Last Man Standing | EP 273

Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistleblower, an American patriot. Prepare to embrace the uncomfortable truth because this program has no time for comforting lies. Here is civil liberties enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI agent Kyle Serif. Hello my friends. Welcome to the Kyle Serif Show. Today is Wednesday. It is March the 27th and we are rolling live on rumble.com/kyle Serif. And make sure you have liked

this video at some point. Make sure you subscribe to the channel. Make sure if you're watching us somewhere else, especially if you're watching it in a replay and you don't want all the commercials come to rumble, There's less, there's less and we actually get paid. We're monetized there. We don't get paid on the other

places. If you're watching us on X, we appreciate you guys joining us. We're going to be talking some X stuff today, including I just, I just had this little funny interaction and I want to share it with you all just because this is the kind of stuff that goes on just before the show gets started. I'm having this conversation

with a buddy of mine. I'm looking over on my my little chat group here and he's a he's a former Green Beret or retired Green Beret and he goes, you're an influencer in real life. Because one of you in your comments said I'd really love to be able to pay whatever money it takes to get Kyle Serif and up here to teach me about firearms, that I can be competent and defend my family. And he said you're a real life

influencer. And I was like, yeah, well, in the same way that Steve Friend's book is true blue, his journey from beat cop to FBI whistleblower, Mine would be something like from FBI agent to like real life Internet asshole, 'cause I just want to pick fights with these people that are evil. I want to fight the the the abortion harpies that are out there screaming. I just want to get engaged with all of them.

I want to find the people on all the major networks and I want to engage them in the most unpleasant way possible because they are dishonest and many of them are operating from a place of evil in their hearts anyway. That's where I'm at. I just can't get over how funny. My other buddy just sent me a thing that said that the the US Marshall Service has doubled down on the 30 by 30, so they're going to get 30% of their

workforce to be women by 20-30. And if you don't know what the United States Marshall Service does, they protect federal judges and they run down fugitives around the country. So what are we supposed to think? That women are going to be the best at kicking down the doors of seedy hotel rooms and dragging suspected felons out at the early morning hours or whatever hour they decide to go and intervene? I just, I don't get it.

Women, you shouldn't want this for women and men, you shouldn't be allowing it. That's what we're going to talk about today. There's going to be a bunch more of it. We're going to get hot into the culture piece of it. We're going to talk about the last man standing. We got three dudes in the race for president. Yeah, I said dudes. All these dudes are over the age of 70, aren't they? What is going on here? Geriacracy.

Full insanity. All right, before we do that, let's get started with a couple of thanks. And the first one I want to thank out is my friends over at the Catholic Vote Guys. catholicvote.org is the host of The Loop. They are a Catholic advocacy group. They're in the fight for faith, family, and freedom. They are doing it not with their fists. They're doing it with their words and with their money and backing candidates and putting

out information. You can follow them at Catholic Vote, at Catholic Vote on all the major social media platforms. At Catholic Vote. You don't have to be Catholic per SE. In fact, this is not specifically affiliated with the Church. They are Catholics in good standing with the Church, but they are not endorsed or paid for or otherwise by the Church. These are just people who go to the Church, in other words, a lay organization.

They are not ordained members of the Church and today's loop has things about the deadly abortion pill being decided in the Supreme Court. We're going to cover that talks about RF KS controversial pick running for president. We're going to talk about that. They have a story about the New York City council trying to push to let migrants vote. I'm not going to be talking about that And some stuff about the Santos in Florida veterans warning about DEIA really solid

thing. They got their own podcast called the Loot Cast. My friends are on there. Go check out Tom and Mercer and Allison and see what they have to say. You guys may really enjoy that. All right, catholicvote.org, our friends and our big sponsors here. And one more. I'm going to do this right up front just because it's at the top of my mind and my awareness right now. Patriot coolers.com I am sitting here next to my Patriot cooler.

This is the Seraphin 19 oz. Black Tumblr that has traveled to multiple states with me. Patriot coolers.com promo code Kyle gets you 10% off if you're in the market for a Tumblr. Let me tell you what this thing has done for me today, because it is full of coffee and I need it. My youngest daughter woke me up at 1:15. At 2:22, I still saw that I was awake. I looked up at the clock, which I have one of those projection clocks above my my bed, and I went.

I just got an hour of sleep, stolen by my oldest. It's going to be a coffee morning. So it is a coffee morning. And what's gets it's what gets me out of the bed and keeps this coffee hot enough that I can keep drinking it. I start here at about 5:45 and we roll all the way through until 8:30 to get this show together. Patriot Coolers is not just a sponsor, but they are also supporting My Chemical Health and My Mental Health. Patriot coolers.com. You guys can get your own Tumblr there.

Use promo code. Kyle STILL hot. Yep. And and save that 10%. So let's do some stories. We're into the last man standing now. We've gotten rid of all the fluff. We've gotten rid of all the noise. Oh, I'm seeing this in the chat. Chris Roush asked if it's blackout coffee. It is blackout coffee. And Chris sent it to me. I'm still burning through that 5 LB Bag. Appreciate that, man. That was very nice of you. All right, here we go. 3 three men standing.

Only one can be the president. One is a doddering crazy old fool. The other looks like he might be on steroids. He seems to be quite fit for a dude in his his 70s or coming right up on 70. He just picked AVP pick. We have two of these individuals, both Democrats have both picked women to be their running mate. And then you got The Donald. The Donald looks funny there. This is a CNN piece. So they're never trying to make him look good this hair.

I mean, he just looks very Donald Trump on this picture. Anyway, this is the contention. This is the story that we should see. They picked a running mate, they being whoever the RFK, the RFK campaign is. And we start off with CNN, who had a really funny, actually, I've got it on my phone here. They had a really funny take on their opening page. I want to actually, I screenshot of it because it was worth looking at. What do they say? Can Biden put a Trump state back

on the electoral map? That's the question. That's the question that CNN wants you to click through. That's their click baity title. Can Biden put a Trump's date back on the map? OK And the actual article is written by Stephen Collinson, who is my favorite bad analyzer of information analyst. Bad analyst analyzer. Why the 2024 election is about far more than Trump's legal nightmare. Is that what it was about for you guys? Was it about his legal

nightmares? That's what you thought you were going to be electing? Well, if you're on the political left, that's what you're focusing on. Donald Trump, 91 indictments, blah, blah, blah. They're very upset about this. They're upset about insurrection. They are upset about classified documents, even though they don't know what the hell they're

talking about. These people who have never held a classified document, who have never moved with classified documents, who doesn't understand anything about the originating authority of classifications, how they are declassified, what the authorities, the presidents are the case law around it. They don't know any of that. They just know he had classified documents in his bathroom and there was a chandelier in his bathroom and people who have chandeliers in their bathrooms are bad.

That's the take. So we're going to break this thing down. It says this year is not only going to be about Donald Trump's courtroom dramas, as the ex president tries to This is my favorite sentence in the whole thing. I read this out loud to my wife this morning before she was awake.

As the ex president tries to ride a narrative of personal political persecution through his criminal trial quagmire back to the White House, other substantial political forces are gathering that could be equally critical to November's election. Listen to that long sentence, holy moly. That's right. So Trump is writing a narrative, not the real story that they are actually doing political persecutions against him in a multiple jurisdictions.

That's not what's going on. No, this is a a narrative of that and his criminal trial quagmire is what they want to call it. All right, well, let's accept that the political left is never going to see eye to eye on what's going on there. They also mentioned political drama coming in from Washington to North Carolina and Colorado. I keep saying they because it's they as CNN and CNN is represented by Steven in this case. This Tuesday, they had a already intense campaign.

It has been highlighting that there's going to be a rematch between the presumptive nominee. Yes, it's going to be Donald Trump and President Joe Biden. There's a trio of events that have showed that there's a lot more at stake here. And So what are these events going to be? What are we going to hear? All right, #1. Washington, DC The Supreme Court has heard a case about restricting A widely used abortion drug that is also used

to manage miscarriages. That's what's going to be on the ballot, apparently, because Democrats are 100% all in, with no reservations that baby should be able to be killed at any time by anyone in anywhere. 100% baby killing Now here's my thoughts.

This is a really, really bizarre departure from 20 years ago Democrats, which we know we listened to, how far away the the Democrat Party of 2024 is from the 1995 Bill Clinton State of the Union on immigration, the fact that we should actually have American borders and the whole concept of safe, legal and rare, they always accepted that it was bad. Now what we've moved into is this full embrace of evil. And that's what this is. This is evil.

If we were having a disagreement with people who said abortion is terrible, we think it's a necessary evil, and it's necessary for the following reasons, then we could have a debate about whether those reasons actually justify the evil. You know, I don't think they do, but we could have that debate. Those are those are people who at least accept the facts on the ground. What they've gone to do is they've turned it into this, this hideous sacrament of leftism, Leftism.

