BLIND MAN'S BLUFF: Dems played Biden, but Biden played them back | Ep 568 - podcast episode cover

BLIND MAN'S BLUFF: Dems played Biden, but Biden played them back | Ep 568

May 20, 20251 hr 8 min
--:--
--:--
Download Metacast podcast app
Listen to this episode in Metacast mobile app
Don't just listen to podcasts. Learn from them with transcripts, summaries, and chapters for every episode. Skim, search, and bookmark insights. Learn more

Episode description

Join the Kyle Seraphin Show LIVE 9:30a ET on Rumble, or
find me on Spotify for ad-free video: https://KyleSeraphinShow.com
__________________________________________________
Our Sponsors make this program possible:
https://SLNT.com/KYLE (Save 15% off everyday Faraday bags)

Https://PrepareLikeKyle.com (Emergency Supplies - No Promo needed!)

https://MattHatJerky.com/Kyle

keywords:
FBI,Kash,Bongino,Biden, Autopen,Pelosi,Cancer,Uniparty,Bombing

Transcript

Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistle blower, an American patriot. Prepare to embrace the uncomfortable truth because this program has no time for comforting lies. Here is civil liberties enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI agent Kyle Seraphin. Well, hello, my friends. Welcome to the Kyle Serif and Show for Tuesday. It is May the 20th and I very much appreciate you being here with us. Today. We're going to be talking about Kennedy's Law.

You probably don't know this unless you follow my Twitter feed and you just saw it recently. Kennedy's Law is going to come into play. It is a corollary to the woods #3 law woods law #3 and I will share you share with you what those things are in a moment. I also want to talk about the concept of blind man's bluff, which is what it feels like has been going on in this country

for a couple years. And lastly, I want you to consider this as we keep an open mind about what's happening out there and we look into it with a skeptical and sort of a, a generally pessimistic sort of outlook. The question is can you actually believe that there is a deep state or an administrative state, which I think that there's ample evidence of? Can you actually believe that there is in fact a Co aligned and single interest in Washington DC so-called uniparty type?

Can you actually believe that and then also think that individually the people that you like are working on your behalf and that there's not just some broad tactic or agenda that's making things happen and you only get to have sort of like individual minor heroes who pop up and say things that you like?

Just for a moment. If you truly believe that there is in fact this insidious administrative state out there that has its own interest and a Co aligned uniparty where each wing of each party flap for the same bird, it's really hard to go look at anybody as an honest actor. So we're going to do that today and we're going to actually evaluate Kennedy's Law, which I will share with you.

No matter who you nominate to be the FBI director, you get James Comedy. That is the corollary to no matter who you vote for, you end up with John McCain. All right. And that might be a dark way to start the day out, but that is what we're going to do.

And since we're talking about things that are ugly and nasty and things that you should protect yourself from, government, public corruption, big tech, all of these folks that do not have your interests at heart, they're interested in getting access to your private data.

You can protect it physically by putting your things in Faraday bags, whether whether you're traveling, whether you're on public transportation, if you want to go ahead and lock down your devices or make yourself invisible to all the corporate prying eyes or the governmental prying eyes that want to keep track of you, you can do so with my friends over at silentitsslnt.com/kyle. That will save you 15% and get you free shipping on qualified orders.

Again, it's silent. They make a Faraday product that blocks all ingoing and outgoing signals, so your devices are virtually invisible and they're safe from the outside world. They make backpacks. They make phone sleeves. I'm using their dry bag, which is really helpful.

I went to the pool yesterday and it started raining on me out of nowhere, and I was relatively happy to remember that I'd thrown my phone in a Faraday bag so no one could track me when I was underwater because I don't want to be ambushed when I'm at the pool. But also, if it rained and soaked all my stuff, I might have a wet towel, but I would have a dry phone, and that's actually pretty helpful.

They make great stuff. I've got their Faraday backpack sitting behind me. It is virtually impervious to TSA hands. They cannot figure out how to deal with a backpack that has a roll top. If you're interested in confusing government agents, you can do that and they make a product that really works. You can spend as much as you want or as little as you want. If you want to spend something on the overseas manufactured equipment, they work just as well.

You can also buy them that are what are called very compliant so that they'll work for U.S. military contracts and if you work in the law enforcement space, they even make this really great Faraday cage. You can put it in your pocket and carry it for what's called sensitive sight exploitation. You can unroll that thing out and put things like phones and laptops and computers and tablets and so on and so forth so that they cannot be wiped remotely.

If you are gathering evidence, lots of useful tools, whether it be for government or for private use, check them out and do not compromise your privacy. Again, it's slnt.com/kyle. slnt.com/kyle, go silent today. Stay ahead of what's coming. Secure your privacy. Don't leave it to chance. Well, let's get let's get into what we're going to do today and we're going to hurt some feelings. OK, so we had a power outage over the weekend.

For some reason we there was a lightning strike and my my computer flickered out for just one second and most of the lights and most of the, you know, the normally flashy clocks stayed on. But for some reason my my computer went out in that brief moment and it resized my list of videos to a very, very, very small amount, which I do not like. So now I'm like squinting. If you guys see me squinting, that's what I'm trying to figure

out how to resize this thing. I actually don't know how to zoom in on this spreadsheet because I don't use office products. OK, so let's talk about blind man's bluff. I want to read it to you what blind man's bluff is, and we're going to keep that in mind. I'm going to hit a couple of headlines because the major news media organizations all hit kind of a one or another topic, and they all kind of fall into the same vein.

And then we're going to get into what I think is most important, which is we're not allowed to talk about Joe Biden sucking as a president for four years because now he has cancer, even though he's probably had cancer for probably like, I don't know, 5-8 years, Something like that. Blind Man's Bluff has multiple meetings. Depending on the context, it refers to a childhood game, a drinking game, a book game, or a

painting. It could be a game known where one player is blindfolded and tries to catch the other players by feeling them out. If you've ever seen this, you can do it visually. Imagine someone ties a blindfold around your eyes, and then they put their hands out and they're in kind of like a circle, and everyone kind of stays away from them and they walk around blindly, feeling with their fingers out, trying to find the other players.

If they find somebody, then that person becomes the blind man, and then the other person goes out there and gets to walk around. All right, that's blind man's bluff, essentially. There's other ways like drinking games where you're trying to guess like what the other person has and you're doing it without being able to see and you're trying to read reactions. We do a little bit of that in our in our politics too. But I think more often than not,

we are blindfolded. We don't have all the information we are hoping that we're going to be able to see things go on. And it's up to us to be so skeptical and so suspicious of the sources of news and the information that's being presented that whenever it even sounds like it might be good or useful to us, we should be, we should be highly skeptical. This is a story that comes from ABC. This was their one of their top stories. And as far as I can tell, this

is actually propaganda. And it's propaganda on behalf of the Trump DOJ. We have it from some pretty decent sources that the Trump DOJ has leaked this information, unsubstantiated, but it sounds plausible to me. Leaked this information to left-leaning sources saying that Ashley Biden's family is going to receive a $5,000,000 settlement with the DOJ. Now why would you go to a left-leaning source? I'm going to read you some of this Ashley. This is the sub had a headline.

Here is Ashley Babbitt was killed during the January 6th riot at the US Capitol. The Trump administration is set to pay out nearly $5,000,000. Why nearly? That means less than 5 million to settle a lawsuit brought by the family of Ashley Babbitt, a writer who was fatally shot during the January 6th attack on the Capitol. So, say, if sources familiar with the matter, the settlement will resolve a $30 million lawsuit.

