Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an American patriot prepared to embrace the uncomfortable truth because this program has no time for comforting lies. Here is civil liberties enthusiasts, Second Amendment defender and recovering FBI agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello my friends, welcome to the Kyle Seraphin show. Today is Thursday. It's October the 3rd, 2024 and we are in the middle of what CNN referred to as a three headed monster for the Biden Harris regime.
We're going to talk about all the aspects of it except the one that's going on overseas because I am an America only kind of guy. You guys can find out more about what's going on with Israel, Iran, Lebanon, etcetera somewhere else today. Today we're going to dig into something that occurred to me. It's it was inspired by the striking signs of the longshoremen. There's currently a dockworker strike going on on the East Coast specifically, which I'm sure is going to be problematic.
I just received a a message that there might be some shortages of some medical supplies starting already. That seems quick, but some of the things that they use in medicine are used every single day, like IV supplies and some types of things that don't last forever. There's not really a stockpile of of normal saline necessarily. If people burn through it pretty quickly on ambulances, they use it in almost every medical procedure. So it's possible that people will start feeling that effect
immediately. Hard to say. The other problem is, is that we have a natural disaster that has happened, a hurricane that is punched over into the Southeast. Some states recovered quickly. Others got hit harder in places they were not expecting it. FEMA, predictably, is doing a
terrible job. And that goes along with the thesis of this program, which is that the government, particularly the federal government, is the worst solution to every single problem, including what it is, the only solution to the problem. And that's not been something that should be new. It should not be a revelation to you.
So today's going to be a good reminder for you to stock up on the things that you need, that you should be prepared to take care of yourself, and then be aware that you might be asked to take care of your neighbor to the extent that you can. It's an ongoing theme of this program that self-reliance equals independence. And that is a conservative position. There's some basic American positions that have always existed.
I think it's my belief that the values America espouses are rugged accountability and self-reliance and the ability to take personal responsibility for your own safety, for your own progress, for the success of you and your family. And if you're a conservative, you fall on the side of improving processes and making sure that people understand that no one owes them anything. I stole this from Ben Shapiro quite a while ago, and I continue to believe it.
Nobody in America is guaranteed success. I think most of you who are listening can feel that to be true. You're guaranteed a shot of the journey, but your results may vary. And so just like the immigrants that came here, and I call them immigrants accurately, the people that landed at Ellis Island, or maybe they walked across the southern border, or maybe there was no southern border at the time, who came to the United States at various times in history.
They came here hoping for the adventure. And some of them died trying. And some of them were able to make fabulous wealth and they lost it. And some of the fabulously wealthy families from the 19th century are not that today. Some still are. You're not guaranteed success. There's no safety net in a real America. But we've been building it up over and over again. And what we're seeing is it's very ineffective at doing an equitable or a reasonable
distribution. So I dug into something today that I was most interested in by the signage. The signage said something to the effect of robots don't pay taxes, automation doesn't feed families, and we've done this before as human beings. It turns out many things are not new under the sun. This fight has been has been a an age-old recurrence that as industries advance, I'm going to give you some some analogies and some analogs for you to be able
to have in your head. But the term Luddite is something we should be familiar with. And I'm not a Luddite, but I understand where they came from. And I also understand that it's not really an American position. It's probably why it happened in England. So we're going to go into the Luddites today.
And I took a long time setting that up because I want you to understand that this is a an age-old fight, that people who are stuck in the belief that someone owes them a living, that someone owes them a paycheck, that someone owes them success because that's how they've done it before. And I don't say that as someone who has not had to reinvent himself. My friends know that my work
history is pretty ridiculous. If you were to go look at my my resume, when I used to shop it around, I spent a little bit of time in a lot of industries. And one of the interesting things, the first job that I did out of college was in sales. And one of my first clients was the International Longshoreman and Warehousers Warehouse Workers Union. It was the ILWU in San Francisco, CA. And what I found when I went to go sell to them is that they had more money than they know what to do with.
They were not very worried about spending it or negotiating down rates when it came to to buying equipment, which was quite expensive. And the reason that I was able to walk away with, and by the way, I talked to other people that sold to that business as well, is that they sort of operate like a mini federal government, which is to say they
use OPM, other people's money. And so they are not that accountable for it. And we're starting to see that because most Americans are not aware of the unions is particularly if you live in a right to work state like I do, that's to say that you can have a job and you don't need to be part of a union. The union can form, but the union can't force you to be part of it. There are states where if you want to work in an industry, you
must be part of the union. And I think that's not American, particularly when the federal government has stepped in and done the job of it. So now we have the government doing the thing that it does, safety regulation of, of the industry and so on, requirements of minimum wages and, and, and, and minimum safety protocols. And then you have another little mini government type apparatus, this sort of shakedown mafioso rig. And I say that very
specifically. We're going to talk about La Cosa Nostra, at least what it is. You guys have the terminology to deal with this. This is mobster tactics, this is protection racket, this is shakedown. And it's pretty common on the East Coast. Most people who are on the West Coast haven't seen it in the same way. So we're going to kind of touch on that before we get too deep into the weeds here. I want to do say thank you to my buddies at Catholic Vote and they are my friends.
Most of folks over there, they've nominated Marcus Allen, one of our suspendables as Catholic Hero of the Month, or one of the Catholic heroes at least. And I expect him to be nominated for Catholic Hero of the Year, a man who stood up for his faith. If you guys want to follow Catholic Vote, people that are backing my friends backing this program, catholicvote.org is where you can go do that. You can sign up for the loop. You can sign up and put your
e-mail in there. You'll get outstanding information. You can follow them on social media. They're talking about surrogacy today, which I think is useful, but Catholic Vote, it's at Catholic Vote if you want to find it there.
And interestingly enough, we set up a little e-mail and it resulted in an interview with Marcus, the top story of the day here on your phone if you were to get it, FBI whistleblower and the Holy Spirit. We are in a spiritual battle right now for this country and you guys should check in to my friends over there who are helping me fight it, who are helping you fight it, who are helping America fight it.
And they're all in for Donald Trump, even though I don't have to be. I think Donald Trump is a lesser of two evils. They've endorsed the man and you guys can probably get behind that as well. So thanks to them. All right, let's see. I wanted to start with something completely different, one of the ongoing lies that's been predicated because I think it actually had a lot to do with the vice presidential debate
that happened this week. One of the lies is is that there was an insurrection on January 6th, 2021, that people tried to overthrow the American government. And those people were endorsed and backed and supporting Donald Trump. All right, that's an interesting take for those of us who have been paying attention. And so here we have it. Officer Harry Dunn was one of the heroes of the so-called interaction.
