Are you familiar with FBI Special Agents Kyle Serpent? I'm familiar with the name. Is that. Yes, I'm familiar with the name, familiar with the name, familiar with the name. Let's bring in Kyle Serafin. He's the FBI whistleblower who helped expose government censorship of our First Amendment rights. Now, we only have this memo because a recently suspended FBI agent called Kyle Serafin brought it to the public. And we're grateful that he did. Kyle, thank you so much for
joining us tonight. He's the host of something that strangely is called the Kyle Serafish. Kyle Serafi. I can't thank you enough for speaking out. I knew you guys were out there, and I knew it was just a matter of time. But you got a lot of guts put in your face and your name to this. You're doing a service on behalf of the American people. And from the bottom of my cracked and broken heart sometimes, thank you very much. Take a look.
Behind the curtain with a real whistleblower and American patriot, Prepare to embrace the uncomfortable truth because this program has no time for comforting lies. Here is civil liberties enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI agent Kyle Seraphin.
Well, hello my friends and welcome to the Kyle Seraphin Show. Today is Thursday, it is November the 21st, and I want to thank you all for being here and joining us. We're going to be talking about something that I'm calling Joe Biden's parting gift, but I think it goes back a little further.
It is a instinct that the Democrat Party has, and those who have been serving in Democrat offices as they took over the presidency, one of the things they like to do is screw things up on the way out the door. It's a fundamentally unamerican way to operate. And it is a very dishonest and dangerous thing to do in the world. It's dangerous to our youth. It's dangerous to our economy. It's dangerous to our sort of
sense of national cohesion. But it is something that the Biden administration looks like they're doing, and it's also something that the Obama administration did the last time Biden was part of an administration. You get it, There's a lot of danger out there. We're going to talk about all that stuff in a second post. I just want to make sure you guys know you can follow us in
various places if you can. If you're so interested, you can follow us on Rumble. That's easyitsrumble.com/kyle Serif. And you could also follow us at our new X account and that's Kyle Seraphin pod. It's just my name with the word POD for the podcast on X. If you want to follow us over there, you're going to be able to find the podcast and some clips that you're not going to see other places. So make sure you are doing that.
Follow us over on X if you can. And lastly, if you want to keep track of all the things that we talked about during every day, I always post all the articles and some videos and things on the back end at kyleseraphin.com for locals. So you guys can check out that. There's also an entire community of people who think probably the way you do. If you listen to this program and you guys can interact with them, I think you'll to kick out of it.
And last but not least, I'll just let you know the Kyle Seraphin show on Spotify is a place where you can download the episodes. You got to get the app and do it, but you can watch our videos without any interruptions. The ads are only the ones that I read and I try to make them a little bit more fun than maybe what you're used to seeing in some other places. So check us out there as well.
Let's go ahead and say thanks to one of our sponsors while we're at it, and that is our friends at Catholic Vote. You can follow them on social media while you're over on X or if you're on true social, a Catholic vote. It's just spelled out, all Catholic vote. One of the biggest things that happened in this last election season was a Catholic vote turned out, not just my friends, a Catholic vote, but the actual voters who are in fact Catholic turned out in favor of Donald Trump.
And not the least of which that came from some of the work, the ground roots and the grassroots efforts of the folks at Catholic Votes to follow them. If you want to get a fantastic e-mail each day, that is not going to upset you. It's simply going to inform you. They don't really try to sell you much. They'll give you a little bit about the Catholic history at the bottom, but the top probably half dozen or so posts are going to be relevant news stories to
you. If you care about faith and family and freedom, catholicvote.org is where you go get the loop, and I recommend it. It's something I get every morning and I'm glad that I do. I'm glad that we get to work with them because they're seriously great people. All right, let's get right into this Biden parting gift, the twilight of the Biden administration coming at us, and it's not good.
So the top story that I had yesterday that I didn't get to really finish out and I wanted to is that they, the media is focused on one thing while the Biden administration is doing the other. Let's talk about the one thing they're talking about, which is that he's going to break the federal government. Can he do that? You're seeing on the screen a picture of Elon Musk, who obviously has started this thing called Doge and it's going to be
operated. 2 very, very wealthy men, Vivek Ramaswamy and Elon Musk trying to figure out can we make the government more efficient. And there is something ironic about having an agency set up. It turns out it's going to be a non governmental agency, which is something of political left seems to love unless it goes against what they want to do.
ABC is lamenting the possibility of being able to RIP this thing apart and being able to do the thing that Donald Trump kind of promised in his first round, which is that he was going to turn Washington on its head. That is what the spin is about. And so I think that the Biden response to it has been to get us more and more entrenched in sort of the classic governmental boondoggles and mistakes that continue to happen and continue to sort of plague the American pocketbook.
If you want to be real about it, This particular article saying that Donald Trump's pick to lead the administration are talking about abolishing entire federal agencies, firing 10s of thousands of federal workers at a time. This is obviously the thing that people wanted him to go and do
permanent. Washington seems to be the enemy of the irregular American people, the sort of plumbers and mechanics, the people that do construction work, the people that have calluses on their hands and work outside, the people that have hard and tangible skills, right? That's what Americans wanted. That's why you got Donald Trump. It's an FU to the establishment, to the people that wear suits and try to make decisions but have never created anything in
their life. They've not created jobs, not real jobs. They've never created a revenue stream. They don't have a product or a service that anyone wants to go out and do and spend their money on. The federal government should not be the single biggest employer in the world. The United States federal government has something like 3 million employees. And the question is why? I get that it's a federal jobs program.
I understand that a lot of these people wouldn't have jobs without it, or they would have to go actually do something of value. Maybe that's this, this the the fundamental disconnect and the thing that people really hoped that Donald Trump would bring is kind of a business person who has created jobs, who has created an industry or a space where people want to come in and work that has paid out people's
paychecks and supports families. The federal government thinks they do, but they only do so as long as there are people that are actually earning an income like you who are paying for it. It's very weird. In any case, for some reason, the political left, and I think the reason is, is that they're dependent on this establishment status quo if they want to continue to exist in the way that they do.
