Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an American patriot. Prepare to embrace the uncomfortable truth because this program has no time for comforting lies. Here is civil liberties enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello my friends and welcome to the Kyle Seraphin Show.
Today is Friday, September the 26th, and I did not mean to be so late, but as I got up this morning and started tearing through, they were documents, they were false statements, They were things that needed to be grabbed for today's program that took a little longer than normal. So that's what I did. It's a one man show, so it takes as long as it takes to be able to get the information so that we can be on point. And I think we're going to do that. We're going to talk about James
comedy. Did he lie? Does it even matter? He was indicted yesterday. We got messages from that. We got some James comedy statements. I don't think people even know what they think that he was indicted for. So I've got the indictment here. We're going to go through that. I think it's, I don't think it's what you guys were hoping for. There's not a single mention of seditious conspiracy or treason or any of the other things that I kept hearing people say.
Even senators don't know what the hell they're talking about. We had senators going on TV last night talking about Russia. It's not what was happening, so we'll get into that. I had a like a world class article dropped on me. I think they were trying to paint me in a bad light, but it ended up being quite hysterical for me. So I'm going to go over something which I don't normally do. When you're part of the news, then sometimes you got to cover yourself.
So we're going to cover ourself up in something that one of my buddies referred to as a framer, an article written that should go in a picture frame on the wall. I might do that. I might actually get a really nice print out of this because it's pretty funny to me. We're also going to talk about how we can no longer discuss whether people are politically right or politically left now that we've seen a number of shooters going out and killing
people that are on the left. I'm sorry, the shooters are on the left. They're shooting people just randomly, sometimes at an ICE facility or maybe a prominent conservative political figure. So now we got to stop looking at politics people. We just got to come together. Maybe a little too late for that. Kind of like a weaponized justice system that doesn't really work well. So a lot of stuff to go on in all those spaces and we'll try to make some sense of it.
I think we're going to do our best. You guys know how we do it here before we get started, since we can't trust anybody, we can't trust the news media, we can't trust our government, we can't trust these institutions. You can't even apparently trust Tile Doll, which has been around for a long time, but it's always been kind of a dangerous thing if we talk about pharmaceuticals in your drinking water and the fact that we've got sketchy things coming out of the tap.
Folks Cove pure.com slash Kyle is the website. There's a link in the show description. The people in charge of our government at the local, state, federal level, they can't fix a pothole. How are you going to trust them to give you safe drinking water? You can ask the people in Flint, MI. You can ask the people in Albuquerque, NM where I used to live. Lead, heavy metals, rust, liquid poison coming straight out of the tap. That's why we have a Cove Pure system.
It is sitting in my kids bathroom so that we can fill that sucker up and they can have unlimited access at a kid height to clean fresh, clear drinking water. They do what the government ought to do, which is make sure that our our tap water is actually safe from the heavy metals and the toxins, the fallout of corroded pipes. It should have been replaced decades ago. In our case, there's tons of sulfur, which is actually just a really terrible taste and a kind of a nasty smell.
Lead exposure just doesn't make the water taste like you're chewing on a car battery can actually cause brain damage and cancer and birth defects. There's all kinds of sketchy things, pharmaceuticals and so on. You guys want to make sure that your water is safe and pure to drink. It actually has a massive impact on the taste and then the health benefits. You can't see them, but they're there. Coke Pure is obvious fix. They're clear. Wave technology will remove 99.9% of contaminants.
It's easy to set up. It gets rid of lead and PFAS and pharmaceuticals, you name it. No plumbers, no drilling. You just plug the sucker in on your countertop. It's super easy. Even a child can do it. Takes about 15 minutes to get the whole thing flushed through and ready to go, and it's just pushing buttons. I've done other water purification. It takes a lot longer and it's actually a lot more sort of, let's say, technically difficult. Check out the Cove Pure system. Guys.
If you don't have something to do with you, can't wait around for the government to solve it, go to covepure.com slash Kyle. Right now. You're going to save $200 off while supplies last on the system. You see on the screen. We have one sitting in our house. It has a very, very nice function. It's easy enough for kids to use. They select the water size.
You can take back control of your family's health and get safe drinking water, which is something that we should actually expect in 2025. But unfortunately, like so many other things, you can't just assume it. Anyway, if you guys want to take control of your own drinking water, check them out Cove pure.com slash Kyle. Here comes today's program. Right now you. Know. What's also good about good drinking water is it makes your tea and your coffee better.
And I'm just going to say that right now as I'm sitting here drinking coffee out of my Patriot Cooler and let's go with verse story of the day. It is a weird one. It is a funny one. It is amusing to me. Meet the ex FBI podcaster driving Cash Patel nuts. He's a conservative, he's brash, and he's tormenting the FBI director. Folks. That is not the goal of this podcast. To be fair, I actually thought we were going to be on the side
of the FBI director. I thought we were going to go out there and be celebrating victories to the point where we were no longer relevant. But as you guys know, as men plan, God laughs. I guess I don't know. Here we are. I'm just going to read some of this stuff because it's quite funny. Will Summer wrote this. There's been some various takes. I think that the people on the political left that want to try to smear me and they, they called me a MAGA guy.
You guys have to tell me if that makes sense to you. I don't think I got the Red Hat on. I don't think it's been the case. Look, Donald Trump does some good things. He does some bad things. And I don't feel like I'm compelled to say one thing or another about it. In April, FBI Director Cash Patel promoted an FBI agent named Steven Jensen to the head of the prestigious Washington
field office. Almost immediately, Patel and his deputy director Dan Bongino began to get heat from Trump supporters online over the decision. In social media posts tagging Patel and Bongino, critics let the image conscious pair know that Jensen had been involved in
the January 6th investigations. No voice on the right was louder than an ex FBI agent turned conservative podcaster named Kyle Serafin. In a steady stream of social media posts, Serafin dogged Patel's management of the Bureau, including over Jensen's promotion. It apparently irritated Patel to no end. According to Jensen, Patel suggested that Jensen sue Seraphin for defamation and even recommended some lawyers.
In Jensen's telling, Patel said a defamation suit would get some pressure off him, Him being Patel, Jensen ultimately declined to go after Seraphin. He told Patel that he was unconcerned with the viewpoints of online personalities. 2 points to Steve Jensen, J6 warlord. That's the thing you're supposed to do. You just do the job. Those revelations about irritation, Seraph and Cause Patel were buried in a lawsuit that Jensen and other agents filed.
Again, we cover this a couple of days ago and it alleges of wrongful termination. I actually do think they were wrongfully terminated. I think it was a terrible decision and I think that they are going to be vindicated. It's probably going to cost them a lot of money and take a long time. For example, the head of Las Vegas field office was told to stop posting on social media and ultimately fired after being criticized by Serafin, according
to the same lawsuit. Guys, for those who are wondering how does this podcast punch so far above its weight? It's because the things we're saying about the FBI are accurate. Even the New York Times went out there to try to say something which they didn't get my quote correct. They said, well, Chris Meyer, former FBI agent now, who was terminated in August, you know, he wasn't the case agent on the Mona Lago case. So do you feel bad about what you said?
And I said the actions by FBI management indicate the accuracy of the report that I gave. Do you guys think that the FBI director of forever, for all of his incompetence, and there's plenty of it, you think that he's unable to go out there and do a a Sentinel search for who, who were the case managers on on the cases that were relevant? Do you know that the entire squad that Meyer was part of was disbanded? I don't know what happened to all the agents.
Maybe some of them actually lost their jobs, but The New York Times is claiming that I presented no evidence. I mean, yeah, I don't have access to the FBI case file. Neither do you. What I have are good sources and the result and the actions taken inside the FBI. If you guys think that I get to just wave my magic wand over here at this podcast and make people in the FBI go away, that's not how it really works. I have no direct authority.
It is pretty wild, though, to see how much of this stuff keeps hitting home, how many arrows that we pull out of our quiver actually strike home. And here's another piece. Are you really listening to this guy? Former FBI acting Director Brian Driscoll asked Patel about Serafin at one point, according to the Times report. Driscoll is another of the people that were fired during this lawsuit, and he's in the lawsuit against Cash Patel.
The incident offers a glimpse into the outside power wielded by Seraphin in a moment of intense chaos and uncertainty inside the FBI. In a matter of months, Seraphin has become a mischievous boogeyman for Patel's operation, using his experience, sources within the agency, and a pugnacious online persona to constantly goad the director. Should we just take a little moment and just be amused? A pugnacious online personality that has become a mischievous
boogeyman. I I I am actually reveling in that. They actually quoted that I I don't think that I generally do this all day long, but after a post like this and after a sub stack from from bulk work, I I can't help but laugh. Serafin seems to be reveling in the idea that he's got Patel spooked. He told me he was happy to point out Patel's incompetent and bumbling actions. Those are my words. I said that for the whole world to see and agreed that he seems
to live in Patel's head. And when they say agreed, they said, do you think that you live in cash, Patel's head, rent free? And I said, yeah, it kind of seems like that way, doesn't it? I said he's very much out of his depth. He understands that he's out of his depth. What else is in here? Serafin's no liberal. Join the FBI in 2016, work surveillance, counterintelligence suspended in 2022 / a dispute the FBI's COVID rules. Partly true. Also the whistle blower stuff.
He rose to prominence as a right wing whistle blower after complaining to Jim Jordan's committee about the FBI's treatment of parents at school board meetings. Not entirely accurate, as you guys may know. I actually didn't complain about the treatment. What I said is that I believe the attorney general committed perjury and a bunch of other sort of violations of people's civil liberties, which were actually unrelated to parents at school boards. But that's for another time.
