mansoor. It says the FBI claimed secret evidence, Trump's religious discrimination charges in domestic spying cases for me. This is a sort of the way that the shark is jumped.
You know, everyone seeing it, we're going to know that that's the case when we're going after a former president and claiming that he somehow was, is being injury has to to this country that he is now running to be in charge of again. But in this place, this is the same case here. I'm going to read you kind of the piece that made the most sort of troubling allegations, which is that it's a decade into the system. This has been going on for
almost 15 years, right now. But, they've been in court for over a decade, they had a Supreme Court decision, kick it back down, and it was heard back in front of the ninth circuit again, and the argument is the FBI says, That the plaintiffs claims alleging religious discrimination, I'm going to quote directly here. Need to be dismissed because it has secret evidence. That would exonerate the FBI if they made it public, but they're not going to do that.
And since the court cannot hear evidence as to who the FBI investigated or why, it cannot adjudicate whether the government targeted, the plaintiffs based on their religion, it said in their legal filings, the plaintiffs have argued. They don't need secret evidence to win their argument and that the case should proceed without the information, religious discrimination claims. They should not be dismissed, they stated. That makes sense to me the government.
So far has not invoked the state-secrets privilege for allegations of unlawful surveillance but essentially the FBI is arguing. Just trust me bro. We had reasons to be there. We're not going to tell you what they were and we're not even going to tell you that there was any prosecution out of it. This goes back to our long discussion about intelligence versus criminal cases, they could have had a predicated intelligence investigation,
which is very Broad and easy. Z and they would have never need to bring criminal charges and yet they could be involved in spying and then also please just trust me bro we did it for a good reason. Yeah, yeah. I mean there's Congress shall make no law. Right? I mean it's the first one guy. It's this is free religion, and you're going to say, well, we've passed a law that allows us to infringe on your religion. We can't tell you about it because we're doing really
important things here. So there's always the caveat. You can have free religion, but if we want to do something that infringes on that, then you're just going to have to sit and take it and just take our word for it. I was thinking about actually we it was laughable back in the 60s, when Richard Nixon was running for president and he said, he had a secret plan to end the u.s. involvement in Vietnam. Just have to trust me and elect me. Yes.
And could and people at that point gave him the benefit out and essentially handed the presidency over to him. You can debate whether or not that was a good decision or not. Richard Nixon and then Richard Nixon up with the most indictments in a presidential cabinet. In a presidential staff which was 75 until we got to Donald Trump which has now eclipsed it by orders of magnitude 215.
So we've gone from a man who commissioned a break-in of his political opponents and used government apparatus for physical spying to a man who is now being targeted by that same apparatus in a way and obviously he's far more guilty and far more dangerous with 215 and I To all of his close Circle and friends and advisers, so there's that.
Yeah, but but the point is that government secrecy is never led to a good outcome and it just leads to infringement on civil liberties religious freedom, free expression and the government, then has this get-out-of-jail-free card that we've seen the FBI continuously deploy or we can't reveal that because it's an ongoing investigation. We can't reveal that because we Have to protect our sources and
methods. I think for a time, it's those, the sort of you give them the benefit of the doubt. I think we've got exit, put the last exit off that Highway was passed miles ago at this point. So I got, I got to thinking about the first amendment when you were talking about it. There's two real pieces that discuss the, the religious Liberties that we have in this country. One is that Congress shall make no law?
That establishes a particular religion and then it shall not make any laws that infringe on the, the free. Exercise. Their upright. So we have two real important pieces and right now in this case, they're saying, look, I know it's in the Constitution.
But what we're doing is so much more important because we're defending the Constitution. I think this is sort of the fundamental argument that we've been making that the FBI has reached the point where it is now, in the same way that Skynet wanted to kill off all the people in The Terminator movie. It's like, who's the real threat to democracy? Oh, the Democratic people. We need to get rid of those. People. And then we can have perfect democracy with no people by the way.