And we're getting all of the signals that people don't want this from viewership disappearing from MSNBC and CNN and so on and so forth. Some of these have some of these shows that are on mainstream media. They have it takes millions of dollars to produce them. They have these huge control rooms. They've got dozens of employees. They've got cameras that are
north of $100,000. Meanwhile, we're doing it here and giving you at least as high quality and maybe better information half the time, and we're doing it for a fraction of the budget of 1 of their cameras on an annual basis. What does that tell you? It's pretty wild and that's why they're focusing on things that don't matter. That's why they're going to be really up in arms. Here's another little story that came from the New York Times at
a legacy media outlet. What does Andrew Klavan like to call it? A so-called newspaper or a former newspaper? The New York Times is being mocked because they went after RFK Junior. You guys have probably already heard the story. I'm going to try to put it in a larger context here though. The story was is that they're really mad at RFK Junior because
he's not a doctor. It turns out most of the people in the Biden administration and many of the people in their cabinets had 0 credentials to be hired on into that space. What did Pete Buttigievs had to do with being a Secretary of Transportation other than he's a smart guy, he's a weird guy. He's a effeminate, nerdy, policy wonk kind of guy, but he was a mediocre mayor in a tiny little town that doesn't really matter
on the national scale. So maybe give RFK Junior, who spent the last 20 years of his life as kind of a crusader on food and health and actually in his 70s, looks like an absolute stud. That's why we played that video the other day of sort of the joke of him going out and protecting you from your own bad decisions, drinking Diet Coke or Coke 0 or whatever is in, you know, the aspartame stuff. They're they're mocking RFK Junior about his take on fruit
lips. Because what you do, if you want to be a good sycophant of the regime is you hone in on a micro piece of information and you say that this is not accurate or it requires context when in fact it actually is accurate. So the the paragraph in particular that they kind of honed in on this one. And it's just a it's a microcosm for what is going on in our media right now, defending sort of the status quo and attacking anybody that would come in and change. It is as follows.
This is a a piece from the Daily Wire reporting on it. The article quoted Kennedy when he was asked in an interview with MSNBC, quote, why do we have Froot Loops in this country that have 18 or 19 ingredients and you go to Canada and it has two or three? Now, if any of you have ever lived abroad, you do know that food is different there. And generally speaking, it's not as colorful.
It doesn't look as much like a poison dart frog that's living in the Amazon rainforest, but it probably has more ingredients that you can pronounce and understand. And so they made fun of him. The writer just said that Kennedy was wrong on the ingredient count because they have roughly the same number of ingredients and that the cereals in the United States and Canada are roughly the same. They're roughly the same, but then they have to be followed on
by the following. This is a direct quote saying, but the Canadian version does have natural colorings that are made from blueberries and carrots. OK, just put that in your head. Canada blueberries and carrots, by the way, the UK and, and other European nations have the same kind of things. They can have, you know, natural flavorings that are made from natural items. the United States products have red dye #40 yellow #5 blue dye number one as well
as this one. I'm not even sure if I can pronounce it, but it's butadolated hydroxycholine. I remember using like tolene products. They were like organic solvent that you used to be able to pull things out when you were doing extractions in my organic chemistry lab. So that's good to know. It's known as BHTI. Remember as a kid reading it and finding it that it was always in every single food that I ate. And I was like, oh, BHT. It's just, it's just a thing
that they use for freshness. And when you're nine years old or 10 years old, reading it on the back of the box, you think it's refreshness. That must be important. And then when you're an adult and you're like, I don't need whatever this is, either give me a fresh product or I don't want it. Why in the hell are we buying things that are not possibly fresh? Toluene is a is a is a organic solvent used in all kinds of different processes and various different derivatives of it.
It doesn't seem like a thing based on my use in the chemistry lab where I had to have like a mask over my face and wearing goggles. It doesn't seem like a thing that I want to throw in the breakfast cereal to feed my kids and my kids who have probably eaten like maybe two or three boxes of what we call sugar cereals in their entire lives.
You know, we went out and got a couple of, I actually did like one of those dad moves where mom was rehabilitating from having baby #4 and I went to the grocery store and I let them all pick out like whatever the most wild cereal they was. Because you could eat a little bit of poison in your life, it turns out, and you'll be OK. Most of us did. But is that the kind of thing that when I go out there and I'm shopping for ingredients and yes, I do.
I, I look and I go, oh, it has 100% organic milk and gargum and carrageenan, which is a derivative of like this, like seaweeds. These are thickeners and products that are necessary for not the actual thing that you want. I regularly have to turn away products that should be otherwise fine. They have nice packaging. They look pretty. They might be in a glass bottle, but they're garbage. And that's what RFK Junior talking about. And that apparently is something that very much upsets the
mainstream media. Why would that be? Is it because they're advertisers are cereal companies? Is it because their advertisers make a lot of money by making cheaper and less healthy products that are ultra processed? You've seen defense by like Time magazine, which I think is up for sale right now because they are also going bankrupt.
All the wild stuff that you're seeing pushed by these, by these editorial boards, they kind of have like a financial stake in it. We had a funny conversation behind the scenes the other day, a favorite Blaze reporter of mine asking, you know, what do you think the position is of Julie Kelly on RFK Junior? Because RFK Junior has been very clear that bioengineered foods and putting pesticides and other sort of dangerous things in the products that we eat is not good
for American health. Of course, Julie Kelly, who is now ultra MAGA person, gave a bunch of money to Democrats, shows up on Bandit all the time. She sort of is conspicuously absent on talking about the cabinet, probably because it interferes with her husband's business because he's a big AG lobbyist. And so you just see there's these all these overlapping things, these people, they've conflicts of interest. It's the upside of being what we
do completely independent. You'll notice the people that support us are sitting here on the on the table with me. It's a it's a cooler company. It's a, it's a patriot food company that says, yeah, these may not be the most healthy things in the world, but we put them out there because you have the opportunity to hold on to them and not be starving. And there is a place for ultra processed foods.
Anybody who's ever eaten Mr. ES or has been in the military and had or if somebody who's gone on long camping trips knows you might need that thing in an emergency, but it's not like the default food that you're going to eat. It's certainly not something you live off. How interesting. The other thing that's kind of fun to watch is this, this question that they're worried about doge, They're worried about the federal workers.
Why is it? Well, because the federal workforce is pretty reliably Democrat voting. They basically vote for a living. They vote for the agencies and they vote for the people that are going to keep them in a paycheck, even though they're kind of like not necessary for most Americans. The joke that we used to make is that you can shut down the federal government. Most people wouldn't notice. It's the reason why I was in the sort of like camp of no one for
speaker. I don't need a federal government to function because I've seen what the federal government did in 2020. And so did you, by the way. You just didn't know that people didn't show up. And during that 2020 COVID sort of insanity, which was rolling out all over the place, I happened to see it from Washington. DCI got to see exactly how few people were what we call essential workers in the federal government. They all got paid, by the way,
but they all went home. And one of the things that DOGE is going to try to do, it's something that the private industry has been doing, some of you may have experienced it yourself, is they're trying to drag people back into the workplace. We did a story about this maybe a couple months back, talking about how many federal buildings are left vacant. It's like paying farmers not to plant their field with farm subsidies.