He was once on friendly terms with Patel. You guys know that. He met him through a podcast and Dan Bongino. All true. My primary grievance, they believe, is that I haven't, that he hasn't shaken the Bureau up enough. I think I'm going to actually hone in on that just a little bit more here people, because my primary grievance is not the shake up of the FBI. What I'd like to see, we covered this on last night's call in show and I did it discussing it
with you all. I'd like to see de weaponization of this agency and it actually segues very, very nicely into a story we're going to cover because a new after action report from the Washington field office and the FBI in particular
was released about January 6th. And so there's this discussion about what was the worst thing that's ever been done And how is how is the, you know, the the federal judiciary being weaponized right now against James comedy and political enemies of Donald Trump. And people are saying this is the worst thing that has ever happened in DOJ. I'm actually going to push back and say that's not true.
The worst thing that the DOJ has ever done is they've dropped the veil and they showed exactly what they were interested in by going after folks on January 6th. That was the single worst thing that our Justice Department has done. It was worse than COINTELPRO in many ways because what it did is it made it naked and raw for the American people to see. All right, let's see what else is on here. There's some other kind of funny
stuff. Sarah said he wasn't happy to learn that Patel had allegedly asked subordinates to sue him for defamation. He argued that the FBI director telling an employee to sue him for speech and even offering to help find a lawyer would be a clear First Amendment violation.
I don't think that's exactly how I said it, but it does look like kind of a conspiracy against rights when a member of the government is asking a subordinate who works in the government to go out there and use private resources to come after someone just because they don't like the criticism. You're in the public role of FBI director. You get criticism. You guys know that. We'll criticize James Comedy for all the things that he did. We'll criticize Chris Wray, and we did.
He actually used to lead out the podcast intro. For those of you that are new here, there's a famous question where Cela Jackson Lee asked him, ask Chris Wray, are you familiar with FBI agent Kyle Sarah Penn? He said, I'm familiar with the name. Why was he familiar? Because I was a very, very vocal critic of the FBI director, no matter who holds that role, because I believe in Kennedy's rule #1 some of you guys may know this Phil Kennedy who's going to be prominently featured
in a few minutes. Just so you guys are aware, Phil Kennedy is responsible for Kennedy's first law. And that says no matter who you nominate to be the FBI director, you end up with James Comedy and that interesting. You end up with a political activist who does things that are not brilliant. Although James Comedy was
clearly smarter. And I think we'll end up being in better shape than Cash Patel. This is a dangerous precedent that we're about to walk into today's show talking about the FBI director, a former FBI director, being indicted for perjury and lying to Congress. Would you really want to live in that glass house as an FBI director like Cash Patel, who started off his first hearing, the confirmation hearing prior to even being FBI director with lies, demonstrable lies,
provable lies that we can actually show you. He claimed credit for doing things like personnel actions prior to being in the FBI. Now there would have been a a totally innocent explanation for it saying, hey, look, I'm part of the transition team. There's an expectation that I'm going to be confirmed into FBI director. So of course I'm going to be out there talking to people that are in that space and the and the president has asked me to go out there and and interface with them.
That would be totally reasonable for a regular person to think and to say Underoath if you were not a complete bonehead. But instead what we had was an FBI director that went out there and said that he never had any involvement in that. I'm paraphrasing here a little bit. Obviously you had the FBI director indicate Underoath to Cory Booker and others, both in written form and in Word, that he was not actually involved in personnel decisions and actions prior to him becoming FBI director.
I have text messages that say otherwise. So he would have to explain that there are people that were in meetings that went to members of Congress or members of the Senate specifically that said otherwise. How do you make that work? How do you square that circle? If you're an FBI director who started off your first official act by engaging in what the FBI likes to call lack of candor. Is that the is that the house you want to live in?
That the precedent is whenever somebody gets in there and decides to to change the rules or go after like the guy who was in the the office former, you're going to be on the chopping block because that means Cash Patel is in real bad shape The next time that we have a Democrat president, if they are so inclined. Just saying that. I also apparently said that the his actions reflected poorly on Patel's competence quote. It's barely checkers.
It's certainly not chess moves is attributed to me. I don't know that I said that exactly, but that sounds about right. I mean, the guy's not playing chess, is he? He's just barely getting back into the king row. So there's other stuff that's in here, but that's the biggest funny thing. They also brought up the fact that I was willing to throw some
bombs at James O'Keefe. I don't know what this is, but I've seen a bunch of people from the left that are now following me. So folks, if you're new to the podcast and you just started following us, I don't I don't mind. We're not going to agree on everything you're going to find out, but I do think that we cut fairly, fairly, fairly fairly. You know, I saw a lot of people with like anti gun stuff. I saw people on the hard left
saying things. I see a bunch of folks that are that are clearly of a very different political persuasion. And I'll tell you this, this is the promise that I make when we do these types of shows in general, just as a general rule on the podcast, you won't necessarily agree with everything I had to say, but I'm going to present to you why I think the way I do and then we can still be friends. It turns out I grew up in the 80s. You didn't have to actually agree with everything around
you. In fact, most people probably didn't agree on a bunch of things like religion and politics and they just thought it was not polite to talk about it. Since we do talk about politics here, the rule is we can agree to disagree. While you guys are thinking about that, if you're following us on Rumble, make sure you like the video bumps us up on the leaderboard. If you're following on YouTube, make sure you're liking us over there.
If you're on X and you're new welcome, hit the like button. You guys can always join the community. It's at kyleseraphin.com. That's where I go and give you the articles that are referenced. You guys will see a link to this article out there. Make sure you're liking sharing and subscribing and the place you can. And if you want to have the best single way to check out our program, the best way to do it is on Spotify. Spotify is Kyle
seraphinshow.com. If you're watching a replay on any of the video platforms, you would be far happier with the control you get on Spotify. It's the best monetized platform for us. I get the best data, but also I think the interface is you can switch between audio and video and do a lot of control. So check out Spotify. Just go to kyleserifandshow.com, kyleserifandshow.com. Make sure you guys leave us a comment over there.
And again, if you're watching the video platforms, just hit the like button, but don't worry about it so much. OK, that's as much as I really want to do on this story, this lawsuit story, but it is kind of funny. Not the lawsuit, sorry, the the self coverage. Let's go to the quote UN quote bombshell. And this is what took me a little bit of time today. Here's the bombshell as written last night by my friend Steve Baker and Joe Hanneman over at Blaze.
And I got some issues with their story. I'm a little concerned with how quick this reporting went out and what it may or what it may not actually say. The FBI had 275 plainclothes agents embedded in the January 6th crowds, congressional sources say. I got a message from Steve Baker before we went Live Today. And he said now what we're going to see, there's a big discussion about dispatched versus embedded. And he is exactly right. And that is the discussion.
And I actually think the Blaze may have come down on the wrong side of this. You guys know that I care about facts. I care about accuracy. That's going to be the single most important thing in any of this stuff. Let me read the story. Disclosures by the FBI to Congress answer long simmering questions but do not reveal what the agents did that day.
The FBI has acknowledged that they were 275 plainclothes agents in the massive crowd on January 6th, 2021, more than 4 1/2 years after these questions were first raised about the level of FBI involvement in the day. Senior Congressional source said the number is not necessarily a surprise, since the FBI often embeds counter surveillance
personnel in large events. But given the FB is now steadfast refusal to disclose the level of presence in the capital, the figure might be viewed with some skepticism, at least in some quarters. The news comes in the wake of claims by the US Justice Department Office of Inspector General that the FBI had no undercover personnel in the
January 6th crowds. Quote, we found no evidence in the materials we reviewed or the testimony we received showing we're suggesting that the FBI had undercover employees in the various protest crowds or at the Capitol on the day of January 6th. That's what the 88 page Office of Inspector General report said. So you guys come here for FBI analysis, particularly in stories like this. I will give you the inside baseball and how this works #1 the words FBI.
Sorry, undercover personnel or undercover employees. That is a very specific program. They are used here in an like a non air quotes way. They are not used in any sort of a capitalized. But when we refer to undercovers in the FBI and, and, and other law enforcements do the same thing. We're talking about a program and usually someone who is certified to be an undercover. The DEA certifies almost all their agents and maybe all of them to do undercover work. The FBI does not.
Your average FBI employee does not go through the undercover coursework and therefore they are not listed as what's being a UCE or undercover employee. It's a brand name product. It is a certification that goes in like a resume item. And so you're not going to find out that they were undercover employees, AKAUCES, people specifically trained to act as undercover agents in that January 6th crowd.
And so I believe the Office of Inspector General report, because they're not saying the same thing that is commonly meant in the same way that you and I will often talk and we'll say certain things like this looks like entrapment. Well, there's a legal definition of entrapment that the DOJ plays with. And that legal definition is antithetical to the moral definition. When you look at it from the outside, you're like, obviously what was going on? There was some sort of
entrapment. They were presenting a, you know, a plan. They were presenting the means to accomplish a plan. How is that not entrapment? And the way that the entrapment definition works officially is very different than what we would understand it to mean colloquially. It's important. It's a major distinction. And so when we say UC ES, brand name, trademark, UC ES all, all capital letters, it's a different animal. All FBI agents are plainclothed.
What does that mean? That means there's no uniform for being in the FBI when you're an FBI agent, as I am, dressed right now is perfectly acceptable for plenty of things. Most of my work on surveillance was done in a T-shirt, sometimes in shorts. You're blending into the environment and FBI agents are allowed to have a several sort of like deniable contacts in sort of a semi undercover type
role. They're allowed to do that a certain number of times by policy without having to be certified UC ES. So once you understand that these words have very specific meanings, and this is going to play into the comedy indictment, words have meanings. They are very specific. And federal law enforcement, because now federal law enforcement is so ingrained with this broader context of intelligence work, they operate in the fringes of technicalities.
