Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an American patriot. Prepare to embrace the uncomfortable truth because this program has no time for comforting lies. Here is civil liberties enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello my friends, welcome to the Kyle Seraphin show. We are rolling. We are live right now on rumble.com/kyle Seraphin.
We are over on X and we appreciate you guys following us over there and you can find us on locals. It's Kyle seraphin.com. Today we're going to talk about something, something kind of ugly and I think I'm going to upset some of you. I just have that instinct that today is going to be one of those shows where I'm going to hit some of you where you feel it. We're going to be talking about entitlement.
The word entitlement is going to be a prevalent theme throughout all of the topics that I want to hit today. We're going to be talking about, let me just kind of like do a quick survey here. We're going to be talking about people attempting to stop the mass firings at DOGE, and that means we're going to be talking about government workers in the federal government. We're going to be talking about state workers in the state of New York, including a prison
guard strike. We're going to be talking about Zielinski, the president of Ukraine. We're going to be talking about illegal aliens inside the United States who think they have a right to stay here. We are going to be talking about IVF, in vitro fertilization. We're going to be talking about Catholic Bishops asking for more money to be able to help, quote UN quote, migrants, AKA illegal aliens that are inside the United States. And we're going to be talking about the media.
And all of these things, I believe, can be sewn together under this banner of entitlement. The reason that when we look inside at all of those problems, and they're all significant, the overwhelming and the overarching theme that flows through all of these people is a sense of entitlement. And I pulled up a definition because I was curious. Well, first of all, I wanted to know, are there any pathological disorders that are associated with the, the trait of entitlement?
And the answer is, is things like narcissistic personality disorder, borderline personality disorder, antisocial personality disorder. A lot of these personality disorder types, the things that make people like incompatible with others. Entitlement is a big symptom. It is a, it is a, a worldview that causes significant issues. And that doesn't matter whether you're looking at a protest that is happening outside the the state capitol in Austin, TX.
I've got some funny footage from Owen Troyer talking to this. The people that are on the wrong side of the abortion debate. I did say the wrong side 'cause it's pretty clear even when they start speaking, just let them open their mouth and say it. It's entitlement to think that killing off another person is your right. Yeah. So we're going to get into entitlement and I think it's, I think it might be one of the biggest sort of failings.
It's a parental failing often times if you let your kids grow up with a sense of entitlement. All right, that's where I'm going to go. And so brace yourself because it kind of probably get ugly for some of you. I guarantee some of you are going to be pissed off about it. Oh, even more. We're going to talk about that. The airliner that flipped again, entitlement, all of those things. Before we get started, let's talk about something that in addition to entitlement, nobody
likes being sick. I am the the weakest person when I'm sick. And the one thing that I definitely don't want to do is have to make decisions. That's the hardest thing to do when you're feeling terrible because all you want to do is lay around and do nothing. If you're an adult, you've been sick, you know what it's like if you want to avoid sort of that that crisis, Do I go to a doctor? Do I solve this problem or do I just do the thing I know I need to do?
You can go to TWC dot health slash Kyle and you can prepare instead of repair. You can limit one of the worst things, running errands, sitting in pharmacy lines, waiting in doctors waiting rooms, trying to wait for someone to see you to tell you the thing that you already know about yourself. You already know how to solve that problem. Most likely if you've lived enough life, you can go ahead and get an emergency medical kit at TWC dot health slash Kyle.
You could also check out the contagion emergency kit if you want one of these things. Both of them have things like ivermectin. They both have a Z pack, also known as azithromycin. You can get amoxicillin. They're going to have on the contagion side, you're going to have Tamiflu, which is only useful like early on in the flu symptoms. If you get it later on, they'll just tell you you're wasting your time.
And then the other option is getting something for your airway, a corticosteroid, which is in a nebulizer form. If you guys want to get prepared for illness so that you know, look, you're going to be around other people, There's a possibility you bring it home with you from work or your kids bring it home from school. If you don't want to be destroyed and having to figure it out after the fact, go to TWC dot health slash Kyle. It's a 2 minute intake form.
After you finish your order, make sure you do the intake form. They'll ship it to you, US customers only. And again, use that promo code Kyle. You'll save yourself like up to $40 off. So definitely worth your look. Control your own health, folks. We're talking about more about that too. All right, here we go. So entitlement again, we're going to just keep hammering at home. I said it yesterday, I said it
yesterday. And my wife, she said sometimes I like listening to what you have to say, which is nice when you're married to someone who says that. It's nice listening to what you say because I have that instinct, but I don't have the word per SE. And so whenever I am listening to you articulate it, I go, ah, yes, that is the thing. And this is really going to be
your gift for the day. Entitlement and being able to diagnose entitlement to be able to give it a name because once people hear it, there's nothing positive associated with that term. Again, I'm looking through Google's sort of AI overview of it. A sense of entitlement is a symptom that can can be part of different personality disorders. The sense of entitlement or symptoms entitlement include feeling that rules don't apply to them. How often does that make sense?
Believing that they deserve recognition, rewards or other things that they, in fact, have not earned. Or I remember Tom Segura talking about shopping for a luxury jet in one of his comedy routines. He's like, yeah, I just do go down the rabbit hole of doing online shopping, and then suddenly I'm looking for the private jet that suits my needs best when in reality, I can't afford a private jet.
I'm just looking at things like if I was out there shopping for a yacht, I don't have the ability to have a yacht, one of the ability to maintain a yacht or afford a staff for a yacht. I certainly don't know how to pilot a yacht. And if I was out there doing that, there's a sense of entitlement, believing, as Tom Segura said, again, a comedian, but sometimes hitting on those truths, that there is something that I have not quite earned that I believe that I should be
associated with. And so this goes on and on. Craving attention and admiration, Symptoms of entitlement, struggling with criticism, Having an exaggerated sense of self worth, feeling superior to others when in fact you are not. How many of those things apply right now to those in the political left? I think a lot. I think a lot of them in fact do. And so this is kind of the funny part. There's an expectation that by default, we are the good guys. You're always the hero in your
own story, are you not? Nobody wants to go out there and say that you're the villain in your own story. Your friends that do that, they are the most interesting friends because you're kind of like, hey, man, how come you're not the good guy when you tell the story? Right now we're seeing this happen and it's playing out in the court system because the expectation is that the left who is now filing cases against Donald Trump, they've already set it up. They've already set up the
narrative. The narrative is very obvious. Orange man bad. We can get into more sophisticated versions of it. But when you actually ask people on the street, hey, what is it that Trump's done that you hate? They're just like, yeah, he's threatened Constitution and he's a Nazi and he has really bad ideas. And I don't, I don't, I don't like him.
He's taking my rights. It's like, do you have any evidence for this Is, you know, again, you're not going to convince them by telling them they're wrong. What you can do is you can go to that self revelatory moment where you ask all the questions. Well, what are those things? And so I've got some funny video, like I said, of, of Owen Shroyer, who is a master troll. 1 Owen is very bright. 2, He's fearless and he just does not mind people being upset with
him. So when he goes out there to ask these questions, they're just they get funnier and funnier like Elon Musk is a Nazi. You're seeing Elon Musk on the screen right now. It says the judge denies the request for temporary block of Doja's mass firing and access to data. Again, there's this sense of entitlement. 14 different state attorneys general are doing the cosplay theater asking for a TRO. They said this is coming from ABC News.