What do they do? They worship the government. The government is interested in having women in the workforce full time, that their babies not relevant, raising a family, not a value. Your value is only if you compete with men head to head, just like I talked about with my friend over here in the US Marshall Service.

If you are not kicking down doors next to men trying to drag bad guys out, which is the work of men, it's the work of men because it's dangerous and men do not represent the future the way that children and women do. Had a long conversation with Dexter Taylor. He's the gentleman we talked about goes by Carbon Mike online. Dexter is facing down the prosecution in the city of New York in in Brooklyn specifically the the DA of Brooklyn is going

after him over gun stuff. And we were talking about men used to know one of our one of our sacred tenants of Western civilization is that civilizations in in the West looked to the future. They always considered the future. Other civilizations have looked at the past, they've looked at history, they've looked at their legacy and the ancestors and so on.

People in the West have always looked forward specifically in a post Christian. And you know as the as Christianity took over, we looked to the future. There's a couple of things that are hallmarks of Western civilization. Number one is the innate value of every single person. And the political left actually knows this. Leftist know this. They know that every person is sacred and valuable. They know that the poor, even though they have no money, are

people. They're people that matter to them. They champion the poor, do they not? That's what Marxism is all about. That's who the proletariat are. They're the unwashed masses of people that need to have freedom, that need to have rights and so on. That is a Christian concept. We're already on the same page.

They just don't know it. They can't they can't digest that because it it goes against the thing that they're being indoctrinated to believe that religion is coming after them, but religion actually formed and Christian religion specifically is the fundamental jump off point.

I will, I will challenge all of you to talk to your leftist friends, your your, your Democrat neighbors, the people that are independents that are in the middle, that are wondering that don't let's say that they're spiritual or not religious or that they don't think religion is good at all. Where did your values come from? What are the things that you live by and why? What is the originating source

of those beliefs? Do you believe that every person has a right to their labor, that the thing that they do is theirs, that they can own property, and that they should be able to have possessions? Do you believe that even the poor have value as human beings, That you can't just arbitrarily terminate them, throw them off, kick them off a Cliff because they don't matter? They're not favored by God? That is a uniquely Christian idea.

I challenge you. Go into any civilization and find a time when people said that those without matter. And I will also suggest to you that that didn't exist prior to Jesus Christ coming to earth and bringing this revolutionary concept that those who were sick, who were poor, who were unwell, those previously were thought to be people who were in the possession of demons or that were serving out the sins of

their of their parents. Generationally, we're going to get into a biblical perspective on what and not and not the way that Garrett does per SE. I just want a reflection on words because they're really interesting that we've lost this word. But I want to talk about the the the complete 180 flip that has happened about abortion. And it's not just since 1995 with the Clintons, it's actually way deeper than that. In any case, abortion is the

fight that they want to have. You're seeing this year a new front in the abortion fight. This is what's this is what CNN are, I'll call them center left because there's close to center left, even though they're far left compared to 20 years ago, their center left compared to today. And one of the things that they are arguing is that Donald Trump killed Roe V Wade. That's what Biden's saying. That's what they are highlighting here.

When you highlight quotations from someone that you believe because they think Biden's the best choice, if you're going to do that, then you're telling us that you also believe that that's what CNN's position is on Roe V Wade, that Donald Trump killed it. And I say good riddance, but what he really did was he actually remanded it to the States because we have all kinds of people that are more than happy to get behind it. Here's what's fun. There are two Democrats in the race.

As I said earlier, there's RFK Junior and there's Joe Biden. One of them is younger and smarter and more capable. One of them has a better record, at least on advocacy when it comes to the environment, which is another big sort of piece for the political left. The climate paganism, right,

That's a George Hill term. Climate pagans, the people that worship a Gaia or a Mother Earth, because they can't figure out that that they're actually talking about God, which our founders called the God of nature, the God of man. So you've got two of them. I think the record for RFK is better. He will draw people from the Joe Biden camp that look at him and think that he's terrible. RFK is probably better on an anti war sentiment. That's also good for RFK. It's good for Trump, It's bad

for Biden, right? And then lastly, you wonder, OK, the political lefty, the the the old anti vaxxer thing from my childhood, the 80s and 90s moms that were living in Berkeley or that we're living in Washington state and they didn't want to vaccinate their kids and they were talking about autism. Those people all love RFK. They're all left. That was a leftist position until just recently when we all kind of went like, oh, all the institutions are corrupt.

We don't even like my, my youngest daughter has never even seen a doctor, not even when she was in the womb. She hadn't seen a doctor ever. Seven months old and nine months of development. Never seen a doctor. Why? Because we don't trust this institution. It doesn't mean that I think medicine is bad. If I broke an arm, I would go to a hospital. But I have an innate distrust now that is built up. And there are people that have had this distrust long before we have, long before I have, and

long before many of you have. So The thing is, is RFK is still on the political left. Do you remember how many people were saying, oh, there's some folks out there that were like in the DeSantis camp and then they went, oh, now we're going to go after RFK because RFK is the only real conservative. There is nothing conservative about this man. And I want to show you his VP pick. Her name is Nicole Shanahan. She's a left wing lawyer.

She gave a six figure amount of money to the awful DA in Los Angeles. She spent money on behalf of, like, all kinds of left wing causes, big money. And here's what she has to say. Listen to the cognitive dissonance that she is going to spell out right now. She's about to tell you, and I want to prep you with this before you hear it. What you're about to hear her say is that women's fertility is a big issue to her. It's a big issue to me. I think fertility is really

important. It's the reason why I refused the vaccine. When I worked for the FBI, I specifically noted fertility issues as one of the reasons. The other one I issued was the fact that I was not interested in the way it was developed. But what's crazy is this, this woman, because she's a leftist and they don't have to make sense, not in their own heads, not when they speak out loud. What she says is women's fertility is down for three reasons. She's going to lay them out.

They are all going to appeal to people in the political left. They're going to appeal to the climate change people, to the to stop using pesticides people. It's going to appeal to folks who are interested in safer foods. That's all great, but she also says that women's reproductive health is at stake. And we know that reproductive health is a euphemism for abortion. Explain to me, anybody, in the chat in the comments.

I'll show you later on at the end of the show, on how you guys can contact us if you're not familiar. I want to know if anybody can explain to me how you could be very worried about women's fertility issues and at the same time advocating for women's unlimited access to abortion. Why do you care about being able to make babies if you also really, really want to defend the right to kill babies? It makes no sense, but that's a Joe Biden position.

It's an RFK position. Those guys are going to Duke it out for people that are on the left in the middle. That's what they're going to do. So let them have it. Here's a little taste of this woman in her speech accepting the, the, the, I don't even know what you call this. It's not a nomination, but accepting the sort of the request to join the ticket with RFK Junior and listen to those things. In contrast, you just hear them

right there. I discovered that women's fertility is in precipitous decline around the world. We are facing a crisis in reproductive health that is embedded in the larger epidemic of chronic disease. Because it has been so personal for me and my daughter, I got deep into the research and consulted some of the best scientists and doctors. Let me tell you what I found.

There are three main causes. One is a toxic substances in our environment like endocrine disrupting chemicals in our food, water and soil, like the pesticide residues, the industrial pollutants, the microplastics, the PF as the food additives, and the forever chemicals that have contaminated nearly every human cell. Yes, and it makes you angry to hear this. It makes me angry to say it because we shouldn't be here right now. 2nd is

electromagnetic pollution. You don't hear politicians talking much about that either, but it is something we need to look at. As Bobby says, we need to investigate every possible 'cause of chronic disease epidemic that is devouring our nation from the inside. 3rd, I'm

sorry to say is our medications. Pharmaceutical pharmaceutical medicine has its place, but no single safety study can assess the cumulative impact of one prescription on top of another prescription, and one shot on top of another shot on top of another shot throughout the course of childhood. We just don't do that study right now. And we ought to. We can and we will. Conditions like autism used to be one in 10,000.

Now here in the state of California, it is one in 22, one in 22 children affected, allergies, obesity, anxiety, depression. Our children are not well, our people are not well, and our country will not be well for very much longer if we don't heed this desperate call for attention. I think that's enough for all of

you. And yet despite the shrill voice and the fact that she's not a great public speaker, it's important to note that that take an environmental take, an anti vax take or an anti pharmaceutical without limits take, that will resonate with people in the middle. It will resonate with people who would otherwise lean to the political left, because they do. They're she's a, she's a Democrat. So is RFK.

She may not be a good messenger, but the words she's saying and the emotion that she has in that way, that is a decidedly feminine way to look at this problem. It also was completely illogical. Did you hear her say we should not be here right now? It goes along with the things that I hear Joe Biden say. Joe Biden will say things like what? What? What was my favorite one, though? You know, that's not our values. It's like, who the hell are you to decide what our values are?