I had someone comment to me last night about the military and what they said was in the military, you're not able to just shade around the edges and tell a partial truth or sort of like a lie of omission. I would say that's the default position of an Intel agency to do that because the word has a specific meaning and as they understand it and, and by the way, we do business here this way.
When I say the word agents and I'm talking about an intelligence service, I'm not talking about W2 employees. We talked about this the other day, but I'll continue to say it. An agent working on behalf of an Intel agency is a recruited source or asset. Those are interchangeable words. An intelligence officer is someone who actually works on behalf of fill in the blank government or intelligence service. So words are very specific and they have very specific
meanings. The problem is if you do not define your terms openly and you go out there and you say in a 88 page OIG report where we're supposed to be getting accuracy and honesty that there was no undercover employee, it doesn't mean that there were no people in the crowd working for that agency. Now, I would be surprised to find out that the FBI actually has an accurate count of all the people that were in the crowd that were FBI affiliated of any level. Because I know that they were
professional staff. I know that they were FBI agents that were on leave on that day that were out there in the crowd. I have an alibi for whatever it's worth. I was not there. And this goes to a bigger problem and a bigger presentation of what we should be talking about on that specific day. On the day of January 6th, 2021, something should have happened that did not. There should have been what was declared as an NSSE.
And people who are even well versed in this, including my friend Steve Baker, don't necessarily know top of mind what that means. A national special security event. Since we're talking about January 6th, we should talk about that. And I should remind myself again that not everybody understands that the normal protocols for very large gatherings in Washington, DC were not followed on that day.
And the answer would be why? And I think a congressional hearing that actually queried people who were in a position to decide whether we were going to have an NSSE on that day would be really useful to all of us. We would actually learn
something. A National Special Security Event is something that is by statute and policy executed by the US Secret Service. It comes from the Department of Homeland Security. Again, there are actually CFRS that define the roles and say who does what, and an NSSE is an all hands on deck call for all federal resources and it also authorizes federal payment of local overtime and other teams and so on. Nsses which are like July 4th.
I'm sure the inauguration is always one of them, but there's also other ones that will be Nsses. Like you'll have parades, large protests can be the March for life is 1, the, the whatever the 250 year celebration they're going to do on the White House lawn, that will be an NSSE. And what they do is they bring in all of the resources they can find. Everything will be brought in from the DC Metro PD. The ATF will have teams out there. They'll be doing bomb sniffing.
You'll have people from the Department of Energy, they're driving around looking for a nuclear or radioactive waste or or dirty bombs. You'll have the FBI, all the dive team out there running around in boats looking under the bridges. Everybody gets involved.
And generally speaking, you're going to have not undercover, but what they would call counter, I don't know, counter surveillance teams walking around in the crowds, making sure that everybody is safe and doing the things that they're supposed to do. And they actually are out there theoretically to protect the liberties of the people that are either protesting or enjoying a nice day. And there's nothing wrong with that.
Here's the problem. What you're seeing on the screen right now is this congressional report, which was given to John Solomon at just the news, as far as I can tell, again, kind of our our favorite sort of controlled outlet leak from the Trump administration. I say that in air quotes because I'm not a big fan of John Solomon, as many of you may know, and this is what it says deployment date, personnel type. You're looking at the top of the screen here.
It's in small type. So I'm reading it for you. The event, the field office or headquarters division and the total personnel count and then notes about that actual line item. The the stuff you're seeing are all from January 6th of 2021 and the position types go from agents to attorneys to IA, which is your intelligence analyst, other that's going to be your just regular professional support staff. And then total numbers in the incident. The line item people are
focusing in on is agent. The incident is January 6th or 1/6 incident. The field office is Washington Field where I was assigned on that day. And the total personnel count under agent is 274. Hence our highline title of 275 agents were embedded in the crowd. But that word embedded doesn't seem right when you read the note. That doesn't mean the FBI hasn't lied to us. It means that technically speaking, they're talking about something else. That's my belief and here's what
it says. Included agents that responded to the Capitol grounds as well as inside the Capitol, the pipe bombs and the red truck that was believed to have contained explosive material, as well as CDC and ADCS. A/C DC is a chief division counsel, so that's an attorney and ADC as an assistant division counsel and so they're also an attorney. They're almost always FBI agents as well. So you might have them in an on scene role. OK, the number. Includes. Agents that responded.
That's a really specific. Way of saying things that does not mean embedded in the crowd. And so as much as I love Steve Baker and I do think that Johanneman they do very vigorous work. I think this so-called bombshell that they were 275 agents embedded is not accurate. I bet you there are still people that were walking around in those crowds, whether they were source handlers, whether they were there for their own personal razors and so on. That's one thing. But they did deploy agents.
There were many emails that went out in those deployment requests and they sent a bunch of people to go do a response. The response, that's a deployment. That is not the same thing as being embedded. That's not the same thing as being tasked on the day of to be in the crowd in case something goes down in the way that we used to have what are called I teams and then which are investigative teams or interview teams. That is not the same thing. And I've done those jobs.
I've done those jobs numerous times. And again, because this was not an NSSE, because it wasn't declared as such by the Secret Service, which is a really big question. And you hear a lot of focus on the FBI. You hear some focus on DHSI, never hear them get to the sub agency and say, hey, Secret Service, why was this event not an NSSE? Because if it was an NSSE, what would happen is this, I would not have been on leave on that day.
It's an all hands moment. They would have staged my surveillance team, which was specialized in following bad guys around and been doing so in a low visibility role. We would have been staged somewhere nearby the capital to be able to do any follow ONS and that was not asked of us.
So I know there are some real problems with this information and I know we're not getting it. And I guess this goes to the broader question and the broader effort issue that we've all seen Mike Johnson. Came in with some. Promises. One of them was that he was going to release all the J6 footage. They haven't done that yet. They were going to have some sort of truth reconciliation on that day because the question should actually offend people on the left and the right.
No matter what side of the political aisle you're on, you should not see a politically targeted operation by our government. Whether it was by negligence, whether it was intentional malfeasance, whatever went on, we should unpack that day. Because if it was the biggest attack on our democracy, shouldn't we know all the facts about it? And it shouldn't be in a
partisan way. And if it wasn't, and I don't believe that it was, I think it was a riot that got out of control and the people that fought cops probably belonged in jail for a period of time. But I also believe that shouldn't we have seen something like that happen during 2020 'cause I did work in DC and I did see the amount of civil unrest that was going on, and I did see Donald Trump driven into
a bunker. You don't have to like Donald Trump to say that a disturbance on the North Lawn of the White House is wrong and it was violent and it was dangerous. This shouldn't be a partisan issue if you go and destroy American federal property wherever you are. We shouldn't tolerate that as a nation because it brings on a lot of other ugly things that we don't want to face down. And, and, and you know, broken window pane policing does
actually work effectively. If you let a bunch of small things go and people build up a steam head of energy behind it, that inertia could be incredibly dangerous. That's that's my. That's my. Even handed take, if you will, but I think it's actually really problematic. There's another story that was written by a disclosed TV and they basically covered these 274 agents. And so if you guys want to find some of the stuff, it's on social media.
They started getting into some of the comments and the comments are really wild because what many of you may not know is that the FBI is constantly doing like every military unit or law enforcement unit, they're doing what's called an after action or a self-assessment. So they go on a hot wash is another word for it. They go in and they and they say, hey, this, this just happened. Whatever it was, we had an event, we had a response, we had deployments, we had action on target.
How did we do? Can we look at ourselves critically and figure out what are the things that we should improve? What are the things that we should sustain, or in other words, keep doing? What are some outside the box criticisms or problems? What resources might we need to add to what we're doing? Those are all pretty good. You want to do that?
My team used to do it. After every single shift, we would have one positive and one negative from every single team member because we always wanted to improve as a investigative unit. How can we do our thing better? What do we do really well that we should continue to emulate or even add as a as an SOP? So they did this and I'm going to cover some of these stories because one of them in this story stood out like a sore thumb. I thought, I know those words. I've seen those words.
I've read those. Words before and. We're going to do it in one second before we do. How about my friends over at Patriot coolers? Guys, you're seeing the cooler on the the on the screen if you're watching on Spotify or if you're watching on the video platforms, they make an outstanding product. They put stars and stripes on them just like you're seeing on there. I actually have my own. I have the wood grain going right now. There are 50 stars on the bottom.
There is coffee in here that is not leaking on me. That's fantastic. Got a great spill proof lid, 20 ounces of a of a hot liquid that's staying hot during the entire show. And I we've made this coffee like 6:00 AM, so couple hours still going strong. Check out my friends at Patriot coolers. The website is Patriot coolers.com slash Kyle. Actually I'm not sure if you put the Kyle there's actually a link in the show description that takes you to the Kyle Seraphin
thing. Use the promo code KYLEKYLE 4 letters 10% off. That's the deal. That's the rule. You'll get free shipping over I think 75 bucks Find yourself or maybe it's over 50 bucks. Find yourself something you like, find something for someone you love. Just do that, check them out. If you guys are in the market, don't spend money. You don't need to. You don't need to do that for us. But I know that people are
constantly looking. We're moving into the the outdoor season for people that are going into deer camp and elk camp. You're doing hunting and things like that. You get a lot of stuff in those 50 quarts and they will keep ice for a very long time. They're also just a really good looking product. You're not going to be sad about it. OK, I want to get into this thing right here because I'm telling you this. Was pretty wild to me. This is the number 11 comment in the feedback for the future.
And so I might even have let me see, I think I've got it right here. This is it right there. OK, folks, let me read to you the number 11 comment feedback for the future. Goodness, here we go. What can the FBI do better investigate credible threats of election fraud so Americans don't get so upset in the 1st place. Parenthetically, look, I know you're not going to take any of this feedback seriously.
