Are you familiar with FBI special agents? Kyle Serpen? I'm familiar with the name. Is that? Yes, I'm familiar with the name. Familiar with the name, familiar with the name. Let's bring in Kyle Serafin. He's the FBI whistleblower who helped expose government censorship of our First Amendment rights. Now, we only have this memo because a recently suspended FBI agent called Kyle Serafin brought it to the public. And we're grateful that he did. Kyle, thank you so much for joining us tonight.
He's the host of something that strangely is called with Kyle Serafish. Kyle Serafi, I can't thank you enough for speaking out. I knew you guys were out there and I knew it was just a matter of time. But you got a lot of guts putting your face and your name to this. You're doing a service on behalf of the American people. And from the bottom of my cracked and broken heart, sometimes, thank you very much. Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an
American patriot. Prepare to embrace the uncomfortable truth, because this program has no time for comforting lies. Here is civil liberties enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI agent Kyle Seraphin. Wow, wow. OK, hello my friends, welcome to the Kyle Seraphin show. Today's Wednesday. It's December the 11th and we are rolling live over on rumble.com/kyle Seraphin. We are on kyleseraphin.com. We are at X at Kyle Seraphin.
I'm amped up today, guys. I don't, I don't know why. It may have something to do with the fact that my wife adjusted the grind of our coffee maker, which we're going to be talking about coffee in just a second. Adjusted the grind so I didn't just get coffee out of the French press this morning. I got that thing that I I called a slurry. I don't know if that's what you guys call it too, but it's when the grind is so fine that you're drinking the grounds.
We are amped up. OK, so we're going to name Daniel Penny the man of the year. Time magazine actually thinks that Kamala Harris might be the man of the year, but we're a little bit more sensible over here on the Kyle Sarapan show. So we're going to start with, let's see, we're going to go and get into a little bit of the kind of conspiratorial nonsense that people are going down the rabbit hole with this guy Luigi with the squeegee Mangiano.
We're going to talk about him. We're going to talk about hypocrisy. We can't help it because that is what the the mainstream you get coffee so thick it's chewy. Thank you. The chat coming through with exactly what I'm feeling right now. A lot of that and then I've got some fun videos and I actually have you have to stick around to the end. If you are listening on the audio.
Do not miss the last three minutes of today's show because I am going to put something in your ear that is going to make your Christmas bright. That is my promise to you and I challenge you to find it wrong. If you think that I am mistaken, please put it in the comments below as we get going. But let's go ahead and start off with a thanks again. We'll just thank coffee companies and let's start with Blackout Coffee for bringing it here.
Listen, folks going to tell you about a company that is shaking up the coffee world, It's Blackout coffee. It's not your typical run-of-the-mill brew from a corporate giant that doesn't share your values. Blackout Coffee is bold, unapologetic and truly America first. This month, Blackout Coffee is making it easier than ever to give the gift of amazing coffee or cocoa or tea and more. That's right, Blackout Coffee is running sales all month long so that you can fill those
stockings. Make the gift basket bright. Whether it's a bag of their premium roasted coffee, delicious hot cocoa, or a box of specialty teas, you will find something perfect for everyone on your list. Coffee is the gift that you can always use. Let's not forget the gear. They've got mugs and shirts and so on. In fact, their logo is a gear, so that makes it look right. This is stuff that's designed to
make a statement. Let people know that you're enjoying a great cup of coffee that looks as good as it tastes. Don't wait. Head over to blackoutcoffee.com/kyle. blackoutcoffee.com/kyle right now. That should automatically give you the promo code Kyle. Stock up for the holidays. Grab the gifts for those who will actually get to use it. Support a company that stands for the values that you you believe in. blackoutcoffee.com/kyle. Use that promo code Kyle for up to 20% off your order.
You will not be disappointed. We've got some in the mail right now. I keep checking at the front of the at the door to see if the box is there yet because I get excited about receiving packages. Let's get into it now. All right, all right, All right, all right, All right. OK. So we're going to settle into this. We're going to be talking about the suspected CEO killer Luigi Mangiano. He's got a fun name to say. He comes from a wealthy family.
All of these things. And that means, well, it couldn't be. If he's a very smart guy who was a valedictorian of his high school class, how could he have been caught so easily? I'll remind you that most people are caught, like, within minutes of doing stupid things. Like they shoot somebody, their buddy calls the cops, turns them in for the reward money. Yeah, of course. Most people who are not good at doing crimes because they don't do crimes all the time get caught when they do crimes.
This is a basic thing. It doesn't have to be more confusing than this. But we're going to actually hear a lot of folks say it. I listen to a little clip on on Twitter on X Dan Bongino saying something's not right. Why? Based on what? People who don't do crimes are not good at doing crimes, folks, The thing is this, once you've done it, it can haunt you
forever. The evidence that you've left, the trail that you put behind you will follow you and the people that are supposed to go look for it will do that. This was a high profile murder in a city like New York where they have unlimited capabilities of resources. They have a huge Police Department, they have a massive FBI office there. They have a huge presence of the United States Marshall Service. All of these people can run out
there and get after this. I even saw people like Tracy Bean saying either this guy is insane or there's something else going on here. Why? Because he did this. I'm going to play the video. We'll just play it. Look, people who kill people probably are not all right? And so is this a little bit
strange? Yeah. But this is Altoona, PA. This is not some big city where they have extra body armor to throw on everybody and they think someone's going to assassinate folks that are getting taken in for either their initial appearance or for their plea. This, this is not that crazy. Like people say all kinds of wild stuff when they're in custody. You usually don't see it. That's all. One, it doesn't make a clip.
Two, you don't have the interest in it, but like sitting in the back of the car with somebody or driving them anywhere. Like you're taking them to jail, you're taking them in for for confinement, you're taking them in for an interrogation. People do weird things in custody because it's a totally unnatural experience. And imagine this, you're a kid in your 20s. You've you've gotten some injury. You get really pissed off, you decide to go do something. Does this mean this guy's
guilty? Absolutely not. OK, Absolutely not. It means that he's innocent until proven guilty. But there's some strong evidence there, and you're seeing it on the screen. That's the actual the picture of the security Cam footage from the McDonald's that captured him sitting there eating a hash brown, probably figuring out what the hell have I done? How the hell am I going to get out of this mess?