They said that they wanted a temporary restraining order on an emergency basis and that was denied yesterday. It was denied actually, while I was sitting in in at Altman's podcast studio. I'm sitting there reading through Twitter and I'm like, oh, look. And of course it was AUS District Judge in DC. This woman, Tanya Chuckin, who handled a bunch of J6 processes denied an urgent request to block Elon Musk and the government, the Department of Government efficiency.
Now, what's interesting is, is that this this organization, news organization, ABC News continues to talk about Elon Musk like he's the boss and so has Donald Trump, but the court filings are saying something different. So everyone's trying to get to the bottom of it. What is Elon Musk's role in this organization?
But I do want you to consider that even the attempt to stop this assumes that the states, the attorney generals of these 14 states have, they're entitled to the position of blocking the federal government, doing the work of the federal government. Now, Randon, we already had case law come out and say that the president is both immune from prosecution but also has the opportunity to do the job of the president.
Now in sharp contrast as well, because everything that I'm seeing shows up in this contrast, Joe Biden was not doing the job of the president. Suddenly the political left cares who's running things in the White House. They didn't care when maybe Hunter Biden, who was giving advice to his dad. They didn't care when a recovering drug addict guy who lost a gun and did all the most irresponsible things. He was going after prostitutes and collecting bags of money all over the world.
That guy was fine to be in the White House standing right next to the president. I mean, I'm not sure if they ever went into the Oval Office. I'm not sure if Joe Biden got out of bed most days. That is one of the biggest contrast that we see. So not only is there this sense of entitlement that they should be able to stop what the president's doing, they also think they should have unlimited access to ask all the questions and get in his face.
And they've never asked those questions in the last four years, which is a really weird moment. Here's Fox News. I'm going to give you contrasting opinions. Fox News asking the question. Then we've got CNN doing the gotcha. And then I've got some fun stuff from Stephen Miller, who just kind of splashes these people because suddenly, apparently, CNN discovered that there's a bunch of military veterans that
work for the federal government. They didn't give 2 rats about Gerardo Boyle, my friend who's been on this program many times, an FBI whistleblower who's now been unpaid for, like coming up on 30 months. They didn't care about me. They didn't care about Marcus Allen who testified in front of in in front of the weaponization committee. They didn't care about most of the the veterans that I know. I had friends that had their I had a guy inside the FBI that
had his job suspended. He was thrown on the bricks, what is what we call it, put out to unpaid and he did it. He got thrown out because for one or two days while the COVID vaccine mandates were coming down and they were shoving this down everybody's throat. He put the Star of David in his profile picture on his government linked account and they said that offended a Jewish person in the middle of in a meeting. No, you know, you know, no, no
grievance actually filed. That's how wild this has been. So suddenly we now care again, I'm going to show you this out. Who's who's in charge of those? What's, what's Elon Musk's role? They feel very entitled to find out who the president's advisers are and what their official titles are. I don't understand why. I don't understand why it matters if they're actually doing good work, which it seems
like they are. It seems there's been a lot made of what Elon Musk's role is actually at DOGE. The president has introduced him as the head of DOGE multiple times in interviews. Yet there's this affidavit that we've been able to get our hands on here that the press has as well, that it contradicts the White House claim that he's the head of DOGE. This, this affidavit actually says he doesn't work for DOGE at all.
Reading directly from it, it says Musk is not an employee of the US DOGE Service or the US Doge Service Temporary Organization. That's according to the director of the White House's Office of Administration. So what is his role at DOGE? Sure, I'm happy to clarify.
Elon Musk is a special government employee here at the White House serving at the direction of the President of the United States, Donald Trump. Elon Musk has been tasked with overseeing DOGE on behalf of the President and DOGE employees. DOGE folks have been on boarding at respective agencies across our federal bureaucracy as political appointees just like any other political appointee gets on board with the new administration with the changing of hands.
And those individuals are helping the secretaries at all of our agencies that have been nominated and confirmed by President Trump in the United States Senate to cut waste, fraud and abuse at these respective agencies. So there you go. There's the answer. Asked and answered. It makes a lot of sense. It's like, OK, they're political appointees.
They've come in under this program that the president has the guy who's in charge of the executive and he's going to do it. Now, here's The funny thing, because because Chuckin, Judge Chuckin in DC is not conservative and probably doesn't like any of this stuff. And yet it's still going to be constrained by fact patterns because it's going to be looked at again.
What judges don't like more than anything else is seeing their opinion taken from a higher court and slapped out and saying, hey, you screwed it up and you don't belong here. That's that's a big, you know, slap in the face for these judges. So here's what she wrote the plaintiffs. This is a quote directly out of the out of the the article, but the specifically out of the
decision quote. The plaintiffs asked the court to take judicial notice of widespread media reports that DOGE has taken or will take certain actions such as mass terminations. But you can't substitute those reports for quote, specific facts in an affidavit or a verified complaint that clearly show immediate and irreparable loss, injury or damage will result. So there, that's what it is. It's you guys talked about
standing. You have to be able to document that the thing that you want to stop either has stopped or will stop that there's some report outside of like the news media losing their minds about it. Here's NPR story. Now, the funniest thing about this NPR story and it'll be LinkedIn. Our are articles for the episode, which you guys can always find at kyleseraphin.com. It's always a free post so you guys don't have to be a member.
You do have to sign up for the locals community to be part of our our posting, but you should be able to click through these links if you just want to find out. Hey, where you getting your information from? It's always over at kyleseraphin.com. Again, that's our locals community. You could be a paid or an unpaid member and interact with the folks there. Plenty of information that goes on. This is a story that is quite funny. Again, this is that sense of
entitlement that I get. And I listened to her own words because this was an audio interview that was more or less transcribed into this article. She worked for years to get a federal job. Within a month, she was fired. Now, there's an emotional component to this because apparently this girl spent years working to land a federal job. Let me tell you, as someone who spent years working to land a federal job, it was two years just to get hired on by the FBI.
But in order to become someone who was interesting to the FBI in the in the role of special agent, I went to the military. So I probably spent a total of, I don't know, maybe six or seven years, maybe eight years getting myself in a position to be hired on by the FBI at the age of 35. And I got to work there for a couple years, which was great. I got to reach the the ripe old government position of GS13, which is the tenured rank or the tenured pay grade of an FBI agent.
And I was unceremoniously removed because they pulled my security clearance and accused me of a bunch of felonies and, and misdemeanors. One of the misdemeanors, by the way, that the FBI found in their internal affairs investigation. To me, I just should share this with you guys because you probably don't know this in the background. They actually accused me of the misdemeanor crime of misusing the FB is badge which I showed as part of the one of the Chiron's in the early podcast days.
By having a picture of the FB is badge and a picture of the FBI seal on a Wrecking Ball smashing the brick wall of America. That was considered a misdemeanor according to the FBI. I'm just telling you, when this girl was crying about all the time it took to get the federal job, So what? How entitled are you?
The funniest thing about being a federal employee, something that is hammered into everybody that works in federal employment, at least in my experience, almost all federal employments go through what's called the one week. It's the opening first week of employment. It's like, here's your benefits and here's your package, and here's your HR chain, and here's your whistleblower rules, and here's all the different things that go along with it. And here's the good and the bad and the ugly.