WFO is a hopelessly broken office that's more concerned about wearing masks and recruiting preferred racial and sexual groups than catching actual bad guys. The front office is comprised of yes men who've never opposed a single thought from the Good Idea Fairy. We had an addict. That's what Steve Jensen was. That's the assistant director in charge. Retire on a Friday afternoon at 4:30 PM with nothing more than
an e-mail and a deputy director. Suddenly retire in the midst of the largest manhunt in the history of mankind, and yet we're supposed to pretend that everything is just fine? Emails from the director with focus group language are not going to cut it anymore. It's time for someone to admit that WFO has serious problems so the trust can be repaired. That's. Pretty strong language, don't you think? Coming from an internal person at the FBI, isn't that something?
We don't have any trust from the American. People, we know that you don't take this feedback seriously. You're more interested in people wearing masks and and recruiting preferred racial and sexual groups than catching actual bad guys. Who would be so bold as to say something like that? You think? Well, it turns out the person who said that is one of your suspendables. The writer of that comment was Philip Kennedy, the original the first producer of this podcast.
What you're seeing here is. A couple of little snappy, nasty snapshots. In the middle is that language from comment #11 and below it is a screenshot that Mister Kennedy held onto when he left the FBI. They are exactly the same. I knew that I had read it before. I knew that it was familiar language to me. Because sometimes you just know how your buddies say things, right? And there it is, right there in black and white. Phil Kennedy shared exactly the
problem. Now let's consider If you look at his Twitter bio, you'll see that he calls himself the Canary. That's my term for Phil. Phil. Is the Canary. Because he was the first person that tested, Can you say something true about the FBI and still work there? And what he proved was the answer is no, you cannot. You cannot. And so I actually have his entire. I have his entire response to the WFO command post questionnaire, the hot wash section, and I want to read some of it to you.
The part that is not actually visible in this particular thing, but it is interesting that it made it into a findings that made it into the Congressional Record. What did WFO do well? During the Reese's crisis and command post implementation. Here's his answer. WFO did a great job of continuing the Crossfire Hurricane investigation. Trump's presidency started with the FBI investigating his supporters, and it ended with the FBI investigating his supporters.
Maybe the case should have been given a name like Gravelly male movie announcer voice crossfire hurricane 2 the redemption the. FBI also did a great job. Of maintaining its obvious bias that Americans have continued to witness since James Comedy's first famous July 5th, 2016. No reasonable prosecutor's
speech. One could head down to the first floor training room and witness CT 4 as a case squad watching the disgraced former deputy Director Andrew McCabe, a known liar and alleged criminal, described the riot as an orgy of violence. And why is CNN allowed to be viewed in a federal building this way? This propaganda outlet campaigned against Trump for four years and it propagated the myth of Russian collusion. Washington Field Office did a great job.
I'm masking the fact that Officer Brian Sicknick did not die at the hands of a Trump supporter, but rather due to a cardiac incident caused by an allergic reaction. That may not be accurate, but this was a pretty tight in when we didn't have all the facts. It did a great job of ignoring the death of an unarmed veteran named Ashley Babbitt while lionizing a criminal named George Floyd.
Washington Field did a fantastic job of sending leads to other divisions to interview Trump supporters who were nowhere near the Capitol, some of whom were not even in Washington, DC on 1/6/2021. Guys, do you see this? The Division did a great job of using the Capital riot as a pretext for investigating the Proud Boys, the Oath Keepers, and Parlor while giving Marxist radical leftist Antifa a pass during the DC Summer Riots of 2020.
And finally, Washington Field Office continues to do an excellent job of protecting the government and its preferred servants from accountability. For example, Kevin Kleinsmith was quietly sentenced to probation after manufacturing fraudulent evidence in Crossfire Hurricane. One other not so fortunate employees to face harsher sentences for abusing something so simple as the government travel card. This is not an acceptable. Thing my friend was talking about this in 2021.
I began talking about what the FBI was doing inappropriately in 2021 and when that when that stuff came out, what do they do? Do they say holy crap, we should we should review ourself and figure out where we have error? No, they did not and they decided to go after, and I bet you a real serious investigation into weaponization would evaluate how many of the employees that had negative comments or constructive feedback for their agency were actually removed from their
jobs. I bet you the instances of disciplinary actions like Phil Kennedy got and, and, and these comments are very closely aligned and I'd be surprised to find that some of these people are still working there. Very surprised. There's a bunch of really aggressive statements in here. How about this one? I wish. You would all would pay more attention to our safety than what types of masks we're
wearing. If you're going to deploy us into a riot situation, then give us the proper damn safety equipment, helmets, face Shields, protective clothing, and training. I've told you many times the FBI was not trained to go and deal with riots. They're the wrong tool. This is the second time that the whole office has been deployed to handle a situation and nothing was learned from the previous crisis over the summer.
That would be the summer that I've told you that the FBI deployed a bunch of people out there on president's patrols. The only difference are new inept leaders who just want to push us out there for a photo op for the media. It's a miracle that no one from the FBI was seriously hurt or worse. Are you going to wait until something like Miami happens for us to to one of us at WFO? It's on your conscience if it does.
Miami is a reference to two agents being shot and killed and A and a third being a very seriously wounded. How about this? The FBI needs to. Be politically impartial. It needs to treat all crimes with an equal hand, whether from the left, the right. And it needs to have its final goal ultimately be the integrity of our Republic. That's. The very source of our. Transparent electoral system and it is not so now. Isn't this really simple? Focus on the investigation is what we do well.
Stop trying to throw agents at a problem. Listen to your followers and supporters inside this at this office. There is so much criticism in here and a bunch of these people, I can almost guarantee you do not work there anymore because of the way that they phrased it, because they were critical and you're not allowed
to do that, this guy said. Generally speaking, I have little interest in the political preferences of FBI leadership or whether the agency as a whole is more supportive of one political party than another. However, the FBI irreparably damaged its credibility among the American people and a great percentage of its personnel by abandoning its mission and
priorities. Guys, this stuff is termination type material inside the Bureau. For those of us who didn't think it, how about this little bombshell dropped in a freaking
anonymous survey? In approximately 2008, the FBI stopped an ongoing public corruption investigation operation, board games and into the Illinois governor just shy of potentially implicating a sitting United States Democrat President due to the damage it might cause to the United States. Approximately 8 years later, the FBI began actively and publicly investigating and attempting to unseat AUS President Republican through deceit and abuse of its
authorities. Crossfire Hurricane. In 2020, WFO Washington Field Office assumed the mission for which the personnel were untrained and under equipped to provide and defend a Plaza dedicated to a group of domestic terrorists that's a left-leaning with a history of violence and criminal activity during its First Amendment activities and then took a knee on command in January of 2021.
Washington Field Office immediately and aggressively began targeting anyone accused by the public of having been in the geographic vicinity of similar crimes perpetrated by another group of so-called domestic terrorists who are right leaning with little or no history of violence or criminal activity during these activities. This. Stuff is damning.
Is it? Not this ongoing, obvious, unapologetic, and for all intents and purposes legally sanctioned bias has thoroughly demoralized the FB is personnel and the American people, further endangering the agents as they interact with the public and conduct their official duties and jeopardize the ongoing safety and the security of the United States and its citizen. That folks, might be the single most damning thing that I've seen written.
I'd be shocked to find out if that person still has a job. If they did not have retirement available to them already, they probably do not work at the FBI and I'd be desperate to find out. If anyone knows who that person is, please let them contact me info@kyleseraphin.com. If you want a voice, I will give it to you and unlike. Some of the others I. Don't care what you have to say. You can say anything you like, whatever your perspective is,
because that is utterly true. And that was very fair and balanced and accurate. There's some institutional knowledge there. We know that cases were walked away from that were Democrats because it was too political, it was too close. We know that the FBI got involved in politics in ways that it should not have. And that should not be an. Acceptable thing. So for everyone who's claiming oh, Jim comedy like it's too much, listen, I don't have any love for Jim comedy.
I also don't have any any illusions about this being a serious undertaking to go out there and indict the former FBI director. It is a truly stupid and dangerous decision that was made truly stupid. Let's talk about the ice shooting first, because. That is also the other piece that everybody wants to get involved in. And I'm going to, I'm going to go out there and tell you that everybody who is talking about it, and I mean everybody in all the mainstream voices, they're
suddenly all on the same page. We cannot look at left or right. We cannot look at political ideology. What we need to do is just focus on the problem. And apparently the problem are white men with rifles. This is alleged Republican, I would say actual Republican. You're the rhino. If you guys are actually conservative people. This is a real Republican telling you it's white people with rifles that are the real thing to look into. You guys ready for this?
It's CNN. It's nauseating. It's Adam Kissinger. Listen, the thing that we need to be looking at is not, is this the right? Is this the left? Is it whatever? It's why are young white males doing this? Why do they feel so disconnected from society that they have to turn to violence? And that's not what the president's talking about. Instead, he's talking about it's the left. And I got to tell you, we're missing the. We're missing the point.
Oh, is that so OK. ABC News reports as a motive still remains under investigation in the fatal sniper type shooting in the Dallas Immigration and Customs Enforcement office that took place this week. Law enforcement experts said the incident is part of a frightening trend of rifle wielding shooters targeting politicians, police and others from long distances. Now I just want you to take a second and listen to what those words were one more time and I'd like you to figure out, can you
also be put in this group? Are you ready? Rifle wielding shooters are targeting who? Politicians, police and others from long distances. So that's all of. US apparently since the alleged would be assassination attempt to kill Donald Trump in July of 2024 at a campaign rally in Butler, PA.