I've done it, now what? Anyway, this is the video that is making people say like there's something more to it. Why? Because he's yelling things that sound like a guy who would go out there and kill someone over ideology. That's what he sounds like to me. Insult the intelligence of the American people experience. You're completely out of touch and you're insulting the intelligence of the American people and their lived experience. What does that even mean? That doesn't mean anything.
That just means you're yelling something because you have a press corps there. You're yelling something because you did theoretically an action that was based on ideology and then you have like, ideology you want to yell about. It makes perfect sense to me. In any case, nothing about that is unusual. The fact that someone decided to print a 3D gun and go and do a suppression, you know, and, and kill somebody on the street in New York, that's weird. It truly is. But this is how people get
caught. The minute you walk away, we'll call it right of bang. OK, so the action happens. And then to the right of that, he had a getaway plan, I'm sure, which we saw he got on a bike and he went there. But once you're out of the area, all of the chain of evidence continues to follow you. So for all of the the the idea that he was this mastermind, which is what people keep kind of acting like that he was this like, you know, almost pro.
He was like a semi pro assassin. You leave evidence like bullets behind really things that may or may not have fingerprints on them. You're going to have the striations from the the rounds that hit the guy you were on camera where the actual assassination took place. If this is the kid that they actually, if they have the line of evidence that that runs it to there, there's unlimited evidence that's going to connect him.
And then he had the things on and people, people don't get rid of. Like where would you get rid of a fake ID? If you were smart, you would take pieces of the gun and you'd throw it, you know, over the couple, you know, dozens of miles between the the place where the crime took place and where you ended up getting caught in Pennsylvania. That's what you would do. You'd ditch it into fields, you ditch it into lakes.
You wouldn't go straight into Central Park and drop it in the lake where they had the the NYPD dive team looking for it. There's ways to do these things, but you'd have to be smart enough to realize what is and what is not going to get you jammed up. And you probably have to have a familiarity with law enforcement. You know who also knows how to get away with crimes? People who do crimes all the time.
It's way harder to find that. It's rare that somebody has got enough information from watching something on TV to figure out how actual crimes are actually solved. Just saying. So most people have the same awareness of, of let's say like the law and order crowd or the SVU type crowd. It's just, it's just not the way that real crimes are solved. They're they're solved because people around you see you. It's because you showed your face somewhere. If you look, he showed his face
like a week prior. The minute that you do an action like that, everything that you've done in any bubble that they can expand out to is going to be under scrutiny. Most people just don't have the awareness how to do that. And what was this cover story? What was this cover for action? It doesn't seem like it was really there. Just saying it doesn't have to always be a conspiracy. Somebody said this online the other day and I think it's true.
It's a it's anonymous Twitter account that runs underneath the name Publius. But the, the, the, the ability to, to convince the American people that everything is a conspiracy, kind of Alex Jones thing. They're always trying to lie to you. That is the Kansas City shuffle that has been taken, that is undertaken and is being used in a weaponized fashion.
The information operation we talked the other day about sort of like, you know, Assad's plane being downed and everybody ran with it. Why? Because we need that dopamine hit of thinking that we discovered the thing that nobody else saw. Everybody wants to be a detective. Everybody wants to be Sherlock Holm. Everybody wants to see those, those red strings in their mind connecting the dots. I'm just going to tell you don't
have the facts. This is why I don't get that deep in the weeds on a lot of this stuff. Even the things that look kind of shady. It's like I'm not in a position to know that and neither are you. So don't worry about it. Let's just figure out the things that we can actually deal with. Let's figure out the narratives that we can actually debunk because we know these people are lying. That's all. It's hard. It's hard because like, we're constantly being lied to.
In any case, I'll read a little bit of this. He he was sitting at a table with a laptop and a backpack. He was wearing a brown medical mask, a brown beanie. Sorry. He was wearing a blue medical mask, a, a, a blue beanie, a dark jacket. And then he's sitting there eating and, and somebody apparently looked over and said, doesn't that guy look like the shooter from New York, one of the regulars in the McDonald's? You're wondering like, oh, well, this guy like hates corporate
stuff. And he's like this, you know, kind of clean living fanatic, like what's he doing in a McDonald's? People go to things that are familiar and they also go to places that they think nobody would find them. The problem with places like McDonald's is that they are frequented by people who pay attention to the news, who have nothing else going on. They're sitting there on a, on a, you know, on a, on a Tuesday morning and they're going, that guy looks familiar.
I've been watching the news. I'm sitting here scrolling on my phone on Twitter, and it's everywhere. And sure enough, maybe I'll ask somebody about it. Look, people get caught because of dumb mistakes all the time. That's regular. It's standard. It's the way of the world. OK?
The one thing that is interesting, because we've been talking about assassinations, particularly of this guy, remember that there was this thing that happened in this country, we had a couple of assassination attempts on the guy who's about to be the president. And so with very little fanfare and actually deep in the weeds, I found this on CB s s website today.
There's a House task force, which of course had both Republicans and Democrats on it. And they have just released their final report on the Trump assassination attempts. So the guy you're seeing on the screen is, is Jason Crow. He's Democrat. I think he's out of Colorado, if that sounds right to me, to double check. Again, they're talking about the situation with Matthew Crooks. They're talking about the situation that happened in Mar a Lago, the golf course and all that nonsense.
It's 180 pages. Yet another reason why members of Congress are more than happy to spend all their time doing things. And what do they do? They do things they're not actually really that good at per SE. For the most part. They hire like former FBI agents. If you guys don't know people that didn't work, the kind of crimes that we're talking about, they generally don't hire like local or retired state police officers. I don't know why they just don't.
They hire people that are from former federal law enforcement backgrounds that don't necessarily work these types of cases. In any case, it was made-up of seven Republican, 6 Democrats, looked into all these sort of assassination conspiracies, went out there and tried to find what is the singular moment that allowed this kid, Thomas Crooks, Thomas Matthew Crooks, close enough to take a potshot at the the future president of the United States. And you're going to be shocked to find out.
And the answer is essentially a cultural failure. the US Secret Service has the exact same problem that we've been talking about from the beginning. They didn't unearth some big conspiracy, not for lack of wanting to, although they didn't have some people that probably should have been on there, right? They didn't have former Seals. They didn't have guys who had a background as snipers or even people that had a background and serious investigations.