He was a person that was marched out as a victorious example of how you are supposed to behave the way that you are supposed to do things. A great federal employee. The problem is, is that his story is completely BS. And my friend, another suspendable Steve Baker who works for The Blaze has covered this. And so in kind of a rare moment, what I did is I stole their trailer. And the only reason I did is because I've tagged Harry Dunn in this.
Harry Dunn is a £350 six foot 7 fat, lazy, classic government employee. Again, the worst way of doing anything, except when it's the only way, and even then, not great. Harry Dunn is a classic federal employee in Washington DC, takes credit for things that he didn't do and is unable to lock into the truth. He's not a a particularly literate man from what you can
tell. He from some information that we got needed help writing a single letter that he took credit for and and signed on behalf of all Capitol Police officers, which is inaccurate as he couldn't do that. So here we go. There's a little taste. I want you guys to do it. What I'm going to do is give you a little bit of homework today. And one of those pieces of homework is go see the Blaze Channel and check out the story of Harry Dunn. A day in the life of Harry Dunn,
the leisurely walk. Because this man, for all of his testimony about how hard he was working and what he was doing and that he was running around trying to save lives on January 6th, it appears that almost all of it is manufactured. It goes along the lines with what Nancy Pelosi said about how they need to preserve the narrative of January 6th. So this is a teaser and there's a 15 minute video. You guys can watch it in 2X and you won't lose anything.
If you really have a fast ear. So you can go watch it in about 7 or 8 minutes. You should see this because people on the left that are going to argue one thing are not going to watch it and therefore you should arm yourself with the facts. Harry Dunn taking it easy on a day that he claimed that he was basically fighting for his life
over and over again. Private First Class Harry Dunn Officer Dunn has been among the First Capital Police officers to describe what happened to law enforcement on January 6th. Dunn is launching a new political action committee called Dunn's Democracy Defenders. Fighting on January 6th, that was hard. We've watched hours of footage. Dunn is either a pathological liar or he has been conscripted to support their narrative. Officer Harry Dunn is an American hero.
Private First Class Harry Dunn Saturate Congress, The truth tellers, he says. That day we met in a large auditorium. We went over logistics, who the overall commander would be, who the field lieutenants would be. Harry never attended a morning roll call briefing. Nothing Harry described about that meeting ever took place that morning. Why is telling the truth hard? I assumed my post on the east side of the Capitol at about 9:30 AM. The truth is on my side.
We can see Harry did not take his post until more than two and a half. Hours after he claimed. It's always important to tell the truth and be honest about what happened. I rushed into the Capitol with another officer going first to the basement. He never went to the basement. I'm not one to speculate, so I like to stick the facts. Dunn basically spent the entire day doing everything he could to avoid being in the presence of
protest. This is a day in the life of Harry Dunn. All right, and it says watch Part 1 tomorrow, that tomorrow is today and it started this morning at 0700 Central Time, so you guys can check it out. He's going to be exposed for a liar. It's pretty obvious what Steve Baker does. Friend of mine. So Full disclosure, I like Steve. I don't care what you think about the Blaze. I actually don't. I don't care what you think about the people who founded the Blaze. I don't.
I care about the fact that I've spent a lot of time eyeball to eyeball with Steve Baker. And although Steve and I don't agree on every fact like all friends don't, we agree on the process and the methodology. And his methodology is solid.
So look at it. He's comparing the the words in Harry Dunn's book, which is part of this marched out nonsensical lie about what happened in 2021. And he compares it against the video footage, which is pretty conclusive, especially the time stands on it. Just as an example, the man supposedly got to his post at 9:30 but didn't show up until 12/19. These are lies. It's not OK for people to go out in front of Congress and do this. There's no accountability on it.
And of course, those groups have been funded. So when you think the government's working against you, the answer is pretty obvious that it is because we can actually see it on tape. All right. As we move forward, I want to cover some of the things that happened. Again, like I said that that vice presidential debate has been kind of sticking with me a little bit and there were two things that were brought up in there that are that I thought were very interesting.
People on the left think the question about 2020 and the election and who won the election was definitive. A knockout blow was the claim over on Morning Joe, which is the hard left egotistical sort of emotional center of of leftism. And then there was what I thought was the knockout blow, which is that JD Van stepped up and said, if you're going to Fact Check me, allow me to talk about the CBP 1 app. So there are these two
contrasts. One of them is them the the campaign that's talking about moving forward, about how we're going to look forward to a better America. They're simply focused on the rearview mirror mostly January 6th, the election of 2020, how much they hate Donald Trump despite the fact that his outcomes were actually better than where we're sitting right now as a nation. And then the alternative, which is to say, OK, we should be focusing on the border. That's actually a forward look.
How do we fix this? How do we deport these people? How do we try to grab back our country from the millions of people that have been brought in here that have no authorization to be so? So those were the two contrasts, I think, from that debate. As I'm sitting and reflecting on it over the last couple days, let me tell you, or let me play you this sort of clip of Mika Brzezinski and their their guest talking about, I think this is Michael Steele.
He's talking about what they believe was the knockout blow. And then I went back and pulled a couple of little fact checks 'cause I was so curious. You'll be shocked to learn that the lefty fact checkers didn't actually give it a fair shake. So we'll read through that in just a second here. Here's this little take again. This is what the left is hearing. It's worth knowing and it's debunk able in real time. This. Is a practice a couple of ways real quick.
So the the first part of this you're right. This I I looked at that debate between Vance and and walls as two fighters in a ring going at each other. One fighter, Vance, for you know, out of a 10 round bout for 9 rounds, was winning on points, right? He was. The judges were impressed by the style, the movements. He landed some punches.
It was winning on points. In the 10th round, the guy who's losing on points landed a knockout blow with one question, which utterly disqualified his opponent for the office that he's seeking. And that's that's a profound moment. And I think that moment will register and has registered with the 40 + 1,000,000 Americans who
watched that debate. That part of that, what happened of that story is what the campaign has to get out in front and which they've begun to do almost immediately after that debate with a very important ad. I think this sort of clarifies that that's 1-2, all right. So no to everything there except the fact that JD Vance was winning all nine rounds and then he won the 10th round because the claim was is that he got knocked out because the question came up who won the election in
2020? What JD Vance did over and over again, he said you guys are worried about this guy becoming a dictator, but he turned over power on January 20th of 2021. That happened. Donald Trump left. He got in Air Force 2 or Air Force One rather and well, what whatever, Marine One rather the helicopter and he flew off and then he got on his plane and he flew down and moved to Florida.