There have been 7 sniper type incidents that have unfolded across the country including the September 10th shooting that claimed the light of conservatives conservative political activist Charlie Kirk. While such shootings have been a part of American history, including the assassination of JFK and Martin Luther King Junior in the 1960s, law enforcement experts told ABC News that they have never seen so many sniper type incidents occurring in such a short amount
of time. I believe that this is the next chapter, if you will, in our history of violence, said Jesse Hambrick, a retired Georgia deputy sheriff and counter sniper expert. Especially in our active shooter type situations. Quite interesting.
The latest incident which happened on Wednesday morning, as we reported here as well, was when a 29 year old suspect identified by federal law enforcement officers to be Joshua Jahan or Jahan JAHNI, don't know how you pronounce the name of Fairview, Texas. He opened fire in a Dallas ICE facility, killing a detainee and leaving two others critically wounded. The victims were shot in an uncovered sallyport near the facility. You guys can go back and listen to our coverage on that.
The other day. He allegedly planned the attack for months. He opened fire on the roof using an 8mm bolt action. I guess it wasn't a 30 ought 6. I guess it was an 8mm. That was the other speculation. FBI Special Agent charge of the Dallas field office brought this up. Interesting. Interesting. In a really sad. Way isn't it? There's no political affiliation. We just have to focus on the fact that it's white men with rifles. That's the thing that we need to talk about.
Is political violence acceptable? Everybody needs to just tone it down. It does seem that it is more 1 sided in this particular type of violence, specifically all of the instances that were listed right here. And here's the other thing that I would like you to consider because it's really worth considering right now. If we pay 11 billion.
Dollars a year for an intelligence agency that also has law enforcement capabilities, AKA the weaponized FBI that I used to work at that I have just read you some damning indictments of from inside that FBI. Aren't they supposed to be able to do the thing? Like know who's coming for you now? I would also argue to you that they're unable to do that. That's not physically possible for them to do pre crime. And it's also antithetical to American liberties.
We cannot have pre crime. We can't go out and go and decide that you're going to do something until you were actually in the act of. And disrupting that is very hard to do in real time. And we shouldn't be monitoring people to. The point where we know exactly what they're going to do before they do it. I saw that movie. It was written about by Philip K Dick. It was portrayed in a wet 2004 movie with with Tom Cruise. The end result is this is super
dangerous behavior. The government should not be surveil you to the to the point of secret police status where they get you with thought crime. That means you have to inherit a certain. Amount of risk. That means that the solution is actually cultural, that you value human life. A culture that values life is not going to go out there and take life from a rooftop. Or we can go out there and just try to condemn. Political violence very nebulously and not actually
address the real problem. How important is it for leaders, especially at the very, very top of the government, to set the tone? Listen, it should not matter whether the radicalization comes from the right or the left or,
you know, sort of the non. Ideological deep, dark recesses of the Internet. This president, this vice president has had a chance now since the assassination of Charlie Kirk to bring the country together to try to stamp out all sorts of violence, including political violence. And they refuse to do that with. They're trying to do is exploit these murders and these shootings in order to silence only dissents and political opposition on the left.
No, criticizing the way that ICE is rounding up people in this country in a deeply inhumane and immoral way is not an incitement to violence. There is a moment where you cross the line. But what they are trying to do is to destroy the ability for people who oppose their policies to legitimately. Engage in political debate and, and, and we are not going to let them do that.
Listen, you can have legitimate political debate, no doubt about it. But there is also a moral framework being constructed by some people on the political left. And I would not say it's everyone, it's certainly not. But there are some people that are very deliberately doing something. They are setting up a moral framework in which they can
actually justify that violence. And then what you hear them say is we condemn violence on all sides while they are simultaneously using very specific language that is going to justify a moral framework within some people, usually those who are not mentally with it, that do not have value for life, that do not care about the consequences, that maybe don't want to continue on in life, that are going to go out there and end their own lives over this stuff.
That was a very dishonest. Talking point there from Chris Murphy. I disagree with what he said vigorously. And it has been a trend. And these are the same people that once something violent happens, then they're all like, oh, shut down the mean rhetoric.
Right, using the word shutdown. Reminds me that we are nearing a government shutdown in a couple of days, October 1st, if there is not ACR passed, which means that we're going to get a continuing resolution and there's going to be a bunch of caving because nobody wants to own the idea of a government shutdown. NBC News is saying they've got to fight back. Democrats pressing leaders not to cave in during the shutdown fight.
The White House is threatening to carry out mass firings of federal workers if the government is shut down. I do like this. I do hope they shut down the government only because I don't need this government to protect me and honestly, neither do you. Your local governments, state governments, they are more than adequate to solve the problems.
And as this country was originally designed, we are meant to have United States and they're supposed to be a small federal government that overseas the Interstate part of it. What we've seen is the Commerce Clause and Interstate communications all kind of stepped in. The the idea of federal government involvement in everything you do is relatively new and it certainly was not the way that this country was designed.
Just look at the name. We were meant to be the functional unit of, of our Republic was supposed to be state to state. We were supposed to have, you know at this point, 50 individual laboratories for freedom and democracy, for freedom and your representation. And the federal government wasn't supposed to necessarily be that. You're only supposed to have one elected federal representative, one, not the president, not your senators, just your congressman or congresswoman.
That's the only person that was supposed to be out there doing that. The Senate was supposed to represent the states, the upper house, the lower house is the people. The upper house is the states. The executive was actually supposed to be picked by and still has the ability to be picked by our state houses. It is supposed to be an amalgamation of filtration of power that goes up and represents the majority of the states. And they're not supposed to be
making policy as an executive. This king like executive, it's not good. It's not good for America. It's a failed experiment. We've seen far too much power seated over the last 120 years, starting at the turn of the last century, and it just continues to move on and on and on. And now we are demanding certain things. Now we have a president out there demanding individual actions and prosecutions. The most minute thing that our Justice Department does. That is the worst case scenario,
folks. It is not good. I would love to see the Republicans own a shutdown and use it as an opportunity to actually make smaller government. I don't think they'll do it, and I don't think any of us think that that's very likely. But wouldn't it be nice to imagine a government that actually served like the ideological purposes that they were put there for and then maybe they could get to work by doing single, single issue, turn on the lights one at a time.
You know, sometimes when you're trying to do troubleshooting in a house, you turn off all the circuits and you find out which one is going to either blow the fuse. You're going to find out which one is actually causing the problem. So you shut down everything all the way across. All of your fuse is off now it's completely dark. Now we turn them on one at a time. We figure out what works. That's the idea that Mike Johnson actually ran as speaker.
That was what he that's what he put forward in the in the public. He was going to do single issue appropriations. Well, let's do it. Let's figure out how long it takes. Write your single issue. Turn on the government one single office at a time, line by line, one page bills. Very, very simple. Give them what the tasking is. Give them the purpose of the tasking less they need to interpret some of it and give them the funding that you are going to agree to. That's what you came on to do.
Republicans will never do it. I think we can all agree on that. We're going to see ACR and then eventually they'll push another omnibus bill. But that's what they actually said they were going to do, and we should demand better. Let's get. Into the the Jim comedy. Stuff here because you know it's time. It's time. It is just before I'll remind you again, Spotify is Kyle serifandshow.com that is our preferred and it is probably the
easiest way to watch the replay. So if you're watching this replay and you want to watch it again, Kyle serifandshow.com will take you right to Spotify. It's free and you may hear a pause right now. If you're listening on the audio platform, you'll get one additional canned ad that happens right now. You guys can always be a Spotify. Premium member, which means that you don't get those ads and also I think we get paid for them too. So even better, like we
appreciate all that stuff. We get some sort of revenue share. If you want to be Spotify premium, if you're listening on Apple or or any of the other places, you may hear that stuff, but the best place because you get audio and video and you can swap between them again. I I was never a Spotify user until I started hosting with them and I'm a big fan and they don't give us anything to say that I'm I'm literally promoting their their platform because I
think it's the best. All right, let's do the Jim comedy stuff. We have to here it is baboom. There's Jim comedy. Jim Comedy was underoath many times. Jim Comedy is, in my words, a middle finger to the American people. He's almost 7 feet tall. He has become like an action figure for the Democrat Party of late. It's sad. He talks a really good game. He handed me up my credentials when I joined the FBI and I heard the speech that he gave at my graduation ceremony at the
FBI Academy 4-5 times. It's just a canned speech. He's a good actor. He's certainly smarter than the current FBI director. He was very, very big on recruiting, cult of personality, and people really bought into what he did. I'll tell you something kind of funny. I think I said this the other night 1. Of the things that I left. Of the of the very few things that were personal I left in the FB is office. When I was suspended, I left two
books as a box set. One of them was Seamus Bruner's book, which was given to me by a family friend. That was called Compromise, how money and politics ended up compromising the mission of the American, you know, the FBI. And the other one was Jim Comedy's A Higher Loyalty. And I thought they were a box set because A Higher Loyalty and Compromise ran side by side. They're perfect.
The argument being made right now is that the thing that is being done to Jim Comedy, and I'll show you why I think it's scary because this is not good, The thing that's being done to Jim Comedy is crossing a line that can never come back. Here's Donald Trump's true social post about this. Whether you like corrupt James Comedy or not, I cannot imagine too many people liking him. He lied.
That is a factual statement. He is now asserting something that's going to be kind of dangerous because he represents the top of the executive. It's not a complex lie. It's very simple, but an important one. There is no way he can explain his way out of it. He's a dirty cop and he's always been that. He was assigned to crooked, but he was assigned a crooked Joe Biden appointed judge. So he's off to a very good start. Nevertheless, the words are words and he wasn't hedging or in dispute.
He was very positive that there was no doubt in his mind about what he said or meant by it. He's left himself 0 margin for error. That's a big claim. It's a real big claim when you say that, there's no doubt in anyone's mind what was being said. We got a problem because some people don't know what he said. This is Lindsey Graham, this is a sitting United States senator.