OK, now you're starting to see. Brought by the Babbitt estate and the conservative group Judicial Watch alleging that the Capitol Police officer who shot her as she attempted to breach the broken window was negligent in his duties. If you've ever carried a gun for a living in a law enforcement context, you understand that what Michael Byrd did most likely does not meet the deadly force standard for any regular Police Department. And it certainly didn't meet the

standard for federal. Now, the federal standard comes directly out of case law from the Supreme Court. You cannot shoot unless you have a a reasonable belief that that person poses an imminent danger of death or serious physical injury to yourself or another person. And a lady putting a head with no hands, again, whenever you decide to assess a threat in law enforcement, they teach you all this. It doesn't matter whether it's federal, state or local, everybody teaches the same

thing. I imagine that the probably the military teaches the same thing as well. You always look at what can hurt you first. And so it starts like this. Hands, the thing that holds weapons, waistband, which is where weapons are usually stored. You could see like a slung chest rig or holsters, but generally speaking, it's waistband in the civilian context. And then lastly is demeanor, the manner in which somebody presents themself.

So hands, waistband, demeanor. If you're out there in the world and you are assessing threats, if you are not a familiar situational awareness type operator and you want to look around and see who am I most worried about? The first thing you should be doing is scanning hands in a crowd and then waistbands where they can hold their weapons. Lastly, demeanor. Are they presenting themselves in a menacing way? This woman showed no hands. You couldn't see them. They were behind the glass.

We saw that from the from the video camera perspectives, multiple angles. You couldn't see her waistband either because just her head poked through a tiny little glass window, which her shoulders would not have fit through. And her demeanor was about like that of a Groundhog or a Gopher popping out and going, oh, what's on the other side of this door? Bam, shot in the neck and dead. What's wild is why would the

Trump administration go forward? And, and it's not the Trump administration, if we're being totally honest, by the way, this I think is a smear. This is the way it's written. There are people within the DOJ that are attempting to conserve government resources for the first time in the history of government or resources, they want to settle for less than $5,000,000 when the suit is $30 million. Now, why would that be? Because it's somebody who lost their life in the middle of that riot.

And it was a riot. Like there were people that were acting riotously. They were, they were disrupting the peace and they were acting inappropriately, no doubt about it. There was property damage. There were people that were physically injured. None of those things are good. But it wasn't the vast majority of people. And a lot of people were pursued for things that were completely ridiculous.

When you look at what the DOJ actually does with its time on any given day, the FBI and the DOJ do not investigate misdemeanors in in the form of trespassing ever, historically right up until January 6th when they changed their game. So if you pay out the only person who was shot by law enforcement and I think was shot like in a violation of probably their policy and also in the violation of federal law based

on the standards that exist. If you went out and and pay her $5,000,000, how little is the suffering and the damage that the other J Sixers are going to be paid now? It's interesting. Ed Martin, who has defended J Sixers, who also is now going into DOJ to go and investigate or help prosecute weaponization. I hope that he does his job. He seems to be at least saying the right things. I've been fooled before. You guys know. We're going to talk about that a little further.

He went on Betty Johnson's show and he said that he thinks J Sixers should be paid. If you are going to pay people and there's only a $5,000,000 payout for losing your life and an American veteran and someone who maybe did something stupid, which it's not a smart idea to be in the middle of a riot and stick your head through a door, that doesn't necessarily mean

you would lose your life. If she was another skin color in a different situation like there would be, the entire of Washington DC would be burned down right now. If you only pay her $5,000,000, then what is everybody else's suffering and pain worth or less quite a bit less. This would be a terrible president to set because she lost everything including her life.

That should be the highest bar and if they set it down as low as under $5,000,000 which is a ton of money but it's probably not what like Even so I've done the calculations on it. If I just for your guys awareness, if I would have been paid out the rest of my time as an FBI agent and then paid out a pension to a like a normal and natural death for someone in my level of fitness, it would have been 6 or $7,000,000 that would have I would have been paid during that time.

It's like 6.2 to $6.4 million so $5,000,000 is less than like normal people could earn if they are in their late 30s early 40s and they have a decent sized career and you know they actually do some decent investments with their money. So just be aware. As much as that sounds like it's not that much to lose your life over, it's certainly not what you can't replace a mother for that kind of money. I want to play this little clip from Betty Johnson show.

Pay people to get whole. And we should do it. We shouldn't be afraid, you know? Oh, you want to pay J Sixers? You're damn right I want to pay J Sixers. If you got wronged by the government, then you should be made right. That's America. There's a fund that's available for doing this. Actually, when the DOJ goes and destroys someone's life and it's a fraudulent prosecution, right? Yeah, There is there, there's always been that, that, that, that fund is for when you yes, for when you.

And there's a process to sue for it and all I'm saying it's got to be faster than that. It's got to be realer than that. But, and I'm not against that. I'm just saying you're right. There is this process and and we've got to do that too. It's my guess that people are trying to still subvert the will of what Donald Trump has set in into action by his pardons.

That's my belief. I, I don't know that this is being directed by Trump. I don't think he would ever raise to his level and I don't think that he's necessarily paying attention to it. He's mentioned Ashley Biden, Ashley Babbitt and her family and sort of what happened. I think he has a lot of sympathy for that situation.

And then you see people slowly kind of working to subvert, right, that same kind of subversion we showed you the other day where your chain of command has spray paint over it and has been defamed. That's on a military base. If you're watching on the screen right now, you're seeing an intelligence squadron from the Air Force. I can't see what the number of it is because it's actually blanked out. But they sprayed FDT for F Donald Trump. We assume disrespecting the

commander in chief. That's sort of like subtle subversion. It's like, well, we can't do everything. It's the same reason why people who were worried in the FBI, in other parts of the federal government when they came in and the doge guys were coming in. And then you slowly started seeing some people push back against it. And when they did, those people who had their bankers boxes ready to go and thought they were going to get walked out, just like we saw the people at

USAID quietly unpacked. And they're feeling very comfortable today. The question was asked of Ed Martin. I think I played this last week from from Jesse Kelly. Hey, are people going to go to jail? Like, are people going to be held accountable? He says yes, but don't stop the pressure. This is not a fight that has been won in any way, shape or form.

It's not over. And I'm going to show you something that blew my mind because I didn't realize that there was a tool that could have been broken out at anytime during the BITE administration, during previous Trump administrations. Like, I don't know how they've just suddenly discovered that all the things that we've been told couldn't be done previously actually could have been done.

We could have been dismantling things like sanctuary cities where you had all these criminals who went out and violated American Civil Liberties. Who took their lives and took their freedom and their innocence, like all these things could be handled previously. And I didn't realize that. I've got some local news that will show you exactly how bad it is when the status quo keeps winning. Anyway, here's Ed Martin first saying that keep, you know, hold them accountable.

That's what we're trying to do. That's why I'm trying to give you guys things to think about as you go out there in the world and engage with people and and ask certain questions. So what is a realistic expectation from people watching, myself included, who want criminals inside of the government arrested? I'm thrilled with the newest cartel guy going in prison. Yeah, I mean, throw the pedophiles in the Pacific Ocean for all I care.

All that stuff sounds great. But if people have committed crimes with either party for any reason with their government position, for me that's as serious as any crime on the planet because you're taking a responsibility and you're abusing people's rights with it. But is it realistic to think we're going to see government people go to prison in the next four years? Yeah, yes. The answer is yes. And and I, here's what I'd say #1 everybody who's watching and including you, Jesse, don't stop

being pissed at the speed. We need to be faster. So don't stop even at me, even at the good guys, Right. And, and everybody, I agree with it because we're running against the clock. The clock is used against us. The Article 3 courts are you. They slow us down. And, and I can tell you as a prosecutor, you're looking at this. You're saying this case is going to take 18 months and you're thinking 18 months from now?