So Skynet, got rid of all the people that were a threat to humanity, which was humanity and and it seems like the FBI is on the same. Sort of AI logic course at this point. And, and even to take it out of the fictional science, the science fiction film theater. Let's just put it to real world. I have to suspend principles of the free market to save the free market. By stalwart of constitutional conservatism George w--. Bush 2008. Right.
This is the Patriot Act arguments is essentially that the only way that we're going to save, this country is by turning it into the autocratic and tear tyrannical, sort of government that we were fighting against in other places because because, because trust me, bro is what it keeps coming down to is that we have your best and I mean part, we know about the head with a Patriot Act, they did and they did it with tarp with Financial
sector. It's always, it's always just trust us this time because we have to do it for your, for your own good. It's back to the, the 10 most terrifying words in the English language. I'm from the government and I'm here to help.
And on top of that, and I've made some arguments recently that this, this government-sponsored religion, which is the religion of leftism is, it's complete with all of its own things, including a promise of eternal life that eternal life just turns out, to be for government entities, things like the ATF. That should have been disbanded.
Years ago, we're actually on the chopping block and so rather than lose the ATF, we now have a bigger ATF than ever and the reason they got that way is because they got involved in a botched rate in Waco and they went after a US military veteran for having it illegal shotgun potentially by like one or two inches on the barrel, which I don't know if anyone's ever tried to conceal, like a 30 inch long gun under anything, it's just not an issue. So these, you know these things
musket. It's it's yeah, it's like a blunderbuss and There's just there's no justification for coming after people in that way. And yet we see This Promise of eternal life. And then we have all these other sort of illogical, tenants of sort of cultish type religion, which is going to be things like climate change and, you know, the lgbtq agenda which is shutting down families.
And, you know, separating kids from their parents and letting people know that you don't have a right to raise your own children, the state knows better which is why we're getting government, indoctrinations and all this kind of thing. So we're in this like spiritual battle but we're actually in a physical battle when the FBI is Being listening devices going
back. 15 years in churches, going after and targeting these religious minorities which historically that was the whole point of this country that you were allowed to practice, your religion, and being a religious minority. In this country was sort of sacrosanct, you didn't go and screw with them. You didn't mess with people who wanted the Latin Mass when everybody else wants Mass, you know, in an English in the vernacular.
It's just a departure. And again, the idea that we are going to suspend the Constitution so that we can protect the Tushin. If people are not waking up to see this and for some reason, we're seeing people on the left that are just cheering this on and defending it, is there any way that you can get into the heads of those people and understand what they're saying, because they don't sound like they're foaming at the mouth crazy.
Even though the things they're saying, are terrifying to me. No, it's invulnerable. Ignorance. At this point it, I remember hearing the story about the. I think it was during the Clinton when they when Bill
Clinton was first elected. And there was some sort of during his inauguration or some of the festivities in the immediate aftermath of that, there was a military event where the planes did the giant fly over and one of his, you know, code pink style supporters was like, well, I thought, you know what We were going to shut down the military-industrial complex because we're going to you know it's there the the hippies right there against the the military and the response back was well
known. Now we have those tools at our disposal their hours and I think that the folks on the left see the FBI is their plaything now and they've been able to institutionalize so much now that they don't foresee a Time the future where the tables will be turned and then they can be those forces. Can be used against them. I think that they now feel like they've reached the end of the race. They run the race they won, and we are in charge in into perpetuity.
So you think that they are not in the, the category of the crocodiles going to eat us last. So we're just sort of staying at the end. They think they actually won this thing and that this will not come back, even though we're seeing evidence. Like I said, people in the Muslim Community are basically considered to be protected and yet they're not, it's the same story that we talked about with April Rogers and the infiltration of the Lem protesters that were going on in Colorado.
This only happened two years ago. So this is not this is not something that the FBI has given up on even in the last two years. Even as we've seen like a dramatic push to the left, they're still willing to go after anybody civil liberties. It's just takes a, you know, it's taken a back seat to their involvement in January 6, because there's obviously money
to be made in the DT space. Yeah, I think that they view those those people as necessary sacrifices their the pawns on the chessboard but at the end king and queen are going to going to win and Reigns Supreme. And they don't really care if they have to sacrifice a few ponds for the cause. How do people that work in the FBI right now? Justify working for that agency. I just sent a copy of the letter that I got from the, the office of the Inspector General.