This is a man who doesn't know what was being discussed, doesn't know what the indictment was about, and is making claims that are completely irrelevant to the actual indictment that was done. We'll do the indictment one second. First, let's hear Lady Graham say his piece. Everything he says here is
wrong. By the way, as far as what the indictment was alleging, The question for this country, and I believe this for five years, did the FBI director have information he should have given the FISA court that were to stop this madness? And the answer is yes, he did. And the madness continued. And why did it continue? Because James Comedy and a bunch of others wanted to destroy Donald Trump. That, to me, needs to be looked at. OK, he missed the point. He. Doesn't know what was going on.
The claims on the on the political left coming from like MSNBC are saying that this has crossed a boundary. This is a Rubicon. This is a, you know, a line that no one has ever crossed before. That's also not true. And I'm going to give you the evidence of it. The worst thing that the Justice Department did was January 6th. That's what I that's what I'm sharing.
With you, you not just broke faith with the American people and people on the political left and the right, what you saw was very disparate treatment of leftist and right leaning ideologies in a very short period of time. One of whom was basically ignored and almost no prosecutions happened. The other one resulted in the largest manhunt in the history of the FBI. And then you had to have an election to. Overturn it and you had this big piece where you were.
We were getting presidential. Pardons to stop the Justice Department. It has been my overwhelming sentiment that what Donald Trump did with the pardons, including people that probably didn't deserve like a true pardon in that way, what he did was not a rebuke of or or a condoning of the actions of those who participated in, in the riot activities of, of, of January 6th.
What I think Donald Trump was doing with those pardons, at least the way that I've read it, it was a rebuke of the federal government's actions against those people which were unfair. They were unbalanced. They were incredibly biased. They were truly not about justice. They were about seeking an outcome. And that's what I've been arguing against, weaponized, weaponized government where we have a a goal, we have a process that is supposed to be fair and blind.
And what we've done is we've said, I'm going to get to this goal and I'm going to make the process work for me to get there. That is the same thing they just did to Jim Comedy. It was requested that he be indicted and then he was indicted. The look is tragic, but this has been done before and to act like
this is new. And of course, everybody wants to make the 1:00 to 1:00 comparison Donald Trump to Jim Comedy. I actually think that the situation with the J Sixers was first and more accurate. That's my take on this. Here's MSNBC saying that we should protect the Process and people inside should be very offended. And also the kind of nonsense it
stands for. Joyce, if it is such a dire moment, what is your advice, your message right now to those people inside the Justice Department, inside these US attorney offices, the, you know, rank and file prosecutors that are doing the work to bring cases like this one? What do you say to them? So the mission inside of. US Attorney's offices across the country is to keep their
communities safe. And in difficult times like this, the traditional advice to federal prosecutors is to keep their heads down, do the important cases in front of
them. Because the cases that we're talking about on a, that's maybe 1% of what's going on in the Justice Department. But every day there's violent crime, there's drug crime, there's civil rights violations and white collar crime that prosecutors and agents across the country are working on. The issue prosecutors are hardwired to understand, and I hope Americans will understand this too, is that when you become an assistant United States Attorney or a political appointee in an office, you
check your politics at the door, you walk in and you do your job looking at the facts and the law without fear or favor. And that's what I believe Andrews and my former colleagues across the country are trying their hardest to do right now. There may be a moment for difficult choices coming for many prosecutors, and I hope that when those moments come that the American public will stand up and support these
people. I think if there is a move to indict Jim Comedy, we will likely see resignations out of Alexandria. And she's right. People will resign. That's already started, but to act like there's some sort of like pure as the driven snow attitude in these people that work at DOJ, that's absurd. That's not true. There's great AUSAS, there's not great USAAUSAS. There's some that are highly political and they can't shake it, and there's some that are not. And we already saw them go
along. With J6 prosecutions to keep their jobs and we know that a bunch of these people, they, there's nothing in the mission set of the DOJ that's supposed to keep the American people safe. That is not an opportunity that law enforcement has. That's the intelligence apparatus. That's the secret police game. All of that stuff is terrifying to me. It should be terrifying to you, no matter what your politics are. If you hear a government say that we are going to keep you
safe. The mandate is tyrannical and it's very, very like nature. It has to be. It's tyrannical because you cannot predict human behavior. You're not authorized as a federal law enforcement officer, as an investigator. It's called criminal investigator, not criminal preventer and protector. Your job is to investigate after crimes, the allegation or information that a federal crime is taking place.
This whole idea of getting into the threat landscape and stopping threats before they happen, that's crazy talk. We know it doesn't work. Why? Because there's still violent crime and we always find out, oh, they were on the FBI's radar. That's not fair. There are 1,000,000 people on the FBI's radar, whatever that means. There are all kinds of people that are inappropriately reported. The law enforcement.
There's mental illness that rings the phone all day long and makes allegations that are crazy. The FBI can't protect you from anything. There's 14,000 agents. There's 350 million people in this country. Just do the math. The pre crime doesn't line up and DOJ, those are attorneys. They can't protect anybody. There are their job is to go out there and create a a punishment situation where they go and say
here's the evidence. A jury of your peers will decide it. And the hope is, is that there's a deterrent effect. The deterrent effect is the only piece of it that can matter because. If you go, do fill in. The blank crime, you see that the following actions will happen to you and then you go, ah, I don't want to do fill in the blank crime. I don't want to do the time, right? Do the crime, do the time. That's what it's supposed to be. Bill Shipley said it during the J6 prosecutions.
The entire job of the government is to ensure fair process. That's it. The outcome should be irrelevant that the ability to convict or not evict. You should basically not bring cases that are not going to be strong enough to convict. You certainly shouldn't have like any interest in whether or not a jury says one thing or another. All you should do is care about fair process. Are we doing it right? And I know that's not what's going on.
And I know that's not what's going on with Jim Comedy. And so do you. Former FBI Director Jim Comedy indicted Thursday, 2 counts making a marking a major escalation, says CBS News, in President Trump's effort to target his political opponents and use the Justice Department as part of his campaign to seek retribution against his most ardent critics. You know what the best way to prove that wrong? Not say anything. Do you know what Donald Trump is not capable of of?
He's not capable of not saying something. Comedy was charged with one count of making false statements and one cart of obstruction of justice. Let's do what that looks like. Here it is on the screen. I will read you. The indictment is very short. There's a criminal case. It's brought the Eastern.
District of Virginia, United States versus James B Comedy Junior, Defendant Count One false statements within the jurisdiction of a legislative branch of the United States government on or about September the 30th of 2020 in the Eastern District of Virginia. The defendant, James B Comedy Junior, did willfully and knowingly make a materially false, fictitious, and fraudulent statement in a matter within the jurisdiction of the legislative branch of the United
States government by falsely stating to AUS Senator during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing that he, James B Comedy was had not, quote, authorized someone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source in news reports regarding an FBI investigation concerning person 1. I believe that person one is, is is Donald Trump this? Statement was false because.
As James B Comedy junior then and there knew he had in fact, authorized Person 3 to serve as an anonymous source in news reports regarding an FBI investigation concerning Person One. If Person 3 is not an FBI employee, I don't think this holds any water. I don't have to love James Comedy. I think that he's, like I said, I think he's cartoonishly silly and partisan at this point. And still this actually matters for all of you saying things like, well, they got Al Capone
on on tax evasion, right? This is not a conviction. This is an indictment. And the indictment seems weak. And they went for three indictments and they got two of them to come back with a true bill. Here's the other one. Count to obstruction of a congressional proceeding on or about September the 30th, 2020 in the Eastern District of Virginia.
The defendant did corruptly endeavor to influence, obstruct and impede the do and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under to which an investigation was being had before the Senate Judiciary Committee by making false and misleading statements before the committee. It's a violation of 18 USC 15 O 5. So that's what we've got. We've got a 1001 charge which carries up to one year in federal prison. It is the lowest level felony
that the US government has. The second one is a 15 O 5 felony and it carries up to five years. That's pretty weak tea, people. That's not that impressive. And I don't know if I, I, I'm trying to find the actual verbiage of where this was discussed. I believe this is being presented to me online right now as the actual interchange where he lied and I can actually hear that he just danced out of it and that this is not going to be, this is not going to be a successful prosecution on the
actual facts. If this is in fact the exchange, then this thing is DOA. Just so you guys can tell. Listen, this is Chuck Grassley. Remember, this is going to hinge on the specifics of the word. Grassley says an an FBI employee. If if person #3 is not an FBI employee, it's dead because the factual pattern is not going to be able to line up. Director, Comedy, have you? Ever been an anonymous source in news reports about matters relating to the Trump investigation or the Clinton
investigation? Never. Have you ever? Authorized someone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source in news reports about the Trump investigation or the Clinton investigation. No, I needed to get. That out into the public square. And so I asked a friend of mine to share the content of the memo with a reporter. Didn't do it myself for a variety of reasons, but I asked him to because I thought that might prompt the appointment of a special counsel.
OK, he said. No. Authorize someone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source in news reports. I'm pretty sure that this is the exchange, this is Chuck Grassley. I'm going to play it one more time for you. Someone else at the FBI are the actual words that Chuck Grassley seems to say in this. You guys listen real closely. And then he says a friend of mine was that friend an FBI employee is the real question. As I understood it, it was a journalist. It was not.
Or it was a friend from like law school or something. So person 3 is where this is going to come up. Here we go. Director comedy. Have you ever? Been an anonymous source in news reports about matters relating to the Trump investigation or the Clinton investigation? Never. Have you ever? Authorized someone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source in news reports about the Trump investigation or the Clinton investigation. No, I. Again. Person three, that's going to be what it hinges on.