And this is what your employment means. One of the things they tell you is that you're probationary for two years, two years, you can be fired for no reason or any reason. And I have friends who were fired at the one year and 364th day mark. I have a friend who was a prior cop who was removed the day before his probation ended. And you know why it was?
It's because he didn't wear a jacket, a suit coat when he went to go sit in the back of the gallery for an initial appearance in Washington, DC in Criminal Court. I'm not exaggerating. They took a guy that they spent 300 to $400,000 on adjudicating a clearance and then however much money, probably another 150,000 to $200,000 paying him a salary, developing him, sending him through various trainings and pushing him through Quantico.
So you got, you got 21 weeks there plus all the on the job training for two years. And they fired him for not wearing a jacket because he embarrassed a female supervisor who wasn't actually a supervisor. She was an acting supervisor. That's how little your employment means. Any reason or no reason? This girl got fired within a month of being at the Department of Energy, and the sad thing is she just really wanted to work on clean energy solutions. Go to an energy company, honey.
If you want to go actually solve problems in the energy sphere, find out what the market bears. It goes back to that guy we talked about from NASA. If you don't have any idea what to do, you can always go get a government job because they won't demand a lot of you. There's no results required. It's the the laziest way to work in any industry, but it does give you good benefits. It's never the highest paying, but it's never the lowest paying.
It's almost always the easiest work, and most of them have the lowest amount of expectations on your performance. Government employees do not get measured the way that you might in the private industry. How do you know that, Kyle? Because I worked in both. I was discussing this with Joe Altman the other day. I worked at a movie studio.
I came in with no background in finance whatsoever and spent 18 months working multi $1,000,000 accrual projects for one of the largest movie studios in the world. Because I worked at it, I spent a bunch of time learning how to do things you have to actually perform. If you don't do your job in most businesses, they're not going to keep you around because you're dead weight. The minute you've been evaluated. You're not entitled to keep working there.
All right, I'm going to read a little bit of this girl's story because it is kind of funny, she said. I was winding down for the day, and then all of a sudden I get a notification ping. She reached for her government phone, which had been issued to her just a month earlier when she took a new job at the Department of Energy. Everything about this female story, by the way, which is not necessarily listed. I get the impression that she worked from home. What a good gig.
You're 26 years old, you can work from home, you have, you know, almost no expectations. You have no colleagues. You can sit there in your PJS and you can do you know, maybe your top up is professional and you're sitting in your pajama flannels. The e-mail said the following quote. Don't. I'm sorry DOE, Department of Energy finds that you're further employment would not be in the public interest. The 26 year old was removed from a position effective today
immediately. Again, just like my friend Joe who listens to this program, who knows exactly what I'm talking about, you can be removed for little or no reasons at all all the way up until your last day of probation. So that's the job. And that's the the conditions under which she signed up. Now everybody thinks they're going to be able to work forever and they're crying in this because she said this. This is funny.
This is the girl. She's going by the name Rose, which is apparently her middle name because she doesn't want retaliation. And she's thinking about, I swear to God, she says it in the article. She's thinking about sitting outside of the offices of the Department of Energy hoping that they will pick her back up again because she doesn't know what else to do. That is entitlement. Go find a way to contribute to society. You do not have any right to your job. When the FBI kicked me out, you
know what I did? I didn't even file for unemployment. I just went out there and tried to figure out what the next thing was. Luckily, I built myself a condition called financial security where I had passive income so my kids weren't going to starve. This girl's talking about how she has a car payment. She's 26 years old, she's not married. She's making bad decisions already. Why do you have a car payment if you if you just have a job for one month?
It doesn't make any sense, especially if she's in the DC area. It's actually a terrible idea. There's no parking there need. And I used to go to DOE to work with the people that were in the counterintelligence program there. She says people who've been in the federal government for 30-40 years are like, we've never seen this before. This is unprecedented. And they also lost jobs. Good. You're not entitled to it. What have you been doing for 30
or 40 years? If someone comes out there and looks in and says, Oh yes, you're not doing anything, what is it that you do here? As we've been kind of joking about the sort of Bob's efficiency experts that come in and do the evaluations on your on your position from office space. If you don't have anything to answer there, you're gone. And if you do have something that you can do, then you don't have to worry about it. They're very upset about this. CNN thinks they got it.
They've got Elon Musk, They're very upset about how do we try to nail this guy down? So Elon is working for Doge, but he's not working for Doge. And they think that this is going to, to, to solve this problem. Again, they are, they are, they are structuring a problem that doesn't matter. How about is the stuff that Doge is uncovering really troubling? Shouldn't Democrats also be worried about fraud, waste, abuse of the government,
taxpayer dollar? No, they're trying to, they're trying to counter Trump because they think that's going to win again. They're picking the 20% on the 8020 thing. 80, the 8020 rule is that basically 80% of people probably feel a certain way. Most people don't want their taxpayer dollars squandered. I'm going to show you a bunch of examples as we continue on. It's absurd.
And this lady, and I can't remember her name, she thinks that she's smarter than she is. I'm going to show you some really funny stuff when she tries to go head to head with Stephen Miller, who's infinitely smarter than her and way more Wiley and doesn't have a job as a as a stand up host at CNN. He has a job like doing litigation and now he's working on behalf of the US president. It's not an accident that this
guy's in this role. Documents filed by the Trump administration are raising new questions about Elon Musk's role in the White House. The filings say Musk is not an employee, nor is he an administrator of the Department of Government Efficiency, also known as DOGE. Instead, the billionaire is described as an advisor to the president, working as a special government employee.
And like other senior advisors, this filing says Musk has no actual or formal authority to make government decisions himself. With us now is Stephen Miller. He is the White House deputy chief of staff for policy. Stephen, thank you so much for taking time for us. So who is in charge of DOGE? The President of the United States. He's the administrator of Doge. No, the Doge is the what was formerly US Digital Services.
It's an agency of the federal government that reports into the Office of the Executive Office of the President, which reports to the President of the United States. He's just describing how the executive works. And she's like, wait, who's in charge? Like the answer of who's in charge of the DOJ at this point, it's the president of the United States. Why? Because he's the senior
executive. If you want to go to the top of the chain of command, doesn't matter whether it's the military, whether it's any civilian agency, they all go up to one person. When we say the quote UN quote, the government, most of the government is answerable to the
president. The difference is, is for the first time, maybe in my lifetime, probably in yours as well, the president is actually trying to be the one who's in charge of it. Generally what happens is they have these hands off policies and they just get further and further and further ideologically captured and further and further left. So when that happens, you're not going to get the president is in charge of the agency. Then they have to go down and play this little game.
This woman, Brianna, whatever her name is, Kaylor, and I don't know how to pronounce her last name. And I don't necessarily care. She tried to do these gotcha moments. So she's asking Stephen Miller, who's working on behalf of the president, who is the federal workforce. Do you even know who the federal workforce is? In sudden fashion, they now care about veterans at CNN for the first time ever. They don't really care about veterans.