These buildings are paid mostly not owned by the federal government, but actually just rented out their office space That is paid for by the federal government. It's kind of a subsidy to people that own property in DC, but they're not actually working in those spaces. So we spent all the money to set them up. And you've got maybe somewhere between 10 and 25% of federal workers actually filling up the spaces. And then they're trying to build new headquarters for places like
the FBI. They're trying to to get new buildings that are cleaner. Why? Because everyone wants to work in a new building. It's nicer to work in a nice, pretty place, isn't it? But why? And who pays for it? It turns out when you put people that run businesses that are trying to make a profit, that are trying to scrape by and turn some sort of good or service into something they can return to their shareholders in the form of dividends or profits.
Yeah, they they may not think that makes a lot of sense. And it doesn't make a lot of sense to most Americans. Most Americans have this kind of idea of fairness. And it says if you're going to get a paycheck, you should show up and do the damn job. I had an experience the other day which I think we talked about here on the program where I called in to get help on a package that was marked delivered but wasn't delivered from the United States Postal Service. And it's kind of a semi
government agency. It's a weird animal the the Postal Service, but I got a girl in the background who and had her fire alarm that was going off. Now, I'd never heard the chirp as we call it. I've never heard the chirp of a fire alarm go off in a government building without it being addressed. Because that's something that the facilities people can
handle. And that's what's something that you'd have these sort of workers that sit there with their space heaters on and their blankets and watching Oprah on TV or The View or whatever the heck it is they watch. Those people are very, very acutely aware of their own safety. Even if they're not doing their job, they're going to make sure other people do their job, including changing the batteries on the fire alarm. But it turns out at your home, you can do whatever you want.
And so we've outsourced these people to do, like, pretty critical jobs, like call center work for the federal government. You want to be a private industry, and they don't want to rent out the call center space. They want to send calls to your cell phone and have mediocre things where there's a dog barking in the background or you can hear kids playing. Like, whatever. I may or may not choose to use
your product. We're talking about animals that we all pay for and are subsidized by federal tax dollars. And that seems absurd. So this crackdown on remote work, one of the easy things to do is say your job is no longer in Washington, DC. And the other thing you can do, which they've also lost their minds about, is say you got to come back into work. I'm going to play you a, I'm going to play you a little clip of the kind of people that I would like to see eliminated
under all of this. And it's going to play into a, it's going to play into a bigger, a bigger story about what's going on in the DOJ. This is Merrick Garland. He's one of those people that's going to be leaving. And he's kind of telling the folks that have been doing a terrible job at DOJ that have been attacking American citizens that have been following orders when they should have been questioning them, that they're the heart and soul.
It's the reason that the, the, that Trump got in, I think is that they want to see this changed. They want to see this dismantled. They don't want to see more of the same. Here is an old man who sounds like an old woman crying about how the DOJ is the people that work there are the heart and soul of the agency that the institutional knowledge of it. Just take a little taste of this. You tell me if you want more of this or if you want to see
disruption. Now, for myself, I may be coming to the end of my tenure at the Justice Department, but I know that all of you will continue. You will continue in the department's mission, what has always been its mission, to uphold the rule of law, to keep our country safe, and to protect civil rights. You, the career lawyers of this district, the career lawyers of all the US Attorney's offices, the career all lawyers of the Justice Department as a whole.
You are the institutional backbone of this department. You are the historical memory of this department. You are the heart and soul of the department. You are the Justice Department. I could not be more proud of you, and I could not be more grateful for all of the work that you have done to protect the American people. Thank you. Is he about to cry? Because I felt like I was going to cry listening to him. You are the Justice Department. You are the institutional soul.
Why is it that so many of them are scared and getting ready to disappear and walk off their jobs? Is it because they've been doing stuff like this? So this is what was inevitable, And this is the thing that I've been most worried about. January 6th, defendant is convicted of conspiring to kill FBI agents investigating the
capital attack. There are plenty of FBI agents that are garbage, and some of whom probably should be tried for some really aggressive abuse of the statues that they've been abusing against others. But what I don't want to see is people writ large killed, especially by people that don't know what the hell they're talking about. This is ACNN article, which I think is it's worth remembering.
It's worth talking about. Is that this Tennessee man was found guilty of assaulting a police officer. It's been my contention that people that were violent on January 6th, they should probably be dealt with.
I've actually sort of tempered my thoughts on this because at this point, the way that they went after these people, the way that Merrick Garland and the heart and soul of the Justice Department, the institutional knowledge in the backbone of the Justice Department went after people. It's so incongruous with the way that they handled the people in the BLM riots that went on for months in 2020.
They just didn't do it this way. And it's sort of understandable that if you put someone to a decision for all their chips and you find somebody that has been convicted of assaulting a cop and they go in and they come out of, of the Justice Department or they're waiting on a sentencing hearing and they don't see any other options. Then they are eventually going to turn to the thing that men do when they are backed up into a wall, which is to turn to violence.
This guy, Edward Kelly, 35, was found guilty in a District Court in Tennessee conspiracy to murder federal employees. Again, it's an ugly, ugly look. Even though I understand where the instinct comes from. I don't want this. I don't want this for Edward Kelly. I don't want this for the people that work in the, the, the Knoxville office, The FBI, which is a, my memory serves, I think
it's a, a resident agency. So it's a satellite office outside of Nashville. It's also interesting that I couldn't find the criminal complaint on this. For some reason, DOJ didn't didn't process it. But I do have the public release of what they had to say. And it sounds like they had a cooperating defendant.
So I don't know if that means that they found somebody early on that said, hey, I've got this guy and he's talking about doing something really dangerous and you know, I'm willing to wear a wire kind of thing. Or if they actually just put a cooperating defendant in that was there for some other reason and turned him. But there are recordings of this guy saying some really dumb, stupid, dangerous stuff, proof that he had a kill list of various different FBI agents.