You had a bunch of congressmen that just kind of showed up to get their name on the report. But the end of the day, I don't think they're wrong. I think there is a failure in federal law enforcement and in federal protective service, which is that they think that they're going to win. They think because they've never been tested, they haven't been tried. You don't need something more
complicated than that. And what they said is that there's an this, this, this built in sensation that if you bring something to light, then you will pay for it. If you call out your agency, whether you're an FBI agent, whether you're someone for the US Marshall Service as a as a deputy Marshall, if you are somebody at the ATF, if you work for the DEA, you bring that forward and you are going to eat
the consequences. The problem is not what your agency is doing is that you recognize that your agency has flaws. That rings pretty true to me and it actually hits me pretty close to home because that has been my personal experience and that has been the experience of the suspendables. God forbid you stand in front of the class and say you are all wrong.
What you are doing is a mistake. You are not following your constitutional oath, You are assuming things that should not be assumed, and you are putting our mission in jeopardy. The minute you do that, you are the enemy. You are the problem. I'm going to give you guys some more examples of that soon, but nothing is more.
Maybe ironic in this exact moment when we are getting that report saying that the culture is the failure it, it reminds me of the Durham report, which I always go back to. You remember Durham report comes out and everybody was looking for all these indictments. What it said was something that was so obvious to those of us who has worked inside the FBI and what was wrong. What it said was, is that no policy, no procedure and no federal law would correct the
problem with the FBI. It is a culture problem. It is a it is if you do not hire the right men and women to do the job, then you will have failure. They will fail to do the right thing. Given that moment, my speech to anyone coming into Quantico, if I was ever given the opportunity to do so, would go something to the effect of one day someone is going to ask you to violate your oath to the Constitution out of loyalty to this institution.
And if you take this job, you better be in the position to say I will honor my oath to the Constitution first. It is your first responsibility. It is your first job, it is the only one, and you may lose your job over it. If you are not prepared to lose your job in order to take this job, then you do not deserve this job. Period. That has been the message that
the suspendables came up with. What is really funny, ironic and disgusting is that Eric Swalwell, who seems to be a very detestable kind of Weasley character, a guy who is a sort of a test balloon for a lot of Democrat ideas. Can we float these things out there and see if they catch wind? Why? Because he has a lot of notoriety, because there's a lot of skeletons in that man's closet.
And for all of the court of like the people talking about, oh, he slept with a Chinese spy and the Fang Fang thing, he really wasn't in a position to know very much. He was being, let's say he was being cultivated, I think, as an asset, but I don't think that he was actually the asset that everyone thinks he was. But there's probably some compliment on him from that time.
Assuming that they had any shame, assuming that they had any scruples, assuming that the Democrats actually held anyone to the standard that we would hold ourselves to. And that assumption would be false. By the way, right here's Eric Swalwell encouraging FBI agents, the line prosecutors of the DOJ, to disobey any orders that they believed to be unlawful. It's a little late for that, my friend. It's a little late for that because we already know they did.
And we know they did because I called them to the carpet on this. I called Spencer Evans, who was the deputy assistant director of the human resource department of the FBI. He is now the assistant director of human resources. He is on the list of people that needs to be addressed for his COVID tyranny. And what I said was there's no reason for you to enforce something that will be sorted out in the courts and will go in
our favor. And he chose to do the wrong thing anyway, even though there was plenty of reasons to hide behind it and just say, why don't we just let the courts sort this out? And they did, By the way, the 5th Circuit put a nationwide injunction on Biden's vaccine mandate. So we already know that members of the FBI and certainly members of the DOJ are willing to push forward against and and and institute unlawful, illegal
orders. So isn't it interesting that suddenly when it's now valuable to the Democrat Party, they're going to have scruples and standards? I've got multiple examples of this. So allow me to prove the case. But we'll start off with this Eric Swalwell clip. He was on MSNBC with, I think, Chris Hayes talking about this. Enjoy.
Hypocrisy at its finest. I worked across from Cash Patel on the House Intel Committee and, and he was a loyalist to Devin Nunez and did everything to be a Wrecking Ball there. And he blindly followed the orders of Nunez and essentially Trump. And he'll do the same at the FBI. But to the agents at the FBI and the DOJ prosecutors, I say this, I was a prosecutor once, You know, I had an oath to upkeep to the Constitution and to the court. And you're not helpless.
You do not have to follow illegal orders. And the American people, while they want to see the cost of their goods and groceries come down, they do not want us to look. Like Russia or China. And so it's going to depend on the men and women at the FBI and the DOJ to stand tall and to show the courage that, you know, really LED them to join the ranks of those forces. And I still have trust that they will be a firewall as well.
I work a firewall. You say You notice the one thing he didn't say in that particular little diatribe there? He said he was a loyalist. He said he'll be a Wrecking Ball. What he didn't say is that the conclusions that he came to were false. Being a Wrecking Ball and a loyalist have nothing to do with the accuracy of the thing that you discover. I was a Wrecking Ball to my own case occasionally.
In fact, that's the thing that I would encourage FBI agents to do. Turn around, look skeptically at everything that you were asked to do and everything that you were in trying to prove and try to disprove it. It will make your case stronger. And if you do disprove it, you should be proud, you should be happy. Nothing wrong with that. But that evidence of resistance or the the inclination to resist, we already know that the FBI agents out there are willing to break the law.
We've seen it. And they're certainly willing to violate long standing traditions of staying out of the the 1st Amendment. That's where your oath belongs. I make the argument here all the time, but I'll make it again. If you sign up for government service, particularly in the enforcement end, if you are a state or a federal law enforcement officer, if you are sworn to uphold the Constitution, you are not trying to uphold the Article 1 powers of the legislature or the Article 2 powers of the
executive. And make sure that those things play out according to the way that our founding fathers wrote them. That's not your job. Your job is to make sure that you and your agency and your ability to project federal or state power on the people abides by the Bill of Rights, the leash that the inhibition that the government is supposed to experience and not come after you. It's very critical that that's where your oath lies. They're not there. Look at this. This is a really interesting
story. This is coming from a website that I hadn't heard before. It's a sub stack, essentially. This is called Spy Talk and it seems like it reprints over on Substack. You can be a paid subscriber, blah blah blah. All right, so the story is this FBI intimidating visits to Discord leak story. FBI agents told a former Army officer to delete his months old
spy talk story. So again from this blog that he posted over on LinkedIn because it then became something that they were aware of. There's a lot of former FBI agents on LinkedIn. If you're not aware of, there's a lot of them out there that will go and cry to their old masters and, and, and, you know, try to serve what they think is the public good. So what we're seeing here is a secret. It's a picture of a document marked Secret RELIDO that's released to, It's a release to
sort of control secret. The S is for secret. So that is this is a theoretically a secret document analysis. It's now been exposed all over the place. We are showing it because it's part of this story and because we have the right to publish things that have been exposed if it's in the public interest. It's months old. It goes back to April this year. OK Paul Kobaugh, a 66 year old former United States Army
information warfare expert. I don't know what that means, if he was in fact an expert or not, but that's what they're claiming here. Spent much of his retirement years writing books about political warfare, posting articles by others that he has and follows on LinkedIn this week. This is actually coming up on actually that's two years old, that story. So this is actually a year old story that was just brought to our attention. So bear with me.