So that already happened. What's fun is you can actually read the Fact Check because one of the things that I always remember from that time, I'm old enough to remember it, as some people have said, Fact Check. Biden won the most number of total votes in history of any president ever, and the fewest total number of counties of any president-elect. This is coming from USA TODAY and it's dated December 9th of 2020. Look, before the Stop the Steel rally and before the January 6th debacle.
And then you read the claim is that he won the most number of votes in history, but he run won a a record low number of counties. And how could that be? And then you read and you read and you read and you read down and they talk about the votes and they talk about the counties and counties are not the same thing as population and that they vary. And so it doesn't necessarily have a correlation. And it goes down and we're reading and we're reading. And they finally get to the
rating at the bottom here. And it says our reading is that it's missing context, which is to say, yes, he supposedly got the most number of votes in American history, but it doesn't have the context, which is to say that we really can't. We can't really assess it because he did also get the least number of counties to vote for him. America doesn't have a popular vote system, as you well know. My friend Sal Greco likes to say that a lot.
As you well know, people listen, America doesn't have a popular
vote system. That's what the Electoral College is. There's a reason why they hate the Electoral College, because the Electoral College puts the power in the States and specifically the state legislatures, and this was defined in 2020, that the state legislatures have the plenary power to appoint electors that you actually have no right to vote for in a president, period, because the president wasn't supposed to be that big of a
deal. Just because we've made the executive office in the executive branch into sort of a monarchical power doesn't mean it was supposed to be that way. And this is a reaffirmation. The other thing is, is that apparently amongst registered voters, there was like 91% turn out. And I looked and the previous high of voter turn out before that interesting election that happened was far lower. You guys can see it on the
screen here. I didn't have time to pull these graphics for you, but there's a strange little bump in 2020, which is higher than any bump in American history. So the most number of people turned out to vote, the most number of people voted of the registered voters, and they elected a man in the least number of places. So the problems of 2020 persist. It's yet another reason why people like George Hill and I don't believe that we're about to have a free, fair and reputable election.
And it actually has a lot to do with the Luddites. You guys are going to be shocked to find out that I found a parallel because we're talking about using voting technology and automating a process. And I don't think that every process deserves to be automated, but some of them certainly do, and logistics are a big one of them. So we're going to get to that in just a moment, I promise you.
I also wanted to touch on the winning moment for JD Vance, and I actually want to play you what I think was the winning moment for him because he dominated not just the person that he was debating, but he also dominated those clowns that were moderators. I actually saw a couple of women say this is the reason why two women should never moderate the debate. They had feelings. They couldn't help themselves. They had to correct the problem. They couldn't just sit there and listen.
If anyone's ever done an interview with someone who is lying to them, and I have done this, you don't interrupt them when they're lying. You just take note of what they're saying. You can go and do commentary later. You can do the investigation and prove that they were lying as a later thing. But these women couldn't do that. And so they tried to Fact Check JD Vance. And when he was doing his job, which was pushing back, they got upset. We played this for you
yesterday. I want to play it for you again. This was the winning blow. And then I want to play you something with the CBP One app because he mentions it. And I found a pretty, pretty interesting little video of a guy who decided to use it in America. And I've never seen it. I've only heard about it. And you probably haven't seen it either. Here we go, this is the debate footage from yesterday as well. After watching that. That is not the debate footage
from yesterday. So where did I put that? Oh, there it is. Debate footage from the debate Mara. But but thank you, Senator. We have so much to get to. Margaret I I think it's important because Margaret. The the the rules were that you guys weren't going. To Fact Check.
And since you're fact checking me, I think it's important to say what's actually going on. So there's an application called the CBP One app where you can go on as an illegal migrant, apply for asylum or apply for parole and be granted legal status at the wave of a Kamala Harris open border wand. That is not a person coming in, applying for a green card and waiting for 10 years. Thank. You, Senator Rotation of illegal immigration. Margaret by. Thank you, Senator, for
describing the legal process. We have so much to get to, Senator. We have so. We have so much to get to, Senator. We cannot sit here and belabor the fact that what you said is accurate and it's devastating to the people that we're supporting. Again, as I promised, this is a guy who actually went up there and use the CBP One app. There's some visuals in the background. He's explaining his commentary on. I don't think it's bad commentary. So we're going to play the whole thing.
This is like a TikTok video, but look in the background for those you are watching, for those you are listening. He's describing it accurately. I'll just go ahead and give you the heads up. After watching that vice presidential debate last night, I was curious just how easy that CBP One app was to use, so I downloaded it. So once you create an account from the main page, you just have to choose if you're the smuggler or the smuggly.
Then you just got to fill in basic info, first name, last name, you know. All the basics. I don't know my gender yet. I'm still figuring that out. Now it's time to take a selfie. And passport or any identification is also optional. Then it asks you which state you're headed to. I said I didn't know the address, I didn't know the city. I just chose California. And then I added the first zip code that Google gave me for California, and that's it. I'm good to go.
It does let you choose. Between like 8 different bridges to meet under. I chose the Eagle pass bridge to meet under. I just have to wait until noon, so a couple more hours to actually make my appointment. Now I know what you're saying. That's not you, that's Carlos Mencia. Correct. I was just trying to show you how easy it was to register. I'm just a white dude from Michigan. This took me 5 minutes. Someone who really wants to get into this country get temporary asylum with open-ended
expiration dates. They'll just use their own picture. I said I have no documentation. I have no ID, no passport, no license. There is no way to cross check who I say I am with who I really AM. All they go off of. Is the picture that you submit all right? So you guys see that? That's what it looks like. And then this is how it looks in real life. There's a guy named Anthony Aguero. He's running down on the southern border. He's really, really good reporting in so much as he just
presents information. I'm going to skip around in this video because it's about 6 minutes long and I want to get to some. There's some really unsettling people that speak English really well. They're Russian. What the hell they doing here? And they look young and scared. But this is Anthony going down along the southern border. You can see the the border fence in the background. These people just snuck into the
country. They all have a location in mind where they want to go. I'm sure that's the way they did it in the CBP One app. Hence, they are all primed to answer this question and they do. So you're going to hear a lot of Spanish, but you'll understand what's going on. He's asking them essentially, where are you coming from and where do you intend to go in the
United States? And then they answer them and you'll hear country like Peru or Venezuela, and then you'll hear they're going to Florida, California, Michigan, Detroit, take it back, whatever. They're some are specific by state, some are specific by city. You hear Tampa in there a few times. So just kind of a mixed bag. A lot of people going to Florida, whatever that's worth. Some of them are Cuban, so that makes more sense. But listen to this for just a
moment. Venezuela, Venezuela. Miami. Venezuela. Miami. Venezuela, Miami. Colombia. Tampa. Colomba. Tampa. You stay Venezuela, Chicago. You stay Venezuela. Chicago. You said Cerrita. CUA. Las Vegas, You said CUA. I'll never. Tampa, you said. CUA. I'll never. You said. Cool. I'll never. Miami, you said. What? I'm sorry. Where are you going? Going. I don't know. Where are you coming from? I'm from Russia. Oh, you're from Russia? OK, cool. All right.