How are we? Going to be able to win the battle for the future of the country. So my my be be mad about the timing. I just would say this, I'm in this and I'm not you know, I don't care about being spit at. I I mean it's it's you know, last week. But I can tell you we get I get threats against me and my family and all and everybody does it. It goes into this. And so at this level and where we are, it's worth it because it's now or never.

I mean, now or never is the only way that you can look at this problem. There's no reason to ever let up. You should not let the gas pedal up. We've watched that The left has done the exact same thing. And if you're being really honest, is it just the left? It seems like it's everybody. What about the people that are theoretically apolitical? We were told that the DOJ was apolitical, that the people that were at the front. OK, we just heard this, like in

that interview yesterday. Bongino and Patel are out there talking about it. Bondi, they act like they just, like, replace the people at the top and suddenly all the people at the bottom, we're going to fall in line. Where was this novel strategy for getting rid of illegal aliens and dismantling sanctuary cities? They're doing it in Los Angeles. This is Fox News covering something that could have been done from the beginning.

Why were they not trolling these databases from the beginning to get rid of the illegals that are actually taking up our resources? I mean, they're taking up our resources in the Bureau of Prisons, too, folks. That means that you're going to have to parole out and let people into this country. You're going to have to let out like violent folks because you can't afford to even keep them. If you've ever been in in federal prisons, they run out of

space all the time. They're constantly getting contracts with local prisons, with county prisons and state prisons to be able to put federal inmates in them. There's federal sections under all of those because the United States Marshall Service and then the BOP cannot actually keep as many people as we have in prison, probably because we're overrun by these a holes. Watch this. This story blew my mind, and it really did that this could have

been done from the beginning. In a Fox exclusive, you're watching an incredibly rare interaction as the jail in Los Angeles transfers an illegal alien to ICE custody. The sanctuary jurisdiction forced to hand this Mexican national over thanks to a first of its kind federal operation. With this operation, we're going to be neutralizing California sanctuary state policies. Bill Assaili is the US attorney in LA and the architect of Operation Guardian Angel.

California is the testing ground on this. We are one of the largest sanctuary jurisdictions. All right, guys, thanks for circling up. So how does it work? The Saley has created a federal task force made-up of ICE, HSIFBIDEA and ATF all working together out of this office in downtown LA. How's his criminal history? He's got the. Domestic violence. They scan these criminal databases daily to find illegal aliens in local jails who have been previously deported from the United States.

If they've returned to the US, they've committed a federal felony known as illegal re entry in a Salee's office will immediately seek a criminal arrest warrant against them, which unlike an ICE detainer, sanctuary jails can't ignore. We're going to flood the system with warrants for criminal illegal immigrants that are in county jails. They can ignore a detainer, but they cannot ignore a criminal arrest warrant. What do you remember that?

We were told that they, all these people got out because the sanctuary cities basically had the unilateral authority on whether or not they would acknowledge an ICE detainer. And we thought that was all there was. I had to look up the statue like right there. 8 USCII never did a Title 8 stuff at all. As a federal agent, that was not part of my, my purview. HSI does it, ICE does it.

The ERO folks that are out there doing enforcement removal operations from, from DHS, like that's their ball game. Eight. It's 8 USC 1326. Re entry of a removed alien. So it's a federal crime and they could have been using this statute all along and they chose not to. How can you tell me that there's good people in this, in this program?

Because if you think that this is the first time anyone's ever thought of this, I, I can guarantee you that they were enterprising officers that were out there figuring out that this was an option, that they were enterprising federal agents that wanted to use this, that they were AUS as that wanted to do this and said they had to wait until Trump 2 point O right now. And suddenly when we have the 12 million or whatever the heck it is that invaded our country in the last four years.

Now suddenly we're going to have a pilot program in a Los Angeles only like rolled out immediately. It works. It clearly works. If they cannot ignore it, then they should be doing it in Austin, TX. They should be doing it in New York City. They should be doing it up in Maine. It should go coast to coast. You don't need a pilot program. Throw everything at the things you guys said you were going to do. Unless it's all made-up in the first place. It makes me think that it is made-up.

That's the worst part of it. This is like some of the most black pill week. I'm going to show you something that the Kennedy rule. We're going to get into it. Like I said, no matter who you put as the FBI director, you end up with James Comedy. James Comedy went on, I think MSNBC the other day. I got a clip of that and he had no idea that he was causing such a stir. If you buy into the rage bait, if you were outraged at Jim Comedy, then you're following the laser pointer.

One of the analogies that I've used from the beginning of the show is that so often, and I'm guilty of it and you're guilty of it. We all get sucked into that laser pointer, which is getting shined around on there like a cat, and we attack it. We attack it. We think we've got it. And you look underneath your paw and there's nothing there. And who goes to jail? Nobody. That's how I know there's nothing there. Who gets held accountable? Nobody. Nothing.

What about Joe Biden? We're not even allowed to talk about Joe Biden right now because he has cancer suddenly, except he's had cancer probably for a long time based on the type of cancer that he's admitted to. Like we quite likely we can't look it up. How many? What's amazing is is that the amount of literature that you can scan through the upside of the Internet. The downside of the Internet is that it makes everybody a terrible person.

The upside of the Internet is that you have access to the collected human knowledge for all of history in like on your in your butt pocket or in your Faraday bag. In my case, you can go out and grab it. It's it's right there so you can find out how long it takes for cancer like that to metastasize and what are the odds of a doctor missing it in a man that age. Just saying they can't pull the stuff over your eyes. They just assumed that you were going to be disinterested.

And, and for the most part, they're generally correct. Here's Bernie Sanders, who I'm no fan of. I'm not a fan of him at all saying that it was always rigged. He's talking about the election when when he was selected, when they they didn't get to Hillary Clinton, but also has a sort of a harbinger of what happened with Joe Biden. Joe Biden was able to subvert

the will of his own party. And you got to think that a guy who is so addled and so confused and doesn't know where he is and is dying of cancer, he's still just a prickly, mean, like petty son of a bitch to use his own words. And we're going to show you some of that too. This is a left-leaning podcast. I think Andrew Schultz is hilarious. So like, I don't know why comedians now have such a a place in our political discourse, but maybe because they're all we're all just

dealing in clown world. Here's Bernie Sanders basically admitting the democratic process doesn't even exist on the people that quote UN quote fight to defend democracy. And I don't think he's wrong. And, you know, neither does anybody else when they listen to it. The problem I think a lot of voters had is like, they didn't even know if it was her. We didn't even know if Biden was president. We didn't even know if these

were her talking points. And we felt that over the last four elections, Democrats, we felt that we didn't have a say on. Who? Could be president, We talk a lot about the Republicans being autocrats and oligarchs and taking over democracy. But from the Democrat perspective, and there's I'm a lifelong Democrat, I felt like the Democratic Party completely removed the democratic process from its constituents. And then I think they need to have some accountability of that. No argument here.

I don't answer you. I mean, I wanted you to like 2016. I was like, this is going to happen. This guy's going to do it. And it felt like they it felt like they stole it from you. And I'll be honest, it broke my heart when you when you supported. Him look, but you have in the world that I live in, you got a choice and I mean, a lot of people, including my wife agree with you. But you know, you're down to a choice. Is going to be Hillary Clinton or is it going to be Donald

Trump? Not a great choice, but it ended up being him anyway. So why don't we burn it down? Well, because it's easy to say burning it down means that children are not going to have, you know, food to eat, that the schools will deteriorate, people will not have health care. And I, you know, I'm an elected official. I'm going to represent the people.