I'm just showing you an example. This week the FBI took notice of those articles posted back in April. Agents from the Bureau San Antonio office, which is the one closest to me, visited the veteran at his home on Wednesday and asked him to delete articles from the so-called Discord
leaks. A massive trove of highly classified and highly classified is probably secret is not highly classified in my world, but whatever highly classified documents that a low level Air Force National Guard enlisted guy has been charged with stealing and posting on social media. The story goes on to say that essentially the agents went and knocked on the door. They tried to do a what's called a knock and talk.
When they went to do the knock and talk, he didn't answer 'cause he and his wife were busy. They left a business card. There's a picture of the business card and the and the officer. Sorry, the agent wrote. Please contact me, press 0, ask for an operator to connect, direct you to me directly. He spends his time in a Home Office where he's the vice president of a group called Narrative Strategies, AUS based think tank and a consultancy that specialize in non kinetic
aspects of conflict. Which is to say that he's still involved in that world and he also operates this sort of spy talk, occasional writing articles and working on books. The agent said specifically, we need you to take it down. When they met him in person, they said they believed I may have posted something that had classified markings on it. That's totally irrelevant, by the way. Case law is not new in this case. We'll talk about United States versus New York Times in just a
minute. The agent told him I'd like to examine your phone for any other replicas of classified documents. Stupidly, this man actually agreed to that. You guys know the rule. ABCD, if the FBI shows up at your your house, you should always be closing the door. ABCD, you don't share this kind of stuff, but that's what they did. And when he asked about it, they said, oh, this is part of the FB is counterintelligence project maybe. So maybe they need to go out there and try to mitigate risk.
But you can't ask a journalist to take some things down. And This is why you can't. New York Times Co, NYT Co versus the United States. You guys can find this. It'll be on our it'll be over on the local page. This is a 19711971 decision. Southern District of New York attempting to stop to have an injunction against the printing of the Pentagon Papers. Do you understand I just said this, 1971 that predates every single FBI agent that happens that happens to be on duty right now.
This got decided long before they became FBI agents, long before. And it's taught at the FBI Academy. Ask me how I know. This addresses the problem what's called prior restraint. This is a big deal right now because judges are trying to engage in prior restraint on a regular basis. They're trying to get people to self censor, saying what you're doing might be getting you on the wrong side of the law.
No, this is what the case says, that you have a right to publish it if it's in the public's interest, including things that are classified, as long as you were not the one who was asking for that to be to happen. If you were not incentivizing, which is, by the way, the claim against Julian Assange.
If you're not incentivizing people to go out and access these documents on your behalf if someone happens to bring you something, you could publish stolen and hacked and classified documents if they're in the public interest. And the only way way that you wouldn't be able to do it are some very narrow parameters which are pretty narrowly defined. And the New York Times won this case. This is Pulitzer Prize type
stuff. When you actually expose it, the government tries to hide between Section 973 of the Espionage Act. This was the stuff that was cited at the time. But I'm putting the decision up here for you and I encourage you to go make yourself familiar with New York Times, the United States. It's not new case law, but it is important. It means that you have the right to publish things.
I'm going to read you just from the opinion section here, if that's OK. The Supreme Court heard arguments from the executive branch, the Times, the Washington Post, the Justice Department on July the 25th and 26th of 1971, along with the issue of how the Times obtained the documents, which was being investigated by a federal grand
jury elsewhere. The real issue for the court was whether or not there was a sufficient justification for prior restraint, which would be a suspension of the newspapers First Amendment rights to freedom of the press. You know, the thing that you swear allegiance to as an FBI
agent. The 1st Amendment states that no federal law can be made abridging the freedom of the press, but there are a few landmark cases in the 20th century that did establish precedents creating exceptions to that rule when they were a clear and present danger. Essentially, you have to put someone's life in danger.
There has to be a grave and probable danger and that was not met here and the government has to meet the burden of showing justification for the imposition of such a restraint and failed to do so. 6 Justices concurred with the opinion, and the Supreme Court upheld the right of the newspapers to publish the material. There are multiple concurring,
including by Hugo Black folks. The fact of the matter is, is that this should have never come in front of anybody because you do not have the right as a federal government employee to try to stop the press from publishing things. Period, end of story. The exceptions are very, very small. It doesn't stop these people. It doesn't stop them even a little bit. It gets me hot about this stuff. I really do. It gets pissed. It pisses me off.
Let's talk about something. Speaking of like, if I'm running this hot right now, probably some of you guys are too. You've got a bunch of stuff going on. You've got a a busy schedule. So we're going to pivot over, say thanks to our friends over at the Wellness company, and then we're going to get deeper into some of the sort of like, I don't know what it is. It's like gossipy type material at this point. All right, folks, All right, so
the holidays are here. That means that sick season means that you might be running a little bit quick and running tired. Sinus infection, strep throat, upper respiratory hacking, coughing. Everyone is traveling. They're all passing around. I get it. Let's do a little bit more of the kind of the weird Wednesday thing that's kind of like the heavy meat of it. We're going to get into something a little bit lighter. Kind of, let's talk about this sort of, I don't know, tabloid type story.
This is being covered by the the New York Post. So that's a really good place for it. Other people picked it up as well. Donald Trump has tapped Kimberly Gilfoy to serve as the United States ambassador to Greece after they split up. They being Don Junior and Kimberly Gilfoy and people are like, that's the art of the deal. What's darker than that? They had a, an engagement. I actually didn't know if they were engaged or married.
I never really did. But I've never actually seen them together when I was even at Mar a Lago. I think they've been kind of separated for quite a while. It is what it is. The New York Times, the New York Post, the Washington Post, all these people are running these stories. Why? Because they're really excited to see anything that is kind of like personal. And so the idea is, is that, you know, they broke up. So he's sending her overseas. No, I'm sure this was a good move for her.