He was involved in surveillance. Some of this stuff doesn't sound like what normal people would do. It does sound like getting wrapped up in kind of the playbook that we talked about here a lot. So I'm kind of going to reserve judgement on the on the DO JS case. But he was convicted of it. And there are recordings of them saying things that are objectively terrible like that he wanted to assassinate the FBI employees in their home and wanted to follow them to places
like movie theaters. I don't know any FBI agents that are going to movie theaters. Most of us tend to have kids and that kind of thing. You know, that was I, I can't remember going to a single movie theater the entire time that I work for the Bureau and my wife and I had a few minutes to ourselves. It was it was rare. In any case, he's going to be sentenced in May of 2025.
So he may get a life sentence for that, but also at the same time get pardoned for the underlying reason under Donald Trump. Again, desperation makes people do various things. And it turns out that, see, this is the other piece of it. It says it was it was processed by the Joint Terrorism Task Force out of Knoxville, which again, makes me feel more like the playbook. We're going to reserve judgement for a minute. But Merrick Garland and the way that he ran this agency pushed
Americans over the edge. It pushed them into this place. And it's been my ongoing fear that we are going to see a justification for much more aggressive enforcement when their answer should have been back the hell off. We're seeing it in a lot of the the cases of these judges that are not slowing down. They're not willing to take a moment and and breathe while we wait for new priorities to come in because the American people voted and they spoke.
And that is not just happening on the domestic front. It's also happening on the, let's say, the international front. So we're going to cover down on that as well. The biggest thing that's budding right now is the potential conflict with Russia, which we spoke about a little bit the other day, but we're going to talk about a little bit further. Probably a good time for us to break over here, say thanks to our sponsors.
And also, as we talked about preparedness, it's worth considering folks, you can go to prepare like kyle.com if you want to check this stuff out. It is. It's the best value per calorie, which is, by the way, how I chose to go with them in the first place. I even priced them against Costco. So consider that. All right, let's get into the weeds of the ugly thing. I want to go back in time a
little bit, if you don't mind. This is something that most conservatives are aware of, but I don't think a lot of people on the left are black. Jesus, Barack Obama had this to say. And this is an article that only goes back to 2023, and it's referencing a conversation that Obama had in 2020 when he was speaking to the various Democrats at some sort of AI don't know. He was in front of some kind of audience talking privately.
And the story is he said, don't underestimate Joe's ability to F things up. And Barack Obama was, in fact, right to be wary of Joe Biden's ability to F things up. This was written in 2023 by Michael Goodwin. There's evidence all over the place in the Biden administration. And you're seeing on the screen a picture of what that's Solinsky sitting along there by Joe Biden. They're holding the flags for some reason. We love to put the Ukrainian flag at the same level as the American flag.
It is a, it is a subservient nation that exists only by our, you know, by our charity. And that seems problematic. Now, Obama did his own sort of parting gift for the first Trump administration. And some of you may not be all that aware of it. We have talked about it on this program, but I want to touch it a little bit further.
This is it. This is coming from, I believe this is from the New York Times. The Obama administration is spent to expand the sharing of data that the NSA intercepts. All right, the NSA, the National security and Agency, has broad, sweeping access to American telco and lines and is able to
exploit information. We had an NSA embed sitting on my floor when I worked counterintelligence for the FBI in Washington, DC. But we've had George Hill on here, who's a former NSA analyst, and then afterwards was an FBI analyst, the senior sort of supervisory type that handled counterintelligence and counterterrorism.
And he said the single most dangerous thing that the Obama administration did was on the way out the door, the parting gift to trump #1 which is that they allow the FBI to access a database of things called Seven O 2 FISA, Seven O2. FISA is incredibly dangerous because it doesn't require a true FISA warrant. It's a very, very light lift in order to get it. Do you know who's in favor of that kind of stuff? Mike Rogers, potentially the
next FBI director. If you believe what the leftist media and the mainstream media are reporting, there's a reason why we are only cash here. We're only cash because cash understands the danger that exists and that FISA is not in fact, a law enforcement tool. It's an intelligence tool. It's used for developing intelligence and you must keep intelligence tools away from law enforcement agencies unless you want what Black Jesus gave us and that is called a secret
police force. The FBI dramatically went downhill from the time that I started there. And if you didn't work there not only in the post 911 era, but if you didn't work there in the post Obama era, then you don't know what we're talking about. We're talking about a thing that Mike Rogers accurately stated is expressly against the law and it's done every single day. It's called reverse targeting.
And that is to say that if you were a criminal investigator, as I used to be, if your job is 1811, which was what my job title was, there is no such thing as a as a federal special agent. That's a category of people who do a thing known as 1811 criminal investigations.
The weird thing is if you take criminal investigators and you train them investigative minds that are looking for crimes, that want to prosecute people who have done bad things and you give them tools and tell them they can only use them in one way, but they could possibly use them in a way that's illegal and nobody would really know about it.
And by the way, your boss is telling you to use it in a way that's illegal, but telling you that it's not, that the training is inappropriate, that the safeguards and the and the guardrails are non existent. I am a pretty smart guy, folks. I'll just go out there on a limb and just tell you that I can objectively say it based on all the test scores for a long, long time. And I got training on how to handle the FISA tools that we got.
And I did my damnedest to do them properly, to use what we call mitigation techniques properly. And I went through a FISA audit somewhere in 2018, beginning of 2018, and after good faith efforts in order to properly follow the mitigation tactics and techniques that the Bureau teaches with the mediocre training they have in a very complex software system called DWS, the data warehouse system. I had no ability to do it properly.
I sat down there with the chief division counsel from the Washington Field office and an outside lawyer from DOJ. We sat there and we watched, how did you do? And they went, let's do this query and see if you minimize it properly. And I went, oh, OK, this should be no problem. I remember doing this boop and it popped at the results and it was wrong. And I went, oh, and they said, well, that's OK, sometimes you
people get things wrong. Let's see, every single damn instance that they audited my ability to mitigate as you're supposed to do, to mask Americans and so on, failed. Even though I tried, even though I did the best I could and I was doing what I thought was correct. There was no hands on training. It was like, welcome to this incredibly dangerous tool. Go do whatever the hell you want with it. And if you're trying to do it the right way, you still might not get it right.
Do you know how scary that is? The only reason that was possible is because of this, because the Obama administration allowed the sharing of the NS as raw data, not analyzed, not mitigated, not not masked information. Straight up, I would look right into your e-mail box if you were in my list. And then we would go out there and we would search because you're told, hey, go find the
people that are doing espionage. Find the people that are in contact with your various targets, whether they be from Iran or China or Russia or take your pick. And when you would go out there and try to do that, that's actually illegal. And if you ask questions about it, they would tell you that it wasn't because you had authorization for some reason, even though you knew you didn't, even though you're reading in the media, right?