You don't know where you're going yet. I don't know. You don't know. I don't know. All right. All right. You Russia. You don't know where you're going. They don't know here. USA. We're in USA. OK. OK. Yeah. Detroit. OK. You stay. You're going to Houston. You stay there with that. What? What state are you going to? You don't know where you're going. OK. OK. You're still in the NA Colombia de Colombia a Maryland, Cesarita de Cuba, Yandeva para Tampa, FL.
You said Florida, the Nicaragua, you stay Cuba Andeva, Maryland, you stay Miami, FL Miami, FL you stay Colombia. OK, so and it goes on, like I said, there's there's several minutes of this. He does this quite a bit. If you guys want to follow his channel, you should definitely do that. It's Anthony Aguera live.
The thing that's most interesting in that visually, first of all, there's people from all over the place and they're all coming into the US. The other thing is that you'll notice there's a border fence in the background, the sort of Trump border wall, those big slats of vertical steel. And then as they get to the end of the video, you see something very different. And those things are called Jersey barriers or Normandy barriers rather. Jersey barriers are on a highway.
Normandy barriers are basically a, it's an X with these little lines that go in between them and they stop cars and cattle, but not people from climbing under, over or around them. And that's what they do. And so these are things that are all over the place once you run out of border wall and they're not affected barriers except for vehicular travel. That's why those people are all on foot. So anyway, just AII know that to be what the border looks like.
Any of you who spent any time down there do, if you've ever worked with people from CBP, Customs and Border Protection, or if you've worked with the US Border Patrol, and I've worked with both and I've spent time at the checkpoints and also just out in the middle of nowhere, that's what it looks like. And it's very easy to walk across that border. People move those, those, what do you call them, Normandy
barriers out of the way. They do look like the sort of barbed wire stuff that you'd see down on like the World War 2 footage. That's why they're called that way. But they can move those out of the way and drive a vehicle and then move them back. It's actually relatively easy. A couple of men can do it. So just so you guys are knowing what we're seeing, this stuff all checks out. And this is what's happening at
the southern border. So that CBP One app gives them the two things that are most important. Where are you coming from in very, very broad strokes and where are you going to? And the Biden's administration is is accommodating. We also saw people from Russia. There's people that seem like they're fleeing from conflict.
I don't know what that means. Neither do you, and neither does the Biden administration, as far as we could tell, because they're throwing an awful lot of money at bringing these folks in. What they're not doing is taking care of people in our own country. So here's a little taste of kind of a side by side. We're giving money to Ukraine to the tune of 2.4 billion more. That's what the president's doing.
And then the person who seems to be auditioning for the role in the next round, who wants to be the next president, is doing what she's going to talk about how much money American governments are going to give back to the American people that actually pay those taxes. And you're going to find a kind of a stark contrast there. 2.4 billion, says Joe Biden. Here we go. I see two key pieces. First, right now we have to strengthen Ukraine's position on
the battlefield. And that's why today I'm proud to announce a new $2.4 billion package of Security Assistance. I've also directed the Pentagon to allocate to allocate all the remaining security systems funding that has been appropriated from Ukraine period, by the end of this my term, which is January 20. I see.
So give all the money that we can, anything that the Pentagon has, don't worry about the Blackhawks that should be flying out there to North Carolina or Georgia or whatever and getting people out of areas where the the roads are down. Don't worry about that. Don't worry about tread vehicles or water filtration or purification. Make sure we're sending things over to the Middle East where they screwed up and allowed something happened.
And make sure that we're giving as much money as possible to Ukraine, where they also screwed up and allowed something to happen, which is to say, weak people allow strong people to make strong moves. That's been the legacy of the Biden administration, and Kamala is going to get front and center. She's going to take the glory.
Imagine thinking that this was a good look because someone in her campaign advised her to step up and get in front of this microphone and announce the amount of money that they're going to give to Americans. The people who actually pay those taxes, the ones who are funding that $2.4 billion additional money to Ukraine. Yep, She's going to go out there and let them know. You're going to hear an eerie similarity. I don't know where this number
comes from. It must be built into the way that FEMA operates, because I heard this in Hawaii too, and it wasn't good enough. Then we're just stacking failure on failure. FEMA, like all other government agencies at this point, it doesn't serve the people it's meant to. They exhausted their budget on those people you saw on the southern border. So they've got this kind of money for people who just lost everything and have been paying taxes their whole lives.
And the federal relief and assistance that we have been providing has included on FEMA providing $750 for folks who need immediate needs being met, such as food, baby formula and the like. And you can apply now for anyone who's watching this, who has been affected. You can apply if you have service, if you have the ability to see what's going on, if you have Internet connectivity, which you probably don't, if you're sitting in the middle of the woods, if you need $750, not even $1000.
In this economy where we've seen inflation just continue to weaken, that $750 is worth less than it was in Hawaii, isn't it? So that's what they do. You don't hate your government enough. Your government is meant to serve you. And it acts like it's going to it's, it's throwing out crumbs. We're in the let them eat cake situation at this point. When, when are we going to start seeing heads roll, literally or figuratively? Actually don't care because these people are horrific.
And there are bureaucrats that work within these agencies that are totally fine with what they're doing and they think that they are serving and they're going to get a nice pension when they're done with it, $750, huh? It bothers me. Meanwhile, there are some people that have been doing pretty well, it turns out.
Let me just throw this last thing up here and then we'll we'll break away to the story and talk about Luddites because I just, it's fascinating to me that this has been done before. There you go. This is FEMA. Why is it available, unavailable to those who need it most? And it's coming in 2021 when they were problems in Puerto Rico. They are problems that have existed. They happened in Hawaii when they had the disastrous fires. I don't need to get conspiratorial about what happened.