It's she's a nice lady. I've met her in person a few times. I've also dealt with her on her podcast. She's always been very nice to us. So congratulations to Miss Gilfoy. I think that's probably an interesting post. I hope it is. I hope that the two of them get on and they're always shutting and then they're showing John Junior who's running around with somebody new. And now at this point, people will always be fascinated with sort of the Trump kids.
It is not quite the same, for whatever it's worth. It's just not the same when it's on the left because there's all kinds of political like, how about running around with like child prostitutes? That seems like a real problem. You don't see that kind of stuff running front page when we're talking about Hunter Biden. But because we're talking about Don Junior, he's got the same name as the future president. They got to go in and get after him and share all this kind of
stuff. The other thing that they've been trying to do is dirty up all the cabinet pits. You guys have been aware of this. We've seen some really good movements on the Hill where folks have been meeting with guys like Cash. They've been meeting with Pete Hegseth. They've been meeting with Tulsi Gabbard, take your pick, and
kind of moving the needle. We had this initial outburst against one thing where everyone kind of acts outraged, then they kind of forget about it. So we're seeing this. This is a kind of a good piece from ABC saying that the pressure that the MAGA types, that's you, most of you, and even the people that are just in the conservative camp. We just want to see Donald Trump get the people that he he asked for. Not all of them are our favorite choices. That's going to be objectively
true. We just want to see him get the cabinet that he wants so he can do the things that he said he would do, whatever that looks like. Because Donald Trump gets a chance to pick his cabinet. That's what we thought. ABC News reporting that MAGA pressure on senators over the Trump cabinet picks are showing
early signs of paying off. We've seen pictures all over the place, Senators like Joni Ernst, Lindsey Graham, people that have basically highlighted themselves as potential problems in these confirmation hearings. They all seem to be stepping in line. They're all getting the things that they need. They're getting the the light touch. They're getting an opportunity for a photo op. I'm seeing positive things all over Twitter. Going to going to resist my general urge to just crap on people.
I will crap on Mitch McConnell in a second here because he's 1000 years old. But everybody else seems to be kind of stepping up. They said their first piece and then they get to have the meeting and then they get to negotiate whatever it is that they're looking for, whatever they're trying to have happen. And that's all kind of going the right way. That's not bad. There are people that don't know how to play the game, or at least they forgot that the Internet exists.
I guess generally what happens is you come out really strong on something and then someone comes in and you just say, aha, yes, yes, I've had my my mind changed because I had this very important meeting where some negotiation happens. That's politics. There's some sort of compromise. What happens when you say things that you can't walk away from? What happens when you say the things that will never be unsaid and then the people that you work with do them?
Adam Schiff might be the best example. We we showed like our number one hateable, who might be Eric swalwell #2 hateable's got to be Adam Schiff. He might be the number one. He's weak, he's frail, he's effeminate. He says things that he's absolutely shameless in. And we continue to see this stuff. So I'm going to play you kind of a super clip of Democrats saying the one thing that they wanted, they wanted to see Donald Trump held accountable.
Now, the fact that he's out here doing his things, we all don't care. We don't care if he sends Kimberly Gilfoy to Greece. We don't care if he appoints one of his, his son's father in law's into a foreign post. We don't care. It doesn't matter. None of that matters because they lost their credibility over
things like this. This is a compilation of Democrats and Democrat activists and mouthpiece in the media trying to basically tell you we need to indict Donald Trump because we have to defend the democracy. And then suddenly they've got and blanket pardons are only for the corrupt. So let's just hear it from their own mouth. Have you ever heard of somebody? Getting a preemptive. Pardon. Who was innocent of all crime? Who's just an innocent person?
Have you ever heard of that? Just somebody getting a blanket pardon and they're an innocent person. But no, it's the president's own family. It's people that have been covering up for the president in addition to his own family. Is there an innocent explanation for someone to seek pre emptive pardons for family members? Would you do that if you knew you were innocent and just
worried about outside forces? The the answer to that is going to be no. If you haven't done anything wrong, you sit there and go. What do you need a pre emptive pardon for this? This clip actually goes on further. So I cut away from it. I'm going to play you a shorter version of it showing just just Adam Schiff encouraging the indictment of it shows you a
time stamp. So it's 2018, the first clip, 2019 and then 2024. This is put out by the maze and the account over on X, which is a really good compilation clip. You'll see them kind of go across. But if you're listening and you're trying to figure out like, what's the what's the catch here? The catch is he does it in 2018, in 2019. And then after Donald Trump is coming back in, he has a new position, you know, a new perspective.
None of these people, they're all unburdened by what has been, I guess. I guess that's the upside to it. We're going to get a little bit more into sort of the resistance that is being cultivated right now in a second. But enjoy this little sort of mash up of just, can you just eat your own words? By the way, he looks exactly the same in the last six years. That guy has a lot of either makeup or Botox or he just lives a pampered indoor lifestyle.
On the day Donald Trump leaves office, the Justice Department may indict him very strongly in favor of indicting the president when he is out of office, I don't think. The incoming president should be threatening his political opponents with jail time. That's not the kind of talk we should hear from the president in a democracy. We have a Republic. We keep telling you it's not a democracy, so we don't really care.
Isn't it interesting though? They always find their standards whenever it's going to benefit them, and they always ignore them when it's going to go and attack them. So there's that. Speaking of standards, remember, your job is to do exactly what the federal government wants you to do unless the federal government is controlled by the other party, and then you better resist, Resist over and over
again. Democratic governors are quietly preparing extensive plans to counter, AKA resist Donald Trump. This is coming from CNN, the most trusted source in propaganda, diplomatic, depressed as they've been in public, a small group of Democratic governors are deep into the behind the scenes preparations and deliberations. Sounds like a insurgency.
It sounds kind of like sedition. They want to balance the politics of pushing back on what they expect from Donald Trump on their next turn in the White House. They've been pouring over Project 2025, Project 25, so that they can go after Donald Trump's blueprint and see if they can stop it. They're going to be studying what their executive powers allow, what the state powers that allow, and they've been making really, really good
decisions, as you guys know. They want to make sure that life is just better for you, the people. They're going to try to fix the problems that were created under the BITE administration. One of those was inflation. You guys might remember we had kind of an inflation issue. I also think that they don't understand anything about how the economy works. They continue to prove this.