Then reverse targeting, going after Donald Trump and all of this stuff, the Carter Page stuff. How crazy. This was one of those parting gifts. This was Barack Obama effing it up prior to Trump 1. And so not to be outdone and not to be just doing it on the domestic level, Joe Biden seems to be doing it at an international level. Here it is. This is coming from my buddies over at Catholic Vote. It's a story they put out
yesterday and yesterday's loop. But you can go find Russia says that Ukraine's use of American made missiles signal a new phase in the war. What would that phase look like? We covered it briefly, did we not?
Imagine arming your neighbor, training your neighbor, equipping your neighbor, giving them ammunition, giving them a rifle scope and then showing them how to point it at the neighbor across across the streets, house into the windows and letting them know when the most likely time was that it would be effective and then going I have nothing to do with the fact that they're using it. It turns out the Russians don't
think that. And here is one of their foreign ministers stating this is on RT saying y'all you can't just arm the other team and act like you have no say in it. The Russians rightly take it as a kind of an affront to to the piece that we would have between each other. If long range missiles are going to be applied from Ukraine into Russian territory, it will also mean that they are operated by American experts, military experts.
And we will be taking this as a qualitatively new face of the Western war against Russia and will will react accordingly. Uh oh, they said they'll react accordingly. The other interesting thing is that Americans couple weeks ago elected Donald Trump, which was a vote for peace. One of the things that he was campaigning on is no new wars, which is the thing that happened under his first administration, right? No new wars, a timetable and a
plan to get out of wars. So the Biden administration has now got a couple of wars going. They're brewing one in the Middle East, which we keep seeing. We just had the international courts issue a arrest warrants for people like Netanyahu. I don't have a lot of faith in what goes on to The Hague. It seems very political. It seems very left-leaning. And we've also got this sort of escalation going on right now in Ukraine in a very, very scary way. So the Ukrainians decided to
take the US up on the offer. They were authorized. The question that I always have too is did the Ukrainians say, hey, hey, can we, can we fire long range missiles into Russia and piss them off more? Or did the United States say, Hey, we gave you all those missiles, it's time for you to use them? We sent you special advisors and United States Special Forces operations troops to come in and teach you how to use those. We showed you how to target them. We gave you the munitions.
We, we moved them in. We physically moved them to you because they had no ability to get them themselves, right? And it's time for you to start using some of our munitions because it's time to feed our war machine. Is that what happened? Because it seems most likely. Do you guys want to know what it looks like when this is what it looks like when Russia doesn't like it, When they decided that long range missiles supplied by the United States is going to
develop a warning system? What you're seeing on the screen right now is absolutely terrifying. There's no audio to it. Those are ballistic missiles with multiple re entry warheads hitting a Ukrainian city. How scary is that? We're looking at a clouded sky, looking through the night from a distance. Security camera footage of some kind and we are dropping massive, massive ordnance coming out of the sky.
Multiple re had one single missile and they're just showing the Russians are just saying, hey guys, do you know who you're messing with You're messing with the wrong people. There is a European perspective on this. We'll cover that in a second. Let's cover the United States perspective. Wouldn't it be nice if we had somebody in office that could reach out that actually had an established relationship. I listened to something on Joe Alban's program which I think will air today.
It was a, it was Vladimir Putin through translator saying, you know, say what you like about Donald Trump, but he took a bullet to the head and he stood up and he, he revealed his core character, which is one that is honorable and masculine. It is an alpha male type attitude. It is the opposite of what we see Joe Biden do, isn't it?
So wouldn't it be nice if the somebody who had a mutual like stood on mutual terms of respect instead of looking at some frail doddering old man that's going out there and going to accidentally lead us into World War 3. Trump had something to say about it too. We're going to do Cash Patel talking about it. You know, the guy that's totally unqualified to lead things because he doesn't know what he's talking about Per to the
left. Then we'll get into a European perspective who kind of have some skin in the game if they're going to be really close to a nuclear war. And then we'll go and see what Donald Trump said because he's been releasing more and more of his videos and they're pretty good. And it's going to lead us to kind of like a final thought, which is that the Biden administration keeps doubling down on some of the most
retarded ideas. Like DEI ought to be able to call the Putin's of the world, who has the largest nuclear arsenal outside of America and say, yo, we are not going to war and you are not invading the Ukraine. I mean, just think about the power of someone who's in the position of the Oval Office to effectuate that call and say, uh, uh, we're standing up for global peace.
And now the mainstream media wants to attack Trump for having the audacity to have a relationship with these guys and avert another World War. I mean, these people are the biggest hypocrites in Washington, DC, and what they see is, as you alluded to, their nest egg, their contracts being taken away because Trump is saying we're not going to another war. It seems pretty obvious that this is about money. This is about a Piggy Bank.
This is about making sure that the things that they've profited from, I know that those of you who are Dan Bongino listeners are very familiar with the insane and the Ukraine kind of thing and the follow the money. This is a very common theme for those of us that are kind of watching from the outside going, like, what the Hell's going on over there? Why is it that all this money gets put in?
Why are they driving Bugattis around when they ought to be theoretically trying to defend their nation? Because this corrupt practice has been pretty, pretty ubiquitous for at least. Oh yeah, going back to the Obama era, right. One of those other little fun things. I like listening to the cash say it. I like listening to what Donald Trump has to say about it. And can we just talk about one thing real quickly about Cash Patel that never gets mentioned.
He would be the first non white male to take over the FBI director position. Shouldn't the the radical like gender and race focus left just be 100% behind a cash battelle? Wouldn't that be a big deal for them? None of us really notice it because he's just a bro Because he's wearing a hoodie and he's got a MAGA hat on. Like we don't recognize it but don't Don't the political leftist like just relish the idea of the first Indian American being in office? How racist are these people?
They always, they always let you know who they are. All right, here's Donald Trump's take on this, which I don't think is wrong. And it's worth noting he doesn't say it perfectly. He's kind of like he's doing that kind of Trump thing where he kind of meanders off a little bit. But one of the things he gets into is about DEI, which is crazy and the fact that we've become sort of this godless nation, not wrong. But here he is talking about the prospect of World War Three.
Are we the closest ever? Maybe so. We have never been closer to World War Three than we are today. Under Joe Biden, a global conflict between nuclear armed powers would mean death and destruction on a scale unmatched in human history. It would be nuclear Armageddon. Nothing is more important than avoiding that nightmare. We will avoid it, but we need new leadership. Every day this proxy battle in Ukraine continues, we risk global war.