They care about Democrats like Rose, who just got this new job. And they want her to be able to be paid and in that space and be able to work against the things that they want. They want their policies carried out, whether or not it's the policy of the president and, and you know, by extension, the American people who elected him. They want something. They're entitled to it. They believe the federal government's job is to serve the things that they want, and how
dare you question it? So here it is, Stephen Miller getting asked the question, who works in the federal government, and he handles this one pretty well. And then we're going to go even further because suddenly, like I said, they realize that military veterans work there as well. I'm going to draw heavily from this particular little article or evidence because it's quite funny. Does your administration understand who is in the federal workforce? Yes, we have such a broad
question. Of course, they understand who's in the federal workforce. And I'm happy to indulge all of these very histrionic questions that anyone who may not be fired. That it's 30% veterans. I think that the. And that you have people who are deployed. The the US government as $36 trillion in debt. The interest payments on the debt exceed the National Defense budget.
The American people are exhausted and tired of watching their tax dollars be corruptly spent, abused, wasted, and in every sense robbed and stolen from them. This president, for the first time in history, is committed to restoring accountability at every level of the federal government. You may assert there's no waste in the Pentagon. You may assert there's no waste in Treasury. You may assert there's no waste
in attention. She's 100% asserting that what she wants done is what she wants done because they're advocates. They're not doing reporting and they're not just asking hard questions. They're coming with a predetermined position. Do you even understand who works here? It's crying, it's crying because of the loss, and that is what they're going to call accountability. But it's really just this entitlement that we are supposed to be in charge of the government because we're the good guys.
We already have decided that. Let me go back to the list here again, because it's fun, right? Having an exaggerated sense of self worth. That seems to be accurate right there. Craving attention and admiration, struggling with criticisms, feeling superior to others, feeling the rules don't apply to them, believing they deserve recognition, rewards or other things that they have not in fact earned. All of these things are symptoms of that word entitlement. Now here's where it gets really
fun. Like I said, suddenly CNN has decided that there are in fact military veterans who work for the federal government. Do you know who some of the least entitled people that I knew were? Because they dealt with really hard stuff and they knew how to just move on. There's a, there's a term inside those that that have worked in that kind of space. Many of you may know it or a a turn of phrase. The phrase is embrace the suck. There's another one that's a
little bit less fun. It's called Bohica, which you guys will have to go look up on your own. Some of you know Bohica. But embrace the suck means it's not going to be good and we don't have a choice. So onward we go. We're going to embrace the fact
that things are going to suck. It is something that I have taken on. It is something that my friends who are whistleblowers took on. And there's not a coincidence that most of the people that step forward into the whistleblower space, at least against the FBI, which is a very scary entity to fight because DOJ has unlimited financial resources. And you're not entitled to any of them, by the way, and you're not entitled to protection.
It turns out there's not a coincidence that many of them are met at military veterans. Marcus Garrett, myself, George Hill, right? How about prior law enforcement guys like Steve Friend? Entitlement is when you think that the system is supposed to work for you. And if not, then you sit and cry about it. The people who know better know that Bohica is a principle and that is time to just embrace the suck.
It's like it's going to be a bummer, but it's the right thing to do. I love that chat is over here running the BOHICA thing. If you guys don't know, you can look over on our rumble chat. They will tell you what the what the acronym BOHICA stands for. All right, here's here's this woman again. Now she's going to own him and she's going to talk about a thing called USERA. The it's USERRA. I've got a little a break out on
this thing. It is the Uniform Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act. We are about to see Stephen Miller get, quote UN quote, owned by ACNN host. I'm going to show you why this is not a real thing in just a second. Ready. Here we go. OK, Steven, so there are military members of the Guard and Reserve. They are protected by law from being fired from their day job while they're deployed.
I have learned that at one agency, an employee who's actually currently deployed with the military has been notified they've been fired. Does your administration understand who actually makes up this workforce that they're dismantling? I'm sorry, I'm confused by your question. Is your question, does the President have the authority to fire a member of the US
military? This is a this is someone who is a federal employee and is currently deployed who has government protection, as I'm sure you're aware. There's a lot of. Protecting that. I don't know what laws you're referring to. I would love for you to be more specific. So far you're not telling me, the employee, the agency?
Uniform services employment and reemployment rights act it's well known by HR and the federal government and in in private industry as. Well, OK, so you're saying that the president, in your view, doesn't have the authority to recall a member of the armed forces who may or may not, again on the first time hearing of this, that may or may not be serving overseas? Stephen, you understand how the garden reserve work. They have a day job and then when they're activated, they deploy.
While they deploy, that employment is protected by law. OK, we're going to get deeper into that. Before we do, how how about people that actually do care about veterans, My friends over at Patriot Coolers, because we're going to go ahead and plug them. I'm sitting here with a large cup of coffee off screen. This is one of their 30 oz tumblers, Patriot Coolers.
And one of the reasons why I like them as a company gives a portion of all of their profits, everything that they make on all of the, the things they sell back to veterans who need help, you know, mobilizing around their home. They have multiple charities. You guys can go and check it out. A portion of all of their proceeds go to support veterans charities. My brother has actually seen and been present when they've handed out those big checks, those sweepstakes checks.
If you want to support veterans, you want to support the Kyle Seraphin show, you want to support a company that actually has similar values probably to what you do, go to patriotcoolers.com. The promo code Kyle will save you 10%. It's the same discount you'd get if you were a veteran or if you were a first responder. They do a discount for that. But you can just use my promo code. You don't have to plug your information in Patriot coolers also has a Kyle Seraphin show
collection. You guys can find the link in the show description and if you look over my shoulder up here it's on the wall there it is there I can point out it's on the wall. This is the black 30 oz as well. It's got the the the suspendables logos, the flag, the badge and so on. If you guys want to support our program and support veterans and get yourself an awesome product that you're never going to be disappointed with this is look, it's like one of the best looking cups.
I carried it with me yesterday when I went to San Antonio. I actually took two of them with me, including the first one I ever got. I've been using them for quite a while, so check them out. All right, are we ready for this? Because I'm going to break it down. This is the the the ACT I'm going to throw it on the screen. It's going to be probably too small for most of you to read if you're on your phones, but if you're watching on the computer screen, you can read this.
The, the referenced the law is the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act, USERA, and it's well known apparently to HR departments in the federal government and private sector. And according to CNN, it means that if you are deployed, you cannot lose your civilian job. And that's false. It's absolutely false because the what it protects you against is losing your job on account of
your military service. Again, this sense of entitlement which is being applied to some service member and I don't think it's real. You're protected against discrimination for being a veteran. If you are past, present, or have future military obligations, you cannot be fired for that and you can sue to be reinstated if that is the given reason.
If the person leaves for military service, it's required that the employer reemploy them upon return, assuming that the individual still meets the criteria for work. There's all kinds of little cut outs here, and the biggest one is RIFF. RIFF is a reduction in force. This is the standard term for a government layoff in the context
of a riff. USERRA does not explicitly prevent the employer from conducting layoffs, but it does require that the service members military status not be used as a deciding factor for whom to lay off. In other words, you can't just say, well, we're going to lay off everybody that's in the National Guard that's been activated. That's illegal, but if you lay off everybody in a specific department, then you can do
that. So this is a disingenuous presentation by CNN trying to act like they think something. Now they suddenly have discovered that there are military veterans working inside the federal government. They haven't give 2 rats about these people up until right now, but they think it's a way to dunk on the sitting president and it's nonsense. And again, it's a sense of entitlement that they think that they're supposed to win. And so they're going to show people how to do it.