Here's Kathy Hochul solving the problem of inflation in the state of New York, and she is doing so by giving away the money that the government collected back to you. She's going to buy votes and buy taxpayers with their own money. Tell me how this solves inflation. Enjoy this one. This is pretty hard to watch by the way. Think about how much money they spent on the stupid press conference in the signs too.
Just just say it in my. Budget Next month they will send you a check to buy your groceries for a month or whatever you want to spend it on. And if you're an individual earning up to $150,000 a year, it's $300.00. What does that look like? All right, how about that when we're individual? Now, if you're filing jointly and you have a family, you need a little more, right? Families are expensive. How about this 500 dollars $500? 500 smackaroos. How about this? You know what that vibe is?
Is it just that people in New York are not used to being humans, that they just elect these automatons? Do you remember when the, when, who was it? It wasn't Bloomberg, it was the other guy. He's he's, he's eating like French fries. He's like, are you trying to tell me that if I go get this shot, I get this delicious hamburger and these French fries? I get to, I get to eat this like mediocre ass food. Is that what you're trying to
tell me? Look at these, look at this, this amazing check I'm going to send you for 500 smackeroos. Your life is going to be your life's going to be so much better. That's what's in our budget. We're going to give you the money that we took from you, but we spent all the time processing it and doing this, this fluff job that we're doing on ourselves. Gross. At least the priorities are correct, right? Here's another good one of
priorities. So like I said, This is why they're losing because they're spending time doing ridiculous, stupid nonsense. How about this? Democrats are calling for action on law enforcement selling restricted weapons. And you're not going to you're
not going to believe this. But This is why I had to use the story including weapons of war that have been sold illegally in 23 states, Puerto Rico and Washington, DC, based on a study found by House Democrats. And in a letter that they wrote to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms and Explosives, they said that they found dozens of law enforcement officials accidentally or illegally selling firearms that
they're not allowed to sell. And it was led by Democrat Robert Garcia of California, which is a communist state. It was sent off to the ATF director, Steve Deidelbach, who doesn't know anything about guns by his own admission. It was co-authored and joined in this letter by Dan Goldman, who is a big loser and doesn't need guns because he has people that carry them for him on the screen. What you're seeing right there is an FNFS 2000.
It is a hideously stupid looking plastic bull pup design 556 with a very cheap Vortex little optic on the top of it. It is a 1X magnification tube. Yeah, God forbid, by the way, that's legal in anywhere that you can be in America except in the communist areas. But that is a weapon of war. It's not select fire. So it's really not.
And the thing that they said is that there has been some reporting suggesting there may be serious systemic vulnerabilities in the current machine gun sought off shotgun and rifle regulations and enforcement mechanisms which jeopardize public safety by enabling the proliferation of dangerous weapons into the hands of international traffickers and organized crime groups. They said breathlessly as they held onto for the prairies. Tell it to Randy Weaver a holes.
They have been enforcing stupid laws on stupid things about not weapons of war for since 1934. Short barreled shotguns, This is the thing. Sawed off shotguns. Do you guys really think that? Like that's the threat? Do you know how big a shotgun is? Even if you sawed off, it's going to be like 18 inches long. How many people can conceal that? One guy, One guy that I investigated in my history with the FBI, he was 6 foot 7 or 6 foot eight. He weighed £350. He looked like a professional
wrestler. He could have concealed a short barreled rifle. That's about it and it's bull put by the way, that thing has a 16 inch barrel that they're showing on the screen, so they don't even know what the hell they're talking about. It's incredible. Anyway, Speaking of not knowing what the hell they're talking about, it's got a little taste of some of the things. There's been some reaction to the verdict that's gone on because Daniel Penny was acquitted.
We cover that the other day. I just want to let you know the ladies over on The View are unhappy. And my favorite comedian, Whoopi Goldberg, who was in famous movies like Karina Karina, she used to be funny. She wasn't really that funny, was she? Probably not. She was in Sister Act Sister Act was good, had some great songs to it. That was peak Whoopi Goldberg. That's where she should have
stayed. Anyway, now she's really upset because a guy who just saw the judicial system work against all expectation and odds was able to be acquitted by a New York jury of doing a thing that he should have never been charged with. And she's pissed that he went out and had a beer and walked away. OK, suck it in, folks. It's view time. Here we go. There's been polarizing reaction to this verdict as well. I don't know, I I don't know that seeing them celebrating in
a bar made me comfortable. You know. I mean, you killed a guy, the man is dead. And maybe you just, you take the celebration home. You don't do it outside. But that's just me. Don't listen to anything I say. How do we, how do we talk about something that we're so ignorant of, we don't really know anything about? While we're talking about it,
let's talk about self-defense. Let's talk about my friends over at Shield Arms. You guys can go ahead and check them out at shieldarms.com promo code. Kyle, I've got some weapons that are being built over there right now as we speak. I can't talk about it, but I will show them to you soon. I imagine they may be here in time for Christmas. shieldarms.com. They are the maker of the magazines that I carry every single day. Actually, I've got a next one here. This is from a pistol caliber
carbine. Let me just pull this up on the screen. Boom, look at this. They're very well made. They make these, these extension butt plates. If you want to get them for your for your regular, you know, double stack Glock mags, you want to get them for the the compact carry ones.
If you want to look into a high quality weapon for someone that you love a shooter in your life, you will not find a a much nicer arm for the money and you get 10% off by using my promo code Kyle. Do check them out by all means you'll enjoy it. You'll appreciate it. The ladies on the view will cry very, very difficult. If you want to carry a capable weapon system, the one thing you can do is you can upgrade your trigger.
You can upgrade the ability to change magazines and you should upgrade the capacity of said magazine. You can do that over at Shield arms dot com promo code Kyle. Let me pull them off the screen right now. OK, OK. That vibe that Whoopi just had, I'm very upset that they went and had a beer. It reminded me of a scene from my favorite television program, maybe my favorite television program ever, which was really, really good inside baseball of how things work at the LAPD, at
least how it worked in the 70s. And they did a great show called Bosch. Many of you have seen it. The people who made it are kind of libs. But this is one of those scenes. They're talking about having a beer after after killing a man and men blow off steam differently because violence and adrenaline and all the other things and having names in the law enforcement world. It's kind of a dark thing if you get involved in that. And, and soldiers and Marines and sailors and airmen have the
same experience. They just have a different way of dealing with trauma. And there is a trauma in taking life. Let me show you a little scene from Bosch. Then we're going to get into why I think Daniel Penny is man of the year. And I'm going to close with that. And it's still got that Christmas thing, so do not forget. All right, check this out. Scene from Bosch from the courtroom in the first episode. I'm not spoiling it anything, detective.