We must be absolutely clear that our objective is to immediately have a total secession of hostilities. All shooting has to stop. This is the central issue. We need peace without delay. In addition, there must also be a complete commitment to dismantling the entire globalist neo con establishment that is perpetually dragging us into endless wars pretending to fight for freedom and democracy abroad while they turn us into a third world country and a third world
dictatorship right here at home. The State Department, the defense bureaucracy, the intelligence services and all of the rest need to be completely overhauled and reconstituted to fire the deep Staters. And put America first. We have to put America first. Yeah, Isn't that just simple
stuff? He goes on to talk about the fact that the those people are trying to institute a godless policy, that they are out there destroying sort of the the boundaries of the United States where we should and shouldn't get involved. All that stuff seems totally accurate to me. And here you have reporting from CBS talking about Russia firing missiles at Ukraine. It's kind of a little warning. That warning comes in the form of destroying an entire city. Some of the pictures are
absolutely insane. The claim was is that that that it was under an ICBM. The CBS is saying that it wasn't an ICBM. That doesn't necessarily mean that it was a a nuclear ICBM. They have the ability to send ballistic missiles that have different payloads. Sounds like they were conventional payloads. Pretty terrifying, multiple re entry vehicles, multiple strikes getting in and just being destructive.
It's time to realize that although Russia may not be a first rate power and the same way the United States is, it has all of the vestiges of the Cold War. And we keep getting told this thing that the Russians are something they're not. The Europeans don't want this. By the way, isn't it funny? The Europeans don't want anything to do with this? Because having this on their doorstep equals a lot. Like, look, look at the map
you're seeing on there. Look at all the different sort of Central European and Eastern European countries that are surrounding it. A tactical nuclear strike is not going to be something that is going to leave the rest of the areas unaffected. And so we keep having these sort of debates about it. I love listening to people's
perspective on this. Here's a a professor of political science having a discussion saying essentially what we talk about here all the time, that the United States never left the Cold War even though we thought we would. And so this conflict is not what is being presented by. There's a fundamentally disingenuous nature to it. And it seems like Donald Trump's is sort of like the mitigating
factor. He's sort of bringing a a softer touch to it, understanding that the Russians actually have something to argue for and it wasn't just some random aggression. Here's a little taste on a little historical perspective coming from a TikTok video, but I found it useful. This is not an attack by Putin on Ukraine in the way that we are told every day.
This started in 1990. February 9th, 1990, James Baker, the third our Secretary of State said to Mikhail Gorbachev, NATO will not move one inch eastward if you agree to German unification, basically ending World War 2. And Gorbachev said that's very important, yes, NATO doesn't move and we agreed to German unification.
The US then cheated on this already starting in 1994 when Clinton signed off on a basically a plan to expand NATO all the way to Ukraine. This is when the so-called neocons took power and Clinton was the first agent of this. And the expansion of NATO started in 1999 with Poland, Hungary and Czech Republic. At that point Russia didn't much care. There was no border other than with the Koerningsberg, but other than that there was no
direct threat. Then the US-led the bombing of Serbia in 1999. That was bad, by the way, because that was a use of NATO to bomb a European capital, Belgrade, 78 straight days to break the country apart. The Russian. There's more to it, I will post this over on our local channel if you guys want to hear this. It's a pretty decent little like synopsis of a lecture. the US keeps getting involved in these things. And yeah, look, 1999 who was in charge?
Clinton, the neo con sort of push that you've got the Obama allowing certain things to happen, moving further when someone says, hey, we're not going to come any closer. Think about the the the type of aggression. We see these in like law enforcement videos all the time. It's like, don't take another step closer. And then they do and you're like, I'm going to have to shoot this guy and you're like, just stay where you are. Put your hands up and they're like, yeah, yeah, yeah, I got
you, I got you. I'm going to keep coming closer. They test, test, test. We are the ones that are kind of doing the aggression on this. We being NATO, we being the people that are benefiting from sort of conflicts and wars and sending all of our munitions around, doing military training exercises. I don't want that. Turns out they kind of let the bag, the cat out of the bag when you ask him point blank, what's the most important thing in this
war. Here is Kern Starmer, who's the PM of, of Britain. He's like, it's Russia's fault. And the biggest deal, the most important thing is we must support Ukraine. I'm going to show you another thing that Biden's doing to, quote UN quote, support Ukraine to the detriment of Americans in just a second. Let's do this little video first, kind of enterprising reporter asking the quick questions. To do that, just quickly, Russia's also threatened nuclear
escalation. Are you comfortable with that when people at home are watching this, worrying that you could put Odin at risk? Well, it's very important. It's very important that we're steadfast in our support for Ukraine. Russia is the aggressor and Russia, Russia has to be the one that makes the move to stop this war. It's within their gift. But we must support Ukraine. It's impacting not just Ukraine, it's impacting the rest of the world, including the UK.
It's your message to viewers back home that there will not be a nuclear war because that is what Russia is threatening. My message is that we need to ensure that Ukraine is put in the best possible position. This is 1000 days of conflict and there is a very high cost if Russian aggression is seen to pay off. Oh, there's a very high cost. If it pays off, is it going to be the nuclear war? Yeah, The very high cost is is you guys keep doing this thing
makes no sense whatsoever. Incredibly dangerous. It bothers me. Let's hear what the actual Europeans have to say. You know, the ones that might actually have to deal with the conflict. How about this? Because they understand it needs to be peace. And we are in a very dangerous time for the next few days. Here.
Here comes a major concern, although the American people have decided, although it is a clear interest of the European people as well, that peace should come back to Central Europe, but I think that the two months ahead of us up to the 20th of January are the two most dangerous months comparing the last couple of decades. Why? Because those who have carried out.
This failed pro war strategy are not only not giving up, but they try to create a situation until the 20th of January where peacemaking will be extremely, extremely complicated their. Goal is definitely to make it impossible by the 20th of January to make peace. Look at the measures. Allowing the long range missiles to be applied against the depth of the territories of Russia. Allowing the mines to be
applied. And the High Representative of the European Union is calling for the European Union itself to allow long range weapons provided by European countries to be used against Russian territories. While European Union does have nothing to do with that, since European Union does not deliver weapons, it's only member State. Who do so? You get it. The people that are sitting in power are trying to provoke this
thing. And then the last little FU gift as Biden starts going towards the twilight is that the administration has been moved. They are trying to forgive $4.7 billion in loans to Ukraine because all the stuff we gave, some of it was given in loan format and some of it was given in simply military aid. They're trying to forgive these things. How does that benefit the United
States? How are you A, doing things that are for the best in the American people's interest when $4.7 billion of our money is forgiven to a country that got itself into its own conflict, that has been pushed along, sure, by CIA cutouts and so on. And now you want to make sure you forgive our money? You want to give it away even though they've already given away 10s of billions of dollars? Funding bill passed the United States Congress in April.