I've got a clip from Chris Matthews who's really I didn't realize Chris Matthews is 79 years old. He's really showing his age right now. He's talking about this sense of entitlement, this idea that we're the good guys and the other guys are the bad guys and that there is a way to to win and a way to lose. But this is not it. And so we've got to go after Doge. This is why I think he's speaking the quiet part out loud on why they're going after everything Elon's doing right now.
So let's just listen to this. This is over on MSNBC again. Now we're going to go further, further left. Yeah, well, there's a lot of rules out there about how to behave when you're losing. But, you know, the big problem is that Trump came in this time, this second time with a machine gun, and he fired so many shots. He said, first of all, the people that tried to kill Congress by attacking the US Congress on January 6th, I'm going to pardon them all to let
you know where I stand. I'm with them. That was a pretty clear statement. I'm with Article 2, not article one. I'm not with the Congress. I'm not looking out for you guys. And when it came time for advise and consent, which there's a whole book written about and a whole it was a big issue, the right of the Congress to say no to a cabinet appointment. He said you're not going to do that because I'm going to shut you guys down. And he did. So Tillis and Cassidy and
Collins, nobody taught. They shut down the Congress. He said I'm the boss, and he just said the same thing overseas. He said basically, let's see, I'm going to have one of my guys over there is going to say that Germany should go to the right. Germany should move to the right. Now there's an interesting foreign policy. I haven't seen that in the 20th century. Certainly go to the right. And that's what his vice president said. I want you to accept the Afd, join the right, put up with
them. Not only put up with them, tolerate and use them, bring them, bring them forth. Go to the right, get to the right. OK, So what is this problem? He thinks that the president is now supporting the Article 2 powers of the president instead of the Article 1 powers of Congress. Who do you think started that? What kind of weird entitlement is it that everybody has to do what we think when they're in
office? You have to play by the rules, not the rules that we invented, the rules that we want you to follow. How about we just read the Constitution? Article 2, Section 2. The president shall be commander in chief of the army and the Navy in the United States and of the militia of the several states. OK, that's pretty easy.
He may require the opinion and writing of the principal officer in each executive department upon any subject relating to the duties of their respective offices, and she'll have the power to grant reprieves and pardons. OK, so it's within his authorities as president to have a reprieve or a pardon for the things that happened on January 6th. That's a constitutional power. Deal with it. Except in cases of impeachment. He can't do that. How about this clause #2 under
Section 2 of Article 2? He shall have the power by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties, provided that 2/3 of the Senate present concur, and he shall nominate with the advice and sent of the consent. Sorry. The advice and consent of the Senate shall appoint ambassadors and other public ministers and councils and judges of the Supreme Court, and so on and so
forth. The Congress may by law, that's the appointment of such inferior officers as they deem appropriate in the president alone and in the courts of law or in the heads of departments. He should fill up all the vacancies that happen during recess if necessary, right? Like this is not crazy stuff. This is what the Constitution says. These a holes. It's so wild. They're the ones that are talking about a constitutional crisis. And yet it seems like they don't actually even know what the
Constitution says. It's, it says exactly what he's supposed to do. The first section of Article 2 explains who can be president, how to be president, how you get put in and how you get taken out. If you guys don't read the Constitution, you don't know what it says. So make sure you do, you should carry a little pocket one with you or get the app. It's real easy. Section 2 says what the duties
are. Section 3 says a couple of other things about when we have the State of the Union, which by the way, we've turned into this grand thing. It's not even supposed. It says from time to time. And then he's going to go and tell people what's going on, that he's going to get ambassadors and other public ministers and show up. All of these are constitutional duties. He's the guy that's supposed to go out and make the treaties and then the Senate's supposed to
approve them if they agree. He's doing that. And they're very, very upset that suddenly he's decided he's going to go talk to Vladimir Putin. Imagine being mad about Donald Trump going forward and talking to Vladimir Putin. We'll just go to the main piece here He's made. This is this is CN NS headline. This is the front of their front page today. I, I kid you not, this is analysis. Are you ready? Trump makes his most hostile comments yet towards Zelensky. That's analytical.
That's an opinion. How do I know? Because most hostile is a qualifier. It modifies the type of comment and the only way that you could do that, it is not objectively the most hostile. It's what you believe. So it's not analysis. As presented by Stephen Collinson, who's one of my favorites hands down, because he's always a good example of someone who just says what he feels. It's emotional, it's entitlement. Here's the the third paragraph things. Sorry, this is the first paragraph.
This is the opening line of this particular article over on CNN. It looked like things couldn't get any darker for Ukraine. And then President Donald Trump spoke up. Such analysis. That's not analysis. That's your emotional opinion. You beta After cutting President Vladimir Zelensky out of the 1st US talks with Russia on ending the war, Trump on Tuesday falsely accused Ukraine of starting the conflict that has ravaged its land and killed thousands of its people. Yeah, it's terrible what's
happened there, by the way. It's absolutely atrocious. But if you're the Big Brother and the little brother picked a fight and you're the one who's been fighting the fight, or you have been funding the fight, or the reason that the fight is not over is because you are standing behind the little brother. Do we care what the little brother wants to do to negotiate out with the other guy on the other side, the bully, the big
person that's going on? No, the United States has decided, for whatever reason, under Joe Biden, that we're going to bankroll the entirety of the Ukrainian defense. We are bankrolling NATO so that they can be part of it. Everybody's going to go and put money in. Do you know who has the biggest stake in there? I mean, the biggest life stake is obviously the Ukrainians. But financially, how many billions of dollars in treasure has the United States government sunk into this conflict?
We have as much as a stake as anybody in talking about what should end it. And so, no, we don't care what Ukraine thinks. This puppet dictator who doesn't want to hold elections, who Donald Trump said I think accurately has plummeting just like he said, 4% approval rating. It's probably not that low. But Donald Trump speaks in hyperbole. He doesn't do the BS that Joe Biden does where he's like, not a joke. That's not hyperbole, man.
Whenever it was hyperbole, Donald Trump just says hyperbole and then he just doesn't caveat. You could actually call Donald Trump no caveats. That's the way he speaks. They're really, really upset. So here's a little video. This one is a pompous CNNA hole who's going to take one single sentence out of a like dozens of minutes of him talking. They're going to give you about 8 seconds of it. I want you to hear how it's presented.
Again, the sense of entitlement is that we think that we should be able to tell you exactly what the news is. We're going to spoon feed you an opinion and you must accept it and I'll show you another little piece in just a second. Enjoy this like exchange between Jack Jake Tapper and some guy who takes 1 less than one sentence from Donald Trump to be
able to give his opinion. Back in our world lead and breaking news moments ago, President Trump weighing in on the talks between his government and Russia to end Russian leader Vladimir Putin's three-year assault on Ukraine. CNNS Jeff Zeleny is traveling with President Trump, he's in Florida. Jeff, what exactly did President Trump just say? Well, Jake, the president is signing a couple of executive orders and really having his afternoon session with reporters at Mar a Lago.
But taking the side once again of Vladimir Putin, as we've seen really over the last week or so, but in striking new language, seeming to blame Vladimir Zelinsky, the Ukrainian president, for the war. Let's listen. And I think I have the power to end this war. And I think it's going very well. But today I heard, oh, well, we weren't invited. Well, you've been there for three years. You should have ended it three years. You should have never started it.