There's going to have to be this 1001 statement has to be true for the 15 O 5 to be true, I believe. And if that's the case, if that's what we're looking at, this seems terrible. That doesn't mean Jim Comedy is a good actor. It doesn't mean that he's a good guy. It doesn't mean that we like him. It doesn't mean that he's not completely deranged under what people call Trump Derangement Syndrome. There's a little bit.
Of that this. Is I'm going to go 20/24/2021 2018 2017. He's too smart to get. Caught Underoath saying things that are factually untrue, at least in my experience of watching him. Chris Ray did the same thing where the things he are saying are materially false but he's going to be able to dodge behind technicalities in specific words. Why? They were very competent and intelligent people. They just weren't necessarily
ethical and forthcoming people. And that means you're not going to probably see what you guys think is going to happen here. That's just going to be my take on it. Here he is with Jen Saki 2024, talking about whether or not you could put Donald Trump in prison. Remember, that was the discussion happening a year ago right now, would you put Donald Trump in a prison cell? And he says, oh, yeah, we could do it.
Here's how you do it. So a lot of people have suggested that there are a range of factors that would make it difficult to put a former. There's not. The system has not been tested in this way. Do you agree with that? That would be difficult or nearly impossible for the law enforcement institutions to put him in in actual jail? No. And we just put him in a. Double wide somewhere out near the fence, out in the grass, and he would eat there, he'd shower
there, he'd exercise there. He'd be away, as Danya Perry said, from general population, but it's obviously doable. So what? OK, so all all he's saying is that's technically possible. What? He wasn't wishing for it, right? No, of course he was. He was actually wishing for this. Here he is in January 2021. He wants to see bad things happen to Donald Trump. I can understand the animus. I really can. I understand why people would
say this. But to act like this was like that, this is not somehow very personal for both men, Trump and comedy. It's this is a this is a personal feud being carried out with mechanisms of government kind of relates to what I saw with this lawsuit that's going on with people coming at me and the FBI director on duty asking his own employees. It's not great. We don't have to love the people involved.
You're not like me to still believe that fair things are supposed to happen in this country. We're not supposed to use our weaponized government against individual citizens. Which Jim Comedy? He got fired. He's a private citizen. He writes crappy books and find shells on the ground. Now convict him Bar. Him from future service, have the prosecutors, the local prosecutors in New York pursue him for the fraudster that he was before he ever became president. Lock him up for the garden
variety frauds he did there. But don't give him that center stage, that dominant role in our national life, just down the street where Joe Biden is trying to heal this nation. Oh, Joe. Biden was trying to heal this nation. I'm pretty sure Joe Biden was part of the team that was a really 100% in assuming he was actually awake or sentient enough to do it. He was 100% there to make this nation heal. That's what I felt. I actually felt most healed.
I think when Joe Biden and Coe wished me and my family a winter of serious injury, serious sickness and death, that's when I felt best. What about you guys? Come on now, don't gaslight me again, he went on. Shows he can't be held accountable for statements he made in the public that were false. He made all these statements about. The Steele dossier. He went public in 2018. Here he was in April. My wife was asking a question real simple. Hey, why? Why is this guy out there talking?
Why is he out there talking to like a comedy late night host? Because he's a private citizen. You do whatever the hell he wants. Is it common? Have we seen other FBI directors go do this? No, we have not. You ever see Bob Mueller sit down and try to do the Late Show? No, you see Louis Freeh go out and do that. No, we're entering a new era. Chris Wray has been smart enough to stay quiet, by the way. You're not hearing anybody
scream about him. And he's the one who's not going to be outside of the statute of limitations on anything he did, probably because he also was too smart to get this. If this is all they have, this is the weakest tea. Anyway, here he is doing the 2018 pee pee hoax. You went in in January of 20-17 to tell President Trump about the Steele dossier. How did you tell him that there was a, and I want to put this delicately pee pee tape? How did you tell him about that rumor I spoke?
About information unverified, They're related to an allegation that he was with prostitutes in a hotel in Moscow and that the Russians had videotaped it. I didn't go into the rest of it. I thought that was notice enough they didn't mention. The salacious detail of of the two prostitutes getting up on the bed that the Obamas had stayed in because it was the presidential suite and and, you know, engaging in some water play. You didn't. You didn't. You didn't mention that at all.
I thought I'd I'd. Served enough notice without going to that party. And what did he super? Funny, right? Of which it all that was completely unsubstantiated. It's terrible. And Stephen Colbert obviously doing political hackery there as well. And yet it's not criminal, just means you don't like him. We're not supposed to go after people we don't like just because we don't like him here.
He isn't in June of 2017. Again, I'm sure the statements he's making here are probably factually accurate, even if they are overplaying the amount of relevance that they have to say that other nations actually tried to meddle in this in our elections. They do it every year, every
election. Foreign foreign nations will do what they can to try to interrupt or influence or put their operations and kind of weigh in on the scale as best they can because we're free and fair and open society in general. That's our goal. So we accept a certain amount of risk here. He is underoath in 2017. Nothing he says here can be
prosecuted. But people are trying to comply, like act like everything he said is going to be on trial simply because of something that he said in September of 2020. The fact of the matter is it's going to go very specifically and very tightly, which is probably why the United States Attorney's office didn't want to bring this because they don't like losing. There should be no fuzz. On this whatsoever, the Russians interfered in our election during the 2016 cycle. They did it with purpose.
They did it with sophistication. They did it with overwhelming technical efforts and it was an active measures campaign driven from the top of that government. There is no fuzz on that. It is a high confidence judgment of the entire intelligence community and and the members of this committee have seen the intelligence. It's not a close call that
happened. That's about as unfake as you can possibly get and is very, very serious, which is why it's so refreshing to see a bipartisan focus on that, because this is about America, not about any particular party. OK, great. It's about. America doesn't mean that they had any effect, doesn't mean that they were able to actually dial it into that. And then we got this. Asinine statement from our current FBI director. Again, Kennedy's Law.
Number one, no matter who you get in there, you get somebody that's going to be a partisan actor right now, you're going to get a Jim comedy cult, a personality. Here's Cash Patel saying the following. I'll quote this directly because I don't want to get this one wrong. Career FBI agents, Intel analysts, and the staff led the investigation into comedy and
others. Notice he doesn't say who called for it. They called balls and strikes and will continue to do so. The wildly false accusations attacking this FBI for the politicization of law enforcement comes from the same bankrupt media that sold the world on Russiagate. It's hypocrisy on steroids. They're baseless objections tell us now more than ever that we are precisely over the target and will remain on mission until completion. Thank you to this brave FBI
team. Mission first America emoji flag. Are you kidding me right now, dude? Patel, are you serious? This FBI, it's the same people that were working January 6th you clown. It's the same FBI. To act like this is something different is so disingenuous and foolish. It's the entire point of what I pointed out in August. This guy who is the director doesn't have any institutional knowledge and he's backed up by someone named Dan Bongino who also doesn't have any
institutional knowledge. Consider the following. We're in September, he came in. So seven months. Let's add five months. Let's call that a year. I have 600 plus percent more FBI experience than the current director and deputy director of the FBI combined. And that's not even to say the time afterwards where I still know more people in the FBI that I can trust. I guarantee you that I can trust more people in the FBI than these two guys can. That's absurd.
No wonder you're screwing up to act like this, though. OK. They led the investigation. Career FBI agents did. Isn't that the entire problem? That they're willing to go do anything? The Seraphin message to you all will continue to be the same here. Where am I? It's this one here. Driving Cash Patel nuts. That's fun. The Seraphin message is as follows. The FBI doesn't necessarily go to one party or another party. What they do is what they're
told. And so the leadership and the middle management of it matters, and you're about to see what it's going to look like. This is Senator Blumenthal.
Talking about exactly what will happen next, because when it changes hands, instead of treating the FBI and the DOJ as it currently stands like the Ring of power and understanding the message that came from the Lord of the Rings and all of these sort of allegories that explained human failing when trying to grasp absolute and God like power, what do they do? They fail. So what is the answer? You keep it out of reach of man. There were two arguments that
got made during that time. One was destroy it. That's what should be done. Does that mean that we have no DOJ and no FBI? No, what it means is destroy the weaponization, the possibility of it mostly that lives inside the intelligence branch and the mission to do intelligence, that should be done. It should be done forthwith for everyone's safety, for the left and for the right, because you're going to hear what the left's going to do with it too. And now the right's doing it right now.
Trump said it in his his post. Patel is saying the same thing whether he likes it or not. You should cast it into the fire. The alternative is what the Men of Gondor did. And yes, it's a little bit nerdy, but I spent a lot of time reading Christian allegory when I was growing up, so here it goes. Very simply, the Men of Gondor wanted to keep it, retain it, and wield it against their enemies.
When you do that, eventually your hand with that ring gets cut off and somebody else picks it up on the battlefield and wields it against you. And that will be what happens here. And Blumenthal is telling you and Swalwell are telling you, the Democrats know exactly They started this game. There's no question in my mind that they drew first blood on this. None. But that problem goes back 120 years, and it goes back to a Democrat that's not even alive
right now. And even the institution of the. FBI currently, as it exists, has always had institutional rot and has always been a some segment of it violated the constitutional liberties of regular Americans, mostly by the way they went after people on the political left, whether you like that or not, because those people were thought of as being UN American in their descent and their dissident status.
Did you realize that, do you realize that like the Palmer Raids and going after the communists and going after the civil rights movement, like all of these people like would be what the left would consider their folks right now? I guess the civil rights would be kind of a a toss up in some ways, but the. The the concept of going. After the right, they went after Muslims who the the left would defend after 9-11. But there are spots in there where they've gone after the other side.