You claim to be a Catholic, and then you're pro abortion. Not pro-choice, pro abortion. You're advocating on behalf of abortion. You are funding abortion. You're putting your money where your mouth is. That's crazy to me. It's a crazy take. It's a good thing that this woman's in the race. It's a good thing that she is representing a second female vice president choice. That's why Trump can't choose a

female vice president choice. We cannot have three elderly men and three younger horrible women involved in this in this political cycle. Just if you're going to be pretending to be a conservative. And Full disclosure, I don't believe that Donald Trump is a conservative and I don't think any of you can show me evidence otherwise. But he is a populist that is answering to a conservative audience, and that's not terrible.

It's not terrible. That's the fair choice to look at. He's a populist who needs to listen to people that are conservative. That's what many of you are, lowercase C, non, TM, not, not trademarked. And if that's the case, then he needs to actually think about what we're talking about conserving and how about we conserve things like values. And those values would be, let's find a strong male that's going to be able to replace him in four years and put that person

up there. I'm sick of hearing the Tulsi Gabbard argument just because someone looks good in a bikini and somebody is able to carry a gun and wear a plate carrier and join the military and by the way, joined the military while she was a politician. Do you guys realize the Tulsi Gabbard sort of disingenuous arc? It's so bizarre. She joined the State House and then she joined the military. That looks so brazenly

political. There's no other way to explain it. I don't care if Tucker Carlson likes her, I'm fine with people liking her as a person. She's probably lovely. She's probably a lovely person that I would disagree with vehemently on things like abortion. But there's nothing conservative about that. And the second thing that's so strange to me is conservative movements are all about personal responsibility. I want anybody to clip out and send to me. I will play it and I will eat my

words. If you find where she says everything that I used to believe is wrong because I didn't understand what was going on, not well, I came to understand that the Democrat Party is now the one that is against freedom and they've moved. And I've just sort of stayed here. Yeah, you stayed here as a Lib. She would have been a good pick for RFK. She would have been a better pick for RFK. That's it. She's not a good choice for a Donald Trump. That's not a tack back towards the middle.

That's a that's a surrender. It bothers me. It bothers me that so many people think that's reasonable. It bothers me that people like Roger Stone are out there advocating on it. When you hear people talking about this woman like they're selling you something and it's a weird something at that, there's a second thing. That's a play in the CNN article that I wanted to bring back up. The second one is, can we can we put Biden on the map in North Carolina? And that's what they're talking

about. So that's the, that's the the the state that they believe is in play. Like North Carolina, like vacillates between being red and purple on any given day. And the urban areas are certainly held hostage by Democrat voters. That's what they brought up. And so there's a couple of states that they think are in play, this sort of Silicon Valley choice of this Nicole Shanahan who is, you know, going to speak to those crunchy, crunchy mom types that are also

libs. So California, they think is in play. Washington is in play because of what's going on with the Supreme Court. And then specifically it said North Carolina. Very weird. It's a weird time to be alive. It's a weird time to see all this stuff. We're going to get deeper into a whole bunch more. What I wanted you to know is that despite all the lies that are out there, this this is an easy Donald Trump run. All he's got to do is not say much about abortion at all.

He already did it. The answer is I put in conservative justices. They've made decisions based on the constitutionality of it and they've remanded it to the states. This is a state's issue. The end. That's the winning pick. What I love him to say. I think we should have banned abortion. Yes, it does. That win. I don't know why. Why even make it about that? The left is perfectly crazy on being radicalized against babies. Just let him be that that's not a popular position.

Here's the thing that I've been finding out when I sit and talk to folks, we we oftentimes assume that there's this black firewall, this black voting base of black people that live in urban areas. Overwhelmingly, if you look at people who vote and are black, they they they go to churches, they have otherwise conservative liens. They just think the government is willing to help them. The evidence is pretty obvious that it's not.

You could simply run on this. It's like, hey, the government has been intervening since the 1930s. Do you think that black people are better off now than they were when they had more dads in the home, when they had babies, when they didn't have a bunch of Planned Parenthood's being built up in poor black neighborhoods? Do you really want to see more black baby death? Is that what you guys are about? Or are you actually Christians who go to church? Oh, you are. We think the same way.

You should consider doing a change. Give it a shot. See how it feels. See how it feels to actually embrace something that's pro-life because you're pro-life. What's more important, babies. Or like government programs that fund garbage? Like somebody who just said Malcolm X was pointing these things out? Yeah, of course. Anybody who looks at it knows there's not good outcomes. Forget about the the, the, the color of the politician. Forget about the words they're

saying that are pandering. Forget about that. If you ain't black, then you ain't for me, kind of nonsense. It's real simple. You just have to ask simple questions. Are your outcomes decidedly better? Did Barack Obama the great, the great hope that he brought of change? Did it make it better? Or do you feel more divided against your white neighbors? And is that a thing that you

want to teach your children? Do you want to go out and have your children believe that all black people are your friend and that all white people are dangerous to you? Is that a, A, a, a value system that you're willing to stand behind? I don't think it is.

When I was talking to Dexter yesterday, again, this is Dexter Taylor out in Brooklyn. We're talking about it, He said, as a young man with dreadlocks swinging, I thought one thing, which was that, yeah, the man's keeping me down, all this other stuff. But then I had a lot of black people not step up when they said they should have. And I realized people are individuals, which is what we all come to when we're old enough to look at it.

When you're old enough to look at it, you realize that individually, a lot of people suck. That's like a sociology area right there. Some people are worse than other people. Now you all have a sociology degree. That's fantastic. Steal that from Tom Segura. That was one of his great comedy little bits. It's true. Some people suck. A lot of them suck. And if they suck, then you realize that we should take people as individuals. And that's a conservative position.

We were going to analyze people by their fruits. That's a biblical position. And their fruits are pretty straightforward. If the outcomes are decidedly better than you can say, yeah, this person has done better for me. If the government, if you want your children raised by the DMV and you think that government schools are resulting in better reading rates and better, you know, opportunities of success, how about it? I just don't think the evidence is there, and neither do most

people. Most people know, hey, our schools are not wrong. It's not that we need to give our schools more money. If the answer is more money and more government programs, maybe you should consider that they have a ton of it and it's not working. Maybe we try something else. It's very simple. It's Socratic. Hey, do you think they're doing a great job? They've had a bunch of money. They have more money than they've ever had before. Does that seem like it's working?

Would you be interested in trying something new? These are basic sales techniques, by the way. It's asking questions that are leading to a solution. And the solution is always like, have you tried this thing that I am offering you? I don't have to tell you explicitly, I just have to undermine the things that are garbage. From your own personal. Experience, which we all have that experience. It is there. All right. I want to show you how, how all in these people are on the

abortion game. By the way, this is a proxy. This is, this is New York State, so it's as safe as it gets. And this is a truly radical take. This is the governor of New York giving her little hot takes on why abortion pills are so important to the point where she's going to spend your money on it whether you like it or not. If you're a conservative, lives in New York, it doesn't matter. She's spending your money because she's you and I already decided she's going to give out

152,000 doses of baby death. Here we go. New York State is a safe harbor. This is what I announced right after the Dobbs decision. I announced $35,000,000 to beef up the services here in New York knowing that we'd be the place for for freedom refugees. I mean, these are women seeking freedom, freedom over their own body. And so we're going to continue supporting them.

But as I mentioned, it's one thing to provide abortion services, but if they outlaw the distribution of mifepristone as a result of the Supreme Court decision which we'll hear about in June, if they go that far, then what options do I have? I have 150,000 doses stockpile, but it should not come to this. And we are becoming now a state of of haves and have nots. Some states have freedom, sums do not, based on your governor.

But if this Supreme Court listens to these judge, this judge in Amarillo, TX of all places, to dictate to all of us that our freedoms that we fought for for decades and decades are gone. I'm going to tell you this, don't underestimate the rage of women in this country.

They will March, they will take to the streets, they will protest, and there will be electoral consequences because Donald Trump appointed 243 federal judges, of which one of them, this judge in Texas, was, and the Supreme Court, there will be a rebellion. Well, there's going to be a rebellion. Sounds like a call for insurrection. Sounds like a call for violence. We don't care about that kind of stuff because it's political rhetoric and we're people on the political, right?

So we listen to people and we take them at what they mean and not what they just said. Just like I'm going to play a little bit maybe on about how this guy James Cargill was talking about wet work, jobs and people getting all incensed. It's like now let him speak. Who cares? We're not talking about actual assassinations. So she just disparaged Texas. She said that New York is going

to be a state of freedom. Meanwhile, they are restricting gun laws and they're trying to put a black man who's never been in jail, who's never had a criminal record, who has no run insurance with the cops, who's 51 years old, who's been a productive member of society working in that tech industry, that they worship so much for 30 plus years they're going to throw that guy in jail. Are you kidding me? It's absurd. It's on his face. Absurd. So let him run it.