I watched Steve Baker yesterday talk to Alex Stein. Alex Stein is happy to get into the conspiracy theories and what not. At the end of the day, regardless of what happened, there was a failure on the federal government side. So I am less interested in the action that took place than the reaction by the government and the government's inefficiencies and inability. What they have shown us is that they always suck and they've sucked for a long time. This is a left-leaning source
that loves the government. This is NPR heard on ALL Things Considered, why FEMA aid is not available to those who need it. They talk about a people that are got hit with a hurricane in De Quincy, Louisiana, living on the end of an unpaved Rd. They live in a mobile home. People that probably have a lot of needs and don't have the financial cushion to solve their
own problems. And in theory, if we did have a safety net in this country, the safety net should benefit, you know, American citizens, not Ukrainian citizens, not people from Paraguay or Peru or Venezuela. But instead, the federal government has decided to take all the money for FEMA. And it's used to set up migrant welcoming centers because that's obviously an emergency, an
emergency that is predictable. And instead of using the CVP officers and using the the Border Patrol to stop these folks from coming in and repelling them at the border and actually having that boundary, they don't do it. The funny thing about leftism is it's this false compassion and they continue in false compassion to bring people in to the detriment of those who would otherwise be willing to help them. We can't help them if you
overrun our systems. If the people that are living in FEMA, FEMA a failure areas when category 4 hurricanes come in, they did this little analysis. It said 4.8 million people registered for aid. This is in 2021. That's when the the story is between 2014 and 2018, almost 5 million Americans registered for disaster relief. And they found that the poorest renters were 23% less likely to receive any help compared to people who had more money.
So it's for the all the crying of the political left. They should be upset that there's this disparity that the poor are most likely to be impacted by this stuff, which makes sense because people who have more money one, maybe they have better access to government and 2:00 they have better access to kind of fighting this. All right, before we go forward on, let me just say thanks to my friends over on the locals. If you guys are a a subscriber or a supporter over on locals,
we really do appreciate you. Kyle seraphin.com is how you get there. Kyle seraphin.com makes it really easy. Link in the show description if you want to join the locals community discussions happen after the fact. We're doing our call in show tonight. Tonight it might be me solo. We do that at 8:00 Eastern Time. That's 7:00 central.
If you guys want to support us on locals, if you want the phone number to be able to call in, it is available only to subscribers on locals and you can also do it on X, by the way, we'll give you the phone number there. Let's get into this thing. Let's talk about Luddites. This just came out yesterday. New York Post, a union bossed who threatened to quote UN quote, cripple the economy, lives in a luxurious 7000 square foot mansion. By the way, it's on 10 acres.
Good reporting done by the New York Post. It's being covered other places. Let's listen to this guy. Let's see you guys feel sympathetic to this man. He made, as we talked about yesterday, about $900,000 a year. I looked back going back to 1999, he's been making in excess of $400,000 a year. Back when 400 K was actually like even more than it is today. Since the time that I was in high school, this dude's been making nigh on half $1,000,000 and now closer to $1,000,000 a
year. Drives a Bentley, has a 7000 square foot house, and he's out there talking like he's a tough guy that actually works on the docks when he hasn't been doing it in 25 years. Very interesting, very mafioso like. So let's just listen to him in his own words, his threats, and then we're going to cover down on more stuff about. Him do you worry that this the capital to settle this thing? Are you worried that this strike is going to hurt the everyday American, the farmers that need
to reach the export market? They're telling me that they're going to hurt you start to realize who the longshoremen are, right? People never gave a about us until now when they finally realized that the chain is being broke. Now, cars won't come in, food won't come in, clothing won't come in. You know how many people depend on our jobs?
Half the world. And it's time for them and time for Washington to put so much pressure on them to take care of us because we took care of them and we're here 135 years and brought to where they are today. And they don't want to share. They don't want to share, they don't want to share 135 years of us doing this thing. Da da da 20. Five years of you living in a mansion. Pretty nice look at that. Look at the mansion here on the screen. That's a big ass pool people.
I don't know a house to describe it. That thing looks like a castle and it's on 10 acres so it's not messing around either. Here's another shot. It's got A5 car garage to keep his Bentley in, in a guest house, and probably an outdoor sauna that sits right next to the pool. It's a nice place to live if you can get it. Nothing against it except you work for a union, you freaking clown. Are you kidding me? He's 78 years old. And so it brought us to this thing He's mobbed up.
We know this. Connections that are listed in indictments going back to 2004, the Genovese crime family. I brought it up online because someone said, oh, now we got to listen to a former FBI agent talked about the global logistics chain. News flash for you, Bod. I didn't always live and work as an FBI agent. I also used to work for some of the biggest manufacturers in the
world. I work for Dell Computers, which is probably one of the most successful and capable logistical companies I've ever seen. And I've seen some. I've done a tour of Dell's facility, which happens in, it's in Round Rock, TX. And not only do they bring in and not pay for the stuff until they actually use it, they empty an entire truck.
They make the trucks back in, They get shipped in from Korea and the different parts and all the different transistors and circuit boards and so on. They come in on one side, let's call it the east side of the of the facility. And then from left to right, from east to West within this building, they build every single thing that they're going to build. They assemble them from the parts and from the finished chips and so on. They put together an entire PC and it goes out the West side.
It is 100% streamlined and efficient. I've seen what efficiency looks like and I've seen what global commerce can look like. I also had longshoremen who were in fact my clients and as I found out later, they make a ton of money and they sub out. They hire these casuals to be able to do their work. So they can actually work multiple jobs for seven days a week and make money off it. So these guys, often times the reason they look doughy and weak is they've never actually done the work.
Once you get high enough up, you're actually hiring people to do the work on your behalf, like a subcontractor and they're just collecting the money because of the union. That is a Mafiosa protection type operation. And I, I mentioned La Cosa Nostra a couple times and people
said, what is that? So I wanted to tell you, if you just type in La Cosa Nostra and pull it up, even Wikipedia will tell you that it's referred to as the Sicilian Mafia or Cosa Nostra or La Cosa Nostra. LCN is the way that organized crime organizations fight against it. We call it, we call it transnational organized crime or
talk. OK. And La Cosa Nostra is fairly well known and it dates back to the 19th century in Sicily. How interesting, because we're going to be talking about some 18th century and 19th century movements about Luddites. And so this is what spiked it.
Automation hurts families. What you're seeing on the screen is that guy, Harold Daggett. And Harold is standing with a bullhorn and he's wearing like an everyman jacket because he got out of his Bentley and he took off his like, driving hat and his little British leather gloves or whatever it is that he did. He's worn a, he used to have a clean shaven face, but he decided to do a goatee because
he looks too fat and weak. So now he's got the goatee, so he looks more like a biker and he wears his trucker hat and he's carrying a bullhorn. And behind him are the following, the following things that I'm reading. Automation hurts families. The ILA stands for job protection. OK, Machines don't feed families, support ILA workers. And the last one is profit over people is unacceptable. So these are all pro union things. Why? Why should we think that that families have a right to do
anything? Like, look, I'm compassionate and I'm a Christian, and so I believe that I want people to succeed. But not at the cost of efficiency. That's not very American. And if you're a free market type of person, you start realizing that everything about unions works against the free market. Now they can band together and they can actually organize for collective bargaining. That's not a problem. This was brought up in the debate as well.