It included $9.4 billion in forgivable loans for the economic and budgetary support of Ukraine's government. And it's forgivable as long as it signed off on it was appropriate, a total of $61 billion, six 1B with a billion dollars to help fight the full scale invasion of Moscow, to fight the full scale engagement. Moscow launched, sorry, in February 22. Two, remember 2022. We're going to come back to that in a second.
So if we've taken steps to outline the law to cancel these loans, we said that it could be done and now we're going to do it. Now Congress could block the move sentence due to vote on it on Wednesday. It's important that everybody shows up and does the thing. You can let your Congress people know. You can let your senators know. Republicans like Rand Paul, frequent critics of this support, are trying to get it.
Of course, senators from both parties seem to support the aid programs to Ukraine because it's most important, most important that we support Ukraine, nevermind what's going on with Americans. I found this little thing too as well. This is an older article coming back from October. It says in the twilight, his turn, Biden greets the global audience weary of war and weary
of US politics. And So what they've done is they've allowed it to basically turn and focus on Donald Trump's cabinet and they are trying to do the crazy stuff. The other thing that was sort of big news that happened yesterday was the conviction and maybe the like kind of the nail in the coffin on one of the reasons why I think the Biden slash Harris administration failed in the re election attempt. And that was that this porous and open border caused a real
problem for them. Nobody has been a better representative. The family of Lake and Riley who was was hideously murdered by a guy named Jose Ibera. Jose Ibera was convicted yesterday. I'm going to tell you something about that in a second. First, just for this for a moment, it actually feels kind of good to listen to This is the jury reading the verdict in English to a non-english speaker sitting in our courts.
Again, we give them due process at a speedy trial and we paid for his defense, but he was dead to rights when it came to the conviction. And you guys will hear that in one second. We're going to go back and talk about how Joe Biden honored the the memory of Lake and Riley and her family just after the video. One malice murder, I find the defendant guilty. Count 2, felony murder, I find the defendant guilty. Count 3, Felony murder, I find
the defendant guilty. Count 4. Felony murder, I find the defendant guilty. Count 5. Kidnapping with bodily injury, I find the defendant guilty. Count 6, Aggravated assault with intent to rape, I find the defendant guilty. Count 7, Aggravated battery, I find the defendant guilty. Count 8, obstructing or hindering a 911 call, I find the defendant guilty. Count 9, tampering with evidence, I find the defendant guilty. Count 10, Peeping Tom, I find the defendant guilty.
I certainly will allow both sides to look at this if you want to do it. Yeah, guilty. All counts now. Interestingly enough, the DA down there decided that it would be bad for illegal immigrants because those are the people we care most about in this country, just like we care most about giving our money to Ukrainians. It would be bad for other illegal immigrants if they sought the death penalty. So he's going to be going probably looking at life in prison and multiple concurrent
sentences. So be it. We'll see how that works out for him. You shouldn't have to ask for the inmates in a prison to provide the kind of justice that family probably needs and wants. This is a predator. He's going to be in good company. He's going to be in a prison system where he can go and enjoy that sort of thing. Well, the sad thing is that we keep seeing these sort of local types obstructing and attempting to obstruct, keeping the keeping, keeping the wheels of justice at Bay, right?
We're seeing mayors, we're seeing local district attorneys and so on. They've all kind of done this. Even Californians are a little bit less crazy than they used to be in the era of Trump 2.0. They actually voted against a a comprehensive proposal in California to raise the minimum wage, which would go to, of course, to illegal aliens as well. People who are working like nominal jobs. Imagine if your first job paid
$18.00 an hour out of the gate. That's what they were looking to do in California. It's $16.00 an hour right now. They wanted to raise it by $2.00. And finally, people in California even said no to that. They said yes to criminalizing actual felonies, like stealing a bunch of stuff. And they said no to raising the rates on jobs that are not supposed to be able to feed your family. In the meantime, the question has to come up, what's going to be different?
How's Trump going to do it differently? You mentioned, we mentioned earlier, he was talking about like a godless society and the people at the neocons doing this thing. Here's Tom Holman who's saying exactly what he thinks should happen to politicians that want to get in the way of the mission of mass deportation, which should happen. And I think this is very interesting. Real.
Quickly what happens to mayor? Or local Police Department chief that is under a Democratic leadership that obstructs ICE in your federal agents that are helping get these deportation of what happens to them. Well, first of all, if they want to help us get the hell out of the way, we're going to do it.
If I got sent twice amount of resources to that city, that's what we're going to do. If if they would give us access to the jail, that would mean less agents in the community for them pushing back and not let us into jail. It just means more agents are going to be in the community. So they're hurting themselves. Finally, I'll say this, they need to educate themselves. They need to review this title 8
United States Code 1324 triple. I read about that and don't cross that line because it is a felony to harbor and conceal an illegal alien from ICE. Read the statute. Don't cross that line. Wouldn't it be nice if we had a Justice Department that would go out there and prosecute 18 USC 1324 that he's talking about? I think so.
Here's how Joe Biden, Joe Biden went ahead and celebrated the victory in our court system or let's just call it the administration of justice of someone being found guilty after being let into this country illegally by his bad policies. Joe Biden says on Twitter, quote today on Transgender Day of Remembrance, we mourn the transgender Americans who lost their lives that were taken in horrific acts of violence. Every American deserves to be treated with dignity and live
free from discrimination. Today, we recommit to building a country where everyone is afforded that promise. That was tweeted out at 6:00 PM Eastern Time yesterday. No mention of Lake, Lake and Riley. I went and looked at his page. The only other thing that he brought up is the other piece of the culture of death that he's been out here fostering, he said.
Today I had the honor of awarding Cecil Richards the Presidential Medal of Freedom. With absolute courage, she fearlessly leads us towards the America that we say we are. A nation of freedom, a nation free to murder its babies. Cecil Richards is the former president of Planned Parenthood, so he celebrated it by talking about trannies and talking about baby death because that's the person that we have sitting in the office. The American people are sick of it. They're tired of it.