I can't turn my back on. But then could, could we not also say if ostensibly there hasn't been a fair primary for the Democrats since 2008, are they not also a threat to democracy? We often hear, fair enough. That is, that is. Yeah, I'm not going to argue

with that point. OK, so if Bernie Sanders is going to agree that Democrats are a threat to democracy and the Democrats are arguing that the Republicans are a threat to democracy and everybody is a threat to democracy, and then all of them are are showing us that they don't actually have a real choice, that the only way you do it was with a groundswell, I think people like Bernie Sanders. And it turns out, I think that people like Donald Trump as

well. The system disruptors who kind of come in and say the thing that they're that that everyone thinks but no one thinks they can accomplish. They're occasionally allowed to be in place because they're a bleed off foul for people's, you know, frustrations. So you have to have the possibility at least of

redemption. If there was enough outrage on the leftist side, I don't think you could have gotten a Hillary Clinton. I'm going to do a quick read for our folks over at my Patriot Supply. It's probably timely. If you guys are thinking like, oh, well, we're all screwed. For every person that's out there in the world that is telling you, well, I have hope in this person or I trust these people that I've never met.

If you trust people like Donald Trump, who you've never met or you've met for one second, he doesn't know you exist. Don't trust people. That's silly. You can be hopeful, but you should always probably row for the shore on your own. That's been kind of like my mindset. I don't know where I learned it. God helps those who help themselves. If you guys want to do that, you just plan ahead.

You just go, OK, well, things could get bad and I'm going to just hedge off the contingencies that I can handle on my own. One of the ways that we do that here at the Seraphin household, it's not an exaggeration, it's totally factual, is that we have stuff from my Patriot Supply. You can go to prepare like kyle.com. Right now, they're running the special. It'll change up in a couple

days. So this is your last couple days to do it if you want to get started with kind of an entry level option, if you're worried about the farmland getting bought up by the Chinese, if you're worried about people taking control of critical supply chains, if you're worried about the government not doing its job, which is all real things. If you're worried about fertilizer or animal feed or farming equipment, or if you don't have the ability to actually do your own thing.

One of the things you can do is give yourself a cushion and have your own personal insurance policy with My Patriot Supply. They're the largest emergency food preparation company. And the the deal that's running right now is 4 weeks of emergency food +4 free 72 hour food kits. So you're going to get 12 days of food absolutely free on top of your normal order. It's like almost 50% more. The upside is you can use it for training or you can stash it in places. You never know if you're going

to bug in or bug out. If you're going to travel to something, you might want to keep it in on on the road with you in case things go bad. I've been on the road when they shut down this country, by the way, when when they did the Covic shutdowns and it was bizarro. I don't know if I would have carried food with me, but like I wouldn't have not carried food with me. Thinking about it now, four weeks of delicious meals that last up to 25 years, 2000 calories per day ship fast and

free. You guys can check it out. We can't prepare what's going on in the world. We can only prepare what's going on in our homes. Prepare like kyle.com is how you get there. Again, prepare like kyle.com. No promo code required.

While we're doing that, let me just remind you guys, if you're watching the show, whether you're watching it over on YouTube, which many of you are doing right now, if you're watching on Rumble in our live chat, which you guys are fantastic and I always appreciate you all make sure you've given us a like make sure you've liked the video, share it with a friend. If you find something, give them a time stamp, say hey, check this out. This is something I hadn't thought about before.

Share with anybody like and you can do so by doing that on locals. If you want to support us financially, if you want to get in the community and do it for free, you can do that. It's Kyle serafin.com. And then last and certainly not least, our Spotify audience continues to grow every single month and it's Kyle serafinshow.com audio and video. You got two options there. So if you want to get into the live chat, YouTube and and

rumble are the two best places. But when it comes down to getting into sharing it, maybe that maybe that link is your, is your easiest way to do so. We're going to keep pressing onward. Bernie Sanders. I I mentioned Hillary Clinton and and the reason I mentioned it is because like I did that I ain't no ways tired clip the other day and it just lives in my head. I cannot believe organically that normal people, Democrats who are not crazy people per SE, like they may not agree with me

on politics. They may not agree with me even on values or what America is about. I can't I can't believe that if you walk down the street show 10 people this clip, they wouldn't also just cringe like 8 out of 10 of them. There's no possible way that this lady was the best choice, just like there's no possible way that that Kamala Harris was the best possible choice for running as a Democrat for president. We're not going to have a female president because of what those

two people did. I don't think that's a bad thing. I think that's actually great because I don't want anything like this near the presidency. But here's Hillary Clinton's advice for the first female president. And it all, of course, has to do with retarded leftist early 2000s patriarchy talking points and The Handmaid's Tale. If you can imagine, this is nauseating stuff. What advice do you have? The first female president of the United States.

Well, first of all, don't be a handmaiden to the patriarchy. Which kind of eliminates every woman on the other side of the aisle except for very few. Yeah, there's a few. Look, first we have to get there. And it is, you know, obviously, so much harder than it should be. So, you know, if, if, if a woman runs who I think would be a good president, as I thought Kamala Harris would be and as I knew I would be, I will support that woman, ha. Ha, ha.

If you could just carry some hot sauce in your purse, it would be great. Then you probably could get it. Shouldn't be that hard for a woman who's that unlikable. You're a shit actress. It's like, it's so gross. And it was all fake. It was always fake. You just heard Bernie Sanders say, of course he got removed. He was a far better candidate, even though I think he would have been terrible for America. Who's a better candidate?

What about this? I had to go back to the New York Times. This is a New York Times article that dates back to when is this July 19th of 2024, just as Joe Biden. Joe Biden, as you guys like to say in the chat, dropped out. Representative Nancy Pelosi of California, the former speaker of the House, recently told her colleagues in the California delegation that if President Biden were to end his campaign, she would favor a competitive

process. Oh, you mean like democracy and, and an open primary rather than the appointment of Vice President Kamala Harris as the new Democratic presidential nominee? You don't have to like George Carlin. But it is a big club and we're not in it. And apparently sometimes it just means that it's just happenstance.

The story goes is that Joe Biden got edged out and got basically muscled out by Nancy Pelosi. And as he stepped down, within 30 minutes, he nominated or stated that he threw his support behind Kamala Harris as an F you to Nancy. That's how petty and stupid it was because he wanted to stay on even though he was dying. How crazy is that stuff like that's how petty these people are.

The same guy that lied, except when he didn't lie when he actually told you the truth about having cancer in 2022. You guys have probably already seen this clip out there, but we're going to show you what a lying sack of garbage this was and how we've been playing blind man's bluff for for like the last four or five years. We just had some person out there just dottering around lying, people covering for IT, people acting like they didn't understand.

And then now, because of this revelation of something that he actually stated earlier, you're no longer allowed to question it because that would make you a bad person. You would be insensitive. Turns out some of us are just fed up with it and we don't care. Anyway, here's Joe Biden standing in front of like, I don't know, like a toxic waste dump or like a maybe this is just a beach in New Jersey. I don't know what this is, But he's talking about how he had cancer.

And then everyone's kind of like, oh, like, that's just a gaffe. And because it was a four lane highway that was accessible, my mother drove us and rather than us be able to walk and guess what? The first frost, you know what was happening. You'd had to put on your windshield wipers to get literally the oil slick off the window. That's why I had so damn many other people. I grew up have cancer. And why can't For the longest time, Delaware had the highest cancer rate in the nation.

Adjust those glasses homie because you weren't supposed to say that part out loud. Remember when they told you you weren't supposed to talk about your cancer diagnosis and then you did it anyway and then you went like really hope that nobody was paying attention? Those sunglasses might be the key to edit this out of the the live take and only play other

parts in the replay anyway. Super honest man Always was Joe Biden right there scratching his head trying to figure out what we got going on. Here he is talking about how transparent he was going to be. The real problem was always Donald Trump. Donald Trump was lying about his health. Meanwhile that dude rolls around like a like a 80 year old man on cocaine. I don't know what powers Donald Trump. Some people are just built differently.