You could have made a deal. That's all they played. It cuts back. And he was like, then he repeats back the words. Meanwhile, you've got breathless coverage by NBC News talking about how Zelensky hits back at Donald Trump's comments and says Ukraine is not for sale. Really. Since when? When is that started? Is that a new policy that you guys have now? It's suddenly not for sale after several, what, several $100 billion?
The best for the CNN piece for me is, is the way that they actually they they characterize the most hostile statements yet an apparent bid in the process of pushing Zelensky aside, making deals using Vladimir Putin's talking points. I kid you not. That's out of an analytical piece, according to to the CNN. And they wonder why they've lost all the credibility. Maybe it's because they don't
actually respect their readers. Again, this entitlement where they think that they can tell you what your opinion is and you're going to walk away with it. And nobody says it better than Jennifer Rubin. She's a 60 something year old pundit who just left the Washington Post. She was working there and she was recorded. And I just saw this clip running across, so I found a way to share it with you. Apparently, none of you can read what's on my screen.
Most of you are MAGA people. I understand that you guys know I'm not like a MAGA guy per SE, but I'm enjoying what Donald Trump's been doing. I've got something I'm going to push back on in just a minute here because I don't think everything he does is great. I think some of the things he does are not great. And you'll hear it in just a second. But here she is. Jennifer Rubin again, Washington Post cut from that same cloth of like analysis equals my opinion should be your opinion.
This is the opposite of way that America was raised. I was never told that somebody else's opinion has to be mine. You don't have to have your opinion and you don't have to share mine. You don't even have to believe that entitlement is the problem with airlines and illegal aliens and Washington Post reporters or writers or whatever. You don't have to believe that. You should take it and consider it and say, well, does it make sense? And if you say no, that's OK too.
I'm not mad at you. You shouldn't be mad at me for having it. I'm not mad at her for thinking that people who are MAGA folks can't read. But it does make me wonder, why do they have chyron's on the bottom of the Fox News articles or the Fox News pieces? It seems like that is that might be a waste of time and effort. Why would ABC Disney, the mouse, who has more money than God, settle with Donald Trump? I honestly don't know.
You know, I've asked why would ABC, but people ask me all the time, why is the media so lamsey, pamsey? And there are two explanations. The one is they are convinced that if they would just move a little bit to the right, all those MAGA readers out there now, you'll notice the contradiction in terms. MAGA readers would pick up the Washington Post and they would have more readers. What is the logical fallacy here?
Yes, reader. And there is nothing that the Washington Post could possibly do that would have those people take out a subscription. But they're convinced they're they're in there someplace. Right, because none of you can read. They don't Do they even hear themselves? She you guys are phoning in on the same thing. This is why I love my our live chat. If you guys have never joined us over on rumble.com/kyle Seraphin, the live chat is where my most amusing little comments come in.
Like during the actual moment you guys are saying the same things. I'm thinking her voice like nails on a chalkboard. 100% that. What happened to her arm? Why is her arm broken? I assume because she's got like osteoporosis and she just has like weak bones. She probably has poor genetics. She probably doesn't take care of herself. She doesn't seem to she's, you know, maybe weakened by bitterness and hate. All of these things are, are are
questions that I might have. She felt like she was entitled to be able to lift a box that she couldn't, I don't know, maybe she tried to open a pickle jar. She doesn't have a man in her life. Whatever, whatever the issues are, I'm seeing some of these funny little moments where it's just like, it's awful and nobody, you're going to just defame and say that these people are not good enough. This is why they've lost their credibility and they don't even realize it.
They think they are entitled to your attention, that you need to listen to their opinions. They don't give any evidence of it. And then you have crazy stuff like this. This is another one from CNN
because this is pretty funny. A group that defended undocumented migrants cuts dozens of attorneys and staff because apparently the United States government is not now going to pay for it. They talk about how a guy was beginning his his beef slaughterhouse job in rural Tennessee when ICE showed up with guns drawn and ordered him to toss the tools on the ground. He was 60 at the time of the raid. He explained that his that he had legal status to work in the United States, but the agents
zip tied him anyway. He and 100 other Latino agents or sorry workers were shuttled off to a nearby National Guard Armory. And this was one of the largest workplace raids that have been sending a signal that then Donald Trump's tough talk on immigration would actually have hard node. Actually that happened in 2018. So now we're going to go back to the old one. And there was an Alabama based organization that had a team of lawyers that was going to go out there.
They were funded apparently by the Southern Poverty Law Center, which apparently has been getting government funding as well. And now suddenly they're just not going to waste their time on it. But these people who are illegals think that they are entitled to be defended by United States dollars, by people who live in the US. This might be the funniest story of the day. It comes from ABC. This is what I feel like people voted for. And there's a sense of entitlement that is pervasive
here as well. Three migrants beat the Trump administration in court. They got deported the next day. Listen, if you're going to play in the game of the United States court systems, then words have meanings.
And what these people did, this is illegal aliens that were inside the United States. They are being held in custody for over a year, facing the possibility of being transferred to the Guantanamo Bay specifically because the the government was arguing that they were from Transda, Transda Agua. So this Venezuelan gang, they said no, I'm sure they're being totally honest, like, I don't know, but it doesn't really matter because you're not even here legally.
Then they claimed that this person, these guys didn't have any criminal offenses, and the ones that were criminal were
nonviolent. So what the best thing is this the future look bright because last week in an immigration custody battle for over a year, facing the possibility of transferred to Guantanamo, three men asked a federal judge and a federal court to intervene entitlement and they thought that they might be disappeared into the legal black hole of Guantanamo Bay. The federal judge in New Mexico handed down a surprising ruling blocking the Trump administration from sending said men to Guantanamo.
Their first successful legal challenge to the policy since it was enacted last month is a very, very recent thing that the Trump administration has decided you might send people to Guantanamo the very next day. Those men were placed on the 1st deportation flight back to Venezuela in over a year, said
their lawyer. It's hard to imagine that it didn't have something to do with them filing a habeas peace and then stepping forward to challenge the threats to Guantanamo. So they got a favorable ruling. You can't send them to Guantanamo. But they didn't say you can't deport them. So they just sent them the hell out of the United States. You are not entitled to hang out here in my country. Sorry. How funny is that?
And you go, well, but what? But what about No, the law, The law said what it was The, the court came down and said, you just can't go to Guantanamo. And they said, fine, we're going to send you back to Venezuela. Go back to Caracas. Done. Adios. Now those people are in danger. You know how they wouldn't be in danger if they stayed in their own damn country in the 1st place And they didn't break US immigration laws.
That's why they got deported. It's not like there's just like a law that's just so they're grabbing people off the street. Are any of you in danger of being grabbed off the streets by government vans and deported to Venezuela? No, because you're not from Venezuela, because you're from here. How about this? You want evidence it works. It's right here. This one's this. Like, it seems like these people are actually making arguments in favor of the things that I want.
This is also from ABC. So ABC crying about someone getting deported because they didn't have to go to Guantanamo, they have to go to Caracas. Now you've got apprehensions along the southwest border plummeted in January. I wonder why the hell that would be. Why would it be that suddenly people don't want to come to the United States? Why are they not sneaking into this country in the same levels they were before?
