Take a look behind the curtain with a real whistleblower, an American patriot. Prepare to embrace the uncomfortable truth, because this program has no time for comforting lies. Here is civil liberties enthusiast, Second Amendment defender, and recovering FBI agent Kyle Serafin. Whoa, I don't know where we went. Hello, my friends. Welcome to the Kyle Serafin Show. That was weird. Screen just blanked on me. All right, so it is Wednesday, it is May the 8th, and we're
getting rolling. Might as well start Weird Wednesday with something weird. And that was pretty weird on our tech and everybody just said they'll black out. That's right. All right folks, we are rolling live over here on rumble.com/kyle Serif. And yeah, let me throw this up and thing. You guys can see the chat going. You'll probably see some of these people. The Black hole. Make sure you come over to rumble, Make sure you've hit the like button. Make sure you subscribe to the
channel. That means you follow it first, then you can subscribe. It's 5 bucks a month and that supports US. 100% of those funds go directly to us. We appreciate that sort of thing. And there it is. You can see if you're anywhere else, if you're on X, if you're on Facebook, I don't know why you're there. If you're over on YouTube, you can join us on Rumble and see the biggest live chat that we have going on right now. And folks, let's get rolling.
Got a weird day today? Got a weird sort of topic, kind of a double entendre, if you will. The double entendre is when a phrase means two things, one of which is a little bit more risque. Generally speaking, Trump is under a gag order right now in his case going on in New York. But the contents of the testimony from yesterday and sort of the overall mentality of the prosecutors in this case are enough to gag you, right?
I I looked up for some reason. I just wanted to see what are the origins of the phrase, gag me and gag me with a spoon. I just have it over here on the side of my screen and it says that it's Valley girl speak from the 80s. No wonder I recognize that. Yeah, gross. There's a lot of gross stuff happening out there. The left wing media is celebrating.
They're absolutely beside themselves with the fact that they got a porn star to step up and tell Donald Trump all of the lurid details of the alleged sexual affair that they had going on. And then, you know, also he's not supposed to be able to speak out on his own behalf. We're going to talk about why gag orders are a problem. There is in fact a three prong test that's supposed to be evaluated. Doesn't seem like they've done
this very well. And we're going to get into who the rights under the the Bill of Rights are supposed to belong to. Surprise for you guys, a little bit of spoiler alert. It's not supposed to be the government. The government is not supposed to be protected from you. Government doesn't have any rights. People have rights. And we're going to talk about all that today. I want to say thanks to my friends over at Patriot Coolers. You guys want to see something cool?
Check this out. Kaboom 2 Patriot coolers customized Right now you guys can go to patriotcoolers.com. You can get a Tumblr that's a 32 ounce. The 20 oz look very similar but they're a little bit slimmer. You guys can get this on a coffee mug. These are the suspendables items. If you get the 32 ounce or if you get the 20 oz water Tumblr, you can actually have it laser etched on to your Tumblr. Very cool stuff. You can arrange more than one as
I did here. So these ones are inbound to Garrido Boil and Steve Friends, the founding suspendables with me. If you guys want to get your own, check out Patriot coolers.com. Use the promo code Kyle Kyle so that you know that we sent you along. Promo code Kyle will save you 10 percent. 50 bucks or more will get you free shipping. If you buy two of these things, you're going to be covered by that. You'll get the free shipping. You'll get two different options.
You can hand one to a friend, one for you, one for a wife, one for a husband, etcetera. Very neat looking designs and these are all GOB actual original designs that you can go in and like I said, you can stack up the two of them on there if you do it right. That's kind of a neat way of looking at it. I'm kind of a big fan of these. So I sent some over to Steve, I sent some to Garrett, I sent some to me. They're inbound.
We got the coffee cup as well. You can have it either screen printed on or you can have it laser edge. But man, it's a really cool looking product. I highly recommend all you got to do is go and click it, then go to where it says add to cart underneath that'll say customize. Go to stock imagery. Yeah, there's a lot of steps, stock imagery and then below that you're going to see the suspendables is giving you four
options for our stuff. So anyway, check out that and by all means get yourself a suspendables cup. Whoever is the first person to take a picture of this cup that they do with Suspendables branding in FBI space, even if it's just outside the building, we will send you. I'm going to send you another free cup. So there's a challenge for you. I don't know who's going to be there. You'll have to hit me up. I want photographic proof. It can be on social media.
You can send it to me directly if you don't want to get hit by the. The FB is security division, but we will make that happen. I will send you a free cup, another one of your choice. I just decided that right now that's a contest for you. OK, let's get deep into it. Let's get started and let's start talking about the four priorities of the Biden administration.
I wrote them down on my little pad right here that I've got sitting next to me. I almost want to make kind of a fake version of of the Pledge of Allegiance for Democrats in 2024. They have this really goofy set of priorities, but it's essentially there's no flag but the LGBTQIA flags, Liberty and abortion for all, leave the border open because we don't like the Republic or the Constitution and we are in constant threat and danger of
white supremacy, AKA racism, AKA domestic violent extremists, which is you, it turns out, and me. So that's kind of the four priorities. And so this is how you get an apologetic piece coming from CBS today. Now, Trump dominated all of the headlines on all the major news outlets across the board, so I had to dig a little bit deeper for this one. This is under their politics section, and this article is
entitled. While illegal crossings drop along the US border, migrants in Mexico grow desperate. I want you to just dissect just the headline with me for one moment. Illegal crossings. So we're going to acknowledge right up front that the thing that is going on, that these quote UN quote migrants, that they are in fact illegal aliens entering our country against our
laws. While illegal crossings have dropped, the migrants are growing desperate while they hang out there in Mexico. We now have CBSA politically leftist organization purporting that this is news, that people who want to break the law to come into our country are being inconvenienced by our laws. What a wild take we are dealing with at this point. How is that even possible? How is it possible that this group and then it says
underneath there. Parenthetically, it says the group of House Democrats are urging Biden to take executive action action on immigration at the southern border so they can alleviate the concerns of non-us citizens who are not in the United States that want to break our laws more swiftly. They want to be able to expediently enter our country illegally. What?
And then also you have to go ahead and handle the cognitive dissonance that these illegal immigrants who are now not just coming from Mexico, which is what they used to be historically. There's actually a Netflix or a there's an Amazon Prime movie out there about a, a guy who was a a legal migrant worker back in the 70s in California and became a NASA scientist. This big puff piece, I started watching it and then I realized I just didn't care. So I just turned it off last night.
My wife and I were just like, now this is looks like propaganda, but there was a a legal way to come in and out of this country to do what they called migrant farm work. That meant you got a permit, you came into the United States, you worked, and then you went back to Mexico and then you built your house or whatever noble thing that they were talking
about these people doing. These guys are now arguing that people who are not just Mexicans or Latin Americans that are living in Central America or South Americans, even people from our side of the the the world need to come into this country. So we're going to get people from Africa, we're going to get people from Asia, We're seeing record numbers of Chinese and so on.
We're going to get all kinds of folks and not only do they not have a right to be here, but we need the president to basically flout the laws that Congress has passed in order to alleviate non citizens experience of desperation as they desperately are interested in breaking our laws. I I I can't wrap my head around it. This is this is the weird Pledge of Allegiance. We'll work on it. I I I will have one for you
quite soon. But I want you to understand how crazy this is. Let's read the article a little bit. Sorry. I got I just like even the headline is enough to blow my mind desperate and exhausted. It starts off with emotional language. They're they're writing a byline from Ciudad Juarez that used to be in my backyard when I was working in Las Cruces. Not a nice place, necessarily.
Lots of violence was over there. We've actually talked to Victor Avila who talked about some of the crazy stuff that happens on the other side of El Paso. Anyway, migrants gathered around a tree that offered them some shade from the unforgiving sun. I don't know why I have to do a dramatic voice when I read this, but I have to imagine that that's the way that this, this was written. All three of the authors have Hispanic sounding names, so there's that.