Let them run on. Babies must be killed at all times. They're they're scared of this stuff. Why? Because you're seeing it a little bit everywhere. This is a little gal on TikTok. What they've done is they've managed to have people internalize women, specifically internalize this terrible idea. This idea comes from women who have bought into feminism, which is a lie. Unfortunately, the idea that you can have it all, you can't.

You can have a career. No one's saying you cannot, but you can't do that and have the best outcome for children. Any women who says otherwise, you have no idea. It's an unfalsifiable premise that you were saying. You're saying, well, my kids came out great, Maybe they came out great. Would they have come out greater? Can you prove that they wouldn't know? We can't.

We can't know. But it's pretty clear if you believe in any conservative principles whatsoever and if you follow any world view that's aligned with what we're talking about here, a mother and a father have unique and distinct roles. When you try to make a mom go to work specifically for a primary income, 50% of the primary income or something to that effect, you're now trying to

make women rival men. And women can do something men can never do. And men are generally going to be better at the thing that women can do. OK, Kicking down doors with the United States Marshall Service. Great example. Are you telling me that if you have 30% of the United States Marshals are women, that they are not going to be 10s of thousands if not hundreds of thousands of men who could do that job better? I'm not saying women can't kick down the door and pull a guy

out. I'm just saying what are we risking and what's the upside for society for that woman, etcetera. We've made it worse and they've internalized it to the point where this little girl is running around saying I should have baby killing options on every aisle of the grocery store.

If you showed this in 1995 to people that were sitting and watching the Bill Clinton State of the Union, that were on the political left, that voted for the Clintons and thought that abortion should be safe, legal and rare, and they were pro-choice, literally in that move, pro-choice, if you showed them this, they'd be like, we can't avow this. This is a radical. This is a person that has lost

their damn mind. Listen to this poor young girl who's internalized it. Abortion pills should be here. They should be here, and they should also be here if you haven't gotten it by now. They should really be everywhere. They should be everywhere. If you haven't gotten it right now, little girl, what should happen is 2 things. Number one, there are a million options for contraceptive. That's obviously a preferable choice. It's called personal

responsibility. Embrace it #2 If you don't want to have babies, there are things you can avoid so you don't have babies. And that includes, you know, the physical act of love, having sex. You could just not do it. That's how you avoid having babies. If you choose to do that. There are, there are techniques and there are tools. There is technology that exists that is inexpensive. And as Rose just said in the chat, you can always just close your legs. You can resist that.

The other piece of it comes from the men's side because it takes two to tango, as we all know. Maybe that's what happens when you stop teaching science, when you start teaching gender ideology in schools, like people think they wake up one day and because a man thought dirty thoughts about them, they they're pregnant. Maybe that's what's going on because they are no longer the party of science. They don't even know what men and women are.

But I think, I think most people have figured out what that, what that looks like, because they even figured it out before they had science, how it all works when men lay with women. So men, it's on. You have babies, take responsibility, take care of the the woman that is raising your children. That's it. It's very easy. It's been going on for thousands of years. It's the basis for Western civilization. It's the basis for the reason why this important concept of fertility matters.

She left out one of those major failures in women's fertility. It may be a little bit about how we have chemicals and it might be because there's radiation in the air. It's also because women and men are not mutually agreeing that till death day we part means forever, and that we are going to do this in order to range children. And I'm going to do a read for my sponsors who are, who are

fantastic. And then we're going to get a little bit deeper into this piece about the biblical language that is escaped and why I'm bringing back the word Baron because I think it's very important. All right. If you have not prepared for the chaos that we are dealing with, we've got two Democrats in the race. We've got one populist Republican. You guys, it's going to get spicy. It doesn't matter who wins. It'll be ugly. There's no question about it.

The political left's not happy either way. No one's going to be happy for patriots.com/kyle. The number 4 Patriots with an s.com/kyle is our emergency food prep place that you can go and get yourself squared away. And when I say squared away, I mean prepared for disaster for emergencies. You can hedge yourself against coming chaos. It doesn't have to be this year. That's the best part. All of their foods are packed

for up to 25 years of storage. You can put them in a dry storage space and just hold on to them in case something's coming down. It may not be this year in your area. It will be this year in somebody's area. You can prepare against that kind of chaos. Make sure that you're able to make good decisions that are coming from a full belly and not from desperation and panic. You have the prepare option now, not the repair. Go to fourpatriots.com/kyle.

If you have not made a plan for your food security for you and your family, then you are falling down on the job and honestly, that sort of thing. It's the same sort of situation. It says when we're talking about taking care of your children, it's taking personal responsibility for yourself. There's a reason why our sponsors work really well with us. They have a lot in common. All right. The interesting piece of all this stuff is this concept of barrenness.

Now I want to show you these are just little clips from social media, from these pro abortion handles. I find them very off putting, but I think it's worth looking. Here's an Amy Klobuchar, Amy Klobuchar quote quote We cannot allow a world where our daughters have fewer rights than

their mothers and grandmother. Yeah, guess what happens If you kill your babies, Then you won't have daughters you clown show Amy. Amy Klobuchar is one of the worst, one of the worst and like least inspiring politicians I've ever seen. It's this crop of women that Does she have children? I don't know. Somebody in the chat let me know if if Amy Klobuchar has children. I actually should have looked into that. So many of these women have

conned the generation. This is what I think the cycle of. I think the cycle of abuse looks like. Abusive cycles usually look like somebody does something and then they basically convince somebody that what they did was good for them, right? A bunch of women. The Gloria Steinem generation went forward and and said women can do all the things that men can do. Women are fantastic and they are just like men and they are able to do all the man stuff.

And so in such, we are not going to have children and around 50 something years old, right. Probably about the time they hit menopause, right. Probably just before that they had that panic where they went, oh shoot, I didn't fulfill my biological imperative, which is to pass my genes down. That's literally why our biological machines exist and we know that there's a biblical concept for it.

But even just on the straight possibility of of populations continuing, we are all built to be able to move our genetic material into the future. That's why Western society works so. Here we are listening to these women that said, I've chosen not to have offspring. I've chosen to pursue a career. I've decided to do something that anybody else could do. The thing that I can only I can do, only men can do or only women can do.

Rather, the thing that only women have the ability to move forward, that that carrying of a child and procreation. I'm going to ignore it. And then suddenly they realized, oh crap, I may have ignored something really important. And I have bitterness and I have anger and I have resentment. And I don't want to be alone in that. And so they've been preaching that same garbage gospel down to women who are younger. Hey, you two can have it all.

You could be just like me, 58 years old, with a couple of cats and no children. You could be the person who also is barren. And some women are like, oh, those those ladies look really happy. Look, they have really nice purses and other things. They know what's up. There's no way that somebody would be malicious and evil and try to talk me out of my own happiness. By the way this was the the coverage that we had here from what what articles.

This is from Wapo. I just wanted to show you guys that a couple of these things are out there that what they what they did is they tried to undermine all the things and we're going to get into like the fact checker piece of it too they tried to undermine all these parts. And before we jump into the biblical piece I want to play you this little clip that I found Where is this lady at talking about abortion pills should be everywhere. Katie Hope Maybe I didn't even add it on here.

There's a there's a woman who she says essentially I'm not even sure that the people that were making the argument that are the the in the case in Texas are doctors. She said people who call themselves doctors like that's how dishonest this has to be. It has to be dishonest because there's no way that you can have this argument on its face. You must go ahead and attack the messenger. It's the same thing that I saw by the way this little piece here from Politico. This was super funny.

It popped up. I typed in fact checking, I think, or maybe I typed in misinformation and I got this little garbage gem. This is from Politica PolitiFact, which is a fact checking garbage institution coming out of Instagram. We fact checked Donald Trump 1000 times. And here's what we learned the best of this. It's not unusual for politicians of both parties to mislead, exaggerate and sometimes still

falsehoods. But as fact checkers, we've never encountered A politician who compares with Donald Trump. Yeah, really. It's because you've never actually looked into the claims of anybody else. You're just so obsessed with the Donald Trump that you can't handle it. Let's move into this little this little concept here. This is an article that is written on a personal blog. The woman's name is Tracy McComb. I found her. She's a military spouse and she writes about things that are

very difficult to talk about. Specifically, miscarriage, which is a concept that is near and dear to my heart. I have a number of friends whose spouses, whose whose wives have experienced a miscarriage in the last couple years. It's it's really, really really hard and often times is not

talked about. This woman has like a pretty good article talking about some of that but we she also talks about is infertility and barrenness in the Bible and they give examples here, which some of you have been calling out in the chat. Sarah and Rebecca and Leah and Rachel and Hannah, Elizabeth and others.