I every time I go on somebody's program, they're like, damn, Kyle needs to, you know, schedule back on the on the caffeine. I'm just like this straight out-of-the-box. You don't need to give me anything. I didn't drink coffee for most of my life. I feel like Donald Trump is the same way. When people ask me why I say clean living in a pure heart. Maybe Donald Trump should start saying that too. Here's Joe Biden, who clearly didn't have a pure heart talking to himself.

Joe Biden versus Joe Biden versus Joe Biden. And so I guarantee you, I guarantee you I will be totally transparent in terms of my health and all aspects of my health. And when it comes to Donald Trump versus me, just look at us, OK? That's why I and so damn many other people I grew up have cancer. I've, I've laid every bit of the record out. Hadn't, hadn't, hadn't, hadn't a thing. Don't ask Trump for his OK?

I bet I laid it all out. Except the cancer part, just wandering around your hands out there, the American people just covered up and unable to see what's happening. Full blind man's bluff situation. But don't. We can't talk like that's the other rule. You can't use echolocation when you're doing blind man's bluff. You can just giggle and and if you actually want to be successful, you got to be quiet about it. We cannot have you talking about Joe Biden and auto pen and all the nonsense.

We can't do that. CNN told you that would make you very bad. In fact, the right answer now is to get this man space. He just found out 10 years ago that he was going to be dying of this thing 10 years from then, which is now. His medical condition now, his announced medical condition now, do you believe that silences or delays a lot of conversations about his, you know, last year and a half of his presidency? For now, yeah.

Well, I mean, I think those conversations are going to happen, but they should be more muted and set aside for now as he's struggling through this. Can you guys just please be nice to Joe Biden? It's time to be nice to the guy. He's having a rough time. OK, We can't talk about the fact that we got screwed over. When I think about what Uniparty is, when I hear the term controlled opposition, a lot of people think that means that you are actually controlled.

I think it doesn't always mean that. I think that controlled opposition, if it's done really well, the opposition doesn't know that they're actually under control. They're just limited in how far their reach can be. And that's what I'm seeing with the Trump administration. That's what I'm seeing. Donald Trump, he's gone out there and he's laid out some pretty good vision. I think a lot of things he said were the right things. Not all of them, but pretty

close. Generally speaking, I'm behind it. I can see where the things that he's saying that are getting traction are problematic to people on the political left. If you want to see what it looks like, it looks like headlines like this. They're very upset about Robert F Kennedy. The two people that I can see, maybe the three that are most upsetting to our leftist media, sort of the status quo that is trying to enforce the same things over and over again.

Remember, the enemy is the only one who tells you where they are strong and where you are weak. They're also the only ones that are going to complain about where you are strong and they are weak. They will lose ground. They're losing ground with RFK Junior, who they can, you know, consistently put at the headlines and try to act like

he's some kind of a kook. They constantly go after Pete Hagseth and you see major subversion, which that DoD is got a lot of money and it's a massive entity. And then the last one is what Tom Holman's been doing when it comes to just going after ice. Like, are they getting enough people? No, but I think he's facing nothing but headwinds. And we see that because why is that Operation Guardian Angel not rolled out across the entire country? OK, They show where they're

upset. That's why you see such a push back. That's why you know the name of Kilmore Abrego Garcia. Why the hell do I have to know the name of some illegal a hole MS13 guy who beat his wife in Maryland? Like, why would I know that guy's name? Why would you know his name? And you do because they made him a hero, right? So that tells you where the problem is. But the controlled opposition part of it is OK, we're going to just put a boundary around what you can and cannot accomplish.

You tell me if this is what you voted for. How many of us still remember that there was a guy named Kevin McCarthy who was the speaker of the House and he wasn't getting it done. And he wasn't doing the proper, you know, push back against Biden that they passed all the Biden spending. So we said we want we want a revolution on that. I was for it. No one for speaker of the House. Stop spending our damn money a

holes, like just knock it off. So that's where I was at and we got this guy Mike Johnson. And Mike Johnson appears to be like a nice man and Christian. And he looks kind of like Clark Kent if Clark Kent was effeminate instead of Superman, right? And he's got the little glasses, you got the swoop hair. He looks, he looks right. He says things in a very calm manner and he just, he just looks like the an accountant that would never bother you. I want you to listen to what he said.

He's putting his priorities on for the big beautiful bill that is being passed with a stuff full of garbage. Did they get the short act in there so we can take short barreled rifles and short barreled shotguns and decriminalize basic arms as as it says in the Second Amendment? No, Did they get the whatever it's called? I think it's called the safe act where you deal with like firearms and the fact that you should be able to own a suppressor, which is a freaking tube people.

It is the equivalent. If I bored a hole in this microphone, I could turn it into a suppressor and it could quiet down. If I, if I threaded the back of this with a with a die and then put it on the end of my barrel and put like a couple of things of foam around it, I would actually have a like a legal suppressor that would be

illegal. You can put a potato on the end of the gun and the ATF will come at you because it'll quiet down the shot even though you can't shoot anything you want to and possibly kill yourself because it might blow up on you. Listen to what Mike Johnson said. Did they did they solve the the problem of firearms or anything conservative? Or did they go after SNAP and entitlements because they think like by playing nice, they're

going to get Democrat votes? No, it's because the, the swamp, the the like the establishment always wins. Controlled opposition means you cannot be effective in the places that you think you are. It's why I don't actually agree that Ed Martin is going to see anybody prosecuted. I think that he might be in it for the right reasons. He sounds like it. And he also said don't quit.

The only way that you get it is enough push that you actually get Bernie Sanders instead of Hillary Clinton that you get enough outrage that you get Donald Trump elected when it's quote, UN quote, too big to rig and nobody like they, they're like, oh, well, we got Donald Trump. So it's over. These are the people that are actually out there quietly screwing over the American people by not putting conservative priorities for it.

They have all three. They have the two houses and the and the main branch of government to sign into law. Why are they not using the majority to do conservative things? Because I don't think they're actually conservatives, which is to say that rhinos are conservatives. The Republicans who are Republican in name only would be someone like me. An independent conservative who just aligns with it. It's terrible. This is the worst. And and Fox News takes it like that, like we're winning.

So let's go ahead and give Mike Johnson a chance to talk about the greatness of this bill. We're on track, working around the clock to deliver this nation, shaping legislation for the American people as soon as possible. Look, all eleven of our committees have wrapped up their work and they spent less and saved more than even we projected initially. This really is once in a generation opportunity that we have here. So you'll heard you heard there the update, the Budget Committee

will reconvene this evening. They'll get that through the committee and the plan is to move it to the Rules Committee by midweek and to the House floor by the end of the week. So we meet our initial or original Memorial Day deadline. Now, look, Shannon, it's very important for everybody to understand why we're being so aggressive on the timetable and why this really is so important. This is the the vehicle through which we will deliver on the mandate that the American people

gave us in the last election. You're going to have historic savings for the American people, historic tax relief for American workers, historic investments and border security at the same time that we're restoring American energy dominance and we're rebuilding the with the defense industrial base.

And we're ensuring that programs like Medicaid and SNAP are strengthened for the US citizens who need and deserve them and, and not being squandered away by illegal aliens and persons who are ineligible to receive them and are cheating the system and. Are you shitting me? Like seriously? Didn't you just listen to what he just said?