Was it the Inspector General? No, it was the office of professional responsibility. Yeah. So I got an opr letter from O.j. stating that they've really investigated themself and determined that they were not at fault that the government has done a government investigation and concludes that the government was in fact. Correct. This is the same government that is falsely. Decided that girdle Boyle was involved with project Veritas prior to him meeting project.
Veritas with, you know, I'll just say it like this. There's no evidence that that's the case, there cannot be evidence of something that didn't happen and yet they have argued. Now, both in front of Congress and they've let drunk Jenny go out there. Who's since retired and she's been able to make this kind of Same with impunity. Like what's the consequences for her? Stating a investigation that has come up with false proceedings? It makes me wonder about Hansen
right now. To be honest, I don't know if
you have that same feeling. Yeah, I mean I'm questioning everything at this point, I'd with a letter, you got from opr, I thought was was great because the Lion's Share of the response you got from them is them say doing our investigation determined that we shouldn't really be having to investigate this because it doesn't meet with our criteria to investigate it. Our parenthetically at the end if we did investigate it were right, that's exactly it.
That's exactly at the because they're not actually making an argument whether or not there was anything there. They just basically say, well we don't have the jurisdiction after all this investigation that we've done. It reminds me of a lot of the stuff that bungee no likes to talk about how he says, you know, it's not happening but it's really great that it is and it in the same way they're like you know, they didn't discriminate against you, but
it's really great that they did. And also if they did discriminate against you, they didn't because we're not at fault because we're the government and we've Estimated herself and hold herself blameless, seriously, scary, seriously weird times, my friend and very unfortunate, I think for the American people because on a Friday, I don't like going out on a bad note, but this is like a rage note.
I feel like we're getting closer and closer to low-intensity skirmishes and like small and violence. As you mentioned, you're going to put 155 pounds of your frame in front of the government. Coming for a guy. Like are it'll boil, I would do the same thing I mentioned that last night. That's my line. That's a red line for me if this government decides to come after people. People that didn't do anything wrong. And I know for a fact that was
not the case. I will be, I will be gorilla Warrior status, like, I just don't see, like, they've left all of the. The ability of them to have any claim, they've left any possibility of legitimacy. And I think a lot of Americans are already there. Anyway. They're all just waiting for their own red line, but that's mine. That sounds like that's yours too. Yeah, I mean I think that I view that as their decision, not ours. At that point.
We're we're just going to I mean it's the thing that I caution about originally when I objected to the January 6 stuff, I said guys were really lucky. You know, that we haven't encountered a community that has the back of somebody whether or not they did something wrong right or wrong. We need to do it the right way and I know that Garrett will be surrounded by Community. You will be and I will be if they come there. I'm going to make him.
Come get me. I don't know, make him come get Garrett because we're not going to. Fly with unlawful out-of-control government. There is some examples of this in Texas, where they had some sort of state warrant, where a guy basically stood on his property for the rest of his life and he didn't come off and he had 400 acres and he just hung out there and he never
left. And so it was like I think it was referred to as the longest armed standoff in the history of America which went on 15 or 18 years before the government drop charges, statute of limitation stuff. I can't actually imagine them going after him in real life, but I do think that is a line that cannot be uncrossed. You know, he's being represented by the same attorneys that represent cash. Represent the president and Michael Flynn. So luckily they have that
background. Not everybody is in that same that spot but they may have picked the wrong guy to be tangling with. Especially because like I said, there is a, they've just undermine The credibility of the agency we work for, and it makes me question, everything. Same with same as you like, I literally am looking at Robert
Hansen and prison and going. Yeah, he probably did all that stuff and yet it came from the same agency that just made a credible allegation to Congress that is factually lacking all evidence. They can't have any evidence because it didn't happen. That's really scary. Stuff when you're on the receiving end of that, I'm sure there's some people who have been framed in the world that
are looking around and going. Yeah, we've been telling you that for a long time, but that wasn't our experience until until right now until the last couple days we've been seeing it building and building and this is sort of the culmination of that foolishness. Oh yeah, that's my monologue. To end it out folks. That can't think about it in any other way. I do want to thank Steve friend
for joining me, buddy. I let people know where they can follow you and will put your book Link in the description. I know that is being sold as about to release. Is it not? Yep. 13th next week is were
cleared for launch. True blue, my journey from Beat cop to suspended, FBI whistleblower, it's on sale on Amazon also Barnes & Noble. If you don't want to give Jeff Bezos any money, you can follow me at at real Steve friend on Twitter at real underscore, Steve friend on true social and I appreciate all the support from everybody's house far. What are you all dressed up? Where, where you at? Right now, you're in another place.