There are many women that are listed as being barren and being infertile, and that was seen not as something that you should aspire to, certainly not that you should try to get rid of the blessing of child. If women were able to carry children, it was looked at as a burden that God would put on women to test them. Sometimes it was thought of as a

curse. The word barrenness meaning that it wouldn't, that women who could not bear children was was something that that people prayed what they would be relieved from. They literally asked God to bless them with children because children have always been thought of as a blessing in Western society. That's how upside down we are right now. We have a Society of people who are telling you we have to protect women's facility. This is why our case choice.

That's why this Shanahan chick is so amusing to me. She actually knows it all. All liberals do, all leftist, actually know what those values are. We share those values with them. We really do. They've just managed to convince themself that the thing that they know is true, that the center from which they are trying to operate, that their values come from, is actually the opposite. And they're in contract there. It's it's the same problem of saying I don't trust the police.

The police are all racist. They're all out there to get me. It's like, OK, so you must be in favor of of universal gun ownership, right? You must be thinking that everybody should be able to own all the same weapon systems that the federal government has and that the local government has. And then they say no, no, no, no guns kill people. How is it that you believe that the only group that has a monopoly on force is the group that is supposed to be the one

that that you can't trust? How how can you trust a group that has a monopoly on force when you actually have already said that your your premise is that they are untrustworthy. They don't. They don't make sense. It's cognitive dissonance. In the same story, we have women out there that are talking about women's fertility and safety and the environment and all the stuff. Why do we care? Why do these people care about

the climate for themselves? Every single climate estimate I've ever heard is always like going out, like into 100 years. It's never going to be like in 10 years we're going to die. Unless you're AOC and she's a dimwit. No real people think that, like in 10 years that the sea levels are going to swallow up Miami. No serious politicians do either. That's how you know that all these politicians have Oceanside villas. That's why they live on Martha's Vineyard.

That's why. That's one of the most expensive places in the world. That's why Barack Obama's little enclave is there. So people who don't think that you should have children, who think that you should have a universal right to kill your children are also telling you that they want to protect the planet. It doesn't make sense. It's upside down and it comes to the fact that we have no longer valued. At least people on the left have been unable to value this concept. They can't rectify.

In their mind, infertility was considered a curse. Baroness was an insult. It was mean. I say it online. Baron spinsters, old women who who did not bear children, they have no skin in the game. That's the way it was looked at for all of time. I'm very sympathetic to individual cases. I'm not trying to call anybody out. I understand that there are circumstances. God doesn't call everyone to have children.

And yet as a society, the values of society only make sense if we actually have a society to continue on. If not, who cares? Then you do the Dave Matthews Band thing, eat, drink and be married for tomorrow. We die. If everybody's going to die tomorrow, it doesn't matter what you do. It doesn't matter what you do for the earth. It doesn't matter what laws you pass because it's all over in a heartbeat. Just have a good time and it's over. We don't believe that.

We actually believe. Even people who are, who are not religious kind of think they're going to be held accountable because they all kind of feel uncomfortable. They have that sense. It's impossible to shake.

It's because they were raised in a in a society that has Christian values, whether they like it or not, they can't help it. In any case, if you want to read this article about infertility and Baroness in the Bible and the reflections on it and what it means for women who have miscarriages, it's a very, very soft take.

I think it's a very nice. It's a very nice look at a difficult thing to discuss from a feminine perspective, from a from a military veteran's wife who's traveled all over the world and chased her husband to do all the things that need to be done for the service of this country. Check out Tracy McCombs. I read this this morning and I thought this was A1 full of biblical quotations, 2 full of modern reflections and her own personal experience.

It's worth your time to look into those things. I'm not going to read all of it. There's no reason to it. But that is the sense that we used to know the difference between blessing and and challenge. Let's call it a challenge, the challenge of not having children. There's a reason why they're also think about the left right now. They're also fighting so much for in vitro fertilization, which seems overwhelmingly to to feed into people that are doing things that are against God's plan.

You know, like 2 dudes who are married to each other. I'm going to put air quotes around marriage because I don't believe that. But two dudes who are together, they're going to rent out somebody's uterus and make a baby that way. Are there solutions that like bring other people? I don't know. I I have a hard, I have a hard time rectifying the sort of dissonance that these people are struggling with every single

day. And they are struggling with it because if they try to adjust their positions and say, yeah, these these are my perfectly aligned, reasonable social agendas, you go, they seem in conflict, nonstop, nonstop conflict. There's another conflict that I think that we should all look at here. This is Steve Friend, my buddy reporting by by Wendy Mahoney over at at Uncovered DC. There's there's this will to do something and then there's still no actual political will to do

that thing. Steve Wren went to Tennessee. I I made reference to it in our show notes. Steve Friend, FBI whistleblower. Author.

Center for Newing America fellow all around good dude, My buddy, our contributor for Friendly Fridays, he went and he was talking in favor of a thing known as House Bill 2912, which was trying to amend the Tennessee code, specifically 38-8, Section 1. Trying to get them to reduce the types of cooperation that local law enforcement could be involved in with the federal government and specifically the FBI. You know why we think the FBI is

dangerous? I'm going to show you why in just a second here as well, for those of you who don't get it. And he was speaking alongside of a Tennessee and a guy named Paul Vaughn who has been arrested for the FBI. He's got 11 children. He's a guy that gets it. He understands what the value of kids are, 11 kids. That guy got after it early. I'm really jealous of those people. I had four kids starting at 36, and I'm 42 now and that's a lot, man.

If I'd if I'd met my wife many years earlier, I wouldn't be the person I am. But we, we talk about this all the time. Like, wouldn't it have been better to have kids when we were in our 20s? We would have been Dumber, no question about it. I was definitely Dumber in my 20s. But for those of you that can figure it out, like jump up being married and and parenthood changes you in a way that you

cannot predict. And if you're doing it right, if you come in it with the right values, you're going to be better off anyway. This man who is who's a a pro-life guy that was arrested by the Bureau. They he has the same sort of skin in the game that Steve Friend does. We both looked at it one looking at it from the position of an FBI agent being asked to do things that are illegal immoral or unethical.

Specifically Steve problem with them going after J Sixers using extreme you know extra force that was totally unnecessary making the the, the process the punishment. We hate that we hate. That is the suspendables. And then a guy who was on the receiving end of it, just the way that mark out was who's been on the show and I think made a very compelling argument against weaponized aggressive SWAT tactics coming in, you know, for nonviolent garbage offenses that

are 1 sidedly enforced. And here's the thing. That's the bat behind the scenes of the story. The behind the scenes of this story is that Steve testified in front of a subcommittee. The subcommittee voted to bring it to the committee. The committee voted to bring it to the floor. And when they got to the floor, Steve was absolutely furious. They brought in four uniformed troopers from the state police that were representing the Democrat position and probably the status quo Republican

position. And those people said, I think this bill would be bad for us. I think this bill would be bad for us. Yeah, it's bad for us. It's it would defund some of our, some of our extra money for overtime. It's bad for us. And then they decided not to vote on it. So Steve went up to Tennessee to try to help a state that claims to care about getting this federal garbage out of the way. And they tabled it. And they said, hey, will you come back and testify another time?

We're going to change the bill. We're going to make it weaker. We're going to make it stupider. We're going to not do the thing that you said. We're not going to specifically mention the FBI. We're going to make sure that the federal government can fund all the overtime. We're going to try to rework the bill where it just says the sheriff has to have some oversight of what his guys do.

Are you folks really OK with the fact that you have publicly funded, at the local level, sheriff's deputies and police officers that are on JTTF, joint terrorism task forces with the FBI that have security clearances that exceed the security clearance of the police chief, of the captains of the leadership in your Police Department or in your Sheriff's Office. And certainly more than your

elected sheriff. And then you're going to have officers who theoretically answer to a chief or to a sheriff that can't even tell the chief or sheriff what it is that they do with their time. And some of that stuff is going to be tyrannical. That's the danger we're talking about. Look at this clown show. This is this useless woman, Gloria Johnson, who Steve said was sitting just five feet away for 10 feet away from him in the

subcommittee. And she's tweeting while she should be listening to what someone who is honest says. And she says, I'm sitting in a committee listening to a former FBI agent talking about being a whistleblower, then finding out he was suspended for refusing to do his job. He refused to participate in J6 cases. That isn't a whistleblower. That's a guy refusing to do his job. Then the guy who was convicted of blocking Women's Health clinic is made big mad that the

FBI came to his door. I can't believe these are considered expert witnesses. You know what, fat middle-aged, midwit woman. You should never hold office in this country. You are a walking argument against participation in politics. You're stupid and emotional, Gloria Johnson. You're a fool. And you're pictured right there with the what do they call them? The Tennessee 3 or whatever these morons. I guess you need a token fat white chick in her 50s to step up.