How many people have you killed? I don't know. You don't know how many people you've killed. How is that possible? I was in the military first Gulf War re upped after 9-11. I did a tour in Afghanistan, you saw. Combat I did. Were you? In the Army, yes. Infantry Special. Forces Special. Forces. So one might say you're an experienced, highly trained killer with a body count too large to remember your honor. Objection Objection.
Miss Chandler, please save the ad hominem character attacks for closing arguments where they belong. Yes, your. Honor, I apologize. What about as a police officer? How many people have you killed in the line of duty? 5 S killing Mr. Flores was not a unique experience for you. Objection. Your Honor, withdrawn. Detective, that night after you shot and killed Mr. Flores, what did you do? Standard. Protocol.
I did an interview and a walkthrough at the scene with an FID detective in my league Rep OK, So he talks about what he does with the the LAPD investigators, which is to say that he stays on scene. He gets interviewed by FID, which he's going to explain in just a second that he goes through with the Liebrec. So you actually have, you know, a representative. By the way, you should have a representative if you talk to the police, even if you are the
police. I'm just saying that's the same thing that happened to Daniel Penny. He remained on scene. He was questioned by the officers. He didn't get legal counsel. That was a big mistake and obviously resulted in a lot more problems for him. But I'm glad that it worked out in his favor and when it is all said and done and he's been cleared, he went out and had a beer with his attorneys. Carry on because this is this is where it's going to get interesting. The K party back at Division.
I spoke to other FID detectives and they also took my statement FI. D Force. Investigation Division. He's in an. LAPD tradition after the killing of a suspect to go out that night or the next with other officers, have a drink or two. I wouldn't. Call it a tradition, but it's been. Known to happen. Sometimes to blow off steam to blow. Off Steam? Understandable. All that adrenaline. Did a gathering of this kind occur after you shot and killed Roberto Flores?
Yes. Do you recall the name of the bar El? Compadre and were there. Other officers there with you that night? Yes. Does this kind of gathering have a name within the department? It's called AK Party. AK Party. And would you please tell us what the K stands for? Kill. You attended a kill party to celebrate the shooting of Mr. Flores. It wasn't a. Celebration, all right, And that's what it looks like, OK, That's the kind of the vibe. That's the that's the thing that
Whoopi Goldberg is doing. If you watch the show, you realize that it was a justifiable shoot. The guy drew a weapon. Listen, same thing Jordan Neely, he presented an imminent danger of death or serious physical injury. It's very important. Prior to that acquittal, he released this video and I want to show it to you guys. There are two pieces of evidence #1 is what he said before he was acquitted and #2 is what he said after, because he just did an interview with Fox News.
And that's why he gets my man of the year and he ends up in the honorary category of suspendables because I do think the man said what men are supposed to do. And it is so critical. Enjoy this real quick East Village. From Manhattan, so I take the subway multiple times a day. In this instance I was coming from school. I got out of class around 2:15 and I took the I was at J Street. Metro Tech took the Uptown F train at 2nd Ave. A man came on, stumbled on, he was appeared to be on drugs.
The doors closed and he ripped his jacket off and violent and threw it at the people sitting down to my left. I was listening to music at the time and he was yelling so I took my headphones out to hear what he was yelling. And the three main threats that he repeated over and over was I'm going to kill you. I'm prepared to go to jail for life and I'm willing to die. That's it.
That's an imminent danger. When that someone looks like they are unhinged, when they look like they are presenting themselves as an imminent danger of death or serious physical injury to another person or to yourself, then you can act under the Constitution, The thing that law enforcement officers are supposed to swear to the end. That's it. That's just there's nothing more to it.
It should have never gone anywhere and it tells you how gross it is. The one thing that I think is so commendable because he's come out and done some press, which he probably doesn't want to do based on listening to him, I believe him. I think that he's been very straightforward and he's mechanical in his delivery.
He reminds me of all the infantry types that I know when things are talking, when they're talking about the thing that they had to do, they have a black and white way of explaining it. So here he is talking to Fox, and the biggest piece of it is the reveal that he drops, saying whether he would do this thing again, knowing the consequences, I mean. I'm not a confrontational person. I don't really extend myself and I think this type of thing is very uncomfortable.
All this attention and limelight is I'm very uncomfortable and I would prefer without it. I didn't want any type of attention or praise or and I still don't the guilt I would have felt if someone did get hurt, if if he did do what he was threatening to do, would never be able to live with myself. And I'll, I'll take a million court appearances and people calling me names and people hating me just to keep one of those people from getting hurt or killed. Time magazine Man of the Year.
Yes, they are in fact considering Donald Trump and Kamala Harris and a couple of others, but this is the man of the year in my book. They would never have the balls to actually name it. That is an honorable instinct say that I would take on all of this again just to make sure I know that women and children and other men that are not as strong as me are not going to face down death or serious physical injury
because someone refused to act. That is the nature of what the suspendables have always stood for. It's the nature of what men in Western society stood for. It's the reason why young men step into the gap and fight things like World War One and World War 2. Whether they are righteous or not in the cause, the instinct to do so is righteous to the to protect your fellow man, to step up and know that there is something that is demanded of you because you're a person of strength.
We hear this about every single superhero story we've ever heard of. They all come from the same place. Great power, great responsibility. That is an American virtue and value. How sad that people on the left wanted to smear this man. It just tells you a lot about the kind of people that they are. It tells you a lot about the way that they operate. They are not serious people. They are fake. They are fraudulent. They masquerade with fake virtue. I've got this fun little moment.
Let me just see if I can throw. Let's see if I can work this together. First of all, Mitch McConnell fell. He's got a bruise on his face. He's got a thing on his lip. So some of these people that are on our side supposedly are not people that we want there. It's not virtuous to stay there when you're in your 80s. Get the hell out. I wanted to throw that on there only because I wanted you guys to see not looking good.