I actually about to go to the Georgia GOP state A convention. I'm in Columbus Georgia, I'm going to be doing address there. I believe. President Trump is going to be speaking tomorrow, but I don't know if his plans may be changed after last night. Yeah, that checks out, fair enough. All right, well, thanks so much for joining me, buddy. I'm going to go ahead and close this thing out. We're going to do a thank you to our sponsors. We're going to start by thanking
Patriot coolers. Folks, if you have not visited Patriot coolers.com, check them out. Put it on your bookmark. You may not need one today, but you might be in the market soon. You've got a picture right now, on the screen of their hard coolers. These are comparable to a Yeti. They've got 13. Drives on the bottom. They say Patriot on them in a nice very patriotic logo, they've got cool colors.
They've got larger sizes for better prices than you'll find on like a Yeti or an Arctic and they're an outstanding piece of equipment. The stuff they can make in America, they do the stuff that they cannot that's provision by a silly laws. By our our government are made overseas just like everybody else's stuff and they are a houston-based company. That does a great job, they support veterans and they support the Kyle seraphin show.
Now for several months, they were our first sponsor and we're truly grateful for that and then secondarily, I want to say thank you to Catholic. Vote.org you can go to their website at Catholic. Vote.org you can sign up for the loop, which is there news and their email. I get it every morning, it's full of excellent updates on current events. They will cover all things from the perspective of Defending faith, family and freedom. These are things that many of us in our audience can all
appreciate and are looking for. You're looking for defending the things that are most important to Americans faith family and freedom check. Gout Catholic vote.org and you can sign up for that newsletter there. Like I said, the loop outstanding stuff, we're really grateful for them coming in here. Ladies and gentlemen, you have been listening to the Kyle seraphin show We do this every Monday, Wednesday and Friday. We have some, just a significant tumbling in of five star
reviews. I will read one again on Monday, I am over my time limit, I think at the moment, but I want to thank all of you for being in the live chat for joining us for, for praying, for the suspended walls, were praying for our nation praying for our former president. Right now, we are at such a dangerous Crossroads. I don't want anyone to be black pilled because there is no reason for you to give up hope, but it is time for you.
If you have not set the Line in the Sand and set your feet, Feet set your face like Flint. Then you better get that done right now. You better do a quick examination before this weekend ends and know exactly what you're willing to tolerate from this government, which is supposed to serve us, and obviously has left the mark a truly dangerous time but all dangerous things will end and all good things can come from them. Might be Rocky in the meantime. Imagine what George Hill said
the other day. This is the the incoming storm this, the cold front. That's going to push out some of the stagnant growth in this. It will be She was during that time and on the other end of it, I see sort of great times hopefully in time for my children to be teenagers and they don't remember any of this stuff, anyhow, we will see you
again. On Monday, I will be working on getting an interview for us there, I have a couple of ideas and if not, then you'll just see me and my smiling mug with more of the ridiculous. New cycle that is going on. Thanks so much for joining us and have a great weekend. Thanks for listening to the Kyle seraphin show streamed live Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays on Rumble.com. Kyle seraphin, follow Chi Lon On Twitter and true social at Kyle seraphin.