By the way she's running against Marsha Blackburn. So if you're in Tennessee and you are not voting make sure you are voting against this clown show who is trying to get the trying to flip the the the the Senate seat Gross. Just gross you. I watched her some of her campaign video. She sat with Mark Hamill like Luke from Star Wars. Really. And she seems to be wearing somebody's floral pattern that came off a 70s couch. Everything about this woman is

detestable. She's exactly the representation of ugly, nasty, gross stuff. She's got pronouns in her bio. She has BLM in there. She's a token clown show, and she's going to go after people like Steve Friend without knowing anything because she couldn't be bothered to listen and ask an intelligent question. She simply asked Steve one question, apparently, And that question was what city were you in the FBI with? And And he answered, and that was it. So there's there's your rigorous

debate and thought process. This is what leftists do. They have no ability to actually process information or take things on. So you're thinking, OK, fine, well, at least that weaponization committee is out there solving problems. We should be good. You know, GOP's got it. Guys, don't worry about this. Luckily, we've elected fantastic representatives all over this country. We have a majority in the House. So here it comes. And this is what they did.

This came out on Saturday, by the way, when no one was looking. This is an article from Fox News. House Republicans moved to strengthen protections for DOJ whistleblowers. Quote, the FBI and DOJ have a long history of quieting whistleblowers, says Representative Nick Langworthy. You remember how he told you that these people will say stuff and then they'll do things. And the entire goal is that they get themselves on Fox News to talk about it.

That's considered the victory. It doesn't really matter what the outcome is. The question is, is can they get a political hit that they can play on their website and get reelected? There it is, he said. Unfortunately, I think we actually have that quote. Let me see if I've got it on here. Yeah, he said. Unfortunately, the DOJ had this long history of of quieting whistleblowers by pulling security clearances, delaying investigations, ending their

careers. The Protect Whistleblowers Act From Retaliation or I'm sorry, the Protect Whistleblowers From Retaliation Act will ensure that those who come forward to do the right thing will do so without having to fear for their future. Really. Will it? Here's the pieces of the ACT. This is what they cite. Specifically, it's going to clarify the investigative authority by letting the DOJ Inspector General be the sole independent investigative body for the whistleblowers.

Hello. The The IG works for the DOJ. They're gutless. Absolutely gutless. Establish reasonable investigation timelines, require the DOJIG to communicate consistent and timely manners with impacted whistleblowers and complete the investigation with 240 days. Do you think any of you can go 240 days without a paycheck the way that I did? I went something like, shoot, what did I go like maybe 500 days without a paycheck. Garrett's right about there now.

Marcus Allen north of 700. Can you guys go for two years without a paycheck while the DOJ invested investigative group that answers to the DOJ that answers to Merrick Garland that is funded by the Attorney General which is a political

hack. While they go out there and do whatever it is they do, grant equal appeal rights that secures the FBI whistleblowers right to appeal to the Merit Service Protections Board, MSPB and ensure that this right is afforded to the same way it is for every other federal employee. I had rights to the MSPB, I'm a veteran. I went to the MSPB and they said we don't know, we don't have standing.

We're gutless. Then they went to Navy versus Eagan. Navy versus Eagan is a court case that already says that you have no right to a security clearance, so they can pull it anyway, even though they said they're going to stop this. And then the last one is enhanced transparency, which require reports on the IG to go at length to the whistleblower retaliation.

What it should say is, is that we will assume that any action taken against someone who comes forward as a whistleblower is by default a reprisal until proven otherwise. That would be real language that mattered. Instead, what you have is this bullshit comment to get yourself on Fox News. And he said, quote, these whistleblowers risk their careers and their livelihoods to speak out, to shine a light on the problem and restore the

public trust in the FBI. Regrettably, loopholes exist in whistleblower protection laws that have allowed senior FBI leadership to retaliate against many of these whistleblowers. That's Jim Jordan. Yeah, you know what, Jim? You can stuff it. You can absolutely stuff it. Because this happened too. Yesterday, my buddy Garrett O'boyle put this out on Twitter. It's been seen 77,000 times. That's not that many. Considering what it is. I'm going to read it for you. The FBI claims that I'm an

employee. They claimed I was an employee until April. I was doing this podcast. I started off and they claimed I was an employee even though they hadn't paid me. In a year. They've severed every single connection that an employer would have, including pay and healthcare.

Garrett O'boyle just paid them $3397.43 for a transfer that they canceled and didn't happen where they stole his stuff, knowing that he didn't do the thing that they said, as whistleblowers have said and shared with The Washington Times, he just paid them $3400 as not an employee because they consider him an employee and they are holding him hostage. That's the bill that you're seeing on the screen right now. That's the requirement. The payment confrontation from

the FBI debt management service. I got one of those bills, by the way, just before. Just before I was suspended forever. And it was thousands of dollars. And I've gotten one cents for my healthcare cost that we didn't have because we didn't know we had healthcare. Why would we have healthcare? We didn't have a paycheck. There was no deduction. They carried it on and sent me a bill for like 10 grand, which I haven't paid and I have no

intention of paying. The FBI goes after people and then tries to financially ruin them instead of saying, you know what, we suck. We're sorry that we've destroyed your careers. A couple of people there could actually be halfway decent. We appealed this, by the way, through the appeals process and all of those are kicked back. So thanks very much, Jim Jordan and weaponization and all you

clown shows. Langworthy out of New York trying to make your whistleblower protection act to get on Fox. You had a victory. We all lose and the American people lose. And that's why the Seven O 2 stuff is going to be so important here because this is what the FBI is getting away with when they fund it, which they did. And then $1.2 trillion, they fund the FBI all the way. Why not? And what does it look like?

It looks like Chris Ray talking about this is the FB is Twitter account by the way which got community noted, which is a Fact Check by the community says the FBI violated American citizens 4th Amendment rights 278,000 times with illegal unauthorized FISA 7O2 searches. I'm going to play the video. I know it hurts to watch but we're going to play this little video of Chris Ray telling you just how important it is that they've they've done a great job. I mean like less than 1% of the time.

In the millions of searches have violated the Constitution. This is the stuff that our GOP is still funding. Just be aware of it. This is what's at stake, folks. Those reforms are working. The FISA court itself most recently found 98% compliance and commented on the reforms

working. The most recent Justice Department report found the reforms working 99% compliance and so I think legislation that ensures those reforms stay in place but also preserves the agility and the utility of the tools, what we need to be able to protect the American people. All right, he needs to protect the American people. So let's go to Lisa Monaco, who I absolutely adore. She's my absolute favorite piece of garbage. Lisa Monaco is going to tell you what the Seven O 2 is most

important for. And just like you already heard, our Speaker of the House get up and say our number one priority is America First. That's why we have to fund Israel and Ukraine, right? That's why no one for speaker was the right answer. Lisa Monaco is going to let you know that those tools that they need to protect the American people, you're never going to believe who their priority is. You just heard me give you a little tip. Here's Lisa Monaco. First, let me agree

wholeheartedly with General Nakasone. 7O2 is an absolutely indispensable national security tool. I have seen the value of it in every job that I have had, and you mentioned my prior roles in national security. I see it when I review the President's Daily Brief. A significant portion of that vital intelligence that we get is derived from 7:02. It gives us insights into cyber threats, help helps us prevent ransomware attacks from foreign

actors. But when it comes to this conflict and what Russia is doing in Ukraine, it has proved vitally important. Indeed, Seven O2 has helped us uncover gruesome atrocities committed by Russia in Ukraine, including the murder of non combatants, the forced relocation of children from Russian occupied Ukraine to Russia, and the detention of refugees fleeing violence by

Russian personnel. All of that we were able to see thanks to Seven O 2. And that information and other information helped has helped us as a country and as a national security community, galvanized accountability efforts regarding Ukraine by allowing us to confidently and accurately speak with the international community about Russian atrocities.

So, Senator, I think one of the most important things that this committee and this Congress can do to help us push back against Russian aggression is reauthorize 7O2. OK, we need to push back against Russian, Russian aggression, and we need to have accountability and we need to be capable on the world stage of talking about Ukraine. What on earth does that have to do with the DOJ? Can anybody fathom how stupid this stuff is? Why are senators listening going? Like, oh wow. Yeah, of.

Course because seven O 2. Because what we're finding war atrocities that were committed by some country that wasn't us, by another to another country that wasn't us. Like what? What role does the Department of Justice, which runs our federal prosecutions and our law enforcement apparatus in this country, have to do with any of that? Are they talking about going after Americans in other places? No. They're talking about insanity. It's Russia. It's Ukraine. It's not America.