They're I think they're tired of being hit. When you say that it wasn't the woke left that lost the election for them, I think that you're out of your minds and I'm going to give you an example. There are two examples. One comes from Jaguar, which is a British car manufacturer. You would think it turns out they're actually just an exporter of what was it, Frappuccino Fragine. Also, Jasmine Crockett talking about DEI hires.
I wanted to play something. She's screaming about racism and I wanted to give you kind of the side by side what what Americans should be seeing every single day. If we had an honest media, they would be playing this. This is what happens when you focus on DEI. You get a congresswoman saying crazy things like this which has nothing to do with anything and it certainly doesn't help the American people. How about you stop giving away
our money to Ukraine? Or you could just cry about like slavery and things that you don't know anything about since you are a privileged black lady from Texas America who lives free and has plenty of money to pay for like Chanel earrings. It's because you can then misuse words like oppression. There has been no oppression for the white man in this country. You tell me which white men were dragged out of their homes.
You'll tell me which one of them got dragged all the way across an ocean and told that you were going to go and work. We are going to steal your wives. We are going to rape your wives. That didn't happen. That is oppression. We didn't ask to be here. We not the same migrants that y'all constantly come up against. We didn't run away from home.
We were stolen. So, yeah, we are going to sit here and be offended when you want to sit here and act like and and and don't let it escape you that it is white men on this side of the aisle telling us people of color on this side of the aisle that that y'all are the ones being oppressed, that y'all are the ones that are being harmed. What we doing oppression speeches in 2024?
Keep running that game. Here she was only two years ago and change not sounding like a complete lunatic who's crying about people getting dragged out of their home. She doesn't know a single person that's been dragged out of their home. Not a single person, I guarantee it. Jasmine Crockett, thank you so much. Really appreciate it. You're a state representative and now you are running for Congress. Why is that and what are your priorities? Absolutely.
First of all, it's good to see you in the new year. You know, no one could have told me that when I went down to Austin. Now looks like a little bit over a year ago that I would be running for Congress. So it's not what my plan was, but what I've always decided is that I would step up when there was a need.
And so I fully anticipated that our Congresswoman would serve out at least one more term, if not more than one term, in Congress. She would step up when they had a need and there was a need apparently for someone to be a racist dollar store Cardi B. And so that's what she is for the Democrat Party. Sad because she's obviously smarter than that and she's obviously just doing a race hustling grift. It's very effective for people like Sheila Jackson Lee. It just turns out it lands you
in hell at the end of the game. That's OK. Hopefully that's not her aspiration. Hopefully she straightens out her course and she realizes that Americans are going to get sick of it. The other thing that we're seeing is, like I said, this push for the ridiculous and here's the last little taste of that. I'll just play it because it's out there running around. For some reason, they haven't gotten the message. Go woke, go broke.
It sounds like if any of you are looking for a luxury car, you should probably consider something else. And that Jaguar. We are passionate about our people. And we're committed to fostering a diverse, inclusive, and unified culture that is representative not only of the people who use our products, but in a society in which we all live, a culture where our employees can bring their authentic selves to work.
And we are on a transformative journey of our own, driven by a belief in diversity, inclusion, creativity, policy, and most importantly, action. We've established over 15 DEI groups such as Pride who are here tonight. Let me just stop you right now. 15 Well, that just barely beats out the FB is 9 Diversity Advisory Council. So congratulations, you're doing really well. They got, I shit you not, there's no other way to say it.
They got a man wearing a mesh shirt that belongs in like a German nightclub and a sequin jacket. That's what you're missing if you're just listening to us to go out there and talk about that when they're a luxury car manufacturer that sells luxury cars to a audience that looks decidedly not like that, but whatever keep running that game. I hope these people continue. It is my favorite there is one of the thing we're going to make fun of as we end here.
Before we do that, let's just say thanks to our friends over at Shield arms. If you guys want to get something that is a fantastic product, an American manufacturer of of arms and accessories, go to shieldarms.com. Use promo code Kyle save yourself 10% site wide. They are a Montana America based weapons manufacturer. They also make accessories for things like your micro glocks. If you want to have a higher
capacity you can check them out. They've got base plates and so on. Fantastic stuff. I carry their products every single day. I use their magwells, I use their magazine releases and I also use their S 9 environment of of magazines to hold 15 in my little Glock 43 X. It allows me to carry a much smaller gun. Couldn't carry it when I was on the FBI, but I sure as heck do today because I don't need to have a full size gun. I'm not out there trying to
arrest people. If you guys are in the world where you're a concealed carrier and you want to up your game, go to Shield arms use promo code Kyle. The link's always in the show description. We appreciate them stepping in and being part of our team. All right, so let's throw the last little thing up there. We talked about cars just briefly. We're going to end it on a little pallet cleanser, something kind of funny and making fun of my buddy Joe, and
Joe bought a cyber truck. I think the market on this is not going to be the same as it was previously. Even if Elon Musk is in the Doge, you're going to find out that there's just not an environment or an infrastructure for a lot of the stuff. You just kind of look like a douche. And sometimes you have to create a symbiotic relationship with a tow truck, don't you? Here we see the cyber truck has formed a peculiar symbiotic relationship with the larger flatbed trailer species.
Evolutionarily disadvantaged, the cyber truck has come up with a clever way to transport itself long distances. By attaching itself to the flatbed trailer, the cyber truck can reliably move about without risking injury to its fragile exoskeleton or internal organs. What the Flatbed trailer gets in return for this kindness, science has yet to discover. It is unclear why you are driving the cyber truck, but you do you folks. That's the brilliance of America. Thanks for being part of our
program today. For all those in the live chat, we really appreciate you. Sorry that you guys had your disillusions about Russ Watt and make sure you're following us rumble.com/kyle Seraphin. You can find the X pod, which is going to be Kyle Seraphin pod at Kyle Seraphin Pod over on Twitter X if you guys want to do that. And lastly, you can check us out on Locals at Kyle Seraphin. Just go to kyleseraphin.com. And you can also get this podcast after some of you are listening on Spotify.
If you listen on the app, you'll be able to watch the video there without any ads as well. Appreciate all of it. Appreciate all of you, and God bless you. We'll see you again on Friday morning. We'll see you tomorrow. Hope you have a great Thursday. Thanks for listening to the Kyle Seraphin Show streamed live weekdays on rumble.com/kyle Seraphin. Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth Social and Instagram at Kyle Seraphin.