Maybe because we haven't rolled out the welcome mat and showed them this entitled attitude of saying, hey, we're going to put you up in luxury hotels. We're going to give you all the things. We're going to give you money. We're going to give you healthcare. We're going to give you abortions. We're going to give you transgender surgeries. All the crap that we've been hearing about the last four years. Very, very simple.
Apprehensions are down. You've ruined the gravy train of people being able to access so-called entitlements and they've done what people do, which is make a sensible decision not to come to the United States. Good. Please stop. Apprehensions along the Southwest border plummeted by a third during January, according to statistics obtained by ABC News yesterday, there were 61,465 apprehensions.
That's CB. I'm sorry, that's a custom, Border Patrol custom and Border Protection rather so CBP. And that was down from January where it was 96,000. People basically saw the door closing. He went from 96,000 to 61 1/2 thousand. The numbers fell even more after Donald Trump's inauguration according to the data. So on a week to week basis, there was an average of 2000 prior to the to the inauguration. The daily average dropped under 1000 to 786 after the inauguration.
That's a massive drop from 2000 to 786 that 786, right? Jeez Louise, still 176,000 along the southwest border in January of 2024. So you had close to 200,000 a year ago and it's just dropping and dropping because you are removing the lure, the the ability to access these quote, quote UN quote entitled positions. They're going away. Let's continue to talk about a little bit of entitlement. It's kind of interesting. How about these ones, prison guards?
They're on strike. Who do you root for, by the way? When Kathy Hochul, who's maybe one of the worst governors when it comes to like a record about freedom, when we're talking about someone who just hates American Civil Liberties, you're talking about the governor of New York. Who do you root for in a government? Workers versus a government. This is kind of like a doge thing. They're like, hey, we don't want to negotiate with you. I, I hate strikes of government
workers. This is not, you know, the 19 teens. We are not dealing with a world where there's workplace safety issues in the same way. There's all kinds of regulations, probably too many regulations. The world is safer. The ability to share information is safer. The power, you know, imbalance, it leans towards this soft, favorable, entitled view towards people with their jobs. I don't know, I'm kind of on Kathy Hochul's side of this one. Like, I just because I just don't care.
Prison guards at the state level, in my experience, they're not all corrupt by, by the way, like this is not a universal statement, but there is a massive amount of corruption that happens because you've put people in a terrible job. The thing is this, you don't have to work that job. And that's the thing that I don't understand this entitled attitude that my job has to fit what I want it to be. It has to pay me better. And that this is one of the wild
things they want. They want more access to be able to put people in solitary confinement. They don't like prison reforms, but I don't know enough to decide whether that's true. But talking to people who've been in solitary confinement, like folks that I have a new found empathy for after January 6th and some of the ways that they've gone after them. My friend Alfredo Luna listening to Stewart Rhodes over this weekend, listening to people who got thrown in solitary, It's pretty awful.
It's a pretty terrible thing to remove people from other human beings and let them just sit in their mind. People go crazy and that's what these state corrections officers are are they're they're demanding higher pay, stricter security checks. I think that's fine. Rollbacks for prison reforms, including limits on solitary confinements. They want to be able to do more of it. It's hard to do that. It's hard to feel good about that situation.
Some of this fine. But if you don't like your job, go find another flipping job. And this is the same state as you guys accurately pointed out in the chat that has Dexter Taylor in in prison. You've taken a guy out who said he was not allowed to bring up the Second Amendment in his trial about guns because of a New York judge. So you're not exactly the good guys on either side. Anyway. There is a sense of entitlement that my job must fit what I want.
And I guess that's the thing that makes me laugh most about these guys on the left. Let's play a couple little fun things. How about women have no rights? This is This is why the arguments don't work, because they don't actually have arguments. They just have this feeling that like, whatever I want is what should happen. Here's Owen Schroyer, as promised. I'm not trying to grow his beard out. I'm just trying to be me.
But Owen Schroyer makes me laugh, and he's talking to what looks like a legit Midget. I don't know why this woman is wearing like a Toadstool thing, but she looks like one of the people from the Super Mario World, and apparently she has no rights. She wants to be able to kill babies. She says it the quiet part out loud in this one too. Is this a gay pride event? It's. A humanity event. A humanity event who doesn't have rights? Who doesn't? Yeah, I don't as a woman.
You don't. What rights don't you have? I don't have the right to kill a person that I'm growing inside my. Body. That's true. You don't have the right to kill a person, that's true. Don't you have? I have the exact same rights you have. No, you have more. Well, I can't. I can't I. You know why you think you have more? No, I don't think I have more. You think I have more? Oh no, you have more. So explain that. Explain history to you, your founding fathers. What year is it?
Exactly. It's 2025, we still haven't broken and we're not doing it anymore. Curses. What curses am I cursed? That the white men have put on us. The white man put a curse on you. White people don't exist. Your existence is based on genocide. That's why you're here trying to find answers, because you have no culture and so you. Robbed us. Of our. Culture really. Like can I get a mushroom to wear on my head? Absolutely. You know where I got it from? One of your corporations.
I don't know what the hell is going on there, by the way. She found a step to stand on, so she was tall enough to talk to him so he didn't have to point the microphone down at a 45° angle. Yeah, you can't kill a kid. We we all agree on that. The fact that she said it that way let's, you know, kind of how it works, right? Speaking of kids, I told you I was going to some things you
guys don't like. You're not entitled to in vitro, and I don't know why the federal government would have to get involved in it. Donald Trump the other day signed an executive order on expanding access to in vitro fertilization. There's a lot of reasons why this is problematic. The biggest one on a moral and ethical issue is that we're talking about creating human life, putting together and creating embryos and then a
bunch of them get destroyed. That's the biggest argument against it. But let's just do it at a level where, why in the hell should the federal government get involved in this? You are not entitled to have the government, the federal government, the largest organization, the the biggest employer in the world right now as far as I'm aware, come in and push the heavy hand. The worst solution to like your individual problem. You're not entitled to have children.
It turns out this is the other thing, like for all of human history, people understood that whether they believed in a God or God's plural, whatever it was that their understanding of the supernatural was, you didn't have the ability to necessarily screw with that. And if you can afford it, great. But like, there's a lot of things that people don't have that they would like. Some of them are children. Some people who would be great parents, I think, don't have
children. You're not entitled to a spouse. That's the old joke. If you were in the military, they said if they, the Army or the Air Force or the Navy wanted you to have a, a spouse, they would issue you one, right? That's the joke that like, let's expand that out like you're just if you, if they wanted you to have children, wouldn't you be issued one? If God wanted you to have children, wouldn't you have them? Does it mean that I'm mad at you if you were conceived by IVF?
No, I'm not mad at you. I'm not mad at anybody for it. I'm just saying that Donald Trump as the president of the United States need not get involved. Daily Wire does a pretty good job talking about it. There are plenty of people that find it to be problematic.
The fact that it cost $15,000. The, the major issue with IVFI think is that it opens up all kinds of really unusual and non conducive and, and, and specifically non child focused families to having kids, people who can't otherwise biologically make it happen. It's tough, OK, it's tough. I understand that. I don't want that for you. I'm I, you know, there are plenty of examples throughout the Bible of talking about children being a blessing.