None of these people care about America. Lisa Monaco has been there forever. She's on Cash Patel's personal hate list. She sucks awful. And her and guys like Lee Loftus, who I mentioned the other day, Both of those people were the ones that ran that mandate and shoved it down the throat of those who worked at the FBI, who were more than happy to just follow orders and get rid of guys like me and Garrett and Steve. And they would have gotten rid

of George if he'd stuck around. That's why he retired. They're justifying 7O2 coverage, which is primarily used to spy on Americans. Whether you like it or not, the only interest you have with Seven O 2 is finding out is there someone you can actually go after in any meaningful way. And those people don't live in Russia and don't live in Ukraine, and they aren't involved in the Russian Ukrainian war. They're in America.

And when you search for their names because they're in America and you want to find out the contacts in DWS, the data warehouse system, when you search for those names, you are breaking federal law. And the FBI bragged that they did such a good job, they only did that almost 300,000, *, 278,000 times. That they violated the 4th Amendment was pretty good because it was down from millions of times of violation, millions of misuse of this tool. I have used it. None of those senators have.

I bet Lisa Monaco has not ever actually gone into DWS personally and used it. And if she has, she's probably broken the law. So how about they get tried for that? How about the Justice Department actually try to do justice instead of reminding us that it's just us out here that care about it? Nauseating. This is why all the stuff about free speech matters. This is why we have to be able

to speak our mind. This is why censorship is such a big deal, why it's at the top of our list when we start thinking about this kind of garbage. I've got a a video here from Brookings Institute. I want to play you this. This is from that 60 minute nonsensical piece I'm going to talk about fact checking. They're so mad that they can't control the information. That's why places like rumble. It's why places like X formerly Twitter. What a what a weird choice. By the way.

I still like Twitter. I hate the name Twitter right up until I started using Twitter and then I'm like, oh, I get it. Anyway, the reason why these these places are so important is because they are the only stuff that is doing something contrary to the garbage narrative that is basically directly coming from the A of the government right to the mouth of the media. And they turn around and spit it back into our mouth like we're baby birds. But we know better.

Here they are trying to throw shade on Elon Musk's, you know, investment and the capabilities that we get out of there. Here we go. After Elon Musk took over in 2022, most of its fact checkers were fired. Now the site is rife with trash talk and lies. Little would you know that this, said to be footage from Gaza, is really from a video game. Eventually, ex users added a warning label in this post. Pictures of real babies killed in Israeli strikes are falsely dismissed as dolls.

The toothpaste is out of the tube and we have to figure out how to deal with the resulting mess. Darrell, WA, senior fellow of technology innovation at the Brookings Institution, says the clash over what is true is fraying our institutions and threatening democracies around the world. Half of the world is voting this year and the world could stick with democracy or move towards authoritarianism. The danger is disinformation could decide the elections in a number of different countries.

In the US, he says, the right wing has been flooding the Internet with reams of misleading information. I'm breaking away from that, OK. I'm breaking away from it specifically because of this. Did you just hear him? He just said half the world is voting and we have to decide whether or not they're going to go for authoritarianism. A journalist would ask the question, what sort of authoritarianism are you worried about? How do you define authoritarianism?

What are examples of this authoritarianism that you think is coming in? Did you hear any of that? Did you hear anybody ask a critical question at all, or are they presenting you with not journalism? What they're presenting you with is a narrative. Remember, the same kind of thing that they're concerned about Donald Trump putting out there when it comes to his court cases, a narrative of persecution. Except the narrative of persecution aligns with the

facts. You can critically ask questions about what happened to Donald Trump, and you will see political persecution. There's no other excuse. There's a victimless crime where nobody lost money. In fact, everybody made money. And it was levied by a judge who's a political activist in the state of New York. And what happened? A 500, almost $500 million penalty was well levied. And then when the appeals court looked at it, they were like, oh, dude, that's way too much.

We're going to probably overturn this. So they knocked it down to 1/3 of that 175 million. And Donald Trump came out like AG and said, yeah, I'm going to pay it in cash because F you, you don't have to like Donald Trump to know that that's AG move. And you don't have to like anything about our court system to know that even the lefties that are in the New York court looked at it and went, this is garbage, we're probably going to have to overturn this. There's no reason to put this

man out for $500 million. We're all going to be on the hook after that. Nuts. Absolutely nuts. And they hate it. They hate the free speech. They want to attack it. It's always these lesbian looking women, these women that hate babies. You could just tell by the way they but why? Because they don't embrace being feminine. They don't embrace anything about it. You could be a tomboy woman and still be very feminine. You can dress in jeans and overalls. I don't care.

There's a difference between that and trying to approximate the dress of a man, which we saw with that starboard. Starboard gal the other day said her name. Yeah, Kate Starboard. The one that had $2.25 million in grants to her little organization by the Biden administration. That was very upset. I'd play the clip, but I don't want you guys to puke. So instead I'm going to play something from Bill Maher. This lady hates free speech and even Bill Maher's like, come on

man, give me a break. Bill Maher just likes to be in a contrarian. He's actually correct in this case too. Elon Musk might be a complicated guy. He's not conservative, by the way. He's not conservative. But he knows that babies are important because he's not insane. You know, in the back of the book instead of, you know, you do blurbs on the back of the book. I put all the insults they had

like, Elon, you're an asshole. My, my my voice is so shrilled only dogs can hear me and that my heart is seething with hate. So that's what Elon thinks of me, which I'm like look in a mirror. Sir, but that's. He's a complicated guy. Oh, OK, sure, why not? Well, I mean. How about he's just not a complicated guy, He's just a jerk. But go ahead. OK, well, you know. What? Complicated. But so are you. So am I. OK, well now you just debated with yourself and agreed with.

Me. Yes. And I can easily prove he's a complicated guy, because yesterday I saw on the news somebody who was paralyzed, who was giddy with happiness because he was being able to play video games with his mind. Yep, that came from Neuralink. That's he. That's Elon's company. And so did my car. And so you. Know I get No, I I I like those. Elon. I I like. I like Tesla. Elon. I like Neuralink. Elon. I even like Hyperloop. Elon. It's it's Twitter slash xe.

I agree. But in in the big scheme of things, where do you think his legacy will be in history? Because I've never seen anybody who has more articles written about him every day in the paper because he's got his finger in so many pies and then he does crazy stuff. He is. Come on, Spectre. Me so. She debated with herself and she lost because Elon's worldview, even though I think he's flawed because he misses the complete version of it, which is to say

why those values are important. His worldview is not wrong, it's it's slanted off. I think he missed the mark and the further you get down, you miss it more. His his perspective is that babies are important, human beings are the end result, that technology is supposed to serve them. I think that he just misses the the gap by seeing that when you start putting men and machines together, particularly things like AI, some of those end up

being misguided. He's also trying to put out electric electric cars, which probably makes sense in a very small way as we continue to experiment. But as it stands, it's also resulting in like slavery in Africa with kids digging out cobalt with their freaking fingertips. So he's not completely unified in his world belief, but he makes a lot more sense than that woman does. I guarantee it. That woman just debated with herself and said I like what he

does, except what he does. These people can't figure it out. A lot of these women, they're they're emotional and they're allowed to be emotional. That's what women are supposed to do. And that's when rationality, the other side of the coin, it's supposed to be a yin and a Yang. They're supposed to be balance. Political left and political right are supposed to argue about it from compassion that that's misguided and from rationality that's detached from emotion.

And then you end up in this thing where we help people, but we do it in a way that makes sense. It's not that hard. Men have to be men, Women have to be women. This is like literally this is who would have thought that in 2024 that our discussion is whether or not men are men and women are women and if we can actually just align those things together And they also want to distract you with this garbage. I had to play this because I saw this and I'm Dumber for having watched it.

Now you all have to be Dumber because you're going to watch it. This is the kind of stuff that the so-called news agency, the people that covered the opening shots of the Gulf War when I was a kid. I remember them watching. They had scud Busters and they were shooting through night vision. You remember this, the 1st 24 hour coverage of a conflict that lasted for three days in Iraq when they opened shot under under Bush One. This organization now has this

silliness. Here's ACNN clip of just like I know they're not serious. They're telling me they're not serious by the kind of idiots they bring on here. All right, have a taste. How popular you are, How talented an artist you are. How many accolades and nominations and everything you've got going on. At least what you have planned for the summer, coming ahead with a concert and a tour, The idea of them inviting you there in particular. Did they talk to you about what

they wanted politically? Did they want your endorsement? They want you to help people get out the vote. Hey, you know, that ain't got nothing to do with me. You know what I'm saying? Like, I'm just living my life like a gold and living my life like a gold. But you know, I'm not going. You know what I'm saying? It's like politics and get out of the president, you know what I'm saying? I love everybody. And at the end of the day that they got to end.

Yo, at the end of the day, the day got to end. That's the Idiocracy. That is what happens when Camacho President Camacho shoots the the, the 240 into the air at the State of the Union. Like, that's where we're headed with that Lady. I don't know who that is. I think it's called Megan the Stallion. But I don't understand who that person is or why. Talentless, retarded, speaking like a fool.