They have the sympathy. They've traveled from countries throughout Latin America, including Colombia, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Guatemala, Honduras, Peru and Venezuela. Some of them are traveling with young children, including toddlers. Others are young men. That'd be military age men, would it not? Some of them are teenagers, appeared to be unaccompanied minors, traveling without their parents. Yeah, inevitably. Those people are all victims.
That's the way this works. Victimized by sexual predators, by coyotes who are going to, you know, move them across. I don't know why I'm doing this Mexican accent, but I am. I feel like my mom on this one, OK, All of them share a common goal entering the United States, which is just a few yards away but is also illegal. It's also against the law for them to come in because they have no right to be here. They have no, they have no passport.
I mean, they don't have the thing that you need to come in to this country. They have no visa. They have no legal right, OK, One of the migrant men said in Spanish, showing the CBS News cameras on how sharp the wire could be. They're trying to kill us. No, they're trying to dissuade you from breaking the law, asshole. Like, what is what is that movie? I know it's Jim Carrey screaming at, but he starts screaming. He's like, stop breaking the law, asshole. You know, like that.
Like, that's the attitude we should be having right now. How on earth are we defending this behavior? And they're writing all these sycophantic pieces to people that are non-us citizens. In the meantime these are the same quote UN quote liberals, but progressive leftist if you will. These are the same progressive leftist that are, you know, bemoaning the the plight of the poor in this country. So you can't really take both sides. Yeah, it was from liar, liar.
Thank you, Renzo. You can't take both sides of this argument. You can't say that people who have no right to be in this country, who are willing to work for less than the minimum wage and come in and work illegally, which overwhelmingly helps people who are very wealthy, if that's what they're looking for and not most people want to do that. But you could. You can hire people if you have means, right? It's people who have money that are doing the hiring in this
world. It's not people who are destitute, it's people who have no money that are most most impacted by illegal immigration. So how are you going to claim to be the party, like Democrats do of the working poor and then simultaneously give me this? They're trying to kill us of the migrant men. By migrant, we mean illegal alien men. Men who have come into this country or attempted to come to this country, crawl across barbed wire, potentially, and injure themselves because of
their stupidity. Ben Shapiro used to talk about this on his program when I used to listen to him before he got COVID Weird. And one of the things that he said is that in America we can have open borders, we actually can, but we can't have it with a welfare state that guarantees you certain things. The American experience was always about one thing, a guaranteed shot at the ride, but people died on that ride all the time.
I always go back to the same example, but you might as well get used to it. The example is that people came into this country and built the railroad and were buried under it, attempting to create, you know, create a better life for their future, for their family and their future. That was the American dream. The shot at potential prosperity, the possibility, not the guarantee, but the possibility that you could elevate your status beyond what was going on in your previous country.
We can have that, but what we can't guarantee is success for all. That's not part of the Pledge of Allegiance. That's not part of the thing that we agree on. It's not in the Constitution that you're guaranteed life, liberty and happiness, which meant property. What you're guaranteed is the pursuit of happiness, is it not? That's what is supposed to be defended by the American system. You're supposed to have an
opportunity to come here. But we took all that away when we started building the great, the Great Society, the foundational sort of war on Poverty, eliminated our ability to have an open border. We can't do an Ellis Island. Everybody shows up that's not too sick and doesn't get quarantined, can come on in. That's not possible because we now have all these entitlements, right? Things that you and I have to pay for as taxpayers.
And having just written that check in April, I know that I had to pay a chunk of my income that goes out to people, you know, to run our government. We're not just running a government now, We're now also running this welfare state. And that's what these people, a lot of them are attempting to get you. I never had a problem with people that wanted to come here and work.
Some of the hardest working people in this country were immigrant families that came in with very little, came here the right way, busted their asses and created their own version of the American Dream. Whether it was small, little neighborhoods with little businesses, it didn't matter, like if they came here and did that. But when you start bringing in people that have no access to law enforcement, that have no legal right to be here, you are creating a captive victim population.
And the leftist argument doesn't work. They are using things like compassion and weaponizing it against you. It's fully crazy to me to think that compassion is the argument in this case, because there's nothing compassionate about bringing people in here that are going to be victims of crime. Let's imagine even just a simple idea. I've said this before, but 100 people come in this country. If one of them is a predator, they have 99 potential victims that they can sponge off and
live off. And they will, and they do. And I have worked those cases. I've worked surveillance where we were wiring up sources who were being extorted for $20 a week. But if you extort 100 people for $20 a week, that's a pretty good income, it turns out.
And if you do that to more than 100, because your little gang from MS13 has a captive victim population that doesn't belong here and has no right to be here and had to crawl over barbed wire and they're trying to kill us to get here, then you're going to end up with a bunch of people that are living in a nightmare in America and we are bringing them here for it. There is no compassionate argument to be made.
The left's arguments fall flat the second you get to 2nd dimensional thinking, and this is one example of it. You can't be in favor of mass illegal migration and also try to be the party of the working poor. It's wild. But that is one of the tenants that we are seeing the Bite administration try to run for re election on. We opened up the border. We need to open it up more. It's nuts. And then the second one, as I said, abortion for all. They're going to try to cover down on this.
I did dig a little bit here. This is an opinion piece written by Professor Mary Ziegler. She's from UC Davis School of Law in California, so no shocker here. Her concern is President Donald Trump just gave a revealing glimpse into his abortion stance. But it's not enough because they need people to be in lockstep ideologically on things that have already been decided by our Supreme Court. Are not a federal issue. It doesn't make any bit of sense.
It's completely irrational. The Supreme Court has come and gone on this, did they not? That's what Dobbs just said. The odds of them overturning their own decision? Minimal, says the former president gave an interview with Time magazine. Telling was telling for both what he was willing to say and what remained unspoken. Oh oh oh oh, because he toyed with the idea that there might be a federal a federal push for a 15 week ban.
This is a professor of law who apparently has given up her her sanity, and her understanding of what our Constitution says. The powers of the presidency are nothing under the Article 2 powers that the president is entitled to have nothing. Nothing there grants him the power to make laws or to make policy on how laws are enforced. When it comes to abortion, it's not in there. Congress would have to act. So lobby somebody else. Who cares what the president's
stance is? The only thing that the president's stance would be relevant to is if there was enough of a consensus in Congress, which there is not, to pass some sort of abortion law, which there, like I said, there's it's not happening. And then he could veto it in
theory. And if we had a fully functioning democracy, as they like to say, or Democratic Republic, we would actually have the people that represent us, who apparently in this case in her fantasy world, would overwhelmingly have to be interested in abortion 2/3. They could actually overrule the president. But because we are so narrowly divided in this country on this stuff, it's left to the states, which is the right answer for
federalism? Is it the right answer for a moral Christian, for somebody who has a Catholic president now? Like, of course it's not. We have a Catholic president, allegedly. I don't believe it. You don't believe it either. He doesn't act like a Catholic. But here's the facts. It's totally irrelevant because we don't have enough consensus in Congress to even pass like basic budgets, let alone some sweeping idea that this country is massively divided upon.
So it's where it needs to be. But this professor is making the argument. The problem with Trump is, is that he wants to go back to some 19th century obscurity. They want to go ahead and and ban abortion for all, which would obviously destroy women and their ability to compete in the workplace. Maybe that was not a good experiment in America. We have to kind of consider the long term implications. What are the long term implications of having women in the workplace?
Because we we haven't really sussed this out. Jordan Peterson does a great job of talking about it. There's sexual tensions that exist between men and women. There's sexual misconduct that happens. We get strange ideas pushed forward that don't have a lot of balance. Our country is off the rails and it it turns out, I think it's because we've gone radically to the left, which is the emotional, feminine side of our political spectrum, not women per SE.