So a lot of these things keep touching the same thing. But what they've done is they've tried to do a shakedown, a protection racket. So I wanted to talk about Luddites because most people actually, if you ask them what a Luddite is, they would tell you it's someone who fears technology, but it's not 100% correct.
The Luddite was a protest movement that happened in 19th century Britain. Interestingly enough, 19th century Sicily was exporting organized crime and the Luddites were trying to basically fight for their survival. Who were they? They were textile workers. They were people that were skilled machinist that ran very sophisticated looms. But it still required a lot of manual and human interaction with them.
And so when they started getting replaced essentially by machines that could automate the processes that they did, they came in with hammers and they broke them. And they had this fictional leader named Lud, which is the the person you see pictured. I'm going to read a little bit from some of these articles. Despite their reputation. This is coming from Smithsonian Magazine.
Despite their reputation, the original Luddites were neither opposed to technology nor were they inept at using it. Many were highly skilled machine operators in the textile industry, and nor was technology that they attacked particularly new. Moreover, the idea of smashing machines as a form of industrial protest did not begin or end with them, them being the Luddites.
In truth, the secret of their enduring reputation depends less on what they did under the name and more on what name they used. In fact, you could say that they were very good at branding because many of us still use this term, although most of us have forgotten what it means. The disturbances, I'm sorry, the disturbances started in circumstances that are superficially similar to our own.
Now this is not a very modern this was like I think a 10 year old article at this point, but it's but it's still we're going through these in multiple different industries.
British working families at the start of the 19th century were enduring economic upheaval and widespread unemployment seemingly endless wars against Napoleon's France Interesting the United States has been in endless wars for the last 20 years as well has brought the hard pinch of poverty wrote a Yorkshire historian, a guy named Frank Peel, where it had hit her
been a stranger. Food was scarce, becoming more costly, and then on March 11th of 1811 in Nottingham, a textile manufacturing set of British troops had to break up a crowd of protesters demanding more work and better wages. This is where we are at right now in America. When we keep talking about these things have all been done before. I believe they have.
We've seen these things, they've happened before, and now people are asking the question about whether they're a Luddite for resisting certain types of technologies. There's articles written about it because people are interested in the tech industry. They're worried about AI replacing writers. Most of the AI actually does a better job than writers because of the writers that I see need editors pretty badly, and we decided to scrimp on editors and just mass produce garbage content.
So here's a little article asking the same thing and do we need to take a hammer to these things? I'm not a Luddite, and I don't think you should be. This is a position paper arguing that you ought to be a Luddite, and the reason you should do so is simply because there are all kinds of value and the innate value of the human being doing
the thing. I don't necessarily believe that, but I am an anti technologist in some ways because I watched the Terminator growing up and I understand that AI leads to certain things like sentience and it undermines the value of human life, but not human labor. There's still going to be people that make the equipment that does the automation. It's just going to be a more
sophisticated person. You're not going to be able to come out of high school with no particular skill set, make friends in a nepotistic way with a guy like Harold Daggett, who's a gangster who takes you onto his wing, and he's going to show you how to do it. And by the way, here's your chain and now you're one of us. This kind of nonsense, you're
not going to be able to do that. And you can't turn around and make your 100, your $81,000 a year base salary, which is $200,000 a year with overtime, because you slowly work around and you work at the speed of Harry Dunn. The interesting thing about unions today is that they are so in bed and they are so mobbed up in their mindset, they actually operate far more like government than they do like private industry. And so they're actually making things inefficient when they shouldn't be.
It doesn't make a lot of sense for us to be doing that as a nation, as particularly one that is a group of people that that resist communism, that resist a lot of the sort of ugly sides of the labor movement. Now, labor movement has a massive history in socialism. So I went back and found an article jaded July of 1913 by someone named Anton Penekohic, Socialism and the Labor Union. And you can even find him today.
Or even when Donald Trump was running under the Democratic left banner, which comes from the democratic socialism America, the Socialist Party's legacy in the US labor movement. They don't hide this stuff, folks. It's not like they're trying to say that that's not a thing that they do. Of course they do it. Little piece here. The labor union movement and from from this article written in 1913 took a little little segment out here. I'm going to read to you.
Naturally that only holds true where labor union is actually fighting against the capitalist, and not where, as in the old conservative trade utism, peaceable agreements are the goal and harmony between capital and labor is the guiding rule of a narrow trade egotism. But where they regard their activity as a struggle, as part of the great class struggle of Labor against capital, they constantly increase the most important elements of the proletariat's power.
They are building the foundation of our future victory by making new men out of the workers who, through their rigid discipline and their strong organized spirit, are capable of overthrowing the power of the bourgeoisie. It's like 112 years old. Interesting, right? We're talking about the ideas of struggle. These are not American ideas. And the idea that you still have people like the Democratic Socialists of America who are more than happy. This is the opening paragraph.
This is coming from September 27th of 2016, more than 100 years after that article was written. the US labor movement has been fueled by the passions and the fires of socialists and anarchists and communists and the leftists of many types. Socialists have been active since the very beginning of the nationally organized movements. The best known amongst them is Eugene Debs, a moving orator and a staunch union activist.
He began his career as the leader of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen. Do you know how many locomotive firemen are in existence today? Probably none. It's not a union anymore. The reason is because technology left that behind. They have automated systems to do that for fire suppression. And after the founder and the guiding light, he also helped find, found the American Railway Union during the Great Pullman Strike of 1894.
We all remember that one, of course, powerful corporate U.S. government alliance was smashed through the strike. They imprisoned Deb and other union leaders, and they destroyed the early industrial union. But he went on to be a member of the Socialist Party as a a candidate for president in the 1st 2 decades of the 20th century. Thankfully didn't actually
triumph. How interesting the hardcore leftist were able to get this movement only because they talk about unfairness and they think that we should all have it. This is something that I actually do get behind because I am sort of an anti technologist in certain phases. And many of you who called into our show actually realized that because we would all hit the red button that would make social media go away and Internet connectivity would be the cost
of that. I'm going to read you something that I found very interesting. I'm going to put on the screen and then I'm going to show you who wrote it because it might surprise you. Introduction The industrial revolution and its consequences have been disastrous for the human race. Many people could probably make this argument comfortably. They've greatly increased the life expectancy of those of us who live in, quote, so-called
advanced countries. But they have destabilized society, have made life unfulfilling, and have subjected human beings to indignities, have led to widespread psychological suffering and in the third world to physical suffering as well, and have inflicted severe damage on the natural world. The continued development of technology will worsen the situation. It will certainly subject human beings to greater indignities and inflict greater damages on the national world, natural
world. Rather, it will probably lead to greater social disruption and psychological suffering, and it may lead to the increased physical suffering even in advanced countries. The same same article that I just quoted has an entire section called the Psychology of Modern Leftism, saying that everyone will agree we live in a deeply troubled society, a spiritual war, if you will.