He's got a wrist brace on. And we, you know, we haven't heard a lot about the glitch in a while, but it's out there. On top of that, some really good things have happened. We've seen that the DOJ, which went after guys like Mark How, who also stood up and did the thing you'd expect protected his own child, but would have protected other children as well. Strong men being strong is not a
crime. And luckily, we're seeing that the Department of Justice is going to get Harmeet Dillon as the, the assistant attorney general for civil rights, the AAG under the civil rights division, which the, the, the leftist media is going to call the storied civil rights division. The weaponized is more accurate right now. She's going to fight DEI, supposedly. No, I think she's going to actually just return it to doing the job it's supposed to do,
protecting civil liberties. Harmey Dillon is a champ. I've spoken to her personally when I had my problems. She gave me a, a consultation on the phone, which is a nice thing to do for someone who's got the kind of national prestige she does. She's a, she's absolutely a great choice. And so we've had some good choices. We've had some OK choices. We've had some and we've had some out of the park choices. And this is one of the out of the park choices.
So if you didn't know that Harmeet Dhillon has been tapped to be an AAG at Justice. She's going to step, step away from her firm. It's great for her firm and guys like Ron Coleman who work at her firm too in New York. It's awesome. It's awesome for America to see this kind of stuff. OK, let me let me pivot to the kind of the difference between that because they're going to attack everybody. This is why they lost.
They can't figure it out. I'm going to give you a difference between the type of people that surrounded Donald Trump and the type of people that surrounded Kamala Harris. Harris was surrounded by actors and fakes, not Daniel Penny types, not like real human beings, but frauds. So here is a little version of Mindy and Kamala, 2 Indian ladies. Remember, there's some Indian people in the orbit of Donald Trump that have been popping up.
Here's some fake fakeness. I'm going to play you just a little bit of that and then we're going to get into the anecdote to it, which my wife shared with me yesterday. And. Today we are cooking, but we have a very special guest. Very special. Senator Kamala Harris. Hi, guys. Wait. So here's what I want to know, OK. Is it? Respectful to call. I should be calling you Senator Harris, right? No, you should not. That's not on my birth certificate. OK. Kamala, yes, please.
OK, because. The Indian and me. I feel like my parents, my dad will watch this. Just don't call me. Auntie, OK. I won't. That's so genuine. They totally didn't just, like, play that out. That's what acting looks like. It's like drunk mom wine acting nastiness. Gross. Here is a really genuine reaction, by the way, something kind of funny when someone makes fun of you or is like lampooning your personality and you can take it.
That's amazing. Vivek Ramaswamy, one of the reasons why he was so successful in the campaign trail from a guy with a name like Ramaswamy, which most Americans would be like, who the hell is this to? Most of you couldn't tell whether it was Vivek or Vivek. I'm told it's Vivek. It rhymes with cake. That's what I was told. So it's like, cool, got it. His people were awesome. He's kind of awesome. I've dealt with him face to face, you know, man on man. I like him a lot.
I like that he's personable. And this is a real human reaction of someone lampooning you, which you can't get set up for. How do you not love it? The people that are in Trump's orbit are just a different kind of breed, it seems so far. So that's what I liked. Even the people that I don't know, I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt because of stuff like this. There's a video of you out there. I didn't realize you have an accent and I want to show you
this. I just want to Give your opinion on that. Let's see it. No, mom, I'm going to be first. But but Trump is so he's so gay ahead, gay ahead, man. But I tell them, I went to Harvard, I went to here. They look at me like, OK, that's really funny. Hey, Vivek. Hey. Hey, man. How are you? Yeah. Promise, Mommy. Good to meet you. Good to meet you. Yeah. What brings you to this part of town? Where are you from? I'm, like, down the street, actually. Oh, that's fantastic. So. So.
So what do you do? I'm a student. I want to play basketball. It's fantastic. So when you have, you know, you can be a cornerback, you can be a wide receiver. It doesn't really matter. The great thing about a meritocracy is if you're really good, you're going to make millions of dollars. It's really good. Oh, my gosh. Yeah. So this guy might have a future career. Is that not you? I mean, I wish I was in my 20s. That guy's pretty good.
Yeah. So maybe when when they're looking for people to mock me on SNL, he'd be a pretty good. I think he'd be pretty good. I'm going to tell you, if you did a video with him and you brought him here, you'll get like 30 million views. 100%. Why? Because it's genuine. And yes, and if you can say that, you know that you're going to be mocked on SNL already and then like you're sort of down with that as opposed to being the star of SNL right before you lose the presidential election.
It's a big difference. All right, that's what we got for the day. I will not leave you without a sort of cleanse to your palate. I promised you something that will make your Christmas merry and bright. I don't think I'm overselling this. This is the best Christmas cover song maybe ever made. For all of you out here that remember the 90s, that's most of my audience. I'm fairly confident you remember this. This is going to tickle your heartstrings. It'll be in your head for the
rest of the day. I will apologize in advance. No, I'm not sorry. I'm just kidding. You're going to enjoy this. I will put it over on locals as well, and you can follow the account which is called, I think it's called I Ruined It. I'll tell you at the end of it what the name of this this little group is. This is Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer. The red nosed reindeer had a very shining nose and if you ever saw it, you wouldn't even say it glows.
I love the other reindeer, used to laugh and call him names. They never let Rudolf Dawn in any reindeer games in one foggy Christmas Eve. Oh, Santa, came to say, can you take me higher to the square? Snowman sea? Can you take me higher? Show the list where slave bells rain. All right, it's by a it's by an account over on Instagram called There, I ruined it. You can also follow them over on XI, encourage you to do so. They got my follow. That thing is amazing.
Like who doesn't love Creed? If you don't, I think you hate America. There's something wrong with you. That's our weird Wednesday for the day. I hope that was something special. I kind of want the whole album done that way. It's epic folks, don't eat your coffee grounds. You're going to be coming at it
with the energy that I did. If you're listening over on Apple on Spotify, on iHeartRadio and the others, make sure that you have subscribed that you're being notified and that you share this episode with a friend. If each of you share it with one friend will double the audience overnight, and I'd really appreciate if you guys did. I think we're having a lot of fun over here.
And if you haven't joined the live chat, you're missing out on the best live chat on Rumble and on X. You should jump in. You should just put them on the screen for a second. There they are in all their glory. This just scrolls past the whole time that I'm talking. So I do appreciate all of you, all that are out there. God bless you, have a wonderful
beautiful day. I look forward to seeing you again tomorrow and go out there and sing some Take Me Higher, Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer for the rest of the day, just brighten everybody's Christmas. Thanks for listening to the Kyle Seraphin Show, streamed live weekdays on rumble.com/kyle Seraphin. Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth Social and Instagram at Kyle Seraphin.