The amount of insanity that just got crammed into that little Fox News hit there is so staggering #1 They're going to give you historic savings by charging you less taxes. In other words, they're going to take less of your money, but they're still going to take plenty of your money. They're going to codify the tax cuts of 2017, which should have been far deeper. The goal is not to, like, go back to what we did a few years ago. It should be less and less. What happened to scaling back

government? No, And they said we're going to protect SNAP and the benefits to people who are not who, who and Medicaid. And we're going to take it from illegal aliens and give it to Americans. What it has the possibility of being generation shaping legislation. And so we we, we're going to spend another $10 trillion I think is what Tom Massey said.

I think maybe $26 trillion. It's going to spend a ton more money because there's nothing conservative about any of these Republicans. It's never been about that. And they and they cut things like actual civil liberties, the things that we hear Harmony Dylan kind of suddenly prioritizing on. There's some really clear language in our Constitution. Like I'm not, I'm not a single issue voter anymore. I used to be only a guns voter.

And then I saw what they did with the First Amendment when I was working for the Bureau. And I realized, like the entire Bill of Rights, it is spilled. It's still supposed to be a leash on the government. We are well over the boundary of what that leash is supposed to allow. Somebody dropped the damn leash and no one's even trying to grab it right now. And they theoretically have the

ability to do something. Let me read you the key part of this article that comes from CBS News that explains to you why House Speaker Mike Johnson, Louisiana Republican, can only afford 3 defections in a floor vote if all the members are president voting given his slim minority majority. Rather the Democrats are all expected to oppose it. Is that because the Democrats don't want to spend more? No, they want to spend even more than this crazy amount.

And you hear people like Tom Massey going out there like, hey, guys, not only are we going to have a problem by adding to the federal debt significant amount in the trillions, we're also going to be growing the debt as it continues on. And still the liability of that debt is going to increase because we already owe in the 30s. Does nobody understand money at all or do they just not care? And that seems to be the case. They don't care what you want.

They don't care at all. In the same way we're seeing in the Texas, the Texas Legislature that they were supposed to go and do something about property taxes because Texas has pretty high property taxes. They're not going to do it. So don't tell me that quote UN quote, we won or we're in charge. We're back now, baby. The answer is it's a combination of this, this thing that, that, that was called the, the woods rule or the woods laws from Tom

Woods, Woods law #3 all right. No matter who you vote for, you always wind up getting John McCain. It's Republicans who want to spend money and have bigger wars and, and are crappy people that are abusive and they abuse your trust because they go out there and they talk like a medium game. I listened to John McCain speak at my college graduation in 2005, and my dad and I made a pact that if he ever ran for office, we would not vote for him and I would still not vote for John McCain.

This Woods law #3 has a corollary and it's called the Kennedy law. It's Kennedy law number one. I'm sure I'll get some other ones. I won't tell you Kennedy is, but if you guys have been around the show long enough, you know, no matter who you nominate for the FBI director, you always wind up getting Jim Comedy. Why is that? Why is it that the status quo is undefeated? Maybe because we don't have politicians that do stuff like this.

Here's Ron Paul, he understood back when we were still doing VHS recordings. I know this is kind of like a played up version of this, of this little conversation he's having, but he's not wrong. These people are legislating things that they have no business even stepping into because none of them take their oath to the Constitution serious. No one has the right to tell you you can't publish a book because you might libel somebody.

Nobody tells you you can't own an automobile because there might be an accident. And nobody should tell you you can't own a gun because it might be misused. If somebody is liable, they have recourse in the courts. If somebody causes an accident with an automobile, this can be dealt with in the courts. The same way with a gun. If a gun is misused, it should be dealt with in the courts. Unfortunately, government doesn't enforce the law against

those individuals who commit violent crimes. 70% of the crimes in this country are committed by individuals who have prior criminal records. This gun sure looks deadly, but it's not the least bit deadly. Unless I. Pointed at someone. And pull the trigger. In the words of Thomas Jefferson, he said that we are endowed by our Creator with certain inalienable rights, and among those rights is our right to defend ourselves, defend our family, and to defend our property.

Unfortunately, in every society there are those individuals who will resort to force to get what they want. It's impossible to have a policeman on every corner to protect us, so therefore it is very important that we maintain the right to defend ourselves. This seems like a no brainer. It's just like there's there's there's nothing to it. The government is more than happy to come in that that gun is not dangerous in and of itself. Unless it's in like the hands of an ATF agent.

Then you might get shot or probably your dog will too. Right? That's the joke. It's not a joke, there's actual people who get killed because of it. Why? Because they have the suspicion that something happened and they showed up at your house instead of calling you when you've been otherwise a law abiding citizen your entire life.

But maybe you legally bought too many guns of the same variety and they think that you're out there selling it on the street to make extra money even though you have a decent paying job. Why not call you? You're not dangerous. Or they can kick in your door at 6:00 AM and see if you show up with a gun so they can shoot you in the head. And while we speak about that, let's press over to this. Here you go, Jim. Comedy, 8647, The shells on the beach. All right, so here's the deal.

Whether it makes you angry or not, because we talked about this, this is constitutionally protected speech as set up by the Supreme Court. Our system does describe what is a true threat. This is not a true threat. It is also not prosecutable because even if you do believe it's a true threat, which I think you're mistaken on, you're not going to be able to get him. And no reasonable person can convince you in a jury that he already knew.

And then all he did was lie because he said it and you can't prove what's in his mind. Jim Comedy is getting exactly what he hoped for, which is that today his book is dropping. So for those of you who are interested in getting FDR Drive, knock yourself out. You can go get FDR Drive, a crime novel, a novel about domestic terrorism and right wing demagoguery. It's out today. So Hooray. Congratulations, Jim Comedy, you did a great job of of getting your book out there in the in

the public sphere. It's a reminder that you should own guns because people like Jim Comedy run the agencies that have the people with guns. You cannot trust government, period. No one's coming to save you. It's on you. This is the guy that used to be in charge of federal law enforcement when I signed up. And I actually bought it for about the first time. I heard his first speech. And after that I did not. I went on Larry Elder and talked about this as well, but here's a

little clip of him on MSNBC. Just he can't even believe that people are like, how did we get here? I'm just walking on the beach with my wife saying inflammatory things and trying to sell my book. You are back in the middle of a political firestorm. Yeah, for walking on the beach with my wife. So I don't know how we ended up here. Never occurred to me that it was any kind of controversial thing. But that's the time we live in. So take me back to the walk on

the beach. We were walking on the beach. We went to the beach to prepare for this week, which was the launch of my book, and to think about the book and to prepare, to ask, answer questions about it. And we were walking back towards the road and we saw in the sand someone had arranged shells with numbers. And Patrice, my wife, said, why would someone put an address in the sand? And I said, I don't know.

And we stood over it. And I said, you know, I think it's some kind of, like, political message. And she said, you know, 86 when I was a server, she did a lot of work in restaurants meant to remove an item from the menu when you ran out of ingredients. And I said, well, to me as a kid, it always meant to leave a place to ditch a place. I said, that's really clever. So then she said, you take a

picture of that. And I did, And I posted it on my Instagram account and thought nothing more of it until I heard through her that people were saying it was some sort of a call for assassination, which is crazy, but I took it down. I don't. Even if I think it's crazy, I don't want to be associated with violence of any kind. But I do really appreciate the the multi $1,000,000 advertising dollars that I got to do and sit on your mainstream media thing.

He has plausible deniability. You can't say otherwise. What he just said sounds completely reasonable to a normal person that might listen to it that doesn't think that James comedy is like a chronic and and pathological narcissist. And I was just looking right now while this thing that clip was running. I wanted to hear what was the difference between sociopathy and narcissism because I do think that these things run deep in the folks that run our

country. You know, if we're not in the club, to be in the club, you have to absolutely love yourself and you have to have one thing. And I didn't realize this because I'm not a like, I'm not a psychology major. My wife probably already knew this. Sociopathy and narcissism are both personality disorders. I knew that. And they involve a lack of empathy. That's the thing my dad always told me I needed to develop when I was a kid. Empathy. What is empathy?