Most widespread manifestations of the craziness of our world is leftism, and so the discussion of psychology of lesson can only serve as an introduction to the discussion of the problems of the modern society in general. But what is it? In the first half of the 20th century, leftism could have practically been identified with socialism, and today that movement is fragmented and it's not clear who can properly be
called a leftist. As we speak of leftist in his article, we have to keep in mind that mainly socialist, collectivist, politically correct types, feminist, gays and disability activists, animal rights activists and the like, that's the people that fit into that category, but not everyone who is associated with these movement and a leftist obviously not. So we're trying to discuss leftism not so much as a movement or an ideology, but as a psychological type. Do you know who wrote all those
words? Because it's going to be fun. Are you ready? I'm going to just unveil it here on the screen for you. How many of you know on the chat? There you go. Somebody knows. I saw that. Watch this. That's being quoted from Industrial Society and Its Future by Theodore Kaczynski at 1995. First appeared in The New York Times in The Washington Post, September 19th of 1995. I was in high school. I was actually probably about to start my what? No, I was probably.
Yeah, I was just going into high school. How interesting Ted Kaczynski, also known as the Unabomber, he saw these problems. And as one of these articles I just was reading quoted, they said that he saw a problem with technology and he decided to go after the people that were in charge of technology with greater and greater sophistication of explosive devices using automated systems
like sending through the post. The Unabomber used technology to try to disrupt technology as same as the Luddites who decided to use hammers to smash machines that they had been working on. Do you know who lost in the end of all the stuff the Luddites didn't win? We have very, very sophisticated and automated textile machines. We can buy cheaper clothes and clothe the world in a way that we couldn't do before.
So there are some things out there that seem pretty obvious that when you actually add technology, you're not entitled to do an older style of work. Nobody owes you a living at that. Your job is to adapt. Most of the American accomplishments came from technological adaptations. We did it better, we did it faster, we did it more efficiently, and therefore America maintained its space in the world.
It's pretty interesting to think that we have people that are arguing about the the non automation of docs because they want to keep making a living and their argument is people need jobs and we pay taxes. The taxes can also be paid on profits, on the efficiencies that they're able to do, on sales taxes, on taxes on fuel as it moves. And it's also interesting to note that the shortest amount of movement in the logistical supply chain happens from ship
to shore. And those people tend to be the best paid in the entire world. The US has a very inefficient port system compared to many, and the US also faces a billion plus dollar problem in shrinkage, in theft of cargo, loss of cargo, and it happens because you have not automated these ports and the accountability is low.
Hence the mafia thing. I told you the story of one of the companies I work for that was a manufacturer lost entire truckloads because mafioso guys would get in, take over the truck, disappear, they'd move off with $1,000,000 for the merchandise. That happens over and over and over again to the tune of 1 billion plus dollars a year.
It's interesting to me they're fighting to maintain something that is proven to be inefficient in the same way that places like Oregon and New Jersey insist on somebody coming to pump your gas because this somebody needs a job. It's the argument that was made to me while some guy in a yellow vest unhappily did a job that nobody wanted.
The problem for human happiness is when you're doing a job that you know is unnecessary and you're only in a job simply because it feeds your family and not providing value to the company or your service that people want. There's not a lot of pride in it. Notice how pissed off those people are. Wouldn't it be better if they were involved in the anime, like in the the automation process? They could become consultants in
that space. They would actually probably have a lot of like hands on knowledge. This is why you can't do it this way. This is why you need the machine to do this. This is where you're going to find the the weak points. These are some of the unusual circumstances you need to program the bots to do blah blah blah. Like there are jobs, just not as many. And some people are going to have to find new jobs, just like the Luddites had to find new jobs when some of their textile
jobs were replaced. This has always happened, by the way. Imagine the amount of anger that happened between the people that started running the, let's say, the Telegraph services. They probably were really hated by those who are doing the telegram services because we don't do telegrams anymore because we have the Telegraph. And then the Telegraph operators must have been furious at the telephone operators. As technology moves forward, the product end ends up better for the consumer.
And yeah, some people get lost in the in the shuffle. There are not people that are out there making a living as Coopers and farriers in the same way they did 150 years ago. These technologies have passed by. But as I said, each one of these technologies gives birth to something else. There will be people that need to maintain the machines. They will have to be mechanics
that go other. Even if you have machines retaining maintain maintaining the machines, they're not all going to be sentient and able to see and diagnose the problems. And someone has to program them and someone has to stock all that. So even if you have automated factories, that will still be a human component to it, except when humans are going to find other things to do, less and less of us work with our hands, more and more of us work with our minds. It's not terrible.
I actually like the connection with the with the physical world. I think Ted Kaczynski was correct about that. It does have a problem with human psychology. But it's all about finding worth in what you do. And so if your job exists simply because your job needs to exist, then you don't have worth and you know it. And that's a weight, that's a
psychological burden. And women, you may not understand it the same way, but it hits men in a very specific way when you know your job is unnecessary, when you have a job for the sake of having a job. It's the reason why most people in the government are miserable and do a shit job at it. Excuse my language. They do a crap job because their their work is not necessary. They are the self licking ice
cream cone. They have a job specifically because there's a job that needs to be done for them to get paid. Most of the federal government works on a federal jobs program. And when you do that, what do you do? You lose a lot of joy in what you do. So for all of the nonsense that the political left talks about, about bringing joy back into it, the reason they need to bring joy is because they've sucked the joy out of doing things that involve creation, involve destruction, involve progress.
The actual progress, not some garbage about equity, but like really doing things that change the game for people. When you introduce those kind of things, you actually can feel it. There's a psychic value to your work. Here's the last little thing. CNN covered it too, and I thought it was fun. CNN wanted you to go out there and know that there's basically a triple headed monster. And they are talking about how doc workers are fighting the battle against automation.
We should all take note. This is their senior business correspondent, this woman named Allison Mora. She might be my second favorite now to Stephen Collinson. And she's talking about how they're doing something really, really important and they're fighting against this evil called automation. It's because they're leftist. It's because her job also provides no value because her commentary is foolish. She doesn't know anything, and
it's a shame. They're talking about modest wage increases of $5 per hour for each of the next six years until the point where they actually have a 77% increase on their base. That's wild, folks. It's completely wild. Find me another job that's going to increase your pay at like 12 1/2% per year. We'll all take that, I'm pretty sure of it. That's a huge amount of interest to go there. In any case, this is her bottom line.