Because the FBI is not about 1 institutional left or right. What they're interested in is how do I get my budget? How do I justify my own existence? What is going to work in favor of me getting to retirement? And I'm just going to tell you, we are now three years and two days after my first interview ever went public with Dan Bongino, the current deputy director of the FBI, is insane as that is. I left the FBI to go talk to a man who is now at the FBI. And I explained to him this
exactly. And my message has not changed in three years of doing this publicly. Is that crazy? We talked about the golden. Handcuffs in Part 1 of the first interview I ever did with Dan Bongino out in public and yesterday, which you guys do not know. Trevor Aronson, the author of The Terror Factory, a liberal and a friend. I would say we're friendly for sure. We talked fairly frequently. He sat in the studio. He sat right over there in a chair that you could not see.
He sat right here in the empty chair that I did not put on the screen while we did this podcast. And afterwards, we spoke for hours about exactly what I just told you because the two of us agree that the danger is if you narrowly focus in on a time frame, you're going to see that the FBI is targeting people on the left. If you narrowly focus in on the 90s, you see they were going after the Pat Con and they were going after the patriot groups
and the militia movement. So they were focusing in on people on the right. But in the reality, when you zoom out, what you see is the FBI focuses on who the FBI is most likely to be served by focusing on. And that is not ideologically driven. That is self-serving. That is the turd that drops a turd that drops a turd. If you guys see me over on social media, that is the self licking ice cream cone and it is antithetical to American liberty.
Here's here's Blumenthal telling you what's going to happen next. Let's just go ahead and say it. We're going to get ACR eventually we'll have another Democrat organization come in and they will take over and use this weapon just this way.
The old saying, what comes around goes around, you know, today it's a Republican president, but degrading the democracy and ruining, literally perverting the great ethos and tradition of the Department of Justice, where I was in awe when I walked through those halls as a federal prosecutor. I think it's time for Republican colleagues to say enough is enough and we are going to push them and do it hard. The real problem is is that. People on the right, they love it. You're CNN.
People on the left think they understand you can't talk to us if you're not one of us. I'm not one of either. But I do think that I can talk to people on the right. I'm just going to give you the warning that this is a very dangerous path that you walk. Holding on to the ring of power and trying to wield it the way you want will not go well.
The problem is there are people on the on the right that are like, this is what I voted for that are ready for retribution and they are ready to see government power seized and used against the enemy. And that argument's being made. I think this is Ben Ferguson talking about it.
This woman tried to claim, hey, people I know that don't want this smart people don't want this, but not for the reason this lady is saying not it. It's because of principle because we care about actually looking forward and saying, oh, this will obviously if you turn against us all the this is what I voted for and just like let the let the man cook. It's real bad. It's just dangerous on every level. Here we go. It feels good, but only for a short while.
I agree, gentlemen, that Trump is trying to flex a muscle here, but the average American, my hometown, Galesburg, IL, the people who voted for Donald Trump want them to flex muscles for them, not for a political persecution. And right. I don't know this. I'm asking, did you vote for Trump? No, I didn't raise your hand if you voted for Trump. I did not, Frank. No, I have. I talked to very regularly. No, that's not.
He literally ran on saying his manufacturing plants in Iowa literally ran on saying that he's gonna be accountability for the abuse of justice. And here we've got he literally ran for. We have a long time family. Can you just give her a second, please? Thanks. He literally ran for four years saying that political persecution was awful, that he was a victim. It didn't hurt him. He ended up as president of the United States. And now he overturned. He has no outstanding
indictments. And now nobody wants him to go after more people. That's absolutely not what he said. Yeah, it's absolutely not true. There are plenty of people that 100% want him to go after people A. 100% there are people. That are screaming this is what I'm all about. I'm just going to warn you from someone who also did vote for Donald Trump, that. This is a bad A. Bad road to walk down. It doesn't play well. I can already look into the
future and so can you. I think Eric Swall was talking about it in this clip here. Let's play this real quick. And by the way, the president's. Saying he has no control here. He has all of the control here. He's the one who has been tweeting to the attorney general that comedy needs to be indicted. He's the one that fired the US attorney who would not indict comedy. And so this is a, you know, very, very corrupt, corrosive act that the president is taking.
And, and what I would just say to any prosecutor at the Department of Justice is it's not going away, is as a member of the Judiciary Committee, I promise you when Democrats are in the majority, we are going to look at all of this. And there will be accountability and bar licenses will be at stake in your local jurisdiction. If you are corruptly indicting people where you cannot prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt, there you go and.
That's where it's going to go. It's going to go down to the line level. So you've got politicians that will have authority making threats and they're going to try to go after bar licenses. And so everybody now is in the battlefield and that's what happens when you start making this stuff happen. It's all dangerous and stupid. I'm going to give you a final thought from from Jim Comedy. This is what he actually said in his response. I think it's nauseating. I think it's self-serving.
I think it is. It's pretty lame. But let's at least give you guys what he said after being indicted. Listen, he says he's not walking in fear. I can tell you when somebody comes after you legally and they have way more authority and power and capabilities. Even as bright as Jim comedy is, and he's bright, it's not at the goal, but he's bright. It is a big, big weight. But even this feels very performative. He went out and read a CAN statement. This is what it sounds like.
My family and I have known for. Years that there are costs to standing up to Donald Trump, but we couldn't imagine ourselves living any other way. We will not live on our knees, and you shouldn't either. Somebody that I love dearly recently said that fear is the tool of a tyrant. And she's right. But I'm not afraid, and I hope you're not either. I hope instead you are engaged, you are paying attention, and you will vote like your beloved country depends upon it. Which it does.
My heart is broken. For the Department of Justice. But I have great confidence in the federal judicial system and I'm innocent. So let's have a trial and keep the faith. So, I mean, he's probably right. Whether you guys like it or not, you probably didn't do the thing that they actually did. Based on what I just read and what I just listened to that interchange, I think he's probably clear. I think this is weaponized. I think it's going after it. That's not in a popular position
for people on the right to hold. Do I think that he said that? Wrong. Yeah, I sure do. Because what did he say? Standing up to Donald Trump? Do you guys see how bad it is when you say I'm going to stand up to one side? The answer is I will stand up for American principles and they are universal and they are irrelevant to whoever it is holding that office. That's the right answer. It continues to be the right answer because nobody swore allegiance to one side or the
other. When you go out there and you do that federal oath for all of you that served, you know what I'm talking about, Military or civilian service, you swear allegiance to the Constitution, which is the basis of a brick and framework of of laws. And there are principles and there is a governmental leash on what you may and may not do. We saw that leash broken and snapped and ignored in 2020, in 2021 under a lot of the Biden administration.
As I continued to make points to Trevor yesterday while we were talking, I stated some real simple things. Do you have any idea how many FACE Act violations were engaged in and how many of them only went after people that were on the right that were standing up and saying, I want to pray in front of this abortion clinic? And they even had it Like, one of the worst ones was the rebuke of the Justice Department for doing politicized attacks on what Mark Howe, the Catholic
father, was. He have like 7 kids, maybe 9 kids. I have to double check. I think it's 7. He was indicted. He was arrested. He was brought in and tried in a federal courtroom, and it took one hour for a Philadelphia federal jury to acquit him after Larry Krasner and a Soros back DA office decided to not even charge him locally. Do you guys get how dumb this stuff is? It's obviously political, but the answer is certainly not more politics. But I didn't listen.
At the end of the day, I'm going to keep doing what I'm doing. You guys keep doing what you do. Make sure you guys are prepared. Make sure you're getting your fitness done. Make sure you're stacking up on food and water and weapon systems and training and knowing your neighbors and building a community that's going to be resistant to whatever crazy
nonsense comes from the outside. Because this stuff is actually just as scary as what I saw before the election in November last year to me. We'll get into more about what. The heck that that server farm was about the fact that we saw Pete Hegseth call in like 800 generals and said, you know, we're going to have a private meeting face to face. What that might be, I don't know enough about it.
So maybe we'll hear about it later on, but I didn't want to cover much about it without any information. It is being covered in the mainstream news. That's where we're going. Get yourself prepped up for your own sort of ability to survive locally. That doesn't mean violence. What that means is that you forge community bonds so that whatever's happening on the national scale is less, less relevant to you. Here's the palate cleanse of the day.
Let me just actually, before we do the palate cleanse, let me just hit this here again, make sure you guys are following us over on Rumble on YouTube where we are. We're almost at 14,000 Subs over there. So I appreciate that. New followers on X welcome to the program. Kyle serafinshow.com if you want to see us over on Spotify and Kyle serafin.com if you want to join the Locals channel. Let me do a palette cleanse here to kind of go into the weekend. This is the way I feel about all
government right now. And the way the government talks to us, this is as accurate as it gets. We might have played this before, but it's still true. You have nothing to worry about. I mean, there's nothing like strange or nefarious going on. I mean, And even if there was, you'd never know it, right? Yeah. And sorry. Wait, what? Anything that may or may not be afoot shouldn't concern you because anything that would or wouldn't happen would do so without your knowledge or awareness.
And even if it did happen, you wouldn't understand what it was or wasn't. So it's all perfectly fine as far as you're concerned. What? That's us. Right now, yeah. So we're not going to be able to solve that problem. It's too big. But we can do things locally and we can go out there and meet our neighbors. God bless all of you. Get off the Internet this. Get off the Internet this weekend. Go hang out with your kids. Love your families.
And I look forward to seeing you after the next couple days. We'll see what happens on Monday. It'll be it'll be exciting for everybody. Have a good weekend y'all. Thanks for listening to the Kyle. Serafin Show streamed live weekdays on rumble.com/kyle Serafin. Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth Social and Instagram at Kyle Serafin.