It's not sympathy. I'm good with sympathy. I can look at you and I see that you are in pain and I recognize that you're in pain and I don't like that you're in pain. Empathy is something that my wife has in spades. It's something that she has to actually be really cautious

about. It's my job to protect her empathetic heart because empathy is the thing where you look at somebody and see that they're in pain and you feel their pain as they do. If you're a sociopath or if you're a chronic narcissist, you're unable to look out there and see other people's pain and feel their pain from themselves.

And you might be able to actually weaponize things like like sympathy, where you know that they have pain, you can recognize their pain, you feel bad that they're in pain, but then you decide you can still do it anyway. Maybe you have no sympathy either. But a lack of empathy is really problematic. And it took me to this space here, which I've been holding on to this for a little while, too. There are people out there that

are trying to run this country. I think Donald Trump is probably a blip in the radar, especially when you hear people that that talk to him and like him and know him. I think he's surrounded by a bunch of these sociopathic or narcissistic types. That seems to be the case. That's why he's always sort of, he is controlled. He's opposition, but he's controlled not by his own, you know, choices, but because of the people that are around him. They keep him in a pretty contained bubble.

There's only so much you can do as one man. It's not his fault, I don't think. Honestly, I wouldn't blame the guy for it. How do you go out there and move something so big? You can affect individual things, You can solve individual federal agencies, but if you're in charge of all of them, at some point you have to trust people. And you're surrounded by people like Jim Comedy, who's a really good liar. That was a truly plausible,

believable thing. If you don't know that Jim Comedy is a liar and you haven't heard him say that before, he probably practiced that, if I had to guess. It comes off sincere and honest, and he's not a guy that wants to have anybody get hurt, would he? That doesn't sound like a man that would run the FBI. So theopathy.

And we're going to get to Kennedy's Law, I promise you, because I do want to close with a big finish for you because once you see it, man, we're going to destroy some some faith in what's going on right now. For any of you have not believed that our law, our battle to take over the FBI is over. It's over, folks. It like it's all over. It's already happened. And I'll, I'll say it again. I think Dan Demongino is either running for office or he's back

at a podcast desk. Like before the end of this year, I'll be Christmas time. He has to make some announcement. This is a man on the Nate Friedman show, which I'm not familiar with, talking about another person who we think is probably sociopathic, who lacks empathy. We won't diagnose him, but we'll say there's a lack of empathy that seems very profound.

Gavin Newsom. And he's somebody that you could also see stepping into the shoes of, like, a Hillary Clinton, a Joe Biden, a Barack Obama, a Kamala Harris. Like, he seems like the heir apparent to this kind of stuff. Of course, he's related to Nancy Pelosi. So that's even more juicy. Here we go. Can't understand how anyone would vote for Gavin Newsom. He's like clearly a sociopath and has a thing about this

today. Imagine rising to the position of Governor of California, the 6th largest economy in the world, the most beautiful, one of the most beautiful places in the world, and having your legacy be that you created a crime ridden. Bankrupt shithole. This place had a surplus 2 years ago so that would disqualify. Like Gavin Newsom would not be employable in the private sector with that kind of performance. But these people continue to vote for this stuff, and I've thought about leaving.

Multiple times but I love it here. I don't want to. So I hope that this disaster might change things and wake people up.

I. You could switch some of those words and that would be every one of you who are repent registered Republicans talking about the things that go on with the Republican Party and what they've done with your faith and your trust, what they've done with your money, what they've done when they promised you one thing and they did something else with it. What is the difference between the description that he just gave of of Gavin Newsom and the

way that we should be feeling about a Mike Johnson or John McCain for that matter? This is another wild story. This is a lady who is legitimately out there telling you that they're buying votes of people who can't afford it. You're taking your money and they've apportioned it to the same thing that Mike Johnson thinks is important, paying off things that people who cannot afford them have. Do I think that medical debt should be what it is?

No. But is medical debt a problem simply because of policies like this where they've given things away to people that didn't earn them and have no right to it that they've made, you know, illegal aliens have unlimited access to, to ambulances and, and, and emergency rooms and so on? It is, that's the reason, like the reason your medical bills are so high is because you're paying four other people who refuse to pay at all. And now we're going to just make sure that you don't have to pay.

So the people who didn't even go to the freaking doctor are going to have to pay for it. Guys like me are going to have to write that check people who haven't been to a doctor in 10 years for all of you that are healthy, if you didn't earn it by putting your life on the line with the VA. And I do think that we should take care of our vets. Now. You can pay for everybody. That's by the way, what your health care insurance is doing anyway. Check this lady out.

They're going to cut checks out to like 130,000 people because why not? It's just money and we just made it up. Starting next week, 134,820 LA County residents will receive one of these in the mail with no strings attached. Inside is a letter telling them that Los Angeles County has eliminated their medical debt. Completely gone. And you get your medical debt eliminated and you 134,820 people. I think I saw that number correctly.

OK. Like, that's why you have a communist shit hole in what used to be one of the most beautiful places in a blood red area that elected Ronald Reagan. What happened in my lifetime, we lost California. It is not a livable place for someone like me because they hate things like Ron Paul and guns, and they hate things like your ability to worship God. They think that they should be able to tell you not only how to spend your money, but whether or

not you can even go worship. Because right now we're doing crazy stuff. We're saying that we're not allowed. You're not even allowed to go into a church right now. God forbid. How crazy is that? All right, you guys want the real worst thing out there. This is the worst thing. This is like, this was devastating to me last night. It made me kind of like chuckle because I I I have like a a sick appreciation for bad news. Here we go. This is Kash Patel from yesterday.

And then I'm going to play you something that will probably rattle some of you. And if it doesn't, it's going to at least confirm what you heard yesterday is correct. Look, the FBI is 38,000 when we're fully manned, which we're not in the National Capital Region, in the 50 mile radius around Washington, DC, there were 11,000 FBI employees. That's like a third of the workforce. 1/3 of the crime doesn't happen here. So we're taking 1500 of those

folks and moving them out. Every state's getting a plus up. And I think when we do things like that, we inspire folks in America to become Intel analysts and agents and say we want to go work at the FBI because we want to go fight violent crime and we want to get sent out into the country to do it. And that's what we're doing in the next 369 months. We're going to do that hard. And you know, I didn't know that I was going to do this, but I'm going to announce it on your

show anyway. This FBI is leaving the Hoover building because this building is unsafe for our workforce. And we want the workforce gave up a big nugget we want, but we want the American men and women to know if you're going to come work at the premier law enforcement agency in the world, we're going to give you a building that's commensurate with that. And that's not this place. We're going to give you a building that's commensurate with the premier law enforcement agency in the world who

nominated them that they did. And did you hear what he said about why they got to go? It's because the building is unsafe and they're supposed to have 38,000 people and they don't. So are they going to fight for their headcount? Yep. Are they going to fight for a new building? Why is it dangerously unsafe? What makes that building unsafe? I've been in that building. I don't think it's unsafe. It's ugly. It's like what they call

brutalist architecture. It's really like it's a blot on the on the otherwise beautiful buildings that can exist in Washington, DC, but it's not it's not dangerous, it's old, it's not a palace. Like nobody gets excited about it. Kudos to the folks over at the oversight project project. It's at it's your Gov. It's your Gov over on X. If you guys want to follow them. Mike Howell shared this with me last night.