And imagine that was your job. Like you're you're like a news anchor for a news station and you've got to ask this lady, I'm like, did the Biden administration ask you to do something? She's like, I don't even know how questions work. What is that? Is that an interrogative? Terrible, Absolutely terrible stuff. Anyway, if that's who the Biden administration is inviting to the White House, that's what that story was about. By the way. They invited that woman to the White House.

Pro abortion retards trying to influence people. Can we do better? Can't we? Can't we say it's not about the the the mug shot for Trump and sneakers to get people in the black community like black communities? Because I don't think there's one. I think there are many. Can we just go out there and be like, hey, your outcomes suck. People are trying to kill your babies. We like babies. We want you to have better outcomes. We want to have less government.

We think the government should get out of your business. It's a hopeful position to be in the conservative thing. Do you think that you one day could have more money? Wouldn't you want people to have more money? Don't you want the less government pulling money when you make more money? That's the hopeful position. Or do you say, hey, are you too dumb to ever make money? You should vote for the people that think that you're too dumb to make money because that's what Democrats do.

It's really simple stuff, man. It's like it's the easiest pitch in the world. What's working? Has it been like this for a long time? Does it seem good? Do you think that voting for these people is going to help? There's a lot of people in in black communities across this country that don't vote because they just feel like they're disaffected. There's a lot of people in white communities that feel the same way. It's not a race issue.

At the end of the day, it's the people that say we have no skin in the game. A lot of these local races are decided by a few thousand votes or less, some of them by dozens of votes, most of them by a few 100 votes. In the local elections where that really, really makes a difference, you could at least get some people with guts that would go after a bill like Steve Friend had. I'm just saying, All right, I've got this last little piece here.

I wanted you guys to kind of revisit the bridge collapse thing from yesterday. If you didn't listen to our show with George Hill, I encourage you to listen to it. George Hill is a counterterrorism expert. He didn't think that it had a counterterrorism Nexus. The FBI has said, no, we don't take the FBI at their word, but we do look at real sources of information and we try to evaluate them. And by the way, Laura Logan, I think she's way off. I don't know who her sources

are, but doesn't really matter. People that I've talked to that spent decades working in cyber security, including guys like Aaron Gogley, who was a former IRS agent that worked this way in a big way. He worked on cybersecurity task forces for the federal government.

We don't think, as you heard George say the other day, even though many of these ships are going to be corrupted with malware, it's going to be exploiting information and status and position the odds of it being something that they can remotely control. We're not talking about an RC car here. We're talking about a hundreds of thousands of ton cargo ship that appears based on the information that I've seen from this guy.

So I recommend this article. This is coming out of Bloomberg and this guy's, his name is Sal, and I'm going to mess up his last name here, Mercagliano. I think it's his last name, Mercagliano. He is a shipping expert. He has an entire podcast that literally is about what's going on with shipping in the world. That's what it's called, what's

going on with shipping. And his take was essentially that they lost power, which could happen and that could be the result of some kind of a, a a major actual problem. It could be a result of bad fuel, is what they're saying, and this is the investigation that's going on currently. But essentially, either way, the ship lost power. There's no way they could predict that it would hit that particular pylon the way that it did.

And they dropped an anchor. That sharp turn that you saw was the drop of an anchor, which is part of the. SO PS when they've lost power to try to slow and retard the speed of that vessel and then they drop the other angle trying to like last minute correct. And it ended up going directly into a darkened pylon. Not a good situation. It doesn't always have to be a conspiracy. I'm going to show you one last thing here. I talked about this the other day with Dexter when we were on

the phone. Do you see this? This poster some of you guys have seen? It says I want to believe it's from The X-Files. It's from the opening pilot episode of The X-Files where Scully comes down and meets Mulder. I've probably said this year before, but I'm going to say it again. We all want to believe in all of our weirdest theories. We all want to believe in the conspiracy, that our worldview is united, that the things that we suspect are actually true, that everybody's coming to get

us whatever. The thing is that we are personally invested in when it comes to looking at, hey, was it terrorism? Are they lying to it? Yeah, they're lying to us all the time, they being the institutions for their own reasons. But that doesn't mean that everything is going to align. You remember the number of times that they were actually aliens

and fault in The X-Files. It was almost always like, weird stuff going on, but there was almost always some sort of explanation for it. And that's why we also have to be not just our own Fox Mulder, we also have to be our own Dana Scully. We have to have that voice of

reason of balance. We have to have that emotional instinct to say, yeah, it's crazy and the Russians or the Chinese crashed a ship into our port or bad fuel, basic failures of software, engine failure, you know, the the, the SOP's for safety resulted in a terrible outcome. And those bridges are supposed to fall the way that they did. There's a bridge expert I was reading about who said it's a complex bridge and it was always going to have that.

If you had a structural support, you're going to lose multiple tresses. OK, I believe you. Here's how I know you're not going to be able to coordinate a ton of these people, including some random dude who's been shipping, doing shipping information for for a decade and talking about it on a podcast. He didn't randomly just get, like, a bunch of government talking points. That's not how it works. There's no way to reach out to

that guy. There's no way that anybody would know that that dude would be interviewed about this particular situation. And he's picked up by a number of, like, very small but articulate voices across social media, including places like X. Which is why the free speech matters. It's why all of this unified thing, even though we want to believe one thing, we got to be cautious about it. And we have to. We should start from the position of skepticism.

That's how we do it. All right, that's a lot. Let me give you a dad joke. I just thought this was funny, OK, so if you're listening, I'm going to read it for you, Man sits down. He tells his wife. Listen, I've got to tell you something that's really been bothering me for the last 28 years. All you've done is find mistakes in anything that I say and she interrupts him and says 29 years, that's that's OK We're OK

with that. Folks, If you want to send comments to the show, I wanted to put this on here. Some of you don't know this. If you go to kyleserafin.com, it's just my name, Kyle. serafin.com. You can actually go to the open DMS, which are on Twitter. There's a link to it right there. There's also an arrow down there that you'll see the chat function that sends emails to us. You can click on. I have a question.

Or you could just click the chat and you can send us just a little bit of your thoughts if it's a question. If you're going to suggest a guest, I'm fine with that. You better have contact information for the guest, because I don't have contact information for everybody. OK? But if you want to reach out to us with your thoughts, your questions, your comments, your sarcastic remarks, I'll take those. There's a lot of weird mental illness that comes through

there. You guys can start doing that from the people that listen to the show that want to add some context. Or if you have some information or whatever it is, you can reach out to me there. That goes directly to me. I may or may not be able to get back to you in a reasonable amount of time. A lot of stuff comes in there, but I just want to let you guys know that is a way you can do it. Kyle. serafin.com. Go in there and then let's also say support o'boyle, the O'boyle family.

You guys can go to thedashsuspendables.com. The dash suspendables.com. The Don't forget the dash suspendables.com. The promo code. Kyle will save you 10% on there. That's just just kind of a way to track it. But essentially, if you guys want to support the family that just paid the FBI for not working for the FBI, it's like writing your taxes when you know that you're directly funding tyranny. That's what we're involved in right now.

You guys can support them. And my buddy who's going through, you know, it's a mentally rough thing to do to write a check to the government when you know the government has been screwing you. I know a lot of us are doing that in tax season right now. And the new Kyle Seraphin show shirts are coming and they are en route. I saw a stack. There are dozens and dozens and dozens of T-shirts on their their prep table to ship out. They just got a bunch of the pins in.

So if you guys were waiting on a pin, they are now on en route. They've got the stack of pins in there, a big, a big sort of order. I think we had over 1000 that we ordered so that they came in from the manufacturer and we're going to ship those out to you guys as well.

So if you were waiting on that or if you did have those in your order and you haven't received your order in the last couple weeks, that's what's going on there was just waiting on a manufacturing thing, the Dash suspendables.com promo code, Kyle and that is it. Let's do a five star review and let's shut the sucker down. All right, Five star review coming in from Reba Will in a sea of podcast. Five stars out of all the choices a person can make in a

sea of podcasts. I listen to Kyle because of his keen intellect and razor sharp wit. He dissects the issues of the day and breaks it down so that even Tards can understand. I don't know why that makes me happy. Tards even has like a little apostrophe. I wonder if this review will get censored. The review did not get censored. It made it through. Remo. Remo. Well, thanks so much for joining us. All right, ladies and gentlemen, we will see you again tomorrow on Thursday.

I've got a an interview that I'm going to be recording today for you with a surgeon who blew the whistle on some garbage going on in the Texas, the Texas hospitals. So look forward to that pretty soon. God bless you. I mean it. We'll see you again tomorrow morning. Thanks for listening to the Kyle Serafin Show streamed live weekdays on rubble.com/kyle Serafin. Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth, Social and Instagram at Kyle Serafin.