We're dealing with the society that says otherwise. So so pushes against that society. There's a nuance there, for sure. Federal government is not involved in your medical decisions that way. And that seems terrible. It seems like a really awful use of our money, seems like a really awful use of the executive power. And at the end of the day, I don't know what it's actually going to bring out. Now, that's a Catholic position, no doubt about it. It's generally a Christian
position. Let me push back against some of those people as well. Here's my people saying something that makes me pissed off. And it's also about entitlement. Again, if you feel entitled to IVF from the federal government, you got a problem. Like, I disagree with you. So let's hash that out. Feel free to put it in the comments. How about this nonsense? This is coming from The Washington Times, the United States Catholic Bishops
Association, these guys, when they get together. the US Conference of Catholic Bishops have sued the Trump administration asking for a federal judge to order the State Department to restart giving taxpayer money. Gosh, talk about entitlement that the bishops say they need in order to help refugees who don't have a right to be here. OK, so let's get to how how entitled does it get Your religious group, my religious group, these are these are the
leaders of my church. The Catholic Bishops are saying that the State Department must give them back money to help the people that came to the United States illegally that they are referring to as refugees because they have Co opted that name because they're not refugees, not in a in a traditional status. They should have stopped in the first country. They're not asylum seekers because there's not an asylum law that would justify them. It is tough. It's not appropriate.
The Bishop said that they are. They were giving assistance to 6700 refugees. And Donald Trump shut off the government spigot. Yes, as is his right as the chief executive. Deal with it to deal with it. I'm just seeing this. Look at I told you guys you were going to be pissy about this. I don't care about your opinion on this. I don't agree with you. IVF is a net bad. The fact that you think that there are some goods out of it. Exceptions don't prove the rule.
The rule is it allows people that shouldn't have it. This will always be the case. I look forward to seeing you guys over on the on the X platform or if you guys want to do it in the comments under Neon Rumble, let's play. But the fact of the matter is there are plenty of things the federal government need not get involved in. IVF is one of them, and supporting migrants through a Catholic charity is another one. The church has a lot of money.
If people want to put their money into it through private charities, I absolutely agree with that. If that's what the Catholic Church or your parish wants to do or your pastor thinks that this is a a priority, let them spend your money very, very close to you. Stop making it come to the federal government of my tax dollars. It's not good. So again, we have to take shots at everything.
Let's do the last one. Speaking of shots, how about RFKRFK Junior is telling his staff that he will investigate the childhood vaccine schedule, anti depression drugs, all the things that we were hoping would happen. This is another thing that should happen because the federal government does push a pretty heavy hand down and it has raised a lot of questions. They delegitimized the strength of the institutions like the CDC and others.
And so now you're seeing people feel like this is the sky is falling. My favorite is that it this is from ABC News. Again, numerous studies show no link between childhood vaccine schedule and autism. And yet was it properly studied by people who actually didn't have a vested interest? I just want to know because we have an opportunity right now and it's a new opportunity. We have places like Joe Rogan's podcast.
You've got people coming out suddenly after a lot of us have been talking and here's the vice president, United States. A lot of us have pushed back on Donald Trump statements about Operation War speed and his his father of the vaccine and all this other kind of crap, which was not a good take and definitely could have lost him some votes in November.
From the people that are very conservative, not necessarily people who are Republican, but the conservative types like me that are like, man, you have to have a net positive set of good takes and you've had some bad ones. It's nice to know that the number 2 JD Vance is saying things like this, which I think are eminently reasonable.
I'm not mad at anybody who got the vaccine shots, but if you think that you should force anybody else and you don't have any questions about it, what the hell are you reading? This is an an obvious example that apparently MAGA people like JD Vance actually do read Washington Post lady Enjoy.
This and I, I mean, you know, I, so I, I, I took, I took the vax and you know, I haven't been boosted or anything, but the, the moment where I really started to get red pilled on the whole vax thing was the sickest that I've been in the last 15 years by far was when I took the vaccine. And I, you know, I've had Covic at this point five times. I was in bed for two days. My heart was racing.
I was like the, the, the fact that we're not even allowed to talk about that even, you know, no, no, like serious injury. But but even the fact that we're not even allowed to talk about the fact that I was as sick as I've ever been for two days and the worst COVID experience I had was like a sinus infection. I'm not really willing to trade that.
And you don't even, you know, everybody that I know or a lot of people I know, they talk about the second shot that they got of the vaccine was really that made them really, really sick. Well, that's a side effect and not a side effect that we even talk about enough in this country. No, it's and it's also again.
We're talking about companies that have a long history of lying and being forced to pay criminal fines, and then we're giving them this exemption from being responsible for any of the side effects. Right. An entitlement to be able to take your money and not have any consequences. All these things, this entitlement sort of like theme. It's really bothering me. And it might be the rest of the week that we talk about it.
Tomorrow we're going to talk a little bit about that plane crash that happened in Toronto because I want to get into that. I got a couple other things that we could get into. Apparently they want to blame Donald Trump for inflation still. So all the things, this entitlement that now that your guys in, we want to see you, you, we want to hold you to your own standard.
But when the the standards on, you know, when the the other team has got the ball, as Stuart Rhodes said over on our Sunday conversation, we don't ever want to see the standards applied to them. Very weird time to be alive. And if we're not debunking the stuff and asking the questions about what's going on, then we're going to get screwed up. OK, I do have a another video that we're going to end with as as sort of our palate cleanse for the day.
And it is an entitlement thing. You guys will laugh, but we're going to talk about my friends, the snow Mexicans who are up on the north side up in America's attic, also known as Canadians. Why they're called Canadians is unknown to me. Snow Mexicans is getting getting some steam behind it. So make sure you're using that term. Let me remind you again, you want to support the channel. If you don't have to do it financially, you can simply do
it by sharing it with a friend. We're on X, we're on YouTube, we're on Rumble and all those. You can share it by going to kyleserafinshow.com. Very, very simple website and that will redirect you to Spotify. Spotify is free for my show. It's free, there's no ads on it. So if you'll share it with a friend or two, I'd very much appreciate it. We can grow the numbers there, which is great. It gives us an opportunity to continue doing the thing we're doing and reach a bigger
audience. But it doesn't cost you anything. So if anybody might benefit from some of the stuff, and if you're hearing things here, you don't hear other places, share it. Let people know like, hey, come listen, challenge your mind. Don't feel entitled to being safe and smug and thinking that you know all the things.
I don't either. That's why I engage on X the way that I do. So we really appreciate that people who are smug and safe and living in maybe the most entitled position in any government in the world, our friends the snow Mexicans. So here is our way out the door with a comedian who I really love. I love Daniel Tosh, he always made me laugh. He reminds me of my younger brother for some reason. Canada has the greatest fence ever built.
America. It is foolproof if you can afford it. Really easy to be the cool open minded hippie country when there's a Kevlar snuggie of America draped around your fat frozen asses. Dare in the world to talk shit. We don't use our military. We know we got you taken care of. Go back to bed, we'll wake you in the NHL. Playoff start Canada has. Yep, Canada does have it pretty easy. So congratulations and you're welcome. Snow Mexicans, we'll keep you safe. You can be smug and hippy and
cool. God bless the rest of you who are out there, my American friends. Thanks for listening and we'll see you again tomorrow. Have a great day. Thanks for listening to the Kyle Seraphin Show, streamed live weekdays on rumble.com/kyle Seraphin Bobble Kyle on Twitter, Truth Social and Instagram at Kyle Seraphin.