This tells you at all, no matter who to nominate to be in charge of the FBI, you get James Comedy. So what are your colleagues saying about this? That you're going to get out of the Hoover Building? We need a new headquarters very, very badly. New headquarters proposal that we have. This FBI is leaving the Hoover Building force gave up a big nugget. We want. For about about a decade now, the FBI has been working on plans to move various functions and headcount to.

Out of the National Capital Region. If our people are going to be safe because this building is unsafe, be effective. And if we're going to be good stewards of the taxpayers money and being good stewards of the taxpayer dollars, we got to get them all in a modern, safe, efficient FBI headquarters. We're going to give you a building that's commensurate with that and that's not this place. And so there is a big sum asked for in our budget to support that.

We're always going to fight for our personnel and for as much money as we can get, force gave up a big nugget we want. So what are your colleagues saying about this that you're going to get out of the Hoover building we need? Just let that sink in for a second. Those words that Cash Patel said did not come from Cash Patel. They came from the FBI that's been running the FBI director, which is what I've been telling you guys for what, 2 years now?

The FBI runs the director, The director does not run the FBI. And the only thing that really is supposed to do implementation is the deputy director. But that deputy director is excited about a big nugget. There's a big nugget right there. We're going to go do the thing that the FBI has been asking to do for a flippin decade. You think anything can change and the director is mouthing the same talking points, the exact same damn words.

We're willing to bet and we're going to do some research on this. I already showed you a couple weeks ago, maybe 2 weeks ago, Cash Patel was talking about how do you defend the FB is, you know, success and accomplishments right now in this era. Oh, you know what you do. You tout recruiting numbers.

Chris Ray did it, comedy did it, Mueller did it, Cash Patel did it. All the last four directors have done it. I bet you there is an elderly black lady who's working in a senior map of position somewhere in the Hoover building in some useless job that writes up these little speeches, talking points, and then some senior executive gets it and vets it the same way that the one who was in that desk before them did. And they've all gone forward and

said, Yep, that's a winner. We've got increased recruiting. This building is unsafe. No further information. No, like is it full of black mold? Is it, is it going to fall? Is it structurally unsound? It has a premium Starbucks in there. People, I've been in there. The courtyard, it has some, you know, some weeds coming up through the, through the concrete. It's not unsafe because of that. It's not even a freaking trip hazard. Like what makes it unsafe? They have a CrossFit gym that is

open air on the outside. There's a track that runs around the courtyard so you can do sprints and you can do pull ups and all kinds of stuff. No one uses it. My buddies and I went over there, we'd jog over to go do it, then we'd go do some workouts, then we'd jog back and it was almost always empty. Really cool space. Like if you guys had that in your office, you would use it. I wouldn't. I hate working out. The Hoover building is unsafe. We're always going to fight for

our headcount. We don't even have our 38,000 people strong. They all say the same thing. Kennedy law number one. No matter who you nominate for FBI director, you always get jam comedy. OK, if that doesn't prove it to you, I don't know it will. But we're going to find more. I'll just continue to do it. But we're going to add to Kennedy's law. We're going to give you more evidence as we go on.

There's no other way to do it. And if you guys want to know, this is the same in every single agency because as we showed you the other day here, this is that Laura Logan picture from Austin, TX. Apparently in the federal courthouse, United States Marshall Service has the same exact problem. Why does the US Marshall for the Western District of Texas not have the actual senior executive, the chief of the the executive on the wall? Why is it still Biden and Harris?

These are reasonable questions that reasonable people should be asking. It's not good. Let me throw one last little problem out there cuz I saw this. We're going to cover it maybe more tomorrow. We talked a little bit about terrorism. We had a pretty nice thing with Sarah Adams, we had Peter Johnson, we had Boone from Benghazi, a couple of others talking about like multimodal multi site terrorist attacks and the vulnerabilities the United

States has. Tell me that this doesn't look like a probing of of exactly what sort of penetration you can get done. Do you need to take down an airliner to make people scared of air travel or do you just need to make something happen on the ground even Why are you getting a DoorDash and how many American born U.S. citizen people are driving around doing DoorDash and then driving onto

an airport? Or is it like another one of these Jordanian like penetration leak test You just watch this and tell me if this doesn't bother you for a terrorist threat, not for anything else like interrupting air traffic watch. But I already turned that on. Hold on one second I. Responded to a car driving on an O'Hare tarmac over the weekend. Imagine this. CPD now says the vehicle belonged to a very confused food delivery driver who accidentally entered an area.

Posted his off limits to non airport personnel. Where was he trying to get? That's what I want to know. So the driver was not sighted. Was the driver from America? Because that's the only question I have when I look at a story like this. And of course, if you're doing, you know, Chicago news, the odds of you answering that are very, very low. All right, that's what I've got for today. Put those things in your head. There are real threats out there.

Prepare yourself for them. If you guys want, you can always go and get yourself squared away with my friends over at Shield Arms. That's what I'm carrying every day. I'll just kind of plug them. lastlyshieldarms.com promo code Kyle, save yourself on soft goods. If you want to have a response kit in your car, we do that here. I have their magazine releases. I have their their magwells, I have their magazines. I've got their expansion kits.

I carry a Glock 43 X. There's actually one sitting here on the desk behind me, which I'll show you right now. If you guys look over here, right there on the desk, boom, there it is. OK, that's one of them. I have two of these guys out there kitted up with the shield arms thing, so check them out if you guys want again, promo code Kyle link in the show description. Check us out on YouTube at Kyle Seraphin. Check us out on X at Kyle Seraphin.

Follow us on Rumble. For those of you that are really appreciate it, I'm not going to leave you without a palette cleanser. I will tell you too. We'll just flash us briefly on the screen here. If you do want to write to the show, and some of you do for whatever reason, don't send me live animals, but some of you guys want to send postcards and letters and interesting things.

One of you sent me like a treatise on how to make brisket and I appreciate that because I'm now interested in smoking meats. I like doing slow cooking. I don't know if I want to do the the investment in a big piece of equipment, but I got your note and it was very thoughtful. My wife loved it including color pictures of meat, which is a great way to get my attention. 9073 W state Highway 29, suite 110, box 5 O 9, Liberty Hill, TX 78642.

If you guys want to hear it again, you can just go back and look at it. Let's do a pallet cleanse because we need one. How about something kind of funny? This is great advice if you're a spouse. If you are a man and you have a woman in your life, this is the way that you get her to act properly sometimes. Pro marriage tip, If you find that your wife has become hysterical and angry, the worst thing you could do is tell her to calm down.

If you really want to get a word in and have her not speak for a little bit so that you can talk, just let her know that she is starting to act like her mother and you didn't sign up to marry her mother because if you did, you'd have a clean house and a home cooked meal. Michael No. Michael no, I don't know why. That's my favorite part. They do this act, this little kid, they must have a fun marriage because she obviously is on board with hearing these

things. And I wonder if he actually surprises her and she does the the faux outrage or if that's something that they've scripted out to. Either way, it's cute. Have fun with your spouse, have fun in the world. There's really probably only one person in the world that you can totally lean on and that's the person that's in your house. You better have that person in your corner. So go do that.

Go out and have a fantastic day. We're going to move you over to the American Radicals. If you guys are listening over on Rumble. If you guys are listening over on YouTube and you want to join us on Rumble, you can do that too. If you guys want to see my buddies, Steve, friend Garrido Boyle, until tomorrow, God bless you. Have a fantastic day. I'm sorry to throw some black pills at you, but you should at least know what the Kennedy law is so we can go out there and

act accordingly. All right, have a fantastic Tuesday y'all. Thanks for listening to the Kyle Serafin show, streamed live weekdays on rubble.com/kyle Serafin. Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth Social and Instagram at Kyle Serafin.

Transcript source: Provided by creator in RSS feed: download file
For the best experience, listen in Metacast app for iOS or Android