There are plenty of you that are conservative. I understand that. But the fact of the matter is we have leaned in to that. Yin, that balance is off. And you got ladies like this out there trying to endorse saying that this is a real problem for Donald Trump. I don't know. I find it weird. I find it somewhat amusing that it's so out of touch because it just double s down on what I keep saying.
They're going to run on abortion and abortion access as being a federal issue when it's already been kind of pushed back to the states. It's because they can't win in the states where they want to win. They're not going to be able to flip red States and have them have abortion until the last second, until they're born or until after they're born. It's not going to happen.
So the left is more than happy to use the federal government to come in and tell everybody what needs to happen in their life. And whenever the federal government is the right tool, But sometimes they cry about the state, right? Every state should be able to remove Donald Trump from the ballot. These people can't make up their minds. As I said earlier, it's the same problem that you would have with trying to endorse the working
class. And then also illegal immigrants that come in and directly harm and cause worse problems for the working class. It's like the cognitive dissonance is so strong. And I guess, I guess that leads us to this this. Hush money case, which is not really about hush money. It's about business records. It allows you to be the kind of person that wants it both ways. We're going to cover down on ABCCNNN, MSNB, CS take about the the stormy Daniels testimony. I want to kind of hit all of
those. Before we do I want to suggest you guys that you can support our program by going to mad Hat Jerky. Yeah, I just got a like, I've ordered like over 2 lbs of mad Hat jerky the other day. You guys can order your own. Matt with two TS hat with 1tjerky.com/kyle. That's how you get there. That will tag us. Use the promo code Kyle when you check out. It should automatically populate, but in case it doesn't that will get you 20% off.
That's what's in it for you. 20% off and figure out what kinds you like. My favorites, hands down in this order, are the original spice, which I like In the USDA prime flank you can actually get the regular or the USD prime. The prime is a little more tender. It's like a dollar more or a little bit less so it's totally worth it. $0.80 with our promo code. Then you can also get the black truffle which is my second
favorite. Maybe my first favorite and then last and like a second but fighting for for excellence is the roasted garlic flavour. So those are my 3 favourites. You'll have your own. I just had a family friend send me over picture of the Punjabi one the the Indian spice. Not for me, but it works for him. So that's cool guys. Check out my hat. jerky.com/kyle promo code Kyle, save that 20% support the show. Get yourself a good snack. All right, let's get into this
article here. Everybody on the front page, whether it was CBS or NBC or CNN and all the others, they all had takeaways. I don't know why takeaways was the word of the day, but there it is. 4 big takeaways coming from This is ABC News, 4 big takeaways from day 13 of Trunch, Trump's hush money trial. Now again, if you get deep into what this trial is about, it has very little to do with the the aspect that it is hush money. It's a falsification of business
records. It's a movement of money that was in violation of a law that expired. And they then they went back and did sort of this ex post facto, you know, run back. So they're they're outside the statute of limitations, but they've charged it as a felony
and they're playing this game. And so the the jurors are now being subjected to what basically a leftist fantasy they have a former president of the United States hated by the political left, someone that they have basically attacked since the first second that he announced that he was going to run as a as a conservative, as a as a GOP candidate for
president. They've got this guy sitting in the courtroom with a a legitimate porn star and pole dancer because that's the clown show that our country has become. This is the nature of the gag me. This is the the double entendre, and we are being subjected to the lurid details that are being alleged but haven't been proven and won't be proven.
In this case. It's just her testimony that she had sex with Donald Trump in a hotel room in 2006 in graphic detail, including position, including state of dress, including the way that they ended up on a bed. And then we're led to believe, because this is the fun thing. They say Trump is on trial for allegedly falsifying business records to hide the reimbursement of hush money
payments. That is then attorney Michael Cohen. Michael Cohen, who we know has been, has been lying in public for quite a while and has had to deal with that in a legal sense. The former president has denied all wrongdoings. We have a presumption of innocence in this country, except when you're going to be tried in the state of New York. All right, So she gave a description of the sex, the absence of a condom and other
salacious details. That prompted repeated objections from attorneys for Trump often had his urging. Why were they not doing it preemptively? The legal Teague later said that this should be the grounds for a mistrial. That's the the take away that I walked out with, that it was extraordinarily prejudicial, was there was their statement, the commentary that Stormy Daniels was allowed to give, and they had this sort of contentious
cross examination. The the the details that ABC wanted to call out was that she gave details of an alleged sexual encounter with Trump, that they had sex on a bed. Yes, I was standing there with my clothes off, my shoes on. I believe my bra was still on. That was her claim, she said they they asked her, this is the prosecutor, what, if anything do you remember other than having sex with him? And she said I was staring at the ceiling and I didn't know
how I got there. This is a woman who has sex with people on camera, professionally. And she's allowed to to get out here and give these. Do you remember how your clothes got off? No, I don't. I don't know how my clothes got off. Maybe because that's what she does for a living, is end up with no clothes on. Did you end up having sex with him on the bed? They asked. Yes. Did you touch the skin? Yes. Was he wearing a condom? No. Gross. Absolutely disgusting.
And then quotes. Trump is saying we'll have to get together as soon. Never making a comment about his wife, Melania. Look, is this plausible? Sure. Is it likely? I have no idea, and neither do you, because she started talking about it in 20/16/2018. That's when the money was paid. Money is paid by wealthy people who have a lot for a lot of reasons. Who knows what this encounter was? Is it within Trump's sort of historical character to to say that this is plausible?
Yeah, for sure. Does it have anything to do with the way that the money was moved around in the business records? No. Do we need to hear about the sexual exploit? No, we do not. And so the statement was by by Trump's attorneys. It's like, look, they're supposed to be guardrails. When a witness is answering these questions, the government has just thrown them all to the side. How do you unring this bell? We should have a mistrial.
And the judge who's been very fair to this point, including gag orders, which we're going to talk about in a little bit. I'm being sarcastic, of course, The judge said. I don't believe we're at the point where a mistrial is warranted. Why? Because this is the goal. The goal is a humiliation. Embarrassment, disgusting. The goal is smear. The goal is to shut the guy down and to make him endure everything possible. That's all they want. That's the whole purpose of this.
The goal is to see if you can can attack Trump in as many different possible ways financially, and then overwhelm him. Flood the zone, so to speak, with all of the legal cases, possible fraud cases. This is the garbage rape allegation that was going on in the defamation case that happened for EG Carroll. This is a criminal story about moving money around. Then you've got the the classified document stuff going on, which we're going to talk about a little bit later as
well. It's got the same thing the the conspiracy to defraud Americans of their right to vote. Which is weird because the conspiracy didn't have an underlying crime where it actually worked. So this was just a plan that didn't work, apparently. And we're going to run that. We're just going to throw everything against the wall at the sky over and over and over
again. And we're going to have this woman who has discredited herself in public, who said that she signed a document in 2018 that many of you have seen. It's been running around social media. They're not allowed to talk about it. In the case it's been under, it's under the gag order.
But this is a document that basically was signed by Stormy Daniels saying that I never had sex with the president or informed President Trump, which was apparently part of the the agreement in the testimony she gave, she stated. And I think we've got CNN's up there as well. So I'll show you that in the testimony that CNN quoted she talks about how she went on The Tonight Show. Was that what it is with Jimmy Kimmel?
I'll have to look at what the actual name of Jimmy Kimmel show is because I don't watch it. But the statement was is that she signed her name in a way that she normally doesn't sign her name. This, this is known as discrediting. You try to do that sort of thing, right? Discrediting is the way that you might say things in a weird town. Here it is, she said. She said she explained how she was not truthful when she denied that she had an affair.