The bots are coming for all of us, which is why the outcome of the port strike is particularly important to watch. It's the early battle of well paid workers against advanced automation. There will be many more to come. Yes, but only if you don't understand the dynamics and the fact that this historically has played out over and over again. If anybody wants to go back and live in 1811 and wants only the clothes available in 1811, let me know.
There's no way to transport you back, but you can actually go fake that somewhere, so that would be good. All right, I got something a little bit fun for you. It's a little bit silly. A lot a lot of news has been covering down on stuff that's been going on with P Daddy. Before we do that, let me just throw a little thanks to my buddies of Rich Shield Arms, an American manufacturer that is
not outsourcing. They are using sophisticated techniques and they make a really good product, which I was just using the other day. shieldarms.com, that's the website. You also can find out they have an entire group of like slings and soft goods. They call them under the the banner Mountain Partisan. My promo code should work at all those. The promo code is Kyle. It's Kyle saves you 5% site wide, including on their firearms, which are extraordinary. They are really well made.
They feel really good. I've held a lot of high end firearms and these would qualify in there and they're at a pretty reasonable price for a hiring thing. The owners of the company are shooters and that makes a big difference because shooters making guns for shooters is a good deal. They're not just going on marketing trends, they're actually out there at making something they use themselves. shieldarms.com promo code Kyle, How about a little bit of light hearted stuff?
A lot of been going on about Diddy Sean Combs in New York. I got kind of an interesting interview that you guys might enjoy. This actually happened with Caitlin Collins, who was interviewed Donald Trump and some others. She also interviewed Bill Clinton and an expert on Sean Combs. So that we'll just play a little bit of that real. Quick as Sean Diddy Combs sits in a prison cell in New York waiting to stand trial. Few people have come out in
support of the man. Many people are branding a dangerous and violent sex offender. But today, I'm joined by Diddy's personal friend and former President Bill Clinton, as well as legal expert Dave Berg. Thank you both for being here today. Thanks for having me Caitlin, it is great to be here. Hi, Caitlin. Looking wonderful as always today. Thank you, Mr. President. You can call me Bill. Bill, you have shocked a lot of people by coming out in defense of Diddy.
How long have you known one another? Diddy is a good man. We've known each other since the Vote or Die campaign in 2004. Since then, he's been a great friend, even inviting Hillary and I to some of his mansion parties. But Hillary's invitation kept getting lost in the mail, if you know what I mean. Dave, what are your thoughts on the likelihood of a conviction in the case based on everything you've seen and read? You know, I think he's fighting an uphill battle.
The things that he's been accused of are serious and will be difficult to defend. I mean 1000 bottles of baby oil. Hey, a lot of people use baby oil, even me. At any point I have a few 100 bottles on hand as I have dry skin and it really helps. Bill, what about the 784 dildos? Does hearing that concern you? No, there's actually a really good explanation. You see, whatever, you go over
to someone's house. Normally you bring a bottle of wine, but Diddy was having so many parties he was having a problem storing all the wine and was complaining about it. So one day, as a joke, I decide I'm going to bring him a giant pink dildo in a box. I think it was called the Destroyer or the Gate Master, one of those two. Either way, when he opened the box, he couldn't stop laughing and put the big pink dildo next to all his awards.
And that caught on and other people started bringing him dildos to his house parties, or so you can see how he would have so many. It's important to remember in America it is not a crime to have 1000 bottles of baby oil and 784 dildos. And I think that's important context. That is important context, folks. It's not a crime to own a lot of baby oil or to have nearly 800 dildos in your house, especially if your friends just bring them to you as a gift instead of a
bottle of wine. It's way easier to store because they're not breakable in the same way that might not have actually been Bill Clinton. We are living in an age when automation and AI is coming out there, and it makes it pretty hard to tell the difference except when comedians use it for great comic purpose. And I appreciate them doing so. I hope you guys get a kick out of that, too.
I think I actually added another pallet cleanse in here, and I don't remember what I added, so it's probably about the biopic. This might be Danny Polchuk's buddy and partner. We're shutting this thing down, so let's enjoy like a little bit of comedy on this. He's dropped another biopic about me, so I'm just going to watch the trailer. He is considered a sacred figure by both Republicans and Democrats. He led the nation through its greatest crisis. He's on our currency.
We build monuments to him. He's the greatest president the United States has ever had. Today, the big question that people are asking is, was Abraham Lincoln gay in the 19th century For many men, their closest relationships were other men and the. Same guy and jovial. Greater. Live with another man when they're single and often did in shared beds. Lincoln slept in the same bed with men more than he did with women. Honest to God never did that. If you want. A smoking.
Gland. Here it is. But again, you see. Problems to the end of the 19th century. Because this guy, if you can accept a queer Lincoln, you. Can accept dear people. Overall, lover of men, there's there's some technical glitch. Yeah, that's a real movie. By the way, Lover of men, Abe Lincoln story. If you can take on a queer Abe Lincoln, again, this is the problem. It's revisionist history. It's people who don't know
history. And if you don't know anything, then of course you could be programmed with new stuff. A lot of empty headed folks out there. So in any case, here what I have to say, question it all you want, go out there and do some reading. Go read about the Luddite movement, see if you are more sympathetic to the mob types that run our longshore workers. It's an interesting time to do it. They did it for political leverage and they're going to
get leverage. I just don't think it's going to work out the way they think because history is a pretty long tradition of saying, oh, you don't agree with this technology, we are going to cast you aside and you will now be made fun of. I think longshoremen are probably a job that is short for this world, but in the short term they're going to piss everybody off. So there's that that's the that's the show for the day.
Hope you guys enjoy it. Like I said, if you guys want to join us over on locals, go sign up, become a subscriber. You'll have access to the phone number. We'll do a call in show and I want to hear what you guys have to say about technology, about advancing, about Luddites. We'll talk about that tonight. It's at 8:00 Eastern Time 7 Central. Kyle seraphin.com is how you get to our locals program. Kyle seraphin.com.
Thanks for all of you who are already subscribers and we'll have a good little chat about that this evening. Until then, hope you guys are having a great day. Hope you do OK out there and for all of those people that are from America that are in a hard spot, we really do pray for them. I hope you guys take a moment, just silently pray for the survival and the help of those that are going to get their neighbors to step in and help fix some of the problems that are happening in their own
backyard. See you again tonight. God bless. Thanks for listening to the Kyle Seraphin show, streamed live weekdays on rumble.com/kyle Seraphin. Follow Kyle on Twitter, True Social and Instagram at Kyle Seraphin.