So she denied in writing that she had an affair with Trump in 2018, after the hush money payments went public, she said she signed a statement before going on Jimmy Kimmel Live. That was the name of the show, I guess. And she said she signed her name in a way that she's never signed it before. As a tip off to the late night talk show House. Now, I know all of you have followed the career and the Life and Times of Stormy Daniels
quite exclusively. Many of you are probably very familiar with the signature of Stormy Daniels. And you know, right away when when said porn star decides to sign her name in a way that she's never done it before, you'd be like, ah, obviously that's what's going on. This concept, the concept of being able to discredit with a with a garbage signature. This is something I learned when
I was in seer school. They teach you that if you're going to be forced to do propaganda and you can't help it. So you're a service member, you've been captured by an enemy group, They want you to do some sort of propaganda. You're you're supposed to find a way to discredit it. Like, you're supposed to say things and pause awkwardly and shake your head.
You know, like say the words but shake or or look off the camera and show that you're being held hostage and whatever that looks like, you're supposed to show a way to discredit it. Apparently, this woman's signature that no one's ever seen before because nobody knows what the hell a signature of a porn star who's using a fake name. Everyone's supposed to know that she was discrediting this. The real way you do it is like you blink Morris code if you
really know how to do it right. You're doing Morris code saying, like, yeah, SOS, stuff like that. There are all kinds of little tools you can use to discredit an appearance. She's obviously not that sophisticated. This sounds like something she came up with after the fact. I can't prove it. So I'm just going to say that's what it sounds like to me.
But she testified underoath that that was the case, that she signed her name, and that's why everyone should know that obviously what she's saying is true, none of which has anything to do with the business records, which was the point. How come nobody in the political lefty media, How come ABCCBSNBCMSNBCCNN? How come they can't walk away with the fact that this was salacious details that basically didn't add anything to the criminal nature of what was
going on? Like the criminality is discussing whether or not he moved money illegally. That's like the most boring thing in the world. So, you know, let's add some sex. Why not all of this LED all this, led to a pretty awful article written by Norm Eisen. You guys will remember him. He was the impeachment counsel for the House Judiciary that went after Donald Trump. So obviously a fare operator you
can imagine. This is exactly the way MSNBC feels about it. This is an article written by multiple people, all of whom are associated with Brookings Institute, a left wing think tank in DC. Judge Mershon just put on a clinic and how to deal with Trump's disinformation. The former president's false claims are designed to inflamed emotion, but Mershon refused to take the bait. Well, that's so heroic, isn't
it? This guy overlooked in the fervor over Donald Trump's aides Hope Hicks testimony in the president's New York criminal trial Friday was a quieter but less important event. This is where we're going to get into the gag order. Merchant politely but firmly deflated Trump's latest misleading spin, and in doing so offered the dozens of journalists in the courtrooms pointers on how to deal with Trump's incessant lies. Isn't that weird, that the judge is giving pointers on how to
handle the freedom of the press? Should that not bother us? A gag order is in place that he's not allowed to attack witnesses, not allowed to say certain things in public. He's been found in contempt 9 Oh no, 10 times of that gag order, which cost him money every single time he does, he's being fined. He's not being imprisoned at
this point. But Dan Bongino made the argument yesterday that that would be the best thing that could happen, and that there is absolutely no indication that these people realize how awful it would look. What a martyr that would make Donald Trump. I'm totally fine with that idea. I I 100% agree. I don't think they recognize it. I think they think the American people are on their side. That's why they have people like Norm Eisen out there writing these pieces.
Now, Trump did say something that was false. He said that I'm not allowed to testify. I'm under a gag order, I guess. Right. So he's asking some questions and he's kind of pointing this out. And then the judge basically, you know, rebukes him and says no, of course you're allowed to testify, which he is because it benefit him, is another
question. Trump is kind of he's, he's doing this kind of misdirection game, saying like, I'm under a gag order and I assume that means that I can't speak the gag, you know, And then he tweeted about it and so on. He says, this guy judge, who's totally conflicted, that does seem to be the case. There is a conflict of interest. Other judges, even on left wing programs and and their family members have said, like, yeah, I would have recused myself in
this case. This is not a good look for the judiciary. It's not an impartial situation. In any case, you've got this, you know, statement by Trump that I'm under a gag order. No has ever had that before. Yeah, people have had gag orders, but there's some real
problems with a gag order. But not to Norm Eisen, not to a guy who works in the policy advocacy part of the Brookings Institute says first gag orders are commonplace in high profile criminal cases to prevent the parties from making extrajudicial statements that may affect the integrity of the
proceedings. That doesn't actually sound like the way that I read it. And I'm going to bring up some some information that comes from Yale's law school and we'll talk about whether that makes sense in the 1st place. He also says that, secondly, the Appellate Division is reviewing Marshawn's work and they've decided that to allow it to continue on, The gag order is allowed on, which sort of suggests that they agree with the constitutionality of the gag
order. And 3rd and most important, by the way, this is an appeals court in New York, so we'll just take that for what it's worth. It's behind enemy lines. And 3rd. And most importantly, the gag order does not bar Trump from testifying. Obviously, that's the case. Defendants have an absolute right to testify in criminal cases in their own defense. In fact, New York even provides more rights.
They have this thing called a sand ball hearing that makes the defendants aware or whatever the prosecution will be using against them and help them decide whether or not it's in their best interest to testify. So they actually get a little a little heads up as to what the playbook would look like from the prosecution site. So that's not terrible, you know, Let's be fair. This article is terrible. It's garbage. And he goes on to define our favorites, things like misinformation and
disinformation. And misinformation and disinformation are kind of part and parcel of the leftist censorship tools. They want you to know that they are going to define the terms of interactions here, he says. Right here, quote, disinformation is the deliberate spread of false information with bad intent. I've never heard the bad intent before, by the way. Just deliberately misleading. That was on purpose. Whereas misinformation is accidentally saying things that
are not true. It's false information, and it's accidentally going to lead people down a false path. Now, if you'll remember, we shared this with Congress. The FBI's Political Corruptions Unit, the Political Integrity Corruptions Unit, I think is what it's called PQ. I'll have to double check that the FBI's analysts working there claimed that misinformation and disinformation related to an election was a federal election crime, which is false.
It's not. And that just seems like we have a government that continues to be completely out of touch with the reason for the government. I don't think they get it. I don't think they're paying attention. I think that we are living in this post constitutional world where they've abandoned the principles of what were founded on because they're attributing rights that belong to the people. You always hear these people on the on the political right talking about we the people.
I actually, that's like one of my pet peeves. You guys probably don't know that. But I really hate it when someone says, you know, we need to figure out what we the people know. It's like what us the people you clown like it's us. What? What? What? Like, anyway, maybe not in that particular sense, Yeah, but. But they're always going out there and quoting the Constitution, and we've we've abandoned it. We've completely abandoned it.
We're not even fighting for basic constitutional principles. We had some pretty good comments on yesterday's episode talking about that being an issue. I want to show you guys, this is real, simple stuff. This is what the judge is running up against, the 1st Amendment right. Trump's ability to communicate. Nothing in there says the government is supposed to have a right to a fair trial. By the way, we're going to talk about this.
But First Amendment Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. Now, we know that you're not just free to practice your religion, but you're also like you can't be abstain, you can't be held back from practicing a religion. Doesn't mean you have freedom of religion. We just have freedom to to practice it, not freedom from religion. They don't get to remove it from everything. You're allowed to do it in public spaces.
And then or OK, so Congress may make no law abridging the freedom of speech or of the press. That's it. That's the end of it. There's nothing more to it. It's plain English. Congress shall not do that. Congress is the organization that's supposed to write the laws. The judges are supposed to fairly decide those laws. How can you have a gag order then? All gag orders are pretty problematic. They've allowed them, but only in so much as it actually
protected the defendant. That's actually supposed to be the way it works. And then of course you see that the right of the people to assemble, petition, the redirect grievances, all these things, these are rights of the people. There are limits in the first clause or two clauses about what Congress can do. And the second part are the rights of the people to assemble and to petition, etcetera, right. That's how these things are
written. There's a little article that I had to call, this is actually from Trump era I pulled up. This is an article entitled When Silence Isn't Golden, How gag orders Can Evade First Amendment protections. You see how this works together. This is written in 2017, so this is under Trump's presidency, for whatever it's worth.
Going back and discussing things like the OJ Simpson trial and high profile litigants, high profile court cases where people have this huge public space, where they have this massive amount of celebrity and they can gather crazy amounts of attention. We've had some big cases in this country. I remember when the OJ trial was going on, they called it the trial of the Century. But there's a trial of the century all the time.
By the way, Norm Eisen in that previous piece I referenced referred to this as the Trial of the Century. Even though it's just at the beginning of the century, right now, we're already going to call it the Trial of the Century.
The Trial of the Century is like some money got moved around, potentially illegally by a lawyer who's been convicted of of of being dishonest and a porn star who says that she discredited herself with A with a signature like she was in seer school like she was a POW going on the Jimmy Kimmel show. Yeah. All right, so here we go. The gag order typically forbids individuals from talking about publishing or disseminating specific, specified information.
It can be imposed by parties to litigation to stop them from talking to the press or on the press itself to stop them from publishing specific information. That's what's going on here. Again, this is coming from a from the Media Freedom and Information Access Clinic, which is the MFIA within the Yale School of Law, probably where most of these these attorneys went. This is the the salient part
that I want to show with you. This is the part that is the biggest piece In the 1976 case Nebraska Press Association versus Stewart, the Supreme Court created a three-part test to evaluate the constitutionality of a gag order that stopped the newspaper from publishing any confessions of an accused murderer made to law enforcement. Whether the publicity, these are the these are the parts here,
OK? Whether the publicity would harm the defendant's right to a fair trial, OK, the publicity would harm the defendant. Whether the gag order was the least restrictive means possible to ensure fairness. So now we're worried about whether it's fair to the press and whether the gag order would in fact be effective, whether they could actually do the thing they said.
Those were the steps requiring A gag order to satisfy each condition, the court said, would ensure that both the 1st Amendment and the 6th Amendment would be respected. The 1st Amendment meaning that there's a right to free speech and a right to the free of the press, That's what's being protected here. And you'll notice that the reason that they're interested in this, the test, the first prong of this three-part test, is whether it would harm the defendant's right to a fair trial.
Doesn't the defendant get decide whether or not they're going to speak? Isn't that what it's supposed to be about? The whole point is to protect the defendant's rights. That's why we have a 4th Amendment. That's why we have a 5th Amendment, a 6th Amendment, an Eighth Amendment. These are, these are protections for the people. There's no protection for the government's case. There's nothing that is written to protect the right of the government to be able to bring effective prosecution.
It's supposed to be hard. The burden is supposed to be difficult. This is my problem with FISA and the argument the FBI has been making. Oh, it'd be really difficult for us to do our job. Tough shit. It's supposed to be difficult when you invade the privacy of American citizens, not the people that are crying on the other side of the border. By the way, that's not the people don't talk about do whatever the hell you want to them. They're not American. They don't get that that
privilege. But if you're going to go and invade the privileges of Americans, whether they are standing trial, whether they are when they're involved in something nefarious, you still have the burden of proof on the government side. It's supposed to be difficult to go and infringe on their civil liberties, those privacies that are supposed to be out there that are protected. And they're out there trying to protect the prosecution's case
because they're afraid. Donald Trump, who has a massive microphone and the ability to share a lot of information, should he so choose, and it will be covered by every single news outlet if it comes up. Every single news outlet will go and run it front page whether they agree or disagree. We're supposed to have a presumption of innocence. We're supposed to operate from that position. And secondly you're supposed to be worried about the rights of
the defendant to a fair trial. That's the whole point. That's the purpose. Let me break away for a second and we're going to we're going to pivot to another trial that's going on or another case that he's dealing with because Donald Trump is just dealing with law after law after law in jurisdiction after jurisdiction. Let's go and just recommend I just got the the shipping notification guys from mypillow.com. You guys can go to mypillow.com/kyle. I got the e-mail yesterday.
They have shipped out my towels. I think I bought 3. I don't know why I bought three. That seems like a weird number. I should have bought 2 or 4 but I bought 3 massive bath sheets which are like 5 1/2 feet on one side and three feet on the other like huge wraps. I promise you I will not do a show wearing them, but I will give a full report because they have been reported to be very absorbent and hopefully they're not too soft because I don't like that. mypillow.com/kyle.
If you want to go and get new bedding, if you're looking for towels and toiletry type items, you can get slippers and slides, so on and so forth. Supporting Mike Lindell and the American workers who are not illegal immigrants as far as I can tell. mypillow.com/kyle promo code. Kyle will save you up to 50% on the pillow. I'm sorry, on the the towels I actually got 30%. I did the calculation yesterday so I got a 30% discount using that promo code and and it was my own promo code.
Go figure. What a weird world. All right. I want to I want to pivot into this the second thing, because this is the other big news which it should also be out there. Judge indefinitely. This is coming from CBS indefinitely delays Trump classification or classified document trial. So that's kind of interesting. Why would that be? By the way the government was arguing that they wanted to get this thing done. This is this is Jack Smith's piece down in the in the district of Florida.
The judge, the district judges, Eileen Cannons, who seems to be the most fair of all of them so far. It's the easiest place for Trump to get a reasonable and fair trial. And so Eileen Cannon just basically said we're in no hurry. The right to a speedy trial is the right of the defendant. You know, like the people. Like the reason that we're supposed to have, we're supposed to have protections for people against the government. The government is not given any
rights or special abilities. So Cannon wrote this. The finalization of a trial date at this juncture would be imprudent and inconsistent with the court's duty to fully and fairly consider it the various pending pre trial motions before the court. Essentially, there's some issues like the critical issues, which is the Classified Information Procedures Act, additional pre trial and trial preparations necessary to present the case to a jury.
There's all these different considerations, mostly because Trump is tied up with a ton of different stuff right now. And his petition, the judge, hey, look, we'll deal with this when we deal with this. There's no imminent danger to anybody. By the way, this is not a violent crime. This is not a man who's going to go out there and hurt anybody. So let's just push it back a little bit. If he has to serve time, he has to serve time. Can we wait?
And the prosecutor said, well, listen, everybody would agree that we could do this by summer. Like, let's do it by summer. Can we do it by summer? Can we get a speedy trial? Hey, the government has a right to a speedy trial. This is the argument that Jack Smith, the special counsel, was making. One thing the party's can agree on is that this case can be tried in the summer, said deputy Special counsel Jay Brat. Jay Brat's the same guy we covered. Was it yesterday or the day
before with Julie Kelly's piece? Jay Brat was the one who looks like he kind of fabricated some information stating that they found those classified document cover sheets. Well, we actually brought them. We brought them, we laid them out, and we actually staged a photograph. We did propaganda. So the government can do propaganda, but Trump can't do any in his own defense. We're talking about something that's not fair. This is why people are starting to gravitate towards this more
and more. This is why all of these prosecutions are going to end up backfiring. The only way this works is if they actually put him in prison and and he might even get elected from jail. I think Steve Friend and I are in agreement on that. We've talked about this quite a bit.
The, the, the the, the worst thing that the Democrats could get is actually to to land this fish because it'll sink the boat if they land the the, if they land the fish of Donald Trump being convicted in one of these wonky BS cases, then he probably gets he probably gets elected by a landslide and if he goes to jail over free speech, man, that's a suspendable move, is it not? The right thing is, is that you speak and you know that there may be a cost.
Right now he's paying like $10,000 per infraction. Let him just go. And I think he's he I mean he's indicated that that's where he's willing to go. The government has no idea. And the government being like sort of the ideological actors that have captured the DOJ, they have no idea what that's going to look like. They're pushing on things just the way the CIA used to push on things in foreign countries. It's like oh let's get rid of this dictator. That's our problem.
It's like oh now there's a power of actor. Now we have ISIS like just foolishness, 1 dimensional thinkers. It continues to permeate these types of things. They have absolutely no idea that if they were to land the fish of getting Donald Trump in jail, which they think would be enough to make everybody go like, well we can't elect somebody in jail. I think America would say hold my beer. I'm fairly confident that would be the case.
If nothing else, just to give a big middle finger to this sort of ugly, gross weaponization that people can see, that would be the most weaponized thing to do. To say that we're so scared of a free and fair election that we claim happened that we're going to actually take the guy off the board, We're going to pull him off and make sure that he can't even be free. And then you think America wouldn't put somebody who was in in jail, in prison, in office.
I bet you they would. I bet you they would. So anyhow, the same attorneys that are arguing up on the Stormy Daniels BS are also dealing with this thing. And so they've been, they've been given a reprieve. They've been given a reprieve by this, by this judge, Eileen Cannon. Like I said, the one who seems to be pretty fair and the argument was about a fair a
speedy trial. So here it is, the 6th, the 6th Amendment. This is the right that is going on. Again, listen to whose rights are being maintained in all criminal prosecutions. The accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial. The accused, not the government. The government is not entitled to anything.
They're also supposed to get an impartial jury of the state and district where in the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, Blah blah, blah, blah, blah goes on and on. They're supposed to be able to confront the witnesses, have compulsory process and have counsel. It's the rights of the accused who is presumed innocent under our system until proven that they are in fact guilty.
So you don't get to act like they're guilty simply because you've charged them or you've indicted them. It's really hard for us in the political right to actually deal with this, by the way. Because when you have a fundamental belief that law enforcement is doing the right thing in the right way, which most of us start from that place at least. And I'm willing to give the benefit of the doubt to most law enforcement that way.
If you start from that position and then somebody is accused of something and you immediately jump down their throat and you're like, ha, yeah, they raped that girl or they killed that person or they had a severed head in their fridge, you're like, allegedly. You have to say that. Allegedly, right. It's really hard for us to kind of divorce what we have maybe seen with our own eyes on body Cam what we meant. It's not the way our system is supposed to work. It's adversarial on purpose.
And the rights are all in favor of the accused. That's hard. If you're a law and order kind of person. You're fighting against your own instincts, which is for justice. You know, all little kids have a real innate sense of justice and and conservatives have that same sort of innate sense that they're supposed to be justice. You are. You're supposed to see it. The rights remain with the accused.
It's really important. I want to pivot over to something else, which is kind of part of the cultural war. I think This is why we are seeing a lot of this nonsense. Like I said, I I think the culture and I think actually the ethos in this country is captured by the feminine. Not to say women, not not the ones listening here, but what I'm getting at is that there's a feminine instinct that has moved on. It is protective, it is inclusive, it is compassionate without any reasoning.
It is lagon emotional without rationality to back it up. It doesn't have that balance, the yin and the Yang and we are out of balance because we've got stories like this kicking off. Where is this one coming from? This one's coming from ABC, although it was covered in a lot of places and it was also covered my friends over at Catholic Vote. If you guys want to support Catholic Vote, just go to the AT catholicvote.org. That's the website. You can get the loop right there.
You'll get the e-mail that included stories about this today, which I thought was useful and valuable, the the Boy Scout story. But on top of that, there's also a new book that's out of which I've written one of the chapters. You guys can find the link in the show notes and the description if you want to do that. And then we're also doing a weekly podcast. It's a short one.
It's like between 8 and 15 minutes long, depending on the topic that we're covering down on, On sort of larger cultural issues. This is one of the things that we talked about a lot on a new podcast with Catholic Vote called Between the Lines and the link is in the description there. If you're listening or watching us on Rumble, you can find the link on Rumble. If you're watching on YouTube, you can find the link to YouTube. Those are both in the show
descriptions. We have unique show notes for each one of those presentations. So if you guys want to find it, check out Catholic Votes channels on both Rumble and YouTube and and get a look in there. Make sure you guys get subscribed up to them. There's some good stuff coming out of there and some of it is coming from me, so I'm biased. All right, here's the story. ABC, the Boy Scouts of America, BSA. How many times we seen that with the Florida lease 114 years.
Boy Scouts of America is rebranding. Here's why they're now named Scouting America. Let me just break it real quickly. What It's down for. The reason it's called Scouting America. We're showing a girl wearing a Boy Scouts uniform why the future matters most. The future of Scouting is a little talk she's doing. She's a picture. She's standing in front of a
crowd. The reason why that they're renaming it is because women have muscled their way into men's spaces and now men are muscling their way back into women's spaces. And we have. We have lost the gender or the sex divide that's supposed to happen. There are some things that are supposed to happen. You're supposed to have boys hang out with boys when they're young. They learn how to be boys and where little girls are supposed
to hang out with little girls. They need to have special spaces that are carved out where they can learn the roles that exist. The roles exist in society for a reason. They've always existed for a reason. Some of it has to do with physical strength and capabilities. Some of it has to do with their their nature. Boys are cruel and they push each other around. They settle fights, you know, like disagreements with their fists. And then five seconds later they're hugging.
Girls hold grudges and do emotional damage. Go watch Louis CK. He does a really good job of breaking. Another difference of being a parent of boys and girls. The boys do damage to things that can be measured like like like a hurricane and property damage, and girls do like emotional damage that you'll feel for a long time. He has this really great breakdown. I am so disgusted. I was once in Boy Scouts a long time ago in the 80s. I spent like a couple of like a season in the Weebleos.
I think there's a there's a punk rock, Sag said. I'll tell you something no one knows. I was kicked out of the Weebleos. It's like my daddy beat me with a hose 'cause I was kicked out of the Weebilos and I I actually, I, as I recall my parents will have to check this one, but I remember being kicked out or I left voluntarily. But I got into a fight with like the the den leader. The den was run run by a mom by
the way. And that in in to me even going back that far was a breakdown because there was a woman running a Boy Scout troop, A Weebilos troop, which is the, you know, before you're it's before you're an actual Boy Scout. You go Cub Scouts and then you go Weebilos. And I got kicked out because I got into a fight with the the den leader's son who was a bully and he was picking on other kids and he like, pushed one of them
down a hill. So I threw him down the hill and then I remember not being there anymore. I also hit him in the face with basketball. I think. Anyway, I had a sense of justice back then. But what's weird is we had moms running that thing and I was kicked out where I left. Whatever. Whatever happened, I remember I had a uniform and I never went back to it. And I've never once looked back and thought, oh, I wish I had
that. We did another little kind of scouting thing like Indian guides, me and my dad, my my, my kid brothers. We'd go out there and, you know, pick out trees and and go do some like, hatchet stuff. The sad thing is, is this was an American institution.
I've got a lot of friends that were Eagle Scouts that that spent time, you know, being around other boys and camping and learning like citizenship and the things that the scouting, the the Boy Scouts of America was supposed to be like a paramilitary type organization where you earn skills and you actually looked and said I'm going to become a functional
member of society. I'm going to be a a a educated citizen who understands civics and I understand why the civics and I'm going to have values imparted on me. Almost all of them were associated with churches as I recall. Now we're going to go ahead and cross that line. We're crossing a line saying we're going to enter it, We're going to force girls into that. And this is not because girls didn't have their own thing. They did. There was Girl Scouts.
Many of you have bought their cookies. Girl Scouts has a totally different focus. It's focused on what girls are interested in. It's so gross that we're seeing this time where we're going to destroy these things and then you're going to at the same time try and have these like feminist. No wonder there's confusion about gender and sex roles in this country. You're pushing girls into something like you don't you want to be an Eagle Scout?
Created for the Girl Scouts. 114 years of tradition, flush down the toilet. And I know many of you will never support this again. And most of you won't put your kids into it. I sure as hell won't. They started saying this back in 2018. They're going to let Cub Scouts have girls. And then they changed their flagship program. They made it. Scouts, BSA. They've been changing the name. They've been screwing around with it. Now there's 6000 girls who are Eagle Scouts. I don't.
Whatever. It doesn't mean anything. It's all, it's all a joke at this point. And you know what it led me to this. This bothers me. This video came from from CNN. I'm telling you, when the weak feminine isn't doing its job, this is actually manipulation being done by CNN. And I was obviously broadcast on there. It's just affirming that if you are not going to give in to the the new gender requirements that are going on. So remember we talked about there is a open border, right?
White supremacy is everywhere. We've got to have abortion for all. And the last one is is no flag except the tranny flag like LGBTQIA flags over the American flag. This is that same push that CNN is doing. It's emotional manipulation of women. Women who are trying to conform, who are trying to keep up with what's the right thing to do. Should I be running a Cub Scout thing? Should I let my daughter into the Cub Scout group? Oh, oh, should I let my son become my daughter?
And should I apologize to him for him basically being a weirdo who's probably gay and maybe was sexually abused or maybe he's just trying to conform? This guy doesn't look anything like a girl other than he has long hair. But we're going to see this little emotional manipulation video. I think I actually have a yeah, look at this. This was on CN NS page, but it was also broadcast obviously on the network quote I had to choose a mom describes accepting transgender daughter.
What are we doing here though? It's not just about that. Megan Cortez feels is a transgender swimmer. This is a direct push against people like Riley Gaines has been swimming all her life. They mean his life. It's a dude. And this dude has an emotional conversation about the journey to acceptance. It's a mom that is basically emotionally bullying other moms into this garbage. So you guys ready for this
video? Because it's kind of gross, but also it's really obvious, like if you watch it with just the audio you're going to hear. This is just a gay guy talking an effeminate male talking to his mom who is like sucking up to him because we don't have any flippant boundaries in this society. You know, like a dude can't go and swim against girls. That seems basic. I swam on a swim team with some of the best swimmers in the country. My senior prom date was in
Olympic Trials qualifier. She was the female athlete of the year in the year 2000, An absolute physical stud. Faster than me for sure. But she couldn't compete with the males who were getting like junior nationals level times. She was actually competing to go to the Olympics. And these guys were like not even in the senior nationals, let alone the Olympic trials. And they were crushing her. Why? Because they're bigger and they're faster and they're stronger.
It's like it's basic biology. We're going to try to deny it here. This is CNN trying to deny it. When I see these old pictures, like in some of the younger ones, you know, I'm just a child. They're you know when you're below the age of five, you're just living life to the fullest. But like 5 on I think I start to see like my trap self. If I could turn back the clock I wish, I wish I could have done some things differently. I remember in my Bible study and I said I need prayers.
My oldest came out as transgender and I just don't know what to do and didn't sit well with me. I feel like God made you you for you like and we're not supposed to change any parts of our self. We're made like that. That's just in my mind what I've always known and I probably said some, you know, hurtful things just because I'm scared. It's it's a fear. It's AI failed my kid. I didn't do enough. Why didn't I see this?
Why didn't I do more. I lost a little boy that, like I I accepted a little boy who wasn't macho boy, you know? And I remember laying in bed and saying, Melissa, you didn't lose a kid. You have a kid right in front of you. You have a choice. May not be what you want it to be, but you have a choice. And I had to choose. I had to choose.
I wanted you guys to see the video, but moreover, I wanted to see the use of Christian imagery and the appeal to God, because we are going to try to subjugate all the things that, you know are real. Yeah. Somebody just said in the chat, where's where's dad? Yeah, where is dad? Why is he wearing a cross around his neck and why does he look like he's like a goth punk kid? Like I used to see people like this in in punk rock shows. They were usually on stage wearing leather, just rocking.
It's just today's sort of pushback. This is today's goth movement. This is today's, you know, resistance is, you know, against parents. You're going to just go and you're going to basically question what your, what your genitals are for. The problem is, is that chemical castration is the side, the side
effect of a lot of this stuff. There's nothing Christian about what she's trying to do. She's decided to give in to something that's not true, and Christianity focuses on something that's called truth, with a capital T that means truth that is beyond human comprehension. She's out there going after the human piece of it. Turns out though, as I said, it's going to give you guys some weird stuff. It is a weird thing.
There is both a fear. This is actually a a result of the fear we are attempting right now to see. An emotional appeal to moms because this is what they're really scared of. This is from me, from Politico. You guys may have seen this already. Politico from their magazine section. The big idea. Oh, it's really good. This is a reporter who works on focuses of, oh, go figure, immigration surveillance and the far right. This is Gabby. The Valley or the Valley.
Gabby writes The rights, the far Rights Campaign to explode the population. Guys, do you hear about this? They're worried about us out breeding them. What I've been saying Go out there, find someone to love, commit to them for life and have some babies. Kaboom the Revolution. Gavin Gavin McGinnis, who's a pretty funny guy and obviously used to be kind of like a weirdo lefty, whatever. Back in the day, he was a guy that founded Vice magazine. He's now seen as kind of like
this firebrand conservative. It's only because he's countercultural. He's what I grew up as a sort of a punk rock attitude, which is that whatever you're going to tell me, I'm going to do something different.
That was his attitude. I think he's a little older than I am, but Gavin McGinnis has stated that the most punk rock thing that you can do right now, punk rock being sort of like counter cultural counter society, pushing back against the quote, UN quote man, you know, fighting the machine. The most punk rock thing you can do right now is get married to a person of the opposite sex, have babies with that person, stay with them, educate them, have a garden and and grow them up in a
faith tradition. So that's what I'm doing, and that's what I recommend that you do. I will unabashedly stand behind this idea. But this is really funny because this is a fear. The right has a campaign to explode the population. By the way, we have negative population growth in this
country except for the illegals. So they're trying to actually have illegals come in and grow our population, but they don't want us to actually have babies because climate change or whatever the hell they're talking about, or white supremacy. It's just it's it's a really funny little article. It's talking about how the threat is existential and biological and epoch defining economies will fail, civilizations will fall and will happen because people aren't having enough babies.
Fact Check. True declining populations are a symbol. Especially declining birth rates are an A a crazy indicator of a failure of societal values. You know who else knows this? Elon Musk. He's smarter than whoever this lady is. The global financial system, The value of your money, every asset you might buy with your money is defined by leverage, which means its value upon depending growth, says a father of six in Virginia. This is a guy named Kevin Dolan,
37 years old. He is winning, having six kids just like my dad. Also six kids. Every country in the developed world and most countries in the developing world face long term population decline at a level that makes growth impossible to maintain. Which means we're all sitting on the bubble of bubbles. The population bubble? Yep, that's it. That's right. That's the real problem. Oh, the mood is optimistic. Why is it because the idiots are
trying to sterilize their kids? Because they're trying to stop having babies and stop getting married and have open marriages that don't produce children. We're going to out breed them two or three to 1. Leftism is a religion of of converts. Leftism is a religion that
doesn't produce its own babies. To raise children in, they have to rely on the university systems, which is why, and this is the argument that I would make to you, this is the argument that is in sort of in favor of this far right campaign. I love that it's far right to have babies and get married. By the way, if you're not seeing the screen right now, what they have is a woman holding a rosary or hands holding a rosary. Somebody looks like holding a
baby with another partner. So probably a baptism or a handing off of a child, a Bible with a rosary. So these are very Catholic sort of looks. Hence my buddy Brian Birch's name. You know, for for God, country insanity, How Catholics will save America. That's the name of the book. You guys can find the link in the description. It shows a picture of a happy family, you know, with a mom and a dad and kids. Oh my God, Go figure.
What? And then it's like millennials that are drinking coffee or Gen. Z, like, looking around going like, is this what I want? Yeah, that's what you want. That's what everybody has wanted for all of human history. It is the American dream. We did a whole show on this. It may be expensive, but it turns out your net worth will probably go up when you get married if you're smart for men. The reason is because you're given a burden and you have to carry it. And guess what?
You're going to perform better or you won't. I don't know. I did. My net worth has gone up dramatically. My earning potential has gone up dramatically. My maturity level has gone up dramatically. I should have gotten married younger. I was dumb for a long time. I'm lucky enough that my wife and I, Forrest gumped our way into a successful marriage going on over a decade now with four kids.
We got married way too late in the game, I would say, if we could do it. We both lament that all the time as 42 year olds waking up with a baby in the middle of the night. It sucks, somebody said in the chat earlier, I think Kyle has given up on sleep. Yeah, basically. But here's the other thing that's important. Here's the story coming out. Daily Wire declined by 9, reading for fun plummets at age 9. Data shows. By the time I was nine years
old, I was reading all the time. I would sneak off and read books. I would hold flashlights under my my covers at night and read books. 910 eleven years old. And they're saying it dropped off. And their claim in this, this article is a little bit about screen time and more about the pandemic. And so that we've spoke, you know what it is. It's that government schools are not pushing this sort of thing as where you decide to be most happy and where you can escape
and let your mind create things. We're so lazy in the society that we don't even want to work for reading the page. I absolutely love reading. I've always loved reading. I don't have time to read the way that I used to. But sitting and reading fiction or even non fiction was one of the biggest pleasures of my life for most of my life. And if you're not going to let 9 year olds have that, like they don't have anything else to do, if they're bored, it's their
fault. My my 6 year old daughter, she takes incredible pride in reading stories to her siblings. Part of that part of that is because we've told them that it's really important and we also we try to limit screen time. They don't have phones, they don't have tablets in any of that garbage. They occasionally get to watch television. More than we would like, probably. Do you want to go out there and give your kids your values?
Take them out of public schools? Do you remember when you were in school and they would like, wheel out a video machine? You're like, aha, we don't have to do any work. That was a rarity, not a, not a standard. Kids are in front of computers all day long now, even though, apparently that the governor of New York thinks that black kids don't know what computers are. Which, by the way, that's another story. We'll maybe talk about that tomorrow. How silly.
How silly. It's time for you guys to recognize that the government's job is to indoctrinate people into its own mindset, and that is leftism. So if you're not figuring out what the cost of homeschooling is, look for the 2nd and 3rd order effects. Whatever it cost you in daycare, whatever it cost you in in packing meals instead of making them at home. Whatever it cost you in your opportunity cost to outsource having your kids raised by somebody else for like 8 hours a
day. At the very least, for the most formative times. Like, I guarantee you, almost all of you can teach your kids up to middle school. Most of you can probably teach up to high school level, especially today's high school and public schools. If you're paying for school, it's different. But consider what homeschooling looks like. That's the resistance. That's the most punk rock thing in the world. That's the campaign to explode the population with people that know what's up.
Anyway, I just think it's fun. I think it's funny. That's what the left is most scared of. That's why they're trying to push back on school choice and all these kind of things, because they need useful idiots that are going to go after and be pro tranny flag, pro abortion. White supremacy is everywhere and open the borders and let everybody in. Even though we're worried about the poor, none of their stuff
makes sense. You would understand that if you had a basic instruction in logic, which is what Western societies chose to be built on. That and Christian values. Super easy to do, folks. That's the end of it for the day. What do you think? I think we've made some points today that should bother you. Remember when you're out there hearing this gag order stuff and none of this stuff is supposed to benefit the government.
Lastly, I'm going to suggest to you, if you guys want to support our program or especially our friend Garrett, you guys can get the new tile Kyle Serafin show shirt which I'm wearing right now in black. It's a pretty good looking shirt. Go to thesuspendables.com promo code. Kyle, Kyle again, the suspendables.com. That's the merge store. Links are always in the description. You guys don't have to go too far. I got a palette cleanser for you. It's weird. Wednesday we started off kind of
weird. We started off with a blackout with the video not working and I wanted to play another weird thing for you. Yeah, I'm going to play something that is a dad joke and also how people on the right roll at least the weirdos do. Let's do a weirdo video. We'll break it down in just one second, wait for the dad pun at the end. It's coming. If you're listening to this, you're going to have to go to the end of the show and watch it. I'm not even going to explain it to you.
Here we go. Why are you in my seat? You know better than to be in my seat. Get out of my seat. Yeah, that's your seat. You're not driving. You're the navigator. Let's go. Keep going. No, keep going, keep going. Let's go. What Florida people, is this real? I know Steve Friend is a new Floridian. So maybe when you've experienced Floridian, can you tell me, do you guys keep alligators as navigators in the front seat of your car? Man, Can you imagine trying to
car Jack that car? You're going to go to Grand Theft Auto and suddenly you're face to face with like a six or an 8 foot long alligator hanging out in the front seat. Oh my God, that's a navigator. You got it, you guys got it, got it. You guys all know he had a harness on That was his alligator. Like he kept that damn thing in his car. Who does that? You know what the upside to an alligator in your car is, though? I guess you don't really have to worry about rolling the windows
down. They actually like it hot, don't they? Like they want it to be warm in there. You don't have to do like like a dog. You got to roll the windows down, you got to leave the air conditioning on or you have one of those crappy Tesla's that has like a little things. Like, my owner knows I'm in here. And don't don't call the police or break the windows. Like, I'll keep the temperature nice.
I don't know if you've seen that, but there's like a big screen that tells you that there's a pet in there when people have their crappy little poodles. Dude, an alligator hanging out in your car. And I like that. He calls him Dude, too. That's how I talk to my kids. I'm like, hey dude, get out of my seat. Except he's talking to a freaking reptile. He's talking to like, a flippin monster. So weird. People in Florida, you guys are strange.
You know who's not strange? Our five star reviewers. The folks that are giving us the five star views on Apple, we really appreciate it. All of you guys go and leave your own five star view and I will read it on the show at the end here. This one is from 1961. Richie says me like a lot. This is going to get a little weird because we're going to make an analogy here that I'm going to have to probably explain, but let me go five
stars. I have a dozen podcasts that I listen to and Kyle is at the top of my podcast playlist. Thanks so much. It's just simply great. I love the way he and his team help expose the truth. By the way. The team is just me, for whatever that's worth guys. Then here comes where it gets weird. If you have a painful boil, then apply some heat. This is like some medical advice for you. It will come to a head and it may rupture on its own, or it may need some minor surgery.
Either way, pressure will be relieved and the healing process can begin. I think that's a reference to what needs to happen in this country that we've got to apply pressure to some of the evils that are out there and expose the truth. And you know, it might be ugly for a little bit. I think that's what's being said. Otherwise you've just gotten some like doctor, Poppet or whatever advice from the comment section here. We appreciate that.
Anyway, 1961 Richie, thanks for the five star review. I appreciate it. Graphic but also very helpful. And it is our goal to get into the top of your playlist for all your podcast. So thanks so much for leaving that little five star review. That's it for today. Y'all. You guys can always give us questions, comments and don't forget sarcastic remarks by going to kyleserafin.com, the website kyleserafin.com. We're going to start building some more of that out.
Make sure that you have liked, subscribed, and notified yourself when this podcast goes live, which it does at 0930 Eastern Time. That's 8:30 here in Texas, America out of Liberty Hill, TX on every single weekday unless something crazy happens like the FBI kicks the door. You guys can support us by going to Patriot Coolers, going to Catholic Vote, going to madhatjerky.com, mypillow.com/kyle, and our merch store at the suspendables.com. All of those are always in the show descriptions.
And like I said, the main website. If you want to send a message over to us, let's do it. We're going to raid the Dan Bongino Show in just one moment. You guys will see a dump into the live chat. Thanks so much for joining us. I look forward to seeing you guys tomorrow on Thursday morning. And until then, God bless you and be safe.
We'll see you soon. Thanks for listening to The Kyle Seraphin Show streamed live weekdays on rumble.com/kyle Seraphin. Follow Kyle on Twitter, Truth, Social and Instagram at Kyle Seraphin.